Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/09/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Very poor quality from mass upload. Better images available in Category:Wasserturm (Ahaweg, Karlsruhe). Sitacuisses (talk) 01:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
This image is so unclear that it is useless. It is likely also a copyright violation. Steelkamp (talk) 04:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Bad quality collage wihout educational use Drakosh (talk) 05:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 05:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Globbook Logos
[edit]crosswiki spam. Self-promo. Deletion per: Wikidata:Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#User_:_Bovlb_Deleted_Our_Wikidata_Page
Estopedist1 (talk) 06:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE as "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text".
Lord Belbury (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
no es interesante Egdaly (talk) 04:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Vano111ru (talk) 06:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Clearly a selfie out of scope and claiming to be the Duke of "The Duchy of Nakulugamuwa" Pierre cb (talk) 13:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Selfie out-of-scope Pierre cb (talk) 13:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by VateGV as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The artist died in 1956 (less than 70 years). Check also the other files imported by this user. Yann (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
I AM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER AND THIS ENTRY IS NOT AUTHORISED. IT IS ALSO A REGISTERED TRADEMARK AND A REGISTERED DESIGN Sunburntflagowner (talk) 03:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete That seems very definitive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: personal images.
MKFI (talk) 11:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Content is outside COM:SCOPE and the multiple weblinks to anankafasteners.com (which matches the uploader's username) in the pdf indicate this is merely an attempt to drive traffic to that website. If any of this text were needed anywhere, it should be text not a PDF file. Marbletan (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by U.ANNADURAI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files (CV, certifications, etc.) outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has no other contributions.
- File:FINITE GROUPS.pdf
- File:SSLC CERTIFICATE.pdf
- File:Other backward class certificate.pdf
- File:Anna graph.pdf
- File:Resume of Prof.U.Annadurai.pdf
- File:Teaching and work experiences of Prof.U.Annadurai.pdf
Marbletan (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
unused file. Crosswiki spam. Deleted from Wikidata Estopedist1 (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ROCK EN CARTAGENA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal doodles
Enyavar (talk) 13:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. - Jmabel ! talk 14:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Porque lo subi por error SegurosSURA uy (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & OOS. --Achim55 (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear DW by Flickr photographer. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
video doesn't work YitzhakNat (talk) 04:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted image with no proof of ownership, no metadata, user's only contribution. This image keeps appearing, irritatingly (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michelle Rowland MP.jpg) Neegzistuoja (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, same image as previously deleted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Caricato per errore Massimo Veneziano (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Errore di caricamento Massimo Veneziano (talk) 19:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, the image is owned by the Afghanistan Cricket Board but here it says that there is a Creative Commons license, which there isn’t. Hamza Ali Shah (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Last remaining files from this user. I just deleted over a dozen copyvios they uploaded; given that track record and the lack of metadata, I'm guessing these are as well.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, hosted @ imgur since 2 years. --Achim55 (talk) 09:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Bastiantiamo (talk) 01:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, LTA user blocked indef. --Achim55 (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Source mentioned doesn't come under Creative Commons Licence Rejoy2003 13:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:43, 14 September 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: Copy of https://www.timebulletin.com/meet-with-umair-ali-mudassar-khan-the-youngest-successful-entrepreneur-of-pakistan-2021/amp/ --Krdbot 13:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
This is a copyrighted photo which has been cropped without permission from the copyright owner. The original photo shows that there were five members but has been altered to fit the narrative that they are now a four-member group. Alpaca87 (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a copyrighted photo as you can see in the image description. This is not an adequate deletion justification. Nkon21 (talk) 08:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason for deletion. You don't need a permission to crop. --Achim55 (talk) 12:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --✗plicit 12:36, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Photo taken by YG Entertainment, not Korea.net, thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Per the VRT ticket. Nkon21 (talk) 22:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Big Bang wins MTV EMA award (6324393625).jpg (cropped content). --Wdwd (talk) 10:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry photo, which can be replaced by File:Hongqiao Art Centre.webp now. Lt2818 (talk) 12:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AudeCathare (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. One is duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AudeCathare
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. One is duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. AudeCathare (talk) 17:11, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AudeCathare
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. One is duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. AudeCathare (talk) 17:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope - unused logo. Lymantria (talk) 17:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion by non contributor Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion by non contributor Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. 2001:4451:82BB:7100:55DC:E790:D622:E92 00:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused joke image by a non-contributer. No categorization, only description is "dsdsdsds". El Grafo (talk) 12:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, and I suppose the tiny image of a pizza this is based on is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. El Grafo (talk) 12:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mousumibasak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files (homework assignments, essays, etc.) outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader has no other contributions.
- File:Proposal.edited (1).pdf
- File:Dissertation 28000.pdf
- File:Nursing.pdf
- File:DISMANTLED CAR PARTS.pdf
- File:250 words essay - role of information technology.pdf
- File:500 word technology (1) (1).pdf
Marbletan (talk) 13:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cinematerra (talk · contribs)
[edit]First: part of an advertising. Second: fake license, logo and posters of the theater can't be own or free.
- File:Аукцион.png
- File:Водевиль "Актер".png
- File:Труппа театра "В главных ролях".png
- File:Афиша 2.png
- File:Афиша 1.png
- File:OYps9K YpOLlNUhbPghgJUiKbLTBQBkcS5j2iKlBy7FrFmlS5PCNUQHPsHmH2puEmbOwLDqzW1DA6yC8OVNLFEs9.jpg
Bilderling (talk) 13:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Среднегодовые реальные темпы прироста ВРП ригонов Узбекистана.jpg
- File:Разрыв между максимальным и минимальным значениеями ВРП на душу населения в регионах Узбекистана.jpg
- File:Изменение территориальной структуры ВВП.jpg
- File:Региональные темпы.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:9° caida libre 1 al 10.jpg
- File:9° caida libre 21 al 30.jpg
- File:9° caida libre 11 al 20.jpg
- File:9° caida libre 41al 50.jpg
- File:Hidrostática del 41 al 60.jpg
- File:11 hidrostatica de 61 a 70.jpg
- File:FIS caida libre problemados.jpg
- File:Física caída libre problemaonce.jpg
- File:9° FIS caida libre 1 PG.jpg
- File:11FIS energía mecánica pregunta 9.jpg
- File:11FIS energía mecánica pregunta 8.jpg
- File:11FIS energía mecánica pregunta 4.jpg
- File:11FIS energía mecánica pregunta 3.jpg
- File:11AFIS DINAMICA PROB 5.jpg
- File:Dinamica 3 11ro preg 3.png
- File:Dinamica 3 11ro preg 1.png
- File:Dinamica 3 11ro preg 2.png
- File:Dinamica 3 11ro preg 5.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of jpg I uploaded ShadZ01 (talk) 04:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 1
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Nepal: non-free (2010) statue.
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev.jpg
- File:Kailesh nath maadev.jpg
- File:Lord Shiva.jpg
- File:Sanga Mahadev Ritesh 1.JPG
- File:Sanga Mahadev Ritesh 2.JPG
- File:Tallest mahadev.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Can any one suggest me is there any solution for this? What if I obtain any letter from the owner of the statue? is there any format of such letter? -Krish Dulal (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- This would be appreciated, however the permission to freely license these photos should be obtained from the sculptor (author) of the statue, not from the owner. Please follow the guidelines at COM:OTRS. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 2
[edit]See prior discussion. Unveiled in 1992 and built/designed by Kamal Jain, CEO of Hilltake Group of Companies. Lest Nepal's copyright law is changed to allow commercial use of images of copyrighted artistic works without artists' prior authorization.
- File:Beautiful view of lord shiva.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 02.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 03.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 04.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 05.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 06.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 07.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 08.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 09.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 10.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 11.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 12.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 13.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 14.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 15.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 16.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 17.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 21.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 22.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 23.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 24.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 25.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 26.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 29.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 30.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 31.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 32.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 33.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 36.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 37.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 38.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 39.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 40.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 44.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 45.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 46.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue Nepal.JPG
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue-02.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue.jpg
- File:Kailashnath, Sanga.jpg
- File:Left view of shiva.jpg
- File:Sanga Downwards.jpg
- File:Sanga mahade.jpg
- File:Sanga mahadeb.JPG
- File:SangaShivji.jpg
- File:Shiva Idol in Sanga, Kavre.jpg
- File:Shiva Statue from behind - Flickr - anantal.jpg
- File:Shiva Statue in Sanga.jpg
- File:Shiva Statue in Sangha.jpg
- File:Shiva11.jpg
- File:Shivaji in Sangha.jpg
- File:The highest Shiva idol (183 ft)--At Sanga, Kathmandu, Nepal- 2014-05-30 11-48.jpeg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue
[edit]The statue was completed in 2010. There is no freedom of panorama in Nepal, permission from the creator is needed as he/she is unlikely to be dead for 50 years.
