Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/07/26
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Evidently self-promotion (x-wiki abuse). SHB2000 (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake BunchaLean (talk) 11:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:39, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Image was downloaded from facebook (FBMD), no evidence of ownership. 0x0a (talk) 12:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Two of the files a covers of music albums (copyright violation) and the other are photographs without a metadata and low size/resolution. Own work claim questionable
- File:پیانوی دوره قاجار با اجرای محمدرضا امیرقاسمی.jpg
- File:محمدرضا امیرقاسمی (آهنگساز و نوازنده پیانو).jpg
- File:Mohammadreza Amirghasemi ( محمدرضا امیرقاسمی ) 2.jpg
- File:Mohammadreza Amirghasemi ( محمدرضا امیرقاسمی ).jpg
- File:شبی برای پیانوی ایرانی (روایت اجرایی از پیانوی ذوره قاجار ).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Publicity shots of different people from different photographers (eg. File:Mohammadreza_Amirghasemi_Conducted.jpg is a photo of Mohammadreza Amirghasemi watermarked to Mahtab Nazmdeh, File:فرهادفخرالدینی.jpg is a photo of Farhad Fakhreddini copyrighted in the EXIF to Mani.L) uploaded as own work. If this is an agent representing all of these people, or something like that, evidence of permission needs to go through the Commons:Volunteer Response Team.
- File:Mahindokht Lotfalikhanzand.jpg
- File:فرهادفخرالدینی.jpg
- File:Moshir Homayoun Shahrdar.jpg
- File:Mohammadreza Amirghasemi Conducted.jpg
- File:Ardeshir Rohani.jpg
- File:Mohammadreza Amirghasemi.jpg
- File:Mohammad Oushal.jpg
- File:Javad Maroufi.jpg
- File:Mohammadreza Amirghasemi qajar.jpg
Belbury (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
uploaded by mistake Wilfredor (talk) 13:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This one is redundant we can delete it MdupontMobile (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake LucaSdiogosousa425 (talk) 10:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to change the file name Kaiakala (talk) 13:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. @Kaiakala: Deleting the file is not usually necessary to change the file name. You can use Template:Rename for such cases. --Rosenzweig τ 17:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
User request. Uploaded accidentally and I believe this violates FOP in Japan Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 15:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ооржак Сегил (talk) 16:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Pinterest 186.175.3.108 18:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 17:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Pinterest 186.175.3.108 18:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Derivative work of "Candy the Cat" from Five Nights at Freddy's. Omphalographer (talk) 04:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 17:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE selfie of a non-contributing user m:Special:CentralAuth/Costel buhaceanu Gikü (talk) 16:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Stolen photo. It was me who take this picture and on Flickr I have "All rights reserved". Link to my flickr photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bojanm/7623030734/in/album-72157630697411042/ Bojan Marušič (talk) 08:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete then QuickWittedHare (talk) 19:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Speed delete. Dr-Taher (talk) 04:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Tobias Sutter - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
I don't have an Apple device so I don't know if this is an Apple image, but is this a false own-work, and if so, does it meet TOO? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Puerto Rico A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Réunion (France) A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Jordan A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Jordan A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Jordan A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Jordan A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused contextless pic, orphanes since draft page was deleted on en.wikipedia.org because of misusing wikipedia as web hoster. Fl.schmitt (talk) 05:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
This image has no correct source Leoboudv (talk) 06:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Bulgaria, artist Andrey Nikolov died in 1959 A1Cafel (talk) 09:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Bulgaria, artist Andrey Nikolov died in 1959 A1Cafel (talk) 09:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Bulgaria, artist Andrey Nikolov died in 1959 A1Cafel (talk) 09:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
This file has no source, so PD claim is unsubstantiated. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
File:'전주대학교 성폭력 및 갑질 사건 피해자와 함께하는 학생들' made a banner urging Prof. Park Byung-do's investigation.jpg
[edit]Fix of malformed DR. Achim55 (talk) 12:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
위 사건은 2021년 11월. 2심(고법) 판결에서 무죄판결을 받고, 2021년 2월. 대법원에서 최종 무죄 확정 판결을 받은 무고사건으로서 본 사진은 삭제되어야 합니다. Sunshine0726 (talk) 10:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 14:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused blurry photo of nondescript room, no context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal "art", COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. And taken from some publication, unknown copyright status. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused diagram without context or clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with FB/transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Personal image, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused image of nondescript bird, no context, no educational value, out of scope. No value over numerous better images already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
1934 French photograph. Need a death date on "Artet" in Dijon, if he died before 1954, then this is PD in France. Abzeronow (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
1941 newspaper clipping that could be PD in France, but not in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
article in image form, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Blurry and unused image, can be replaced by alternatives A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality, Blurry and unused image. Can be kept personally, not at Commons. --Javidd (talk) 08:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio -- EXIF data says that author is VELIJA_HASANBEGOVIC Ђидо (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anette-Prehn-2-print-by-Maria-Sattrup-scaled_(1).jpg InfoHjernesmart (talk) 06:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Costel buhaceanu (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: User talk pages aren't generally deleted, you may blank or archive it if you want. --CptViraj (talk) 05:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. The monument was erected in 2005 and co-authored by sculptor Зинухов А. П. and architect Повстюк В. Л..
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine, and these commercially-licensed images infringe sculptor's copyright. The monument was installed in 2004. If no sculptor (and his year of death) is identified, then these images won't be restored even if the work falls out of copyright in Ukraine in 2075, because taking U.S. copyright into account (provided that Ukraine still does not grant a complete, commercial FoP that does not restrict images with economic value like these files), the work will only be allowed after U.S. copyright expires (that is, on January 1, 2100, or 95+1 years after 2004).
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument to Viktor Usov
[edit]There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Per this site, the monument was unveiled in 2005 and was authored by sculptor Зинухов А.В. and architect Повстюк В.П.
- File:Пам'ятник В. Усову по вул. В. Усова міста Нікополя..jpg
- File:Пам'ятник В. Усову, Нікополь.jpg
- File:Памятник Усову В. по ул. В. Усова в г. Никополь.jpg
- File:Усов В.М. м. Нікополь..jpg
- File:Усову 2142.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Aleksandar Čović Frontmen Regine 2008 godine ,album “Vrijeme je”,Snimljeno u Beogradu.jpg
[edit]Copyvio -- https://glossy.espreso.co.rs/zabava/muzika/228163/grupa-regina-snimila-je-spot-za-pesmu-nije-me-strah Ђидо (talk) 05:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CAMILO BARROSO TELES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal family photos (related to pt:Flávio Terceiro Teles).
- File:06 foto ultimo fim de ano vovo em sua residencia.jpg
- File:07 sorrindo com o seu filho na sua festa de 90 anos.jpg
- File:05 foto flavio teles sorrindo.jpg
- File:Curtindo a copa de 2014.jpg
- File:03 familia de flavio teles.jpg
- File:02 familia de Francisco Teles Dourado.jpg
- File:01 familia terceiro teles.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 00:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Still of interest to Wikidata so should be kept. --RAN (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jared bubb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: fictitious political party logos.
- File:British Populist and Conservative Party 2 (fictional).png
- File:British Populist and Conservative Party (fictional).png
Omphalographer (talk) 00:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 01:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from all-rights-reserved website. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
author's request Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 01:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unneeded redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
File is not rendering properly within the article Kj1595 (talk) 02:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
File is incomplete as it was a half-downloaded file uploaded from my device. JoeSolo22 (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text, almost unreadable in this format. Content of the document - a series of solutions to web development exercises - would likely be out of scope on any wiki. Omphalographer (talk) 03:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep In scope as an artistic work. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Even if you consider this blurry, noisy photo "art" - and I'm not convinced it is - being "art" doesn't automatically make an image in scope. Omphalographer (talk) 15:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality, Blurry, noisy and unused image. --Javidd (talk) 08:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, extensive AI-generated content and plagiarism (e.g. the extract from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/amg-acta-geneticae-medicae-et-gemellologiae-twin-research/article/karl-landsteiner-father-of-blood-grouping-and-immunochemistry/CB635080E85F850EC0694CFA169BE2B5 on page 8, https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/blood-groups/ on page 19, probably many more). Omphalographer (talk) 05:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio -- EXIF data says that author is VELIJA_HASANBEGOVIC Ђидо (talk) 05:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. All images taken from different sources without source stated and permission.
- File:Милош М16.png
- File:Лазар3М.jpg
- File:Mилош 2.jpg
- File:Брзи вишенаменски чамац.jpg
- File:M63 Plamen.jpg
- File:Top M48B-1.webp
Smooth O (talk) 07:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
No permission from given author - see metadata that read "Copyright holder Poelkbeekstr. 27 1760 Roosdaal Author J.De Mont" Hoyanova (talk) 07:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 07:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text only. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Screenshot of non-notable software, promo George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by امیر الله وردی زاده (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, promotional by including contact information of the shops
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک13.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک10.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک12.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک11.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک7.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک9.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک8.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک5.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک6.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک4.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک2.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک-1.jpg
- File:پوشاک-قاصدک3.jpg
- File:سورنا-دکور7.jpg
- File:سورنا-دکور6.jpg
- File:سورنا-دکور3.jpg
- File:سورنا-دکور2.jpg
- File:سورنا-دکور1.jpg
- File:سورنا-دکور0.jpg
- File:سورنا-دکور.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by امیر الله وردی زاده (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal host
- File:ابولفضل الله وردی زاده و من.jpg
- File:ابولفضل الله وردی زاده1.jpg
- File:ابولفضل الله وردی زاده.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Raymond (talk) 07:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rouzbeh behrouzi (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, self-promotion
- File:Doc pezeshkian.jpg
- File:Dr alireza rahimi tabriz.jpg
- File:Dr alireza rahimi.jpg
- File:Img dr alireza rahimi.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused too blurry photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Dont want the logo file on the Public domain Brandloksatta (talk) 11:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use, and PD-textlogo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Darwin in Facebook 186.175.29.97 11:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M najafvand (talk · contribs)
[edit]All were taken from an Instagram page without permission.
- File:ZakiNajafvand.jpg
- File:MojtabaSafari.jpg
- File:AliAghaNajafvand.jpg
- File:BonZolfi.jpg
- File:JahangirDerikvand.jpg
- File:Younes-Heidari.jpg
- File:HajiAqaNajafvand.jpg
- File:جومه.jpg
- File:پیشکوه.jpg
- File:بالاگریوه.jpg
- File:چراگاه پیشکوه بالاگریوه لرستان.png
- File:آستان مقدس آقاسیدعلی.png
- File:AliKaramNajafvand.jpg
- File:SheeraNajafvand.jpg
- File:Ibrahim Najafvand.jpg
- File:MahdiNajafvand.jpg
0x0a (talk) 12:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Are You sure ? M najafvand (talk) 13:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: photos of existing photos, screengrabs, and unused selfies. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable logo, out of the project scope: en:User talk:BliZZard06#Speedy deletion nomination of TheWhiteTree.org Nutshinou Talk! 12:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caled Torres (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Titanium CALEDTORRES.png
- File:TPMHMF-CALEDTORRES.jpg
- File:NEMPACUSTICCALEDTORRES.jpg
- File:NOVIADECALEDTORRES.jpg
- File:CALEDTORRES SPOTIFY.png
- File:NEMPCALEDTORRES.png
- File:DISCO ALBUM CALED TORRES.png
- File:Caled Torres POSANDO.jpg
- File:Caled Torres - En Colombia.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caled Torres (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:OOS: Unused files.
