Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![41 File:"Portrait de marocain au burnous" par Max Moreau.png](#File:"Portrait_de_marocain_au_burnous"_par_Max_Moreau.png){kind=link}
![70 File:ח"כ נירה שפק בנאום הבכורה שלה.jpg](#File:ח"כ_נירה_שפק_בנאום_הבכורה_שלה.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![106 File:Logo "El Rodeo".jpg](#File:Logo_"El_Rodeo".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
It belongs to me and I don't want it here Cdwell (talk) 04:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this to be used on KSI's infobox, however it was removed because it wasn't of high enough quality so I would like this to be deleted so I can find a better quality image to upload under this name. Xixse (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I can't find a copy of this image online, but all other seven uploads from this user were copyright violations, so this probably is as well. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: NETCOPYVIO. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Highly improbable that the Record TV Goiás holds the copyright of these images.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Perfektsionist (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Image appears at https://www.tabnak.ir/fa/news/377925/%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%87-%D8%AC%D8%B4%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85-%D9%81%D8%AC%D8%B1%DB%B2, the person standing behind has been photoshopped out. Original image is watermarked "Ⓒ TABNAK/Ali Alizadeh" Lord Belbury (talk) 15:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by 4nn1l2 at 18:46, 13 January 2022 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:رضا عطاران در جشنواره فیلم فجر ۱۳۹۹.jpg: Image appears at https://www.tabnak.ir/fa/news/377925/%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%87-%D8%AC%D8%B4%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85-%D9%81%D8%AC%D8%B1%DB%B2, the person standing behind has been photoshopped out. Original image is watermarked "Ⓒ TABNAK/Ali Alizadeh" --Krdbot 02:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
File page without file. Leonel Sohns 13:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works Polarlys (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright vio? Joschi71 (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 16:42, 18 January 2022 UTC: No permission since 10 January 2022 --Krdbot 20:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
YouTube account holder is not the author for this portrait, which is actually from other places; LR failed due to a non CC-BY license for YouTube video.
- File:Zeng Qinghong.jpg
- File:Kieu thach.jpg
- File:Nouhak Phoumsavanh.jpg
- File:Nguyenvanan.jpg
- File:Phankham viphavanh.jpg
- File:Phungquochien.jpg
- File:Nguyenducchung.jpg
- File:Le thi thu hang.jpg
- File:Nguyen duc hai.jpg
- File:Nguyen khac dinh.jpg
- File:Vanson.jpg
- File:Le Duc anh.jpg
- File:Truongmyhoa.jpg
- File:Tran thanh man.jpg
- File:Vothianhxuan.jpg
Stang★ 18:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
According to Scifinder, pseudoconhydrine (CAS#140-55-6), is (3S,6S)-6-propyl-3-piperidinol. This image has the wrong stereochemistry. File:Pseudoconhydrine.svg and File:(3S,6S)-(+)-Pseudoconhydrine Structural Formula V2.svg are correct versions. Innerstream (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
-(%2B)-Pseudoconhydrine_Structural_Formula_V2.svg){kind=link}
Delete per nom. Furthermore, low-quality GIF images should always get replaced by PNG or SVG versions. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Several lines render incorrectly (left and right reaction-arrows, and some C–C bonding in the central structure). Replaceable by File:Glucosone Degrad.jpg by same uploader. DMacks (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeethu.skariah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Source given is Google Images, with the explanation that they were "taken to conduct quiz in my church". COM:WEBHOST and all presumably copyrighted.
- File:Fruits of the spirit3.jpg
- File:Fruits of the spirit8.jpg
- File:Fruits of the spirit14.png
- File:Fruits of the spirit2.jpg
- File:Fruits of the spirit1.jpg
- File:Fruits of the spirit4.jpg
- File:Fruits of the spirit5.jpg
- File:Fruits of the spirit7.jpg
- File:Fruits of the spirit9.jpg
- File:Fruits of the spirit10.png
- File:Fruits of the spirit12.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 10:18, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope logos and screenshots, not used for any educational purpose
- File:Mobile view of ayedot previous version blogphins.png
- File:Ayedot previous name is Blogphins.png
- File:Front page of ayedot.png
- File:Ayedot Secondary logo with fit to border.png
- File:Ayedot black logo.png
- File:Ayedot company logo white.png
- File:Ayedot Secondary logo with fit to border with grey background.png
- File:Ayedot Secondary logo 2.png
- File:Ayedot publishing platform flat logo.png
- File:Ayedot publishing platform flat logo white.png
- File:Ayedot Secondary logo.png
- File:Ayedot second instagram post.png
- File:Ayedot's First Instagram post.png
- File:Ayedot small logo.png
- File:Ayedot twitter first post.png
- File:Ayedot twitter post.png
- File:Ayecircle.png
Yeeno (talk) 19:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Model Daphne Artemis asked, now, for image deletion because is a trans people and not a male. Bebeto maya (talk) 03:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jmelendez5025 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown author, no evidence of free license
- File:CZ 805 BREN A1.jpg
- File:FX-05 Xiuhcoatl.webp
- File:CZ 805 BREN.jpg
- File:Elementos del Ejército Mexicano.jpg
- File:M4A1 SOCOM.webp
Avron (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; see COM:L. and COM:permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nate Dunn
[edit]Not own works. Would it be possible that the paintings are the public domain (lack of notice, or copyright renewal)?
