Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Premios_Ciudad_de_Alcalá,_logotipo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Evariste_Carpentier.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
My personal picture 186.175.91.207 00:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Riad Salih as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This picture is more likely to be a screenshot from a video made by INA Yann (talk) 12:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann as I mentioned, this picture is taken from the INA archives. It is 67 years old, so even the public domain laws of France cannot be applied. Please check the footage yourself, and you will notice. Riad Salih (talk) 12:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
LTA, not a notable person Veracious (talk) 10:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
LTA, not a notable person Veracious (talk) 10:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
LTA, not a notable person Veracious (talk) 10:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Originally tagged as a copyright violation, removed by User:Yann. This logo is non-free in the UK (see COM:TOO UK). It has been deleted countless times in the past. – Pbrks (t • c) 14:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It didn't see any mention of UK before. --Yann (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article, nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article BenedictKauktus (talk) 14:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 18:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article BenedictKauktus (talk) 14:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article, a selfie which is not used in any article BenedictKauktus (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry BenedictKauktus (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 19:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The source flickr account is full of freely licensed derivative images Here and Here How can we trust that this photo is really "own work by the flickr account owner? Leoboudv (talk) 21:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: License laundering (F6) - image here in 2016, well before 2021 Flickr upload; more complete version here (i.e., thus not originating from Flickr); and, as referenced, many works in Flickr user's stream that obviously are not theirs. --Эlcobbola talk 23:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The source flickr account is full of freely licensed derivative images Here and Here How can we trust that this photo is really "own work by the flickr account owner? Especially when the flickr account owner has other several other images of the same person Here and Here Leoboudv (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: License laundering (F6) - image here in 2016, well before 2021 Flickr upload; in higher resolution here (i.e., thus not originating from Flickr); and, as referenced, many works in Flickr user's stream that obviously are not theirs. --Эlcobbola talk 23:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
likely taken from flickr [1] that is licensed with an incompatible license ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/38337191@N06/4701825028 is licensed under cc-by-nc-2.0. --Wdwd (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Taken from a porn site. not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 22:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Rename file Brightt11 (talk) 15:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: pbvious copyvio, alsos requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Versehentlich hochgeladen, bitte löschen auf Wunsch des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 15:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Eine Person im Bild versehentlich hochgeladen, bitte löschen auf Wunsch des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 16:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject Benaouda Benzerdjeb died in 1956 but the original photographer who took this photo must be dead for around 70 years before this image becomes public domain. This appears to be a derivative image Leoboudv (talk) 21:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Leoboudv, I fixed the licence. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment: If this image is from a modern book, it means that you did not take this old 1950's era photo and that Commons cannot keep it since it is not "own work" by you Riad Salih No one knows if the original photographer licensed the image freely. Just a comment, nothing more. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv the author of the book (source) is actually my friend. I have made some changes to the description. Benzerdjeb depicted in the image is an Algerian who has been killed during the Algerian War (1954/1962), died in 1956. An Algerian photographer took the photograph. In Algeria (Template:PD-Algeria-photo-except), all pictures captured prior to 1984 fall within the public domain. Best regards. Riad Salih (talk) 22:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination That was what I was looking for: an Algerian license template. I will pass this image on this template and withdraw this Deletion Request now. Best from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Have a nice day, thank you. Riad Salih (talk) 22:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 22:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
AI-generated image of a real person. Out of scope as such images should never be used, as they will always be less accurate than actual photos of the subjects they depict. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete Looks more like a photoshopped background than AI generation, it was also posted to Twitter four years ago: https://twitter.com/RosarioCentral/status/1272932891442454529 Belbury (talk) 10:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text, nonsense. Omphalographer (talk) 01:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. (A doctor's note?) Omphalographer (talk) 01:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 01:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 01:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Text is possibly above threshold of originality Trade (talk) 01:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted magazine A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep, due to partial artwork in the foreground and the others are de minimis per COM:DM. -- Ooligan (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, intent is clearly to show the artwork. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
作者による依頼：長らく使用されてないのであれば整理削除したい。(Author's request:If it is not used for a long time, I would like to delete it.) Kentagon (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted maps in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in Georgia — Racconish 💬 12:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- File:27th Tokyo International Film Festival The World of Hideaki Anno (15493661999).jpg
- File:27th Tokyo International Film Festival The World of Hideaki Anno (15494331867).jpg
- File:27th Tokyo International Film Festival The World of Hideaki Anno (15494332307).jpg
- File:27th Tokyo International Film Festival The World of Hideaki Anno (15655812556).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP Japan. These photographs were taken in Japan. Neon Genesis Evangelion and the photograph of Hideaki Anno are copyrighted. --IDCM (talk) 14:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A1Cafel, who uploaded these from Flickr, is well aware that they need to know the intellectual property laws of the countries ge uploafs photos from. It’s clear by now they are not paying sufficient attention to their uploads and their lack of judgement in this area is terrible. These need to be deleted immediately. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete These cases are not subject to the FOP. These are not a permanently located work. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Immelstorum (talk · contribs)
[edit]no com:ev.
RZuo (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently those images are copyvios (definitely not "own work").
- File:AkirraTorriyama.png
- File:Felixplantalechbatlle.png
- File:AlcaldeFranciscoVilafrancaGovern2.png
- File:AlcaldePereVilafranca.png
- File:AlcaldeFranciscoVilafrancaGovern1.png
- File:AlcaldeMarcelVilafranca.png
- File:AlcaldeAguadoVilafranca.png
- File:AlcaldeFelixVilafranca.png
- File:Foto del vicepresidente de conradlandia en 2023.png
RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 04:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
these files either in low resolution to be not realisticly used in articles or possible copyvio.
- File:DI Neville Parker.png
- File:Jack Mooney.png
- File:Humphrey Goodman CP.png
- File:Richard Poole (2011-2014).png
- File:Phclargoblanco gris.png
- File:Ciudadanos post.png
- File:RMP.png
- File:Josep Tarradellas I Joan.png
- File:Qw6gyuhjjugholnbkl.png
- File:Lcpc.png
- File:G nj gkuilk bkilkj kuij.png
- File:Kn .joiugbh guklgn ili.png
- File:Jbuitdr67ibugctk.png
- File:Nmmmmmmmmmm. vtuo.png
- File:Jhbk cg vykhhhhh.png
- File:Presifotorftr.png
- File:PauCpc.png
- File:Joanpc.png
- File:Paragonescat.png
- File:Borrascat.png
- File:Junquerascat.png
- File:Arturmas.cat.png
- File:Pasqualmaragallmira.catpresident.png
- File:Jordipujolpresident.cat.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, some already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
same reason as Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_RafelCRD
- File:Jordipujolpresident.png
- File:Jmontilla president.png
- File:Joseptarradellaspresident.png
- File:Joseptarrapresi.png
- File:Hbjnkmlmnjkjl.png
- File:Póster de Rose The Thinker The Movie.jpg
- File:Niceto Alcalá-Zamora (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
No metadata, small size, low resolution image of a band uploaded to help or create an article, seems as if this image may not be own work either. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Composite images need to have each part of the composite uploaded separately before combination. If this was uploaded from a single source, please provide source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
source video is cc-by, but some of the content in this video is marked as "资料"（material） (see the upper right corner of the screenshot), and the copyright ownership of the "资料" is not sure. shizhao (talk) 07:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an extract of a videoclip by the Retame musical group. Who owns the rights to this video clip? Leoboudv (talk) 23:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
private photo and no educational value LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
low quality private pron LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nourafakhry90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:FFB IMG 1712336951168.jpg
- File:RReceived 7420058318083583.jpg
- File:PReceived 351425547934276.jpg
- File:IIMG-20240327-WA0006.jpg
- File:IIMG-20240402-WA0002.jpg
Trade (talk) 19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nourafakhry90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
Trade (talk) 01:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nourafakhry90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
Trade (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
unused personal files Estopedist1 (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hogir Ebdo (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by seeming company rep; no usage, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 17:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bqlqmutoff (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Изображение 2024-02-03 233221839.png
- File:Изображение 2024-02-03 233143408.png
- File:Изображение 2024-02-03 233109933.png
- File:Изображение 2024-02-03 232918527.png
- File:Изображение 2024-02-03 232846440.png
- File:Изображение 2024-02-03 232737468.png
- File:TownyMinecraft2.png
- File:TownyMinecraft1.png
Mitte27 (talk) 04:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 17:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:US National Archives series: Digital Photographs Relating to America's Byways (low quality)
[edit]Low quality images uploaded as part of bulk upload.
Unfortunaly, those images are either extremely low resolution or have other significant issues, which makes them unusuable for any realistic educational purpose, and therefore out of project scope. (see COM:EDUSE)
All images in this category/all images nominated depict only generic landscapes/structures or random people. Note that the images in the original archive version are also only aviable in this quality, so this is not an uploading error, e.g. this image on commons and the original.
