Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/01/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 8th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description states it is in Fuerteventura, Canary Islands, Spain. Unsure if this drawing is eligible for Spanish freedom of panorama, if it is found along outdoor thoroughfares (or at least along outdoor paths or sidewalks), or just found in one of the indoors there. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Withdraw my nomination. Evidently part of File:Fuerteventura - Betancuria - History.jpg which is clearly outdoors. (non-admin closure) _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

666666899 2001:8003:2468:3100:9C61:4EFE:C285:DA91 00:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 13:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MaGa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ticket permission added by non-VRT user. Most images have invalid source. None of the sources is mentioned in the ticket. Invalid permission.

Krd 07:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: I am the VRTS agent who processed the ticket. I hereby confirm @MaGa: asked me about the best way to move all these files to Commons, and I instructed him to add the VRT permission template himself. The source for all these images is the Croatian Ministry of Culture, which has given its explicit permission to use all these files under CC-by-sa 3.0 or GNU licences, as stated in ticket:2021043010005276. Copyright-wise everything is okay. —Ivi104 12:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see your talk page at VRT wiki. Krd 13:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd, I've made changes according to Ivi104's instruction. Two files from this list has nothing to do with Croatian Ministry of Culture, so please remove deletion request for them:
If I need to do something more, please let me know.
Thank you and sorry for inconvenience. MaGa 15:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn per discussion. --Krd 17:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Italy A09 (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Mexico.svg. Fry1989 eh? 00:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of unsourced images (most presumably taken from another site, copyvio). Taichi (talk) 01:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Roblox is a derivative work Trade (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The answer is no, don’t call a game derivative work. It does not work. BeeSpeed1989 (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, calling a game derivative is inappropriate for Roblox, and it’s also “game calling” (name calling). BeeSpeed1989 (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The screenshot might be from a game called 'Bee Swarm Simulator'. It's still a copyright violation regardless. @BeeSpeed1989: --Trade (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily: Screenshot of non-free content. @BeeSpeed1989: . —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File in copyviol; screenshot from a videogame. GC85 (talk) 12:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, was warned in December 2022 about the same issue but continued to upload unfree photos. Iggy the Swan (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File in copyviol; screenshot from a videogame. GC85 (talk) 12:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iggy the Swan (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File in copyviol; screenshot from a videogame. GC85 (talk) 12:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iggy the Swan (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File in copyviol; screenshot from a videogame. GC85 (talk) 12:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - screenshots of videogames containing players in sport in this case is not the real version as well as the reason given in the nomination. Iggy the Swan (talk) 22:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File in copyviol; screenshot from a videogame. GC85 (talk) 12:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Administrators notified on this issue about uploading game screenshot photos. Iggy the Swan (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File in copyviol; screenshot from a videogame. GC85 (talk) 12:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iggy the Swan (talk) 22:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used as vandalism on eswiki about a meme of Masahiro Sakurai. Also, likely not own work.. ZebaX2010 (talk) 20:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. COM:NETCOPYRIGHT Many hits on the internet as meme e.g. [1] Platonides (talk) 23:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted (Copyvio). --Kadı Message 09:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP Iraq 186.175.32.106 21:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

لا اريده 156.206.156.142 01:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