- File:"Abstract I" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Abstract II" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Abstract" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Bottle and Glasses" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Bridge Building" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Harbor Scene" by Nate Dunn, 1955.jpg
- File:"Pitcher and Fruit" by Nate Dunn, 1952.jpg
- File:"Still Life" by Nate Dunn, 1954.jpg
- File:"Street Scene" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"The Cove" (v.2) by Nate Dunn, 1959.jpg
- File:"The Cove" (v.3) by Nate Dunn, 1959.jpg
- File:"The Harbor" by Nate Dunn, 1957.jpg
- File:Dunn04.jpg
- File:Il fullxfull 237407084.jpg
_by_Nate_Dunn,_1959.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Nate_Dunn,_1959.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 11:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete If someone can established that a certain painting was published at some point, it might be possible to establish it is in the public domain. But if it was one of the 545 paintings that were auctioned off in 1983, according to w:Nate Dunn, they're going to be life+70, otherwise a complicated publishing history is going to need to be established.--Prosfilaes (talk) 05:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nate Dunn
[edit]See previous DR above.
Yann (talk) 20:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AleBetty56 (talk · contribs)
[edit]no evidence of free license
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Avron (talk) 19:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Not own work. 3 taken from a forum, other from the net. Copyvio
- File:Corvo atacameño.png
- File:Uniforme de oficial granadero 1878.jpg
- File:Oficial granaderos a caballo 1878.jpg
- File:1832 - 1843 granadero a caballo.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - lower res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Atacameño FAMAE.jpg here in 2016; File:FAMAE FN 750.jpg here (direct) in Feb 2021; etc.), user history of copyvios, etc. Duck/PRP.
Эlcobbola talk 19:11, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Another load of what is apparently COM:NETCOPYVIOs. I've already deleted a bunch where I could easily find the source online, this is the rest. As before: user history of copyvios. The files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
- File:Barrett M82.jpg4646.jpg
- File:Pistola chilena FAMAE.jpg
- File:FAMAE mini SAF.jpg
- File:FAMAE SAF.jpg
- File:FAMAE SG 540-1M.png
Rosenzweig τ 09:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it with the correct licensing information on Wikipedia. I apologize for the errors I made here. Addred85 (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:35, 30 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Album cover --Krdbot 19:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
low quality, spam, out of scope //LevandeMänniska (talk), 13:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Team 2 Sayul Brazil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, original picture is not released under public domain or free copyright licence. Billytanghh (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: apparently election map of an alternate history Enyavar (talk) 05:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: misused picture for alternate history elections (in NationStates) Enyavar (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Source of derivative work not specified since 22 December 2021. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
This image appears to be a photograph-of-photograph, a COM:Derivative work. Claimed from 2022, but dated 2017 in https://hawkeyesports.com/news/2017/01/21/iowa-mens-tennis-vs-creighton/ MKFI (talk) 10:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 00:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Hulged (talk) 07:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- In use in Wikidata. Shouldn't the Wikidata item be deleted before atempting to delete the image in Commons?--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Pere prlpz: Not in use now--Trade (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 00:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Hulged (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Hulged (talk) 07:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
No proof that the author owns the rights to that photo Trade (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- I own the right of this photo, I'm his manager. also I provided the link of the original URL of the photo. so there is no copyright issue. 131.255.4.108 11:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Okay, it is a LOW-quality image. Please delete it as soon as possible. Heterotrofo (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
No creo que este archivo sea trabajo propio. 191.126.37.241 00:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is there any reason like having found the same image elsewhere?--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work + poor quality upscalled image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Trabajo propio? 191.126.37.241 00:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Low quality, no EXIF data, likely copyright violation. A.Savin 01:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- It's not copyright violation. I'm sure, I made it by myself. Владимир Бурым (talk) 05:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Scope no 191.126.37.241 01:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unused, uncategorized, likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Scope no 191.126.37.241 01:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unused, uncategorized, likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data (probably scanned image). Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Not the original work of the uploader. No creator or date info. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
It's not the own work of the uploader. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![01:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/13#c-Nanahuatl-2022-01-13T01:28:00.000Z-File:"Portrait_de_marocain_au_burnous"_par_Max_Moreau.png){kind=link}
Deleted: copyright issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
![15:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/13#c-Christian_Ferrer-2022-02-05T15:14:00.000Z-File:"Portrait_de_marocain_au_burnous"_par_Max_Moreau.png){kind=link}
