Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/01/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_tmp-63a19212b5793.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![54 File:Jan Fabre's "Searching for Utopia" in Florence - 30330061406.jpg](#File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30330061406.jpg){kind=link}
![55 File:Jan Fabre's "Searching for Utopia" in Florence - 30929941061.jpg](#File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30929941061.jpg){kind=link}
![56 File:Jan Fabre's "Searching for Utopia" in Florence.jpg](#File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence.jpg){kind=link}
![57 File:Jan Fabre's "Searching for Utopia" in Florence - 30330079216.jpg](#File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30330079216.jpg){kind=link}
![58 File:Jan Fabre's "Searching for Utopia" in Florence - 30248685312.jpg](#File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30248685312.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
_(2022).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![135 File:"Gaolese Kent Koma, New Mexico, 1974".jpg](#File:"Gaolese_Kent_Koma,_New_Mexico,_1974".jpg){kind=link}
_femelle_mangeant_une_fourmi.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_p288_Frans_Ludwig_Schauman.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I noticed there is a newer painting in the photograph of which I believe is not in the public domain. I then cropped it out but I should have cropped it before I uploaded it. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake GuillaumeFaivre (talk) 07:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was inadvertently uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, please delete it Kiwipete (talk) 08:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
It's my own photo. I don't want that this photo on Wikipedia commons. Rudra56 (talk) 08:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
It's my own photo. I don't want that this photo on Wikipedia commons. Rudra56 (talk) 08:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Wrong File Nrshaown (talk) 08:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
{{SD |1=G11|2=https://profile.yoshimoto.co.jp/talent/detail?id=6447}} Nuraa.sinora (talk) 11:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
not right Boltadj (talk) 12:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: SD: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
It is not educational and is very grainy. Derrikisa (talk) 03:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep As good as the image on the Pioneer plaque. --RAN (talk) 05:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Comment OK as a thumbnail. I could take it or leave it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- It contains nonsense in the caption section. It literally says poopy poop butt. Not a candidate for educational use media. Plenty of images like this out there, not a strong contender. Rainnrainn61 (talk) 17:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
The image contains copyrighted material property of Ables Intimate Couples Photography and was shared without permission. Derrikisa (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- It should be deleted. If this is a copyright infringement claim there is no reason to keep it up. There are already plenty of images of nude couples similar to this on the commons and not including the faces of the pictured couple does not increase the educational value of the image whatsoever. It looks as though the image has perhaps been altered in some way from the original. Ashleybruner (talk) 17:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Echoing above nomination for copyright infringement, and you can see at the top near the woman's face there seems to be some blurring of the face. Looks like an altered image. Rainnrainn61 (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. In addition, I found a link on reddit. --Achim55 (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Das Bild ist nicht korrekt Rumtreiber123 (talk) 14:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Das Bild ist doppelt vorhanden Rumtreiber123 (talk) 14:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Das Bild ist nicht korrekt Rumtreiber123 (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Perhaps some NBC logo is present somewhere in this SVG… but for all practical purposes there seems little practical purpose for what is basically a solid rectangle. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obviously not a CC-licensed "own work"; this particular non-flat version of the NBC peacock has enough effects applied that would probably put it over TOO, and I believe someone has tried to upload such a version here. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. (Also garbage description text pattern of repeatedly blocked sockpuppeter uploader of sometimes dubious logos). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused low quality out-of focus penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope - Not Educationally Useful / Redundant Bakertaylor28 (talk) 06:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per previous DR and nomination by SPA and blocked account. Similar images were already kept. Tm (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:45, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Delete Quality as a thumbnail is OK, but there's nothing particularly interesting about this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, badly lit penis selfie. (Not the same as any of the 3 previous uploads of same name.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This is not the same as previous files - this one is markedly better. I would be inclined to keep but there are numerous others - is it remarkable enough? Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- No, not really. Delete it. 186.175.95.162 11:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep it’s not terrible Dronebogus (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: like all the ones before (+ we already have a lot of penises). Ruthven (msg) 12:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Just a hoax. Achim55 (talk) 12:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hoax and unsourced DW. Achim55 (talk) 12:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
its a screenshot from Instagram... https://www.instagram.com/p/B30L243AY0I/?hl=en AwkwardChester (talk) 12:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
_tmp-63a19212b5793.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_tmp-63a19212b5793.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hoax by proxied school account Achim55 (talk) 12:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
_tmp-63a19212b5793.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
_tmp-63a19212b5793.png){kind=link}
Per Facebook/Instgram-code in metadata likely copied from social media. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Looks like a useful educational substitute if you run out of rabbit photos. 181.43.3.236 15:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I'd like to know more about the CDs, but this is a usable photo of a woman wearing rabbit ears. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per above, just recently kept in mass request, no evident problem - does not pretend to be a real rabbit, clearly categorized as rabbit costume. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Toys. ..... Matlin (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; DW by Flickr photographer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio. Metadata gives credit to Nicolás Aguilera, photographer for the news agency EFE. Frodar (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted. --Polarlys (talk) 23:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Navid_Hadzaad_at_DLD_Conference_Munich_in_2016.jpg 80.169.156.186 16:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- No reason given. --Achim55 (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
CV + no valid source Mateus2019 (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blatant CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
The Pacific Crest Trail Logo is protected by a servicemark (similar to a trademark) held by the US Government and requires approval for use. see ticket:2021080410000171 shizhao (talk) 02:57, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep i think this is, again, nonsense, as the creation of this logo by a national park employee precedes every service mark claims anybody could have. i am no able to look into the wikimedia vst, so it would be nice if you post the contents of the ticket here. --MikOGNN (talk) 07:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The contents of the VRT ticket (an email from an individual with the US Forest Service requesting deletion), have been sufficiently summarized by VRT team member Shizhao. As a creation of a division of the National Park Service, the file is appropriately licensed {{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} and deletion is not warranted. However, I have added {{Trademark}} to the file. JGHowes talk 13:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly a public domain work produced by a US federal employee as part of their official duties. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:51, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The Trademark template should address of the concerns. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
The PCT logo is under trademark (U.S. Trademark RN 1656456) by the US federal government and is not available for public use unless authorized. https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4805:39ykwi.3.2 I am the PCT Trail Administrator with the US Forest Service and manage all service mark approvals for the PCT. This image and page should be completely removed. If you have further questions, email at lindsey.steinwachs@usda.gov. 170.144.250.207 16:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Trademark is a non-copyright law. Commons keeps logos with trademarks. The Forest Service retains its right to sue anyone who attempts to use the logo for a commercial purpose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
F10 body parts of an F10 person. 186.173.43.49 17:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused poor quality penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Nonsense Dongre Yash (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; unused, uncat, no evident in-scope usefulness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
book in CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 ES: https://www.caib.es/govern/rest/arxiu/3387213 (page 51) Docosong (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Non-free image. Image is a scan of a 1954 Topps baseball card, for which copyright has not lapsed. Copyright can be seen in bottom right corner of reverse of the card (https://www.tcdb.com/Images/Cards/Baseball/33/33-213Bk.jpg). Adam Penale (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
book in CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 ES: https://www.caib.es/govern/rest/arxiu/3387213 (page 95) Docosong (talk) 18:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
This file is not educational and uses a low quality image. Derrikisa (talk) 04:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I learned a lot from the image and at 2.34 MB it is high quality. --RAN (talk) 05:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure. Can be used for men's shirts or necktie articles. Also you can use it at the F10 explanatory notes as a good example. 181.43.3.236 15:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 10:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Not the compound supposed to be, but octafluoropropane. Leyo 15:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I have corrected the file. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn after correction. --Leyo 12:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Did you check which country it was before asking the question? It wasn't difficult to find COM:FOP Belgium. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide location of this mural to support your claim. Photographers from Bruxelles, Belgique could make photos in other countries. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Click the freakin geocoordinates, for God's sake! Would it really have taken you much time to check these things? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg¶ms=050.858538_N_0004.351580_E_globe:Earth_type:camera_source:Flickr_&language=en){kind=link}
- Keep Per Ikan Kekek. What a train wreck lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep, absolutely no valid reason given, as Ikan Kekek clkearly showed. Bad faith deletion request, imho clear vandalism, by the wannabe deleter. Obviously no time or thought whatsoever spent before nomination, pure and utter nonsensical DR. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 07:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)- Speedy keep Wtf --Trade (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Often, the Flickr link includes locations of where the photograph was taken. Anyway, this was taken in Belgium and it is taken outdoors in a public place so yes, FoP should cover it. Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - keep - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- And kept. Allee, da's niet plesant om dit te nomineren. (Vlaams) :-) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Done
out of scope Trade (talk) 13:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo. --Polarlys (talk) 10:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
DELETE complex logo. 186.175.112.100 12:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 20:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop doing deletion requests for photos that are in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/hans_castorp2010
[edit]Appear to be taken from other Flickr users and COM:FLICKRWASHed. At least three of the images seem to come from this album, which I believe to be the original since it contains other photographs taken at the same time and place, and it predates the creation of the hanscastorp_2010 account by 3+ years.
