Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/03/29
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
Source writing Youtube, not own work. Zafer (talk) 06:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Standard yt license @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gNMhjjeuPo. --Achim55 (talk) 10:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Wrong uploaded Venkat Charan (talk) 09:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
So you were old enough to take pictures before the First World War? 186.174.168.209 01:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- If it's that old the copyright has likely expired. PD-Australia Nakonana (talk) 05:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was making a point about their own work claims, dear. 186.174.168.209 11:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: File desc and license have been fixed. --Achim55 (talk) 12:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, random penis selfie; undistinguished snapshot of very common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
لاانها لكل بساطة تتحكم بكامل خصوصيتي وتتجسس عليي 🙂💔 77kjjjjgghjnn (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense. --Achim55 (talk) 12:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
wrong upload Venkat Charan (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete out of courtesy & F10. --Achim55 (talk) 09:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request within month of upload; unused personal photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
this is mine Bloodhood0621 (talk) 11:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Because I need it removed TheLiminalCamera (talk) 01:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete User request within 7 days of upload. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I think this photo doesn't represent the person identified. I could find no person with this name and the draft it was used on on En-Wiki was deleted. Liz (talk) 01:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Just a "tincada" (intuición) but I suspect the head was manipulated... 186.174.168.209 02:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete composite image. --RAN (talk) 04:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The photo is real; the name is not. Cropped and recolored version of File:Ambrose Burnside.jpg. Omphalographer (talk) 05:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- If you're right i wouldn't go to this person's barber. 186.174.168.209 11:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion, dishonest manipulated photo, apparent part of hoax. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Eddie Gossage announces the 2021 NASCAR All-Star Race will be held at Texas Motor Speedway.jpg
[edit]Contains Getty Images metadata and cannot be used. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CV, metadata also gives attribution to different name than uploader. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The Jungle Book (1967)
[edit]- File:The Jungle Book (1967), theatrical trailer.webm
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Baghera and Baloo.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Baloo.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Kaa.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, King Louie, Mowgli and monkeys singing and dancing.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, King Louie.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Mowgli.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Mowgli and Baloo.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Mowgli and the four vultures.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Mowgli and vultures.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Shere-Khan.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, Shere-Khan attacks.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, elephants.jpg
- File:The Jungle Book trailer, little girl.jpg
At minute 3:25 of the trailer, there is a copyright notice.--Andrek02 (talk) 07:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Files were on Commons with claim to be PD in US as published without copyright notice; this claim was false. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate category, delete please --Gampe (talk) 05:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep with category redirect to Category:Pramen svatého Václava (Semily) per COM:CATRED. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, requested by category creator almost immediately after creation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
obviously not his own image, see his rationale. Also was on Instagram Jimfbleak (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (If the actual photographer & copyright holder agree to free license the image, they can confirm per COM:VRT in which case image can be undeleted.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
L'image semble ne pas être le travail du contributeur.
La même image en juin : https://www.purepeople.com/diapo/maxime-biaggi-squezzie-show-dement-a-paris-les-places-arrachees-en-quelques-secondes_a510545/1#block-diapo2 Rémi sim (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CV, false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Looked into the author, Licensing is not authorized on the image (Author: REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji)
https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/k-pop-girl-group-twice-aims-top-billboard-2024-02-23/ Sirk6H (talk) 19:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Potentially above COM:TOO Nutshinou Talk! 21:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: spam, too. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Human symbol is not too simple to be ineligible Bedivere (talk) 22:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied. --Bedivere (talk) 22:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake. In fact I have a very similar photo, but this one was downloaded from Pixlr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/200341435@N05/53619583659/in/dateposted-public/), it's not my work. I had it on my desktop, and, at the moment of upload the image I've charged this one by error. By this reason, I ask you to delete it, in order to can uploaded correctly. Thank you. Trolaro (talk) 22:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo of user राजकुमार(talk) 13:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by علاء. --Rosenzweig τ 15:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
I used this file to illustrate my proposal. I don't need him more. Afanasovich (talk) 11:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
採用予定のページが削除されたから Otonoka (talk) 12:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Pi.1415926535. --Rosenzweig τ 15:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Mistake; Image is protected by drawer Udo Trichtinger from Kernen im Remstal Laserlicht (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
For copyright LOPEZwas (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 15:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to enter the Wiki Loves Folklore with this image, it was uploaded from the wrong section. Please delete it so I can submit it for the contest. Ellie Stoykova (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to enter the Wiki Loves Folklore with this image, it was uploaded from the wrong section. Please delete it so I can submit it for the contest. Ellie Stoykova (talk) 19:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to enter the Wiki Loves Folklore with this image, it was uploaded from the wrong section. Please delete it so I can submit it for the contest. Ellie Stoykova (talk) 19:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to enter the Wiki Loves Folklore with this image, it was uploaded from the wrong section. Please delete it so I can submit it for the contest. Ellie Stoykova (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to enter the Wiki Loves Folklore with this image, it was uploaded from the wrong section. Please delete it so I can submit it for the contest. Ellie Stoykova (talk) 19:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Curtesy deletion of own content on upload day Nocomment-temp (talk) 23:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jmabel. --Rosenzweig τ 14:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Hubo una confusion , ese no es el estilo del escudo del apellido Risco Zzcarloszz (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Porque se creo otro escudo mas planificado y hecho Zzcarloszz (talk) 23:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Falta mejorar la calidad de la imagen Zzcarloszz (talk) 22:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 17:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Wrong use of Commons:User pages, Personal attack Wilfredor (talk) 18:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Solution of the issue: Wil/Basile's IBAN. ★ 19:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- This is a nomination for deletion of the page, it has nothing to do with anything personal with Basile, and I had already answered this here, please don't cross posting Wilfredor (talk) 19:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Page used by me, on my personal space.
- Really sad to hear the odd allegations of "Personal attack". As explained in this summary it is a "nice message moved". And I have also written a very friendly response with sunny smiley and creation of my own.
- Does this need more words? Wilfredor knocked on my door to express a subjective opinion. I respect this opinion and don't share it. Thus made the effort to politely respond. Now, agree or disagree, in case Wilfredor disagrees with my refusal to follow the strange invitation to "take a little break", then just DROP it, right? Why staying stuck on my user page? To seek war? We don't like wars on this project.
- About the context, this message is part of a long series of ambiguous comments written or not with chatGPT. posted by the same user. Here we can be sure of something: there is a cute kitten displayed, and I really love kittens. Many photos of cats have been uploaded by myself (verify!). And even in doubt, just retain positive things. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleteunless all references to Wilfredor, direct or indirect, are removed. Basile, you should know better than writing fluff. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)- I will, however, !vote keep if you choose to rewrite the page to criticise the use of ChatGPT for writing descriptions, because that is a valid use of your userspace. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- The page has now been cleaned up so I have struck my vote. Thank you for your cooperation, Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- SHB2000, point of order, the page is cleaned, but the text has just been moved to a new page. Is it the page itself or the text that is offensive and should be removed? --Cart (talk) 17:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- The page has now been cleaned up so I have struck my vote. Thank you for your cooperation, Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Info Commons:User pages displays in bold at the top the warning message: "The Commons community has rejected this guideline, policy, or process." Conclusion of this consensus. On which ground, do you allow yourself to arbitrate the management of my personal archiving space? You want this content to be deleted? Way to the trash bin? With my polite response deleted too? As far as I know, we are free to sort our personal discussions the way we see things. I own a few special pages on my talk page, they are all accessible from the main one, and I am also free to re-configure all the past archives the way Salvador Dali eats melted cheeses 🧀 Yum -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, purely disruptive page. Fails Commons:Assume good faith. I think we should start thinking of an interaction ban, by the way. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Piece of advice Fist step to avoid interaction, start by avoiding the talk page, perhaps? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Nice messages moved to User talk:Basile Morin/Content to move to appropriate locations. Any difference? Not really. Before, the content was there, now it is here . Bye bye! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Special note to the closer of this DR. Now the content has become 100% neutral, then please keep as it is. Favorite cute kittens will be added for personal appreciation. If not, then please visit User talk:Basile Morin to find the way. Thank you! 🛸 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete It was a mildly inappropriate page that served no other purpose other than to highlight an interaction with Wilfredor. Replacing it with some cryptic message (a sphinx cat), when the page never served any other purpose, and following it up with the taunts above? Come on, Basile. The sarcasm, passive aggression, and coy smileys are too much. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Info For the record, the user has attempted to circumvent the deletion of this page by transferring its inappropriate content to another, which does not address the underlying issue. The problem does not lie with the page itself but with its passive-aggressive content. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Completely inappropriate use of user pages. Your userspace being "yours" is not grounds to create pages to highlight personal attacks. This is obviously not okay and Basile may be subject to a sanction pending resolution at COM:AN, ongoing at this moment. I have also deleted User talk:Basile Morin/Content to move to appropriate locations as it's obviously been created to circunvent the result of this deletion request. --Bedivere (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
機能不全家族の細分化 Nejiko123 (talk) 04:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xfileexpert (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality / non educational
- File:Driveway Twins.png
- File:Water Safety Instructor Passing Out Graduation Certificates.jpg
- File:Drinking in Mens Dorm 20230105-211352.png
- File:Climate change has real effects on society.png
- File:Young Caucasian adult male mowing grass shirtless on a hot summer day.jpg
- File:Reflection of a shirtless adult Caucasian young man in window of truck.jpg
- File:Young Caucasian man playing basketball in November in Midwest USA.jpg
- File:Ufo abducting me 50154705778 efc1536aa9 o.jpg
- File:BasketBall Back 540x890 96dpi Screenshot 20230307 002714 Yelp(1).png
- File:YELP STATIC 1 MUSCLEMAN.jpg
- File:DragonBehindGlass-JPG - Copy (1).jpg
- File:Backyard Mechanic Working (File name 50121449916 73ac95cabe o) wikipedia.png
- File:Backyard Mechanic Working (File name 50121449916 73ac95cabe o).jpg
LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as out of scope. --Bedivere (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
El Usuario Alachuckthebuck nominó "speed Deletion" como Copyvio (copyright violation) AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Difficult problem. COM:Lebanon says nothing about threshold of originality. I tend to consider this a complex logo, but another opinion is needed as well. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I Had removed my inital speedy due to a message on my talk page about the logo not meeting too. If we have no idea what the policy is in lebanon, then delete. Alachuckthebuck (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Según la opinión del Usuario Bedivere en el User talk:Bedivere#Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Cablevision (Lebanon).png dijo:"Está difícil, puesto que no hay datos sobre el criterio de originalidad en Líbano. Pero sí, es bastante simple, quizás podría pasar por simple". AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment (I've been asked to comment. I have no decision, but a few observations.) Would likely pass as "simple" for many countries, but as noted we lack info on standard for Lebanon. Looking at former colonial powers, which may have influenced Lebanon law, France looks like no and Turkey looks like OK. A quick look at other media in Category:Logos of Lebanon look like this would be OK, but uncertain if other media has been properly reviewed. If after time for review and comment no good legal reason to keep is offered, precaution would go to deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation:Buenas, lo mismo pasó con el otro Deletion Requests (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido futuro.png) según el Usuario Bedivere dijo en inglés:while it's true there's no guidance on the threshold of originality in Venezuela, the logo is too simple, consisting only of letters, and there are other Venezuelan logos much complex than this, so I err on the side of keeping this."
- AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- but there's more of a guideline on TOO of Venezuela (although based on previous decisions rather than an actual guideline), which is not the case for Lebanon. Bedivere (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere:Buenas, si tienes razón pero según el {{PD-textlogo}} dice en inglés:This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- but there's more of a guideline on TOO of Venezuela (although based on previous decisions rather than an actual guideline), which is not the case for Lebanon. Bedivere (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete If we don't know the threshold of originality in Lebanon, delete per COM:PCP. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 07:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Queen of HeartsHi, but the logo is too simple only text "CV" AbchyZa22 (talk) 09:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination:Ese logo es muy simple según el {{PD-textlogo}} AbchyZa22 (talk) 09:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Queen of HeartsHi, but the logo is too simple only text "CV" AbchyZa22 (talk) 09:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prinz Goldlagg (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Eine Bildfreigabe ist in die Wege geleitet. Eva Scrittura (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 06:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Violation of sculptor's copyright, considering Finland not permitting commercial Freedom of Panorama for their public monuments still under copyright. See prior deletions of images of this monument at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Maria Alexandrovna (Kovaltchuk), Mariehamn. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Violation of sculptor's copyright, considering Finland not permitting commercial Freedom of Panorama for their public monuments still under copyright. See prior deletions of images of this monument at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Maria Alexandrovna (Kovaltchuk), Mariehamn. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
vaguely described and no specific location to make this image educational — billinghurst sDrewth 03:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
no specific description or location to make this a useful educational image — billinghurst sDrewth 03:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Invalid FoP tag. The work is not found in Germany, but in France. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Couvent Sainte-Marie de La Tourette. German Wikipedia can locally host this image though, as German Wikipedia does not need to respect the restrictive copyright law of France (only copyright law of Germany, which does provide commercial FoP). Wikimedia Commons, however, needs to respect the copyright law of France. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
unused text table, unattributed — billinghurst sDrewth 05:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
This appears to be a picture of the subjects on a jumbotron, an unacceptable derivative work. ✗plicit 05:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Per filename, this is art installation. There is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates and the photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Lack of COM:EDUSE due to very poor quality. Achim55 (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Poster, needs VRT-permission from copyright holder. In my opinion threshold of originality is surpassed. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
non-educational with the current non-description and information — billinghurst sDrewth 09:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
no clarity that the image of this person is education; seems more to be marketing — billinghurst sDrewth 09:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation Leoboudv (talk) 12:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Incredibly poor quality, better alternatives available in Category:Shivakumara Swami. ✗plicit 14:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from Star Wars art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
User blocked for copyright violations, small file without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Kundgebung Dortmund 1933. Adolf Hitler, Viktor Lutze, Josef Wagner, Wilhelm Schepmann. Deutschland erwacht Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP Nazi propaganda rally (Untitled 244) public domain.jpg
[edit]Per [1], this 1933 photograph is yet another photograph by de:Heinrich Hoffmann (Fotograf), who died in 1957, so it is still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2027. The file can be restored in 2028, unless it is found that the URAA did restore the US copyright for this photograph after all. The US copyright would run to the end of 2028, so in that case the file could be restored in 2029. Rosenzweig τ 19:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The creator of this 1916 drawing is German artist de:Julius Ussy Engelhard (J. U., not F. U.), who died in 1964. So it is still protected by copyright in Germany until the end of 2034, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2035. Rosenzweig τ 21:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland for non-architecture. The author of the statue, sculptor w:en:Kain Tapper, died in 2004, so this work is still under his posthumous copyright. A credit to him is not enough; we need conmercial licensing authorization from his heirs through email (COM:VRTS correspondence). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
current infomration does not provide enough context to be educational. More data should be added i this is to retained — billinghurst sDrewth 22:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aleksis Kivis minnesmärke 01.png. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptural monuments. The author of this 2022 public art titled Puu, joka suojaa, w:fi:Maija Kovari, is still alive. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
low quality image of no educational value — billinghurst sDrewth 01:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused low-quality version of File:Doubleday Page & Company logo.png. Omphalographer (talk) 01:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Omphalographer. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The crop may be your own work, but what about the original photo? If it was in your family album, what about all those passport-size photos you uploaded as own work? Are you a passport photographer? 186.174.168.209 01:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Australia and USA. --RAN (talk) 05:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright expired (to the IP, no one claimed it was their own work). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Realy?! 186.174.168.209 11:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I mean really? 186.174.168.209 11:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I mean really no one claimed own work? Then you and I looked at the file in different moments. By the way this user has claimed own work for everything, except Mona Lisa, which would also be PD by now... 186.174.168.209 11:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I mean really? 186.174.168.209 11:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Realy?! 186.174.168.209 11:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
!Keep this file and the original. I hope someone already took a lesson about lying in Commons. 186.174.168.209 13:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader apparently had false/incorrect information, but those have been corrected, and underlying work seems out-of-copyright and in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Australia + PD-US. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
uncertain of the educational function of a person's rendition — billinghurst sDrewth 03:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS personal artwork. (Cute for some other places online, but not useful for Commons.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 07:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope and not user's own work राजकुमार(talk) 12:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 12:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 12:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope and not user's own work राजकुमार(talk) 12:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 12:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Look like personal photo of user. राजकुमार(talk) 02:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erik Wannee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Violation of sculptor's copyright, considering Finland not permitting commercial Freedom of Panorama for their public monuments still under copyright. See prior deletions of images of this monument at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Maria Alexandrovna (Kovaltchuk), Mariehamn.
- File:Staty av Maria Alexandrovna i Mariehamn (portrait).jpg
- File:Staty av Maria Alexandrovna i Mariehamn (landscape).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep While the photo is copyrighted, the photograph is only a small part of the photo which displays the surrounding fence and poster. The portion that is the John Paul Filo photo is small, poor quality, and of low resolution, and is shown within the context of a much larger photo that is part of a set on the George Floyd protests in Minneapolis. A copy of the John Paul Filo photo of the Kent State massacre is in use on the w:Kent State shootings page and is of a better quality. Claims of copyright violation in this instance are excessive. However, I have included a "De minimis" ("The law does not concern itself with trifles") template/warning on the photographs page. Myotus (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This is derivative work of a famous photo, but per File:Mary Ann Vecchio Kent State May 4 1970 John Filo Photograph.jpg the famous photo is out of copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per Infrogmation. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; nothing useful in photo other than COM:DW of sign. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted banners A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jayray1015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various copyright violations, all above the threshold of originality
- File:Hip Hop Starz.jpg
- File:The Music Producer Logo 2.jpg
- File:The Music Producer Logo.jpg
- File:Tmp packshot.jpg
- File:I heart haiti.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 11:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Extremely unlikely to be own work, appears to be from [2] Ravensfire (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Yann. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This file received a speedy deletion tag for copyright violation, to which I disagree, so I have replaced that tag with a request for deletion per the instructions in the template, for commuity review. I believe this image is allowed to be used on Wikipedia based on the Creative Commons 3.0 license in the bottom left and the adjacent text. Willmskinner (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. The original tag was correct. This image is unambiguously licensed as CC-NC-ND (no commercial use, no derivatives), which is not compatible with Wikimedia licensing. Omphalographer (talk) 00:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Yann. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:OOS, unused logos
Yeeno (talk) 23:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Es ist derzeit nicht möglich, den Bildautor zu benennen. 2003:E6:3F28:A3E0:9461:9A9D:E961:A828 09:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajan raaz pandey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:BeautyPlus 20160213165342 save.jpg
- File:Rajan raazpandey.jpg
- File:Rajan raaz apndey.jpg
- File:Rajan raaz pandey.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajan raaz pandey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images by non-contributor, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajan raaz pandey/Archive.
- File:Tmp 28452-gif 2016031Rajan raaz pandey.gif
- File:Tmp 9207-20141221 123509 001-11886958237.jpg
- File:Tmp 25991-BeautyPlus 20160213165342 save-156636145.jpg
- File:PicsArt 02-22-09.13.09 science exhibition project by rajan raaz pandey.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 10:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal selfie by non-contributor, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajan raaz pandey/Archive Nutshinou Talk! 10:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Logo likely to be above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 10:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality TwinTails (talk) 11:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not low quality. Request by uploader, 3 years after upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality TwinTails (talk) 11:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Illustrative, not low quality. Request by uploader of photo they uploaded in 2017. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality TwinTails (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep In use. Not low quality. Request by uploader, 3 years after upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry Patrik Kunec (talk) 11:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not "totally blurry". Looks like a cityscape with smog. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Decent quality in illustrating smog. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Patrik Kunec (talk) 11:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It is not "nonsense" it a photo of sunset in Ampangabe, Madagascar. Midling quality photo, but harmless at worst, adds to our illustrations of that part of the world. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Because it is totally blurry Patrik Kunec (talk) 11:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like that might be smog rather than photo blur? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I see it the same way. We don't just keep sunshine pictures. Herbert Ortner (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Photo is quite good for illustrating smog. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo of user राजकुमार(talk) 12:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 12:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:NUDE LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. We have numerous photos of what a nude man looks like without disturbing digitally smeared face. Not a good quality photo even aside from that significant horror. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cabbageinaletterbox (talk · contribs)
[edit]No educational value, images are pretty low quality
- File:Young man standing with erection and removed body hair.jpg
- File:Mirror Selfie of erect penis with removed pubic hair.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 12:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Possibly above COM:TOO? Nutshinou Talk! 12:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Russia Altenmann (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Personal photos by non-contributors. Ayane (meta | phab) 03:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
- File:C4795.00 04 37 06.Still004.jpg
- File:C4795.00 04 37 06.Still003.jpg
- File:C4795.00 00 00 00.Still001.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Image is not a free image, and shows zero permission of free-use, and is also not the same image as shared in bare URL. Livelikemusic (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Made a mistake 20billion (talk) 17:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: music album coer and non-free art
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Резниченко Арсюша (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, personal files
- File:Arsyusha 29 Apr 2022.svg
- File:Arsyusha 2022 Ukraine edition.svg
- File:Compote1.jpg
- File:Arsyusha 2022.png
- File:Arsyusha Reznichenko logo and Youtube.png
Nutshinou Talk! 20:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ivayloovcharov (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of the project scope / no educational use
Nutshinou Talk! 21:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bean plushies of unidentified Lycoris Recoil characters at FanimeCon 2023 (53055048367).jpg
[edit]Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio? this is just a really bad copy of the fair use image the en:wiki article uses - idk how bad a drawing has to be before its not derivative TheLoyalOrder (talk) 05:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Regardless of the horrendous crimes Kajuga committed in life, this crude drawing is not an appropriate way to represent him. Omphalographer (talk) 05:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Omphalographer. This is an embarrassment to Wikimedia. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: While this was in use, the position of several elements in the picture made it clear that this was a derivative work (no matter how poorly executed). --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kein eigenes Werk. Quelle? - No own work. Source unknown. GerritR (talk) 08:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, questionable claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Any copyrightable architectural elements are obscured and de minimis behind the Christmas tree. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by علاء. --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Murahovsky (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots/map/diagrams of questionable notability.
