Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/06/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
trimethylsilane.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Unauthorized use of portrait rights of minors 2404:7A80:8240:7500:3DE8:4117:F6F3:35B3 03:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, (C) OSAMU FUJIMARU. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Trade as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. Appears to be in use on Wikidata, but I'm unsure about the file's copyright status. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete, and ditto for the other selfies uploaded by this user. The Wikidata entry has been nominated for deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 05:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Diese datei existiert bereits drei Mal Gerhard Rinderle (talk) 10:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
not saisfied Black beau (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
not satisfied Black beau (talk) 12:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
not good Black beau (talk) 12:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Used this image as a TEST for a new Wikipedia page - It is not the image we want use so can we delete please. Thanks OurHistoryToday (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
not good Black beau (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Used this image as a TEST for a new Wikipedia page - It is not the image we want use so can we delete please. Thanks OurHistoryToday (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
not good Black beau (talk) 12:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Used this image as a TEST for a new Wikipedia page - It is not the image we want use so can we delete please. Thanks OurHistoryToday (talk) 12:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Apparent hoax images--no such painter or such paintings found in internet searches, the brief user-subpage "article" by this uploader indeed has no sources and is replete with vagaries that suggest it is a fiction. Visual characteristics suggest the images are contemporary works, likely AI generated (noticeable tells include background texture on top of, and interwoven with, hair in File:Maria w wodzie Giuseppe Di Benedetto.png, finger coming out of wrist and numerous rendering glitches in File:Pożar Rzymu.png, etc.)--see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by BrennaKaufmann for similar issue. Evidence that these are genuine is needed.
- File:Lucyfer Giuseppe Di Benedetto.png
- File:Dziewczyna z koszem Giuseppe Di Benedetto.png
- File:Maria w wodzie Giuseppe Di Benedetto.png
- File:Pocałunek Giuseppe Di Benedetto.png
- File:Pożar Rzymu.png
- File:Podpis Giuseppe Di Benedetto.png
- File:Giuseppe Di Benedetto.png
Эlcobbola talk 15:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Acknowleged as such - Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 15:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
1 Microsoft Way, Redmond 2001:4898:80E8:A:7A1B:3BD4:EB46:553E 15:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
C'était un test de publication Rhrta (talk) 13:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
GoogleStreetView CopyVio. (Go there and make a free photo yourself!) Enyavar (talk) 15:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect image uploaded RDJain (talk) 16:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation; insufficient/no proof of permission given Ugogames (talk) 15:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
cross wiki promo spam, out of project scope, minor Hoyanova (talk) 06:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: see meta:Special:CentralAuth/Developermusic. Ruthven (msg) 12:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:San Agustin Church (Parañaque)
[edit]The parish dates to 1996, and the church looks recent to be post-1972 and its architect not yet dead for more than 50 years. Fails {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}}. Interior architecture and stained-glass artwork are included here. Unsure about the statues of saints here though if those are very old or recent.
- File:8134Moonwalk, Parañaque City 47.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 01.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 02.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 03.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 04.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 05.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 14.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 15.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 18.jpg
- File:8281Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 19.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 02.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 04.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 06.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 09.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 10.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 11.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 12.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 13.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 14.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 16.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 17.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 18.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 19.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 21.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 22.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 25.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 26.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 39.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 40.jpg
- File:8314Villages Moonwalk, Parañaque City 46.jpg
- File:Moonwalk in Parañaque City (Barangay) 05.jpg
- File:Moonwalk in Parañaque City (Barangay) 06.jpg
- File:Moonwalk in Parañaque City (Barangay) 07.jpg
- File:Moonwalk in Parañaque City (Barangay) 08.jpg
- File:Moonwalk in Parañaque City (Barangay) 09.jpg
- File:San Agustin Parish Church (San Agustin Village) 09.jpg
- File:San Agustin Parish Church (San Agustin Village) 10.jpg
- File:San Agustin Parish Church (San Agustin Village) 11.jpg
- File:San Agustin Parish Church (San Agustin Village) 20.jpg
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_20.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also LTA sock. --Yann (talk) 18:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
contenu pornographique explicite 82.120.229.176 08:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep Not a valid reason--Trade (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Dronebogus (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Pornographic content without educativ purpose 80.146.8.244 09:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these) --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 19:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
That's not educational. That's a porn movie, Commons is not a place for pornography. BZPN (talk) 15:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Did you notice it had been kept 3 times already? When will self-styled censors give up? Pornography can be educational, and it's a valid encyclopedic topic. We are not going to host any and all pornography, but as 1989 points out, this is COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 13:09, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Commons nie jest amatorską stroną pornograficzną 188.147.12.36 21:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per above (in use). Also, the quality is good enough, or at least better than what we have at the moment. RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: decent quality. --Strakhov (talk) 19:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Pornographic content without educativ purpose 80.146.8.244 09:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these). Previously kept allready. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
This content serves no educational purpose. Bilksneath (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Pornographic content without educativ purpose 80.146.8.244 09:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these). Previously kept allready. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
This content serves no educational purpose. Bilksneath (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Pornographic content without educativ purpose 80.146.8.244 09:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these). Previously kept allready. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 19:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons nie jest amatorską stroną pornograficzną 188.147.12.36 21:53, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Pornographic content without educativ purpose 80.146.8.244 09:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these). Previously kept allready. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 19:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? And what good does it do to the society? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZzMysyeryxX (talk • contribs) 13:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, seems to have encyclopedic relevance if we do not already have media of the specific act. -- The Anome (talk) 12:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason provided for deletion; video is unique in its subject matter and of reasonably high quality. Dronebogus (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ƏXPLICIT 13:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Pornographic content without educative purpose 80.146.8.244 10:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these). Previously kept allready. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Nieodpowiedni 31.61.229.221 12:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:NUDITY. 180.214.232.18 13:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep It delivers what it advertises. Wikipedia has a page on doggy style sex. NudistPhotographer (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Cleaning up unused photos and videos NudistPhotographer (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep being unused is not a reason to delete if in scope. Dronebogus (talk) 10:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
this is porn 81.191.203.225 15:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per two previous listings; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