Cropped from an unidentified image. No EXIF data, possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - furthermore a photomontage. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused non-educational/personal/promotional logo. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Flag for the w:Isle of Man Civil Defence Corps, dubious own work claim. Also, unclear if this is actually freely licensed; appears to be derived from w:File:Isle of Man Civil Defence.tiff which is tagged as a non-free image. FASTILY 02:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Duplicated with File:UsnisaVijayaDharani.gif Stang★ 04:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: apparently election map of an alternate history Enyavar (talk) 05:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: apparently election map of an alternate history Enyavar (talk) 05:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: apparently election map of an alternate history (NationStates) Enyavar (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: misused picture for alternate history elections (in NationStates) Enyavar (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: misused picture for alternate history elections (in NationStates) Enyavar (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: misused picture for alternate history elections (in NationStates) Enyavar (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: fictional election map (for NationStates) Enyavar (talk) 05:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: Stuff about some fictional country (https://southambia.fandom.com/wiki/Southambia) Enyavar (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: Stuff about some fictional country (https://southambia.fandom.com/wiki/Southambia) Enyavar (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: Stuff about some fictional country (https://southambia.fandom.com/wiki/Southambia) Enyavar (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: Stuff about some fictional country (https://southambia.fandom.com/wiki/Southambia) Enyavar (talk) 05:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: Stuff about some fictional country (https://southambia.fandom.com/wiki/Southambia) Enyavar (talk) 05:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Scope: Stuff about some fictional country (https://southambia.fandom.com/wiki/Southambia) Enyavar (talk) 05:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 00:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Hulged (talk) 07:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep Enormous Efreet (talk) 20:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Por qué keep? Quién es? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.126.157.65 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
copyright infringement, blurry image Kotofey2016 (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Can be found on the Internet, and there is no proof that the uploader is the original creator of the file. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.uni-saarland.de/fakultaet/nt/professuren/professuren-visitenkarten/professuren-chemie-fr-81/prof-dr-alexander-titz.html 2A01:5241:658:800:0:0:0:BA99 06:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Der Autor und auch die Rechteinhaber des Bildes haben ihr Einverständnis gegeben, dieses Bild zur Verfügung zu stellen. Wir haben daher auch "HIPS/ Oliver Dietze" hinzugefügt. Wir würden es schätzen, wenn dieses Bild online bleiben könnte. Mathijs844 (talk) 07:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: insufficient permission, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation https://www.uni-saarland.de/fakultaet/nt/professuren/professuren-visitenkarten/professuren-pharmazie-fr-82/prof-dr-anna-k-h-hirsch.html 2A01:5241:658:800:0:0:0:BA99 06:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Der Autor und auch die Rechteinhaber des Bildes haben ihr Einverständnis gegeben, dieses Bild zur Verfügung zu stellen. Wir haben daher auch "HIPS/ Oliver Dietze" hinzugefügt. Es wäre zu schätzen, wenn dieses Bild online bleiben könnte. Mathijs844 (talk) 07:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: insufficient permission, needs COM:VRT from original photographer. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Olga Kalinina, Professorin für Wirkstoffbioinformatik an der Universität des Saarlandes.jpg
[edit]
copyright violation https://www.helmholtz-hzi.de/en/research/research-topics/anti-infectives/drug-bioinformatics/olga-kalinina/ 2A01:5241:658:800:0:0:0:BA99 06:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Der Autor und auch die Rechteinhaber des Bildes haben ihr Einverständnis gegeben, dieses Bild zur Verfügung zu stellen. Wir haben daher auch "HIPS/ Oliver Dietze" hinzugefügt. Es wäre zu schätzen, wenn dieses Bild online bleiben könnte. Mathijs844 (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: insufficient permission, needs COM:VRT from original photographer. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation https://www.uni-saarland.de/universitaet/aktuell/news/artikel/nr/22749.html 2A01:5241:658:800:0:0:0:BA99 06:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Der Autor und auch die Rechteinhaber des Bildes haben ihr Einverständnis gegeben, dieses Bild zur Verfügung zu stellen. Wir haben daher auch "HIPS/ Oliver Dietze" hinzugefügt. Es wäre zu schätzen, wenn dieses Bild online bleiben könnte. Mathijs844 (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: insufficient permission, needs COM:VRT from original photographer. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I searched it up on Duplichecker and found it here https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitoTfvVwFbQlaQSnwOvHIggCI6G8p4dYboInTKuT-asrTXLv-QRX_1ZNavlTrq8gbTZfQqOkmNRlsz8fCkkTnfiaNe6-XCb4LRH3gbjgLysxB3jDIZu5uc9laFizJ3kfoY8kZZzXDWc6vt4VAdb4aOmIuL_1eTsGrFQvhZ_18tTBob4br5ArxzCupG-DazR-2m2hRKbAj5HmNPnP6XTT-NLFHW6pxOOK7Ce8w2MNCBLkOJ_1-Wgm6Mel45jWJ6rMO9zVUR0BVtu51DcPPCHSCjwEKEDH5LaBci9z_12Zhz1Okg-NNWGObkdT_1FoUbEnYnbDHGLy9926fPqd1IBj5JC_1qKG5EewTc9A Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Most likely cropped from https://www.europlan-online.de/stedelijk-sportstadion/stadion-4387.html Achim55 (talk) 07:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
A photo taken by the official photographer of the Israeli parliament (as mentioned in the details of the file in Hebrew). It can not remain in the Commons without an appropriate OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 07:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![07:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/13#c-Ldorfman-2022-01-13T07:51:00.000Z-File:ח"כ_נירה_שפק_בנאום_הבכורה_שלה.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
![19:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/13#c-P199-2022-02-07T19:04:00.000Z-File:ח"כ_נירה_שפק_בנאום_הבכורה_שלה.jpg){kind=link}
author request Ibtihaj Alghamdi (talk) 08:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- After almost nine years? Wutsje 08:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
author request Ibtihaj Alghamdi (talk) 08:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- After almost nine years? Wutsje 08:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
please delete this post — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibtihaj Alghamdi (talk • contribs) 19:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Most taken from FB per MD, no meaningful exif, needs OTRS
- File:Land Navigation.jpg
- File:Pandemic Assistance with Food Distribution.jpg
- File:GSDF COVID-19 for Wikipedia 242585502 223234809848043 1619938147259998352 n.jpg
- File:GSDF- AR Ready to Serve - Vest for Brochure - (Original) (002) Wikiepedia.jpg
_(002)_Wikiepedia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Professional photo, no exif, unlikely to be own work. Published here in 2018 https://lift.erau.edu/shake-snow-globe-life/ - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
