Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 28th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor Quality, LTA file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allocato (talk • contribs) 01:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SP of AXXXXK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allocato (talk • contribs) 01:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 09:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor Quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allocato (talk • contribs) 02:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality Allocato (talk) 03:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, incorrect nomination. I blocked Allocato indefinitely as vandalism-only account. Probably long-term abuser as well. Taivo (talk) 06:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LriaS MAOVK wouexj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

sock puppet of LTA AXXXXK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allocato (talk • contribs) 03:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some other problem? They seem to be taken from the same place, likely by the uploader. –LPfi (talk) 11:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Balakumar chinnathambi Rao (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 07:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Balakumar chinnathambi Rao (talk) 18:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 07:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

errore nel caricamento Francesco028 (talk) 00:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Francesco028 (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Cap1011 (talk) 11:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porquoi pas 193.5.240.1 13:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Information can be deleted 188.50.209.20 15:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted Files 2001:16A2:E3D6:1716:9815:CC1A:DF10:53DB 17:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleteeeeee 2001:16A2:E3D6:1716:ECB1:31F9:CADC:6DED 17:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. File protected for 1 month. --Achim55 (talk) 17:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong image Hondapolo (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo under copyright (from the French national assemby) Culex (talk) 14:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OTERO OFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two selfies and two flags, one made up (File:Sandys.jpg) and the other (File:Etesech.jpg) is an unused duplicate of File:Flag of Brazil (November 1889).svg. Another uploaded file marked as copyvio.

TFerenczy (talk) 19:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 16:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 19:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Löschung Bild, da meine Wohanschrift zusammen mit meinem Kfz Kennzeichen ersichtlich sind. Dss Bild ist bitte zu löschen. 2003:CF:174D:FFD0:5465:D671:DB7F:99CB 17:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept the file as such, but uploaded a new version that does not show the license plate and hid the original version. There's something wrong with the server cache though, it kept showing a thumb of the original version, purging did not work, so I finally moved the file to the new file name File:Garmisch-Partenkirchen - Burgstraße 5.jpg which apparently did the trick and forced a new thumbnail image. --Rosenzweig τ 19:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Raymond E. Mc Kay Jr. (talk) 19:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Good and useful picture Z thomas 19:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense by another Anroid app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 19:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whilst I would normally tag as copyvio or no permission, I have some doubts. So, I decided it to bring it to DR. Is this above or below the threshold of originality? Justarandomamerican (talk) 01:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hardly believe why it is above that it has a 3D lightning shape, resulting in it being  deleted, in my opinion. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 21:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC); edited: 21:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 07:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Porn. If everybody upload their genitals here, Commons will become the largest and most ordinary porn site. 181.203.153.32 20:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cindyf1 and please do not make double deletion requests. A09 (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close as already nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cindyf1. Please go there and continue the dicusccion.(non-admin closure)--A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work issue Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks of E.V. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks of E.V. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Kevin Durant (KD), the uploader is unlikely to be KD A1Cafel (talk) 07:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammadzaidmansoori8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Persona; images of non-notable non-contributor. Commons is not Facebook.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammadzaidmansoori8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope?

Trade (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old photo, clearly not a 2023 own work. Needs source etc Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted document. Hanooz 11:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf of a vandalized Persian Wikipedia article. Hanooz 11:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably taken from this video - https://www.instagram.com/p/CLzwllNAVv8/?hl=en - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly photograph of a computer screen. Very likely not own work. – Pbrks (t • c) 14:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp and hiwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"All images on www.tatasteelchess.com are copyrighted.

Images for press may be used in accordance with the following guidelines:

   To report on the Tata Steel Chess Tournament, but the images can by no means be used for print or as stock photos, unless explicit permission from the photographer is granted.
   Inclusion of copyright:
   © Jurriaan Hoefsmit – Tata Steel Chess Tournament 2023; or
   © Lennart Ootes – Tata Steel Chess Tournament 2023Please check the filename to credit the photographer" at source. These licensing terms are not free enough for Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bottom of the page says "© 2023 ரெலோ - தமிழ் ஈழ விடுதலை இயக்கம்". I cannot find any indication that Telo uses a free license for their photographs. Abzeronow (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No official roadsign and unusable (maybe except for an advertisement for the market feeder). Didym (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for a non-notable company. Unused. Abzeronow (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata indicates this is from Facebook. Unused photograph with not useful description. Abzeronow (talk) 20:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we need this clumsy letter? Out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to figure out what it is and what for. Signed as "documents for a bombshelter", it does not help. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to figure out what it is and what for. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing

Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shabadgar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contribs to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 09:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Infringement of Shutterstock's copyright. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 01:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a picture of me i don’t approve Pantounet2 (talk) 04:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pantounet2,
I hope this helps. Laddo (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • If they want a different image to represent them in their article, then they need to submit an image or images themselves, and release it under a proper license. The image must be submitted by the photographer. --RAN (talk) 15:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Beautiful photo, COM:INUSE. As a fellow musician, I will tell you that at least to my understanding, unless you perform in a venue where no photographs are allowed, you have no right to demand the takedown of a photo of you. This was an outdoor concert, so I think you are out of luck. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio from [1], other "own work" uploads from this creator are also questionable per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SeasSoul Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeasSoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are highly compressed, and look like they might be screenshots from a video recording, potentially from TV. As such, it is unlikely that they are the uploader's work, and they are probably copyright violations.

