Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/04/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
年本殿正面.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.RAMONA_VINSON.CHARCOAL_ON_PAPER.ca.1920's.8.75"x12.5".FRONT.jpg){kind=link}
-1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![222 File:Лого на Агенция "Пътна инфраструктура".jpg](#File:Лого_на_Агенция_"Пътна_инфраструктура".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
obvious copyright violation Wasell (talk) 06:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GMGtalk 11:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
I did not know it would be publicly visible ৰাহুল চেতিয়া (talk) 10:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pixelati as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Too old for G7, and in use. Pixelati: any reason for the deletion? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- This picture wasn't taken by me. It was taken by a distant relative and I just uploaded it when I was still young, not thinking much about it. So, it's an obvious copyright violation. Thanks, Pixelati (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: F1. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
No more use あ四タ (talk) 15:08, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Image was uploaded in 2016 and is in use.
Keep --Túrelio (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: courtesy deletion not applicable. --Yasu (talk) 16:12, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
This file is no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- This file is in no more use. Please delete this file. あ四タ (talk) 05:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
I do not use this file. あ四タ (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 21:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
%E5%B9%B4%E6%9C%AC%E6%AE%BF%E6%AD%A3%E9%9D%A2.jpg){kind=link}
%E5%B9%B4%E6%9C%AC%E6%AE%BF%E6%AD%A3%E9%9D%A2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
年本殿正面.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
年本殿正面.jpg){kind=link}
%E5%B9%B4%E6%9C%AC%E6%AE%BF%E6%AD%A3%E9%9D%A2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 21:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 06:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 21:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:47, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 21:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This file is in no more use. あ四タ (talk) 05:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: uploaded 6 years ago, courtesy deletion not applicable. Remember that CC licenses are not revocable. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
This file is not used. あ四タ (talk) 16:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept. This is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
fix some image qukaity Renadoo456 (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 23:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Michel Bakni the video is a screenshot from a CC from YouTube interview, so where is the violation here? Riad Salih (talk) 00:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, ture, this is wrong form my part. Sorry, please keep it. Michel Bakni (talk) 06:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep not COMMONS:Out of scope. --Panam2014 (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept, the file is in scope per COM:INUSE. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Seems to be a stock image, eg. https://twitter.com/bmchsd/status/1521127322639908865 Belbury (talk) 08:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 08:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Wdwd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Solicito la eliminación de esta foto dado que contiene errores en las fuentes y en su autoría. Gracias. Roberto Konisberg. (I request the elimination of this photo since it contains errors in the sources and in its authorship. Thank you. Roberto Konisberg) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberto Konisberg (talk • contribs) 02:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Solicito la eliminación de esta foto dado que contiene errores en las fuentes y en su autoría. Gracias. Roberto Konisberg. (I request the elimination of this photo since it contains errors in the sources and in its authorship. Thank you. Roberto Konisberg) --Roberto Konisberg (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Como usuario creador de este archivo File:Menem Rojas.jpg, doy mi consentimiento para que él mismo sea borrado. Gracias Roberto Konisberg (talk) 18:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
16:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
I request the elimination of this photo since it contains errors in the sources and in its authorship. Thank you. Roberto Konisberg
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Resident of Greece as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: -author. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, converting. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, courtesy deletion due to very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploads by Pietro Rossi 04
[edit]- File:Bradley_Gregg_in_2016.jpg
- File:Dakin_Matthews_in_2015.jpg
- File:Tonino_Accolla_durante_un'intervista.jpg
- File:Piero Tiberi durante un'intervista.jpg
- File:Paul_Brooke_as_Malakili_in_Return_of_the_Jedi_(1983).jpg
- File:Bill_McKinney_in_Rambo_First_blood.jpg
- File:Michael_V._Gazzo_1975.jpg
- File:Philip_Jackson_and_Alfie_Curtis_on_musical_video_Take_on_me.jpg
- File:Philip_Jackson.jpg
- File:Gigi_Angelillo_nel_film_Mio_Cognato.jpg
- File:Paul_Shenar_appearing_on_Dynasty.jpg
- File:James_Avery_appearing_on_My_Wife_&_Kids.jpg
- File:Tony_Burton_in_Rocky_II.jpg
- File:Frank_McRae_in_the_movie_Last_Action_Hero.jpg
- File:Mario_Milita_2011.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Clearly unsubstantiated claim of CC 4.0 "Own Work" – these images are screenshots from films and TV shows.--Muzilon (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nominator. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 01:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 19:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 朱律安
[edit]- File:Stoner M63.jpg
- File:QBZ-03 556.jpg
- File:QBZ97A.jpg
- File:H&K XM29 OICW.jpg
- File:Steyr AUG.jpg
- File:T75 light machine gun.jpg
- File:TRW Low Maintenance Rifle.jpg
- File:KAC LMG.jpg
- File:SR-88A.jpg
- File:SAR-87.jpg
- File:SAR 80.jpg
- File:L85A1.jpg
- File:RPS-001.jpg
- File:Robarm XCR.jpg
- File:Robinson M96.jpg
- File:KH2002 Khaybar.jpg
- File:Kel-Tec RDB.jpg
- File:Kel-Tec SU-16.jpg
- File:Kel-Tec PLR-1.jpg
- File:Remington ACR.jpg
- File:Remington 7615P.jpg
- File:Oa-93.jpg
- File:MSBS GROT.jpg
- File:Magpul PDR.jpg
- File:M249Para.jpg
- File:LAPA FA 03.jpg
- File:Tavor-X95.jpg
- File:ACE 21N.jpg
- File:Tavor.jpg
- File:Negev-NG5.jpg
- File:IMBEL IA2.jpg
- File:Imbel MD 97.jpg
- File:ImbelMD3.jpg
- File:HowaType89.jpg
- File:HowaType20.jpg
- File:HK433.jpg
- File:Heckler & Koch G41.jpg
- File:G36K STANAG.jpg
- File:HK23E.jpg
- File:FN SCAR L.jpg
- File:F2000.jpg
- File:FN Minimi.jpg
- File:Fort-221.jpg
- File:FN FNC.jpg
- File:Famas g2.jpg
- File:EMER-K1.jpg
- File:Ultimax 100.jpg
- File:SAR 21.jpg
- File:SC-2005.jpg
- File:Micro Dynamic Rifle.jpg
- File:Daewoo K11.jpg
- File:Daewoo K3.jpg
- File:Daewoo-K2.jpg
- File:Daewoo K1.jpg
- File:DAR-21.jpg
- File:CZ 805 BREN.jpg
- File:Beretta Rx4 Storm.jpg
- File:Beretta ARX-160.jpg
- File:Beretta AS7090.jpg
- File:AR7090.jpg
- File:APC556.jpg
- File:Ak 5.jpg
- File:LR-300.jpg
- File:Tara TM4.jpg
- File:T91.jpg
- File:T86.jpg
- File:T65K2.jpg
- File:M&P15.jpg
- File:SR-556.jpg
- File:Mk 12.jpg
- File:SIG SG 556.jpg
- File:SIG SG 516.jpg
- File:SIG MCX.jpg
- File:SOAR.jpg
- File:PDX.jpg
- File:LWRC M6.jpg
- File:MARS-L.png
- File:M16K.jpg
- File:HK M27.jpg
- File:HK416C.jpg
- File:HK416 14.5.jpg
- File:MK 556.png
- File:Gilboa Snake.jpg
- File:G5 carbine.jpg
- File:M4 carbine.jpg
- File:Colt Canada C8 Carbine.jpg
- File:Diemaco C7.jpg
- File:Mk18.jpg
- File:CSLM8.jpg
- File:CSLM11.jpg
- File:Norinco CQ.jpg
- File:Colt CM901.jpg
- File:Bushmaster M4.jpg.webp
- File:M231FPW.jpg
- File:CAR 816 black.jpg
- File:CAR 816black-side.jpg
- File:CAR-15.jpg
- File:M16S1.jpg
- File:Ares Shrike 5.56-MCR.jpg
- File:Honey BadgerSD.jpg
- File:ARAK-21 XRS.jpg
- File:AR-15w30RdMag.jpg
- File:Ares Shrike 5.56.jpg
No indication that any of the sites have images under a CC 4.0 license. Loafiewa (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Not freely licensed, source states "Copyright MPM2008 - 2009 Licensed to www.imfdb.org" Loafiewa (talk) 03:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Please delete the redirect as they are not duplicates Chidgk1 (talk) 09:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Undeleted: Caused by accidental upload of a wrong version on File:Sera gazlar Türkiye emisyon emme.svg. --Achim55 (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
This file does not belong to the uploader and is from the images available on the Internet CaesarIran (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:PRaymondJr
[edit]
No reason to believe the state of New Hampshire has licensed these logos as CC-BY-SA. More likely a copyright violation and the user just picked the default choice. -Apocheir (talk) 23:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Advertising CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photograph of a commercially sold bottle CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 01:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 01:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
creators request Afakii (talk) 11:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Hoax/Unsourced flags
- File:Shanghai flag.png
- File:Jiangsu flag.png
- File:Flag of Barawe.svg
- File:Flag of Shantou.svg
- File:Flag of Dhusamareb.svg
- File:Flag of Foshan.svg
- File:Flag of Baidoa.svg
- File:Flag of Dusmareb.svg
- File:Flag of Maoming.svg
- File:Flag of Beledweyne.svg
- File:Flag of Shaoguan.svg
- File:Flag of Jowhar.svg
- File:Flag of Meizhou.svg
- File:Flag of Heyuan.svg
- File:Flag of Bu'ale.svg
- File:Flag of Qingyuan.svg
- File:Flag of Jieyang.svg
- File:Flag of Kismayo.svg
- File:Flag of Jiangmen.svg
- File:Flag of Dongguan.svg
- File:Flag of Las Anod.svg
- File:Flag of Buuhoodle.svg
- File:Flag of Huizhou.svg
- File:Flag of Garoowe.svg
- File:Flag of Mogadishu (1998-2022).svg
- File:Flag of Bosaso.svg
- File:Flag of Mogadishu (2022).svg
- File:Flag of Southern Region, Malawi.svg
- File:Flag of Lilongwe (since 2021).svg
- File:Flag of Northern Region, Malawi.svg
- File:Flag of Central Region, Malawi.svg
- File:Flag of Isfara.svg
- File:Flag of Alichur.svg
- File:Flag of Bokhtar.svg
- File:Flag of Yibin.svg
- File:Flag of Yichang.svg
- File:Flag of Nanchong.svg
- File:Flag of Dazhou.svg
- File:Flag of Marigot.svg
- File:Beijing flag.png
- File:Xinjiang flag.png
- File:Qinghai flag.png
- File:Flag of Zhanjiang.svg
- File:Flag of Shanwei.svg
- File:Flag of Yangjiang.svg
- File:Jilin flag.png
- File:Liaoning flag.png
- File:Chongqing flag.png
- File:Hainan flag.png
- File:Flag of Zhongshan.svg
- File:Flag of Chaozhou.svg
- File:Shanxi flag.png
- File:Tianjin flag.png
- File:Gansu flag.png
- File:Flag of Beijing.svg
- File:Flag of Tibet Autonomous Region.svg
- File:Flag of Xinjiang.svg
- File:Flag of Mamoudzou.svg
- File:Flag of Ngerulmud.svg
- File:Heilongjiang flag.png
- File:Flag of Djibouti City (1997-2019).svg
- File:Flag of Nouakchott (2019).svg
- File:Flag of The Valley, Anguilla (2021).svg
- File:Flag of Willemstad (1986-2020).svg
- File:Flag of Zhenlai County.svg
- File:Flag of Pu'er.svg
- File:Flag of Lincang.svg
- File:Flag of Zhaoqing.svg
- File:Flag of Yunfu.svg
- File:Flag of Nokhur.svg
- File:Flag of Mary, Turkmenistan.svg
- File:Flag of Gypjak.svg
- File:Flag of Erbent.svg
- File:Flag of Daşoguz.svg
- File:Flag of Çäçe.svg
- File:Flag of Anau, Turkmenistan.svg
- File:Flag of Arkadag.svg
- File:Flag of Balkanabat.svg
- File:Flag of Qujing.svg
- File:Flag of Lijiang.svg
- File:Flag of Temburong District.svg
- File:Flag of Tutong District.svg
- File:Flag of Brunei-Muara District.svg
- File:Flag of Alofi.svg
- File:Flag of Belait District.svg
- File:Flag of Avarua.svg
- File:Flag of Tutong (town).svg
- File:Flag of Bandar Seri Begawan.svg
- File:Flag of Kuala Belait.svg
- File:Flag of Pago Pago (1995-2003).svg
- File:Flag of Willemstad.svg
- File:Flag of Inner Mongolia.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alexphangia Talk 12:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It's kinda ridiculous he's *still* doing this even with a deletion request open.