pornographic content without educativ purpose 80.146.8.244 10:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these). Previously kept allready. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Educational? Seriously? 181.43.1.187 16:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, because pictures (or videos) of different sex practices are suitable to illustrate related articles. Pictures are suitable for illustration here. This one is even in use, which means by definition that it is in scope (see COM:INUSE) --PaterMcFly (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- I hope you learned your lesson well, then. 181.43.1.187 20:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, because pictures (or videos) of different sex practices are suitable to illustrate related articles. Pictures are suitable for illustration here. This one is even in use, which means by definition that it is in scope (see COM:INUSE) --PaterMcFly (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Educational? Seriously? 181.43.1.187 16:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Obvious troll nomination Dronebogus (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 12:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, was apparently deleted once before Enyavar (talk) 07:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by علاء. --Rosenzweig τ 07:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused Tiktok selfie with false description Enyavar (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by علاء. --Rosenzweig τ 07:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused photo of some person; the uploader claims in other uploads that the depicted person is responsible for some Terror attack. This might also violate WP:Bio Enyavar (talk) 08:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by علاء. --Rosenzweig τ 07:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 22:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- He's one of the experts mentioned as one of the 5 cyber experts de Volkskrant interviewed to give consumers cyber security tips at the beginning of the year 2018, as he's the founder of BitSensor. Vera (talk) 03:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: It’s in use, so there’s no discussion, per policy. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Vera (talk) 06:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Madhusahan Wijewardhana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of photos, presumably from third parties (low resolution/size, partly missing EXIF, partly implausible EXIF information, cameras range from Hasselblad to Nikon and Canon), historical photos, everything with an own work claim
- File:BIA is the hub of Sri Lankan Airlines.jpg
- File:Bandaranaike International Airport Main Building.jpg
- File:War hero Memorial.jpg
- File:P. de. S. Kularatne.jpg
- File:Flag of Nalanda College.jpg
- File:Malalasekara Theater of Nalanda College.jpg
- File:Jinendradasa Hall.jpg
- File:Oldest buildings of Nalanda College.jpg
- File:SCH-880 Sri Lanka Air Force C130H.jpg
- File:CJ-712 BAC Jet Provost.jpg
- File:DHC-1 Chipmunk.png
- File:Sri Lanka Airforce Boulton Paul Balliol History.jpg
- File:Crest of KDU.png
- File:KDU flag.jpg
- File:LPG operations.jpg
- File:Hambantota International Port in 2020.jpg
- File:A330-300 Business Class.jpg
- File:4R-ANC A321-251N.jpg
- File:4R-MVS Air Senok AS350.jpg
- File:4R-EXR A320-232 of Fitsair with new livery.jpg
Polarlys (talk) 19:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all unless true source and proof of free license is shown. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:11, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept the flag as PD-simple. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Madhusahan Wijewardhana (talk · contribs)
[edit]See above thread, multiple sizes, no exif. doubtful own work.
- File:SLAF Mig27,Kfir,F7.jpg
- File:SLAF Bell 412ep.jpg
- File:SLAF Mi 24.jpg
- File:SLAF F7 Skybolt.jpg
- File:SLAF Mig 27.jpg
- File:SLAF IAI Kfir C2.jpg
- File:Air Traffic Control Tower of BIA.jpg
- File:Entrance of KDU (from inside).jpg
- File:Entrance of KDU.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- File:SLAF Mig27,Kfir,F7.jpg is credited in press to Sri Lanka Air Force, which has a copy here with a copyright notice.
- File:SLAF Bell 412ep.jpg — not found
- File:SLAF Mi 24.jpg is here, copyright Hans Rolink.
- File:SLAF F7 Skybolt.jpg — also found on Sri Lanka Air Force, which has a copy wallpapers page
- File:SLAF Mig 27.jpg — not found
- File:SLAF IAI Kfir C2.jpg — photo credited to Key Aero Key Aero version here
- File:Air Traffic Control Tower of BIA.jpg — Getty Images
Speedy delete - File:Entrance of KDU (from inside).jpg — not found
- File:Entrance of KDU.jpg — found on Facebook not sure if this is original source
- Delete in general, unless better information provided. The Getty one should be dealt with speedily. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag (description: "This is the flag of a fictional nation"). Omphalographer (talk) 00:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: glitchy recolored copy of File:Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg. Omphalographer (talk) 00:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused recolored version of the US flag. Omphalographer (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Rachata PaGDu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: fictitious flags.
- File:Kogenik’s Revolutionist resistance banner.png
- File:National Flag of Multiuniversal Union of the Republics of Dasheria.png
Omphalographer (talk) 00:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag (description: "for a fictional country for a story that OP has created"). Omphalographer (talk) 00:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious micronation flag. Omphalographer (talk) 00:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by James cristopher clayton (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: various fictitious flags.
Omphalographer (talk) 00:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
This file is not in use anymore. TylerKutschbach (talk) 03:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Agree, it can be deleted Qkxwsm (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. GeorgHH • talk 13:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Unused files are not a valid reason for deletion. Please provide a policy-based rationale. --Missvain (talk) 16:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I made a file with color shadings of the county’s margin File:Tennessee Presidential Election Results 1984.svg TylerKutschbach (talk) 19:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not the same. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
This map is replaced with File:Tennessee Presidential Election Results 1984.svg with the vote percentage shadings 2600:1009:B047:7008:8912:ECA9:D37D:A242 03:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Still no valid reason for a deletion. PNG and SVG are different formats, too. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. the third time is not the charm. please do not nominate again for this or a similar reason. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation. The screen shot contains two emails, the uploader could be one of those individuals, but they can't really be both. Therefore this breaches at least one person's copyright. WereSpielChequers (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete immediately as unambiguous copyvio. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep (I was harassed in a public space full of Wikipedians. The Trust and Safety Employee who witnessed the incident did nothing to stop the offender. I requested a public communication of the outcome of the investigation, regardless of whether it was in my favour or not. I get a pat on the back, the offender gets away with it and seven years later there's a deletion request on grounds of copyright? Do transparency, safety, friendly spaces etc. policies really matter to the Wikimedia Foundation and Movement? Rhetorical. Obviously copyright on what should have been public in the first place is more important) --Saintfevrier (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- This site exists to hold material that is either copyright free or openly licensed so that anyone can freely reuse it. So yes when we find material that is a copyright violation we delete it, whether it belongs on other sites or might belong on other sites if the personal details were removed is not relevant to this site. As for why it persisted for seven years, as far as I can see the uploader ticked the box that they owned the copyright to the material, and because the uploader was a trusted user it took a long time before anyone spotted that they had done this. WereSpielChequers (talk) 12:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete immediately. Unambiguous copyvio and, frankly, a pretty shameful breach of privacy. It is entirely appropriate that Trust & Safety cases be handled privately and discreetly between everyone involved. It is entirely inappropriate that 1 party in a disagreement decry their mistreatment when other observers and participants would presumably characterise the situation differently. A vexatious user posting a private email conversation — including other people's names — to Commons should, in my opinion, result in action being taken against the user, as well as speedy deletion. — OwenBlacker (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, for copyright reasons only. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete nothing new Dronebogus (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete : I’m voting for it to be deleted. You are right, it’s a meaningless picture that isn’t used.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amin (talk • contribs) 11:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality penis photo, only being used in a small-scale WP discussion, I don't think it affects much A1Cafel (talk) 12:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted COM:PACKAGING. Permission is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 12:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 12:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 13:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 13:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 13:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 13:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 13:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France. Architect Louis Mortamet' died in 1956
- File:Détail Carillon Mas Rillier Miribel Ain 1.jpg
- File:Détail Carillon Mas Rillier Miribel Ain 2.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
File:2019-10-10 22 12 08 A packet of Jell-O strawberry gelatin snacks in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
[edit]
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 13:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The strawberry is above TOO. Glrx (talk) 15:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 13:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Glrx (talk) 15:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 14:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 14:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Blurry and poor quality Nemracc (talk) 14:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 14:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Vrak is a Francophone Canadian television channel. This would need VRT permission to be here if it was created by the company. Abzeronow (talk) 18:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
I don't think this can be classed as free parts of copyrighted software unfortuantely. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 00:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:48, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation (https://www.autobild.es/noticias/xavi-marcos-voz-guia-charles-leclerc-f1-1032951) XxAlanEZExX (talk) 01:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 02:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 02:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW; they need confirmation via COM:VRT that uploader is indeed the artist or copyright holder of the artwork.
