Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/12/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 20th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio|1=non-free logo StellarHalo (talk) 04:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio|1=non-free logo StellarHalo (talk) 04:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hexatron93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images of higher-education institutes all around India are all uploaded under claim of self ownership, but all seem to be from Internet sources. I could easily find some, others I could not, but they are very unlikely to be self owned.

Muhandes (talk) 11:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who has copyright on these , Please could you elaborate more ?
How do you know these images are very common, Do you have any proof for these, Please could you elaborate ? Hexatron93 (talk) 12:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I never said these imags are very common, not sure where you took that. I claimed they are unlikely to all be created and owned by you. Are you claiming these images are all your own work and that you own the copyrights for all those images? Muhandes (talk) 13:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please be careful with your answer. I don't have time to be image detective, but as you can see on your talk page, if I take the time I manage to find the source of quite a number of them. --Muhandes (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ew. Probably illegal and definitely OOS. Also where the hell do you even find shit like this? Dronebogus (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering the only other upload by this person is a photo of a woman fellating a horse I question whether this is good faith or even own work Dronebogus (talk) 13:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ну раз без одобрения фирмы, то удаляйте. Носков А. С. (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Joeri.Steegmans as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Info. Credited artist is fr:Emile Rommelaere who died in 1961. Abzeronow (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of an album cover Culex (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:44, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Al*from*Lig (talk) 17:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed blurry image, unusable. Also added:

P 1 9 9   14:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused very poor image, unusable and redundant to many much better alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9   14:42, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused very poor quality photo, animals indistinguishable, unusable. P 1 9 9   14:44, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope * Pppery * it has begun... 22:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ciell as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: YT License review failed: cannot find this shot in the video

@Ciell: As noted in the source field, this image is from the video's thumbnail, which should be under the same license as the video. Yeeno (talk) 23:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yeeno I see no reason for the thumbnail to have the same license as the video, unless the thumbnail actually comes from the video. That is not always the case; the YouTube channel in this case is verified. Brianjd (talk) 12:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to argue the photo was taken only for the thumbnail itself, but it looks like it has been published by BLAST before at https://gamezo.co.uk/blast-pro-series-global-final-2019-preview/. I will speedy G7 both images. Yeeno (talk) 01:50, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yeeno Neither file is eligible for CSD G7. I have changed it to F1. Brianjd (talk) 04:44, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This file has a derivative, Dupreeh 2019 BLAST Backstage (cropped).jpg, which should also be deleted if this file is deleted. Brianjd (talk) 12:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 21:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax flag SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 05:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Didym. --Rosenzweig τ 14:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wotlarx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works as per descriptions. Missing permission.

P 1 9 9   17:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crop of photo published at https://www.ketocooking.us/houston-bakery-beats-diabetes-through-healthy-lifestyle-and-cookies/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE: unused selfies/personal files outside of Commons' scope.

Marbletan (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shusein1786 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope plain text in image format (Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text).

HyperGaruda (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamQuq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (and borderline COM:CSD#F10): digitally generated "signatures" for which I see no educational use.

HyperGaruda (talk) 19:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright violation: seems to be a cropped music album cover titled Anadolu Alevi Klasikleri, so highly unlikely to be "own work". Compare with https://www.deezer.com/en/album/403891. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless, private picture Ciacho5 (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless, private picture, bad quality Ciacho5 (talk) 19:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol, cf. Google Images — danyele 20:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is currently under an non comercial licesne. I couldn't fine in the archives another license. Sanandros (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: even CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 in Exif. --Didym (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hallo, ich habe jetzt gerade erst bemerkt, dass ich beim Hochladen die falsche Lizenz gewählt habe. Das Bild ist nicht CC BY-SA 4.0, sondern CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 und darf ja somit hier nicht verwendet werden. Daher bitte löschen. Bernhard Rieger (talk) 21:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hallo, ich habe jetzt gerade erst bemerkt, dass ich beim Hochladen die falsche Lizenz gewählt habe. Das Bild ist nicht CC BY-SA 4.0, sondern CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 und darf ja somit hier nicht verwendet werden. Daher bitte löschen. Bernhard Rieger (talk) 21:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems out of scope. Not used on any page. Titlutin (talk) 22:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Picture on the website of the producer looking nearly exactly like this one, certainly from the same session https://robertoramasso.com/contratar-a-bhavi/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FLICKRWASHing of a Getty Images photo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as the uploader.Fma12 (talk) 22:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Image in better quality found here https://www.last.fm/es/music/Bhavi/+images/b26a572eac46d061ee5fb75252d4bc7a CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculptural work by Zdenko Kalin (died 1990). Commons only accepts images that may be used for any purpose, which is not the case here. It will become public domain in 2061. A low-resolution photo may be uploaded locally in accordance with the EDP (wikimedia:Resolution:Licensing policy). TadejM (t/p) 00:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission see metadata that read Author Eric Scholten Hoyanova (talk) 10:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RuzzPlays (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same foto was published on official PJ site. https://jaki.pl/ Here there is no camera information in metadates etd. Lowdown (talk) 11:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. --Karim talk to me :)..! 13:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree, considering they've uploaded File:President Rashad Al-Alimi.jpg, which is just his official photo, as "own work". Mass-deletion of this user's uploads may be appropriate. 25stargeneral (talk) 08:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Królestwo Sutimanu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope – symbols of a non-notable micronation

