Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/01/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(Cover).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![135 File:Picture of IMPERKNAC's upcoming mixtape called "Gerk Knob.".jpg](#File:Picture_of_IMPERKNAC's_upcoming_mixtape_called_"Gerk_Knob.".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_He_was_born_in_Iran,_Tehran_province._is_an_Persian_Influencer,_Youtuber_and_Singer._His_nickname_in_cyberspace_is_"Yocin".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Qewdaxazsdqewdredwqdsreftqythilpq a good Agamemnon tomb of Jesus Christ LP 175.100.15.78 02:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Test or vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 09:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
File corrupted. I have uploaded the same image in different format. Maikê (talk) 16:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Brayan010203 (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 22:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Own work? Doubt it. MarioGom (talk) 22:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy F1. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 20:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; should have been f10. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete copyvio, come via Facebook. Lemonaka (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Facebook 186.175.94.27 08:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete his Wikidata and all photos 186.175.94.27 08:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- This one sucks, so no objection. But why delete all? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope —chaetodipus (talk) 04:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of scope —chaetodipus (talk) 04:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Obvious copyright & licensing violation Hwi.padam (talk) 04:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Really awful recording of someone reading the article for Toast Sandwich. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toast_sandwich 9yz (talk) 05:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete: Poor quality, and not realistically useful as an audio edition. —chaetodipus (talk) 05:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)- Delete; recording quality is horrible and it sounds like the text-to-speech that got used (I can't believe that's a human) is just as bad. NekoKatsun (talk)
- Delete: Very bad quality. Recording is clearly autotuned and makes use of an obviously fake accent. Pretty clear to me that the file was created to be unconstructive especially because of the quality of the recording. Does not make any sense to me to keep this here. Evercool1 (talk) 16:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
The person this bust memorializes died in 1985, and the museum where this bust is located opened in 2018. (source). There is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-architecture in Taiwan: see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan regarding Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's dramatic reversal of their 2018 opinion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.
This is an advertisement, a form of 2D flat arts or graphic arts. This is too recent to be considered public domain; it is very unlikely that the ad producer has been dead for more than 50 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan). The photo description page states that it was installed in 2010, therefore the sculptor is not yet dead for more than 50 years and still under copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
No FOP for 3D artistic works in Taiwan. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Comment: See discussion at Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#FOP_in_Taiwan. It seems that taking a photo of a 3D artwork is not considered as recreating the original work in the context of Taiwanese copyright law. --Wcam (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Wcam: What if one of our reusers wants to create a new 3D work with it, like a t-shirt? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- A t-shirt is still a 2D work. If a reuser recreates the 3D relief based on this photo, s/he may violate the rights of the creator of the 3D work but not the photographer. Just to clarify that I do not argue for or against keeping this particular photo, however, as far as COM:FOP is concerned, if a photograph of an outdoor 3D work is permissible for commercial reuse, we should keep it on commons. --Wcam (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Wcam: What if one of our reusers wants to create a new 3D work with it, like a t-shirt? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Why nominate it for deletion?--Kai3952 (talk) 10:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: Because there is no FOP for 3D artistic works in Taiwan, and you kept bringing it up on my user talk page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- Do you want to tell me that "Stop harassment on User talk:Jeff G."? I have explained to you on your talk page. See: [1].--Kai3952 (talk) 01:27, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Kai3952: Because there is no FOP for 3D artistic works in Taiwan, and you kept bringing it up on my user talk page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - per Wcam. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Per w:zh:成功路 (臺南市區)#命名, the statue was installed in 1957 and authored by Chiayi-based sculptor w:zh:蒲添生 who died in 1996. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nebes barzani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE: they all appear to be personal photos of the uploader (the name mentioned in the descriptions matches their username). The uploader has no contribution on other projects.
- File:Archaeologist nabaz azeez maran.jpg
- File:Pr.nebes azeez maran archaeologist.jpg
- File:Pr.nebes barzani archaeologist.jpg
Ahmadtalk 08:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Fontejon Photography (c) 2012 per exif, uploader claims to be the person depicted. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 23:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
wrong pronunciation QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 07:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, tight crop with no exif, unlikely to be own work as claimed Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
See COM:FOP Taiwan and Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan: non-commercial use of public art is only allowed. Needs commercial license permit from the sculpture's artist. The complex where it is situated began inception in 2001; it is found at the vicinity of Building A which was completed in 2014. Likely the sculpture dates to between 2001 and 2014; therefore, the sculptor is not yet dead for more than 50 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Very cute sculpture, but Taiwanese freedom of panorama law is not so cute. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for extensive discussion regarding this. The pangolin sculpture, named 咖咖, was unveiled in 2015 (source). Needs commercial license permit from its sculptor for this photo to be hosted here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
fails commons:SCOPE, no educational purpose, logo for a vanity page deleted a bunch of times across different wikis Vituzzu (talk) 11:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Very lengthy literary text in this informational plate, but there is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-architectural works. A commercial license clearance from the author (or his heirs) is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of screenshot with unknown copyright status. In full resolution text is readable. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
In my opinion the cover is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Likely a fake-flag, out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The logo seems complex enough to be copyrightable. TadejM (t/p) 17:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
There is no explanation as to how the uploader took this picture of a short-lived TV show on a small rural CBS affiliate, which looks like it came from a scan rather than a negitive. Guerillero Parlez Moi 19:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused low-quality photo of Wikipedia, no educational value, out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Has no use, no edicational value. Out of project scope. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Probable copyvio, no metadata, looks professional quality, uploader has no other uploads. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logos
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AydinOstovar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope personal pictures
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, advertisement HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope personal pic HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope, for selfpromo. Taichi (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 11:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 17:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 15:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 17:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 15:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 17:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't know him. 186.175.29.102 15:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I think you mean Delete not notable enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
copyviol from his official Facebook page — danyele 16:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 17:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
per COM:NUDE ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 01:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Only one contribution of this so called user! I suspect this is a case of those sick men who install cameras at women's restrooms. What a pity! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.175.29.102 (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is photo fron art exhibition (per desc) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unknown source, use of non-free image Persia ☘ 09:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Another unofficial-looking logo for NBC Nightly News, asserted to be CC-licensed "own work" (which would be highly unlikely for the logo for such a major nightly network newscast). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Unless there're showing the official new logo of NBC Nightly News, this logo looks fake for time being. 36.77.66.183 20:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused page; content is "This is Diane's press picture. Not sure what I need as far as a release." Page creator was Donaldspadgett (talk · contribs). This unused page may also cause a bug in displaying content for COM:UNDEL. For context see Commons talk:Undeletion requests/Archive 1#Strangely misplaced line. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
File in copyviol; screenshot from a videogame. GC85 (talk) 21:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- The intermediate version uploaded by user:Moxisd132 is in copyviol. GC85 (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Speedy deleted as F1. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Is this KEPT? 186.172.202.107 03:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
I mean version 1 and 3. Why? Just keep the original 2011 upload. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.172.202.107 (talk) 03:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep. The current version does not seem to be problematic. There was a past version of this file which was different and was deleted. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Redundant category, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/12/Category:Interesting. - JopkeB (talk) 05:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oleksandr1406 (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Mitte27 (talk) 05:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ethics issue and license issue. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't see the ethics issue here, sa it's already a publicly published image, and there's certainly no licencing issue as the image has been released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Explodingcreepsr (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per explanation by User:Explodingcreepsr (who should have been pinged) in Commons:Valued image candidates/Individuals who have Snijders Blok-Campeau syndrome.jpg. The fact that this image is already used in an open-access paper means that it's already been publicized, and I don't think its usefulness is in question. What's the license issue? Is there a suggestion that there is a different copyright for the photos than for the article they're taken from? That appears not to be the case: "The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material." There is no such credit line for the image in question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Small size, EXIF data indicate it is from facebook. Possible copyright violation. C messier (talk) 09:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Pressimad
[edit]- File:Harbin Opera House .jpg
- File:MAD Harbin Opera House by Iwan Baan (1).jpg
- File:Hutong Bubble 32 supplementary image2 by ShuHe.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Exif of first two images shows author name "Iwan Baan" and "Please contact Iwan Baan before usage". I doubt image uploader was the real author. Thus authorship of the third image is also unclear. ----Baycrest (Talk) 10:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yavarannam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation. One is a book cover and the other has no proof of being free
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Not an own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amirrezanet (talk · contribs)
[edit]One of the files is clearly copyrighted ("© Copyright - Catalina Gomez Angel 2019 "), two own work claims are questionable due to lack of metadata and very low size/resolution (File:Kaveh Kazemi.jpg and File:Kave farnam.jpg). I tend to believe that the uploader is the photographer of the other three but inconsistency in their metadata is something that I cannot ignore.
