Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/05/30
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Back of someone! Scope? 186.174.91.156 01:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Who is he? 186.174.91.156 01:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:Penis? 186.174.91.156 01:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t think so. The image does not even show a penis. Brianjd (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:OOS then. A picture without a penis? What does it serve? Delete it. 186.174.91.156 03:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would also be inclined to delete, but deletion should be done for the right reason. Brianjd (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:OOS then. A picture without a penis? What does it serve? Delete it. 186.174.91.156 03:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is part of a large set of deletion requests. All of them have different rationales as written, but it seems that they really have the same rationale: Non-educational, personal photo of non-notable person. Next time, consider creating a mass deletion request. Brianjd (talk) 04:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Human back? 186.174.91.156 01:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
What about him? 186.174.91.156 01:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Glasses in scope? 186.174.91.156 01:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Men smiling with teeth? 186.174.91.156 01:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Very much out of scope. If he's a user I'm Jimbo. 191.126.44.131 03:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-user 186.174.91.156 01:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Is this an F10? 186.174.91.156 01:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Scratching one's head, is it in scope? 186.174.91.156 01:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
What about him? What is he doing? 186.174.91.156 01:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:Selfie 186.174.91.156 01:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Elevator selfie 186.174.91.156 01:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. Nor in scope. 186.174.91.156 01:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Is this an F10? 186.174.91.156 01:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1, actually. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Is he someone in scope? 186.174.91.156 02:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Some spam Dronebogus (talk) 04:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Wrong file Norsharin (talk) 05:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
versehentlich falsche Datei hochgeladen Sabine Lott (talk) 10:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Misunderstanding of rights Nvntivs (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Ajanamabhdjd 204.82.145.86 12:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 14:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I accidentally created these subtitles when they were meant to be put into another file. Colohisto (talk) 02:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Colohisto: I am confused. Is it enough to rename this file instead of deleting it? Brianjd (talk) 04:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I accidentally put the TimedText here when I meant to put in File:Voyager Golden Record - Greetings In 55 Languages.mp3, is it possible to delete the TimedText for this file? Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 04:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Colohisto: I would have thought you could just rename (or request a rename) to TimedText:Voyager Golden Record - Greetings In 55 Languages.mp3.en.srt. But I see that you already created the latter file. So: Delete. Brianjd (talk) 04:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I accidentally put the TimedText here when I meant to put in File:Voyager Golden Record - Greetings In 55 Languages.mp3, is it possible to delete the TimedText for this file? Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 04:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per G1/G7. -- CptViraj (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I created this page erroneously, when I wanted to link to the Category:NGC_559 yesterday. Now I've corrected my mistake and this page is meaningless. Kliojünger (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per G1/G7. -- CptViraj (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted in UK, per COM:UK#Known author ({{c|Walter Stoneman Yann (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted in UK, per COM:UK#Known author ({{c|Walter Stoneman Yann (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Where is the evidence that this license is valid? Yann (talk) 19:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: OK. --Yann (talk) 22:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Raymond as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no Freedom of Panorama inside churches. The artist Gerhard Richter is living Yann (talk) 20:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- FoP issues require a regular DR. Yann (talk) 20:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader agrees. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This file is a derivative work of a copyrighted Microsoft icon, see en:File:Clippy-letter.PNG. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I can delete it in a way that matters (speedy delete, copyvio). --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Is this a free file? 186.174.91.156 02:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This file is a screenshot from a Scooby Doo DVD extra, it is copyrighted and not free to use. As seen here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KaH2-x5C28&t=460s MrJoeytheMusicMan (talk) 21:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 21:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC); edited: 22:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Подмосковные вечера
[edit]- File:Vitaly Solomin 2002-1.jpg
- File:Vladimir Steklov 2003.jpg
- File:Aristarkh Livanov 2002.jpg
- File:Semyon Altov 2003.jpg
- File:Elena Kamburova 2002.jpg
- File:Oleg Pogudin 2002.jpg
- File:Vyacheslav Malezhik 2001.jpg
- File:Alexander Malinin 2003.jpg
- File:Ludmila Kasatkina 2002.jpg
- File:Igor Bochkin 2002.jpg
- File:Anastasiya Melnikova 2002.jpg
- File:Sergey Trofimov 2002.jpg
- File:Vitaly Solomin 2002.jpg
- File:Elena Proklova 2002.jpg
- File:Larisa Udovichenko 2001.jpg
- File:Sergey Zakharov 2003.jpg
- File:Inna Ulyanova 2002.jpg
Каким образом канал YouTube, созданный в 2018 году в США, владеет авторскими правами на телевизионную передачу 2001—2003 годов? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
uploaded as own work, but sure looks like a promotional image for a product. Only use was on a now-deleted spam page on en.wp. Just Step Sideways (talk) 20:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've discovered the source and renominated it as a copyright violation. Just Step Sideways (talk) 20:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Is she in scope? 186.174.91.156 02:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reason as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Evita being arrested.webp. Brianjd (talk) 04:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
What's this? 186.174.91.156 02:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Was used in a draft enwiki article, but that draft has been courtesy blanked and is tagged for deletion as an attack article. A quick web search reveals no reliable sources for this subject. Brianjd (talk) 04:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete Taken from https://www.facebook.com/samschicken.EastCroydon/ (the restaurant itself), and not the work of the uploader. No indication at the source that the image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 13:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Aashaa (talk) 03:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
screenshot of some random web site. Pure advertisement, no encyclopedic value, etc. F (talk) 05:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: aleady deleted by Ymblanter. --Rosenzweig τ 10:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Want to upload new one Jecycc (talk) 07:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright Očiglednica (talk) 08:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
copyright Očiglednica (talk) 08:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright Očiglednica (talk) 08:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ооржак Сегил (talk) 10:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Rosenzweig τ 10:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée Aimeabibis (talk) 17:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée Aimeabibis (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please delete asap these persons never gave their authorisation for the photo to be uploaded on commons.Nattes à chat (talk) Nattes à chat (talk) 21:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée Aimeabibis (talk) 17:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please delete ASAP there is a person wearing a red necklace to indicate they do not want to be photographed Nattes à chat (talk) Nattes à chat (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée Aimeabibis (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Source website says all rights reserved. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- E' un'annosa questione quella delle fotografie di organi a canne. L'organo è un oggetto inanimato, immobile, molto spesso immutabile, non cambia aspetto, come ad esempio l'uomo, con il passare degli anni, la natura intorno a lui non cambia con il trascorrere delle stagioni o con il cambiamento del tempo meteo. Fotografare un bambino di 5 anni in un bosco d'estate e ripetere lo scatto 30 anni dopo, nello stesso punto, d'inverno, produce due foto completamente diverse. 1000 persone che fotografano un quadro, una statua, un palazzo, un organo a canne...fanno 1000 foto simili. Le fotografie che noi "contributori volontari" pubblichiamo, spesso sono nostre opere, ma anche molti organisti, organari, musicofili, appassionati in genere ce le inviano da tutta Europa. E' impossibile risalire all'originalità dello scatto e comunque sarebbe un lavoro improbo richiedere paternità dell'esecuzione, liberatorie, iscrizione a Wiki Commons, se la foto è stata presa da siti, se già pubblicata o ceduta da terzi ecc. DISPOSIZIONI FONCIHE DI ORGANI A CANNE è un wikilibro internazionale, anche se quasi tutto italiano, l'area geografica di lavoro è enorme, non è una Diocesi o una Provincia. La pubblicazione vuole SOLO fare divulgazione, essere una veloce rubrica che rimanda sempre con "Altri progetti" o "Collegamenti esterni" per avere notizie più dettagliate. Wikipedia non ci aiuta in questo,se fosse possibile scrivere solo CHI l'ha scattata o scrivere il link da dove proviene la foto, saremmo molto facilitati nella compilazione del format di caricamento. Lo scatto in questione mi è stato donato dalla "Bottega Pinchi". Momimariani1962 (talk) 21:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- No, non quella "degli organi a canne", l'annosa questione è quella di chi non ha ancora compreso che qui, su Commons, ci possono stare solo immagini dal copyright certamente consono al progetto, che permette il riutilizzo del materiale anche per fini commerciali. Se hai la passione per lo strumento immagino che tu abbia la passione anche per la musica che vi viene suonata, ecco quindi che puoi accedere all'esempio perfetto, un brano musicale per organo composto da un musicista contemporaneo trascritto e venduto da terzi per ricavarci un profitto: ovviamente è violazione di copyright, violazione di un'espressione artistica dell'autore, e in cosa sarebbe diverso9 dallo scatto di una foto dove è evidente la volontà di inquadrare il soggetto, attendendo la giusta luce, lavorando in postproduzione per esaltarne colori e messaggio visivo? Tu stesso ammetti che ti è stata concessa (hai scritto donata) dalla "Bottega Pinchi", bene, esiste un modo che comnceda la liberatoria di ogni immagine che provenga da quella fonte, si prendono la responsabilità di assegnare alle immagini una licenza compatibile (ad esempio la cc-by-sa) consapevoli del fatto che poi se un loro scatto si trova su una pubblicazione sugli organi d'Italia che si compera per, ipotesi, 50 € loro non hanno alcuna possibilità legale di chiedere un compenso. Se questo non è ben definito o ben definibile è presunta violazione di copyright fino a proba contraria, piaccia o non piaccia, punto, non c'è da discuterne c'è solo da prenderne atto. Concludo, se ci tieni, ed è nobnile che tu lo faccia, perché mai non ti armi di pazienza e fotocamera andando tu stesso a scattare foto degli strumenti?