Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
no tiene licencia Iamjosemom (talk) 00:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 02:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Danish copyright for simple photographs automatically complies with URAA. This is because the protection term before 1970 was 25 years, and the 1995 copyright law was not retroactive with respect to photographs. See COM:Denmark. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Danish copyright for simple photographs automatically complies with URAA. This is because the protection term before 1970 was 25 years, and the 1995 copyright law was not retroactive with respect to photographs. See COM:Denmark. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Danish copyright for simple photographs automatically complies with URAA. This is because the protection term before 1970 was 25 years, and the 1995 copyright law was not retroactive with respect to photographs. See COM:Denmark. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Random poor quality penis photo, unlikely to be usefu A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
It's too early to create a potd for 2028 Q28 (talk) 03:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Keep Clearly against deletion. There is no rule on which date a FP is registered as PoD. Here the 90th anniversary of the foundation of the church was chosen, because the 80th anniversary was already assigned a long time ago, but the 100th anniversary is too far away. --XRay 💬 04:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)- Keep On the one hand, there is no rule that would prohibit such proposals, on the other hand, it has long been quite common to enter dates that lie in the future. --Smial (talk) 10:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 12:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia and the photo maybe violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- This a public government building in Latvia on a main street in the capital. I am the owner of the photo. The architect probably is dead many years ago since the building is very old and is copyrights had already expired many years ago. Boyko novev (talk) 11:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. Boyko novev you may be the owner of the photo, but this allone does not allowed you to upload the on Wikimedia Commons. The picture is unfree until 70 years after death of the architect. --Lukas Beck (talk) 13:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment @Taivo: Could you please elaborate? This one rather looks like eclectic 19th-century building, which of course would mean {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --A.Savin 15:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- If it's from 19th century, then, of course, it's free. For me it looks like Stalin era building from 1950s. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Stalinist architecture looks different, just take a look at any picture in the Wikipedia article. --A.Savin 15:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Now found the spot: this is the building, surely not Soviet architecture. Keep --A.Savin 15:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- If it's from 19th century, then, of course, it's free. For me it looks like Stalin era building from 1950s. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept, now I can withdraw the request. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake SimoneAvizCardoso (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & dupe of File:NotaMec.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 18:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
WDDBNEB3HBB3BH2 204.43.231.238 19:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Not in the public domain in the US. Work was created anonymously in 1951. If it was published immediately, only abroad, and without compliance with US formalities, it doesn't enter the public domain until 1951 + 95 + 1 = 2047. Changing any assumptions results in a later expiration year. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 20:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry for my bad English. This issue is specific for PD-France because of specific judgement case ("collective work"). Each photo taken by Studio Harcourt before 1953 (70 years after publication by this studio) can be reproduced with the mention "Studio Harcourt". You can refer to this : "Studio Harcourt photos have been judged to be collective works [1]". Before importing to Commons, I asked confirmation to Racconish who is admin [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Racconish
- Regards. Tisourcier (talk) 20:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that this picture is PD in France. However, works on Commons have to be PD in both the country of origin and the US to be uploaded on grounds of PD. Also, the admin didn't respond to you. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 20:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, yes he did :
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Racconish#Sources_Studio_Harcourt_(et_autres)_d'avant_1954
- A lot of these pictures have been published here yet. For instance : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aznavour_Harcourt_1942.jpg Tisourcier (talk) 21:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that this picture is PD in France. However, works on Commons have to be PD in both the country of origin and the US to be uploaded on grounds of PD. Also, the admin didn't respond to you. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 20:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- User:Studio Harcourt has released the bulk of their images to Commons. I have asked to see the terms of VRT, but no one has posted the details yet. Images prior to 1991 are now owned by the State of France, and a tranche of them appear to have been loaded to Commons under a CC license. --RAN (talk) 22:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn per RAN. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
I have to use this file Adv Sh Mishra (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete the photo Adv Sh Mishra (talk) 14:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Sgef1211 (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
DUPLICATE of another file. SurinameCentral (talk) 18:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- @SurinameCentral: Duplicate of which file? --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- the information on that map i uploaded is already on this map: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:7_Ressorts_of_district_Sipaliwini_-_Suriname.png. the same information is presented on this, and the purpose of this file that is requested for deleteion (My Upload) can be reached by the linked map, making this one unnecessary. SurinameCentral (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: So not really a duplicate. But anyway, deleted per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
empty, unused --Kareyac (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just used it 😐. --Narek75 (talk) 10:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
photographer indicates commercial use is disallowed .usarnamechoice (talk) 23:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Parece que este cabro ha logrado por primera vez levantar la pipa y altiro sacó una foto de recuerdo. No es su álbum personal de desarrollo sexual.. 186.173.122.33 02:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Used without permission from photographer 91.183.203.178 11:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 07:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Redundant gallery page; only lists a singular photo out of the four on the Category page. reppoptalk 00:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Single-image galleries are normally "speedied". 186.175.202.40 01:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Redundant gallery page; only two photos listed reppoptalk 00:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; already in cat, gallery page provided no text or other additional information. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Salavat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from a 1958 issue of the Washington Evening Star. Should be discussed, newspapers from that era were often not-renewed or no-notice. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:17, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment, Sorry I should have thought of that. University of Pennsylvania Catalogue of Copyright Entries has no record of any copyright renewals in 1958. It would be good if the uploader could narrow down the issue from 1958 that the image came from though. Salavat (talk) 08:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Follow up comment, I did a search for Beveridge on the Library of Congress but couldn't find this exact image. I likely just missed it but it would be good if we could clarify the edition. Salavat (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The newspaper did not renew any issues. To search just look under the Wikidata entry for the paper, and the copyright status is found by clicking "onlinebooks", you no longer have to search by year, now that the data is loaded here, by publication. Eventually I will import that copyright status directly into Wikidata, but for now just click through. --RAN (talk) 23:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fictional flag (this flag is based on a photo of a pale Latvian flag) Rtfroot (talk) 06:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Copyright violation 118.149.84.121 07:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
most likely a copyright problem, see results of TinEye Lukas Beck (talk) 07:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree - falsely claimed as own work. Marbletan (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Same as her fb pic https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=127613196038549&set=a.127613192705216 albeit in colour, that image has been online since 2021, making this 2023 claim of own work unlikely Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's not a real flag. Wadiya is a movie. Flag Creator (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band for which the uploader does not seem to be the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: picture of a band for which the uploader does not seem to be the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Freedom of Panorama#Indonesia. Architecture is protected under Article 12. JahlilMA (talk) 08:09, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: de minimis: it's a skyline. Ruthven (msg) 21:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Likely COM:Flickrwashing: Flickr-imported image bears a FB metadata ("FBMD2300096901000036400000536f0000c1930000a08b010086dd0100e25e020053b802006a04030075a40300") Also, as the original Flickr-hosted file is no longer accessible, it is difficult to determine if the Flickr user's other uploads are also their own photos or are also mere imports from Facebook. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-wikipedian: out of project scope! --Karim talk to me :)..! 00:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Flickr user admitted this isn't his photo. See his reply to the real photographer in the comments section of the Flickr upload. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- The evidences
- The current Flickr description bears "The photo was taken by FaceBook's Chuck Goolsbee and I found it on FaceBook's [2].
