User talk:ThomasPusch

En la esperantlingva vikipedio estis diskuto kiu laŭ mi finiĝis per malkontentiga rezulto. Mi tial post 11 tre aktivaj vikipediaj jaroj komence de marto 2017 ekprenis vikipedio-ferion de eble monato, eble duonjaro, eble pli longe, dum tiu tempo observos kaj minimume agetos kiel administranto de la esperantlingva vikipedio, kaj ankaŭ en Wikimedia Commons malplimulte aktivos.

Thomas Pusch

Uploads

You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool.

 Rüdiger Wölk 15:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correction of mistyped file names

For the correction of mistyped file names you could use the template: {{Bad name|correctly named image}} for speedy deletion instead deletion request. Axxgreazz (talk) 22:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the new image is the same as the old one, and just the file name is corrected, you can use {{duplicate|NAME OF OTHER FILE}} to speed up deletion process) --Deadstar 14:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated language templates

Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that {{English}}, {{Deutsch}}, {{Polski}}, {{Français}} and so on are now deprecated and should not be used any more.
You can use {{en|Your English text}}, {{de|your Deutsch text}}, {{pl|your Polish text}}, {{fr|your French text}}, etc. instead :)
Best regards,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 08:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know and I do use the templates like {{lt|Your Lithuanian text}} in my uploaded pictures and nearly all commons pages I touch ... Just one time I did ignore the depracted templates in one single description section yesterday, though I changed something else there (being in a hurry). You may control my traces in the commons pages, if you want to be sure.
By the way: You could leave the starting line "== {{int:filedesc}} ==", which puts the header "Description" in the language you selected for communication in the commons pages... That's much nicer than seeing it always in English, I'd say.
Best regards,
ThomasPusch 18:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your answer. Actually I did not check all you edits, I just use to monitor recent changes in pages that link to the deprecated templates, so that I generally catch people who are not yet aware of the new templates :)

About the usage of int:, I think subtitles in image descriptions where the {{Information}} is used are not really useful, although using int: trick would be nice in the information template itself...

Best regards from France,

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 22:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:"Helena Ivanovna Roerich".jpg

I'm afraid you've misinterpreted PD-India. The license is for photographs and films only. Everything else is copyrighted until 60 years after the death of the author. -Nard the Bard 04:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manka kategorio

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Saluton ThomasPusch!

Koran dankon pro la alŝuto de dosieroj al la vikimedia komunejo. Bonvolu atenti, ke la dosieroj en la komunejo utilu al ĉiuj vikimediaj projektoj. Tio nur eblas, se ili ankaŭ troveblas de aliaj uzantoj. Tiucele dosieroj devas esti enordigitaj en taŭgan kategorion de la komuneja kategoria sistemo. Taŭgaj kategorioj ekzemple troveblas per la ilo CommonsHelper (funkcianta en la angla kaj en 32 pliaj lingvoj).

Aldone al la enordigo en almenaŭ unu kategorion vi povas enplekti dosierojn en galerio-paĝojn.

Superrigardon pri ĉiuj ĝis nun de vi alŝutitaj dosieroj eblas trovi ĉi-tie.

Bonvolu kunhelpi ne plikreskigi la bedaŭrinde grandan kvanton de senkategoriaj dosieroj! Koran dankon.

Atentu: Se vi ricevas tiun-ĉi mesaĝon pro antaŭe alŝutita kaj jam kategoriigita dosiero, la kategorio(j) antaŭmallonge estis forigitaj. Tio povas esti okazinta senintence aŭ pro vandalismo. Bonvolu kontroli la koncernan dosieron.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EKG-komplekso eo.svg is uncategorized since 5 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear bot,

until now I uploaded 520 images to Wikipedia Commons, and specially for you I just controlled all of them: in 2 cases of 520 I misspelled anything in placing appropriate category tags, 518 were OK. I just fixed those 2 cases.

S. y.

ThomasPusch (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 3321c40ac5f804db5632363346d22a55

Mi nun posedas vikimedian TUSC-konton!

File:Digestive system diagram eo.svg

Farite --Arno Lagrange ✉ 17:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

About File:Entamoeba histolytica life cycle-eo.svg

the black blocks come from the font you are using, have a look at Help:SVG to see wich fonts you can use without problems. or convert the text to an outline so that it apears like a part of the drawing :) hope that helps.-LadyofHats (talk) 12:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colourful green market.jpg

La dosiero File:Colourful_green_market.jpg estis listigita en la paĝo Commons:Petoj pri forigoj, por diskuti ĉu ĝi estu konservata aŭ forigata. Estus bone se vi partoprenus en tiu diskuto, trovebla en la subpaĝo de la forigopeto.

Se vi mem kreis tiun dosieron, vi atentu ke tiu peto pri forigo neniel signifas malaprezon de via laboro. Simple iu kredas ke povas ekzisti problemo pri la dosiero, ekzemple rilate al la licencado.

Neniel la peto pri forigo estas celata atako kontraŭ vi, kaj vi ne komprenu ĝin tiumaniere. Dankon pro via kompreno kaj kontribuo!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

MGA73 (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Before you move a photo on wikipedia that came from flickr, check the flickr license. If it is licensed freely, then transfer it here and type in a {{Flickrreview}} so the flickrbot or someone will mark it. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forigita el la vikimedia komunejo la 27-an de decembro 2009 pro ne-centprocenta forigo de duboj pri komuneja licenco (la fotintino ne reagis al peto komunejo-konforme rekonfirmi la kopirajtan statuson). Tamen daŭre havebla en la esperantlingva vikipedio, sed en oktobro 2015 ankaŭ forigita tie, por akordiĝi kun la politiko de la vikimedia komunejo.