TFerenczy (talk) 13:42, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image is a mockery of the Rector of the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 193.145.130.48 14:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete COM: SPAM ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 20:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional text for a band, outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons Marbletan (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional text for a band, outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons Marbletan (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional text for a band, outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons Marbletan (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rjkarthik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SELFIE: unused selfies/personal files outside of Commons' scope.

Marbletan (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per nomination. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 20:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused logo Dronebogus (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invented flag with no encyclopaedic purpose. (COM:OS) GPinkerton (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 (me) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Metadata credits MOHAMED EL-SHAHED/AFP Could we get a COM:VRT ticket to verify that the uploader is Mohamed El-Shahed and AFP is fine with this photo being licensed freely? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a JPG on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 15:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete no realistic chance to be used for educational purposes. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 20:48, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to AP here https://apnews.com/article/8c565484874946c795133f1d0d5a4878 - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 15:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brief biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a JPG on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   15:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JND AMD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It looks like the user is uploading cropped versions of images they're finding on the web - I've marked ones that were obvious copyvios. These are web resolution photos with no camera EXIF data.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JND AMD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploads by an unreliable user, taken with multiple cameras at different resolutions. Many uploads are reposts or crops taken from photo sites.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   15:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angela Gheorghita (BSM) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

On each file, respective source (with "All Rights Reserved" mention in footer) contradicts the license statement (CC).

Gikü (talk) 15:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jenova941 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, FB/transmission code in EXIF data or inconsistent EXIF data or credit to someone else.

P 1 9 9   15:58, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size image, visual characteristics suggest screengrab. P 1 9 9   16:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jbingstar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable events/persons, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: credit in watermark not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   16:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small artwork image, likely not own work and nothing else known about it. Missing all essential info. P 1 9 9   16:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dzenan Dzafic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional corporate images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of someone's personal CV. Outside of COM:SCOPE. It seems this is the last of a set of self-promotional files in which all the others have already been deleted. Marbletan (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acracrabe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data. File:Dany Laferrière et Le Chat.png is likely a screengrab judging by its border. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.

P 1 9 9   16:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   16:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Certainly not Oploaders own work. Possibly poublic domain Headlock0225 (talk) 16:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a derivative work of https://www.vippng.com/preview/ohoRmx_host-country-russia-world-cup-soccer-trophies/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Évanéos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images.