Mike Peel (talk) 10:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeasSoul

[edit]

I doubt that the user ever uploaded an own work to Commons, and the following files are certainly above the threshold. Why was this authorship forger never warned explicitly? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Deletion Some of the images are blatantly false creations while the breadth of the subjects covered in the others is far too great for them to all belong to the uploader. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 04:36, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeasSoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, see also deleted uploads

Didym (talk) 21:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeasSoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 23:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SeasSoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. The uploader already has lots of deleted copyright violations.

Didym (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Deletion In the Wikiproject Airports we know well SeasSoul and the troubles caused by him. BTW this is just one of the many aliases used by this person. (Brunoptsem (talk) 17:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is he a chef? 181.203.153.32 23:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User without contributions. 181.203.153.32 23:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: F10, en:User:ShahanurVai has been deleted twice. --Achim55 (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emperooor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos obtained from the internet

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teammaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claims. Low resolution. Only one photograph has metadata.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution? 1,024 × 637 may not be high resolution, but surely not low Victuallers (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP, likely uploaded by her PR team. Can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim. No metadata, low resolution

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, original was credited to www.maralyazarloo.com - needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim. Low reolution and no metadata HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is a Oregon State University student that is taking courses online. She was chosen by the University's public relations department to represent non-traditional students that are not on campus. It is not a "personal photo." This photo may be used currently outside of wikipedia. This photo is a valuable addition to some of categories in which it has been placed by other Commons volunteers. -- Ooligan (talk) 17:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel. Pinging. -- Ooligan (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
TBH, I cannot identify how this student is "non-traditional", and I don't think this photo can show the details that you explain. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keep for now - could potentially have a use. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation
Tyttcfm (uploader) says "cc-by-sa-4.0". But this file comes from http://www.qc.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp/yasunobu_en.html (archive). This website administrator says "copyright© 2012 Nakamura-Usami Group all rights reserved". Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 22:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details (in Hebrew and English). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 03:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, g7. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 10:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy, Instagram. 181.203.153.32 21:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Krd. --Kadı Message 18:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bujababa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:Scope unused personal images and a CV.

MKFI (talk) 12:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reeditoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images that are outside of the project scope

Eureka Lott 13:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is spammy SEO work. The site is illegal and contains black hat seo. 88.242.22.80 13:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete spam per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlessioLupu 1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More fake logos. Please also delete their vandalism pages from other namespaces.

Gikü (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not find any indication that the Flickr user was the photograph. Note the Somba.net watermark.

Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:16, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission, copyrighted company logo, used for advertising article on nl-wiki, no author, no source Hoyanova (talk) 07:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not own work, older image from unknown source no author given Hoyanova (talk) 07:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission, used for advertising article on nl-wiki, no author, no source Hoyanova (talk) 07:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal CV, no use in wikimedia projects or other educational purposes. Velma (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, no use in wikimedia projects or other educational purposes. Velma (talk) 07:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 10:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why? 181.203.153.32 21:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharifi.mr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not notable. out of com:PS.