- File:Pasted image at 2016 01 05 12 45 PM.png
- File:Pasted image at 2016 01 05 12 42 PM.png
- File:Pasted image at 2016 01 05 12 41 PM.png
- File:IQuadris 3.jpg
- File:IQuadris 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Murahovsky (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per previous DR
Nutshinou Talk! 22:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
out of the project scope
- File:.trashed-1668631115-IMG 20220223 130832 243.jpg
- File:.trashed-1668631115-IMG 20220223 130829 036.jpg
- File:.trashed-1668631115-IMG 20220127 222806 287.jpg
- File:.trashed-1668631115-IMG 20220127 222801 801.jpg
- File:.trashed-1668631115-IMG 20220127 222803 714.jpg
- File:.trashed-1668631115-IMG 20220127 222757 584.jpg
- File:.trashed-1668631115-IMG 20220127 222759 333.jpg
- File:.trashed-1668631115-IMG 20220127 222755 495.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 22:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sprinkles are definitely in scope.
Unless there's any copyright problem, we should Keep the photos.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)- Before doing this nomination, I found nothing pointing at these images being copyvios, there was this page https://uzum.uz/uz/product/qandolat-mahsulotlari-uchun-shirinliklar-444513 but figured it meant nothing -- Nutshinou Talk! 09:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like it means these are stolen from there and must be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
unused and obviously out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of GTA: LCS Trade (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from a computer game (or promotional artwork). Own work is therefore very unlikely. 77.6.31.49 16:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmbawangKuala (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/promotional images by non-contributor
- File:Kantor Desa Lama.jpg
- File:BALON123.jpg
- File:BALON 123.jpg
- File:NOMOR URUT BALON.jpg
- File:Panitia PPKD.jpg
- File:BALON KADES.jpg
- File:WhatsApp 2.jpg
- File:WhatsApp Image1.jpg
- File:WhatsApp Imageambawang kuala.jpg
- File:WhatsApp ambawang kuala (2).jpg
- File:WhatsApp ambawang kuala.jpg
- File:FORMULIR-KIA.pdf
Nutshinou Talk! 17:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Complex artwork, not public domain in Ecuador and not the uploader's own work. See further explanation at other DRs such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Babahoyo.svg. Bedivere (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Complex artwork, not public domain in Ecuador and not the uploader's own work. See further explanation at other DRs such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Babahoyo.svg. Bedivere (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Complex artwork, not public domain in Ecuador and not the uploader's own work. See further explanation at other DRs such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Babahoyo.svg. Bedivere (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Complex artwork, not public domain in Ecuador and not the uploader's own work. See further explanation at other DRs such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Babahoyo.svg. Bedivere (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Complex artwork, not public domain in Ecuador and not the uploader's own work. See further explanation at other DRs such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Babahoyo.svg. Bedivere (talk) 13:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The photos are not self-created. All files here have the only copyright tag {{PD-RU-exempt}}. This copyright tag may apply to the medal design, but it not applies to the photographic reproduction of the medal, except where the photographic work is included in an official document of administrative nature. For the photos we require a correct source and a written permission from the photographer.
Martin H. (talk) 23:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Please leave pictures, otherwise I will have no incentive to continue the theme of regional medals.Георгий Долгопский (talk) 05:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and bas-relieves.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan for buildings, sculptures and artistic monuments. We need the artist's or architect's, respectively their heir's permission to publish these pictures under a free licence! Commercial use must be possible! See also Deletion requests/Files in Category:Baikonur city.
Ras67 (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Violation COM:FOP Russia
Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination; sadly. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Violation COM:FOP Russia / Ukraine
Maxinvestigator (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are not drawings as uploader claimed, but photos of 3D objects. Even if the object itself is PD, the photos must be freely licensed. No sources provided to verify this. The uploader has blocks for mass copyright violations.
Quick1984 (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 04:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC) |
Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivatives of copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Perm) 10.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Perm) 11.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Perm) 9.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Perm) 6.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 15.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 14.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 13.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 12.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 11.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 10.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 9.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 8.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 7.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 6.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 5.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour (Kemerovo) 4.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 14:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)
[edit]Another set of derivatives of copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture. Uploaded immediately after the pvevious ones were deleted.
- File:Курган бессмертия (Смоленск) 6.jpg
- File:Курган бессмертия (Смоленск) 8.jpg
- File:Курган бессмертия (Смоленск) 7.jpg
- File:Курган бессмертия (Смоленск) 2.jpg
- File:Бюст Романова В.В. в Коломне.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour ( Kolomna) 1.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour ( Kolomna) 2.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour ( Kolomna) 3.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour ( Kolomna) 6.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Labour Valour ( Kolomna) 5.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 1.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 2.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 3.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 13.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 12.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 14.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 11.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 6.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 8.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 10.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 9.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 4.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 7.jpg
- File:Monument to City of Military Glory (Vyazma) 5.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)
[edit]Another set of derivatives of copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture. Uploaded immediately after the pvevious ones were deleted.
- File:Спорткомплекс имени А. Чуканова (Миллерово) 2.jpg
- File:Памятник М.А. Шолохову (Миллерово) 1.jpg
- File:Памятник М.А. Шолохову (Миллерово) 2.jpg
- File:Памятник Ленину (Миллерово) 3.jpg
- File:Памятник Ленину (Миллерово) 2.jpg
- File:Памятник Ленину (Миллерово) 1.jpg
- File:Памятник И.А. Миллеру(Миллерово) 3.jpg
- File:Памятник И.А. Миллеру(Миллерово) 1.jpg
- File:Памятник И.А. Миллеру(Миллерово) 2.jpg
- File:Кузнецову В.И. (Миллерово).jpg
- File:Воловатову Н.Ф. (Миллерово).jpg
- File:Бюст А.Н. Ефимова (Миллерово) 5.jpg
- File:Бюст А.Н. Ефимова (Миллерово) 4.jpg
- File:Бюст А.Н. Ефимова (Миллерово) 3.jpg
- File:Бюст А.Н. Ефимова (Миллерово) 2.jpg
- File:Бюст А.Н. Ефимова (Миллерово) 1.jpg
- File:Бюст А.В. Кукушкина (Миллерово).jpg
- File:Быкову В.И. (Миллерово).jpg
- File:Безотосной З.Е. (Миллерово).jpg
- File:Яснов Иван Макарович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Шаронов Фёдор Степанович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Черябкин Пётр Лаврентиевич (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Шавырин Борис Иванович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Спирин Иван Тимофеевич (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Фроликов Дмитрий Георгиевич (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Филин Михаил Иванович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Санфирова Ольга Александровна (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Непобедимый Сергей Павлович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Малыгин Сергей Александрович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Кислов Пётр Михайлович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Карасёв Сергей Тимофеевич (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Калашников Михаил Тимофеевич (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Зайцев Николай Иванович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Исаев Константин Константинович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Елдышев Анатолий Алексеевич (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Воропаев Иван Кириллович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Хитеев Борис Никитович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Канунников Василий Петрович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Кириллов Вениамин Иванович (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Бирюков Борис Васильевич (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Антонов Неон Васильевич (бюст в Коломне).jpg
- File:Агафонова Евгения Александровна (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Люкшин Василий Фёдорович (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Докторов Николай Иванович (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Ионенко Иван Родионович (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Новикова Мария Яковлевна (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Петров Александр Егорович (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Митин Владимир Семёнович (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Хрипунов Николай Фёдорович (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Владимиров Степан Никифорович (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Антропов Алексей Иванович (бюст в Воскресенске).jpg
- File:Новороссийский оборонный район.jpg
- File:Морякам революции (Новороссийск).jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 19:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 23:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivatives of copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.
- File:Пионеры на пляже «Широкая Балка».jpg
- File:Пионеры на пляже (Широкая Балка).jpg
- File:Козёл (Широкая Балка).jpg
- File:Дельфиний заповедник (Широкая Балка).jpg
- File:Памятник пограничникам (Шахты).jpg
- File:Шахтинский автодорожный институт.jpg
- File:Памятник советским шахтёрам (Шахты).jpg
- File:Памятник воинам павшим в Гражданскую войну (Шахты).jpg
- File:Памятник Василию Алексееву (Шахты).jpg
- File:Памятник В. И. Ленину (Шахты).jpg
- File:Памятник Александру II (г. Шахты).jpg
- File:Монумент «40 лет Победы в Великой Отечественной войне» (Шахты).jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 02:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 07:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Looks like an accidental upload (2,734,062 × 2,102,790 pixels), and File:War in Sudan (2024).svg seems to be the correct file Nutshinou Talk! 17:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: no realistic educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: no realistic educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 18:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Pakistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sonika Gowda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Watermarked Acchu Photography, these photos need VRT
- File:ACHU8267 copy.jpg
- File:ACHU8224.jpg
- File:ACHU8115 copy.jpg
- File:ACHU8029.jpg
- File:ACHU8098.jpg
- File:ACHU8030.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 22:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/2015112010003179
[edit]All these PDFs refer to ticket:2015112010003179 which was never successfully closed. Hence, we never got a written permission from the respective authors.