P 1 9 9   17:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with FB/transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   17:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing evidence of free license; the uploader is not the photographer. Please provide the required evidence as explained at Commons:VRT. TadejM (t/p) 00:48, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an image edit I made solely to make a Wikipedia-formatted election map, please delete Unreal Heir (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't find a statement listing the copyright status, sorry for uploading. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:22, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a newspaper with a (likely) non-free picture. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 03:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image without adequate EXIF data, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think User:BottleOfChocolateMilk is entirely correct to question whether we should accept "own work" without VRT from an account with no other uploads, and whose account name suggests that it was uploaded by the subject's political strategist. It seems reasonably likely that there could be a copyright problem. User:Putitonamap98 reverted the {{No permission since}}, so I am starting a normal deletion review. Jmabel ! talk 04:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from https://web.facebook.com/centreofinclusivecare/photos/winter-webinar-specialmake-the-most-of-your-holidays-by-continuing-your-professi/1710398452468064/?paipv=0&eav=Afb7iDE7Sct_nX2B-jwn0vGbCQ36M4bWdJ_Gyu6W9Tu6FXbWwb0Xorb2Rd8b0qO_FQE&_rdc=1&_rdr or similar - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not original uploaders own work [1] Boylarva99 (talk) 06:38, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not uploaders own work [2] Boylarva99 (talk) 07:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Multiple higher resolution hits in RIS indicating potential copyright violation. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 11:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think User:BottleOfChocolateMilk is entirely correct to question whether we should accept "own work" without VRT from an account with no other uploads, and whose account name suggests that it was uploaded by the subject's political strategist. It seems reasonably likely that there could be a copyright problem. I reverted the {{No permission since}}, so I am starting a normal deletion review. Putitonamap98 (talk) 07:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused logo Lymantria (talk) 07:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Frau Prof. Ruth Bielfeldt hat um Löschung gebeten, ebenso auf Wunsch des Hochladers. Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC08:27, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Frau Prof. Ruth Bielfeldt hat um Löschung gebeten, und auf Wunsch des Urhebers des Fotos Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC08:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete the artist is apparently still alive as of 2010. Per Rhodes,[3] he tends to be litigious. Also the work here is unlikely to be de minimis; the file name and description pinpoints this graffiti by a known artist. COM:GRAFFITI cannot be invoked. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and also protect the file name against recreation, or it will just come back with the next Flickr mass import. The same goes for the next DRs. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content, derivative work, no FoP; image contains copyrighted sculpture by Nam June Paik (listing at Smithsonian), copyright is owned by the artist's estate, photographed in the United States (no FoP) 19h00s (talk) 04:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are non-permanent display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are non-permanent display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nomination as far as I can see. Thanks for tracking down this problems Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 05:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 05:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 05:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 05:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License updated in good faith, Not a work of US gov, 1963 Theses submission. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-US-no notice, also public domain as work of member of US military. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work of US Gov, ( Affiliation of Author is Phillipene Navy), 1965 Theses Submission to MIT. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: PD-US-no notice. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image Osama Eid (talk) 12:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, EXIF does not match uploader. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded to Wikipedia for promotional purposes only. Osama Eid (talk) 13:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image Osama Eid (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also out of scope personal image. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The poster in the woman's hand is copyrighted Mbazri (talk) 13:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep Per the arguments of Amir. Vysotsky (talk) 22:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Vysotsky: Even this isn't a problem? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226 FoP is irrelevant if the depicted work is free. (If it turns out that it is not free, then FoP won’t help here. It wouldn’t have helped anyway, in most countries, because the depicted work is not permanently displayed to the public.) Brianjd (talk) 12:44, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I don't think FoP Qatar is a problem re this image. Vysotsky (talk) 13:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Vysotsky FoP is never a problem. It is only the lack of FoP that might be a problem. Brianjd (talk) 13:49, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I like the slogan. TOO. Don't see any infringement of copyright. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:52, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Amir. Below COM:TOO Germany, which seems to be location of first publication. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character, temporarily artwork and cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 14:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE -- image contains nothing of significance other than raw text. 35.139.154.158 18:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Needed to verify definition. We have over 1,000,000 pdf/djvu books that are nothing but text. --RAN (talk) 19:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep fits our COM:SCOPE and is Public domain. Bruxton (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Umm, COM:SCOPE very clearly states: "Excluded educational content includes ... Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, ..." (emphasis added). Scans of individual entries in dictionaries are very clearly not in scope; being in the PD is a wholly irrelevant canard and had nothing to do with the deletion rationale. Unless either of you can explain why this particular file shouldn't be subject to this policy, your votes don't make any sense. 35.139.154.158 21:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep In use, which nullifies claims of "out of scope." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:42, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Excluded educational content is still in scope if used by another Wikimedia project. This file is used at en:Got the morbs. Brianjd (talk) 11:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: In use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in India nor the United States for copyrighted two-dimensional works. The sign's text is above the threshold of originality in India (where it was taken) and the United States. As such, this should be deleted as lacking evidence of a free license issued by the holder of the sign's copyright.. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Because, this is an ASI site and ASI info board. ASI – Archaeological Survey of India – is a central government agency of India. The last line on the blue board mentions ASI (in Indian language). This falls under "Works by the Government of India". These can be uploaded under {{GODL-India}}. FoP does not apply to GODL-released works. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:08, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming that, why were these images uploaded under {{CC0}}? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC0 is clearly the license for the photograph, the board is a work of the Indian government. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in India nor the United States for copyrighted two-dimensional works. The sign's text is above the threshold of originality in India (where it was taken) and the United States. As such, this should be deleted as lacking evidence of a free license issued by the holder of the sign's copyright. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Because, this is an ASI site and ASI info board. ASI – Archaeological Survey of India – is a central government agency of India. This falls under "Works by the Government of India". These can be uploaded under {{GODL-India}}. FoP does not apply to GODL-released works. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming that, why were these images uploaded under {{CC0}}? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC0 is clearly the license for the photograph, the board is a work of the Indian government. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:58, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: the sculpture is work by Lojze Dolinar (d. 1970), the architecture is work by Edo Ravnikar (died 1993). The photo will meet the criteria for inclusion in Commons in 2064. TadejM (t/p) 00:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: work by Zdenko Kalin (died 1990). The photo will meet the criteria for inclusion in Commons in 2061. TadejM (t/p) 00:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. TadejM (t/p) 01:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture by Sadar + Vuga. TadejM (t/p) 01:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photography by Fergus Burnett, not a work from the FCDO, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with His Majesty King Charles III holds a reception for Heads of State and overseas visitors A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 05:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 05:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG South Korea, the signature is in a calligraphic way and it is copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 08:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:10, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Austrian art journal has artwork by various artists, some of them contemporary at time of publication, several of which died less than 70 years ago. Among those, the one I could find which died the latest is de:Heinrich Comploj, who died in 1967. So the file should be deleted; it can be restored in 2038. Rosenzweig τ 09:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 14:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 14:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 14:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia.