- NorthTension (talk) 17:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced/fictional/hoax flags.
- File:Flag of Toledo District.svg
- File:Flag of Corozal District.svg
- File:Flag of Stann Creek District.svg
- File:Flag of Orange Walk District.svg
- File:Flag of Belize District.svg
- File:Flag of Cayo District.svg
- File:Flag of Savanes Region, Togo.svg
- File:Flag of Plateaux Region, Togo.svg
- File:Flag of Maritime (Togolese region).svg
- File:Flag of Kara Region.svg
- File:Flag of Centrale Region, Togo.svg
- File:Flag of Maputo Province.svg
- File:Flag of Zambezia Province.svg
- File:Flag of Tete Province.svg
- File:Flag of Sofala Province.svg
- File:Flag of Niassa Province.svg
- File:Flag of Nampula Province.svg
- File:Flag of Manica Province.svg
- File:Flag of Gaza Province.svg
- File:Flag of Inhambane Province.svg
- File:Flag of Cabo Delgado Province.svg
- File:Flag of Nzérékoré Region.svg
- File:Flag of Mamou Region.svg
- File:Flag of Labé Region.svg
- File:Flag of Kindia Region.svg
- File:Flag of Boké Region.svg
- File:Flag of Kankan Region.svg
- File:Flag of Faranah Region.svg
- File:Flag of Sughd Region.svg
- File:Flag of Districts of Republican Subordination.svg
- File:Flag of Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region.svg
- File:Flag of Khatlon Region.svg
- File:Flag of West Coast Division (The Gambia).svg
- File:Flag of Upper River Division.svg
- File:Flag of Lower River Division.svg
- File:Flag of North Bank Division.svg
- File:Flag of Central River Division.svg
- File:Flag of Dakhla-Oued Ed-Dahab.svg
- File:Flag of Yunnan.svg
- File:Flag of Yaren.svg
- File:Flag of Horufadhi.svg
- File:Flag of Huai'an.svg
- File:Flag of Lower Juba.svg
- File:Flag of Middle Juba.svg
- File:Flag of Nugal, Somalia.svg
- File:Flag of Middle Shabelle.svg
- File:Flag of Bay, Somalia.svg
- File:Flag of Mudug.svg
- File:Flag of Galguduud.svg
- File:Flag of Lower Shabelle.svg
- File:Flag of Bari, Somalia.svg
- File:Flag of Bakool.svg
- File:Flag of Togdheer.svg
- File:Flag of Sahil, Somaliland.svg
- File:Flag of Awdal.svg
- File:Flag of Sool.svg
- File:Flag of Panjin.svg
- File:Flag of Xuzhou.svg
- File:Flag of Huludao.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Tulsi 24x7 15:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Federal Information Processing Standards Publication- programming language COBOL (IA federalinformati211nati).pdf
[edit]ANSI standards are not works of US government ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete 1974 copyright notice on page 2. - Jmabel ! talk 18:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
ANSI Standards are not works of US government
- File:Federal Information Processing Standards Publication- programming language COBOL (IA federalinformati211nati).pdf
- File:Federal Information Processing Standards Publication- programming language COBOL (IA federalinformati212nati).pdf
- File:Federal Information Processing Standards Publication- programming language - intrinsic function module for COBOL (IA federalinformati213nati).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete All of these are copyrighted documents. Respectively, 1974 copyright notice on page 2, 1985 copyright notice on page 4, 1990 copyright notice on page 4. - Jmabel ! talk 18:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Federal Information Processing Standards Publication- for information sytems - programming language - correction amendment for COBOL (IA federalinformati214nati 0).pdf
[edit]ANSI standards are not works of US gov ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete 1992 copyright by ANSI on page 2. - Jmabel ! talk 18:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Federal Information Processing Standards Publication- programming language FORTRAN (IA federalinformati691nati).pdf
[edit]ANSI standards are not works of US gov ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete 1978 copyright by ANSI on page 4. - Jmabel ! talk 18:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
ANSI standards are not PD, and this artwork would necessarily derive from the standard. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep ANSI Z535-compliant symbols are not derivative works of the ANSI Z535, for the same reason that browsers aren't derivative works of RFC 1945, and child car seats aren't derivative works of ISO 13216. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - A sign design that follows the guidance of the standard is not a copyright violation. See above argument made better by Snowmanonahoe.--The Navigators (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
ANSI standards are not PD, and this artwork necessarily derives from the standard. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - A sign design that follows the guidance of the standard is not a copyright violation.--The Navigators (talk) 00:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:ANSI Z535 style symbol
[edit]ANSI standards are not PD.
- File:ANSI Z535 - Arc Welding Googles Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Arc Welding Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Electric Shock - Hand Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Flammable Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Flying Debris Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Googles Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Hard Hat Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Hearing Protection Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Overhead Hazard Symbol.svg
- File:ANSI Z535 - Safety Glasses Symbol.svg
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep ANSI Z535-compliant symbols are not derivative works of the ANSI Z535, for the same reason that browsers aren't derivative works of RFC 1945, and child car seats aren't derivative works of ISO 13216. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - ANSI Z535.3 doesn't actually provide a prescribed list of symbols with a specific designs like ISO 7010 does. ANSI Z535.3 is just general guidance on how to create symbols and some base concepts.--The Navigators (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Seems, this nomination was made in over abundance of caution that wasn't justified. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Federal Information Processing Standards Publication- American National Standard PASCAL computer programming language (IA federalinformati109nati).pdf
[edit]ANSI standards are not PD or works of US government. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
& page 6 has copyright notices. Delete. - Jmabel ! talk 15:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
All rights reserved. F1 191.126.167.171 16:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Nudity photo Michel Bakni (talk) 23:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Com:Penis — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.193.211 (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It has a weird yellowish hue. 20 upper 15:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, poor quality photo of very common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 23:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Quite so. Delete. 181.43.193.211 16:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Some kid goofing off, out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Farting? Delete. 181.43.193.211 16:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reza arzhang69 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User appears to be a fawiki contributor, so not G10-eligible, but still unused personal files out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:نویسنده رمان لکه های ته فنجان قهوه.jpg
- File:Polish ۲۰۲۰۰۹۱۵ ۱۱۱۰۵۱۱۷۴.jpg
- File:رضاارژنگ نویسنده کامیابی های یک کرگدن کارگردان-1.jpg
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Project scope. Low quality schoolmate photos.
- File:杜仲展.jpg
- File:史上琳.jpg
- File:孫梓宸.jpg
- File:莊濬凱.jpg
- File:郭欣妤.jpg
- File:李約跑.jpg
- File:許冠惟.jpg
- File:高儀宸.jpg
- File:陳佳萱.jpg
- File:陳楷翔.jpg
- File:葉子睿.jpg
- File:古閎元.jpg
- File:718mcjh.jpg
Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 04:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all. Private image collections. --魔琴 (talk) 03:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- But the last one (File:718mcjh.jpg) can be used to introduce the school. --魔琴 (talk) 03:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be copied from Facebook Another Believer (talk) 06:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope / spam Johannnes89 (talk) 07:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope / spam Johannnes89 (talk) 07:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused, watermark’s name isn’t uploader’s name Goji1895 (talk) 08:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Flickrwashed movie poster, the Flickr user has five uploads and is not claiming to be involved with the film. Belbury (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Centoe Group
[edit]Out of project scope: unused logos, promotional.
- File:Centoe Culture.png
- File:CENTOE EXPERIENCE.png
- File:CENTOE FARM.png
- File:Centoe Group.png
- File:CENTOE HOUSE.png
- File:Centoe Ranch.png
- File:Centoe Technologies.png
Lymantria (talk) 11:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
duplikát Miri.dv272 (talk) 11:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
https://z-p42.www.instagram.com/divya_sandhu__/?hl=fr-ca Cjp24 (talk) 15:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
"droits reservés", see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation? see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
https://z-p42.www.instagram.com/divya_sandhu__/?hl=sv Cjp24 (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
"droits réservés", see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
droits réservés, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
droits réservés, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Germany (1935–1945).svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
wrong author, droits réservés - see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Zeng Liansong's proposal for the PRC flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
out of project scope - used in cyberbullying article on nl-wiki no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Self portrait XRay 💬 18:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Outside scope. Advertissement Wouter (talk) 18:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Falcaojpfsf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Series os files of politicians that can be easily found on internet. See also edits by User:Pedfalseferjos. Uploaded as own work, but are copyrighted.
- File:Luismontenegropm2026.png
- File:LM vs. PNS.png
- File:Luis montenegro ppdpsd.png
- File:Rui-rio-psd 00.jpg
- File:Luis montenegro.png
- File:Emidiopsd.png
- File:Luis-montenegro-psd.png
- File:Governo-de-portugal-cor2.png
- File:Santana-lopes-psd.jpg
- File:Hugosoares.png
- File:JFFerreira.png
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Falcaojpfsf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Again, uploading unfree files that can be easily found on internet and claiming ownership.