- File:Amish Country Byway - Greenery along the Amish Country Byway - NARA - 7716991.jpg
- File:Amish Country Byway - Killbuck Marsh - NARA - 7716981.jpg
- File:Amish Country Byway - Killbuck Marsh - NARA - 7716984.jpg
- File:Amish Country Byway - Shopping at an Outdoor Market - NARA - 7716973.jpg
- File:Amish Country Byway - Strolling on a Leafy Path - NARA - 7716976.jpg
- File:Ashley River Road - A Swamp at Drayton Hall - NARA - 7717049.jpg
- File:Ashley River Road - Ashley River Road - NARA - 7717165.jpg
- File:Ashley River Road - Camellias on Magnolia Garden Pathways - NARA - 7717084.jpg
- File:Ashley River Road - Saucer Magnolias at Magnolia Plantation - NARA - 7717164.jpg
- File:Ashley River Road - Spanish Moss over the Ashley River - NARA - 7717075.jpg
- File:Beartooth Highway - Alpine Wildflowers in the Mountains - NARA - 7717210.jpg
- File:Beartooth Highway - Fly Fishing on Cliff Lake, Beartooth Mountains - NARA - 7717219.jpg
- File:Beartooth Highway - Grizzly bears - NARA - 7717243.jpg
- File:Beartooth Highway - Grizzly Bears In Their Element - NARA - 7717265.jpg
- File:Beartooth Highway - Snowy View from West Summit - NARA - 7717249.jpg
- File:Beartooth Highway - The Bears Tooth Spire - NARA - 7717196.jpg
- File:Beartooth Highway - Waterfall on Beartooth Lake - NARA - 7717211.jpg
- File:Billy the Kid Trail - A Sunset Over Billy the Kid Trail - NARA - 7717366.jpg
- File:Billy the Kid Trail - Free Spirits at the Hubbard Museum of the American West - NARA - 7717337.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - Bridge Over Linville River - NARA - 7717413.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - Fall Color Along the Blue Ridge Parkway - NARA - 7717409.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - Hickory Nut Falls - NARA - 7717412.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - Looking Glass Rock - NARA - 7717414.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - Mabry's Mill - NARA - 7717415.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - Mountain Mists - NARA - 7717416.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - The Parkway in Autumn - NARA - 7717410.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - The Top of Chimney Rock - NARA - 7717408.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - The Viaduct - NARA - 7717405.jpg
- File:Blue Ridge Parkway - Unwinding -- Appalachian Style - NARA - 7717420.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Beech Gap on the Cherohala Skyway - NARA - 7717577.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Islands in the Clouds - NARA - 7717579.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Overlooking the Cherohala Skyway - NARA - 7717564.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Overlooking the Cherohala Skyway - NARA - 7717565.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Rest Stop on the Cherohala Skyway - NARA - 7717558.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Spring on the Cherohala Skyway - NARA - 7717592.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Striking Fall Colors on the Cherohala Skyway - NARA - 7717588.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Sunlight Beyond the Bend - NARA - 7717570.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Sunset on the Cherohala Skyway - NARA - 7717587.jpg
- File:Cherohala Skyway - Tree-lined Road of the Cherohala - NARA - 7717562.jpg
- File:Coal Heritage Trail - Roadside Fall Colors - NARA - 7717670.jpg
- File:Coal Heritage Trail - The Coal Heritage Trail - NARA - 7717671.jpg
- File:Crowley's Ridge Parkway - Peach Trees in Bloom - NARA - 7717859.jpg
- File:Dinosaur Diamond Prehistoric Highway - Dinosaur National Monument Visitor Center in Vernal - NARA - 7718047.jpg
- File:Dinosaur Diamond Prehistoric Highway - Driving the Flaming Gorge-Uintahs Route Near Vernal - NARA - 7718025.jpg
- File:Dinosaur Diamond Prehistoric Highway - Fisher Towers Near Moab - NARA - 7718045.jpg
- File:Dinosaur Diamond Prehistoric Highway - Turret Arch - NARA - 7718093.jpg
- File:Edge of the Wilderness - Birches Along the Byway in Winter - NARA - 7718177.jpg
- File:Edge of the Wilderness - Turtle Lake - NARA - 7718179.jpg
- File:Flaming Gorge-Uintas National Scenic Byway - A Pillar Near Sheep Creek - NARA - 7718322.jpg
- File:Flaming Gorge-Uintas National Scenic Byway - Alert Mule Deer - NARA - 7718348.jpg
- File:Flaming Gorge-Uintas National Scenic Byway - Cattle Drive on the Road - NARA - 7718347.jpg
- File:Flaming Gorge-Uintas National Scenic Byway - Creek Bridge - NARA - 7718340.jpg
- File:Flaming Gorge-Uintas National Scenic Byway - Jensen's Butte and Valley - NARA - 7718344.jpg
- File:Flaming Gorge-Uintas National Scenic Byway - Summer Morning at Flaming Gorge Reservoir in Utah - NARA - 7718353.jpg
- File:Flaming Gorge-Uintas National Scenic Byway - The Winding Flaming Gorge Byway - NARA - 7718381.jpg
- File:Flaming Gorge-Uintas National Scenic Byway - View of Highway 91 from Flaming Gorge Dam - NARA - 7718341.jpg
- File:Flint Hills Scenic Byway - Flint rock wall along Flint Hills Scenic Byway, Kansas - NARA - 7718402.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - A Pioneer Town Street - NARA - 7718692.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - A Rustic Scene on the Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - NARA - 7718689.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - Downtown Grand Junction - NARA - 7718679.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - Finding Fish in Abundance - NARA - 7718683.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - Land-O-Lakes Overlook - NARA - 7718685.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - Mesa Lakes Lodge in the Fall - NARA - 7718690.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - Rich Colors of Fall on the Mesa - NARA - 7718680.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - Summer in the Valley - NARA - 7718698.jpg
- File:Grand Mesa Scenic and Historic Byway - Winter View of the Valley Below - NARA - 7718702.jpg
- File:Grand Rounds Scenic Byway - Hennepin Avenue Bridge - NARA - 7718738.jpg
- File:Grand Rounds Scenic Byway - Martha Crone Visitor Shelter - NARA - 7718744.jpg
- File:Grand Rounds Scenic Byway - Modern Art at Cedar Lake - NARA - 7718742.jpg
- File:Grand Rounds Scenic Byway - Round Lakes - NARA - 7718761.jpg
- File:Grand Rounds Scenic Byway - Walkways Along the Grand Rounds - NARA - 7718750.jpg
- File:Great River Road - Clarks Creek Natural Area - NARA - 7718893.jpg
- File:Great River Road - Heron at the Trempealeau National Wildlife Refuge - NARA - 7718975.jpg
- File:Great River Road - Old Man River at Wyalusing State Park - NARA - 7718953.jpg
- File:Great River Road - Sunset on the Mississippi River - NARA - 7718988.jpg
- File:Great River Road - The Great River - NARA - 7719029.jpg
- File:Great River Road - Waterfowl At Rest - Trempealeau National Widlife Refuge - NARA - 7718993.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Bridge over Walnut Creek - NARA - 7719297.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Cedar Crest Motel - NARA - 7719359.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Clabber Girl Billboard - NARA - 7719295.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Flat Passages - NARA - 7719325.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - In a Cornfield - NARA - 7719335.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Indiana Cornfield - NARA - 7719302.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Landmarks Along Historic National Road - NARA - 7719330.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Looking East from Belleville - NARA - 7719311.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Old Alignment of Historic National Road - NARA - 7719354.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Old Filling Station - NARA - 7719324.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Plainfield - NARA - 7719307.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Remains of a Drive-in Theater - NARA - 7719358.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Rest Areas - NARA - 7719368.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Stilesville - NARA - 7719308.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - Stuckey's - NARA - 7719357.jpg
- File:Historic National Road - The National Road Heritage Trail - NARA - 7719389.jpg
- File:Historic Route 66 - Chapel of the Ages - NARA - 7719432.jpg
- File:Historic Route 66 - Grand Canyon at Dusk - NARA - 7719495.jpg
- File:Historic Route 66 - Meteor Crater - NARA - 7719450.jpg
- File:Historic Route 66 - South Rim at Grand Canyon National Park - NARA - 7719458.jpg
- File:Historic Route 66 - Wildflowers and Aspens - NARA - 7719490.jpg
- File:Indian River Lagoon National Scenic Byway - Hammock Trails on Merritt Island - NARA - 7719535.jpg
- File:Indian River Lagoon National Scenic Byway - Hunting Waterfowl - NARA - 7719527.jpg
- File:Indian River Lagoon National Scenic Byway - Pelican Stretches his Neck - NARA - 7719538.jpg
- File:Indian River Lagoon National Scenic Byway - Waves at Canaveral National Seashore - NARA - 7719529.jpg
- File:Indiana's Historic Pathways - Sunlight Through Pioneer Mother's Forest - NARA - 7719560.jpg
- File:Jemez Mountain Trail - A Blend of Mountains, Sky, and Trees - NARA - 7719656.jpg
- File:Kaibab Plateau-North Rim Parkway - Along the North Rim of the Grand Canyon - NARA - 7719787.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - Autumn Leaves - NARA - 7719800.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - Experience the Byway through Bicycling - NARA - 7719815.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - Lost River - NARA - 7719820.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - Perpetual Scenes of Loveliness - NARA - 7719822.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - Surrounded by Hardwood Forests - NARA - 7719824.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - The Kancamagus Scenic Byway - NARA - 7719821.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - The Swift River - NARA - 7719826.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - Winding Through the White Mountains - NARA - 7719823.jpg
- File:Kancamagus Scenic Byway - Winter Landscapes Worthy of Exploration - NARA - 7719839.jpg
- File:Lake Erie Coastal Ohio Trail - Hawk in Action - NARA - 7719861.jpg
- File:Lakes to Locks Passage - Birder looking over the Lake Champlain Birding Trail - NARA - 7719940.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Bear Creek Canyon - NARA - 7719964.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Buffalo Herd Overlook - NARA - 7719966.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Cretaceous Time - NARA - 7720013.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Dinosaur Bones - NARA - 7720016.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Dinosaur Ridge - NARA - 7719978.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Evergreen Interpretive Area - NARA - 7719989.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Geologic Overview on the Lariat Loop - NARA - 7720014.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Jurassic Time - NARA - 7720015.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Morrison Park - NARA - 7719998.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Morrison-Red Rocks Park-Dinosaur Ridge - NARA - 7719997.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Red Rocks Amphitheatre - NARA - 7719961.jpg
- File:Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway - Visiting Clear Creek History Park - NARA - 7719975.jpg
- File:Loess Hills Scenic Byway - Cat Steps at the Sylvan Runkel Preserve - NARA - 7720110.jpg
- File:Loess Hills Scenic Byway - Emerald Green Hills - NARA - 7720115.jpg
- File:Logan Canyon Scenic Byway - Driving Along Bear Lake's Shore - NARA - 7720253.jpg
- File:Logan Canyon Scenic Byway - Tony Grove Lake in Logan Canyon - NARA - 7720259.jpg
- File:McKenzie Pass-Santiam Pass Scenic Byway - McKenzie Pass - Santiam Pass Scenic Byway - NARA - 7720309.jpg
- File:McKenzie Pass-Santiam Pass Scenic Byway - McKenzie-Santiam Pass - NARA - 7720308.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - A street in Elsah. - NARA - 7720324.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - A Wintery Street in Elsah - NARA - 7720325.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Drive the historic streets of Elsah. - NARA - 7720326.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Family Fun at the Byway Information Site. - NARA - 7720329.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Horses graze in a field along the Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Byway. - NARA - 7720347.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Information Kiosk - NARA - 7720328.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Information kiosk in Elsah. - NARA - 7720310.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Information on the byway - NARA - 7720327.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route. - NARA - 7720337.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Street in Historic Elsah - NARA - 7720323.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Visitors stop for information. - NARA - 7720330.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Visitors view an information kiosk - NARA - 7720331.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Great Rivers Scenic Route - Winter in Elsah. - NARA - 7720311.jpg
- File:Merritt Parkway - Commuting on the Parkway - NARA - 7720349.jpg