Eleassar (t/p) 16:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Interior architecture has the same copyright as exterior. There is no evidence of a high TOO in Slovenia and the interior image would infringe in most countries. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Later deleted:

--Eleassar (t/p) 13:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture by Sadar + Vuga (built 2010).

TadejM (t/p) 00:44, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture – work by Edo Ravnikar (died 1993). The photos will meet the criteria for inclusion in Commons in 2064.

TadejM (t/p) 00:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in SoKor. This building is unlikely to be in public domain; for it to be accepted here on Commons, its architect must have been dead for more than 70 years. Failing that, this architectural work is still under copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but these buildings of Renzo Piano (born 14 September 1937) are too recent and Italy has no FOP exemption. All of these files could lead to lawsuits against the Wikimedia Foundation.

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome).

Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:52, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that File:Porto Antico Genova varie 07.jpg could fall into Commons:De minimis (see also the last deletion request about this category).--Yoggysot (talk) 03:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why this deletion request has not been categorized among the kept cases of no-fop in Italy? Raoli ✉ (talk) 04:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete the first two.  Keep File:Porto Antico Genova varie 07.jpg that fall into de minimis.--Dega180 (talk) 00:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sorry, but except for the palm trees, copyrighted architecture is the whole image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

הועלתה בטעות YACHAA (talk) 08:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image, previously posted Osama Eid (talk) 09:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 14:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, as uploader I did not know Korean law. No argument if it is deleted. Best wishes for the holidays, Daderot (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flags~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-made imaginary symbols. No such thing as "Fiefdom of Dorset".

GPinkerton (talk) 14:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. (COM:FOP Romania, {{NoFoP-Romania}}).

Ox1997cow (talk) 23:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep I see no special architecture on this industrial site. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: Photos of non-free modern architecture from Slovenia are unfortunately not suitable for inclusion in Commons.

TadejM (t/p) 01:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Sculpture by Leonov Alexey Dmitrievich at KSEVT

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free sculptural work by Leonov Alexey Dmitrievich (still living) from 2017.

TadejM (t/p) 01:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StephenRichardBarlow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope self-made flag "proposals" invented de novo by the uploader. No possibility of encyclopaedic use for any of these.

GPinkerton (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photographs are works of German photographer Alfred Frankl, who died in 1955, so they are not in the public domain in Germany yet. The files should therefore be deleted. They can be restored in 2026.

Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding three more files of photographs by Alfred Frankl:


Also see:

Leutha (talk) 11:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina. (COM:FOP Bosnia and Herzegovina, {{NoFoP-BIH}})

Ox1997cow (talk) 23:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, I cannot see some special architectural artistic property on this power plant. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS Disappointing quality image, mis identified also, and not worth finding and correcting the author Peli (talk) 01:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Inferior copy of an 1846 frontispiece to a Dickens novel, see [4]. --Rosenzweig τ 00:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely source, unlikely license. This former logo of radio station KABG in Albuquerque was probably never released under a CC license, but it probably also does not exceed COM:TOO. However, if the license were changed to reflect the likely lack of copyright protection, we would still have an issue with whether the uploader was, in fact, the author of the image. BigrTex (talk) 18:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BigrTex If the file is PD, then we don’t care whether the uploader was the author. We should try to fix the file description as much as possible, but it’s not a deletion issue. Brianjd (talk) 11:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've made the improvements to description and license that I would have if I had uploaded the image. BigrTex (talk) 15:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
By US standards, this certainly looks like {{PD-textlogo}}. Brianjd (talk) 11:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per above. Brianjd (talk) 11:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: PD-textlogo. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inferior duplicate of File:Grit Hegesa (1891–1972) um 1918 © Nicola Perscheid (1864–1930).jpg Rosenzweig τ 11:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The poster in the man's hand is copyrighted. Mbazri (talk) 13:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: although each of the killed children's portraits might (or might not) be copyrighted, the place and significance of each of them for the whole photograph is pretty small; compare to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Museu Valencia de la Il·lustració i la Modernitat, interior.JPG used as an example at COM:Deminimis. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a very low quality copy of File:HGM Weikert Portrait Joseph II.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 19:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: web-sized image with transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   13:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi there ! it is most defiantly my own work, I can share a screenshot of my photos on my laptop privately with you if that helps resolve the issue ? WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
alternatively, i can upload more from the same batch to the actual Pula Arena wiki page for your review, which will have all the same characteristics ? WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 14:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please upload the full unedited version complete with EXIF data by clicking "Upload a new version of this file". No need to upload more for this building, plenty already on Commons. Thanks. --P 1 9 9   14:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:AGF, uploader has no record of dishonesty. --King of ♥ 08:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted trophy A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Almost certainly public domain as a work of the US federal government (either military or office of the president). On the off chance it is not, it was created in 1972 without a copyright notice. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --King of ♥ 10:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a photo of a painting taken inside the Vietnam National Museum of History, this does not fall under COM:FOP Vietnam. Belbury (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file description page does not claim to use the COM:FOP Vietnam privilege. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 20:42, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence that the original paintings are freely licensed. --King of ♥ 10:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is Stefan Rousseau/Press Association Images, not a work from the UK Prime Minister (Number 10) A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have evidence for this and that the number10gov account on Flickr ought not to have licensed it under CC BY 2.0? --Pontificalibus (talk) 07:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You seems to misunderstand the problem. License landuring means that the Flickr user is not the copyright holder of this image. Even the user marked with a Commons-acceptable license, the license is still invalid because this is not his/her own work. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. You are accusing this official government Flickr account of claiming copyright of an image that is actually owned by someone else. However you have presented no evidence of this. Where is it documented that "Stefan Rousseau/Press Association Images" is the actual copyright holder of this image? --Pontificalibus (talk) 07:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - It doesn't take much looking -- the EXIF is very clear:

