User talk:VateGV

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, VateGV!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Schuss le skieur - Grenoble (cropped).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yann (talk) 17:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paralympic mascots (closing ceremony Rio 2016).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sjogg in town (21648317444) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Drapeau fr département Territoire de Belfort.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Eschen.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 05:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:The PyeongChang 2018 Paralympic Winter Games Emblem.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JSH-alive (talk) 00:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

[edit]

Dear VateGV,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Blason de Saint-Cannat

[edit]

Bonjour, pour ce qui est du dessin, j'ai vectorisé le document que la mairie m'a envoyé par mail et il n'y a aucune mention que le blason de leur commune est dans le domaine privé donc la licence ne pose pas de problème. De plus, le blasonnement mentionné sur le document ne mentionne ni de zébrage de sable sur le tertre ni une différence de sinople entre le tertre et la canne feuillée et donc j'ai fais un autre blason en modifiant les erreurs et en appliquant les couleurs définies pour le projet blason. Je préfère recréer un blason plutôt que d'aller modifier le fichier d'un autre.Cdl Spax89 (talk) 21:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Si vous le dîtes, j'imagine donc que le hasard fait bien les choses... VateGV taper la discut’ 22:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stephane Ravier

[edit]

Bonsoir, le portrait vient du crop d'une affiche electorale présente aussi dans la catégorie Category:Stéphane Ravier, c'est pas le copié collé d'une image du site web Marsactu. Si l'affiche est pas copyvio, un crop ne l'est pas. Si les affiches electorales sont copyvio, je comprends mais faudra suppr toutes les affiches présentes sur Commons. --Maxéco (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir @Maxéco: Pour les affiches je ne sais pas, mais en tout cas, je suis quasiment sûr que cette photographie n'est pas de vous comme le laisse entendre la licence du fichier. De plus, le recadrage fait justement penser à une photographie centrée du sujet. Dans la mesure où on ne connaît pas la licence de l'affiche et des photographies, je ne vois pas pourquoi elles pourraient être importées sur Commons. Pour les autres affiches, il faudrait faire du cas pas cas. VateGV taper la discut’ 21:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • C.est ça que j'ai pris en photo, affiche posée sur ma table. Vraiment, c'est pas d'internet. Si ça c'est bon, les crop en decoulant le seront. Sinon, faudrait effectivement que sur les deux crop de portraits, je mette source « crop de File:Municipales Marseille 2020 » plutot que travail perso si ça induit les gens en erreur.
    Bonne soirée et on verras bien. --Maxéco (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    File:Wappen Eschen.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

    If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

    Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

    Sukaq (talk) 16:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Wappen Vaduz.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

    If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

    Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

    Sukaq (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    user:azarbaijani

    [edit]

    Hi @VateGV: You can see contributions of one of the trolls accounts as an example: 1 and 1 and ... He insults different users, including me, with different accounts. I just came to the fr.wiki to remove these personal attacks from my page and I requested you to delete these pages. But you have blocked me infinitely too like this troll! While you can check that I have not blocked in any wiki project so far. And now you have created a check user request in fr.wiki with title of Azarbaijani (!) and you have put my user name (Azarbaijani) next to the user names of the mentioned troll. Please check my ongoing contributions in the fa.wiki as my home wiki and do not slander me and open my account in fr.wiki and delete my username from check user request. thanks. --Azarbaijani (talk) 04:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Salut @VateGV: . Vous pouvez voir les contributions de l'un des comptes de trolls à titre d'exemple: 1 et 1 et ... Il insulte différents utilisateurs, dont moi, avec des comptes différents. Je viens juste d'arriver sur fr.wiki pour supprimer ces attaques personnelles de ma page et je vous ai demandé de supprimer ces pages. Mais tu m'as bloqué infiniment aussi comme ce troll! Bien que vous puissiez vérifier que je n'ai bloqué dans aucun projet wiki jusqu'à présent. Et maintenant, vous avez créé une requête utilisateur de vérification dans fr.wiki avec le titre Azarbaijani (!) Et vous avez mis mon nom d'utilisateur (Azarbaijani) à côté des noms d'utilisateur du troll mentionné. Veuillez vérifier mes contributions en cours dans le fa.wiki en tant que mon wiki d'accueil et ne pas me calomnier et ouvrir mon compte dans fr.wiki et supprimer mon nom d'utilisateur de la demande de vérification de l'utilisateur. Merci. --Azarbaijani (talk) 05:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi @Azarbaijani: . I understand your request. We had to take protective measures yesterday in order to prevent such insults. Remain assured that as soon as we have the check user request results, we will act accordingly. Regards. VateGV taper la discut’ 06:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @VateGV: . Thank you so much for the actions that you and your colleagues in fr.wiki did yesterday. If you think this is necessary to user check my account too, no problem. But after user check, please unblock my account and delete my discussion page (containing insult). In other wikis I asked them to delete my discussion page and they did. Thanks for everything. --Azarbaijani (talk) 07:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Azarbaijani: will do, no problem... VateGV taper la discut’ 07:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @VateGV: Sorry to take your time again. Here you can see the results of the check user and global lock of a number of accounts that you have requested their check user in the fr.wiki. It is also here. I am Azerbaijani and the troll had attacked a number of Turkish-language user accounts, which a number of his accounts reported in the meta. I hope it has become clear to you for these reasons that I am not a saboteur account and there is no need to check user or block me. I can not edit in the fr.wiki. So please, according to these documents and my ongoing contributions in the fa.wiki and other projects, if possible, remove my name from the title and the text of check user request in fr.wiki and unblock me. Or tell my words to the fr.wiki check users. If necessary, fa.wiki administrators can also talk to you about this subject. thanks again. --Azarbaijani (talk) 08:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    [edit]
    The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
    Pour tes images vectorielles de haute qualité ! Golmore (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Merci beaucoup @Golmore: ça me touche vraiment ! N'hésite pas à continuer ton travail sur les BU, comme tu as pu le voir, c'est un sujet à aborder avec prudence, humilité et recul sinon ça peut coincer mais je suis sûr que tu vas faire du bon boulot là-dessus et le reste... VateGV taper la discut’ 20:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    [edit]

    Copyright status: File:Pauline 4.jpg

    bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
    Warning sign
    This media may be deleted.
    Thanks for uploading File:Pauline 4.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

    If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

    If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

    Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

    This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Pics swopped around

    [edit]

    Hello VateGV, did you extract these pics? Please see the talk age: File talk:1904 Olympic Marathon participants, Len Tau (left) and Jan Mashiani of the Tswana tribe of South Africa.jpg. Thank you. Burgert (talk) 13:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Logo SNCF 2011.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

    If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

    Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

    Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]