Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/02/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 24th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake SN Rony (talk) 02:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate; user request. Higher-quality upload used as replacement. Synorem (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Goingon49 (talk) 03:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact duplicate JAn Dudík (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted as dup of File:Hojná Voda kříž u parkoviště.jpg. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Film Poster. メイド理世 (talk) 03:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: pretty clear copyright violation, speedily deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a better version with less edge under a similar name, please delete this version; i took the picture myself Danixcvii (talk) 14:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sockpuppet. Fry1989 eh? 17:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sockpuppet. Fry1989 eh? 17:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sockpuppet. Fry1989 eh? 17:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Elgaard (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Elgaard (talk) 18:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, was created for a mislabeled file that was located ni Nepal instead of India; this district name only exists in India verdy_p (talk) 19:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, this was created while finding file indicating a location in Nepal, but the district with that name only exists in India verdy_p (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good quality Redsoxfan201318 (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising CzarJobKhaya (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Pupusareawesome (talk) 04:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and does not appear to be accurate - wrong part of Africa highlighted per en:Susu language and there's no mention of SEA in the article either. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image portraying sexuality - This image does not serve any educationnal purpose. Blocktomo (talk) 15:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: no legitimate reason to delete. Only file depicting this sex act. COM:INUSE on three different Wikimedia sites. Dronebogus (talk) 09:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The anatomy is severely distorted. Too much of male gaze, pornography, to be realistically educational. Ltalc (talk) 14:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Yann (talk) 17:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of East Timor.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Sudan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Here is the photo attributed to Czech photographer Dan Materna. Gumruch (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Film cover on the Television in Cine Sky. メイド理世 (talk) 04:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: de minimis. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in-use picture of an unknown person. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 05:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 06:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Uploader here. Pilot error. A1Cafel made a valid point, and I support speedy deletion. Geo Swan (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 06:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • この写真は日本人女性 Kaztima109 19:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • This picture is Japanese woman killed by Chinese in Tongzhou_Slaughter 1937. Kaztima109 19:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Any valid sources or just another manifestation of Japanese propaganda? --Алый Король (talk) 03:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. No valid reason for deletion has been provided. --DAJF (talk) 04:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Not a valid deletion rationale. If it were true, and if there was some evidence, it might be a case for renaming, but not for deletion and no evidence has been provided in any case. It's high time the Japanese came out of denial and faced up to their appalling behaviour in WWII. SpinningSpark 17:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please use the {{Rename}} template to request a change of file name. Green Giant (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the photo is of an anonymous person, it is obtrusive, violent, and obviously nonconsensual. This photo does not serve a purpose in understanding the crimes committed as described in the article. 24.38.222.73 06:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If not deleted then covered so that seeing such images of a brutalised human being is a choice not something suddenly and traumatically appearing in such a matter of fact way as you research a topic,as if she is punctuation not someone that lived a hopeful life and died horribly. Other media outlets warn you the image may be graphic and let you decide to see it. I do not need to see the dehumanised body of a raped and murdered woman to understand the accomanying text. I am sure neither she nor her family gave permission and I feel this image amongst others disrespects the victim as well as being appalling to see without warning. If deletion is denied then please consider taht people would like the option to choose whether or not I see this content and not suddenly be faced with it 79.70.9.92 18:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 19:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explicit image of sexual violence, torture and death. Medora73 (talk) 06:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Heavily in use photo that has been kept in three prior DRs. "I don't like it" is not a valid deletion rationale. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vion Music (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, images uploaded for self promotion; no non-userpage usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Ali Askari died in 1978. So {{Own work}} claim is doubtful. Even if this photograph was taken in Hakkari Province, {{PD-TR}} is not valid. Takabeg (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:13, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information of the original creator. The claim of that the uploader is the original creator seems unrealistic. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Iraq. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted magazine cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted flyer. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project's scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, artist Walter Seymour Allward died in 1955 A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:47, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivitive work of a copyrighted photo The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate; user request. Higher-quality upload used as replacement. Synorem (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality JPG logo superseded by File:100 Green logo.svg Yeeno (talk) 00:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nabina1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation: these all appear to be official photos from the Miss Heritage beauty pageant ([1]). Claim of "own work" is not credible, and we'd need VRT permission for these photos regardless.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nabina1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: miscellaneous unused flag images.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph is not at listed source, pd-algorithm license is invalid regardless. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as basis-less proported distinction of a historical figure + nonsense text The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previous nomination related to plain text images
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Born to Endless Night (talk · contribs)

[edit]
Random samples

These are all various forms of plain text over plain or simple gradient backgrounds, sometimes with a logo at the bottom. They're unused and unlikely to be used, as the messages they contain could be replaced with plain text in an article with no loss to the viewer.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per the nothing educational other than raw text of COM:SCOPE. Belbury (talk) 09:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I would agree. Although meeting licensing requirements, none of these files would be of any valuable use or within scope. PascalHD (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is not just raw text, this are promotional images/posters by the government, from democrats in the 2020s. There is clear educational value. Take a look at Category:US National Archives series: War Production Board, compiled 1942 - 1943 or Category:US National Archives series: World War II Posters, compiled 1942 - 1945 - that's essentially the same in this context, just older & with more effort. If you want to delete files, because they are highly unlikely of ever being used in articles, then you could delete literal millions of files on commons. TheImaCow (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TheImaCow: All of the ones in those categories have graphic elements. A lot of Born to Endless Night's uploads also had graphic elements, and I didn't nominate those. I even didn't nominate ones with things like tables of plain text. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alone the fact that those posters from today have so little graphic elements compared to the posters from back then is what I consider to be enough educational value. TheImaCow (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep If you are going to write a book on social media and the presidency, you would need these. To recreate them you would need to know the font and the pantone color of the background. The only way to do that is to have the originals. I can describe and recreate any image from the minimalist and monochrome painting movements, such as File:White on White (Malevich, 1918).png. It is two white squares, or I can look at the image. --RAN (talk) 00:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: TheImaCow and RAN provide clear and convincing rationales for the project scope of these images. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as exceptionally low quality - misgenerated star of david, weird pixelation The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Social media graphics of the Joe Biden presidential campaign, 2020 - Do the graphic elements here exceed the PD-simple threshold? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious CC license - political campaign logo The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:14, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious PD-gov license as campaign material would not be created as part of an official's "official duties" The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. I would say that the more precise issue is that we do not know who the photographer is. If it was a government photographer, the photograph would be in the public domain regardless of its use to promote a campaign-style rally. I cannot find any evidence about the provenance of the photo though. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:14, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The plant art on the left side may make this too complex for PD-textlogo The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:14, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henry Petros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The source does not indicate a clear Creative Commons, The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Music album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gordon527 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Music album covers