--Threecharlie (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Buongiorno Threecharlie, premetto che il progetto https://it.wikibooks.org/wiki/Disposizioni_foniche_di_organi_a_canne, dove vengono messe a disposizione della comunità le disposizioni stesse e gli scatti, NON E' MIO, l'ho trovato già in rete e vi contribuisco volontariamente e gratuitamente, come è lo stesso wikilibro, gratuito. Tali informazioni sono quasi sempre reperite da noi stessi contributori con fotocamera e pazienza, come già espresso varie volte. Accade anche che alcune foto mancanti dalle relative disposizioni, ci vengano direttamente inviate senza specificare chi sia l'autore, o tratte, dagli organari, dai loro siti, o reperite sul web (articoli giornalistici, Facebook, progetti Wikipedia ecc.) o altro. Sottolineo che TUTTE le foto necessitano di ritaglio ed ottimizzazione, non sono quindi MAI identiche all'originale. Puoi facilmente immaginare quale impegno e disturbo può incontrare un donatore di una foto, quasi sempre sua ma non comprovabile, nel momento in cui gli si chiede un procedimento legale per il copyright e la liberatoria per la pubblicazione della stessa, potrebbe aver fatto lo scatto un fotografo professionista, o una persona diversa dall'organaro che lo ha costruito ecc., non è praticamente attuabile. Il Tuo ragionamento non fà una piega se "carpissi" le foto da una locazione a pagamento e le rendessi pubbliche gratuitamente, tutto ciò che facciamo è solo per divulgazione e protezione delle opere organarie. Aiutami a capire..prendendomi la responsabilità, perchè so quello che faccio e pubblico, di ripubblicare una foto di organi non mia, quale licenza dovrei indicare? La CC0 Waiver fruibile a tutti gratuitamente? O è sufficiente annotare in calce alla disposizione da quale parte del web si è presa? Grazie per le Tue riflessioni. Momimariani1962 (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- ..e questa è una foto dove ho indicato con precisone la provenienza! Momimariani1962 (talk) 08:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, non quella "degli organi a canne", l'annosa questione è quella di chi non ha ancora compreso che qui, su Commons, ci possono stare solo immagini dal copyright certamente consono al progetto, che permette il riutilizzo del materiale anche per fini commerciali. Se hai la passione per lo strumento immagino che tu abbia la passione anche per la musica che vi viene suonata, ecco quindi che puoi accedere all'esempio perfetto, un brano musicale per organo composto da un musicista contemporaneo trascritto e venduto da terzi per ricavarci un profitto: ovviamente è violazione di copyright, violazione di un'espressione artistica dell'autore, e in cosa sarebbe diverso9 dallo scatto di una foto dove è evidente la volontà di inquadrare il soggetto, attendendo la giusta luce, lavorando in postproduzione per esaltarne colori e messaggio visivo? Tu stesso ammetti che ti è stata concessa (hai scritto donata) dalla "Bottega Pinchi", bene, esiste un modo che comnceda la liberatoria di ogni immagine che provenga da quella fonte, si prendono la responsabilità di assegnare alle immagini una licenza compatibile (ad esempio la cc-by-sa) consapevoli del fatto che poi se un loro scatto si trova su una pubblicazione sugli organi d'Italia che si compera per, ipotesi, 50 € loro non hanno alcuna possibilità legale di chiedere un compenso. Se questo non è ben definito o ben definibile è presunta violazione di copyright fino a proba contraria, piaccia o non piaccia, punto, non c'è da discuterne c'è solo da prenderne atto. Concludo, se ci tieni, ed è nobnile che tu lo faccia, perché mai non ti armi di pazienza e fotocamera andando tu stesso a scattare foto degli strumenti?--Threecharlie (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear copyright violation should have been a CSD listing. --Gnangarra 09:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation. Sorry! Eisbergsk (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Falsches Bild Aizenthebest (talk) 23:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Falsche Uploadgröße N. Schatzmann (talk) 23:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Iwaqarhashmi as no source (No source since). See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk&oldid=880253680#Frustrating Jmabel ! talk 18:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized, that I uploaded the 1983 photo under the wrong username Chinnichap. I totally forgott that I have a second user account under my real name Helmut Sinor. I think, that this is the main problem with all the copyright questions. Is it a good idea to delete the photo and re-upload it under my real name account? Chinnichap (talk) 08:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Chinnichap:
- No need to delete and reupload.
- Do I understand correctly that this is a self-portrait?
- If so, please, do log in under the Helmut Sinor account, say that explicitly in the description, and mark this work as clearly your own: change the authorship to be a link to that account (along the lines of the way I link mine at File:Museu Frederic Marès, Sala Femenina 01.jpg) and in the edit summary say "see discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Helmut Sinor (1983).jpg" so it is clear what is going on. You might still have to go through COM:VRT to verify that you are who you say you are if someone has doubts, but that's a separate matter.
- If not, who took the photo? They would presumably hold the copyright, and that would need to be sorted out.
- As I remarked to you elsewhere, unless you somehow represent Chinn & Chapman, that "Chinnichap" user name is probably a problem, because that is a trademarked name. You probably want to stop using that account, or actually go through the process to have its name changed.
- Why, in any case, do you have more than one account? Are they somehow used in different roles?
I hope you have not dealt with both in a context where you effectively vote twice on something or look like two separate people in agreement, which would be a pretty severe rules violation.(I looked at the contributions of both accounts and see the struck-through matter has definitely not been an issue for these accounts.) - Jmabel ! talk 18:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Now I am logged in with my real name. Thank you for your instructions and tips. I will try to implement them without errors. Unfortunately, I'm in hospital next week and because I have to prepare for the hospital, I probably won't be able to do much today and tomorrow.
- To answer pont 4: As far as I remember, I created the Chinnichap account first. But I could be wrong, as it must have been a long time ago. I just wanted to familiarize myself with the functions and possibilities without using my real name as my user name. I just wanted to remain anonymous. At the time, I had no idea what effects a simple user name could have. Call it naivety, cluelessness or ignorance.
- I only realized that I had also created an account with my real name two days ago when I was looking through the Excel file in which I had saved all my login data from various sites. I had searched the Excel sheet for “Wikipedia” and suddenly there were two entries. I had simply forgotten the account with my real name, as I probably only used it once or twice at the very beginning.
- I was only indirectly involved with the music publisher Chinnichap at the time through my work in the music industry. I was with Ariola and after various mergers of the major labels of the time from the mid-80s onwards, everything went under the name of Sony Music. But that's just additional background information. The name Chinnichap just seemed memorable to me.
- However, the same e-mail address is stored for both accounts. And if I am not misinformed, the respective IP address is also saved each time content is edited. This should therefore always have been the same, although I was assigned a new IP address about two years ago due to server-side changes. Helmut Sinor (talk) 07:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Before I do something wrong and the story becomes even more complicated: Would the following edited entry be correct?
- @Chinnichap:
- {{delete|reason=This file was initially tagged by [[User:Iwaqarhashmi|Iwaqarhashmi]] as '''no source''' (No source since). See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk&oldid=880253680#Frustrating|subpage=File:Helmut Sinor (1983).jpg|year=2024|month=May|day=30}}
==Summary==
{{Information
|date=1983
|source=Own work
|author=Helmut Sinor
|permission=
|other versions=
}}
==Licensing==
{{self|cc-by-4.0|author=[[User:Helmut Sinor|Helmut Sinor]]}}</span>
<span class="mw-poem-indented" style="display: inline-block; margin-inline-start: 3em;"><noinclude>[[Category:Portraits]]</noinclude></span>
<span class="mw-poem-indented" style="display: inline-block; margin-inline-start: 3em;"><noinclude>[[Category:Helmut Sinor]]</noinclude></span>
<span class="mw-poem-indented" style="display: inline-block; margin-inline-start: 3em;"><noinclude>[[Category:1983]]</noinclude></span>
<span class="mw-poem-indented" style="display: inline-block; margin-inline-start: 3em;"><noinclude>[[Category:Self-timer]]</noinclude>
- And in the summary field i would write "see discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Helmut Sinor (1983).jpg".
- The main structure of the entries was automatically generated by the Upload Wizard. In the preview when I move the cursor over the |author=Helmut Sinor it says "page does not exist". I didn't save the changes but canceled them to be on the safe side before I messed up even more than I already had. Furthermore, I would like to apologize profusely because I am obviously being terribly clumsy. Helmut Sinor (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's at least a step in the right direction. We don't have to solve everything at once. The issue here is just to work out a basis to keep the file; I can work with you on things like categorization after that. The "red" link for your user page is correct: you haven't built yourself a user page.
- You still haven't answered one key question, though: did you take this picture yourself? If so, we are fine. If not, the copyright would belong to the photographer, and you'd need to track down that person (or their heir) and get a license from them; you can't grant a license to their work yourself. - Jmabel ! talk 17:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
It sounds like this can probably be saved, and that it may be a while till Helmut can answer my question, since he needs to go into the hospital. Please do not close this before he has an opportunity to clarify who took the photo. - Jmabel ! talk 22:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Good morning, Jmabel!