voglio cancellare questo file Altrochebit (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file Altrochebit (talk) 11:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file Altrochebit (talk) 11:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: aleady deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deletd by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is sourced from personal facebook post, no proof that author has released the image under CC license. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 16:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:46, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Xunks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, first published: [2] (2012/08) Upior polnocy (talk) 11:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added two crops of the same image. King of ♥ 17:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Authorship has been demonstrated satisfactorily. --King of ♥ 07:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Completely unbacked by any non-admin closure policy. This template was sloppily imported from enwiki with no consideration for localisation. Besides, any non-admin closure policy doesn't exist, so this is unbacked by any policy or consensus whatsoever.. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 19:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep: From Commons:Deletion requests#Closing discussions: Non-admins may close a deletion request as keep if they have a good understanding of the process, and provided the closure is not controversial. If in doubt, don't do it.. Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Non-admin closure also show 639 transclusion so it's pretty heavily in use. I usually subst: the template when I use it however.Jonteemil (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, in that case then a  Keep. We need to internationalize this template & create documentation though. We also need to substitute transclusions. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 17:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Sebicux (talk) 01:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 08:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Map of FZM L1.svg as high-quality version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Transparence1 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC) F6 Transparence1 (talk) 15:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTER A09 (talk) 17:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 08:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo can be used when the wikipedia page of Kronno Zomber is created or in any other place about him. Maybe this logo and this other photo aren't the best images, but they can work until better images are uploaded.--Sebasweee (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination--Trade (talk) 23:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 08:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file does not represent the Coat of arms of Lithuania as its colors differs significantly from the original coat of arms (see more information HERE; for example, the shield should be blue or was purple for a very short period of time in early 90s), therefore it is a violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX. By the way, it was created and uploaded by a user who was indefinitely blocked for trolling/long-term abuse and such creations with aim to distort national symbols of other countries was one of his malicious activities. -- Pofka (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I asked an user to vectorize that, following my discoveries: File:1991 09 21Šiauliųvėliava1.jpg, File:National coat of arms of Lithuania in 1990-1991.gif, File:Coat of arms of Lithuania (1990–1991).webp. This is the version that Lithuania have used after the country opted to withdraw from the Soviet Union, and it was used until new version by Kazdailis is adopted. --Great Brightstar (talk) 03:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have better source? I hope you can let us know. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 04:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just an FYI. There's also File:Lithuanian postal envelope with the coat of arms. 1990.jpg, which has the coat of arms in red (well, more like orange but whatever) and appears to have been put out by the Postal Administration of Lithuania. It would be hard to argue the Postal Administration of Lithuania is trolling, distorting their own national symbols, or otherwise created the coat of arms in red for malicious purposes. In general though, if the Postal Administration of Lithuania is fine with the coat of arms of Lithuania being in red/orange then I don't see why it would be a problem for Commons to host images of it in similar colors. The only reason Pofka might disagree is because they are clearly on a harassment campaign against the uploader and trying to push a Lithuanian nationalistic POV by having their images deleted. One that is clearly leading to spurious DRs. At least the DR in this case is clearly bogus. Although a lot of his other deletion requests have been just as unscrupulous. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Great Brightstar: According to the official website of Seimas (parliament of Lithuania): "The coloured standard coat of arms, adopted by the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania on 17 May 1990, had a Purpure (purple) background and a purple shield of the knight. This coat of arms became a symbol of the transitional period and highlighted Lithuania's continuation of the pre-war traditions. At the same time, the Lithuanian Heraldry Commission was tasked to draw up a revised version of the coat of arms based on historical and iconographic sources. On 4 September 1991, the Supreme Council– the Reconstituent Seimas adopted the second version of the coat of arms created by artist Arvydas Každailis and approved by the Lithuanian Heraldry Commission. It is used to date." (see: HERE). I don't know exactly what kind of tone purple was used and Seimas website do not provide an example. This file show colorless (white) coat of arms on a orange field. -- Pofka (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It is currently in use, so the nominator's rationale is not sufficient for deletion. However a warning template can be added to the file description. Yann (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Yann: Permanently blocked user Лобачев Владимир is inserting this false coat of arms himself in multiple Wiki projects to crash the nomination. This is what aggressive trolling is about. There should be some kind of preventive tools against such trolling. Even the Russian Wikipedia permanently blocked this troll for destructive actions. -- Pofka (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mostly agree, but then it should be easy to remove the images from the pages it is used. Yann (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: It is impossible because user Лобачев Владимир then causes endless edit (revert) warring (from Chinese to German Wiki projects, etc.). I'm not capable to discuss with administrators from different countries projects in languages I don't know (and creating hundreds of reports to various wiki projects administrators noticeboards would not be an effective way to combat a troll). The most effective way would be to delete such files so that he could not abuse these files any longer as he would not be able to upload them again due to blocking in Commons. Just imagine if somebody created distorted coats of arms of your country and inserted them into hundreds of different languages projects (I proved with a quote above that the colors are incorrect). That's what he is doing with Lithuanian national symbols (he was likely also blocked in the Polish Wikipedia for attacking Ukrainian symbols as well). -- Pofka (talk) 20:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete OK, then. Yann (talk) 21:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep although edits are probably required.
Errors are not a reason to delete. At least, not if we can fix them so easily. You could indeed do this for yourself.
This is not a violation of WP:OR or WP:HOAX, because those are policies on Wikipedia and this isn't Wikipedia, it's Commons.
This is not a violation of COM:NOTHOST. At least, not unless you're arguing that "Coat of arms of Lithuania (1990–1991)" is itself outside COM:SCOPE (The fact that Category:National coats of arms of Lithuania in 1990–1991 contains several near-identical representations of this, and this image is already COM:INUSE suggests not).
Category:National coats of arms of Lithuania in 1990–1991 contains 4 copies of this, all with the red shield. Are they also in error? Why didn't you list them for deletion too? This is our only coloured SVG copy.
File:Coat of arms of Lithuania.svg (blue shield) is also available. Do you have any comment on that? Is it applicable to the '90–'91 period? Would it be a reasonable fix to replace one with the other?
If you have issues with trolling, then report those as necessary and try to have them dealt with. But DRs are not the place for that sort of problem, and if DRs are needed, do that after any trolling has been ceased.
As to this image, then do we need this category for '90–'91? If so, this is an SVG version, and that has value to us. I'm sure that any issues you've raised can be fixed by editing this, not by deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per my prior comments here and in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seal of duke Skirgaila -1386.svg, which is along the same lines. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, it does not matter, how bad, erroneous or misleading the file is: if it is used, then it is in our scope. This file is used in multiple projects. We have now even source. Taivo (talk) 14:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsley claimed as own work; copyright is owned by a Minnesota police department. Comitialbulb561 (talk) 00:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non libre de droit 2A01:CB10:1D6:1200:5851:A1C4:89EF:B9D3 01:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Clearly in public domain due to age. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Profile picture of this YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@roqueoliver CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos show the Brutalist building as main or intended subject. The work was completed in 1983 and designed by two architects:[5]: Branko Bulić (died 2015) and Milan Kušan (died 1984). As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina, commercial license authorizations from their heirs is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Same applies for this entry: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Elektroprivreda_BiH_building_(headquarters) My-wiki-photos (talk) 19:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to w:no:Sjømannsmonumentet, it was unveiled in 1950 and authored by w:en:Dyre Vaa (who died in 1980). There is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-arcitecture in Norway, therefore this commercially-licensed photo is a violation of sculptor's posthumous copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to w:no:Sjømannsmonumentet, it was unveiled in 1950 and authored by w:en:Dyre Vaa (who died in 1980). There is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-arcitecture in Norway, therefore this commercially-licensed photo is a violation of sculptor's posthumous copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to w:no:Sjømannsmonumentet, it was unveiled in 1950 and authored by w:en:Dyre Vaa (who died in 1980). There is no commercial freedom of panorama for non-arcitecture in Norway, therefore this commercially-licensed photo is a violation of sculptor's posthumous copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This textual work seems to be located inside a structure, and may not meet the "dedicated for public access" (not public use) as required by COM:FOP Germany, as set by the German courts. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raag o rup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source is given as BBC Archive, Internet, Media Belur Math, etc. None are own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot, source is given as TV9, needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has claimed "own work", but this is clearly a photo of an image displayed on a TV or a computer monitor. JPxG (talk) 07:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 15:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person (F10) https://www.google.com/search?q=RemonRana&oq=RemonRana&aqs=chrome..69i57.381j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Mateus2019 (talk) 09:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person, posing img (F10) Mateus2019 (talk) 09:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 10:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK published edition, No details found for author, Using publication date+50 is 1960 (I'm assuming they didn't publish as a minor). As of 2023 , UK authors have to have died before 1952. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  • He died in 1919. How about doing a little more research before nominating for deletion? It took me just a few minutes to find his obituary. Isn't it better to preserve information, rather than delete on speculation? --RAN (talk) 01:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-encyclopedic selfie used in promo draft on enwp. Anarchyte (talk) 10:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 15:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid tag of {{FoP}}. This is in Denmark, and their freedom of panorama does not cover artworks. Proper documentation is required to determine if the artist has died for more than 70 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is not a work of art, it's a milestone featuring the monogram of a Danish king who died in 1912. And those royal monograms were in use well before that, see Category:Royal monograms of Denmark, so any copyright they might have had must have expired by now. --Rosenzweig τ 07:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: if so, the suitable template must be used instead of vague {{FoP}} that is meant for tracking template (and for categorization at tracking category of Category:FOP). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Rosenzweig. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama indoors. Original artist not credited. 2003:EC:5F24:6C00:6C57:949E:1AE5:2BD8 11:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. For example: here. --Karim talk to me :)..! 12:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader states the image was taken from Instagram, instagram post. nicolas talkpage★★★ 23:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Nobreasts}} was already deleted A1Cafel (talk) 12:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Nobreasts}} was already deleted A1Cafel (talk) 12:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Nobreasts}} was already deleted A1Cafel (talk) 12:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Nobreasts}} was already deleted A1Cafel (talk) 12:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Nobreasts}} was already deleted A1Cafel (talk) 12:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Nobreasts}} was already deleted A1Cafel (talk) 12:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Nobreasts}} was already deleted A1Cafel (talk) 12:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Yann. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Altrochebit as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit|subpage=File:La cucina di casa mia.jpg|year=2023|month=January|day=8
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Yann. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Yann. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Altrochebit as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit|subpage=File:Via Alfonso Gatto, panorama.jpg|year=2023|month=January|day=8
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same situation with:


Deleted: Deleted by User:Yann. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on Legatt. This is given as a 1921 work, so PD-assumed can't actually be used. The author would have to died before 1952 for this to be PD in the UK. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a free file. Uploaded, apparently, from FB. Onel5969 (talk) 13:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio from this https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/movie/sov/2269/annot/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio from this https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/movie/sov/2269/annot/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio from this https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/acter/m/sov/15348/bio/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio from this https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/acter/w/sov/817/bio/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio from this site Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio from this https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/composer/sov/25558/bio/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio from this https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/acter/w/sov/116/bio/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio from this https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/director/sov/27392/bio/ site Kotofey2016 (talk) 13:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncredited copy of File:Bernard Arnault (2) - 2017 (cropped).jpg with a poorly drawn hat (?), out of COM:SCOPE Belbury (talk) 14:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope. Not used on any other page. --Titlutin (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted public art, authored by w:en:Fritz Røed, but Norway has no commercial freedom of panorama for public art. See also COM:Deletion requests/File:Sverd i fjell panorama.jpg, COM:Deletion requests/File:Sverd i fjell closeup.jpg, and COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sverd i fjell for prior redactions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted public art, authored by w:en:Fritz Røed, but Norway has no commercial freedom of panorama for public art. See also COM:Deletion requests/File:Sverd i fjell panorama.jpg, COM:Deletion requests/File:Sverd i fjell closeup.jpg, and COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sverd i fjell for prior redactions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:BOOK A09 (talk) 15:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO United States A09 (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sztefinek as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: There is no information about the church shown in this picture.  Question Why is this a reason for deletion? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is as of low resolution, missing EXIF data, also it looks like a screenshot with a tiny black frame on top. This is the user's only uploads, which make it dubious to claim as "own work" (There may be COM:PENIS concern as well) A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This "mural" is recent and above COM:TOO, thereby copyrightable. Unfortunately, France has no freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contracted work by third party for BLM, No apparent notice, but primary authors are not necessarily Federal employees ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep Up until 1989 you still had to register for a copyright, and this was never registered. We haven't found any of the US reports you have nominated so far in the copyright registration database, instead of nominating them, why don't you look in the registration database yourself, or concentrate on those published after 1989? You are already aware that there is no copyright notice on the document. If you look directly in the registration database, it cuts the Commons work load by two-thirds. There is your work, followed by my work, then the deletion review administrator's work. PD-US-1978-89 --RAN (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per PD-US-1978-89. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 16:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 00:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this is not personal he is a digital marketer I'm already writing an article Saxena404 (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This website is not the right place for that Trade (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: F10, G10. Not to be confused with en:Abhishek Saxena. --Achim55 (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 23:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Cross-wiki spam, requested speedy deletion in two wikis. --Kadı Message 19:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 00:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 16:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Trade (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pre-1923 Swedish wedding photograph. Could be public domain, has newbie "own work" declaration, and no information on the photographer (it could be artistic enough that we would need to know if photographer died before 1953). Abzeronow (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per PD-Sweden. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

META pointing to a scanning of this image, unlikely uploader owned Pierre cb (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also out of scope as unused personal image (note watermark). --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Syria ({{NoFoP-Syria}}) and the building looks modern. I suspect architect's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educational value is not shown, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 17:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhukya Dhasaradh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private photos, out of project scope.

Xunks (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion this is not a simple logo. Blue and red part of logo is complex. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by سید محمد1381 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work

HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 18:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Smells OOS. The uploader Joseph7225 has no other global user contributions as of yet and the picture was uploaded 10 days ago. Furthermore the file lacks meta data, which smells fishy, too. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 00:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COMːTOYS Gbawden (talk) 18:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was just vandalism on enwiki ([7]), and I don't see any meaningful purposes for this. Additional, I think he didn't create the image by himself, but we don't know where the original is from. 958s (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Described as United Press International, no photographer credit, no copyright notice, but no evidence for the latter since the photo is taken from Ebay where it has likely been cropped etc. Not a government agency and claimed to be created in 1958. Since the license tagged obviously does not apply, this should be deleted per COM:PCP. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source image was deleted as a copyvio ( Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dwarves warhammer-inspired (fan picture).jpg ) Di (they-them) (talk) 20:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo. out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is sufficiently original to be copyright protected. And PNAS licenses under an incompaticle statement ("Copyright © 2023 National Academy of Science. All rights reserved.") L.tak (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is sufficiently original to be copyright protected. And PNAS licenses under an incompaticle statement ("Copyright © 2023 National Academy of Science. All rights reserved." L.tak (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Semen.erofeev1961 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright issues - small images with FBMD marks and characteristic sizes for Facebook. Some out of scope also.