- File:Midland Trail - New River Gorge from Canyon Rim Visitor Center - NARA - 7720396.jpg
- File:Mountains to Sound Greenway - I-115 - Snoqualmie Point View Park Visitors - NARA - 7720484.jpg
- File:Mountains to Sound Greenway - I-125 - Green Fields and Mountains - NARA - 7720487.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - A Bridge Just Below Nashville - NARA - 7720568.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - A Cemetery Along the Byway - NARA - 7720552.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Along the Natchez Trace - NARA - 7720571.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - An Overpass Along the Natchez Trace - NARA - 7720548.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Bridge South of Nashville - NARA - 7720560.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Driving Over a Bridge - NARA - 7720562.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Driving Under the Bridge - NARA - 7720557.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Early Buildings on the Natchez Trace - NARA - 7720550.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Forehand Hollow Bridge on the Natchez Trace - NARA - 7720565.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Interpretive Signs for Native American Mounds - NARA - 7720554.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Jogging Along the Trace - NARA - 7720561.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Looking Back at the Natchez Trace - NARA - 7720566.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Monuments and Markers on the Trace - NARA - 7720553.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Parking at a Rest Stop - NARA - 7720570.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Parking at the Natchez Trace Information Center - NARA - 7720555.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Rest Area below Nashville - NARA - 7720569.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Rest Area on the Natchez Trace - NARA - 7720547.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Rest Stop South of Nashville - NARA - 7720563.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Rock Wall on the Natchez Trace - NARA - 7720572.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Rounding a Bend on the Natchez Trace - NARA - 7720564.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Tennessee Valley Divide - NARA - 7720588.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Tennessee Valley Divide - NARA - 7720589.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - The Natchez Trace Information Center - NARA - 7720556.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - The Natchez Trace on a Dreary Day - NARA - 7720567.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Transformation of a Hunter's Path - NARA - 7720551.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Viewing the Bridge from Below - NARA - 7720558.jpg
- File:Natchez Trace Parkway - Viewing the Bridge from the Rest Stop - NARA - 7720559.jpg
- File:Nebo Loop Scenic Byway - Mt. Nebo Wilderness - NARA - 7720653.jpg
- File:Nebo Loop Scenic Byway - Visitors Enjoying a Trail on Nebo Loop - NARA - 7720635.jpg
- File:Ohio River Scenic Byway - Encased in Winter Snow - NARA - 7720806.jpg
- File:Ohio River Scenic Byway - Walking along the Ohio River on the River Trail - NARA - 7720807.jpg
- File:Outback Scenic Byway - Birds Take Flight Over Abert Lake - NARA - 7720844.jpg
- File:Outback Scenic Byway - Frozen Landscape around Summer Lake - NARA - 7720855.jpg
- File:Pacific Coast Scenic Byway - Oregon - A Peek at the Pacific Shoreline - NARA - 7720914.jpg
- File:Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway - Icefishing Sunset - NARA - 7720962.jpg
- File:Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway - Pine River Dam - NARA - 7720983.jpg
- File:Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway - Pine River In Autumn - NARA - 7720994.jpg
- File:Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway - Pine River Pumpkin Patch - NARA - 7720993.jpg
- File:Paul Bunyan Scenic Byway - Snowmobilers on a Snowy Wooded Path - NARA - 7720964.jpg
- File:Red Rock Scenic Byway - Birds in Shallow Waters - NARA - 7721226.jpg
- File:Red Rock Scenic Byway - Golf Course on Red Rock Scenic Byway - NARA - 7721236.jpg
- File:River Road Scenic Byway - Hardwood Forests along the Au Sable River - NARA - 7721262.jpg
- File:River Road Scenic Byway - Leading down to Iargo Springs. - NARA - 7721271.jpg
- File:Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway - A Splash of Color - NARA - 7721381.jpg
- File:Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway - An Idyllic Backdrop at the Woodruff Bridge - NARA - 7721365.jpg
- File:Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway - Cascades of Water - NARA - 7721380.jpg
- File:Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway - Jaguar Participants at Crater Lake National Park - NARA - 7721374.jpg
- File:Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway - Jaguar Tour Participants - NARA - 7721373.jpg
- File:Santa Fe Trail - Biking the Santa Fe - NARA - 7721540.jpg
- File:Santa Fe Trail - Sunset Along the Santa Fe Trail - NARA - 7721601.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - A Trail at Posey Lake - NARA - 7721920.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Angel's Palace Trail in Kodachrome State Park, UT - NARA - 7721687.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Aspen, Pine, and the Road Down Boulder Mountain - NARA - 7721774.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Calf Creek Falls - NARA - 7721737.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Calf Creek Falls from a Distance - NARA - 7721738.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Calf Creek in Escalante Canyons - NARA - 7721739.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Canyons at Calf Creek Recreation Picnic Area - NARA - 7721740.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Castle Rock - NARA - 7721752.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Dipping Down into Escalante Canyons - NARA - 7721832.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Driving Along Upper Valley - NARA - 7721971.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Driving through a Red Canyon Tunnel - NARA - 7721970.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Entrance to Escalante Multi-Agency Visitor Center - NARA - 7721824.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Escalante Canyons seen from Boynton Overlook on Scenic Byway 12 - NARA - 7721715.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Fall Foliage on Boulder Mountain - NARA - 7721709.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Featuring the Qualities of Scenic Byway 12 - NARA - 7721813.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Fun in a Tree at Capitol Reef National Park - NARA - 7721900.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Hiker at an Overlook in Red Canyon - NARA - 7721938.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Hikers along Mossy Cave Hike and Tropic Canal - NARA - 7721894.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Hoodoos on Mossy Cave Hike in Bryce Canyon - NARA - 7721893.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Indian Granary in Escalante Canyons - NARA - 7721866.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Jagged Formations at Kodachrome Basin State Park - NARA - 7721875.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Junction of Scenic Byway 12 and Posey Lake Road Scenic Backway - NARA - 7721870.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Junction with Hole-In-The-Rock Scenic Backway - NARA - 7721869.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - North End of Upper Valley near Intrigue Pullout - NARA - 7721972.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Panoramic View from Boulder Mountain - NARA - 7721911.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Pinnacles Seen on Nature Trail Hike - NARA - 7721876.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Pit Dwelling at Anasazi Museum - NARA - 7721681.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Posey Lake in Summer - NARA - 7721923.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Powell Point, "A Landmark in History" - NARA - 7721701.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Pullout Along Scenic Byway 12 for Hole-in-the-Rock Turnoff - NARA - 7721856.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Ranch in Tropic, Utah - NARA - 7721966.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Red Canyon Scenic Turnout and Thunder Mountain Trailhead - NARA - 7721881.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Rock Formations Along Scenic Byway 12 in Red Canyon - NARA - 7721933.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Route to Boulder Mountain - NARA - 7721706.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Rugged Redrock of Capitol Reef - NARA - 7721865.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - The Blues Landscape - NARA - 7721700.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - The Fruita Orchards in Spring - NARA - 7721891.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - The Qualities of Scenic Byway 12, Utah's All-American Road. - NARA - 7721814.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Too Pooped To Pump - NARA - 7721812.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Torrey Main Street - NARA - 7721955.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Turnoff to Boulder Mountain - NARA - 7721707.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Turnoff to Scenic Byway 12 from SR-24 Near Torrey - NARA - 7721872.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - View Across Plateaus from Scenic Byway 12 Rest Area near Bryce Summit - NARA - 7721953.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - View from Boulder Mountain - NARA - 7721703.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - View from Boulder Mountain - NARA - 7721878.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - View from Powell Point - NARA - 7721926.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - View from Scenic Byway 12's Boynton Overlook - NARA - 7721716.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - View of Boulder Mountain - NARA - 7721708.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - View of Canyons from Burr Trail - NARA - 7721722.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Viewpoint a Few Miles North of Hole-in-the-Rock Turnoff - NARA - 7721949.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - When Mountains Get the Blues... - NARA - 7721699.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 12 - Wildcat Ranger Station - NARA - 7721986.jpg
- File:Scenic Byway 143 - Utah's Patchwork Parkway - Fly Fishing at Panguitch Lake - NARA - 7721996.jpg
- File:Skyline Drive - Visitors Enjoying a Field Seminar in Big Meadows - NARA - 7722204.jpg
- File:Stevens Pass Greenway - Cascade Mountains and Valley - NARA - 7722234.jpg
- File:Strait of Juan de Fuca Highway - SR 114 - The Rocky Shores of Salt Creek Recreation Area - NARA - 7722257.jpg
- File:Strait of Juan de Fuca Highway - SR 128 - A Scattering of Trees on the Way to Hurricane Ridge - NARA - 7722241.jpg
- File:Talladega Scenic Drive - Dense Conifer Forests - NARA - 7722300.jpg
- File:The Energy Loop- Huntington-Eccles Canyons Scenic Byway - Crabapple Trees in Bloom at Fairview Museum - NARA - 7722352.jpg
- File:The Energy Loop- Huntington-Eccles Canyons Scenic Byway - Scofield Reservoir - NARA - 7722371.jpg
- File:The Energy Loop- Huntington-Eccles Canyons Scenic Byway - The Energy Loop Meandering Through Lush Valleys and Over High Peaks - NARA - 7722320.jpg
- File:The Energy Loop- Huntington-Eccles Canyons Scenic Byway - Winding Through the Utah Mountains on The Energy Loop- Huntington-Eccles Canyons Scenic Byway - NARA - 7722317.jpg
- File:Trail Ridge Road-Beaver Meadow Road - Miles of Mountains - NARA - 7722543.jpg
- File:Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway - Burney Falls in Northern California - NARA - 7722686.jpg
- File:Western Heritage Historic Byway - The Snake River Canyon - NARA - 7722771.jpg
TheImaCow (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edivale Va (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.
- File:Industrialización y avances tecnológicos.jpg
- File:Regímenes totalitarios.jpg
- File:Regímenes socialistas.jpg
- File:Regímenes liberales.jpg
- File:Surgimiento del Estado liberal.jpg
- File:Participacion Ciudadana.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
None of these are own works, and probably complex enough to have a copyright.
- File:Logo Polizia Locale Regione Puglia.jpg
- File:SOGGOLO D.jpg
- File:Livrea polizia locale puglia.jpg
- File:FRONTE TESSERINO 3.jpg
- File:RETRO TESSERA.jpg
- File:Fiat punto polizia locale puglia.jpg
- File:RETRO TESSERA POLIZIA LOCALE.jpg
- File:FRONTE TESSERA.jpg
Yann (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
More files with uncertain copyright.
- File:Encomio regione.jpg
- File:Encomio del sindaco.jpg
- File:Encomio consiglio comunale.jpg
- File:Encomio comandante.jpg
- File:Meriti speciali regione puglia.jpg
- File:Lungo comando.jpg
- File:Encomio sindaco.jpg
- File:Anzianità di servizio.jpg
- File:Encomio d'onore deliberato dal Consiglio Comunale.jpg
- File:Encomio del comandante.jpg
Yann (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romanov KV (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement.