- I would like to start by thanking you very much for your helpfulness and patience. The last day before my hospital stay has begun.
- I changed the entries a few minutes ago. I have also added some categories. And “yes”, I took this photo of myself with my father's camera and its self-timer function. That's why I put “self-timer” in the categories. All the best from Vienna. Helmut Sinor (talk) 07:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I've done some further cleanup, mainly categories. Since I've been heavily involved with this, I don't want to close it unilaterally as kept. @Iwaqarhashmi: are your concerns satisfied, or should we have another admin besides myself make the decision? - Jmabel ! talk 18:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel, thanks for reaching out. I've been closely following your progress, and I must say, the work you've done is fantastic!
- I'm completely satisfied with it, feel free to close it out at your discretion. Waqar💬 18:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept by consensus including original nominator. - Jmabel ! talk 19:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The main subject is the image, and there is no evidence that it was published under a free license. Yann (talk) 19:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, I already uploaded a replacement. PS: Desktop screenshot is way better than the nominated file I uploaded before. Ahri.boy (talk) 12:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- As a Latin I see nothing special here. Delete. 186.172.201.2 23:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Photo of very poor quality. --Achim55 (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, Achim, and COM:CSD#F10. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ─ Aafī (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you homo erectus? Delete. 191.126.183.167 23:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom and COM:CSD#F10. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ─ Aafī (talk) 16:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
copy vio / facebook https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=944554013954630&id=100052001202344&set=a.265223255221046 2600:8800:2C09:3200:89AF:5BB6:6D3:AE24 21:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Author is Kevin Ku, not uploader. See EXIF shizhao (talk) 02:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no suitable Freedom of Panorama in Luxembourg. The work was completed in 2005 and co-authored by French architect Claude Vasconi (died 2009) and his associate from Luxembourg Jean Petit. The commercially-licensed image here does not show the building incidentally, so an infringement of the architects' copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no COM:Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The statue of the grotto is unlikely to have been designed by a craftsman who died more than 50 years ago, for it to be in public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Not in public domain as painter died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 12:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1943 painting, the painter died in 1960. The file can be restored in 2039 (URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 04:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
File:LBDC Giuseppe Tribus painting circa 1945 showing the porch of the hotel and the steeple before the 1926 fire.jpg
[edit]Not in public domain as painter died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1945 painting, the painter died in 1960. The file can be restored in 2041 (URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 04:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 12:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 13:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 13:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 13:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 13:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo, not educational value. Lymantria (talk) 17:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
While a simple logo in the US, it is copyrighted in Australia (per COM:TOO Australia. Also not the uploader’s own work. Bidgee (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 22:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 04:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this a free file? 186.174.91.156 02:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, This is an absolutely free file that can be used publicly Lysanderseo (talk) 02:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete as spam. --Achim55 (talk) 07:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank God he was kind enough not to take a picture while defecating. Delete and apploud him. 191.126.183.167 23:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, low quality, and COM:CSD#F10. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Aafi. --Kadı Message 08:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 06:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope? Trade (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope
- File:Fictional flag of Petrograd.png
- File:National Flag of United Kingdom of Northern Italy.png
- File:Coat of Arms of UKNI.png
- File:Civil Flag Of United Kingdom Of N.Italy.png
Trade (talk) 07:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flags, again.
- File:Civil Flag of United Kingdom of Northern Italy and National Flag (1948 - 1987).png
- File:Alternate War Flag of United Kingdom of Northern Italy.png
- File:War Flag of United Kingdom of Northern Italy.png
- File:Flag of United Kingdom of Northern Italy (1987 - Now).png
Omphalographer (talk) 02:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Requesting deletion as the file's uploader; it is a selfie. Matthew - (talk) 07:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
advertisement Abo Yemen✉ 07:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
apparent copyvio, link is in an all rights reserved website DGtal (talk) 11:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused YouTube icon, out of COM:SCOPE CutlassCiera 12:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused YouTube icon, out of COM:SCOPE CutlassCiera 12:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused YouTube icon, out of COM:SCOPE CutlassCiera 12:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
grabbed from the Web, license bogus Albinfo (talk) 16:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
very bad quality Ted1968 (talk) 17:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep So what?? Just one of the many Louvre-images. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 11:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This look like indeed a bad quality image, but this is, for now, the only one with the 4 archers together. Also, the resolution is OK, there only a problem with the luminosity. This image can probably be salvaged with an image editing tool. Miniwark (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 08:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image for non-contributor Nutshinou Talk! 17:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image for non-contributor Nutshinou Talk! 17:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image for non-contributor Nutshinou Talk! 17:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image for non-contributor, uploaded for spam purposes Nutshinou Talk! 17:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image for non-contributor Nutshinou Talk! 17:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image for non-contributor Nutshinou Talk! 17:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Selfie/Non-notable person Kenfyre (talk) 18:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. There's, like, one or two apartment buildings visible in the background - hardly a "city skyline". Omphalographer (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, https://www.tbv-lemgo-lippe.de/mannschaft/ Lanthan2003 (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FizzlandGOV (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fictional content (like coat of arms and flags) is out of the project scope
Nutshinou Talk! 20:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
unused autopromo with a watermark Pibwl (talk) 21:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal documents (online course completion certificates, not diplomas as implied by the filenames).
Omphalographer (talk) 22:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:News presenters from Vietnam
[edit]Bad AI upscaling, current AI still doesn't understand that eyeglasses are symmetrical and don't blend into the skin of the wearer's face.
- File:NEWS at HUNG YEN TV - 2023.08.07.png
- File:NEWS at HUNG YEN TV - 2023.09.02.jpg
- File:NEWS at HUNG YEN TV - 2023.12.24.jpg
- File:NEWS at HUNG YEN TV - 2023.12.25.jpg
- File:Presenter Hung Yen TV - 2023.12.30.jpg
- File:Presenter Hung Yen TV - 2023.12.31.jpg
- File:Presenter KIM DUNG - HYTV - 2023.02.03.png
- File:Presenter KIM DUNG - HYTV - 2024.02.10.png
- File:Presenter TUYẾT MAI - HYTV - 2024.04.27.jpg
- File:Presenter TUYẾT MAI - HYTV - 2024.04.30.jpg
- File:Presenter TUYẾT MAI - HYTV - 2024.05.19.jpg
Belbury (talk) 11:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- You can't see the glasses through the AI, right? Is that the reason for your deletion? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you're asking. Belbury (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- What I'm asking is that you can't see the news presenter's glasses clearly in these photos, right? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can see the glasses clearly and they are badly misshapen, this is why I have nominated the files for deletion. Belbury (talk) 15:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've uploaded the new version of File:Presenter TUYẾT MAI - HYTV - 2024.04.30.jpg. You can check and confirm whether is good misshapen or not. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 04:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The lenses are still different sizes. Belbury (talk) 07:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- So how to be good misshapen in some photos, especially AI-upscaled photos? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- If upscaling an image introduces clear inaccuracies and errors, do not upscale it, upload the original instead. Belbury (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. I've uploaded the original version finally. Now you can delete the deletion request. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I withdraw my nomination now that the problem with these images has been resolved. Belbury (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. I've uploaded the original version finally. Now you can delete the deletion request. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- If upscaling an image introduces clear inaccuracies and errors, do not upscale it, upload the original instead. Belbury (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- So how to be good misshapen in some photos, especially AI-upscaled photos? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The lenses are still different sizes. Belbury (talk) 07:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've uploaded the new version of File:Presenter TUYẾT MAI - HYTV - 2024.04.30.jpg. You can check and confirm whether is good misshapen or not. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 04:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can see the glasses clearly and they are badly misshapen, this is why I have nominated the files for deletion. Belbury (talk) 15:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- What I'm asking is that you can't see the news presenter's glasses clearly in these photos, right? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you're asking. Belbury (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, after change retracted. --Túrelio (talk) 12:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dumpygibed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fictional content is out of the project scope
- File:Greater Arms of the Republic of Socialnyet.png
- File:University of Fernando N. Barnstar of Excellence.png
- File:Coat of Arms of Socialnyet.png
- File:Order of The First Sons.png
- File:Order of The First Diaspora.png
- File:Order of The First Above of the Republic.png
- File:Coat of Arms of philadelphiapsalms14, adorned with the Order of the First Sons.png
- File:Coat of Arms of ashzzman, adorned with the Order of the First Sons.png
- File:Coat of Arms of MiniMikeUrzednik, adorned with the Order of the First Sons.png
- File:Coat of Arms of NSDiplomat, adorned with the Order of the First Sons.png
- File:Coat of Arms of socialmanz, of the Order of the First Above.png
- File:Coat of Arms of groopensmoit, adorned with the Order of the First Diaspora.png
- File:Coat of Arms of numanumaboy2299, adorned with the Order of the First Diaspora.png
- File:Coat of Arms of sociallnyet, adorned with the Order of the First Diaspora.png
- File:Coat of Arms of NSDiplomat.png
- File:Coat of Arms of socialmanz.png
- File:Coat of Arms of sociallnyet.png
- File:Coat of Arms of philadelphiapsalm14.png
- File:Coat of Arms of numanumaboy2299.png
- File:Coat of Arms of groopensmoit.png
- File:Coat of Arms of ashzzman.png
- File:Coat of Arms of MiniMikeUrzednik.png
- File:Pisstales First Int Congress Section AB.svg
- File:UFN Right Honorable Teufel de Sagonne Coat of Arms.svg
- File:UFN Right Honorable Aladeen Coat of Arms.svg
- File:Mystic order.svg
- File:Ufn coat of arms.svg
- File:Patch of the UFN Security.svg
- File:Socialnyet monogram.svg
- File:Socialnyetian phalanx.svg
- File:Greater Coat of Arms of the Republic of Socialnyet.svg
- File:Lesser Republican Coat of Arms of the Republic of Socialnyet.svg
- File:Flag republic oocialnyet.png
- File:Second Flag of the Republic of Socialnyet.svg
- File:Greater Republican Coat of Arms of the Republic of Socialnyet.svg
- File:Republican Arms of NSDiplomat, the First Pre-Nyetian Son.svg
- File:Flag of socialnyet tiny.svg
- File:Flag of the Republic of Socialnyet.svg
- File:Republican Arms of Socialmanz, the Sixth Son.svg
- File:Republican Arms of Groopensmoit, the Fifth Son.svg
- File:Republican Arms of Sociallnyet, the Fourth Son.svg
- File:Republican Arms of Numanumaboy2299, the Seventh Son.svg
- File:Republican Arms of MiniMikeUrzednik, the Third Son.svg
- File:Republican Arms of Ashzzman, the Second Son.svg
- File:Republican Arms of Philadelphiapsalms14, the First Son.svg
Nutshinou Talk! 22:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 23:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dumpygibed (talk · contribs)
[edit]User blocked for racism, and apology of Nazism. We can't trust that any of these are really free and educational.