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Nondescript photo of common subject not in use Dronebogus (talk) 23:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Created as an advertisement... --Karim talk to me :)..! 23:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Source (https://www.financ-immo.com/agence-angers.html) does not indicate a free license. Lymantria (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused loo, source not available, promotional like Lymantria (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo. Lymantria (talk) 13:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo Lymantria (talk) 14:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: copyrighted architecture. TadejM (t/p) 15:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Not CC-BY-SA, but may be {{PD-textlogo}}/below COM:TOO, cf. Car Credit City example. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
1947 film poster. I am not having much luck trying to figure out who "M. Frias" was, but this poster would have been restored by URAA regardless. Abzeronow (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Coat of arms of a club that was established in 1963 (was dissolved in 2022) http://www.leedsengine.info/leeds/ildtec.asp I doubt the uploader is the creator of the coat of arms. Abzeronow (talk) 18:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
1954 French document. Relates to L'association Votre École Chez Vous (VECV) which was founded in 1954. Uploader is definitely not the author of the document. Text might be over the ToO in France. Abzeronow (talk) 18:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
.RAMONA_VINSON.CHARCOAL_ON_PAPER.ca.1920%27s.8.75%22x12.5%22.FRONT.jpg){kind=link}
.RAMONA_VINSON.CHARCOAL_ON_PAPER.ca.1920%27s.8.75%22x12.5%22.FRONT.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
1920s art work. Not own work of the uploader, but by an American artist. If it was made available to the public before 1928, it would be public domain. We'd need more information to determine copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.RAMONA_VINSON.CHARCOAL_ON_PAPER.ca.1920's.8.75"x12.5".FRONT.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
.RAMONA_VINSON.CHARCOAL_ON_PAPER.ca.1920's.8.75"x12.5".FRONT.jpg){kind=link}
-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2018 French document. Unused, unclear if it meets Commons scope. Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
-1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
-1.jpg){kind=link}
not a selfie Ankry (talk) 19:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:La Gran Prensa
[edit]Out of project scope: unused logos of unknown "news paper".
Lymantria (talk) 11:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a low-grade screenshot from a German TV show, claimed license of CC 3.0 is doubtful. Muzilon (talk) 02:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 15:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Crop of the first photo of the linked news article which is likely the source of this version instead of "Jordi Amat Twitter". Iggy the Swan (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, agree with you pal Malcom the Malamute (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 15:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Taken directly from the website mentioned in the source and that website is copyrighted. Mondo (talk) 16:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 15:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
The source is © 191.126.167.171 16:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 15:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Game screenshot Alexphangia Talk 12:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo of not an active contributor, out of project scope Ignatus (talk) 12:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 08:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Repost. Still out of project scope. Ignatus (talk) 16:52, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
no source no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 06:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 05:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation : Hocus Pocus, movie of Walt Disney Company Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation : Hocus Pocus, movie of Walt Disney Company Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Twitter, permitted? 191.126.167.171 16:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
This is a copyright violation from: https://www.easterneye.biz/indias-19-year-old-atharva-ankolekar-is-a-born-fighter/ AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 02:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleting, © 191.126.167.171 15:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted album cover without evidence of a valid free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleting, robo 191.126.167.171 15:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Speedyable: No license since February. --Achim55 (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No license since February for this copyrighted cover art. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Tapa de libro, F1? 191.126.167.171 16:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Photograph of a copyrighted book cover without evidence of a free license; see COM:F3. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted book cover A1Cafel (talk) 01:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Free image? 191.126.167.171 16:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Image from the internet without evidence of a free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:32, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Instagram, Facebook, F1 191.126.167.171 16:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Facebook. Attack. SPEED! 191.126.167.171 16:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination; photo from facebook without evidence of a suitable free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Intothebonchet
[edit]
Photos are found on their Instagram pages - the Forestieri one is more easier to be found than the other two. --Iggy the Swan (talk) 09:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Terrible quality, and a possible copyright violation. A.Savin 00:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment Uploaded in 2004 and stated to be from before 2002, so what makes it suspect in terms of copyright? Otherwise, is it of any historical interest? I would call it very small but marginally usable and wouldn't fight for it to be kept, but I'm also not sure it needs to be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Neutral COM:INUSE on dewiki, and uploaded in 2004 so it might explain why the low-quality image is like that. But the uploader, Vkem, does have a short history of copyvios on another WMF project.
Kept: Early days of project we did not have thumbnails hence early small photos. In use. (If there is any actual evidence of copyright violation, present it in new nomination.).). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose De Minimis. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I'm sorry to disagree, but the toy occupies too much of the picture frame to be de minimis, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; modern copyrightable face design of doll is key part of photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 01:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- I thought it was possible to post this image because it was a parody and the political aspect was the main subject. Rémi sim (talk) 21:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment That would be a basis for COM:Fair use, which does not exist on Commons but does exist on some Wikipedias and so forth. You might investigate the policies of some Wikipedias in regard to this kind of image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Юрий Д.К. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From Facebook. Author claims own work in description and source field. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: FB metadata. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Yes, It's mine, from my own profile, my own camera — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oyd11 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ESA images are not PD by default. The image appears to have been first published here (where it is credited to the ESA), which pre-dates the NASA photo. Likely non-free. FASTILY 02:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete (as uploader). New data requires image be deleted. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: See also the discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/04#Can we trust images from NASA's Spacecraft Icons page? Ixfd64 (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Potentially ESA granted permission, but there's no evidence of that. Existence of non-NASA assets on the NASA website does not imply lack of copyright unless explicitly stated for that asset. — Huntster (t @ c) 07:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, license uncertain. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
according to new data (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Europe) this derivate i made is not (and never was) accurate, and is therefore useless and erroneus Archiwald (talk) 05:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copyright violation, see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Netherlands#Stamps. Copyright on stamps of the Netherlands expires only 70 years after publication (on January 1st of the next year). This stamp was issued in 1975, so more than 22 years to go. JopkeB (talk) 08:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Also affected:
- File:'Gebruiksvoorwerp-postzegels-stamps-01.jpg - most recent was issued in 1997
- Keep - college of countless red post stamps. There is copyright protection on any individual stamp only. There is also some kind of protection of the work of an artist in the Netherlands, that you may not take to many works into one collage. But this is not the case here. With this collage the graphic artist created a new work of art, which see may release as she pleaces. -- Mdd (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- File:Kilowaar.png - idem probably ±1999 (before the general introduction of the euro in 2002)
- Keep - college of countless red post stamps. There is copyright protection on any individual stamp only, which seem to be de-minimis here in such a set. -- Mdd (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- File:Aankomst van dr Drees en echtgenote in Israel, zomerzegels 1960, Bestanddeelnr 911-1142.jpg - 1960
- File:Anti-Natopostzegel van PSP in Nieuwspoort gepresenteerd anti-Natopostzegels, Bestanddeelnr 927-1924.jpg - 1974 (perhaps not issued by PTT, but still copyrighted at least 70 years)
- Keep Given the presents of the accompanying press release image, I believe a for of implied licensing may be asssumed here. -- Mdd (talk) 22:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- File:Anti-Natopostzegel van PSP in Nieuwspoort gepresenteerd Bram van de Lek met ant, Bestanddeelnr 927-1925.jpg - idem
- Keep - Picture of press release of with assumably the initiator/maker and his work. I believe only the individual poststamp is copyrighted and this is de-minimis in this particular picture. -- Mdd (talk) 22:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- File:Jubilea postzegels van PTT 25 cent Het Nederlands Rundvee Stamboek, 25 cent 2, Bestanddeelnr 927-3455.jpg - 1974
- File:Jubilea postzegels van PTT jubileumzegel tgv Het Nederlandse Rundvee Stambo, Bestanddeelnr 927-3456.jpg - 1974
- File:Minister Smit Kroes biedt op Paleis Soestdijk Prinses Juliana en Prins Bernhard , Bestanddeelnr 933-8539.jpg - 1987
- File:Nederlandse Beneluxzegel t.g.v. 20-jarig bestaan, Bestanddeelnr 916-9351.jpg - 1964
- File:Nederlandse Zomerzegels 1968, Bestanddeelnr 921-1079.jpg - 1968
- File:Nieuwe postzegels van 30ct, Bestanddeelnr 913-2633.jpg - 1962
- File:Nieuwe serie zomerzegels met toeslag bedreigde diersoort onderwijsmjubilea en s, Bestanddeelnr 928-4550.jpg - 1976
- File:Postzegel i.v.m. volkstelling 1971, Bestanddeelnr 924-2092.jpg - 1971
- File:Postzegel NL NERIS JULIAO.jpg - unknown issue date (Neris Juliao was born in 1951 and on the stamp she looks at least 40 years old, so many years to go before the copyright expires)
- File:Postzegel van professor mr. E. M. Meyers, Bestanddeelnr 923-2042.jpg - 1970
- File:Postzegelherdenking 500-jarig Staten Generaal, Bestanddeelnr 915-8370.jpg - 1963
- File:Staatssecretaris Scherpenhuizen en burgemeester van Thijn (rechts) tijdens de pr, Bestanddeelnr 933-5445.jpg - 1986
- Keep Photo of press release of a politican and mayor around a new design with the design partly only presented. There is long tradition where artists and designers are aware of these releases and implied license might be assumed here. -- Mdd (talk) 22:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
_tijdens_de_pr,_Bestanddeelnr_933-5445.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Statuutzegel Nederlandse Antillen 1964, Bestanddeelnr 917-1879.jpg - 1964
- File:Zegels gewijd aan het verzet, de 7, 15 en 40 cent, Bestanddeelnr 917-4774.jpg - 1965
- File:Zomerzegels 1962 (fotos C. van Week ), Bestanddeelnr 913-6628.jpg - 1962
,_Bestanddeelnr_913-6628.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note: It does not mean a bit that the Nationaal Archief published these photos with a valid licence. That licence is only for the photograph/photographer, not for the design of the stamps. --JopkeB (talk) 09:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Even for works in a collage it is necessary to have permission from the copyright owner, see for instance https://www.bno.nl/blog/faq-22/mag-ik-zomaar-andermans-werk-gebruiken-voor-mijn-collage-896 (BNO is a professional organization -beroepsorganisatie- of designers in the Netherlands). The collage itself may be copyrighted by the maker, but even then it is possible to violate the copyrights of the maker of -in this case- stamps.
- If one stamp is copyrighted, a whole sheet of stamps will be copyrighted too. Moreover: Commons requires a licence that gives permission to (among others) make cropped versions, cutouts. Someone can make a cropped version with only one stamp and then there will be copyright violation for sure.
- I left out here photos with de-minimis stamps. So I consider all images of stamps mentioned here not as de-minimis.
- The press has more rights than Commons, see Auteurswet art. 15.1, so a press release does NOT imply licensing may be asssumed here.