Hanooz 11:13, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the subject asked me, the author, to take ir down. It was made 14 years ago and I already deleted it from my flickr account, when asked to. Thank You Josegoulao (talk) 12:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The photo, as is clearly stated in the description, was also of an public event as "The Socialist Party spokesman, Vitalino Canas, comments on the first projections on today's european elections, at Hotel Altis, in Lisbon, June 7th 2009", so a public press about an european election made by the spokesperson (the depicted person) of what was (and still is) the biggest portuguese party.
I speculate that this is deletion request made in flickr made by the center-left PS (not the one made by Josegoulao here in Commons, user that is possibly the photographer) is one more example of attempt by some portuguese parties (the two that i know are by the far-right Chega and the center-right PSD) to shape Wikimedia Foundation Projects to its political goals by edited articles in portuguese Wikipedia or the photos that are present here to remove wjay they perceive to be negative facts or depictions, no matter how much they are sourced or innocuous. Tm (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand and value surveillance for democracy. But in fact, in this case it is a request made by the portrayed to the photographer who captured and published the photograph. Mr. José Sena Goulão, willingly acceding to the request, removed it from his Flickr account and promoted its deletion with Wikipedia. Any clarification you deem necessary, you can contact me, to assure you that the case has nothing to do with unfortunate attacks on democratic freedom. Tiagorozarodrigues (talk) 07:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. All that matters is whether the photo was properly licensed at the time it was uploaded to Commons. There are en.wikipedia and pt.wikipedia articles about this man, and Commons has only 5 photos of him. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Ikan Kekek, you said well "All that matters is whether the photo was properly licensed at the time it was uploaded to Commons" but since this week the photograph has lost any rights, since its author, journalist José Sena Goulão, removed it from his Flickr account, as you can see, and consequently asked Wikipedia to remove any use of it. If Wikipedia does not remove the photograph, we will no longer be in the domain of freedom to share information, but of a use that may perhaps be considered criminal. As has been said, there are several photographs, less unpretentious of the portrayed subject, that can be used, bearing in mind that the portrayed is a public figure.
    Wikipedia is a space of freedom, and it should remain so, it just shouldn't be a lawless space. And each and every person, from the most anonymous to the most famous, deserves protection of their right to image and honor. Thus, a photograph that can objectively be considered offensive must be removed immediately. Tiagorozarodrigues (talk) 07:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • First, this is Commons, not Wikipedia, but that's beside the point. How does a journalist deciding to revoke an irrevocable Creative Commons license have any legal implications for reusers of the image? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello again. I read the discussion around the deletion request. I can´t understand how, being myself the author of the photo and having been asked by the portrayed person in no intimidatory fashion whatsoever to take it down because it has been used multiple times to ridicularize him in a context that have nothing to do with the one of the photo itself, I think it more than justifies for it to be deleted. It was made 14 years ago when I was starting my photojournalism career and probably I wouldn't have published if it was taken now. I ask you please to reconsider it. Thank you. Josegoulao (talk) 11:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Matlin (talk) 15:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Su error fue sacarle una imagen donde parece perro. Saque una mejor para reemplazar esta, si es que ahora no está muy viejo... 186.175.8.72 16:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As we can not confirm that you are the author of the photo and that the person depicted wants the photo removed the person depicted should send a Mail as described on Commons:Contact us/Problems. GPSLeo (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I ask you to reconsider, instead. So, you probably would not have published this photo if you took it now. Understood. But you took it 14 years ago, so for better or worse, it's a matter of history and public record. Otherwise, there is nothing to add that was not already covered in the previous deletion thread, that was closed as a keep. And when this one is kept, please don't try a third time and think there is a chance you would be successful then. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We do not generally remove photos at the request of the subject and we never remove them at the request of anybody but the subject. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatemehabdimorad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very low quality, uploaded by a new user, unlikely to be own work, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image, likely not own work. MKFI (talk) 12:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality images in an inappropriate file format and with large unnecessary white space. We have much higher quality alternatives, such as File:Carbonyl-Seite001.svg, that can be used instead to illustrate this concept. Marbletan (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with questionable own work claim (no metadata, low resolution) uploaded by banned user.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created for vandalism purposes at en:Kevin Street. Not here for constructive purposes so should be deleted. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created for vandalism purposes at en:Crewe. Same user has also vandalised en:Kevin Street - the BLP subject named in the filename 10mmsocket (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by R8dikal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claim, low resolution and no metadata

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim. No metadata, low resolution HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim. No metadata, low resolution HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Maryland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Hawaii.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Alabama.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Colorado.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of California.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of South Carolina.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Arizona.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Alaska.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Puerto Rico.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Ohio.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Missouri.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of North Carolina.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of North Dakota.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Oklahoma.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Wyoming.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Wisconsin.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of West Virginia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Washington.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Virginia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Vermont.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the United States Virgin Islands.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Minnesota.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Michigan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Massachusetts.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Maine.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Louisiana.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Kentucky.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Kansas.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Iowa.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Indiana.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Illinois.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Idaho.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Guam.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Georgia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Delaware.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Connecticut.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Arkansas.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of South Dakota.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Rhode Island.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Pennsylvania.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of New Jersey.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of New Mexico.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of New Hampshire.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Nevada.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Nebraska.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Montana.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Mississippi.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this is a work by Fars News. No watermark, no photographer credited HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:13, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'Keep Is there an indication that this work is by someone else? It is the only place I'm aware of it being published at. You need to provide source for the copyright violation. Solavirum (talk) 19:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Solavirum Yes. This is obtained from the Iranian foreign ministry: [2], [3], [4]. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This footage was originally aired on Iranian state television. Kanal13 account on youtube does not have exclusive content from Iran. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed license does not apply AT ALL. Note that "c. Names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s); (...) e. Military insignia;" are explicitly excluded and not covered by this license. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed license does not apply AT ALL. Note that "c. Names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s); (...) e. Military insignia;" are explicitly excluded and not covered by this license. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed license does not apply AT ALL. Note that "c. Names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s); (...) e. Military insignia;" are explicitly excluded and not covered by this license. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 18:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Trans-2-Pentenoic-acid-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 02:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 03:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (courtesy delete). -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Samanta Sahory as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Razón o Fuente. Converting to DR as this seems to be allowed per COM:FOP Peru. Ineligible for COM:CSD#G7 due to the amount of time passed. King of ♥ 23:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is a mural inside this library, compare [5], so not covered by Peruvian FoP which is for outdoor works. The library was built in 1999, the artist is named Mauro apparently, so the murals are still protected by copyright (Peru has 70 years pma). --Rosenzweig τ 11:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://twitter.com/rashtrapatibhvn And "The twitter account https://twitter.com/rashtrapatibhvn does show a link to the website of the president. The copyright statement on the president website is not compatible with the GODL-India license template on Commons, as it states ‘’This contents of this website may not be reproduced partially or fully, without due permission from The President of India, If referred to as a part of another publication, the source must be appropriately acknowledged. The contents of this website can not be used in any misleading or objectionable context.’’ So copying work or making derivative works is not allowed it seems, from the website, but probably the same will be true for the twitter account. " (Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Kovind presented Nari Shakti Puraskar to Jodhaiya Bai Baiga.jpg)

Also, GODL requires license to be clearly marked, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Media_in_Category:Unreviewed_photos_of_GODL-India and https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&oldid=680893121#Copyright_query It appears that this image fails this requirement.