- File:The save.svg
- File:War flag.svg
- File:Imperial Banner of the Holy Roman Empire.svg
- File:Lesser Coat of Arms of the Archduchy of Austria.svg
- File:Socialnyet Monogram.svg
- File:Arms of Holy Roman Emperor, Maximilian I.svg
- File:Flag of the Holy Roman Empire (under Maximilian I and Charles V) (2).svg
- File:Flag of the Holy Roman Empire (under Maximilian I and Charles V).svg
- File:3rd tank hunters.svg
- File:Nationalist Flag (1939-1945).svg
- File:Nationalist Flag (1936-1939).svg
- File:Spanish Renovation.svg
- File:Accion popular logo.svg
- File:CEDA logo.svg
- File:Acción Popular Española flag.svg
- File:Tercio of Montejurra flag.svg
- File:Tercio of Montejurra reverse.svg
- File:Tercio de Burgos Requetes Flag.svg
- File:Primer Requete De Pamplona.svg
- File:Primer Requete De Pamplona (Reverse).svg
- File:Burgundy Cross Flag.svg
- File:Rojigualda.svg
- File:Bandera Movimiento Nacional.svg
- File:Traditionalist Communion Square Banner.svg
- File:Morrocan Falange Square Flag.svg
- File:Morrocan Falange Flag.svg
- File:Morrocan Falange Division Flag.svg
- File:Spanish Volunteer Division Flag.svg
- File:Falange Zaragoza Flag.svg
- File:FET de las JONS Square Flag.svg
- File:Emblem of the Falange Espanol de las JONS.svg
- File:Emblem of the Delegación Nacional del Frente de Juventudes.svg
- File:Emblem of the Cisne Frente de Juventudes (1940-1960).svg
- File:Flag of the Traditionalist Communion.svg
- File:Flag of the Confederation of the Equator.svg
- File:Coat of Arms Confederation of the Equator.svg
- File:Codfwdedsfdfdf.svg
- File:Stone plaque inscribed with ostriches and possible Canaanite deity, Ein Zippori in the North (September 2012).png
- File:Pennant of the All-Polish Youth Vertical.svg
- File:The wreathery.svg
- File:Wreathe.svg
- File:Wreathed hakenkreuz.svg
- File:Leave 2.svg
- File:Thicker outlined lione.svg
- File:Rrereererererre.svg
- File:De lion.svg
- File:Boar head colored.svg
- File:Sword 2rte.svg
- File:Ram headedrqw.svg
- File:Swordsdf.svg
- File:African shield.svg
- File:Lion def.svg
- File:The head and swordere.svg
- File:Cheetah face.svg
- File:Leapordewr4.svg
- File:Glgogorr.svg
- File:Commando c cabinda.svg
- File:Shield ribbon.png
- File:Shield red.png
- File:Shield back.png
- File:Full herladfddfs.svg
- File:Empty shield3342323.svg
- File:Full herlad.svg
- File:International joeyist federation.png
- File:Comandos Omega 7 Seal Transparent.png
- File:Juventudes Falangistas de Cuba.png
- File:Falangist Cuban Flag 2.png
- File:Falangist Cuban Flag 1.png
- File:New eagle gold.svg
- File:Fdgfdgsgfdfgdfgdfgdfgddgfgdf.svg
- File:Odran Coat of Arms.svg
- File:Gold long wreath.svg
- File:Silver long wreath.svg
- File:Corner 324234234234234.svg
- File:Red skull 2.svg
- File:Red skullwefwefwefwef.svg
- File:Corner design 5.svg
- File:Silver connector bit.svg
- File:Silver corner design 4.svg
- File:Silver corner design 2.svg
- File:Silver corner design.svg
- File:Meremrt.svg
- File:Capetia COA.svg
- File:Coa kingdom of god.svg
- File:Angel of matthew the man.svg
- File:Democratic Socialist Coalition poster.jpg
- File:Ornamental center 2.svg
- File:Ornamental center.svg
- File:Kingdom of god coa center.svg
- File:Coat of arms of the lel.svg
- File:Attributed arms of st. jude.svg
- File:Eagle supporter.svg
- File:6 pointed star.svg
- File:Arms of the family finished.svg
- File:Arms of family.svg
- File:Acevedo Coat of Arms.svg
- File:Blason quarters white.svg
- File:Shield red outline233.svg
- File:Cross gold 2.svg
- File:Cross gold.svg
- File:Shield red outlineeqw2qwe.svg
- File:Shield red outline.svg
- File:Sheild in gold.png
- File:Blank template uyii.svg
- File:Red castle simeon.svg
- File:Wheat bundle.svg
- File:Shield in gold.svg
- File:Flag of the President of Cuba (Military-Commander in Chief).png
- File:Coat of arms of odra.png
- File:Naval jack of odra.png
- File:Naval Ensign.png
- File:National flag of odra.png
- File:Civil flag of odra.png
Yann (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete most. This is a lot to review, but most of these appear to be unused and either 1) functional duplicates of existing flag/emblem images (e.g. File:Nationalist Flag (1939-1945).svg, duplicative of File:Flag of Spain (1938–1945).svg), 2) clearly fictitious (e.g. File:National flag of odra.png - no such real or historical nation exists), or 3) too poorly described to identify (e.g. File:Meremrt.svg - described simply as "eedede"). However, a couple of these images are in use, possibly legitimately, and those should be pulled out of the nomination and investigated separately. Omphalographer (talk) 22:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 08:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Lilboi ayo
[edit]- File:A reddish Tree leafs.jpg
- File:A unique tyre sitter.jpg
- File:A gate design.jpg
- File:A Designed mirror.jpg
- File:Rubber ceiling.jpg
- File:An inscribtion art.jpg
- File:Scrap woman.jpg
- File:Bottle with prints.jpg
- File:Portrait framed Nigeria map.jpg
- File:Bottle lid curtain.jpg
- File:Portrait leaf tree.jpg
- File:Scraped gate part.jpg
- File:Tire sink.jpg
- File:Bottles and lanterns.jpg
- File:Portrait made with biscuit nylon waste.jpg
- File:Olowo waste mug cup.jpg
- File:Portrait bottle lid woman.jpg
- File:Infinity sign held by Jumoke olowookere.jpg
- File:Rolling Plastic hanger.jpg
- File:Tyre seat with rope.jpg
- File:Wooden rhombus.jpg
- File:Clayed pig head.jpg
- File:Pot and Plastic plant.jpg
- File:Porcelain rose on tyre seat.jpg
- File:A snail shell.jpg
- File:A brown Wooden cup.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Lilboi ayo and are not within Commons:Project scope GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 08:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Keine Recht dieses Privat Haus zu veröffentlichen, außerdem ist dieses Haus keine Kulturdenkmal mehr siehe https://web1.karlsruhe.de/db/kulturdenkmale/detail.php?id=02370 77.83.113.29 15:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Das ist schade, dabei ist es mal ein Gebäude bei dem man sich nicht fragt, warum es unter Denkmalschutz steht (oder stand). In Deutschland gilt:
- Freedom of panorama, therefore Keep. Killarnee (talk) 20:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Zu der Äußerung des Kulturdenkmals, dieses Bild wurde auf einer Liste von Kulturdenkmälern in Rüpurr gelistet bevor ich es entfernt habe da wie schon gesagt es keines mehr laut der Stadt Karlsruhe https://web1.karlsruhe.de/db/kulturdenkmale/detail.php?id=02370.