--JopkeB (talk) 06:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept some Deleted others per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Added note: Per feedback on my talk page, I have no objection to relisting of files I kept. I thought the DM content was de minimis, but others more familiar with Netherlands/EU copyright may have other views. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake 二フタ6000 (talk) 02:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: unfortunately too late for courtesy deletion. Seems in scope. --Yasu (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bonitopedro (talk · contribs)
[edit]PNG-format images. I suspect these are not self-photographed images of the uploader.
- File:Marilaque Highway Street Sign.png
- File:TFDP, FLAG, ABC, and KAAKBAY.png – author field claims "Danilo Gallerdo", which is linked to Bonitopedro's user page.
- File:Gen. Manuel T. Yan.png – author field claims "Pedro Raymundo", which is linked to Bonitopedro's user page. Does Bonitopedro have two real-life names? Doubtful identity, only scammers do this (having two personal names with no valid reasons), COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle rolls in. Plus there is a background image of a scenery that makes it a COM:Derivative work.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File:TFDP, FLAG, ABC, and KAAKBAY.png had its souce and author changed, but I could not find it on the stated source website - fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bonitopedro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Blurry png images. I suspect these are not self-photographed images of the uploader unless he uploads original versions/resolutions of images with complete Exif metadata for verification purposes.
- File:Eulogio Rodriguez's Tomb (Puntod ni Sen. Amang Rodriguez at and Kanyang Asawang si Doña Juana Rodriguez).png
- File:Amang's childhood portrait.png
- File:Amang Rodriguez's First Floor.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:47, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
the correct "planche 3" is the actual File:Benjamin Roubaud - Grand chemin de la postérité - planche 6.jpg. This one has to be deleted in order for the other one to be renamed properly Skimel (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 01:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission from the copyright holder for derivative works to be created, and no FoP for artistic works in Denmark. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Not taken by an U.S. employee; photo was taken three years before she was elected by Leroy Hamilton, an independent photographer, so PD-USGov-Congress does not apply. PD-CAGov can't apply either since he didn't work under the California government. reppoptalk 03:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:ANSI intitle:/pdf/
[edit]ANSI standards are not PD or works of US gov.
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete ANSI's 1981 copyright is on page 4. - Jmabel ! talk 18:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: published with notice in the United States in 1981. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
No COM:FOP US for 2D artworks and sculptures. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Being uploaded by a user listed as blocked on enwiki for purest vandalism in 2021, I'd highly suspect this has been uploaded without Joe Hank's (the original Flickr uploader) permission and falsely claimed as own work: see corresponding Flickr post. Hullian111 (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
https://www.instagram.com/divya_sandhu__/related_profiles/ Cjp24 (talk) 15:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission from the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Yakshitha (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: DR was filed one day after the photo was uploaded, so this appears to be a case of COM:G7. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleting 191.126.167.171 15:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted cover art from 2003; no evidence of a valid free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted cover art from 2003; no evidence of a valid free license. --Geni (talk) 04:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Facebook F1 191.126.167.171 15:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The source indicates that this is a screenshot from this YouTube video, but that video does not have a free license. As such, this should be deleted per COM:F3 as a screenshot of a non-free work. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- I know the photographer of this picture personally and he gave me the pictures. CHUniZH (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- In this case, as I cannot check this information, could you please get in contact with the Volunteer Response Team to sort the situation out as explained at this address?: [1] CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: "I know the photographer of this picture personally and he gave me the pictures" is not sufficient proof of a free license as required by Commons, the photographer must explicitly agree to release the pictures under a free license; also, as it's an interior view of a modern work of architecture and freedom of panorama does not apply to interior spaces in Switzerland, the architect or rights owner must also agree, and this must be documented via the Volunteer Response Team, see the link by CoffeeEngineer. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
It's just a head. A restoration requires the wole animal. ÎnghețarePulă (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC) The discution terminate 5 june 2023.
- No valid reason. In use. --Achim55 (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. Not the most detailed restoration, but a usable one nonetheless. Not a reasonable reason to delete. SlvrHwk (talk) 03:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
not public domain SecretName101 (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
not simple geometric work. A photograph SecretName101 (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The simple text "Caution shattered glass" as well as the photograph are ineligible for copyright; the photograph because it's only a reproduction of the 2D public domain text and not an original, copyrighted work. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
From a book. What do you do in these cases? 191.126.167.171 16:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Krd. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
From a copyrighted video game (Garten of BanBan). 2601:40:C000:9710:392E:20C7:8672:54B9 17:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:43, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
A clear derivative of this 1932 photograph, making it too new for the licensing tag claimed. As additional proof the date of 1890 is incorrect, the bridge in the background is the George Washington Bridge, which was built in the period between 1927 and 1931. I cannot find enough information about prior publication or the author's date of death to indicate that this could potentially fall into the public domain, so this would seem to fall under COM:PCP (FWIW, the place holding the scan where this image apparently originated from is selling the rights to the image, so yes, there is potential harm from us having this possibly non-free image up). This could be undeleted in 2028. Hog Farm (talk) 19:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2028 (and correct file name and description then, as it's not an 1890 photo). --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Besseres Foto vorhanden! Der Barbar (talk) 18:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Jospedfalseqfer (talk · contribs)
[edit]This looks like to be a revival of Pedfalseferjos that had their uploads deleted a while ago. For the same reason, those should be deleted as they can be easily found on internet with unfree license. As I noted here, there may have other accounts from same person with same behavior.
- File:Passos Coelho em 2023.png
- File:Luís Montenegro retrato em 2023.png
- File:Luis Montenegro em março de 2023.jpg
- File:LMontenegro 2022.png
- File:Passos Coelho2011.png
- File:LMontenegroppdpsd.png
- File:Luis Montenegro jul22.png
- File:Lmontenegropsd.png
- File:Lmontenegroppdpsd.png
- File:Passos Coelho PM2011.png
- File:LuismontenegroPPDPSD.png
- File:Luís Montenegro PPD PSD.png
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 18:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Falcaojpfsf. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 18:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Adding File:Luis montenegro Psd.png.
Same reason, easily found on internet. Similar username.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 02:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Adding File:Luis montenegro Psd.png.
Delete In my opinion, the images should be removed by quick delete, as Pedfalseferjos is clearly not the copyright holder, and he is a repeat infringer. Ser.Silv. (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Comic Con Germany 2018
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 095.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 105.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 412.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 413.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 414.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Comic Con Germany 2018
[edit]I am afraid but we will have to delete these photos showing copyrighted works of art and we do not have the necessary permission from the authors.
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 060.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 072.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 077.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 078.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 079.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 438.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 439.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 440.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 441.jpg
- File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 442.jpg
- File:Mark-Benecke-by-Steff-Murschetz-Poster-U-Comix-50-jahre-WEB-comic-salon-muenchen.jpg
Gnom (talk) 08:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Also this:
--Gnom (talk) 08:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Image 78 and 79 clearly show a person who is clearly agreeing to the picture. There are millions of pictures with circumstantial Beiwerk in the background on Commons, if we delete all of them, there is nothing left. This would require a much larger scale decision. --Ailura (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- And Mark Benecke does not belong in this group request. The uploader claims that the image was given away "for free", this may be verified, but it's a different case. --Ailura (talk) 09:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but Ines Korth (the author depicted in images 078 and 079) does not hold the rights to the images visible in the background – they are held by the respective publishing houses (Carlsen and Schwarzer Turm). Also, under German copyright law, these images do not pass the threshold for Beiwerk (de minimis).
- For the Mark Benecke image, we have no reason to believe that the author (Steff Murschetz) released his work under a Creative Commons license. Gnom (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Das Urheberrecht ist nicht übertragbar. Auch wenn Carlsen hier umfassende Nutzungsrechte hat, bleibt Frau Korth weiterhin die Urheberin (das hilft uns nur nicht). Aber ernsthaft: Carlsen wird nicht uns oder den Fotografen verklagen, wenn er auf einem offiziellen Fototermin mit Einverständnis der Autorin und vermutlich auch unter den Augen von anderem Personal ein Bild macht und dann eben auch veröffentlicht. Oder glaubst Du, die Autorin hat hier ohne das Wissen des Verlages heimlich Poster aufgehängt?
- Mark Benecke hat mit dieser Angelegenheit und auch mit dieser Veranstaltung null komma nichts zu tun und verdient einen eigenen Löschantrag (oder eine Chance, eine Freigabe vorzulegen).
- --Ailura (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ailura: Danke für den Hinweis, dass das Urheberrecht, anders als das angelsächsische Copyright, nicht übertragbar ist und dass man genauer von "die urheberrechtlichen Nutzungsrechte" sprechen muss. Für die hiesige Diskussion ist diese sprachliche Vereinfachung, die ich mir erlaubt habe, wohl unerheblich und ich denke, dass wir uns ohnehin verstehen.
- Ob uns Carlsen verklagen wird oder nicht, ist unerheblich. Wir wollen hier auf Commons nur Inhalte hosten, die ohne urheberrechtliche Probleme weitergenutzt werden können. Alle Dateien, die diesen Ansprüchen nicht genügen, sind zu löschen. Und, wie schon anderswo angemerkt: Urheberin des linken Covers ist nicht Ines Korth, sondern Sabrina Schmatz.