Sorry that it was not caught before, sadly almost everything in Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India appears to suffer from such issues.

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cindyf1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PS and COM:PORN

A09 (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L. Beck: I do not have any issue with your opinion, but please tell us your reasoning. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 18:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
well, I think that this file has quit a good quality and could therefore be usefull. But all the others aren't. Lukas Beck (talk) 19:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not your real motive. 186.172.241.133 12:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the photo showing the clitoral piercing is excellent and is an accurate depiction of a piercing I have seen no others with that quality Cindyf1 (talk) 18:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
could you be more precised please? What file you mean excactly? Lukas Beck (talk) 18:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: The bulk, if not all, of this user's uploads are stolen from Internet porn sites. Even if File:My vagina before intercourse.jpg is from their "own collection", the uploader purports to be the subject. From the angle, the subject cannot be the photographer and thus, as copyright initially vests in the latter, evidence of permission from the actual author would be needed. --Эlcobbola talk 14:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's own work, most likely taken from the web, where older versions can be found (e.g. here) and where a high-resolution commercial stock photo version is available (here). No evidence of Commons-compatible license anywhere that I can find. R Prazeres (talk) 00:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism only file Allocato (talk) 02:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I can't see any issue with these images, in scope. --P 1 9 9   18:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload by sock puppet Allocato (talk) 02:24, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I can't see any issue with these images, in scope. --P 1 9 9   18:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"NIKON D850" ist eine schwere Profikamera, da macht man nicht mal schnell ein Selfie aus der ausgestreckten Hand. Also wohl fehlende Deklaration des urhebenden Fotografen und kein "own work" des Dargestellten Jbergner (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aus dem Internet, keine Freigabe durch den Urheber Jbergner (talk) 07:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shot for W magazine and found here https://www.wmagazine.com/culture/ethel-cain-preachers-daughter-album-interview before upload. We need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and credit at link above not matching uploader. --P 1 9 9   18:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Humanitarius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted artwork, the uploader has stated in the file description that they have "permission" from the owners, but such a permission should be sent via Commons:VRT. (One of the files is in use in the Finnish WP where it is possible to use such cover art, but the files should be uploaded there locally.)

kyykaarme (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

noneducational out of scope image. Adamant1 (talk) 09:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Delete. 181.203.153.32 21:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Les logos de marque déposée ne doivent pas être importés sur Wikimedia Commons mais localement sur fr.wiki afin de respecter les droits d'auteur. Seuil d'originalité franchi.
English: Non free logo above threshold of originality, it should have been uploaded locally on fr.wiki.
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 10:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Les logos de marque déposée ne doivent pas être importés sur Wikimedia Commons mais localement sur fr.wiki afin de respecter les droits d'auteur. Seuil d'originalité franchi.
English: Non free logo above threshold of originality, it should have been uploaded locally on fr.wiki.
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 10:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nsui Mp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are almost exact duplicates of each other. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyright violation and wasn't take in 2023. This is from https://gujarati.news18.com/news/kutchh/youth-creates-wall-pieces-of-gods-and-godesses-through-rogan-art-in-kutch-kdg-local18-1281961.html - from the video there. Mvqr (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violationi? These photos are from https://www.hospitalaustral.edu.ar/quienes-somos/galeria-de-imagenes/. I do not see a VRT ticket. Anyone can make an account "Hospital Universitario Austral Oficial". So we need an official mail from the Hospital Universitario Austral confirming that it is OK to have these photos on Wikimedia Commons. See Commons:Volunteer Response Team for the content of that official mail. Otherwise these photos will be deleted from Commons.

JopkeB (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khosravioriginal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images taken from the internet

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:30, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khosravioriginal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, self-promotion HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HeminKurdistan Is w:fa:مریم_روحانی notable/compliant with fawiki standards? The image is in use on Maryam roohani (Q110195045), and the Wikidata item cannot be deleted if the article is valid. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mdaniels5757 I did not notice that it has an article on fawiki. I don't know, it seems that the article was deleted twice and then kept. If they decided to keep it, then this picture is not out of scope and shall remain here. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use (for now). --P 1 9 9   18:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Payamzamani 09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claim, files with low resolution and without metadata

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; ow-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles. --P 1 9 9   18:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali.snt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works. One is evidently screenshot and the sound is taken from a film.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Capetainaro as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Too old for G7, so converting to DR. Reason for the request? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: passed license review, in scope. --P 1 9 9   18:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Capetainaro as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Too old for G7, so converting to DR. Reason for the request? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: passed license review at time of upload, in scope. --P 1 9 9   18:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Capetainaro as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Too old for G7, so converting to DR. Reason for the request? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: passed license review at time of upload, in scope. --P 1 9 9   18:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

of no use Jan Myšák (talk) 17:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplicate of File:Goran Schildt-1963.jpg. Mlang.Finn (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplicate of File:Schildt-grave.jpg. Mlang.Finn (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pretty useless for any serious purposes. Geohakkeri (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Dudewanarace