- File:Family of shiva.jpg
- File:Front view of Shiva of Nepal.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev 01.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev 02.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 01.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 20.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 27.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 28.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 41.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 42.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 43.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 47.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 48.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 20171125 165423 49.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue at Sanga.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue.jpg
- File:Sanga Mahadev Ritesh 3.JPG
- File:Shiva Sanga.jpg
- File:Shiva Sanga1.jpg
- File:Shiva Sanga2.jpg
- File:Shiva Sanga4.jpg
- File:Shiva Sanga5.jpg
- File:Shiva Statue on Sanga - Flickr - anantal (1).jpg
- File:Shiva Statue on Sanga - Flickr - anantal.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. For those that might be COM:DM, the other subjects are out of COM:Scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue
[edit]Not OK per COM:FOP Nepal
- File:Kailashnath Har Har Mahadev.jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev (Sanga).jpg
- File:Kailashnath Mahadev 09.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 01.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 02.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 06.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 07.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 08.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 09.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 10.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 11.jpg
- File:Sanga Shiva 12.jpg
- File:Sanga Tallest Shiva.jpg
- File:Sanga with largest statue of nepal.jpg
— Tulsi 24x7 06:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per the nominator. These images clearly aren't PD. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 09:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 09:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Les auxiliaires (talk · contribs)
[edit]A bunch of differnt images, all flagged as "CC-BY self" some quite old, which appears to be professional, some have watemarks from the "Maghreb Arabe Press" (MAP) so I doubt the licenses
- File:Guard provincial, section d'intervention.jpg
- File:Intervention forces auxiliaires.jpg
- File:Les.auxiliaires.21.jpg
- File:Gondarmerie.Royal.maroc.png
- File:Photo de élément des forces auxiliaires.jpg
- File:Élément des forces auxiliaires.jpg
- File:Mosaid des forces auxiliares.jpg
- File:Mokhazeni des forces auxiliaires 1970.jpg
- File:Mokhazeni des forces auxiliaires.jpg
- File:Défilé militaire des forces auxiliaires.jpg
- File:Forces auxiliaires 1962 a rabat.jpg
- File:Élément de forces auxiliaire de la guerre des sables.jpg
- File:Forces auxiliiares Guerre des Sables.jpg
- File:Mokhazni de l'indépendance Rabat - 1957.jpg
- File:ARM Académie Royale Militaire.png
- File:Grades des forces auxiliaires.jpg
- File:F.a.2019.jpg
- File:Leseleves.mokhzeni.jpg
- File:Cfpfa.eleves.mokhazeni.jpg
- File:F.a.mokhazeni.jpg
- File:F.A.Mokhazenis.jpg
Avron (talk) 10:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Barcroft45 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal digital artwork collection. Images are not used on any Wikipedia project. COM:NOTWEBHOST.
- File:The Robot Progression by Soriano.png
- File:Matisse Style Line Drawing by Soriano.png
- File:Signs of Things to Come.png
- File:Pop Art 2022 Side-View Mirror.png
- File:Simple Still Life.png
- File:Cubism 2022 Composite Man.png
- File:Psychedelic Surrealism Mundane Monkey (Soriano Style).jpg
- File:Psychedelic Surrealism by Soriano.png
- File:Psychedelic Pop Art Angel Overlook.png
- File:Machine Learning by Soriano.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 17:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, most of these images are too abstract to be useful for illustrating the topics they claim to depict. For example, it would be impossible to tell that File:Machine Learning by Soriano.png is supposed to depict machine learning if it wasn't captioned so. Whilst it could be argued that these files could be useful for illustrating the concepts of abstract art, cubism or surrealism, Commons already has hundreds of artworks from all of these three genres, most of them being higher quality than these. Weak keep File:Psychedelic Surrealism Mundane Monkey (Soriano Style).jpg, File:Psychedelic Surrealism by Soriano.png and File:Psychedelic Pop Art Angel Overlook.png, as Commons' collection of psychedelic art is not quite as extensive as its collections of cubism or surrealism (the main psychedelic art category contains less than hundred files). Chiolite (talk) 04:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Unintentional breach of copyright Gabriel trzy (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Unintentional breach of copyright Gabriel trzy (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Unintentional breach of copyright Gabriel trzy (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Unintentional breach of copyright Gabriel trzy (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
This image is a copyvio, it saids its under "PD-Cuba" when this was made in 2006-2012 (source:https://www.caimito.gob.cu/es/simbolos-provinciales/7046-escudo-caimito) CubanoBoi (talk) 21:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Also the image File:Bandera de Caimito, Cuba.svg is the same file but in a cyan background. CubanoBoi (talk) 21:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete And here you are, uploading derivatives of likely not PD works such as this one... Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs)
04:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC) - @Flagvisioner yes I agree you can take those at the time I didn’t know CubanoBoi (talk) 12:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete And here you are, uploading derivatives of likely not PD works such as this one... Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![21 File:"Bushmills" advertisement, Belfast - geograph.org.uk - 2622385.jpg](#File:"Bushmills"_advertisement,_Belfast_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2622385.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![138 File:"Esso Blue" advertisement near Lisburn - geograph.org.uk - 2366471.jpg](#File:"Esso_Blue"_advertisement_near_Lisburn_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2366471.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Aarhus_-_Denmark_(51464551122).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![02:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/13#c-A1Cafel-20220913023800-File:"Bushmills"_advertisement,_Belfast_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2622385.jpg){kind=link}
![19:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/13#c-Infrogmation-20220913193000-File:"Bushmills"_advertisement,_Belfast_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2622385.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
--At_Sanga,_Kathmandu,_Nepal-_2014-05-30_11-48.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Replaced by higher quality "File:C 24 GIJON CENTRO.jpg". No remaining uses of PNG image in Wikipedia nor Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MGeog2022 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Replaced by higher quality "File:C 24 GIJON ESTE.jpg". No remaining uses of PNG image in Wikipedia nor Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MGeog2022 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MGeog2022 as duplicate (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F8|year=2022|month=09|day=13
Converted to regular DR to allwo for discussion as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 18:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Túrelio and Jeff G.: sorry, I'm new to Wikimedia Commons, and I don't know very much about deletion processes. In summary, I uploaded that 7 files some weeks ago, in PNG format with quite low image quality. Yesterday I uploaded the same 7 images, but now in JPEG format, which allowed far better quality. I updated all existing references in Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, from the old PNG to the new JPEG images. I removed all cathegories from old images and assigned the same cathegories to the new ones. It's easy to verify that the 7 PNG images now have no use at all in Wikipedia, Commons or any other wiki, they belong to no cathegories, and they have much lower quality (when viewed at full resolution) than the new JPEG images. I don't have much time available, and I feel I don't have enough experience in Commons to take part in a complex deletion procedure. I hope that what I have told here could be enough to allow for speedy deletion of the PNGs as duplicates; if that's not the case, please tell me what I have to do (for example, write a confirmation for each image?; I didn't think at all that the deletion process was so complex). Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks in advance. MGeog2022 (talk) 19:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. Declining speedy-deletion does not equal "no deletion". Files may well be deleted, especially as you now presented a sound rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Thank you very much :-) MGeog2022 (talk) 20:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. Declining speedy-deletion does not equal "no deletion". Files may well be deleted, especially as you now presented a sound rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:OVIEDO ESTE.png
- File:OVIEDO CENTRO.png
- File:OVIEDO OESTE.png
- File:GIJON CENTRO.png
- File:GIJON SUR.png
- File:GIJON OESTE.png
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Replaced by higher quality "File:C 24 GIJON OESTE.jpg". No remaining uses of PNG image in Wikipedia nor Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MGeog2022 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Replaced by higher quality "File:C 24 GIJON SUR.jpg". No remaining uses of PNG image in Wikipedia nor Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MGeog2022 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Replaced by higher quality "File:C 44 OVIEDO CENTRO.jpg". No remaining uses of PNG image in Wikipedia nor Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MGeog2022 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Replaced by higher quality "File:C 44 OVIEDO ESTE.jpg". No remaining uses of PNG image in Wikipedia nor Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MGeog2022 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Replaced by higher quality "File:C 44 OVIEDO OESTE.jpg". No remaining uses of PNG image in Wikipedia nor Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MGeog2022 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
This file contains information of myself as well as a photo which I did not consent to. I would like this removed 41.150.34.6 09:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Also not very notable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 14:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 93.148.93.86 as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep unless evidence of copyvio can be found. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence provided. --Strakhov (talk) 14:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
This seems to be a widely used stock image (eg [1]); dubious claim of own work by a single-use account El Grafo (talk) 12:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 14:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Text-only file, not in use, out of scope as excluded educational content. Chiolite (talk) 14:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 14:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Collage of unsourced photos. (Note: Not the same as any of the 3 previous deleted photos uploaded under the same name.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
The image is what has been plagiarized from personal blog(http://vege.way-nifty.com/vegetable/2020/03/post-f035c7.html https://vege.way-nifty.com/photos/uncategorized/9592.jpg). Daraku K. (talk) 21:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- understood. I'll turn it off. 安結野 凛 (talk) 04:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Not only simple geometric shapes or text. Yann (talk) 15:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The image claims to be {{PD-textlogo}}, but the lion is not a simple shape. Without a license for the lion, the image does not belong on Commons. Glrx (talk) 22:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As I posted at COM:VPC#Smithmore Castle logo, the lion imagery seems too complex to be {{PD-logo}} per COM:TOO United States which means COM:CONSENT is probably needed for this to be kept. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Apparently, these files are works by José de Zamora (1889-1971). Not in the public domain yet, permission from copyright owner needed (artist's heirs, presumably). Contacting COM:VRT suggested. If permission not provided, undelete in 2052.