- File:Alain Godon 2010 Affiche EndurOpale Touquet.jpg
- File:Alain Godon 2011 Affiche New World Center Miami Beach.jpg
- File:Alain Godon 2012 Affiche Drasner Aspen.jpg
- File:Alain Godon 2012 Affiche exposition Extravaganza.jpg
- File:Alain Godon 2014 Affiche Bloch Los Angeles.jpg
- File:Alain Godon 2017 Affiche exposition Matisse-Godon.jpg
- File:Alain Godon 2005 Affiche Darga.jpg
- File:Exhibition of Alain Godon 2008 at the Elysees Gallery in New-York.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
A plain black photo, nothing to see. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 08:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
television screenshot Caulfield (talk) 07:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
unused. Promo for not notable app. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Possibly a child photo of the uploader? Enyavar (talk) 11:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- This image depicts an older Caucasian male with lighter skin. The educational value is to show the differences between the other images listed in the same categories that represent younger males. My image shows very good colour, clarity and composition and a good representation of an aging male body. CalusUse (talk) 12:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- The image is fairly low res tho Trade (talk) 18:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Dark & grainy. Unable to identify anotomical features. File has no educational value. Delete per COM:PENIS guidelines. Senator2029 19:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete per COM:PENIS Mjrmtg (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 23:35, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2A02:2F07:4509:E100:CCB6:974F:720B:52C as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-free image from the official city website Gajmar (talk) 12:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Spam, selfie, not in use Bilderling (talk) 14:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cửa hàng thiết bị điện Amazen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
- File:Cảm biến quang Hanyoung.jpg
- File:Cảm biến quang là gì.jpg
- File:Cảm biến quang Fotek.jpg
- File:Một số thương hiệu cảm biến quang khác.jpg
- File:Cảm biến quang Autonics.jpg
- File:Cấu tạo cảm biến quang.jpg
- File:Cảm biến quang phản xạ khuếch tán.jpg
- File:Cảm biến quang thu phát.jpg
- File:Cảm biến quang phản xạ gương.jpg
- File:Nguyên lý hoạt động của cảm biến quang thu phát.jpg
- File:Nguyên lý hoạt động của cảm biến quang phản xạ khuếch tán.jpg
- File:Nguyên lý hoạt động của cảm biến quang phản xạ gương.jpg
- File:Thông số cần lưu ý khi mua cảm biến quang.jpg
- File:Sơ đồ đấu dây cảm biến quang 3 dây.jpg
- File:Ứng dụng của cảm biến quang.jpg
- File:Thông số cần lưu ý khi mua Encoder.jpg
- File:Nguyên lý hoạt động của Encoder.jpg
- File:Phân biệt giữa Encoder tương đối và Encoder tuyệt đối.jpg
- File:Xác định ngõ ra Encoder.jpg
- File:Encoder tuyệt đối.jpg
- File:Encoder từ trường.jpg
- File:Encoder tương đối.jpg
- File:Encoder trục lồi và Encoder trục lõm.jpg
- File:Encoder ứng dụng cho máy CNC.jpg
- File:Encoder quang.jpg
- File:Encoder Omron.jpg
- File:Encoder loại thẳng.jpg
- File:Encoder loại điện trở.jpg
- File:Encoder là gì?.jpg
- File:Encoder Hanyoung.jpg
- File:Encoder đo lường chiều dài.jpg
- File:Encoder ứng dụng trong băng tải.jpg
- File:Encoder dạng xoay.jpg
- File:Encoder loại cơ khí.jpg
- File:Encoder Autonics.jpg
- File:Encoder biểu thị tốc độ.jpg
- File:Cấu tạo của Encoder.jpg
- File:Logo Amazen.png
- File:Kho-hang-hoa-amazen.jpg
- File:Gia-tri-cot-loi-amazen.jpg
- File:Doi-tac-cua-amazen.jpg
- File:Chuc-nang-dieu-khien-nhiet-do-theo-thoi-gian.jpg
- File:Dieu-khien-nhiet-do-cho-lo-nuong.jpg
- File:Nguyen-ly-hoat-dong-bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do.jpg
- File:So-do-dau-day-bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do.jpg
- File:Dieu-khien-PID.jpg
- File:Dieu-khien-bat-tat-ON-OFF.jpg
- File:Bieu-do-nhiet-tren-phan-mem.jpg
- File:Bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do-DIN-Rail.jpg
- File:Ung-dung-bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do.jpg
- File:Bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do-autonics.jpg
- File:Bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do-hanyoung.jpg
- File:Bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do-conotec.jpg
- File:Cau-tao-bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do.jpg
- File:Bo-dieu-khien-nhiet-do-la-gi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. Some of the files contain what appears to be promotional text within the image, which makes them unsuitable for use on Wikimedia projects (outside of COM:SCOPE). Others are images of products that are likely in scope, but have promotional descriptions that should be edited if the files are kept. However, spot checking a bunch of them, each is easily found on the web from various different sources; therefore, the claim of "own work" for all of them is highly suspect. So even if some of the images are perhaps in scope, in the absence of permission from the photographers/copyright owners they should all be deleted. Marbletan (talk) 19:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
unused. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. Some random room. No location given. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:44, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Reuters images are copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 16:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 06:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Q&A about digital citzenship. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 17:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, but a reproduction of copyrighted book. ErikvanB (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
ErikvanB may be right: it is indeed a copy of the backside of a book. However, the book is no longer in print and it is only the back. I felt that that may have been OK enough. Thanks for correcting me I guess :-)
This is a screenshot of a computer game and therefore presumably constitutes copyright infringement. ErikvanB (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. The underlying game is GPL / CC-BY-SA, so this might actually be OK from a copyright perspective. I don't feel like it's a particularly effective illustration of cheating in video games - the only way it differs from a normal screenshot is that some of the numbers are different! - but it's in use on some wikis, so whatever. Omphalographer (talk) 19:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized file. No location given. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Clearly copyright violation TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Qualifies for F1. They say they took it from Ballotpedia and did not provide a license. TDKR Chicago 101, if you are sure it is a copyright violation, please use {{copyvio}} in the future. 25stargeneral (talk) 00:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. (Title translates as "artistic approach to learning supervision"). Omphalographer (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JosefinaDiLeo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posible violación de derechos de autor. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The image is below Threshold of originality --ℳaʐbeʟ (✉︎) 20:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete
- Although the image is below the originality threshold, it has an extremely artistic design, therefore it can be considered as copyvio JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 18:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JosefinaDiLeo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Imagen sin licencia "CC". COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Esta imagen también no cumple con la licencia necesaria para permanecer en Wikimedia commons y hay algunos archivos que marque anteriormente por los mismos motivos y que fueron borrados JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 12:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Typefaces can't usually be copyrighted, but I think the artistic styling of the letters is unique enough in this case to warrant airing on the side of caution by deleting the image. That said, it's borderline and I won't be surprised of other people disagree. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
random tower. No location given. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment If the uploader provided the airport this was taken on, it would be clearly in scope. Appears to be somewhere in Spain, but that's not sufficient. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Jorge Wilstermann International Airport, Cochabamba, Bolivia. --Rosenzweig τ 11:09, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karladelaforsenza (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these are own work. The upright photos have Chanel credited bottom right
- File:LigaZemtureEditorsLetter.jpg
- File:LigaZemtureLOfficielLatviaLOfficielBaltic.jpg
- File:LOfficielLatviaLOfficiel100AnniversaryIssue.jpg
- File:LigaZemtureLOfficielLatvia100AnniversaryInterview2021.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 11:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Ronco Scrivia - frazione Borgo Fornari - chiesa di Santa Maria Assunta - altare dell’Assunta.jpg
[edit]