File:Royan vojmontrilo Balingen kaj Palais de Congrès.jpg

File:Royan vojmontrilo Balingen kaj Palais de Congrès.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Coyau (talk) 23:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kopiita al la franca vikipedio: Royan vojmontrilo Balingen kaj Palais de Congrès.jpg. La foto estis ankaŭ uzata en la germana kaj esperantlingva vikipedioj, do vole-nevole mi permane kopios la foton ankaŭ al ili, por daŭrigi la uzon tie. ThomasPusch (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Done Thomas Pusch[reply]

File:Entamoeba histolytica life cycle-eo.svg

Probably this mesage is reaching you a bit too late. i had been rather busy and didnt came to your mesage until now.
The problem with the image is the Font you are using. there is a list of fonts thatshow correctly on HELP:SVG.
you could also try outlining the text.

-LadyofHats (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lázár György.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lázár_György.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Lázár_György.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I can't give more information than it's indicated in the file's page. More data could only give an administrator of the hungarian wikipedia, where the image came from, but was erased there after it was moved to wikimedia commons (not the only case information traces got lost after moving something from a wikipedia branch to wikimedia commons...). I would be sorry though if the file would have to be deleted now only because it is hard to trace its very origns in the hungarian wikipedia - the file is needed in a bunch of wikipedia branches and up to now there is no alternative in wikimedia.

ThomasPusch (talk) 09:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich werde in der ungarischen WP um Wiederherstellung des Bildes bitten damit es erhalten bleibt (dort ist es leider aber bis März 2011 nicht wieder aufgetaucht TP). Für Commons fällt das Bild eindeutig nicht unter COM:L#Hungary mit {{PD-old}} und auch nicht unter das derzeitige {{PD-ineligible}} mit Commons:Licensing#Simple design. Leider also auf den anderen Projekten nicht verwendbar. --Martin H. (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forigopeto el la komunejo

File:Vincas_Mickevičius-Kapsukas_en_la_monumentejo_Grūto_parkas.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bedauerlich, die überstrikte Commons-Interpretation des eigentlich liberal gedachten Gesetzes zur Panoramafreiheit in Litauen. Diskussion über den Link im Kasten einsehbar. -- ThomasPusch (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kelkheim bistroo Esperanto

Saluton,

Se vi havas informojn pri la bistroo esperanto en Kelkheim, ĉu vi bonvolas aldoni ilin ĉe eo:Listo de ZEO-j en Germanio ? Koran dankon, NicoRay (talk) 13:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bedaŭrinde mi ne havas plian informon. Mi fotis la ejon, kiam mi hazarde preterveturis. Laŭ [1] la adreso de la bistroo Esperanto estas "Bahnstr. 18a". Pli mi vere ne scias.

ThomasPusch (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help for Translation

Saluton, ThomasPusch. We are looking for someone who could translate into Esperanto this page or a part of it. Can you please help us or suggest what to do ? Thanks in advance, Saluti dall'Italia--Aeron10 (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Provinz Sicilia

Hallo ThomasPusch, du hast die Datei File:Sicilia SPQR.png erstellt. Im Altertum gehörte auch die Insel Malta südlich von Sizilien zu der Provinz, könntest du die bitte noch entsprechend einfärben? Grüße --Bjs (talk) 20:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done ThomasPusch (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC) (Das Einfärben hätte eigentlich jeder schnell machen können, es ging ja nur um das Ändern weniger Pixel. Malta sieht etwas rundlicher aus als es eigentlich ist, aber bei der geringen Auflösung ist keine wirklich naturgetreue Inselsiluette hinzubekommen.)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear ThomasPusch,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maroun04.jpg

Discussion

Your "Category:Location not applicable" removing on French military flags

Hello ThomasPusch,

I have seen that you removed the category Category:Location not applicable on French military flag files. I think this category is appropriate, because what is the location of a flag ? Can you say where exactly is a flag of France, for example ? There is no answer to this question : a flag can be placed and moved everywhere. So I revert your changes.

Sémhur (talk) 16:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

File:Boris Jelcin.png have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 13:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Danielius Dolskis.jpg have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear ThomasPusch,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Verwaltungsgliederung Deutschlands

Verwaltungsgliederung Deutschlands has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hallo Thomas, ich wollte dich über diesen Antrag informieren, da du diese Übersicht im Oktober 2006 in Kategorien verlinkt hast. --79.197.122.32 23:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Trijnstel_talk 15:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frankfurta librofoiro 2012 Deutscher Buchpreis Ursula Krechel.JPG

Hallo ThomasPusch, falls das Foto auf dem Poster nicht auch von dir stammt, ist das aktuelle Foto eine Bearbeitung die das Urheberrecht des anderen Fotografen verletzt. Panoramafreiheit dürfte hier kaum gelten (wohl nicht dauerhaft und offenbar indoor). Am besten selbst die Löschung beantragen. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Bedauerlich, aber laut COM:DW wird Túrelio recht haben - natürlich ist das Foto auf dem Poster nicht von mir persönlich geknippst, sondern das Bild ist einfach ein Ausschnitt aus der Portraitgalerie "Werkschau" des Deutschen Buchpreises auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2012. Ich beantrage selbst die Löschung... -- ThomasPusch (talk) 15:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frankfurta librofoiro 2012 eldonejo Schirmer.JPG

