Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/08/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 19th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be outside of COM:SCOPE as not educational and it looks like a copyright violation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Web site screenshot. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong version uploaded by mistake Ootyjp (talk) 05:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not of use Jktechnosoft (talk) 10:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violates COM:SPAM; this image, its title, and its description show that this is blatantly advertising and self-promotion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 06:51, 19 August 2022 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 13:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. 丂ㄒ尺ㄚ几 (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. 丂ㄒ尺ㄚ几 (talk) 07:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Authr requests deletion. Drmies (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image, no encyclopedic purpose. 丂ㄒ尺ㄚ几 (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Author requests deletion. Drmies (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ne convient pas avec la religion islamic 197.1.117.121 16:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • How do you like File:Siyah Qalem - Hazine 2153, s.33a.jpg for instance? We cannot delete files for subjective arguments not written in the Commons guidelines. If an image has been created four centuries ago, it has been created; now, whether it complies with religious concepts or not is an important issue that has to be kept and dealt out of this place. --E4024 (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is absolutely no reason to delete this file. --Lebob 18:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Kept according to established policies and overwhelming established consensus, Commons is not censored based on your religious beliefs. Please refer to en:Talk:Muhammad/FAQ, File talk:Maome.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mohammed kaaba 1315 bew.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mohammed kaaba 1315.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Maome.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mahomet.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Muhammad 1514.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maome.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mcrop.JPG (concerning the same file), Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed kaaba 1315.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed by Hlkolaya.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg (2nd nomination), Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beheading Prophet Muhammad. Muhammads cousin.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Depiction of The "Prophet" Muhammad by Napalm filled tires.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burning.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:An angel presenting Mohammed with a town.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed Splits the Moon.jpg for example. At this point, endlessly nominating these images without the slightest attempt at bringing any new arguments whatsoever to the table is purely disruptive. If you are offended by depictions of Muslim characters created by Muslim artists, don't look at depictions of Muslim characters created by Muslim artists. Speedy non-admin closure, because there is plenty of precedent here. LX (talk, contribs) 18:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image represents a lack of respect for the Muslim community and especially for the person represented (Muhammad). This is an offence to Muslim, We therefore ask for this image to be deleted as soon as possible. Thank you in advance. 2A01:CB1D:8CD6:1700:593E:DA7C:1E01:8476 12:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non administrator closure) Slam dunk per previous several closures linked above. How can you (or several yous?) claim to speak in name of "the Muslim community"? If it offends you ("offence to Muslim"), dont look at it but dont try to impose your religious convictions on other people, be it muslims or non-muslims or claim to a enourmous and heterogeneous group. In fact this is a ottoman copy of an original iranian copy, clearly muslim countries then and now. Tm (talk) 13:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensive to Muslims — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghost of Kiev (talk • contribs) 19:46, 15 November 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept: (non administrator closure) per previous sections.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

our prophet SHOULDN'T be illustrated !!!! 31.33.138.9 01:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see the requests above. --Wutsje 03:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyun616 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus CC license. Should be sourced and relicensed accordingly to be kept.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For File:Wladiwostok Parade 1918.jpg the source is correctly assigned. I have correctly filled in, the author. The image is free. Accipiter Gentilis Q. (talk) 12:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 21:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyun616 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus CC license. Should be sourced and relicensed accordingly to be kept.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 21:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hyun616 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for statues and 2D works.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; file ripped from Facebook without permission. 130.105.143.85 13:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 06:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect copyright. Not all public records are public domain. Doubtful that the user took the image. 331dot (talk) 13:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Previously deleted at multiple file names. Image is taken from site with copyright indicated here and there is no evidence that the uploader is authorized to release it under a Commons-compatible license. --Kinu (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: https://www.trentonnj.org/ImageRepository/Document?documentID=303. --King of ♥ 07:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VinceJohnVillanueva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zeadmollik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are out-of-COM:SCOPE as they are all personal photographs by a non-contributor. They can be deleted per COM:F10.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This violates COM:SPAM. The image is an advertisement and does not have educational value. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. 丂ㄒ尺ㄚ几 (talk) 07:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam de Fan Aitorembe (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file(s). Out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp & hiwp --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