— doclys (❀) 13:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
very bad quality, very bad resolution better File:Louis XIV.jpg, File:Louis-xiv-lebrunl.jpg Oursana (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and redirected for incoming links. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
It's a personal photo of a non-contributor. But does this show some type of photographic glitch that could be interesting? Or is it edited to look this way? -- Deadstar (msg) 14:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
a 2012 schematic in French without any context. Unused. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alijon3002 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
- File:Zoodedu.png
- File:Zoodservice.png
- File:Zoodmarket.png
- File:Zoodpay.png
- File:Zoodfood.png
- File:ZoodConnect.png
- File:ZOODGROUP.png
- File:Zoodhealth.png
- File:Zoodtaxi.png
- File:Zoodpharma.png
- File:Zooddecargo.png
- File:Zoodbye.png
- File:Zooddehqon.png
- File:Zoodfly.png
- File:Zooddelivery.png
- File:Zood food.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indahwater (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mousskofficiel74 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
- File:Food 5ave Mali 04.png
- File:Food 5ave Mali 02.png
- File:Food 5ave Mali 03.png
- File:Food 5ave Mali 01.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage outside wikidata, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tellergastronomics (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
- File:Dertellerlogo.jpg
- File:Tellerrestaurant.jpg
- File:Tellerevent.jpg
- File:Tellerclubgastronomie.jpg
- File:Tellercatering.jpg
- File:Teller Gastronomics.jpg
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gustavo Cyus (talk · contribs)
[edit]self promotional logos, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yoshi50Win (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, self promotional logos with no use; out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MdupontMobile (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, low quality AI diagrams (cut off, for starters), which seem to exist only to be vessels for an essay the uploader is writing in the file description. Out of COM:SCOPE
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- This will be used, and I will increase the quality. The cutoff I can fix,
- It is low because the emojis are rendered badly, which we can fix as well. Please bear with me. MdupontMobile (talk) 18:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see any realistic possibility that these images will become usable in educational content. Omphalographer (talk) 04:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- I fixed the cropping and I'm going to use this in a Wiki book I mean you guys can delete it and I'll just re-upload it to Wiki books . The novelty here is that it's a self descriptive emergent image that's SVG and I think it's interesting MdupontMobile (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- This content would not be in scope at Wikibooks, and would almost certainly be deleted there. Please refer to b:Wikibooks:What is Wikibooks?. Omphalographer (talk) 23:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- I fixed the cropping and I'm going to use this in a Wiki book I mean you guys can delete it and I'll just re-upload it to Wiki books . The novelty here is that it's a self descriptive emergent image that's SVG and I think it's interesting MdupontMobile (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as uneducational. The Cybernetic-cognitive-art.svg diagram doesn't even seem to match the text in the description, the feedback node isn't connected to the processing node in the image, yet the text says the feedback node provides feedback to the cognitive processing node. Belbury (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete my file Mla2003 (talk) 18:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete my file Mla2003 (talk) 18:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot 186.175.3.108 18:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
upload by error Nicola (talk) 19:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
no description, no metadata, tiny, probably wrong date... Xocolatl (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArhaTotoro (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NTService~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Couldn't find an answer on whether cropped images are deleted when the host image is deleted, but this is just a screengrab from the Republican National Convention. Other deletion discussion found here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tim.Sheehy.jpg Thesavagenorwegian (talk) 19:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution image that appears to be some kind of digital photoshop filter. Seems more likely to be a COM:DERIV of a photograph than an original work based on no particular source image. Belbury (talk) 08:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
je ne veut pas la laisser libre de droit en haute défintion, j'ai fait une erreur je croyait l'avoir upload en basse définition. merci Balano (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Own work? 186.174.214.67 00:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes this is my own work, I took this while I was at TooManyGames. St. Jimmy Jammy (talk) 17:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Claim for own work seems credible. --James F. (talk) 12:21, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Misleading picture דולב חולב (talk) 01:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is a very puzzling deletion request from a new editor who is only action in Commons is requesting the deletion of this picture. As you can see, this is one of the 5 pictures I took of the Carmel Park management offices. I can't understand the editor's claim. In the picture it is written in Hebrew on a sign above the balcony: "Carmel Park Offices" The additional pictures are in Category:Carmel Park Management Offices Hanay (talk) 04:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing is misleading in this picture. This deletion request is nonsense. דוד שי (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyright not assigned, belongs to INRAE: https://www.inrae.fr AudreyPSA (talk) 09:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. --James F. (talk) 12:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Accidental duplicate of File:Space Launch System Core Stage for Artemis II Rocket Loaded onto Pegasus Barge (MAF 20240716 Artemis II Rollout-456).jpg Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 10:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 12:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Accidental duplicate of File:Core Stage for Artemis II Rocket Moved to Pegasus Barge for Departure to Kennedy Space Center (MAF 20240716 CS2 Rollout UAS21).jpg Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 12:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 12:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikos697276 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Unused promotional corporate images and logo, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:SinergyRH logomarca.png
- File:Estrutura módulos com legenda.png
- File:Sinergyrh ícone.png
- File:SinergyRH.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mooresklm2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed own work CC0, but the first file has "Copyright © All rights are reserved by Krystle Minkoff" statement while the second has "Copyright © All rights are reserved by Elfar úlfarsson".
- File:Sleep, The Evolution of Sleep Medicine in Neurology (Part One).pdf
- File:Sleep, The Evolution of Sleep Medicine in Neurology (Part Two).pdf
MKFI (talk) 08:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for such artworks. Quick1984 (talk) 12:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Small, unused redudant render of File:Telegram.svg as png Nutshinou Talk! 13:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Small, unused redudant render of File:Facebook footer.svg as png Nutshinou Talk! 13:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Small, unused redudant render of File:Linkedin footer.svg as png Nutshinou Talk! 13:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 松山區 SongShan District 敦化北路 Dunhua North Road 茹曦酒店 Illume Hotel shop 7-Eleven Store March 2024 R12S 06.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted food menus in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 松山區 SongShan District shop 很牛 TGB 炭燒牛排 The GodBeef steak House March 2024 R12S 812.jpg
[edit]Non-free 3D works in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 14:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 松山區 SongShan District shop 很牛 TGB 炭燒牛排 The GodBeef steak House March 2024 R12S 933.jpg
[edit]New Taiwan Dollar banknotes. Solomon203 (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 大同區 Datong District 民權西路 Minquan West Road n 重慶北路 Chongqing North Road March 2024 R12S 21.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 14:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
copyrighted screenshots and posters in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 14:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:BSicon STR~R.svg Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 14:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:BSicon STR~L.svg Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:BSicon uSTR~R.svg Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 15:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:BSicon uSTR~L.svg Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 15:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing original EXIF. Dubious own work.
- File:Cumaps.net.jpg
- File:Stadion lekkoatletyczny w Lubawce, widok z południowego zbocza Świętej Góry (701 m.n.p.m.).jpg
- File:Maszt na Świętej Górze.jpg
- File:Lubawka, stadion lekkoatletyczny.jpg
Ankry (talk) 08:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable logo, out of the project scope: en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living in Tehran Nutshinou Talk! 10:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 大同區 Datong District 民權西路 Minquan West Road n 重慶北路 Chongqing North Road March 2024 R12S 03.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 大同區 Datong District 迪化街二段 Dihua Street 遊客中心 Visitor Centre March 2024 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 大同區 Datong District 迪化街二段 Dihua Street 遊客中心 Visitor Centre March 2024 R12S 03.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 大同區 Datong District 迪化街二段 Dihua Street 遊客中心 Visitor Centre March 2024 R12S 08.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted posters in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 松山區 SongShan District MRT 台北小巨蛋站 Taipei Arena Station sign March 2024 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei 大同區 DaTong 大稻埕 Dadaocheng Wharf map streets map March 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 臺北市 Taipei 萬華區 Wanhau District 中華路 Zhonghua Road 漢口街 HanKou Street map sign March 2024 R12S 01.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 臺北市 Taipei 萬華區 Wanhau District 中華路 Zhonghua Road 漢口街 HanKou Street map sign March 2024 R12S 02.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 臺北市 Taipei 萬華區 Wanhau District 中華路 Zhonghua Road 漢口街 HanKou Street map sign March 2024 R12S 03.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北市 Taipei 萬華區 Wanhua District 西門町 Ximen Ding HanKou HanZhong Street night March 2024 R12S 12.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北市 Taipei 萬華區 Wanhua District 西門町 Ximen Ding HanKou HanZhong Street night March 2024 R12S 13.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 14:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 14:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Author request from User:Denzilhan per Special:Diff/903533993. I will additionally note that the uploader is blocked on their home wiki (trwiki) for COI violations related to the subject of the photo. Omphalographer (talk) 18:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data.
- File:Andre-mendonca-ministro-stf-1024x700.jpg
- File:Lancerartwork.jpg
- File:Duratest.png
- File:Xanax amarelo.jpg
- File:Material-apreendido-rio-grande-2.jpg
- File:Ampola Durateston.jpg
- File:Durateston.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 松山區 SongShan District 敦化北路 Dunhua North Road 茹曦酒店 Illume Hotel March 2024 R12S 03.jpg
[edit]Non-free 3D works in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 13:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
This picture was taken in another country. This is deliberate misinformation. 2600:1702:3AE0:5E90:4B0B:3AB6:2DA1:DEF 13:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Redundant to the much higher quality File:Small coat of arms of the Czech Republic.svg The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kod B taken on 2022-11-06
[edit]- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 3.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 4.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 5.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 6.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 7.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 8.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 9.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 10.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 11.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 12.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 13.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 14.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 15.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 16.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 17.jpg
- File:Zouleiha Abzetta Dabonné 18.jpg
These files were allegedly all taken on 6 November 2022. This is highly improbable as one picture is taken in Japan, another one in Turkey, and a third one in Madagascar. Authorship and license information are therefore suspicious. No Exif data either. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Cryptic-waveform
- These files above were sent to me by the athlete herself for uploading. She took her photos with her smartphone during her various international competitions. Now if you notice any anomalies, please let me know. Kod B (talk) 09:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. When you upload files on Commons through the Upload Wizard, you need to select whether the files are your own work, or somebody else's work. For these files you selected that they were your own work, when they actually aren't. In this case date, author, source, and permission information on these files are wrong. This need to be fixed for these files to stay on Commons. Specifically the author(s) of these pictures need to consent to releasing them under a license compatible with Commons. See Commons:Email templates/Consent. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 11:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I understand ! Kod B (talk) 13:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. When you upload files on Commons through the Upload Wizard, you need to select whether the files are your own work, or somebody else's work. For these files you selected that they were your own work, when they actually aren't. In this case date, author, source, and permission information on these files are wrong. This need to be fixed for these files to stay on Commons. Specifically the author(s) of these pictures need to consent to releasing them under a license compatible with Commons. See Commons:Email templates/Consent. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 11:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Kod B: You must understand that files "sent to [you]" doesn't mean that the files became your owns. They remain the properties of their respective copyright owners, and we need a formal written for a free license from them for the files to be accepted on Commons.
- Vous devez comprendre que les fichiers « envoyés à [vous] » ne signifient pas que les fichiers deviennent les vôtres. Ils restent la propriété de leurs propriétaires respectifs, et nous avons besoin d'une autorisation écrite formelle de leur part pour une licence libre pour que les fichiers soient acceptés sur Commons. Yann (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024091310007818 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all files were already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 14:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
low resolution no Exif blurry unlikely own work and possible copyvio
Waqar💬 15:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Fredy Doppelhofer - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- The image was provided to us free of charge by the owner and is part of the association's archive. Geomatiker (talk) 11:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Geomatiker: To keep this file, we'd need a proper permission sent by the artist (= author) per e-mail to COM:VRT. For details, address, text to use etc. see COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 17:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Considering this user's many copyvios, I believe it's safe to assume that these photos (one taken in 1987, the other in the 70s or earlier) are not the user's own work and were simply grabbed from the internet.
Sinigh (talk) 12:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I should add, the images above are used elsewhere on the internet, at least one of them (Parijiani) in sources that predate the Commons upload.
- The one upload that does seem legit is the 2016 photo File:Alexidis foto.tif (+ its cropped version). A low-res version is used by the public Georgian Modern and Contemporary Visual Arts Database but hasn't been attributed to anyone. Because of the suspicious nature of literally all other uploads by this user, I still wanted to at least mention it so others can have look. Sinigh (talk) 12:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded a new and better version Kataadj (talk) 13:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded a new and better version Kataadj (talk) 13:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a recent work of art, and probably not own picture anyway (PNG, no EXIF). Yann (talk) 13:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Yann,
- I hereby confirm that I am the author of the exclusive copyright to the media work as listed here. Please keep it and don't delete it.