I've included File:Beachtime 8.jpg since it follows the same "Beachtime X" name as the others, does not have an EXIF data and the image description suggests it's a web download.
- File:Beachtime 7.jpg
- File:Beachtime 6.jpg
- File:Beachtime 4.jpg
- File:Beachtime 8.jpg
- File:Beachtime 5.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete --Trade (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- And please note that I am the uploader and these images are not used on Wikipedia. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan).
The sculptural lantern here was used in the 2014 Taiwan Lantern Festival (w:zh:2014年臺灣燈會). A commercial license permit from its designer or his heirs is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Is this really own work? It's also on Pixelio[1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan).
According to this webpage, the work 馬偕大雕像 was incepted in 1995 and authored by professor-sculptor 張子隆. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan).
According to this webpage, the work 馬偕大雕像 was incepted in 1995 and authored by professor-sculptor 張子隆. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Published previously [2], [3], [4], so COM:VRT procedure required. Achim55 (talk) 12:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Literary works (informational board). There is no freedom of panorama for such works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
1923 portrait from a German artist who died in 1971. Undelete in 2042 Abzeronow (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
German photographer Anny Eberth died in 1954, so this photo is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2025. Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Both the map on the left and the text on the right have Crown Copyrights which will be in force until fifty years after publication. This image infringes. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused blurry image of somebody's dog with no educational value; out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Sculpture in 2016 by Jan Fabre, no FoP in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
![05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-A1Cafel-20230131050100-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30330061406.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
![04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-Krd-20230207045000-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30330061406.jpg){kind=link}
Sculpture in 2016 by Jan Fabre, no FoP in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
![05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-A1Cafel-20230131050100-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30929941061.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
![04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-Krd-20230207045000-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30929941061.jpg){kind=link}
Sculpture in 2016 by Jan Fabre, no FoP in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
![05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-A1Cafel-20230131050100-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
![04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-Krd-20230207045000-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence.jpg){kind=link}
Sculpture in 2016 by Jan Fabre, no FoP in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
![05:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-A1Cafel-20230131050100-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30330079216.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
![04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-Krd-20230207045000-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30330079216.jpg){kind=link}
Sculpture in 2016 by Jan Fabre, no FoP in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
![05:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-A1Cafel-20230131050200-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30248685312.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
![04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-Krd-20230207045000-File:Jan_Fabre's_"Searching_for_Utopia"_in_Florence_-_30248685312.jpg){kind=link}
VP discussion confirmed that FoP in Taiwan cannot applied on artistic works A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, non-architectural works (billboards) are shown as main subjects or theme of this photo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:2016 Taiwan Lantern Festival
[edit]These photos show the official mascot as well as assorted artworks (many seem to be temporal) of 2016 Taiwan Lantern Festival (w:en:2016年臺灣燈會). Per this discussion, Taiwan no longer allows commercial uses of public art without the need of artists' copyright permissions; the 2018 reply from the relevant agency was just a misunderstanding and only suggests de minimis photos of copyrighted public art can only be exploited commercially ("not the main subjects").
- File:2016年臺灣燈會主燈齊天創鴻運.jpg
- File:DSC 0109 (25377248895).jpg
- File:DSC 0116 (25081628130).jpg
- File:DSC 0131 (25081595810).jpg
- File:DSC 0145 (25350993726).jpg
- File:DSC 0146 (25284130601).jpg
- File:DSC 0152 (24750439833).jpg
- File:DSC 0153 (25350980806).jpg
- File:DSC 0154 (25258888582).jpg
- File:DSC 0183 (25081523800).jpg
- File:張院長善政出席2016台灣燈會開燈儀式 01.jpg
- File:張院長善政出席2016台灣燈會開燈儀式 02.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cordero1942 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed location of the artworks is Taiwan. But see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for the dramatic reversal to pre-2018 restrictive FOP for non-architecture: public art in Taiwan can only be used non-commercially.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Promotional image, not within COM:SCOPE. Seraphimblade (talk) 00:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Promotional watermarks, etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Picture of work of art. See COM:FOP & Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US Elisfkc (talk) 01:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
This image is of some dragon sculpture, which is subject to COM:FOP#Taiwan. Without knowing the author or the year of the artwork, let's take the sculpture as presumably copyrighted especially per COM:PRP. George Ho (talk) 05:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think it is a public art. And the photo is taken by me myself. By the way, it is not a dragon, it is a snake.克勞棣 (talk) 06:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Being a "public art" is not a sufficient reason for keeping this image. Public art or not, the sculpture was or is located in Taiwan. Regardless of a photographer, the copyright of the sculpture exclusively belongs to the (unknown or unnamed) sculptor, who may have the authority to decide how photographs of the sculpture is commercially used and distributed. --George Ho (talk) 06:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Since this, should you request deletion to File:Taiwan Kaohsiung Lantern Festival.jpg, File:臺灣燈會吉羊康泰.jpg, File:2014 Taiwan Lantern Festival main lantern 20161209.jpg, File:2016年臺灣燈會主燈齊天創鴻運.jpg, File:2017 TLF main lantern 03.jpg in the same time, which are also the photographs of Taiwan Lantern Festival main lanterns? I see no differences between my photograph and them.克勞棣 (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- I should have (re-)read COM:FOP#Taiwan (Republic of China) and CT:FOP#FOP in Taiwan. Seems that they are attempting changes to the rule for clarity. --George Ho (talk) 19:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Since this, should you request deletion to File:Taiwan Kaohsiung Lantern Festival.jpg, File:臺灣燈會吉羊康泰.jpg, File:2014 Taiwan Lantern Festival main lantern 20161209.jpg, File:2016年臺灣燈會主燈齊天創鴻運.jpg, File:2017 TLF main lantern 03.jpg in the same time, which are also the photographs of Taiwan Lantern Festival main lanterns? I see no differences between my photograph and them.克勞棣 (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Being a "public art" is not a sufficient reason for keeping this image. Public art or not, the sculpture was or is located in Taiwan. Regardless of a photographer, the copyright of the sculpture exclusively belongs to the (unknown or unnamed) sculptor, who may have the authority to decide how photographs of the sculpture is commercially used and distributed. --George Ho (talk) 06:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per depending on the modified Commons:Freedom of panorama#Taiwan (Republic of China). --Y.haruo (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan). The sculpture appears recent, its sculptor likely not yet dead for more than 50 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan).