Discussion

Kleiner Tipp vom "Gegner" ;-), wenn du eine Löschung für unberechtigt hältst, wie z.B. bei Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frankfurta librofoiro 2012 eldonejo Schirmer.JPG, dann ist der korrekte Baustein nicht "kontra", sondern {{Vk}} (steht für vote keep, also behalten, statt löschen). Das kontra ist dort unpassend. Ändere das am besten noch. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Man sieht, dass ich im Allgemeinen nicht viel Zeit in Lösch- oder Behalte-Diskussionen investiere, und der absolut größte Teil meiner Commons-Uploads ohne irgendeine Diskussion seinen Platz in der mehrsprachigen Mediensammlung findet... --ThomasPusch (talk) 20:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tenita en la eo-lingva vikipedio. Eblus aparta alŝuto ankaŭ al la de-lingva vikio, sed mi mem faris la foton unuavice por la eo-lingva projekto kaj tial ne mem alŝutas ĝin de-vikipedie. --ThomasPusch (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vükiped Cifapad 2012-11-15.png

File:Vükiped Cifapad 2012-11-15.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Iketsi (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

File:Seremban Night.jpg

File:Seremban Night.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion log states:

02:17, 16 Apr. 2013 INeverCry deleted File:Seremban Night.jpg (reason: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing)

The file was used in the english wikipedia, was marked as a candidate to be moved to Wikimedia Commons, and seemed to me to be properly licensed. I can't check any more, because after my action moving the file to Wikimedia Commons yesterday evening, at 02:17 UTC it was deleted not only in Commons, but also in the english wikipedia, where it existed before without any problem. Yesterday, the file was the only suitable panorama of the city of Seramban in Malaysia in any wikimedia project, now there is no such file at all. Therefore I ask an administrator to check the file licence critically, and if really not suitable for Wikimedia Commons, to check if the file cannot be restored in the english wikipedia, where seemingly it didn't bother anyone before Wikimedia Commons came into action... --ThomasPusch (talk) 17:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I nominated this for speedy deletion on both projects and INeverCry (talk · contribs) later deleted the image on both projects. If I remember correctly, I found that the file appeared on Skyscrapercity a few months earlier, referencing Flickr where it was listed as "all rights reserved" with no indication that the Flickr user was the same person as the Wikipedia uploader. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here it was: Skyscrapercity & Flickr. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per Stefan. Sorry, the file is not suitable for Commons or Wikipedia, because there is no indication it's freely licensed. This isn't a case of Commons springing into action for the sake of being annoying –⁠moogsi (blah) 20:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the explanation and the Skyscrapercity & Flickr links. I can see the point now. --ThomasPusch (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, ThomasPusch. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saintes arta muzeo Musée l'Échevinage.jpg

File:Saintes arta muzeo Musée l'Échevinage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

82.124.52.138 21:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darmstadt Christengemeinschaft 3.jpg

File:Darmstadt Christengemeinschaft 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Weissbier (talk) 11:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

Copyright status: File:Michelstadt kastelo Fürstenau, Laufwasserkraftwerk kaj Kavaliershaus.jpg

Please check the license status of File:Michelstadt kastelo Fürstenau, Laufwasserkraftwerk kaj Kavaliershaus.jpg. Ju Ta 21:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I uploaded several photos of the castle to category:Schloss Fürstenau (Michelstadt) that day, by UploadWizard, but in this one case the upload helper skipped the part

=={{int:license-header}}==

I just added it manually. Everything OK now. Thank you for your attention! --ThomasPusch (talk) 10:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Legoland DE Amsterdamo.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 10:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Legoland DE tri sciuroj.JPG

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 02:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Saluton! Mia frato Arno kiu redaktis la artikolon pri Tibor Sekelj deziras korespondi kun vi limakpoŝte. Ĉu vi povas retmesaĝi al mi vian poŝtadreson kiun mi sciigos al li private : rene.blag ĉe free.fr. Dankon por Arno Lagrange ✉ 11:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Landonomaj ŝablonoj

„La reguligo ke redaktanto de plena enciklopedia artikolo rajtas decidi ĉu en tiu teksto aplikiĝu la landnomaj formoj de finaĵo -ujo aŭ -io, ne signifas ke redakteto de ŝablono rajtigus ŝanĝi la artikolonomon.“ (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AVietnam&diff=114884022&oldid=103472131 and 44 aliaj ŝablonoj)