- The comment section itself:
Why not ask me directly to repost, or reuse permissions? It is not like I'm that hard to find - last I checked, I'm the only "Chuck Goolsbee" on the entire planet.
— chuck goolsbee
Hi Chuck - I found the image on the FaceBook Prineville page. It was credited to you there but didn't include any contact info for you on the page.
I needed an image for a blog post I was using about the data center (see greenmonk.net/facebook-open-sources-building-an-energy-ef... and the one on Facebook isn't embeddable afaik.
Not knowing how to contact you and having a looming deadline, I decided to put a copy here, referencing you as the copyright owner, saying where I found it and also crediting you in the blog post.
If you'd like me to remove it, obviously I will. Otherwise, is there some other way I can make this right?— Tom Raftery (the Flickr uploader)
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Complex logo Trade (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Agência Brasil image published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Agência Brasil image published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Agência Brasil image published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Agência Brasil image published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Agência Brasil image published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Agência Brasil image published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commonsv A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Agência Brasil image published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not published prior to 1983 and still protected by copyright A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope.
- File:Tondo (HAMEDZIDAART.COM).png
- File:Rabem (HAMEDZIDAART.COM).png
- File:Ziri (HAMEDZIDAART.COM).png
- File:Jibun (HAMEDZIDAART.COM).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Complex artwork and obviously not the uploader's own work Bedivere (talk) 03:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:TOO Chile seems quite low. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Wikimedia Commons' policy is to not delete files based on just allegation that the URAA applies. FunnyMath (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; 1999 > 1996. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 16:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=747007341#File:Li_Fu_Lee,_Kuan_Tung,_and_their_family_in_China.jpg){kind=link}
Private picture without any realistic educational use. R555445 (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Seems that it is a random nude photo providing little educational value, just a nude men standing and nothing special A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Poor photo quality of nude man and domestic refrigerator, both subjects we have many much better and more useful photos of, no evident compensating importance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Akstik is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
PD dispute Rev-san (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep – I am the nominator, but I do NOT want the file to be deleted. I brought the discussion here because another user attempted to abuse the {{copyvio}} template to speedy delete this file. The speedy deletion mechanism is only appropriate for *obvious*, undisputable copyright violations. For any other cases, the {{Delete}} template and the regular deletion mechanism should be used. I want the aforementioned user to provide their arguments here in a clear manner for the deletion.
- According to the Voice of America (VOA) website, all in-house VOA content (whether article content, radio or television programming) is in the public domain as part of US government work. Content that is externally made (content from AP, AFP, Reuters) is not, because those are copyrighted. The photo related to the speedy deletion request is an in-house photo made by a VOA photographer, therefore it is in the public domain. The in-house crediting ("Henry Ridgwell/VOA") can be seen here: https://www.voanews.com/a/netherlands-tells-china-to-close-police-stations-/6815747.html
- The VOA copyright terms can be seen here: https://www.voanews.com/p/5338.html (as linked from the VOA PD licence template)
- As a side note, Commons already has a number of VOA photographs determined to be public domain in the following category: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:PD_VOA_(VOA)
- Again, let's not harm the project by arguing on technicalities in bad faith. – Rev-san (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - the Look at the very first statement on the VOA copyright page. It says, "All text, audio and video material produced exclusively by the Voice of America is in the public domain". Not images. Followed by "However, voanews.com content may also contain text, video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material that is licensed for use in VOA programming only. This material is not in the public domain and may not be copied, redistributed, sold, or published without the express permission of the copyright owner." As there is no clear indication that this image is public domain it must be assumed that it is copyright. How can it be otherwise? 10mmsocket (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- The quoted part, "voanews.com content may also contain text, video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material that is licensed for use in VOA programming only", has no relevance in this discussion. Also note that it uses the word "may" anyway.
- Content from external sources on VOA, such as content from wire news agencies, are copyrighted by their respective copyright holder. The article (more precisely, the article text) in question is attributed to AFP, therefore it is copyrighted by AFP. The image used to illustrate the article is however clearly attributed to a VOA photographer. You base your claim on the single technical fact that the phrase "all text, audio and video material produced exclusively by the Voice of America is in the public domain" doesn't contain the word "image" or "photograph". Simply based on the established practice (VOA images being on Commons with a verified VOA PD template), we can see that the anomaly here is someone unilaterally declaring that the photographs appear to be copyrighted by VOA, but not their extensive collection of journalistic content, radio and television programming. It simply doesn't make sense to assume that their disclaimer excludes still images just because the wording (on a news website with photographs) doesn't include the phrase "image" or "photograph". It can be reasonably assumed that the "text" part of the phrasing meant to imply in-house "text material", along with "audio material" and "video material", i.e. journalistic articles, as in printed media and on news portals. Journalistic articles often, if not always, contain illustrations as a part of them. Arguing that VOA does not put its own in-house photographs in the public domain, yet puts everything else in it, is just nitpicking in bad faith. – Rev-san (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Per Rev-san. It's been long-established on Commons that photos by VOA employees (and not from any news agency) are in the public domain. If there was really some major change in VOA policy, it would have affected all images in Category:PD VOA, but that is obviously not the case. Yeeno (talk) 04:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Personal logo that I previously uploaded, has no encyclopedic relevance whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tundraski (talk • contribs) 15:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Hatred image user created to use in his personal infobox. Kwasura (talk) 17:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Anty-anything files could be a problem, but no valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment @Amitie 10g: It is used by one user only, in his personal infobox only, in Russian Wikipedia only. If Ukrainophobic agenda is so important for him he can upload such images to RuWiki (more than welcome) but since when did Commons became an agitation stand. --Kwasura (talk) 18:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SVG_Anti_logos ! most of the used ony in personal space, still, never deleted. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: per Amitie 10g--PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Tasteless but per Amitie. Natuur12 (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hatred content. Obviously. Lemonaka (talk) 18:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Does your rationale apply also to File:Anti-American.svg, for example, and other similar files in Category:Political anti logos? Marbletan (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Marbletan Please focus on current DR, instead of expanding to others. If you'd believe it also apply to that file, please DR as you wish. Lemonaka (talk) 22:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please consider my comment solely in the context of your rationale for deleting the nominated file. Marbletan (talk) 12:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. Opposition to and animus toward different nations and peoples is an obvious encyclopedic subject, as witness the 4 Wikipedia articles this image is on. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Zafer (talk) 09:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tauã Paiva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos with no exif, uploader claims to be subject of the photos and the article they were used in was deleted. Probably out of scope and copyvio
Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The watermarks indicates another author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
copyright, book cover, no VRT permission; bad name Ponor (talk) 12:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Unrecognizable person , No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mike Wahrlich (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not notable person.
