Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/01/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 15th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake लोकतांत्रिक जनाधार पार्टी (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I seriously doubt the claim of {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. Radio stations do not routinely free-license their logos, and there is no evidence that this is an exception. Might be {{Textlogo}}, I'm not sure about the color gradient. Jmabel ! talk 03:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel I did not spot that, yikes! I was trying to clean up the work of a contributor who's been blocked on enwiki. Would this meet TOO in the US? Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 03:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sammi Brie: as I said, "I'm not sure about the color gradient". You'd need to ask someone with more expertise about where the line falls. - Jmabel ! talk 03:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel, I asked @AntiCompositeNumber on the English Wikipedia Discord and he said, very likely below. the text isn't protected, that's a simple shape, and gradients like that aren't protected. I'm going to change the tag; if anyone objects to this being below TOO in the US, let me know. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 05:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fine with me. - Jmabel ! talk 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as keep, get rid of the bogus license, image is below TOO. - Jmabel ! talk 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seriously doubting {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Only the holder of a copyright can grant a license, and there is no evidence that the TV station has granted this CC license. Might be {{PD-textlogo}}; we'd need a more expert opinion than mine on whether the shading gradient pulls it above the threshold of originality Jmabel ! talk 02:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fox4fan2 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously, the now indef-blocked uploader saying "keep" without a rationale shouldn't carry much weight. It's all going to come down to TOO. - Jmabel ! talk 06:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader blocked indef. for harassment, vandalism, etc. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This may well be valid under {{Textlogo}} (I leave it to someone more expert than I about the threshold of originality to work it out) but I can't imagine the station offered a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license for it, and there is no evidence that they did (instead, a dubious claim of "own work"). Jmabel ! talk 02:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader blocked indef. for harassment, vandalism, etc. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Judging by caption added here by uploader, this is a made-up logo for a hypothetical scenario. I can't think of any educational value to that. In fact, it could be actively misleading. I believe it should be deleted. Jmabel ! talk 02:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader blocked indef. for harassment, vandalism, etc. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

<noinclude>{{cancella subito|22}}</noinclude> FIUNT (talk) 03:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author claims that it is their own work but it is the logo of a team. 176.61.36.40 01:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality 2600:100C:A210:2BB2:9050:3414:8EBC:5BC9 09:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use on several projects. --Achim55 (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Mint eggy93 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. Please don't upload such crap. --Achim55 (talk) 15:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 11:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outdated version of File:Logo of OQ Chemicals.svg with SVG errors. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author, source, license are fake. Picture taken probably from an online store (Aliexpress, can't add the link because it's banned here) VanHelsing.16 (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio, many web hits. --Achim55 (talk) 18:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 11:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cartoon_Network_studio_New_Look_for_2023.png Tugi2004 (talk) 20:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Would Like it deleted Jaydenvossofficial (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 21:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

parce que Rolimof (talk) 21:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not know it would be publicly visible Afaq ahmad052 (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal image by non-contributor. --Wutsje 03:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Picture already on internet in 2019 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader's request Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per fairly prompt uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work"; may be copyrighted TV screenshot Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: obviously derivative work (book cover). 217.239.3.173 07:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 02:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: obviously derivative work (book cover). 217.239.3.173 07:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does putting two copyrighted pieces of work into one image make this have a threshold of originality of its own? 217.239.3.173 07:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear COM:DW copyright violation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation © TLnews - www.TLnews.ro - 2015 - 2023 | Toate drepturile rezervate. Kun Kipcsak (talk) 07:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, claimed free license not seen at source page. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree image Mateus2019 (talk) 08:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbtYubtUkAA5WG_.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No camera or other details suggests that this is copied from elsewhere, thus a copyright violation. A prior file by this name has been deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anushka Sen.jpg but there are so many pictures of the lady on the internet that it could be from anywhere. Permission seems to me to be needed, but I did not want to flag this as a permissions request in case the uploader needed more information Timtrent (talk) 07:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, promotional img https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisYqxA5xp92lJNTv7_1LHBmm4KxECYy67KBtPXzgunEjHIc_1HyX8TLTihLMxzflvR-6XuCTg9EB3UYJ_1Y1KIoRYjbc7w7wjgaOxXstrugfdoecP4b5YZtdQTSby4nNEajdvUixLRD5c7B9l1a6faKe4HxsZRKQ#imgrc=Hsn7hR49CMryuM Mateus2019 (talk) 08:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is obviously no work of the United States Federal Government: a better source gives us the information: © 2007 Jupiter Images Corporation High Contrast (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, obviously. Rama (talk) 10:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Top-left corner is an image that is copyrighted (Omagh bombing) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 10:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Collages always need VRT tickets. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 02:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW, all individual images in collages need to be sourced and free licensed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that the original uploader owns the copyright to this commercial logo. HouseBlaster (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, looks well over TOO. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me di cuenta que es malo para mi privacidad DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Don't see privacy issue, but OOS fiction map. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious scan or photo of printed material: https://www.moroccan-judaism.org/objets_popup.php?id=22062 Sîmbotin (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No lo quiero Angel Francisco perez (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yo tampoco. El dedo! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.173.28.94 (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Андрей. --Achim55 (talk) 08:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaurav mahaur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very unlikely that these are "Own Work" as claimed by the uploader. The clam requires justification. In addition there are no camera details. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Андрей Романенко. --Rosenzweig τ 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proven notability, Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 06:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Rosenzweig τ 17:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MMMM97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work, and useless file out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 08:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rikefe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion, the subject was deleted from the Hungarian Wikipedia.