The sculptural lantern here was incepted in 2002, for the 2002 Taiwanese Lantern Festival. A commercial license clearance from its artist or their heirs is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed to delete it.
- Haragayato Haragayato (talk) 03:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan).
The nominated sculptural work is the main lantern of the 2003 Taiwanese Lantern Festival. A commercial license clearance from the sculptor (or his heirs/beneficiary) is required.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 03:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 03:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thomas Decays (talk · contribs)
[edit]These drawings are all part of some non-notable personal game and are unused, and therefore out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Put out of misery.png
- File:Redgull.png
- File:Shitbox-S.W.A.T.png
- File:Hardware store.png
- File:Happy dog.png
- File:Call plumber.png
- File:Almost dead.png
- File:Evil win screen.png
- File:Win screen.png
- File:Woah!.png
- File:Basement 3.png
- File:Bedroom 2.png
- File:Bedroom 3.png
- File:Kitchen 2.png
- File:Bathroom 2.png
- File:Death screen.png
- File:The pit.png
- File:Basement door.png
- File:Bedroom1.png
- File:Kitchen 1.png
- File:Bathroom 1.png
- File:Basement 1.png
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as no permission (No permission since). Subject lived 1862-1930, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD in Iceland and USA, you can just fix noob errors. --RAN (talk) 05:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Iceland. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Info It's not screenshot, but photo of background screen of the conference. Read all informations, also from source page before requesting. Matlin (talk) 04:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- There is no information in the source page. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Matlin That copyrighted audio-visual content on screen is not background. It fails de minimis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, not de minimis, and COM:ISRAEL claims State works are copyrighted. A few public domain works from the Israeli government are "statutes, regulations, Knesset Protocols and judicial decisions." Israeli State videos are not unprotected works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per JWilz - Deminimis obviously doesn't apply here. –Davey2010Talk 15:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Can be found here with better resolution [5] also with watermark. The only upload of user. I doubt own work Avron (talk) 07:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chayanamanofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:Chayan Aman 12.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 11.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 10.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 9.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 8.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 7.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 6.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 5.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 4.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 3.jpg
- File:Chayan Aman 2.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
No FOP for artistic works in Taiwan. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I've seen others do the same. For example, this image(File:Container art work.JPG) I saw was a public art work. Why can not I upload a picture of the public art work from flickr?--Kai3952 (talk) 08:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: Please see my link above and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Container art work.JPG. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: If it is like this, every file in the category page of "Public art in Taiwan" should be deleted. But I think this problem didn't happen in other countries. Why is this the case?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: In some countries, public art can be photographed and the photos can be used commercially and in modified form, see COM:FOP and the top two colors in the legend of File:Freedom of Panorama world map.png. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: In reply to your words, please see at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tunyuan Trailhead.jpg.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: Art and buildings in Taiwan are treated identically by the "Copyright Act" (1992-2016-present) Article 58: commercial use is not allowed. If this was mistranslated at this government website from the Chinese original, please let me know. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: In reply to your words, please see at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tunyuan Trailhead.jpg.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: In some countries, public art can be photographed and the photos can be used commercially and in modified form, see COM:FOP and the top two colors in the legend of File:Freedom of Panorama world map.png. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: If it is like this, every file in the category page of "Public art in Taiwan" should be deleted. But I think this problem didn't happen in other countries. Why is this the case?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: Please see my link above and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Container art work.JPG. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:16, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 13:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- This logo is belong to my organisation 115.187.52.184 16:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't appear notable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Possibly above the threshold of originality Trade (talk) 14:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Possibly above the threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 14:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Metadata credits Nasir-Khan-Risan Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be from the subject's LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-s-boyd-12943724/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
Mon propre travail (Pikendorf, py.redon@gmail.com, je n'arrive plus à me connecter malgré plusieurs demandes de réinitialisation). Très mauvaise qualité avec reflet (photo de photo dans un cadre).A l'époque je n'avais pas su revenir en arrière lors de la publication. Photo utilisée nulle part. PYRDLT (talk) 08:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
mauvaise qualité PYRDLT (talk) 15:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Bad quality, but I didn't notice another photo of that particular turret in Category:Turrets (architecture) in Lot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Replace when we have a substitute. --RAN (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Photo of existing photo, DW missing all essential info for the original. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, no, no! "Own work" refers to this digital photo, not the original. As you can tell from the sheen and reflection, this is clearly a photo of a display, not a scan of a personal photo. Just compare this photo with other photos of the same tower by this uploader (all taken with the same camera at the same time).
- I have been an admin long enough to know that when someone claims "own work" for a derivative work, it almost always means own work of the derivative, not own work of the original. We are constantly deleting DW, exactly because they are claimed as own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- The photographer stated in the first deletion request for this image that it is their own photo. You are convinced it's not, but in cases in which people are calling it "own work" only because they photographed a photograph, don't you find that they very rarely give a date for the photo other than the date they snapped the digital photo-of-a-photo? But maybe the third deletion request is the charm. We shall see. I will say this, though: looking at their other photos, I do find it strange that they were taken with different cameras and in some cases have no EXIF. So you could be right. I will reluctantly cross out my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- I have been an admin long enough to know that when someone claims "own work" for a derivative work, it almost always means own work of the derivative, not own work of the original. We are constantly deleting DW, exactly because they are claimed as own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pirsharafshah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.mizanonline.ir/files/fa/news/1396/3/17/1164183_609.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pirsharafshah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal pics
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lagerhaus Museum, St. Gallen
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Exposition Musée Am Lagerhaus - St Gall 2020.jpg
- File:Exposition Musée Am Lagerhaus St Gall 2020.jpg
- File:Femme au chapeau pourpre 1996.jpg
- File:La filette aux souris + photo de Linda enfant Musée Am Lagerhaus 2020.jpg
- File:Salle aux "Murs" humains Exposition Musée Am Lagerhaus St Gall 2020.jpg
- File:WWYJ1393.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:15, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaurenceNaeff (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Boîtes à pensées.pdf
- File:L'appartement de Linda Naeff 2016.jpg
- File:L'homme de sang.jpg
- File:Boites à pensées.pdf
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:15, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
No conozco este abogado 186.173.157.226 20:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unused low quality personal photo of non-contributor. -- 01:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, see signature Xocolatl (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Lacks permission from the muralist Jess X Snow for this 2017 work. Innisfree987 (talk) 21:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Belatedly seeing this foto was itself taken from the artist’s website, a clear copyvio. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, per Innisfree987. Also to note that the photographer is actually David Deffenbaugh, and is not their own work. reppoptalk 07:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (Photo by Tom Sorensen/Moovieboy Pictures) M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. Album cover claimed as own work by uploader; would need OTRS to use, and the article at en.wiki where it is being used is on course for deletion. C.Fred (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Possibly above the threshold of originality. Neither the source repository nor League of Legends are owned by Google, so the license is likely invalid. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama. 186.173.248.141 21:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- I thought it was well-established that photos of bottles are OK. In any case, I think the bottle, the product and the specific shape are all part of the subject, without any one element being more emphasized. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Soft drink brand created in USA more than 100 years ago. Out of copyright. {{Trademark}} notice added. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: clearly below COM:TOO and out of copyright. --Thibaut (talk) 14:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Soft drink brand created in USA more than 100 years ago. Out of copyright. {{Trademark}} notice added. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: clearly below COM:TOO and out of copyright. --Thibaut (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Soft drink brand created in USA more than 100 years ago. Out of copyright. {{Trademark}} notice added. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: clearly below COM:TOO and out of copyright. --Thibaut (talk) 14:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut (talk) 14:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Déjà publiée sur / already published on : https://www.ouest-france.fr/bretagne/dinard-35800/dinard-hugues-borsarello-violoniste-passionne-et-engage-en-concert-samedi-29-janvier-2022-ab8d3048-7f68-11ec-a260-20b6064ec764 Habertix (talk) 20:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: archive link for the article, we need COM:VRTS permission from the photographer. --Thibaut (talk) 14:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Source website is no longer online, but archived snapshot indicates "All rights reserved." Ixfd64 (talk) 21:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Taken from various websites, none of which indicate a free license.