[edit]

I was just about to upload an image of a Radial Rocket of my own when I noticed that one of the existing images has a watermark from "radialrocket.com". After doing some digging, I found that all four images of the Radial Rocket uploaded by User:Dudewanarace as "own work" seem to have been taken from the website (which no longer exists, see archive). Three of the images have been cropped to remove the watermark, though it is still partially visible in the top left of File:RadialRocketRG 03.jpg. - ZLEA T\C 23:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license. Seems unlikely to be copyleft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rooiratel (talk • contribs) 07:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 19:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nelvega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

photos from different sources (missing EXIF, different EXIF authors, satellite images, hotel pages) → copyright violation

Polarlys (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader request : obvious error. Think. Angelicadia (talk) 19:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   18:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maame1Yaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OOS

A09 (talk) 19:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for correcting me, I had one DR recently with porn topics and mixed things up. So far, things seem out of project scope for me. Also de minimis could be debatable in two of the above files.--A09 (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Right. I don't know what the copyright status of the buildings is. But why do you think at least the photo of the bamboo would be out of scope? That one is obviously in scope to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It looks to me that all of within the scope... Anthere (talk) 00:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope of their respective categories. Deleted one fuzzy and unidentified plant pic. --P 1 9 9   18:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CGENEYTON (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 19:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture depicting a mural. FoP is unknown. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 22:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TinEye turns up a hit of an older artwork from DeviantArt that uses the same wall. https://www.deviantart.com/nate657/art/Unbekannter-Soldat-459107253

Apparently also TinEye turns up hits for a graffiti generator, so this might be personal artwork that's partially a DW. Abzeronow (talk) 19:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (and filename also seems to indicate not own work). --P 1 9 9   19:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The town of Sant Miquel de Fadells doesn't exist and the uploader of the photo has been blocked for creating hoaxes in es.wp. The file is probably AI generated. I guess COM:NOTHOST applies. -sasha- (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS A09 (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some private cartoon, uploader's only contribution Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a white line on the photo, which is clearly the iOS gesture bar, meaning this is not original work as specified in the license, but rather a screen shot of a copyrigted news segment by TV network PowNed. Mondo (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to me that the uploader cannot be the copyright holder, or not easily: the artist supposedly died in 2022, according to the draft on Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 15:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 03:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster with copyrighted photograph Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. Would need VRT confirmation to be hosted here. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No correct information 2001:448A:11A0:1A19:88B1:24D7:E48A:3135 10:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see the image is perfectly correct, in general, for a prince of Sweden and duke of a province there. I may lack a specific source, but that is no reason to delete it. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep, no valid reason to delete Kontributor 2K (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hyju as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAKvvUv_wck

 Keep because the video was released by Warner Bros. under a Creative Commons Attribution license. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Di. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hyju as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxAWEgLzbic Di (they-them) (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep because the video was released by Warner Bros. under a Creative Commons Attribution license. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Di. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hyju as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAKvvUv_wck Di (they-them) (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep because the video was released by Warner Bros. under a Creative Commons Attribution license. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for same reasons as above. DrPepperIsNotACola (talk) 03:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Di. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tural Zeynallı1951 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claims

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 00:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 03:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 00:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Samanta Sahory (talk) 00:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 00:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Samanta Sahory (talk) 00:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 00:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 00:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 03:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Samanta Sahory (talk) 03:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Russia (edited) A09 (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what is "TOO RUSSIA"? NorthTension (talk) 09:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@NorthTension: I mistyped, sorry. I fixed the link. A09 (talk) 15:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Apparently, the image consists of simple elements that are not protected by copyright (with a star, it’s clear, as for the fist, we have freely posted images where the fist looks the same). 95.55.207.190 10:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per linked analysis: Simple result of creative work (creative human activity) is copyrightable. A09 (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Russia A09 (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Apparently, the image consists of simple elements that are not protected by copyright (with a star, it’s clear, as for the fist, we have freely posted images where the fist looks the same). 95.55.207.190 10:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Russia has no clear cases about such so COM:PRP. A09 (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit: Steven Purcell/TheAtlantic.com, not a work from the U.S. Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 10:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit: Chinese Ministry of Finance, not a work from the U.S. Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 10:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GODL requires license to be clearly marked, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Media_in_Category:Unreviewed_photos_of_GODL-India and https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&oldid=680893121#Copyright_query It appears that this image fails this requirement. Like probably nearly all 11746+ (now 13281) images from Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India

Also, it is an invalid license use, claimed license is for data (including graphic representation of data) - not for photos. See "“Data” means a representation of information4, numerical compilations and observations, documents, facts, maps, images, charts, tables and figures, concepts in digital and/or analog form, and includes metadata,5 that is all information about data, and/or clarificatory notes provided by data provider(s), without which the data concerned cannot be interpreted or used.6" in license text

And how do we know that "b. Data that the data provider(s) is not authorized to license, that is data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive;" exclusion is not applying? That is why GODL requires license to be clearly marked - because without that omnipotence is required to know whether this (or some other exclusion) is applying

I am really sorry for confusion and mess caused by this license, but it is fault of whoever designed such trap.