Kiun artikolonomon vi pensas? --Petrus Adamus (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jes, mi pro hasto en tempe limigita labora paŭzo iom malklare esprimis min. Pardonu. Jen pli klare: Vi konas la interkonsenton en la e-lingva vikipedio, ke "oni povas uzi kaj la UJ-sistemon kaj la I-sistemon por landnomoj. Kiam iu kreas (=verkas) artikolon kun landnomo en la titolo, li povas mem elekti, kiun formon uzi." Simpla teknika ago kiel ekzemple alinomigo de artikola titolo de nacilingva al esperantlingva formo ne estas kreo de nova artikolo (ekzemple se vi prenus la e-vikipedian artikolon NEOS, en kies teksto estas ekzemple unuafraze "NEOS - Das Neue Österreich (tradukite: La nova Aŭstrio) estas liberala partio de Aŭstrio, fondita en 2012", vi ne rajtus simple elpensi novan artikolan nomon "NEOS - la nova Aŭstrujo" kaj alinomigi la artikolon tien, sed respekti ke la artikolo verkiĝis je uzo de la landnomo "Aŭstrio". Same la mallonga teknika aldono de e-lingva interna ligilo [[:eo:Aŭstrio|Aŭstrujo]] en multlingva ŝablono {{Austria}} ne signifas ke vi verkis novan artikolon pri la lando Aŭstrio, kaj tial rajtas devigi ĉiujn esperantoparolantojn en la vikimedia komunejo pere de la ŝablono estonte uzi nur la komunejan artikolonomon "Aŭstrujo" por artikolo vere titolata "Aŭstrio", sed la tasko estas simple sendi al la e-lingva artikolo pri la lando, en respekto de ties nomo. Se vi rigardas la ŝablonon {{Austria}}, en neniu alia lingvo estus tiel ke faranto de ŝablona redakteto en la komunejo mem elektas novan artikolon de la prilanda artikolo (ekzemple [[:de:Österreich|Oesterreich]] pro persona malŝato de litero Ö), sed simple uziĝas la artikolonomo. Tial por la e-lingva artikolo "Svislando" en la komuneja ŝablono uziĝu la nomo Svislando (ne Svisio aŭ Svisujo), por "Litovio" la nomo Litovio, por "Egiptujo" la nomo Egiptujo, por "Belorusio" la nomo Belorusio (ne Belarusio, eĉ se oni persone preferus tion) kaj por "Luksemburgo" (lando) la nomo Luksemburgo (eĉ se en la artikola diskutpaĝo multaj uzantoj pledas por akcepto de la praktike uzata formo Luksemburgio por la lando kaj Luksemburgo por ties ĉefurbo ... Luksemburgujo certe ne, ĉar tiam ĉiuj loĝantoj estus luksemburgoj). Mi tute ne volas akuzi ke vi fakte "ŝanĝis la artikolonomon" en la e-lingva vikipedio, tion vi ne faris, sed en la ŝablono vi ŝajnigis alian e-lingvan artikolonomon ol efektive estas, kaj tiu truko en tiu-ĉi komuneje centra ŝablono ne bonus. Ĉu klare? Sinceran saluton, ThomasPusch (talk) 20:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miaopinie, miksi en la ŝablonoj (kaj ankaŭ en la artikolotitololoj de la Esperanta Vikipedio) plurajn formojn de landonomoj (kune Egiptujo, Germanio, Alĝerio, Nederlando, Svislando) nur kaŭzas absolutan konfuzon kaj ege komplikas Esperanton, ĉar necesas por ĉiu nomo parkere lerni, kio en ĝi estas radiko (tio estas reala problemo, mi renkontis multajn „spertajn“ Esperantistojn, kiuj absolute ne orientiĝis en la afero). Se iu ajn volas subteni la senutile malfacilan sistemon per argumento pri ties vasta uzo, mi devas nur atentigi, ke per la sama argumento eblas ankaŭ tute kondamni Esperanton – la Angla lingvo ja estas multe pli malfacila kaj maltaŭga, sed ĝi ja estas jam vaste uzata… Ĉar mi volis subteni uzon de la facilaj kaj por Esperanto naturaj formoj, mi volis disvastigi ilian ekziston en la interreto ankaŭ per la ŝablonoj en Vikimedio, la penon vi nun detruis – favore al la malfacilaj formoj, kiuj jam plurfoje igis min preskaŭ forlasi Esperantujon: enirante ĝin, mi mise pensis, ke ties anoj cerbumas kaj preferas (almenaŭ lingve) solvojn pli bonajn anstataŭ simple imiti la ĉirkaŭaĵon kaj elekti solvojn pli facilajn, pli disvastigitajn – tio tamen montriĝis esti tute erara ideo, la komunumo ja konsistas grandparte el stranguloj, kiuj tamen almenaŭ en la strangula grupo volas konformiĝi, ankaŭ al la uzo de senutile malfacilaj landonomoj… --Petrus Adamus (talk) 22:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mi komprenas vian motivon, sed la celo de enciklopedio estas priskribi la mondon, ne reformi ĝin. Kaj la celo de la multlingva vikimedia komunejo vere ne estas de-ekstere plibonigi Esperanton. Konsciu ke mi tre aprezas vian redaktadon en la e-lingva vikipedio kaj vere ne volus persone lukti kontraŭ vi. Sed ke ekde la komenco de praktika aplikado de la lingvo Esperanto aperis iuj (en strikta senco ne-necesaj) sinonimoj, kiel "Svisio" kaj "Svisujo" (en tiom arda lingva batalo ke Edmond Privat jam antaŭ preskaŭ jarcento proponis la "pacan kompromison" neŭtrale uzi la nomon Svislando), kiel "komenciĝi" kaj "eki", kiel "hospitalo" kaj "malsanulejo", estas fakto. Jam antaŭ 100 jaroj estis esperantistoj, kiuj en serĉo de simpleco volis ke "-ujo" havu la signifon "ujo", tiel kiel ĉiu alia afikso de Esperanto havis unu signifon (nur "-ujo" havis tri): do pomujo estu ujo de pomoj (kesto, bovlo aŭ simile), pomarbo estu arbo, kaj lando prefere havu propran nomon, ne estu "ujo de homoj el unu gento", ĉar tiel ne estas: svisoj loĝas ĉie en la mondo, kaj en la alpa ŝtato loĝas multaj homoj de aliaj gentoj. Kiam mi kiel infano lernis Esperanton, la -uj-formoj estis preskaŭ malaperintaj kaj aspektis arkaikaj, nur dum la lastaj jaroj, kiam homoj ne plu tiom lernas la lingvon parole en kursoj, kongresoj kaj vojaĝado, sed pli interrete, skribe kaj memlerne, ĉe la hejma komputilo, la malnovaj formoj reviviĝis. Sed ja "Svisio" kaj "Svisujo" same ĝustas, kvankam du ĝustaj solvoj anstataŭ unu ĝenas multajn anojn de partio. Mi firme kredas ke nek la laŭ vidpunkto ĝusta aŭ abomeninda uzo de "-io" kaj "-ujo" nek de "-ata" kaj "-ita" decidas pri la fina venko de Esperanto. Sed certe la multlingva vikimedia komunejo ne estas la ĝusta loko devige ŝanĝi la praktikan lingvouzon de Esperanto laŭ vidpunkto tute ne dividita de ĉiuj. ThomasPusch (talk) 23:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/ThomasPusch⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Ergebnisse zum Wettbewerb Bild des Jahres 2013