- Zu dem Recht es zu veröffentlichen mit dem Recht auf Panorama gibt es Kriterien die bei diesem Bild nicht erfüllt sind, zum einen ist das inneren des Hauses sichtbar aber aber auch teile der Rückseite. Laut diesem Artikel darf ausschließlich die Fassade veröffentlicht werden https://www.urheberrecht.de/panoramafreiheit/#Welche-Vorgaben-gelten-fuer-Aufnahmen-von-Werken-an-oeffentlichen-Plaetzen. 77.83.113.29 14:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wie alt ist das Haus? Wenn anzunehmen ist, dass der Architekt seit mindestens 70 Jahren tot ist, spielt die Panoramafreiheit überhaupt keine Rolle, weil dann das Urheberrecht ohnehin erloschen ist. Übrigens ist Fassade = äußere Ansicht (der Außenwand), egal ob vorn oder an der Seite oder hinten. --Achim55 (talk) 21:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep: Es gibt kein de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache. --Achim55 (talk) 21:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 19:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 14:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 14:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Poster with en:Kool-Aid Man. // sikander { talk } 🦖 15:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
No COM:FOP Italy for an outdoor, illustrated map. Belbury (talk) 16:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Looks like an official press photo, variants appear online. Proof of ownership is needed and if the original photographer agrees with the given license. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: Exif data shows that BNR Super is the copyright holder. So looks indeed like an official press photo. Mbch331 (talk) 15:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Derechos de autor 186.175.121.42 10:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 21:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright CHAMBAM! 186.172.2.134 22:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Low quality AI image (plastic-looking food) that can easily be replaced with an actual photo The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [1][2]); no evidence that the uploader is the photographer as claimed. HaeB (talk) 02:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [3], credited as "Photo by Tim Devine"); no evidence that the uploader is the photographer as claimed. HaeB (talk) 02:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry TheNuggeteer (talk) 04:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Uploader indicates that the image was taken from a commercial new site. WikiEditor50 (talk) 06:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 13:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Random PD tag, no evidence that the author died 70 or more years ago. Quick1984 (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Of course PD-old license is wrong. But we have anonymous publication from 1940, so I changed the license for PD-Russia and point 2a of the license applies. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Low-res, unused artwork not likely to be useful for educational/encyclopedic purposes. Sinigh (talk) 19:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, it is very unlikely that User Pawel zolnierczyk is the photographer Goesseln (talk) 19:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also first publication date not given. --Wdwd (talk) 14:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused, incomplete version of another file (File:Rap Rakesh in Music Video Launch.jpg). Sinigh (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, F7. --Wdwd (talk) 14:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, accordign to the descritpion, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, per CoffeeEngineer. In addition, this file probably qualifies for speedy deletion (COM:CSD#F10). Marbletan (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Previously used in other sources, like this one from 2022, yet the photo was uploaded one year later. George Ho (talk) 21:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=944554013954630&id=100052001202344&set=a.265223255221046 2600:8800:2C09:3200:89AF:5BB6:6D3:AE24 21:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HDanPlanetEarth (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, out of scope autopromo
- File:4 Información del docenteBIs.png
- File:5 Imagen sobre el programa del curso.png
- File:6 Horario de clases-asesorías-parciales.png
Pibwl (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G10. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Instagram? 186.174.91.156 00:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: AGF for now. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio. 186.175.235.179 21:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
False own work claim: Admin confusion or what? See EXIF. 186.174.91.156 00:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Exif shows not an own work. 186.174.91.156 00:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP, likely from Insta. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. 186.174.91.156 02:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. 186.174.91.156 02:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 — billinghurst sDrewth 02:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Facebook. 186.174.91.156 02:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.91.156 02:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this a free file? 186.174.91.156 02:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this a free file? 186.174.91.156 02:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. 186.174.91.156 02:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. 186.174.91.156 02:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. 186.174.91.156 02:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Lovely drawing, but as it comes from Facebook, permission is needed. 186.174.91.156 02:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Facebook, ask for permission. 186.174.91.156 02:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chambre de commerce du Luxembourg (52822272518).jpg, same reason. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kueb
[edit]There is no Freedom of Panorama in Luxembourg. The work was authored by architect w:lb:Pierre Bohler, who is still alive (1938–). Commercially-licensed images here lack permission from him.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Not in use, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 04:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused made-up flag Dronebogus (talk) 04:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Photograph by Herbert Mason (died 1964) are still under copyright. 49.150.8.134 04:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution version of File:Fredensborg Palace from the garden.jpg Leoboudv (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Processed as dup. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-trivial logo that does not look like own work by uploader, but tineye did not find exact match. Current logo of orgnization differs from this one WindEwriX (talk) 05:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of en:File:Grateful Dead - Steal Your Face.jpg#Licensing Nutshinou Talk! 06:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio: Image has associated press meta-data: "Credit/Provider: AP" - see https://time.com/longform/kenya-hotel-terrorist-al-shabab/ for likely source. Uploader on en.wikipedia has few edits, and no other uploads with a Canon 5D (some mobile phone uploads after this was uploaded at en). 133.218.250.164 08:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
This file should be deleted as the author is Yu. Elmurzaev (from the book Страницы истории чеченского народа; 1993) and not Flandria12. Thus, the file is a violation of copyright. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 09:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The uploader of this file on Flickr is not the owner of the copyright. So the licence is wrong there. Maungapohatu (talk) 10:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- How do you know that flickr user Simon Butler is not the photographer / author of that photo? --Dual Freq (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Maungapohatu: Keep The Flickr user, simon butler, claims to be an aviation enthusiast and has uploaded many aviation photos. I see no evidence that this photo is not their own. Brianjd (talk) 12:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, here is a link: Flickr upload. Brianjd (talk) 12:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: AGF, Butler has a huge collection of scans from photos, likely his own archive. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 186.174.244.237 11:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Warum nicht? 186.174.244.237 11:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Import was a test Privatemajory (talk) 11:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 186.174.244.237 11:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright Hannah Cooke 186.174.244.237 12:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Given Junior Cáceres Noldin (talk · contribs)'s questionable uploads, I doubt this is their own work. The image file is a derivative of a photo of the late Mother Angelica that is certainly copyrighted and not under a free license. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Image most likely does not belong to the uploader. It's a very low-res image with a watermark that belongs to iGoGo, a now-defunct Portuguese travel & tourism guide. The uploader, User:Tomasalex13, has 1 edit on Commons (uploading this file) and a handful of edits on the Portuguese Wikipedia, which got him warned for vandalism and unconstructive editing. ReneeWrites (talk) 13:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Copy vio, cp. https://allthatsinteresting.com/nutty-putty-cave (Family Photo via The Denver Post) NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 13:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 13:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 13:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 13:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Glyn Carrall (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promotional images by an otherwise non contributor to the project.
- File:Glyn Carrall 2020.jpg
- File:GLyn Carrall.png
- File:Glyn Carrall Pop God 2021.png
- File:Glyn Carrall Pop God 2022.png
- File:Glyn Carrall Pop God 2023.png
Herby talk thyme 12:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Glyn Carrall (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seems to be band members of the Australian rap crew Cult of Mickeys. When googling the members' or the crew's name I find pretty much nothing except a Pinterest page. Hence I think the pictures are not within COM:scope.
Jonteemil (talk) 15:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The statue by sculptor Andrzej Pitynski , no freedom of panorama in the USA. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in Iraq or Kurdistan Regional Government. The mounment was finished in Sep 2003. أنون (talk) 22:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
No FOP. Is it a modern statue? 186.174.91.156 00:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - likely old statue, but photo appears in many places, small, no EXIF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the dog is COM:UTIL, and so are the flowers (if they're not they're COM:DM). —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -uselesscontributions} 19:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- Toys are not Util in the USA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Bad quality SVG. Superseded with improved image. Fornax (talk) 09:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This is not a good reason. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 12:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SpinnerLaserzthe2nd: please explain, why "bad quality SVG" is not a good reason. This file is so very bad quality AND superseded, that nobody will use it with good intention. – Doc Taxon • Talk • 06:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - We don't need two and the other is widely used. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
not own work, see watermark on bottom left side Bradipo Lento (talk) 10:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:RCE suggested: Bed
[edit]Out of scope. Low quality photographs (in terms of vagueness + composition) + I have no idea how these three images would be reusable.
- File:Verplaatsbare bedstede nr. I -22 fotonr. 40 - Haarzuilens - 20456748 - RCE.jpg
- File:Vm. bedstede - IJzendijke - 20505794 - RCE.jpg
- File:Vm. bedstede - IJzendijke - 20505795 - RCE.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 12:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Abysmal image quality; I can't even tell what I'm looking at in the first photo. There's quality issues throughout many of the RCE uploads; this may be worth a larger cleanup. Search for the phrase "Deze afbeelding hebben wij helaas alleen in deze lage resolutie" ("Unfortunately, we only have this image in this low resolution") to find additional examples. Omphalographer (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. But:
- A few years ago I have nominated one of them for deletion (not one of these three), referring to a better photo that was from a later date. But it was kept because a little detail of the building was on the old photo, but not anymore on the new photo (due to wear (slijtage)) and for that reason the old photo was kept.
- I myself have used one (File:Ankerbalk V - Winterswijk - 20467477 - RCE.jpg) in two gallery pages because I could not find a photo that shows better what I would like to show.