- File:Champion worlds 2019.jpg
- File:Champion worlds 2018.jpg
- File:Champion worlds 2017.jpg
- File:Champion worlds 2016.jpg
- File:Champion worlds 2012.png
- File:Champion worlds 2011.jpg
- File:Champion worlds 2013.jpg
Ixfd64 (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut (talk) 14:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Case of Commons:License laundering. All logos owned by their respective organizations.
- File:GAM logo.svg
- File:FL logo.svg
- File:UOL logo.svg
- File:FLY logo.svg
- File:TSM logo.svg
- File:LGD logo.svg
- File:RGE logo.svg
- File:PSG logo.svg
- File:MCX logo.svg
- File:TL logo.svg
- File:MAD logo.svg
- File:LGC logo.svg
- File:INTZ logo.svg
- File:R7 lol logo.svg
- File:SUP logo.svg
- File:V3 logo.svg
- File:DragonX lol icon.svg
- File:DAMWON Gaming lol icon.svg
- File:Top Esports logo.svg
- File:Suning logo.svg
- File:GenG logo.svg
- File:JD Gaming logo.svg
– Pbrks (t • c) 22:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The Github repository is clearly not the original source of these images. Omphalographer (talk) 22:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Charges should be either on the oxygen atoms or outside the brackets, but not both. Marbletan (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, issue also applies to File:Диурана анион.jpg. --Leyo 15:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that one should be deleted too. Marbletan (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: both, per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 12:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Low quality image with incomplete stereochemical information. We have File:Structure of (3β,5α,24Z)-Stigmasta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol (23290-26-8).svg as a high quality, correct alternative. Marbletan (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
-Stigmasta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol_(23290-26-8).svg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)
[edit]private images, out of scope
- File:Brazen.jpg
- File:Bmai.jpg
- File:Bmanne.jpg
- File:Bmannnnn.jpg
- File:Bmannnnnn.jpg
- File:Bmann.jpg
- File:Bmannn.jpg
- File:Bmannnn.jpg
- File:Wikitswanian.jpg
- File:Sir seretse khama airport (mompati).jpg
- File:Wikipedian Mompati Dikunwane with a mastermind book.jpg
- File:Wikipedian Mompati Dikunwane.jpg
- File:Motswaledi.jpg
- File:Gomolemo Motswaledi.jpg
- File:Kanani, Nguvauva and Kazonda.jpg
- File:Mompati Dikunwane.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Indeedous (talk) 16:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope, unused private photos
George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 01:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, commons is not a photo album
- File:Mompati Dikunwane 2 Cape Angela.jpg
- File:Mompati posing inside the caverns of Cape Angelo Tunisia 2018.jpg
- File:Mompati 2 at Cape Angela 2018.jpg
- File:Mompati Dikunwane at Cape Angela Tunisia 2018.jpg
- File:Mompati at Cape Angela Tunisia 2018.jpg
- File:Dumisane and Mompati at Cape Angela in Tunis.jpg
- File:Mompati at Sheraton hotel, Stockholm 2017. 3.jpg
- File:Mompati at Sheraton hotel, Stockholm 2017. 1.jpg
- File:Mompati at Stockholm 2017.jpg
- File:Mompati at Sheraton hotel, Stockholm 2017. 2.jpg
- File:Mompati DIkunwa e at Stockholm, Sweden 2017.jpg
- File:Mompati and Felix Nartey at Sweden, Stockholm 2017.jpg
- File:Wikimedia Diversity Conference 2017, Sweden Stockholm.jpg
- File:Mompati and Youseff at Stockholm 2017.jpg
- File:Mompati Dikunwane and Katherine Maher (The Executive Director Wikimedia Foundation a.k.a Wikipedia) 1.jpg
- File:Mompati Dikunwane and Katherine Maher (The Executive Director Wikimedia Foundation a.k.a Wikipedia) 2.jpg
- File:Mpara 4.jpg
- File:Mpara 3.jpg
- File:Mpara 2.jpg
- File:Mpara 1.jpg
- File:King and Queen attire at Sweden(Stockholm) 4.jpg
- File:King and Queen attire at Sweden(Stockholm) 3.jpg
- File:King and Queen attire at Sweden(Stockholm) 2.jpg
- File:King and Queen attire at Sweden(Stockholm) 1.jpg
- File:Mompati Dikunwane and Marti Johnson.jpg
- File:Mompati in Stockholm 1.jpg
- File:Mompati in Stockholm 2.jpg
- File:Mompati in Stockholm 3.jpg
- File:Dihosana dance troupe 9.jpg
- File:Dihosana dance troupe 10.jpg
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_4.jpg){kind=link}
_3.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I see some of them are use in a user gallery - but all that is is a photo album, so being in use shouldn't be a reason to keep them Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- I agree and hesitated this time because some of the pictures show relevant people like Katherine Maher and so it could be wrong to mass delete them. It may be better to have a look on each of the pictures. --Indeedous (talk) 19:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted only selfies. — Racconish 💬 11:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)
[edit]No EXIF data or other information provided that allow verification of the uploader's "own work" claim or the en:provenance of these photos. Possibly "own work", though not sure that can just be automatically assumed given all the notifications found on the uploader's user talk page. Since the uploader hasn't edited Commons since March 2021 or English Wikipedia since September 2022, tagging the file's with {{Npd}} probably would be equivalent to deleting them by default; so, after asking about them at User talk:King of Hearts#Query about some photos, I figured it's better to bring them up for discussion at DR.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-- Marchjuly (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mompati Dikunwane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern buildings from Botswana, where there is no freedom of panorama. Commercial license permissions from architects of the nominated buildings or their heirs are required.