Bencemac (talk) 09:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JUANCARLOSHUERTASDIAZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boukharikhalid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:Scope. Jonteemil (talk) 20:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 01:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A text of a poem previously written for some competition. Even if it's the author who put it here, do we need it? Ignatus (talk) 21:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, non-notable person. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not active contributor personal photo, likely a self-PR Ignatus (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, non-notable person. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone's bio as a text, out of the scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified personStrange cropping suggesting it is part of a batch of photos as per the bottom right CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Picture with a copyright in the watermark and a name in the metadata different from the name of the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio above COM:TOO UK. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I seriously doubt the claim of {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. Radio stations do not routinely free-license their logos, and there is no evidence that this is an exception. Might be {{Textlogo}}, I'm not sure about the image of the Washington Monument, but it's simpe enough that it may be OK. Needs an opinion from someone more expert on the threshold of originality. Jmabel ! talk 03:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. In my opinion this is textlogo. Taivo (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Taivo, likely below COM:TOO US. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely above COM:TOO UK. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Band logo. Doesn't seem like a band logo, given the smartphone EXIF at the bottom. That said, unclear what this is supposed to depict. King of ♥ 03:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PIcture of a picture. No indication on who the original author and license are. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubt this is "own work". The metadata credits another person. Doing a reverse search you can see older files with the same size. Also the user already had files deleted previously. Osamu Dazai 2022 (talk) 04:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roisun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photos, not special enough to be educationally useful

A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO China --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low-res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel james17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded for user sandbox on enwp. No other apparent use.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screen 186.174.255.188 06:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 13:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. From the file history, we can see that this photo was screenshotted from a social media app (possibly Facebook). This means it is likely that the uploader is not the original author, as is claimed in the file summary. IagoQnsi (talk) 08:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of art that does not seem to be the depicted person;'s own work 331dot (talk) 08:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This image shows little more than the copyrighted poster in the middle. Not de minimis because the image would not be useful if the poster were blacked out. IagoQnsi (talk) 08:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit AP Photo/Denis Poroy, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit AP Photo/Denis Poroy, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit AP Photo/Denis Poroy, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit AP Photo/Denis Poroy, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, not own work, blurry Mateus2019 (talk) 08:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AffshinveisiAf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Used for promo of non-notable individual on wikidata. Out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dsfdgh23456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Used for promo of non-notable individual on wikidata. Out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Profile picture on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/auzzybearofficial/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Photograph fond on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye, also available on the bad's website https://blacklaceofficial5.wixsite.com/black-lace/reunion CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is in the photo, Not own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Most likely not own work, the uploqder is in the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The uploader is in the picture: most likely not own work, Is on the internet since 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded from a YouTube channel without correct CC license (other videos from the channel do have CC licenses but not this one it appears) Dhx1 (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file. 95.52.97.221 15:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked to photographer Kevin Buret (https://www.facebook.com/OnTheRoots), no credit or evidence of permission. Belbury (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Valo139 as Unfree Flickr file (Unfree Flickr file) and the most recent rationale was: Unfree The copyright on this photograph wouldn't have belonged to the Washington Spark, it would have belonged to the Jackson (Mississippi) police. 1961 photograph so it could be copyrighted until 2057. https://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/mississippi/ Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I have to admit that I didn't investigate the case enough. But anyways thanks for your addition. (P.S. I'm new in the license reviewing business) Valo139 (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Valo139:  Keep PD-US-not renewed. Mugshots are "made public" when a "discernable copy" is viewed by a person other than the photographer. The photographic negative is made into multiple print copies, one is glued onto a booking card, sorted by name. One is forwarded to the National Crime Information Center (modern booking images are digital), one goes into a perp book sorted by date to show recent crime victims. To be eligible for copyright, it would have had to be registered with the copyright office, and had that copyright renewed. The link above concerns state government documents and their classification as a public record. --RAN (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-US-not renewed. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The texts may be simple, but the informational board became artistic thanks to the drawings. Unfortunately, Australian freedom of panorama excludes graphical works. Needs license permission from the graphic artist of the drawings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ursredadaaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly this user doesn't understand what Wikimedia Commons is for