- File:Maja Bigyana Parakha.pdf
- File:Paribesha O Atmanirvarsilata.pdf
- File:Gijubhai Sikshanidhi.pdf
- File:Kanhiki Bhai Kanhiki.pdf
- File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf
- File:Surya Aama Bandhu.pdf
- File:Paribesh Pradusana.pdf
- File:Bigyana Ka'na.pdf
- File:Kagaja Bhangaru Jyamiti.pdf
- File:Atha Kuhuka.pdf
- File:Akashare Luchakali.pdf
- File:Kimiara Bigyana.pdf
- File:Kagajara Khela.pdf
- File:Ganita Kuhuka.pdf
- File:Biplaba Suare Padartha Bigyan.pdf
- File:Akarara Dunia.pdf
- File:Hatatiari Khelana.pdf
- File:Jibanara Piladina.pdf
- File:Bigyana Parakha.pdf
- File:Chhai Aluara Khela.pdf
- File:Paribesa, Bikasa O Alia.pdf
- File:The Story of Our Universe.pdf
- File:Kagaja Bhangara Maja.pdf
- File:Bikasha Pain Binasha.pdf
- File:Asha Tara Dekhiba.pdf
- File:Graha Sanchara.pdf
- File:Paraga Grahan O' Dhumaketu.pdf
- File:Kita O Tara Jatibhai.pdf
- File:Gachhabaida.pdf
- File:Baigyanika Drustikona.pdf
- File:Jahnadhara Baia.pdf
- File:Patraru Chitra.pdf
- File:Odishara Banyaprani- Stanyapayi.pdf
- File:Mo Bandhu Sri Leaky.pdf
- File:Chandra Abhijan.pdf
- File:Pade Chhande Paribesha.pdf
- File:Bigyana Pahali.pdf
- File:Kheli Kheli Sikhiba.pdf
- File:Biswara Rupa.pdf
- File:Paribesha Darpan.pdf
- File:Odisha Pain Gachha.pdf
- File:Chitra Pahachare Chidiakhana.pdf
- File:Divaswapna.pdf
- File:Rahasyamaya Mangala.pdf
- File:Prasna Kare Anarko.pdf
- File:Ama Manara Gita.pdf
- File:Akasha Bichitra 1996.pdf
- File:Prakruti Parakha.pdf
- File:Ama Ghara Ei Pruthibi.pdf
- File:Aliaru Maja Kama.pdf
- File:Kagajaru Akruti.pdf
- File:Hata Pa'ntare Bigyan.pdf
- File:Padartha Bigyanara Kahani.pdf
- File:Jala Sampada.pdf
AFBorchert (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert: I don't understand. I don't have access to the ticket and cannot figure out what I need to do here. Tagging for deletion all these books that a tiny Wikimedia community has worked hard to negotiate with authors on the basis of something that is opaque to me or rest of the community members is probably not the best solution. What was the reason the ticket was not closed? What was really missing from the community and/or the authors? Psubhashish (talk) 18:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: It is quite simple, those who we were in contact with were never able or willing to obtain written permission for the release under a free license from the respective copyright owners of these books. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I was in touch with the Copyright Owner and I have in front of me an email to OTRS from the Owner on November 20th, 2015, containing all the titles tagged. Sorry to be blunt, but your response sounds like preaching to the choir, and indicates that the effort of small communities does not matter. It would be a collective harrassment to go back and ask the Owner to write to OTRS when the 2015 email is per the process, leaving any room for confusion. Please share your email so that I could forward you the original email. Psubhashish (talk) 02:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: I have read the entire conversation archived at VRT. None of this included the required permission from the individual authors of these books. It is neither the fault of the VRT member at that time handling the ticket nor mine that these permissions are still missing. The problem behind this is a significant misunderstanding of copyright. Under normal circumstances contracts between authors and publishers do not include the right to relicense the works under a free license. The publisher could neither present proof of such a right nor did we have permissions from any of the authors for such a release. I understand that this might be frustrating but we cannot keep these works at Commons without the necessary permissions. All this was patiently explained within the correspondence. No response came after the last email was sent by the VRT member on 8 January 2016. All these files were uploaded afterwards in March 2016 without the necessary confirmation from VRT. If you want to do something about it you have to contact all the individual authors asking them for permissions. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of the copyright issues when we're dealing with magazines with multiple authors. The 109 volumes of ବିଜ୍ଞାନ ତରଙ୍ଗ (Bigyan Taranga) magazine published during 1988-2007 would be the affected ones where different articles have different authors outside of Srujanika, and hence Puspashree Pattnaik's relicensing would not cover those specific articles. But, it's ridiculous when the book metadata page, for instance this one, mentions the author as Puspashree Pattnaik and the organisation Srujanika being the copyright holder, and her email to VRT clearly mentions that she as the representative of Srujanika is relicensing it under a Wiki Commons-compatible CC License. You yet chose to arbitrarily tag all such books by assuming that copyright migration was not successful, making our entire effort futile. Psubhashish (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: We do not need representatives or publishers, we need the permissions from all authors involved. Please take the time and get familiar with copyright law, in particular with the restrictions of an assignment of copyright according to chapter IV in Indian copyright law. Let me quote from Ishan Sambhar, India: Assignment and Licensing of Copyright: However, mere grant of right to publish and sell the copyrighted work amounts to publishing right and not assignment of copyright. The article refers to the decision Video Master v. Nishi where the Bombay High Court decided that an assignment of video rights did not include the right of satellite broadcast as well. In summary, if we do not have proof that the written contract regarding the assignment of copyright includes the unusual right of relicensing the work, it is still the reserved right of the respective owners as first owner of copyright to decide whether they want to relicense their works or not. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Of course. That said, Srujanika, the publisher in this case, owns the copyright. On the top of that, Puspashree Pattnaik herself is author of some of the books, as I shared in the last message here. The books you've flagged are Srujanika's own publications and they own the copyrights. Bigyan Taranga, the magazine they published, that are not yet uploaded to Commons, contain articles owned by multiple authors. Psubhashish (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: This does not cover books like File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf or File:Kimiara Bigyana.pdf that were written by other authors. All files need a confirmation through VRT. You do not get this through this deletion request, the conversation with VRT has to be re-opened for any files here you want to keep. Without VRT confirmation all files will be deleted. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Can you in that remove tags from books that Srujanika owns copyright of? It makes no sense when Puspashree Pattnaik is the author, and hence, copyright holder of File:Maja Bigyana Parakha.pdf, and has permitted through VRT, and yet that book is tagged for deletion. Who else is expected to provide permission? Psubhashish (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: This does not cover books like File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf or File:Kimiara Bigyana.pdf that were written by other authors. All files need a confirmation through VRT. You do not get this through this deletion request, the conversation with VRT has to be re-opened for any files here you want to keep. Without VRT confirmation all files will be deleted. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Of course. That said, Srujanika, the publisher in this case, owns the copyright. On the top of that, Puspashree Pattnaik herself is author of some of the books, as I shared in the last message here. The books you've flagged are Srujanika's own publications and they own the copyrights. Bigyan Taranga, the magazine they published, that are not yet uploaded to Commons, contain articles owned by multiple authors. Psubhashish (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: We do not need representatives or publishers, we need the permissions from all authors involved. Please take the time and get familiar with copyright law, in particular with the restrictions of an assignment of copyright according to chapter IV in Indian copyright law. Let me quote from Ishan Sambhar, India: Assignment and Licensing of Copyright: However, mere grant of right to publish and sell the copyrighted work amounts to publishing right and not assignment of copyright. The article refers to the decision Video Master v. Nishi where the Bombay High Court decided that an assignment of video rights did not include the right of satellite broadcast as well. In summary, if we do not have proof that the written contract regarding the assignment of copyright includes the unusual right of relicensing the work, it is still the reserved right of the respective owners as first owner of copyright to decide whether they want to relicense their works or not. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of the copyright issues when we're dealing with magazines with multiple authors. The 109 volumes of ବିଜ୍ଞାନ ତରଙ୍ଗ (Bigyan Taranga) magazine published during 1988-2007 would be the affected ones where different articles have different authors outside of Srujanika, and hence Puspashree Pattnaik's relicensing would not cover those specific articles. But, it's ridiculous when the book metadata page, for instance this one, mentions the author as Puspashree Pattnaik and the organisation Srujanika being the copyright holder, and her email to VRT clearly mentions that she as the representative of Srujanika is relicensing it under a Wiki Commons-compatible CC License. You yet chose to arbitrarily tag all such books by assuming that copyright migration was not successful, making our entire effort futile. Psubhashish (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: I have read the entire conversation archived at VRT. None of this included the required permission from the individual authors of these books. It is neither the fault of the VRT member at that time handling the ticket nor mine that these permissions are still missing. The problem behind this is a significant misunderstanding of copyright. Under normal circumstances contracts between authors and publishers do not include the right to relicense the works under a free license. The publisher could neither present proof of such a right nor did we have permissions from any of the authors for such a release. I understand that this might be frustrating but we cannot keep these works at Commons without the necessary permissions. All this was patiently explained within the correspondence. No response came after the last email was sent by the VRT member on 8 January 2016. All these files were uploaded afterwards in March 2016 without the necessary confirmation from VRT. If you want to do something about it you have to contact all the individual authors asking them for permissions. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I was in touch with the Copyright Owner and I have in front of me an email to OTRS from the Owner on November 20th, 2015, containing all the titles tagged. Sorry to be blunt, but your response sounds like preaching to the choir, and indicates that the effort of small communities does not matter. It would be a collective harrassment to go back and ask the Owner to write to OTRS when the 2015 email is per the process, leaving any room for confusion. Please share your email so that I could forward you the original email. Psubhashish (talk) 02:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Psubhashish: It is quite simple, those who we were in contact with were never able or willing to obtain written permission for the release under a free license from the respective copyright owners of these books. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024010810006889 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- This concerns File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf. However, the credits at p. 4 name Vijay Gupta as original author of the English text who remains unnamed in the file description. Jeeban Kumar Panda has apperently translated the book from English to the Odia language. We need permissions from both. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert can you please remove deletion tag from books like File:Maja Bigyana Parakha.pdf as she is the moral and copyright holder of a book like that, and has already provided permission? That way, it would be clearer which books actually would need further permission, like the example you've shared in your last message. I have very little mental and physical bandwidth and no other community member is available to trouble two seventy-year-olds who are busy archiving thousands of books, like machines. In worst case, books like File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf will vanish from Commons and Wikisource, and would continue to live elsewhere on the internet. Fuck copyright (sorry for my language but I an done at the moment seeing years of collective endeavour going in vain)! Psubhashish (talk) 14:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- This concerns File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf. However, the credits at p. 4 name Vijay Gupta as original author of the English text who remains unnamed in the file description. Jeeban Kumar Panda has apperently translated the book from English to the Odia language. We need permissions from both. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
I suggest to put the on hold and re-elaborate the ticket(s). --Krd 05:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Reading most of the Indian scripts is a difficult job. I believe this needs some patience and work but this requires a good collaboration from the uploader and others associated with permissions. These files should be handled one-on-one basis. Some of these might survive whilst many more will go. I see there has enough been said previously and @Psubhashish needs the understand the intricacies of copyright, and considers mere guidance as trouble. ─ Aafī (talk) 19:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Saileshpat & @Chinmayee Mishra, @Prateek Pattanaik I'd appreciate your help wrt to these pdfs. Thanks in advance. ─ Aafī (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @Aafi: I guess we have never met and you assume that I am totally ignorant of copyright, despite being deeply involved in the Wikimedia and CC movement since 2011, who needs "guidance" on "intricacies of copyright". But that's okay. I am always open to learning and have grown a thick skin to this behaviour. It feels utterly frustrating to see collective labour of so many community members, as well as that of archivists that I love and care, going down the gutter for the sake of copyright. I treat humans above copyright and internet platforms. Don't take diverse social perspectives for ignorance. It's also a good idea to ask the other person if and how much they know about a topic instead of assuming that them to be ignorant jerks. One does get tired and frustrated, especially while volunteering. Labour, fatigue, being burnt out, anger and frustration are all human attributes. I'd loved to have a matured conversation where we acknowledge that humans don't operate like machines without emotion, and it's okay to share emotions. I have no time left to do much about these books and all I'd do is probably download a copy of each in the meantime. Do not patronize me and say anymore condescending words, please. Psubhashish (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I understand what it takes to create and make resources and what one feels when one sees them up in a deletion request. However, as always said, this should not been taken personal. The concerned ticket is from 2015 (9 years old) and this wasn't rightly handled, neither were appropriate responses received, and the ticket was never successfully closed. It was thus not right to use the ticket at the first hand. Please don't think "I am patronising you", I do not do. I would myself want these resources stay here and that's the reason I have pinged some Odia language users above. A straight-way forward would be to identify the books originally authored by Puspashree Pattnaik for example, and get an email by her sent to VRT that she releases these works authored by her under CC BY-SA 4.0 or so, and also those where she has contributed as a co-author. Similarly, we could deal with the works by other authors except translations. Translations would required a dual permission: one from the author of the original work, and the other from the translator. For instance, for File:Saikelara Kahani.pdf, we have permission from the translator only. A simple way ahead to cool down (I understand how one usually gets frustrated at such incidents but it doesn't help) and then collaboratively help in having the permissions secured. I am certain it won't be too much difficult to help VRT get a permissions release by some of these authors or at the least Puspashree Pattnaik for her books. Simply, as a author, than as a representative of some publisher. Best regards, ─ Aafī (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @Aafi: I guess we have never met and you assume that I am totally ignorant of copyright, despite being deeply involved in the Wikimedia and CC movement since 2011, who needs "guidance" on "intricacies of copyright". But that's okay. I am always open to learning and have grown a thick skin to this behaviour. It feels utterly frustrating to see collective labour of so many community members, as well as that of archivists that I love and care, going down the gutter for the sake of copyright. I treat humans above copyright and internet platforms. Don't take diverse social perspectives for ignorance. It's also a good idea to ask the other person if and how much they know about a topic instead of assuming that them to be ignorant jerks. One does get tired and frustrated, especially while volunteering. Labour, fatigue, being burnt out, anger and frustration are all human attributes. I'd loved to have a matured conversation where we acknowledge that humans don't operate like machines without emotion, and it's okay to share emotions. I have no time left to do much about these books and all I'd do is probably download a copy of each in the meantime. Do not patronize me and say anymore condescending words, please. Psubhashish (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Saileshpat & @Chinmayee Mishra, @Prateek Pattanaik I'd appreciate your help wrt to these pdfs. Thanks in advance. ─ Aafī (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
After reading the previous discussion, I understood that uploaders should present some examples of books in this regard that were written by someone else and uploaded by the user in accordance with Wikimedia Commons and Wikisource guidelines. Also, if the author or publisher who owns the copyright has granted permission, examples of how this permission is implemented on the wiki platform in accordance with the guidelines should be provided. Obviously, instead of nominating so many painstakingly submitted books for deletion, uploaders should be told the simplest way possible, as it is obvious that they have not broken the copyright. Rather, it might be claimed that they did not deliver the copyright information accurately. In such a situation, decent gentlemen should try to work with them rather than simply telling them the rules. A person who has been using Wikipedia for many years may not be familiar with all of the terms and policies. Khaatir (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Having looked at the ticket again, I'm going to close this as deleted per nomination, as no valid permission has been achieved. --Krd 10:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/2015112010003179
[edit]This is a follow-up to the previous deletion request. All three files refer likewise to the ticket which was never successful. (I do not know why these files did not turn up in my first request.)