Author Stefan Rousseau
Copyright holder PA Wire/Press Association Images.

   Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SIG United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality fictional symbol Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 11:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of scope. Flagvisioner (talk) 01:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files not PD in US

Dronebogus (talk) 12:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There has been no discussion about these images, therefore I do not see sufficient arguments for deleting it. The Wikimedia Foundation – through the statement of the Legal department - does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. The document on Commons at COM:URAA states “A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.” Nobody took the effort to participate in this discussion, therefore I decided to keep the images, because they are having a correct licence for the country where they originated. In addition, the file pages are showing a warning sign that a licence tag is missing which will show the image is possibly not in public domain in the USA which will prevent re-users from USA to use it freely without additional research. If you do not agree with this decision, you are kindly requested to nominate the image again for deletion in order to have a broader discussion about it. --Ellywa (talk) 20:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Literally the first sentence of Commons:Copyright rules says files must be free both in the US and the country of origin. I don’t know how this is controversial.

Dronebogus (talk) 14:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dronebogus The statement by WMF Legal says (among other things):
  • There are other factors that must be considered (including, but not limited to, the reason that the work entered PD in the US prior to the restoration date).
  • The {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} tag may be incorrect, and cannot be relied on as an argument for deletion.
Unfortunately, this information is not clear from other statements about the URAA.
In any case, it was wrong to tag these files {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} because they were uploaded after 1 March 2012. Brianjd (talk) 10:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Ellywa as a courtesy and for potential clarification, as I have little knowledge of the URAA or how it affects Commons. Brianjd (talk) 10:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Assorted low quality, OOS, redundant, and ambiguously free images