- Mark Beneckes Bild können wir hier gern abspalten, wenn du möchtest. Auf seiner Disk habe ich dazu schon einen Thread angefangen. Gnom (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- --Ailura (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We don't delete because of a copyrighted image in the background, we just blur the offending part.--RAN (talk) 01:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Moin zusammen,ist es so besser und ich hatte eine akkritierung und habe sie auch gefragt. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 15:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Raboe001: Die Akkreditierung und die Frage bei der abgebildeten Person lösen die urheberrechtliche Problematik bezüglich der im Hintergrund klar erkennbaren Werke leider nicht. Einzig eine Verpixelung (oder eben eine Freigabe der beiden Verlage) würde das Bild für uns "retten". --Gnom (talk) 08:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Es kann nicht sein, dass ein Veranstalter Fotografen akkreditiert, damit die genau solche Fotos machen und der Verlag dort einen Stand aufbaut, damit genau solche Fotos gemacht werden und die Veröffentlichung ist dann illegal. Wie soll man so arbeiten? --Ailura (talk) 17:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Frag ich mich auch die ganze Zeit, ich hab das Bild abgeschnitten, so das die Bilder im Hintergrund nicht mehr zu gebrauchen sind und somit in meinen Augen wirklich nur Beiwerk sind. Aber egal, die Autoren sitzen immer vor ihren Bildern oder ihren Büchern. Ich bin deshalb auch letztes Wochenende nicht zur Messe gegangen, sollte die Firmen doch Fotos machen und selber hochladen. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 18:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ich halte es eher für problematisch, die Werbung im Hintergrund zu manipulieren, wenn man akkreditiert wird, um genau die zu verbreiten. --Ailura (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ich hab mir mal viele Messefotos angesehen, also das wir ja genug Jäger haben, werden sie alle Bilder finden, wo Werbung im Hintergrund ist. Ich denke ich mache es so, ich lade einfach nach einer Messe Bilder hoch und die Jäger löschen sie wieder. Was hab ich davon, ich bin sicher, das wird meine Motivation steigern :) Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 19:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Eine Akkreditierung ist keine bedingungslose Freikarte. Ich muss mich als Fotograf darauf verlassen können, dass ich das, war mir der Veranstalter hier zubilligt, unter Normalbedingungen auch legal tun kann. --Ailura (talk) 19:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Die Akkreditierung erteilt der Veranstalter, nicht die Verlage. Unter "Normalbedingungen" wird die Akkreditierung für Pressefotografen erteilt, die die Fotos dann in der Presse verwenden, für die andere Regeln gelten als für Fotos auf Commons. Ich finde es ehrlich gesagt uncool, wie ich hier als Buhmann dargestellt werde. Es ist doch ein Commons-Grundprinzip, dass wir hier nur Material erlauben, das unter den angegebenen Lizenzen weitergenutzt werden kann, ohne dass ein Nachnutzer sich vor einer Abmahnung durch einen Rechteinhaber fürchten muss. Gnom (talk) 07:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Dann erkläre mir bitte endlich mal schlüssig diese anderen Regeln. Die Verlage stellen auf solchen Messen aus, damit das gezeigte veröffentlicht wird. Die werden nicht vom Veranstalter hinters Licht geführt, der dann böswillig Fotografen reinlässt. --Ailura (talk) 18:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Moin Gnom, Du bist nicht der Buhmann, sondern der Jäger, Du jagst nach strengen Maßregeln Verstöße, was ich als Beiwerk sehe, siehst Du als Grund einer Löschung an, okay so verschwinden halt meine Fotos wieder, ist okay, habe gelernt damit zu leben und das Fotografen immer zwischen den Stühlen sitzen. Ich mache trotzdem weiter, wenn meine Kamera wieder funktioniert und ich Zeit und Lust verspüre. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 13:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ich "jage" nicht. Die Sache wurde auf de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen angesprochen. Die Beiwerk-Schranke nach deutschem Urheberrecht ist enger, als man denkt (siehe Möbelkatalog-Urteil). Gnom (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Okay Danke, muss gestehen das ich das Möbelkatalog-Urteil nicht kenne. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 15:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Der Fall ist in meinen Augen nicht vergleichbar. Wenn ich jemanden in seinem Wohnzimmer vor seinem Roy-Lichtenstein-Poster fotografiere, dann mag das zutreffen. Aber in dem Fall richtet ein Verlag seinen Messestand mit der Absicht ein, dass er fotografiert wird. Da hängt nicht irgendwas an der Wand. --Ailura (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Aber trotzdem bleiben die Rechte an den Bildern beim Künstler. Qwertzu111111 (talk) 18:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Irgendwo weiter oben steht, dass die Rechte beim Verlag liegen, der meiner Meinung nach (IANAL) mit dem Messestand und der Möglichkeit, dort Fotos zu machen und zu veröffentlichen, einer Veröffentlichung (jedenfalls als Motivhintergrund/Beiwerk) schlüssig zugestimmt hat. -- Ailura (talk) 11:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Richtig, die Rechte liegen bei den Verlagen. Eine "schlüssige Zustimmung einer Veröffentlichung als Beiwerk" können wir leider nicht verargumentieren. Gnom (talk) 12:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Gnom, bitte erkläre mir (gern auch auf meiner Diskussionsseite), warum für meine Fotos auf Commons andere Regeln gelten als anderswo (ob ich Geld oder nur die Namensnennung bekomme, hat ja mit diesem Fall nicht viel zu tun). --Ailura (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Es gelten dieselben Regeln überall. Gnom (talk) 16:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Unter "Normalbedingungen" wird die Akkreditierung für Pressefotografen erteilt, die die Fotos dann in der Presse verwenden, für die andere Regeln gelten als für Fotos auf Commons. - Bitte erkläre mir, was das für Regeln sein sollen, die kenne ich nicht. --Ailura (talk) 17:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, klar doch: § 50 UrhG gilt für die Presse, aber nicht für Wikipedia. Gnom (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Und das ist wirklich in dem Medienarchiv, aus dem sich der Nachnutzer (z.B. die Tagespresse) bedient, ein Problem? --Ailura (talk) 18:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ja, weil diese Vorschrift nicht auf Commons anwendbar ist. Gnom (talk) 05:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Die Vorschrift ist aber auf Gettyimages.com auch nicht anwendbar. Abgesehen davon sind Veranstaltungsbilder hier grundsätzlich auch über die Kategorie und in der Regel auch im Text auf die Veranstaltung bezogen. Ailura (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Weder die Kategorie noch der Text helfen uns hier – § 50 UrhG greift auf Commons einfach nicht. Gnom (talk) 16:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Die Vorschrift ist aber auf Gettyimages.com auch nicht anwendbar. Abgesehen davon sind Veranstaltungsbilder hier grundsätzlich auch über die Kategorie und in der Regel auch im Text auf die Veranstaltung bezogen. Ailura (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ja, weil diese Vorschrift nicht auf Commons anwendbar ist. Gnom (talk) 05:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Und das ist wirklich in dem Medienarchiv, aus dem sich der Nachnutzer (z.B. die Tagespresse) bedient, ein Problem? --Ailura (talk) 18:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, klar doch: § 50 UrhG gilt für die Presse, aber nicht für Wikipedia. Gnom (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Unter "Normalbedingungen" wird die Akkreditierung für Pressefotografen erteilt, die die Fotos dann in der Presse verwenden, für die andere Regeln gelten als für Fotos auf Commons. - Bitte erkläre mir, was das für Regeln sein sollen, die kenne ich nicht. --Ailura (talk) 17:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Es gelten dieselben Regeln überall. Gnom (talk) 16:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Gnom, bitte erkläre mir (gern auch auf meiner Diskussionsseite), warum für meine Fotos auf Commons andere Regeln gelten als anderswo (ob ich Geld oder nur die Namensnennung bekomme, hat ja mit diesem Fall nicht viel zu tun). --Ailura (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Richtig, die Rechte liegen bei den Verlagen. Eine "schlüssige Zustimmung einer Veröffentlichung als Beiwerk" können wir leider nicht verargumentieren. Gnom (talk) 12:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Irgendwo weiter oben steht, dass die Rechte beim Verlag liegen, der meiner Meinung nach (IANAL) mit dem Messestand und der Möglichkeit, dort Fotos zu machen und zu veröffentlichen, einer Veröffentlichung (jedenfalls als Motivhintergrund/Beiwerk) schlüssig zugestimmt hat. -- Ailura (talk) 11:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Aber trotzdem bleiben die Rechte an den Bildern beim Künstler. Qwertzu111111 (talk) 18:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Der Fall ist in meinen Augen nicht vergleichbar. Wenn ich jemanden in seinem Wohnzimmer vor seinem Roy-Lichtenstein-Poster fotografiere, dann mag das zutreffen. Aber in dem Fall richtet ein Verlag seinen Messestand mit der Absicht ein, dass er fotografiert wird. Da hängt nicht irgendwas an der Wand. --Ailura (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Okay Danke, muss gestehen das ich das Möbelkatalog-Urteil nicht kenne. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 15:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ich "jage" nicht. Die Sache wurde auf de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen angesprochen. Die Beiwerk-Schranke nach deutschem Urheberrecht ist enger, als man denkt (siehe Möbelkatalog-Urteil). Gnom (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Die Akkreditierung erteilt der Veranstalter, nicht die Verlage. Unter "Normalbedingungen" wird die Akkreditierung für Pressefotografen erteilt, die die Fotos dann in der Presse verwenden, für die andere Regeln gelten als für Fotos auf Commons. Ich finde es ehrlich gesagt uncool, wie ich hier als Buhmann dargestellt werde. Es ist doch ein Commons-Grundprinzip, dass wir hier nur Material erlauben, das unter den angegebenen Lizenzen weitergenutzt werden kann, ohne dass ein Nachnutzer sich vor einer Abmahnung durch einen Rechteinhaber fürchten muss. Gnom (talk) 07:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Eine Akkreditierung ist keine bedingungslose Freikarte. Ich muss mich als Fotograf darauf verlassen können, dass ich das, war mir der Veranstalter hier zubilligt, unter Normalbedingungen auch legal tun kann. --Ailura (talk) 19:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ich hab mir mal viele Messefotos angesehen, also das wir ja genug Jäger haben, werden sie alle Bilder finden, wo Werbung im Hintergrund ist. Ich denke ich mache es so, ich lade einfach nach einer Messe Bilder hoch und die Jäger löschen sie wieder. Was hab ich davon, ich bin sicher, das wird meine Motivation steigern :) Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 19:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ich halte es eher für problematisch, die Werbung im Hintergrund zu manipulieren, wenn man akkreditiert wird, um genau die zu verbreiten. --Ailura (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Frag ich mich auch die ganze Zeit, ich hab das Bild abgeschnitten, so das die Bilder im Hintergrund nicht mehr zu gebrauchen sind und somit in meinen Augen wirklich nur Beiwerk sind. Aber egal, die Autoren sitzen immer vor ihren Bildern oder ihren Büchern. Ich bin deshalb auch letztes Wochenende nicht zur Messe gegangen, sollte die Firmen doch Fotos machen und selber hochladen. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 18:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Es kann nicht sein, dass ein Veranstalter Fotografen akkreditiert, damit die genau solche Fotos machen und der Verlag dort einen Stand aufbaut, damit genau solche Fotos gemacht werden und die Veröffentlichung ist dann illegal. Wie soll man so arbeiten? --Ailura (talk) 17:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Raboe001: Die Akkreditierung und die Frage bei der abgebildeten Person lösen die urheberrechtliche Problematik bezüglich der im Hintergrund klar erkennbaren Werke leider nicht. Einzig eine Verpixelung (oder eben eine Freigabe der beiden Verlage) würde das Bild für uns "retten". --Gnom (talk) 08:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Moin zusammen,ist es so besser und ich hatte eine akkritierung und habe sie auch gefragt. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 15:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Will you take care of the blurring then? Gnom (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- The background is already blurred. Stop destroying pictures. --Ailura (talk) 17:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Will you take care of the blurring then? Gnom (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023041710003656 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Mark-Benecke-by-Steff-Murschetz-Poster-U-Comix-50-jahre-WEB-comic-salon-muenchen.jpg” under ticket:2023041710003656. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 07:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination, kept the Benecke file (which has a VRT permission now); there's a replacement file for the Korth portrait already uploaded. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 1
[edit]Various Milau Viaduct photos where the viaduct is clearly the subject and focus of the image, thus failing COM:DM.