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shreyas Kavankar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of the background image which is a large poster. Too dominant to be de minimis. Herbert Ortner (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly misgenerated AI upscaling with a hairy hat brim and melting eyeglasses. Belbury (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, creator Michel Virlogeux is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible issue on educational use (COM:SCOPE), as this appears to be a personal photo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is unused and does not seem very useful for WikiCommons as there are many other cat images here. Leoboudv (talk) 13:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very elaborate interior architecture, but France does not allow commercial Freedom of Panorama. Violation of architectural copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gare de Lyon-Saint Exupéry. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person is not mentioned in en.wiki and uploader is indefinitely blocked there. Probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author, dubious license. — Racconish💬 18:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:תמונות החטופים הישראלים בעזה, מרכז הקניות של רובע א' באשדוד, דצמבר 2023 01.jpg. COM:DW - photos of photos. {{FoP-Israel}} allows for freedom of panorama when an image is "permanently situated in a public place", but these aren't permanent installations. Permission from the owners of the original photographs are required. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

why would this be useful? also misgeneration issues (hands, foods sizes) Prototyperspective (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. Uploaded for a personal essay on hi.wiki. That page has been marked for speedy deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 186.174.165.18 02:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{No permission since}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by جورجي عناب (talk • contribs) 07:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader made an apparent misformed request to delete shortly after upload [2]. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New upload of vulva photo, not special enough to be educationally useful FPTI (talk) 02:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Female vulva? Delete, not so interesting. 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Asian anatomy is lacking in the category. Deletion will underrepresent Asian anatomy in a category filled with Caucasian images, we want to avoid selection bias. If you are writing a textbook on anatomy for the Asian market you will want representation. --RAN (talk) 00:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Found in higher resolution here. ~ Saur (talkcontribs) 05:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Also copyrighted app icon. メイド理世 (talk) 05:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (also unused and blurry). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was replaced to "Signature of Charles VIII of France.svg" Tveol1091 (talk) 07:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD, in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file by mistake Kj1595 (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I replaced this auto-traced raster file with a a PNG version. Kj1595 (talk) 07:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2022, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, old but not so old as to be certain to be PD; lacking reliable information to determine license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2022, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, old but not so old as to be certain to be PD; lacking reliable information to determine license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

13 years of difference between Exif and upload. Probably robbed file. No eduse either. 186.175.196.163 10:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: random penis photo with dubious claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo in wrong file format (GIF) and with opaque (white) background. Replaced by File:Logo of Honeywell UOP (2021).svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with colored atoms & not drawn according to MoS guidelines. In addition, the areas around the oxygen atoms have a strange white background. Replaced by File:Ethyl-formate-2D-structure.svg and File:Ethyl-formate-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality versions. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image (probbly downloaded online), uploaded by a sockpuppet, see en:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/TronFactor. Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. MarioGom (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author, A watermark appears on the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional and out of scope, Gore was not the Democratic presidential nominee in 1968 nor was Romney the Republican nominee N Panama 84534 19:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, architect Henri Joulie died in 1969 and artist Gaston Dintrat died in 1964.

A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Vous êtes surprenant. En quoi cette image pose-t-elle un problème de copyright ? --François GOGLINS (talk) 08:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vous êtes surprenant. En quoi cette image pose-t-elle un problème de copyright ? --François GOGLINS (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vous êtes surprenant. En quoi cette image pose-t-elle un problème de copyright ? --François GOGLINS (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vous êtes surprenant. En quoi cette image pose-t-elle un problème de copyright ? --François GOGLINS (talk) 08:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan. This statue was erected by Ito Ioki (1918-1992)[3] Unfortunately Commons cannot hold this file. Y.haruo (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan. This statue was erected by Ito Ioki (1918-1992)[4] Unfortunately Commons cannot hold this file. Y.haruo (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete NoFoP Japan. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 12:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan. This statue was erected by Ito Ioki (1918-1992)[5] Unfortunately Commons cannot hold this file. Y.haruo (talk) 20:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The content of the website is not PD. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1985 Russian television broadcast screengrab, unclear why it is being claimed as copyright having expired in the US. Belbury (talk) 10:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 10:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong author, source, date... Xocolatl (talk) 10:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://de.linkedin.com/in/maximilian-arland-a02673222 - copyright? Xocolatl (talk) 10:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the watermark on the bottom right CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

playground (does not define its purpose) which is not been edited for almost 2 years (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?)title=Commons:Silly_things&action=history Mateus2019 (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It had been used for a caption contest. If it's not being used, I've got no objection to it being removed, if Commons is moving in a more "professional" direction. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Past contests are not normally deleted just because we are no longer running them. - Jmabel ! talk 17:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Jmabel. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and low resolution duplicate of File:Jonas Kazimieras Sapiega vyresnysis.jpg Seva Seva (talk) 13:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is no photo with the title ‘불알’ in Korean. Also, '불알' is a Korean word and there is no picture of Koreans' 'testicle'.Therefore, there is no reason for it to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaji778 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since there are no pictures of Korean people's 'balls', this could be used as educational material. And one person cannot judge whether something is educational or not educational. Jaji778 (talk) 07:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 02:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Music album cover, The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 03:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Husam safsaf 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --plicit 03:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality and low resolution duplicate of File:Jonas Kazimieras Sapiega vyresnysis.jpg. Seva Seva (talk) 13:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: COM:INUSE. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 13:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The original picture was uploaded 16 August 2011 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyfio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: the uploader is not the author, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Profile picture, The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thisasia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The two Taesan pictures are quite obviously low-resolution screen captures from videos, which are presumably copyrighted. The Leehan pictures are screen captures from videos uploaded to Pinterest, with no indication of who the original creator is. The attribution to "Günesiimmm" also doesn't match the uploader there. The uploader did state on Enwiki that they are not the creator and that they did contact the original uploader, but there's no evidence of permission, and if the person they contacted just made an edit of other videos and uploaded it to Pinterest, it wouldn't be their permission that's needed anyway.

Paul_012 (talk) 12:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul 012 When asking for permission to use, i wasn't sure if he is the original owner or just a fan which I will probably try to check more into it even if I want to upload it again while declaring the proper licence. Thanks. Thisasia (talk) 20:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken from a website with no clear license or author. Gajmar (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 09:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

कुर्पया यह इमेज डिलीट करने की कुर्पया करें क्योंकि यह इमेज कई जगह पे है और डबल/डुप्लीकेट है Government814150 (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, superseded by superior SVG version. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality duplicate of this image: File:Історія України-Русі. 1912. Гетьман Данило Апостол.jpg. There are many alternative portraits, see Category:Portraits of Danylo Apostol. Seva Seva (talk) 10:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OsvaldoP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Different authors are marked in the uploads, The uploader is not the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaronnatoli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is ? 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is? 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Studio photo 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

انه ملف شخصي ولا يمت لاحد بصلة ولا ارغب ببقاءه على الويكيبيديا Husam Falah (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signature 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

انه ملف شخصي ولا يمت لاحد بصلة ولا ارغب ببقاءه على الويكيبيديا Husam Falah (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal signature. --P 1 9 9   02:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signatue 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ارجو حدف الملف لانه ملف شخصي ولا يمت لاحد بصلة ولا ارغب ببقاءه على الويكيبيديا Husam Falah (talk) 15:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal signature. --P 1 9 9   02:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mi diploma 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ارجو حدف الملف لانه ملف شخصي ولا يمت لاحد بصلة ولا ارغب ببقاءه على الويكيبيديا Husam Falah (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal doc. --P 1 9 9   02:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mi certificado de medalla 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ارجو حدف الملف لانه ملف شخصي ولا يمت لاحد بصلة ولا ارغب ببقاءه على الويكيبيديا Husam Falah (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal doc. --P 1 9 9   02:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mi medalla olimpica 2800:150:152:840:4806:29E6:EAA4:BAA 14:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ارجو حدف الملف لانه ملف شخصي ولا يمت لاحد بصلة ولا ارغب ببقاءه على الويكيبيديا Husam Falah (talk) 15:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal doc. --P 1 9 9   02:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by White63wolf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: From Facebook

