User talk:Abalg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Remerciement

[edit]

Bonjour @Abalg et merci pour vos votes. Malheureusement légalement, sans autorisations des auteurs des photos, les fichiers sont heu hum, je ne sais pas comment le dire, illégaux, interdits, hors la loi, inautorisés quoi, et cela même si j'en suis l'auteure, ce qui me paraît étrange quand je constate qu'il est plus facile de conserver un fichier dont on n'est pas l'auteur. Mais c'est comme ça. Je ne pense pas qu'ils seront conservés et c'est peut-être préférable au fond... Car obtenir des autorisations serait compliqué et chronophage. De mon côté une Wikipause ne sera pas de trop, pour revenir un jour dans de meilleures conditions ! Merci encore et bonne continuation ! Olga Rithme (talk) 07:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Olga Rithme, je pense que ce sont des cas limites qui peuvent être sauvés. On verra bien ce que diront les autres contributeurs. Comme dans toutes relations, il est parfois nécessaire de s'aérer l'esprit. J'ai fait plusieurs pauses dont une qui a duré 8 ans et j'ai fortement ralentie ces 2 derniers mois. Bon vents pour la suite. ----Abalg (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mongolia Saiga tatarica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MPF (talk) 21:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikimedia Commons! Thank you for you contributions. When you add categories generally just use the most specific category. For example if you categorize an image of a yellow circle, it should generally only be in Category:Yellow circles and not also Category:Yellow shapes or Category:Circles, thank you. Lhikan634 (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm agree with your exemple. But it's not a representative one of our problem. What if you have ONE composed image with yellow, red, blue and green circles? I think this image should be both in the main circle category and in each color circle categories. Regards. ----Abalg (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Lhikan634, I have deleted under categories and have kept only the main one. Regards. ----Abalg (talk) 06:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The current version has removed an additional category that is not a part of of Mutillidae. In addition, this image will no longer appear under the actual species categories when this is the only image available of a couple of those species. Categorizing each represented portion of an image as specifically as possible is standard practice on Wikimedia Commons. You can see this principle in use on File:Three_Circles.svg and most any other composite image of biological specimens. What benefit is there for Commons in removing more specific information? Lhikan634 (talk) 07:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Lhikan634. Are you really criticising me for deleting categories? Let's keep the image in the Mutilidae family category AND the species category. By that way, we'll be able to meet the objectives of making the montage representative of the family and the species precisions. In your exemple, there is the blue-green-magenta category, wich is a sort of color family. The categorization is not each color. Regards. --Abalg (talk) 13:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For this one File:Bunte Kreise auf weißem Grund.png, you will forbiden the circles category too? --Abalg (talk) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bassine agricole de Pouillac (Cramchaban, Charente-Maritime, France).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vue aérienne du lac de Caussade (Pinel-Hauterive, Lot et Garonne, France).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:État des travaux du projet de la Famille missionnaire de Notre-Dame à Saint-Pierre-de-Colombier en juillet 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vue aérienne de La Lanterne de 2021 (Versailles, France).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]