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let us work to improve Wikipedia by enriching its content. This page mentions about deleting images, which according to you fall in an area, which could be ‘non-shareable and/or sensitive’.
Data as defined in the NDSAP [6] includes images – I find it difficult to understand why images does not mean ‘pictures and photographs’ (considering that they have mentioned charts, figures and concepts separately).
Now let us see where all these pictures come from. Most of these are from the social media handles of branches of the Indian Armed Forces. The exact images and information are posted on twitter, facebook and Instagram. In all these media outlets, there has been no restriction or effort made to deny access to this information to the public. This itself means that the data is not sensitive. The content generator posts these information on social media, which is widely seen and shared !
The same information comes frequently on the website of the Press Information Bureau of the Government of India. The copyright policy can be viewed here [7] . The policy states clearly that ‘Material featured on this website may be reproduced free of charge and there is no need for any prior approval for using the content.’
The twitter handle of the Indian Army is embedded in the landing page of Official website of the Indian Army [8]. The copyright policy [9] is same as that of the Press Information Bureau.
When the Government of India and its branches are very open and liberal about putting this information on the public domain, encouraging users to freely share this information, and explicitly stating this in their copyright policies, I find it difficult to agree on your opinion that these images need to be deleted.
Rather that deleting images, I suggest that you come out with constructive suggestion on how to better apply the license. Thank you Akk7a (talk) 06:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"The copyright policy can be viewed here [10] . The policy states clearly that ‘Material featured on this website may be reproduced free of charge and there is no need for any prior approval for using the content.’" is it stating anywhere that photos posted on Twitter are coverer by it? Note also "The permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any third-party material." so there needs to be confirmation that given material is not such third-party material and "The material must be reproduced accurately and not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." may be not sufficiently free for Commons. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"the Government of India and its branches are very open and liberal about putting this information on the public domain" with "not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context" and "the source must be prominently acknowledged" material is NOT in public domain. See [11] Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"rather that deleting images, I suggest that you come out with constructive suggestion on how to better apply the license." - sadly, many images are not openly licensed and are ineligible for upload. In this specific case if I would have time to invest in this I would write to whoever operated this accounts and ask them to clarify legal status of images (if you do this - mention it here so more time will be needed for this process and I will try to not nominate more images you uploaded). In general, solution with some government works being automatically in public domain like USA did would be nice though that would be really hard to achieve. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Data as defined in the NDSAP" - how it is related to GODL? Do you have this document in text form, not in image form? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Let us work to improve Wikipedia by enriching its content." - note that Wikimedia Commons is for freely licensed content with documentation why it is freely licensed, and it is responsibility of uploader to document why image is freely licensed. Images which are not fulfilling this requirements should be deleted - and this also improves Wikimedia Commons (though I hope that in this case they are rescuable) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No evidence GODL applies here. --Yann (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that it has not been in use within five years of its original publication (since April 2018) A1Cafel (talk) 14:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that it has not been in use within five years of its original publication (since April 2018) A1Cafel (talk) 14:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that it has not been in use within five years of its original publication (since April 2018) A1Cafel (talk) 14:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that it has not been in use within five years of its original publication (since November 2018) A1Cafel (talk) 14:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello A1Cafel, can't one also argue that there is no proof that the image in question is currently being used by the government? I'm not sure how exactly I can provide proof that the image has not been in use within five years when the image is from a previous government cabinet member that has no association with the current government of Alejandro Giammettei. I would also like to note that the Government of Guatemala isn't necessarily the best at archiving its own material (I would know, I have previously requested information from them but to no avail). Performing a reverse image search also shows that the government has not recently used the image in question. So I'll toss the question back to you, do you have evidence that shows that the image has been in official use by the government after the government of Jimmy Morales? Encyclopedia2001 (talk) 01:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that it has not been in use within five years of its original publication A1Cafel (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello A1Cafel, can't one also argue that there is no proof that the image in question is currently being used by the government? I'm not sure how exactly I can provide proof that the image has not been in use within five years when the image is from a previous cabinet member that has no association with the current government of Alejandro Giammettei. I would also like to note that the Government of Guatemala isn't necessarily the best at archiving its own material (I would know, I have previously requested information from them but to no avail). Performing a reverse image search also shows that the government has not recently used the image in question. So I'll toss the question back to you, do you have evidence that shows that the image has been in official use by the government after the government of Jimmy Morales? Encyclopedia2001 (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jordi as no license (No license since). Photograph that was likely created in the 1920s. Could be public domain in both Germany and US, but would need more info to verify. Abzeronow (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no information available. Uploader is inactive at both Commons and German Wikipedia, he uploaded the piece in 2018 under a false license as a supposed "own work". We do not know if the photograph was published before 1927 or not, even if it was published at all, requirements for beeing in the public domain in US. We also do not know the exact year when it was taken (1920s or 1930s), and of course we do not know the author. So there is no hint or evidence that it could be PD in Germany (70 years after author's death). Google Reverse Image Search gives no clues. I like the image and I think it does not suppose any serious risk for us to leave it, but I think according to the Rules of Commons there is no real chance to do so and it has to be deleted.--Jordi (talk) 19:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with your analysis. I'd guess it was created between 1921 and 1931 since the subject was born in 1881 and the subject appears to be in his forties. We do not know when it was published so it could have been published after 1927, which presents an URAA issue, and since we do not know the details of publication, we do not know if it had a known author or not. Abzeronow (talk) 20:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} + {{PD-US-expired}}. Commons:Licensing#Old orphan works applies. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LV Mecklenburg-Vorpommern logo.svg also exists, making this version unnecessary Nordat (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: TOO in Russia is very low. holly {chat} 21:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

above COM:TOO USA A09 (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since).