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kotmic kenan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality photo. Unclear what it's supposed to depict. Of no practical use. Shawn à Montréal (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical map without any reference. Nanahuatl (talk) 17:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a near duplicate of File:Belles Conseil municipal.svg. This file appears to be the orignal file however the other duplicate seems to be used in other projects, hence nominating this. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 17:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate withdrawal of the request. Didn't see the description suggesting that the grey spots represent different groups and was been misled by renaming request that was submitted on this file linking to the file nominated. Huge apologies. --Contributers2020Talk to me here! 17:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   02:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused duplicate of File:Qasımov Emin Rasim oğlu.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not relevant Ibrahimu Mcharo (talk) 17:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English  español  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  sicilianu  македонски  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  +/−

the paintings of the artist are out of scope of the project, no notability Oursana (talk) 18:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-encyclopedic ogranisation. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 18:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik heb per ongeluk een verkeerd bestand opgeladen. Ik bezit geen auteursrechten over dit bestand. Ik verzoek u dit bestand daarom te verwijderen. Bij voorbaat dank. P.M.A. Derks (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   02:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-encyclopedic organisation. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 18:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-encyclopedic organisation. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality very low resolution better file:Claude Monet - Nature morte au melon d’Espagne.jpg Oursana (talk) 11:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: they are two different files, we can keep both. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality very low resolution, better: File:Apples and Grapes MET DT1561.jpg Oursana (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be almost pure black, perhaps with some digital noise, but I cannot see any actual content in this image. Huntster (t @ c) 20:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Opened it in an image editor and adjusted level and and yep, there's nothing to see here. There's a very faint light streak starting near the center of the image and heading down and slightly to the left, but it's impossible to tell whether it's part of the image or just a coincidental pattern in the noise. Omphalographer (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ThatOneEli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Some of this content might be more appropriate on Wikibooks or Wikiversity.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non sourcé Emmanuel Dissais (talk) 21:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   02:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with File:Kantor Desa Tungkap, Tapin.JPG. I thought there was no file for this title, it turns out it already existed before. Exagren (talk) 02:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not redundant, restored original version of other file per COM:OVERWRITE. --P 1 9 9   21:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover Nanahuatl (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vilius.a (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source, also fails {{PD-Canada}} A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I had tagged the CC0 licensing with Template:Disputed soon after the upload, four years ago, in the hope that the uploader would himself do the research needed to find the necessary information and clarify the status. Obviously that did not happen. Thank you for bringing this file back to attention. I did some research and added to the information. I would say it's PD-Canada as a Government photo and, as such, Crown Copyright expired. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I already uploaded a better version of this photo at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Buster_Keaton,_Clyde_A._Bruckman,_Joseph_A._Mitchell,_Jean_C._Havez,_Eddie_Cline_1923_(Better_Version).jpg. This needs to be deleted due to the bad quality of this particular photo. GreatSpeedyGreatSpeedy (talk) 11:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Islasdensidad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not own works. --P 1 9 9   21:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: the model is marked as the author, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeffmoraes1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author (selfie), possible F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   21:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license is CC BY NC 4.0 Leoboudv (talk) 12:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No it is CC-BY. That is stated clearly on https://fishbase.us/photos/ThumbnailsSummary.php?ID=13431
"Image can be freely copied and altered, as long as original author and source are properly acknowledged." Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you open an image tagged as NC in Fishbase you see (I have bolded the difference) "Copyright: Image can be freely copied and altered but may be used only for non-commercial purposes. Original author and source must be properly acknowledged," (e.g. https://fishbase.us/photos/ThumbnailsSummary.php?ID=54# CAPAPE.JPG) rather than "Copyright: Image can be freely copied and altered, as long as original author and source are properly acknowledged." I think that its a bug or mistake in Fishbase and the tag on the website matches the copyright statement seen when you click on the image Quetzal1964 (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Quetzal1964, confirmed CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   21:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image license is CC BY NC 4.0. Non-Commercial restriction Leoboudv (talk) 12:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No it does not. It is CC-BY. That is stated clearly on the page https://fishbase.us/photos/ThumbnailsSummary.php?ID=417#
"Image can be freely copied and altered, as long as original author and source are properly acknowledged." Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you open an image tagged as NC in Fishbase you see (I have bolded the difference) "Copyright: Image can be freely copied and altered but may be used only for non-commercial purposes. Original author and source must be properly acknowledged," (e.g. https://fishbase.us/photos/ThumbnailsSummary.php?ID=54# CAPAPE.JPG) rather than "Copyright: Image can be freely copied and altered, as long as original author and source are properly acknowledged." I think that its a bug or mistake in Fishbase and the tag on the website matches the copyright statement seen when you click on the image Quetzal1964 (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Quetzal1964, confirmed CC-BY license. --P 1 9 9   21:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jager Gyula Official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: A watermark appears on the photo on the bottom right CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: the band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   21:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silvesterick (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Doubt on the claim that it is personal work, seems like pictures from magazines

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   21:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalla jayvee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Music album cover, Doubt of the claim of own work

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:Ivan Mazepa 2.png Seva Seva (talk) 13:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henesa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per metadata

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the auhtor, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Watermark states copyright by a person who is not the uploader. Till (talk) 14:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, definitely not own work Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 15:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission from artist. --P 1 9 9   22:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copyrighted Mohammed Qays (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   22:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copyrighted Mohammed Qays (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   22:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copyrighted Mohammed Qays (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   22:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copyrighted Mohammed Qays (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   22:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copyrighted Mohammed Qays (talk) 16:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   22:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map was already made with File:Florida Presidential Election Results 1924.svg 2600:1009:B05C:D6C9:EDD8:5065:91A2:FD5C 17:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in zoom. --P 1 9 9   22:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 1

What says the 2013 OTRS permission, please?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, perhaps Patrick should find the OTRS volunteers before opening the DR. --A1Cafel (talk

) 02:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Each person its job, please: you should tell us, you are the uploader after all. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Jeff G.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 2