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Bn109 (talk) 09:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2019, so much too late for a courtesy deletion, also in scope. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- File:NCPSSD-70038509 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038506 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038507 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038505 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038504 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038502 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038503 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038501 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038499 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038500 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038497 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70038498 時務通考三十一卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037179 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037177 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037178 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037176 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037175 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037173 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037174 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037172 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037171 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037170 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037169 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037168 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037166 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037164 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037167 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037165 西學格致啟蒙十六種.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037162 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037163 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037161 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037159 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037157 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037160 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037158 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037155 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037156 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037153 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037154 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037152 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037151 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037150 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037148 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037149 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037146 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037147 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037145 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037144 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037142 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037143 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037140 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037138 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037139 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037132 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037136 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037135 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037134 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037131 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037133 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037128 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037130 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037127 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037129 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037123 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037126 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037125 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037124 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70035221 荔牆叢刻.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037122 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70037116 西學富强叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70036127 潛研堂全書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70034934 槐廬叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70033646 經義考三百卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70034899 槐廬叢書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70033619 經義考三百卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70033346 彚刻書目二十冊.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70030527 常州先哲遺書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70033611 經義考三百卷.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70030524 常州先哲遺書.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70029091 經策通纂（經學輯要、策學備纂、策學備纂續集）.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70029767 賭棋山莊全集.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70029084 經策通纂（經學輯要、策學備纂、策學備纂續集）.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70029075 經策通纂（經學輯要、策學備纂、策學備纂續集）.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70029039 經策通纂（經學輯要、策學備纂、策學備纂續集）.pdf
- File:NCPSSD-70028860 談藝珠叢.pdf
Duplicate files. Please delete all above. Uploader's request.--維基小霸王 (talk) 14:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 11:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BoatersList (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
- File:Boaterlist wiki2.png
- File:Martin Kroesche CEO and Team.png
- File:The Boaterslist Crew.png
- File:Reel Coole The Official Spokeswoman for Boaterslist.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 11:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shane Editor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, stolen from social media sites/Google (e.g., File:BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow.jpg is here, File:Lok Bhavan, Lucknow.jpg is here, etc.), uploader significant copyvio history (see talk/deleted contribs), etc. Duck/PRP issue.
- File:BRSABV Ekana Cricket stadium during Legends League cricket match.jpg
- File:Ekana Cricket stadium.jpg
- File:Ekana Stadium during Legends League match.jpg
- File:Ekana Cricket stadium, Lucknow.jpg
- File:Inside of BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow.jpg
- File:BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow.jpg
- File:Lucknow International Airport Terminal-2.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 11:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
No evidence is provided that (a) the editor who uploaded this college's wordmark owns it and (b) the college has released their wordmark under a CC license ElKevbo (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Textlogo, below COM:TOO. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
براي تغيير ديبا جان (talk) 04:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use on user page, in scope. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Wrong| speedy 5.209.104.252 20:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- If you are User:ديبايی log in please. --Achim55 (talk) 08:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: very prompt request by uploader. First requested for deletion by uploader account same day it was uploaded - should have been deleted in first request whether in use at that time or not. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ihatescienceclass123321 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope.
Estopedist1 (talk) 05:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Dubious license claim: low resolution, no EXIF (except it's created by paint.net). The uploader has a history of taking Google Street View imagery and claim as "own work" thus making their license claims untrustworthy. Wcam (talk) 13:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Diese Datei existiert bereits drei Mal Gerhard Rinderle (talk) 10:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
trimethylsilane.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
trimethylsilane.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:(Trifluoromethyl)trimethylsilane-2D-structure.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
trimethylsilane-2D-structure.svg){kind=link}
trimethylsilane.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 17:12, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
trimethylsilane.png){kind=link}
without Permission VRTS Caulfield (talk) 07:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Taken from http://www.giadabenedetti.com/photo-books/, COM:VRT permission needed from Stefania Rosini. Ruthven (msg) 15:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
per COM:FOP Japan. According to the news article[1], this wall painting is unveiled in this May. Obviously, its copyright is still valid. Netora (talk) 23:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
przekierowanie jest niepotrzebne Adam Klocusky (talk) 15:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
privacy violation minors out of project scope - used for sockpromocampaign for not relevant minor Eterno singer/actor/artist Hoyanova (talk) 06:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation, https://www.transcend.org/tms/2018/02/if-america-won-the-cold-war-why-is-there-now-a-second-cold-war-with-russia/ 2001:BB6:C41E:B200:39ED:7E9C:1A8D:7A3E 00:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Unused group photo of some student team, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
unused files. Promotional for not notable company Alphalauf. Out of project scope.