This is a selfie I took with a high end camera. I, Landon Ashworth, was the photographer and own the copyright. I’ve posted the image and have used the image in several places since I own the copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.173.238.151 (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No way of knowing if IP user or uploader is indeed the photographer, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Probably taken from https://thewocproject.org/team - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I don't think that this image was really created by the uploader. There is no indication that this files was ever published under a free licence. The emoji is also maybe copyrighted D-Kuru (talk) 08:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Solar eclipse of 2006 March 29
[edit]just random unintentional blurry shots
- File:KIF 2247 (3241362025).jpg
- File:KIF 2248 (3241364157).jpg
- File:KIF 2249 (3241366255).jpg
- File:KIF 2250 (3242201742).jpg
- File:P1020144 (3187089304).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Draceane talkcontrib. 09:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, yes, just random shutter presses. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Mass upload should be curated. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Found here before upload - https://twitter.com/Novara__1908/status/1376834803555794948/photo/1 - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Twitter message is dated 5:52 AM · Mar 30, 2021, upload to Commons was May 8, 2021. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
No information about the creator or the date. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
No selfie as claimed bu author is found in metadata - Ruben Timman - and has not given permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
blurry photo of (apparently commercial) map; unlikely to be own work Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sí. Ho pots esborrar. Gràcies Crespinell (talk) 16:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of unknown person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- also redirect file:Bandera de valencia de don juan.GIF
Incorrect coat of arms, we have correct CoA. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DERIV, the original Flickr description saying "the background image is NOT mine, I pulled it off google images" and giving no specific source. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Wrong picture, not my own work ! Voctir (talk) 10:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Unidentified image, single upload, not in use. Smooth O (talk) 10:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elentrerriano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Images available on-line on various sources.
- File:Barrio Parque en construcción, año 1928. .jpg
- File:Aerea foto hipodromo.jpg
- File:Foto aérea Hipódromo - Parque Independencia.jpg
- File:Barrio parque 5.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 10:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
picture taken here: https://www.diocesicatanzarosquillace.it/arcivescovo/index.htm Almàr23 (talk) 10:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work: picture of a modern artwork by a living artist. VRT permission from Solange Pessoa needed. MKFI (talk) 10:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author Tom Cogill www.tomcogill.com Copyright holder copyright Tom Cogill". VRT permission from Tom Cogill needed. MKFI (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. MKFI (talk) 11:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PEproduction (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images taken from Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=123900859746900&set=ecnf.100063809582998, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=290178346452483&set=a.123679549769031), band website (https://f4.bcbits.com/img/0024222608_10.jpg) or previously published (https://open.spotify.com/artist/0cqr8fRghJnj2U05qX7Qgc). @PEproduction: if you have permission to publish these please send verification to VRT.
- File:Patriks Peterson portrait.jpg
- File:Petersons Band.jpg
- File:Ivars Pētersons.png
- File:Patriks Peterson.jpg
MKFI (talk) 11:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author Shao Dan Cen Copyright holder @ShaoDanCen2015". VRT permission from Shao Dan Cen needed.
MKFI (talk) 11:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Gikü (talk) 11:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
No evidence that uploader was authorised by copyright holder. RJFF (talk) 11:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, the license (CC BY-SA 4.0) is displayed on this official page: https://helenethouy2022.fr/portrait/ Vlavv (talk) 13:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I was not aware of that license. I withdraw my deletion request. --RJFF (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Collection of personal photos and Facebook screenshots. Not in use.
- File:Busqueda.jpg
- File:TIC.CAPTURA.3.png
- File:TIC.2.png
- File:CapturaTIC.png
- File:Trabajoenelaulaconnet.jpg
- File:Usodenet.jpg
- File:Trabajoenelaula.jpg
- File:S4l4prof3sor3s.jpg
- File:Chicosenronda.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment I speedy deleted 3 files. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
No evidence that it is under Creative Commons. Erick Soares3 (talk) 12:25, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Old Indian movie poster, not own work. Higher res and colour at https://in.pinterest.com/pin/746823550706370335/?d=t&mt=login Lord Belbury (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
1970s movie poster (https://www.justwatch.com/in/movie/daana-veera-sura-karna), not own work. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Home movie (?) poster featuring a copyrighted Pokemon character. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete likely a copyvio and also blatant advertising (see uploader's contribs at enwiki). JavaHurricane 09:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![12:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/13#c-Taivo-2022-01-13T12:47:00.000Z-File:Logo_"El_Rodeo".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
![19:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/13#c-P199-2022-02-07T19:27:00.000Z-File:Logo_"El_Rodeo".jpg){kind=link}
Low-quality low-resolution icon, unclear purpose and source. Users other uploads were copyright violations taken from web pages, so this may also be. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 04:06, 14 January 2022, by Túrelio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
The photo belongs to Russian TV channel but there's no evidence of the copyright holder's permission to the uploader to release this under CC BY-SA. Other uploads of the same uploader worth checking too. Tatewaki (talk) 13:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello photo doesn't belong to Russian TV. Photo from Photosession of Isa Bagirov. I have Full notarial permission to this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrTaghizade (talk • contribs) 07:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, the editor above me (looks like) is claiming to have taken the picture himself, which if it's true shows potential undisclosed paid editing. - Kevo327 (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- a duplicate file with the same issues uploaded by same editor. - Kevo327 (talk) 17:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: both versions, per nomination. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Leonel Sohns 13:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unclear copyright. Would require permission to COM:VRT as well. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Leonel Sohns 13:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Contains a source name "ORBO" in lower left. No other info about source of this attractive animated file. Search yields https://giphy.com/explore/orbo-trolling which is likely the source. Downtowngal (talk) 13:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