Any evidence that they are photos by an employee of the Office of the Speaker as part of that person’s official duties. Besides uploader states Nancy Pelosi as creator but she ios obviously not.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, this is an "an official Twitter (social media) account of the Speaker". No matter it is a selfie or not, the image is still in PD. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info false author info: the images does not seem to be selfies. Ankry (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Pending further information. You cannot simply take a photo from an official twitter account, or even from a .gov website or an official government report unless you can demonstrate that the photo was the work of a US federal employee and taking that photo was part of their official duties. At the very least, this normally requires some form of clear attribution. GMGtalk 19:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ridiculous. If it is the case, then all images from Twitter/Facebook/Instagram of the US Government have to be deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • If we don't know who took the picture, then we don't know whether they are public domain. This image was posted the same day on the Facebook page for Gavin Newsome. Was it taken by a staffer for Pelosi, a staffer for Newsome, an employee of the Democratic party (not a government employee at all) or any other person present at the governor's association conference taking place at the time? If the photographer was actually associated with either Pelosi or Newsome, were they a paid employee or were they an unpaid intern? Unpaid interns are not employees and their works are not public domain. Unless we know who took the picture we have no way of knowing whether the image is public domain.
Pelosi (or more likely some intern or low-level staffer) has apparently posted hundreds (thousands?) of images on her twitter account, and there is no guarantee that she understands copyright law, or has thoroughly inspected the nature of the image with regard to it's copyright status. Government websites and social media accounts regularly post content either under fair use, or (like 90% of people on the internet) without regard to copyright whatsoever. Because of that merely appearing in one of these outlets is not sufficient to determine the copyright status of the work. GMGtalk 13:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unpaid interns working for Congress should fall under PD-USGov. It's still a work for hire, paid or not, I'm pretty sure -- it is part of duties ordered by the employer. I think my best look at that question is here, where agency law still applies to volunteers. (I think Congress is about to make sure that interns get paid going forward, anyways.) All of these photos are of people visiting Washington, where the Congressional staffers are most likely to be present. People operating official Twitter accounts for senators or representatives should have a reasonably clear idea of copyright. It would make sense that such a photo would be supplied to the visiting California governor (and would be PD-CAGov if taken by his staffers anyways). Yes, it's always theoretically possible that someone else took such a photo, but those do not seem to be reasonable doubts, and the usual assumption by publishing on official government sites is that such works are treated as PD-USGov even if it was not technically that way prior. I would certainly treat elements being published on official Twitter accounts the same thing as being published on their governmental website. If there is a strong indication that a particular photo was taken by someone else, please nominate that one individually. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As to volunteers, Community for Creative Non-Violence specifically examining copyright, stated that among the reasons Reid was not considered an employee (and retained the copyright to his work) was because the organization did not pay his payroll taxes, provide any benefits, or contribute to unemployment insurance, and in fact, the court simply presumed method of payment as one of the essential determining factors in defining employment (not whether he was paid, but how he was paid).
Regardless, the onus is not on me to provide a strong indication that it was taken by someone else; the onus is on the uploader to demonstrate the content is in the public domain. Whether it was published on this Twitter account simply has no bearing on US copyright law any more than the person depicted does. The only thing US copyright law cares about it who created the work. If someone wants to demonstrate that this image is public domain, then they should email Pelosi's office and ask who the creator was. Otherwise, the only way we keep it is by simply throwing COM:PCP out the window. GMGtalk 16:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That specific court case says that agency law determines "employee", and Reid was determined to be an independent contractor instead of employee by that definition. Agency law however says that:
(a) an employee is an agent whose principal controls or has the right to control the manner and means of the agent's performance of work, and
(b) the fact that work is performed gratuitously does not relieve a principal of liability.
So it is not the lack of payment that determines employee, but other conditions. The court case primarily said, Reid engages in a skilled occupation; supplied his own tools; worked in Baltimore without daily supervision from Washington; was retained for a relatively short period of time; had absolute freedom to decide when and how long to work in order to meet his deadline; and had total discretion in hiring and paying assistants. In other words, it depends on how much control the employer has over them; it is a distinction between "employee" and "independent contractor". Congressional interns are not independent contractors, as the employer has as much control over their activities as paid employees. Reid was paid, but in the manner of a contractor, not employee.
COM:PCP is for *signficant* doubts, not just theoretical possibilities. These do not qualify, in my opinion. We allow claims of "own work" all the time, even though those are similarly not proven. For a DR, someone needs to supply a significant doubt. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The significant doubt is that we do not know who the author is and we regularly delete modern works where the author is unknown. Posting on the twitter account merely tells us who the author might be and who might be able to tell us. GMGtalk 16:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, just completely disagree. Stuff posted to congressional websites is presumed to be PD-USGov all the time. We do not need to identify the photographer's name in every case. For works where we don't even know the source of initial publication, absolutely unknown authors create significant doubts. Not the case here. Where we do know the place of initial publication, and no author is named, that is then "anonymous" and different laws can apply which we then use. For PD-USGov, the distinction is irrelevant. If it's overwhelmingly likely to be done by a staffer (paid or otherwise), that is generally enough. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Nobody knows who the copyright owner is, so it really doesn’t matter." GMGtalk 17:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That part of PCP is for a completely different situation than this. Again, that policy is for significant doubts as to copyright status. We don't require the actual employee name on every PD-USGov upload we have -- by your logic we should delete them if we don't. We don't require that "own work" uploads identify who they are -- user accounts are just as anonymous, and the "own work" claim is assumed there. If further information comes up -- such as the existence of an "own work" photo elsewhere on the net (and especially with a differently-named author), or (in this case) the appearance of the photo elsewhere which would indicate it was not PD-USGov, then we nominate then. But we have to make some assumptions on nearly every upload. Stuff like this is far more likely to be OK than an "own work" upload, and at that point it's not worth forcing uploader to come up with unreasonable detail. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As a matter of course, yes, content tagged as PD-USGov needs to have sufficient information about authorship to determine that it was the work of a US government employee. Ideally, that is done like this (U.S. Navy photo by Erik Hildebrandt/Released) or this (Image credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA) or this (Air Force Staff Sgt. Jordan Castelan). If you don't have this information then you do not know the copyright status of the work and merely taking it from a government website is not a guarantee of authorship. GMGtalk 18:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep for me. The official Twitter accounts are generally done by staff, i.e. employees of the government. The photos in question above look to be of the type made by staffers. A claim of "Nancy Pelosi" of author is really just claiming it came from her staff, realistically. While it's theoretically possible for these to be photos taken from outside sources, I don't think that rises to a reasonable doubt per COM:PRP at least for the ones above. We would not have any issue if they were published to a .gov website, and I don't see why official Flickr accounts would have a different assumption. If some aspect of the photo makes it more likely it came from a non-USGov source, that could be reason to question the license, but all of the above look to be situations where her staffers would be present. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Carl and caution A1Cafel to stop alleging false author info.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I second Carl Lindberg's points. These five photos were taken with phones by someone that is most probably the staff. A challenge is possible only if for example it is shown to be (almost) identical to a non-staff person's photo. Or for example https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1159919184127692800 is obviously not a work of Pelosi's staff.--Roy17 (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've cluttered up this DR enough already, but if someone reuses this in their book or website, I have serious doubts that "probably staff" is going to give them much comfort if they get threatened with a lawsuit. GMGtalk 13:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Same goes for any "own work" upload, which is far more likely to be a problem than this. As Commons:General disclaimer basically says, nothing here is guaranteed so re-users should look at the evidence provided and determine their own comfort level. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Carl. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 3

Missing EXIF informations + photographer's watermarks on files.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 4

https://www.gettyimages.fr/photos/gandhi-downing-street?family=editorial&phrase=Gandhi%20Downing%20Street&sort=mostpopular#license

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: May you explain what {{PD-India}} has to do with British pictures? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There were a bunch of photographers standing around making photos of that scene. So each different photo can have its own copyright status, depending on where it was first published (probably which company the photographer worked for) and the like. Some of those may have been first published in India (or some other country who had correspondents there taking pictures), and some may have been simultaneously published in many countries. So, we need to track down sources, and unfortunately some of these are all over the net. Many are probably PD today, but some are probably not.
The first one above can be found here, with a credit of "J Gaiger" of the Topical Press Agency, whose archives were bought by Getty. That looks like a raw source version. So, probably first published in the UK, and with a named author it's not PD-UK-unknown meaning we would need to know the death date. That was discussed a decade ago at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Gandhi Downing Street.jpg and was deleted due to lack of information. Maybe we could find more info now, but it would seem as though Getty would indeed hold the copyright if it still exists, and it's not just a PD picture that Getty is claiming ownership of (which does happen).
The second one, yes it's on Getty here. They claim a source of "Daily Herald Archive/SSPL". There is another copy here with a claimed copyright owner of "Camera Press". It's been on covers of books too. There is an SSPL source here, where they say the source is a gelatin print. So they are likely claiming copyright ownership because they own a print that was distributed in 1931. If anything, they can only claim copyrights on that particular scan, and probably valid in the UK at most (if even there). But, not sure who the source of the original print was. If it was anonymous UK, then it's PD-UK-unknown today. If it was also simultaneously published in the U.S., it would avoid the URAA as well (if not, it would be Not-PD-US-URAA until 2027). Sure feels like most of the world is treating it as PD, but not sure we know the true source either. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: based on the analysis by Carl. In the second case the PCP applies due to the uncertainty. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 6

Commons:Derivative works from posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:A1Cafel comment above. --P 1 9 9   13:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 7

where does it say that the twitter account is also covered by OGL?