- File:Hamid Khansari.jpg
- File:Saman-ehteshami.jpg
- File:Kave farnam.jpg
- File:Kavehkazemi.jpg
- File:Kaveh Kazemi.jpg
- File:Sahar Mohammadi.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Low quality personal drawing, out of COM:SCOPE. Belbury (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by مریم زارعی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images obtained from the internet
- File:اکبر-لاجوردیان.jpg
- File:228787 567 بیمارستان بازرگانان.jpg
- File:بیمارستان 11326 بازرگانان.jpg
- File:0-300x191 آیت الله کاشانی در بیمارستان بازرگانان.jpg
- File:6-581x400 بیمارستان بازرگانان.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 20:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use. You're trying to get all your uploads deleted based on some privacy claim? If you disclosed too much personal information, you can ask for an administrator to do courtesy deletions of the edits that show the problematic information, but requesting deletion of all these photos is not going to be successful and is likely to just result in everything being kept without any modification. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Not Blongs to user and a copy of internet. Parsa 2au (talk) 21:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
NO EVIDENCE 93.66.153.139 21:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use, and I don't understand what you mean. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (photo by Maria Alessandra Diolosa) M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: Probably screenshots of Google Street View.
- File:Regulation of motorcycle access on freeways vietnam.jpg
- File:Prohibition of motorcycles on the highway Indonesia.jpg
- File:Regulation of motorcycle access on freeways vietnam new.jpg
TilmannR (talk) 22:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- These three images have a dark gradient at the top, are of low quality and have no metadata, which indicates that they share a common origin and are probably not own work. On the right side of Regulation of motorcycle access on freeways vietnam new.jpg you can see artifacts, which are commonly caused by stitching multiple images into a panorama, as is done for sites like Google Street View. I tagged another image by the same uploader for speedy deletion (Motorbikes banned from Thai highways.jpg), because it contained a "© 2022 Google" watermark. TilmannR (talk) 22:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Picasso art : no rights ! Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 22:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- Can i know why you want to delete this page, this is created with the reference and it's original source here:
- https://www.ezrankings.com/
- https://prnewswire2-a.akamaihd.net/p/1893751/sp/189375100/thumbnail/entry_id/0_h3692h5q/def_height/400/def_width/400/version/100012/type/1 Vincentj1010 (talk) 09:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Vincentj1010, can you establish that this company is notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and looks like advertising to me. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Published previously [2], so COM:VRT procedure required. Achim55 (talk) 14:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
_(Cover).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Cover).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't agree that this music album cover is below the "threshold of originality". consequently, unfortunately, I don't see it as PD. Mosbatho (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
_(Cover).jpg){kind=link}
- As uploader ... Then please delete. The constant discussions are too exhausting for me. ChrisHardy (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 13:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
_(Cover).jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: highly unlikely to be own work. PD? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-UK-unknown is correct license. --RAN (talk) 05:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per user:RAN. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:DW. Neveselbert (talk) 03:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please explain your case. Why do you think it is a derivative work and why do you think that makes it eligible for deletion? Without further details, this will likely close as keep by default. From Hill To Shore (talk) 05:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply, I didn't see the notification. I don't see any evidence that this work, which is a derivative as a "Scan from the original work", is in the public domain as there is no evidence provided that this work was published circa 1905. Neveselbert (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Ok, let's break this down then. First off, we have a photo of unknown origin. While it may have been manipulated in the scanning process, there is currently no evidence of that. On Commons we treat scans that make minimal changes to the base work as de minimis; in general no new copyright is generated from the scan. Unless additional details are provided, I think we should set aside the derivative work argument for now as your main focus is on the status of the original work. The file was uploaded with a claim of own work and a date of 4 October 2022.[3] That date is a little odd as the file was uploaded on 3 December 2022 - the difference in date means the uploader made a conscious decision to set it rather than inserting the date of upload as we see with many false claims of own work. The date was then changed by RAN first to circa 1900[4] and later to circa 1905.[5] RAN's habit of changing the dates of files up for deletion has caused difficulties in previous discussions, as it often appears to be based more on intuition than any solid evidence. Until RAN clarifies their position, I am working on the assumption that the circa 1900 date is based solely on the appearance of Donald in this photograph (perhaps he looks 24 in this photo?). The circa 1905 date appears to be linked to him taking on the position of chief from after the death of his father - I am unclear whether there is any evidence in the content of the photo that he was chief at the time (is there some aspect of the clothing here meant to denote that?). The claim of this being an anonymous work has come from RAN rather than the uploader.[6] RAN also set {{PD-UK-unknown}} at the same time. However, the PD-UK-unknown template can only be used where we have made a reasonable enquiry about the identity of the author. As the uploader is still active on Commons but has provided no comment on the source of this file, I don't think we can say we have acted in a "reasonable" manner (a guess by an unrelated user on Commons is not a "reasonable" amount of effort when a better source of information is available). We don't know the date of creation of the image, we don't know if it was published or if the uploader found it in a private collection. The uploader also has a history of uploading copyright violations to Commons. @Fitzkarl: Can you please provide us with some details on where you found this image and anything you know about the date of creation, the photographer or a date of publication? In the absence of any further information, I will have to opt for deletion on the basis that we have not made a reasonable effort to justify the current licence on the file page. From Hill To Shore (talk) 02:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Do you think it was taken after 1953, perhaps post-mortem, and the license does not apply? Do you think it was actually taken in 2022, and I should revert back to that date? Almost every image taken before cameras recorded the date are estimates, unless taken on a recognizable datable event. If you don't want changes made to images in the deletion queue, lobby to have them locked during the process. --RAN (talk) 02:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- 1953 (as it is recorded in {{PD-UK-unknown}}) is only a valid date for this discussion if this is an anonymous work or if a reasonable enquiry has been made to establish the author's identity. My point here is that we haven't asked the uploader what they know about the file, so we wouldn't stand a chance of defending our claim in any UK court on the grounds of reasonableness. You have not explained your basis for those dates I questioned, so I have to assume my hypothesis was correct on how they were generated. Now, for the sake of argument, we make a reasonable enquiry and the uploader tells us the image was taken in 1900 but also gives us the name of the photographer, whom we find to have died in 1960. That would mean the file is still in copyright in the UK until 2030. Without making a single enquiry of the uploader, we have assumed a work is PD when there is a reasonable hypothesis that it isn't. That goes against the precautionary principle. From Hill To Shore (talk) 02:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have already done a reverse image search, and searched under this person's name looking to see if this image has a named creator, you can confirm the same thing in just a few nanoseconds of search time. Precautionary principle actually says there must be: "significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file". Theoretical speculation, that if we just search a little bit harder, and a little bit longer, we will find a named creator doesn't rise to the level of "significant doubt". The same theoretical speculation can be said of any of the >10,000 images using this license. Reverse image searching compares to over 1 billion images. A Google search by name looks in over 1 million scanned books, and over 100 million websites. --RAN (talk) 18:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- The image may have come from a private collection or a non-digitised book, so wouldn't show up in a reverse image search. The thoroughness of your search and the extensiveness of the Google database (as you point out) makes this more likely to be an unpublished image from a private collection. And yes, conducting a Tineye search was one of my first actions before commenting here. The uploader knows where the image came from but has not commented in the last discussion or on the file (despite being active in the last month). Independently of any information from the uploader you have made the decision that this is an anonymous work and applied a licence that requires you to make a "reasonable enquiry." My contention is that the "reasonable enquiry" here is to ask the uploader (who is still an active user) to provide details on where they obtained the image. If this was an older upload and the uploader had been inactive for a period of years, then our own searches could (perhaps) be judged the most reasonable action in the circumstances. The continued presence and silence of the authoritative source makes any independent searches void. The uploader wants the file here; it is reasonable for the uploader to tell us where they found it. As stated in the precautionary principle, a bad argument in these situations is, "Nobody knows who the copyright owner is, so it really doesn’t matter" which is effectively the argument you are using by unilaterally declaring this as an anonymous work. Now, I suggest we leave this for other editors and the closing admin to draw their conclusions. I am not going to be changing my mind that asking the uploader is the "reasonable enquiry" in this case. From Hill To Shore (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- For reference of the closing admin, the uploader has been active on the English Wikipedia since my previous comment. They should have received notifications for the messages on their talk page and my ping asking them to participate here. If they choose not to clarify the situation here before the discussion closes, I would ask for that to be considered as part of the closing comment (whether the decision is to keep or delete). From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- As some related evidence, the user uploaded another file for the 23rd Chief and gave relevant birth dates, source and author.