- File:5 Phasen des Alphalaufs.png
- File:Oberst Eligius Adam und Dr. Johannes Huber, 2012, Entwicklung und Gründung Alphalauf.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 06:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Promotional image, not used anywhere. Of no encyclopaedic value Nick Moyes (talk) 08:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
These posters are not own work and have exif edited to remove author info. Also would need license/source info for each picture
Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ISurvivor007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused diagrams. No source for diagram's data given. Out of project scope.
Estopedist1 (talk) 09:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Promotional SPAM uploaded by a non-contributor. Adamant1 (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry Dasnusantara (talk) 09:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio (photo by Jan-Hendrik Kurtz) M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Self-promotion, out of scope
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tabercil as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Presumptively a copyrighted image, needs proof of PD status. U.S. publicity photographs from this era were frequently never copyrighted, so I'm sending this to DR rather than actioning the speedy. I agree that evidence of a PD status is lacking, however, and this should be deleted if we cannot find evidence thereof. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Ruthven. --Rosenzweig τ 10:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Turelio? 186.172.78.208 12:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 10:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ryan Mandy (talk · contribs)
[edit]File:Out Cry Storm.jpg has watermark with implies that not free image. Hence: not own work. VRT-permission from the photographer is needed. I suspect same problem with other image as well
Estopedist1 (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Badoomtalkh (talk · contribs)
[edit]No watermark or photographer credit seen, not a work by Fars
HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File:LV Mecklenburg-Vorpommern logo.svg also exists, making this version unnecessary Nordat (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Not own work per TinEye search. VRT-permission from the photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jpopmoretrivia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern or post-1972 buildings are the focus here, but there is no COM:FOP Philippines. Missing commercial license clearances from the architects or building designers. One building here seems the same case as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Zuellig Building.
- File:Ayala malls vertis north.jpg
- File:Serendra 2 condo building.jpg
- File:West fairview high school.jpg
- File:Makati Diamond Residences.jpg
- File:Zuellig Building.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 03:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal file, uploaders single file. Out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 21:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://magazine.janedeboy.com/interview-les-bonnes-adresses-parisiennes-de-diane-goldstein/ Culex (talk) 21:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://magazine.janedeboy.com/interview-les-bonnes-adresses-parisiennes-de-diane-goldstein/ Culex (talk) 21:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://www.hedva-ser.com/biographie Culex (talk) 21:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Rather the other way round. Our image has a higher resolution than the one on that website. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: https://static.wixstatic.com/media/e34a9b_46f6390e23dc4b929528d9162569872b~mv2.jpg. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
a post-1976 photo, inelegible under the PD-Italy/PD-1996 licence — danyele 22:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
globally blocked user. Unused file, no location given. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- First of all, not an own work as the uploader claims. 186.175.245.143 21:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 | Welcome, Wikipedians! This deletion discussion is generating interest on Wikipedia. If you are a Wikipedian without much experience of Commons, your input here is welcome, but please be aware of Commons' policies, particularly deletion policy and project scope (criteria for inclusion). Note also that, like Wikipedia deletion discussions, Commons deletion discussions are not decided by voting. You may find Commons:For Wikipedians helpful as an introduction to Commons. |
This file was initially tagged by Johnson524 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. The user has ove two thousand contributions on EnWiki, and this doesn't appear to be a personal photograph, so I am sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy. I lean towards keeping; it purports to be the signature of a mayor of a city of 280K+ people, which seems like it would be within project scope. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Red-tailed hawk, and thank you for reaching out 🙂 I was contacted on my Wikipedia talk page by the Durham city attorneys office about a possible security risk from signature fraud with the image, and asked for it to be removed as soon as possible (read that message and my response, including how I got the signature, here if you would like). Looking at the criteria for specifically a speedy deletion, "personal image" seemed to be the best fit, but then again I didn't look too long at all the criteria, and just wanted to get the image off the platform ASAP as I have never been contacted by an official agency before, oof. Congrats again on becoming an admin! Johnson524 (talk) 11:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- In the case of any further discussion, it should be noted that this signature became topic of a controversy, discussed more broadly in this news report Johnson524 (talk) 03:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Endorse removal on the pure procedural reason that if Johnson524 is not Elaine O'Neal then the file is completely incorrectly attributed and licensed as it cannot possibly be their own work since it's not their signature. Canterbury Tail (talk) 18:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with CT, if someone then wants/can upload it correctly, they will do so. May not be worth the bother. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- I honestly see little value in people's signatures unless they're really famous and it has real significance. The signature of a public official doesn't strike me as encyclopaedically useful. Just because we can doesn't mean we should. Canterbury Tail (talk) 21:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Afaict, the "own work" problem has been solved. Noting that the sig was removed from the WP-article, it was commented on in the ANI thread.[2] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Agree with CT, if someone then wants/can upload it correctly, they will do so. May not be worth the bother. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The source of the image can be updated to point to the publicly available playbill for DPAC, that's easily done. If this falls under fair use, then okay, a local English Wikipedia version can be uploaded instead, but I'm not sure the copyright claims fall out that way. Otherwise, I see no reason for deletion. Silver seren (talk) 22:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- FYI Relevant discussion: en:Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#NLT,_subject_of_news_article. SCP-2000 06:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep To be more clear, this is validly COM:INUSE on Wikidata, so we can't delete for scope, and there appears to be nothing wrong with hosting this for use on Wikidata from a copyright perspective or otherwise; see {{PD-signature}}, particularly as it applies to the United States. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I also do not see the point in images of signatures, they do not assist the reader at all. But while they are allowed, they should be used, and while they are in use we do not delete them. We certainly do not delete them just because someone who has already publicised their own signature then chooses to disapprove of its publication elsewhere. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 07:17, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Relevant guidance which presents the rationale for keeping and which links to precedent includes
- For the journalists, researchers, policymakers, and future lawyers for public figures who come here to see how signature removal requests play out on Wikipedia, check out
- My take on what happened is that a Wikipedia editor developed a biography which included the published signature of a mayor for a major city. Despite the signature being used in promotional materials of the en:Durham Performing Arts Center, the city administration also uses that signature as a secure key, and gives access to restricted resources when people present it. Because the signature is a key, the city attorney goes to the user who uploaded it - who identified themselves as a teenage high school student who writes about local city government - and says that they as a lawyer on behalf of the mayor can approach the Wikimedia Foundation to "ask that they disclose the identity of the party who uploaded the signature image", and to demand the signature's removal.