RZuo (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep UK government Twitter channels become archived at the end of the year at nationalarchives.gov.uk, when they become explicitly OGL3. See webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk for this one. You could argue that the link to to the number10.gov.uk website on the Twitter author page, which website also explicitly has the OGL 3.0 license, is enough. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok. users should specify that the video became ogl by way of being included in the archives like https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/twitter/10DowningStreet/post/bd72bc8e-963d-11ec-b845-62848c3126f2/video , though. i dont agree that the licence on another website can be interpreted as covering twitter, unless someone can find ogl websites in which twitter posts are somehow embedded. RZuo (talk) 10:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Quite possibly not, though you know the contents will definitely become OGL at the end of the year, so it's arguing over technicalities and timing. If the same content is on the website then it's definitely fine, but unsure if it was on the website when uploaded. It would be helpful if they mentioned a licensing statement on the Twitter author page, for sure. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Are we sure the music in the background is freely licensed? I agree that it would appear to be under the OGL, but I don't think the U.K. government can extinguish the copyright of a music recording just by placing an excerpt in a video that they then post to social media. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
you're right. it seems to be the first 40s of "Music Of Filmmaker - My Lord - Song by Yarin Primak" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjQOI_2Anfs . i didnt watch the video beyond a few seconds initially.
difficult to isolate and remove the music. muting it renders the video useless.  Delete.
the footage of bojo speaking is from house of commons, though. so it's actually possible to find those raw footage. RZuo (talk) 07:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 8

No FOP in South Africa.

Edelseider (talk) 09:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I hate giving an answer to this because I am against deleting South African images on Commons for FOP reasons as the law in South Africa is in the process of changing to include a FOP copyright exception. If I had to give an answer it would be... maybe, bridges might (but if so then perhaps not always) also exceed COM:TOO. I have a vague recollection of photographs of South African bridges on Commons having being deleted in the past. That's why copyright exceptions tend to use the term "public works" dropping the term "art" or some other word that might imply creativity so as to be as broad as possible. Also because the law recognizes that it is not a good judge of what is "art" or not but instead tries to use tests for novelty in patents and creativity (or "sweat of the brow" intellectual work that does not plagiarize) for copyright. However, it must be noted that many bridges, it can be convincingly argued, are effectively simple objects consisting of geometric shapes. In this interpretation bridges that do not have a decorative facade would not be copyrightable but ones with such a facade would be. The same would be true of buildings. I can get a legal opinion on this later this week as I am no IP law scholar. Then I can give a better answer. Either way I can see this falling into a gray area.--Discott (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by A1Cafel (talk · contribs) 9

Duplicates.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Always the same problem with A1Cafel using Flickr2Commons without due diligence. He has been told so many times to avoid creating duplicates, which is in fact very easy: stay away from Flickr2Commons, use the Upload Wizard instead. @Jmabel: this raises again the question of the usefulness of F2C (see [6]). --Edelseider (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7: If they are duplicates, why a DR instead of {{Duplicate}} to speedy-delete them? - Jmabel ! talk 22:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment matter was discussed at Commons talk:Flickr2Commons#Duplicates 2 but it seems no one takes this thing seriously. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I take it very seriously and have raised it multiple times in the past. There is only so much you can do when the designer of this tool doesn't fix it. F2C is responsible for millions of duplicates that have appeared and been deleted here over the years. It's also very helpful when it is used properly. Edelseider (talk) 14:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks like they were already converted to redirects. holly {chat} 21:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from Quirinale.it after September 2024

[edit]

Unfortunately permission for files from https://www.quirinale.it has been revoked by the Italian presidency. See Template talk:Presidenza della Repubblica. My understanding is that files from the site can no longer be uploaded, regardless of the date the photo was taken.

// sikander { talk } 🦖 02:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn after clarification. // sikander { talk } 🦖 20:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Chile.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explicit pornographic content محتوى إباحي صريح البربوشي (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Speedy delete not because it’s “explicit pornographic content” (eye roll) but because it’s obviously stolen from a porn site Dronebogus (talk) 12:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedied by Yann. --Yasu (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, apparently uploaded with a Creative Commons license erroneously attached, is retained as the intellectual property of Intellectual Reserve Incorporated. See the Book of Mormon Art Catalog, an art history resource run by a trained art historian: https://bookofmormonartcatalog.org/catalog/moroni-burying-the-gold-plates-moroni-hides-the-plates-in-the-hill-cumorah/ P-Makoto (talk) 20:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable de minimis. The only thing interesting here is the station building itself, with the signage on the left and the non-descript grounds becoming secondary. With no public-domain building or object to make the station secondary (like having very old buildings at the back or at the sides), the de minimis becomes weak. For the building, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gare de Lyon-Saint Exupéry for a prior deletion request. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person in pic claims "own work", but... I see a possible copyvio. It's hard to believe that this pic is sort of a selfie. KlausHeide (talk) 14:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be in the public domain already. According to uploader, it was translated into Portuguese by Radio Islam, an organization that apparently just came to exist in the 1980s. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Church built 1952-1954, interior not covered by FOP.

Didym (talk) 17:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's rather architecture than art.... --Subbass1 (talk) 18:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which does not matter, architecture is also protected by default, unless there are other applicable laws as FOP. --Didym (talk) 09:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - one kept per comment. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nous ne souhaitons pas qu'elle soit utilisée à des fins commerciales Leon Zanella (talk) 23:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English  español  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  sicilianu  македонски  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  +/−
, no notability Oursana (talk) 18:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English  español  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  sicilianu  македонски  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  +/−
Oursana (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; contemp. artworks, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag Martin Sg.! Ich konnte leider in Ihrem Löschantrag zum Foto „File:.00 4098 Innenraum der Jesuitenkirche in Koblenz.jpg“ keine für mich verständliche Begründung finden. Ihre Ausführungen:
Reason for deletion request:: copyvio; contemp. artworks, no fop.
Grund des Löschantrags: copyvio; zeitgenössisch. Kunstwerke, kein Geck.
Sollte sich Ihr Antrag auf im Bild befindlichen urheberrechtliche geschützte Kunstwerke (z. B. Kirchenfenster) beziehen, so möchte ich feststellen: Die betreffende Kirche ist allgemein öffentlich zugänglich und Fotografierverbote sind nicht erkennbar angebracht. Die Aufnahme zeigt außerdem den gesamten Kirchenraum und sollten ein tatsächlich urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk in Teilen unabwendbar mit abgebildet sein, so gilt im deutschen Recht die Panoramafreiheit. Für diesen Fall muss der Urheber des Werkes nicht um Erlaubnis ersucht werden. Ich halte Ihren Löschantrag als nicht begründigt und stelle dieses zur Diskusion. MfG W. Bulach
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Martin Sg! Unfortunately, I could not find a reason that I could understand in your deletion request for the photo "File:.00 4098 Interior of the Jesuit Church in Koblenz.jpg". Your remarks:
Reason for deletion request::copyvio; contemp. artworks, no fop.
Grund des Löschantrags: copyvio; zeitgenössisch. Kunstwerke, kein Geck.
If your application relates to works of art protected by copyright (e.g. church windows) in the picture, I would like to state that the church in question is open to the general public and there are no recognizable bans on photography. The photo also shows the entire church interior and if parts of a work that is actually protected by copyright are inevitably shown, then freedom of panorama applies under German law. In this case, the author of the work does not have to be asked for permission. I consider your deletion request to be unfounded and put this up for discussion. Yours sincerely, W. Bulach W. Bulach (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Guten Tag W. Bulach. Nein, Panoramafreiheit in Deutschland gilt (ebenso wie auch in der Schweiz) n i c h t für Innenräume von Kirchen, Museen u. a. --Martin Sg. (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. File:Koblenz, Jezuïetenkerk, roosvenster.jpg is a work by de:Jakob Schwarzkopf, who died in 2001, and can be restored in 2072. The rest can be restored 70 years after the death of goldsmith Evert Hofacker. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. (see :File:Innenansicht Jesuitenkirche Koblenz.jpg