- RCE has removed many of them from their website, because I cannot find them anymore there. I guess Commons is still the only place to keep them. But on the other hand, that is not one of the scopes of Commons, so it is no reason for keeping them on Commons if they are not reusable for educational purposes.
- So I have made Category:Low quality images of the Netherlands and put them there if I am annoyed enough.
- Sometimes, like for these three, I nominate them for deletion because I have really no idea how they are reusable. JopkeB (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. But:
- Keep sure, crap quality, but the only photos we have and part of a collection. How does hiding these images from normal users make Commons a better place? Do tag them with {{Low quality}}. That's a {{Negative boosted template}} which will push it down on the search results so you have less chance of encountering them. Multichill (talk) 18:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- User:Multichill That might be true, but the question here is: How are they reusable? That is the scope of Commons, not whether they are part of a collection. JopkeB (talk) 06:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @JopkeB and Omphalographer: I created {{RCE-higher-resolution}} some time ago and tagged RCE images with them to get the higher resolution versions. That seems to be impossible for these. How about I create {{RCE-low-resultion}} with some info and inclusion of {{Low quality}} and replace it with that one? Multichill (talk) 18:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Multichill:
- How does Commons get the higher-resolution versions? Who is going to do that?
- What would be the purpose of {{RCE-low-resultion}}, what problem would it solve? Your information is not enough for me to understand that.
- JopkeB (talk) 06:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Multichill:
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Instagram? 186.174.91.156 02:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Instagram? 186.174.91.156 02:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Nicht Eigenes Werk. 186.174.244.237 11:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Nicht eigenes Werk. 186.174.244.237 11:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
doesn't look like a selfie - who is the author? Xocolatl (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely own works. 1940s - 1980s photos, maybe a scanned family album. Also nominated 1920s - 1930s images stated as own work.
- File:Rode-Orlovsky.jpg
- File:1964-Rode.jpg
- File:1966-Rode-Tartu.jpg
- File:1970s-Pereshkolnik-Bondarev.jpg
- File:Bondarev-Pokrovka.jpg
- File:1969-Vtorov-Bondarev-Pompei.jpg
- File:Bondarev-02.jpg
- File:Vtorov-Pereshkolnik-Bondarev-TS.jpg
- File:1969-2-Bondarev-Afrika.jpg
- File:1930-MarkinNI.jpg
- File:1929-MarkinNI-PI-SI.jpg
- File:1930-Moscow-Redsq.jpg
- File:1960th-Lev-Bondarev.jpg
- File:1970е-субботник-МГУ.jpg
- File:1951-МГУ-Географический.jpg
- File:1980-old-planeterium-moscow.jpg
- File:IlinSS-1200.jpg
- File:Sukachev-Rode.jpg
- File:RodeAA-1977.jpg
- File:RodeAA-1961.jpg
- File:RodeAA-soil.jpg
- File:RodeAA-CChZ.jpg
- File:RodeAA-1970.jpg
- File:RodeAA-1970th.jpg
- File:1991-ZlotinR-ChernovI-Israel.jpg
- File:1980-VetlickayaN-856-school.jpg
- File:1960s-TyanShan-Bakov-Еvgeny.jpg
- File:1969-Bondarec-Gvinea.jpg
- File:1969-Senegal-bondarev.jpg
- File:1969-Bondarev-Afrika.jpg
- File:1983-Artem-Gromov.jpg
- File:1988-oct-gph-arm.jpg
- File:1947-MarkinAI.jpg
- File:1930-MarkinAI.jpg
- File:MarkinAI-1946.jpg
- File:MolodcovV-.jpg
- File:GundorovA-MolodcovV-Sovinform-1946.jpg
- File:MolodcovV-July-1948.jpg
- File:1987-feb-georgy-khomizuri.jpg
- File:1965-Vtorov-Bondarev-Syrty.jpg
- File:Bazar-SOL468.jpg
- File:Man-SOL469.jpg
- File:S-sol-tshfgs.jpg
- File:Sol-SOL471.jpg
- File:1968-Kara-Bantak-mi4-gidromet.jpg
- File:1969-Uzbekistan-Blagoobrazov-Pereshkolnik-Vtorova-Kozhevnikova.jpg
- File:1960-Zabirov R D.jpg
- File:1967-KrinickayaRR-ZabirovRD BondarevLG-ChonKyzylSu.jpg
- File:1964 RD Zabirov.jpg
- File:1957-PPV.jpg
- File:1957-May-03-MGPI-PPV-NND.jpg
- File:1975-PPV-NND.jpg
- File:1976-PPV-WWF-Sweden.jpg
- File:1976-PPV-Sweden.jpg
- File:1963-PPV-NND-AlmaAta.jpg
- File:1970-PPV-Kara-Bylun.jpg
- File:Sol-glyaciologs.jpg
- File:1967-nash-mir.jpg
- File:LGB-przevalsk-1972.jpg
- File:Bondarev-LG-Schukin-1955.jpg
- File:Bondarev-LG-tsh.jpg
- File:BondarevLG-parents.jpg
- File:Bondarev-LG-1965.jpg
- File:Bondarev-LG-2000-MSU.jpg
- File:Vtorov-PP-Bondarev-LG.jpg
- File:17-IGC-Moscow-1984.jpg
- File:1958-molodcov-venezia.jpg
- File:1962-filfak-msu.jpg
- File:1978-peter-vtorov-issikkul.jpg
- File:1985-molodsov.jpg
- File:1978-vtorov-drozdov.jpg
- File:Tsfgs-1.jpg
- File:Tsfgs-3.jpg
- File:Tsfgs-2.jpg
- File:Ppv-1958.jpg
- File:Pp vtorov.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- All of this photos made by me or belonds to me, I have original films or prints. (Подтверждаю оригинальность этих фотографий) --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Who's owning the physical film is irrelevant. Did you personally take this photo of Alexander Markin in 1930 and and this of Lev Bondarev in 1969? jonkerz ♠talk 00:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото разных годов, сделаны на разные фотоаппараты. Необходимо пояснение в OTRS
- File:1998-BogatovEA.jpg
- File:2000-BogatovEA.jpg
- File:1979-june-Leningrad-BogatovEA.jpg
- File:2002 Bogatov Evgeny.jpg
- File:1981-BogatovEA-856-school.jpg
- File:2015-BogatovEA.jpg
- File:1980-BogatovEA-Planetarium-Mosco.jpg
- File:2016-Evgeny-Bogatov-Artist.jpg
- File:2016-Evgeny-Bogatov-RussianArtist.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- подскажите, пожалуйста, какое пояснение к моим фотографиям нужно? Я гарантирую что это мои фото, которые я сделал на плёнку, и цифровые камеры. Могу негативы показать. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Commons:OTRS/ru для фоновых картин вчера отправил автор (для File:1998-BogatovEA.jpg, File:2000-BogatovEA.jpg, File:2015-Bogatov-Exhibition.jpg) для других они не требуются. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- + см. правила для фоновых изображений на Commons:De minimis. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Напишите в OTRS(COM:OTRS или ru:ВП:ДОБРО). С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Теперь всё. --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 18:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Пришло разрешение в OTRS и от автора фото и от художника (хотя вопрос был именно к фотографу). Ticket#2017030310014862. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: revoked by nominator - verified via OTRS in the meantime. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Derivative works of non-free content. No permission.
VLu (talk) 20:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- File:2019-NatanS-BookPaper.jpg & File:2019-SimonNatan-INHIGEO.jpg — Photos from Book: S. Natan. Flying high. the Photography of Lloyd Homer, 2019. It is noted in the book: This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, and review as permitted under the Copyright Act. Images from the book for Russian WikiNews only (https://ru.wikinews.org/?curid=515524). --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- File:2019-MiningSchool-SPb6.jpg — {PD-text} citation --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair use is not allowed on Commons. PD-text claim unlikely. --Storkk (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Random PD tags. If you can't name the author you can't claim that he or she could have died 70 or more years ago. Also, the first publication date is needed to determine copyright status as per COM:Russia.