Dronebogus (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of file:Chapada diamantina bahia brasil20180218 140929.jpg André Koehne TALK TO ME 14:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: close but not identical -- note slender stalk in forground -- straight up in one, bent to the right in the other. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality self-made flag uploaded by user banned for serial fabrications GPinkerton (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9   16:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original author is Christian Vandendorpe (i.e. Codex). The photo was taken in my own apartment in Québec city during an interview for the magazine Québec français. It was first published in Numéro 24, décembre 1976, p. 21–22 (https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/qf/1976-n24-qf1201303/56717ac/). Codex (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. No reason for deletion. There is nothing suggesting a problem. "Author, source, date, and permission" are indicated. "Missing essential info" is false. The user may send something to VRT as a technicality because a version was published, although in this case it is not useful since it would not provide any more information than we already have. The Commons image cannot have been copied from the image published in the magazine because the Commons image has more of the original photo at left and bottom than the magazine image. And the magazine image does not seem credited. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am assuming considerable good faith on the part of the uploader, but there is an apparent licensing conflict - License given on upload is CC-BY-SA 4.0 , Meta-data states-"Lloyd’s Register Foundation 2022All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or used in any information storage retrieval system without prior permission being obtained in writing from Lloyd’s Register Foundation.", There's no indidcation of a CC-license in the actual PDF, which also seems to contain some images from third parties-under commons incompatible licenses. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Co-licensing does not invalidate other granted licenses. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 20:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kai Burghardt Can you elaborate? According to the nomination, this is not a multi-licensing issue, but rather a work with no valid license at all. Brianjd (talk) 11:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: The LRFHEC can publish a book under multiple licenses. They can publish it for money (sell the book) or they can publish it for free (upload to Commons). These are separate “licenses”. They act between parties. The CC license granted to us does not imply that we had to honor the commercial license the LRFHEC grants to others. These circumstances are not exclusive; they don’t interfere with each other. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 12:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kai Burghardt From the comment I am assuming considerable good faith on the part of the uploader, I assumed that the file was uploaded by a third party. Of course, if it was uploaded by the copyright owner, that is a different matter.
This still does not address the issue of third-party images that lack a compatible license. Brianjd (talk) 12:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianjd: Yes, PDF page 183 attributes various photo stocks. However, I assume good faith on LRFHEC’s (the uploader’s) side and I share the sentiment of COM: ALAMY. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 20:45, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kai Burghardt No one is accusing the uploader of bad faith, but good faith is not enough. I had a look through the credits. Some images are CC BY-NC-ND. At least one image is credited to the European Union. An image on page 69 (page 35 of the PDF) is credited to Wikimedia Commons! It appears to be a crop of Viking Grace Turku 2.jpg. If so, it violates the license by failing to link to the original work. Brianjd (talk) 05:28, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Kallerna as uploader of Viking Grace Turku 2.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete in the absence of permission from Lloyds (unlikely) this is simply a copyright violation. Herby talk thyme 12:32, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader is a non-profit foundation that holds the archive of the Lloyds Register, so it's clearly not a copyvio. VRT from the uploader would of course resolve this very quickly.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:45, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - no confirmation (as required by COM:Username policy) that the uploader is actually an authorized official of the Foundation. The verious images contained are not freely licensed and it is very unlikely that the publisher of the book as the right to freely license them. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality fictional symbol Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 11:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo design possibly above the threshold of originality. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I will upload a new file in here. Kurmanbek (talk) 07:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: The "new file" mentioned above seems to be Teyit logo (2022).svg, which is already the redirection target of Teyit logo.svg. I assume Kurmanbek intends to move Teyit logo (2022).svg to Teyit logo.svg, which would meet the G6. Uncontroversial maintenance speedy deletion criterion. TilmannR (talk) 09:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi TilmannR, yes I want to move. Kurmanbek (talk) 09:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality fictional symbol Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 11:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality fictional symbol Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 11:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality fictional symbol Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 11:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Явно подложная лицензия. Фотография 1860-1862 года никак не может быть собственной работой её загрузившего. 2) Ввиду неуказания источника никак нельзя установить факт того, что фотография находится в общественном достоянии. Jim Hokins (talk) 22:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Я не утверждала, что работа собственная. Это мой скан старой фотографии. В чём проблема? Вы что не видите, что это старая фотография? Действительно примерно 1860-1862 годов. Но скан мой. Забава Путятишна (talk) 01:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Так что нет никакой "подложной лицензии". Забава Путятишна (talk) 01:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Эту лицензию мне автоматически подсунула Википедия. Я исправила. Это скан старой фотографии. Забава Путятишна (talk) 01:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Источник: Архив Васильевых-Шиловских Забава Путятишна (talk) 01:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
И что теперь? Где дискуссии? Почему молчание? Вы пришли, написали что-то, отправили на удаление, вам ответили, всё предоставили. Что вас теперь не устраивает? Хотите можете обратиться к владельцу фотографии, который предоставил мне эту фотографию для сканирования и размещения в Википедии. Забава Путятишна (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: corrected. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is not in public domain, it is protected by copyright law Забава Путятишна (talk) 15:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Image from Russian Empire, Soviet Russia has no claim to previous copyrights. --RAN (talk) 03:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This photograph is in the private collection of S. Shilovsky’s descendants. The rescan was made by me from original scan taken by one of the descendants. Image added by me. A private photograph cannot be in any public domain. I want to remove it at the request of the copyright holders. Moreover, it is not used on any Wikipedia page. The copyright holders did not like the license, which was put forward not by me, but by one of the Wikimedia participants. For this reason, the photo is now on the site, where it is an object of commercial use.
    And I don’t understand what Soviet Russia and the ownership of this photograph have in common. Забава Путятишна (talk) 15:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Please stop adding all these licenses because they are unfair.
    This photograph, together with the owners of the photograph, was located on the territory of the Polish Republic in the city of Lublin, and not in the Russian Federation. No one made or posted this scan from the territory of the Russian Federation. Just as now, this photograph is not located on the territory of the Russian Federation. Therefore, the license you specified does not apply to this photo. Забава Путятишна (talk) 15:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. We have no evidence of publication, publication date and place. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:21, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From government website; PD tag does not apply to photos. Renata3 (talk) 05:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; did a universal replace with File:Algirdas Brazauskas 1998.jpg. holly {chat} 22:15, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/ibna.ir

[edit]

Source site footer only says All rights reserved. Using the site content with mentioning the source is allowed., which is insufficient for Commons:Licensing (unclear whether this licence is perpetual, covers derivative work, etc).