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; stained glass windows from 1993, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright infringement JaimeDes (talk) 22:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think it exceeds COM:TOO. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 06:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 12:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation: date of metadata is inconsistent with the date of the photography. Given Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ByaduniaEspoir, it's likely to be a scan. Esprit Fugace (talk) 08:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque accede ami informacion 189.216.23.100 13:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. No veo ninguna información personal en la foto. Ruthven (msg) 12:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier étant traité par la BNF, ne peut pas être du domaine public. Emmanuel Dissais (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Photograph of a man who died in 1887, published in France in 1910. At the very least, {{PD-old-assumed-expired}} applies. --Rosenzweig τ 21:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Traité" ? Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ? Jospe (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Il est clairement indiqué par la BNF que les éléments numérisés par leurs services ne sont pas libres de droit. D'ailleurs, il existe un template
De plus, l'image n'est pas de bonne qualité et il y en a de meilleures de Coffinière totalement libres de droit. Et donc la bibliothèque qui a numérisé le document a de facto un droit sur l'objet mis en ligne
Cordialement.
It is clearly indicated by the BNF that the elements digitized by their services are not free of rights. Moreover, there is a template . Additionally, the image is not of good quality, and there are better ones from Coffinière that are completely free of rights. Therefore, the library that digitized the document de facto has rights over the object posted online. Sincerely. Emmanuel Dissais (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC) {{PD-GallicaScan}}[reply]
That is not correct. It was formerly assumed that everything scanned by the BNF was in the public domain, but as we see now, that is not true. The template explicitly says that the file might not be in the public domain and that it is possible that the file is in the public domain not because the BNF has scanned it, but because of other reasons. In such cases, a new rationale should be applied, and a different license tag (see Commons:Licensing and valid license tags at Commons:Copyright tags) should be used. --Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "Libre de droit" n'a aucun sens... en droit. La photo est dans le domaine public, pour la France et pour les EEUU. Ruthven (msg) 12:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logotype without permission, the license looks false. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Arroser as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image HARCOURT, toutes ne sont pas libres de droits — Racconish💬 19:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Racconish: clearly the photo dates from the 1940s (and maybe earlier). Ruthven (msg) 12:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating because this restoration was deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Behind the Door (1919).webm. I am neutral. Prospectprospekt (talk) 21:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Movie is in the public domain. I don't think coloring is creative enough, even when it is itself derivative of the original prints (as stated in the previous nomination). Had the musicalized version been uploaded it would have certainly been deleted, but this muted version is completely fine as it is firmly in the public domain in the US. --Bedivere (talk) 04:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the original movie is public domain, this particular restoration apparently contains new copyrightable elements: "No single, complete, copy of the film is known to survive. This restoration is based [on] an incomplete 35mm print and a separate small roll of shots preserved at the Library of Congress National Audio-Visual Conservation Center, and a 35mm copy of a Russian version, based on an export negative preserved at Gosfilmofond of Russia. In two sequences, still images have been inserted to bridge gaps where motion picture material was not available. Shot continuity and text for re-created intertitles and bridging stills are based on director Irvin Willat's original script and continuity. Color tinting and toning have [been] reproduced based on the laboratory notations in the leaders of the Library of Congress print." Thus the new editing, bridging sections, recreated intertitles, and possibly tinting are copyrighted. Nosferattus (talk) 01:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I also nominated this restoration for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Behind the Door (1919) by Irvin Willat.webm. According to SilentRobert3 at Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Behind the Door (1919).webm, there are bridging sequences at 43:08 and 50:30; in our version they are at 43:56 and 50:29 respectively. SilentRobert3 also implies that there are "new 'insert' shots and titles" apart from the two aforementioned sequences.
I searched the Catalog of Copyright Entries for any registrations by Flicker Alley. The only one I could find is PA0001194345, their restoration of Lewis Milestone's 1928 film The Garden of Eden. "Editing", "text", and "compilation" are all listed as part of the "Basis of Claim" for that registration, and Flicker Alley says that it is "mastered from what is considered to be the best surviving elements." Maybe Flicker Alley did something similar here? I think we should contact them to know (1) exactly what additional editing they did apart from the two bridging sequences and (2) what their correspondence with the Copyright Office regarding their registration for The Garden of Eden contained, because that would probably be useful for this case. prospectprospekt (talk) 00:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't reviewed the video closely, but if the bridging sequences are the only issue, I think the best approach would be not to delete the video but to mark it as {{Non-free embedded}} and open a COM:GL/AV request to trim them out of the video. The reconstructed intertitles are more complex than the typical restoration since they've got image backgrounds, so that might end up being the more important issue. hinnk (talk) 01:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Behind the Door (1919) by Irvin Willat.webm. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PERUARMY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Considering the lack of metadata, the varied image sizes, that some of these are studio shots, and the uploader's history of copyvios, it should be assumed that these own-work claims are false.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source mentioned doesn't have the images that are posted here. Even though the site is CC-BY-SA 4.0, these images still wouldn't, because the site isn't a site of the original publisher, thus they don't have the copyright and can't rellease these images. They were published less than 70 hears ago, so not in Public Domain.

Mbch331 (talk) 21:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Permission received. --Bedivere (talk) 04:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a copy of this photo from JetPhotos with the watermark removed. Not explicitly under a free license. Seawolf35 (talk) 21:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seawolf35: Did you provide the right link? The linked photo and the one in this DR are very different - different angles, the one here has the pilot visible, etcetera. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep pending nominator's response The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Seawolf35 the photos are of two completely different aircraft. The one you provided on JetPhotos is of a Global 6000, whereas the one listed here is of a Global 7500. The photo uploaded here was also taken two years after that one, and their registration numbers are completely different, too. KeepPhlyingHigh (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to Withdraw this nomination. Seawolf35 (talk) 17:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Bedivere (talk) 04:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chronokernel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of authorship.

— Racconish💬 18:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir
ces photos appartiennent aux archives de la famille de M. Heftler-Louiche
gérés par son fils Jean-Marc Heftler-Louiche.
Merci de ne pas les effacer car la famille souhaite qu'elles soient publiques. Chronokernel (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Owning paper copies of photographs does not give one the right to freely license them -- that right belongs to the photographer and their heirs. There is no evidence here of any license from the copyright holders. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chronokernel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of authorship

— Racconish💬 18:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir
ces photos appartiennent aux archives de la famille de M. Heftler-Louiche
gérés par son fils Jean-Marc Heftler-Louiche.
Merci de ne pas les effacer car la famille souhaite qu'elles soient publiques. Chronokernel (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Owning a copy of a photograph is not the same as owning its copyright. Only the copyright owner can license the work. — Racconish💬 20:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (but kept the 1908 anonymous photograph).
@Chronokernel: Il faut que les hérities écrivent à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org en donnant toutes les informations nécessaires à la publication (auteur, date, etc.) afin que les photos soient publiées. Merci. Ruthven (msg) 12:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chronokernel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The source indicates a no-free license: "Toutes les photos sont publiés sous licence CC BY-ND 4.0 et proviennent des archives de la famille Heftler-Louiche."