- File:Ministry of Education and Skills Development.jpg
- File:Mancosa College, Gaborone, Botswana 4.jpg
- File:Mancosa College, Gaborone, Botswana 1.jpg
- File:Mancosa College, Gaborone, Botswana 2.jpg
- File:Mancosa College, Gaborone, Botswana 3.jpg
- File:Head-quaters, Tsholetsa house, Gaborone, Botswana 8.jpg
- File:Head-quaters, Tsholetsa house, Gaborone, Botswana 7.jpg
- File:Head-quaters, Tsholetsa house, Gaborone, Botswana 6.jpg
- File:Head-quaters, Tsholetsa house, Gaborone, Botswana 5.jpg
- File:Head-quaters, Tsholetsa house, Gaborone, Botswana 3.jpg
- File:Head-quaters, Tsholetsa house, Gaborone, Botswana 4.jpg
- File:Head-quaters, Tsholetsa house, Gaborone, Botswana 2.jpg
- File:SQUARE MART BUILDING, BOTSWANA.jpg
- File:Ministry of youth Sports and Culture development Gaborone, Botswana 2.jpg
- File:Ministry of Trade and Investment, Gaborone, Botswana 1.jpg
- File:Ministry of youth Sports and Culture development Gaborone, Botswana 1.jpg
- File:Ministry of health, Gaborone, Botswana 7.jpg
- File:Ministry of health, Gaborone, Botswana 6.jpg
- File:Ministry of health, Gaborone, Botswana 5.jpg
- File:Ministry of health, Gaborone, Botswana 4.jpg
- File:Ministry of health, Gaborone, Botswana 3.jpg
- File:Ministry of Education, Gaborone,Botswana.jpg
- File:Ministry of Education, Gaborone,Botswana 2.jpg
- File:CBD, Masa Square center, Gaborone, Botswana 1.jpg
- File:CBD Itowers, Gaborone, Botswana.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Likely COM:Flickrwashing. Metadata gives credit to Javier Garcia Martino for the agency Photogamma, seemingly unrelated to Maggi Bautista (name of Flickr user). Frodar (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
VP discussion confirmed that FoP in Taiwan cannot applied on artistic works A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, this file should be deleted even before the VP discussion because the posters were just temporarily displayed and Taiwan FOP provision always requires long-term display. Teetrition (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete non-commercial FOP of Taiwan is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Commercial license clearance from the poster designer is a must. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
No source or metadata avalaible. Presumably copyvio. Taichi (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
No source or metadata avalaible. Presumably copyvio. Taichi (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source or metadata avalaible. Presumably copyvio. Taichi (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:SpaceX Crew-6
[edit]Sadly everything is "Credit/Copyright/Author": SpaceX and none (as I could see) have a explicity PD dedication from the company.
- File:Jsc2022e065066.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065072.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065073.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065074.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065075.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065076.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065077.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065078.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065083.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065086.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065087.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065088.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e065089.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e002308.jpeg
Erick Soares3 (talk) 10:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Also see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Training of SpaceX Crew-6. Erick Soares3 (talk) 10:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Training of SpaceX Crew-6
[edit]Sadly everything is "Credit/Copyright/Author": SpaceX and none (as I could see) have a explicity PD dedication from the company.
- File:Jsc2022e079352.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e079353.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e079354.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e079355.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e079356.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e079357.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e079358.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e079359.jpeg
- File:Jsc2022e079360.jpeg
Erick Soares3 (talk) 10:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Also see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SpaceX Crew-6. Erick Soares3 (talk) 10:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Training of SpaceX Crew-6
[edit]Same issue as this request: none of those images received an explicity PD release in their EXIF data by SpaceX.
- File:Jsc2023e005733.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005734.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005735.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005736.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005737.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005738.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005739.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005740.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005741.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005742.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005743.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005744.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005746.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005747.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005748.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005750.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005752.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005755.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005756.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005757.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005758.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005760.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005761.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005762.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005763.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005764.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005765.jpeg
- File:Jsc2023e005766.jpeg
Erick Soares3 (talk) 11:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
empty and not needed anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vergänglichkeit (talk • contribs) 03:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom or redirect to Category:Flags of Romania. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Redirecting would make sense. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: redirected. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
empty and not needed anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vergänglichkeit (talk • contribs) 03:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to Category:National flag illuminations by country. --Horcrux (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: redirected. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploader request [6] and [7] , also see User talk:Johnj1995#Delete Abortion of "PANO_20160923_165000.jpg. Rationale given was, "I'm the author of this image and I wish to delete it." @Ahmed: Andy Dingley (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:PANO_20160923_165000.jpg&diff=719606672&oldid=576796974){kind=link}
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:PANO_20160923_165000.jpg&diff=723225855&oldid=719697455){kind=link}
![User talk:Johnj1995#Delete Abortion of "PANO_20160923_165000.jpg](/wiki/User_talk:Johnj1995#Delete_Abortion_of_"PANO_20160923_165000.jpg){kind=link}
- Note that there is no Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. Also see Category:Al-Kheder mosque. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
@Andy Dingley: Can we expedite the process of deletion? It has been more than a month. --Ahmed (talk) 08:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but one (of many) problems on Commons these days is a shortage of "active editors" (not just admins). There is little I, or most of us, can do to "expedite" stuff, there's just not a good route by which to do it. You would need to give a strong reason why this needs to be deleted.
- It's possible that much of Category:Al-Kheder mosque ought to be deleted, because it's a problem for copyright to photograph new and distinctive buildings in Saudi Arabia. This is because of there being no Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. This image might come under that too, and you could help by telling us when it was rebuilt and (if possible) who the architect was.
- A clear DR statement, based on Commons:Deletion policy will carry more weight and will be resolved more quickly
- I would warn you that "I am the uploader" will not carry much weight, not past 6 years anyway. See Commons:Courtesy deletions. The reasons why are complicated, but take a look at Powelliphantapatrickensis2 / AN/U VoidseekerNZ and the horrible mess that can turn into. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- This can most likely be Deleted per COM:FOP Saudi Arabia. Historical Google Earth images of the area around 26.5634°N, 50.0791°E show that the mosque was under construction in 2009 and a completely different building occupied the site in 2005. That is too recent for PD-Old (50 years post-mortem) even if the architect would have died the same year. --HyperGaruda (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Given no FoP in Saudi Arabia, and that this image seems to have been taken almost immediately after the constructing of the new 2016 façade, this seems to be a pretty clear-cut delete. - Jmabel ! talk 16:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Sourced to Pablo Sarompas and previously published at https://www.tripadvisor.com/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g661469-d23182686-i481398608-L_Aljub-Elche_Costa_Blanca_Province_of_Alicante_Valencian_Country.html
- File:20200829-sarompas DSC8700-Pano-Editar.jpg
- File:20200829-sarompas DSC8604-Pano-Editar.jpg
- File:L'aljub.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Metadata credits Gruppe C Photography, unclear if the uploader is connected to the photographer.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- All files have been purchased at Gruppe C Photography during the 24h Race. So we are allowed to use those Finnalbig (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Finnalbig Did you purchase the publishing rights to the images or did you pay for usage? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Metadata credits Oliver Czubaszek, different from the uploader's other photographs Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 21:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 17:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
While the flickr user posts the photo under Public Domain, the flickr user most likely does not own the photo. Photo is used on multiple sites - https://www.rollbamaroll.com/2021/9/12/22670160/watch-devonta-smith-scores-td-on-first-nfl-drive and https://touchdownwire.usatoday.com/2022/08/25/devonta-smith-philadelphia-eagles-wawa-locations/ but the owner of the photo is shown as Dale Zanine of USA TODAY Sports. On these sites the license of photo is not shown. Diddykong1130 (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete Obvious (though likely accidental) Flickrwashing. I have listed the account for blacklisting at COM:QFI. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