- File:3card final.gif
- File:VideoToGif GIF.gif
- File:Card gif 2.gif
- File:Card gif.gif
- File:Export full.gif
- File:Export 0.gif
- File:Creditcard.png
- File:Cardgrey.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
copyrighted film, not own work Bultro (talk) 10:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 15:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- How is this a "personal (?) photo"? Strakhov (talk) 04:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination probable copyvio. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sam feetpics (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
Trade (talk) 21:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it hasn't got the permission of the family to publish it. It is a very sensible information. I, has her daugther, request that file to be deleted. Thank you. Laegipcia (talk) 16:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. The file is free (CC-BY), and the information on Bañados' death is public. Bedivere (talk) 16:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I want to add that this is the death certificate of a notable individual, whose cause of death has already been publicized by news media such as Cambio21 [2]. The certificate can be obtained for free by anyone using Bañados' RUT (national ID number), which is also publicly available. This particular file is used as a reference on Wikidata, which sustains the cause of death in the infobox used by the Spanish Wikipedia. Removing this valuable source of information, just because somebody who says it's his daughter (which I respect but can't take seriously because they are trying to take down public information) wants to take down information already publicly available in news reports too, including the very same death certificate. Bedivere (talk) 03:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Alaa :)..! 19:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Scope? Also user uploaded 2 photos, the other from social media, no reason to believe this would be an own work. 186.175.58.56 23:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramdani mourad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Poor quality
- File:ختان الأطفال.jpg
- File:طبق وهراني.jpg
- File:حي الحمري وهران.jpg
- File:النَّعْل.jpg
- File:مدينة وهران.jpg
- File:سماء.jpg
- File:حي الحمري بوهران.jpg
- File:الكَبْشُ.jpg
- File:تين.jpg
- File:عِمارة.jpg
- File:تِمْثالٌ.jpg
- File:لوحة إعلانية.jpg
- File:ساحة مدينة.jpg
- File:العَيْنُ.jpg
- File:قاعة الأساتذة.jpg
- File:الله لا إاله إلاٌ هو.jpg
- File:الدخول المدرسي.jpg
- File:أستاذ الرياضيات.jpg
- File:حي تافنة.jpg
- File:حي تافنة وهران.jpg
- File:الساعة اليدوية.jpg
- File:الْكُسْكُس.jpg
Trade (talk) 22:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, quality is OK, not everybody has a camera. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
personal info. not in use.- Gveret Tered (talk) 12:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, it's a personal document! André Koehne TALK TO ME 15:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
personal info. not in use. Gveret Tered (talk) 12:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Hynamorii M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
The X(Twitter) youtuber icon is copyrighed Vitorperrut555 (talk) 23:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/193751847@N03
[edit]Source Flickr account is a license laundering account; see COM:AN post and DRs (e.g., Commons:Deletion requests/File:CHIARA LUCE BADANO 3.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Valentino Rossi 1997.jpg). For files here, for example, File:Katie Taylor 2016 Astana World Boxing Championship - Katie with Skye Nicolson.jpg, File:Katie Taylor 2016 Astana World Boxing Championship - Katie with Skye Nicolson (cropped).jpg, and File:Katie Taylor 2016 Astana World Boxing Championship - Katie with Skye Nicolson (cropped 2).jpg were here 27 May 2022, before 28 May 2022 Flickr upload.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Katie Taylor 2016 Astana World Boxing Championship - Katie with Skye Nicolson.jpg
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Reggio Emilia, manifestazione NO Green Pass 6 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Una valanga umana a Milano per dire NO Green Pass Obbligatorio.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Bassano del Grappa, manifestazione NO Green Pass 6 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - La Spezia, manifestazione NO Green Pass 6 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - -Verona, manifestazione NO Green Pass 6 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Genova, manifestazione NO Green Pass 6 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Padova, manifestazione NO Green Pass 2 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Trieste, manifestazione NO Green Pass, la Polizia usa i manganelli.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Firenze, manifestazione NO Green Pass 6 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Roma, manifestazione NO Green Pass 6 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Coronavirus-Covid - Siracusa, manifestazione NO Green Pass 6 novembre 2021.webm
- File:Katie Taylor 2016 Astana World Boxing Championship - Katie with Skye Nicolson (cropped).jpg
- File:Katie Taylor 2016 Astana World Boxing Championship - Katie with Skye Nicolson (cropped 2).jpg
Эlcobbola talk 23:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all the images....and media. Basically, the images and videos from these accounts were stolen or taken from other websites and freely licensed on this flickrwashing account. This is one of the worst cases of flickrwashing I have ever seen. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom and Leo. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per @Leoboudv -- Ooligan (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Queen of Hearts (not related) 05:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image, text only (∩ symbol) Nutshinou Talk! 20:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 12:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of the project scope, low quality drawing Nutshinou Talk! 20:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work of copyrighted character. --Strakhov (talk) 12:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:NUDE LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality penis snapshot. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Discord
[edit]icon and banner are copyrighted
Nutshinou Talk! 19:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Discord
[edit]Commons:De minimis
- File:DiscordVoiceChannels.png
- File:Server Boost Badge Levels.webp
- File:Tampilan Peladen Mobile Discord.jpg
- File:VerifiedDiscordServer.png
- File:WorldHistoryDiscordRoles.png
- File:Ciberatentados del Domingo 10 de Abril de 2022.jpg
- File:Screenshoot-proof-mystictipi.jpg
- File:Screenshoot-proof-mystictipi2.jpg
- File:Screenshoot-proof-mystictipi3.jpg
Trade (talk) 01:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Should probably be undeleted in 95 years, or so. Sebbog13 (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted image uploaded to Commons, from https://mubi.com/en/cast/terry-carter TAnthony (talk) 01:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
copyrighted Veracious (talk) 03:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 188.170.76.132 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 03:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no evident reason for deletion, 19th century municipal seal. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Composite images require each to be uploaded separately with correct permissions and sources. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Ellin Beltz if all of the components' licenses are compatible with Commons, then the licensing is correct, even though the sourcing is inadequate. IMHO, Template:Dw no source since should be applied to the file; not a deletion request. Given the uploader's previous answer when asked for sources on another DW, the chances for correct sourcing are slim, but it's best to assume good faith. Webfil (talk) 13:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No progress; collage of unsourced photos some clearly modern enough that they cannot be assumed to be out of copyright. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
single uploading by the user. Small image, no EXIF-data. Unlike that own work Estopedist1 (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; false claims per reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 06:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
_Premios_Ciudad_de_Alcal%C3%A1,_logotipo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Premios_Ciudad_de_Alcal%C3%A1,_logotipo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Source states "Copyright Portal Municipal del Ayuntamiento de Alcalá de Henares" and PD-Textlogo is hardly applicable. Remains the question whether it is above or below COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
_Premios_Ciudad_de_Alcalá,_logotipo.png){kind=link}
- Complex enough to have artistic value. Delete. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion, not text. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
_Premios_Ciudad_de_Alcalá,_logotipo.png){kind=link}
The threshold for copyright in the UK is very low, and even a very simple design may qualify for copyright protection. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 08:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hubnetix is a company registered in the UK, and the copyright is registered in the UK. An overview of the company is shown on the right. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; claimed CC license unsupported. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No apparent good-faith purpose, out of scope. funplussmart (talk) 23:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio Eni Appartei (talk) 09:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio Eni Appartei (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Delete, food image could be blurred likely, but it is unlikely that the file will be still useful. TheImaCow (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the food images are too prominent unfortunaly. TheImaCow (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Derivative work of this copyrighted file (generated before he was president, that would have made it PD) Bedivere (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It looks like Leandro Rocha invented a feminine user to upload this photo. 186.175.27.21 22:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Don't delete, let's assume innocence. 186.175.27.21 22:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Erm. Why are you talking to yourself? Omphalographer (talk) 00:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: strange anon double comment. No earlier versions seen in reverse image searches. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyvios; need permission.
- File:Ana María Marcos del Cano.jpg
- File:Foto Sagrario Aznar Almazán.jpg
- File:Foto de Nuria del Olmo Izquierdo.jpg
- File:Foto de Cristina González Gaya.jpg
- File:Carmen Victoria Marrero Aguiar.jpg
RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of permission from artist Trade (talk) 22:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pepe the Frog
[edit]Derivative work of Matt Furie's character Pepe the Frog
- File:Gate of The Young's Hainan Chicken.jpg
- File:IMGP1719 (49151297418).jpg
- File:Jesse Edwards Painting Passion Pepe Billboard.png
- File:Poggers.png (1).webp
- File:SDIM2557 (49403304901).jpg
- File:SDIM2558 (49403304391).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Trade (talk) 13:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- For File:Gate of The Young's Hainan Chicken.jpg, I would argue De minimis applies. Pepe the Frog is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the image subject, but is not essential to the subject (Gate of The Young's Hainan Chicken). Onthewings (talk) 13:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Also think the first image is fine; shouldn't street art like that be allowed with plenty of similar photos being here? Prototyperspective (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Graffiti is not public-domain, and if it contains non-trivial protected content is often deleted. We know Furie actively protects Pepe, so we should default to delete here as all of these are DW unless one can make a specific DM case. I think the Gate is not DM but is instead an overt DW that appears to use Pepe as part of the logo of the business, and that blotting it out (leaving a mostly blank gate) substantively changes the character of the image. DMacks (talk) 06:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pepe the Frog
[edit]Per Commons:Toys
- File:DSCF2025 (49453969002).jpg
- File:IMGP1763 (49151812721).jpg
- File:P1180024 (49372998677).jpg
- File:SDIM2930 (49448135683).jpg
- File:SDIM2932 (49448610196).jpg
- File:SDIM2939 (49448133643).jpg
- File:Hong Kong IMG 5193 (49321917853).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Trade (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep COM:TOYS is not a policy that 'any pictures of toys must be deleted'. Instead it's a recognition that toys, like most things, may incorporate a creative input that is protectable by copyright. However it isn't a given that there will be any creative input in the design of the toy that is thus protectable.
- In this case, the toys are Pepes. The original creativity still resides with the cartoon, not the toy. I see no new creative effort beyond that. So we're back to a situation closer to COM:COSPLAY. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep this photo should crop out toy and keep the rest. Hong Kong IMG 5193 (49321917853).jpg
- --Ooligan (talk) 10:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- It could be blurred. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Deleted the two where the toy was the subject of the photo, kept the rest per the discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Modern building, no FoP in Lithuania. While the sign is the reason for the photo, the building is not de minimis by any stretch of the imagination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Jim. -- Ooligan (talk) 16:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward, Chris.sherlock2, and Ooligan: Since this is in use on ja.wiki, it's worth preserving if we can. I cropped it considerably. What are your thoughts on the current version? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think we can keep it unless it is cropped very tightly on the sign. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probably we should crop it tightly then. This is a fairly historical image, if we can focus on the sign then the building would be de minimus. I’d support that. We would then merely have to delete the previous versions of the image.
- FoP is a pain. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 07:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think we can keep it unless it is cropped very tightly on the sign. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward, Chris.sherlock2, and Ooligan: I just cropped it even tighter. IMO this is the tightest crop possible that includes a) the sign, b) the Ukrainian flag, and c) enough of the building to give the context that this sign stretches across the width of an office building. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nom, thank you. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Invalid licensing information. Source given is Alamy which is a commercial service. The account has been previously sanctioned for uploading unfree images after warning: block log. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Invalid licensing information. Source given is "WW2 gravestone" which is improbable. The account has been previously sanctioned for uploading unfree images after warning: block log. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
{{autotranslate|base=Speedynote|1=File:Kaiglazier.jpg|2=[[COM:CSD#G7|CSD G7]] (author or uploader request deletion)}} APHCBR (talk) 02:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Source is as indicated, but there is no evidence at the site that the image is available under the here stipulated {{Attribution}} license. While the website might say (as indicated on the image description page) ""All pictures from the city's website may be used [on other websites, including wikipedia], preferably mentioning the source.", it does not say that deriviate use and/or commercial use is allowed. This makes it incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 01:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Image is part of an official document on the city website, which would seem to fall within {{PD-IcelandGov}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
closing comment article 9 says "acts, regulations, administrative provisions, court rulings and similar official documents". I struggle to see how a webpage fits the first four criteria and would be seen as a similar document. I also would have thought that a council website would have a level of difference to the government itslf, especially in context of the stated attribution statement. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 188.170.76.132 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 03:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 188.170.76.132 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 03:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 03:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Fair use (Fair use) which would not be admissible to Commons, however we have another artwork by this same creator which was approved by the OTRS team. Would it be possible for an OTRS volunteer to check if the permission was "all works" or the single work to which the OTRS tag is attached? Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BrianStanding (talk · contribs)
[edit]This group is a good-faith upload of public works of art in the USA created by Sid Boyum who passed in 1991. To retain these due to "no freedom of panorama" laws in the US, and the recent date of demise of their creator requires a release from his heir/s. If that's possible, please have them read the page at COM:OTRS and send in the simple email. Cheers.