The uploader of the file does not own it. The person in the photo is Senator Steven Armstrong from Metal Gear Rising Revengeance (which also does not take place in 1974). It is a clear violation of copyright. InPursuitOfAMorePerfectUnion (talk) 14:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - copyrighted video game character. Yeeno (talk) 19:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jiangzemin1.jpg, copyvio. Stang★ 14:25, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copyright violation: illustrator died in 1955 DanielleJWiki (talk) 14:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- But it was first published in United States before 1927. Borysk5 (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 14:57, 13 January 2022, by Ellin Beltz (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
image is from Instagram and commons includes note that copyright held by mew which user is not Slywriter (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Albut cover [1]. COM:OTRS is required. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Song cover. COM:OTRS is required. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Song cover art [2] COM:OTRS is required. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Song cover art [3] Published before. COM:OTRS is required. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:25, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lolito1111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:Captura de pantalla de 2020-09-29 17-01-27.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de 2020-09-29 17-22-19.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
This picture is from an album cover (https://www.amazon.it/Anton-Bruckner-Symphony-No-7/dp/B007WB5DAW). Kcx36 (talk) 16:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kufer-Q Forte (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Captura de Pantalla 2020-11-29 a la(s) 20.37.11.png
- File:Captura de Pantalla 2020-11-29 a la(s) 20.57.28.png
- File:Captura de Pantalla 2020-11-29 a la(s) 20.56.34.png
_20.37.11.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_20.57.28.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_20.56.34.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
crop of File:Mrs. Marshall McLean 4351606578 6e524c959c o.jpg Downtowngal (talk) 16:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not a valid reason for deleting an image that has been released into the public domain by the LOC. --RAN (talk) 18:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused music score. Should be in Score or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Scan? Urheber ist nicht der Fotograf Dirk Lenke (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
out of the project's scope (fake movie poster, not useful) Rojelio (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
All files marked with * can be found using TinEye and/or GoogleImages before being uploaded here. The files not marked with * can't be found this way, but also are of low resolution, unsual perpective (mostly aerial fotos) and without proper EXIF. The only four files created from a NOKIA X6-00 – most likely by the author – are not listed here.
- File:Typiical nepali house.jpg
- File:Traditional farming of nepal.jpg
- File:Tallest lord shiva stacheu.jpg *
- File:Taal barahi fewa lake.jpg *
- File:Se phoksundo1.jpg *
- File:Se phoksundo.jpg
- File:Marsyandi.jpg
- File:Machapucchare.jpg *
- File:Lumbini.jpg *
- File:Macchaphure from my home.jpg *
- File:Lukla air port.jpg
- File:Khaptad national park.jpg
- File:Kagbeni mustang.jpg *
- File:Elephant and rhino.jpg *
- File:Beautiful hilly town.jpg *
- File:Durbar square.jpg
- File:Gangapurna Lake.jpg *
Polarlys (talk) 17:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
This file is dated as being published before 1927 in the upload info, but that is impossible for two reasons: this (iffy reliability) source dates it to the 1930s, and the Columbus statue it depicts wasn't even put up until 1934. So it has to have been created after that, and is therefore likely still copyrighted and I don't think we can just assume it wasn't renewed. Eddie891 (talk) 17:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Cipreses de Oreamuno.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Debería quitarse el archivo del Escudo de Cabeza del Bue porque no es el correcto ni el oficial BIBLIOTECA CABEZA DEL BUEY (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. You can upload correct version first. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
unreadible blurry map; poor description; no educational use possible Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Low quality portrait, unlikely own-work Stang★ 18:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Modern painting from some self-taught person, not famous painter. Ugly. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Wikipedia isn't a hosting for hobby artworks. Shakko (talk) 19:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Commons:Project scope makes no distinction between whether a file is made by a famous or non-famous creator. "Ugly" is a personal opinion which has no bearing on a deletions debate. Et0048 (talk) 06:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope logos, not used on any projects
- File:Aact logo.jpg
- File:ATAV.png
- File:Guidance Tamil Nadu Logo.png
- File:Guidance Tamil Nadu.jpg
- File:KazeLoon Records & K.D Lean Inc. Logo 2.jpg
- File:KazeLoon Records & K.D Lean Inc. Logo.jpg
- File:Kraschau background.jpg
Yeeno (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Subjective, unsourced example Yeeno (talk) 19:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Plain text PDFs, out of project scope.
Achim55 (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
False license, image from Instagram account מתקןמחשב (talk) 20:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:(ISC)² logo (vectorized).svg. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 20:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
%C2%B2_logo_(vectorized).svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Per EXIF photo comes from Facebook; better sourcing and proof of permission are needed. Gikü (talk) 20:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Uploader did not provide Flickr link, but Flickr source is here where it is cc-by-sa 2.0. This is, however, Flickrwashing as the image was here in 2019, well before 2020 Flickr upload. Image is also low res, has no EXIF, and Flickr stream has other blatant copyvios (e.g., this is here, etc.) Duck/PRP. Эlcobbola talk 20:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete An even older link at https://www.hawtcelebs.com/autumn-falls-at-avn-awards-nominations-announcement-in-hollywood-11-21-2019/ at a site that aggregates agency/papparazzi/award show photos. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 20:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raul rotaru 1992 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvio. Recent artwork of living artist ro:Cristina Machedonski.