Larryasou (talk) 13:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Lt. Col. Fred L. Walker, Infantry Detachment Division Inspector. 3rd Division, Army of Occupation, Andernach on Rhine, Germany - DPLA - b353514d1adb7430a4253aaa41ab2781 (cropped).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antônio rock julio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Selfies and other personal files outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader is using Commons as a personal webhost, has had dozens of files deleted already for this reason, and has no other contributions on Wikimedia projects.
- File:Mike Junior 1444-IMG 20221207 124729 495.jpg
- File:Lone - (Single) By - Mike Junior 1444 Image-typejpg.jpg
- File:Mike Junior 1444-20190209 153731 copy 3000x3000 1.jpg
- File:Mike Junior 1444-IMG-20220902-WA0003-1.jpg
- File:MikeJunior1444-20220817 152222.jpg
- File:Mike Junior 1444- 20220817 152216.jpg
- File:Mike Junior 1444-20230320 131753.jpg
- File:MikeJunior1444-20220806 145213.jpg
- File:Mike Junior 1444 20220806 145210.jpg
- File:Mike Junior 1444 20190225 173956-2jpg.jpg
- File:MIKEJUNIOR 1444-20220804 160600.jpg
_By_-_Mike_Junior_1444_Image-typejpg.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Marbletan (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted frame from a Simpsons episode. RteeeeKed (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nominator. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 22:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- help! help! im being repressed Киан (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Are frames from shows not allowed? this feels like a fair use situation Киан (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Fair Use is not allowed here! Lukas Beck (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- it would be fair use if it weren't for the fact that this is on commons, usually free use images are hosted on wikipedia, plus this one claims it's the uploader's own work which is false RteeeeKed (talk) 23:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Mostly small files, missing metadata. The uploader has at least one previously deleted file with false own work claims.
- File:Josef Mölschl.jpg
- File:Tragtier Bundesheer 1959.jpg
- File:Scharfschießen mit Tragtier.jpg
- File:Standartentrupp des Tragtierzentrums.jpg
- File:Remonten beim Bundesheer.jpg
- File:Esel Bundesheer.jpg
- File:Verletztenrettung Pferd.jpg
- File:Reitpatrouille ÖBH.jpg
- File:Kinder auf Bundesheerpferd.jpg
- File:Stranighütte.jpg
- File:Kaponigbach01.jpg
- File:Pfaffenberger See.jpg
- File:Johanneskirche Ruine Oberfalkenstein.jpg
- File:Hauptaltar Oberfalkenstein.jpg
- File:Philippusfresko Oberfalkenstein.jpg
- File:Johanneshaupt Oberfalkenstein.jpg
- File:Oberfalkenstein mit Falkensteinbrücke.jpg
- File:Deckenfresto Oberfalkenstein Taufe Jesu.jpg
- File:Empore Oberfalkenstein.jpg
- File:Groneck 03.jpg
- File:Groneck 02.jpg
- File:Walleck.jpg
- File:Groneck01.jpg
- File:Carshuttleservice Tauernschleuse.jpg
- File:Gipfelkreuz Groneck.jpg
- File:Gatternighof.jpg
- File:Ortstafel Pfaffenberg.jpg
- File:Mölltaler Bergbauernhaus.jpg
- File:Gratschacher Viadukt alte Tauernbahn Oberfalkenstein.jpg
- File:Deckenfresko "Die Taufe Christi" Oberfalkenstein (Obervellach).jpg
- File:Groneck.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 21:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
license was likely changed, no proof available though Polarlys (talk) 10:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anthidium punctatum 138539025.jpg --Polarlys (talk) 10:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
1959 Spanish photograph. It would be public domain if considered simple enough but I'm unsure if it qualifies. Abzeronow (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Hungarian artwork. Author died in 1995. Undelete in 2066 Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
1964 American photograph. Likely was published with notice so likely under copyright until 2060. Abzeronow (talk) 16:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted characters. Worse, these life-sized figures of Transformer characters are in Congo-Kinshasa, that does not provide complete freedom of panorama. There are some precedents on Wikimedia Commons regarding deletions of photos showing Transformer robots in countries with no applicable freedom of panorama, like one from the United States. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Small resolution photograph. Description is just a measurement of area. Possible netcopyvio Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
unusable due to small size/poor resolution Achim55 (talk) 19:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:TOYS. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Self-promo and DW (lots of unsourced photos) Achim55 (talk) 19:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused random photo of nondescript item, no context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused random photo of nondescript item, no context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per IP user 195.19.125.171 on my talk: "A man in the photo died a long time ago. However, this is a drawn picture of a contemporary artist. He is still alive and not very old." —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:3-Buten-1-ol-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
There is an extra bond to the rhodium atom. The uploader has already corrected the file, but with a different file name (File:Cp*2Rh2Cl4new.png). This incorrect version should therefore be deleted. Marbletan (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused image with strange fonts, colors, shadows. Replaced by File:Sodium glycolate.svg. Marbletan (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 13:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schwarzwaldschreiberle (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1959, i.e. public domain not before 2029.