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (19).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (16).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (17).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (15).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (13).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (12).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (11).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (10).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (9).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (8).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (7).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (6).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (4).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (5).jpg
- File:Pepito Zamora, un artista de revista. Museo de Sitges 2022. (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Strakhov (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination . —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for artworks in the US Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 09:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 13:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable persons, self-promotion only George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 23:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Per COMMONS:PORN, this low-quality file does nothing to improve our collection of either Second Life erotica or zoophilia illustrations. Dronebogus (talk) 22:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep These are not real images of zoophilia and are not explicit depictions of zoophilia. These are also not low quality, in particular given the common resolutions in computers at the time of the upload. So Commnons has an grand total of 5 images related with zoophilia in second life and yet you nominate all 5 to deletion? For several reasons, this grand total of five images is also the grand total images of zoophilia in contemporary art or culture that could be reasonably expected to hosted legally by Wikimedia Commons Tm (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- But is “zoophilia in Second Life” something we will, realistically speaking, ever have a need to illustrate? Is modern zoophile art enough of a notable topic that we need to have examples? Dronebogus (talk) 01:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes and yes. Tm (talk) 13:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- How so? Dronebogus (talk) 16:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- As i said above and the 58 articles in different languages. Tm (talk) 15:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- How so? Dronebogus (talk) 16:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes and yes. Tm (talk) 13:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- But is “zoophilia in Second Life” something we will, realistically speaking, ever have a need to illustrate? Is modern zoophile art enough of a notable topic that we need to have examples? Dronebogus (talk) 01:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It's art, it's not a real situation, not prohibited by law. --34 super héros (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- The issue here isn’t legality. It’s whether the image is out of scope due to being low-quality amateur porn that doesn’t significantly improve the collection of images on its subject. Dronebogus (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I nominated the pictures in part because there seemed to be an uncontroversial precedent that all the pictures in this series were OOS per COMMONS:PORN. See:
Dronebogus (talk) 16:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- I feel like nobody is going to choose these images to represent modern zoophilia culture over something comparatively tasteful like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeta_toy_MMB_01.jpg, and the same goes for illustrating sexual lifestyles in Second Life. Dronebogus (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- A photo of an rubber (?) dildo of a wolf pennis is not a good representation of zoophilia and worst than this one. Also an photo of an real dildo of a wolf pennis is not more "tastefull" than an image of virtual zoophilia. Tm (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Zoophilia doesn’t mean bestiality, even if it is commonly used that way. The image represents zoophilia because it’s an object designed to appeal to zoophiles. It’s more tasteful because it’s just an unrealistically colored object photographed reasonably well and not crudely made 3D pornography. Dronebogus (talk) 10:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- They might be a slight difference yet zoophiles (desire) commit bestiality (act) or do want to engage in bestiality and itb was you that started talking of "zoophilia illustrations". The virtual representation is much better and "tastefull" than a image of an crude rubbery imitation\dildo of a wolfs pennis. Or, as you speak about taste, much, much more usefull and tastefull than some of your uploads of, in my opinion, crudly designed drawings like File:Wikipe-tan Nude.png, badly redrawing of human genitalia in the otherwise good drawing in File:Wiki-trans-cis lesbian sex.png. Tm (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Zoophilia doesn’t mean bestiality, even if it is commonly used that way. The image represents zoophilia because it’s an object designed to appeal to zoophiles. It’s more tasteful because it’s just an unrealistically colored object photographed reasonably well and not crudely made 3D pornography. Dronebogus (talk) 10:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- A photo of an rubber (?) dildo of a wolf pennis is not a good representation of zoophilia and worst than this one. Also an photo of an real dildo of a wolf pennis is not more "tastefull" than an image of virtual zoophilia. Tm (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- I feel like nobody is going to choose these images to represent modern zoophilia culture over something comparatively tasteful like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeta_toy_MMB_01.jpg, and the same goes for illustrating sexual lifestyles in Second Life. Dronebogus (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ad hominem, plus the second example didn’t even look like what it was supposed to look like! It was initially just airbrushed out! Dronebogus (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- You were the one that started talking about wolf pennis, not me, as better examples of zoophilia and it was you that started talking about tastefulness of images or lack of it, so the examples of some of your uploads are completly relevant to the case in point], a mere comment to show that will you continuously comment about tastefulness, some of your uploads are with it, and so your words about taste are wrong, as these uploads by you show it. So my comments about your uploads were not ad hominem and your attempts to hide this text as "personal opinions about wolf dildos and ad hominem, irrelevant to debate" is clearly wrong. Tm (talk) 13:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Taste is a matter of personal opinion, that’s why I was dropping the subject. I don’t care about wolf dick either and don’t think it’s relevant at this point. Dronebogus (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- You were the one that started talking about wolf pennis, not me, as better examples of zoophilia and it was you that started talking about tastefulness of images or lack of it, so the examples of some of your uploads are completly relevant to the case in point], a mere comment to show that will you continuously comment about tastefulness, some of your uploads are with it, and so your words about taste are wrong, as these uploads by you show it. So my comments about your uploads were not ad hominem and your attempts to hide this text as "personal opinions about wolf dildos and ad hominem, irrelevant to debate" is clearly wrong. Tm (talk) 13:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept, per Tm. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
This has previously been nominated for deletion on grounds of COM:SCOPE, but nobody seems to have done an analysis on the copyright of this image. The image is copyrightable and, while the screenshot was licensed on Flickr (though the page is no longer available), there is no evidence that the uploader of that screenshot designed the artwork for the dog and each of the women. And I think that this image contains copyrighted works (such as the design for the dog and for the two women) that are greater than de minimus. As such, I believe that this file should be deleted as a two-dimensional depiction of non-free three-dimensional copyrighted works. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I’m unsure about the copyright situation but I stand by my original stance that this will never be used educationally and is extremely w:wp:gratutious. Dronebogus (talk) 22:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 02:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I can't see any indiction that UPROXX's videos are licensed CC-BY, not on the video itself or anywhere on the channel. reppoptalk 20:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded by SPA, unlikely Own work. Higher resolution image (https://www.vesti-online.com/i-tito-je-voleo-dzez/) assigned to Darko Ćirkov. Also complaint in ticket:2022090910000185 Ankry (talk) 11:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: published elsewhere before upload to commons; speedied. --Ankry (talk) 22:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
This image is not in public domain. My reserch shows Aimee Schweig died in 1987, so their work is still under copyright WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
I can't imagine that the commons user is the creator of this photo. Therefore the used CC license is to be doubted. Mosbatho (talk) 19:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused private photo of non-notable person, personal resume and self-promotion George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Original research flowchart that in not used anywhere. Uploaded by a user blocked at enwiki for promoting CIA conspiracy theories and blockchain technology. Also includes unsourced images which are likely copyright violations. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: No valid purpose for an encylopedia, created entirely to promote their elaborate scheme which is supposed to make carbon credits even more complex than they already are, and would infringe the right to privacy that all trees are endowed with. Ok, maybe not the last one. There's plenty enough ideas to save the planet, and plenty of ideas for uses of blockchain and weird cryptocurrencies, but adding two cool ideas together does not equal a 'mega-cool' idea, it just equals original research.
- Mako001 (talk) 12:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
per EXIF-data, author is Diana Unt. VRT-permission is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 05:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal pictures.
- File:Mike Wilen Wall Street Journal.jpg
- File:Mike Wilen Business Awards.jpg
- File:Fox News Mike Wilen Super Bowl Special.jpg
- File:Mike Wilen David Copperfield.jpg
- File:Mike Wilen.jpg
- File:Trig The Optimus.jpg
Lymantria (talk) 08:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author JUAN RODRIGO LLAGUNO". VRT permission from Juan Rodrigo Llaguno needed. MKFI (talk) 11:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Copyright holder 2021 AFL Photos". MKFI (talk) 11:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author Gavin Morein". VRT permission from Gavin Morein needed. MKFI (talk) 11:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
"taken by Laura Flanneru": VRT permission from Laura Flanneru needed. MKFI (talk) 11:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Helvetica.HouseElf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artwork by living artist, taken from http://www.davidchatt.com/ which has "All rights reserved" copyright disclaimer on subpages. Photograph is unlikely to be own work. VRT permission from David Chatt needed.
- File:108 Meditations in Saffron.png
- File:If She Knew You Were Coming.png
- File:1982, David Chatt.png
- File:Cast Bowls.png
- File:Scizzors.Pen.png
- File:ScizzorsPen.jpg
- File:1.LoveLetters1.jpg
- File:David Chatt Biography Photo.jpg
MKFI (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a table on a wiki page (possibly an old version of en:Mobile telephone numbering in India). Unused, pointless, and for some reason the uploader seems to think people would pay them to use it - apparently did not understand the terms of the CC license they attached to it. El Grafo (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheRandomEntity (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are newspaper cuttings unlikely to be the sole own work of the uploader.