- Thank you! Anonymous-anonym (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please send a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 10:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: permission via VRT received. --Wdwd (talk) 12:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
It was uploaded an incorrect image file. It has copyrights and should be deleted. X0a32 (talk) 13:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Delete The image does not belong to the uploader. copyright has been violated. the user was previously blocked 85.132.29.163 05:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I agree
Nemoralis (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
As the owner of the image, I do not want it to be published anymore. Ignacio Valdés Zamudio (talk) 08:39, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Of course, I want to delete both versions of the image. Ignacio Valdés Zamudio (talk) 08:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: not a recent upload, in use. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 10:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
元となるウェブサイト https://naotofukasawa.com/ja/about/ からの無断転載。ウェブサイトには「Copyright © Naoto Fukasawa Design All Rights Reserved.」という記述がある。 RuinDig (talk) 02:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Works by Georges Elisabeth
[edit]- File:Y'a bon Banania - affiche G. Elisabeth.jpg
- File:Y-a-bon-Banania-optimized.jpg
- File:La Cousine Bette (film, 1927) - affiche G. Elisabeth.jpg
- File:L'Autre Aile - affiche G. Elisabeth.jpg
All tagged as {{PD-anon-70-EU}}, but the author is known and claimed authorship by putting his signature on the images. Georges Elisabeth continued working at least into the 1940s, so there's a good chance his work is still under copyright. These should be deleted until his year of death is known or his work is {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. --hinnk (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- The burden of proof should not be reversed. "G. Elisabeth" could very well be a pseudonym, and there is nothing to indicate that this author lived after the dates preventing the images from being displayed. --Guise (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Am I misunderstanding you, because the burden of proof is on you, the uploader, to establish that the author was anonymous or pseudonymous if {{PD-anon-70-EU}} is going to be used. And if that can't be established, then the appropriate tag is {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}, which currently doesn't apply. hinnk (talk) 18:46, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing information about the author, to young for PD-old-assumed-exp. COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Yo no he entendido hasta ahora cuando las fotos de turistas/vacaciones están en scope y cuando no... Al parecer esto es algo subjetivo, depende del país o de las personas o de la idiosincrasia de los bibliotecarios. A mi juicio, si podemos ver suficiente el Lago Sevan la foto está en scope, si las personas nos dejan poco espacio, como aquí, no. 200.39.139.7 16:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Clear personal photo with little educational value. Günther Frager (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rodrigo768 (talk · contribs)
[edit]-- Reuploads
-- New files
- File:JMLlop.jpg
- File:Humberto Lentz.jpg
- File:Alejandro Abaurre.jpg
- File:Feliciano Gambarte 2010.jpg
- File:Predio de Coquimbito.jpg (uploaded to Commons in 2017; was used in an article in May 18, 2015 https://www.diariouno.com.ar/ovacion/predio-godoy-cruz-ultima-etapa-18052015_H1mbppP6gJH)
- File:Feliciano Gambarte 2014.jpg
Reuploads of images deleted in a previous deletion request. Also added other files that are scans uploaded under "own work", which I'm nominating for deletion under COM:PCP, because I believe the user can be considered untrustworthy at this point due to a long history of Flickrwashing, copyvios, and now reuploads. nicolas talkpage 17:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © JUERGEN ALTMANN - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I bought the rights from him with the pictures. so feel free to contact him Diana Brekalo (talk) 20:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Diana Brekalo: Actually, the onus to have him send a suitable permission by e-mail to COM:VRT is on you as the uploader if you wish that the file is kept. --Rosenzweig τ 17:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's a shame. Cause I bought the rights in 2022 when my CD was released. I certainly wouldn't use the picture without his permissions. 2003:E5:9740:A8D3:93C:9AD1:4BF9:9DE1 21:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I just found the invoice where the rights are on it. How can add the document as proof? 46.188.186.106 09:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's a shame. Cause I bought the rights in 2022 when my CD was released. I certainly wouldn't use the picture without his permissions. 2003:E5:9740:A8D3:93C:9AD1:4BF9:9DE1 21:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Diana Brekalo: Actually, the onus to have him send a suitable permission by e-mail to COM:VRT is on you as the uploader if you wish that the file is kept. --Rosenzweig τ 17:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Source: The same person 186.175.3.108 20:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Possibly public domain if this is automated (COM:Albania doesn't say anything either way), but information about the source and how this photo was captured (e.g. was there manual panning or zooming) is needed. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; scope also unclear. --GPSLeo (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
the photographer stated her work is "not to be used for advertising or trade purposes" [1] 웃OO 02:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- i think i didn't see it because the front page said,
Rights Info: No known restrictions on publication. For information, see "Charlotte Brooks for LOOK Magazine Photograph ...," hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/res.133.bro
- On pondering upon the link and scrolling down, I saw the restriction. I think it should be removed along with the
.tif
version. Sarangem (talk) 16:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; this is simply hint on personality rights. --GPSLeo (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
the photographer stated her work is "not to be used for advertising or trade purposes" [2] 웃OO 02:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; this is simply hint on personality rights. --GPSLeo (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
No lo conozco. 181.203.126.187 02:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely own work. --GPSLeo (talk) 15:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded by the single edit account. Probably not own work. Quick1984 (talk) 12:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Noncommercial (cc-by-nc-nd-3.0); 1934 image will need appropriate review by the community — billinghurst sDrewth 23:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Photograph by en:Walter Stoneman who died in 1958, so this would appear to be . The NPG's generic/universal copyright statements typically need to be reviewed. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:UK#Known author (Walter Stoneman). ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 18:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Walter Stoneman died in 1958. --Yann (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Rezolucija ne odgovara Stanccco (talk) 10:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: 2024 EP cover art, not uploader's own work. --Rosenzweig τ 11:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/marcusburns1977
[edit]Past discussions about the DeviantArt user https://www.deviantart.com/marcusburns1977 (who seems to be the same person as User:GalaxyNite) have found that some of their images are based on questionable copyright claims (Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2024-06#File:TabukGold.jpg concluded that there was significant doubt that the Deviant Art user actually owns the copyrights to the many images he has posted there) and that others were videogame screenshots (Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/13#File:Pz_III_N.jpg, a screenshot from WarThunder which Burns still falsely claims on DeviantArt to have Created on Blender - modelling & texturing time: 4 days.).
In Commons:Deletion requests/File:OTs-21.jpg (part of Burns' collection at https://www.deviantart.com/marcusburns1977/art/OTS-21-1022677814), GalaxyNite said they'd generated it themselves with the Midjourney AI but that I was free to nominate it for deletion if I could find earlier media which looked exactly like it - which I could, it was an existing photo which had been slightly edited (the brightness was lowered on the barrel and the magazine was copy and pasted into a loaded position) and then upscaled by AI. Commons:Deletion requests/File:KRISSKARD.jpg was also a minor edit of somebody else's gun artwork, AI-upscaled.
Most uploads in this search are gun and computer-part images have that same AI upscaled look to them. The others are:
- Tank and plane schematics (which may be derived from video games again)
- Black and white scientific footage like File:CloudChamberRadium226.gif and File:ImplosionShapedCharge.gif with no original source specified
- File:Lost Horizons Shangri-La.jpg, described as an own work "oil painting" by Burns but looking like AI, again perhaps from a videogame
- Military photos like File:AIM9AIM7AIM54Intrepid.jpg which Burns claims to have taken aboard an aircraft carrier
- A complex scientific animation at File:LWR Meltdown.gif which Burns claims to have created, but has only uploaded at a very low resolution
Given the problems with this DeviantArt user's perspective on AI upscaling (taking in best faith, a belief that if they find a photo online, alter it slightly and AI upscale it, it becomes an AI-generated image and is no longer subject to copyright) and their false claims about wholly creating images which were actually derivatives of pictures they found online, I think a precautionary delete of all their content from Commons is probably appropriate.
- File:Avtomat fedorov by marcusburns1977.jpg
- File:TITAN RTX SLI.jpg
- File:GTX 295 PlatinumEdition.jpg
- File:AMD Radeon RX 590.png
- File:SIG SAUR MPX.jpg
- File:Daewoo K2C.jpg
- File:AIM120AMRAAM.jpg
- File:Gaming PC set up.jpg
- File:M12S Beretta.jpg
- File:M60MG.jpg
- File:RTX4090 die.jpg
- File:Nuke Briefcase.jpg
- File:Astra400.jpg
- File:RX6900XT.jpg
- File:CR21.jpg
- File:MP412REX.jpg
- File:M39 EMR.jpg
- File:Bergmann Mars.jpg
- File:OTS-21.jpg
- File:Itchaca37.jpg
- File:GTX 480 ASUS.jpg
- File:GM6Lynx.jpg
- File:RPD MachineGun.jpg
- File:Remington model 8.jpg
- File:Tank Variants KV.jpg
- File:Striker Armsel.jpg
- File:CZ805BREN.jpg
- File:GTX 480 PCB.jpg
- File:NVIDIA RTX 4090.jpg
- File:Arsenal Shipka.jpg
- File:8800UltraBSansCooler.jpg
- File:KT PLR16.jpg
- File:Stielhandgranate Bundle.png
- File:RTX 2080FE.png
- File:Chauchat M1915.png
- File:AMD R5700XT.png
- File:QuadroRTX4000.jpg
- File:Beretta M1918.jpg
- File:FNBrowningHP32ndRB.jpg
- File:RSASS.jpg
- File:RX580 Nitro.jpg
- File:QYJ88.jpg
- File:GTXTITANX.jpg
- File:AIM9L.jpg
- File:MP7A1.jpg
- File:WaltherP5.jpg
- File:HK417.jpg
- File:T-34-85-Interior.jpg
- File:GTX780ti.png
- File:TKB022.jpg
- File:Radeon HD 5970.jpg
- File:TKB408.jpg
- File:OTs-02 Kiparis.jpg
- File:M1216SRM.jpg
- File:FAMASF1Felin.jpg
- File:RTX 4060 LP.jpg
- File:GTX TITAN Z.jpg
- File:Panzerfaust 60.jpg
- File:OTS-14 Groza.jpg
- File:CloudChamberRadium226.gif
- File:MaximGun.jpg
- File:Daewoo K7.jpg
- File:F4E Schematic Drawing.jpg
- File:No.3 Revolver CH.png
- File:RTX2080PCB.jpg
- File:CZ Scorpion Evo 3.jpg
- File:Howell Automatic Rifle.png
- File:GTX690 Die.jpg
- File:Kel-Tec KSG.jpg
- File:M39EMR.jpg
- File:Coach Gun DoubleBarrel.jpg
- File:XM312.jpg
- File:9800GX2.jpg
- File:8800Ultra.jpg
- File:AIM9AIM7AIM54Intrepid.jpg
- File:GTX1080tiMSI.jpg
- File:AK47GoldIraq.jpg
- File:GTX480 in pc.jpg
- File:HD 7870 Crossfire.jpg
- File:GTX 590 Cooler.jpg
- File:Type 73 light machine gun.jpg
- File:LMG0818.jpg
- File:Owen Gun.jpg
- File:MiG19VVSDisplay.jpg
- File:T5000.jpg
- File:Heavy Tanks Evolution USSR.jpg
- File:AUROS ITX AMD.jpg
- File:ImplosionShapedCharge.gif
- File:Pedersondevice.jpg
- File:GTX690 SLI.jpg
- File:Mark IV Tankfest 2016.jpg
- File:Gigabyte GV-N690D5-4GD-B 20221029.jpg
- File:Huot Automatic Rifle.jpg
- File:GTX1080TiUnderside.png
- File:MG15 7.92mm.jpg
- File:Intel LGA 1700 Mini ITX.jpg
- File:GTX295.jpg
- File:GTX1080ti.png
- File:PTRD41.jpg
- File:Gtx 590.jpg
- File:RPK 45 box magazine sides.png
- File:AIM-54C.jpg
- File:F35Schematic.jpg
- File:HKG11K2.jpg
- File:Milkor MGL.jpg
- File:NV7100GS.jpg
- File:GTX 690 Die.jpg
- File:9800GX2 in pc.jpg
- File:GrizzlyBigBoar.jpg
- File:RTX4090 FE PCB and die.jpg
- File:CCRadonGas.gif
- File:TitanXP.jpg
- File:MSI Aegis X.jpg
- File:CloudChamberThoriumRod.gif
- File:H&K G36 Variants.jpg
- File:Lost Horizons Shangri-La.jpg
- File:GeForce GTX 780 Ti SLI on ASRock Z77 Extreme6 20220427.png
- File:Fusil Automatique Modèle 1917.png
- File:Boeing EA-18G Schematics.jpg
- File:ST Kinetics CPW.jpg
- File:LWR Meltdown.gif
- File:FAMAS F1 G 2.png
Belbury (talk) 17:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete Some images look like downsized stripped versions of professional photographs --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Which is still a copyright violation. Even if we supposed a 2000x1000 downscale would be fair use (dubious, especially if the claim by the user below is correct, which would mean that non-encumbered images are available: "This user, using a second account, has edited many Wikipedia articles to delete appropriately licensed images, some of which have been in place for more than a decade, and replaced them with these questionable images."), Commons is not for fair use media. Phiarc (talk) 09:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per the precautionary principle. Delete ASAP. 2003:D6:C726:DE89:798B:3CB5:85A2:1953 11:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- The files relating to cloud chambers uploaded by the user (e.g.CloudChamberRadium226.gif) are derived from a video by YouTube channel CloudyLabs Radioactive sources in a cloud chamber. This and similar videos by CloudyLabs have been used on various news/media sites, consistently credited to CloudyLabs CloudyLabs Videos in the Media, an organisation run by a French engineer building cloud chambers for science education. This source is not indicated in the file descriptions, instead the source given are a files by Deviantart user “MarcusBurns1977”, which do not refer to or credit CloudyLabs and seems unlikely to have any affiliation with CloudyLabs. The CloudyLabs YouTube channel and website have a generic copyright statement but nothing regarding CC licensing as far as I could see. Jôanes (talk) 20:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This user, using a second account, has edited many Wikipedia articles to delete appropriately licensed images, some of which have been in place for more than a decade, and replaced them with these questionable images. This is suspicious behavior which suggests that the user is not operating in good faith, and that these images should be deleted immediately. 76.24.25.153 16:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/marcusburns1977
[edit]Two files missed during the previous nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marcusburns1977 - a deviantart.com user with a history of falsely publishing edited photos as own work.