Ruthven (msg) 12:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toutes les photos sont publiés sous licence CC BY 4.0 et proviennent des archives de la famille Heftler-Louiche. Chronokernel (talk) 13:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[7]https://serge-heftler-louiche.com/
on bottom :
"Toutes les photos sont publiés sous licence CC BY 4.0 et proviennent des archives de la famille Heftler-Louiche" Chronokernel (talk) 13:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Owning a copy of a photo -- as in this archive -- does not give the owner the right to freely license it. That right is held by the photographer or his heirs. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only upload by this user, unlikely to be own work SDudley (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: machine translation of the description seems to imply this isn't a work of the uploader. Janhrach (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - Per COM:UK, there is no freedom of panorama for 2d graphic works. Permission from the owners of the original photographs is required. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC) Also:[reply]

Blur the pictures instead? Sebbog13 (talk) 21:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The site claims that they are free licensed, but they are not.

The rules are written here. We can met there "3.1. Использование Материалов Сайта, Правообладателем которых является «СенатИнформ», допускается на основании лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0", but "4.6. Запрещается использовать Материалы или их фрагменты в ... случаях их прямого коммерческого Использования". Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lvova Тут уже два противоречия - с одной стороны свободная лицензия, с другой запрет на коммерческое использование. Однако же это одно из двух электронных СМИ Совета Федерации, чей его сайт лицензирован по CC BY 4.0. Между тем, на Flickr и на Picvario размещаются исходники фотографий, размещённых на сайте Совфеда - так например здесь портреты российских сенаторов в высоком разрешении, а также приводятся исходные данные о дате фотографии, авторе и модели камеры (такое же есть на сайтах МЧС и Минобороны России, а также у Татарстана и некоторых других российских регионов). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Я не совсем понимаю, как могут помочь отсылки на flickr и на СФ. Они не снимают противоречие. Анастасия Львоваru/en 19:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:תמונות החטופים הישראלים בעזה, מרכז הקניות של רובע א' באשדוד, דצמבר 2023 01.jpg. COM:DW - photos of photos. {{FoP-Israel}} allows for freedom of panorama when an image is "permanently situated in a public place", but these aren't permanent installations. Permission from the owners of the original photographs or the illustrators are required.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Squirrel Conspiracy You put a lot of effort into looking for pictures of those kidnapped by Hamas. So why didn't you mention this? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kfir Bibas 9 months old Was brutally kidnapped to Gaza together with his brother Ariel Bibas 4 years old . not yet released.jpg where the image was not deleted because there is a VRT permission received? I haven't checked all the pictures uploaded for deletion, but all those designed by Dede, Nitzan Mintz and Tal Huber should be removed from this Deletion request. They are easy to identify by their design.
See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Call for the return the abducted of 2023 Israel–Hamas war
FYI, all the photos I took are still in the same place, they will not be removed at least until all the abducted by Hamas are returned. 4.5 months have passed since October 7, 2023. And there is a chance that they will always remain there as part of the public space in Israel. Have you heard about panorama freedom in Israel?
User:Geagea please add ticket:2023122710003649 to all those pictures. Thank you. Hanay (talk) 03:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Closing admin: please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Call for the return the abducted of 2023 Israel–Hamas war regarding the above-mentioned VRT ticket being insufficient. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to respond with reasons for keeping all the pictures I took and maybe more pictures as well. It takes time. Because at one time 33 different pictures I took were requested to be deleted. See User talk:Hanay
I ask the Commons administrators to give me the time to do so. Do not rush to delete. It is much easier and faster to demand deletion than to write reasons against deletion. Thanks Hanay (talk) 07:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, @The Squirrel Conspiracy.
The photos mentioned above that I shot personally (1 & 2) are a classic de-minimis situation.
According to sect. 22 of the 2007 Copyright Law of Israel,

An incidental use of a work by way of including it in a photographic work, in a cinematographic work or in a sound recording, as well as the use of a such work in which the work was thus incidentally contained, is permitted; In this matter the deliberate inclusion of a musical work, including its accompanying lyrics, or of a sound recording embodying such musical work, in another work, shall not be deemed to be an incidental use.

— See here
These photographs contain many supposedly-copyright protected photos, that are beyond particular recognition. Even if we allow ourselves to go nitpicking to the extreme, it would be very unlikely that one whom holds the copyright to these photos would have any claim in these photos.
Also, both are part of Government of Ashdod-led campaign that is ongoing since October. Claiming them as captures of "non permanent installations" would be very inaccurate. These photographs hold importance as a part of a Government campaign, and they do not seem to take away the rights of anyone.
Keep. מקף־עברי (talk) 21:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Squirrel Conspiracy, Similarly to this discussion, not all of the images that are in the current discussion require the permission of the copyright owner because their use is marginal, that is - Commons:De minimis.

For example, There are no pictures of abductees in these files:

in these files the images are unrecognizable:

In these files the images are a small part of a larger work:

In these files, the images are shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity:

In my opinion there is no need to delete the files whose main element is not pictures of abductees. At the same time, the issue of the permanence of the posters must continue to be investigated, only for the files in which the images of the abductees are a central element that is clearly displayed so that its removal renders the file useless. Chenspec (talk) 12:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination, kept as far as possible per de minimis. --Krd 07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:תמונות החטופים הישראלים בעזה, מרכז הקניות של רובע א' באשדוד, דצמבר 2023 01.jpg. COM:DW - photos of photos. {{FoP-Israel}} allows for freedom of panorama when an image is "permanently situated in a public place", but these aren't permanent installations. Permission from the owners of the original photographs are required.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the explanations in this link regarding all photographs of installations in the public space in Israel regarding the Iron Swords War Chenspec (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Squirrel Conspiracy, Similarly to this discussion, not all of the images that are in the current discussion require the permission of the copyright owner because their use is marginal, that is - Commons:De minimis.

For example, In these files the images are not essential, so removing them will not make the file unusable:

In these files, the images are shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity:

In my opinion there is no need to delete the files whose main element is not pictures of abductees. At the same time, the issue of the permanence of the posters must continue to be investigated, only for the files in which the images of the abductees are a central element that is clearly displayed so that its removal renders the file useless. Chenspec (talk) 07:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:תמונות החטופים הישראלים בעזה, מרכז הקניות של רובע א' באשדוד, דצמבר 2023 01.jpg. COM:DW - photos of photos. {{FoP-Israel}} allows for freedom of panorama when an image is "permanently situated in a public place", but these aren't permanent installations. Permission from the owners of the original photographs or the illustrators are required.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the explanations in this link regarding all photographs of installations in the public space in Israel regarding the Iron Swords War Chenspec (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Squirrel Conspiracy, unfortunately Inbar Haiman was murdered, so in general the use of her images is intended for permanent commemoration. Additionally similarly to this discussion, not all of the images that are in the current discussion require the permission of the copyright owner because their use is marginal, that is - Commons:De minimis.

For example, In these files the images are a small part of a larger work:

In these files the images are not essential, so removing them will not make the file unusable:

In these files, the images are shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity:

In my opinion there is no need to delete the files whose main element is not pictures of abductees. At the same time, the issue of the permanence of the posters must continue to be investigated, only for the files in which the images of the abductees are a central element that is clearly displayed so that its removal renders the file useless. Chenspec (talk) 07:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:תמונות החטופים הישראלים בעזה, מרכז הקניות של רובע א' באשדוד, דצמבר 2023 01.jpg. COM:DW - photos of photos. {{FoP-Israel}} allows for freedom of panorama when an image is "permanently situated in a public place", but these aren't permanent installations. Permission from the owners of the original photographs or the illustrators are required.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the explanations in this link regarding all photographs of installations in the public space in Israel regarding the Iron Swords War Chenspec (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Squirrel Conspiracy, Similarly to this discussion, not all of the images that are in the current discussion require the permission of the copyright owner because their use is marginal, that is - Commons:De minimis.