- File:Sid Boyum Grinning Fool.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Geometric Form Number 2.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Red Pagoda (restored).jpg
- File:Sid Boyum 2D Lion (restored).jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Smiling Teardrop Form.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Balinese Goddess.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Red Lantern (Heion-no-Shiko).jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Cowboy and Friend.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum's sculpture "Cowboy and Friend.".jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Anamorphic Female Form.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Multi-Colored Pagoda.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Two-Dimensional Lion.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Geometric Form.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum White Lantern.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Tree Limb Faces.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Lantern in Beige.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Unicorn.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum's Red Pagoda sculpture view 154.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum's Red Pagoda sculpture view 1.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Pyramid sculpture with Schenk-Atwood neighborhod sign. 01.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Blue Tripod Lantern in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum's sculptures, "Gates of Hell," with "The Demon" in Madison, Wisconsin 1.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum's sculptures, "Gates of Hell," with "The Demon" in Madison, Wisconsin 2.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum "Fu Dog Lantern" in Yahara Place Park in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Park bench and Sid Boyum sculpture "Fu Dog Lantern" in Yahara Place Park, Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Yahara Place Park with Sign and Boyum Sculpture 1.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum's "Multi-Layer Pyramid" sculpture in Olbrich Park in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Crowning Woman sculpture in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Hippopotamus in Wirth Court Park in Madison, Wisconsin 2.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Hippopotamus in Wirth Court Park in Madison, Wisconsin 1.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Scarlet Form concrete sculpture in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Man-Eating Mushroom and Blue Urn with Dragon in Jackson Square in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Man-Eating Mushroom in Jackson Squarre, Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Blue Urn with DragonSid Boyum's concrete sculpture, "Blue Urn with Dragon" in Jackson Square in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Creature Abstract in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum's concrete sculpture "Easter Island Head" at Lowell Elementary School in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum "Small Mushroom Number One" at Lowell Elementary School in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Sid Boyum's concrete sculpture "Small Mushroom Number Two" at Lowell Elementary School in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Blockhead Form sculpture in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Cubist Form sculpture in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Satyr Sculpture in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum's concrete sculpture "Dignified Figure" at Lowell Elementary School in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
- File:Sid Boyum Polar Bear Chair, Elmside Circle Park in Madison, Wisconsin.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Too blurry photo. Better photo: File:台北帝寶 183344.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 05:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Better version: File:CLbus FAE-772.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 06:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not limited to one image of the bus. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - https://www.govt.nz/about/using-this-website/copyright-and-attribution/ "Copyright in photographs on Govt.nz is not owned or licensed to you by the Crown. Unless otherwise stated in relation to specific photographs, you cannot copy, distribute or adapt any photograph without the agreement of the copyright owner." TheLoyalOrder (talk) 08:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo of Ba Win should be deleted, because the second Ba Win photo that I have made that is different from this one is better, - No black bar on a photo, better colors and quality. KhantWiki (talk) 08:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
- Удаляете изображения Z с Викисклада, похвально. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 04:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Graywalls as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It says the photo is taken by the photographed subject's partner Elene Medvedev, but does not say that the uploader is Elene. One can't release a copyright of a photo they receievd for a specific purpose. No evidence of permission/license laundering |source= Yann (talk) 08:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission per COM:VRT, uploader is not photographer; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Elena Hill M2k~dewiki (talk) 08:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
|
File:Tursaansydämet.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/20 → File:Tursaansydämet.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG. |
 |
Deleted: though treated as duplicate; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北 Taipei 桃園捷運 MRT A13 Airport Terminal 2 Station from Taoyuan Airport March 2024 R12S.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 11:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Markus13666 (talk) 11:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The bedroom is not fully visible. Crooked perspective of the photo. Julie13666 (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Syd eetfuk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 14:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 14:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 14:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect licence tag, as the image is not a work of an agency of the US federal govt. No indication of free licencing on source website (IUCN). William Avery (talk) 08:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: image has legend "Leaflet | Powered by Esri | Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, EPA E" and Leaflet is open sourceno valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 14:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Delete, food image does probably not quality for de minimis. TheImaCow (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep {{De minimis}} applies to the food pictures on the tables TheImaCow (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep COM:Taiwan#Applicability only protects "literary works" - a generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and dosen't fall into that category. {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Almost all logos depicted here are {{PD-textlogo}}, and the for the few that aren't, {{De minimis}} applies. TheImaCow (talk) 14:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Better version: File:張院長訪視苗栗客家文化園區 09.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 13:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: users can work out which they prefer, no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Dupicate of File:Australian Colonial Flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Being an exact, scaled down duplicate of a pre-existing SVG file has been an accepted rationale for many, many years. Fry1989 eh? 14:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and especially since the PNG was uploaded long after the SVG, so no history preservation issues or etc. TheImaCow (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: asked and answered, {{Vva}} applied; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
i didn't censored license plate on cars Daniel847 (talk) 14:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I have uploaded another version where I blurred the licence plate, original version can be revision-deleted. (I was really confused for the last ten minutes, because I couldn't see the change I uploaded, turns out you need to clear your browser cache) TheImaCow (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.
- File:Cardenales electores por países.png
- File:Cardenales por años 2304.png
- File:Total2304.png
- File:Electores 2304.png
- File:Pasan a no electores por año.png
- File:Distribución de los cardenales electores y no electores por país.png
- File:Distribución de cardenales electores por países.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: lackjing context and source of data, and very much a point in time set of diagrams; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
privacy rights Xocolatl (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: f10; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copies of images of the 1000 hryvnia banknote
[edit]- File:1000 гривен аверс.png
- File:1000 гривень 2019 реверс.jpg
- File:1000 гривень 2019 року аверс і реверс.jpeg
- File:1000 гривень 2019 аверс.jpg
Duplicates --Мункач Варош (talk) 15:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
_-_Evariste_Carpentier.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Evariste_Carpentier.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Les couleurs de l'image ne sont pas bonnes. J'ai remplacé le fichier par une reproduction au couleurs plus fidèles à la réalité. Merci de supprimer. Template:Suppression image Cafedelyon 15:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; use {{Other version}} to identify alternate versions. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
_-_Evariste_Carpentier.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by ProfBethRN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; seems to be educational, simply not used locally. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Author is Tobias Atzkern (see description) SuPich (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, metadata not present; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Approaches to New Orleans. Prepared by order of Maj. Gen. N. P. Banks. Henry L. Abbot, Capt. & Chief, Top. Engrs., Feb. 14th, 1863 - NARA - 306071.jpg
[edit]
Same map as File:Approaches to New Orleans - NARA - 109182632.jpg, but lower quality: Most descriptive texts are not readable here due the resolution being too small. TheImaCow (talk) 16:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: suitably different, leave to users to decide which they prefer; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Poland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality Trade (talk) 16:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: only version of person, poor quality better than nothing; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Serbia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:US National Archives series: J.K. Hillers Prints of the Southwest, 1879 - 1879
[edit]Low quality .gif files - GIF is not suitable for photographic data. Significantly better JPG versions exist here, here and here. Further, all three files are also avaiable as TIF files. The low quality GIF files are unused and out of scope.
- File:A general view of the Laguna Pueblo, New Mexico - NARA - 542443.gif
- File:First terrace of Zuni, New Mexico, showing ladders and utensils - NARA - 542442.gif
- File:Hopi women's dance, Oraibi, Arizona - NARA - 542441.gif
TheImaCow (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- GIFs are fine for photographic data. They are lossless, while JPG is lossy though do thumbnail better usually. PNG and TIFF are typically better than GIF though, and in these cases we have larger TIFFs uploaded earlier, so agreed see no purpose for the GIF files. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Minor note: GIF is limited to 256 colors, so it can only be lossless for greyscale photographs (where all 256 colors will be shades of grey), and even then may be lossy if the creator reduces the color palette or enables image "optimization" in some editors when saving the image. Omphalographer (talk) 00:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- GIFs are fine for photographic data. They are lossless, while JPG is lossy though do thumbnail better usually. PNG and TIFF are typically better than GIF though, and in these cases we have larger TIFFs uploaded earlier, so agreed see no purpose for the GIF files. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted in Austria (Skill and Labour). Alejitao123 (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've received permission to upload this to wikimedia from Irfan himself. I would like this deletion request to be dropped. Mrpenguinb (talk) 23:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- CommentWell, in this case, you will have to confirm it (i think such as a proof of the official support forum or VRT), in this case, he will accept that the image will be used for any purpose, even commercially.Alejitao123 (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Ticket:2015070710007556 may already have the relevant permission we need. Yeeno (talk) 00:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In this case, I think that it could be kept. Make sure to edit the description page.Alejitao123 (talk) 15:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket 2015070710007556 and an explicit statement of CC BY-SA 4.0 on the website. ─ Aafī (talk) 06:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
RZuo (talk) 17:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Conteúdo restrito. Necessário enviar permissão por VRT Cosmo Skerry (talk) 18:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: good faith upload, but the artwork depicted is not free
FOP issue so converting to DR. Abzeronow (talk) 18:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: good faith upload, but the artwork depicted is not free
Converting to DR since this is a FOP issue. The image of the train could be blurred and this could still be a useful file. Abzeronow (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Pictures from a booklet, promotional photoshoot, and a picture found on Google
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stegemann MHG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Carbonlinie C-Flex Wohnzimmer.jpg
- File:Carbonlinie C-Flex Badezimmer Set.jpg
- File:Cl Wohnzimmer c-flex Boden Wand Decke.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Japan. This photograph of the Evangelion was taken in Japan. IDCM (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Adding Category:Japanese FOP cases/pending.--IDCM (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: good faith upload, but the artwork depicted is not free
Converting to DR since this is a FOP issue. Abzeronow (talk) 18:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: artwork is not well-represented, especially in the context of the whole photograph is close to de minimis. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eleonora1948 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User claimed that these photos are own works but no edidence that (s)he is author of them. 3 photos looks like old photos, 3 other are images from books/magazines. and this is photo by user:Horim.
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Александр Леонидович Анисимов.jpg
- File:Могила Александра Шлаена и Аллы Ревенко.jpg
- File:Сестра кинематографиста Алексея Ярмольского Елена.jpg
- File:Алексей Ярмольский и Павел Кадочников.jpg
- File:Обложка журнала Профиль-Украина от 24.04.2006.jpg
- File:Номер журнала Профиль-Украина от 25.09.2006.jpg
- File:Обложка журнала Профиль-Украина в 2006 году.jpg
Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 18:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Do not believe it fits the license as Xiong is not a federal official ABlitzz (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: ©2024 Macomb County Board of Commissioners. All Rights Reserved.; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside spammy sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the claimed {{PD-US-no notice}} license cannot be applied in this case. That license requires that the original publication have been before 1977 and without a copyright notice. These images were sourced from a modern web page with no information about the original publication, so we have no evidence that they were actually originally published before 1977 and without copyright notice.
- File:Chicago and North Western 1200 diagram.gif
- File:Chicago and North Western 1200.jpg
- File:Erie Railroad GE-Ingersoll Rand diesel-electric locomotive 25.jpg
- File:Foley Brothers 110-1.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- The {{PD-US-no notice}} licence can be applied in this case because the first file is a diagram from a railway diagram book created when the locomotive was put into service, and all the other images are factory images taken immediately after the locomotives were built. The evidence is therefore clear that these images were published before 1977 and therefore the request for deletion is unjustified. Pechristener (talk) 20:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pechristener: Internal documents such as diagram books and factory images that were not offered for public distribution are not considered to have been published under US law - see COM:PUBLISH. Evidence is still needed that these images were publicly published before 1977, and that that publication did not have a copyright notice. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- These documents were not internal because they were published in magazines and therefore available to the public. There is already evidence above that the images were published before 1977. Therefore, still no justification for deletion. Pechristener (talk) 21:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pechristener: What magazines? Are there scans available so that we can verify that the magazines were actually published without a copyright notice (which is an important criterion that you have not addressed in your answers)? You need to substantiate your claims with evidence that proves the public domain status of the images, because otherwise COM:PRP means they should be deleted. The existing sources do not support your claims:
- The source for File:Chicago and North Western 1200 diagram.gif sources it to the "Chicago & North Western Ry Diagram Book" which would be an internal document.
- The source for File:Chicago and North Western 1200.jpg only notes it as "Builders view" with no information on provenance.