_Engler.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, still protected in Germany until the end of 2029. The work is dated 1935, so still protected in the US until the end of 2030. The files can therefore be restored in 2031. --Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
THe license provided is for the wrong country and wouldn't apply even if the company was based out of that country. This is non-free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Added File:Raiffeisen Bank International logo.svg to the nomination. ✗plicit 23:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old. This is the logo of Raiffeisen, an Austrian cooperative banking association. While Austria has a low threshold of originality, the main graphic element of the logo (the crossed horse heads roof gable) was already part of the Raiffeisen logo in 1877, in an almost identical version, compare [4]. The minuscule changes made in later versions of the logo are IMO below Austrian TOO. --Rosenzweig τ 12:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: A watermark is visible on the picture, also, not sure the photo is from 2014 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 13:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 13:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 13:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 13:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 14:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 14:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 14:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Tokyo Metro Series 02 02-102F in Yotsuya Station.jpgと構図は全く同じな上、色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 14:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Tokyo Metro Series 02 02-102F in Yotsuya Station.jpgと構図は全く同じな上、色味やコントラストが不自然に加工されており、ウィキペディアの素材としては非常に扱いづらいため。 Sakura Torch (talk) 14:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality and unused vulva image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed, poor quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 15:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
1941 and "own work"? hm... Xocolatl (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this was the same photograph in the previous DR. But it was definitely taken before 1953 and the subject looks over 40 so 1940s would fit. Country of origin appears to be Turkey. Would need further information on this to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 15:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 15:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 19:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 15:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 19:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 16:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 19:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Siegmar Unger (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 17:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope. Leonel Sohns 18:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Facebook 181.43.4.47 19:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 19:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
File:A battle scene with soldiers portrayed as 15th century Ottomans-from Khusrau and Shirin, A.H. 904, (1498–99AD).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Suleyman Pa$a (talk) 20:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete uploaders request shortly after upload, not in use --Lukas Beck (talk) 05:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Although masturbation is in scope, this image is in poor quality and unused, and can be replaced by alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 17:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination, Category:Animations of male masturbation certainly contains much better animations. --Wutsje 06:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
We have a fair number of in-focus videos of men masturbating, I see no usefulness in this poor quality one (different from previously deleted of same name) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
was replaced with a SVG Map with black Lines that is more Clearly visible. the light blue lines are not so easy on the eyes. replaced with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Suriname_Resorts_Updated.svg SurinameCentral (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
was replaced with a SVG Map with black Lines that is more Clearly visible. the light blue lines are not so easy on the eyes. replaced with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Suriname_Resorts_Updated.svg SurinameCentral (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit The World & Vietnam Report, not a work from the USAID, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Abdullah6446 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: the owner of the copyright changed the copyright from "cc-by-4.0" to all "rights reserved" |source= https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102123983 Polarlys (talk) 10:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anthidium punctatum 138539025.jpg. --Polarlys (talk) 10:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination- no license review. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo. Onel5969 (talk) 13:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bmmederos35 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The only two uploads by an indef blocked user, no educational content because of missing explanation what the maps are actually for, missing categories and no usage. Also, unclear copyright status of source maps, if any were used.
A.Savin 14:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete both, 1st is from File:Mapa Habana.png (sorry, didn't notice that before). They created more than 100 accounts. --Achim55 (talk) 16:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
These photos taken as part of Wiki Loves Africa 2020 – Congo-Kinshasa leg show works of art and architecture that are likely still under copyright as their architects and artists are not yet dead for more than 50 years. As Congo-Kinshasa does not provide freedom of panorama, these photos under commercial Creative Commons licenses are all copyright violations. No indication that prior permissions from the artists or building designers, via correspondences, have been secured.
- 3D sculptural works
- File:African Art-1- Kinshasa , DRC.jpg – plaque indicates authorship: Mampuya, 200? (? since the last digit is unreadable)
- File:African Art-2- Kinshasa , DRC.jpg – plaque is almost unreadable
- File:African Art-3 Kinshasa , DRC.jpg – plaque indicates authorship: w:en:André Lufwa, 196? (? since the last digit is unreadable)
- File:African Art-4-Kinshasa , DRC.jpg – plaque indicates authorship: w:en:André Lufwa, 195? (? since the last digit is almost unreadable, possibly "1950" or "1956"?)
- File:African Art-5-Kinshasa , DRC.jpg – plaque indicates authorship: Nginamau, 196? (? since the last digit is almost unreadable, perhaps "1963"?)
- 2D flat art
- Architecture
- File:Building in Kinshasa at Nite.webm
- File:Building on the Boulevard.jpg
- File:CTC Residency-at Kinshasa, DRC.jpg
- File:RAW Bank, Largest Bank of DRC, part of RAWJI Group, Largest Group in DRC.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 17:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This crop is so bad that there is no way of this being realistically useful for an educational purpose. --CaroFraTyskland (talk) 17:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No it is not. The front of her face is visible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- The original version of the picture will remain (File:Sylvi Listhaug-3.jpg). Anyone can make a new/better crop if needed. I'd find a crop like this acceptable if it was made to bring the best out of a bad picture. But the original photo was taken in a studio setting without any distracting elements around her that need to be cut out. And it's not even the complete front of her face, so it's rather hard to recognise her anyway. So I still very much doubt there's any educational value in it. CaroFraTyskland (talk) 17:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I understand your point of view, and we don't have to agree about this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The EXIF metadata of the file seems to suggest that the image is copyrighted and not CC BY-SA 4.0 Milo8505 (talk) 17:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded (by me) to address a problem now solved. Does not reasonalbly serve to illutrate anything else. Kleuske (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Singapore does not apply to two-dimensional works such as billboards, posters...
- File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (046).jpg
- File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (149).jpg
- File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (195).jpg
- File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (210).jpg
- File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (222).jpg
- File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (240).jpg
- File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (241).jpg
- File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (393).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
RZuo (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
out ofthe scope Michel Bakni (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Image was most likely taken from a hotel website (see this page and look at the 4th picture in the gallery). The fairly small size of the uploaded picture seems to support that conclusion too. (The user's other uploads are also suspect.) R Prazeres (talk) 23:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Follow-up comment: I've found some other uploads from this user that were even more obvious copyright violations and have nominated them for speedy deletion. I expect most or all of the user's other uploads are also non-free images taken from the web. R Prazeres (talk) 00:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Ancien logo plus du tout utilisé 37.58.154.130 14:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Ce n'est pas un raison de supprimer cette image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Ancien logo plus du tout utilisé 37.58.154.130 12:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC) 37.58.154.130 12:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Logo plus utilisé Mipoutchinous (talk) 15:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, not a valid reason for deletion, we keep outdated logos. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per previous deletion request, and don't request deletion again next spring. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Interior architecture of a modern work by w:de:Walter Maria Förderer. But Swiss freedom of panorama does not cover free reproductions of copyrighted artistic works in public indoors as well as interior architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Agência Brasil image published after February 2017 are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 02:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
If you do delete the image, please replace it with File:Emiliano Queiroz e Vera Barroso.jpg and follow the instructions that asks the user to crop the image to show the woman on the left. That woman is Vera Barroso, the same woman in the photograph that's getting deleted here. The photograph is also from Agência Brasil but was uploaded on February 2014 and is therefore accepted on Commons.--109.76.97.207 15:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Man Wearing Only White Ankle Socks and Sandals with Legs Spread and a Partial Erection.jpg
[edit]
Private picture without any realistic educational use. R555445 (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Man Wearing Only White Ankle Socks and Sandals with Legs Spread and a Partial Erection.jpg
[edit]
Seems that it is a random nude photo providing little educational value, just a nude men lying and doing nothing A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Exhibitionism as an illness might be in scope, but surely no need for any/every such image. Just as we don't keep pictures of unknown people when they're dressed, although heads, faces, human hair, hands etc all are in scope. Delete. 186.175.202.40 01:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jameslwoodward. --Rosenzweig τ 07:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Seems that it is a random nude photo providing little educational value, just a nude men lying and doing nothing A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: picture of nudist in a particular country at leisure at home.