- File:Maria tanasr paint by Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Fata de la tara by Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Tarancuta by Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Wings by Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Red woman by Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Bird paint by Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Angel painting Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Debut Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Blu eyes Machedonski Cristina.jpg
- File:Paint Cristina Machedonski.jpg
Gikü (talk) 20:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
This drawing appears to be a derivative work (reflected, then traced over) of non-free iStock/Getty Images rights-controlled image (ID #494642696) by Frank Ramspott (see EXIF). —RP88 (talk) 20:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Info The original uploader of this image subsequently added a redundant nomination for deletion with the following comment:
- I interpret this action as a vote for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Isepstudyabroad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:ISEP Green Logo.jpg
- File:ISEP Study Abroad Yellow Logo.jpg
- File:ISEP Study Abroad Sky Blue Logo.jpg
- File:ISEP Study Abroad Red Logo.jpg
- File:ISEP Study Abroad Indigo Logo.jpg
- File:ISEP Study Abroad Teal Logo.jpg
- File:ISEP Study Abroad Orange Logo.jpg
- File:ISEP Logo True Blue.jpg
mattbr 20:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
duplicate (File:Istanbul Turkey 1966 (51192080241).jpg) Jelican9 (talk) 20:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep this file, Delete File:Istanbul Turkey 1966 (51192080241).jpg which was uploaded later. -M.nelson (talk) 10:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: already redirected on 7 February 2022 by JuTa. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate: (File:66-034 Istanbul Turkey 1966.jpg) Jelican9 (talk) 20:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Taken from this site. Obviously some US Congress related publication. Clear evidence that this image falls under some PD-USGov regulation remains unclear. Mosbatho (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
picture grabbed from the official Partizani website or official social media. partizani.al is copyright protected. I wasn't able to find the pic, but it could be this game with identical Gjoka and Pepsi ads in the background https://www.partizani.al/sq/portfolio/fk-partizani-2-0-kf-vllaznia/ Albinfo (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Mispelled, the correct and current is: Category:Matches of Copa Conmebol Libertadores - Fma12 (talk) 21:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Self promo Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
No practical use other than self promotion. The user had only shown interest for the article of this artist.. MexTDT (talk) 22:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
No practical use other than self promotion; most likely a self portrait as well. The user had only shown interest for the article of this artist MexTDT (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
personal artwork, no educational use for commons Joschi71 (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
User has a history of uploading photos as "own work" when they are clearly not, resulting in a CCI on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Yprpyqp).
Obviously it's doubtful that OP painted this image. It appears to be PD-old/PD-art, but I can't find any details about any source image - a title, a painter, a date, an era even. I cannot for the life of me find an original source for the digital image, and I have tried every reverse image search technique that I can. At this point I consider it impossible to verify if it actually is PD-old - for all we know this is a detailed replica-in-style created in the modern era. Since background detail is unavailable, the only option is to delete as unverifiable. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 13:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment the style looks very similar to that of a series called "The Return Herald" (出警图) painted during the reign of the Jiajing Emperor of the Ming Dynasty, an example could be found here. In fact it looks eerily similar to this image. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 15:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- It's definitely a crop of the lower boat in that second image, so as long as you're satisfied that that's a real PD Chinese painting, I'm happy to withdraw this (although our version appears lower-quality by comparison). Premeditated Chaos (talk) 03:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted false license, false authorship, false license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
User has a history of uploading photos as "own work" when they are clearly not, resulting in a CCI on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Yprpyqp).
Actually, I found the source here, the caption of which calls the ship in the image "this merchant junk" - which means it isn't in fact an image of one of Koxinga's ships, and we've been misleading the entire internet for close to five years on this. Great! Premeditated Chaos (talk) 13:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
User has a history of uploading photos as "own work" when they are clearly not, resulting in a CCI on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Yprpyqp). Obviously it's doubtful that OP created or painted the original image. It appears to be PD-old/PD-art, but I can't find any details about any source image - a title, a painter, a date, an era even. I cannot even find an original source for the digital image, and I have tried regular search, reverse image search, and picking through the Great Ming Military blog that OP used as a source for many of his uploads. At this point I consider it impossible to verify if it actually is PD-old - for all we know this is a detailed replica-in-style created in the modern era. Since background detail is unavailable, the only option is to delete as unverifiable. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 13:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted false license, false claims of authorship, source, date; true source not identified. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
User has a history of uploading photos as "own work" when they are clearly not, resulting in a CCI on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Yprpyqp). Obviously it's doubtful that OP created or painted the original image. It appears to be PD-old/PD-art, but I can't find any details about any source image - a title, a painter, a date, an era even. I cannot even find an original source for the digital image, and I have tried regular search, reverse image search, and picking through the Great Ming Military blog that OP used as a source for many of his uploads. At this point I consider it impossible to verify if it actually is PD-old - for all we know this is a detailed replica-in-style created in the modern era. Since background detail is unavailable, the only option is to delete as unverifiable. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 13:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted False license and info; true source not identified. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio? Missvain (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- All I know is the guy who deleted the similar photo of the Beholder statue for copyright violation had no issues with this picture. I assume it is because the inclusion of someone "feeding" the dragon a cheeseburger means this is not a "slavish reproduction" and qualifies as an original work. 173.30.185.103 13:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted COM:DW. Reproduces modern artwork, no FOP in US; work clearly focus of photo, not incidental. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bretbmorgan (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of the user's other uploads were seller submitted photographs on bringatrailer.com. These appear to be the same as well, though I can't find them on the site.