- File:Battle of the bands newpaper.jpg
- File:Off da streets announcement newpaper.jpg
- File:Black history month newpaper.jpg
- File:Benj competition newpaper article.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BIHARBHARAT (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these images are claimed to be own work, but the claim is rather suspect. The uploader has made that claim for works that are clearly not their own work such as this postage stamp. File:Bindeshwari Prasad Verma.jpg is tiny and distorted, and likely cropped from a web page. File:WAP 7 ,Barauni.jpg is the same image as this but with the author watermark credit cropped out from the bottom. File:BJU WAP 7.jpg is the same image as this with the copyright notice cropped out from the bottom. The uploader didn't do a very good job on the crop. If you look at the full size image and go to the bottom, the top of the watermark is still visible in the image. Given this, I find it hard to believe that any of these images are own work as claimed.
- File:Electric Loco shed, Barauni.jpg
- File:WAP 7 ,Barauni.jpg
- File:WAG 9 ,BJU.jpg
- File:WAG 9 BJU.jpg
- File:BJU WAP 7.jpg
- File:HURL, Barauni.jpg
- File:Bindeshwari Prasad Verma.jpg
Whpq (talk) 18:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Update - File:Electric Loco shed, Barauni.jpg is copied from Google user submitted content [2] and File:HURL, Barauni.jpg is copied from [3] -- Whpq (talk) 18:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Apparent COM:DW from television broadcast -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Per copyvio. Taichi (talk) 07:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Apparent COM:DW from television broadcast -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Apparent COM:DW from television broadcast -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Clearly the uploader is not the copyright holder as claimed. Indian stamps are freely licensed and this one is redundant to File:Shri Krishna Singh 2016 stamp of India.jpg. Whpq (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
A screenshot of File:North Bihar.gif that includes some the computer toolbar visible on the bottom. Unused and redundant to the original file. Whpq (talk) 15:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:North Bihar.gif. This is a jpg version of likely cropped from File:Northern Bihar.jpg, This crop has actually removed a small portion of the map from the bottom. No good reason to have a poorly cropped jpg version of a gif format map. Whpq (talk) 15:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
The name of the category was imprecise; it has been renamed and the photos moved to the new one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judesba (talk • contribs) 19:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep per COM:CATRED. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't understand how it works. So you're voting to keep the category, even though the name of the promenade is not that one but that I've added? What's the point?? Judesba (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Judesba: Yes, others may find the imprecise name and a redirect will help them. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- No borrar esta categoria. Ni siquiera hacia falta renombrar-la. El nombre no era impreciso ni podía llevar a confusión. "Passeig Guimerà" se ha utilizado desde antiguo y sigue utilizàndose
- @Judesba: Yes, others may find the imprecise name and a redirect will help them. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't understand how it works. So you're voting to keep the category, even though the name of the promenade is not that one but that I've added? What's the point?? Judesba (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
modernamente. Además, puestos a escoger un nombre más correcto, yo hubiese renombrado el paseo por "Passeig d'Àngel Guimerà", tal como indica el ICGC.
- Jeff G.: te felicito por el celo que has demostrado. Gracias.--Isidre blanc (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete Jeff G.: there's no need to keep it; the name of the promenade is clear enough. Isidre blanc: you are well aware that this is in no way a valid proof of how the promenade was named in the past. --Judesba (talk) 12:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
- @Judesba: What possible harm does it do to keep the redirect? The category you created is the one now in use and the images are where you want them to be. People who search for or stumble upon the alternative name will be directed to the name you prefer. That seems like a successful edit to me! Choliamb (talk) 13:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: and redirected. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:FOP UAE. --Storkk (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The artist of this painting died in 1993 and copyright for Italy lasts for life + 70 years. So this is copyrighted until at least 2,063 Adamant1 (talk) 08:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 93.148.93.86 as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR, as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP - appears to be a professional product shot. If uploader is the copyright holder, as their username suggests, please confirm this via COM:VRT and the file can be restored. --Storkk (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Chevalier-Milo died in 1973. Copyright violation. Chassipress (talk) 14:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Georges Mouveau
[edit]Georges Mouveau died in 1959. Copyright violation.
- File:Château de Bridoré par Georges Mouveau.jpg
- File:Jardin de montigny sur Loing chez Georges Mouveau.jpg
- File:Jean Claude LAURENS, Officier de Marine 1904-1969.jpg
- File:Nature morte fruits 46X32 CM Georges Mouveau.jpg
Chassipress (talk) 14:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Please check for threshold of originality: Is this photo of a (copyrighted) book cover copyvio or a creative photo in its own right? 217.239.8.182 14:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:DW. --Storkk (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per A1Cafel. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per A1Cafel. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per A1Cafel. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Hoax flag SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I agree 69.157.185.224 23:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Clearly hoax. This is something called bad joke, after checking official website of government of Anhui Province, PRC. Lemonaka (talk) 03:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
No indication of OGL applies to the Twitter account of the Scottish Government A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
False license claim; lacking information to determine if is PD under Honduras law Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Honduras -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Любов Станкевич 2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Любов Станкевич 2021
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Любов Станкевич 2021 (talk) 10:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Improbable license and creation claims. (Might or might not be PD for some reason) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Improbable license and creation claims. (Might or might not be PD for some reason) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Improbable license and creation claims. (Might or might not be PD for some reason) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Improbable license and creation claims. (Might or might not be PD for some reason) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
![02:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/13#c-A1Cafel-20220913023900-File:"Esso_Blue"_advertisement_near_Lisburn_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2366471.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
![13:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/13#c-Krd-20221106135500-File:"Esso_Blue"_advertisement_near_Lisburn_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2366471.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Democratic Republic of Congo A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 07:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 07:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Murals by Nils Reumert (1949–) in 1999. No freedom of panorama in Denmark for 2-Dimensional artworks A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Hans Vilandt Oldau Krull - Seagull kiss - Mågekys (1985) - Aarhus - Denmark (51464551122).jpg
[edit]_-_Aarhus_-_Denmark_(51464551122).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Aarhus_-_Denmark_(51464551122).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Murals by Hans Vilandt Oldau Krull (1952–) in 1985. No freedom of panorama in Denmark for 2-Dimensional artworks A1Cafel (talk) 07:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Terajimacho, Naka Ward, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture 430-0925, Japan - panoramio (1).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 07:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Apparent COM:DW photo of someone else's artwork; unless the uploader is the artist or the original can be shown to be PD/free licensed, CV. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in North Macedonia A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
This is an unused COM:PENIS that doesn't really seem to have any educational value above that of other images of penises with foreskin on them. As such, this should be deleted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep it’s decent quality and an interesting example of an unusual foreskin. However it also is not essential in any way and features a pointless watermark. Will probably crop if kept. Dronebogus (talk) 22:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep very unusual foreskin. genitals are clearly in project scope. keep unless we have a better picture of this. --Ordercrazy (talk) 17:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 02:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per others, since Dronebogus plans to crop .-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk The description says it’s the source for 陰茎による包皮の解説及び全体図 00.jpg (the labelled version). (Read the descriptions before nominating files for deletion!)
- Also, the file itself is obviously in scope. The opening of the foreskin seems to be at a right angle to the shaft; this is indeed unusual. I noticed it even on the labelled version.