- Venkat TL (talk) 07:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete this is just a personal photo, nothing special here Dronebogus (talk) 05:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward. Armbrust (talk) 20:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
this file is not needed Ушаков Даниил (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: redirect. File was renamed one day after upload. --Achim55 (talk) 19:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1930s photograph. Source doesn't give any information on who the photographer was or where this was published (Germany? France? Spain?). Depending on where it was published, it also could have had its copyright restored by URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Found through TinEye a site that helps. https://www.kontextwochenzeitung.de/schaubuehne/132/fotografien-gegen-den-krieg-1770.html Photograph is captioned ""Geschichte machen und Geschichte fotografieren," Gerda Taro, um 1927. Foto: Collection Irme Schaber" Schaber (born in 1956) had written a book about Taro. Abzeronow (talk) 16:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" would be the correct license. --RAN (talk) 23:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, probably. We still don't know if it had its copyright restored by URAA though. Knowing it was created in Germany in 1927 doesn't tell us where and when it was first published. Publication after 1927 in Germany or Spain would mean URAA applies and if it was published in France before 1939, it would be public domain in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. We simply don't know enough about this photp to be able to ascertain its copyright status. Gerda Taro died in 1937 (at the age of 26), so that's the last year the photo could have been taken. The file can therefore be restored in 2058 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
this file is not needed Ушаков Даниил (talk) 20:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Looks to have been taken from tv/video screen; COM:DW Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Since you haven't put in any effort in making this reckless assumption (e.g. looking at the other photos I've taken), I'm going to tell you right now that I took all of these as credentialed media. No more needs to be said. --Bobak (talk) 03:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Building on a parallel discussion: I was there in person. These photos were taken in the same room. If you'd bothered to look at my other photos you'd have seen how the look from a distance. I'm sorry you're unfamiliar with what quality you can get out of an iPhone. This is why Wikipedia is a joke. -- Bobak (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- I took this photo in the same stadium. Look at my other works. I challenge you to figure out how this was not an iPhone zoomed in?
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-0109-CFPtitlegame_Pre-Game_view_South_end_zone.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-0109-CFPtitlegame_Pre-Game_view_North_end_zone.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-0109-CFPtitlegame_Pre-Game_view_UGA_sideline.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-0109-CFPtitlegame_Pre-Game_view_TCU_sideline.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-0109-CFPtitlegame_Rece_Davis_David_Pollack_Nick_Saban.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-0109-CFPtitlegame-Lincoln_Riley.JPG
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023-0109-CFPtitlegame-Jason_Kidd.jpg
- etc, etc.
- This nomination is borderline disingenuous. Bobak (talk) 16:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- I took this photo in the same stadium. Look at my other works. I challenge you to figure out how this was not an iPhone zoomed in?
- Building on a parallel discussion: I was there in person. These photos were taken in the same room. If you'd bothered to look at my other photos you'd have seen how the look from a distance. I'm sorry you're unfamiliar with what quality you can get out of an iPhone. This is why Wikipedia is a joke. -- Bobak (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's assurances. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
File:DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Participates in 9 11 Remeberence Ceremony - Flickr id 51467648520.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work of copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Íñigo Morte Ledesma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree files per COM:SPAIN, author is still living. COM:VRT ticket is needed.
- File:Cubierta paravectorial.jpg
- File:Agustinos, 2006.jpg
- File:Bloque Berlin.jpg
- File:AstraBilbao.jpg
- File:Rosa-Luxemburg-Strasse.jpg
- File:Hiperspektiba Astrabudua 02.jpg
- File:Psikopolis 03.jpg
- File:Cosecha Vectorial.jpg
A09 (talk) 14:17, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO USA A09 (talk) 14:17, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Added this entry in order to had to the "História" section in A.R.C.D. Mendiga page in portuguese wikipedia Arcdmendiga (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Arcdmendiga: If portugese wikipedia allows fair use, please upload logo locally (in case my suspicion is confirmed). A09 (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Juanwikiwayuudigital2022 (talk) 14:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations + this is not an authentic Disney logo -Muchasz (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No clear reason to justify the deletion. Additionally, "Disney" text is just simple text logo. 114.125.253.62 09:58, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. The Disney text logo is always in public domain. FireDragonValo (talk) 17:12, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no copyright problems, COM:INUSE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Yes, everything is more and more expensive each and every passing day. What need makes this file necessary? 181.43.4.47 16:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- IP user's vandalism. --Solomon203 (talk) 13:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry? Do you always do that? (False accusations and unilateral removal of deletion tags; now that "IS" vandalism.) 181.43.4.47 14:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- The deletion request is your vandalism. --Solomon203 (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- No. I opened the request because I saw no eduse at the file. If I'm wrong I will be wrong, but never a vandal. Your vandalism is clear enough. 181.43.4.47 14:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- You might not have started the "vandalism" nonsense going on here IP 181, but you can certainly help stop it by not reciprocating. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:47, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- No. I opened the request because I saw no eduse at the file. If I'm wrong I will be wrong, but never a vandal. Your vandalism is clear enough. 181.43.4.47 14:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- The deletion request is your vandalism. --Solomon203 (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry? Do you always do that? (False accusations and unilateral removal of deletion tags; now that "IS" vandalism.) 181.43.4.47 14:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a deletion reason. If anything, documenting inflation would make this more valuable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Solomon, why did you decide to add the words "IP user's" to your vandalism claim? Do you make vandal edits without signing in? Subconscious? 181.43.4.47 14:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- The deletion request is an IP user's vandalism. -- Solomon203 (talk) 10:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Solomon203: Stop attacking the IP user. They might not have been correct in requesting deletion, but this is NOT vandalism. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'll stipulate that it's not necessarily vandalism, and I'm willing to assume good faith and say that it is not vandalism, absent possible additional evidence. However, you have to admit that the deletion reason that was given at the top is not actually a reason to delete the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Solomon203: Stop attacking the IP user. They might not have been correct in requesting deletion, but this is NOT vandalism. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ahmed M Farrag as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of uhlsport. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused logo with no description = out of scope. —holly {chat} 17:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ahmed M Farrag as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of Jako. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tag, @King of Hearts. The uploader claims he's the creator/owner, which is not the case. Had he claimed COM:TOO we'd have investigated the local copyright laws. What do you think? Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 04:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Same goes for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sysyuhlsport.jpg. Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 04:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Whether or not an image is PD does not depend on any claims made by the uploader; it is something we must decide for ourselves. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- I see, @King of Hearts. In this case, this particular logo already lives here on commons at File:Jako logo.svg. Should this one be a redirect? I'm learning here 🤓. Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, @King of Hearts, ping wasn't sent. Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 19:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I see, @King of Hearts. In this case, this particular logo already lives here on commons at File:Jako logo.svg. Should this one be a redirect? I'm learning here 🤓. Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Whether or not an image is PD does not depend on any claims made by the uploader; it is something we must decide for ourselves. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Same goes for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sysyuhlsport.jpg. Ahmed M Farrag (talk) 04:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused logo with no description = out of scope. —holly {chat} 17:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:JR East E257-2500