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am that seller on bringatrailer. These are my photos. Bretbmorgan (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- My username is "buy." The 560SL image was an unused one from this listing: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1988-mercedes-benz-560sl-164/
- The 318i and F150 I did not sell on bringatrailer. Bretbmorgan (talk) 21:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:1988 560SL.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022012410000358. —MdsShakil (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:1988 560SL.jpg” under ticket:2022012410000358. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:1984 318i.jpg” under ticket:2022012410000358. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:1986 F-150.jpg” under ticket:2022012410000358. --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept as permission has been verified. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Castrowikis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with inconsistent EXIF data (FB or transmission code, one credits "Author Arthur Marques N Pereira").
- File:Almenara.jpg
- File:ComercinhoIgreja.jpg
- File:PontodosVolantesentrada.jpg
- File:ItingaMGpraça.jpg
- File:Dr Jean Freire.jpg
- File:Ale silva foto.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F5 GerritR (talk) 21:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Schnelllöschantrag in regulären LA umgewandelt, weil die Datei häufig verwendet wird. Löschung sollte daher mit der nötigen Überlegung angegangen werden, falls erforderlich.--GerritR (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, from someone else. (non-admin closure)--Kadı (talk) 08:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
seems to be a publicity photo from the 1940s, presumably from that year because she appears young here
I don't believe this image is in the public domain, considering this level of uncertainty regarding origin and date. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 14:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep She died more than 25 years ago PD-Spain-photo would still cover her image even if you do not believe that she is in her 20s in the image. --RAN (talk) 13:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sai Pallavi
[edit]Blatant Flickrwashing - image was here prior to upload to Flickr and (crude) use of the clone tool to remove watermarks is clear on the Commons version (see, for example, the blurry strip along the bottom of the image)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 14:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
unknown year of the photographer's death Friedolf (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment We have another image of the same subject by the same photographer in File:Hermann Göring - Röhr.jpg whose source claims it to be in the public domain.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- When I uploaded the photo, I assumed that he died during the big air raid on Magdeburg when his atelier was completely destroyed. But now I know that he was still alive in 1961 (see Google Books snippets). --Friedolf (talk) 02:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Further information: Robert Egbert Röhr was born in Bromberg on 14 December 1882. In the beginning of 1948, Röhr fled from Magdeburg to Altdorf bei Nürnberg, where he opened a photographic studio at Marktplatz 21. The linked address book is dated from 1 January 1961 (see Google Books snippet). --Friedolf (talk) 13:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Accd. to a note of User Friedolf at de.wp, which I consider to be reliable, the professional photographers' guild of Middle Franconia says that Röhr died on February 19, 1964. So his works are still protected in Germany until the end of 2034. This file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 11:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused file, use the SVG File:Royal Standard of Lesotho.svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- The existence of better SVG files is no valid reason for deletion, even when the so called superseeded files are unused in Wikimedia projects. I've learned this lession already with "superseeded" coats of arms of municipalities in Germany. Such files could be useful elsewhere.--GerritR (talk) 21:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per GerritR. --Rosenzweig τ 17:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ColorfulSmoke as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: There's a SVG version available. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC). Previously kept at DR, converting. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We should keep both, the only way to detect errors, is to compare the two, sometimes there are subtle color changes. --RAN (talk) 02:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no new/other reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
https://vk.com/wall-32987137_96731 copyright infringement Kotofey2016 (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Оригинал фото в бумажном носителе, публикуемый материал и фото в указанной ссылке взят и опубликован сотрудником организации. Мне также разрешено публиковать и размещать эти фотографии Понтий Пила73 (talk) 11:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- ̈ Уважаемый коллега, конечно, я верю, что у Вас есть все нужные разрешения. Но другие люди никак не могут в этом убедиться, никак не могут полагаться на Ваши слова, особенно если возникнут проблемы. Поэтому я прошу Вас обратиться в службу VRTS. Написав туда по электронной почте, Вы сможете прислать документы, которые подтвердят все разрешения, права и законность действий Вашей организации. Согласитесь, не зная этих подробностей, трудно быть уверенным в том, что всё законно, всё в порядке. Итак, присылайте документы, подтверждайте Ваши права. Kotofey2016 (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
User has a history of uploading photos as "own work" when they are clearly not, resulting in a CCI on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Yprpyqp). Obviously it's doubtful that OP created or painted the original image. It appears to be PD-old/PD-art, but I can't find any details about any source image - a title, a painter, a date, an era even. I cannot even find an original source for the digital image, and I have tried regular search, reverse image search, and picking through the Great Ming Military blog that OP used as a source for many of his uploads. At this point I consider it impossible to verify if it actually is PD-old - for all we know this is a detailed replica-in-style created in the modern era. Since background detail is unavailable, the only option is to delete as unverifiable. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 13:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Only the entire postcard is in the public domain. — Redboston 05:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Per {{PD-RU-exempt}}:"This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps.". --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Amera Tower (talk · contribs)
[edit]Recent building (built 1979, renovated 2020). No FOP in Romania.
- File:Amera3.jpg
- File:Amera 1.jpg
- File:Clădirea înaintea de renovări.jpg
- File:Clădire.jpg
- File:Nutrex SA.jpg
Gikü (talk) 11:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amera Tower (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:HOST. We should not welcome companies promoting their products here.