- Unfortunately, the labelled version has its own DR, where Ikan Kekek raised copyright concerns. Brianjd (talk) 11:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Comment The uploader changed the DR tag on this file to display this rationale: 投稿者による削除の依頼。内容の変更および投稿の取り下げを求む (DuckDuckGo translation: Deletion request by contributor. Request a change in content and withdrawal of a post). I reverted this change, since the new rationale does not even appear on this page.- Also, the new rationale doesn’t even make sense. It made sense when it was written at the other DR, for the labelled version. But here, what is there to change? Brianjd (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- 削除 I would like the person who posted it to delete it. However, we will repost the photo materials in response to the voice of survival. The reason for reposting is that he goes against Commons' recommendation to "do not recommend using watermarks". Please delete the offending photos in the log as well. 翔之介 (talk) 08:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:07, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Orient Industry
[edit]Please see COM:TOYS
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 02.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 03.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 04.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 05.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 06.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 07.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 08.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 09.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 10.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 11.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 12.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 13.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 14.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 17.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 18.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 19.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 20.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 21.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 25.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 26.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 27.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 28.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 29.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 32.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 35.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Orient Industry
[edit]Per COM:TOYS
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 15.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 22.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 24.jpg
- File:ORIENT INDUSTRY 40th Anniversary -LOVE DOLL- 34.jpg
- File:ラブドール 足の裏 (34351218434).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 14:37, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't know whether pictures of small parts of this doll show sufficiently distinctive characteristics to require deletion. I'll be interested to see what decision is made on them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:36, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Please check the ticket correspondence on this image. This is obviously a professional promo photo and not a selfie, so there is no way the image subject is the copyright holder (by Austrian Urheberrecht). See also here. 217.239.8.182 11:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Valid ticket, no reason for deletion. Krd 08:42, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work Kingofthedead (talk) 02:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The lion element of this logo seems a little too complex to be {{PD-logo}} per both COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Spain. If it's not PD-logo in both countries, it can't be kept by Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Statue of Hj Nortamo, in Pori, Finland (Wikidata:Q21803294). Unveiled in 1948/1936. Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Yrjö Liipola (Wikidata:Q11903032), died in 1971. No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland, not in PD yet. Htm (talk) 02:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Porigami in Pori, Finland. Unveiled in 2020. Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Milla Vuorinen (Wikidata:Q110670428), born in 1986. No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland, not in PD yet. Htm (talk) 03:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment We need to be consistent about this issue. See COM:AN#Application of FoP in Mexico. Yann (talk) 17:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Most likely Template:PD-MexicoGov-2013 applies. These fliers were published at .gob.mx websites. Tbhotch™ 01:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- I thought this was a federal doc. It is actually a Mexico City doc. {{LGACDMX}} applies. Tbhotch™ 06:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: updated tags. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Kultakäkönen (Wikidata:Q21856758), in Pori, Finland. Unveiled in 1955. Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Aimo Tukiainen (Wikidata:Q2076471), died in 1996. No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland, not in PD yet. Htm (talk) 03:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Why do you want to delete this file? An image of posters, This is an snapshot of that everyday life in Stockholm/Sweden — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:801:743:6FCE:D59F:B039:FBD1:E0C4 (talk) 07:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- @2A00:801:743:6FCE:D59F:B039:FBD1:E0C4 and IngimarE: the photo of posters under commercial license violates the poster artist's copyright, hence this photo must be Delete as per COM:FOP Sweden: Swedish freedom of panorama does not apply to all temporary public works and art (not permanently installed in public spaces). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment You are asking for courtesy deletions after 4 years, so please explain why retaining these photos would be a real problem for you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Because I don't want the photo to appear on my artist name search. theses shot is made for the contest, I even not the winner. Religion and nationalism are involved,
- I don't want it effect my life creation. please change my name on wiki or Delete it. Korgibani (talk) 12:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't want my name to appear on the search, architecture is not my work Korgibani (talk) 18:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted promotional poster (1984 movie) Mateus2019 (talk) 04:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
E' stato caricato per errore sul comune di Masone. Ho caricato il file corretto nella posizione corretta, grazie Paolocarminati81 (talk) 05:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The small problem indicated by the user (wrong Wiki Loves Monuments ID) has been fixed, since I don't see any other problems with this good quality file I think it is useful to have it on Commons, salûi! --N.Longo (talk) 10:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
E' stato caricato per errore sul comune di Masone. Ho caricato il file corretto nella posizione corretta, grazie Paolocarminati81 (talk) 05:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The small problem indicated by the user (wrong Wiki Loves Monuments ID) has been fixed, since I don't see any other problems with this good quality file I think it is useful to have it on Commons, salûi! --N.Longo (talk) 10:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
E' stato caricato per errore sul comune di Masone. Ho caricato il file corretto nella posizione corretta, grazie Paolocarminati81 (talk) 05:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The small problem indicated by the user (wrong Wiki Loves Monuments ID) has been fixed, since I don't see any other problems with this good quality file I think it is useful to have it on Commons, salûi! --N.Longo (talk) 10:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Not CC BY 3.0 (https://www.instagram.com/p/CE6cgZnBQjc/) 寒吉 (talk) 05:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:03, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Not CC BY 3.0. 寒吉 (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:03, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted object A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 07:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version available: .svg)
Ђидо (talk) 19:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version available: Ђидо (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version available: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OR-2 (1951–1982).svg Ђидо (talk) 19:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OR-7b (1982–1992).svg Ђидо (talk) 20:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OR-7a (1982–1992).svg Ђидо (talk) 20:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OR-6 (1982–1992).svg Ђидо (talk) 20:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OR-5 (1982–1992).svg Ђидо (talk) 20:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OR-9 (1982–1992).svg Ђидо (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OR-8 (1982–1992).svg Ђидо (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. Keine Rechte beim Uploader erkennbar RoBri (talk) 06:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Not OK per COM:FOP Nepal, related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue — Tulsi 24x7 06:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Not OK per COM:FOP Nepal, related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue. — Tulsi 24x7 06:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Similar to UK, there is no freedom of panorama in Ireland for "graphic works" such as posters or murals.
- File:James Earley Clonmel 2017.jpg
- File:Magdalena Karol Waterford Walls 2020.jpg
- File:Russ Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Magdalena Karol Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Aches Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Garreth Joyce Waterford Walls 2020.jpg
- File:Lost Optics Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Yasja 2019.jpg
- File:Taquen Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Spear Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Signs of Power Waterford Walls 2020.jpg
- File:Shane Sutton Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Shane O Driscoll Waterford Walls 2020.jpg
- File:Shane O Driscoll Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:RUSS Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Rask Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Omin Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Novice Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Nina Valkhoff Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Michael Beerens Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:MEHSOS Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Louise McKenna Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Lisa Murphy Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Kreemos Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Koga.one Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Kevin Bohan Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Humble Writerz Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Humble Writerz 2019.jpg
- File:Huariu Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Holly Pereira Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Garreth Joyce Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:FRIZ Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Dan Leo Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Curtis Hylton 2 Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Curtis Hylton Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:ColourHive Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Caoilfhionn Hanton Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:Buse Signs of Power Waterford Walls 2019.jpg
- File:ADW 2 Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Aches Tulleys.jpg
- File:Aches Maser Waterford Walls 2020.jpg
- File:A Waterford Walls.jpg
- File:Volunteers Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Sonny Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Shane Sutton Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:SHUK Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Samer Waterford Walls 2018 B.jpg
- File:Samer Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Rask Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Omin Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Peachzz Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Novice Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Mr Cenz Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Monkey Bird Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Mark Finn Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Mantra Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Magdalena Karol Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Louise McKenna Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Louis Masai Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Louisa Donnelly Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Lost Optics Waterford Walls 2018 B.jpg
- File:Lost Optics Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Lisa Murphy Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Le Bas Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Kevin Bohan Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Karen Hickey Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Joe Caslin Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Iljin Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:Holly Pereira Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Gemma Aylward Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Giant Sigh Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Emily Dawson Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Fats Patrol Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Dan Leo Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Dan Kitchener Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Ciara McKenna Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Caoilfhionn Hanton Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Bo Virvar Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Brian Brennan Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Ayse Leflef Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Animalitoland Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Aches Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:Anna Doran Waterford Walls 2018.jpg
- File:JMK Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Eoin Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:Anna Doran Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:Cruinniu Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Myne Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:JMK Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:ADW Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:SHUK Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Rask Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:ESTR Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Street art Newgate Street.jpg
- File:Sonny Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Dan Leo Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Kinmx Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:Animalitoland Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Omin Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Ador Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Cruinniu Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Joe Caslin Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:James Earley Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:Joe Caslin Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Thiago Ritual Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Eoin Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Mels2 Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:James Earley Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Fresh Mess Waterford Walls 2017 A.jpg
- File:DMC Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:Fresh Mess Waterford Walls 2017 B.jpg
- File:Fresh Mess Waterford Walls 2017 C.jpg
- File:Fresh Mess Waterford Walls 2017 D.jpg
- File:Dan Leo Waterford Walls.jpg
- File:Magdalena Karol Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:BirdO Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:BirdO Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Arcy Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Oner Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Kinmx Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Vunik Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:ESTR Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Le Bas Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Lisa Murphy Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:DMC Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Lula Goce Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:JMK Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Shane OMalley Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Dan Leo Waterford Walls 2015.jpg
- File:Rory Thompson Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Kemp Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Sam Doyle Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Vents Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Verz Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Fintan Magee Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Bubu Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Kinmx Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Aches Waterford Walls 2017.jpg
- File:Trinity Square street art 2017.jpg
- File:Smug One Waterford Walls 2016 B.jpg
- File:James Earley Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Iljin Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
- File:Smug One Waterford Walls 2016.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Random question, but do you think there would be freedom of panorama in the UK/Ireland for things like plaques that include graphic elements but aren't really known as "graphic works"? --Adamant1 (talk) 23:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
I don't want this photo of me on wiki media any more! (I am this person) Bernddormayer (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:34, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Al Iraqi87 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Patrol ships IqN.png
- File:FAB IqN.png
- File:Umm qasr naval base Pier.png
- File:Umm qasr naval base.png
- File:Floating dock Iq.png
- File:IqN commander.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:32, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 06:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Al Iraqi87 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images from facebook or some unclear sources. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see why they have a free license.
- File:Saqar1 front.jpg
- File:Saqar1.jpg
- File:Iraqi Army Aviation Command flag.png
- File:Iraqi Army Aviation Emblem.jpg
- File:Iraqi Amy Aviatin CH-4 UAV.jpg
- File:Iraqi Army Aviation Command Flag.png
- File:Iraqi E.R.B.jpg
- File:Iraqi Basketball Association 01.png
- File:Iraqi Basketball Association.png
- File:Emblem of Iraqi Army aviation.png
Avron (talk) 08:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Image is from the stadium video screen, which appears to show this photo: https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/55a86f5be4b04793ffcf2904/1534862584870-3YBUDFHA74MCYN5KBL34/image-asset.jpeg?format=1500w, likely derivative work of a copyrighted photo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jean Messagier
[edit]Jean Messagier died in 1999. Copyright violation.
- File:Jean Messagier 'Louis IV l'apres midi' 1966.jpg
- File:Jean Messagier ) 'Les portes de Mars' 1966 oil on canvas 105x170 cm.jpg
_%27Les_portes_de_Mars%27_1966_oil_on_canvas_105x170_cm.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Chassipress (talk) 13:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2070. --Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jean Milhau
[edit]Jean Milhau died in 1985. No OTRS.