- File:2005 MillauViaduc0409.JPG
- File:Approaching the Millau Viaduct, A75, Aveyron, France, 2008 - Flickr - PhillipC.jpg
- File:Millau (10).JPG
- File:Millau (19).JPG
- File:Millau bridge struts (3843357484).jpg
- File:Millau Bridges.jpg
- File:Millau Bridges2.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct 1 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct overall view.jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau - depuis le point de vue au sud de Millau.png
- File:Viaduc Millau 01.jpg
- File:Zicht op het Viaduc de Millau.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi @Mattbuck: , Have you seen [ https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama&oldid=256272743 my edit on this very subject]? I have been trying to understand why the English have so much difficulty with a simple French law? Probably because the French do too- and it is not that simple. The law seems to be moving, based on developments of case law. WP is erring on the side of caution when it makes a bland statement stating there is no FOP- and we need to use the American concept of DM in whether to allow or not allow an image.
- Firstly an error of translation- this viaduc is a civil engineering work Ouvrage d'Art not a Work of Art.
- The draughtsman or his employer holds copyright on the 2D drawings, and the concept if it is original and has never been used before. He does not hold copyright on any concept that is a concept because it is a good technical solution (or a design inspired as the only technical solution to a project, his copyright is on the ćreative decisions he has taken within group of technical possibilities. The onus of proof lies on the designer to convince a court that he holds a copyright that has been breached.
- If it accepted that the draughtsman has designed something truly original then photographs are not permitted of that work in its entirity or photographs of the entirity of the actual section of the work that was deemed to be creative. Photographs of parts of the work that have been used before on other structures can be used.
- Au Millau, all of it has been done before- conceivably the only artistic decision that can be copyrighted is the relative heights and number of the pylons and their shape above the bridge deck. Below the deck, the deck, each individual pylon the play of light caused by a parabolic curve are all common engineering solutions so cannot be copyrighted. If copyright was ever claimed the architect, would still have to prove that there were other viable engineering solutions and his solution was more than a consequence of engineering necessity.
- To prevent publication, there is another test that must be fulfilled and it is not DM- more the question could the desired photograph have been taken without including the civil engineering structure. This gives us virtually the same freedom as FOP.
I apologise for not giving you references for all the case law/ It is essential to read the judgements in French- as American synopses miss all the nuances. So lets look at all the beautiful photographs and make some comments:
- File:2005 MillauViaduc0409.JPG- mine- borderline-I claim the view could not have been taken without including the bridge
- File:Approaching the Millau Viaduct, A75, Aveyron, France, 2008 - Flickr - PhillipC.jpg-same as above
- File:Millau (10).JPG-engineering detail
- File:Millau (19).JPG-photo of bridge not exhibiting creative element
- File:Millau bridge struts (3843357484).jpg engineering detail
- File:Millau Bridges.jpg the view could not have been taken without including the bridge- then not sufficient is included
- File:Millau Bridges2.jpg the view could not have been taken without including the bridge- then not sufficient is included
- File:Millau Viaduct 1 - panoramio.jpg-hard to defend
- File:Millau Viaduct overall view.jpg-hard to defend
- File:Viaduc de Millau - depuis le point de vue au sud de Millau.png-hard to defend
- File:Viaduc Millau 01.jpg-hard to defend
- File:Zicht op het Viaduc de Millau.jpg- no opinion
The Case law is growing, and I think we should reflect it in our decisions- ann then revisit other deletions File:Millau7641.JPG and File:2005 MillauPéage0416.JPG which quotes the Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gare Lorraine TGV deletions and reversions. --ClemRutter (talk) 00:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ClemRutter: Actually I would like to read the judgements (or at least an article about them in the French press) to make my mind on these ones. If you say that Commons guidelines are not enough, you must provide an alternative. I can read French, so there are no problems I presume. --Ruthven (msg) 22:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: While bridges are not copyrighted in the USA, they are in France. The fact that cable stayed bridges have been built before does not mean that cable stayed bridges cannot have a copyright. Glass fronted skyscrapers all have copyrights, although they all are similar to prior works. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 2
[edit]No acceptable FOP in France. None of the images nominated here pass French de minimis; the viaduct forms an important element to each of these images. See also the prior nomination above and also Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Viaduc de Millau.
- File:Beautiful Millau Viaduct (190899149).jpeg
- File:Crossing Millau Viaduct (2724957846).jpg
- File:Le viaduc de Millau - Millau viaduct - Flickr - OliBac.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct (2724140287).jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct (2724142781).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct (2724938054).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct (2724940182).jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct (2724960820).jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct 2 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct tourist view.jpg
- File:The Viaduct Of Millau (31594173).jpeg
- File:Viaduc - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau (10458569676).jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau (10458688003).jpg
- File:Viaduc Millau P1010248mod.jpg
- File:Viaduc-de-Millau.jpg
- File:Viaduct in Millau (2724111935).jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- It appears that the implementor of Architect Lord Norman Foster's copyright holder-ship (the management) has placed some authentic restrictions over any forms of reuses of images of this bridge: [2] Perhaps night scenes of the bridge (which I haven't yet nominated) might need to be deleted too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 3
[edit]Per the CEVM's house rules on usages of any visual representations, even drawings are not allowed if they will be reused commercially (without permission from CEVM who acts as the "guardian" of architect Norman Foster's copyright). This means graphical renderings of this bridge are not OK per their rules in relation to French copyright law. Furthermore, no freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Heights of Millau Viaduct.PNG
- File:Viaduc-Millau Pile-P2 Eiffel.svg
- File:Viaduc-Millau Pile-P2.svg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 10:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 4
[edit]5 images of the viaduct at night, and 4 images of the viaduct at the "borderline of foreground and background". No FOP in France, the bridge's management is aggressive in protecting Architect Norman Foster's copyright over the bridge, and see the above nominations. While the 4 images are borderline between foreground and background, the main intent of those images are the viaduct itself (as evidenced by their file titles). COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle applies for this case.
- File:Approaching the Millau Viaduct 20140102 123012.jpg
- File:Approaching the Millau Viaduct 20140102 123019.jpg
- File:Millau viaduct (2724126321).jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct at night (2724120179).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct at night (2724124919).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct at night (2724945334).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct at night with car (2724947154).jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau. (6744815357).jpg
- File:Viaducte de Millau. France - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 5
[edit]No FOP in France. Designed by Michel Virlogeux and Norman Foster, both are still living. The Compagnie Eiffage du Viaduc de Millau is clear that only non-commercial images are permitted without royalty payments. See: https://www.leviaducdemillau.com/en/rules-use-images-viaduct.
- File:00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg
- File:Aire de Montjaux 03-edit.jpg
- File:Aire de Montjaux 03.JPG
- File:Detailshot of the 11 years old Millau viaduct with the Causses Noir (black chalk higlands) in the background - panoramio.jpg
- File:Driving on the Viaduc de Millau.jpg
- File:Millau-PM 37773.jpg
- File:Millau-PM 37785.jpg
- File:PM 037774 F Millau.jpg
- File:PM 037785 F Millau.jpg
- File:PM 037802 F Millau.jpg
- File:PM 037809 F Millau.jpg
File:Tarn Comprégnac Peyre amont.jpg- File:The Elegant Millau Viaduct.jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau (10458519044).jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau C.JPG
- File:Viaduc de Millau Peyre.JPG
- File:Viaduc de Millau.JPG
- File:Viaducto de Millau, Francia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Vista aerea-Viaducto de Millau.JPG
- File:Vue du viaduc depuis le village de Peyre.JPG
- File:Vue sur le viaduc de Millau depuis le village de Peyre.JPG
_in_the_background_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Labattblueboy (talk) 06:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment My very limited understanding was that photos which don't have the copyrighted structure as their primary focus, but merely in the background as some of these do, are legal. But I couldn't name or quote the relevant law. Anyone else with more expertise?--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 10:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- See ClemRutter's comment above. We'd however need some more clarification on the law and jurisprudence. –LPfi (talk) 12:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Das Foto File:00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg zeigt die Stadt Millau vom Standort östlich der Stadt an der „Route du Causse Noir“. Aus dieser Blickrichtung auf die Stadt kommt in einem Bildfeld zur Aufnahme des gesamten Stadtareals zwangsläufig der „Viaduc de Millau“ in die Aufnahme. Beabsichtigt war nicht eine Aufnahme des Viadukts, sondern das Stadtbild. Ob in diesem Falle eine Verletzung des Urheberrechts vorliegt, zweifle ich an. Mit freundlichen Grüßen W. Bulach
- The photo file: 00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg shows the city of Millau from the location east of the city on the "Route du Causse Noir". From this direction of view of the city, the “Viaduc de Millau” inevitably appears in an image field to capture the entire city area. The intention was not to record the viaduct, but the cityscape. I doubt whether there is a violation of copyright in this case. Sincerely, W. Bulach W. Bulach (talk) 13:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Taking a precautionary approach, I do question whether in image File:00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg the bridge is unintentional and simply background. Compositionally the bridge's location in the image follows the rule of thirds and contains the entire bridge length. The image could also be cropped (at the bridge deck) without deleting the image of the city. As noted in the nomination a cautionary stance is necessary as the copyright holder has expressly stated that royalties are required for commerical images.--Labattblueboy (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Et désolé, je ne suis pas doué en anglais. Ma photo File:Tarn Comprégnac Peyre amont.jpg est l'une des 51 photos que j'ai prise ce jour-là à Peyre (Aveyron) et déposées sur commons. Lorsque je visite un lieu, je prends un maximum de photos, notamment des cours d'eau, vers l'amont comme vers l'aval. J'ai donc pris le Tarn (sujet principal) vers l'amont et vers l'aval. Il se trouve que vers l'amont, au fond, il y a un petit morceau du viaduc de Millau qui apparait, représentant environ 5 % de la photo. Donc, pour moi, vouloir la supprimer pour ce motif est clairement un abus. Pour précision, j'étais en vacances à Millau pour une semaine et des photos beaucoup plus précises du viaduc, j'en en fait quelques dizaines, mais je n'en ai déversé aucune sur commons. Père Igor (talk) 14:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've retracted the nomination for File:Tarn Comprégnac Peyre amont.jpg. I agree that the bridge composes a minor attribute of the background.-Labattblueboy (talk) 05:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- See ClemRutter's comment above. We'd however need some more clarification on the law and jurisprudence. –LPfi (talk) 12:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, just now - maybe too late - I realized that I should give my statement about deletion request of my file. "Driving on the Viaduc de Millau.jpg" at this place. Actually I put it at my Discussion side as follows:
Hello user Labattblueboy, thank you for the check on my file "Driving ...". Yet I oppose the result in form of the deletion request. As you can see in in the version history of the file, there was a deletion request in February 2021 that finally got cancelled by User:Racconish with his remarkː "On second thought, I think my deletion was excessive. Just leave the file as it is and good luck for the challenge". I had argumented that the topic of the picture was not the construction of the bridge itself but the impression of driving on a bridge towards the dark clouds of a thunderstorm contrasted by the cables high lighted by the sun. The name of the bridge is just mentioned to tell the location where the picture was taken. Best regards Foeniz (Diskussion) 14:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
I do hope this stil may have any influence on the decision process. Best regardsFoeniz (talk) 20:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
If it would help, I would not mind to change the file name to "Driving on a cable-stayed bridge".Foeniz (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:Driving on the Viaduc de Millau.jpg is a lovely photo. That said, the bridge is not a de minimis feature in the photo. I understand the intent but there is no indication that bridge's copyright holders would consider this image being in the public domain.--Labattblueboy (talk) 23:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Labattblueboy: one of the files has an active DR started by me on July 2021: Commons:Deletion requests/File:PM 037802 F Millau.jpg. Please be mindful of initiating mass DRs next time; you can see a file with an active DR having a "d" with rectangular orange background designation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, previous discussions on this DR page. --Rosenzweig τ 14:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I am sorry about this decision. Especially as it contradicts the earlier decision by User:Racconish that made me hope for some time. Besides this personal event: I do appreciate your engagement in Commons. Best regardsFoeniz (talk) 09:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 6
[edit]The bridge is the main subject here, and it is most probably covered by copyright.