Belbury (talk) 08:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete same as it ever was Phiarc (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
błędny autor w szczegółach właściwości Martyniakaleksander (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article Seshu0222 (talk) 07:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Misleading rationale for deletion. Very simple inscription and seems to be related to id:Maruto Nitimihardjo. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ridiculous deletion reason! The dead person took a photo of their own gravestone? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sadads (talk) 01:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Claims to be پرچم-جکومت-سلوکیان-اسکندر-مقدونی - flag of Seleucid-Alexander-Macedonian rule. No source mentioned, a quick search does not come up with something similar. Without a source, this is not a valid flag and is thus out of scope. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:39, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 01:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Own work? 186.175.3.108 20:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sadads (talk) 01:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chris (CIS-A2K) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope -- Personal art from a non-notable artist. Commons is not your web host.
- File:Comic- Adventures of Wiki-Witch.png
- File:Adventures of wiki-witch.png
- File:Comic- Wiki-Witch- punjabi.png
- File:Wiki- Witch Comic.png
- File:Wiki-Witch Comic Strip.png
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. In use at meta:CIS-A2K/Reports/Newsletter/April 2024. Omphalographer (talk) 04:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Work of affiliate, related to movement history. --Sadads (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Drbogdan
[edit]- File:DrDennisBogdan-OriginalSong-JustOutWalking-WikiTest.webm
- File:ScienceFacts-DrDennisBogdan-20231203.jpg
- File:DrDennis&JoanneBogdan-01.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-2.jpg
- File:FremontPeak3-WindRiverRange-WyomingUSA-DrDennisBogdan-1971.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-RhoChiHonorSociety-1971.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-ClinicalElectrophoresis-HelenaLaboratories-1977.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-ChemistryAnalyzer-Coulter-1975.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-ASCD-QualityEducation-1989.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-SMAComputer-Technicon-1976.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-AmericanAssociationOfClinicalChemists-1973.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-NationalAcademyOfClinicalBiochemistry-1978.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-AlphaChiSigmaChemistryFraternity-1964.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-RhoChiHonorSociety-1971.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-BS-Diploma-GWU-1966.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Diploma-SUNYAB-1973.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-153-FIGURE-34.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-151-TABLE-12.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-149-FIGURE-33.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-147-FIGURE-32.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-145-FIGURE-31.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-143-FIGURE-30.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-141-FIGURE-29.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-139-TABLE-11.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-137-TABLE-10.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-135-FIGURE-28.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-121-FIGURE-21.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-133-FIGURE-27.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-131-FIGURE-26.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-129-FIGURE-25.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-127-FIGURE-24.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-125-FIGURE-23.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-123-FIGURE-22.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-121-FIGURE-21.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-119-TABLE-09.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-117-TABLE-08.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-115-TABLE-07.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-113-FIGURE-20.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-111-FIGURE-19.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-107-FIGURE-17.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-097-FIGURE-13.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-105-TABLE-06.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-103-FIGURE-16.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-101-FIGURE-15.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-099-FIGURE-14.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-095-FIGURE-12.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-093-FIGURE-11.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-091-FIGURE-10.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-089-TABLE-05.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-087-TABLE-04.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-085-TABLE-03.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-083-FIGURE-09.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-081-FIGURE-08.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-079-FIGURE-07.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-077-FIGURE-06.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-075-FIGURE-05.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-073-FIGURE-04.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-071-TABLE-02.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-069-TABLE-01.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-067-FIGURE-03.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-019-FIGURE-02.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-PhD-Dissertation-SUNYAB-1973-017-FIGURE-01.jpg
- File:NeutronActivationAnalysis-ATF-WashingtonDC-1966-DrDennisBogdan.jpg
- File:WikipediaOverview-Template-DrDennisBogdan-20200123.jpg
- File:ScienceNews-DrDennisBogdan-20200118.jpg
- File:ScienceFacts-DrDennisBogdan-20200118.jpg
- File:ScienceNews-DrDennisBogdan-20200101.jpg
- File:WikipediaOverview-DrDennisBogdan-20200101.jpg
- File:ScienceNews-DrDennisBogdan-20191228.jpg
- File:WikipediaOverview-DrDennisBogdan-20190917.jpg
- File:ScienceNews-DrDennisBogdan-20190917.jpg
- File:ScienceNews-DrDennisBogdan-20191012.jpg
- File:WikipediaOverview-DrDennisBogdan-20191004.jpg
- File:ScienceNews-DrDennisBogdan-20191004.jpg
- File:WikipediaOverview-DrDennisBogdan-20190628.jpg
- File:FremontPeak2-WindRiverRange-WyomingUSA-DrDennisBogdan-1971.jpg
- File:DrDennisBogdan-Ferrari.jpg
These images all fall into three categories: self portraits (beyond the one used on Drbogdan's profile, which I've left untouched), figures and images from his dissertation which was removed from Wikipedia for webhosting via MfD but which still has remnants here, and screenshot backups of a personal template on Wikipedia which was intended for the user page of Drbogdan (who is now CBANned) --Warrenmck (talk) 10:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Keep The nominator even failed to provide a deletion discussion. The uploader of these files is a notable contributor and these files are relevant, partly in use, e.g. adding to the credential of the user. --Prototyperspective (talk) 09:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Prototyperspective You've got to give editors a moment to actually upload the discussion in cases of large batches of images. There are a substantial number of images in this batch, it took me more than a little bit to write all of the file names and tag the images. To anyone reading this, the keep vote came before I'd added any content at all to this page. The uploader of these files has been CBANned from Wikipedia for promotional content and low quality editing and the only images I've tagged for deletion were either self portraits, images from a dissertation which was removed on webosting grounds, or screenshotted backups of a template. Warrenmck (talk) 10:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- There is a tool to batch nominate and it seemed like you were finished. Didn't know the user was banned on WP now, I think there really were issues with the user but on the other hand he partly contributed very constructively, partly creating heavily-used templates. I don't think the user should be banned for the issues there are even though he should have changed that and probably would have but I haven't looked into it. I think the dissertation could be deleted as well as old images of the templates, but not the latest ones. I think the diploma images could stay but it seems like the files you nominated indeed are deleteworthy and not of the templates I thought so I'll strike my Keep. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not calling for a ban here, just a removal of these images. A huge amount of this users other images are in use and high quality. Note I'm not calling for the deletion of a template, I'm calling for the deletion of screenshot backups of old versions of a userspace template as out of scope.
- I missed there was a tool, so you can possibly understand how this took a minute when done manually! Warrenmck (talk) 10:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I was not saying or implying you were calling for that and don't know why you clarified this. The same applies to calling for deletion of a template, I didn't suggest you were saying so. Good if this was helpful info. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, probably a pre-coffee reading comprehension issue on my part in that case. Warrenmck (talk) 11:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I was not saying or implying you were calling for that and don't know why you clarified this. The same applies to calling for deletion of a template, I didn't suggest you were saying so. Good if this was helpful info. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- There is a tool to batch nominate and it seemed like you were finished. Didn't know the user was banned on WP now, I think there really were issues with the user but on the other hand he partly contributed very constructively, partly creating heavily-used templates. I don't think the user should be banned for the issues there are even though he should have changed that and probably would have but I haven't looked into it. I think the dissertation could be deleted as well as old images of the templates, but not the latest ones. I think the diploma images could stay but it seems like the files you nominated indeed are deleteworthy and not of the templates I thought so I'll strike my Keep. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unlikely to be useful to people other than the uploader. One exception: this one is pretty cool and should be kept. It is in use on the Neutron activation analysis article on enwiki. File:Beamline-self-portrait.jpg is in a similar situation (selfportraits of Wikipedians which are also suitable for use in Wikipedia articles) and it has been uploaded by Warrenmck. Note that so-called Wikipedians in residence just straight up upload their portraits (for some reason) so why not have Category:Photographs of Wikipedians? Polygnotus (talk) 03:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- (selfportraits of Wikipedians which are also suitable for use in Wikipedia articles) and it has been uploaded by Warrenmck.
- note this is explicitly why I left the portrait that he has on his user page off of this list of uploads for deletion list here :) Warrenmck (talk) 22:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 23:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by Айнур Алматинский ГПЗ
[edit]- File:Река "Средний Талгар".jpg
- File:Снежный барс.jpg
- File:Слияние реки "Среднего Талгара" и "Правого Талгара".jpg
- File:Туркестанский рысь.jpg
- File:Река "Шелек".jpg
- File:Река "Жарсай".jpg
- File:Ущелье "Правый Талгар".jpg
- File:Пик "Талгар".jpg
- File:Ущелье Есик.jpg
Photos with clear authorship in metadata, author haven't done these uploads and asks me to delete the photos. --Красный wanna talk? 13:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
This video is not completely a work of Voice of America as it contains content from non-free sources (ABC, the ACLU and Twitter). JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 01:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:DW. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ye Qianyu
[edit]Ye Qianyu was a Chinese citizen working in China whose files are generally tagged {{PD-China}}. However, according to PD-China, as he died in 1995, his works in general will leave copyright in 1995+50+1 = 2046, in both PRC and ROC.
- File:Modern Sketch issue 2 by Ye Qianyu.jpg
- File:Mr. Wang joins the army.gif
- File:Ms01 001 ModernSketch.jpg
- File:Ms01 018 ModernSketch.gif
- File:Second-class Rail Carriage by Ye Qianyu.jpg
- File:Shanghai Manhua 1928-05-12.jpg
- File:Supply Exceeds Demand, Demand Exceeds Supply by Ye Qianyu.jpg
- File:Ye Qianyu, "Recent Empresses." Shanghai manhua 18 (Aug. 18, 1928).jpg
- File:Ye Qianyu, "Serpent and Woman." Shanghai manhua 4 (May 12, 1928).jpg
- File:Ye Qianyu, "Summer Fashions." Shanghai manhua 6 (May 26, 1928).jpg
- File:Ye Qianyu, "Unfortunate Love." Shanghai manhua 9 (June 16, 1928).jpg
- File:Ye Qianyu, "Untitled." Shanghai manhua 15 (July 20, 1928).jpg
Prosfilaes (talk) 02:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete works before 1951 in 2046. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletionper |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm... this is interesting. You here seem to be emphasizing the claim that I am committing copyright infringement. To be honest, I made this dossier based on File:Lambang Kabupaten Seruyan.png taken from the regency's official website, and only added a background based on this photo source: [3] [4], This kind of flag was actually adopted in the Regency, but I think the photo is indeed an unreliable primary source. Regardless, I think adding {{Extracted from}} is a wiser choice than deleting. Fazoffic (talk) 04:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Fazoffic: IMO, instead of {{Extracted from}}, {{Attrib}} seems to fit better. Ckfasdf (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
-  Well, I guess that's better. Fazoffic (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Fazoffic: IMO, instead of {{Extracted from}}, {{Attrib}} seems to fit better. Ckfasdf (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- For further information, please see my comments in the related discussion. Fazoffic (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I will quote another user's comment that may explain this,
This is not true, Government Regulation No. 77 of 2007 outlines general guidelines for regional coat of arms and flags, covering provinces, cities, and regencies. According to Article 6.1, regional flags must be square with a 2:3 ratio and feature the coat of arms.