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Hallo ThomasPusch,

Der Wettbewerb zum Bild des Jahres ist beendet und wir freuen uns, die Ergebnisse verkünden zu können: Dieses Jahr haben wir den Teilnehmerrekord gebrochen – mehr Benutzer haben über das Bild des Jahres 2013 abgestimmt als jemals zuvor. In beiden Abstimmungsrunden wählten insgesamt 4070 unterschiedliche Personen ihre Lieblingsbilder. Zusätzlich gab es mehr Kandidaten (exzellente Bilder) im Wettbewerb als jemals zuvor (insgesamt 962 Bilder).

In der ersten Runde haben 2852 Nutzer über 962 Bilder abgestimmt.
In der zweiten Runde haben 2919 Nutzer über die 50 Finalisten (die 30 beliebtesten Bilder insgesamt und die zwei beliebtesten jeder Kategorie) abgestimmt.

Wir gratulieren den Gewinnern des Wettbewerbs und bedanken uns bei ihnen dafür, dass sie diese großartigen Bilder erstellt und unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht haben:

157 Nutzer stimmten für den Gewinner, ein Bild einer Glühbirne, deren Glühwendel aus Wolfram durchbrennt.
Für den zweiten Platz, ein Bild des "Sviati Hory" (Heilige Berge) Nationalparks in der Oblast Donezk, Ukraine, stimmten 155 Nutzer.
Für den dritten Platz, ein Bild einer im Flug trinkenden Schwalbe, stimmten 131 Nutzer.

Klicke hier um die Ergebnisse anzuzeigen »

Wir bedanken uns auch herzlich bei allen 4070 abstimmenden Nutzern für ihre Teilnahme und hoffen, dass Ihr beim nächsten Wettbewerb Anfang 2015 wieder dabei seid! Ihr seid herzlich eingeladen weiterhin in der Gemeinschaft auf Commons mitzuwirken, indem ihr eure Werke teilt.

Vielen Dank
Euer Bild-des-Jahres-Team

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo ThomasPusch,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

File:Aeroport Maya-Maya.jpg

File:Aeroport Maya-Maya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

82.127.154.3 16:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept.

Notiz für mich selbst

Das Bild Guggenbergkapelle.jpg hat einen überflüssigen Streifen am unteren Rand, der nicht zum Bild gehört. An diesem Computer kann ich das nicht selbst beseitigen, aber falls nicht zufällig jemand anderer in der Zwischenzeit den unnötigen unteren Streifen entfernt, setze ich mir selbst diese Notiz, das bei Gelegenheit am eigenen Computer zu machen. --ThomasPusch (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo ThomasPusch,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

File:Salomonaj cendaj moneroj.jpg

File:Salomonaj cendaj moneroj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DrKiernan (talk) 18:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bedaŭrinde la dosiero vere ĉi tie forigendas. Mi konvinkiĝis per la argumento kaj mem subtenis la forigon. ThomasPusch (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korsuno-002.jpg

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely, Максим Підліснюк (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Sakhteman markazi01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Frankfurta librofoiro 2012 eldonejo Was ist was 2.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 01:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pri referenco al artikolo

Cxu iu povus aldoni al artikolo ligilon de ipernity kiel prezento-referenco? ekzemple en artikolo Spiros Sarafian la ligilon: ↑http://www.ipernity.com/doc/kostas.kiriakos/41140860/ Vortoj de la redaktoro. Alia demando (kompreneble sen via gxeno): cxu vi havas skajpan kodon por kelkaj teknikaj klarigoj? Dankon --Giorgos ab1234 (talk) 11:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