Юрий Д.К. (talk) 22:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These were automatically uploaded under the assumption that they were {{PD-USGov-NPS}}. However, they are clearly not the work of NPS employees, and there's no evidence the NPS would have acquired the copyrights.

BMacZero (🗩) 23:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm probably being a little nitpicky here but the artwork on these postcards clearly wasn't created by employees of the National Park Service and children can claim copyright. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the rest of the similar images below, I'll see about stopping these from getting uploaded until this is resolved. – BMacZero (🗩) 02:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BMacZero: Thanks! --Adamant1 (talk) 11:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Fitindia in the other DR. – BMacZero (🗩) 15:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See related deletion requests in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jimmy Carter National Historical Park.

BMacZero (🗩) 02:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 11:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It does not look like an own work (some uploads from this user are already deleted as copyright violation). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 08:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:FOP

[edit]

All files were moved from de.wp and likely to be not free derivative works not "FoP-Germany"

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first is a board, see this picture shown it from distance. The last picture is a typically info-picture on outstanding boards in Germany, as this is a photo (see EXIF) and the picture is flat and not curved+shadowed (as it would be if taken from a book) this is more likely a photo from a infoboard than from a book. In Germany there are alot of such infoboards to many things, like walking, history, geological themes and much more. --Quedel (talk) 10:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: three are FOP Germany, but the one is presumably in the UK, where 2D works are not covered by FOP. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:FOP

[edit]

These nominated photos from New Zealand are under the tracking category as they are tagged with the vague {{FOP}}. It is understood that New Zealander FOP does not apply to 2D graphic works as well as textual works. Nominated photos show a variety of texts, 2D graphic works, and photographs of various kinds.

It is unsure if the texts in several images can be considered as simple enough to deny writers their rights for copyrights. Some may be in public domain, but the FOP tag generates uncertainty over their copyright statuses.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.latribunadeciudadreal.es/Noticia/ZDE412372-E2B4-A87E-67119317671449B4/202207/Los-grandes-exitos-de-la-Zarzuela-se-dan-cita-en-Villahermosa. Unlikely to be own work. Grabbed from the web. Strakhov (talk) 01:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of an Australian television network; TOO in Australia is very low, probable copyvio. FASTILY 07:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Three-dimensional representantion with distinctive visual qualities, not a simple geometric shape. Alalch E. (talk) 14:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of an Australian television network; TOO in Australia is very low, probable copyvio. FASTILY 07:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of an Australian television network; TOO in Australia is very low, probable copyvio. FASTILY 07:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of an Australian television network; TOO in Australia is very low, probable copyvio. FASTILY 07:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 08:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission from the creator of the work - Fintan Magee John Dalton Art (talk) 09:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@John Dalton Art: Please submit it to VRT--A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no permission no author Hoyanova (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does this light installation passes the permanence requirement of COM:FOP Germany? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Austrian photographer Josefine „Pepa“ Feldscharek, born in 1899 and also known as Josefine Schreier (her married name), did not go missing in 1939 as claimed. She emigrated to the US, was naturalized and died there in 1962. So these files are not in the PD in Austria yet and should be deleted. AFAIK she was not active as a photographer in the US; these photos are all from her time in Austria and can be restored in 2033; their US copyright terms should have expired by then as well.

Rosenzweig τ 12:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos all show works of art by German artist de:Joseph Fassbender, who died in 1974. They are from 1955 (Vihaminazhera), 1958 (Coincidentia), 1959 (the rest of the Beethovenhalle images) and 1963 (Gobelin). Since they are all inside buildings in Germany, there is no freedom of panorama. The works are still protected until the end of 2044 in Germany and even longer in the US (95 years from publication, which should be the same as creation here). So the files should be deleted. They can be restored 95 years after publication, so in 2051, 2054, 2055 and 2059.

Rosenzweig τ 13:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wdwdbot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Cypriot freedom of panorama does not cover literary works. These are information boards that contain detailed text, unlikely to be simple texts only.

The latest Cypriot copyright law states: "της αναπαραγωγής και διανομής αντιτύπων οιουδήποτε καλλιτεχνικού έργου μονίμως εγκατεστημένου σε μέρος όπου αυτό δύναται να βλέπεται από το κοινό·" — "the reproduction and distribution of copies of any artistic work permanently installed in a place where it can be viewed by the public." No indication that literary works can be freely used.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fog is thick. What do you think, is the photo educationally useful? Taivo (talk) 18:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 21:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 08:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely small picture, unused. Superseded by File:Bertie Ahern and George Bush on 2008-03-17.jpg. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is absolutely fake and is not based on any historical depictions and was created and uploaded by a user who was indefinitely blocked for trolling/long-term abuse and such creations with aim to distort symbols of other countries was one of his malicious activities. It is a violation of COM:NOTHOST, WP:OR, WP:HOAX and must be deleted in order to not confuse other users. -- Pofka (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As I assume the nominator is aware, there's no rule against people uploading their own creations to commons. In this specific case, the uploader makes it clear in the "source" field that it is their own work. So there's zero claim on the uploaders part that it is a 1/1, authentic reproduction of the original seal. Maybe the claim that they uploaded it to distort national symbols or confuse people would hold some water if they did, but there's nothing malicious or miss-leading about a drawing that is clearly labeled as the uploaders own work. Even WP:HOAX says "A hoax is an attempt to trick an audience into believing that something false is real." How exactly is the uploader attempting to trick the audience into believing it's the real seal if they are being upfront about the fact that it's their own work and not an original image?