AFBorchert (talk) 13:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No clear permission was ever achieved. ─ Aafī (talk) 20:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a scan of a printed photo. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
The photo predates digital photos. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2406:3400:25D:CD00:51ED:44D0:C371:B754 (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Perhaps that's true, but there is no valid date on the image with which to evaluate that. If the image is that old, it seems less likely that the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Simply possessing a physical copy of a photograph does not grant someone copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I took the photo Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- From where? 186.174.168.209 02:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- The date should be 7 December 1999, and was taken on the Gold Coast. Highvoltage113 (talk) 02:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Are you from NSW University? Highvoltage113 (talk) 03:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I will be taking this matter up with the Dean of NSW University next week. Highvoltage113 (talk) 03:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Have a nice weekend. 186.174.168.209 11:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- The date should be 7 December 1999, and was taken on the Gold Coast. Highvoltage113 (talk) 02:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- From where? 186.174.168.209 02:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unless information is given to VRT. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Let me know what information you require. I am prepared to provide you with statutory declaration that I took the photo. Highvoltage113 (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- You took the photo, OK, then suddenly you decided to claim you scanned your own work... What? 186.174.168.209 12:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I scanned my own work. It was pre digital camera's. Highvoltage113 (talk) 12:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @186.174.168.209: Film cameras (the most common variety of cameras until a generation ago) produce physical photos, which need to be scanned to be turned into digital files. Nothing "What?" about that. If you don't know that basic fact about photo history, I suggest you refrain from commenting on images more than a dozen or so years old until you've made yourself better informed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I scanned my own work. It was pre digital camera's. Highvoltage113 (talk) 12:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- You took the photo, OK, then suddenly you decided to claim you scanned your own work... What? 186.174.168.209 12:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Let me know what information you require. I am prepared to provide you with statutory declaration that I took the photo. Highvoltage113 (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Highvoltage113: I'm wondering why you dated the photo to "2017" when you uploaded it in 2024 and say you took it in 1999. Also, why small resolution? If you still have the original photo and access to a scanner, I suggest you upload a higher res scan, thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- It was an error that the photo was dated 2017, it was taken in 1999. I have since corrected the date. I have tried to provide a higher res scan but the original photo quality is not the best. Highvoltage113 (talk) 22:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: reupload of already deleted picture, G4. --Wdwd (talk) 13:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sure it is. Pre-digital camera in 2019. 186.174.168.209 13:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, different web sources. --Wdwd (talk) 13:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work,m 186.174.168.209 01:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, taken from https://www.unsw.edu.au/news/2021/09/how-unsw_s-first-business-school-graduate-took-every-opportunity. --Wdwd (talk) 13:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Then why did you change your own work to scan on the file? If i were an admin i would block you a month. 186.174.168.209 12:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 02:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Unused copy of File:West Coast Main Line.png. The original has been updated to the correct detail. Rcsprinter123 (talk) 01:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Same user claimed a 1913 photo as "own work" so their claims to this effect seem worthless. - Jmabel ! talk 07:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- That error was corrected. In relation to this photograph, I am prepared to provide a statutory declaration that this is my own work. Highvoltage113 (talk) 22:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo via COM:VRT. --Wdwd (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, image from linkedin. --Wdwd (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- You mean the crop, right? 186.174.168.209 01:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I took photo Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I also took some in my younger days. 186.174.168.209 01:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I took photo Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- You mean the crop, right? 186.174.168.209 01:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Langer Avery.jpg (same picture, G4). --Wdwd (talk) 13:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
The image license is not valid because U.S. passport photos are not taken by government employees. Anyone applying for a passport has to get a photo taken of themselves, and mail it in to be used on their passport. The rest of the passport would be public domain, but the photo is not; given that this image is cropped to just the photo, it's not de minimis. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, delete it. Sizeofint (talk) 06:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 10:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Photo Murt 12
Hello, I took this photo while walking on the beach. This is my original photo. This is my work. Murtblackberry (talk) 05:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Murtblackberry: please do not reply at talk pages of deletion requests. Reply at the deletion requests pages themselves.
- Regarding your photo, you took an image of a copyrighted work of architecture, and the U.A.E. does not allow Freedom of Panorama. As there is no FoP, you still need commercial Creative Commons licensing clearance from the author of the famous building, Architect Tom Wright. In only a few countries like Singapore and the United Kingdom, there are FoP laws that removes the need for photographers and end-users to secure licensing permits from architects or sculptors to commercially-distribute their photos of copyrighted public landmarks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete, no FoP on the United Arab Emirates, and so images of this famous building cannot be freely licensed commercially. Work is under architect Tom Wright's copyright. See also Category:Burj Al Arab-related deletion requests/deleted. _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hjart as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Vágur.Suðuroy.5.jpg
I have the feeling that one has anothe greyscale than the other, so pls discuss it before deltion. Sanandros (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: not the same picture, both in use. (no reason to delete one). --Wdwd (talk) 08:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Blue Elf as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Cathedral spire - panoramio.jpg
Not excactly the same pic, one shows sligthy a diffrent frame that the other pic. Sanandros (talk) 11:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (duplicate file), add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - taken from https://www.erclassics.nl/ - used for company advertising on nl-wiki. no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 11:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - taken from https://www.erclassics.nl/ - used for company advertising on nl-wiki. no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 11:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio - taken from https://www.erclassics.nl/ - used for company advertising on nl-wiki. no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
inferior precursor of File:Set Builder Notation.svg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am the creator and I agree -- I just didn't know how to delete files that I had uploaded. (And I made the first two images, both "File:Set Builder Notation.svg" and "File:Set-Builder Notation.svg" as SVG, hoping this would render more nicely than PNG. But after uploading, the alignment of the boxes rendered differently on the site than it did on my computer, so I switched to PNG, hence the most recent "File:Diagram of Set Builder Notation.png" looks much better.)
- Anyway, I'm happy if anyone deletes the older files (and leaves "Diagram of Set Builder Notation.png")! :) Addemf (talk) 13:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality TwinTails (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Wdwd (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality TwinTails (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not low quality. Request by uploader, 3 years after upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality TwinTails (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not low quality. Request by uploader, 3 years after upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality TwinTails (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality TwinTails (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Watermark indicated "© Anatoly Ionkin, 2011", published 12 years before uploading, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 11:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Image from https://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002842902 Sangjinhwa (talk) 12:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Du JasDolt (talk) 12:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
採用よていのページが削除されたから Otonoka (talk) 12:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 09:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miquel Blanca Calvo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Author = "desconocido" (unknown). Source is "Turismo Aragonés" (?). Apparently not old enough to be in the public domain.
Strakhov (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Low quality, redundant to File:GE Aviation logo.svg --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 09:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio of https://www.wilcuma.org.uk/sussex/a-history-of-sussex/ which does not cite a free use license that I can find Anaxial (talk) 14:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
misleading redirect Phso2 (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/G2. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
The user has uploaded several images citing as their "own work", however they are just pictures of photographs taken by others and previously published elsewhere. I do not believe the user has permission to upload these files. Lindsey40186 (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 13:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
The user has uploaded several images citing as their "own work", however they are just pictures of photographs taken by others and previously published elsewhere. I do not believe the user has permission to upload these files. Lindsey40186 (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
The user has uploaded several images citing as their "own work", however they are just pictures of photographs taken by others and previously published elsewhere. I do not believe the user has permission to upload these files. Lindsey40186 (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2024
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 13:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Replaced with a svg file and the shapes are misshapen 174.100.101.201 18:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Test page/G1, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to enter the Wiki Loves Folklore with this image, it was uploaded from the wrong section. Please delete it so I can submit it for the contest. Ellie Stoykova (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 14:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:La_Liga * Pppery * it has begun... 01:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete on the basis of TOO- next time, please state the reason you want the file deleted more clearly though. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 21:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. No creative architectural elements shown. This is just a simple, large utilitarian room. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Any copyrightable architectural elements are obscured and de minimis behind the Christmas tree. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. No significant architectural elements seen. Only chairs, which are functional objects and the front of a simple stage. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. No significant architectural elements seen. Image is mostly chairs, which are utilitarian objects. Everything else is de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Credited to the AP, and possibly under copyright SchroCat (talk) 09:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Addendum:According to advice from Nikkimaria on en-Wiki, "the new version is credited to the AP, which makes things a bit more complicated than that tagging would suggest - per Library of Congress 'works published after 1963 and unpublished photographs in the collection may be protected even if they were not registered with the Copyright Office'. From what I've seen Commons has typically deleted such images under the precautionary principle citing that LOC guidance." If nothing else, this discussion may provide clarity on whether the image is free from copyright and can therefore be used freely. It should be noted that the original image seen here was taken by Mel Parry, a Welsh photographer, and is still under copyright in the UK, which may or may not help in coming to a decision. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Created in UK by UK photographer, still under copyright in source country. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the building in question was only inaugurated in 1991. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Simple shelves and display cases are not likely copyrightable architectural elements. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center, Leof. Andrea Siggrou, Kallithea, Greece by Renzo Piano.jpg
[edit]The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Any elements shown are too simple and limited a picture of the overall work to be anything but de minimis here. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Any elements shown are too simple and limited a picture of the overall work to be anything but de minimis here. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 2024 – Centro Archiemede GMGtalk 10:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sharlonoreano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata
- File:Elephantoffice-controlroom.jpg
- File:Junior Rios na Elephant com SSL.jpg
- File:Junior Rios jurado do canta mais.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 10:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, I will also suggest stop holding any further Commons:UAE in Lens Competition contests. Too much infringements to architects and sculptors' copyrights already. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj khalifa.jpg Taylor 49 (talk) 23:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexander517 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, as they are fictional flags.