[7] On checking the source, that image was clearly labelled as the 24th Chief[8] and our file here was renamed. As a user that uploads random screenshots of internet pages as own work and misidentifies individuals named in the source material when they do declare it, I am not sure it is safe to assume this particular image is of the 25th Chief (which throws out any guesswork on dating). From Hill To Shore (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- The image may have come from a private collection or a non-digitised book, so wouldn't show up in a reverse image search. The thoroughness of your search and the extensiveness of the Google database (as you point out) makes this more likely to be an unpublished image from a private collection. And yes, conducting a Tineye search was one of my first actions before commenting here. The uploader knows where the image came from but has not commented in the last discussion or on the file (despite being active in the last month). Independently of any information from the uploader you have made the decision that this is an anonymous work and applied a licence that requires you to make a "reasonable enquiry." My contention is that the "reasonable enquiry" here is to ask the uploader (who is still an active user) to provide details on where they obtained the image. If this was an older upload and the uploader had been inactive for a period of years, then our own searches could (perhaps) be judged the most reasonable action in the circumstances. The continued presence and silence of the authoritative source makes any independent searches void. The uploader wants the file here; it is reasonable for the uploader to tell us where they found it. As stated in the precautionary principle, a bad argument in these situations is, "Nobody knows who the copyright owner is, so it really doesn’t matter" which is effectively the argument you are using by unilaterally declaring this as an anonymous work. Now, I suggest we leave this for other editors and the closing admin to draw their conclusions. I am not going to be changing my mind that asking the uploader is the "reasonable enquiry" in this case. From Hill To Shore (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have already done a reverse image search, and searched under this person's name looking to see if this image has a named creator, you can confirm the same thing in just a few nanoseconds of search time. Precautionary principle actually says there must be: "significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file". Theoretical speculation, that if we just search a little bit harder, and a little bit longer, we will find a named creator doesn't rise to the level of "significant doubt". The same theoretical speculation can be said of any of the >10,000 images using this license. Reverse image searching compares to over 1 billion images. A Google search by name looks in over 1 million scanned books, and over 100 million websites. --RAN (talk) 18:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- 1953 (as it is recorded in {{PD-UK-unknown}}) is only a valid date for this discussion if this is an anonymous work or if a reasonable enquiry has been made to establish the author's identity. My point here is that we haven't asked the uploader what they know about the file, so we wouldn't stand a chance of defending our claim in any UK court on the grounds of reasonableness. You have not explained your basis for those dates I questioned, so I have to assume my hypothesis was correct on how they were generated. Now, for the sake of argument, we make a reasonable enquiry and the uploader tells us the image was taken in 1900 but also gives us the name of the photographer, whom we find to have died in 1960. That would mean the file is still in copyright in the UK until 2030. Without making a single enquiry of the uploader, we have assumed a work is PD when there is a reasonable hypothesis that it isn't. That goes against the precautionary principle. From Hill To Shore (talk) 02:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Do you think it was taken after 1953, perhaps post-mortem, and the license does not apply? Do you think it was actually taken in 2022, and I should revert back to that date? Almost every image taken before cameras recorded the date are estimates, unless taken on a recognizable datable event. If you don't want changes made to images in the deletion queue, lobby to have them locked during the process. --RAN (talk) 02:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply, I didn't see the notification. I don't see any evidence that this work, which is a derivative as a "Scan from the original work", is in the public domain as there is no evidence provided that this work was published circa 1905. Neveselbert (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Donald_Walter_Cameron_of_Lochiel,_25th_Chief_2.jpg&oldid=711965753){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ADonald_Walter_Cameron_of_Lochiel%2C_25th_Chief_2.jpg&diff=720074903&oldid=720042788){kind=link}
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ADonald_Walter_Cameron_of_Lochiel%2C_25th_Chief_2.jpg&diff=728606326&oldid=728589727){kind=link}
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Donald_Cameron,_24th_of_Lochiel.jpg&oldid=701845829){kind=link}
- Keep No valid reason for deletion first time, and now for the second time. Three speedy deletion were also denied. --RAN (talk) 05:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Per {{Dw no source since}}, This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source and copyright information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. The author and source of all incorporated works must be given so that the copyright status can be verified. Neveselbert (talk) 19:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment without new evidence on when was this underlying work first published, {{PD-UK-unknown}} seems to be the reasonable work license for now. First condition states: "A photograph, which has never previously been made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) and which was taken more than 70 years ago (before 1 January 1953)."
But the underlying work does not appear to be a photograph: it resembles more of a painting that is just included in a publication of some sort (a book or a post card?). Third condition states: "An artistic work other than a photograph (e.g. a painting), or a literary work, which was made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) more than 70 years ago (before 1 January 1953)." Still "1905" must be confirmed as the date when this underlying painting was first made to public, as a notice exists at the bottom of the licensing template: "Unpublished anonymous paintings remain in copyright until at least 1 January 2040."JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)- My apologies, it is indeed an old photograph (in sepia), not a painting. So likely, Weak keep. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- It is a highly compressed jpg with compression artifacts that give it an odd look. That is why I usually store scans as png files, despite the problems with contrast in thumbnails. --RAN (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- My apologies, it is indeed an old photograph (in sepia), not a painting. So likely,
- This was clearly published over a 100 years ago. I'm not entirely convinced that a search was done to verify that the photographer of this file cannot be found so I'm a Weak keep. I do agree with RAN that this was published before 1953 and was almost certainly published before 1928. Abzeronow (talk) 20:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've searched Google and TinEye for this image and found nothing. Neveselbert (talk) 20:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Licensing seems correct; from apparent age of person date range close enough to apply. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this work, which is a derivative as a "Scan from the original work", is in the public domain as there is no evidence provided that this work was published circa 1905. Neveselbert (talk) 17:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
no permission; taken from website : https://www.bruceofballater.co.uk/our-products/art/signed-print-of-sir-donald-walter-cameron-of-lochiel-25th-chieftain-of-clan-cameron Fitzkarl (talk) 10:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- can be viewed here. Fitzkarl (talk) 13:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and warn people who repeat useless nominations. This is the 4th nomination excluding the multiple speedy deletions that were denied. Please look for sockpuppet activity between accounts that are nominating. As before, republishing an historic image to your website does not transfer the copyright to you, or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Last time that I participated in this DR, I was unsure that a search for the photographer had been done. Now, we know the photography studio (George Crow & Co. Publishers, 34 St. Enoch Square, Glasgow), and the latest date it was published (1900). The Crow studio moved in 1900 to 136 Buchanan St. http://www.thelows.madasafish.com/cards/crowgco_136.htm Research on the studio turned up at least two photographers. George Crow and Robert Kerr https://digital.nls.uk/directories/browse/archive/85327533 I haven't found a death date for either, but since this was published in 1900 (and probably created around then), this qualifies for PD-old-assumed-expired, and probably qualifies as PD-UK-unknown because we may not be able to find out who the actual photographer of the image is. Abzeronow (talk) 15:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasoning outlined by Abzeronow and the prior deletion nomination discussions. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. Uploader claims it's freely licensed, but source does not. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 05:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Low quality, probably not own work Dronebogus (talk) 06:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyviol from https://www.equipe84lastoria.it/#&gid=1&pid=4 Flazaza (talk) 09:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The uploader is not the author of this book cover and the file has been licensed incorrectly – it falls under fair use and as such cannot remain on Commons. Neptune, the Mystic (talk) 09:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure there is anything copyrightable on this book cover. The monogram is very simple. --TadejM (t/p) 10:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Commons has no info on TOO for Croatia. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded to test VideoCutTool Gopavasanth (talk) 10:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see exif Xocolatl (talk) 10:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Testing VideoCutTool Gopavasanth (talk) 10:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Testing VideoCutTool Gopavasanth (talk) 11:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
No notability, Out of scope CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover, Ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong file Tamu006 (talk) 12:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
empty photo? Lemonaka (talk) 14:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- It may be a code issue, or an issue with Chinese characters. The image (which might need updating) appears at: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/%E6%AD%90%E7%9B%9F%E9%AB%94%E9%97%9C%E4%BF%82%E5%9C%96.svg
- It needs updating. I will try reuploading it when I have had a look at it. Hogweard (talk) 14:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Very odd. The image opens in Inkscape, then the image turns black. I copied the content (without background) and pasted it into another language's version: it appeared as it should be, then suddenly the black mask appeared over everything (not just the image I had pasted). There must be something wrong with the coding in one or more of the objects - but that is beyond my expertise.. Hogweard (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep. @Hogweard, @Lemonaka: It's a terribly messy file. I would advise against using it. The flag of the Vatican had really bad gradient coordinates, which apparently cause numeric instability in the rendering process. I replaced that flag with Nuvola Vatican flag.svg, optimized the file with SVGOMG, and now it barely works. TilmannR (talk) 20:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- That would explain the problem. I fixed it my copying bits element by element, and taking some from another language version. The graphic needs an update in any case, as a few countries have moved into or out of rings. I will have a look again this evening. I will not let an inability to read Chinese get in my way. Hogweard (talk) 07:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Very odd. The image opens in Inkscape, then the image turns black. I copied the content (without background) and pasted it into another language's version: it appeared as it should be, then suddenly the black mask appeared over everything (not just the image I had pasted). There must be something wrong with the coding in one or more of the objects - but that is beyond my expertise.. Hogweard (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Hogweard@TilmannR