La tekston Spiros Sarafian mi rerigardos morgaŭ. Nun nur respondon al via dua demando: bedaŭrinde mi ne kutimas skajpi, sed eble helpas ke vi havas la eblecon retpoŝti al mi per la esperantlingva vikipedio, paĝo "Uzanto:ThomasPusch", ligilo "retpoŝti ĉi tiun uzanton" en la listo de iloj maldekstre. Kaj etan noton al la unua demando: mi konjektas ke ne temas pri iu paĝo el la vikimedia komunejo, sed pri la artikolo Spiros Sarafian el la esperantlingva vikipedio - tiukaze pli sencas ke vi afiŝas noton en mia diskutpaĝo de la esperantlingva vikipedio. Mi vidas la notojn same rapide, sed tamen la diskutoj restas iom pli ordigitaj se ili "okazas en la koncerna diskutejo". Ĉu? Plu pri la teksto Spiros Sarafian do morgaŭ. --ThomasPusch (talk) 19:07, la 25-an de julio 2016 (UTC)

La ipernity-ligilo en la teksto Spiros Sarafian nun estas tute en ordo. Salutas --ThomasPusch (talk) 19:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amasa ŝanĝado de landonomaj tradukoj

Saluton. Amase ŝanĝante landonomojn en Vikimediaj ŝablonoj, vi aludas En la artikolaro de la esperantlingva vikipedio estas rajto uzi la landonomojn de finaĵo -io, -ujo aŭ -lando en propra gusto, sed tio ne signifas aplikon al la kategoria sistemo aŭ al la vikimedia komunejo. Laŭ kiu regulo do kondutu ĉi-tieaj landonomoj? Mi unue pensis, ke vi volas koherigi ilin kun nomoj de la Vikipedia artikoloj, sed laŭ Template:User_United_Kingdom/eo aspektas, ke ne, ĉar la Vikipedia artikolo nomiĝas Unuiĝinta Reĝlando. --Petrus Adamus (talk) 21:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Klaipėda teatra placo (teatros aikštė) Ännchen von Tharau 2.jpg

And also:

File:Klaipėda teatra placo (teatros aikštė) Ännchen von Tharau 3.jpg

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schankwirtschaft Mainufer Frankfurt Aug2006.jpg

File:Schankwirtschaft Mainufer Frankfurt Aug2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

File:Sögel kastelo Clemenswerth 1.JPG

File:Sögel kastelo Clemenswerth 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 04:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Ies:

Werter Kollege Ies, du hast im Juli 2017 das Foto Sögel kastelo Clemenswerth 1.JPG als potentielle Copyrightverletzung markiert, entsprechend auch die Dateien 2+6, und dann vermutlich auch gelöscht. Mir ist klar, dass die Bilder ganz sicher meine eigenen waren und ein öffentlicher Park wie dieser unter die Panoramafreiheit fällt. Das Problem muss also in einem Detail gelegen haben. Unglücklicherweise habe ich auf meiner Diskussionsseite keinerlei Hinweis auf eine Löschdiskussion gefunden. Kannst du die Löschdiskussion rekonstruieren? ThomasPusch (talk) 21:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo ThomasPusch, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, hatte ich zu Deinen Bildern einen Löschantrag gestellt, weil auf diesen recht deutlich einige Kunstwerke zu sehehen waren. Und zwar solche Kunstwerke, die, im Rahmen von in Clemenswerth öfters stattfindenen Ausstellungen, dort nur temporär aufgestellt waren und somit nicht unter die Panoramafreiheit fallen. Wenn Du auf Deiner Diskussionsseite keinerlei Hinweis auf eine Löschdiskussion gefunden hast, muss da im automatischen Ablauf etwas schief gelaufen sein. Das hatte ich nicht überprüft, denn damit hatte ich nicht gerechnet. Ich entschuldige mich aber dennoch für die entstandene Verwirrung. Beste Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 06:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aber die Löschdiskussion muss doch irgendwo archiviert sein, oder? Umso bedauerlicher ist es, dass ich inzwischen längst nicht mehr in der Region lebe und arbeite, und mir in der Zwischenzeit zwei Labtops mit ihren Festplatten das Zeitliche gesegnet haben, so dass ich solche Bilder überhaupt nur noch auf Commons "archiviert" hatte... ThomasPusch (talk) 11:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Constantly there is no hint to any entry of deletion request. ThomasPusch (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg departemento blazono.jpg

File:Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg departemento blazono.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afriko-meza.png

Hello.

Can you add South Sudan in the map File:Afriko-meza.png as well as in other Esperanto maps where it is missing?

I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files, now it is reduced to 760 maps, but there is a long way to go.

Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps and complicated PNG myself, that is why I asked you.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The file is really "historical", one of the very first files of the Esperanto-Wikipedia, and is graphically very modest - but I adapted the adaptation to the graphical level and it fits. ThomasPusch (talk) 20:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the update! If it is not much too ask, would you update File:Central african republic sm04ESP.jpg or send my request to Esperanto Wikipedia, if a graphic lab exists there, where some users might be interested in editing obsolete maps?

Done: I made up a completely new file Centra Afrika Respubliko.png, graphically better than the old one, and added South Sudan there. ThomasPusch (talk) 13:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And would you add South Sudan in the German language maps File:Afrika Politisch 2.png, File:Afrikamapde.png, File:Karte der Zentralafrikanischen Republik.png, File:Zentralafrikanische-republik-karte-politisch.png or send my request to German Wikipedia, if a graphic lab exists there, where some users might be interested in editing obsolete maps?