_(2022).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2022).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Previously published as the subject's Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/itswestonh/photo, please submit permission via COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
_(2022).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Jameslwoodward. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
_(2022).jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake RovshenSuleymanov (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep unless some specific problem can be explained. Has been on Commons since 2021; in use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Rosenzweig τ 12:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry, bad quality with low resolution, better File:Angelico - Crucifixion - detail (left-hand strip with prophets and sibyls), 21-508585 (cropped1).jpg Oursana (talk) 00:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
,_21-508585_(cropped1).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Uploader is claiming this as their "own work" and that it was created on 13 July 2013, but the file name implies that the photo is from 1974. The uploading of this file seems to be the only edit the uploader made to Commons, and they haven't edited on English Wikipedia since July 2013; so, I don't think asking them for clarification will lead anywhere. The uploader could've just mistaken the upload date for the creation date, but the lack of EXIF data or any other information to support the "own work" claim is a problem. The file actually looks light the primary image was cut-out from somewhere and then copied-pasted or photoshopped on to this background. Unless the there's a strong consensus to really assume good faith, I don't see how this can be kept per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
![00:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-Marchjuly-20230131004700-File:"Gaolese_Kent_Koma,_New_Mexico,_1974".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Clearly a DW, missing essential source info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
![17:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/31#c-P199-20230303173000-File:"Gaolese_Kent_Koma,_New_Mexico,_1974".jpg){kind=link}
Multiple hits on TinEye earlier that the upload date (e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20140402133140/http://www.lanumero12.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/o_boca_juniors_la_bombonera-1497827.jpg) Frodar (talk) 01:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since). 1932 Soviet photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; historical photo missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by King of Hearts as no permission (No permission since). Converting to DR as the uploader replied on their talk page. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Youngjimmymusic88: See COM:VRT for details on how to get the photographer to send us permission. Please reply here and not on your talk page, as people are unlikely to read anything you post there. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- The photo I uploaded is the original photo. Just delete it. Youngjimmymusic88 (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
copyright infringement https://photogoroda.com/foto-236227-manap-bij.html Kazman322 (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
This is a random file of some person with categories that don’t even link to the photo (Octonauts, Pokémon, etc) 24.217.231.69 04:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Looks like a professional works to me with D.M. initials. The only upload of the user, so I doubt it is own work Avron (talk) 07:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screenshot. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
test 83.167.219.186 07:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- If you are User:Bbqproducten login please. --Achim55 (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: DW copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
_femelle_mangeant_une_fourmi.jpg){kind=link}
_femelle_mangeant_une_fourmi.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mon fichier n'est pas pertinent, je l'avais importé pour le mettre dans l'article de Synema globosum mais on ne distingue pas son abdomen caractéristique et il existe déjà des photos de prédation sur l'article Simon Thevenin (talk) 08:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
_femelle_mangeant_une_fourmi.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, more than sufficient quality and license is not revocable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
_femelle_mangeant_une_fourmi.jpg){kind=link}
In view of this uploader's history, this image is very unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with File:Corey Haim.png
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Also listing File:CathMontgomery.jpg
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Cropped porn/erotic photo: https://tineye.com/search/8e52fc188bc6a9098e45a60e15a51a0aa5a76f3a?sort=size&order=desc&page=1
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. The licensing of this image seems to be sound. It's the depicted person's Flickr-account and it's also her Flickr-profile-image. However, it may simply be out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is certainly not porn, but it's very small and I haven't found evidence that the subject is notable. If she is, we could keep the photo, but otherwise, it's a really small personal image that's not in use on Commons and therefore out of scope, as you suggest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as the original nominator. The initial uploader/Flickr user has also uploaded File:CathMontgomery.jpg. You can find the original image at the same porn/erotica site as the above photo, which the URL indicates dates back to 2004, years before the edited image was uploaded to Flickr: https://www.metartnetwork.com/model/vera/gallery/20040101/VERA_1/ (NSFW, obviously). The Flickr account contains two other photos of the same model with a dress pasted on to make them SFW.
- I don’t think there’s any indication that the Wikipedian/Flickr user and the model are the same person, and even if they are, the photographs belong to the adult website, not the model. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- How do you know that site doesn't simply license the pictures? However, it's likely that the photographer owns the photos, not the subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I found it very hard to edit on wikipedia without people deleting my work and being very rude about it. I wanted to remain anonymous as the atmosphere from wikipedians appeared toxic to me. After I added two profile pictures and a soft profile, then wikipedians WERE kinder. I created the derivative work. It didn't occur to me that copyright from the original was needed too. Sorry. It seems to me that with the tea house and other politeness initiatives, things have got a bit better on Wikipedia than 10 years ago. Plus deletions and discussions take longer, and are not as abusive. My advice to dedicated Wikipedians is to be VERY kind to the newcomers. After a while I came to the conclusion that trying to make my positive improvements to Wikipedia was not a good investment of my time. Good luck in your endeavours. I apologise for uploading the two pictures. Please go ahead and delete them, in the easiest way possible. CathMontgomery (talk) 12:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Terry Lam? 186.173.236.255 10:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Why do you think this should be deleted? Your question does not seem to be an explanation. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence of permission from Terry Lam. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
F10 own work! 186.173.246.131 12:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. Unreliable uploader. And out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Facebook own work 186.173.246.131 12:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from FB, not own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: On the internet since 2013 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation. XxAlanEZExX (talk) 14:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio, readily found online, including larger uncropped versions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_p288_Frans_Ludwig_Schauman.jpg){kind=link}
_p288_Frans_Ludwig_Schauman.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unnecessary, low-quality, non-colour duplicate of File:Frans Ludvig Schauman by Reinhold.jpeg. Mlang.Finn (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
_p288_Frans_Ludwig_Schauman.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep It's part of a complete book, see Category:Finland in the Nineteenth Century (1894) by MECHELIN. --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Rosenzweig. One alternate version is acceptable since it is part of a larger series. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
_p288_Frans_Ludwig_Schauman.jpg){kind=link}
Unnecessary, low-quality, non-colour duplicate of File:Frans Ludvig Schauman by Reinhold.jpeg. Mlang.Finn (talk) 15:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Mon propre travail (Pikendorf, py.redon@gmail.com, je n'arrive plus à me connecter malgré plusieurs demandes de réinitialisation). Très mauvaise qualité avec reflet (photo de photo dans un cadre).A l'époque je n'avais pas su revenir en arrière lors de la publication. Photo utilisée nulle part. PYRDLT (talk) 08:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Photo de mauvaise qualité, reflets PYRDLT (talk) 19:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete If this is a photograph of a photograph, it would appear to be an infringement of the copyright on the original photo.
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tourmirandol1.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Tourmirandol1.JPG as well. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité - Photo de photo flash. PYRDLT (talk) 15:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: photo of existing photo, DW missing all essential info for the original. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Google Lens suggests this is a previously published photo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Filename also suggests taken from internet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
bad categories, no educational purpose, self promotion on tawiki Ponor (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photo was made by Edgar Keats; according to https://m.imdb.com/name/nm5310158/mediaviewer/rm2252928001 it is copyright protected: "© protected www.edgarkeats.com". I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 15:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Yard of damaged and destroyed M1A1M Abrams tanks of Iraqi Army, Camp Taji, June 2020.webp
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as no permission (No permission since). Uploader objects so I am turning it into a DR. Jmabel ! talk 16:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I don't believe the {{PD-URAA-Simul}} applies as I don't see any indication that the photo was published under a free license.
- Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
So I picked the wrong license? Which license template was I supposed to use for a pseudonymous photo relating to Iraq copyright laws? Bobisland (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Bobisland It's not so much about the license template. I'm questioning whether the image is in the public domain. The basic assumption is that all photographs are copyrighted unless the copyright owner specifically abandons their rights and releases the photograph into the public domain. In Iraq, copyright doesn't expire for 50 years, so we'd have to see some evidence of the owner either giving up their rights altogether or publishing the photograph under a free license. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
and:
- File:2021-01-10 14-29-35 ILCE-6500 DSC01368 DxO (50958731936).jpg
- File:2021-01-10 14-00-33 ILCE-6500 DSC01361 DxO (50958410662).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I don't care much about these photos, but photos of dogs are not personal, and dogs are in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Despite the dogs, certainly personal photos. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
TinEye show this image and derivative versions existing elsewhere online as far back as 2015, prior to the image's upload in 2016. (https://tineye.com/search/c7d6f85f61767a92c76062bec981c8ccbd474a4f?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1) Belbury (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
I highly doubt that a marketeer would own the copyright of his employer's logo Hiro (talk) 16:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
no permission from author Hoyanova (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Unlike other uploads of the user, this photo is not called own work. Instead, unlike other uploads of the user, this is called work of Tanisha Gupta. I suspect copyright violation. No evidence, that uploader Siliguri metro is the same person. Taivo (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
deleted RovshenSuleymanov (talk) 17:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Personal file (homework assignment) outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has no other contributions. Marbletan (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by طرفدار محیط زیست (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvio, screenshots
- File:ُTop Iranian community activists environment. ده نهاد برتر فعال سال سامانه جامعه محیط زیست کشور.jpg
- File:Eco Divers Dredger غواصان زیست لایروب.jpg
- File:Iranian EcoSports Community.jpg
- File:فعالان برتر سامانه الکترونیکی جامعه محیط زیست.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Low res duplicate of File:Basilica Immaculate Concepcion Parish (M.H. Del Pilar, Batangas City)(2018-07-30).jpg Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
(2018-07-30).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Tangopaso (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Obvious copyright violation. The YouTube channel has been banned due to this same behavior, just check on Wayback Machine (“Ce compte a été clôturé, car nous avons reçu, à plusieurs reprises, des réclamations de tiers pour atteinte aux droits d'auteur concernant le contenu publié par cet utilisateur.”) As far as I’m concerned, Globo never lets its content under any license accepted by Commons, unfortunately. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Also valid to:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
I doubt that these images are the uploader's own work. Particularly File:Leikhúsið í Mariupol eftir innrás rússa.jpg: This looks like a crop from a photo that's in use widely on news websites attributed to Reuters agency, for example here (dated 23 June 2022, so well before the Commons upload): If you look closely at the image, you see exactly the same debris in front of the building, the same car to the right etc., I would say it is the same image (cropped). The other images are of higher resolution and I couldn't find them all on other websites, but I think this makes "own work" doubtful (Exif data is missing as well); also, the uploader's name and the Icelandic "Leikhúsið ..." file name suggests an Icelander; while this is not impossible, I would find it a bit surprising that an Icelander would be in Mariupol to take drone photos at this time of war...?
- File:Leikhúsið í Mariupol eftir innrás rússa.jpg
- File:Mariupol-apart2.png
- File:Mariupol-apart3.png
- File:Mariupol-apart1.png
Gestumblindi (talk) 21:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
These photos are vital and represent the best images available given the situation. They should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:183:4A81:DA60:F491:43E2:59C6:9BE5 (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Head of a Cycladic statue at the National Archaeological Museum of Athens on October 6, 2021.jpg
[edit]
I went earlier today to the museum and took this photograph (File:Head of a Cycladic statue at the National Archaeological Museum of Athens (1-31-2023).jpg). I thinik it is better than the one I am requesting to be deleted. A larger part of the artifact is in focus. It might be not perfect but it is better than the older one. I think it is obsolete. On the other hand you may find the angle the older image was taken still useful. At any rate, it is your call. I thank you in advance for your time. George E. Koronaios (talk) 21:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. They are both good pictures. I don't see a clearly superior image and I suspect that an editor might have a preference for one or the other. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, mostly out of focus and superseded by File:Head of a Cycladic statue at the National Archaeological Museum of Athens (1-31-2023).jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Found elsewhere on the web. The source doesn’t seem to be correct, and even if so there’s a copyright mark on it. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - Hochlader soll selbst auf dem Bild abgebildet sein, dieses ist aber sicher kein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 22:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE question. Assuming that this uploader actually created this image and there are no issues with the various DW of the various nations/images, what educational purpose does this image provide? The image itself is not important: there are no articles or discussions about it itself. Would it be appropriate to illustrate 1968? To illustrate any of the events pictured? This seems like basically personal artwork that is humorous and fun and that can be enough of a reason to keep it but I don't see the educational purpose of it. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. @Ricky81682: answering your questions, yes, the image is appropriate to illustrate 1968 and the events pictured. Maybe you don't like Polandball, but it doesn't mean that Polandball images have no educational purpose. --Universalis (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't have any issues with Polandball but I don't think personal artwork that illustrates things is what Commons is for. We have en:Protests of 1968 which is at Category:Demonstrations and protests in 1968 but art (even a photorealistic image) that isn't itself significant would seem out of place there. Also, is your 'yes' that you created this image yourself? Ricky81682 (talk) 20:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; agree that this personal interpretation of 1968 is out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Codc as no permission (No permission since). Is a catalog like this copyrightable (COM:TOO)? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use, and there is nothing distinctive about a simply typewritten list except the information in it. If that's copyrightable, I stand corrected, but if I type up a laundry or shopping list, do my heirs have to give permission for someone to post it to a website after I die? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Das Werkeverzeichnis hat Walter Leschetizky auf seiner Schreibmaschine getippt und seine Tochter hat es in seinem Nachlass gefunden. Es sind lediglich ein paar Blätter Papier.
- Also Urheber Walter Leschetizky selbst, ich gehe davon aus, dass seine einzige Tochter das auch verwenden darf. GoldenbookofLuxury (talk) 09:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No copyright here, but ordinarily we would not keep a simple list like this. However, this is in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Codc as no permission (No permission since). Subject lived 1909-1989, PD? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU up until 1953. Image circa 1940. --RAN (talk) 13:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: PD EU after 1996, therefore under US copyright until about 2035. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Oh Bear
[edit]These appear to be modern works by living sculptor and muralist. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan).
- File:Cycling Route No.1 start, TRA Songshan Station 20170309.jpg - Oh Bear statue
- File:Cycling Route No.1 start, TRA Songshan Station 20210321.jpg - Oh Bear statue
- File:新竹車站 (27175172271).jpg - mural on train
- File:新竹車站 (27175172411).jpg - mural on train
- File:環島1號線起點.jpg - Oh Bear statue
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
I feel like I'm starting a mess but according to this page, this is an image derived from an image that was deleted because it was a copyright violation. As such, it's a derivative work of a copyrighted work and that is assuming we even believe that the uploader was the person who created the image in the first place. There is also a scope issue. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
|
first of all, we should check this page: Polandball ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 19:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC) Derivative works of this file:
|
- so, big no! many page will got affected for this. since 2019 no one got see this except you huh? im trying to write, if many people get along with this, just dont bother.
- ""There is also a scope issue."" no. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 18:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G. since you are the only one in commons that using one of these images in your user page. i think you should be informed about this nomination. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 20:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- The number of pages affected does not mean it is suddenly not a copyright violation. If it is, then it all needs to be deleted which is why I said I may be starting a mess. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Ukraineball.PNG as in use on my userpage (in protest of Vladimir Putin's aggression, in solidarity with the people of Ukraine) and therefore in scope. Pinging @Javacode, Yann as uploader and deleting Admin of File:The Book of Börk.png. All of these files should be kept if in use. Thanks to modern_primat for the ping. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 07:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G. COM:INUSE doesn't trump copyright issues. The fact that a derivative image which isn't even up for deletion here is being used doesn't trump the copyright issue. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- if you are obsessed with the INUSE policy, did you consider nominating over 5m useless uploads from Flickr instead? images that will never be used or in scope but we keep getting 1000's daily.. Stemoc 10:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ricky81682: "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed" per COM:PS#File in use on Commons only. How is the situation different if I wasn't the uploader? The file is also in use on two other Commons userspace pages. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G. Rule # 1 of the Project scope is that content must not protected by copyright. I don't get to upload copyrighted images because I want to use them for my personal use or because I want to use them on a project. Some projects allow it but Commons does not. You are seriously asking for the Dutchball image to be kept because a derivative image that you are using could be deleted. Why not stick to the actual image in question? You didn't even create these images. You two are the ones screaming about INUSE which is irrelevant. This is the consequence of displaying on your userpage a copy of a copy of an originally copyrighted image that someone else uploaded to this project. I haven't even nominated the one that bothers you so much. I don't know why it's so bloody difficult for people to go to Microsoft Paint and create their personal ball in the style of a Ukrainian flag rather than demand that we keep a derivative work of a derivative work of a copyrighted image. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- we must re-create and upload them if they got deleted. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 09:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- the real hard work is not create and upload them. it is exchange old files with new files, lots of pages using these images. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 09:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- the real question is...