Speedy keep Not empty anymore. Lemonaka (talk) 04:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Unidentifiable person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OOS by non contributor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Captain Tucker? Sorry, this is from Facebook. You must OTRS or we will delete it. 186.175.29.102 15:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derrivative, unused works Matlin (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I am the owner of this, so this is my choice to delete it for some security purposes. I don't want to show my artwork before a public launch. Kiingkunal (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion, but Delete by courtesy. --Achim55 (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Not in use. Is this file likely to be notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
I am the owner of this page and this image is always popping up on google and I do not approve of this. Please take this page down, thank you. Dean Symonds (talk) 16:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not a deletion reason, but are you notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Yes I am fairly notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dean Symonds (talk • contribs) 04:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- If you're notable, photos of you are in scope and should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes I am pretty notable 75.182.144.78 00:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- But I don't like this picture, I am so young 75.182.144.78 00:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes I am pretty notable 75.182.144.78 00:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- "I don't like it" is not a deletion reason, but I don't see another photo of you on Commons. However, if you uploaded some more recent selfies that you like, users would probably be more likely to use those than this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- If you're notable, photos of you are in scope and should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I just want this photo deleted, I hate being put out on the web and would do anything for this photo removed. Please can you remove this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dean Symonds (talk • contribs) 04:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, I have no authority to delete (really, hide) any file. It'll be up to the closing admin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- How can I contact them to do this…. or can you contact the closing admin Dean Symonds (talk) 12:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Eventually, some admin will make a decision and close this deletion request. No need to contact anyone. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- How can I contact them to do this…. or can you contact the closing admin Dean Symonds (talk) 12:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, unused personal photo of minor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The anthem was composed in 1978 so it is still copyrighted. C messier (talk) 16:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it is not mine compose sure. It was released on audio tape in 1982 by ΝΕΔΗΣΥ (author). Paotis (talk) 06:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
No quiero que siga siendo visible IBERZA (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Kept, in use, uploaded too long ago for simple courtesy delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of India.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted by Getty Images, not CC. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/michael-fagan-the-intruder-who-gained-access-to-the-bedroom-news-photo/1271920360 Muzilon (talk) 11:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
The person this bust honors died in 2008, and the vicinity where this bust is located opened in 2012. Likely it was created between 2008 and 2012 and its sculptor not yet dead for more than 50 years.
There is no commercial freedom of panorama for copyrighted artworks in Taiwan. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for an in-depth discussion on this. A commercial license authorization from the work's artist is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Per w:zh:吳晉淮#紀念, the statue was first unveiled in 1996 and moved to its current location in 2016. There is no commercial freedom of panorama for copyrighted artworks in Taiwan. Probably the sculptor is not yet dead for more than 50 years.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an artist CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Anouk Nieuwenweg
[edit]I am creating this deletion discussion because the requester's IP is blocked (ticket:2023012610009148). The subject would like to delete the pictures with the following reasoning:
I’m starting this discussion, because i want to ask friendly to get these pictures removed from WikiCommons. At the time these pictures where taken, I was sick but i didn’t know then. I’m having an sickness called hashimoto, and for the ones who don’t know this, without medicines you can get really fat and puffy. This is exactly what happend to me. Luckely i have my medicines now and i am looking like a whole different person.
I think for every women, our physical appearance, and body is something really important. When it doesn't look like it normally does, in my case due to medical reasons, this can make a woman really insecure. And the way i look in this pictures, makes me really really insecure. I’m really ashamed for it, and that everybody can see these pictures makes me feel even more insecure and sad. For me, it’s such a big and important thing, and i will be so happy when these 2 pictures finally can be removed. I’m trying so hard to get these deleted, and i really hope you guys will understand my situation and how it makes me feel. The internet is such an big thing now in 2023, and i feel so uncomfortable knowing everybody can see these pictures when they Google my name.
So i am almost begging you, if you please can remove these 2 pictures for me. It means so much to me and i will be really thankfull, from the bottom of my heart.
Previous DR can be found here. Please decide, thanks! Bencemac (talk) 18:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC).
- File:2020-07-15 Handball, 1. Bundesliga Frauen, Thüringer HC, Teamfotos 1DX 5213 by Stepro.jpg
- File:2020-07-15 Handball, 1. Bundesliga Frauen, Thüringer HC, Teamfotos 1DX 5215 by Stepro.jpg
Bencemac (talk) 18:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We are not going to delete an entire category of images of an individual who's covered by Wikipedia articles in English, German and Dutch. Based on these photos, Anouk was a beautiful woman at the time they were shot. I hope she can become less insecure about her former appearance, but erasing the public memory of it is not our job, as a repository of useful images. If she would like to take selfies of how she looks now and upload them, I hope there will be a way to facilitate that. Why was her IP blocked? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I believe it was a range block but did not ask more details, I rather provided her the link of this discussion. Bencemac (talk) 07:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- If she was an unintended target of a range block, she can remedy the problem by registering an account on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Info She has accounts here, e.g. User:Handbal12345 or User:Thea12345. Stepro (talk) 11:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- If she was an unintended target of a range block, she can remedy the problem by registering an account on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be a CC-licensed "own work". Is the nature of the color gradient in this version of the TBS logo enough to put this version above TOO? WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The color gradient version of the logo looks below TOO for me. However, someone who uploaded it mistakenly making the color gradient version of the logo as "own work", which was very unlikely. This image should be given its status as "TOO-US" if the image decided to kept. 36.77.66.183 20:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Magog the Ogre. --Rosenzweig τ 07:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted text broadcast on screen: COM:SCREENSHOT. Invalid FOP template. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
no metadata no author given no permission non encyclopedically relevant person Hoyanova (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
no metadata given no author no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, readily found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Unknown source Persia ☘ 09:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, readily found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Non enciclopedical. Blurry picture of non-relevant person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaronjaSatsuma (talk • contribs) 08:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Press agency photo (Rex Features); claimed CC license is unlikely. Muzilon (talk) 11:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Has better PNG and SVG variants. VileGecko (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
The uploaded is not the photographer, seems to be copyright infringement Kershatz (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright. I don't believe this is own work. It is the ony contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Unidentified person CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
This file is an album cover, therefore it doesn’t have a compatible license with Commons. I added a fair use file to the respective article on English Wikipedia. GiankM. M (talk) 13:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The name of the author is not the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an artist CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio:Logo of a label CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
![14:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/29#c-CoffeeEngineer-20230129143700-File:Picture_of_IMPERKNAC's_upcoming_mixtape_called_"Gerk_Knob.".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
![18:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/01/29#c-P199-20230228181900-File:Picture_of_IMPERKNAC's_upcoming_mixtape_called_"Gerk_Knob.".jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Seems to use a variant of the back to the beat image on the internet since 2010 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
unclear copyright situation https://www.athinorama.gr/tv/3009082/i-martha-lampiri---fentorouf-aisthanomai-oti-fero-euthuni-apenanti-stous-anthropous-pou-me-empisteutikan/ Mateus2019 (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- also file:Prado leaflet b (34419310771).jpg
Although David Short published the files in Flickr under free license, real copyright holder of the leaflet is Prado museum in Madrid. The leaflet has no copyright message. In my opinion this is Flickrwashing. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Hanasheens (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images obtained from the internet
- File:جشن قهرمانی پانیک تالش-0.jpg
- File:کارخانه صنایع چوب و کاغذ ایران (چوکا).png
- File:بازی پانیک تالش و مقاومت آستارا.jpg
- File:14001114000537 test photon.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mirzafetaliahundov (talk · contribs)
[edit]These would appear to be duplicate images that in part are promoting the uploader's blog. As maps go - assuming the base map is freely licensed I'm not sure what they add to this project.