- File:Jean Milhau, Buste 1941.JPG
- File:Jean Milhau, Le potier au travail 1950.jpg
- File:Jean Milhau, Les bohémiens 1934.jpg
- File:Jean Milhau, Montferrier 1957.jpg
Chassipress (talk) 14:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2056. --Rosenzweig τ 14:47, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
I am not convinced that the tree constitutes a simple shape VateGV ◦ taper la discut’ ◦ 11:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support The image seems to taken from the website of the party [4]. According to the website all rights are reserved by Nepali Congress. PenGear (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Marie Antoinette Boullard-Devé died in 1970. Copyight violation. Chassipress (talk) 13:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bruno Mendonça
[edit]Bruno Mendonça died in 2011. Copyright violation.
Chassipress (talk) 13:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:51, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
kullanıcının kendi isteği. Zemxer (talk) 18:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CSD G7. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no es interesante Egdaly (talk) 05:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Not being interesting is not a valid reason for deletion, but this looks like it was scanned from a textbook. Note the bend of the page at the upper right. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:54, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Дима Г as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The depicted person died in 1956. It's unknown who took this photo and when it was published for the first time. May be old enough. Yann (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
I doubt that the PD-CAGov-license template is valid for this image (or any UCLA-work), as UCLA is not a unit of the state of California, AFAIK. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Same problem with:
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Better version available: .svg)
Ђидо (talk) 19:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:18, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality image of unspecified beverage (beer?) which reduces what little utility it might otherwise have had. Ubcule (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OR-1 (1951–1982).svg Ђидо (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yogurt yeah (talk · contribs)
[edit]
* File:Kindergarten class early 1970s.jpg <-- image is in use. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, and some personal images. --2001:4451:82BB:7100:55DC:E790:D622:E92 04:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: File:Me @ Birth.jpeg and File:Kindergarten class early 1970s.jpg per COM:INUSE. Deleted: everything else. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Most certainly copyrighted and not an own work of a user: [5] Aʀvєδuι + 07:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- This poster is commissioned by the Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission Guangzhou Liwan District People's Government Jinhua Subdistrict Office, in public places to the city's public posters, so it will not constitute infringement.
- 这一张海报是由广州市卫生健康委员会委托广州市荔湾区人民政府金花街道办事处，在公共场所向全市民众公开的海报，因此它绝对不会构成侵权。 中少 (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @中少 真的么？我怎么觉得这种情况不符合{{PD-PRC-exempt}}？(lit. Oh really? I feel that that case doesn't match {{PD-PRC-exempt}}?) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- 真的。Really. 中少 (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- @中少 真的么？我怎么觉得这种情况不符合{{PD-PRC-exempt}}？(lit. Oh really? I feel that that case doesn't match {{PD-PRC-exempt}}?) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission (广州市卫生健康委员会) 中少 (talk) 01:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- @中少: I removed my delete vote, since you have already mentioned the probable author. Although I have some reservation if a relevant local government body can be used as attribution, unless the work is a joint work of the said local government. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission (广州市卫生健康委员会) 中少 (talk) 01:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The author is listed on the poster. Should fulfill the requirements of Chinese FOP regulation--220.246.140.60 11:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No requirement of permanence. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Well, the FOP clause in the law is just a generalized statement that makes FOP existent in China; but courts give full meaning to it. One court declares faithful reproductions of 2D works are not allowed for commercial uses, like File:Mao Zedong portrait.jpg.
And for this photo, it shows a work not meant to be permanent. Per a 1995 Supreme People's Court opinion, non-permanent works cannot be freely used. See also [6]. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Kashgar_Xi_Jinping_billboard.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=726149429){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Caption: "Copyright Berit Kröner", Author /"Own Work" by Friederike Roger. That doesn't go together well (uploader is not copyright holder). 217.239.8.182 14:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:VRT permission needed to host this file. --Rosenzweig τ 12:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Allegedly a photo of 1941. Definitely not an own work - and possible fake (as far as the name of this Nazi general cannot be found in reliable sources). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The article about him in ruwiki was deleted as probable fake. Wikisaurus (talk) 16:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Bass string wings, Jyrki Kangas memorial statue in Pori, Finland. Unveiled in 2022. Derivative work of Finnish sculptors Pekka and Teija Isorättyä (Wikidata:Q112844015), Pekka Isorättyä Wikidata:Q99036903, born in 1980 and Teija Isorättyä Wikidata:Q99038451, born in 1980. No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland, not in PD yet. Htm (talk) 01:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The artist of this painting died in 1968 and copyright in Italy lasts until at least 70 years after the death of the artist. So this is copyright until at least 2038. Same goes for File:Romorini-Maria-ved-Mariani-ritratto.jpg. Adamant1 (talk) 09:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture of Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq (Pakistan president) is claimed to be public domain because there is nothing in it of original authorship. This is cleanly not true as it is a photo of a person. COM:CRT/Pakistan indicates government works are copyrighted for a period of 50 years which for this image from 1985 would expire in 2035. There is no indication or evidence that this image is an exception to government copyright. Whpq (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Disagree. This photo was used for many public purposes, including display in government buildings, fulfilling autograph requests, etc. It was intended for the widest possible dissemination, not restricted use. Billmckern (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Widely distributed, and displayed does not mean a work is free of copyright. There are many images widely distributed that are copyrighted, the prime example being photos sent out as part of press releases. Whpq (talk) 17:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Hoax flag SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I agree (delete) AAAAA143222 (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 16:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
not a NASA map as claimed: early GoogleEarth CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 13:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
This image is not in public domain. My reserch shows Patricia Degener died in 2008, so their work is still under copyright WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
I've created a new category with the correct name of the building and moved there the photos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judesba (talk • contribs) 20:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per COM:CATRED. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't understand how it works. So you're voting to keep the category, even though the name of the building is not that one but that I've added? What's the point?? Judesba (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Judesba: Yes, others may find the incorrect name and a redirect will help them. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Mantener la categoria: No es necesario eliminarla, aunque carece de precisión. En "Caviquipèdia" se ha mantenido la pàgina redirigida. ver ca:Xalet a la carretera de Barcelona (Ribes de Freser). Hagamos lo mismo en Commons. Isidre blanc (talk) 09:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Judesba: Yes, others may find the incorrect name and a redirect will help them. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't understand how it works. So you're voting to keep the category, even though the name of the building is not that one but that I've added? What's the point?? Judesba (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete Jeff G.: there's no need to keep it. "Chalet on the road to Barcelona" is ultra-imprecise and is not the name of any house. Isidre blanc: keeping the page "Xalet a la carretera de Barcelona (Ribes de Freser)" in the Catalan Wikipedia has no connection to keeping the name here; moreover, the first statement can be easily solved. --Judesba (talk) 12:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Judesba (though I was partly persuaded by Jeff G. first). --Xover (talk) 17:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: implausible redirect deleted per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
claim of "own" and "own work" as Source and Author?...Unless the uploader is the person who actually CREATED this signature, is actually "Kenya Moore" then this asserted "creation" is at least spurious if not false. Shearonink (talk) 03:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Also, the licensing claim seems odd. Maybe I'm mistaken but how can a claim of {{PD-ineligible}} be made for a signature as being "common property with no original authorship"? Shearonink (talk) 06:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Shearonink: See COM:SIG and {{PD-signature}}. Xover (talk) 17:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Signatures are generally ineligible for copyright in the US (and this signature is that of a US actress). --Xover (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: license changed to PD-signature per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
In order for Commons to keep this file as licensed, it needs to be too simple for copyright protection not only per COM:TOO United States, but also per COM:TOO Spain. Although it might be OK to treat this as {{PD-logo}} uder US copyright law, things aren't nearly as clear cut when it comes to Spanish copyright law. The "moving" soccer ball element of the logo might just be enough to establish this logo as having established "uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability" characteristics that Spanish copyright law seems to require for something to be eligible for copyright protection, and I don't think Commons can keep this file per COM:PCP absent any clear consensus stating otherwise. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Not educationally useful, accurate and redundant. My error JJNito197 (talk) 05:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Question Is it your own work? If it is, I would disagree with your current assessment, as it is by now a historical photo showing 1950s hair and dress style. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, yes own work but v bad quality image. The image has unknown provenance, I cannot confirm the location or ethnicity with any certainty. From a family album with no caption. JJNito197 (talk) 05:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think it's terrible quality for a 1950s photo. I respect your desire to delete it, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see a valid deletion rationale here. --Xover (talk) 17:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The issue seems uncertainy of identity of women seen, I will rename the image accordingly. In scope as example of fashion and everyday life in Egypt in early 1950s. License/source info adjusted to clarify that this is an heirs photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete the redirect please, confusing 181.43.3.236 18:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Not done. File was under previous name for years, discussion links there, only moved less than an hour before this request was made. Too soon to delete redirect. (Not sure why anon calls this "confusing".) --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no Exif data, also see https://yandex.com/images/search?rpt=imageview&url=https%3A%2F%2Favatars.mds.yandex.net%2Fget-images-cbir%2F1658559%2FeVuq55lZYrK6f3vGrU54CQ6561%2Forig&cbir_id=1658559%2FeVuq55lZYrK6f3vGrU54CQ6561 appears to be a wallpaper. Дима Г (talk) 08:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