- File:Flag of Ukraine with Swastika.svg
- File:Flag of the Nazi People's Republic of China.svg
- File:Flag of Nazi North Korea.svg
ㆀ (talk) 20:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Every single file this user uploaded is out of scope, so it should be widened to include those; I'd do it myself but idk how to add to an existing DR NorthTension (talk) 07:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @NorthTension: if you enable the bundle nomination gadget in preferences you can just select the missing ones and they’ll be added to a new section on the same page, as seen below. Dronebogus (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- ooooh okay, thank you! NorthTension (talk) 19:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @NorthTension: if you enable the bundle nomination gadget in preferences you can just select the missing ones and they’ll be added to a new section on the same page, as seen below. Dronebogus (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexander517 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope fantasy/hoax flags or otherwise useless files
- File:Flags of USA and the US Army 16-9 ratio.svg
- File:Novgorod Republic Silver Castle.svg
- File:White-Blue-White Flag (Russian Azure) with Novgorod Republic Coat of Arms 3-2.svg
- File:White-blue-White Flag UA Blue 5-3.svg
- File:Flags of Free Russia and Republic of China 16-9.svg
- File:New Flag of Moscow 5-3.svg
- File:White-Blue-White flag (Russian Azure) with Novgorod Republic Coat of Arms 5-3.svg
- File:Flag of the Post-ANC South Africa with SADF Logo 16-9.svg
- File:Flags of Japan and South Korea 16-9.svg
- File:Flag of the Post-ANC South Africa with EU Flag 16-9.svg
- File:Flag of the Post-ANC South Africa Brighter Variant.svg
- File:Flag of the Post-ANC South Africa Darker Variant.svg
- File:Presidential flag of the post-ANC South Africa.svg
- File:Presifential flag of the post-ANC South Africa.svg
- File:Flag of the President of post-ANC South Africa.svg
- File:White-Blue-White flag (UA Blue) with Novgorod Republic Coat of Arms 5-3.svg
- File:White-blue-white flag (UA Blue) 5-3.svg
- File:Ensign of the post-ANC South African Defence Force.svg
- File:Flag of Anarchist Ukraine with Tryzub.svg
- File:Flag of United States Armed Forces 3-5 Undone.svg
- File:Flag of United States Armed Forces 3-5.svg
- File:Flag of Republic of China (3-5).svg
- File:White-Blue-White flag with Coat of Arms.svg
- File:Flag of post-ANC South Africa.svg
Dronebogus (talk) 19:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Flags of USA and the US Army 16-9 ratio.svg, File:Flags of Japan and South Korea 16-9.svg, File:White-blue-white flag (UA Blue) 5-3.svg and File:Flag of Republic of China (3-5).svg, since they are either simple hybrids of flags, of which there are many on this site, or they are simply variations of real-life flags. Delete the rest. I would also like to point out that this user often adds his political arguments to the file descriptions, which are inappropriate at best. 78.81.217.109 01:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept 4. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
May be above france's low TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
May be above france's low TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO France. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Above TOO france. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Above TOO france. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO France. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO France. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO France. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
no description, no category, low quality, no encyclopedic value, unused, etc F (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
out of the project scope if not a copy vio Nutshinou Talk! 21:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
out of the project com:scope [laughter]
- File:Untitled design (1) krunker from reddit.png
- File:Background (16).png
- File:Background (10).png
- File:Krunker scope Lilbrzzy.png
Nutshinou Talk! 21:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Watermarked, no indication it's shared by owner. Oroso (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Was verified on upload as being under a free license. A quick look over the source Flickr stream shows that they consistently watermark their images with the same name as well as having some history of changing licenses on Flickr. Creative Commons licenses are not revokable however. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per above. Seems to be the Flickr user's won watermark. I'm convinced. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Is the uploader a war correspondent? If not, there are several own work claims like this... 186.174.168.209 01:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Screenshot from a video, probably copyright violation. 0x0a (talk) 14:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
A modern architectural creation. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
A modern architectural creation. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Wirklich eigenes Werk, also eigenhändig gezeichnet? Oder aus einer Quelle (welcher?) entnommen? Oder aus Elementen unbekannter Herkunft zusammengestellt? GerritR (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland for non-architecture. The author of the plaque, sculptor w:en:Kain Tapper, died in 2004, so this work is still under his posthumous copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptural monuments. The work dates to 1956 and was authored by sculptor w:fi:Wäinö Aaltonen who died in 1966.
- File:Gryning - Sarastus - Daybreak av Wäinö Aaltonen 01.png
- File:Gryning - Sarastus - Daybreak av Wäinö Aaltonen 02.png
- File:Statue (41792997630).jpg - if the statue is removed, then the image becomes useless as the Flickr file name indicates the statue as the only interesting object
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Intentional / non-de minimis image of w:en:Aleksis Kivi Memorial, which dates to 1939 and authored by sculptor w:en:Wäinö Aaltonen. As the sculptor is not yet dead for more than 70 years, the monument is still under his posthumous copyright. Finland does not have commercial Freedom of Panorama for copyrighted sculptural monuments. See also this past deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/Statue of Aleksis Kivi. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of Pehr Evind Svinhufvud
[edit]These are the non-incidental images of the statue, first publicly-displayed in 1961. The author was w:fr:Wäinö Aaltonen (died 1966). Still under his posthumous copyright, and Finland does not grant commercial Freedom of Panorama for sculptural monuments.
- File:Stop Fueling War - We Stand with Ukraine 022 Helsinki (51990809639).jpg
- File:Svinhufvud-statue-Parliament-Helsinki.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Stop Fueling War - We Stand with Ukraine 022 Helsinki (51990809639).jpg as I have removed the statue and now the focus is on the placard. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you upload this in the first place? If you want to upload from Flickr, you need to know the copyright laws of the country of the photo. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the file name is about the state, I don’t see the correlation with the file name. If A1Cafel wants to upload the cropped images under an appropriate file name, go ahead. But this one is needs to go. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Veijo Rönkkönen
[edit]There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for copyrighted public art in Finland. The sculptors' author, w:fi:Veijo Rönkkönen, died in 2010. File:Veijo Ronkkonen.jpg is not included as it bears COM:VRTS authorization, whereas these two images don't have.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
These three images are intentionally focused on the monument. Commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland does not apply to copyrighted sculptural works. For the date and authorship of the monument, see Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Equestrian statue of Marshal Mannerheim.
- File:2021-06-30 Elokapina Queerkapina 04.jpg
- File:Gustaf Mannerheim on horse-back, 1867-1951.jpg
- File:Statue of Mannerheim 206.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for filing a considerate deletion request and not just blankly submitting all of the category's files for deletion. I've blurred the statue out of File:2021-06-30 Elokapina Queerkapina 04.jpg. The purpose of this photo is only to inform about the slogans used in a political demonstration. Please withdraw this photo from the deletion. Nemo 18:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Nemo bis the blurring is still inadequate IMO. Another blurring may be required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, work of modern artist still under copyright. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
This image is from a blacklisted account. Leoboudv (talk) 09:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Is there a problem with the image itself? From the subject matter, it seems pretty clear that it is out of copyright. -- WikiPedant (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Possibly public domain. Would need research done on whether it had a known author or an author that cannot be found. Abzeronow (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence provided that author cannot be found per UK law. Undelete in 2040. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own work: scan of existing photo, missing original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, also adding the very similar File:Emin Qasımov.jpg. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This work is not original and not own work Pomznp (talk) 04:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Copy of File:Max Fishman.jpg same copyright issues Drakosh (talk) 05:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete either way - either a redundant copy of File:Max Fishman.jpg or a copyright violation. Felix QW (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Unknown author, no reason why this file should have a free licence. Leokand (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Obviously incorrect license, this is a scan/crop of Sony promotional material. Source is here: https://bouya.officew.jp/sl-mv1/ Hbent (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright infringement: The person depicted cannot be the author at the same time. XoMEoX (talk) 13:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
An updated version of the company in questions logo has already been uploaded, this file is no longer needed, hence the request for deletion. BlockBuster2K43 (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, could be used for historical purposes. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? Has the uploader any real own work? 186.174.168.209 01:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- This is my own work. Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: No exif, PCP. Can be undeleted with VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:MacOS logos
[edit]Derivative work of copyrighted logo: en:File:MacOS original logo.svg#Licensing
- File:Mac OS 8 painted logo.png
- File:Mac OS 9 painted logo.png
- File:Mac OS X 10.0 Cheetach painted logo.png
- File:Mac OS X Public Beta painted logo.png
- File:OS X painted logo.png
Nutshinou Talk! 14:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
no permission no author copied from https://www.wtcnieuwendijk.be/ Hoyanova (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 06:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
A modern art creation / work of art. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
A modern art creation / work of art. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Maybe above COM:TOO Germany. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 22:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete on a precautionary basis per COM:TOO Germany, unless additional information indicates it's not above that standard. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Nothing but text. Yes, the text has a couple of different colors, but this is arranged in a simple geometric pattern. This is below COM:TOO Germany. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded a higher quality version of this image Eehuiio (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per uploader request; unused. Consigned (talk) 20:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
A modern architectural creation. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
A modern architectural creation. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Although the source Flickr stream publishes under CC0, these three files have a copyright notice in the EXIF and are not work of the Moldovan Parliament.