- File:1932 - Матрос Береговой обороны (Алексей Владимирович Богачёв).jpg
- File:1930-BogachevVV.jpg
- File:Grigorovich-Berezovsky N. A.jpg
- File:1920-Echeistov.jpg
- File:NovograblenovPT.jpg
- File:Vsekohudozhnik-logo.jpg
- File:NeustruevSS.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Given the description, it was first published in 1968, so still non-free as per COM:Russia. Quick1984 (talk) 14:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The photo was made before 1920 (Sultan Dudaev died in 1920) which makes it free to use as it's before 1929. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- If it is pre 1917 then it is PD-RusEmpire. Anonymous images had no copyright protection in Russia prior to 1943. Generally an image is made public (published) when it leaves the custody of the photographer. --RAN (talk) 00:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. We have anonymous publication from 1968, so the photo can be restored in 2039 (70+1 years from publication). Taivo (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, the file was not free on URAA date, so USA demands 95 years from publication and the file can be restored on 2064. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Can't find any license information (or the image itself) at the since archived source. (Uploader has had three copyvio images of the same subject deleted before.) Sinigh (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete It's not clear where the image originated, but neither of the two possible sources license it with a CC or other compatible license. The file name matches how images are stored on the website, but the Wayback Machine doesn't seem to have captured that specific image. That said, the image was uploaded in 2020 and at that time the foundation's conditions of use explicitly bar redistribution or commercial use of its content. The image also appears here on a website of the province of Málaga, but COM:Spain doesn't list any reasons that a provincial government's materials would be copyright free and pages condiciones legales explicitly exert a copyright claim to all materials. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
This is a collage of many individual photos, information for which was missing. Subsequent edits indicated that all those photos were created by the uploader. If that is true, then this file can be kept. Brianjd (talk) 03:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Daniel is the model, Daniel is the photographer, Daniel is the uploader. Erm, maybe Daniel should decide what to do about this collage... 186.174.91.156 03:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment The image as contributed needs to comply to Com:Derived works. At this stage it does not. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: The uploader says that the photos are their own, and no evidence to the contrary has been presented. What else is required? Brianjd (talk) 06:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I am not seeing any evidence that the work is not the creation of the uploader, and since we do not host the individual images there is no expectation of linking to them. --RAN (talk) 13:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Brianjd and User:RAN. The individual images are 100% consistent, clearly the work of one photographer, who is the uploader as declared. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, it taken from the copyrighted newspapers: https://tuoitre.vn/mo-cua-thi-truong-mang-lai-nhieu-co-hoi-xuat-khau-cho-viet-nam-20191227131250049.htm Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 09:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope 186.174.244.237 11:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
non è una sua opera propria Giovanni Cardinali (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Mestre Big Brother (talk) 13:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
page de garde sans intérêt Damouns இ 13:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
painting appears to be signed CN, not CE Clarinetguy097 (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of Gemini symbol (fixed width).svg; own creation Kwamikagami (talk) 18:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BabiBandung (talk · contribs)
[edit]Can't see anything at the source URL to say that these images have been CC licenced, they just have a Voor meer informatie ("For more information") text credit for the copyright line.
- File:Nooit op pad zonder een schone spuit.jpg
- File:Een stomme kloot spuit zich dood.jpg
- File:Chinese opiumschuiver in Nederland.jpg
Belbury (talk) 18:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Cetus symbol.svg. self-nomination. Kwamikagami (talk) 18:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Different author per metadata Yann (talk) 20:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Different author per metadata Yann (talk) 20:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
fake license Bestalex (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Fictional flag of misleading nature: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shekpeer (Barun-Khemchiksky District) Nutshinou Talk! 22:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 13:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
This photo has been identified (at the file page of File:Türkiyeişbankasınınaçılışı.jpg) as a work of photographer Cemal Işıksel, who died in 1989. Thus it is still copyrighted in Turkey until 2059 inclusive. While File:Türkiyeişbankasınınaçılışı.jpg claims a CC license, the only source provided at that page is a 1969 book, with no evidence of free licensing.
- File:1929 10 24 Cumhuriyet Ataturk Is Bankasinda.jpg
- File:Head Office of the Turkish Business Bank 1929.jpg
- File:Türkiyeişbankasınınaçılışı.jpg
Felix QW (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Derivatives of 2D artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.
- File:Баннер с изображением И.В. Сталина в Бее (май 2014 года).jpg
- File:Баннер с изображением И.В. Сталина в Бее (май 2014).jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 14:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-free photo of a 3D object (even if it is PD itself) without photographer's permission. Quick1984 (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Random PD tag. Given the description, it was first published in 2017, so still non-free as per COM:Russia. Quick1984 (talk) 14:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The photo is from late 19th century which makes it free to use as it's before 1929. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- PD-US, but not in Russia. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
copivyo de colours of football https://www.colours-of-football.com/colours03/fra/brest/brest_1.html Algipan (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
copyvio de colours of football https://www.colours-of-football.com/colours03/fra/brest/brest_1.html Algipan (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
No evidence that all authors of texts and photos in the entire newspaper are died 70 or more years ago, questionable PD claim. Quick1984 (talk) 04:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Do you mean, that somebody who made photos or wrote texts in the newspaper for 1931 year is alive for nowdays? Dear it already left 93 (2024-1931) year!!!! What are you talking about??? You mean that it is becouse Abkhasians are longlives, it is possible that somebody who was 18 year on 1931, now he is alive and is now 110 (93+18) year old??? Are you joking?????? Please delete "nomination" yourself.--Surprizi (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Surprizi, it looks like you are unable to read the license tag you set by yourself. The point is not that the authors are still alive, but that there is no evidence that they all died more than 70 years ago. --Quick1984 (talk) 06:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Quick1984 Ok, but what do you recommend? What license do I have to indicate here? Surprizi (talk) 06:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- None, in case you do not have evidence of that. --Quick1984 (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Quick1984 Ok, but what do you recommend? What license do I have to indicate here? Surprizi (talk) 06:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Surprizi, it looks like you are unable to read the license tag you set by yourself. The point is not that the authors are still alive, but that there is no evidence that they all died more than 70 years ago. --Quick1984 (talk) 06:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Lean keep. This is the daily newspaper of the Abkhaz Regional Committee of the Communist Party of Georgia, the Central Executive Committee, and the Council of Trade Unions of the SSR of Abkhazia, according to the masthead. Given that, this may be covered under {{PD-GE-exempt}}, if such a paper is considered an official document of the state. Otherwise, {{PD-Georgia}} could apply given it's been more than 70 years since the complied work was published. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Georgia does note that authors of material in complied works hold a copyright, but the way it's phrased sounds like they have the right to reuse the material elsewhere, not inhibit the use of the complied work. —Tcr25 (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: it is a state document and so it is exempt from copyright in Georgia. --Bedivere (talk) 05:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Unreasoned closure by User:Bedivere. If they had even looked into the PD-Georgia, they would have been convinced that none of the points were suitable for this case:
- It is an anonymous work - no, at least half of the notes are signed by the authors;
- It is another kind of work, and 70 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author) - no evidence of that provided;
- It is one of official documents (legislative acts, court decisions, other texts of administrative and regulatory nature) - no, these are notes on a variety of topics that have nothing to do with official documents;
- It is one of official state symbols - not applicable as well.
If the uploader needs any document from this newspaper, it is this that should be cropped out. Quick1984 (talk) 13:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is not an unreasoned closure but I understand the point of reopening the request. I think this is a work of the state, as the Communist Party of Georgia was an actual state organisation of the former Georgian SSR, and so this should qualify as an official document. I can't read Georgian so I don't know if the wording you cite is taxative or only meant as an example of which works are exempt from protection. If it is taxative, it could still be considered a document of administrative nature as you say, because it was an actual official document. If these are only meant as examples, then it is up to interpretation and even more then this newspaper could be considered to be in the public domain. I am not voting to keep since I expect there to be more informed votes and comments. Bedivere (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- This PDF is complect of several numbers of the 1931 year Russian newspaper "Soviet Abkhazia". So, inside this complect it is written a 6-th Abkhazian Congress of Soviet. Insiade Soviet union there where all countries and Autonomius Respublics had their own Congress of Soviets. So this is Abkhasian 6-th Congrees of Soviets. Unfortunately I cannot find this congress book version and photographed newspapers and make pdf that everybody see main source of truth, not historians bla-bla-bla. Sincarely!!! Surprizi (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Surprizi, an example for you: Category:Pravda, 1953. A fragment, containing a legislative act, may be exempt from copyright and can be uploaded on Commons, but not the entire newspaper. Quick1984 (talk) 14:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear, no problem you can delate it. I already coped for myself. Whole newspapers I use especialy for the reasons if somebody have against for the source. I thought I fixed so problems. No problem, you can delete it. Surprizi (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Surprizi, an example for you: Category:Pravda, 1953. A fragment, containing a legislative act, may be exempt from copyright and can be uploaded on Commons, but not the entire newspaper. Quick1984 (talk) 14:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- This PDF is complect of several numbers of the 1931 year Russian newspaper "Soviet Abkhazia". So, inside this complect it is written a 6-th Abkhazian Congress of Soviet. Insiade Soviet union there where all countries and Autonomius Respublics had their own Congress of Soviets. So this is Abkhasian 6-th Congrees of Soviets. Unfortunately I cannot find this congress book version and photographed newspapers and make pdf that everybody see main source of truth, not historians bla-bla-bla. Sincarely!!! Surprizi (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Two slightly conflicting points from Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Georgia: This a composite work, so copyright runs for 70 years from the time when the works were lawfully published or made available to the public, and the author of a compiled work holds copyright in that work, but unless provided otherwise by contract the individual authors have the right to use their contributions independently and in other compiled works. The unclear bit is whether or that author's copyright is tied to their lifetime (70 pma) or if it is saying that during the composite work's copyright period an author can republish or otherwise use the material without violating the composite work's copyright. If the publication date +71 years is the mark, then {{PD-Georgia}} applies. A separate consideration is if the work is considered a official document of the state providing information about facts and events, then {{PD-GE-exempt}} would apply. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I thought. This is over 90 years old. If someone more proficient with this Georgian law could help out, it would be great to dilucidate that unclear bit you mention. But anyway, I think PD-GE-exempt applies. Bedivere (talk) 00:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - It's a newspaper and, according to the comment above, it is Russian, not Georgian. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Clip comes from the 2019 documentary CHERNOBYL DISASTER - An Inside Look - 3D. The uploader claims to be the documentarist, but there's no WP:OTRS confirmation and the original YouTube video is apparently not CC licensed. Schierbecker (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am the author of File:Chernobyl rubble and steam tanks overlaid.gif and I am also the author of the Youtube documentary where the complete clip is played. This is evident on my user page User:Tadpolefarm
- There is no need for deletion. No copyright has been violated. The WP:OTRS confirmation does not apply. Tadpolefarm (talk) 08:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- User:Tadpolefarm We don't have any proof that you are the same person. Can you put a "cc-by-sa-4.0" notice in the YouTube video description? Schierbecker (talk) 22:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
This coat of arms, although included on the website of the municipality of Gioia Tauro, is actually a creative work created by araldicacivica.it, whose materials are released under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. The site administrators have never authorized the municipality to use their image and have not agreed to distribute the CoA under CC-BY-SA, or in any case we have no proof of such authorization. The most prudent choice is therefore to delete the image, which is already orphan as it has been replaced by an svg version re-designed according to the blazon. Arrow303 (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
this original files uploaded by me. but overwrited by any user 2 years later. the material is not my business. DON'T display my name. eien20 (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi.