- The source for File:Erie Railroad GE-Ingersoll Rand diesel-electric locomotive 25.jpg sources it to a commercial railfan publication, which may have been published with a copyright notice.
- The claimed source for File:Foley Brothers 110-1.jpg does not actually contain the image (and did not either before or just after the time of upload either). This means we know nothing about the provenance of the image.
- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pechristener: What magazines? Are there scans available so that we can verify that the magazines were actually published without a copyright notice (which is an important criterion that you have not addressed in your answers)? You need to substantiate your claims with evidence that proves the public domain status of the images, because otherwise COM:PRP means they should be deleted. The existing sources do not support your claims:
- These documents were not internal because they were published in magazines and therefore available to the public. There is already evidence above that the images were published before 1977. Therefore, still no justification for deletion. Pechristener (talk) 21:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pechristener: Internal documents such as diagram books and factory images that were not offered for public distribution are not considered to have been published under US law - see COM:PUBLISH. Evidence is still needed that these images were publicly published before 1977, and that that publication did not have a copyright notice. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: all images are pre -1977; andwopuld not have originated at source site; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:US National Archives series: Gulf of Maine Fisheries Maps and Charts, 1978 - 1984
[edit]Unessescary single-page PDFs, higher-quality JPG images of the exact same map exist here, here, here and here.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Northeast Channel - DPLA - 22b60344bfb0099b9290a08bd64897c6 (page 2).pdf
- File:Tidal Energy in the Gulf of Maine - DPLA - aedaaebd56a0919e4c8259fb533a4684 (page 2).pdf
- File:Twice Daily Tidal Elipses - DPLA - 0c059eff2fb67b26b52e988c4c5a17c2 (page 2).pdf
- File:Water Circulation in the Gulf of Maine Area - DPLA - 4e8bd4cd5b98f11f2b0b1b481e04ebc9 (page 2).pdf
TheImaCow (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicates; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
"Public domain" status questionable without additional info Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio; or derived image of unknown origin, per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly not own work but work of Ela Gawin (Elżbieta Gawin), for example another photo from the same session (public FB group) https://www.facebook.com/groups/502182526918285/permalink/1837766840026507/ 178.37.205.142 20:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: cp[yvio, no evidence that it is uploaders work; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The image does not belong to the person who uploaded. There is no meta data, the source link does not work to even verify the license FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
It is doubtful that this was an original work by the uploader. Signed copies exist in much higher resolution, including this version that was sold years prior to the photo appearing on Commons. This exact copy of the image (same resolution and metadata) appeared on a blog months prior to being uploaded to Commons. VTRS permission would be needed; unfortunately, the uploader has not edited in a decade. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Keep.
(1) This photo was taken from a public highway, of items placed next to the public highway for the purpose of public viewing and phogotraphs. The objects were part of a scarecrow festival, and were placed next to an exhibit as part of the show. All this is covered in the UK by Panoramafreiheit.
(2) The link given above is about US law only and the US does not have Panoramafreiheit. If you extend your US laws to all photographs uploaded from the UK, then you will have to delete all photographs taken from public highways, including all public monuments. You are not doing that, though, are you?
(3) As I understand it, toys count as utilitarian in the UK, since they fulfil a need for all children (and for plenty of adults, who may keep a favourite toy all their life). For example, toys are commonly used as a sleeping or calming aid for very young children.
(4) The stuffies (as I believe you call them in the US?) in the picture are almost certainly hand-made by the householders who created the scarecrows for the festival. Commercial toy manufacturers turn out thousands of identical toys, but this pair consists of two individual items. In my generation in the UK, girls were taught cookery and sewing at school, and the boys were taught woodwork and metalwork. I made loads of stuffed animals, as a kid. Thus, most women of my generation can easily make items like the ones in the picture, to our own designs or from patterns. 3D hand-made objects like that are not matters of commerical copyright in the UK, and, I repeat, the ones in the photo are covered by Panoramafreiheit. Storye book (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Bad decision above. These clearly have a copyright as sculptures -- all created works have copyrights. They are not permanently displayed, so FoP doesn't apply. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOYS. --Jarekt (talk) 01:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Storye book (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all images of scarecrows at various UK festivals. They are all temporarily exhibited, so FoP does not apply and they all have their own copyrights as sculptures. Anticipating the uploader's claims, which they made in a similar case at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minskip 2 September 2023 (135).JPG, I point out that the fact that they are non-commercial is irrelevant -- all creative works have copyrights until they expire.
.JPG){kind=link}
_2a.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The following quotation is from the Wikipedia article Freedom of panorama#United Kingdom. It says that the creator of the photographed item must be both a craftsman and an artist for their creation to be considered an artwork for copyright puroses. However there is no evidence that all the villagers who created the scarecrows were professional craftsmen or professional artists, and there is no evidence that their purpose was to create artworks. Their purpose was to have fun making a temporary effigy out of bags of straw. All the examples of such intended artworks given in that article are saleable items made by professionals with a high degree of skill. That includes the hand-knitted jumper. I can design and knit a jumper because I have the professional skill to write knitting patterns for jumpers. socks etc. - but do you have that skill? No such skill is required to make a scarecrow effigy. A lot of the scarecrows are made by children and cub scouts, many of them under five years old. Are you going to delete pictures of their work, as if they are by professional artists? What are your legal grounds for doing this? Storye book (talk) 23:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The courts have not established a consistent test for what is meant by a "work of artistic craftsmanship", but Copinger suggests that the creator must be both a craftsman and an artist.[125] Evidence of the intentions of the maker are relevant, and according to the House of Lords case of Hensher v Restawile [1976] AC 64,[126] it is "relevant and important, although not a paramount or leading consideration" if the creator had the conscious purpose of creating a work of art. It is not necessary for the work to be describable as "fine art". In that case, some examples were given of typical articles that might be considered works of artistic craftsmanship, including hand-painted tiles, stained glass, wrought iron gates, and the products of high-class printing, bookbinding, cutlery, needlework and cabinet-making.
The United Kingdom has Panoramafreiheit, which, as I understand it, permits photography of scarecrows. United Kingdom law takes intention into consideration. It permits photography from the public highway of permanent items, items which may be considered de minimis, and creations by people who are not craftspersons or artists, and have not intended their creations as artworks. Scarecrows are effigies, i.e. non-commercial creations which are intentionally temporary and often crude representations of humans, animals and other things, and are intended for imminent dismantling or destruction. Whether or not they may be considered to have copyright, such effigies can be photographed under Panoramafreiheit in the UK.
Scarecrow effigies are temporary objects made for fun by anonymous villagers or townspeople and their children, and in general such a group is not considered as a whole to be an artist group with special skills for artworks. The effigies do not in themselves have a commercial value. In general, money for a village charity or for community benefit is made at scarecrow festivals by sales of a map or plan of the "scarecrow trail" i.e. a guide to the site of each exhibit within the village or town, and that 2D copyright graphic map is not reproduced on Commons. Money is not made directly from the exhibits themselves.
Consideration of intention is a large part of the structure of British law. British copyright is created for the protection of potential financial rights of the creator to the made object, i.e. it has a commercial intention. However, scarecrow effigies in UK scarecrow festivals have no commercial intention, therefore photographs taken of such effigies do not impinge on the creator's rights. When such photographs are uploaded to Commons under a free commercial-use licence, the creators have full use of those photographs anyway, so they lose nothing, and gain commercial opportunities from the photographs long after their temporary creations were destroyed. Scarecrow festival organisers in the UK tend to encourage photography of the exhibits in public places, because they can use the free-licence photos, and the publication of those photos is good publicity for them, anyway. Storye book (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Stoyre book's strong arguments here & at the other DR, which said everything there is to say. PCP is good, turning into copyright paranoia isn't. TheImaCow (talk) 09:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
I note that the quote above includes "if the creator had the conscious purpose of creating a work of art". It is completely clear that the creators of the scarecrows were consciously creating works of art. There is nothing in the quoted paragraph which even suggests that there must be a commercial motive for a work to have a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Jim. It is only your personal opinion which says "it is completely clear that the creators of the scarecrows were consciously creating works of art". For a start, a high proportion of the scarecrows are made by pre-school children - sometimes under parental/teacher supervision, sometimes not. Children that age cannot comprehend what a work of art is, and even then, the definition of art has always been a moot point. The best that we can do in law is to refer to professional intention, which tends to be commercial. British law is based on precedent (as opposed to adversarial law in US). As far as I am aware, there has been no precedent of a copyright case in British law concerned with the photography of scarecrows. Just the thought of the idea of that happening in a British court appears preposterous. (There may have been cases where an effigy was considered to be defamatory, but that is not a copyright matter, or about photography or whether it is art) Storye book (talk) 08:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- I should add that in British law, quantifiable gain or loss by the perceived victim of an offence tends to be the major issue in a judge's summary decision. Potential financial gain or loss is the main quantifiable assessment in this type of case. Where no quantifiable financial gain or loss can be established, the complainant is likely to lose the case. In the case of these scarecrows, they are mostly bags of straw. You cannot store that in the house; straw is full of bugs, and rots down quickly. If you keep them in the shed, it rots down even more quickly. Festival scarecrows have to be dismantled soon after the festival in most cases, because they would otherwise require storage space, and most houses do not have that much space. New festival scarecrows are made each year, and must be disposed of. At Kettlewell, which is one of our biggest scarecrow festivals, the organisers come around at the end of the festival with a pickup truck, collecting scarecrows for disposal. Bearing in mind that most festival scarecrows are intended for a temporary existence, and are in themselves non-commercial, no British court could easily establish quantifiable loss where photographs of the scarecrows were commercially used. Whenever I have discussed my photography with festival organisers, they have always been grateful that they would get free-use photographs to share with their exhibitors. Storye book (talk) 09:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Here is a typical UK police view of taking photographs in public places. US readers please note that British police all follow the same laws, i.e. we don't have separate federal or state laws as you do in the US. So every police force in the UK works under the same laws as all the others (excluding small local-site bylaws which are not at issue here). This source makes clear that panoramafreiheit covers everything on British public highways. The only exceptions would be where the photographer compounded the issue by committing offences such as terrorism, stalking, blocking the highway etc. I hope that helps you understand that we are not under US law here. Storye book (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Once again, you are selecting quotes that are not on subject. You can, indeed, photograph almost anything you want in any country, including copyrighted works in the approximately half of all countries that have no FoP (there are exceptions that are not relevant here). You may not, however, use such photographs for much beyond private enjoyment if they are derivative of copyrighted works unless Fair Use applies. The policeman quoted says nothing about selling the photographs -- only taking them. The first is legal almost everywhere, the second is not often not.
- "I hope that helps you understand that we are not under US law here." No, I don't understand that because it is wrong. Commons images must be free under both the law of the country of origin, in this case the UK, and free under US law.
- "Whenever I have discussed my photography with festival organisers, they have always been grateful that they would get free-use photographs to share with their exhibitors." Sure, that's entirely natural and legal -- if you want to give photographs to exhibitors, that would be perfectly OK. You cannot, however, sell them to anyone, including the creators of the works, without getting a written license from the creator. Once again I remind you that the organizers have no right to say anything about the copyrights for the works -- they belong to the creators.
- "For a start, a high proportion of the scarecrows are made by pre-school children". I don't believe that and I doubt that you really do either. The costumes are sewn, or purchased. It may be that the costumes are stuffed by children, but their creation has significant adult involvement.