This image comes from an otherwise copyrighted website www.ilmamilio.it and there's zero evidence that it's released under a free license. Adamant1 (talk) 08:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Is this Own Work? The only contribution of the user. The metadata mention "Auteur Chris Eckert/Studio D, Auteursrechtenhouder Hearst Communications Inc., 2009". What about the copyright? Wouter (talk) 14:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
this is not own work + Fake License [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 19:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
I don't want this photo of me on wiki media any more! (I am this person) Bernddormayer (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: "I don't like it" has never been a valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, but this one isn't in use. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
@Funke and Ailura: I don't remember who was in charge of this project but I think it was one of you. If I remember correctly, the participants such as Bernd Dormayer had to sign a paper with which they agreed to their photo being published with a cc license. Do we have this kept somewhere? Apart from that, the "not any more" part of the argument does not go well with the agreement we had or with the license, and "not in use" may be true for WMF hosted sites, but the file could be in use (also transcluded) in other places. → «« Man77 »» [de] 21:26, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- I sent you the permission signed by Bernd Dormayer by email. --Funke (talk) 10:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. As per Commons:Volunteer Response Team and Commons:Photographs of identifiable people I do not think that this is a case for an OTRS ticket, but in case it is, or in case the sysop deciding this case wishes to see the permission, I'll happily forward it. → «« Man77 »» [de] 18:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. This person is in scope, as there exists an article of them, de:Bernd Dormayer. No reason to delete this alternative photo. If mr. Dormayer can provide a severe reason to delete the image, we might reconsider. --Ellywa (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Syunsyunminmin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: url=https://o-ishin.jp/member/detail/fujita_fumitake.html
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as undated thumb-sized external image can hardly be the source for our 35 MPixel file. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. That's a bit better, but still 700x1000 (external PNG) vs. 5000x7300 (our JPG) pix. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I couldn't find any more sources...--Syunsyunminmin (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- The uploader said "This image is taken from the official site", but I couldn't find the same pixel image on the official site. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 11:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. That's a bit better, but still 700x1000 (external PNG) vs. 5000x7300 (our JPG) pix. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not seeing any valid deletion rationale here. --Xover (talk) 18:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. No reason to think the uploader did not make this photo. --Ellywa (talk) 20:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yanguas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://lavozdeldesiertoweb.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/jc3b3venes-y-padres-unidos-en-cristo-dallas-texas-la-voz-del-desierto-mc3basica-catc3b3lica-estados-unidos.jpg
Converted to regular DR, as external low-res collage from 2015 can't be the source of our mid-res upload from 2014. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. I am the author of the photograph. It was later used in a flyer. Cheers Labanderadeadiosayer (talk) 18:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Not seeing a valid deletion rationale. --Xover (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per comment of uploader and exif data. --Ellywa (talk) 20:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Italy generally doesn't have FOP laws. So copyright for sculptures lasts until at least 70 years after the death of the sculptor. In this case the sculptor died in 1990. So images of this sculpture are copyrighted until at least 2,080. The same goes for the following images:
- File:Antonio berti e richard ginori, altare dell'immacolata, 02.jpg
- File:Antonio berti e richard ginori, altare dell'immacolata, 03.jpg
- File:Antonio berti e richard ginori, altare dell'immacolata, 04.jpg
File:Antonio berti, tomba di pietro azzari, 1927, 03 firma.jpgthis is just a signature, it's PD signature.--Sailko (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)- File:BiblioRagionieri 01.jpg
- File:BibliotecaRagionieri 13.jpg
File:Santo stefano in pane.JPGThis is Commons:De minimis, the main subject is the church facade. --Sailko (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)- File:Chiesa di santa croce, monumento funebre di ugo foscolo.JPG
- File:The grave of Ugo Foscolo, Church of Santa Croce, Florence.jpg
- File:Tomba Ugo Foscolo.jpg
- File:Toscana2011 (6276899779).jpg
- File:Toscana2011 (6277419256).jpg
- File:Ugo Foscolo's tomb, Basilica di Santa Croce, Florence (26677529255).jpg
- File:Ugo Foscolo, Basilica di Santa Croce, Florence (26403917280).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 09:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I striked out two files, as one is just a signature, not copyrightable, and the other is a picture of a building, with on a side a statue by Antonio Berti (not removable from the view) and it falls under the policy Commons:De minimis --Sailko (talk) 11:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- That's fine. I question the statue in front of the church being de minimis since it's one of the main elements of the image and what the viewers eyes are naturally drawn to (at least it is in my case). So in no way is it trivial or inconsequential to overall image, but whatever. To each his own. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I find the de minimis on the statue to be borderline, but I just buy Sailko's assertion there (by a hair). --Xover (talk) 18:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion deleted all but 2 striked files. Added de minimis template to one of these to warn users. --Ellywa (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
All marked as own work but the uniforms are from Liliane and Fred Funcken, the Ejército Argentino is an offical work (File:Escudo del Ejército Argentino.png) so I also have doubts for the rest.
- File:PM Pistolones cruzados Dorado.png
- File:Ca PM 101 Vector.png
- File:Logo PM 101.jpg
- File:Mauser 1891.png
- File:Escudo PM 101.png
- File:Basalete101.png
- File:Ejercito Argentino.png
- File:Escudo PM 101 Wiki.png
- File:PISTOLAS SIN FONDO.png
- File:Condecoracion cl44.jpg
- File:Harper, modelo 1805, de color dorado.png
- File:PM Uniformes 1810-13.png
- File:Ferry de Harper, modelo 1805.jpg
- File:L´uniforme et les armes des soldats du premier empire.png
- File:Organigrama PM 101.png
Avron (talk) 09:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
I guess this file is redundant and it can be safely removed from the site, because this coat of arms is historically identical to the coat of arms 
and fully reproduces its distinctive features, the difference is only the name of a noble family. Genatsvale (talk) 13:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, made a redirect to File:RU COA Lobanov-Rostovsky.svg. --Ellywa (talk) 20:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
The source is it.wiki, but it.wiki coats of arms are released under unfree license (see Autorizzazioni ottenute/araldicacivica). Fair use works cannot be hosted on Commons. Ruthven (msg) 14:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The age of the design is not known. Coat of arms of Italy are not in PD per Commons:Coats of arms. --Ellywa (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
The source is it.wiki, but it.wiki coats of arms are released under unfree license (see Autorizzazioni ottenute/araldicacivica). It's an image that can be used under Fair use Ruthven (msg) 14:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The age of the design is not known. Coat of arms of Italy are not in PD per Commons:Coats of arms. --Ellywa (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Idéfix~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source is it.wiki, but it.wiki coats of arms are released under unfree license (see Autorizzazioni ottenute/araldicacivica). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Italian CoA
- File:Pontebba-Stemma.png
- File:Palestrina-Stemma.png
- File:Caprino Veronese-Stemma.png
- File:Spello-Stemma.png
- File:Celano-Stemma.png
- File:Montesilvano-Stemma.png
- File:Polignano al Mare-Stemma.png
- File:San Giovanni Rotondo-Stemma.png
- File:Monte Sant'Angelo-Stemma.png
Ruthven (msg) 15:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The age of the designs is not known. Coat of arms of Italy are not in PD per Commons:Coats of arms. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Image was first published in UK, not USA. No proof that it was published in the US less than 30 days after publication abroad. Although copyright in UK is expired, copyright in USA restored due to COM:URAA. Copyright expired 95 years after the year of publication, i.e. in 2029 A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 19:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Can be undeleted in 2029.. --Ellywa (talk) 20:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence that uploader ("Walter Pernety") is the copyright holder. In the Wikipedia article for Fantax, it says: "He was created by writer "J.K. Melwyn-Nash" (aka Marcel Navarro) and artist "Chott" (aka Pierre Mouchot)", so the true copyright holders for this character would likely be Navarro and Mouchot. Chiolite (talk) 17:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. I made the visual of the Fantax. I created it with one picture of the statuette (I took the photo) that I have and another one (personnal photo) for the background. Walter pernety (talk) 18:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- In Commons:Derivative works#Casebook, it says: "Comic figures and action figures: No photographs, drawings, paintings or any other copies/derivative works of these are allowed (as long as the original is not in the public domain). No pictures are allowed of items which are derivatives from copyrighted figures themselves, like dolls, action figures, T-shirts, printed bags, ashtrays etc." Therefore, permissiom from Marcel Navarro and Pierre Mouchot would be required for hosting this file in Commons. Chiolite (talk) 08:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom / Chiolite. --Xover (talk) 20:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Useless since File:Production fonte fer acier France G-B.svg has been converted to a Multilanguage file. Borvan53 (talk) 19:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:REDUNDANT all information is included in the other file. --Ellywa (talk) 20:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
These bits of text (definition of a phrase) are outside COM:SCOPE. If the text is needed anywhere, it should be text not a PDF file. Marbletan (talk) 20:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Files are currently not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
False license claim; lacking information to determine if is PD under Honduras law Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Honduras -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It is not clear whether this image has been published rightfully more then 70 years ago. --Ellywa (talk) 20:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gmcsenegal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works, permission via COM:VRT needed.