Some provinces have specific regulations regarding their flags, which provide a legal basis for their status. Additionally, under Article 42(b) of Indonesian copyright law, any content derived from regulations cannot be copyrighted, meaning flags governed by specific regulations are in the public domain.
It’s important to note that, unlike regional flags, all regional coat of arms are regulated by specific laws, placing them in the public domain. Since provincial flags are simply the coat of arms placed on a square background, they are considered derivative works of public domain images. As such, anyone arranging the coat of arms on a square background can rightfully claim it as 'own work' and no copyright violation exists.
So the images should be deleted as OOS. As well as potentially COPYVIO. The main reason here being that it's pretty likely they are COPYVIO though.
According to COM:OOS, Files are considered within scope if they are media files in an allowable free format, freely licensed or in the public domain, realistically useful for educational purposes, and do not contain only excluded educational content. The images in this deletion request meet these criteria, as they are media files, freely licensed or public domain as on my comments mentioned above, and serve an educational purpose by representing regional flags per COM:INUSE.
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per |this discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure there is anything novel enough in those to be copyrightable. Very similar to things that were already commonplace (and old) when I was a child in the 1950s. - Jmabel ! talk 05:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Jmabel. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete Copyright does not belong to the uploader of the image. 85.132.29.163 04:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: No status of copyrightability of signatures in Azerbaijan. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Per the note in the main category there are no provincial flags of Indonesia. Making these fictional and/or completely fake. The status' of the flags are also extremely questionable since at least some of them come from websites with copyright notices. Whereas others are licensed as "own work" when in fact they are based on provincial shields. To make matters worse according to Template:PD-IDGov "There shall be no infringement of Copyright for: Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction of State emblems and national anthem in accordance with their original nature" and it's really clear if turning a State shield into a State flag would be in accordance with their original nature or not. I'd argue not since again, a lot of these are fake and/or based derivatives of derivatives that appear to be copyrighted to begin with. So the images should be deleted as OOS. As well as potentially COPYVIO. The main reason here being that it's pretty likely they are COPYVIO though. Baqotun0023 (talk) 07:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The West Bandung Regency flag is based on Article 4 of Regional Regulation No. 4 of 2008. Since it's based on a regulation, Template:PD-IDNoCopyright should apply according to the Indonesian copyright law. Additionally, the license information in the file has been corrected. Ckfasdf (talk) 17:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Ckfasdf. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
No historical source of such a flag. However, there is sources for another version of Wallonie Libre with Lorraine cross. Should be delete and preserve other version (File:Flag of Wallonie Libre.svg) LeHardi45 (talk) 07:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Unlike the other flag you include, this one is certainly not a fantasy. Here is an example of the flag in use displayed on the party's own website (1. A brief online search would also have takien you to this image) which is featured in the website of the provincial government and includes an almost identical flag. I have added this information to the image entry and tagged the other for deletion. Thanks. Brigade Piron (talk) 09:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per Brigade Piron. This flag exists. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Solicito su borrado inmediato por la interrupción de la conexión con la institución y la pérdida de vinculación con los derechos de la imagen. Ignacio Valdés Zamudio (talk) 08:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Image does not belong to uploader: Image copyright José Juan Rivas https://idagem.es/category/fotografia/. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm unable to find any reference to this flag outside of Wikipedia. Tempted to say that this is imaginary work and therefore out of scope. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, I was able to find https://www.belgiumwwii.be/belgique-en-guerre/articles/wallonie-libre-la.html which shows a logo (not a flag) related to a Resistance movement called "La Wallonie Libre". Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still in favor of removing this made-up flag, and replacing its usage with the actual original logo. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I do not understand why you want to remove the flag. There are sources relating the existence of this flag. The file is usefull. Sthubertliege (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- There are 2 reasons why I think this file should be removed:
- Unless a source is provided that this logo was used as a flag, it is an interpretation of the logo and therefore not historically accurate.
- An actual picture of the flag would be preferable to this file which has gone through several versions, hinting at the fact that it is not accurate.
- The file can be replaced with File:Logo La Wallonie Libre.png. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- There are 2 reasons why I think this file should be removed:
- I do not understand why you want to remove the flag. There are sources relating the existence of this flag. The file is usefull. Sthubertliege (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still in favor of removing this made-up flag, and replacing its usage with the actual original logo. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. You can add {{Factual accuracy}} for now. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced/fantasy flag. Although it is true that the central emblem was indeed used by the underground newspaper Wallonie Libre during the occupation period, there is no evidence that it was ever made into a flag or has any existence outside of the creator's mind. The movement has indeed used another flag since the 1970s (e.g. 1, 2) which we already have on commons in a separate file. Any uses of this file on Wikipedia are easily substitutable with one of the two other images and appear to have been added by the creator or a closely affiliated account. ((Brigade Piron (talk) 09:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I do not undertsand why you want to delete this file. The flag has been built directly from archives of the website : Wallonie libre (La) (belgiumwwii.be), which contains lot of references of the red and yellow logo. The are lots of examples on this website : La Wallonie Libre | The Belgian War Press (cegesoma.be). On the other hand, this file : File:Flag of Wallonie Libre.jpg — Wikimedia Commons has been built on pure imagination ! You should focus your deletation efforts on this document, not mine. Really, I do not see why you want to delete this file. We have perfectly the right to build a modern version of the flag based on original documents. The flag is correctly referencing the original logo with walloon rooster and Lorraine cross. There is no reason why it would makes problem for you. Please respect users right to import better quality version of historical logo, wich is a way to improve Wikipedia files. Sthubertliege (talk) 11:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide evidence that this flag has ever existed. I'm talking about a flag, not a logo. Transforming a logo into a flag that never existed is what is discussed here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. The logo clearly existed - and we already have it here although frankly I'm not sure of the copyright position. The use of the devise as part of a flag is pure fantasy, however. Brigade Piron (talk) 09:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide evidence that this flag has ever existed. I'm talking about a flag, not a logo. Transforming a logo into a flag that never existed is what is discussed here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There is no evidence that this logo was used as a flag, and it was added to Wikipedia articles such as List of Belgian flags. Where needed, the historically accurate File:Logo La Wallonie Libre.png should be used instead. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
The file is sourced from https://www.flickr.com/photos/ministryofdefenceua/27095245666/ which appears plausible to me, but AP also claims to be copyright holder at: https://newsroom.ap.org/editorial-photos-videos/search?query=852436505613&mediaType=photo&st=keyword Krd 12:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: AP is not in the habit of publishing images they don't have the rights to. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
File:2024194210444 2024-07-12 Bregenzer Festspiele - Der Freischütz - Sven - 5DS R - 0001 - 5DSR9914.jpg
[edit]No freedom of panorama. See: § 54 Abs. 1 Z 5 UrhG Bauer Alfons (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Accreditation was provided and can be checked via OTRS. Svema (talk) 15:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Do you also have a permission of the stage designer himself, cause it's a not permanent building? OTRS is not valid for stage design. --Bauer Alfons (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- +1 An accreditation does not normally include the stage designer's copyright release to reproduce his work. Rather, it is merely a release from the theatre to attend and reproduce its performance. --Plani (talk) 19:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Do you also have a permission of the stage designer himself, cause it's a not permanent building? OTRS is not valid for stage design. --Bauer Alfons (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted stage design -- no FOP. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright. Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fictional flags of West Java. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 22:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- nah aaron himself gave me the image.
- it's nowhere elce on the internet
- and i have express premission so i think it's ok Rowan hunter little plante (talk) 23:35, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Have Seth Christie contact COM:VRT to personally give his permission and agreement with the terms of the Creative Commons Copyleft license required for images to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Otherwise, the image has to be deleted. Aaron is the subject, not the photographer/copyright holder. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: We will restore when we receive permission from Seth Christie via Volunteer Response Team. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Own work! 186.175.3.108 21:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The license is wrong. It's OpenStreetMap, so it's free. Change the license, don't delete. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
1.It is fake, it doesnt reflect the truth. For example, Transylvania already had a lot of Hungarian settlemets. Seethis image, which is referenced with a book from the Columbia University Press (Bóna, István; Translation by Péter Szaffkó (2001). The Settlement of Transylvania in the 10th and 11th Centuries. Columbia University Press, New York,. ISBN 0-88033-479-7. http://mek.niif.hu/03400/03407/html/54.html.) in article Transylvania. 2) This map is not neutral, it reflects serb nacionalist POV. The used source for this map was written by "historian" Jovan Pejin, who is a serb nacionalist, also the member of the Serbian People's Movement. He is famous over his anti-Croatian and anti-Hungarian statements. (like: "Croatians do not exist as a nation", January 25, 2004, "accused Hungarians, Slovaks and Romanians of "occupying" Serbian territory in Vojvodina since the 10th Century", and anti minority books like "Autonomija Vojvodine" -- Košmar srpskog naroda/Autonomy of Vojvodina- Nightmare of the Serbian people. Currently, he is having a trial for this. (initiated by minister Jovan Branislav Lečić) It has 0 reliable, neutral,verifiable sources. --ЛенинВладимир (talk) 22:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is sourced work based on the book of historian Jovan Pejin and Wiki projects are here to present all valid opinions about various subjects. Other historians might have different opinion about that subject and nobody stopping you to draw a map that will reflect such opinions, but opinion of historian Pejin is a valid opinion as well. Also note that image "MagyarsInTransylvania.PNG" that you presented is completelly unsourced (I do not see where you found info that such map is "referenced with a book from the Columbia University Press"?) and also uploaded by known Hungarian nationalist user:Fz22. But, even so, these two maps do not contradict one to another since Pejin did not showed areas were Hungarians lived but only areas where Hungarians were in majority (which does not mean that they did not lived as a minority among Slavs as well). Here you can see also another map uploaded by another Hungarian user, which also show that Slavs lived in the entire territory where Pejin presented them: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hungary_b._10th_century.png As for historian Pejin, his political involvement is not relevant here - he is an professional historian-archivist (and he was also a director of the Archive of Serbia from 2001 to 2003: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=jovan+pejin+archivist&btnG=Google+Search ), so he is a relevant person to present his opinion about historical subjects. I made this map according to the map from the book "Velikomađarski kapric" writen by Pejin, which is in fact very good book about history of Greater Hungarian irredentism and it is writen in very professional way without nationalist anti-Hungarian statements. Also, "www.hhrf.org" that you posted as a source against reliability of Pejin as a historian is an nationalistic Hungarian web site and thus we cannot trust to that site regarding statements about historian who wrote a book about history of Hungarian nationalism. PANONIAN (talk) 00:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Also note that user:ЛенинВладимир that proposed this map for deletion is obviously a sockpuppet of some kind since he have only a few edits and his account was created on 8 January 2010. PANONIAN (talk) 00:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is sourced work based on the book of historian Jovan Pejin and Wiki projects are here to present all valid opinions about various subjects. Other historians might have different opinion about that subject and nobody stopping you to draw a map that will reflect such opinions, but opinion of historian Pejin is a valid opinion as well. Also note that image "MagyarsInTransylvania.PNG" that you presented is completelly unsourced (I do not see where you found info that such map is "referenced with a book from the Columbia University Press"?) and also uploaded by known Hungarian nationalist user:Fz22. But, even so, these two maps do not contradict one to another since Pejin did not showed areas were Hungarians lived but only areas where Hungarians were in majority (which does not mean that they did not lived as a minority among Slavs as well). Here you can see also another map uploaded by another Hungarian user, which also show that Slavs lived in the entire territory where Pejin presented them: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hungary_b._10th_century.png As for historian Pejin, his political involvement is not relevant here - he is an professional historian-archivist (and he was also a director of the Archive of Serbia from 2001 to 2003: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=jovan+pejin+archivist&btnG=Google+Search ), so he is a relevant person to present his opinion about historical subjects. I made this map according to the map from the book "Velikomađarski kapric" writen by Pejin, which is in fact very good book about history of Greater Hungarian irredentism and it is writen in very professional way without nationalist anti-Hungarian statements. Also, "www.hhrf.org" that you posted as a source against reliability of Pejin as a historian is an nationalistic Hungarian web site and thus we cannot trust to that site regarding statements about historian who wrote a book about history of Hungarian nationalism. PANONIAN (talk) 00:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like nonsense, but is in use. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Per my explanation above. PANONIAN (talk) 00:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Comment Commons can contain childish images like this, but should not be used in Wikipedia (except for example to illustrate anti-Hungarian hatred), as it is extremely biased (or briefly 'false'), made by a well-known anti-Hungarian historian in Serbia (a Slavic country). Qorilla (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please answer these questions: 1. How exactly this image is "childish"?, 2. How exactly this image could reflect "anti-Hungarian hatred"?, 3. how exactly this image is biased or false?, 4. how exactly this historian is anti-Hungarian? (please quote any possible anti-Hungarian actions or statements that this historian might done or said and then we can analyse such actions or statements to see is he realy anti-Hungarian or Hungarian nationalists only do not like him because of historical facts that he presented and that do not support false historicist claims of Hungarian nationalism), and finaly: 5. how exactly the fact that somebody is from Serbia or Slavic country would determine is he biased or not? PANONIAN (talk) 15:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, you know the answer to these questions, so I write this for the readers who don't. This is a map which tries to prove that there were not many Hungarians living there in the early times, and therefore they should shut up outside the smaller-than-ethnic borders created after World War I. The area was populated by many people beforehand, including Slavs, but I guess it is a huge lie to show this map for the 12th century. You could draw one from the 8th century and write a hundred times Slavs on it, as Hungarians moved in around 900. So I can imagine that when they started to settle in the (sparsely populated) Carpathian Basin, there was not many of them in the first years.