In the meantime something isn't automatically a hoax just because it's not an original. As the guideline says, the image has to clearly be meant to trick people. Even if the uploader hadn't of said it's their own work, no one is going to be tricked into thinking the image is a 1/1 exact recreation of the original seal anyway. It's obviously an amateurish reproduction, no one is claiming otherwise, and Commons hosts plenty of inexact reproductions of originals. So there clearly isn't a valid reason to delete the image. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:NOTHOST "Although we do host media and images on Wikimedia Commons, all content must be within our project's scope, which requires, among other things, that all media must be realistically useful for an educational purpose.". Since this image is a completely own work without any historical (educational) value it violates COM:NOTHOST. Such file can only be used for trolling purposes (the reason creator of this file was blocked in Commons) and that is not compatible with the Commons:Assume good faith. Per these rules it is clearly not allowed to create a stickman and claim that it is Julius Caesar, etc. -- Pofka (talk) 21:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It is currently in use, so the nominator's rationale is not sufficient for deletion. However a warning template can be added to the file description. Yann (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Permanently blocked user Лобачев Владимир is inserting this false seal in multiple Wiki projects to crash the nomination. This is what aggressive trolling is about. There should be some kind of preventive tools against such trolling. Even the Russian Wikipedia permanently blocked this troll for destructive actions. -- Pofka (talk) 20:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mostly agree, but then it should be easy to remove the images from the pages it is used. Yann (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: It is impossible because user Лобачев Владимир then causes endless edit (revert) warring (from Chinese to German Wiki projects, etc.). I'm not capable to discuss with administrators from different countries projects in languages I don't know (and creating hundreds of reports to various wiki projects administrators noticeboards would not be an effective way to combat a troll). The most effective way would be to delete such files so that he could not abuse these files any longer as he would not be able to upload them again due to blocking in Commons. This file has as much "educational purpose" (required per COM:NOTHOST) as Stick Man would have in articles about the Great Seal of the United States. -- Pofka (talk) 21:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete OK, then. Yann (talk) 21:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IMO it's sufficiently close enough to the originals to serve an educational purpose. That's just me though, but I've looked through various coins and other objects with seal and they are pretty similar. No drawing of physical object is a 1/1 recreation, obviously. I don't find the "it's not educational" justification to be compelling either since I didn't know the seal of duke Skirgaila had a knight riding a horse on it before I saw the image and now I do. So it's educational in that regard, which should be enough to make it in scope for educational purposes.
Just like a lot of postcards of historical locations are still in scope and serve an educational purpose even though they aren't 100% accurate of the time periods or locations, obviously. No one being half good faithed about this is going to argue that say the images in Category:Postcards published by Curt Teich & Company should be deleted as WP:OR, WP:HOAX just because Curt Teich & Company often embellished the colors, used fake skies, or inserted objects into the images that didn't exist in real life. All of which they did BTW. There is no mandate that something be a 1/1 recreation of the original historical object for it to be hosted on Commons, obviously.
The question should be, what's unique about this case, and I don't see anything unique about it that warrants making a possibly precedent setting exception. What I do see though is a lot of claims being made by Pofka about the uploaders behavior on other projects, which has nothing to do with the educational merits of the image. Obviously Лобачев Владимир can troll on other projects and the image can serve an educational purpose. They aren't mutually exclusive. So what exactly makes this specific image not educational or uniquely worthy of deletion compared to other artistic recreations that are perfectly fine? --Adamant1 (talk) 22:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, here's a link to the original that Лобачев Владимир based his image on. Like I said in my last message, it's perfectly fine for Commons to host artistic recreations of physical objects and that's literally all the image is. No one expects a recreation to be 100% accurate though. IMO in this case it's close enough to the original to say it's a none issue. Also, it's pretty weak sauce that you both copied and pasted the same comments into both nominations. You could at least have the scruples to be honest about the fact that you could care less about this if that's the case instead of wasting everyone's time with the fake, spam discussion. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, mostly per Adamant. Every file in Commons must have a source. Adamant found a source. The file is even used and so in scope. Taivo (talk) 20:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taivo can you link Adamant source because his link doesn't work for me? The only possible source of the picture can be actual seal of Skirgaila, which is this: File:Seal of duke Skirgaila with Vytis (Waykimas), 1382.jpg, there is no double-barred cross on it. So the picture we talk about should be removed, because it's misleading. Also Adamant argument is fundamentally wrong, because we are talking about sigillography, where such small elements are very important Marcelus (talk) 22:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for showing another source. Correct links are on file infobox. It does not matter, how bad, erroneous or misleading the file is: if it is used, then per COM:INUSE it is in our scope. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with outdated/incorrect depiction of radical. We have File:Ethoxy-radical-2D-structure.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 06:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chess position without educational use. Author banned for vand in ruwiki. Drakosh (talk) 06:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's a very obvious position, isn't it? Are you concerned that the style of the diagram is sufficiently unique to be copyrighted? If it is, that could be an issue. If it isn't, I don't see the problem. This is not Wikipedia, and furthermore, there have been only 4 moves per side, so this is extremely easy to describe. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unused, uncat, no specific description; there are billions of possible chess positions and no reason we should keep a random one without apparent use (and new versions can be created for any chess positions that have some particular notability). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other versions of this painting were deleted in the past. This was by Ibraham Jabbar-Beik (1923-2002). Jacqke (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other versions of this painting were deleted in the past. This was by Ibraham Jabbar-Beik (1923-2002). Jacqke (talk) 15:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, fictional election map Hinnerk11 (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RTmunz (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fairly prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a screenshot from the copyrighted TV channel QPVN but for some reason it is still here??? Hwi.padam (talk) 20:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OBVIOUS DOXXING, WHY HAS THIS BEEN UP FOR 2 MONTHS? KENGRIFFEY24FAN (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is currently in use at w:Olivia Dunne. There the caption says “childhood home”, that means the individual does not live there anymore. Hence I cannot share the nominator’s concerns. [Please inform me if the caption on said Wikipedia page turns out to be deceptive.] ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 00:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is her childhood home, but her family still lives there. They deserve to have their privacy maintained. 74.105.51.230 05:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, this is really an issue the contributors of the English Wikipedia need to decide. Since it is in use in a sister project, this file is within our project scope (COM:INUSE). Legally, photographing buildings is covered by COM: FOP US thus indicating approval of such behavior. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 12:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The building is visible from a public road, and the photograph was taken on a public road that is accessible to everyone. No one trespassed on any homeowner's private property to take the photograph. The building was also completed prior to 1990. According to copyright rules as outlined in COM: FOP US, there is complete FoP for such buildings, without regard to whether the building is visible from a public place. Anyone can drive past this residence on a public road and take a photograph. As long as no one is entering private property without permission from the homeowner, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy according to the rules.
Paulthelawyer (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kai Burghardt and Paulthelawyer: This discussion is a little confusing. There are two pieces of information to consider here. One is the building itself; that was thoroughly addressed above. The other is the connection between the building and the family. That was also addressed above: any other projects that are using this file need to deal with that themselves. But that is a bit of a problem, because I am not sure that anyone at the English Wikipedia, besides the uploader Paulthelawyer, has taken a look at this issue.
@Paulthelawyer: I don’t usually edit Wikipedia, but I am tempted to remove this image as unsourced information about a living person. Can you add a source and explain why the file description just says The home of … instead of childhood home? Brianjd (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: It’s the de facto MO: Someone shows a behavior you don’t like, but there is no legal basis for a cease and desist order. KENGRIFFEY24FAN thinks this image was a blatant instance of doxing, but there’s no law against having/displaying a picture of one’s home (and even tagging it with a name of a [former] resident). So what do you do as an attorney? You resort to other branches of the law, in particular media law is heavily (ab‑)used for such situations. Even though you don’t care about any copyright, you claim a breach of copyright in order to get the result you actually intend (a takedown of the image). That’s why two issues get mingled into one. — As far as I know we generally avoid interfering with other projects’ editorial choices. E. g. in COM:INUSE it says It should be stressed that Commons does not overrule other projects about what is in scope. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 13:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kai Burghardt Your comment is addressed to me, but doesn’t seem to address my concerns. It just creates more confusion. As far as I know, ‘doxing’ isn’t a legal term; it could just as well be referring to something like Commons:DOX. Despite the repeated references to copyright, no one has actually suggested a breach of copyright here. Your comments about not interfering with other projects’ editorial choices are correct, but only to the extent that those choices have the support of those projects’ communities. It is not clear whether that is the case here, as I explained above. Brianjd (talk) 14:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: No requirement to delete, no consensus to delete. (Photos of local residential architecture as seen from street are legal in US, and Commons has many thousands of such. After I close this, I shall rename the file "House in Hillsdale, New Jersey in 2022" as that is what it shows; "Olivia Dunne" is not shown in this photo. Whether the photo should be used in the en:W article is a question for discussion on en:W, not here.) --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore President Loki (talk) 04:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I couldn’t find a file depicting the same subject matter. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 00:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No consensus to delete, 5 months is too long for automatic courtesy deletion with no reason other than author request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded a file from YouTube that is not Creative Commons licensed. Dhx1 (talk) 05:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 17:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 10:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ho cambiato idea e voglio cancellare questo file Altrochebit (talk) 12:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio cancellare questo file, user Altrochebit Altrochebit (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 10:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ho cambiato idea e voglio cancellare questo file Altrochebit (talk) 12:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the url, thank you. --Yannorton (talk) 16:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. P 1 9 9   14:19, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted photo from Vogue magazine as the summary informs itself. 187.62.234.150 17:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no indication that Flickr user has rights to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of India.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused smaller dupe. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same picture than this : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nio_ES8_rear.jpg Navigator84 (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Smaller resolution duplicate of File: Nio ES8 rear.jpg, plus copyright violation (missing correct attribution). ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 00:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr files from bad author list. The EXIF data indicated the author should be Ministry of I&B, Government of India A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Dubious license claims; no info on date and place of creation needed to see if it was PD. On en:w is under non free fair use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pyramidon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; works by living artist.