higher quality JPG version here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paul_Nadar_-_Henri_Becquerel.jpg FMSky (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close: This is a PNG version of a JPEG. JPEGs are a lossy file type, so continued editing will degrade them, so a PNG is usually kept as well. It's standard practise. Any visual difference between the two is because of a known thumbnailer bug that Wikipedia has A. known about for nearly a decade and B. Has decided not to fix because in a tiny minority of files it's advantageous to be blurry, apparently. But, if you actually look at the files at full size, JPEG isn't higher quality, it's a lossy encoding. If Wikipedia actually had working PNG thumbnailing, we wouldn't need two copies of edited files (we could just use the PNG), but... there we go. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It includes fingerprints from an unknown person! Cvalda (talk) 10:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Metronomfamily

[edit]

COM:ADVERT for promotional Wikidata items, out of scope --JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used + unknown license WoweMain (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense, Wikidata description read “Religious current in Segovia, Spain” Emu (talk) 10:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakenly uploaded, please delete. Abd Alsattar Ardati (talk) 10:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another chemistry-related gallery page, since 2000s there is little interest in any edits or updates of this page, it contains a few random files, while the respective Category:MDMA is well-maintained, just like with the rest of similar galleries, I see no reason to keep a page that gains minimal interest once a decade. Wostr (talk) 11:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by XNAWAZ22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos by someone with no other contributions. Commons is not free webhosting for personal photos. (And, obviously, if the person depicted is the user, which seems to be implied, then they are copyright violations anyway since the copyright belongs to the photographer.)

B (talk) 12:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gefrorener Krieg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious flags of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdohadjmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Themaller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is out-of-scope, as it is a personal photograph that is of low quality (it is extremely blurry) by an otherwise non-contributor. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diana salas modelo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Persistent self-promotion (see also Special:DeletedContributions/Diana salas modelo). Commons is not your personal free web host. In addition, obviously not "own work".

Achim55 (talk) 20:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by فاطمة الزهراء as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: ملف شخصي اريد حذفه
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy and is useful as stock-image. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by فاطمة الزهراء as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: ملف شخصي اريد حذفه Yann (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file is my personal work, and I don't want this image to be used in articles or even Commons, so I want to delete it. فاطمة الزهراء (talk) 18:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
فاطمة الزهراء: The licenses on Commons are irrevocable. Once you publish a file here, it is permanent. Courtesy deletions are allowed within one week of upload only. Yann (talk) 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi@Yann There are files that were published years ago and have been deleted, so why not this file? Also this picture is a personal picture and I do not want it to remain on the site, and I think this is my right? فاطمة الزهراء (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann@Túrelio I uploaded this picture as an experiment at the beginning here on Commons, and currently I hope that it will be deleted in order to preserve my privacy as well as the privacy of the child in the picture فاطمة الزهراء (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy deletion, small size, no EXIF, not used. --Yann (talk) 21:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PLEASE IGNORE THIS DELETION REQUEST, IT WAS MADE INCORRECTLY AND THE FILE NO LONGER NEEDS DELETING (EDITED 15:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)) ProfAuthor (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: nomination withdrawn. --Strakhov (talk) 12:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an advertisement for "Maestros espirituales" and there is no evidence that the uploader has the rights to license this photo under CC-BY-SA. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 18:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sousce. La loi et la justice (talk) 05:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 19:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an outdated logo of the Finnish National Opera and Ballet that is no longer in use and should not be used by anyone any longer. 94.199.117.113 06:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, we don't delete historic logos just because they're historic. --Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minia Joneck, who provided me with the photos, decided against our licenses today, sorry --MBq (talk) 08:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minia Joneck, who provided me with the photos, decided against our licenses today, sorry MBq (talk) 08:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's the name of the photographer in the bottom right corner? -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to replace this media with a new one News blade 24 (talk) 08:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is copyrighted SuperMug (talk) 16:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2043. --Rosenzweig τ 18:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New version of picture will be posted Alifono (talk) 18:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lefjag as Speedy (Db-g7) and the most recent rationale was: g7 In use. Yann (talk) 18:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, I uploaded this photo and want it to be kept. Lefjag (talk) 13:19, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the evidence of public domain or a free license. Currently it is under a mention "All rights reserved." on Flickr. Yann (talk) 16:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: , If you want to delete this photo, you may delete it, I have not any objection. Lefjag (talk) 03:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are indicated in the file description as being "Copyright reserved by copyright owner", In past instances this has also meant that the relevant documents were not necessarily authored by entities being funded as serving US military, or US federal employees. A number also post-date any notice requirements meaning that they cannot be converted to no-notice licenses. These had been previously tagged as copyvio, but concerns were expressed that use of that CSD was creating an undesirable backlog, and hence they have been brought to DR instead. The entire category needs to be resolved, but VFC cannot cope with 1500 files in a single request.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete all. Admittedly I didn't look through most of these files and I'm not super up on the technicalities involved in the broader issues with the backlog or whatever. But, the few I looked through were written as college dissertations, which I'm pretty sure aren't PD (someone could argue they could be if the research is done as part of a government research grant or something but that's really out of the scope of this deletion request). So I think the files should be deleted to at least abide by the precontionery prenciple if not for any other reason. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 05:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These files have been "temporarily" undeleted per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2022-10#Files in Category:Documents from the US Naval Postgraduate School Library/reserved. As it appears nothing relevant has changed since then, I'm re-deleting them now. --Krd 11:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appear to be from http://alghadeer.tv/news/detail/102607/