- File:OrtaAsyaHaritası693.jpg
- File:OrtaAsyaHarita.jpg
- File:693Harita.jpg
- File:Orta Asya Haritası.png
- File:693 Yılı Orta Asya Harita.png
- File:693 Yılının Orta Asya Haritası.jpg
- File:693 Yılı Orta Asya Haritası.jpg
- File:693 Orta Asya Haritası.jpg
- File:693 Haritası.jpg
Herby talk thyme 09:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I still improving the map. 693 is unkown date for Central Asia. That's why I'm doing that. Mirzafetaliahundov (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Keep working on improving the map, and when done, just upload your final version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
The uploader is not the author of this book cover and the file has been licensed incorrectly – it falls under fair use and as such cannot remain on Commons. Neptune, the Mystic (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No creative elements. PD-text will do it. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: agree with User:Herbert Ortner. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
The uploader is not the author of this book cover and the file has been licensed incorrectly – it falls under fair use and as such cannot remain on Commons. Neptune, the Mystic (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No creative elements. PD-text will do it. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: agree with User:Herbert Ortner. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
The uploader is not the author of this book cover and the file has been licensed incorrectly – it falls under fair use and as such cannot remain on Commons. Neptune, the Mystic (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No creative elements. PD-text will do it. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: agree with User:Herbert Ortner. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
The uploader is not the author of this book cover and the file has been licensed incorrectly – it falls under fair use and as such cannot remain on Commons. Neptune, the Mystic (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: No creative elements. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a copyvio CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. Only used on sandbox page of user without any edits. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
AI generated image of a person who never existed, uploaded to make what seems to be a fictional alternate-history election page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheStrandedDemon/sandbox. Out of COM:SCOPE as artwork for an offsite personal project. Commons is not a free web host. Belbury (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of Iranian defence ministry. Same pictures published by defanews.ir without watermark and with higher quality (please see gallery here).
- File:10-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:9-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:8-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:7-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:6-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶- بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:5-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:4-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:3-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:2-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:1-پهپاد ایران-مهاجر۶.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of IRGC Navy. Same pictures published by farsnews.ir with another watermark and credited to "NEDSA" (IRGC Navy) (please see gallery here).
- File:47-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل2.jpg
- File:46-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل2.jpg
- File:45-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل3 و ابابیل اطلس.jpg
- File:44-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر6.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. Same pictures published by ISNA with its own watermark (see gallery here).
- File:31-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:28-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:29-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:30-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:27-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:26-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:25-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. See the second image published by Fars News (credit: Recieved) image gallery and by Moj News Agency without credit image gallery. Probably a work of Iranian navy.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. Same igames published by IRNA without credit (see gallery) Image from a secret underground base is highly likely to be taken by the Iranian armed forces. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CaesarIran that includes same pictures.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Work by Mehr News, but 'Received'. CC does not apply.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Same image with alterations published by Mehr (Credit: Received) [9] gallery
![[9]](https://media.mehrnews.com/d/2022/08/24/4/4257952.jpg){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Same image used by Fars News (link) and Mizan (link) which is not obtained from Tasnim (margins different, bigger picture).
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Sane images published by ISNA gallery and IRNA gallery (credit 'Recieved'). Janes credits one to Iranian Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics.
- File:42-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل و اطلس.jpg
- File:41-پهپاد ایران- جت ناصح.jpg
- File:40-پهپاد ایران- کرّار.jpg
- File:16-پهپاد ایران- کمان۲۲.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
The source says it has received the photographs and does not name any photographer. Probably a work of Iranian defense ministry and certainly not a work by Mehr News.
- File:30-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:29-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:28-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:27-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:26-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:25-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:24-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:23-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:22-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:21-موشک- فکور.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. We lack author information, which is required under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license, so we cannot host these files. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah.
- File:35-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:34-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:33-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:32-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:31-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:30-هواپیما- جنگنده صاعقه.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Work by Tasnim (Iranian defense ministry is the likely source.) because:
- No photographer is credited
- The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.
- File:44-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:43-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:42-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:41-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:40-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:39-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:38-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:37-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:36-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- General comment
Who the original author is do not matter. What is important is to know who the copyright holder is. There could be more than one copyright holder as the original author might have given the rights to more than one person. Therefore, about the images published by Tasnim or Mehr news agencies in the photo section of their site:
- Keep if Tasnim / Mehr is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
- Keep if the photographer is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
- Delete if another agency is credited
- undelete images that didn't need to be deleted
For images credit "received", I am not sure about who is the right holder. Maybe we can keep the ones only published by one agency and delete those that were also published by non-free agencies.
--Hosortyr (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Published by (and watermarked by!) official Iranian news agencies, such as Tasnim. "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." See also this related discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The comment above ("2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.") only strengthens my argument. At the footer of the mentioned yjc.ir website it says: کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان بوده و استفاده از مطالب آن با ذکر منبع بلامانع است., (English: "All the rights of this site belong to the Young Journalists Club, and the use of its contents is unrestricted as long as the source is mentioned.") It seems clear that the Iranian Armed Forces supply photos with a free license to several press agencies, to use as however they see fit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See this related (successful) undeletion request. --- Vysotsky (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Files are not a work of Tasnim, they are obtained from leader.ir which does not release with a free license.
- File:12-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:11-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:10-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:9-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:8-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:7-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:6-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:5-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:4-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:3-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:2-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:1-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85_%D9%82%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photo taken from leader.ir, which does not release with a free license
- File:9-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
- File:8-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
- File:1-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%86_%D9%88_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%84%E2%80%8C_%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%AA%E2%80%8C_(%D8%B9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%86_%D9%88_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%84%E2%80%8C_%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%AA%E2%80%8C_(%D8%B9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A8_%D8%A8%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%86_%D9%88_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%84%E2%80%8C_%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%AA%E2%80%8C_(%D8%B9).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not; the files are marked as "received". — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
No photograph is credited and the files are recieved, not a work by Mehr/Tasnim News Agency.
- File:29-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:28-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:19-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:18-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:17-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:16-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:15-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:14-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:13-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:12-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:11-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:10-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:9-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:8-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:7-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. Photos marked as received are clearly created by someone else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photographs are recieved, not a work by Mehr News so cc does not apply
- File:23-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:22-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:21-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News.
- File:27-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:26-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:25-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:24-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photograph is 'received', not a work by Mehr News
- File:32-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:31-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:30-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:29-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:28-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:27-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:26-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:25-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:24-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:23-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed. I don't know how many times should we warn this user and then again waste our time by nominating uploads from leader.ir for deletion.