Vera (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ursredadaaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement, out of the project scope

Nutshinou Talk! 18:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like derivative work Vera (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of someone who died in 1996 is clearly not from 2023. No reason to think other fields are more accurate; needs factual info on actual source and proof of free licensed status. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. New Zealander freedom of panorama does not cover textual works; moreover, New Zealand government works are copyrighted for 100 years. Needs commercial license permission from the text author. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this crocodile image in public domain? If not, then may violate Australian freedom of panorama which does not cover textual works. If copyrighted, this photo needs commercial license permission from the image artist. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional logo. Commons is not a repository for your design exercises. In addition ARR in file desc. Achim55 (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF, professionally shot, most likely a video still from the series "Sandman", only upload by user Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly above COM:TOO Japan, see also w:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_January_7#File:Nintendo_-_1950.png --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you want to delete this file?? QaMario (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@QaMario: the logo is likely copyrighted. It may have passed the Japanese threshold of originality. Not simple logo. This means the designer has the right to claim copyright and prevent anyone to freely distribute the logo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I'm pretty certain this logo is in public domain in Japan. en:Copyright law of Japan#Length of protection states that corporate copyrights were good for 30 years prior to 1970 and 50 years prior to 2018. Regardless of whether the 2018 law is retroactive, the logo would be out of copyright in Japan either way. However, the copyright status in the U.S. would depend on whether or not the 1970 law applied to existing copyrighted works. If the 1970 law did not extend existing copyrights, then the logo entered public domain in Japan in 1950 + 30 + 1 = 1981 and would be in public domain in the U.S. as well. Otherwise, the logo would be copyrighted until 2046 in the United States because 1950 + 50 + 1 = 2001 came after the URAA restoration date of 1996. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Do we know any example of a term extension that is not just non-retroactive in the sense that expired copyrights are not renewed but in the sense that only works published after the date are covered? I can only think of the US' change to pma copyright, but that was quite a unique situation. Felix QW (talk) 08:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Yann wants to delete this file now? QaMario (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is a very old logo.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michalg95 (talk • contribs) 11:34, January 22, 2023 (UTC)



 Kept, per Ixfd and COM:Japan. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar file tagged as fair use on enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images are different. Logos-sealbsu.jpg reflects official name change. Fallfoliage (talk) 03:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 09:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1933 photograph from an author who died in 1987. Undelete in 2058 when it becomes public domain in Paraguay. Abzeronow (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Below COM:TOO Brazil. --King of ♥ 10:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO US, in my opinion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 00:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i accidently had uploaded this file, which is a duplicate of another file i had uploaded: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jind_Kaur_with_son,_Duleep_Singh.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D ThethPunjabi (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidental duplicate file of (both uploaded by me): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drawing_of_the_Golden_Temple_at_Amritsar._Temple_in_a_large_lake_(sarovar)._Shrine_and_pilgrimage_site_for_Sikhs,_circa_1860.jpg ThethPunjabi (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was going to use for an article but it's too blurry MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   21:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was going to use for an article but it's too blurry MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   21:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and unused, ouf of scope. --P 1 9 9   21:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and only used on sandbox page of non-contributing user, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   21:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, ouf of scope. --P 1 9 9   21:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, ouf of scope. --P 1 9 9   21:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a picture: File:Obama testing the Federal Government IT Dashboard.jpg. No reason to keep this over the original. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a picture: File:Obama testing the Federal Government IT Dashboard.jpg. No reason to keep this over the original. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although this is a selfie with a notable individual, there is no apparent use for this file and there are many better files available at CAT:Gavin Williamson. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, numerous high quality alternatives already available. --P 1 9 9   21:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no photographer given no metadata Hoyanova (talk) 10:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use of metadata not obligatory. --P 1 9 9   21:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I don't want it in Wikimedia anymore, thanks. Developerburak (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In use. Given CC licenses cannot be revoked. --Achim55 (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   21:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality personal picture not reasonably useful for educational purposes. – JBarta (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear situation of authorship, no opposition, no description. RE rillke questions? 20:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{User page image}} states: Commons:Project scope#File in use in another Wikimedia project: the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project. The uploader only has 9 global edits so it doesn't count as active user. Hence delete per COM:CSD#F10. Jonteemil (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete COM:SELFIE/NOTHOST. The only (non-User-namespace) use is a bogus use. It was introduced by Dollmaster (who is not the uploader of the image we’re seeing now). ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 01:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 142.167.26.214 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: appear to be fair use, likely copyrighted. The file has been 17 years in Commons and deserves regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and unused, ouf of scope. --P 1 9 9   21:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this yesterday. Although built in 1954, the railway line was not opened until 1957 (at the same time as the Marree line). I have therefore combined this with Stirling North railway station, South Australia -- track layout (schematic) 1957-2001.jpg. Keeping it would now be misleading. SCHolar44 (talk) 22:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   21:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright infringement Speravir 23:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t help it, but to me it looks like the image has been copypasted from page 6 of a PDF of de:LMBV despite the uploader claimed the image would be an own work. I am not 100% certain (but almost), hence here. In my opinion we should delete this file because of the precautionary principle. Note that the imprint page of LMBV.de does not state any of free licences, instead there is