- File:AVEYRON.Viaduc de Millau-1-cliche Jean Weber.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct (42509428741).jpg
- File:Rob Bell by the Milau Viaduct in the South of France.jpg
- File:Tallest Bridge. (6744815357).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 10:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Tallest Bridge. (6744815357).jpg - Despite the photographers intentions this image is basically a motorway with a bridge sort of in front of it - I give or take would say the bridge is DEMINIMIS, If kept I'll rename / +cats, The rest are either close ups or imho too close for DEMINIMIS to apply, –Davey2010Talk 13:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Rob Bell picture. As his head takes up 3/5ths of the picture and the bridge just 1/5th the bridge is clearly not the main focus!Davidstewartharvey (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Technically speaking there's nothing that confirms the uploader is Robbie Bell, Anyone can grab a picture of the net, call themselves "that person" and upload it here. –Davey2010Talk 16:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- You realize, it's COM:INUSE in w:Rob Bell (TV presenter), so do you have any reason to believe it's not Rob Bell? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- I do although I only realised after I made that reply, Still irrespective of INUSE the point still stands there's no evidence to say this is Rob. –Davey2010Talk 15:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- You realize, it's COM:INUSE in w:Rob Bell (TV presenter), so do you have any reason to believe it's not Rob Bell? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Tallest Bridge might be OK. File:AVEYRON.Viaduc de Millau-1-cliche Jean Weber.jpg is definitely not OK; File:Millau Viaduct (42509428741).jpg is a bunch of extraneous people sitting in front of the bridge, also not OK; I think File:Rob Bell by the Milau Viaduct in the South of France.jpg may be OK because he is the subject, but that's open to question. If he were not himself in scope, that photo definitely would not be OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and nominee by other user, because Yann has a personal prejudices against me. Matlin (talk) 10:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all photos but Keep one. File:Rob Bell by the Milau Viaduct in the South of France.jpg can simply be censored by cropping the whole bridge away and turning it into a portrait picture. Reference to this discussion is encouraged on the file description page so that no one will wrongfully nominate it (there is a tendency that once cropped, the indications of his selfie action will disappear along with the bridge). For others, I do not see those as passing de minimis. File:Tallest Bridge. (6744815357).jpg may be a close call but I'm uncomfortable at having a 50/50 photo (50% main subject, 50% de minimis) that may lead to Wikimedia being slapped with French lawsuits from CEVM, the management who is Architect Foster's beneficiary of his property rights over the public landmark he designed. Note the descriptions and title suggesting the bridge as the real intent of the photo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Info "File:Tallest Bridge..." seems to be a reupload of File:Viaduc de Millau. (6744815357).jpg, deleted through this deletion request page too. See the file title's log. Therefore, it is eligible for speedy deletion as reupload of deleted content deleted through a consensus. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed, if this DR isn't happened, the last one may be G4-able. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- From all of the above views, Keep the Rob Bell one and Delete the rest 3, this looks like another propaganda of Yann on their selection of {{De minimis}} applications. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Rob Bell image cropped and old version hidden. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Previously published a month earlier than upload date with no free license https://businessmirror.com.ph/2023/03/04/nobita-embraces-vulnerable-side-on-new-single-kalangitan/ howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 11:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
ANSI standards are not works of US gov.
- File:American national standard N540; classification of radioactive self-luminous light sources (IA americannational116amer).pdf
- File:American national standard N537; radiological safety standard for the design of radiographic and fluoroscopic industrial x-ray equipment (IA americannational123amer).pdf
- File:American national standard N542- sealed radioactive sources, classification (IA americannational126unit).pdf
- File:American national standard N433.1; safe design and use of self-contained, dry source storage gamma irradiators (Category I) (IA americannational127amer).pdf
- File:American national standard N538; classification of industrial ionizing radiation gauging devices (IA americannational129unit).pdf
- File:American national standard N432; radiological safety for the design and construction of apparatus for gamma radiography (IA americannational136amer).pdf
- File:American national standard N43.10; safe design and use of panoramic, wet source storage gamma irradiators (category IV) (IA americannational142unit).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep All of these are GPO-published U.S. government documents. As I've remarked elsewhere, being an ANSI standard doesn't place something in the public domain, but it also doesn't remove it from the public domain. - Jmabel ! talk 18:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Printed in the United States before 1989 without a copyright notice and without apparent subsequent registration. As such, even if not government works, these would be {{PD-US-1978-89}}. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:/American National Standard/ intitle:pdf
[edit]ANSI standards are not PD or works of US gov.
- File:Radiological safety in the design and operation of particle accelerators (IA radiologicalsafe107amer).pdf
- File:American national standard N43.2 - radiation safety for x-ray diffraction and fluorescence analysis equipment (IA americannational1111unit).pdf
- File:General safety standard for installations using non-medical x-ray and sealed gamma-ray sources, energies up to 10 MeV (IA generalsafetysta114unit).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Not all the same case. Just being an ANSI standard doesn't make them public domain (and the Pascal one isn't), but it doesn't magically turn a federal government document into something copyrighted:
- Keep File:American national standard N43.2 - radiation safety for x-ray diffraction and fluorescence analysis equipment (IA americannational1111unit).pdf comes from the Government Printing Office and was published in 1978 with no copyright notice, at least none I can readily find. What would be the basis to say it is copyrighted?
- Keep File:General safety standard for installations using non-medical x-ray and sealed gamma-ray sources, energies up to 10 MeV (IA generalsafetysta114unit).pdf, ditto other than the year being 1975.
- Keep File:Radiological safety in the design and operation of particle accelerators (IA radiologicalsafe107amer).pdf, ditto other than the year being 1970.
- Delete File:Federal Information Processing Standards Publication- American National Standard PASCAL computer programming language (IA federalinformati109nati).pdf certainly copyrighted: published by Wiley, with IEEE and ANSI copyright notices.
- Jmabel ! talk 17:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
per COM:POSTER - Missing permission for shown artwork. Wdwd (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- i took the photo — mark
- it s not "cat wurst" but "ket" from ketchup — mark Markbenecke (talk) 18:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Cat sausage? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.193.211 (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Markbenecke: Das Problem ist sind die Urheberrechte an dem Plakat, die wohl bei dem Imbissbudenbesitzer liegen. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING. Missing permission for shown artwork Also apply to:
--Wdwd (talk) 19:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- i took the photo — mark 2001:4DD6:A6B2:0:408E:9A36:7607:DBB 18:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- i took the photo — mark Markbenecke (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Markbenecke: Das Problem sind die Urheberrechte an der Gestaltung der Verpackung, die wohl beim Hersteller liegen. --Gnom (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photo of commercialy sold bottles from the brand Bulk https://www.bulk.com/uk/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour aussi,
- Comme indiqué dans les références de la photo, elle provient d'un site de photos libres de droit, Open Food Facts : https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/5060343749542/blancs-d-oeufs-liquides-bulk.
- Sauf erreur, il n'y a donc pas de copyvio.
- Bien à vous,
- HistoVG (talk) 07:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- De ce que je comprends, une inscription permet d'ajouter des informations sur le site. Est-ce qu'on a un moyen d'être sûr que la marque approuve le fait d'utiliser la photo ?
- Cordialement, CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Sur le site, à la page de la photo (https://world.openfoodfacts.org/cgi/product_image.pl?code=5060343749542&id=front_fr), est indiqué : This file was uploaded to product Blancs D'Œufs Liquides - Bulk - 6x500g and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. (Original Image).