- File:14-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:13-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:12-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:11-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:10-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:9-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:8-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:11-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:10-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:9-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:8-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:7-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:9-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:8-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:7-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:6-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:5-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:4-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:3-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:2-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:1-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:22-Popular gathering and support for Gaza children-Tehran-تجمع مردمی و حمایت از کودکان غزه- تهران.jpg
- File:3-The burial ceremony of the martyrs who defended the shrine-Milad Heydari,Meghdad Mahghani-مراسم تشییع پیکر شهدای مدافع حرم- میلاد حیدری و مقداد مهقانی.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Asao Kurebayashi
[edit]Not PD in US; Commons requires all images to be PD in both the US and the home country
Dronebogus (talk) 07:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
See COM:VPC#PD-CSPAN question and COM:HD#File:David Bunning Confirmation.jpg for reference, but this file is not eligible for licensing under either {{PD-CSPAN}} or {{PD-USGov}} because it's a screenshot from en:C-SPAN covered of a 2006 en:US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that took place at the en:Senate Dirksen Business Building and not within the actual Senate Chamber. It's footage taken by C-SPAN employees using C-SPAN cameras, not footage taken by US federal government employees using US federal government cameras as part of their official duties. Thus, it is eligible for copyright protection and that copyright is owned by C-SPAN. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Yocin (Yasin Moghadasi) He was born in Iran, Tehran province. is an Persian Influencer, Youtuber and Singer. His nickname in cyberspace is "Yocin".jpg
[edit]_He_was_born_in_Iran,_Tehran_province._is_an_Persian_Influencer,_Youtuber_and_Singer._His_nickname_in_cyberspace_is_%22Yocin%22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_He_was_born_in_Iran,_Tehran_province._is_an_Persian_Influencer,_Youtuber_and_Singer._His_nickname_in_cyberspace_is_%22Yocin%22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
High quality studio type photo with no exif, unlikely to be own work as claimed. PCP Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Gbawden
- This photo is my work and I took it in my personal studio
- Thank you for your review
- With respect Mangert1402 (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Even if it is the uploaders own work, which I highly doubt, it's still PROMO spam and should be deleted on those grounds regardless of if the uploader took the picture in their personal studio or not. Although I doubt they did since they also created the Wikidata entry for this person. So more then likely they are just an average, run of the mill paid editor and they usually aren't professional photographers. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed with Adamant1. I also nominated another file from the uploader: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yocin.jpg.
- HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Adamant. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
One has wrong licnese (not a free picture) the other own work claim is questionable due to lack of metadata/low size
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 2nd, first was already deleted. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Nuking the entire category as a violation of Taiwanese FOP law. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for the extensive discussion regarding the return of non-commercial FOP for non-architecture, invalidating the 2018 interpretation which happened to be a "misunderstanding". Since all photos show the sculpture as the theme, de minimis cannot be invoked. Per this article, the installation was in 2008. Most likely the sculptor has not been dead for more than 50 years.
- File:Koxinga Statue.jpg
- File:Statue of Koxinga, Tainan.jpg
- File:StatueofKoxinga.JPG
- File:Tainan Taiwan Statue-of-Koxinga-01.jpg
- File:Tainan Taiwan Statue-of-Koxinga-02.jpg
- File:ZhengChenggong.jpg
- File:延平郡王像.jpg
- File:鄭成功騎馬石雕.JPG
- File:雄揪揪氣昂昂 - panoramio.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- We should at least try to research the artist before we delete all this. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert: per this, the statue was a gift of the people of Quanzhou to Taiwan. This is also stated in the news article that I gave above. Probably the sculptor is unknown, but still does not make the statue magically public domain. Per COM:Taiwan#General rules, "Economic rights in a pseudonymous work or an anonymous work endure for 50 years from the time of public release." But U.S. copyright may also be taken into account which means undeletion may be more later than 2059. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I do not claim that this work is in the public domain but that this will eventually happen. Undeletions at some point in the future are more likely to occur if the name of the artist is known. We should at least give this deletion request at least some extended time frame for further research. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert: per this, the statue was a gift of the people of Quanzhou to Taiwan. This is also stated in the news article that I gave above. Probably the sculptor is unknown, but still does not make the statue magically public domain. Per COM:Taiwan#General rules, "Economic rights in a pseudonymous work or an anonymous work endure for 50 years from the time of public release." But U.S. copyright may also be taken into account which means undeletion may be more later than 2059. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Info see my input here, regarding TIPO's reaffirming of their restrictive stance on Taiwanese FOP. @AFBorchert: , FYI. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:06, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of Tang Gao
[edit]These nominated photos show the sculpture as the theme (not incidental) subject. Installed in public in 1977 and authored by 蒲浩明 (as per w:zh:唐高#身後), it is bound to non-commercial freedom of panorama as it is a recent sculpture and not an architectural work. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for the associated discussion on Taiwanese FOP, regarding TIPO's impressive reversal of 2018 opinion and the return of original essence of restrictive Taiwanese FOP.
- File:唐高銅像側面.JPG
- File:唐高銅像全景.JPG
- File:唐高銅像正面.JPG
- File:唐高銅像正面照.jpg
- File:唐高銅像特寫.JPG
- File:唐高銅像背照.jpg
- File:唐高銅像與電車.jpg – in this photo, the sculpture is intentionally included to suit its relation to the train to the right.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have no opinion if the photos I taken about the sculpture of Tang Gao are deleted.克勞棣 (talk) 15:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Info see my input here, regarding TIPO's reaffirming of their restrictive stance on Taiwanese FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Luzhou Lee Family Mansion
[edit]The 3D relief artwork 李友邦將軍夫婦浮雕銅像 was incepted in 2013 and authored by 蒲浩明 who is apparently still alive, according to this and this. Taiwan does not allow commercial freedom of panorama for artworks. See also Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan for extensive discussion on the return of restrictive Taiwanese FOP.
- File:Li Youbang and Yan Xiufeng memorial relief at Li Family Abode 20140206.jpg
- File:Li Youbang and Yan Xiufeng memorial relief at Li Family Abode 20160213.jpg
- File:李友邦夫妻浮雕.jpg
- File:蘆洲李宅李友邦夫妻浮雕.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Info see my input here, regarding TIPO's reaffirming of their restrictive stance on Taiwanese FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Art works by Jimmy Liao
[edit]These photos show non-incidental inclusions of artworks by w:en:Jimmy Liao, who is still alive. But there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan. A commercial license permit from him is required.
- File:2016-06-05 artworks by Jimmy Liao in Pisirian Village, Taitung.jpg
- File:2017-03-12 artworks by Jimmy Liao in Pisirian Village, Taitung 01.jpg
- File:2017-03-12 artworks by Jimmy Liao in Pisirian Village, Taitung 02.jpg
- File:2017-06-09 Jimmy Park in TSMC Fab Tainan Science Park.jpg
- File:2020 Bitan Land Art Festival 02.jpg
- File:2020-08-05 Yilan Happy Station 01.jpg
- File:Jimmy Liao' s floating super moon appears in Bitan, New Taipei (1).jpg
- File:Jimmy Liao' s floating super moon appears in Bitan, New Taipei.jpg
- File:Jimmy's painting.jpg
- File:LRT Binhai Yishan Station bus shelter 20190123.jpg
- File:MRT Nangang Station B1.jpg
- File:MRT Nangang Station1.jpg
- File:Nangang Station Platform Art.jpg
- File:Statues with Face Masks in Danhai LRT Hongshulin Station.jpg
- File:信義誠品書店 - panoramio - Tianmu peter (1).jpg
- File:新竹市晶品城幾米廣場1.jpg
- File:新竹市晶品城幾米廣場2.jpg
- File:淡海輕軌紅樹林站幾米裝置藝術.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- May I know why aren't File:新竹市晶品城幾米廣場1.jpg and File:新竹市晶品城幾米廣場2.jpg "向公眾開放之戶外場所長期展示之美術著作" since they are located at the outdoor plaza of J.Piin Mall? I assume that J.Piin Mall has already paid money to Jimmy Liao for this public art work.克勞棣 (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- @克勞棣: if the copyright law of Taiwan does not indicate public indoors, then the situation is the same: artworks indoors cannot be exploited freely. Copyright laws operate on "what is not written in the law is forbidden" principle. If the law prohibits commercial FOP for public art outdoors, more so the public art indoors are not OK for commercial use because indoor works are not mentioned in the law.