- images are literally world flags with simple shapes? im aware that these things are public domain. so, they are completly OK even they are from copyrighted book. what do you think about this? am i wrong?
- if these things got deleted, im gonna try to recreate and reupload. my work will still be so similiar with these images(for example: File:Greeceball.png, File:Turkeyball.png) . so, there should be no copyright issues?
- @Jeff G. @Ricky81682 @Stemoc ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 10:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- man... those are really a "mess"... there is much and much more images got affected by this(they are not shown there, i found more).... i guess, i should give up(i wont recreate and reupload)..... but still, these images should Keep. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 11:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- If you think that, then argue for that. You are arguing keep because it was in use and pinging users who's only argument seems to be "I have a derivative one on my user page so I should get to use it regardless of copyright issues." It doesn't make sense that the base source was deleted as copyrighted but the derivative ones are simple shapes so it should be public domain. Be consistent. I know that there are a lot of Polandball images derived from these sources so we should resolve this discrepancy because I don't see an endgame that isn't just a giant mess. My point is that anyone could literally make their own image in Paint today and upload that do that. Why must we keep Russavia's version? You keep shifting why without explaining the inherent discrepancy. If you think they should all be allowed, then go request undeletion of the first image and the entire issue is moot but a lot of these look literally like "I found these on the Internet" source-wise as I doubt most of the users here actually created them. Create your own balls and your own stories but it looks to me like most of the balls and stories uploaded here are here because they are popular on the internet and this is a great webhost for our amusement. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Universalis you would wanna check this. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 19:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Look, @Modern primat I'm not sure why you are picking specific people to ping here but please COM:CANVASS in a fair manner. I already put this in Category:Polandball-related deletion requests/pending which I hope gets the people who have experience or interest in the prior Polandballs discussions. I don't know why you consider all these affected images to be included in this discussion and fine if you want to. If you want to inform everyone who created them, fine as well, but let's keep this a fair discussion and I hope that there is more here than simply "I like these images so they should be kept." As I said, I don't see any issues with your own similar images but perhaps others will say the first deletion by Yann was incorrect but that seems incorrect. :-/ Ricky81682 (talk) 23:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G. Rule # 1 of the Project scope is that content must not protected by copyright. I don't get to upload copyrighted images because I want to use them for my personal use or because I want to use them on a project. Some projects allow it but Commons does not. You are seriously asking for the Dutchball image to be kept because a derivative image that you are using could be deleted. Why not stick to the actual image in question? You didn't even create these images. You two are the ones screaming about INUSE which is irrelevant. This is the consequence of displaying on your userpage a copy of a copy of an originally copyrighted image that someone else uploaded to this project. I haven't even nominated the one that bothers you so much. I don't know why it's so bloody difficult for people to go to Microsoft Paint and create their personal ball in the style of a Ukrainian flag rather than demand that we keep a derivative work of a derivative work of a copyrighted image. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G. COM:INUSE doesn't trump copyright issues. The fact that a derivative image which isn't even up for deletion here is being used doesn't trump the copyright issue. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: NOte first that this is a valid DR only with respect to Dutchball, as none of the other files have been tagged. I think Dutchball and the others that I have looked at are well below the US ToO and the ToO in most other countries -- a rough face -- a circle with two rough circle eyes is well below. The flags are, of course, PD. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 22:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 22:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:PACKAGING – the packaging seems to be the main subject in this image and does not pass COM:TOO Famartin (talk) 00:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 22:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No indication of being in public domain HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 21:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
The map was copied from The Timucua, Jerald T. Milanich (1996), Blackwells, page 49, see in Google Books. The uploader claimed the map is their own work. I have found no indication that the map has been released under any license that is compatible with keeping it in Commons. - Donald Albury (talk) 15:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:39, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Russian Wikinews page «Алексей Навальный задержан сразу после выхода из-под ареста» Screenshot 2018-09-25.png
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by A.Savin as Dw no source since (dw no source since), with the edit summary "This is a derivative work and no source or permission of the original work is provided." It is indeed a derived work, but for Wikipedia screenshots we generally don't require specifying sources or permissions of the authors on the file description page. LPfi (talk) 18:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- In this case finding the sources is more complicated, as the image principally depicts the Wiki Loves Monuments banner, which does not appear in the file history (I assume the proper link to the page would be n:ru:Special:Permalink/665522, based on the date given). Still, the banner should be findable, and its content suitably licensed. I prefer leaving the digging to somebody who knows Russian well or have been engaged in WMF banners or the campaign. –LPfi (talk) 18:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Violation of Free License terms. --A.Savin 20:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- What terms were violated? What underlying copyright is it that you find problematic? If that is identified, it should be possible to just add the correct attribution and licence. Or is there something more that is problematic? –LPfi (talk) 22:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- I see at least three pictures on this screenshot, their source is for sure not Russian Wikinews and their author is for sure not "Russian Wikinews users". Improper source & attribution = violation of Free License terms, in case you're not aware. --A.Savin 22:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, of course. But you are usually not required to site authors of works in a Wikipedia screenshot, and the same should apply for Wikinews. The problem here is that the banner does not appear in the article history, and the permanent link to the page doesn't show those images, so they cannot be clicked for licence information. On the other hand, I expect banners on Wikimedia sites to be freely licensed. We just need to find the banner and its history. As Russian speaker you are much better equipped to do that than what I am. No user is obliged to do that work, but it seems silly to need to delete a free image because a WMF project doesn't keep a transparent attribution trail. –LPfi (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I see at least three pictures on this screenshot, their source is for sure not Russian Wikinews and their author is for sure not "Russian Wikinews users". Improper source & attribution = violation of Free License terms, in case you're not aware. --A.Savin 22:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- What terms were violated? What underlying copyright is it that you find problematic? If that is identified, it should be possible to just add the correct attribution and licence. Or is there something more that is problematic? –LPfi (talk) 22:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per A.Savin, and the uploader has been WMF-banned. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
non free logo see https://www.coornhert.nl/ Hoyanova (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. [24Cr][talk] 20:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Essa imagem parece não ter sido carregada pelo próprio, veja na descrição da imagem aqui que diz ser outra pessoa. Cosmo Skerry (talk) 02:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Skerry. A imagem foi carregada pelo próprio. Na página do instagram fez-se somente a menção do estúdio onde a foto foi tirada. Alice da Cruz (talk) 14:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Favor, mandar permissão de uso para o e-mail: permissions-pt-nf@wikimedia.org Cosmo Skerry (talk) 12:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep This is own work of uploader. 185.172.241.184 11:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission has been received, apparently. --Ellywa (talk) 22:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