- File:18.03.2024-20.03.2024 Participarea Președintelui Parlamentului, Igor Grosu, la Conferința Președinților Parlamentelor statelor membre ale Strategiei Uniunii Europene pentru regiunea Dunării - 53596384132.jpg
- File:18.03.2024-20.03.2024 Participarea Președintelui Parlamentului, Igor Grosu, la Conferința Președinților Parlamentelor statelor membre ale Strategiei Uniunii Europene pentru regiunea Dunării - 53597471728.jpg
- File:18.03.2024-20.03.2024 Participarea Președintelui Parlamentului, Igor Grosu, la Conferința Președinților Parlamentelor statelor membre ale Strategiei Uniunii Europene pentru regiunea Dunării - 53597717020.jpg
Gikü (talk) 19:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The EXIF copyright tags suggest that these are the work of a photographer for the Austrian parliament, their terms of use do not allow commercial re-use: https://www.parlament.gv.at/en/services/help/terms-of-use - Consigned (talk) 22:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I want it deleted. I uploaded this photo but I don't want it to be on Commons. Kızıldeniz (talk) 19:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Past the automatic courtesy deletion period and looks useful, but did you really take this photo in 1970? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- No! :) I think the date is wrong... Kızıldeniz (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Did you take the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete Unused, I feel like we can delete per uploader courtesy, they have uploaded many other useful files. Consigned (talk) 22:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
This image is almost a duplicate of File: Kompilator.tiff uploaded about ten minutes earlier. The nominated image, however, redacts the user name partially matching the uploader’s username User: Beban. I have now removed this image’s only use. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 22:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Es una imagen de baja calidad visual y con faltas de ortografía, que tiene un equivalente SVG traducido al castellano Marion Moseby (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, inferior to File:British main lines railway diagram.svg which allows translation to Spanish. Consigned (talk) 23:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- The logo of NCAHP used here is not genuine because government of India not released any logo yet. Citizen arindam (talk) 07:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- There is a logo contest, but I can't find any winner yet. This image is also copyrighted. -- Valjean (talk) 19:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Logo above COM:TOO, seems to say "since 2021" so doesn't meet the current {{PD-US}}. Consigned (talk) 23:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. We have relatively few images of shepherds in Greece. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
User duncanssmith claims authorship at the same time as noting photograph was taken by Wendy Smith, who doesn't appear to have given permission to use. Quilt Phase (talk) 00:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- There are other files from the same people in this condition. 186.174.168.209 02:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- True, I would like to see how this request goes before tackling the others. Quilt Phase (talk) 03:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I imagined and wanted to help you. 186.174.168.209 13:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- True, I would like to see how this request goes before tackling the others. Quilt Phase (talk) 03:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Have discovered a previous successful deletion request for the same user for the same reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2016_March_7#File:Ymg_003.jpg Quilt Phase (talk) 00:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Possibly exceeds TOO * Pppery * it has begun... 01:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- There's no COM:TOO Palestine. Which country's TOO would be relevant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It's still a very simple logo, though Commons:Copyright rules by territory/State of Palestine has nothing about TOO. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- This does not look like a "very simple logo" to me. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. You were asked about TOO for Palestine which has none. I ask for this to be a speedy keep. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 21:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that Commons has no information on a country's TOO does not mean that said threshold is infinity. It means we don't know what the threshold is. Per COM:PCP if we lack information we err on the side of deleting. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- It appears we do have material on this after all. I change my vote to delete after having read Commons:FOP Saudi Arabia. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that Commons has no information on a country's TOO does not mean that said threshold is infinity. It means we don't know what the threshold is. Per COM:PCP if we lack information we err on the side of deleting. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. You were asked about TOO for Palestine which has none. I ask for this to be a speedy keep. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 21:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- This does not look like a "very simple logo" to me. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- How is that relevant? Pppery is right, though I don't like it at all when files are deleted just because we're ignorant of whatever legal standard they use - or simply none. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, if we don't know the TOO we assume it is low. Besides Palestine was a crown dependency and its copyright law was made in 1924 and modelled on British law. This would imply that Palestinian TOO would be quite low since British TOO is quite low (though there are exceptions, such as COM:TOO INDIA). —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 11:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)- Also COM:TOO Malaysia, COM:TOO Canada, COM:TOO Israel, and probably others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Israel abolished "skill and labor" standard in 1989 and now it depends on the Feist ruling, which is quite high as US threshold of originality. Canada also rejected "sweat of the brow" standards. Kys5g talk! 09:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Don't their COM:TOO pages need to be updated, if their criteria are more cramped now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Although I don't understand what you mean by "quite high as US threshold." If you're saying their thresholds are high, that's what I said. What else would the word "and" refer to, other than "there are exceptions"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Don't their COM:TOO pages need to be updated, if their criteria are more cramped now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Israel abolished "skill and labor" standard in 1989 and now it depends on the Feist ruling, which is quite high as US threshold of originality. Canada also rejected "sweat of the brow" standards. Kys5g talk! 09:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also COM:TOO Malaysia, COM:TOO Canada, COM:TOO Israel, and probably others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Palestine essentially uses law from the UK that was written in 1911. Definitely above British ToO. Would require VRT permission from PFLP. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm the photographer/uploader. I uploaded this in 2006 as illustration of the aftermath of a disaster, mural inclusion incidental. (Were I photographing the scene today, I would have made more effort to make photos including as little of the painting as possible.) I'll let others judge this one. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Should the painting be blurred? Thoughts? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind. Whatever "the others" say the closing admin will find a way to keep the colleague's work. KEEP per the admin-uploader. 186.174.84.65 16:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- If kept please rename, correcting at least the typing mistakes. 186.174.84.65 16:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Anon @186.174.84.65: Snark, I'll guess? I've had a number of my uploads deleted as DW problems - mostly from the earlier years of the project when I was less strictly aware of potential problems and the project as a whole seemed to be less often looking for them. It has included a few that I vigorously protested against deletion - very unlike this one. Are you really voting keep? And if so, on what criteria? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Anon @186.174.84.65: - artefact of early years of the project, I'm not sure if it was Commons software at the time or interaction between my computer and Commons, but titles with more than 2 blank spaces wouldn't upload, and sometimes 1 or 2 were problems, so I generally didn't use spaces in titles. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep peer Infrogmation AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Peer connect? 186.175.112.114 23:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: Do you think the mural needs a light blur? It's definitely an educational file. Abzeronow (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: a moderate blur would certainly remove all issue here. I'll do that; if the conclusion is that it's unneeded someone can easily restore the original.- Jmabel ! talk 20:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I think this settles it. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: a moderate blur would certainly remove all issue here. I'll do that; if the conclusion is that it's unneeded someone can easily restore the original.- Jmabel ! talk 20:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted original file; Kept version with painting portion blurred. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
One of the file components of this photo collage (File:Thessaloniki music Hall4.jpg) was deleted for copyrights violation due to the absence of FOP in Greece. As a result, this montage should either be remodeled with the problematic-deleted photo in question deleted or replaced with another more appropriate one. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment I wish I was notified prior to its nomination for deletion so that I would be given the chance to update it to remove the problematic source. Because it was nominated for deletion without notifying me beforehand, now I am not able to replace/overwrite with a new version. If can we cancel this deletion nomination, so that the option to replace becomes available (this option is unlocked only when a file isn't under nomination for deletion) so that I can replace it with this one: https://i.imgur.com/yAcTh1X.png. This will be appreciated. Edit: my comment was incorrect: turned out the ability to replace photo was due to not being logged-in at the moment I was trying to do so. My apologies for the confusion. --SilentResident (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- The file has been updated and the issue that had caused the nomination for deletion, has been addressed. My apologies for taking so long. I would appreciate if an admin can disable the earlier revisions of the image, so that no editors may revert back to the problematic versions of that file containing removed photos, in the future. --SilentResident (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @SilentResident: Unfortunately, there's still an issue with the file in question as the question here is not necessarily the copyrights status of the file itself, but rather the fact that Greece has no FOP. As a result, no photo of the Thessaloniki Music Hall can be uploaded, or even included in a photo montage as in this specific case, due to copyrights violation. Unless, of course, any law change happens in Greece regarding this issue, something, which, to be really honest, I don't really think that there is any chance to happen. PS. Here's the page with the relevant policy in order for you to get a better grasp of what FOP / Freedom of Panorama is all about ➡️ Commons:Freedom of panorama. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 14:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi User:Εὐθυμένης, thank you for informing me, the Concert Hall has already been removed and replaced with the Science Museum. Feel free to check it out and let me know if there is anything else I can do. Have a good day!--SilentResident (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @SilentResident: Same thing, unfortunately. This museum, as well, is way too recent and unique in its overall design conception in order to fall out of copyrights. Maybe, some building from the "Golden Era" of the city, around the beginning of the 20th century, or something Byzantine, such as the Rotunda or the Eptapyrgion fortress, both of them being some very recognizable landmarks of the city... 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- I believe you, however, from a policy-based perspective, the collage isn't the proper place for contesting each of its individual sources; you will have to raise your concerns in their respective deletion discussions, not here. And if the admins or volunteers who will evaluate your points see there a problem with the landmark's photo, then I am positive they will remove them. If this happens, I will try find some time to update the collage to remove the Science Museum and replace it with one of your excellent recommendations such as the Rotunda. In all case, the collage itself is merely is based on pictures that were not found violating the policies and remain readily available for use, so the collage shouldn't remain nominated for deletion for as long as any of its sources isn't reportedly violating the policies. However, even if the Science Museum isn't nominated for deletion, please feel free to edit and update the collage by yourself to replace the Museum with another landmark of your choice using an image editor of your choice. You are more than welcome to make edits to the collage and my permission isn't required, at all. Have a good weekend! --SilentResident (talk) 00:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @SilentResident: Same thing, unfortunately. This museum, as well, is way too recent and unique in its overall design conception in order to fall out of copyrights. Maybe, some building from the "Golden Era" of the city, around the beginning of the 20th century, or something Byzantine, such as the Rotunda or the Eptapyrgion fortress, both of them being some very recognizable landmarks of the city... 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi User:Εὐθυμένης, thank you for informing me, the Concert Hall has already been removed and replaced with the Science Museum. Feel free to check it out and let me know if there is anything else I can do. Have a good day!--SilentResident (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @SilentResident: Unfortunately, there's still an issue with the file in question as the question here is not necessarily the copyrights status of the file itself, but rather the fact that Greece has no FOP. As a result, no photo of the Thessaloniki Music Hall can be uploaded, or even included in a photo montage as in this specific case, due to copyrights violation. Unless, of course, any law change happens in Greece regarding this issue, something, which, to be really honest, I don't really think that there is any chance to happen. PS. Here's the page with the relevant policy in order for you to get a better grasp of what FOP / Freedom of Panorama is all about ➡️ Commons:Freedom of panorama. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 14:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- The file has been updated and the issue that had caused the nomination for deletion, has been addressed. My apologies for taking so long. I would appreciate if an admin can disable the earlier revisions of the image, so that no editors may revert back to the problematic versions of that file containing removed photos, in the future. --SilentResident (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @SilentResident: Can the deleted science museum be blanked out or replaced with a landmark or artwork that is old enough to not present issues? Right now, I'd have delete because of the science museum. Abzeronow (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Abzeronow: . I see, another photo got deleted again? All right. May I initiate a discussion at Thessaloniki's talk page so that a replacement is decided among the Wiki community instead of depending on just one person (me) alone? This way we can ensure an everlasting result without any potential issues that one person alone may be ignoring. --SilentResident (talk) 11:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Update: A discussion has opened at: [3]. I want to believe that with Community input, the collage won't have similar problems in the future and an everlasting outcome can be achieved. --SilentResident (talk) 11:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- @SilentResident: A longer lasting solution would be to build the collage in the infobox using individual photos, like en:Athens, so that if one photo is deleted, the entire collage is not lost. The downside is that it would have to be built on each individual article/Wikipedia. For now you might want to quickly find a free file that doesn't include any modern architecture and swap it into the collage so that the collage is not deleted; today the collage does include a copyrighted file so there is a bit of pressure to fix (delete) it. COM:Village pump/Copyright could review the new element to validate that it likely won't get deleted in the future. Consigned (talk) 12:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Consigned: , since the issue is pressing, I stepped quickly and resolved it by replacing the problematic photo with that of ancient landmark which would by no means raise copyright issues. Please, would you, or someone else, be as kind as to remove the following warning from the file's page:
- "This media file has been nominated for deletion since 29 March 2024.