- My opinion is that concepts of the Internet, online culture, digital media, en:doxing, en:cyberbullying, en:Streisand effect, and the nature of Wikipedia are so well established as general knowledge that mayors, city attorneys, and all their staff should have awareness of that doxxing and bringing legal threats to Wikipedia editors in good standing is serious and will get public scrutiny.
- I support the signature staying because it complies with Wikimedia Commons inclusion criteria, and because the Wikimedia community has precedent that signatures of public figures belong on Wikipedia, and because this incident itself should be a case study which the Wikipedia community makes public so that anyone considering future such requests can anticipate the outcome. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Per Red-tailed hawk. File is in use and fulfill {{PD-signature}}. Unless there is legal risk or fraud risk confirmed by Wikimedia Foundation Legal Team, there is no valid reason to delete.
- Please also note that if the file is kept, it is the community's decision, based on consensus, rather than the uploader's self decision. Thanks. SCP-2000 16:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThiThuHaNguyen19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]spam account. All his contributions are not reverted, and reverting is not trivial.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Estopedist1 (talk) 06:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atashgah Cave
[edit]Poor quality and the existence of alternatives - And also the request of the uploader.
{{User|POS78}} talk 08:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: quality is fine, no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atashgah Castle
[edit]Poor quality and the existence of alternatives - And also the request of the uploader.
- File:Atashgah castle2021 (cropped).jpg
- File:Atashgah castle2021 1.jpg
- File:Atashgah castle2021 3.jpg
- File:Atashgah castle2021 4.jpg
- File:Atashgah castle2021 5.jpg
- File:Atashgah castle2021 6.jpg
- File:Atashgah castle2021 7.jpg
- File:Atashgah castle2021 9.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
{{User|POS78}} talk 08:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: quality is fine, no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Atashgah Castle
[edit]Bad photos and the existence of alternatives - And also the request of the uploader.
- File:Atashgah Castle2021 (cropped).jpg
- File:Atashgah Castle2021 2.jpg
- File:Atashgah Castle2021 3.jpg
- File:Atashgah Castle2021 4.jpg
- File:Atashgah Castle2021 5.jpg
- File:Atashgah Castle2021 6.jpg
- File:Atashgah Castle2021 7.jpg
- File:Atashgah Castle2021 8.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
{{User|POS78}} talk 22:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted 3, 4, and 5, since they were out of focus. I do not see problems with the others. Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: more than sufficient quality. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find any version of this photograph with Tasnim watermark or with a photographer name credit, please upload if any is available. Tasnim authorship is not established and CC licensed does not apply. HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @HeminKurdistan
- I found this photo at this link: https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1401/04/02/2733202/%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B8%D9%85%DB%8C-%D8%B1%D8%A6%DB%8C%D8%B3-%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B3%D9%BE%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%B4%D8%AF Then I googled this person's name. This photo has been widely used by Iran's public news agencies, and none of them have claimed ownership of this photo! So I referred to Tasnim news agency. HP1250 (talk) 12:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- The fact that "none of them have claimed ownership" is against Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. If Tasnim obtained this from somewhere else, then cc-by-4.0 does not apply to this file. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: The person depicted is an intelligence officer and not so many photographs are available from him. But we do have File:Mohammad Kazemi 2019-04-24.jpg which is freely-licensed for sure. So we lose nothing if we delete this suspicious file. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. Diagram is not in use since 2017. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Дифракция на примере одной щели.jpg, unused. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: other file deleted instead. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern sculptures in Ukraine: see "Commons:Freedom of panorama#Ukraine". — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 07:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
The image infringes on the copyright for the sculpture. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Nunca he oído de este artista. 186.172.251.38 17:10, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Tantas fotos! 186.172.251.38 17:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
El mismo? 186.172.251.38 17:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Qué significa ese movimiento de mano? 186.172.251.38 17:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Que cómodo! Un cafecito? 186.172.251.38 17:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Pero cuántas fotos puede colgar uno? 186.172.251.38 17:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
too blurry to be useful Trade (talk) 17:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete agree Dronebogus (talk) 18:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Soldat... 186.172.251.38 17:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Source:Personne 186.172.251.38 17:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Es aceptable sentarse así? 186.172.251.38 17:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
no further encyclopedic usage envisioned, one and only transclusion has been replaced by a wikitext table in de:Special:Diff/234805471
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 01:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 4nn1l2 as no permission (No permission since) Vysotsky (talk) 13:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Photograph made in Afghanistan in 2015, by a person standing by during the murder. Afghanistan Copyright law doesn't seem to have a clause for photographs made by unidentified photographers, contrary to what par. 3.9 (Anonymous work) seems to suggest. Vysotsky (talk) 14:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
The file is a screenshot taken from an Afghan video published in 2015, in which it was kept on the claim that Afghan Copyright Law doesn't protect anonymous photographers. However, it is clear that per COM:Afghanistan and WIPO's translation of the Copyright Law (Art. 16(1), paras. 5-6), audiovisual works and photographs were protected for 50 years since their publication, and I don't find any provisions supporting Vysotsky's claim.
It should be noted that an anonymous author doesn't mean that it is copyright-free, and based on my arguments, the file is not in Afghan public domain. Without proper permission, the file should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 02:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky and Yann: Notifying previous nominator (keep proponent) and closing administrator.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as neither Vysotsky nor Yann seem to have any objections. —holly {chat} 18:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
This map not showing the shadings of the vote percentages serves little purpose 2600:1009:B047:7008:8912:ECA9:D37D:A242 03:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete I had previously commented. Looks like a file does exist for this election with shades. Delete this one since it doesn't do anything better than the other.--SDudley (talk) 15:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the photographer is needed.
Estopedist1 (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and WHY ARE THESE GIFS. —holly {chat} 18:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Looking at the linked thread, the screenshot is of an email reply by a Singapore government agency, therefore copyrighted as a Singapore government work. Robertsky (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'd say keep, because a single line of text is not copyrightable. This contains nothing that I consider to be artistic. --PaterMcFly (talk) 19:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-text. —holly {chat} 18:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Destructive watermark implies Copyright issues Enyavar (talk) 13:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and replaced with File:AlejandroHLeloir.jpg. —holly {chat} 18:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; EXIF info says creator is "Christof Arnold". —holly {chat} 18:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:61-224-0084 Zbaraz.jpg
- File:P1410929 Пам'ятне місце загибелі полковника запорізького війська Морозенка С.jpg
- File:Zbarazh, Morozenko.JPG
- File:Збараж (332) Пам'ятне місце загибелі полковника запорізького війська Морозенка С.jpg
- File:Збараж 61-224-0084.jpg
- File:Моя ТернопільщинаБуч245.jpg
- File:Пам'ятне місце загибелі полковника запорізького війська Морозенка С., Збараж.jpg
- File:Пам'ятне місце загибелі полковника запорізького війська Морозенка С., Збараж.png
- File:Пам'ятне місце загибелі полковника запорізького війська Морозенка С.png
_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B5_%D0%BC%D1%96%D1%81%D1%86%D0%B5_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%96_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B7%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B9%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%A1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 13:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 14:10, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.