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr geehrter Martin Sg.,
danke dass Sie sich der Seite über Christian Günther annehmen.
Ich verstehe nicht, warum die Abbildungen von den Werken meines Mannes, Christian Günther problematisch sind.
Habe ich etwas falsch gemacht? Mein Mann hat das Copyright sowohl für die künstlerischen Arbeiten, als auch für die Fotos davon.
Mit ganz herzlichen Grüßen
Beate Maria Günther Pyramidon (talk) 10:58, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: permission pending. --Didym (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zoopatrul - is Ukrainian NGO. And the user's nickname is the same. So, we don't know who is a real author of the photo because it is a collective account. Kharkivian (talk) 14:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; needs VRT confirmation. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK Published edition, the only Walter J. Buck I can find on Free BMD died in 1973. Alternatively given the affiliations listed on the title page, is this a different indvidual working in Spain at the time of publication? Applying a publication date +70 years +80 years (Spain had longer terms at the time IIRC) is 2046 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, Per bibliogrpahic data provided by another contributor.(Non admin closure) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person (F10) Mateus2019 (talk) 07:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think a 1975 image in UK are old enough to be in PD. "Freely available" is a vague term, without mention of allowing commercial use and the creation of derivative works A1Cafel (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is freely available, in that it can be accessed and used freely by Harwell Apprentices.
It is highly relevent as it is linked to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Brawn#Personal_life.
As an ex-Harwell Apprentice myself I own the rights to share or publish this photgraph. Jkgoff (talk) 10:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright owner has been consulted and gave the following permission:
We have found this photo in our collection and it does seem to be clearer and without the mark at the top right.  From the metadata we hold, I can see it was taken by Eric Jenkins, photographer at Harwell on 8th September 1975 so we are able to give permission to use as below.
Please accept this as authorisation to use the photo attached for your intended purpose. 
In doing so please also acknowledge that the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) grant permission to reproduce our Copyright material in this instance only and on the condition that:
• It is re-used, recreated or quoted accurately, and not in a misleading context,
• You identify the NDA as the source and state that it is NDA Copyright,
• It is not re-used for the purpose of advertising or promoting a particular product or service,
• Out of date material is not presented as though it was current. Jkgoff (talk) 12:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YT license review failed: video settings are private, or video was taken offline. Also no archived pages available. In general, the Titans channel has it's YT material available under CC-BY but I cannot verify this for this specific still. Ciell (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