Belbury (talk) 11:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/ibna.ir

[edit]

Source site footer (All rights reserved. Using the site content with mentioning the source is allowed.) is insufficient for Commons:Licensing - it is unclear whether this licence is perpetual, covers derivative work, etc.

Belbury (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant with File:Apple-eMac-FL.jpg; not actually transparent (would need to be a GIF or PNG.) David Fuchs (talk) 13:40, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:18, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely Flickrwashing. Low-res version of image available on the web at higher quality (i.e. https://mikegil.com/2012/05/20/back-in-french-polynesia-for-the-summer/). Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the given data-use policy specifically states that DSS is copyrightː http://archive.stsci.edu/data_use.html Lithopsian (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DSS is copyrightː http://archive.stsci.edu/data_use.html Lithopsian (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; universally replaced with File:NGC 1502 AOFPK.jpg. holly {chat} 22:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Deadstar as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source has no info on this image, states "Possible portrait of EGERIA". Source also does not state licence given here. Yann (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please also include file File:EXERIA.jpg which is a larger version of the same image (which is the only information given on the file) -- Deadstar (msg) 22:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's a Fayum portrait ([5], p. 409). One2 (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-waaaaaaay old. holly {chat} 22:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official logos, not own works and above COM:TOO P 1 9 9   17:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having reviewed the linked threshold of originality guidelines for Canada, I would argue that the work meets the requirement that the product of the "author's skill and judgement" beyond "a purely mechanical exercise." The 1973, 1988, and 1998 logos are all derived from photos I took of streetsigns with the old logos. I then edited and colour corrected the photos to recreate the designs in a digital format. The 2021 logo is not present on many signs yet so I only applied the editing and colour correction to an existing digital file. Admittedly, the processing on the 2021 logo could reasonably be considered a "mechanical exercise" as it required far less work than the other three. I would be open to deletion because of the 2021 logo's presence, but would like clarification about whether the other three logos meet or exceed the TOO. If deletion is recommended, I would like to re-upload these three on their own. DarkLanternBrigadier (talk) 11:43, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a collection of, albeit modified, copyright works. The threshold of originality still means you need to start from nothing, not take someone else's work and modify it in a non-insignificant way. Canterbury Tail (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). Wrong license, looks like the file is {{PD-Pakistan}} but would be just after the URAA date for Pakistan. Abzeronow (talk) 17:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ugh, we missed this by nine days and now we have to wait unti 2042. holly {chat} 23:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original logo of ASD Canosa, no indication about a free release — danyele 20:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no way this meets COM:TOO Italy. holly {chat} 23:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally tagged by Ciell as Copyvio and the most recent rational was: YT license review failed: derivative work, design clothing portrayed in a video interview

it shouldnt. She is a designer. She is being interviewed. She knows the photographer owns the photos. She shows her work. This is certainly not grounds for a speedy deletion. It MAY be for a deletion but Speedy if for the obvious copyvio and this isnt Victuallers (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The images of the design clothing in the video are not explicitly under a free license, and therefore per Commons:NETCOPYVIO not included in the free license that the YT video is under - especially because she is not the owner of the copyrights on the YT video, but merely the interviewee. Ciell (talk) 11:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos rather than data display in Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India (group of several images, out of 12 863)

[edit]

how do we know that "b. Data that the data provider(s) is not authorized to license, that is data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive;" exclusion is not applying? That is why GODL requires license to be clearly marked - because without that omnipotence is required to know whether this (or some other exclusion) is applying

Also, it is an invalid license use, claimed license is for data (including graphic representation of data) - not for photos. See "“Data” means a representation of information4, numerical compilations and observations, documents, facts, maps, images, charts, tables and figures, concepts in digital and/or analog form, and includes metadata,5 that is all information about data, and/or clarificatory notes provided by data provider(s), without which the data concerned cannot be interpreted or used.6" in license text

see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Media_in_Category:Unreviewed_photos_of_GODL-India for failed attempt to mass delete everything in category in one go