A 1933 Spanish photograph would have had its copyright restored by URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 15:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} in 2029. holly {chat} 21:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is potentially a copyright issue - it has been removed from the source: Flickr CaroleHenson (talk) 16:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the original file of Linda Finch, taken by Frank A. Vargo III, is no longer on Flickr. Is it likely it was removed from Flickr from a copyright violation - or is there something about this particular file that shows that it is able to be used by commons? I am confused.CaroleHenson (talk) 21:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As an FYI, the Linda Finch article is closed down due to copyright issues and I have been working on Draft:Linda Finch. I replaced the infobox image in the draft with File:Linda Finch speaks to children during World Flight in New Orleans, La (97-095-3).jpeg in the infobox.CaroleHenson (talk) 00:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As another FYI, the final version of Draft:Linda Finch was copied to Linda Finch.CaroleHenson (talk) 20:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and ordered a universal replace with File:Linda Finch speaks to children during World Flight in New Orleans, La (97-095-3) (cropped).jpeg (which I just made). holly {chat} 21:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Task opened on pictured computer is not under CC license, de minimis cannot apply A09 (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I would argue that the only copyrightable portion of the screenshot is the company logo, which is de minimis. The rest of it is probably below TOO. However, the photo itself has its own copyright because of the composition of the hands and the positioning of the screen. Still, it appears that the uploader represents the company based on the username. Despite all of that, this photo is not in use and the software doesn't appear to be notable enough for an article, so the end result is that I'm deleting it for being out of scope. holly {chat} 21:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License is wrong. Keating only died in 1984 so this is still in copyright Philafrenzy (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was taken by Michael O'Kelly, so the original copyright belongs to him. I showed him the free-licensing criteria Wikipedia requires. He agreed to it and asked me to upload the picture for him. He's not very computer savvy. I look forward to resolving any issues that remain. I have several more photos he took, which he would like me to add, and which would make very nice additions to Tom Keating's page. Candide1993 (talk) 22:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Philafrenzy,
I've just thanked you for several formatting corrections you did to some of my recent edits to the article on Tom Keating. Most of the other edits you did were to sections I've not contributed to yet.
I've been researching Tom Keating's life for over ten years now, and have over two-hundred newspaper articles, and over a dozen books full of citations for other aspects of his story that I feel could improve every section of his page. I'm still learning what distinguishes 'journalistic' from 'encyclopedic' style.
I'm disappointed that you haven't responded to my reply to your 'deletion request' regarding the Keating self portrait. Please tell me how to better address all copyright issues when submitting photos taken by my friend Michael O'Kelly, who is 72 years old, and was a personal friend and student of Tom Keating for over ten years. Candide1993 (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Philafrenzy,
I've just lengthened this article's lead section to (hopefully) adequately summarize the key points and provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.
I also tried to correct the birth and death dates in the infobox to the day/month/year format, but couldn't get it to work. Please let me know if this edit meets the requested objectives. Candide1993 (talk) 03:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have taken up most of this with someone else. I don't check Commons every day. As far as this image is concerned, it doesn't matter what O'Kelly says, the problem is that as a self-portrait, the picture he photographed is likely still copyright Keating's estate unless you have any evidence that Keating legally gave away that copyright. Frankly, that seems unlikely given his disregard for legal niceties. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: @Candide1993: Let me explain how this works: Although O'Kelly took the photo, it's a "slavisih reproduction" of Keating's painting, so the photo has no copyright of its own; thus, the license declaration has to be done by Keating's estate, and they can do that via the COM:VRT process. Once that's done, we can restore the file. Thanks!. holly {chat} 21:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plagiatverdacht und nach dessen antisemitischen Äußerungen entfernt Anton-kurt (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: FOP was valid at the time the photo was created. holly {chat} 21:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sur la photo, ce n'est pas Christian Lapointe, c'est Simon Dumas! FrederiqueDube (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and renamed. holly {chat} 21:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Point by point (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No proof that these photographs are FBI works

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: For all three photos, CNN gives credit to the FBI. It may be possible that the FBI got those from somewhere else, but absent any proof I don't think I can delete them. holly {chat} 22:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Herkunft des Digitalisats verschleiert Jbergner (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild ist sicher nicht von 2022. --Kurator71 (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Looks like a older photo than one from 2022. Needs a source,. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep we don’t actually have a lot of African American penises Dronebogus (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you need "a lot"? You have enough. Delete. 186.173.251.75 00:55, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That’s not a reason to delete. That’s just arbitrarily complaining. Dronebogus (talk) 17:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An SVG version exists, but I'm not sure if it's handy to have a separate PNG and SVG version for re-users as the PNG previews of the SVG version might be of lesser quality. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work. 181.203.153.32 23:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment what is the threshold of originality for Armenia? This could be below it Dronebogus (talk) 02:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No information on ToO in Armenia so deleted per COM:PCP since it could be very low. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the coin itself is in PD according to COM:CUR India, there remains copyright on the photo of the coin, as the coin is 3D. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1-rupees-2011-obs.png Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akk7a (talk · contribs) - unreviewed photos of GODL-India from Twitter accounts - 2023 upload up to 2023-03-28