Gikü (talk) 11:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and copyvios. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Content farm source, unlikely released by "浙江卫视" on YouTube under CC license. Stang★ 13:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rohalamin as Dw no source since (dw no source since) 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in COM:IRAN. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep copyright in both authors and sources has been onserved. Bakhtiar Samadi photograpger and Masud Rahimi sculptor have been mentioned.. Thank you
@4nn1l2: Thank you for your help.. حمیدنوذری (talk) 02:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Do you have any valid source that show us this has been made in 1990? Rohalamin (talk) 07:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Rohalamin:you said just authors and sources are needed and I thought date is not part of copyright....anyway about date I'm sure because Saqqez is my hometown. any information needed is on the saqqez municipaly official website:http://saqqez.ir
- also by searching in google, It is easily possible to get any information we like .. حمیدنوذری (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Where did I say just authors and sources are needed?
- I'm not going to google it or dig the municipaly website. You have to find 'em and show us. Rohalamin (talk) 05:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I think the license is right. thanksArashbara (talk) 20:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep While no idea why the original author chose a different CC license from Farsnews, the statue is just free licensed, if this isn't enough, we may hope the author send a VRT mail to show their determination on free licensing. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete While the CC lisense tag for the photo as such appears to be ok, I don't understand why the file also has a {{cc-by-sa-3.0|Masud Rahimi}} tag for the sculptor/the sculpture. Is the sculpture under a CC license? I didn't see any evidence for that. Or is the sculpture somehow meant to be covered by a {{PD-Iran}} tag? The only case remotely applicable for that, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iran, would be "In cases where the work belongs to a legal personality or rights are transferred to a legal personality, it will go into the public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation (Article 16)." It is said that the sculpture was made "in 1990 ordered by Saqqez municipality". Is that meant to imply that the municipality held a copyright for this sculpture and that this copyright has now expired after 30 years? If so, I'd want more evidence for that. If no evidence to this effect is presented, the file should be deleted because there is no freedom of panorama in Iran as already mentioned. --Rosenzweig τ 16:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Although the photo itself is freely licensed, there is no freedom of panorama in Iran per COM:FOP Iran. @حمیدنوذری: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the sculpturer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 08:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Not sure if this logo is above TOO in Cuba. There is no such information page on commonswiki so this is just a suspicion. Stang★ 19:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: On the guidelines of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba it is not described whether this country has copyright laws that define a threshold of originality to show which images are not protected by copyright due to their simple design. In addition it is not shown per COM:EVID that the used licensing template, Template:PD-Cuba is valid in this case. Consequently, this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 08:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
el escudo no es el correcto y se requiere su eliminacion ya que no es el oficial expedido por la Alcaldia Municiipal de Gachala Cundinamarca Capinillag (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- si, no es el escudo de Gachalá y wikipedia deberia borrarlo de inmediato porque esta generando errores en la parte publicitaria de la alcaldia 190.13.83.222 16:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 08:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Esta página debe ser borrada da que está causando conflictos con la imagen original -user2007-27 (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not a good rationale for deletion. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
sourced to devianart but seems to be based on a WarThunder screenshot, see [4], The small structure is a massive indicator for derivative work, imagine the camera position moved in front and below the tank and the real source becomes obvious Denniss (talk) 23:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![[4]](https://de.warthunder.info/index.php?title=Datei:Pz_III_N_Garage.jpg){kind=link}
- Weak keep, both are based on real tanks, utilitarian articles. The same tank may have been photographed from multiple angles and elevations. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Even including the exact same scratches and dents? --Rosenzweig τ 00:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- A very strange argument for a keep vote. so any ship/aircraft/tank/whatever can be copied from games if they are based on real existing things? --Denniss (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Is it possible to get the exact shot from the game, or a very similar one? --Ganímedes (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- A very strange argument for a keep vote. so any ship/aircraft/tank/whatever can be copied from games if they are based on real existing things? --Denniss (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Even including the exact same scratches and dents? --Rosenzweig τ 00:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Permission to use this image has been given per ticket:2019040610003952 by Marcus Burns, user who uploaded the image on the source website [5]. On the source, Marcus Burns states "Created on Blender - modelling & texturing time: 4 days". Ellywa (talk) 11:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what it says at Deviantart. The question is: Is it true? --Rosenzweig τ 12:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- In any case, the VRT agent added the permission to the file page. How far do you go doubting the honesty of people. Thats rather a philosofical question. Ellywa (talk) 14:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Image is far to similar to the game screenshot to believe the original authorship claim from the devianart user. --Denniss (talk) 15:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Clearly the agent act in good faith. No one can argue that. But the source... it's a different matter. I find the file too similar to the game picture. However, it's not exact the same, and that is why I was requesting a screenshot in the same angle, if such thing it's possible. --Ganímedes (talk) 10:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Image is far to similar to the game screenshot to believe the original authorship claim from the devianart user. --Denniss (talk) 15:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- In any case, the VRT agent added the permission to the file page. How far do you go doubting the honesty of people. Thats rather a philosofical question. Ellywa (talk) 14:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what it says at Deviantart. The question is: Is it true? --Rosenzweig τ 12:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per discussion. Highly likely that the user who gave permission took the original from a game screenprint. Deleted per COM:PRP, serious doubt. --Ellywa (talk) 13:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Leonel Sohns 13:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unclear copyright. Would require permission to COM:VRT as well. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 22:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