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 05:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these images are from the official twitter account of the Indian Army. The copyright policy of the Indian Army website is here [6] The twitter account, using logic, is an extension of the website. Akk7a (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The other images are from the Indian Navy website [7] and should probably be using the template {{Indian navy}}. Akk7a (talk) 13:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright policy of the Indian Army website start from "Material featured on this site" so it does not apply to Twitter. Also, not sure about "This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." restriction anyway Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Akk7a: Are you aware of any policy applying to their Twitter postings? What you linked starts from "Material featured on this site" - is there anything covering Twitter there? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{Indian navy}} is quite confusing - is it applying to all materials produced by Indian Navy? Some subset? Publications on some websites like indiannavy.nic.in? Is it overriding "© Since 1999. All Rights Reserved." in footer of for example https://indiannavy.nic.in/node/27254 ? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Akk7a: Do you have any idea to what {{Indian navy}} can be applied? I would help with it but I have no idea at all to which content it is applicable. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mateusz Konieczny and Akk7a, it applies to "work[s] created by the Indian Navy and [] present at https://indiannavy.nic.in/, so the works needs to be made by the Indian Navy and present at https://indiannavy.nic.in/ to qualify. And this overrules any "All rights reserved" footnote. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the licensing with a "data" license is incorrect. The images from website indian navy can be kept according to the discussion and the VRT ticket. The other images are deleted as the source is a twitter account or other indian government websites. --Ellywa (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logos/insignia apparently excluded by claimed license

[edit]

Claimed license does not apply AT ALL. Note that "c. Names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s); (...) e. Military insignia;" are explicitly excluded and not covered by this license.

Also, it is an invalid license use, claimed license is for data (including graphic representation of data) - not for photos. See "“Data” means a representation of information4, numerical compilations and observations, documents, facts, maps, images, charts, tables and figures, concepts in digital and/or analog form, and includes metadata,5 that is all information about data, and/or clarificatory notes provided by data provider(s), without which the data concerned cannot be interpreted or used.6" in license text

And how do we know that "b. Data that the data provider(s) is not authorized to license, that is data that is non-shareable and/or sensitive;" exclusion is not applying? That is why GODL requires license to be clearly marked - because without that omnipotence is required to know whether this (or some other exclusion) is applying

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Help:VisualFileChange.js updated this page instead of creating new one. Let me know if that was a misuse of that tool (still, likely better than a new separate entry for every single image with the same reason) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for File:BRICS India 2021 logo.svg - The logo is a simple geometrical shapes and text and thus is below COM:TOO / COM:TOO India threshold. As such it should be updated to PD-logo license and a better quality version from [8] be uploaded. I haven't checked other files, but will do so in a couple of days -- DaxServer (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hallo, ich habe jetzt gerade erst bemerkt, dass ich beim Hochladen die falsche Lizenz gewählt habe. Das Bild ist nicht CC BY-SA 4.0, sondern CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 und darf ja somit hier nicht verwendet werden. Daher bitte löschen. Habe mittlerweile ein Bild gefunden, dass verwendet werden darf und das werde ich demnächst hochladen. Bernhard Rieger (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hallo, ich habe jetzt gerade erst bemerkt, dass ich beim Hochladen die falsche Lizenz gewählt habe. Das Bild ist nicht CC BY-SA 4.0, sondern CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 und darf ja somit hier nicht verwendet werden. Daher bitte löschen. Habe mittlerweile ein Bild gefunden, dass verwendet werden darf und das werde ich demnächst hochladen. Bernhard Rieger (talk) 21:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robe070 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PORN, too shaky and low quality to be of any use. The subject is also poorly groomed with dirty-looking nails, a highly visible bandage, and excess body hair; this is distracting and makes the video unappealing to watch

Dronebogus (talk) 22:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can appreciate how the issues you listed could be distracting when considering the video from a purely aesthetic viewpoint. I too notice the damaged and dirty-looking nail and the bandage placed on the power centre each time I look at the video. As for the hair, that is very subjective and for a Caucasian it is perfectly normal. Its is not provided to be attractive to anyone from a beauty perspective. And yes its shaky. Difficult to keep still when you are having an orgasm. But I say these issues are not important. Its a demonstration of a rarely seen event - a man having an orgasm and not ejaculating. Its evidence to support that its possible.
A person who can sense energy in a person will be able to feel what is happening in the video and understand the truth of it.
And its not intended as porn. Its educational.
And only one of the videos has the beauty issues - File:Male Full Body Non-Ejaculatory Orgasm.webm. The other is fine. Robe070 (talk) 22:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus I looked at the videos after reading this DR, but didn’t even notice the nails. Presumably the bandage is there for medical reasons and the hair is natural; what you are really saying is that you don’t want certain types of people featured in Commons videos, which is a really disturbing comment. And if you don’t recognise these things as normal, that might actually be a reason to keep at least one of these files.
I make no comments on the quality of the videos themselves, as I generally do not look at videos and am therefore not able to compare these videos to others. Brianjd (talk) 12:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not saying I have any problems with “certain types” of people; admittedly the body hair thing might be a personal preference. I still think the subject could have waited until the minor injury had healed and done something about the nail. Dronebogus (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and per COM:Nuditiy, there exists a sufficient number of such films on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]