Yann (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Il s'agit bien d'une œuvre personnelle. Je suis habilité à l'utiliser dans le cadre de ce travail. Gmcsenegal (talk) 09:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Gmcsenegal: Ces 2 images ont été prises avec 2 appareils différents. Êtes-vous le photographe ? Pouvez-vous importer les versions originales de ces images ? File:Emblème photo.jpg a certainement été publié ailleurs auparavant. Il faut donc une confirmation de la licence par écrit. Voyez COM:VRT/fr pour la procédure. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Pour les deux photos de personnages – mais pas pour l'emblème – nous avons reçu une autorisation par Ticket:2022091410005876.
- For the two personality photos - but not for the emblem - we received permission per Ticket:2022091410005876.
- Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Gmcsenegal: Ces 2 images ont été prises avec 2 appareils différents. Êtes-vous le photographe ? Pouvez-vous importer les versions originales de ces images ? File:Emblème photo.jpg a certainement été publié ailleurs auparavant. Il faut donc une confirmation de la licence par écrit. Voyez COM:VRT/fr pour la procédure. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the VRT-confirmed files; Delete File:Emblème photo.jpg per COM:PRP since there is insufficient claim to compatible licensing. --Xover (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder of this coat of arms Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation Why do you doubt that? COAmaker17 (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- So you, and not the municipality of Copán Ruinas, are legal owner of this coat of arms, and the municipality cannot use it except with your express permission? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation They can use it if they want. But it's not the same one they made I wouldn't mind having it in the Public Domain. COAmaker17 (talk) 21:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation Similar to the Mexican and Argentine law, the industrial property law says that the symbols, flags and shields of any country cannot be subject to copyright. Read article 83, section 16 https://honduras.eregulations.org/media/LEY%20DE%20PROPIEDAD%20INDUSTRIAL%20(actualizada-07).pdf
- Very similar to
- {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}
- Mexican Law In Spanish: Las reproducciones o imitaciones, sin autorización, de escudos, banderas o emblemas de cualquier país, estado, municipio o división política equivalente, ni las denominaciones, siglas, símbolos o emblemas de organizaciones internacionales gubernamentales, no gubernamentales, o de cualquier otra organización reconocida oficialmente, así como la designación verbal de los mismos.
- Honduran Law: Incluyan una reproducción o imitación total o parcial, de un escudo, bandera u otro emblema, sigla, denominación o abreviación de denominación de cualquier Estado u organización internacional, sin autorización del Estado o de la organización internacional de que se trate.
- It is necessary to make a honduran coa PD tag
- COAmaker17 (talk) 03:50, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- So you, and not the municipality of Copán Ruinas, are legal owner of this coat of arms, and the municipality cannot use it except with your express permission? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If it can be shown to be PD, I'm all for correcting the license and keeping it. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Consolidated_list_Central_America_and_Mexico#Honduras suggests it needs to be documented to be at least 75 years old? The quote COAmaker17 gives above suggests we could make a template for Honduras coats of arms similar to the one for Mexico. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation Yes it is necessary to make a PD CoA template for Honduras and Guatemala similar to Mexico based on the law. COAmaker17 (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation PD CoA template of Honduras is done {{PD-Coa-Honduras}} now this file is in public domain. COAmaker17 (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Question: @Infrogmation and Althair: . To keep this image, it would be preferred if the template {{PD-Coa-Honduras}} (made by Althair) and its rationale would be included on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Honduras and in the list on Commons:Coats of arms. How should this be realized? Ellywa (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Erm. Article 83 of the above cited law reads Signs that are included in any of the following prohibitions may not be registered as trademarks, when:. So the cited article is about trademark registration, not copyright.The copyright law for Honduras is Copyright and Related Rights Law (Approved by Decree No. 4-99-E, and as Amended by Decree No. 16-2006). Limitations to copyright ("Limitaciones y Excepciones al Derecho De Autor") are in Title IV, and I can find no mention of "symbols" there. In fact, the law makes no mention of coats of arms (escudos) at all that I can tell.In other words, {{PD-Coa-Honduras}} is nonsense and should be deleted, and this file is a derivative work of a presumably copyright-protected coat of arms that needs to be deleted as well. I also note that COAmaker17 has cited this rationale for multiple files and deletion discussions, so a review of all their uploads would seem to be prudent.Courtesy ping since the discussion is old: Infrogmation, COAmaker17, Althair, Ellywa. --Xover (talk) 08:44, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder of this coat of arms. (Might or might not be PD for some reason.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation Similar to the Mexican and Argentine law, the industrial property law says that the symbols, flags and shields of any country cannot be subject to copyright. Read article 83, section 16 https://honduras.eregulations.org/media/LEY%20DE%20PROPIEDAD%20INDUSTRIAL%20(actualizada-07).pdf
- Very similar to
- {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}
- Mexican Law In Spanish: Las reproducciones o imitaciones, sin autorización, de escudos, banderas o emblemas de cualquier país, estado, municipio o división política equivalente, ni las denominaciones, siglas, símbolos o emblemas de organizaciones internacionales gubernamentales, no gubernamentales, o de cualquier otra organización reconocida oficialmente, así como la designación verbal de los mismos.
- Honduran Law: Incluyan una reproducción o imitación total o parcial, de un escudo, bandera u otro emblema, sigla, denominación o abreviación de denominación de cualquier Estado u organización internacional, sin autorización del Estado o de la organización internacional de que se trate. COAmaker17 (talk) 03:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
{{PD-Coa-Honduras}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by COAmaker17 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- See my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escudo de Copán Ruinas.svg. --Xover (talk) 08:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Improbable license and creation claims. (Might or might not be PD for some reason) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I have the access to use the shield and the full license because it is for public use. WebOn HN (talk) 16:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- If you have agreement to share it under the tagged license or some other free license, please submit info via COM:VRT, thanks. (And please try to be accurate and honest with authorship and license statements, thanks.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:11, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No plausible assertion of copyright ownership. The uploader may well have made the uploaded file, but it is a COM:DW of an original work for which the uploader does not, presumably, hold the copyright and is therefore not authorised to license. --Xover (talk) 08:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete answer suggest confusion between availability and licensing. Hekerui (talk) 13:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no progress in establishing potential reason for free license since September. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
This image is not in public domain. My reserch shows Warren Ludwig died in 1965, so his work is still under copyright WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The person in the portrait, Aimee Schweig, was an American artist. Was Warren Ludwig American, too? Is it a painting created in the US? Then we would have to determine the copyright status of this work not simply by the painter's year of death (for which 70 years p.m.a. would be applied in Europe), but according to the complex American situation as per the Hirtle chart. As a 1928 painting, it's just a year too "new" for {{PD-US-expired}} to apply, even if it was published in 1928, but if it was published between 1928 and 1977 without a copyright notice, it could be a case of {{PD-US-no-notice}}... - But there's also the question of the frame in the image. Apparently, the image was taken from the website of the Missouri Historical Society where I can't find it now. Was it really licensed under CC-BY-SA there? If not, there might be a photographer's copyright on the image as a photograph of a 3D object (the frame). Altogether, taking COM:PCP into account, my vote is Weak delete. If it's possible to be reasonably sure that the image was exhibited (and thus published) in 1928, it could be restored in 2024 with the frame cropped away, I think, but I assume we would need some evidence for that... Gestumblindi (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: Does exhibiting a painting constitute publication for copyright purposes (offer for sale or distribution)? --Xover (talk) 20:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Xover: That's an excellent question! As far as I'm aware, works made accessible to the general public and without explicit prohibitions on making reproductions, for example through an exhibition, are considered "published" under the 1909 US Copyright Act, which is still valid for works first published (therefore including: publicly exhibited) before 1978. I remember some in-depth discussions with User:Lupo, who is sadly no longer active here, on the topic. From one such discussion (starting in German, continued in English):
- "In particular, it was generally held that exhibiting a painting in a gallery was only a "limited publication" if the the artist or gallery did not permit members of the public to photograph or make copies of the work (s:American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister). If, however, such copying was allowed, exhibition amounted to a "general publication" (s:Letter Edged in Black Press, Inc. v. Public Building Commission of Chicago)."
- Of course I assume it will in most cases be impossible to ascertain, even if we know for sure of an exhibition, whether it was expressly forbidden to make photographs... - See also this discussion (though concerning statues) from 2008. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, that accords reasonably well with my own understanding; including the fact that absent concrete evidence COM:PRP comes into play in these cases. Xover (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Xover: That's an excellent question! As far as I'm aware, works made accessible to the general public and without explicit prohibitions on making reproductions, for example through an exhibition, are considered "published" under the 1909 US Copyright Act, which is still valid for works first published (therefore including: publicly exhibited) before 1978. I remember some in-depth discussions with User:Lupo, who is sadly no longer active here, on the topic. From one such discussion (starting in German, continued in English):
- @Gestumblindi: Does exhibiting a painting constitute publication for copyright purposes (offer for sale or distribution)? --Xover (talk) 20:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Gestumblindi and, ultimately, COM:PRP. There's insufficient evidence / information available to seriously entertain any of the theoretically possible paths to expired copyright. The given painter does seem to have been an American, active in Missouri, and vital years 1899–1965; but that doesn't help us much just now.
- Delete for works predating 1966 in the US (assuming it's American because of this) it is of interest whether there was publishing or registration, and whether the publishing was with or without notice and with or without renewal of the registration. There is no evidence of any of this here unfortunately and I can't find the source using archive.org. Hekerui (talk) 14:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Not yet established to be PD. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