[edit]- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 01.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 02.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 03.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 04.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 05.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 06.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 07.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 08.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 09.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 10.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 11.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 12.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Higashi-Tagonoura Station 13.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Mishima Station 01.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Mishima Station 02.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Mishima Station 03.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Mishima Station 04.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Mishima Station 05.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Numazu Station 01.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Numazu Station 02.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Numazu Station 03.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Numazu Station 04.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Numazu Station 05.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Numazu Station 06.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Numazu Station 07.jpg
- File:Series E257-2500 NC-31 in Numazu Station 08.jpg
- Comment I don't understand why these photos wouldn't be usable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan KekekBecause these images are unnaturally processed in terms of color and contrast. Sakura Torch (talk) 03:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Have you ever had a usable photo deleted because the white balance was off? If not, you might want to see if that would happen before nominating hundreds (thousands?) of photos for the same reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Worse yet, such images interfere with the search for better images within the categories. Leaving such poor quality images in such a situation can only have a negative impact. This is the reason for requesting their deletion. Sakura Torch (talk) 11:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- I uploaded a lot at that time without thinking it through. As a result, several people pointed out the problem, and I apologize for that. Now I have reflected on it and uploaded them after carefully considering whether they are really appropriate as materials. As a sign of this remorse, I am requesting that they be deleted. Sakura Torch (talk) 11:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe there will be courtesy deletions, then. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- I uploaded a lot at that time without thinking it through. As a result, several people pointed out the problem, and I apologize for that. Now I have reflected on it and uploaded them after carefully considering whether they are really appropriate as materials. As a sign of this remorse, I am requesting that they be deleted. Sakura Torch (talk) 11:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletions for all. —holly {chat} 18:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- also file:V&L Ugo Camera.jpg
Why M. Penaranda uploaded these photos with description "Todos los derechos reservados", which means "All rights reserved" in Spanish? Maybe the photos are not free? In addition, maybe Ugo Camera is the photographer, that case the photos are not own work? Taivo (talk) 14:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes, Ugo Camera is the photographer's name: see @ugocamera on Instagram. —holly {chat} 18:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
While its true its a US congress file its still copyrighted due to the Zoom software being copyrighted Qwv (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing copyrightable by Zoom about the simple display of the video, IMO. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; any Zoom bits here are {{PD-ineligible}}. —holly {chat} 18:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Jordi Play is the named photographer by Flickr source and the metadata shows a copyright notice to them. Play is a professional photographer, and I think this requires VRT permission from them. Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Effectively, the author of the photograph is Jordi Play, however, the file was published under the Public Domain Mark 1.0 license. I understand that the file is in the public domain and therefore free from copyright. With that in mind, I would like to know what the specific problem is. It is not important whether it is deleted or not, as the file does not appear to be currently in use. If it is decided to delete it permanently, please let me know.
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/artssantamonica/49639245191/ Alzinous (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, we have a Public Domain Mark license on Flickr from the museum. Since Play is the photographer and copyright owner, we cannot accept a PDM license from the museum. Abzeronow (talk) 17:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: this is COM:License laundering, although probably unintentional on the museum's part. —holly {chat} 18:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Copied from a website without stating consent to do so. 2001:A61:10FE:E801:A506:CD3B:8EA2:C63A 17:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No free license at source; may be above TOO--discussion needed Эlcobbola talk 17:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: See COM:TOO Morocco. —holly {chat} 18:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of scope
- File:MIKAEIL ALIZADEH 2023.png
- File:MIKAEIL ALIZADEH TWO YEARS AFTER SEX CHANGE OPRETION.jpg
- File:MIKAEIL ALIZADEH WITH HER HUSBAND BAHADOR SHAFEGHATIAN.jpg
- File:MIKAEIL ALIZADEH.jpg
- File:MIKAEIL ALIZADEH IN 2023 CHRISTMAS SHOW ORYANTAL SOLO.jpg
- File:MIKAEIL ALIZADEH 2022 IN OSMANIAN CLOTHES.jpg
- File:MIKAEIL ALIZADEH 2022.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Fairly extensive media coverage of her in a web search. If we were to keep any of these photos, obviously the long, promotional text in lieu of a file description would have to be deleted and a more neutral and much briefer one would need to be substituted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- با درود
- موافق حذف فوری تصاویر هستم. این عکس ها فاقد ارزش و دستکاری شده با نرم افزار و از طرفی بدون منبع هستند. Mostafameraji (talk) 13:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: These are probably within scope, but I highly doubt any of them are "own work" as claimed. —holly {chat} 18:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
this file is not needed Ушаков Даниил (talk) 20:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
this file is not needed Ушаков Даниил (talk) 20:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: this was a redirect created as a result of a move; no reason to delete. —holly {chat} 18:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
this file is not needed Ушаков Даниил (talk) 20:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per COM:FR#Leaving redirects. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G., nominator is the uploader of the original file. I mean, COM:FR does not state deleting redirects is totally prohibited, does it? If I have gotten it correctly, only suppressredirect is allowed in certains circumstances—and prohibited in others. Nothing about deleting it days after the file have been moved. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- @RodRabelo7: @Ушаков Даниил proceeded to remove the redirect in this edit without good reason, which is tantamount to vandalism. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- By the way, sometimes I ask some redirects of files uploaded by me to be deleted for aesthetical reasons. As far as I’m concerned, no one ever complained. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G., nominator is the uploader of the original file. I mean, COM:FR does not state deleting redirects is totally prohibited, does it? If I have gotten it correctly, only suppressredirect is allowed in certains circumstances—and prohibited in others. Nothing about deleting it days after the file have been moved. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: this was a redirect created as a result of a move; no reason to delete. —holly {chat} 18:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
this file is not needed Ушаков Даниил (talk) 20:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: this was a redirect created as a result of a move; no reason to delete. —holly {chat} 18:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