- Assuming that your assumption is true, that does not mean the work can be freely exploited by anyone. Perhaps there has been an agreement that the mall can freely use the work, but this means the artist only gave exclusive commercial license to the mall allowing them to make profit over his work, and the mall has no right to further give away that license to others. For all peoples around the world to freely "consume" this public art, they must obtain license from the artist first.
- Another situation may be that artist already transferred his copyright or economic rights to the mall via a written agreement. But that only transfers copyright and does not magically remove it. Assuming this second case is true, then licensing permission from the mall is required.
- In both cases, Wikimedians who took photos of these works or imported Flickr photos of such need to contact the copyright holder (whether the artist or the mall, in first or second cases respectively) via COM:VRTS correspondence to secure commercial license authorizations. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- But the outdoor situation is not the same to the indoor situation. It is "written in the law":
- COPYRIGHT ACT
- Article 58
- Artistic works or architectural works displayed on a long-term basis on streets, in parks, on outside walls of buildings, or other outdoor locales open to the public, may be exploited by any means except under the following circumstances:
- 1.Reproduction of a building by construction of another building.
- 2.Reproduction of a work of sculpture by production of another sculpture.
- 3.Reproduction for the purpose of long-term public display in locales specified in this article.
- 4.Reproduction of artistic works solely for the purpose of selling copies.
- The plaza is indeed outdoor and open to the public.克勞棣 (talk) 15:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- @克勞棣: it does not matter if it is open to the public. What matters is the fourth restriction for non-architectural works: "4. Reproduction of artistic works solely for the purpose of selling copies." This restriction makes Taiwanese FOP for non-architecture incompatible for Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: But what did I sell? If I sell something, I should get money or other valuable things for exchange. But I earned nothing.克勞棣 (talk) 17:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @克勞棣: kindly read COM:Licensing. Commons only allows free licenses that do not restrict commercial reuses, like CC Attribution and CC Share-Alike, or both. Non-commercial licensing is not allowed. What matters is that files must be freely reusable by anyone in the world, something that is being restricted by copyright laws of several countries like Taiwan with regards to public space works still under sculptors' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: But what did I sell? If I sell something, I should get money or other valuable things for exchange. But I earned nothing.克勞棣 (talk) 17:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @克勞棣: it does not matter if it is open to the public. What matters is the fourth restriction for non-architectural works: "4. Reproduction of artistic works solely for the purpose of selling copies." This restriction makes Taiwanese FOP for non-architecture incompatible for Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Info see my input here, regarding TIPO's reaffirming of their restrictive stance on Taiwanese FOP. @克勞棣: , FYI. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 03:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Is he a famous blogger? 186.175.29.102 15:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe in Uzbekistan? But this site doesn't keep photos even of famous bloggers unless they have Wikipedia articles about them, from what I've seen. They can have more than 1,000,000 subscribers on YouTube, and that still doesn't seem to count here. So no way will they accept much lower readership of a blog, based on it being in Uzbek, as notable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Support as per above. --Figure19 (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --✗plicit 03:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Bad McCandlish tartan images
[edit]- File:McCandlish, red, photorealistic, 1264x1264 square.png
- File:McCandlish, red, photorealistic, 1248x1248 tileable.png
- File:McCandlish, grey (dress), photorealistic, 1264x1264 square.png
- File:McCandlish, grey (dress), photorealistic, 1248x1248 tileable.png
- File:McCandlish, green (hunting), photorealistic, 1264x1264 square.png
- File:McCandlish, green (hunting), photorealistic, 1248x1248 tileable.png
- File:McCandlish, arisaid red, photorealistic, 1264x1264 square.png
- File:McCandlish, arisaid red, photorealistic, 1248x1248 tileable.png
- File:McCandlish, arisaid grey, photorealistic, 1264x1264 square.png
- File:McCandlish, arisaid grey, photorealistic, 1248x1248 tileable.png
- File:McCandlish, arisaid green, photorealistic, 1264x1264 square.png
- File:McCandlish, arisaid green, photorealistic, 1248x1248 tileable.png
,_photorealistic,_1264x1264_square.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_photorealistic,_1248x1248_tileable.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_photorealistic,_1264x1264_square.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_photorealistic,_1248x1248_tileable.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
All of these images have a thread-count error in them, and are incorrect representations of the tartans in question (in each of them, a stripe that should be 4 threads wide is rendered only 2 wide). I no longer have access to the software that was used to generate the kinda-sorta photorealistic versions. I have already uploaded (in same category) replacement images with correct thread counts; they just are not at the same file names (they don't mention photorealism). I am the creator of all these files. None of them are used right now by any WMF projects. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:55, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Derivative of the copyrighted cartoon characters. 188.123.231.43 16:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Russia#Freedom_of_panorama no FOP for sculptures. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- PD-textlogo in my opinion; in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I agree that it looks as if it is below the threshold of originality in both Germany and the US Felix QW (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
These are beautiful outdoor paintings in a Taiwanese school, all authored by 沈保杉 "and his team" according to this news article. But that beauty does not extend to Taiwan's copyright law. There is no commercial freedom of panorama for artworks in Taiwan. See also Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan.
- File:Murals of Changhua County Wan-Sing Elementary School (Cropped).jpg
- File:彰化縣萬興國小 深海鯨鯊司令台彩繪牆.jpg
- File:彰化縣萬興國小 深海鯨鯊彩繪牆.jpg
- File:彰化縣萬興國小再現侏羅紀彩繪牆.jpg
- File:萬興國小 侏羅紀彩繪牆.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm pity, these pictures will be taken off the shelves soon due to copyright reasons. Now I can remove the image I created , but because the other author is not very active, it may take about a month to remove it. Q28 (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Q28: yeah, no choice since your country's FOP legal right is identical or similar to 6 other countries – Denmark, Finland, Japan, Norway, Russia, and the United States – that only provide commercially-suitable FOP for copyrighted architecture only, not copyrighted public art. Notice the Taiwanese FOP is identical to Japan's FOP and similar to South Korea's, though SoKor's FOP is totally unacceptable because even architectural works cannot be freely photographed without architects' licensing clearances. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345 And these pictures even include a QI, but it will also deleted. Q28 (talk) 04:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Q28: yeah, no choice since your country's FOP legal right is identical or similar to 6 other countries – Denmark, Finland, Japan, Norway, Russia, and the United States – that only provide commercially-suitable FOP for copyrighted architecture only, not copyrighted public art. Notice the Taiwanese FOP is identical to Japan's FOP and similar to South Korea's, though SoKor's FOP is totally unacceptable because even architectural works cannot be freely photographed without architects' licensing clearances. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral At the moment, due to zh:Wikipedia:互助客栈/其他#有关维基共享资源台湾全景自由问题一事. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Info see my input here, regarding TIPO's reaffirming of their restrictive stance on Taiwanese FOP. @Q28: , FYI. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy IBERZA (talk) 19:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy IBERZA (talk) 19:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I realized it is bad for my privacy IBERZA (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I realized it is bad for my privacy IBERZA (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
No quiero que siga siendo visible al público IBERZA (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No quiero que siga siendo visible al público IBERZA (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
No quiero que siga siendo visible IBERZA (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
No quiero que siga siendo visible IBERZA (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Es malo para mi privacidad IBERZA (talk) 20:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Photographs of identifiable people: Uploader has asked for deletion on my disk, de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Karsten11#Löschung_meines_erstellten_Wikipedia_Eintrags Karsten11 (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please delete also File:Cedric 2022.jpg (same uploader) due to bad quality (also accepted by uploader).--Karsten11 (talk) 19:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, poor quality, non-notable people, and also uploader's own request. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of the non-free text and map in the picture. Both of these are above the COM:threshold of originality, they form the whole content of the picture so they're not de minimis, and Freedom of Panorama in the UK doesn't apply to literary or graphic works. bjh21 (talk) 14:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No FOP for 2D graphical works in the UK and map is above the ToO. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:19, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SergioCarino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Hard to imagine these versions of the PBS logo are any less likely to be above TOO than its successors, which have been deleted in previous discussions. They certaintly weren't created by Logopedia or "winkimedia" [sic].