- I do not see why would somebody falsify a map to "prove that there were not many Hungarians living there in the 10th-12th century" when all historians agree that there were no Hungarians at all in that area in the 9th century. In another words, we do not have problem with historians who "want to prove that there were not many Hungarians", but we have a problem with Hungarian nationalists who want to prove that Hungarians "always" lived in all areas claimed by Greater Hungarian irredentist goal. Therefore, any historian that present any opinion opposite to this would be automatically attacked by Greater Hungarian nationalists. As for time period involved here, historian Pejin clearly say that it refer to 10th-12th century time period, which might not be the case for late 12th century of course, but it certainly could include beginning of that century. However, I clearly stated in the map itself that it is made according to the historian Pejin and that this map represent his opinion only, so I do not see a point of adjusting info in this map to other opinions. You can draw other maps that would reflect opinions of other historians. PANONIAN (talk) 21:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- A shading according to population density would be very beneficial. Also I have seen quite a few maps, but none showed such a small extent. This is the minimal area that the Serbian nationalist historian (who is also involved in political topics as I see) was able to draw. Another childish aspect is that it puts "Slavs" on the map a dozen times, and colors uninhabited areas as Slav.
- As I said, you did not proved that Pejin is politically motived in his historical work, so until you prove that, please refrain yourself from such accusations. As for map presentation, there are external sources with maps whose authors mark all these areas as inhabited by Slavs, see this: http://www.home-edu.ru/user/uatml/00000628/rumjancev/drevnieslavjane/rasselenie.jpg or this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/Slav-7-8-obrez.png or this: http://www.uncp.edu/home/rwb/slavs_map.jpg - there is nothing unique in that presentation. PANONIAN (talk) 21:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- As there were no censuses that time, we can not know the exact ethnic configuration, but giving this map as fact is nonsense. You are right that the fact that one is Serbian, doesn't mean he is automatically manipulative, but this map is. I just wanted to say, it is no wonder why, if one sees where he comes from, and knows what the Serbian nationalism tries to push. Qorilla (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- There were no censuses, but there are other ways to research population data from that time: data presented by various historians, archaeological research of graves, origin of place names, etc, etc. Of course, different historians might come to different conclusion from that data, but there is no single proof that opinion of Hungarian historians is right and oppinion of Serbian historians wrong. In fact, it is not a purpose of any Wiki project to determine who is right or wrong in any such dispute, but the true purpose of Wiki projects is to present all relevant opinions about all subjects, so let present to readers both, maps made according to Serbian and maps made according to Hungarian historians, so they will conclude for themselves who is right and who is wrong. PANONIAN (talk) 21:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, you know the answer to these questions, so I write this for the readers who don't. This is a map which tries to prove that there were not many Hungarians living there in the early times, and therefore they should shut up outside the smaller-than-ethnic borders created after World War I. The area was populated by many people beforehand, including Slavs, but I guess it is a huge lie to show this map for the 12th century. You could draw one from the 8th century and write a hundred times Slavs on it, as Hungarians moved in around 900. So I can imagine that when they started to settle in the (sparsely populated) Carpathian Basin, there was not many of them in the first years.
- Please answer these questions: 1. How exactly this image is "childish"?, 2. How exactly this image could reflect "anti-Hungarian hatred"?, 3. how exactly this image is biased or false?, 4. how exactly this historian is anti-Hungarian? (please quote any possible anti-Hungarian actions or statements that this historian might done or said and then we can analyse such actions or statements to see is he realy anti-Hungarian or Hungarian nationalists only do not like him because of historical facts that he presented and that do not support false historicist claims of Hungarian nationalism), and finaly: 5. how exactly the fact that somebody is from Serbia or Slavic country would determine is he biased or not? PANONIAN (talk) 15:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- This is a very heated and politically loaded topic, which does not belong to this page, so it's best to close it at this point, with the conclusion that commons can host images that are not universally accepted, as there is no NPOV criteria for media on commons. Qorilla (talk) 23:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Kept, POV and nationalist deletion request. File is in project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 08:47, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
That map is an user made photoshopped map, represent a weird Serbian anti-Hungarian nationalist view, that is really nonsense that only around Budapest lived Hungarians around 1200 in that big Kingdom of Hungary. We know well that Hungary had many Hungarian settlements and Hungarian historical things in the whole kingdom. This is a hardcore abuse of Hungarian history regarding Hungary. Only Budapest is Hungarian but the full Hungarian country was a Slavic country? What a nonsense!
This is a Hungarian National Atlas about Hungarian demographic (made by many scholars during 30 years of researches and based on sources), which is total different than this photoshopped map: https://www.nemzetiatlasz.hu/MNA/National-Atlas-of-Hungary_Vol3_Ch2.pdf + https://www.mtafki.hu/konyvtar/karpat-pannon2015/en/supplementary_maps.html + https://emna.hu/en/map/Km_nyelvi_terszerk_1495/@46.6812151,21.2342624,7.00z + https://www.nemzetiatlasz.hu/MNA/3_en.html + The English version of that atlas won the most prestigious professional prize in the biennial International Cartographic Conference (ICC) was held in Tokyo between 15 and 20 July 2019 by the International Cartographic Association (ICA). I think this tell a lot what was the international feedback regarding this Hungarian atlas. https://mta.hu/english/english-edition-of-the-national-atlas-of-hungary-voted-world-number-one-109950 OrionNimrod (talk) 21:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Keep Not a deletion reason.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)- Do you think is ok to make a fake map that in the kingdom of Hungary in 1200 only around Budapest lived Hungarians?
- Or do you think it will be ok to make another fake maps that French lived only around Paris in the Kingdom of French or Germans around only Berlin in the Holy Roman Empire, or Poles only around Warsaw in the kingdom of Poland or English people only around London… etc?
- OrionNimrod (talk) 22:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Ikan Kekek @OrionNimrod, I also think it would be worth deleting these clearly incorrect maps. There’s no point in keeping them on the wiki.
- As I can see, a prize-winning map has been presented as a counter-argument, so it’s unnecessary to keep the incorrect ones, especially since they clearly contradict the facts. And if they were indeed created to spread negative things about another ethnic group, then they definitely should be deleted. CriticKende (talk) 15:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think it was or I thought it was in use before. I don't have expertise in this topic and don't really care what decision the closing admin makes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
That map is an user made photoshopped map, represent a weird Serbian anti-Hungarian nationalist view, that is really nonsense that only around Budapest lived Hungarians around 1200 in that big Kingdom of Hungary. We know well that Hungary had many Hungarian settlements and Hungarian historical things in the whole kingdom. This is a hardcore abuse of Hungarian history regarding Hungary. Only Budapest is Hungarian but the full Hungarian country was a Slavic country? What a nonsense!
This is a Hungarian National Atlas about Hungarian demographic (made by many scholars during 30 years of researches and based on sources), which is total different than this photoshopped map: https://www.nemzetiatlasz.hu/MNA/National-Atlas-of-Hungary_Vol3_Ch2.pdf + https://www.mtafki.hu/konyvtar/karpat-pannon2015/en/supplementary_maps.html + https://emna.hu/en/map/Km_nyelvi_terszerk_1495/@46.6812151,21.2342624,7.00z + https://www.nemzetiatlasz.hu/MNA/3_en.html + The English version of that atlas won the most prestigious professional prize in the biennial International Cartographic Conference (ICC) was held in Tokyo between 15 and 20 July 2019 by the International Cartographic Association (ICA). I think this tell a lot what was the international feedback regarding this Hungarian atlas. https://mta.hu/english/english-edition-of-the-national-atlas-of-hungary-voted-world-number-one-109950 OrionNimrod (talk) 21:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
* Keep Not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Do you think is ok to make a fake map that in the kingdom of Hungary in 1200 only around Budapest lived Hungarians?
- Or do you think it will be ok to make another fake maps that French lived only around Paris in the Kingdom of French or Germans around only Berlin in the Holy Roman Empire, or Poles only around Warsaw in the kingdom of Poland or English people only around London… etc? OrionNimrod (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have any expertise in this subject or opinion about the accuracy or inaccuracy of this map. I thought it was in use, but it's not, nor is the other file. I don't care what the admins do with this or the other file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Vista panorámica de punta veleros del distrito de Los Órganos, Talara- Piura, 02, JPG.jpg
[edit]imagen está borrosa Yhhue91 (talk) 21:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 17:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
imagen de poco valor informativo Yhhue91 (talk) 21:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Not entirely unuseful, uploaded by a secondary school student for Wikiaction Peru. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 17:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
no posee valor informativo Yhhue91 (talk) 21:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Not entirely unuseful, uploaded by a secondary school student for Wikiaction Peru. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 17:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Like the dewfall (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely COM:License laundering. These are artworks by Polish artist that are still alive. The photos were taken "from the Internet" or from Facebook (see the initial revision of the files). I marked some of these photos as copyvios, and later the said they were licensed with CC-BY according to https://ssi.edu.pl/, see Special:Diff/903342047. The problem is that it points to a Google Drive with files uploaded yesterday after the files were tagged as copyvios. Also the last archived version of the website doesn't have such notice. We need a COM:VRT from the copyright holder ticket to keep these images.