- Also note that COM:PCP explicitly forbids consideration of whether the copyright owner would sue. The discussion of whether a lawsuit could succeed is entirely irrelevant here. I also think that your analysis is wrong. It is well established that copyright applies even if the creator has no hope of profiting from their work -- consider artists who paint murals for the fun of it. However, you can not profit from their work without a license -- you could not sell your photographs. If your free license were valid, people could make and sell posters of the scarecrows. A court could make you, or those relying on your invalid licenses, turn over those profits to the creators of the scarecrow.
- If suit were brought against you as a massive violater of copyright, it would succeed in the US and I guess also in the UK. There might or might not be financial damages but you would be enjoined from continuing your copytheft.
- Carl, what do you think of this? . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @JIm. You are overreacting here. By your logic, we could not upload any photographs of any man-made objects to Commons. Photographs of man-made objects make up a high proportion of our pictures here. Your example of murals is inappropriate, since I have not photographed 2D items in this case. No court could make me do anything. The scarecrows at issue were destroyed soon after creation, so there is nothing in existence with any copyright (if it had any copyright in the first place). You have given no evidence that there has been any claim to copyright on those scarecrows which, as intended, no longer exist. And if the villagers have given the festival organiser the right to hand out permission for photography (which they have) then he can hand out permission for photography. An adult overseeing a child stuff a bag of straw is not an artist, and is not creating an artwork. It is not a copyright breach to photograph old clothes worn by an effigy in a public place, because those clothes are de minimis. Please stop making up more and more spurious accusations of crimes. I have committed no crimes. This situation is amounting to hounding, and I find your behaviour offensive. What I have done was done in good faith that I was working within the law. And why are you only attacking photographs uploaded by me, personally? What about all those photographs of effigies/scarecrows uploaded over the years by people from other countries, including the US? And why has this type of photo suddenly become illegal for me and not for anyone else on the grounds of your lone voice? You threaten a suit against me personally. Yet that is not going to happen, because there is no reason for it to happen. You use words like "massive violater" and "copytheft" which is libellous. How dare you. This whole hounding incident looks illogical, obsessive and paranoid to me. That is my opinion of the matter. Storye book (talk) 18:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Storye book here. It is a stretch to call scarecrow festival a collection of temporary sculptures, and someone photographing it "a massive violator of copyright" waiting to be sued. --Jarekt (talk) 01:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Update. I have spoken with some members of the Chartered Institute of Trademark Attorneys (CITMA). I understand that:
- British courts do not define art or artists, nor do they differentiate between artist and non-artist, or art and non-art. This is because such definitions and differentiations are moot points and matters of opinion, which can never be decided in court. Therefore, the above complaint is null and void, and this request to delete 754 of my uploaded images on the sole basis of their Commons categorisation is spurious in the extreme.
- British law takes intention into consideration. Therefore, in such a case as this, British courts would recognise the fact of creation, and would ask what was the purpose of the creator. Copyright would then be based on whether or not the creator had a purpose in mind when creating. Definition of purpose would be speculative in this deletion request case, since British festival scarecrows are almost always anonymous, because, for example, they are displayed in front of people's gardens, and British people do not like their names and addresses to be publicised. However we can be sure about the work of toddlers, especially those under two years old. The child psychologist Piaget reckoned that children under two are at that point of development self-centred, and cannot consider the responses or feelings of others. Therefor the toddlers who contributed festival scarecrows no doubt enjoyed stuffing straw and scribbling on paper plates, but they cannot be said to have had a purpose as creators of festival scarecrows - other than enjoying themselves for five minutes.
- Unlike the US courts, British courts do not inflict judgements of punitive damages, and it is the punitive damages judgements which get the news headlines, because they can involve millions of dollars. In British courts, if the creator of a festival scarecrow instigated a case against someone financially profiting by my photo of their scarecrow, only the amount of financial profit made by the person commercially using my photo would be taken into consideration, and paid to the complainant - and that is all that they would get. As far as I can find out, there has been no record of such a case, because photos of festival scarecrows have little or no financial prospect, and certainly too little prospect to pay for the barrister's fees.
- It would be very odd if I alone were to be punished for uploading pictures of festival scarecrows, and all the millions of other such uploads on Commons were to be pointedly left alone. For that reason, I understand this deletion request to be a vexatious complaint. The fact is, if this request were to be granted, we would then have to adjust the guidelines to fit, then go about deleting most of the images of British man-made 3D objects on Commons.
- The above is why Commons has so far treated this kind of photography as a grey area. It is obvious that we cannot delete all images of British 3D man-made objects here. Even under the above complainant's definition of temporarily-displayed statuary, we still have many thousands of photos of festival effigies, religious procession effigies, Guy Fawkes Night effigies, and so on. Those things are displayed in public, with the expectation (and hope, usually) of the publicity of photos being uploaded on the internet. We have to treat all photos in these categories in the same way, and not just pick on the photographs of one photographer or uploader.
- So I would ask those who have legal control of Wikimedia Commons to tell us on what basis all such items are officially judged, because if the above request to delete is allowed, then we must all suddenly go about starting millions of deletion requests, and there would be an outcry from all our British photographers. Storye book (talk) 08:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Update. I have spoken with some members of the Chartered Institute of Trademark Attorneys (CITMA). I understand that:
And another thing. The above list of images, offered to be summarily deleted on the opinion of one individual, has not even been examined before being uploaded to this deletion request. I have just looked through the photos which I uploaded but which were not created by me, and noticed that in a lot of them, the scarecrows are de minimis in the photos. Commons has a clear guideline that de minimis items are not to be considered in copyright-deletion cases. The above list demonstrates that the complainant has judged these photos solely on the basis of their Commons category, and not on the basis of what is in the photos. Here are the de minimis examples which I have found so far:
- File:The Farsley Scarecrow Hunt 2021, Springbank Primary School geograph-6987438-by-David-Goodall.jpg (de minimis)
- File:A garden during the Kettlewell Scarecrow Festival geograph-7046357-by-habiloid.jpg (de minimis)
- File:The Farsley Scarecrow Hunt 2021 geograph-6987385-by-David-Goodall.jpg (just a pair of pyjamas)
- File:Mary Poppins Scarecrow outside Little People Nursery geograph-6987351-by-David-Goodall.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Maypole, Kettlewell, North Yorkshire geograph-1786779-by-nick-macneill.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Overton Scarecrow festival - 2018 geograph-6581559-by-Mr-Ignavy.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Marilyn on Waterside Road geograph-6882432-by-David-Dixon.jpg (de minimis)
- File:A Tree of Toddlers geograph-6882438-by-David-Dixon.jpg (de minimis) Storye book (talk) 09:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note to admin. Please leave all the abovementioned files undeleted until I have had a chance to check all seven hundred and fifty-four of them, because they have been listed on the basis of their category, and without any consideration of actual content. I have so far checked the first twenty-one, and found eight which are not relevant to the complainant's deletion request. I still have 733 files to check through. At the same time I am working full-time on producing articles on en.Wikipedia, so this job is going to take a long time. I am aware that the scarecrows in some of the pictures will be de minimis, and I remember that I discovered that at least one of the objects photographed was actually a cast concrete permanent roadside installation, which fact disqualifies it from the above list. So I have to find and note that here, too. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 08:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Update: I have checked another 21 (up to Northowram no. 59) and found three more files which should not be in the list:
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 75.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 63.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 61.jpg (de minimis. And tractor is not a scarecrow.)
- I still have 712 files to check. Storye book (talk) 08:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Update: I have checked 26 more files (up to Northowram no. 33) and found six more files which should not be in the list, as per the reason given by the complainant:
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 48.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 46.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 45.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 41.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 38.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 36.jpg (de minimis)
- I still have nearly 700 files to check. Storye book (talk) 10:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Update: I have checked 21 more files (up to Northowram no. 13), and found eight more files which should not be in the list, as per the reason given by the complainant:
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 34.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 31.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 26.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 22.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 21.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 20.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 14.jpg (de minimis)
- File:Northowram Scarecrow Festival 2015 15.jpg (de minimis)
- I still have roughly 680 files to check.
- I am sick and tired of this utter waste of time. The above deletion request is ill-conceived and ill-thought out, and a waste of my time and everyone else's. I have so far checked a small proportion of this careless list, based on a commons category only, and on a false definition of scarecrows as artworks (which definition is not recognised in British courts), and found around 17 files which should not be in the list according to the above complaint, because the complainant has not even looked at these files, which are de minimis, i.e. the scarecrows in the photograph are too small and therefore too trivial, so as to be below the interest or notice of any judge. If the complainant had been believed, and all 754 files summarily deleted, than an awful lot of innocent files would have been deleted unnecessarily, What on earth are we playing at, here? Storye book (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It's a hell of a stretch of a definition to call a scarecrow an art exhibition. (Unsigned comment by User:Mtaylor848.)
- Keep per Stoyre book's strong arguments of april 21th above. ThomasPusch (talk) 17:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: consensus is to delete, and a reasoning has been provided about context re UK perspective with no argument to the contrary; no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
A photo of a TV cant be considered as the work of the uploader. Olivier LPB (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Een soortenarme rompgemeenschap met groot laddermos en fijn laddermos binnen het Dicrano-Pinion.jpg
[edit]
Brengt verwarring, het is beter dat deze redirect verdwijnt. Industrees (talk) 21:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: recent upload, uploader request; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentifiable logo. Description say it's "the logo of PhaitaDev", but I can't find anything online with that name. Omphalographer (talk) 21:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ravikirancybersaviour (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: cover/back photos of a non-notable self-published book.
- File:Back cover of game of hacking with terminal.jpg
- File:Game of hacking with terminal.jpg
- File:Gameofhacking.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 21:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Anonymous (group)
[edit]Out of scope: unused photos, logos, and artwork related to the "Anonymous" movement. There's a practically infinite number of images of the Guy Fawkes mask and the headless-suit emblem online; we don't need to collect all of it.