this file is not needed Ушаков Даниил (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: this was a redirect created as a result of a move; no reason to delete. —holly {chat} 18:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Looks to have been taken from television/video screen rather than directly; COM:DW Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Since you haven't put in any effort in making this reckless assumption (e.g. looking at the other photos I've taken), I'm going to tell you right now that I took all of these as credentialed media. No more needs to be said. --Bobak (talk) 03:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Bobak: Please don't make reckless assumptions as to what reckless assumptions I might have made :-) - Great you were there as credentialed media, but I fear some more does need to be said. I noted that if taken from a video screen COM:DW can apply. Is this from a video feed? If so, who did the video feed, and do they waive copyrights to it? What is the box with the name at lower right that seems superimposed on the image, which led me to strongly think it was a television/video feed? Thanks for your attention. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I was there in person. These photos were taken in the same room. If you'd bothered to look at my other photos you'd have seen how the look from a distance. I'm sorry you're unfamiliar with what quality you can get out of an iPhone. This is why Wikipedia is a joke. -- Bobak (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- You've said several things, but you haven't answered my questions. You were there, we weren't, so please explain for the benefit of the rest of us. Again, what is that red rectangle with text "BENNET" etc at lower right? Not a joke, just trying to make sure we comply with the convolutions of copyright law. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- You're so disingenuous... as I said: "I was there in person. These photos were taken in the same room. If you'd bothered to look at my other photos you'd have seen how the look from a distance." You never saw the photo that was uploaded with it:
- Or here:
- They should've answered any question you had. Anyone who watches sports knows exactly how this all works. Is there any way I can encourage you to stop being a Wikipedian? Because you don't assume good faith. You just harass and post frivolous deletion attempts and extend them just like you're doing now because you don't bother to understand. You just want to make this a game. Bobak (talk) 05:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Don't be rude dude, Infrogmation themself is a prolific photographer, we just have to assume here that Apple Phone's iPhone 12 mini takes shitty photos...as someone who has come across photos taken by Iphones on flickr, most really are poor, think they focus more on the front view camera for selfies anyways.. Stemoc 16:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- They didn't assume good faith. They didn't look at the dozen photos I took at the event. They apparently used the entire deletion process as a learning opportunity. That's not what this deletion request process is for. If he wanted to, he could've reached out to me after he did a modicum of additional looking before he dragged this into whatever this commons version of AfD is...in which case he would've seen all the other photos I took for that event:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:2023_College_Football_Playoff
- This is how you drive off contributors: Baseless accusations that use a sledgehammer like this process to ask a question. This is why I tell people that this site is difficult and exclusionary. Look at this process right now: it's still open despite all the proof that everything about this nomination was wrong. --Bobak (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Don't be rude dude, Infrogmation themself is a prolific photographer, we just have to assume here that Apple Phone's iPhone 12 mini takes shitty photos...as someone who has come across photos taken by Iphones on flickr, most really are poor, think they focus more on the front view camera for selfies anyways.. Stemoc 16:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- You've said several things, but you haven't answered my questions. You were there, we weren't, so please explain for the benefit of the rest of us. Again, what is that red rectangle with text "BENNET" etc at lower right? Not a joke, just trying to make sure we comply with the convolutions of copyright law. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- I was there in person. These photos were taken in the same room. If you'd bothered to look at my other photos you'd have seen how the look from a distance. I'm sorry you're unfamiliar with what quality you can get out of an iPhone. This is why Wikipedia is a joke. -- Bobak (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Bobak: Please don't make reckless assumptions as to what reckless assumptions I might have made :-) - Great you were there as credentialed media, but I fear some more does need to be said. I noted that if taken from a video screen COM:DW can apply. Is this from a video feed? If so, who did the video feed, and do they waive copyrights to it? What is the box with the name at lower right that seems superimposed on the image, which led me to strongly think it was a television/video feed? Thanks for your attention. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Bobak: If you think the allegations you make against me are accurate, I suggest you list me at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems - while I don't see my actions that way, I certainly acknowledge that anyone who that is an accurate description of certainly should not be an admin, and what's more should probably be blocked from the project. I have also commented at more length on your talk page at User_talk:Bobak#File:2023-0109-CFPtitlegame-Brady_Quinn.jpg. Thanks for your attention. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, "the box with the name at lower right that seems superimposed on the image" actually appears to be a fancy placard provided by the championship game staff sitting on the table in front of the player, see the wider view photos referred to above at 05:49. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input, Jeff G. Is "placard" the term for these things? Are they just cardboard signs, or some type of electronic device? Wondering, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: Given the lack of borders, I doubt they are electronic. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input, Jeff G. Is "placard" the term for these things? Are they just cardboard signs, or some type of electronic device? Wondering, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and to be fair, I agree that this looks like a photo of a video screen with the player's name in a chyron. —holly {chat} 20:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
logo not free 葉又嘉 (talk) 03:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Abecedare as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot from a copyrighted Reuters video not released under any free license; see original and licensing information at https://www.britishpathe.com/asset/139392/
1947 work, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Reuters is a UK company, so copyright term is pma-70. That means the videographer must have died in 1952 or earlier for this to be PD. {{PD-UK-unknown}} could possibly apply but only if Reuters doesn't have records of who made this, and someone would need to do the research to find out. —holly {chat} 20:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Well-Informed Optimist as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: "There is no clear precedent in Russian courts for the threshold of originality for simple logos", so COM:PCP. —holly {chat} 20:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
The {{GWOIA}} legislative yuan version has an additional term that "The information on this website (excluding the pictures in the "Congress Art Exhibition") may be reproduced for personal or family non-profit purposes". However, these restrictions are incompatible with license policy of Commons. Please also refer to COM:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2022-07#File:第八屆立法委員謝國樑.jpg. Larryasou (talk) 05:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- The additional statement are not incompatible with other parts of GWOIA. It just specially points out that one may reproduce the information for non-profit purposes, but did not prohibit one from reproducing the information for commercial purposes. The other parts of GWOIA, which are compatible with the license policy of Commons, are still effective, or this entire page would be useless. The purpose of that statement obviously, is to exclude the pictures in the "Congress Art Exhibition" from the scope of application, and should not be considered as hard modification of GWOIA itself. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 07:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Seems to be another problem accounted via {{FoP-Taiwan}} issues, which have some terms that can lead some community members to believe its NC feature. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Those were totally different issues. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 13:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Seems to be another problem accounted via {{FoP-Taiwan}} issues, which have some terms that can lead some community members to believe its NC feature. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- We should not adopt interpretation e contrario simply by looking at the meaning of point 4 of "二、相關事項說明" (II. Miscellaneous), but should acknowledge the terms of the 立法院網站資料開放宣告 (Legislative Yuan Website Open Information Announcement, LYWOIA) as a whole. In particular, we should explore the purpose of the overall statement. Apart from the brackets, the provision is simply a reminder. First of all, "一、授權方式與範圍" (I. License Grant and Scope) clearly states that "為利各界廣為利用網站資料，立法院全球資訊網（以下簡稱本網站）網站上刊載之所有資料與素材，其得受著作權保護之範圍，以無償、非專屬，得再授權之方式提供公眾使用，使用者得不限時間及地域，重製、改作、編輯、公開傳輸或為其他方式之利用，開發各種產品或服務...。然使用時，應註明出處。" (To facilitate the widely diverse utilization of the website data, all of data and materials on the Legislative Yuan's website, which are deemed as protected under copyrights and published publicly, are provided in a free of charge, non-exclusive, and sublicensable method for the public. The users are granted a perpetual, worldwide, license to the data and materials for reproducing, adapting, compiling, publicly transmitting, or applying it on other methods, and as well as developing various products or services based on it... However, the attribution shall be provided in the further application.) In fact, this license is more lenient than the CC license, which is mentioned in the legal terms of CC BY/BY-SA that it cannot be sublicensed. This part means that as long as the source is indicated, commercial reproduction is also allowed, which is equivalent to the license requirement of the Attribution template for shared resources. Therefore, we cannot say that because the Legislative Yuan specifically reminds individuals or families that non-commercial reproduction is allowed, it is interpreted as "non-individuals and non-families, or non-commercial, are not allowed to reproduce", because if this is interpreted, it does contradict the provisions of "I." and is obviously not the original intent of the Taiwanese government to promote open licensing. 2. I guess that "二、3." (II.3) mentions that "部份的影音、圖像、樂譜、專人專案撰文或其他著作，經機關特別聲明須經同意方可使用者。" (Part of the videos, photos, sheet music, project outcomes, special topics, or other works by named authors, respectively marked as additional approval required for the utilization by the entity.), so the role of the brackets is to refer to the special declaration here, that is, to exclude the pages of the Congress Art Exhibition from the scope of LYWOIA "一" (I). S099001 (talk) 00:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- I've called and asked the Legislative Yuan. They say roughly the same thing as Eric. S099001 (talk) 07:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable to me. @Elcobbola: Any other concerns or comments？--Larryasou (talk) 15:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per COM:PCP? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Clearly not in the scope of that. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 05:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ericliu1912 The problem is that a license must allow commercial reuse to be used on Commons, if this license doesn't allow so, we have to deny further usages (at least purely usages) here. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- As S099001 and I explained, it is impossible for the additional statement to modify and invalidate the original context of the entire GWOIA, which is compatible with the license policy of Commons. At least that would definitely not be the intent of the government. Thus, I don't see COM:PCP being applicable here. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 12:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ericliu1912 The problem is that a license must allow commercial reuse to be used on Commons, if this license doesn't allow so, we have to deny further usages (at least purely usages) here. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Clearly not in the scope of that. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 05:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I've reveived an email response from the website saying that the purpose of the clause is to exclude the pictures in the "Congress Art Exhibition" rather than limit the scope of application.--Larryasou (talk) 12:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. —holly {chat} 20:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
je souhaite supprimer mon fichier téléversé Organica.technology (talk) 07:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Pourquoi?-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, so courtesy deletion granted. —holly {chat} 20:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor SVG 2001:448A:11A0:1C91:8DCB:AF9E:A3D7:AFF5 09:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- In use on fr:Rai (Orne). --Achim55 (talk) 16:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 19:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Replaced by File:Medaljen till minne av Nobels fredspris till FNs fredsbevarande styrkor - NobelFNMSM1.svg. I made both this one and the replacement. Saftgurka (talk) 10:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Died in 1998, unlikely to be own work. Clearly a signed promo photo Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I changed the attribution. --RAN (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no death date known for the photographer "Herrera" ("Ferrera"?). —holly {chat} 19:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file is an inferior version of the logo due to it being an inaccurate representation. I believe it should be deleted because many people may use it on accident not knowing it is an inaccurate logo. It should be redirected to the official version. OmegaFallon (talk) 11:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IagoQnsi as no permission (No permission since). However, the design may be simple enough to fall under the threshold of originality and qualify as PD-textlogo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Good point. Not sure if this exceeds COM:TOO Japan; there aren't many examples listed for Japan so I'm not sure if this would cross the line or not. –IagoQnsi (talk) 22:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: TOO in Japan is pretty low. —holly {chat} 19:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Photo by Get Pageant Ready, not from the Miss United States, thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 12:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Get Pageant Ready is name of Miss United States photographer (GPR is the photographer, but Miss United States organization owns all rights to photo) via Miss United States Organization Flickr Sharpgirl22 (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 19:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 13:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Jishnu Nagan? Bibliotecario? 186.175.9.168 13:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This appears to a photo of the uploader, who has no other contributions besides this, so deleting as out of scope. —holly {chat} 19:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Better version: File:摹繪自台灣博物館收藏黃虎旗圖.png Solomon203 (talk) 10:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not used. --Yann (talk) 17:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1000mm as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No indication that the image has been released for free use. |source=https://digitaltmuseum.no/011012738306/loytnant-ragnar-berg
1930s photograph from Norway. Could be {{PD-Norway50}} Converting to DR for discussion Abzeronow (talk) 15:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- The source says, in Norwegian:
- «Lisensinformasjon
- LISENS Kontakt eier for mer informasjon»
- which translates to:
- «License information
- LICENSE Contact owner for more information»
- The owner is Norges hjemmefrontmuseum = Norway's Resistance Museum, a part of Forsvaret's (The Defence Force's) own museum. 1000mm (talk) 15:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- That doesn't answer the important question of who the photographer was (which matters more in terms of copyright) and whether or not it was simple enough to have protection of creation + 50 (which it would have been public domain in Norway before 1996 which would also make it PD in the US) or if it was artistic enough to be 70 pma. Abzeronow (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-Norway50}} is OK here. --Yann (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope imaginary map, manipulated version of a sourced map HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
UK Author died in 1970, so this is not necessarily out of copyright in the original country of publication, However, if this is a US edition (of 1905) it could be locally hosted on English Wikisource. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- @ShakespeareFan00: Published abroad in 1905 is still PD in the US, so please go ahead and upload this to Wikisource. Ping me when done, and I'll delete this. Thanks. —holly {chat} 17:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Billinghurst. --Yann (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- also file:طابع بريدي للدولة الكثيرية.png
Not own works. Real author and real license are needed. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think {{PD-Yemen}} could be applied. Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Stamps aren't "applied art or photography" and I don't know what else would apply to them in PD-Yemen. So there's zero reason to keep the image in absence of that. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:Yemen says nothing about stamps so per COM:PCP, the presumption is that they're copyrighted. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