- File:Saint Norbert.jpg
- File:Shavuot Pentecost Zesłanie Ducha Świętego.jpg
- File:Dormition of the Blessed Virgin Mary Zaśnięcie NMP.jpg
- File:Wniebowstąpienie Ascension.jpg
- File:Exaltation of the Holy Cross Podwyższenie Krzyża Świętego.jpg
- File:Entry into Jerusalem Wjazd do Jerozolimy.jpg
- File:Narodzenie NMP Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary.jpg
- File:San Damiano Cross (Swiatkiewicz).jpg
- File:Etimasia DKR Bytom.jpg
- File:The Presentation of Mary in the Temple SSI WTUO.jpg
- File:Simon the Zealot (Galazka).jpg
- File:Saints Apostles Peter and Paul (Jaskola).jpg
- File:Saint Natalia of Nicomedia (Galazka).jpg
- File:Saint Michael the Archangel (Wawrzak).jpg
- File:Saint Michael the Archangel (Wawrzak) 2.jpg
- File:Pantokrator (Michalski).jpg
- File:Ignacy Loyola.jpg
- File:Desiderato Christ (Sekowski).jpg
- File:Transfiguration from Nysa.jpg
- File:Saint Paul (Kochel).jpg
- File:Pantokrator Szymik.jpg
- File:Our Lady of Deesis.jpg
- File:The Blessed Virgin Mary Pneumatofora.jpg
- File:Our Lady of Smolensk Hodegetria.jpg
- File:The Good Shepherd (Kalos Poimen).jpg
- File:The Blessed Virgin Mary in You, Unity.jpg
- File:Saint Christopher (Gzela).jpg
- File:Saints Cosmas and Damian.jpg
- File:Saint Julia.jpg
- File:Anastasis Resurrection.jpg
- File:Saint Anthony of Lisbon and Padua.jpg
- File:Saint Monica 2017 (Jerominek).jpg
- File:Saint Peter Hosea.jpg
- File:Saint Adam the Forefather.jpg
- File:Arthur of Glastonbury.jpg
- File:Saint John the Theologian.jpg
- File:Saint Joseph.jpg
- File:Mandylion from Paris with Egon Sendler.jpg
- File:Saint Ignatius of Loyola.jpg
- File:Saint Benedict of Nursia 2008.jpg
- File:Zwiastowanie 2015 Jerominek.jpg
- File:Zaśnięcie fragment SSI Jerominek.jpg
- File:Wypłyń na głębię (Łk. 5, 4-11) Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Wszystkowidzące Oko Boże Jerominek 2017.jpg
- File:Wernisaż Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Święty Jerzy 2013 Jerominek.jpg
- File:Święta Teresa od Dzieciątka Jezus i Przenajświętszego Oblicza Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Święta Teresa Benedykta od Krzyża Edyta Stein Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Święta Faustyna Kowalska Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Święta Agata Jerominek 2023.jpg
- File:Św. Tomasz spotyka i dotyka Zmartwychwstałego Jerominek 2021.jpg
- File:Słońce i księżycu błogosławcie Pana (Dn. 3, 52-90) Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Siedem smutków Matki Bożej Jerominek 2024.jpg
- File:Serafin Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Rajskie ptaki Jerominek 2020.jpg
- File:Psalm 121 wersja 1 Jerominek 2019.jpg
- File:Pusty Grób 2014 Jerominek.jpg
- File:Psalm 4 wersja 2 Jerominek 2020.jpg
- File:Objawienie Pańskie i Anioł przy pustym grobie 2015 Jerominek.jpg
- File:Płaszczenica Jerominek 2019.jpg
- File:Monika JEROMINEK Psalm 4, deska, lewkas, tempera jajowa, złoto, fi 30 2019.jpg
- File:Mandylion Jerominek 2020 Podpis.jpg
- File:Mandylion 2015 Jerominek.jpg
- File:Którzy we łzach sieją... Ps 126-5-6 Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Labirynt duchowy Jerominek 2020.jpg
- File:Jeżeli Pan domu nie zbuduje, na próżno się trudzą ci, którzy go wznoszą (Ps. 127, 1-5) Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Jerominek Warszawa.jpg
- File:Jezu ufam Tobie Jerominek 2024.jpg
- File:Jerominek Tomasz i Zmartwychwstały.jpg
- File:Virgin Mary of Bytom Jerominek.jpg
- File:Jerominek Anioł.jpg
- File:Jerominek Adam.jpg
- File:My Beloved is mine and I am his Jerominek 2024.jpg
- File:Niech Ci wystarczy Chrystus Ukrzyżowany, z Nim cierp i odpoczywaj Jerominek 3.jpg
- File:Drzewo życia w środku tego ogrodu (Rdz. 2, 8-9) Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Dodi. Raiti II wersja 2 Jerominek 2021.jpg
- File:Dodi. Raiti I wersja 2 Jerominek 2021.jpg
- File:Chrystus w majestacie Jerominek 2020.jpg
- File:Anioł Boży, mój Stróż Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:Brat Karol Jerominek 2015.jpg
- File:A gdy ją znajdzie, bierze z radością na ramiona (Łk. 15, 4-7) Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:...tylko Ty, Panie, pozwalasz mi mieszkać bezpiecznie (Ps. 4, 1-9) Jerominek 2022.jpg
- File:A światłość w ciemności świeci i ciemność jej nie ogarnęła (J. 1, 1-14) Jerominek 2022.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 08:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Yann (talk) 09:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Not only are the circumstances of these files appearing on the website suspicious, but it's unclear why that website would have the authority to release these images under a CC license. Its statement that "their digital reproductions, with the permission of the authors, are also the property of SSI" makes very little sense. Omphalographer (talk) 15:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is an organization that upholds law and objectivity and is usually kind to those contributing to its development. It is not enough for someone to have a suspicion, denial, or belief to block someone. One must demonstrate: (1) that someone's action is illegal; (2) specifically indicate which legal norm is being violated (this norm must be cited); (3) state what formal and minimal documents someone must present to be able to publish a given work, to convince the super editors. Otherwise, deleting someone's contribution to Wikipedia's development is an abuse and an act of violence by the super editors. Actions that have the characteristics of harassing novice editors should also not be undertaken. Like the dewfall (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Like the dewfall
- Congratulations on your effort and contribution. Don't be discouraged. This is normal on Wikipedia, and no one is against you. It's absolutely important to add good, verified photos, images, and files. Everything is OK, but please check the file (image) "Adam Eden Nude": notice that it is stylistically different, and there may have been an error. I am "preemptively" removing it from Jerominek's gallery in her entry. It can always be restored, but it seems to me that it isn't hers. Her style is very recognizable. Also, contact Jerominek and check the shared gallery of authors associated with the Silesian School of Iconography. Jan Sandomierski (talk) 19:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Jan Sandomierski, thank you for your kind words. You were indeed right about the "Adam Eden Nude" file, and I checked that it does not belong to Monika Jerominek, nor is it in the resources shared by the creators of the Silesian School of Iconography. I made a mistake. It needs to be deleted. It belongs to Yaryna Movochan, but I have no contact with her. Too bad. Once again, thank you for your substantive comments. Like the dewfall (talk) 18:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Like the dewfall please see my note below about having Ms. Jerominek contact the Volunteer Response Team Bastique ☎ let's talk! 23:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jan Sandomierski, thank you for your kind words. You were indeed right about the "Adam Eden Nude" file, and I checked that it does not belong to Monika Jerominek, nor is it in the resources shared by the creators of the Silesian School of Iconography. I made a mistake. It needs to be deleted. It belongs to Yaryna Movochan, but I have no contact with her. Too bad. Once again, thank you for your substantive comments. Like the dewfall (talk) 18:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Omphalographer, please help me delete the file "Adam Eden Nude" File:Jerominek Adam.jpg because I made a mistake: I do not have the rights to it, and I was wrong about the author. I can't delete it myself. I apologize. Like the dewfall (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is an organization that upholds law and objectivity and is usually kind to those contributing to its development. It is not enough for someone to have a suspicion, denial, or belief to block someone. One must demonstrate: (1) that someone's action is illegal; (2) specifically indicate which legal norm is being violated (this norm must be cited); (3) state what formal and minimal documents someone must present to be able to publish a given work, to convince the super editors. Otherwise, deleting someone's contribution to Wikipedia's development is an abuse and an act of violence by the super editors. Actions that have the characteristics of harassing novice editors should also not be undertaken. Like the dewfall (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Gunter Frager, please help me delete the file "Adam Eden Nude" File:Jerominek Adam.jpg because I made a mistake: I do not have the rights to it, and I was wrong about the author. I can't delete it myself. I apologize. Like the dewfall (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support There are the original Icins from The Slaska Szkaola Ikonograficzna. In same times the webside of this Institutions will be improwe. Michał Lew (talk) 21:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. It appears that Monika Jerominek has given SSI the authority to release her copyright under the CC-BY-SA license. Given the situation, it would be best, however, if Ms. Jerominek would contact our Volunteer Response Team (at that link) to confirm that this is the case. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be restored if we have VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
F5 _ The file is not referenced to any source and has no source to verify the information. Mostafamirchouli (talk) 11:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: the file is in use on a number of articles in fawiki. It, I believe, represents countries with the highest amount of biodiversity. The user cites: "here" as the source of the data, but I don't know how one verifies that. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 23:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台北市 Taipei 松山區 SongShan District 敦化北路 Dunhua North Road 茹曦酒店 Illume Hotel shop 7-Eleven Store March 2024 R12S 02.jpg
[edit]COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 13:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Possible Fake - no reputed sources four use of such "logo") Stauffen (talk) 14:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I agree. I know I’m a random guy without an account, but I searched and could not find anything that suggested the image was real. When I saw it, it immediately struck me as fake and fanmade. It’s things like this that make people lose a little faith in Wikipedia’s credibility. That’s not what happened with me, but especially with El Mayo’s recent arrest, I wouldn’t be surprised if attention is drawn to it within the next week or two. 2604:3D09:D078:6A00:E194:3AD2:AD77:AAE3 22:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. But remove any references to it being any kind of flag of Sinaloa and simply call it a graphic placeholder, or something like that, as it is in use in a substantial number of articles on eswiki and enwiki. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE , feel free to add {{Fact disputed}}. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
The source website provided no longer exists, and seems to have been an early site for people to upload and share photos under cc-0 licence. There is no information about original uploader, Commons uploader picked cc-sa-4 licence here. I'm not sure this is all OK to keep, but as it's been here so long already (2016), perhaps this horse has bolted. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment These are not professional quality images and the uploader seems to be "Erin Clark for art class". But I think that we can delete them simply on their lack of usefulness out of COM:SCOPE Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per Bastique. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Puede o no puede ser own work. 200.39.139.7 16:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see a deletion reason here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete highly professional photograph, but seems to be self-promotion. Need COM:VRT in any case. Who is Sevan? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Bastique. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Puede o no puede ser own work. 200.39.139.7 16:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see a deletion reason here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I do. Use Lens. 200.39.139.7 15:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I still don't see a deletion reason. Speak plainly in any language instead of insinuating. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I do. Use Lens. 200.39.139.7 15:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete highly professional photograph, but seems to be self-promotion. Need COM:VRT in any case. Who is Sevan? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 15:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Bastique. IP user was probably referring to Google Lens. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Painting? If it is just a photo consider withdrawn, it looked like a painting to me.186.175.3.108 19:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's a photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete Self promotional? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 17:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope personal photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
1938 photograph that is now public domain in New Zealand as the photographer died in 1971, but not PD in the US yet since this was still copyrighted in 1996. Abzeronow (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination / still copyrighted in the US. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 16:53, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Flags of cities of Indonesia
[edit]per in this disscusion The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia, making these representations fictional or entirely fabricated. The authenticity of these flags is highly questionable, as some originate from websites with copyright notices, while others are falsely labeled as "own work" despite being based on provincial shields. Furthermore, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is unclear if transforming a state shield into a state flag aligns with this principle, and I would argue it does not, as many of these flags are fake or derivative works that may already be copyrighted. Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO), with the primary concern being their likely infringement of copyright.
- File:5. Flag of Yogyakarta City.png
- File:Municipal Flag of Bandung, Indonesia.svg
- File:Bendera Porto.png
- File:Bogor Flag.jpg
- File:Bogor Flag.png
- File:City Flag of Ambon.png
- File:City Flag of Balikpapan.png
- File:City Flag of Banjarbaru.png
- File:City Flag of Baubau.png
- File:City Flag of Bogor.svg
- File:Bogor Flag.jpg
- File:City Flag of Palangkaraya.png
- File:City Flag of Palu.png
- File:City Flag of Sorong.png
- File:City Flag of Tidore Kepulauan.png
- File:Flag of Banda Aceh City.png
- File:Flag of Bandar Lampung City.png
- File:Flag of Banjar City.png
- File:Flag of Banjarmasin City.png
- File:Flag of Batu City.png
- File:Flag of Bekasi City.png
- File:Flag of Bengkulu City.png
- File:Flag of Cilegon City.png
- File:Flag of Denpasar City.png
- File:Flag of Gorontalo City.png
- File:Flag of Jambi City.png
- File:Flag of Jayapura City.png
- File:Flag of Kediri City.png
- File:Flag of Kendari City.png
- File:Flag of Kupang City.png
- File:Flag of Langsa City.png
- File:Flag of Madiun City.png
- File:Flag of Magelang City.png
- File:Flag of Mataram City.png
- File:Flag of Medan City.png
- File:Flag of Mojokerto City.png
- File:Flag of Padang City.png
- File:Flag of Palembang City.png
- File:Flag of Pangkalpinang City.png
- File:Flag of Pekalongan City.png
- File:Flag of Pekanbaru City.png
- File:Flag of Pontianak City.png
- File:Flag of Sabang City.png
- File:Flag of Salatiga City.png
- File:Flag of Samarinda City.png
- File:Flag of Semarang City.png
- File:Flag of Serang City.png
- File:Flag of South Tangerang City.png
- File:Flag of Subulussalam City.png
- File:Flag of Sungai Penuh City.png
- File:Flag of Surabaya City.png
- File:Flag of Tangerang City.png
- File:Flag of Tanjungpinang City.png
- File:Flag of Tegal City.png
- File:Flag of Yogyakarta City.png
- File:Makassar city flag.png
- File:City Flag of Sukabumi.svg
- File:City Flag of Tasikmalaya.svg
- File:Flag of Dumai.svg
- File:Flag of Yogyakarta City.svg
Baqotun0023 (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding these Cities and Regencies flags in Indonesia, I assure you that these flags are based on my research on official media that displayed these flags inside the regional government buildings. So these flags surely not fabricated nor fictional. I admit that only few regional governments in Indonesia have regulation about their flags, the non-official ones exist just because it's commonly used by previous officials. As you said, according to Template:PD-IDGov, there is no copyright infringement for the publication, distribution, communication, or reproduction of state emblems and the national anthem in their original form. It is clear and common in Indonesia if transforming a regional symbol into a regional flag aligns with this principle. The official flags of Provinces of Indonesia are displayed inside the Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia.