_logo.svg){kind=link}
WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-US-1978-89}}. This was broadcast as part of network IDs but without copyright notice [10]. Search of copyright registration records show that while PBS did register some logos, it was not done until 1993 and so cannot be for these 1984 logos (registration must be within 5 years). IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- I defer to your knowledge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per IronGargoyle. These entered the public domain via formalities. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.39.5 11:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Images obtained from the internet
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No publication date - PD Poland doesn't apply here. Photograph has halftone so it was very likely published before 1994. Converting to DR for discussion Abzeronow (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We generally assume images are "made public" after they are created, unless they have a provenance showing that they remained with the photographer. We have several collections from archives that were donated by the photographer, where we can assume they were never seen by the public, or never had discernable copies made. --RAN (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Nope. Dozens if not hundreds of photos have been removed because the publication date and publisher were not specified. Institutional collections, including collaborations with Wikimedia Foundation, are a different matter. And COM:PCP. Matlin (talk) 18:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- The photograph has halftone which means it was likely published before the 1980s, and almost certainly published before 1994. Yes, a publication date would be very helpful. Abzeronow (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- The precautionary principle (point 4 specifically) does not allow for any assumptions. Most likely it is orphaned work, nevertheless it doesn't equal it is in public domain. To be in such, one needs to prove it - providing source and date. Therefore it should be deleted. Masur (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete it. „Likely published” is not a sound argument when discussing copyrights. Boston9 (talk) 19:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- When I say likely it refers to the timeframe or in this case, the endpoint of that timeframe, this was definitely published at some point. Abzeronow (talk) 15:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: publication may have been before 1994, but that PD rationale requires proof that it was published without a copyright notice. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The off-center "NBC News" text — and its typeface, for that matter — seem to indicate that this is more of an "own work" than an NBC News logo ought to be (i.e., it is not real). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- The SVG tries to use
font-family="Raleway", which is not on the list of available SVG fonts. TilmannR (talk) 20:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC) - Keep Five months after Wcquidditch deletion request, NBC News officiallly used the new logo as of June 19 rebrand of NBC Nightly News. The difference is it not used the Raleway font as Jordanene7's sock (NovaFan3948529435) used, but rather the NBC Tinker font, used for NBC's rebranding last year. So, do not need it to be deleted because i will update the logo and instead of Own-work tag, it could be replaced by "public domain" tag. Source came from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp2iGwExoK4 Yayan550 (talk) 23:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Yayan. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of an artist Yann (talk) 21:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete duplicate file, restore first file. Error uploaded. Also bust is author works by Dmytro Krvavych. No Permission, no FoP in Ukraine. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
重複したファイルがあるから。 ツムラ (talk) 11:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC) 光厳法皇像.jpgとほとんど同じもので、アップロードの必然性に乏しかった。--ツムラ (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree that the other version looks nicer, but this one is a slightly higher resolution. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim. File with low resolution, no metadata and available all over the internet HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Replacements available. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.175.29.102 (talk) 16:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, No valid reason. Seems good.Owais Al Qarni (talk) 03:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean by good? This is the most common reason to doubt own work claims. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment As there are TinEye hits up to 4 years before this photo was supposedly taken, I clearly do not believe the own work claim. However, the first Tineye hit is from www.IWPR.net, and it could possibly turn out to be covered by its permissive license for images. Felix QW (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean by good? This is the most common reason to doubt own work claims. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Felix - PCP. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The logo seems complex enough to be copyrightable. TadejM (t/p) 17:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I doubt it. --Leyo 00:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Any rationale? It certainly is more complex than the logo discussed at COM:Slovenia#Threshold of originality. --TadejM (t/p) 10:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Are you referring to I Feel Slovenia? There, the idea has some merit in terms of originality. --Leyo 13:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, so can you provide some cases to show that the logo discussed here is not original? --TadejM (t/p) 13:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's nice but seems like a text logo, and without the dual meaning of the "I Feel Slovenia" example. I have no expertise on Slovenian law, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is much simpler. --TadejM (t/p) 13:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Any rationale? It certainly is more complex than the logo discussed at COM:Slovenia#Threshold of originality. --TadejM (t/p) 10:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The logo seems complex enough to be copyrightable. TadejM (t/p) 17:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Before creating this file, I had these four countries in mind as an example: the United States and Croatia as quite liberal in this matter, and the United Kingdom and Slovenia as very strict. Next, I looked at many logos of American record companies on Commons and concluded that the one in question has a very similar complexity. Then I looked on the website of the Dallas Records company and found that it was established in 1987 in Ljubljana, Slovenia, then in Yugoslavia as well as Croatia. That was four years before the breakup of Yugoslavia. No specific documents about registration in Slovenia were found or mentioned on the company's website, but just one simple statement, also there is no such reference on any Wikipedia. At that time, I managed to find the registration for Croatia (registered 1994) on the website of the Croatian Commercial Court (Sudski registar - Podaci o poslovnom subjektu), and put it as a reference in the article. I personally did not manage to find any official registration information in Slovenia at the time, and no one else has provided it so far. Thus, the relevant information about registration in Slovenia should be attached so we can assess whether these two sides are independent or one falls under the other. Also, at that time I set a category for this logo only for Croatia, but later in 2021 the user ZimskoSonce changed it to Slovenia [11]. I note that there are no references on the Slovenian Wikipedia that would follow such a change. --Vhorvat (talk) 02:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
![[11]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ADallas_Records_Logo.svg&diff=612469103&oldid=591756843){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No publication date - pd anon eu doesn't apply.. Late 1930s photograph, was probably published around time of creation. Converting to DR for discussion Abzeronow (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No publication date - pd anon eu doesn't apply. Photograph created in 1939. Converting to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
doppelte Datei VSchagow (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - requested by uploader. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as no source (No source since). 1919 German photograph. Looks scanned from a book. More information from the uploader would be helpful to determine its actual copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 20:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- TinEye search turns up the photograph being used in the November-December 2008 issue of Emma. https://www.emma.de/ausgabe/emma-ausgabe-novemberdezember-2008-274511. Photograph is also found here: https://www.lwl.org/marsLWL/de/instance/picture/MZA-Serie-o-Nr-Arbeiterbewegung-in-der-Weimarer-Republik-Unterrichtsmaterial-nach-1949.xhtml?ls=L2RlL2luc3RhbmNlL2tvLnhodG1sP2Zyb21PaWQ9ODUxJm9pZD04NTEmcmVsSWQ9MTAwMSZyZXN1bHRJbmZvVHlwZUlkPTE3MiZyb3dDb3VudHNJbmRleD01JnNvcnREZWZpbml0aW9uPUFSQ0hJVkVOVU1CRVItMSZ0aHVtYlNjYWxlSW5kZXg9MSZ2aWV3VHlwZT1ncmlkJmZyb21JbmZvVHlwZUlkPTI1Nw%21%21&oid=11578&rs=17 where it is stated that the photographer is unknown. Abzeronow (talk) 21:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure --RAN (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- The uploader also had this to say on their talk page " eso, dieses Foto ist mehr als 100 Jahre alt. Keine. der Abgebildeten ist noch am Leben. Wie die Bildunterschrift (V / 174 Die ersten weiblichen Volksvertreterinnen) ist dieses Bild aus dem Buch des Deutschen Bundestages Fragen an die deutsche Geschichte, Ideen, Kräfte, Entscheidungen Von 1800 bis zur Gegenwart, "istorische Ausstellung im Reichtagsgebäude in Berlin, Katalog, 2. erweiterte Auflage", Bilder: ohne Seitenangaben, aber mit Ausstellungsstellen.H Schlosstoni (talk) 09:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)"
which does help sort out the sourcing issues but still there is an issue of when this photograph was published. Abzeronow (talk) 16:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio. No unknown author - picture taken around 1965 by Austrian photographer Alfred Luft, who is still alive. Herbert Ortner (talk) 12:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