updated the link on the file page to a new version of the interview the titans put up. should be ok now. my apologies. Rubythrees (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, @Ciell URL to the photo appears to have been updated and video does appear to have a CC license.
Diddykong1130 (talk) 04:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per update link on the file information page. --Ciell (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Estonia, architect Meeli Truu died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 08:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with a general consensus (2012), English Wikipedia only follows the copyright law of the United States (Title 17 of the United States Code). Therefore, the U.S. freedom of panorama (for architecture only) is applied to images of all copyrighted architecture from countries with no freedom of panorama exceptions.
The U.S. freedom of panorama, found at Sec. 120(a), allows photography and the distribution or public display of resulting images of architectural works that are found in or visible from public spaces. For more information, see c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Freedom of panorama. 5anco5s (talk) 16:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 08:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with a general consensus (2012), English Wikipedia only follows the copyright law of the United States (Title 17 of the United States Code). Therefore, the U.S. freedom of panorama (for architecture only) is applied to images of all copyrighted architecture from countries with no freedom of panorama exceptions.
The U.S. freedom of panorama, found at Sec. 120(a), allows photography and the distribution or public display of resulting images of architectural works that are found in or visible from public spaces. For more information, see c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Freedom of panorama. 5anco5s (talk) 16:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. This is not the english wikipedia. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albonzenbon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rotchitalie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ADOAAODA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely license laundering. Unlikely that the YouTube uploader owns the broadcast footage rights.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 08:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's an exact copy of Henriette of Brandenburg-Schwedt by Lisiewski.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 05:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

λαθος τιτλοσ Nikoskpa (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

deletion not needed for a rename request 67.0.9.222 08:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alibadamchi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work

HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP and scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot found any proves of notability of this person. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ما السبب في ترشيح الصورة للحذف؟ إيناس علي (talk) 19:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of PD, dubious rationale (pma 70 + unknown author). Xunks (talk) 06:58, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Created in 1941-1943 per source, so cannot be assumed that we're at life+70. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albentab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo of a photo, needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 07:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LessRecords (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Credited to Arne Schramm and Thomas Stelzmann, plus one DW of photos on a wall. All need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden Thank you for your note. We can hereby confirm that we have full rights for using these photographs. LessRecords (talk) 07:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@LessRecords: Can you please provide that confirmation via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. @LessRecords: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holders/photographers to publish these files on Commons with a free license. If successful, the files can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No info for the "publishing date", therefore we can't make comment if it's a PD or not. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:24, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The person died 1950, so it's very unlikely that it's younger than 70 years. 958s (talk) 20:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to the photo, the rank of the person named Fevzi Çakmak in the photo is marshal and the Chief of General Staff of the Turkish Army. After receiving the rank of marshal on 31 August 1922, he carried out these two duties until 12 January 1944. Probably the photo was taken between these dates. In Turkey, if the owner of the photograph is a real person, it becomes public domain 70 years after his death. If it is a legal person, the work becomes public domain 70 years after it is published. Since it is not known whether the author is real or legal, it is not possible to say anything. Uncitoyen (talk) 14:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and {{PD-old-assumed}} a photo which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this photo must be deleted now but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1944 - in 2065.. --Ellywa (talk) 07:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Cold Cave Thalia Hall 2018.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:24, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see no need to remove this file; it seems to be similar to the allegedly redundant file, but this file is fuller than that one. We can keep both this file and the allegedly redundant file (which is a crop of this file), and simply connect the two like we do with other image crops. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
AFAIK, crops are meant to scale an image down to show a specific portion of it. In this instance, this is a crop to remove the black shadow at the lower right corner. Since both images are uploaded by the same user, I'd say they are redundant and there's no issue of keeping the history intact for license attribution. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no need to delete. I merged the versions in accordance with cropping guideline. --Ellywa (talk) 07:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suchai Charoenratanakul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these are own work

Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. Therefore – due to lack of information like source, author, publication status and creation dates – these images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bulawa as itself, as 3D work is uncopyrightable. But specific photo of it (photo of 3D work) is copyrightable. Alex Spade (talk) 08:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 07:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK Published edition, No details found for Cargill, Publication date+50 years ( assuming no publication as minor/child) is 1966, UK authors have to have died before 1952 to be in the public domain. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep Publication_date+50_years doesn't appear to an actual WikiLaw or copyright law, and the previous batch that were nominated for deletion under the publication_date+50_years rule, all had authors who died prior to 1953 when research was performed and their obituaries were found. I don't believe this type of speculation meets Commons: Precautionary principle, based on how wrong it has been in the past. Rather than nominate for deletion based on theoretical speculation based on a formula not found in law, maybe it would be better to ask for research on the author at Village pump or a genealogical message board, or look for an obituary like I did. All this can be done prior to nomination. --RAN (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I did not find any information about life of author, Alexander Cargill. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and {{PD-old-assumed}} a work which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this work, published 1912, must be deleted now but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1912 - in 2033.. --Ellywa (talk) 08:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tout simplement parce que j'en suis à la 3ème personne qui ne respecte pas la licence et ne cite pas mon nom d'auteur. Les 2 premiers il a fallu que je le contacte pour qu'ils rectifient mais le 3ème refuse vcatégoriquement, ni lien ni nom de l'auteur. Dans ces conditions je ne vois pa pourquoi fournir des photos inédites dont je suis l'auteur si les gens ne respectent pas la licence accordée. RB100254 (talk) 10:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