- Thank you for your concern and I hope these flags images not deleted.
- Best regards M darmanto (talk) 06:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding these Cities and Regencies flags in Indonesia, I assure you that these flags are based on my research on official media that displayed these flags inside the regional government buildings
- thank you @M darmanto, because that's literally what i did, i do the research about the flag usage in the official building and then make the flag design in MsWord, although i'm not sure about the detail for some of them (the emblem ratio and base color of the flag), and i think yeah, most of the flags are rarely used in public.
- if those files is not deleted anytime in the future, i'll be happy if anyone could help me for the correction. HclUSA (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @User:Matrix Do you think I should whether this discussion may be stopped because in accordance with in discussion you have closed the discussion and maintained it?
- Baqotun0023 (talk) 04:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Baqotun0023 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think we need to focus on each flag individually and focus more on fixing it. As I said in this discussion, I have been working with other people on FOTW itself to figure out if flags are real or not. There are other users in Indonesia who are helping to figure out what is going on. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- For File:Flag of Yogyakarta City.svg, the flag of the city can be seen at here and here. As for the coat of arms, we can see the information and regulations here. This will show that the file at File:5. Flag of Yogyakarta City.png is completely false and never existed (as we saw with the provincial flag regulation, the flag has to have one background color only). User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Zscout370: FYI, Article 11(2) of Yogyakarta City Regulation No. 6 of 1979 ("Peraturan Pemerintah Kotamadya Daerah Tingkat II Yogyakarta Nomor 6 Tahun 1979 Tentang Penggunaan Lambang Kotamadya Daerah Tingkat II Yogyakarta") specifies that the background color of the city flag is light green. Btw, In general, the background color of regional flags is typically a single color. However, there are a few exceptions where two or more colors are used in the background. Ckfasdf (talk) 05:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep In general, my comments are the same as in this discussion, but I'll rewrite them here anyway.
- The primary issue is that there are no official provincial flags of Indonesia.
- This is not true, Government Regulation No. 77 of 2007 outlines general guidelines for regional coat of arms and flags, covering provinces, cities, and regencies. According to Article 6.1, regional flags must be square with a
3:22:3 ratio and feature the coat of arms. - Some cities have specific regulations regarding their flags, which provide a legal basis for their status. Additionally, under Article 42(b) of Indonesian copyright law, any content derived from regulations cannot be copyrighted, meaning flags governed by specific regulations are in the public domain.
- It’s important to note that, unlike cities flags, all cities coat of arms are regulated by specific laws, thus placing them in the public domain. Since cities flags are simply the coat of arms placed on a square background, they are considered derivative works of public domain images. As such, anyone arranging the coat of arms on a square background can rightfully claim it as 'own work' and no copyright violation exists.
- Therefore, these images should be deleted due to being out of scope (OOS) and potential copyright violations (COPYVIO)
- According to COM:OOS, Files are considered within scope if they are media files in an allowable free format, freely licensed or in the public domain, realistically useful for educational purposes, and do not contain only excluded educational content. The images in this deletion request meet these criteria, as they are media files, freely licensed or public domain as on my comments mentioned above, and serve an educational purpose by representing regional flags per COM:INUSE. Ckfasdf (talk) 05:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There was a similar CfD discussion in which the nominator's statement was essentially a paraphrase of the previous CfD. The subject matter is likewise comparable—this case concerns the flags of cities in Indonesia, while the earlier case dealt with the flags of provinces in Indonesia. Accordingly, the rationale for retaining the files in this nomination should be consistent with the previous discussion. That CfD concluded with a 'clear consensus to keep.' I would recommend referring to that prior discussion for guidance. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: In accordance with/same rationale as Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Fictional_flags_of_Indonesia. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 16:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Per the note in the main category there are no provincial flags of Indonesia. Making these fictional and/or completely fake. The status' of the flags are also extremely questionable since at least some of them come from websites with copyright notices. Whereas others are licensed as "own work" when in fact they are based on provincial shields. To make matters worse according to Template:PD-IDGov "There shall be no infringement of Copyright for: Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction of State emblems and national anthem in accordance with their original nature" and it's really clear if turning a State shield into a State flag would be in accordance with their original nature or not. I'd argue not since again, a lot of these are fake and/or based derivatives of derivatives that appear to be copyrighted to begin with. So the images should be deleted as OOS. As well as potentially COPYVIO. The main reason here being that it's pretty likely they are COPYVIO though. Baqotun0023 (talk) 07:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Per the note in the main category there are no provincial flags of Indonesia. Making these fictional and/or completely fake. The status' of the flags are also extremely questionable since at least some of them come from websites with copyright notices. Whereas others are licensed as "own work" when in fact they are based on provincial shields. To make matters worse according to Template:PD-IDGov "There shall be no infringement of Copyright for: Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction of State emblems and national anthem in accordance with their original nature" and it's really clear if turning a State shield into a State flag would be in accordance with their original nature or not. I'd argue not since again, a lot of these are fake and/or based derivatives of derivatives that appear to be copyrighted to begin with. So the images should be deleted as OOS. As well as potentially COPYVIO. The main reason here being that it's pretty likely they are COPYVIO though. Baqotun0023 (talk) 07:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Per the note in the main category there are no provincial flags of Indonesia. Making these fictional and/or completely fake. The status' of the flags are also extremely questionable since at least some of them come from websites with copyright notices. Whereas others are licensed as "own work" when in fact they are based on provincial shields. To make matters worse according to Template:PD-IDGov "There shall be no infringement of Copyright for: Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction of State emblems and national anthem in accordance with their original nature" and it's really clear if turning a State shield into a State flag would be in accordance with their original nature or not. I'd argue not since again, a lot of these are fake and/or based derivatives of derivatives that appear to be copyrighted to begin with. So the images should be deleted as OOS. As well as potentially COPYVIO. The main reason here being that it's pretty likely they are COPYVIO though. Baqotun0023 (talk) 07:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Olympic Phryge
[edit]These are all images of the 2024 Paris Olympic mascot. Some are the mascot itself and others plush toys. In either case, these are derivative works of a copyrighted mascot.
- File:07.24 總統接見「世界臺灣商會聯合總會第29屆回國訪問暨投資考察團」.jpg
- File:Mascotte des jeux olympiques lors du relais de la flamme à Saverne.jpg
- File:Museo del Comité Olímpico Argentino en marzo de 2024 - BugWarp (177).jpg
- File:Museo del Comité Olímpico Argentino en marzo de 2024 - BugWarp (178).jpg
- File:Museo del Comité Olímpico Argentino en marzo de 2024 - BugWarp (179).jpg
- File:Phryge olympique Brest 2024 (cropped).jpg
- File:Phryge olympique Brest 2024.jpg
- File:Phryge Olympique.jpg
- File:Phryges.jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (10).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (11).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (12).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (13).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (3).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (4).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (5).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (6).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (67).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (68).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (69).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (7).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (8).jpg
- File:Uzbekistan vs. Spain, 2024 Summer Olympic men's association football, 2024-07-24 (9).jpg
Whpq (talk) 12:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Some of these images are costumes of the mascot, those should be kept as per Commons policy (see "Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?"). Regarding the stuffed dolls, I think they should also be kept due to Commons:De minimis and Lack of Harm.--BugWarp (talk) 12:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. A professional mascot costume is not a utilitarian object, and can be protected by copyright. It's much more akin to a sculpture with a person inside it than an article of clothing.
- The stuffed toys are clearly covered by COM:TOYS; there's no ambiguity here. The toys are not de minimis (they are the primary objects in the photo), and "lack of harm" is not a defense. Omphalographer (talk) 15:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I insist, the costumes can be kept per Commons policy (see for example Lyo and Merly), why should we go against it on the eve of the opening ceremony of the 2024 Summer Olympics?
- And in many images, the toys are not the main subject, and even cropping the images wouldn't make for a proper use.--BugWarp (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced that those images are within policy either. Regardless - we don't make exceptions to copyright policy for special occasions. If anything, the fact that the Olympics are about to start is a compelling reason to remove images which may be copyright violations so that downstream users don't inadvertently use images from Commons which we can't guarantee are freely reusable. Omphalographer (talk) 17:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep specifically the files depicting a performer in costume, as Commons has lots of precedent for keeping images of costumed performers (IE, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spiderman and child.jpg and the dozens of categories of character cosplays). Delete the toy images per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 09:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I believe your referring to Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Costumes and cosplay, and specifically Present consensus is that "files that merely show people cosplaying" are acceptable.. However, in this instance, these are not cosplayers, but the actual official mascot costumes. -- Whpq (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think that there's really not any difference between a cosplayer and an official performer; both are performers in costume. I think that the phrase "merely show people cosplaying" can reasonably be extended to "merely show people performing in costume" because cosplay is just costumed performance by fans. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I believe your referring to Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Costumes and cosplay, and specifically Present consensus is that "files that merely show people cosplaying" are acceptable.. However, in this instance, these are not cosplayers, but the actual official mascot costumes. -- Whpq (talk) 15:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep for performers in costume but for toys => Deletion. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 12:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I added all the stuffed Phryges to Category:Stuffed Phryges (mascots). Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep All costumes/ cosplay. delete all toys. -- Ooligan (talk) 14:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete for most of the mascot images. Per COM:COSPLAY the community has not reached a definitive answer on all costumes based on border cases like Spiderman and Child, and there is a difference between a simple costumed figure and a mascot, and we can't apply that decision to all depictions of Phryge as a mascot. Frankly, the fact that the form of the mascot is not in the shape of the body underneath it makes the difference between a border case like Spider-man and Child and all of these...they're effectively a walking COM:TOY. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 22:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all. This is no cosplay, but clearly the copyrighted figure is depicted. --Krd 16:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the costumed version files are not cosplay as Krd says. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
User blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be OK.
- File:Coat of arms of Fernando Altamira.svg
- File:Coat of arms of Daniel Dolan.svg
- File:Dom Rodrigo da Silva, SSJ.png
- File:Coat of arms of Rodrigo Henrique Ribeiro da Silva.svg
- File:"Marcha Triunfal" (Hino Nacional Brasileiro) em Mi maior.ogg
- File:Coat of arms of the Central African Empire (redesign).svg
- File:Marcia per l'Imperatore - Rossini.ogg
- File:Dom Richard Williamson USML.jpg
- File:Coat of arms of Richard Williamson.svg
- File:Gran Marcia Trionfale.ogg
- File:Coat of Arms Papal States.svg
- File:Bandeira do Vaticano versão moderna.svg
- File:Dom José Mauro Guaxupé.png
- File:Servo de Deus Dom Inácio OFM.jpg
- File:Dom Antônio Augusto de Assis.jpg
- File:Brasão da Arquidiocese de Pouso Alegre.svg
- File:Brasão Diocese de Jaboticabal.svg
- File:Dom Ranulpho Guaxupé e Maceió.png
- File:Brasão da Diocese de Sete Lagoas.svg
- File:Brasão Diocese de Guaxupé.svg
- File:Brasão Dom Lanza.png
Yann (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The coat of arms, you can see that they are making corrections to the colors or the text and uploading the corrections. --RAN (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @RAN, not sure what you're saying here or understand why it challenges why Yann has nominated it. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- The coat of arms do not appear to be copyright violations, you can see that the uploader has made changes to the svg file and the components that make it up. --RAN (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Are recent coats of arms of current archbishops not copyrighted? What am I missing? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 22:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unless any argument arises ghat supports the CoA to be in the public domain.
- Are recent coats of arms of current archbishops not copyrighted? What am I missing? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 22:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete
- File:Marcia per l'Imperatore - Rossini.ogg while the composition may be public domain, this is a recording of a specific performance, which is almost certainly not.
- File:Gran Marcia Trionfale.ogg has no source, and is certainly not the uploader's own work.
- File:Dom José Mauro Guaxupé.png
- File:Servo de Deus Dom Inácio OFM.jpg
- File:Dom Antônio Augusto de Assis.jpg
- File:Dom Ranulpho Guaxupé e Maceió.png, the last 4 from the "Revista Centenário - Diocese de Guaxupé". Doubtful of the uploader's authorship.
Bastique ☎ let's talk! 22:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted per PCP. No evidence that the CoA are PD. --Krd 06:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)