Not done Sorry, I'm not really active in the german wikipedia. There seems to be a graphic lab Wikipedia:Kartenwerkstatt.

Maphobbyist (talk) 13:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your contribution and advice. Maphobbyist (talk) 19:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imperium Romanum Germania.png

File:Imperium Romanum Germania.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

197.54.14.127 15:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

Propono traduki/verki pri junularaj rajtoj (en: youth rights)

Temas pri temo kara al TEJO en siaj eksteraj rilatoj. Tial mi proponas ke vi kontaktu eble anglalingvajn vikipedianojn-esperantistojn prioritate pritrakti tiun temon en la esperanta vikipedio. Kion vi opinias ?--Alifono (talk) 15:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mi tute ne kontraŭas verkon de artikolo pri la temo. Sed kial vi ne mem ekverkas, aŭ mem kontaktas anglalingvajn esperantistajn vikipedianojn? ThomasPusch (talk) 19:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ĉu la ligilo koncernas esperantistojn kiuj bonege scias la anglan, proksime al denaska nivelo?--Alifono (talk) 21:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

La ligilo koncernas esperantistojn kiuj deklaras sin denaske anglalingvaj, kun risko ke ili mensogis farante tiel, kaj jes ja estas multaj ... mi mem persone konas same malmultajn el ili kiom vi konas. ThomasPusch (talk) 11:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Kohler el Sud-Afirko en Meetup Capetown/Kaapstad

Johan Kohler el Sud-Afirko en Meetup Capetown/Kaapstad pri lanchis jenan informon : Tri eksterlandanaj Esperantistoj, du el Kolombio kaj unu el Slovakio partoprenas konferencon en Kaburbo kaj tre plaĉos al ili renkonti sudafrikajn Esperantistojn.--Alifono (talk) 21:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Kleestadt.jpg

File:Wappen Kleestadt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

File:Europa-Park - getroffen 3 - und stolz.jpg

File:Europa-Park - getroffen 3 - und stolz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eliedion (talk) 16:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove problem tags

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

--Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to have the file disputed as for "ordinary deletion". I just wanted to stop the speedy deletion, as I was not convinced about the argumentation. Sincerely, ThomasPusch (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Luna eklipso 2006-03-15.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Luna eklipso 2006-03-15.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Luna eklipso 2006-03-15.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can only add a proper template: Original uploader was Timberland at de.wikipedia, I just transferred the file to commons. ThomasPusch (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Büdlich.png

File:Wappen Büdlich.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GerritR (talk) 20:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

Technical hints

Category:Walter Tewsbury has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than using the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 15:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Thank you for the hint about the clickable tool on the sidebar. I extremely seldom need to nominate anything for deletion, and really didn't notice the small three words on the side bar. I did though understand that my deletion request, which seemed quite complicate for such a small type error to tidy up (that really was a case for "speedy" deletion, or let's say easy deletion without endless discussions), remained "malformed", but I didn't want to waste another 30 minutes trying to figure out what the problem might be. I'll use the side bar button from now on. Thanks! ThomasPusch (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. The problems were that you used {{Delete}} instead of {{Delete2}} in that edit and did not transclude the subpage. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 08:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Anyway, I now had a similar case of having created by error a not needed category, and I learned that categories - also if just created and completely empty - cannot be deleted via the sidebar button, just files and probably pages can... I'll try to use {{Speedydelete}} this time. ThomasPusch (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{SD|C2}} can be used for empty cats, and {{G7}} for own work within a week. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 04:18, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ThomasPusch (talk) 05:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 12:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: As you seem to know so much about technical hints, I do have one more question. You could have checked, that I'm an admin of the Esperanto branch. One of my and my collegues' duties is to make sure that all technical communication of the system to editors is carried out in the working language, Esperanto. When starting a new discussion on a talk page, from maybe two weeks on that doesn't work any more, but the system started to write in English: "Start a discussion about TOPIC. Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Vikipedio the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve TOPIC. [Start a discussion]" and when stepping a step further "Please provide a title for your discussion topic. If you click "Add topic", your topic will be added without a title. [Add topic]". This is inadequate. I looked and searched in wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Translate and additionally in meta.wikimedia.org, but nowhere I could find a place to localize that information. Do you have any idea where to find such a place to localize the sentences? ThomasPusch (talk) 13:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your inability to find and localize that text can be reported as a task, please see mw:How to report a bug. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I just checked: the inadequate message anyway has been changed to a proper one in the meanwhile. I don't know who managed this and how, but anyway the problem is solved. I'll save your hint for future cases - I would have had scruples to use the "bug" form, as the problem maybe wasn't a technical bug, just was my "inability to find and localize that text", but you are right: it's better to communicate a problem than only to wonder how one could communicate ... ThomasPusch (talk) 15:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did the same thing in this edit. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: You are right. I forgot about your hint about the clickable tool on the sidebar from more than two years ago and just followed the link "if you contest the speedy deletion, you can place a regular request of deletion instead". Sorry! As I said in 2022, I rarely start discussions about possible deletions here and therefore am not accustomed about the procedings. Can I still do anything to repair the request on Category:People of Georgia (country) by occupation?? As you easily see, it's "not me placing the request", I just wanted to turn the SD request of that Yuri into a regular one... [Now, to add a "2" into "{{Delete2|G5:[[:Category:People of Georgia by occupation]] should be moved here}}" wouldn't seem right any more] ThomasPusch (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No repair needed, as far as I can tell. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, than we'll leave it that way. ThomasPusch (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just for me

→

It has been requested to crop a part of this image, so that the cropped part can serve as its own image for Amber Mountain Rock Thrush.