je rajouterai que s'il faut prendre un avocat pour faire valoir ses droits à quoi sert Commons Wikipédia s'il n'a aucun moyen depuis Commons de faire respecter sa licence. KJe vous met le lien de la personne qui a publié ma photo en citant juste Commons Wikipédia mais en ne mettant aucun lien ni de citation d'auteur. J'ai contacté ce journal sans réponse, le journaliste en question qui répond qu'il a cité Commons Wikipédia comme sources mais refuse de citer mon nom en tant qu'auteur de la photo. RB100254 (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Le lien du "journal" qui diffuse ma photo sans citer l'auteur
https://www.milenio.com/cultura/laberinto/gloria-lasso-la-diva-de-la-cancion?fbclid=IwAR3QB5dKgB3rts0H2aOgW70DUfzJa5RPS7Rn-dfeCqwoJc854NRYpVuhzHo RB100254 (talk) 10:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Et enfin, je vous demande de supprimer cette photo et croyez-bien que je me chargerais de faire valoir mes droits ! RB100254 (talk) 10:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I understand, and it is sad, that people do not respect the license when reusing the image, but this is no reason imho to delete the photo from Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 08:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je demande la suppression de cette photo ne voulant pas encore perdre mon temps à réclamer si comme pour l'autre photo on utilise celle-ci sans citer le nom de l'auteur et ne pas recpecter la licence accordée. RB100254 (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I understand, and it is sad, that people do not respect the license when reusing the image, but this is no reason imho to delete the photo from Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 08:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Allervous (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship, no embedded metadata.

Larryasou (talk) 16:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep No reason or evidence to doubt authorship of an established user. Lack of metadata is merely suspicious but not conclusive. SinghIsFxing (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Established? I guess they have been around a few years. Looking through this user's uploads, however, is concerning. First of all, there is definitely some history of blatant copyright violations claimed as own work. It is true that these images don't return hits on reverse image searches, but they could be from any number of social media sites whose images don't show up in reverse image searches. These particular images very much have a Facebook vibe to them. Most are also of relatively low resolution. It's also odd that the file names from this user switch between multiple languages (and more than just the English and Japanese shown here). There's nothing wrong with being multilingual, but it's just odd to randomly switch between languages for different images you upload. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I see they have around 7,000 edits on the Chinese Wikipedia. SinghIsFxing (talk) 04:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photos without metadata, uploader did not comment. Deleted as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Allervous (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlike own work, low resolution or missing metadata.

Larryasou (talk) 12:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are actually all my works, formally they were only available on Q-zone. Allervous (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed here are some photos of campus club in Qufu normal university, for instance, File:漢服スポークスマンコンペティション.jpg, which had been released on Bilibili earlier as video cover (direct link). Would you mind sharing the original photos to clear the doubts?--Larryasou (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP, User:Allervous, could you please be so kind to upload the original files with exif data?. --Ellywa (talk) 08:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Totenkopfaffe as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, so converting to DR, but  Delete. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File is not in use and there are much better pictures of kingfishers, so  Delete. Moreover, I didn't intend loading up this version of the picture. Totenkopfaffe (talk) 15:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:COURTESY. thanks for all other beautiful bird pictures. --Ellywa (talk) 08:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damavand2024 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

این تصاویر را خودم ثبت کرده ام Damavand2024 (talk) 07:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. @Damavand2024: please read COM:FOP Iran. Photos of modern artwork cannot be published, even you made the photos yourself. -- Ellywa (talk) 08:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination, both are not in use today. --Ellywa (talk) 08:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Het is onmogelijk dat dit Caroline Reboux is: de haarstijl is uit rond 1920, en Reboux zou dan op de foto ongeveer 80 jaar oud moeten zijn. ChristinaHelena (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from User talk:Doug Coldwell

Hello Doug, I nominated the Caroline Reboux file for deleting, but in the meantime I found out what's wrong with it. This is not Caroline Reboux, because the picture is from about 1920, and Reboux would have been 80 by then. It however is Lucienne Rabaté, who continued Reboux' hat workshop from 1927 - 1956. Maybe it is possible to upload the picture again with new data. I found the complete picture on: https://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/designers/caroline-reboux/ with, indeed, the same wrong creditsChristinaHelena (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ChristinaHelena: changing the name and description of a photo does not require deleting it and re-uploading. Just change the description and use {{Rename}} to request a rename. - Jmabel ! talk 20:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


END Copied from User talk:Doug Coldwell - Jmabel ! talk 00:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (on basis of this nomination). --Ellywa (talk) 08:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Het is onmogelijk dat dit Caroline Reboux is: de haarstijl is uit rond 1920, Caroline Reboux zou dan ongeveer 80 jaar zou geweest zijn. ChristinaHelena (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, renamed into Lucienne Rabaté. --Ellywa (talk) 08:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A book cover, I see no permission. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

تحياتي؛
فضلا أريد معرفة السبب في ترشيح تلك الصورة للحذف؟ وهي من عملي الخاص وقد حرصت عند إضافاتها توضيح مصدر الصورة وهي غلاف لكتاب كتبت مقال عنه إيناس علي (talk) 19:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
إذن قانوني من الناشر ضروري. Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/ar Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no permission has been received through VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 08:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright vio? Joschi71 (talk) 23:32, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 90.61.2.240 10:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure if this is still in compliance with COM:FOP Germany. Most types of major altercations are not allowed according to COM:FOP Germany#Prohibition of alteration, except some types. It is not sure if the removal of surroundings already violates limitations of German FOP. The source file is File:Stadtbahnhaltestelle Europa Park Stadion in Freiburg.jpg, which shows the darker background. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Question: If we were to revert to a mere crop, which would result in a mere partial reproduction of the original photograph without any other sorts of alterations, would that be OK? In that case, we'd be at the state of the original crop. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: If you have time available, can you express your opinion about this DR? Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 07:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellywa: Hm. The only thing (perhaps) copyrightable here IMO is the gryphin head in the logo of the SC Freiburg, Freiburg's football club. That logo was apparently created in 1924 (so no URAA problem) by a drawing teacher of the Freiburg university named Hans Dettelbacher, who was born in 1885 and apparently still alive in 1955. So it's not quite in the PD in Germany yet, at least not because the author died over 70 years ago. Now is that drawing below the threshold of originality? Probably yes in Germany, probably not in the US, but the 1924 date should solve the US copyright problem. So I think we can justify to  Keep the file. --Rosenzweig τ 20:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per motivation of Rosenzweig. --Ellywa (talk) 21:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]