- File:5. Збараж .Пам'ятник державному і військовому діячу, гетьману України Хмельницькому Богдану.JPG
- File:61-224-0057 Zbarazh Khmelnytskyi Monument RB.jpg
- File:Chmel'nyc'kyy, Zbarazh.JPG
- File:ChmielnickiB-Zbaraz.jpg
- File:P1410845 Пам'ятник державному і військовому діячу, гетьману України Хмельницькому Богдану.jpg
- File:Zbarazh Khmelnytskyi Monument RB.jpg
- File:Збараж (275)Пам'ятник Хмельницькому Богдану.jpg
- File:Збараж 0 (302).jpg
- File:Моя ТернопільщинаБуч240.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник державному і військовому діячу, гетьману України Хмельницькому Богдану, Збараж.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Хмельницькому. Збараж.jpg
- File:Памятник Хмельницкому. Збараж.JPG
- File:ХDSCF4019.JPG
%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%A5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%83_%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%83.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:No Parking (India).svg ~ Saur (talk • contribs) 14:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; @Saurmandal: as this was your own upload, you could have used {{speedydelete|G7}} and it would have been acted upon much more quickly. —holly {chat} 18:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ElaineGriffith1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:No Standing (India).svg ~ Saur (talk • contribs) 14:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Suspicious source YouTube account. Not clear they own the copyright to release under CC license. The account has uploaded random vidoes including BBC documentary videos, and thus it is likely these aren't owned by the YouTube account holder. Dhx1 (talk) 16:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, @Dhx1: As this was your own upload, you could have used {{speedydelete|G7}} for faster service. —holly {chat} 18:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Suspicious source YouTube account. Not clear they own the copyright to release under CC license. The account has uploaded random vidoes including BBC documentary videos, and thus it is likely these aren't owned by the YouTube account holder. Dhx1 (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, @Dhx1: As this was your own upload, you could have used {{speedydelete|G7}} for faster service. —holly {chat} 18:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CanadianSingh1469 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Upon inspecting one of the sources https://archive.org/details/img-3039/IMG_3897.jpeg from File:Photo of Nachhatar Singh Rode.jpg, the uploader at Archive.org https://archive.org/details/@arsh333 does not seem to hold the rights thus making this license laundering and is eligible for speedy deletion COM:F6
- File:Photo of Nachhatar Singh Rode.jpg
- File:Swaran Singh Rode.jpg
- File:Dalbir Singh.jpg
- File:Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale after being released.jpg
- File:Sant Jarnail Singh and Bhai Amrik Singh.jpg
- File:Gurjant Singh Budhsinghwala.jpg
- File:Babbar Khalsa members.jpg
- File:Sant Jarnail Singh Speech on what the youth should do.ogg
- File:Dharam Yudh Morcha speech.ogg
- File:Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale speech about Bhai Surinder Singh Ji Sodhi’s death.ogg
- File:An extract from a speech by Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale.ogg
-- DaxServer (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete them. I realise how they violate the rules. Although I don’t understand why the General Shabeg Singh image is to be deleted. I had colourised that image. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 19:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you have the rights for the original image? -- DaxServer (talk) 06:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ahhh I get it. To answer the question no. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'll defer the decision, if that derivative work would be considered new work because of the colorization, to the closing admin -- DaxServer (talk) 14:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- No sont delete it how future sikhs will konow about ther past 2401:4900:815A:AC4:0:0:A28:806D 14:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ahhh I get it. To answer the question no. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you have the rights for the original image? -- DaxServer (talk) 06:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no camera EXIF, File:Eleonora Archaia..jpg is here; File:Eleonora Archaia.jpg is here, here, etc. File:EleonoraArchaia2021.jpg metadata credit "Achi Murusidze" (≠ uploader ZazaTs), uploader xwiki copyvio history, etc. Quack.
Эlcobbola talk 17:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
No proof that this is a Tasnim work, lacks typical watermark and photographer credit HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized file. No location given. Too scarce info to be useful. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep: I am a bit uncomfortable with the low resolution and lack of metadata; usually they indicate copyvio, but I found nothing with reverse image search. --HyperGaruda (talk) 12:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 19:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Duplikat VSchagow (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized file. Seems like a personal art. I am unable to find something related to en:Isosceles triangle. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
My understanding of {{PD-BrazilGov}} is that only photographs published by the government prior to 1983 are presumed to be in the public domain. However, this appears to be much more recent, and I have significant doubt about the claimed PD status. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 00:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. VRT-permission from the photographer is needed. From www.postimees.ee Estopedist1 (talk) 07:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
"Screenshot" Gyrostat (talk) 17:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Fake flag, not seen in Varadero, and not seen on any official/government/reliable websites online. CubanoBoi (talk) 23:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Same flag is also seen here, and two other fake flags made by VexoCubano are Flag of Cardenas and a duplicate file of the flag of Cardenas. CubanoBoi (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 00:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Trees in Tauberbischofsheim
[edit]These tree labels feature photographs, so the photographs showing the labels are derivative works and copyvios. The labels are not permanent, so freedom of panorama does not apply.