For example, In these files the images are a small part of a larger work:

In these files the images are not essential, so removing them will not make the file unusable:

In these files, the images are shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity:

In my opinion there is no need to delete the files whose main element is not pictures of abductees. At the same time, the issue of the permanence of the posters must continue to be investigated, only for the files in which the images of the abductees are a central element that is clearly displayed so that its removal renders the file useless. Chenspec (talk) 06:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Mvd.ru (and all photos licensed with it)

[edit]

I'm not sure that the site is free licensed.

The text on the cite:

'Об использовании информации сайта Все материалы сайта Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации могут быть воспроизведены в любых средствах массовой информации, на серверах сети Интернет или на любых иных носителях без каких-либо ограничений по объему и срокам публикации. Это разрешение в равной степени распространяется на газеты, журналы, радиостанции, телеканалы, сайты и страницы сети Интернет. Единственным условием перепечатки и ретрансляции является ссылка на первоисточник. Никакого предварительного согласия на перепечатку со стороны Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации не требуется.'

Good, but nothing about derivative works and commercial use.

The user wrote to the administration of the site and received the answer:

'Сообщаем, что условия воспроизведения и использования информации, размещенные в настоящий момент на сайтах МВД России и его территориальных органов, в целом соответствуют лицензии Creative Commons 4.0 International.'

"В целом соответствуют" (in general correspond) means "not exactly correspond" for me. But maybe community will disagree, so let's discuss. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lvova: нужно ли в данной ситуации снова отправлять запрос в пресс-службу МВД России? Между тем, я им писал в обращении о том, что Creative Commons должно подразумевать использование в коммерческих целях. Видимо они не до конца меня поняли... MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Если Вы хотите всё же сделать так, чтобы быть точно уверенным, то нужно. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Со своей стороны могу предложить такой пример. —
  • Уважаемый Юрий Викторович! Письмом номер ... от ... 2024 года вы объяснили мне: «Условия воспроизведения и использования информации, размещенные в настоящий момент на сайтах МВД России и его территориальных органов, в целом соответствуют лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International». Сейчас, сравнивая условия, размещённые на сайтах МВД России и его территориальных органов, я вижу некоторые разночтения со строгими условиями типового лицензионного договора «Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International». Будьте добры, подскажите, пожалуйста, разрешено ли использование творческих произведений, размещённых на сайтах МВД России и его территориальных органов, (а) в коммерческих и промышленных целях, (б) для создания третьими лицами производных творческих произведений, (в) для использования третьими лицами созданных производных творческих произведений в коммерческих и промышленных целях. Ценность широко распространённых типовых лицензионных договоров «Creative Commons» состоит именно в том, что физические и юридические лица, работающие в городах и регионах России, по этим договорам получают право совместно создавать производные творческие произведения и совместно использовать их в своей работе на понятных, одинаковых, типовых условиях, которые позволяют достигать деловых, коммерческих целей. Несколько лет назад мне доводилось встречать ограничения на коммерческое и промышленное использование творческих произведений, опубликованных органами власти, поэтому хотелось бы избежать таких ограничений. Сотрудничая с Правительством Москвы, вы хорошо изучили практику работы по таким договорам, потому что Правительство Москвы в 2015 году перевело все свои сайты на типовую свободную лицензию «Creative Commons Attribution International» сначала 3, а затем 4 версии. Благодарю вас за ответ.
  • — В этом примере я постарался откровенно объяснить читателю, откуда возникает вопрос и зачем нам нужен его ответ. Читатель должен понимать, что мы просим разрешения для того, чтобы получать собственную выгоду за его счёт, вообще ничем не рискуя. Конечно, надо разбить этот текст на абзацы. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @PereslavlFoto То есть вы сейчас приводите пример, как следует обращаться в российские органы власти за разъяснениями по лицензированию контента? На деле много лет ВМ РУ продвигала идею того, чтобы весь правительственный контент переходил в свободный доступ, как в США, или например был выпущен под единой лицензией, как это есть в Японии с 2016 года. Сами же российские министерства имеют крайне поляризованную политику в области авторских прав - наиболее либеральная она у Минобороны, МЧС (CC BY 4.0) и некоторых других, наиболее строгая - у МИДа, Минздрава, Минтранса и некоторых других министерств. При этом в нынешней ситуации крайне важно перевести на свободную лицензию сайт внешнеполитического ведомства ввиду многочисленных мероприятий с участием главы российской дипломатии Сергея Лаврова, а также его предстоящим 20-летием назначения на данный пост. Письмо я отправил ещё 11 января, но ответа пока так и не получил.
  • Самое интересное из правил распространения государственных медиаматериалов в постсоветских странах является то, что украинский правительственный контент с 2018-2020 годов (поддомены http://gov.ua) фактически стал практически полностью свободным - это касается как центральных органов власти в Киеве, так и многочисленных обладминистраций, городских и сельских советов и он под лицензией CC BY 4.0. На форуме Викисклада я уже поднимал вопрос о том, что на материалы с сайтов с поддоменами gov.ua должен стоять единый шаблон по образцу стандартной лицензии японского правительства, но на это никто не откликнулся. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 21:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Он пытается Вам помочь, предложив готовый текст, Вы ему рассказываете о работе в целом :) Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lvova 22 марта 2024 года я отправил повторное письмо в УОС МВД РФ, теперь скорее всего результаты будут в середине апреля. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Я сочиняю текст, который послал бы я на вашем месте. Я в этом не силён и поэтому вам надо проверить моё сочинение. Вот и всё. Ваши слова насчёт политики я понимаю лучше вас, однако сейчас мы обсуждаем не политику, а МВД. Наконец, меня очень смущает, что вы обсуждаете государственную политику на Викискладе, где нету вообще никого, кто влияет на государственную политику. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lvova Хочу Вам с печалью сообщить, что МВД отклонило мой запрос на перевод материалов сайта по свободной лицензии. Так что вопрос закрыт. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
По какой именно причине? Вы звонили им? -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 01:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Они написали ему отписку, что все условия у них уже есть на сайте (причем почему-то добавили, что не будут публиковать больше, чем уже публикуют, согласно закону). Анастасия Львоваru/en 11:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Это означает, что та сторона не понимает смысл заданного вопроса. Нужно не просто просить разрешение, а подробно объяснять, кому и зачем нужно такое разрешение, и отдельно объяснять, почему не хватает нынешнего. Чиновники с большим трудом понимают, что воспроизведения недостаточно, потому что в их работе никогда не возникают другие задачи. Для них сама задача звучит неожиданно и непонятно: получить права на неограниченное коммерческое использование, не тратя никаких денег на покупку разрешения! То есть разрешить неконтролируемый бизнес с нулевой себестоимостью! Такой подход противоречит привычному порядку. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
В ответе, который цитируется выше, указана несуществующая лицензия Creative Commons 4.0 International. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PereslavlFoto Хочу сообщить, что в самое ближайшее время переадресую вопрос по этой теме. Обращение на стадии подготовки. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If possible please summarise what is the result of this discussion. --Krd 07:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They tried to make an additional request to the site but not successful yet. Анастасия Львоваru/en 07:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. can be restored when permission is achieved. --Krd 08:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]