Crop instructions: bird on the left

If you perform the crop, please

copy this file metadata and upload it using this upload form with “{{Extracted from|User talk:ThomasPusch}}” appended to the source field.
add {{Image extracted|xxx.ext}} to the other versions field of this file.
add the new file as an image to the Wikidata item.

If cropping a JPEG, it is generally preferable to use a lossless cropping tool such as CropTool on Wikimedia Toolforge, Adobe Photoshop, Affinity Photo, jpegtran, or in some cases GIMP, ImageMagick, IrfanView, XnView. For more help, see Commons:Media for cleanup.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ +/−

About the way to make edit requests

Hello. I am here to tell you how to make an edit request because you made a mistake in the way you requested for it.
First, you have tried to make an edit request on this page with the edit request template. However, in that state, we cannot know if a request has been made on the page. This was because you had made it with {{tl|edit request}} (using Tl template) from the beginning. To resolve this, excluding the Tl template, you would need to write it in this way: {{edit request}}. So please be careful when you make new ones. (^_^;") TKsdik8900 (talk) 10:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, understood. That explains why my request was pending so long... Thanks (and Grazie for the italian translation, which attracted attention to the template). ThomasPusch (talk) 10:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Werner Brix en Majenco 2020-02-14 b.jpg

File:Werner Brix en Majenco 2020-02-14 b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Maximum 2520 (talk) 21:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

File:Finnugroj en 1000 (eo).svg

File:Finnugroj en 1000 (eo).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 06:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

File:Erba (CO)-Stemma.png

File:Erba (CO)-Stemma.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 14:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Εὐθυμένης: The file "Erba (CO)-Stemma.png" may well be considered to be a non free file. Anyway, it is not mine - I just removed some disturbing grey background from it some years ago. I now used the occasion to learn how to draw a freely licenced file, and uploaded even two different versions, a smaller file:Erba (Como) blazoneto.svg and a bigger file:Erba (Como) blazono.svg one, which both are much better than this old one, to be deleted without a tear. My two new coat of arms were both drawn based on its blazon which – being a written description – is free from copyright. Any illustration conforming with the blazon of the arms is considered to be heraldically correct. Thus several different artistic interpretations of the same coat of arms can exist, and it is completely appropriate that my two representations differ. Ciao, ThomasPusch (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
Go to your preferences
Scroll down to Email Options
Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
Click Save

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Flanke de la katolika kirko de Šakiai.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erba (Como) blazono.svg

File:Erba (Como) blazono.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Melos (talk) 20:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ne forigita.

File:Blazono de Valle dell'Angelo.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Blazono de Valle dell'Angelo.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Arrow303 (talk) 19:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, go ahead. ThomasPusch (talk) 19:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noto por mi

5 tre etaj bildoj de 2005 el Mario Botti:

"En vikipedio sola GFDL-licenco principe ne plu sufiĉas, devas aldoniĝi CC-licenco de krea komunaĵo. Tion eblas pene aranĝi, sed ĉar la bildoj ĉiukaze ne plu uziĝas kaj estas grafike tre modestaj, laŭ mi ne indas investi la tempon por savi la licencadon. TP"

Tamen Banka dell gotardo.jpg, ne plu uzata, kaj Botta 2 Palazzo Telecom.jpg, ankoraŭ en uzo, restas en la komunejo, ankaŭ BOTTA arbo surtegmente.jpg. Ili ankaŭ aspektas tre paliĝintaj...

Category:People of Georgia (country) by occupation

Category:People of Georgia (country) by occupation has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See above! #Technical hints ThomasPusch (talk) 14:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ThomasPusch

Uploads

Correction of mistyped file names

Deprecated language templates

Image:"Helena Ivanovna Roerich".jpg

Manka kategorio

TUSC token 3321c40ac5f804db5632363346d22a55

About File:Entamoeba histolytica life cycle-eo.svg

Colourful green market.jpg

File:Royan vojmontrilo Balingen kaj Palais de Congrès.jpg

Lázár György.jpg

Forigopeto el la komunejo

Kelkheim bistroo Esperanto

Help for Translation

Provinz Sicilia

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

File:Maroun04.jpg

Your "Category:Location not applicable" removing on French military flags

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Autopatrol given

Copyright status: File:Michelstadt kastelo Fürstenau, Laufwasserkraftwerk kaj Kavaliershaus.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

A barnstar for you!

Landonomaj ŝablonoj

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Ergebnisse zum Wettbewerb Bild des Jahres 2013

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Notiz für mich selbst

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

File:Salomonaj cendaj moneroj.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Pri referenco al artikolo

Amasa ŝanĝado de landonomaj tradukoj

Notification about possible deletion

File:Afriko-meza.png

Propono traduki/verki pri junularaj rajtoj (en: youth rights)

Johan Kohler el Sud-Afirko en Meetup Capetown/Kaapstad

Please do not remove problem tags

File source is not properly indicated: File:Luna eklipso 2006-03-15.jpg

Technical hints

Just for me

About the way to make edit requests

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Notification about possible deletion

Noto por mi

Navigation menu

Search