- File:2023-06-23 Birnenbaum bei Tauberbischofsheim 3.jpg
- File:2023-06-23 Birnenbaum bei Tauberbischofsheim 6.jpg
- File:2023-06-23 Birnenbaum bei Tauberbischofsheim 7.jpg
- File:2023-06-23 Weiterer Birnenbaum bei Tauberbischofsheim 3.jpg
- File:2023-06-23 Weiterer Birnenbaum bei Tauberbischofsheim 4.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Per the uploader (see below), the photos were not taken in a public place, so German freedom of panorama definitely does not apply. --Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Aus meiner Sicht ist das totaler Quatsch. Dann könnte man jedes Bild, auf dem eine Cola-Dose oder Mcdonalds-Tüte am Wegesrand liegt, löschen lassen, weil sie nicht permanent da liegt, sondern irgendwann entsort wird oder zu Erde wird. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 07:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oder was ist mit Bilder, auf denen Bierzeltbänke stehen, Sonnenschirme oder Blumenkästen, die nicht ganzjährig, also nicht permanent abgebildet sind? -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 07:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Auf all denen sind keine Fotos drauf, die ihrerseits geschützt sind. Um diese Fotos (der Birnen) geht es. --Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ich denke, FOP passt hier sogar, da die Bilder ja dauerhaft an den Obstbäumen angebracht sind, zumindest so lange, wie die Bäume stehen. Und da es kein vorher definiertes Enddatum gibt, ist "dauerhaft" zutreffend. Die Panoramafreiheit gilt auch, wenn das Objekt irgendwann doch entfernt werden könnte (sonst wäre sie wertlos, weil ja jede Skulptur irgendwann mal wieder entfernt werden könnte. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Da wären zwei Dinge zu klären: 1. Ist das überhaupt ein öffentlicher Ort bzw. sind die Fotos von einem solchen aufgenommen? Falls ja, 2. ist das Werk (also diese Etiketten) “aus der Sicht der Allgemeinheit dazu bestimmt [...], für einen langen, meist indefiniten Zeitraum an dem öffentlichen Ort zu verbleiben” (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Germany/de#Dauerhaft)? Die Art der Befestigung mit einem Bindfaden lässt mich daran doch zweifeln. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sehe es wie PaterMcFly. Zu Rosenzweig: 1. Ist kein öffentlicher Ort. 2. Dazu bestimmt auf eigenem Grundstück zu verbleiben. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 08:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Na, wenn es kein öffentlicher Ort ist, greift die Panoramafreiheit definitiv nicht. --Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Darf ich in meinem Garten nicht fotografieren und veröffentlichen, was ich will? -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 19:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wenn es um urheberrechtlich geschützte Dinge geht, darfst du die fotografieren und manchmal auch veröffentlichen, wenn eine der sogenannten de:Schranken des Urheberrechts greift. Commons und Wikipedia wollen aber nur freie Inhalte, die von jedem, jederzeit und für jeden Zweck genutzt werden können (Commons:Licensing/de). Mit den meisten Urheberrechtsschranken geht das nicht. Die Panoramafreiheit ist eine der Schranken, mit denen das ginge, aber die gilt eben nur an öffentlichen Plätzen. Um es zu verdeutlichen: Wenn du dir ein (urheberrechtlich noch geschütztes) Gemälde von Picasso kaufst und bei dir an die Wand hängst, kannst du das fotografieren, du kannst dann aber nicht jenes Foto hier unter einer freien Lizenz hochladen. Und mit Fotos versehene urheberrechtlich geschützte Etiketten sind rechtlich auch nichts anderes als dieses Picasso-Gemälde. --Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Darf ich in meinem Garten nicht fotografieren und veröffentlichen, was ich will? -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 19:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Na, wenn es kein öffentlicher Ort ist, greift die Panoramafreiheit definitiv nicht. --Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sehe es wie PaterMcFly. Zu Rosenzweig: 1. Ist kein öffentlicher Ort. 2. Dazu bestimmt auf eigenem Grundstück zu verbleiben. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 08:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Da wären zwei Dinge zu klären: 1. Ist das überhaupt ein öffentlicher Ort bzw. sind die Fotos von einem solchen aufgenommen? Falls ja, 2. ist das Werk (also diese Etiketten) “aus der Sicht der Allgemeinheit dazu bestimmt [...], für einen langen, meist indefiniten Zeitraum an dem öffentlichen Ort zu verbleiben” (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Germany/de#Dauerhaft)? Die Art der Befestigung mit einem Bindfaden lässt mich daran doch zweifeln. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ich denke, FOP passt hier sogar, da die Bilder ja dauerhaft an den Obstbäumen angebracht sind, zumindest so lange, wie die Bäume stehen. Und da es kein vorher definiertes Enddatum gibt, ist "dauerhaft" zutreffend. Die Panoramafreiheit gilt auch, wenn das Objekt irgendwann doch entfernt werden könnte (sonst wäre sie wertlos, weil ja jede Skulptur irgendwann mal wieder entfernt werden könnte. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Auf all denen sind keine Fotos drauf, die ihrerseits geschützt sind. Um diese Fotos (der Birnen) geht es. --Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Compact Jam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected
Estopedist1 (talk) 10:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lukasz Lukomski as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo extracted from a bigger one here: http://scarc.library.oregonstate.edu/coll/pauling/dna/pictures/portrait-hersheychase.html author is stated as Karl Maramorosch, who only died in 2016. Clearly a copyright breach. Heavily used US photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Death date is irrelevant for US copyright here. Could be {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}; anyone want to check? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I checked the 1953 and 1954 volumes and did not get any results, so I think {{PD-US-no notice}} probably works here. —holly {chat} 02:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly, copyright seems to have expired. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lukasz Lukomski as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo extracted from a bigger one here: http://scarc.library.oregonstate.edu/coll/pauling/dna/pictures/portrait-hersheychase.html author is stated as Karl Maramorosch, who only died in 2016. Clearly a copyright breach
.jpg){kind=link}
Heavily used US photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Death date is irrelevant for US copyright here. Could be {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}; anyone want to check? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Martha Chase.jpg. —holly {chat} 02:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly, copyright seems to have expired. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
This needs to be deleted because it is a duplicate upload and post. Richard Warren Lipack (talk) 02:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Warren Lipack: What is it a duplicate of? —holly {chat} 02:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: It does not "need to be" deleted. What it supposedly duplicates never stated. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Decasurger (talk · contribs)
[edit]logos are not covered by the {{GWOIA}} license scope. SeeCOM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:National Dong Hwa University.
- File:1st Gen Logo (1994-2008).png
- File:NDHU College of Indigenous Studies Logo.png
- File:東華海生所.png
- File:NDHU CSIE PIC I.svg
- File:TaiwanTech Logo.svg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Larryasou (talk) 04:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think this logo, File:1st Gen Logo (1994-2008).png, might be released as {{PD-logo}} cause it was no longer used and got expired.
- And I'm wondering whether these logos of this institution's subsidiaries showed below are protected by trademark, cause these logos are not registered in Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. On the contrary, the official logo of this institution is registered.
- The last, the file, File:TaiwanTech Logo.svg, undoubtedly is violated to {{GWOIA}}, it should be speedy deleted. Decasurger (talk) 05:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- In the case of the first logo, it does not meet the COM:TOO US and therefore in Public Domain in U.S., while it may copyrightable in Taiwan according the SUNSHOW case in COM:TOO Taiwan. As for the trademark right, it shouldn't be confused with copyright and doesn't affect whether a file to be hosted on Commons.
See COM:Licensing#Simple_design and COM:Non-copyright_restrictions#trademark-law. Larryasou (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- In the case of the first logo, it does not meet the COM:TOO US and therefore in Public Domain in U.S., while it may copyrightable in Taiwan according the SUNSHOW case in COM:TOO Taiwan. As for the trademark right, it shouldn't be confused with copyright and doesn't affect whether a file to be hosted on Commons.
Deleted: per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Taiwan - they are not simple typefaces, no indication they are "traditional design elements" out of copyright. US:TOO does not apply here. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)