3. Urheberrecht

Der Inhalt, die Struktur und die Gestaltung dieser Internetseite unterliegen dem Schutz des Urheberrechts und anderer Schutzgesetze. Jegliche Vervielfältigung, öffentliche Wiedergabe, Sendung, Veränderung oder anderweitige Nutzung der verwendeten Grafiken, Bild-Tondokumente oder Texte ist außerhalb der gesetzlich zulässigen Verwertungshandlungen grundsätzlich nicht erlaubt und bedarf der Zustimmung der LMBV. Eine Vervielfältigung aller unter der Rubrik „Pressemitteilungen“ hinterlegten Informationen ist jedoch auch zu kommerziellen Zwecken gestattet.

So only “Pressemitteilungen” (press/news releases) explicitly are allowed for commercial use, but no exact licence is mentioned. The linked PDF document is not such a press release.

In terms of content loss: There is another image based on the same source (despite the different source link) by Alabasterstein, but this clearly is an own work. Also pinging @Markscheider because of his archived request for a map regarding this area.

Alabasterstein und Markscheider, falls ihr euch dazu äußern wollt, dann könnt ihr das auch auf deutsch tun.

— Speravir – 23:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete a) Copyright violation. On the penultimate page it says Jegliche Vervielfältigung, Verbreitung, Nachnutzung, oder sonstige gewerbliche Nutzung ohne Zustimmung der LMBV sind untersagt. b) In the said PDF the map is an SVG. If you wanna do it right, upload the SVG, not a bitmap rendering of it. c) superseded by File:Revierkarte Helmstedter Revier 1.png, which still unnecessarily is a bitmap; OSM does allow you to download of an SVG rendition of the map. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 01:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9   22:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Côte d'Ivoire.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a duplicate of an already referenced file seen here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USC_logo_horizontal.svg TheNobleBug (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted and redirected to the duplicate. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Aregotas (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stylized trilliums do not qualify for PD-textlogo because they are not simple shapes and meet the threshold of originality. There was a consensus a while back on this which I cannot find at the moment, but that is the reason why other Ontario parties' logos are also under fair use licenses (except for the PC's, which was erroneously claimed as own work). Yue🌙 04:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is mistake, this is wrong headstone. Not headstone of finnish politician Aarne Saarinen Wikidata:Q301553. Almost similar first name (this is Aarno, should be Aarne; wrong birth and death dates). No educational purpose. This should be deleted . Htm (talk) 07:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Picture from the artist's website, Most likely not own picture https://www.ianhowarth.co.uk/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Most likely not own picture: the artist is in the picture, The metadata indicate a screenshot CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work", uploaded by the subject? Appears to be a professional portrait. David10244 (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work, uploaded by the subject? Looks like a posed, professional portrait. David10244 (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I stumbled over https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/3D_files_and_3D_printing#Weapons and want to discuss whether this hammer could be seen as a weapon and whether it would have to be deleted with it. Thanks! PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: A hammer (for hammering nails as opposed to a war hammer) is primarily a tool and not a weapon. The manufacturing of hammers is (as far as I know) not regulated and they are (as far as I know) not banned anywhere. If this STL had to be deleted for being potentially used as a weapon, then every pointy or throwable shape would need to be deleted for being potentially misused. That's clearly impractical and presumably not the intent of the laws/policies. TilmannR (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not own work, unlike what the file description says - it's the old logo of Maringá Futebol Clube, an active football/soccer club from Brazil. It was changed in 2019. (http://cbnmaringa.com.br/noticia/com-novo-escudo-mfc-da-mais-um-passo-na-gestao-empresarial-do-clube)

The bottom of the club's website (https://maringafc.com/) signals that the Maringá Futebol Clube brand is copyrighted. Likely a copyright violation. Vítor (talk) 13:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded twice inadvertedly: same as [[File:BelfastBankingCo-2Pounds NewYorkBranch 1866 UlsterMuseum-Belfast 20220531.jpg]] ~~---- Zenwort (talk) 13:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph taken by Tony Powell, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the current owner of this photograph (gregoire patrigot). This picture is not public domain, I have allowed one website to publish it, namely http://hmhsbritannic.weebly.com/, as long as the copyright was mentionned. I have never authorised your website to use my picture, even less to put it in public domain and for free reproduction! 87.115.13.115 15:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you are a heir to the photographer you own the rights. Btw also available on ocean4future and Pinterest. --Achim55 (talk) 16:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merely owning the photograph doesn't give you ownership of the copyright, which would have belonged to the photographer and their estate. Abzeronow (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Too recent for PD Old Assumed. Unknown publication date. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While these two 1993 photographs might be in the public domain in Italy, they are still protected in the US for quite some time and should therefore be deleted.

Rosenzweig τ 16:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to COM:FOP Austria, literary works like this are not covered. Needs commercial license from the text author. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billbucher (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA allow this?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Likely PD-no-notice or PD-no renewal, but SIRIS has no information on any inscription, so we can;t keep it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Australian freedom of panorama does not cover textual works; moreover, Australian government works are copyrighted for 50 years. Also, a 2D graphical work is at the right half. Needs commercial license permission from the text author as well as the artist of the graphical work to the right. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"No copyrights ,these photos are randomly taken by people" is an inaccurate understanding of copyright law. Thanks! TrangaBellam (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

اريد حذف صورتي الخاصة Neven abbas (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

اريد حذف صورتي الخاصة لأسباب عائلية رجاء Neven abbas (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gouwenaar as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This photo is a scan of an old photo taken before 1938 (the house was demolished in 1938). Uploader is not the copyright holder. By the way, Velp is not near Utrecht Converting to a regular DR since photograph is at least 85 years old. Abzeronow (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

De fotograaf is Jacobus Johannes Duyvené de Wit jr. (28-09-1870 - 22-05-1935). De foto komt uit zijn fotoalbum uit 1889. Het is een albuminedruk en 134 jaar oud. Endymion87 (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep based on this information. It became public domain in the Netherlands in 2006 and is public domain in the United States based on the age of the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Abzeronow. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maltese freedom of panorama does not include texts, and it only includes uses of artistic works. As read at Copyright Act, 2000 (Chapter 415, as amended up to Act No. VIII of 2011), "literary work is defined as: "irrespective of literary quality, any of the following, or works similar thereto: (c) textbooks, treatises, histories, biographies, essays and articles. These are essay-type literary texts.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farshid.tofigh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, no evidence of a free license.

Yann (talk) 18:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your attention
I will explain a few things about the files I uploaded
Files that are related to actors or characters, I have photographed myself or taken the characters myself
About
File:سید امرالله شاه‌ابراهیمی.jpg
File:شاه ابراهیمی.jpg
File:ناصر خویشتن دار.jpg
File:ناصر خویشتن دار 2.jpg
, due to the fact that he is not alive, manipulated photos have been used in news agencies
as well
about
File:Logo honar tajrobe.jpg
File:Logo honartajrobe.png
I used the logos designed and published by Professor Reza Abedini , which is also available on the https://honartajrobeh.ir/ website
Finally, due to the lack of transparency of copyright laws in our country, I will do my best to comply with the rules on Wikipedia.
Thank you again
And I apologize for not mastering the English language Farshid.tofigh (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Your English is fine.
For all files, where you are not the sole author, a formal written permission is needed from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. For example, File:ناصر خویشتن دار 2.jpg is a picture of a print, so you are not allowed to upload this without the permission from the original copyright holder. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:رسول زاده.jpg, which is a work of Amin Ahouei for Tasnim News Agency and freely licensed,  Delete the rest. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The file above is also a duplicate of File:سارا رسول زاده در تسنیم.jpg. No need to keep it. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Datei habe ich selbst zum Testen für eine noch nicht freigegebene Seite hochgeladen und nicht bemerkt, dass sie auf diese Weise bereits öffentlich im System landet (Anfänger). Weder die Genehmigung des Fotografen liegt vor noch die Zustimmung der abgebildeten Personen. Die Datei soll auch nicht weiter benutzt werden. Ringerang (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es mi fotografia, no quiero aparezca aqui 189.202.29.37 19:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great picture. I think this should stay. Elfrio2023 (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We rarely remove images at the request of the subject and never when the requestis an anonymous Ip user. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy deletion requested, due to the F10 rule. 181.43.5.243 17:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the F10 rule is not valid anymore undelete many pictures that depict people with green, blue, black or brown eyes (like me). My picture depicted very well beautiful brown eyes... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.5.243 (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you trying to get other people's pictures deleted out of spite? Hazel eyes are unusual; brown eyes are common. That matters when considering whether a photo has value and likely usefulness. Anyway, this appears to be a bad-faith deletion request, so maybe post your photos on Instagram or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Hazel eyes are less common than brown eyes and this is a photograph of good quality. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es mi fotografia, no quiero que aparezca en este sitio 189.202.29.37 19:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion We rarely remove images at the request of the subject and never when the requestis an anonymous Ip user. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image 181.43.5.243 17:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is the only picture of a boy wearing mascara. --Trade (talk) 02:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


You like boys with mascara? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.5.243 (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Very poor example of mascara, unusable. --P 1 9 9   16:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation. Note that the original file was overwritten by User:MissNepal94 in violation of Commons:OVERWRITE. The current file has the watermark "perusingtheplanet", suggesting that it was copied from https://perusingtheplanet.com/. This photo is on that website,[1] and is on an archive of the webpage that was captured before the upload of the revised file to Commons.[2] It is also unclear whether the original image is reliably licensed, as it is widely available online, has no camera metadata and is the uploader's only upload. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kiava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kiava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user clearly doesn't understand what a creative Commons license is

Vera (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all except for Fatemeh masoudifar before release movies skin.jpg (someone please check VTRS permission). HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect that the image is not, in fact, the uploader's own work. I've found an instance uploaded to Imgur dated Dec 6th 2015 (https://imgur.com/xCU8131), and a derivative dated May 19th 2014 (https://imgur.com/gallery/jYR2WR9). This is partially supported by the fact that the upload contains no EXIF information. Saintmanchan (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German-American painter and graphic designer Joel Löwenstein, also known as Joe Loe or Joseph Loe, emigrated to the US in 1936, was naturalized and died there in 1964. So while any US works of his might or might not be in the public domain in the US depending on the circumstances, these works are all from his time in Germany, where they are still protected by copyright until the end of 2034. So the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2035; any US copyrights for them should have expired by then as well.

Rosenzweig τ 23:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bernd Schwabe in Hannover: The sources I found are all at Wikidata: d:Q116212211. Wikipedia would probably classify most of those as "original research" :-) ... One freely accessible signature by him (as "Joseph Loe") is here, though I've never seen that on artwork. I've extracted the signature from one of his works as File:Joe Loe signature.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 08:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: . I am not convinced that we mean the same artist. I now tried to begin an article in German about Josef Löwenstein to show his birthdate 1883. At wikidata there is 1945 dated paper which shows the named man had been born about 1888.
What do you think? Do you like to help to expand the German article about Loewenstein (or to make an English one)? Sincerely, Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the 1883 year is correct. The Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon has it too, and apparently it originally comes from this 1992 book. Multiple official German and US records show the man was born on July 1, 1887 (as reflected at Wikidata). You can find and access them with Ancestry (which is included in en:Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library, which you should be able to use). I'll take a look at the German article. --Rosenzweig τ 15:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: . There are more than just one or two Josef Löwenstein from that time; have a look for example. Sincerely; Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
His birth name wasn't Josef, it was Joel. And unlike the chemist Josef Löwenstein born in Warsaw in 1885, the Joel Löwenstein born in 1887 was a painter, a commercial artist, born in Mosbach, and "also known as Joe Loe". I suggest we continue this discussion at de:Diskussion:Josef Löwenstein, where I've provided images of the documents in question. --Rosenzweig τ 16:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of IRGC Navy. Same pictures published by farsnews.ir with another watermark and credited to "NEDSA" (IRGC Navy) (please see gallery here).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. Same pictures published by ISNA with its own watermark (see gallery here).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. See the second image published by Fars News (credit: Recieved) image gallery and by Moj News Agency without credit image gallery. Probably a work of Iranian navy.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work of Tasnim. Same igames published by IRNA without credit (see gallery) Image from a secret underground base is highly likely to be taken by the Iranian armed forces. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CaesarIran that includes same pictures.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Work by Mehr News, but 'Received'. CC does not apply.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Same image with alterations published by Mehr (Credit: Received) [3] gallery

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Same image used by Fars News (link) and Mizan (link) which is not obtained from Tasnim (margins different, bigger picture).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Tasnim work. Sane images published by ISNA gallery and IRNA gallery (credit 'Recieved'). Janes credits one to Iranian Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

The source says it has received the photographs and does not name any photographer. Probably a work of Iranian defense ministry and certainly not a work by Mehr News.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. We lack author information, which is required under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license, so we cannot host these files. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a Work by Tasnim (Iranian defense ministry is the likely source.) because:

  1. No photographer is credited
  2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General comment

Who the original author is do not matter. What is important is to know who the copyright holder is. There could be more than one copyright holder as the original author might have given the rights to more than one person. Therefore, about the images published by Tasnim or Mehr news agencies in the photo section of their site:

  •  Keep if Tasnim / Mehr is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
  •  Keep if the photographer is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
  •  Delete if another agency is credited
  • undelete images that didn't need to be deleted

For images credit "received", I am not sure about who is the right holder. Maybe we can keep the ones only published by one agency and delete those that were also published by non-free agencies.

--Hosortyr (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Published by (and watermarked by!) official Iranian news agencies, such as Tasnim. "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." See also this related discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The comment above ("2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.") only strengthens my argument. At the footer of the mentioned yjc.ir website it says: کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان بوده و استفاده از مطالب آن با ذکر منبع بلامانع است., (English: "All the rights of this site belong to the Young Journalists Club, and the use of its contents is unrestricted as long as the source is mentioned.") It seems clear that the Iranian Armed Forces supply photos with a free license to several press agencies, to use as however they see fit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See this related (successful) undeletion request. --- Vysotsky (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are not a work of Tasnim, they are obtained from leader.ir which does not release with a free license.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

No photograph is credited and the files are recieved, not a work by Mehr/Tasnim News Agency.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. Photos marked as received are clearly created by someone else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Photographs are recieved, not a work by Mehr News so cc does not apply

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Photograph is 'received', not a work by Mehr News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Clearly not a work by Fars News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with the "received" images above, I disagree with these six. I see no mention of "received" images. Vysotsky (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These photographs are not from Iran (France, Gabon, etc) and are from different times. If you check the link, this one even has a watermark and Fars News has not removed it. HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Didn't see that. Thanks for making that clear. Vysotsky (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Does not appear to be the original work of an Iranian press agency. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Files are 'recieved', not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per {{Tasnim}}. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Images are recieved

HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Received. Not a work by Tasnim.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

The rights of these photos belong to Iranian defense ministry, as previously discussed (Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah).

HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Files referred to here (link) were previously discussed and kept. Propose to keep per same argumentation. Vysotsky (talk) 12:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Images are received, not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom and comment. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

No indication that this is a Tasnim work. No photographer credited.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Unlike khamenei.ir, files from Leader.ir are not freely licensed

HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted above per nomination and discussion. Ellywa (talk) 21:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim, files from Leader.ir are not freely-licensed.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Not a work by Tasnim

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not by Tasnim, but "Received", acc. to sources. Copyright not with Tasnim News Agency. Vysotsky (talk) 21:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

Works are 'Received', CC license does not apply as they are taken by the source from somewhere else.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed. I don't know how many times should we warn this user and then again waste our time by nominating uploads from leader.ir for deletion.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP Iran

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos should be uploaded locally HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, the registration of license of this file ({self-work / cc-by-sa-4.0}) is indeed wrong. However, it satisfies {pd-logo} that is qualified to be uploaded onto the Commons under the name of Public Domain file. The ball design is (maybe) simple enough to be considered as public domain, the remaining parts are just simply-designed texts and the Iranian flag - which is definitely in PD. IDK, we need to discuss it carefully as I have found an official SVG file and wonder if I should upload it locally or on Commons. We need to discuss.
    Suggested license: {{Pd-logo}} Hwi.padam (talk) 03:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I posted the same thing at Commons:Deletion requests/File:IR Iran Football insignia.svg, but I repeat it here as well since the two files are the same except for their formats. Commons requires that logos such as this be considered to be within the public domain in not only the United States (where the Commons servers are located), but also in the country of first publication (i.e. the country of origin), which in this case is almost certainly Iran. Even though it could be possibly argued that this logo is too simple to be eligible under US copyright law under US copyright law per COM:TOO United States, things are much less clearer under Iranian copyright law per COM:TOO Iran. So, unless it can be shown that similar logos are considered to be too simple to be eligible for copyright protection per Iran's TOO (ideally by some sort of court ruling) or can be treated as PD for some other reason under Iranian copyright law, I'm not sure this should be kept by Commons per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has been uploading non-free copyrighted images en masse, frequently listing them as "own work" even when clearly not (see user talk page; most of them have been speedy-deleted). I haven't been able to conclusively trace this image's source, which is why I'm not nominating as speedy, but given user's pattern of uploads so far, seems unlikely this one is any different. R Prazeres (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. The source does not release under creative commons HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license. --Abalg (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? Higher resolution can be found here. Attention the link to the page of brandmarket.com gives a warning by Bitdefender for Phishing. Wouter (talk) 13:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wulan_Kenanga.jpg ‎ 43.252.107.136 14:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 01:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herzi Pinki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: identical with [4] on https://www.sulzenauhuette.at (and logo cropped away).User insists on images being just similar, not identical: File talk:KreuzMairspitz.jpg Friedo (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe bei der Sulzenauhütte nachträglich um Zustimmung gebeten und bitte daher, die Datei nicht zu löschen. --Friedo (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. @Friedo: For a permission follow COM:VRTS. --Wdwd (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As stated here by the uploader, he did not take the picture: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskussion:Mairspitze&diff=229870249&oldid=229870045 --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 13:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) Friedo (talk) 14:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild trägt zwar denselben Namen wie die ursprünglich gelöschte Datei, doch handelt es sich um ein ganz anderes Bild. Das Bild ist von mir. Es hat meine Frau aufgenommen und die gezeigte Person bin ich selbst. Zudem ist eingetragen, dass die abgebildete Person mit der Veröffentlichung einverstanden ist. Daher ist mir unverständlich, wie es zu dem Löschantrag kommt. Ich bitte darum, ihn unverzüglich wieder zu entfernen. --Friedo (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Source and author are wrong, therefore the license is invalid. --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unsinn; das Bild ist von mir und hat mit dem ursprünglichen unter demselben Namen nichts zu tun. Friedo (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The picture was not taken by User:FkMohr, you wrote that yourself (see link above). Please familiarize with licensing and copyright! --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das Bild ist mit meiner Kamera in meinem Auftrag von meiner Frau aufgenommen worden; die Bildrechte habe ich selbst und es wurde von mir hochgeladen. Ich bitte, den Löschantrag zurückzunehmen. Friedo (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Die Urheberrechte hast du nicht sondern deine Frau. --Ralf Roletschek 20:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Habe in die Lizenz nun den Namen meiner Frau eingetragen. Ein nachvollziehbarer Löschgrund ist nicht vorhanden. --Friedo (talk) 11:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I have no doubt that Mrs. Mohr irrevocably grants worldwide distribution/exploitation rights etc. to her husband Mr. Mohr. As a non-profit encyclopedia-like platform we are exempt from § 74 Ⅶ → § 18c 2 UrhG (mandatory obligation to obtain permission from the author, i. e. Mrs. Mohr), cf. final sentence of 18c UrhG. The use of {{Own}} is indeed inappropriate though. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 02:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep As an admin, I can confirm that the image that was originally discussed and deleted in May is completely different, so the previous deletion discussion can be disregarded for this case. However, the approach is at least unusual. Per User:FkMohr/Tui, he's uploading images taken by his wife Supakon Mohr, with her permission, and there is a whole category for these images: Category:Files by User:FkMohr/Supakon. In this regard, this image apparently isn't different from the others in the category. I would agre with Kays that there is probably "no doubt that Mrs. Mohr irrevocably grants worldwide distribution/exploitation rights etc. to her husband Mr. Mohr", but maybe a permission sent to VRT (Commons:Support-Team), covering all uploaded works by Mrs. Mohr, would be a good idea to settle the matter once and for all? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - While it is likely that the wife has, indeed, granted the permission orally, marriages do break up and we must be sure of her permission. A VRT message from her confirming her permission for his uploads is required. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

שמירה על פרטיות ואי הסכמה להצגת התמונה 147.234.64.75 03:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

לא פורסם בהסכמת המצולם. מעשה לא חוקי. למחוק את התמונה מיידית ולהסירה מהמאגר 147.234.64.75 03:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I can't really tell if these claims of privacy violation and publication without the photographer's consent are true or not. It looks like a photo from an at least somewhat public event. Please send an e-mail tom COM:VRT if you have any problems as claimed. --Rosenzweig τ 20:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo prise le 15 janvier 2023 d'une personne morte le 6 novembre 2021 me semble être une image tirée d'un film ou d'un document non libre H2O(talk) 15:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comme déjà signalé, je suis l'auteur de cette photo - j'espère que la mise à jour respectera les règles appliquées sur Wikipedia Beedee2023 (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, date of photo corrected per fr:Manu Bonmariage. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Buaidh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Maps clearly taken with data from Esri/ArcGIS and first published by the Colorado Independent Redistricting Commissions, so the CC-BY-SA license tag is dubious

Twotwofourtysix (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I don't think the base map is USGS -- USGS maps do not have place names on white blocks, the place names are simply printed directly over the map detail..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I also noticed a slight discrepancy between these maps and the final district lines, see here Twotwofourtysix (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and comment. Uploader did not explain the map origin. --Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cross and the chain on the right are above COM:TOO#Japan. That's why we have a crop out version here: File:Love Chunibyo Other Delusions logo.svg. Thibaut (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's just combination of geometric shapes. Also there are many other logo images with the cross and the chain: Category:Love, Chunibyo & Other Delusions Kuipuru (talk) 05:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]