- If you insist on deleting it I have no problem with it. I’ll just upload another file. It was a very rudimentary map that I wasn't particularly proud of anyway.
- Tho I’ve used a different base map, I kept your name there as a courtesy. I uploaded this newer version under your original file for convenience purpose (to avoid changing it manually across every page).
- If you don't wish to associate yourself with this file anymore, it’d be fabulous if you could just remove your name instead of nominating it for deletion. Please take no offense and let me know which option do you prefer. Thank you again for your understanding.
- Cheers 沁水湾 (talk) 20:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep BTW My personal preference is keeping it. Not liking your name being kept after updating to a newer improved version of the file isn't a sufficiently sound rationale for deletion. The map provides important contexts in numerous articles across different wikis. 沁水湾 (talk) 20:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't blame others. You ignored COM:OW and posted it. --eien20 (talk) 22:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't get me wrong I'm not blaming anyone. If I sounded rude to you that's absolutely not my intention and I apologize for any offense caused if that's the case. As I was saying, you are more than welcome to do whatever you want with it. I don't particularly care either way. I just think even reverting it to your version is better than deleting it outright (which I still can't comprehend your rationale). If you insist on deleting it (again, your rights) I'll just upload another file. No problem, for real. 沁水湾 (talk) 14:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- You have ignored COM:OW. becourse refused to re-link at other projects. they stoles my name. and the reupload version is {{Nsd}} --eien20 (talk) 16:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- What do you want me to do? I already said, ad nauseam, that it's your right to do whatever you want with the file. I have no problem with it whatsoever. If you are not confident with your English it's fine if you write Japanese BTW. I learned a little back in college, though not very proficient (probably not as good as your English). As for the source it was just the Japanese Wiki page. If you want me to link to it, sure. I'll do it now. 沁水湾 (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- the file is mine, but page is not mine. I created material is poor quarity then yours.I fear credit my name in the file. ありがとう。 --eien20 (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Didn't saw your reply, my apologies. What do you want me to do? Remove your name from the file? 沁水湾 (talk) 18:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- the file is mine, but page is not mine. I created material is poor quarity then yours.I fear credit my name in the file. ありがとう。 --eien20 (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- What do you want me to do? I already said, ad nauseam, that it's your right to do whatever you want with the file. I have no problem with it whatsoever. If you are not confident with your English it's fine if you write Japanese BTW. I learned a little back in college, though not very proficient (probably not as good as your English). As for the source it was just the Japanese Wiki page. If you want me to link to it, sure. I'll do it now. 沁水湾 (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- You have ignored COM:OW. becourse refused to re-link at other projects. they stoles my name. and the reupload version is {{Nsd}} --eien20 (talk) 16:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't get me wrong I'm not blaming anyone. If I sounded rude to you that's absolutely not my intention and I apologize for any offense caused if that's the case. As I was saying, you are more than welcome to do whatever you want with it. I don't particularly care either way. I just think even reverting it to your version is better than deleting it outright (which I still can't comprehend your rationale). If you insist on deleting it (again, your rights) I'll just upload another file. No problem, for real. 沁水湾 (talk) 14:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't blame others. You ignored COM:OW and posted it. --eien20 (talk) 22:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: current version kept, earlier version removed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Logo of a political party in Hong Kong that exceeds COM:TOO Hong Kong. Wcam (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Quick1984 as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Tcr25 (talk) 13:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Converting from speedy so greater consideration can be given. This appears to be an official document with state symbols that would be covered under {{PD-BY-exempt}}. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The photograph is not PD. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Well you never know that unknown author could have died 70 or more years ago. Also, the first publication date is needed to determine copyright status as per COM:Russia. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 16:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion A 1928 anonymous Russian work is PD in Russia and too early for URAA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Logo Yann (talk) 20:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Is this license really valid? Yann (talk) 22:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no free license at https://bsky.social/about/support/tos. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Data already exists in New Jersey County Route 511 and New Jersey County Route 511 Alt BMACS1002 (talk) 22:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Oppose No contest - The data file, based on a 2012 KML file I created, was not using proprietary data from Google Maps, it was all manually drawn. Note the low cartographic generalization used in the linework. If you have an issue with the name, move the page. —Mr. Matté - En. 'pedia talk 23:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC
- My apologies for assuming that! I'd move the page if there wasn't already a page at the name I wished to relocate it to that conveys the same information. BMACS1002 (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Response revised. —Mr. Matté - En. 'pedia talk 22:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - New Jersey County Route 511 and New Jersey County Route 511 Alt are on WP:EN, not Commons. They should be deleted not this. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Redundant from New Jersey County Route 531.map BMACS1002 (talk) 19:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. New Jersey County Route 531.map is on Wp, not Commons, so it should be deleted, not this. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong license Xocolatl (talk) 13:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now corrected. --RAN (talk) 23:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Muhitdin Kurbangaliev
[edit]Random PD tags. These are not legislative acts to be exempt from copyright as well you never know that unknown author could have died 70 or more years ago. Also, the first publication date is needed to determine copyright status as per COM:Russia.
- File:Muhitdin Kurbangaliev (1928).jpg
- File:Muhitdin Kurbangaliev (1935).jpg
- File:Muhitdin Kurbangaliev with colleagues, 1938.jpg
- File:Muhitdin Kurbangaliev, 1935.jpg
- File:Said Vahidi with colleagues, 1930s.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 14:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Quick1984. В двух изображениях были неправильно поставлены шаблоны, потому что я копировал карточку. Теперь поправил. Ещё вопросы? Каким образом вы поняли что неизвестный фотограф, имя и годы жизни которого неизвестны, мог умереть спустя 70 лет со дня фотографирования? А может он умер через год после того как сделал фотографию. Откуда нам знать? Тогда почему вы уверены что здесь присутствует вопрос охраны авторских прав автора, о котором нам ничего неизвестно? В эту игру можно играть вдвоём. На какое время распространяется установленный вами срок охраны авторских прав неизвестного фотографа по фотографиям 1920-1930-х годов? До 2065 года? И да, к публикации авторское право не имеет никакого отношения. Авторское право на фотографию возникает автоматически – с момента создания фотографии и выражения ее в объективной форме, доступной для окружающих (1). Я думаю, что вы прекрасно знаете русский язык, если загружаете изображения российских персоналий и событий и регулярно выставляете на удаление изображения татарских персоналий и событий, причём не только у меня. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 15:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Russia-1996 Anonymous images made public prior to 1943 are in the public domain. They were given 50 years to identify an author, after 50 years that right to claw back from the public domain expired. --RAN (talk) 00:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- PD-Russia-1996 is not applicable. If you don't know (or don't want to know), who the author is, it doesn't mean the author is anonymous. Quick1984 (talk) 03:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all. No evidence of publication on 20th century. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Откуда вы это знаете? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Вместо того, чтобы задавать бессмысленные вопросы, внимательно ознакомьтесь с требованиями правила COM:EVID/ru, где написано, кто именно должен доказывать свои допущения. Quick1984 (talk) 03:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Про анонимные фотографии 90-летней давности там нет ни слова. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ответы в стиле "в огороде бузина, а в Киеве дядька" не приближают к истине. Ссылку на EVID вы получили, чтобы не повторять требования к оппонентам доказывать вашу неправоту. И новая реплика опять содержит совершенно неверный тезис, который выше уже опровергнут. Могу повторить по-русски: юридически анонимное произведение — то, где автор умышленно скрыл своё имя. То, что вы не знаете или не хотите знать, кто автор, не делает произведение анонимным. Quick1984 (talk) 05:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Про анонимные фотографии 90-летней давности там нет ни слова. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Вместо того, чтобы задавать бессмысленные вопросы, внимательно ознакомьтесь с требованиями правила COM:EVID/ru, где написано, кто именно должен доказывать свои допущения. Quick1984 (talk) 03:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Откуда вы это знаете? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: while I do believe these were published in the 1920s and 1930s, not enough evidence presented that they are truly anonymous. Undelete in 2040s and 2050s when we can assume PD-old-assumed. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of a photo with unknown copyright status. 188.123.231.51 21:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The photo pictured on the slide is mine, I'd taken it literally an hour or so before specifically to put it in the slide. AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (talk) 04:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Anton. I believe Anton that the slide photo is an own work. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)