[edit]

GODL requires license to be clearly marked, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Media_in_Category:Unreviewed_photos_of_GODL-India and https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&oldid=680893121#Copyright_query It appears that this image fails this requirement. Like probably nearly all 11746+ (now 13281) images from Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India

Also, it is an invalid license use, claimed license is for data (including graphic representation of data) - not for photos. See "“Data” means a representation of information4, numerical compilations and observations, documents, facts, maps, images, charts, tables and figures, concepts in digital and/or analog form, and includes metadata,5 that is all information about data, and/or clarificatory notes provided by data provider(s), without which the data concerned cannot be interpreted or used.6" in license text

And how do we know that "b. Data that the data provider(s) is not authorized to license, that is data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive;" exclusion is not applying? That is why GODL requires license to be clearly marked - because without that omnipotence is required to know whether this (or some other exclusion) is applying

I am really sorry for confusion and mess caused by this license, but it is fault of whoever designed such trap.

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let us all work to improve Wikipedia by enriching its content.

This page mentions about deleting images, which according to you fall in an area, which could be ‘non-shareable and/or sensitive’.
Data as defined in the NDSAP [12] includes images – I find it difficult to understand why images does not mean ‘pictures and photographs’ (considering that they have mentioned charts, figures and concepts separately).

Now let us see where all these pictures come from. Most of these are from the social media handles of branches of the Indian Armed Forces. The exact images and information are posted on twitter, facebook and Instagram. In all these media outlets, there has been no restriction or effort made to deny access to this information to the public. This itself means that the data is not sensitive. The content generator posts these information on social media, which is widely seen and shared !

The same information comes frequently on the website of the Press Information Bureau of the Government of India. The copyright policy can be viewed here [13] . The policy states clearly that ‘Material featured on this website may be reproduced free of charge and there is no need for any prior approval for using the content.’
The twitter handle of the Indian Army is embedded in the landing page of Official website of the Indian Army [14]. The copyright policy [15] is same as that of the Press Information Bureau.

When the Government of India and its branches are very open and liberal about putting this information on the public domain, encouraging users to freely and widely share this information, and explicitly stating this in their copyright policies, I find it difficult to agree on your opinion that these images need to be deleted.

Rather that deleting images, I suggest that you come out with constructive suggestion on how to better apply the license.
Thank you Akk7a (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"The copyright policy can be viewed here [16] . The policy states clearly that ‘Material featured on this website may be reproduced free of charge and there is no need for any prior approval for using the content.’" is it stating anywhere that photos posted on Twitter are coverer by it? Note also "The permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any third-party material." so there needs to be confirmation that given material is not such third-party material and "The material must be reproduced accurately and not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." may be not sufficiently free for Commons. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"the Government of India and its branches are very open and liberal about putting this information on the public domain" with "not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context" and "the source must be prominently acknowledged" material is NOT in public domain. See [17] Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"rather that deleting images, I suggest that you come out with constructive suggestion on how to better apply the license." - sadly, many images are not openly licensed and are ineligible for upload. In this specific case if I would have time to invest in this I would write to whoever operated this accounts and ask them to clarify legal status of images (if you do this - mention it here so more time will be needed for this process and I will try to not nominate more images you uploaded). In general, solution with some government works being automatically in public domain like USA did would be nice though that would be really hard to achieve. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Data as defined in the NDSAP" - how it is related to GODL? Do you have this document in text form, not in image form? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Let us work to improve Wikipedia by enriching its content." - note that Wikimedia Commons is for freely licensed content with documentation why it is freely licensed, and it is responsibility of uploader to document why image is freely licensed. Images which are not fulfilling this requirements should be deleted - and this also improves Wikimedia Commons (though I hope that in this case they are rescuable) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mateusz Konieczny: I didn't see anything in the GODL that limits it to official *.gov.in websites. Wouldn't official governmental social media accounts also be covered? holly {chat} 22:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Howcheng: is there anything in GODL that causes it to automatically apply to all material from all official media accounts? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 04:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mateusz Konieczny: Checking the text of the GODL, it says in the Definitions section (page 4), "Publication" means making a work available to the public by issue of copies, or by communicating the work to the public, in any medium or format. Thus, it seems to me that social media accounts are in fact included. Am I reading that wrong? holly {chat} 15:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note "all shareable non-sensitive data available either in digital or analog forms but generated using public funds by various agencies of the Government of India" part. So it applies to data, not photos. Unless it is some Indian English/Indian law/Indian court decisions specificity resulting in automatically covering also all photos produced by Indian Government? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It does apply to photos. If we're wrong about that, then we have tens of thousands of files to delete. (Edit to add) It appears you contributed to discussion at Template talk:GODL-India. I suggest that any questions about what is or is not covered by this license be concluded there and that this nomination be closed pending any decisions made there. holly {chat} 17:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]