- File:404s logo.png
- File:Aklan.jpg
- File:Anonymous (6537028099).jpg
- File:ANONYMOUS - AMERICALATINA.jpg
- File:Anonymous 34344343232423.png
- File:Anonymous austria.svg
- File:Anonymous Azerbaijan.png
- File:Anonymous GFB.jpg
- File:Anonymous iran.jpg
- File:Anonymous Legion.jpg
- File:Anonymous Paint.jpg
- File:Anonymous rega.jpg
- File:AnonymousDemotivator2.jpg
- File:Anonymouss.jpg
- File:Anonymus baudi.jpg
- File:AnYmaus free speech.jpg
- File:Brasil Anonymous.jpg
- File:Dark Entity.jpg
- File:Deadliest Cyber Alliance.jpg
- File:Deadliest Cyber Alliance.png
- File:Fireing face.jpg
- File:Anonymous Flag by D3L1GHT.jpg
- File:Guy Fawkes - red-white-blue "Anonymous.png
- File:Hacker-group-anonymous-aims-to-destroy-facebook-on-nov-5-eab62c583f.jpg
- File:Hackerman.jpg
- File:Hackers.jpg
- File:Hopes.png
- File:It's Time To Wake Up People NOW!.jpg
- File:Kcc2.png
- File:Legião.jpg
- File:Myanmar Anonymous logo.jpg
- File:Operation Remember 2011.jpg
- File:Postal anonymous.jpg
- File:Postal anonymous2.jpg
- File:Postal anonymous3.jpg
- File:Raining Vendetta.jpg
- File:Rest in Peace Anonymous.jpg
- File:Screenshot of MagBO.png
- File:Solomonz.jpg
- File:The flag of the Kingdom of Anom.png
- File:Time of rEVOLUTION.jpg
- File:Waleed&yaaqop2.jpg
- File:Waleed.jpg
- File:We are anonymous - 2013-12-28 00-19.jpg
- File:We Are Legion 2016.jpg
- File:We Are Legion.jpg
- File:YAC Broad Logo.jpg
- File:АНОНИМУС.jpg
- File:أبو بيان.jpg
- File:عش هولاوي أو مت وأنت تحاول.png
- File:مهدی ملائی.png
.jpg){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good catch. At a quick look many of these files are unnecessary. Let's hope an admin to delete most or all of them. 191.125.32.12 01:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Log in and show yourself. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - (current) internet culture is culture too, who knows what will be in 50 years. (altrough there is certainly trash such as File:Solomonz.jpg) TheImaCow (talk) 09:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- There's a bunch of in-use images in the category, which I haven't nominated, which are more than adequate to represent the topic. A couple of representative examples are File:Anonymous emblem.svg, File:Anonymous Flag.svg, File:Anonymous art.svg, and literally thousands of photos in Category:Demonstrators and protesters wearing masks of Guy Fawkes. Omphalographer (talk) 14:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well, something caught my eye: While a sizable portion of the proposed deletions above, guessing from their filenames, pertain to Asia and Latin America, the litteral thousands of (well, actually only 1020) photos in Category:Demonstrators and protesters wearing masks of Guy Fawkes, or at least the 300-something that show up in {{Geogroup}}, are exclusively located in North America, Europe, and Australia. Maybe you wanna give this another thought. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Most of the images I've listed for deletion with geographic references (e.g. File:Anonymous austria.svg, File:Brasil Anonymous.jpg, File:Myanmar Anonymous logo.jpg, etc) are logos, not photos - mostly variants on File:Anonymous emblem.svg. While the lack of context makes it impossible to say for sure, it's fairly likely that most, if not all, of these are from non-notable online groups. Omphalographer (talk) 21:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable. Changing to Delete. TheImaCow (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable. Changing to
- Most of the images I've listed for deletion with geographic references (e.g. File:Anonymous austria.svg, File:Brasil Anonymous.jpg, File:Myanmar Anonymous logo.jpg, etc) are logos, not photos - mostly variants on File:Anonymous emblem.svg. While the lack of context makes it impossible to say for sure, it's fairly likely that most, if not all, of these are from non-notable online groups. Omphalographer (talk) 21:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well, something caught my eye: While a sizable portion of the proposed deletions above, guessing from their filenames, pertain to Asia and Latin America, the litteral thousands of (well, actually only 1020) photos in Category:Demonstrators and protesters wearing masks of Guy Fawkes, or at least the 300-something that show up in {{Geogroup}}, are exclusively located in North America, Europe, and Australia. Maybe you wanna give this another thought. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- There's a bunch of in-use images in the category, which I haven't nominated, which are more than adequate to represent the topic. A couple of representative examples are File:Anonymous emblem.svg, File:Anonymous Flag.svg, File:Anonymous art.svg, and literally thousands of photos in Category:Demonstrators and protesters wearing masks of Guy Fawkes. Omphalographer (talk) 14:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. // Liftarn (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete; may be better to deal wiuth individually, no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Smartcom5 (Any thoughts?) 23:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I seen no real reason for deletion — The reason for deletion seems to be overblown (Simple sign/letter logo, without higher threshold of originality, also COM:TOO Germany), which of course doesn't imply it would be free of copyrights. In addition to that, I (as the uploader) expressively included all given license- & source-related informations and also explicitly mentioned its protected status of a registered word-mark. So what is this all about? Smartcom5 (Any thoughts?) 23:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- The background of the logo maybe above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well … I don't really know what to tell you here: The background is nothing out of the ordinary. It's actually just a texture which tries to imitate the leather-cover of older books like they used to be. Just to give the impression of a old books, it tries to create the implication of being time-honoured and thus valuable. Granted, it's the texture of Crocodile- or Snake-skin leather – Though that was used and done most definitely deliberately, especially given the often sneaky and cunning practices of merchants of such time-frame (the game is about being a merchant of the Hansa/Guild).
- See for yourself (tab SCANs): https://amiga.abime.net/games/view/1869-history-experience-part-i#scans
- Many games and digital products back then in the Eightes and Nineties had textures alike on the cover to create such impression.
- Can have a photo-realistic texture of leather actually any TOO? It's simply a snake-skin texture just like it's found on Google Images when looking for said texture (Link).
- Here's some at Adobe stock, while this one here looks very similar, this one is almost identical. You can see my point here now?
- Though I can see now, how you actually ended up thinking it may have TOO, talking about the background! I wasn't even thinking about the background as I was already aware of the leather-origin?! It really flew right above my head back then, as I couldn't grasp what exactly would be TOO-material about the trivial numbers being pictured …
Smartcom5 (Any thoughts?) 01:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- The background of the logo maybe above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: good faith upload, but the artwork depicted is not free
Converting to DR since this is a FOP issue. Abzeronow (talk) 23:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: What nonsense is this? There is no FoP for 2D artworks in the UK. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- When I say "FOP issue", I mean "the photograph is free, but the lack of FOP makes it so we cannot host it here". Sorry if I was unclear. Abzeronow (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pigsonthewing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: good faith upload, but the artwork depicted is not free
Converting to DR since this is a FOP issue Abzeronow (talk) 23:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Taken from undp's page [3], photo got a bit crispier but no difference between original and modified versions. ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is it a problem with the copyright classifications made with uploading, or the image itself? If possible to replace it with the higher quality version, I would be willing to do so. [[User:|Surayeproject3]] (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Did you take this photo yourself? 191.125.32.12 03:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Surayeproject3: Is this your photograph? Or is this a photograph that was downloaded from the UNDP? If yours, then it shouldn't be cited to the url. If it is a download then we have to contend with © 2024 United Nations Development Programme. Please clarify — billinghurst sDrewth 07:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, the photograph was downloaded from the UNDP. I can change the citation as necessary, I apologize as I was still somewhat unfamiliar with Wikimedia Common's regulations at the time of the original upload. Surayeproject3 (talk) 21:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: I've just changed the citation information for this image to the copyright you pasted on June 9th. Please let me know if I did it incorrectly so I can make the necessary changes. Otherwise, I'd like to request that the deletion nomination be closed, since no productive discussion was established at the time of its opening. Surayeproject3 (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Surayeproject3: Is this your photograph? Or is this a photograph that was downloaded from the UNDP? If yours, then it shouldn't be cited to the url. If it is a download then we have to contend with © 2024 United Nations Development Programme. Please clarify — billinghurst sDrewth 07:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Did you take this photo yourself? 191.125.32.12 03:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. © 2024 United Nations Development Programme — billinghurst sDrewth 23:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
What is this? 186.175.91.207 00:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is the flag for an Indigenous government located in Manitoba, Canada. It is intended for use on the article relating to the Manitoba Metis Federation, the government that it represents. This flag is used on government buildings that the MMF uses in Winnipeg and throughout the province of Manitoba. It is resenting the Manitoba Metis Federation government and the Red River Metis people and marks official buildings and events. Its inclusion on the Wikipedia is necessary as it is a part of the symbols of the Federation/. Raccoonny (talk) 04:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Raccoonny: Why do you think that this file has no copyright? That seems unlikely as it has design aspects. Is it cleared from copyright by any Canadian legislation? Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Who is this? 186.175.91.207 00:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is the seal/logo for an Indigenous government located in Manitoba, Canada. It is intended for use on the article relating to the Manitoba Metis Federation, the government that it represents. This seal and its respective flag is seen across Manitoba representing the Manitoba Metis Federation government and the Red River Metis people. Its inclusion on the Wikipedia is necessary as it is a part of the symbols of the Federation/. Raccoonny (talk) 04:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 188.170.76.132 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 03:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Superseded by a PNG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 04:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: not copyright according to the licence, and superseded alone is not a real deletion reason, no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Нет обоснования, почему изображение свободно. Автор Ермаков Вячеслав Александрович жив (2024: http://www.artpanorama.su/?category=article&show=subsection&id=1293&ysclid=lv7ruy4i8o380733247 ), VRT-разрешения нет, вот это изображение свободно, потому что денежный знак: File:USSR-1985-1ruble-CuNi-Festival-b.jpg, а сама эмблема не свободна. Тема на форуме: Commons:Форум#File:Fmje-12.jpg. Lesless (talk) 07:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no justification why the image is free. The author Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Ermakov is alive (2024: http://www.artpanorama.su/?category=article&show=subsection&id=1293&ysclid=lv7ruy4i8o380733247 ), there is no VRT resolution. But this image is free, because the coin: File:USSR-1985-1ruble-CuNi-Festival-b.jpg. And the emblem Fmje-12.jpg itself is not free. Forum thread: Commons:Форум#File:Fmje-12.jpg. Lesless (talk) 07:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Also (derivative work). Lesless (talk) 09:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Doubtful source and license information. https://der-farang.com/de/pages/ein-u-bahn-bukowski-on-abline https://der-farang.com/de/pages/ein-u-bahn-bukowski-auf-abwegen shows a comparable recording of Hartmuth Malorny. Both pictures are apparently part of a series, but the commons file was allegedly recorded by the uploader four years later. GeorgHH • talk 17:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @GeorgHH: I just see a 404 page at the target url that you have noted. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Spanish brandy bottle designed by Salavador Dalí, who died in 1989. While the form of the bottle might be OK (as a utilitarian object), the label should be protected by copyright in both Spain and the US. The file should therefore be deleted. It can be restored in 2060. Rosenzweig τ 10:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete Image is from the source indicated, but there is no evidence the image is available under the here stipulated {{Cc-zero}} license. Image appears to be above threshold of originality and thus eligible for copyright. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 01:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The letters appear to be enlarged from print. The dots are not an element of creativity but halftone dots combined with natural small errors of the printing process. The record icon at the left seems to be below the threshold of originality when compared to examples at COM:TOO US. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am not certain that I would call it TOO, though not the expert for the US. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per [[COM:PRP}}, the combination of dots and font makes it above TOO imho (no expert as well). --Ellywa (talk) 19:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Conteúdo restrito. Necessário enviar permissão por VRT Cosmo Skerry (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to see other comment about whether we have TOO for Brazil in this image. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:TOO Brazil the threshold of originality is considerably higher than the United States. Based on this, I am of the opinion this fairly simple shield can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
2008 work, copyright violation of the editors and publishers -- Plaga med (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Couple of points, it has a level of release, and uncertain whether it is completely unsuitable or not. This needs the input of beWS as it is a work that is included within their system through ProofreadPage. So if it is copyright and not able to be hosted here, and there, then it will need their deletion first. If they believe that it has suitable release, they may be able to host it. I have left a request at s:be:Special:Diff/205225 seeking their input here. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Compilator's copyright, also copyright of authors of the preface and comments. They are all still alive and did not give permission. Information about authors is writen on the third page of the file. Gleb Leo (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Not public domain. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
As the creator of the map myself (Delirium333), I nominate this file for deletion as it is a redundancy of another, better map being currently used in the Wikipedia page for the Federal State of the Visayas. I believe there is no reason for this file to exist and this nomination is for a cleanup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delirium333 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Delirium333: The community should be provided with a copy of the preferred file here at Commons to be able to make an informed decision. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Fedstateofthevisayas.png
- Here is the better map being referred to by this statement. Thanks! Delirium333 (talk) 00:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