- Donc c'est bon ... HistoVG (talk) 06:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of File:PL Wwa, odbicia, Palac Ostrowskich, 2011.09.30.jpg which has been improved and is used in several pages Ivonna Nowicka (talk) 01:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Logo design may meet threshold of originality in US and therefore may not be public domain 131.193.225.153 04:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't believe it does. Would there be a problem in regard to Japanese TOO? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete This looks plausibly over COM:TOO USA due to the creative use of the non-trivial crack patterns. Japan's TOO is higher than that of the USA, so this DR hinges whether or not COM:TOO USA is met. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright infringement? I think the signature and author are different. Nor is it the signature of the subject person.[3]. 61.120.241.1 06:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Frank Lammers - Septimius Awards 2022 Winner Winnaar - Best European Actor - Beste Europese Acteur.jpg
[edit]
no source no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 06:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_of_Road_Infrastructure_Agency.svg Dimitar999 (talk) 08:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
![08:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/15#c-Dimitar999-20230415080500-File:Лого_на_Агенция_"Пътна_инфраструктура".jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy delete COM:F1 Unknown COM:TOO for Bulgaria, thus assumed "Not OK", uploader doesn't have rights -- DaxServer (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
![12:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/15#c-Yann-20230913124800-File:Лого_на_Агенция_"Пътна_инфраструктура".jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio - photo by Sascha Fochler M2k~dewiki (talk) 08:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
O artista faleceu em 1971 GualdimG (talk) 09:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation: character of w:en:God of War (franchise), publisher: Sony Interactive Entertainment Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 12:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright? See "© Forstzeitung 2023" on www.forstzeitung.at. And what about the photo from www.oeforst.at? Wouter (talk) 13:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This file does not belong to the uploader and is from the images available on the Internet CaesarIran (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Possibly {{Tasnim}} (see: [4]). I'd need to do a bit more digging to confirm if that's an original Tasnim photo or if it's a wire photo from some other agency, though. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
![[4]](https://newsmedia.tasnimnews.com/Tasnim/Uploaded/Image/1398/12/10/13981210134734745198087510.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This file does not belong to the uploader and is from the images available on the Internet, File:Telecommunication Infrastructure Company.png CaesarIran (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, in use. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
"own work"? no. copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 15:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Author Young-Ah Kim. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Own work? 191.126.167.171 16:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
not used and super bad quality Scip. (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Dice FBMD. Qué significa? 181.203.113.57 17:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This could be public domain in Australia and the US, but we'd need a better date of publication, and I couldn't find one. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "taken or published prior to 1 January 1955" It appears to be a 1905 image when became bishop. --RAN (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: OK. --Yann (talk) 12:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 07:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: Who is this person? Yann (talk) 12:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. —holly {chat} 20:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
On the left side, there is (inverted) text that says "Aufnahme v. ...". According to Google Translate, "Aufnahme" probably means photo. It looks like it says "E Volz Driver", what looks to be a name, so this work probably isn't anonymous and {{PD-anon-70-EU}} doesn't apply. Though we do need to find the date of the alleged author. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 11:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Could also be "Velz". And its "Drvar", a town in Bosnia. But I assume this won't help a lot. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 11:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Herbert Ortner: The point is, this photo is probably not anonymous, whatever the name is, so {{PD-anon-70-EU}} probably won't apply. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 08:07, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Weak keep We have established that the photographer is a certain E. Volz or Velz from Drvar, so the "anonymous" rationales don't work, but it seems to be a postcard, and then point c) from {{PD-Yugoslavia}} could be applicable, which doesn't require anonymity and, apparently, would also work if the date of the photographer's death is unknown, as long as it was published before 1966 - which seems very likely for this postcard with German text (so, rather before 1918 even). But even though the postcard mentions Drvar, it's unclear whether it was also published there or elsewhere. If published in present-day Austria, I think there would be no applicable PD rationale (there's only the invalid PD-Austria-1932). Still, public domain seems quite likely. Leaving for the next admin to decide... Gestumblindi (talk) 19:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: If I'm reading PD-Yugoslavia correctly, the death date doesn't matter if it was published before 1966, and we can say for sure this was. —holly {chat} 20:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:F. F. E. Yeo-Thomas
[edit]These are photos of a bust of British agent en:F. F. E. Yeo-Thomas, located inside the town hall of the XVIth arrondissement of Paris, France. Apparently the bust was installed there in 2001 as a present of the UK ambassador in France at the time [5].
I could not find either the name of the sculptor or the year the bust was created. It's unlikely that this bust is really a truly anonymous work, and as Yeo-Thomas was not really known in public before 1947, the year of creation is most likely less than 70 years ago, perhaps even as late as 2001 (working from some older photos or similar, because Yeo-Thomas died in 1964).
Which means the bust is most likely still protected by copyright. It is on display inside a public building, but the French version of freedom of panorama is for outside works only and not acceptable for Wikimedia Commons anyway because it specifically forbids commercial use.
So the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle. They can principally be restored 70 years after the death of the sculptor (unless the bust would still be protected in the US because of the URAA at that point). But since we don't know who the sculptor is and 2001 is the only year we have so far, they can be restored in 2122 with {{PD-old-assumed}}, subject to change if the name of the sculptor or the year the bust was created become known.
Rosenzweig τ 12:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Since we have an image of the text accompanying the bust, and the text does not name the sculptor, it should be kept until a creator has been named. We usually don't delete based on hypothetical speculation that a creator may be named in the future. When that occurs and it is under an active copyright, then it should be deleted. The precautionary principle requires "significant doubt". --RAN (talk) 04:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- There IS significant doubt, see above. That the label on the plinth does not name a sculptor does not mean that we can treat this as an anoymous work. Also, we don't even know if the bust is at least 70 years old (all we have is the year 2001), which would be another requirement for us to be able to treat it as an anonymous work in the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 05:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Ich habe eine besseres Bild gemacht! Der Barbar (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
unused and makes no sense in any context Scip. (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: It's being used in a couple of user pages, and since it's freely licensed and made from other freely licensed images, there's no reason to delete it at this time. —holly {chat} 20:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Ich habe ein besseres Bild gemacht! Der Barbar (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Per {{FoP-India}} there is no freedom of panorama in India for text and the photo violates text author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Cathédrale Saint Augustin incategory:"Wikimedia Training Tour in Yamoussoukro"
[edit]There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Côte d'Ivoire, and a commercial licensing clearance from the architect (or his heirs) is required. Per this site, "the construction work was carried out from 1963 to 1964 by the SABAIC company of Mr. le Bellec." (English translation)
- File:Cathédrale Saint Augustin de Yamoussoukro 03.jpg
- File:Cathédrale Saint Augustin de Yamoussoukro 02.jpg
- File:Cathédrale Saint Augustin de Yamoussoukro 01.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Юрий Д.К. as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader request, bad quality. Too old for G7, converting. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep IMO the image's quality is acceptable. User:Armbrust (Talk) 21:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality, many better analogs exist. Юрий Д.К 19:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Light, focus and contrast are acceptable. --Javidd (talk) 15:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Regardless of the quality, this is watermarked and unused, and there are plenty of good alternatives in Category:Red moon, so I'm happy to do a courtesy deletion. —holly {chat} 20:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate of the same image File:Lebensfreude pur !.jpg uploaded by the same User in 2009. Then it was claimed to be the work of Sigrid Pfeiffer (who appears to be the wife of the Uploader) and under two Licenses: GNU Free Documentation License and Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported. The Author of this newer image is Gordito1869 and is Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. No reference is made to the original file. It is all very confusing and contradictory. Perhaps Gordito1869 would like to explain. Headlock0225 (talk) 21:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Personally, unfortunately, I didn't have a free hand - too dangerous for the child. It was a courtesy photo taken with my camera - but please delete it. Best regards --Gordito1869 (talk) 07:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
picture created by Massimo Gherardi (still living italian heraldic artist) for Aradica Civica, website which publishes under cc-by-NC-ND. This license is not compatible with COM:L 82.124.119.228 22:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Firstly, no author information is given in the source, so there's no way to tell that PD-old applies. Secondly, there's caption on the photo in the source so who knows if this is even the correct person. —howcheng {chat} 00:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep It meets "PD-US-not renewed". If you have evidence it is the wrong person, present it here. --RAN (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- It only qualifies as PD-US-not renewed if someone has searched the copyright catalog for the renewal and failed to find it, but there's no author nor even a year of publication (the year 1940 seems to have been created by the uploader). The version in the Wayback Machine near the upload date does not have this information either.
- I don't have evidence it's the wrong person, but I don't have evidence it's the right person either. I went through the entire source site and there is not a single photo that identifies Nicholson. The only possible clue is that the filename is
smnic.jpgif one assumes that the "s" is his first initial and "nic" are the first three letters of his last time, but then where does the "m" come from? It's possible that this is indeed the same individual as in File:Seth B. Nicholson sits at his spectroscope.jpg, but the only thing I can say for sure is that both show Caucasian men with glasses, as the angle of the other photo makes it impossible to see his facial features.
- In short, there are too many unknowns here for this to be kept. —howcheng {chat} 22:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Holly's rationale. We need to know when it was published. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out Of Scope NairobiPapel(Kamaa) (talk) 21:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep This argument has happened dozens if not hundreds of times and is basically a fancier way of saying “I don’t like this because it’s sexual” since human sexuality is definitely in scope. The quality is poor, but the video is the only one on commons specifically depicting gay anal sex (that isn’t a gif anyway), which would mean it can be kept due to lack of better media on the subject. Dronebogus (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Dronebogus. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 08:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ikbsdgv as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Vandalism
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion as previous DR as keep-closed. Independent of current and former rationale, I see a potential problem with copyright, as the uploader changed the author-entry at day of upload to "Tran Bao Long", meaning they might not really be the author. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per remark of Turelio and this revision replacing the author. We would need permission of the author. --Ellywa (talk) 22:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
The Commonwealth flag is protected by copyright according to w:File:Commonwealth Flag 2013.svg, and these images portray it as the central subject of the image, whence it can't be considered COM:DM. (As per "It may be relevant how the image is described or classified: it will be difficult to argue de minimis if the photograph is described as illustrating "an advertising poster" and is placed within the category Advertising posters", it may be worth considering deletion of Category:Flag of the Commonwealth of Nations altogether.)
- File:Commonwealth Day 2017 (33414478655).jpg
- File:Commonwealth Day 2018 (39873600735).jpg
- File:Commonwealth Day 2019 (46624797324).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Without prejudice to copyright, such logo modifications (marked as "own work" by the contributor) explicitly violate the Commonwealth Logo Guidelines.
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
The Commonwealth flag is protected by copyright according to w:File:Commonwealth Flag 2013.svg, and these are COM:DW using the image as a major component which can't be considered COM:DM. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flag of the Commonwealth of Nations.
- File:Flag map of Fiji (Commonwealth of Nations).png
- File:Flag map of Malta (Commonwealth of Nations).png
- File:Flag map of New Zealand (Commonwealth of Nations).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The copyright status is unclear. As the Commonwealth of Nations is an inter-governmental organisation and its logotype was created in London in 1972,[6] the logo should normally fall under UK Crown Copyright#United Kingdom in accordance with the Copyright Act 1956 – the work certainly counts as artistic work made by or under the direction or control of Her Majesty or a government department. Per COM:CROWN, Crown Copyright has a term of 50 years, so the logo should be out of copyright sometime in 2022.
- However, copyright notices are there all over the Commonwealth website. Whether they are based on individual legal analysis, or they simply follow a standard industry practice, or the website design was updated before 2022, remains unclear.
- — kashmīrī 06:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Kashmiri The flag was updated in 2013, so only the original flag might be public domain. According to CRW Flags, the original flag was designed in 1976, so the 1976 flag can certainly be undeleted in 2027. However, the 2013 flag can't be transferred to Commons until 2064. SVG-image-maker (talk) 15:13, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link, but please read it again:
The Commonwealth symbol was originally designed by the Gemini News Service, London in 1972
- @Kashmiri The flag was updated in 2013, so only the original flag might be public domain. According to CRW Flags, the original flag was designed in 1976, so the 1976 flag can certainly be undeleted in 2027. However, the 2013 flag can't be transferred to Commons until 2064. SVG-image-maker (talk) 15:13, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
The flag was adopted on 26 March 1976
- Copyright period counts from creation date, not from any "adoption date".
- The 2013 version was a slightly updated design: the globe shape rotated to match the obliquity of the ecliptic, reduced number of rays, and a new colour scheme (assuming the old design had any colour scheme at all, which I doubt). Whether there was anything creative about it, or any meaningful sweat of the brow, is debatable. — kashmīrī 16:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per discussion, based on COM:PRP. The revised design might have introduced a new copyright, and the threshold is rather low in UK. Maps can be made using the older design. --Ellywa (talk) 22:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Icelandic municipality coat of arms. Would need more information on when it was created to determine copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