- To discuss it, please visit the nomination page.
- Do not remove this tag until the deletion nomination is closed.
- Reason for the nomination: One of the file components of this photo collage (File:Thessaloniki music Hall4.jpg) was deleted for copyrights violation due to the absence of FOP in Greece. As a result, this montage should either be remodeled with the problematic-deleted photo in question deleted or replaced with another more appropriate one."
- Because it is a really outdated message concerning a previous photo that was removed months ago and is no longer the case anymore. Good day. --SilentResident (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you SilentResident, I hope that resolves the issue with this file. An administrator should come by soon enough to close the deletion request and remove the tag. Best, Consigned (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- @SilentResident: A longer lasting solution would be to build the collage in the infobox using individual photos, like en:Athens, so that if one photo is deleted, the entire collage is not lost. The downside is that it would have to be built on each individual article/Wikipedia. For now you might want to quickly find a free file that doesn't include any modern architecture and swap it into the collage so that the collage is not deleted; today the collage does include a copyrighted file so there is a bit of pressure to fix (delete) it. COM:Village pump/Copyright could review the new element to validate that it likely won't get deleted in the future. Consigned (talk) 12:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep current version now that the copyrighted component has been removed; Delete old versions with copyvio. Consigned (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: issue fixed, older versions revdelled. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:US National Archives series: Card Index of Moving Picture Theaters in Missouri, ca. 1917 - ca. 1919
[edit]Unused files, out of scope. The files contain nothing more than a single cinema name and the corrospondening town the cinema is in.
The files are part of a NARA archive series, and the purpose of those records is/was to create a "database" of cinemas. However, we have only 11 27 of those index cards uploaded on commons - the entire set consists of 581 cards. (see https://catalog.archives.gov/id/5397795) Purpose of those cards is to create an index of all existing cinemas - entirety matters in this context. Therefore, those 11 files are out of scope, as they are utterly useless for any educational purpose on their own. Either the entire (linked) collection should be uploaded (althrough the educational value of this is still questionable), or those files deleted.
- File:Bernie, Or. A. Dilts - DPLA - fd360ff765347c6bddf3957d4fdde350.jpg
- File:Kansas City, Alamo Theatre - DPLA - feaf35c69e645d9ba1e8f5c3fd9c30db.jpg
- File:Kansas City, Star Theatre - DPLA - e608449540ac11b8536b07528c48c21b.jpg
- File:Kansas City, Wonderland Theatre, 12th & Grand - DPLA - d2063c6bdc0bb198336d8e08dfa24d0f.jpg
- File:Lamar, Bijou Theatre - DPLA - 1c995140bdbb7bbf45090f760d285aba.jpg
- File:Memphis, New Theatre - DPLA - 47949c9a96f81c7c62be58f83d0c889b.jpg
- File:Oak Grove, Airdome Theatre - DPLA - 7a957359b8c1dfa50cb3d0b699076fe6.jpg
- File:Oran, Majestic Theatre - DPLA - 968e95571d22240248a4ee0fb6dda2ab.jpg
- File:St. Louis, Delmar Theatre, 4936 Delmar Ave. - DPLA - a45d56d3a6aa11f0bfece57877b64d4f.jpg
- File:St. Louis, Duchess Theatre - DPLA - 8a88e10a3f749dc2ef119a8475a18677.jpg
- File:Washington, Calvin Theatre - DPLA - 2156d30f7bb7e8e18ab46aa3e1c00519.jpg
TheImaCow (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
temporarly I withdraw my nomination. I see there are a bunch more uncategorized images which are part of this series within Category:Media contributed by National Archives at Kansas City. I'll go through & categorize, and we'll see if it is complete of not. TheImaCow (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)- I've went through all 8000 files at the linked category, and now we're at 27 files which exist of this collection on commons - way too few to be useful for anything, and consider the nomination reopened for those 27 files. TheImaCow (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:US National Archives series: Card Index of Licensed Bakers, ca. 1918 - ca. 1918
[edit]Unused files, out of scope. The files contain nothing more than a single baker's name and the corrospondening address.
The files are part of a NARA archive series, and the purpose of those records is/was to create a "database" of issued baking licences. However, we have only 13 36 of those index cards uploaded on commons - the entire set consists of 706 cards. (see https://catalog.archives.gov/id/5111276) Purpose of those cards is to create an index of all issued licences- entirety matters in this context. Therefore, those 11 files are out of scope, as they are utterly useless for any educational purpose on their own. Either the entire (linked) collection should be uploaded (althrough the educational value of this is still questionable), or those files deleted.
- File:Butler, W. H. Pexley (?exley) - DPLA - 6a604f39fb836ca640c78cc8428dfb61.jpg
- File:Harrison, William John Beverness - DPLA - 553db217f0cd974a52dda10f9fde5c0f.jpg
- File:Johnson, William J. Barry - DPLA - 1502161fcf195648998008718256cea4.jpg
- File:Jones, G. W. Walker - DPLA - 0870374e47c81b7cdfad39cfa3ef51e3.jpg
- File:Lee, Frank Pollard - DPLA - afd386d2801d10c2aacb1f157fbb59b4.jpg
- File:Shelby, Albert Flechtner - DPLA - e6b59b3afbbe92e7da16b3ba627606f5.jpg
- File:Story, L. B. Wolf - DPLA - 4c81a69dc50dfc523f6ec4646ad66353.jpg
- File:Wapello, Lewis Abrams - DPLA - 6c069503975b2d296007bf9cdf689de2.jpg
- File:Webster, Jessie B. Nydegger - DPLA - 0c4d61e3cb842afa2c4df3963f80c91d.jpg
- File:Winnieshiek, H. M. Mac Reynolds - DPLA - 746d0239a028e6920ba36de53941b7d7.jpg
- File:Winnieshiek, Jonathan B. Wiltgen - DPLA - 0a1388819327902dfd70a45d71488223.jpg
- File:Woodbury, Sioux City Cone & Manufacturing Co. - DPLA - 29a24f44a6c87ef48d478730636e415a.jpg
- File:Woodbury, Tom Kamkutes - DPLA - 42170e5e328cb8a6fc39ce065156be3f.jpg
TheImaCow (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
temporarly I withdraw my nomination. I see there are a bunch more uncategorized images which are part of this series within Category:Media contributed by National Archives at Kansas City. I'll go through & categorize, and we'll see if it is complete of not. TheImaCow (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)- I've went through all 8000 files at the linked category, and now we're at 36 files which exist of this collection on commons - way too few to be useful for anything, and consider the nomination reopened for those 36 files. TheImaCow (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
While the video is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution licence, the image in question is not taken by "Algérie Presse Service", but rather the UN Web TV, which clearly indicate that all rights are reserved, as mentioned by Reda benkhadra Riad Salih (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with him on certain aspects regarding the origin of the images from the UN WEB. It is true that agencies possess the complete right to purchase, utilize, and distribute content from other media sources globally, which is the case as it is explained in the UNTV website (UN footage is not in the public domain, therefore, any use of the footage must be authorized by the United Nations and a license agreement must be signed between the UN and the requesting client. Licensing fees may apply). If the official agency APS published the content under a Creative Commons license, I believe that the government's official media is primarily focused on compliance with legal regulations. By including the screenshot with the company logo, I intended to signify that the images are being republished under the authority of that particular agency. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 16:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Typically news agencies have a copyright policy which indicates that they do not have copyright of third-party content, and third-party content remains copyrighted by the third party. I can't find an Algérie Presse Service copyright policy so lean delete per COM:PRP. Consigned (talk) 22:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
While the video is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution licence, the image in question is not taken by "Algérie Presse Service", but rather the UN Web TV, which clearly indicate that all rights are reserved, as mentioned by Reda benkhadra Riad Salih (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with him on certain aspects regarding the origin of the images from the UN WEB. It is true that agencies possess the complete right to purchase, utilize, and distribute content from other media sources globally. If the official agency APS published the content under a Creative Commons license, I believe that the government's official media is primarily focused on compliance with legal regulations. By including the screenshot with the company logo, I intended to signify that the images are being republished under the authority of that particular agency. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 16:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Typically news agencies have a copyright policy which indicates that they do not have copyright of third-party content, and third-party content remains copyrighted by the third party. I can't find an Algérie Presse Service copyright policy so lean delete per COM:PRP. Consigned (talk) 22:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
pour améliorer le dessin Rojac55 (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, uploader request, superseded by File:Saint-Maurice-sur-Moselle BL B CG.svg Consigned (talk) 20:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:31, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Possible Derivative Work of copyrighted sign. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- What about
{{FoP-Spain}}
? I'm quite sure this applies. Regards, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:FOP Spain and the work is de minimis anyway. The text is illegible and the map is dark, blurry and unusable. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The content on the sign is COM:De minimis Consigned (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: copyrighted elements are DM. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ernst Heller
[edit]copyright violation; public domain 2042; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Büste von Ferdinand Hodler, 1917, WK 36, Kunsthaus Zürich.jpg
- File:Ferdinand Hodler, Ernst Heller 1894-1972.jpg
- File:Gefallener Eisen 1917 WK 37.jpg
- File:Gefallener, Ernst Heller 1894-1972.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Matthias Heller is the son of Ernst Heller and so should have the rights to license derivatives of these sculptures. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Original source of the photo is not provided, no indication the photographer released their photo of the 3D object under a free license, Quick1984 (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, copied from Russian WIkipedia, I corrected the author name into Georgi Dolgopsky, no reason to think they did not make the photo. --Ellywa (talk) 20:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ellywa, surely there's no reason to think so, except the first one, that the user was repeatedly nailed for copyvios and false authorship on Russian Wikipedia, and his uploader rights were removed forever, and the second one - this image is easy to find on the web since 2008: [4]. --Quick1984 (talk) 05:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Next time, please provide a complete list of reasons to delete an image.I will reopen the request because the file is heavy in use. It should not be speedily deleted. Ellywa (talk) 06:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Reopenend regular DR, as my decision was contested. Ellywa (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- From speedy deletion request by Quick1984 Taken from the web, where available since 2008: tineye. Ellywa (talk) 06:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: netcopyvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
This depicts Yui Hirasawa from the anime K-ON! and is therefore derivative work. ㆀ (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep it’s true I did use a free unofficial depiction of Yui as the base, but her hair has been changed from brown to black. I think that’s sufficient to differentiate the two characters since a particular style is not copyrightable and she has no other copyrightable traits of the character in question. For reference far more visually distinct characters explicitly referred to as the character in question have been kept as being below TOO, like File:Marisa get out.png. Dronebogus (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I don’t see any educational value here 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 09:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- It illustrates a common type of “fan service” in anime and manga. Just because you don’t seem to see value in anything I upload doesn’t make it OOS Dronebogus (talk) 13:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Dronebogus that it can illustrate the steam censor, but it's essentially Yui with black hair. I'm not exactly sure it's different enough from the Kyoto Animation designs to still not be infringing. Abzeronow (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- It illustrates a common type of “fan service” in anime and manga. Just because you don’t seem to see value in anything I upload doesn’t make it OOS Dronebogus (talk) 13:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC)