Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/01/15
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake लोकतांत्रिक जनाधार पार्टी (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
I seriously doubt the claim of {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. Radio stations do not routinely free-license their logos, and there is no evidence that this is an exception. Might be {{Textlogo}}, I'm not sure about the color gradient. Jmabel ! talk 03:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel I did not spot that, yikes! I was trying to clean up the work of a contributor who's been blocked on enwiki. Would this meet TOO in the US? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: as I said, "I'm not sure about the color gradient". You'd need to ask someone with more expertise about where the line falls. - Jmabel ! talk 03:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel, I asked @AntiCompositeNumber on the English Wikipedia Discord and he said, very likely below. the text isn't protected, that's a simple shape, and gradients like that aren't protected. I'm going to change the tag; if anyone objects to this being below TOO in the US, let me know. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Fine with me. - Jmabel ! talk 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Jmabel, I asked @AntiCompositeNumber on the English Wikipedia Discord and he said, very likely below. the text isn't protected, that's a simple shape, and gradients like that aren't protected. I'm going to change the tag; if anyone objects to this being below TOO in the US, let me know. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: as I said, "I'm not sure about the color gradient". You'd need to ask someone with more expertise about where the line falls. - Jmabel ! talk 03:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Closing as keep, get rid of the bogus license, image is below TOO. - Jmabel ! talk 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Seriously doubting {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Only the holder of a copyright can grant a license, and there is no evidence that the TV station has granted this CC license. Might be {{PD-textlogo}}; we'd need a more expert opinion than mine on whether the shading gradient pulls it above the threshold of originality Jmabel ! talk 02:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fox4fan2 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Obviously, the now indef-blocked uploader saying "keep" without a rationale shouldn't carry much weight. It's all going to come down to TOO. - Jmabel ! talk 06:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader blocked indef. for harassment, vandalism, etc. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
This may well be valid under {{Textlogo}} (I leave it to someone more expert than I about the threshold of originality to work it out) but I can't imagine the station offered a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license for it, and there is no evidence that they did (instead, a dubious claim of "own work"). Jmabel ! talk 02:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader blocked indef. for harassment, vandalism, etc. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Judging by caption added here by uploader, this is a made-up logo for a hypothetical scenario. I can't think of any educational value to that. In fact, it could be actively misleading. I believe it should be deleted. Jmabel ! talk 02:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader blocked indef. for harassment, vandalism, etc. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
<noinclude>{{cancella subito|22}}</noinclude> FIUNT (talk) 03:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Author claims that it is their own work but it is the logo of a team. 176.61.36.40 01:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality 2600:100C:A210:2BB2:9050:3414:8EBC:5BC9 09:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use on several projects. --Achim55 (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mint eggy93 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. Please don't upload such crap. --Achim55 (talk) 15:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 11:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Outdated version of File:Logo of OQ Chemicals.svg with SVG errors. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Author, source, license are fake. Picture taken probably from an online store (Aliexpress, can't add the link because it's banned here) VanHelsing.16 (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio, many web hits. --Achim55 (talk) 18:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
{{SD|<G1>}} ryo (talk) 11:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cartoon_Network_studio_New_Look_for_2023.png Tugi2004 (talk) 20:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Would Like it deleted Jaydenvossofficial (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 21:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
parce que Rolimof (talk) 21:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
I did not know it would be publicly visible Afaq ahmad052 (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: personal image by non-contributor. --Wutsje 03:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
No sabía que sería visible públicamente DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture already on internet in 2019 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
uploader's request Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per fairly prompt uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Not "own work"; may be copyrighted TV screenshot Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio: obviously derivative work (book cover). 217.239.3.173 07:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 02:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio: obviously derivative work (book cover). 217.239.3.173 07:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Does putting two copyrighted pieces of work into one image make this have a threshold of originality of its own? 217.239.3.173 07:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: clear COM:DW copyright violation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation © TLnews - www.TLnews.ro - 2015 - 2023 | Toate drepturile rezervate. Kun Kipcsak (talk) 07:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, claimed free license not seen at source page. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
unfree image Mateus2019 (talk) 08:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbtYubtUkAA5WG_.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
No camera or other details suggests that this is copied from elsewhere, thus a copyright violation. A prior file by this name has been deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anushka Sen.jpg but there are so many pictures of the lady on the internet that it could be from anywhere. Permission seems to me to be needed, but I did not want to flag this as a permissions request in case the uploader needed more information Timtrent (talk) 07:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, promotional img https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisYqxA5xp92lJNTv7_1LHBmm4KxECYy67KBtPXzgunEjHIc_1HyX8TLTihLMxzflvR-6XuCTg9EB3UYJ_1Y1KIoRYjbc7w7wjgaOxXstrugfdoecP4b5YZtdQTSby4nNEajdvUixLRD5c7B9l1a6faKe4HxsZRKQ#imgrc=Hsn7hR49CMryuM Mateus2019 (talk) 08:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
This image is obviously no work of the United States Federal Government: a better source gives us the information: © 2007 Jupiter Images Corporation High Contrast (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, obviously. Rama (talk) 10:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Top-left corner is an image that is copyrighted (Omagh bombing) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 10:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Collages always need VRT tickets. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 02:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW, all individual images in collages need to be sourced and free licensed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that the original uploader owns the copyright to this commercial logo. HouseBlaster (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, looks well over TOO. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Me di cuenta que es malo para mi privacidad DizzyWithSuccess (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Don't see privacy issue, but OOS fiction map. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Obvious scan or photo of printed material: https://www.moroccan-judaism.org/objets_popup.php?id=22062 Sîmbotin (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
non-notable person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
No lo quiero Angel Francisco perez (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Yo tampoco. El dedo! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.173.28.94 (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Андрей. --Achim55 (talk) 08:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gaurav mahaur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very unlikely that these are "Own Work" as claimed by the uploader. The clam requires justification. In addition there are no camera details. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
- File:Gaurav mahaur.jpg
- File:Harendra singh tomar (casting director).jpg
- File:Anushka sen in yellow dress.jpg
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Андрей Романенко. --Rosenzweig τ 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Proven notability, Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 06:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Rosenzweig τ 17:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work, and useless file out of scope
HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 08:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Self-promotion, the subject was deleted from the Hungarian Wikipedia.
- File:Screenshot 20221116 154147 com.android.gallery3d.jpg
- File:Boros Ferenc meseíró profilkép.jpg
- File:Uj kis kaloz kapitany.jpg
Bencemac (talk) 09:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JUANCARLOSHUERTASDIAZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Boukharikhalid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope. Jonteemil (talk) 20:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 01:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
A text of a poem previously written for some competition. Even if it's the author who put it here, do we need it? Ignatus (talk) 21:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, non-notable person. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Not active contributor personal photo, likely a self-PR Ignatus (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, non-notable person. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Someone's bio as a text, out of the scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Unidentified personStrange cropping suggesting it is part of a batch of photos as per the bottom right CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture with a copyright in the watermark and a name in the metadata different from the name of the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio above COM:TOO UK. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
I seriously doubt the claim of {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. Radio stations do not routinely free-license their logos, and there is no evidence that this is an exception. Might be {{Textlogo}}, I'm not sure about the image of the Washington Monument, but it's simpe enough that it may be OK. Needs an opinion from someone more expert on the threshold of originality. Jmabel ! talk 03:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. In my opinion this is textlogo. Taivo (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per Taivo, likely below COM:TOO US. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely above COM:TOO UK. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Band logo. Doesn't seem like a band logo, given the smartphone EXIF at the bottom. That said, unclear what this is supposed to depict. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
PIcture of a picture. No indication on who the original author and license are. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as COM:DW unless original photo can be identified as PD/free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like gettyimages.com to me. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Doubt this is "own work". The metadata credits another person. Doing a reverse search you can see older files with the same size. Also the user already had files deleted previously. Osamu Dazai 2022 (talk) 04:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photos, not special enough to be educationally useful
- File:Flaccid uncut Asian penis 03.jpg
- File:Flaccid uncut Asian penis 01.jpg
- File:Flaccid uncut Asian penis 02.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO China --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Com-johnny-hooker-bloco-se-te-pego-nao-te-largo-faz-saideira-do-carnaval-de-sp-1518991372358 v2 300x300.jpg.webp
[edit]Small, low-res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel james17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded for user sandbox on enwp. No other apparent use.
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
TV screen 186.174.255.188 06:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 13:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. From the file history, we can see that this photo was screenshotted from a social media app (possibly Facebook). This means it is likely that the uploader is not the original author, as is claimed in the file summary. IagoQnsi (talk) 08:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Work of art that does not seem to be the depicted person;'s own work 331dot (talk) 08:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This image shows little more than the copyrighted poster in the middle. Not de minimis because the image would not be useful if the poster were blacked out. IagoQnsi (talk) 08:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit AP Photo/Denis Poroy, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit AP Photo/Denis Poroy, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit AP Photo/Denis Poroy, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit AP Photo/Denis Poroy, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo credit Mamta Popat / Arizona Daily Star, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
copyvio, not own work, blurry Mateus2019 (talk) 08:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AffshinveisiAf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for promo of non-notable individual on wikidata. Out of scope.
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dsfdgh23456 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for promo of non-notable individual on wikidata. Out of scope.
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DTAICHWOM SIMLOOA (talk · contribs)
[edit]modern artworks. no com:FOP HK.
- File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC 佳士得 Christie's 拍賣前 Auction 預展 preview exhibition November 2021 SS2 292.jpg
- File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC 佳士得 Christie's 拍賣前 Auction 預展 preview exhibition November 2021 SS2 235.jpg
- File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會展 HKCEC 佳士得 Christie's 拍賣前 Auction 預展 preview exhibition November 2021 SS2 075.jpg
RZuo (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Profile picture on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/auzzybearofficial/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photograph fond on the internet in 2008 according to TinEye, also available on the bad's website https://blacklaceofficial5.wixsite.com/black-lace/reunion CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is in the photo, Not own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Most likely not own work, the uploqder is in the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is in the picture: most likely not own work, Is on the internet since 2008 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded from a YouTube channel without correct CC license (other videos from the channel do have CC licenses but not this one it appears) Dhx1 (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Empty file. 95.52.97.221 15:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Watermarked to photographer Kevin Buret (https://www.facebook.com/OnTheRoots), no credit or evidence of permission. Belbury (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Valo139 as Unfree Flickr file (Unfree Flickr file) and the most recent rationale was: Unfree The copyright on this photograph wouldn't have belonged to the Washington Spark, it would have belonged to the Jackson (Mississippi) police. 1961 photograph so it could be copyrighted until 2057. https://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/mississippi/ Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- You're right. I have to admit that I didn't investigate the case enough. But anyways thanks for your addition. (P.S. I'm new in the license reviewing business) Valo139 (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Valo139: Keep PD-US-not renewed. Mugshots are "made public" when a "discernable copy" is viewed by a person other than the photographer. The photographic negative is made into multiple print copies, one is glued onto a booking card, sorted by name. One is forwarded to the National Crime Information Center (modern booking images are digital), one goes into a perp book sorted by date to show recent crime victims. To be eligible for copyright, it would have had to be registered with the copyright office, and had that copyright renewed. The link above concerns state government documents and their classification as a public record. --RAN (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US-not renewed. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
The texts may be simple, but the informational board became artistic thanks to the drawings. Unfortunately, Australian freedom of panorama excludes graphical works. Needs license permission from the graphic artist of the drawings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ursredadaaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clearly this user doesn't understand what Wikimedia Commons is for
- File:AddText 01-10-02.08.40.jpg
- File:Iyfhjhh 23-01-10 02-41-08-645.jpg
- File:Yfhdhjj23-01-10 02-31-08-674.jpg
- File:AddText 01-08-08.02.20.jpg
- File:Djejejejej3-01-10 01-54-30-362.jpg
- File:AddText 01-10-02.00.53.jpg
- File:Enejejjeeh 23-01-10 01-44-17-788.jpg
- File:Djdjejjeje23-01-10 01-48-19-634.jpg
- File:AddText 01-10-01.39.11.jpg
- File:Djdjdjdjdueu23-01-10 01-34-02-034.jpg
- File:28zjxjxjd23-01-10 01-15-52-664.jpg
- File:Zjsjsisjsjsu23-01-10 01-10-53-424.jpg
- File:Djdjejwjjwe23-01-10 01-25-33-928.jpg
- File:Djdjdjd73-01-10 01-03-53-267.jpg
- File:IMGdjdjdjsj.jpg
- File:AddText 01-09-03.20.18.jpg
- File:AddText 01-09-02.46.04.jpg
- File:AddText 01-09-02.53.57.jpg
- File:Ejejejiwiw828.jpg
- File:AddText 01-09-03.11.34.jpg
- File:Djsjsjsj23-01-09 00-17-28-658.jpg
- File:28wjdjxjdrt 23-01-09 02-32-30-681.jpg
- File:AddText 01-09-02.20.53.jpg
- File:Ekekwj 23-01-09 00-13-41-596.jpg
- File:AddText 01-08-08.37.30.jpg
- File:AddText 01-08-08.23.08.jpg
- File:18whshsushjwhe.jpg
- File:Wuwjw 23-01-08 20-11-31-254.jpg
- File:AddText 01-13-02.54.15.jpg
- File:Iylot897hb.jpg
- File:AddText 01-06-01.37.22.jpg
- File:Hfjhgjhgfih.jpg
- File:AddText 01-06-03.40.40.jpg
- File:IMgfuu555uuyy.jpg
- File:AddText 01-06-01.46.56.jpg
- File:Skejejej3.jpg
- File:Djejejejejje.jpg
- File:Ggjjh3-01-05 04-35-16-723.jpg
- File:Jhgjjhhh.jpg
- File:Hduhff.jpg
- File:AddText 01-04-12.46.35.jpg
- File:Djeiwiwi8282hwhd.jpg
- File:Djdjdjejejjejeje.jpg
- File:Eiejdjdusususus.jpg
- File:Jhhhjhhjjykk.jpg
- File:Itlu Nee Ratha nwjwjwjwj.jpg
Vera (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ursredadaaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement, out of the project scope
- File:Screenshot 20230228 235237 Gallery.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20230228 235240 Gallery.jpg
- File:AddText 01-13-02.54.15.jpg
- File:AddText 02-28-11.41.38.jpg
- File:Skelsk 23-02-17 12-08-21-670-1.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 18:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Looks like derivative work Vera (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo of someone who died in 1996 is clearly not from 2023. No reason to think other fields are more accurate; needs factual info on actual source and proof of free licensed status. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. New Zealander freedom of panorama does not cover textual works; moreover, New Zealand government works are copyrighted for 100 years. Needs commercial license permission from the text author. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Is this crocodile image in public domain? If not, then may violate Australian freedom of panorama which does not cover textual works. If copyrighted, this photo needs commercial license permission from the image artist. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Fictional logo. Commons is not a repository for your design exercises. In addition ARR in file desc. Achim55 (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
no EXIF, professionally shot, most likely a video still from the series "Sandman", only upload by user Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Possibly above COM:TOO Japan, see also w:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_January_7#File:Nintendo_-_1950.png --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Did you want to delete this file?? QaMario (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @QaMario: the logo is likely copyrighted. It may have passed the Japanese threshold of originality. Not simple logo. This means the designer has the right to claim copyright and prevent anyone to freely distribute the logo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm pretty certain this logo is in public domain in Japan. en:Copyright law of Japan#Length of protection states that corporate copyrights were good for 30 years prior to 1970 and 50 years prior to 2018. Regardless of whether the 2018 law is retroactive, the logo would be out of copyright in Japan either way. However, the copyright status in the U.S. would depend on whether or not the 1970 law applied to existing copyrighted works. If the 1970 law did not extend existing copyrights, then the logo entered public domain in Japan in 1950 + 30 + 1 = 1981 and would be in public domain in the U.S. as well. Otherwise, the logo would be copyrighted until 2046 in the United States because 1950 + 50 + 1 = 2001 came after the URAA restoration date of 1996. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Question Do we know any example of a term extension that is not just non-retroactive in the sense that expired copyrights are not renewed but in the sense that only works published after the date are covered? I can only think of the US' change to pma copyright, but that was quite a unique situation. Felix QW (talk) 08:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- User:Yann wants to delete this file now? QaMario (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Question Do we know any example of a term extension that is not just non-retroactive in the sense that expired copyrights are not renewed but in the sense that only works published after the date are covered? I can only think of the US' change to pma copyright, but that was quite a unique situation. Felix QW (talk) 08:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep This is a very old logo.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michalg95 (talk • contribs) 11:34, January 22, 2023 (UTC)
Kept, per Ixfd and COM:Japan. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Similar file tagged as fair use on enwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Images are different. Logos-sealbsu.jpg reflects official name change. Fallfoliage (talk) 03:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 09:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
1933 photograph from an author who died in 1987. Undelete in 2058 when it becomes public domain in Paraguay. Abzeronow (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. This is just a standard musical note in a circle. Brazil has a high threshold of originality which this almost certainly falls below (see COM:TOO Brazil). IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Below COM:TOO Brazil. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO US, in my opinion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
i accidently had uploaded this file, which is a duplicate of another file i had uploaded: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jind_Kaur_with_son,_Duleep_Singh.jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D ThethPunjabi (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
accidental duplicate file of (both uploaded by me): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drawing_of_the_Golden_Temple_at_Amritsar._Temple_in_a_large_lake_(sarovar)._Shrine_and_pilgrimage_site_for_Sikhs,_circa_1860.jpg ThethPunjabi (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Was going to use for an article but it's too blurry MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Both of the files you feel are too blurry are adequate as thumbnails. Do you have a clearer photo of this page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Was going to use for an article but it's too blurry MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and unused, ouf of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and only used on sandbox page of non-contributing user, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, ouf of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CoffeeEngineer as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a company. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, ouf of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Reproduction of photo from Office of Chief Information Officer- President Barack Obama (working) at personal computer (PC) - DPLA - 58e3e10bf8dff46f2bbd48590d033b25.jpg
[edit]Picture of a picture: File:Obama testing the Federal Government IT Dashboard.jpg. No reason to keep this over the original. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Reproduction of photo from Office of Chief Information Officer- President Barack Obama (working) at personal computer (PC) - DPLA - e3e28acd0c58e662a366077bd8d54125.jpg
[edit]Picture of a picture: File:Obama testing the Federal Government IT Dashboard.jpg. No reason to keep this over the original. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Although this is a selfie with a notable individual, there is no apparent use for this file and there are many better files available at CAT:Gavin Williamson. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Not a convincing reason to delete a decent quality picture of a notable individual. It would be possible to crop and create more useful derivatives of just Williamson. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, numerous high quality alternatives already available. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
no source no photographer given no metadata Hoyanova (talk) 10:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use of metadata not obligatory. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Because I don't want it in Wikimedia anymore, thanks. Developerburak (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. Given CC licenses cannot be revoked. --Achim55 (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request 8 days after upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused low quality personal picture not reasonably useful for educational purposes. – JBarta (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Either the uplaoder adds some information that would allow usage or it has to go. Also, I am not convinced the uploader this the author of this photo. -- RE rillke questions? 21:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear situation of authorship, no opposition, no description. RE rillke questions? 20:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
{{User page image}} states: Commons:Project scope#File in use in another Wikimedia project: the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project. The uploader only has 9 global edits so it doesn't count as active user. Hence delete per COM:CSD#F10. Jonteemil (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:SELFIE/NOTHOST. The only (non-User-namespace) use is a bogus use. It was introduced by Dollmaster (who is not the uploader of the image we’re seeing now). ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 01:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 142.167.26.214 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: appear to be fair use, likely copyrighted. The file has been 17 years in Commons and deserves regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and unused, ouf of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Stirling North railway station, South Australia -- track layout (schematic) 1954-1956.jpg
[edit]I uploaded this yesterday. Although built in 1954, the railway line was not opened until 1957 (at the same time as the Marree line). I have therefore combined this with Stirling North railway station, South Australia -- track layout (schematic) 1957-2001.jpg. Keeping it would now be misleading. SCHolar44 (talk) 22:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Suspected copyright infringement Speravir 23:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
I can’t help it, but to me it looks like the image has been copypasted from page 6 of a PDF of de:LMBV despite the uploader claimed the image would be an own work. I am not 100% certain (but almost), hence here. In my opinion we should delete this file because of the precautionary principle. Note that the imprint page of LMBV.de does not state any of free licences, instead there is
3. Urheberrecht
Der Inhalt, die Struktur und die Gestaltung dieser Internetseite unterliegen dem Schutz des Urheberrechts und anderer Schutzgesetze. Jegliche Vervielfältigung, öffentliche Wiedergabe, Sendung, Veränderung oder anderweitige Nutzung der verwendeten Grafiken, Bild-Tondokumente oder Texte ist außerhalb der gesetzlich zulässigen Verwertungshandlungen grundsätzlich nicht erlaubt und bedarf der Zustimmung der LMBV. Eine Vervielfältigung aller unter der Rubrik „Pressemitteilungen“ hinterlegten Informationen ist jedoch auch zu kommerziellen Zwecken gestattet.
So only “Pressemitteilungen” (press/news releases) explicitly are allowed for commercial use, but no exact licence is mentioned. The linked PDF document is not such a press release.
In terms of content loss: There is another image based on the same source (despite the different source link) by Alabasterstein, but this clearly is an own work. Also pinging @Markscheider because of his archived request for a map regarding this area.
Alabasterstein und Markscheider, falls ihr euch dazu äußern wollt, dann könnt ihr das auch auf deutsch tun.
— Speravir – 23:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete a) Copyright violation. On the penultimate page it says Jegliche Vervielfältigung, Verbreitung, Nachnutzung, oder sonstige gewerbliche Nutzung ohne Zustimmung der LMBV sind untersagt. b) In the said PDF the map is an SVG. If you wanna do it right, upload the SVG, not a bitmap rendering of it. c) superseded by File:Revierkarte Helmstedter Revier 1.png, which still unnecessarily is a bitmap; OSM does allow you to download of an SVG rendition of the map. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 01:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Côte d'Ivoire.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of an already referenced file seen here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USC_logo_horizontal.svg TheNobleBug (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - no valid reason for deletion. The file is not the same and does not have the unnecessary space around it. Nominating user has a history of deleting files for no reason. Corky 01:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The cited original file did not have the unnecessary space around it and was Corky's revision at time of deletion request. I do not care which version is kept. Please transfer references to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USC_logo_horizontal.svg to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:University_of_South_Carolina_logo.svg if using that instead. Thanks! TheNobleBug (talk) 02:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - no valid reason for deletion. The file is not the same and does not have the unnecessary space around it. Nominating user has a history of deleting files for no reason. Corky 01:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted and redirected to the duplicate. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Aregotas (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Text logo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure, there is a microphone in it, but I would accept it if it is kept for this reason. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PRP. I cannot find any information on the threshold of originality in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is worth noting that Slovenia, which is another part of the former Yugoslavia, has a low threshold of originality for logos. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Fanon et M'Hamed Yazid représentant le FLN à la conférence Pan Africaine en Kinshasa le 27 août 1960 (cropped).jpg
[edit]The original file File:Fanon et M'Hamed Yazid représentant le FLN à la conférence Pan Africaine en Kinshasa le 27 août 1960.jpg was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fanon et M'Hamed Yazid représentant le FLN à la conférence Pan Africaine en Kinshasa le 27 août 1960.jpg. Osamu Dazai 2022 (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Stylized trilliums do not qualify for PD-textlogo because they are not simple shapes and meet the threshold of originality. There was a consensus a while back on this which I cannot find at the moment, but that is the reason why other Ontario parties' logos are also under fair use licenses (except for the PC's, which was erroneously claimed as own work). Yue🌙 04:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
There is mistake, this is wrong headstone. Not headstone of finnish politician Aarne Saarinen Wikidata:Q301553. Almost similar first name (this is Aarno, should be Aarne; wrong birth and death dates). No educational purpose. This should be deleted . Htm (talk) 07:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Picture from the artist's website, Most likely not own picture https://www.ianhowarth.co.uk/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Most likely not own picture: the artist is in the picture, The metadata indicate a screenshot CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
"Own work", uploaded by the subject? Appears to be a professional portrait. David10244 (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Own work, uploaded by the subject? Looks like a posed, professional portrait. David10244 (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I stumbled over https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/3D_files_and_3D_printing#Weapons and want to discuss whether this hammer could be seen as a weapon and whether it would have to be deleted with it. Thanks! PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: A hammer (for hammering nails as opposed to a war hammer) is primarily a tool and not a weapon. The manufacturing of hammers is (as far as I know) not regulated and they are (as far as I know) not banned anywhere. If this STL had to be deleted for being potentially used as a weapon, then every pointy or throwable shape would need to be deleted for being potentially misused. That's clearly impractical and presumably not the intent of the laws/policies. TilmannR (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
This file is not own work, unlike what the file description says - it's the old logo of Maringá Futebol Clube, an active football/soccer club from Brazil. It was changed in 2019. (http://cbnmaringa.com.br/noticia/com-novo-escudo-mfc-da-mais-um-passo-na-gestao-empresarial-do-clube)
The bottom of the club's website (https://maringafc.com/) signals that the Maringá Futebol Clube brand is copyrighted. Likely a copyright violation. Vítor (talk) 13:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Uploaded twice inadvertedly: same as [[File:BelfastBankingCo-2Pounds NewYorkBranch 1866 UlsterMuseum-Belfast 20220531.jpg]] ~~---- Zenwort (talk) 13:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken by Tony Powell, not a work from the US Government A1Cafel (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I am the current owner of this photograph (gregoire patrigot). This picture is not public domain, I have allowed one website to publish it, namely http://hmhsbritannic.weebly.com/, as long as the copyright was mentionned. I have never authorised your website to use my picture, even less to put it in public domain and for free reproduction! 87.115.13.115 15:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Only if you are a heir to the photographer you own the rights. Btw also available on ocean4future and Pinterest. --Achim55 (talk) 16:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Merely owning the photograph doesn't give you ownership of the copyright, which would have belonged to the photographer and their estate. Abzeronow (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Too recent for PD Old Assumed. Unknown publication date. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jamiroquai in 1993
[edit]While these two 1993 photographs might be in the public domain in Italy, they are still protected in the US for quite some time and should therefore be deleted.
Rosenzweig τ 16:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
According to COM:FOP Austria, literary works like this are not covered. Needs commercial license from the text author. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billbucher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA allow this?
- File:Old Lutheran Church Cemetery, site of Gloria Victis or "Fame" Confederate Monument.jpg
- File:Gloria Victus, or "Fame," the Confederate monument in Salisbury, North Carolina.jpg
- File:2021 - October 025-b.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Likely PD-no-notice or PD-no renewal, but SIRIS has no information on any inscription, so we can;t keep it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Australian freedom of panorama does not cover textual works; moreover, Australian government works are copyrighted for 50 years. Also, a 2D graphical work is at the right half. Needs commercial license permission from the text author as well as the artist of the graphical work to the right. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
"No copyrights ,these photos are randomly taken by people" is an inaccurate understanding of copyright law. Thanks! TrangaBellam (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
اريد حذف صورتي الخاصة Neven abbas (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
اريد حذف صورتي الخاصة لأسباب عائلية رجاء Neven abbas (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gouwenaar as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This photo is a scan of an old photo taken before 1938 (the house was demolished in 1938). Uploader is not the copyright holder. By the way, Velp is not near Utrecht Converting to a regular DR since photograph is at least 85 years old. Abzeronow (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- De fotograaf is Jacobus Johannes Duyvené de Wit jr. (28-09-1870 - 22-05-1935). De foto komt uit zijn fotoalbum uit 1889. Het is een albuminedruk en 134 jaar oud. Endymion87 (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep based on this information. It became public domain in the Netherlands in 2006 and is public domain in the United States based on the age of the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Abzeronow. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Malta Gozo FOP
[edit]Maltese freedom of panorama does not include texts, and it only includes uses of artistic works. As read at Copyright Act, 2000 (Chapter 415, as amended up to Act No. VIII of 2011), "literary work is defined as: "irrespective of literary quality, any of the following, or works similar thereto: (c) textbooks, treatises, histories, biographies, essays and articles. These are essay-type literary texts.
- File:Malta Gozo - Ggantija Temples - Information.jpg
- File:Malta Gozo - Ggantija Temples - sign World heritage site.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farshid.tofigh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, no evidence of a free license.
- File:Yoosef pouria.jpg
- File:Yoosef-pooria.jpg
- File:Payam inalooyi.jpg
- File:سید امرالله شاهابراهیمی.jpg
- File:شاه ابراهیمی.jpg
- File:شهرام صارمی4.jpg
- File:شهرام صارمی2.jpg
- File:شهرام صارمی3.jpg
- File:رسول زاده.jpg
- File:Payam inalooei.jpg
- File:Logo honar tajrobe.jpg
- File:Logo honartajrobe.png
- File:SmallLogo honartajrobe.png
- File:ناصر خویشتن دار.jpg
- File:ناصر خویشتن دار 2.jpg
- File:Rezvan Khoramian.jpg
- File:Farhad Hassanzadeh.jpg
Yann (talk) 18:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello and thank you for your attention
- I will explain a few things about the files I uploaded
- Files that are related to actors or characters, I have photographed myself or taken the characters myself
- About
- File:سید امرالله شاهابراهیمی.jpg
- File:شاه ابراهیمی.jpg
- File:ناصر خویشتن دار.jpg
- File:ناصر خویشتن دار 2.jpg
- , due to the fact that he is not alive, manipulated photos have been used in news agencies
- as well
- about
- File:Logo honar tajrobe.jpg
- File:Logo honartajrobe.png
- I used the logos designed and published by Professor Reza Abedini , which is also available on the https://honartajrobeh.ir/ website
- Finally, due to the lack of transparency of copyright laws in our country, I will do my best to comply with the rules on Wikipedia.
- Thank you again
- And I apologize for not mastering the English language Farshid.tofigh (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Your English is fine.
- For all files, where you are not the sole author, a formal written permission is needed from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. For example, File:ناصر خویشتن دار 2.jpg is a picture of a print, so you are not allowed to upload this without the permission from the original copyright holder. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep File:رسول زاده.jpg, which is a work of Amin Ahouei for Tasnim News Agency and freely licensed, Delete the rest. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)- The file above is also a duplicate of File:سارا رسول زاده در تسنیم.jpg. No need to keep it. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Die Datei habe ich selbst zum Testen für eine noch nicht freigegebene Seite hochgeladen und nicht bemerkt, dass sie auf diese Weise bereits öffentlich im System landet (Anfänger). Weder die Genehmigung des Fotografen liegt vor noch die Zustimmung der abgebildeten Personen. Die Datei soll auch nicht weiter benutzt werden. Ringerang (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Es mi fotografia, no quiero aparezca aqui 189.202.29.37 19:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Great picture. I think this should stay. Elfrio2023 (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We rarely remove images at the request of the subject and never when the requestis an anonymous Ip user. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion requested, due to the F10 rule. 181.43.5.243 17:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Kept once, decent portrait, and illustrates the scope of hazel eyes. Why would it be better to hide the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
If the F10 rule is not valid anymore undelete many pictures that depict people with green, blue, black or brown eyes (like me). My picture depicted very well beautiful brown eyes... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.5.243 (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Are you trying to get other people's pictures deleted out of spite? Hazel eyes are unusual; brown eyes are common. That matters when considering whether a photo has value and likely usefulness. Anyway, this appears to be a bad-faith deletion request, so maybe post your photos on Instagram or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Hazel eyes are less common than brown eyes and this is a photograph of good quality. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Es mi fotografia, no quiero que aparezca en este sitio 189.202.29.37 19:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion We rarely remove images at the request of the subject and never when the requestis an anonymous Ip user. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal image 181.43.5.243 17:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Keep This is the only picture of a boy wearing mascara. --Trade (talk) 02:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
You like boys with mascara? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.5.243 (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Very poor example of mascara, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Note that the original file was overwritten by User:MissNepal94 in violation of Commons:OVERWRITE. The current file has the watermark "perusingtheplanet", suggesting that it was copied from https://perusingtheplanet.com/. This photo is on that website,[1] and is on an archive of the webpage that was captured before the upload of the revised file to Commons.[2] It is also unclear whether the original image is reliably licensed, as it is widely available online, has no camera metadata and is the uploader's only upload. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
This user clearly doesn't understand what a creative Commons license is
- File:Amir Masoud Momeni.jpg
- File:Sahab Alam With Setar.jpg
- File:Sina Alam With Kamancheh.jpg
- File:Mehrdad Asemani Photo.jpg
- File:Rojin Altin With Kiava Cameras.jpg
- File:Kiarouhi Iranian Singer.jpg
- File:Fatemeh masoudifar before release movies skin.jpg
- File:Leila Senemar Befor interview with magazine.jpg
Vera (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all except for Fatemeh masoudifar before release movies skin.jpg (someone please check VTRS permission). HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I suspect that the image is not, in fact, the uploader's own work. I've found an instance uploaded to Imgur dated Dec 6th 2015 (https://imgur.com/xCU8131), and a derivative dated May 19th 2014 (https://imgur.com/gallery/jYR2WR9). This is partially supported by the fact that the upload contains no EXIF information. Saintmanchan (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Joe Loe
[edit]German-American painter and graphic designer Joel Löwenstein, also known as Joe Loe or Joseph Loe, emigrated to the US in 1936, was naturalized and died there in 1964. So while any US works of his might or might not be in the public domain in the US depending on the circumstances, these works are all from his time in Germany, where they are still protected by copyright until the end of 2034. So the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2035; any US copyrights for them should have expired by then as well.
- File:1900-1920 circa Joe Loe Josef Löwenstein Reklamemarke G. Söhlke Nachfolger Berlin Mädchen.jpg
- File:1900-1920 circa Joe Loe Josef Löwenstein Reklamemarke G. Söhlke Nachfolger Berlin.jpg
- File:Braune Salamander 1915 - Joe Loe.jpg
- File:Dux Automobile 1920 - Joe Loe.jpg
- File:Einladungskarte zum 'Hallelujah-Ball' von Curt, Grete und Claus Calmon in Berlin, Hardenbergstr. 14, Feb. 1928.jpg
- File:Fröhliche Weihnachten Max Herzberg Kunstverlag - Joe Loe.jpg
- File:Fön, sechs Reklamemarken von Joe Loe (Josef Löwenstein).jpg
- File:Fön. Elektrischer Haartrockner. Das beste Weihnachtsgeschenk.jpg
- File:Joe Loe - Herr Professor Max Reinhardt auf dem BIumenweg, 1910.jpg
- File:Joe Loe - Mayser Patent. Der leichteste Hut der Welt.jpg
- File:Joe Loe - Salamander Stiefel.jpg
- File:Nivea 1913 - Joe Loe.jpg
- File:Portrait Max Liebermann. Holzschnitt von Joe Loe (d.i. Joel Loewenstein), 1910.png
Rosenzweig τ 23:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Rosenzweig. Thank you for your work. If so, we should write articles in English and German to inform everyone about the artist. Do you want to help with sources? Best regards, Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- P.S.: And we should held an example of the signature of Löwenstein to inform the people. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 08:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Bernd Schwabe in Hannover: The sources I found are all at Wikidata: d:Q116212211. Wikipedia would probably classify most of those as "original research" :-) ... One freely accessible signature by him (as "Joseph Loe") is here, though I've never seen that on artwork. I've extracted the signature from one of his works as File:Joe Loe signature.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 08:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: . I am not convinced that we mean the same artist. I now tried to begin an article in German about Josef Löwenstein to show his birthdate 1883. At wikidata there is 1945 dated paper which shows the named man had been born about 1888.
- What do you think? Do you like to help to expand the German article about Loewenstein (or to make an English one)? Sincerely, Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think the 1883 year is correct. The Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon has it too, and apparently it originally comes from this 1992 book. Multiple official German and US records show the man was born on July 1, 1887 (as reflected at Wikidata). You can find and access them with Ancestry (which is included in en:Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library, which you should be able to use). I'll take a look at the German article. --Rosenzweig τ 15:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: . There are more than just one or two Josef Löwenstein from that time; have a look for example. Sincerely; Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- His birth name wasn't Josef, it was Joel. And unlike the chemist Josef Löwenstein born in Warsaw in 1885, the Joel Löwenstein born in 1887 was a painter, a commercial artist, born in Mosbach, and "also known as Joe Loe". I suggest we continue this discussion at de:Diskussion:Josef Löwenstein, where I've provided images of the documents in question. --Rosenzweig τ 16:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: . There are more than just one or two Josef Löwenstein from that time; have a look for example. Sincerely; Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think the 1883 year is correct. The Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon has it too, and apparently it originally comes from this 1992 book. Multiple official German and US records show the man was born on July 1, 1887 (as reflected at Wikidata). You can find and access them with Ancestry (which is included in en:Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library, which you should be able to use). I'll take a look at the German article. --Rosenzweig τ 15:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: . I am not convinced that we mean the same artist. I now tried to begin an article in German about Josef Löwenstein to show his birthdate 1883. At wikidata there is 1945 dated paper which shows the named man had been born about 1888.
- @Bernd Schwabe in Hannover: The sources I found are all at Wikidata: d:Q116212211. Wikipedia would probably classify most of those as "original research" :-) ... One freely accessible signature by him (as "Joseph Loe") is here, though I've never seen that on artwork. I've extracted the signature from one of his works as File:Joe Loe signature.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 08:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of Iranian defence ministry. Same pictures published by defanews.ir without watermark and with higher quality (please see gallery here).
- File:10-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:9-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:8-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:7-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:6-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶- بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:5-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:4-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶-بازدید وزیر دفاع.jpg
- File:3-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:2-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر۶.jpg
- File:1-پهپاد ایران-مهاجر۶.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim News Agency and probably a work of IRGC Navy. Same pictures published by farsnews.ir with another watermark and credited to "NEDSA" (IRGC Navy) (please see gallery here).
- File:47-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل2.jpg
- File:46-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل2.jpg
- File:45-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل3 و ابابیل اطلس.jpg
- File:44-پهپاد ایران- مهاجر6.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. Same pictures published by ISNA with its own watermark (see gallery here).
- File:31-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:28-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:29-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:30-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:27-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:26-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
- File:25-پهپاد ایران- فطرس.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. See the second image published by Fars News (credit: Recieved) image gallery and by Moj News Agency without credit image gallery. Probably a work of Iranian navy.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a work of Tasnim. Same igames published by IRNA without credit (see gallery) Image from a secret underground base is highly likely to be taken by the Iranian armed forces. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CaesarIran that includes same pictures.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Work by Mehr News, but 'Received'. CC does not apply.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Same image with alterations published by Mehr (Credit: Received) [3] gallery
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Same image used by Fars News (link) and Mizan (link) which is not obtained from Tasnim (margins different, bigger picture).
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Tasnim work. Sane images published by ISNA gallery and IRNA gallery (credit 'Recieved'). Janes credits one to Iranian Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics.
- File:42-پهپاد ایران- ابابیل و اطلس.jpg
- File:41-پهپاد ایران- جت ناصح.jpg
- File:40-پهپاد ایران- کرّار.jpg
- File:16-پهپاد ایران- کمان۲۲.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
The source says it has received the photographs and does not name any photographer. Probably a work of Iranian defense ministry and certainly not a work by Mehr News.
- File:30-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:29-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:28-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:27-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:26-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:25-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:24-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:23-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:22-موشک- فکور.jpg
- File:21-موشک- فکور.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. We lack author information, which is required under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license, so we cannot host these files. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah.
- File:35-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:34-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:33-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:32-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:31-هواپیما- جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:30-هواپیما- جنگنده صاعقه.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mohammad Agah
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Not a Work by Tasnim (Iranian defense ministry is the likely source.) because:
- No photographer is credited
- The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.
- File:44-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:43-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:42-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:41-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:40-موشک- نصیر- کروز ضد کشتی.jpg
- File:39-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:38-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:37-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
- File:36-هواپیما- جنگنده قاهر ۳۱۳.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- General comment
Who the original author is do not matter. What is important is to know who the copyright holder is. There could be more than one copyright holder as the original author might have given the rights to more than one person. Therefore, about the images published by Tasnim or Mehr news agencies in the photo section of their site:
- Keep if Tasnim / Mehr is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
- Keep if the photographer is credited (even if also published elswhere with another watermark)
- Delete if another agency is credited
- undelete images that didn't need to be deleted
For images credit "received", I am not sure about who is the right holder. Maybe we can keep the ones only published by one agency and delete those that were also published by non-free agencies.
--Hosortyr (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Published by (and watermarked by!) official Iranian news agencies, such as Tasnim. "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." See also this related discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The comment above ("2. The same images are published by yjc.ir here with its own watermark, clearly not obtained from Tasnim.") only strengthens my argument. At the footer of the mentioned yjc.ir website it says: کلیه حقوق این سایت متعلق به باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان بوده و استفاده از مطالب آن با ذکر منبع بلامانع است., (English: "All the rights of this site belong to the Young Journalists Club, and the use of its contents is unrestricted as long as the source is mentioned.") It seems clear that the Iranian Armed Forces supply photos with a free license to several press agencies, to use as however they see fit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment See this related (successful) undeletion request. --- Vysotsky (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Files are not a work of Tasnim, they are obtained from leader.ir which does not release with a free license.
- File:12-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:11-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:10-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:9-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:8-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:7-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:6-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:5-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:4-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:3-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:2-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
- File:1-(Meeting of Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the people of Qom)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مردم قم.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photo taken from leader.ir, which does not release with a free license
- File:9-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
- File:8-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
- File:1-(Meeting of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution with the poets and reciters of Ahl al-Bayt)-دیدار رهبر معظم انقلاب با مداحان و شاعران اهل بیت (ع).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not; the files are marked as "received". — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
No photograph is credited and the files are recieved, not a work by Mehr/Tasnim News Agency.
- File:29-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:28-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:19-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:18-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:17-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:16-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:15-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:14-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:13-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:12-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:11-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:10-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:9-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:8-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:7-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. Photos marked as received are clearly created by someone else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photographs are recieved, not a work by Mehr News so cc does not apply
- File:23-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:22-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:21-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Files are recieved, not a work by Mehr News.
- File:27-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:26-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:25-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
- File:24-Kausar fighter plane-هواپیما جنگنده کوثر.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
Photograph is 'received', not a work by Mehr News
- File:32-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:31-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:30-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:29-Yasin bomb-بمب یاسین.jpg
- File:28-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:27-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:26-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:25-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:24-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
- File:23-upright bomb-بمب قائم.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. License only applies to works created by the specific news agency, which these are not. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photographs from leader.ir are not freely-licensed. I don't know how many times should we warn this user and then again waste our time by nominating uploads from leader.ir for deletion.
- File:14-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:13-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:12-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:11-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:10-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:9-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:8-The 6th international conference supporting the Palestinian intifada-ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی حمایت از انتفاضه فلسطین.jpg
- File:11-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:10-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:9-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:8-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:7-A group of Basijians from all over the country met with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار جمعی از بسیجیان سراسر کشور با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:9-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:8-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:7-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:6-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:5-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:4-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:3-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:2-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
- File:1-Meeting of students with the supreme leader of the revolution-دیدار دانش آموزان و دانشجویان با رهبر معظم انقلاب.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyed haji (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:22-Popular gathering and support for Gaza children-Tehran-تجمع مردمی و حمایت از کودکان غزه- تهران.jpg
- File:3-The burial ceremony of the martyrs who defended the shrine-Milad Heydari,Meghdad Mahghani-مراسم تشییع پیکر شهدای مدافع حرم- میلاد حیدری و مقداد مهقانی.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Logos should be uploaded locally HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the registration of license of this file ({self-work / cc-by-sa-4.0}) is indeed wrong. However, it satisfies {pd-logo} that is qualified to be uploaded onto the Commons under the name of Public Domain file. The ball design is (maybe) simple enough to be considered as public domain, the remaining parts are just simply-designed texts and the Iranian flag - which is definitely in PD. IDK, we need to discuss it carefully as I have found an official SVG file and wonder if I should upload it locally or on Commons. We need to discuss.
Suggested license: {{Pd-logo}} Hwi.padam (talk) 03:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC) - Delete I posted the same thing at Commons:Deletion requests/File:IR Iran Football insignia.svg, but I repeat it here as well since the two files are the same except for their formats. Commons requires that logos such as this be considered to be within the public domain in not only the United States (where the Commons servers are located), but also in the country of first publication (i.e. the country of origin), which in this case is almost certainly Iran. Even though it could be possibly argued that this logo is too simple to be eligible under US copyright law under US copyright law per COM:TOO United States, things are much less clearer under Iranian copyright law per COM:TOO Iran. So, unless it can be shown that similar logos are considered to be too simple to be eligible for copyright protection per Iran's TOO (ideally by some sort of court ruling) or can be treated as PD for some other reason under Iranian copyright law, I'm not sure this should be kept by Commons per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
User has been uploading non-free copyrighted images en masse, frequently listing them as "own work" even when clearly not (see user talk page; most of them have been speedy-deleted). I haven't been able to conclusively trace this image's source, which is why I'm not nominating as speedy, but given user's pattern of uploads so far, seems unlikely this one is any different. R Prazeres (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Logo. The source does not release under creative commons HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
No free license. --Abalg (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Own work? Higher resolution can be found here. Attention the link to the page of brandmarket.com gives a warning by Bitdefender for Phishing. Wouter (talk) 13:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Wulan_Kenanga.jpg 43.252.107.136 14:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 01:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herzi Pinki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: identical with [4] on https://www.sulzenauhuette.at (and logo cropped away).User insists on images being just similar, not identical: File talk:KreuzMairspitz.jpg Friedo (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe bei der Sulzenauhütte nachträglich um Zustimmung gebeten und bitte daher, die Datei nicht zu löschen. --Friedo (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. @Friedo: For a permission follow COM:VRTS. --Wdwd (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As stated here by the uploader, he did not take the picture: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskussion:Mairspitze&diff=229870249&oldid=229870045 --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 13:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) Friedo (talk) 14:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild trägt zwar denselben Namen wie die ursprünglich gelöschte Datei, doch handelt es sich um ein ganz anderes Bild. Das Bild ist von mir. Es hat meine Frau aufgenommen und die gezeigte Person bin ich selbst. Zudem ist eingetragen, dass die abgebildete Person mit der Veröffentlichung einverstanden ist. Daher ist mir unverständlich, wie es zu dem Löschantrag kommt. Ich bitte darum, ihn unverzüglich wieder zu entfernen. --Friedo (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Source and author are wrong, therefore the license is invalid. --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Unsinn; das Bild ist von mir und hat mit dem ursprünglichen unter demselben Namen nichts zu tun. Friedo (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The picture was not taken by User:FkMohr, you wrote that yourself (see link above). Please familiarize with licensing and copyright! --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist mit meiner Kamera in meinem Auftrag von meiner Frau aufgenommen worden; die Bildrechte habe ich selbst und es wurde von mir hochgeladen. Ich bitte, den Löschantrag zurückzunehmen. Friedo (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Die Urheberrechte hast du nicht sondern deine Frau. --Ralf Roletschek 20:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Habe in die Lizenz nun den Namen meiner Frau eingetragen. Ein nachvollziehbarer Löschgrund ist nicht vorhanden. --Friedo (talk) 11:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Die Urheberrechte hast du nicht sondern deine Frau. --Ralf Roletschek 20:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist mit meiner Kamera in meinem Auftrag von meiner Frau aufgenommen worden; die Bildrechte habe ich selbst und es wurde von mir hochgeladen. Ich bitte, den Löschantrag zurückzunehmen. Friedo (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The picture was not taken by User:FkMohr, you wrote that yourself (see link above). Please familiarize with licensing and copyright! --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Unsinn; das Bild ist von mir und hat mit dem ursprünglichen unter demselben Namen nichts zu tun. Friedo (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Source and author are wrong, therefore the license is invalid. --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I have no doubt that Mrs. Mohr irrevocably grants worldwide distribution/exploitation rights etc. to her husband Mr. Mohr. As a non-profit encyclopedia-like platform we are exempt from § 74 Ⅶ → § 18c 2 UrhG (mandatory obligation to obtain permission from the author, i. e. Mrs. Mohr), cf. final sentence of 18c UrhG. The use of {{Own}} is indeed inappropriate though. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 02:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep As an admin, I can confirm that the image that was originally discussed and deleted in May is completely different, so the previous deletion discussion can be disregarded for this case. However, the approach is at least unusual. Per User:FkMohr/Tui, he's uploading images taken by his wife Supakon Mohr, with her permission, and there is a whole category for these images: Category:Files by User:FkMohr/Supakon. In this regard, this image apparently isn't different from the others in the category. I would agre with Kays that there is probably "no doubt that Mrs. Mohr irrevocably grants worldwide distribution/exploitation rights etc. to her husband Mr. Mohr", but maybe a permission sent to VRT (Commons:Support-Team), covering all uploaded works by Mrs. Mohr, would be a good idea to settle the matter once and for all? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - While it is likely that the wife has, indeed, granted the permission orally, marriages do break up and we must be sure of her permission. A VRT message from her confirming her permission for his uploads is required. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
שמירה על פרטיות ואי הסכמה להצגת התמונה 147.234.64.75 03:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
לא פורסם בהסכמת המצולם. מעשה לא חוקי. למחוק את התמונה מיידית ולהסירה מהמאגר 147.234.64.75 03:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I can't really tell if these claims of privacy violation and publication without the photographer's consent are true or not. It looks like a photo from an at least somewhat public event. Please send an e-mail tom COM:VRT if you have any problems as claimed. --Rosenzweig τ 20:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Photo prise le 15 janvier 2023 d'une personne morte le 6 novembre 2021 me semble être une image tirée d'un film ou d'un document non libre H2O(talk) 15:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comme déjà signalé, je suis l'auteur de cette photo - j'espère que la mise à jour respectera les règles appliquées sur Wikipedia Beedee2023 (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, date of photo corrected per fr:Manu Bonmariage. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Maps clearly taken with data from Esri/ArcGIS and first published by the Colorado Independent Redistricting Commissions, so the CC-BY-SA license tag is dubious
- File:CO CD8 2023.jpg
- File:CO CD7 2023.jpg
- File:CO CD6 2023.jpg
- File:CO CD5 2023.jpg
- File:CO CD4 2023.jpg
- File:CO CD2 2023.jpg
- File:CO CD3 2023.jpg
- File:CO CD1 2023.jpg
Twotwofourtysix (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The map is a USGS map, are the geocoordinates and a black line for a district copyrightable? --RAN (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete I don't think the base map is USGS -- USGS maps do not have place names on white blocks, the place names are simply printed directly over the map detail.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I also noticed a slight discrepancy between these maps and the final district lines, see here Twotwofourtysix (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Buaidh: I'm seeing that you have labeled these as own work. Did you create these maps yourself, or did you pull them from an online source? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment. Uploader did not explain the map origin. --Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The cross and the chain on the right are above COM:TOO#Japan. That's why we have a crop out version here: File:Love Chunibyo Other Delusions logo.svg. Thibaut (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's just combination of geometric shapes. Also there are many other logo images with the cross and the chain: Category:Love, Chunibyo & Other Delusions Kuipuru (talk) 05:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)