Ytoyoda (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, exifdata is missing because I transferred these images from my phone to my computer by email. That's the reason why exifdata is missing. Secondly, it's quite normal that some resolutions are small for the simple reason that they are mostly portraits of soccer players. Finally, if you think about it, you'll see that my nickname is Kari (0t) which is the opposite of Irak = I am a photographer and I work for the Iraqi Football Association. Finally, these images are public interest images to help and reassure the reader that he is on the right page of the player concerned. Kari0t (talk) 06:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear how the uploader can claim ownership of architects’ artistic renderings.

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Several images were uploaded with fake EXIF data, which put the whole series into doubt. See also [1].

Yann (talk) 20:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 05:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kari0t (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Iraq, there is no freedom of panorama on Iraq and photographs of architecture are considered copyrighted. If the uploader has written permission, they’re welcome to submit it to COM:VRT.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing to add:
I noticed in one of the earlier requests an assertion that the uploader has included fake EXIF data, a claim that seems to be supported by File:Jalal Hassan 2023.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karbala Stadium.jpg, two uploads with incorrect camera dates, which generally should not happen with iPhone cameras. It's also strange that every photograph is claimed to be taken on iPhone X, despite many of the photographs appearing to be drone photos or DSLR quality.
Finally, the user claims to be working for the Iraq football federation. That raises the possibility that the photos belong to the federation, which would require verification with COM:VRT.
Anyway, because of the user's edit history, unverified claim about the sourcing, and frankly nonsense rationale about the username and the photos being in public interest, COM:PCP applies here. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, with exception of File:Al-Minaa Stadium.jpg, File:Al-Fayhaa Stadium.jpg and File:Karbalaa Stadium.jpg I fail to see anything above threshold of originality in these images. Is there solid evidence that TOO is really so low in Iran? --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio The honest answer is that I’m not sure. And I realize FOP was my rationale for starting this DR, but given that these images are likely not properly sourced (with faked EXIF data) and (I think) these photos are re-uploads of previously deleted files, I don’t think FOP is that relevant here any more. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as uploader has demonstrated that we cannot assume good faith. holly {chat} 17:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lefjag as Speedy (Db-g7) and the most recent rationale was: g7 In use. Yann (talk) 18:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I uploaded this photo and want it to be kept. Lefjag (talk) 13:19, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, No valid reason for deletion; the photo is a public domain of Pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.111.207.172 (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the evidence of that? Currently it is under a mention "All rights reserved." on Flickr. Yann (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: , I had tagged this photo with g-7 speedy deletion policy, why didn't you delete it then? You may delete it now. File:Pakistani superstar Waheed Murad 1962.jpg, File:Actor Waheed Murad 1959.jpg, File:Singer Ahmed Rushdi in 1959.jpg, File:Ahmed Rushdi playback singer 1954.jpg, File:Ahmed Rushdi 1958.jpg, File:Ahmed Rushdi with musicians.jpg, see these photos and tell where are the evidences of public domain or a free license. Lefjag (talk) 03:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lefjag as Speedy (Db-g7) and the most recent rationale was: g7 In use. Yann (talk) 18:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment, If any administrator wants to delete it, he/she may delete it, I have not any objection. Lefjag (talk) 03:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strainsburg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Angles and image quality/artifacts suggest these are all screenshots of (likely copyrighted) videos.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence Strainsburg (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Strainsburg I’ve explained the evidence. It’s the responsibility of the uploader to provide source information that’s verifiable. Especially since a lot of your other uploads are web copyvios, COM:PCP applies, I think. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strainsburg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same as above - clearly screenshots with source not specified. The uploader’s other contributions were obvious copyvios.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright http://www.handlfh.org/joueuse/julie-dazet/ Remy34 (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still no license. --Yann (talk) 09:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 14:44, 23 September 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 19:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is retrieved from [2]. 小日向麻衣, KOHINATA Mai, is a pop idle of Collet Promotion Inc[3]. The wordings "公式アー写" means "公式アーティスト写真" / 'artist's official photograph'. This file infringes copyright unless Collet Promotion Inc or the photographer grants. The Copyright Act in Japan doesn't have any 'fair use' clause. Kurihaya (talk) 04:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no proof of CC-BY-4.0. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio The copyright of this file is protected by Copyright Law of Japan, because TAKI Shuho (瀧秋方), the painter died in 1979. See: https://crd.ndl.go.jp/reference/modules/d3ndlcrdentry/index.php?page=ref_view&id=1000137839 (Japanese). Ihimutefu (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ihimutefuさんご指摘ありがとうございました。
しかしながら、私は下記の理由により著作権侵害には当たらないと判断して画像をアップロードしました。
この画像は月山富田城跡の太鼓壇公園に立つ看板を撮影したものです。
月山富田城跡は公共の公園であり、そこに立つ看板の一部を写真で撮影した画像です。
そのため、著作権法著作権法45条2項及び46条により著作権侵害の例外とされ著作権侵害にはあたらないと考えています。
(美術の著作物等の原作品の所有者による展示)
第四十五条 美術の著作物若しくは写真の著作物の原作品の所有者又はその同意を得た者は、これらの著作物をその原作品により公に展示することができる。
2 前項の規定は、美術の著作物の原作品を街路、公園その他一般公衆に開放されている屋外の場所又は建造物の外壁その他一般公衆の見やすい屋外の場所に恒常的に設置する場合には、適用しない。
(公開の美術の著作物等の利用)
第四十六条 美術の著作物でその原作品が前条第二項に規定する屋外の場所に恒常的に設置されているもの又は建築の著作物は、次に掲げる場合を除き、いずれの方法によるかを問わず、利用することができる。
一 彫刻を増製し、又はその増製物の譲渡により公衆に提供する場合
二 建築の著作物を建築により複製し、又はその複製物の譲渡により公衆に提供する場合
三 前条第二項に規定する屋外の場所に恒常的に設置するために複製する場合
四 専ら美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する場合
以上です。よろしくお願いいたします SNHRRN (talk) 14:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of COM:FOP Japan. --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://www.facebook.com/iraqgfpg/photos/pcb.4425559350793128/4425559190793144/. Previously published content requires COM:OTRS verification. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:07, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iraq and architectural works are considered copyrighted. Please see previous case Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Basra Sport City. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Related discussion: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Kari0t. Nehme1499 (talk) 16:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by User:Praxidicae, presumably because the source URL does not currently display a CC license. Throast (talk) 23:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's obviously subject to copyright so I fail to see why this needs an outright discussion. Praxidicae (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Then, by that logic, File:AndrewTate.png should also be nominated for deletion. Also, YouTube's policy states that, "By marking your original video with a Creative Commons license, you're granting the entire YouTube community the right to reuse and edit that video." If you misunderstood that, please re-read the statement and focus on the only italicized word in it. L33tm4n (talk) 00:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: CC license states that the video needs to be originally uploaded under such license. As the uploader of the file specifies in the summary, the video was originally published under a compatible CC license. Throast (talk) 23:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Once a work has been licensed under Creative Commons that license cannot be retroactively revoked. Hemiauchenia (talk) 10:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moving to it.wiki under Exemption Doctrine Policy (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:File_non_liberi), currently adopted for party and coalition logos. See https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Italia_Viva_logo_elettorale.svg as an example. MatMasIt (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the depicted mural is clearly above COM:TOO, it is to be considered as copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works (2D "graphic works") in the U.K. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:38, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted people are unidentified, probably non-notable. Quality is not good. Is the photo out of project scope as unused personal photo? Taivo (talk) 20:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work, but work of Andre Gabes. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the Library of Congress, the copyright on this work (which was published with a valid copyright notice in 1958) was renewed. The copyright of the magazine belongs to Billboard Publications, Inc. and, as such, we have no evidence that this whole magazine is available under the license claimed by the uploader. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source for this image is the CC-BY-3.0 arabic license, which is not a valid source. There is no evidence that this file is available under CC0 1.0, which is not supported by the (invalid) source. This image is associated for a movie that was released in 1973, so this would be protected in any country that's either Life+50 years or publication+50 years. Per the COM:PRP, this should be thusly deleted. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist Ottar Espeland (Norway) died in 1996 and has not been dead for at least 70 years. Files showing his work cannot be uploaded until 2067, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Public_domain#Copyright_terms_by_country Norway life + 70 and Category:Ottar Espeland Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlike own work, low resolution photo without EXIF. Larryasou (talk) 01:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:27, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo eligible for copyright, per COM:TOO UK. 丂ㄒ尺ㄚ几 (talk) 03:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used + unknown license WoweMain (talk) 04:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:49, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used + unknown license WoweMain (talk) 04:08, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work; higher resolution version found at http://patricklepetit.jalbum.net/PHETCHABUN/PHOTOS/NATIONAL%20PARKS/Si%20Thep%20Historical%20Park/indexb.html Paul_012 (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Werde in den nächsten Tagen beim Park vorbeigehen und die Parktafel fotografieren.--KusiD (talk) 13:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is corrupted and there's no clue provided showing the image was published between 1927 and 1977. Mhhossein talk 06:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but I would expect a better evidence like an online archive of newspapers or like. --Mhhossein talk 10:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The picture came from the Madison Square Garden archive (also stamped), I'm unsure how that's different from a newspaper archive? I wouldn't expect a 90 year old picture to have metadata.LM2000 (talk) 12:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A newspaper archive guarantees the publication of a work on a specific date, which is lacking here. None of these seem compelling to me. I leave the decision to the admin closing the discussion. --Mhhossein talk 10:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just want to note for the closing admin that we have the front and back of the picture. We know where it came from (Madison Square Garden archive) and who took it (Bert Roberts) and there is no copyright notice. It's stamped April 21, 1931. The subject (Jim Londos) died in 1975 at the age of 81, so we know the picture was taken during that time.LM2000 (talk) 03:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I mean, I've made my case repeatedly already. We know this was published between 1927 and 1977 because Londos died in 1975 (in his 80s at that point). We know where this picture came from and it was stamped (without copyright) in the 1930's. The front and back pictures are clearly related as they were pulled from the same eBay listing; you can see the pictures have the same curl and are taken on the same wooden table. I have nothing more to add, it's up to admins to make the final decision and I will respect whatever decision that may be. Best of luck on the DYK, LM2000 (talk) 00:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: A dated press photo is evidence of publication: "the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending. The offering to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display, constitutes publication.". --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© David Holbrook Photography. See metadata Wouter (talk) 07:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING DanielPenfield (talk) 09:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is not published as Creative Commons. —Ismael Olea (talk) 09:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative, COM:PACKAGING. Xunks (talk) 19:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from website but is not licensed under Creative Commons Dr vulpes (talk) 00:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: CC-BY-SA-4.0 at the very bottom. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was uploaded as the own work of the uploader, but when said user uploaded the image to the Wikipedia article "Coors strike and boycott" they listed the image as "Local 366 Coors Boycott Pamphlet, Juan Federico “Freddie Freak” Trujillo Collection, Colorado State University – Pueblo Archives." Therefore, I have reason to doubt the copyright status of this image. JJonahJackalope (talk) 03:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is inaccurate. It needs to be updated drastically 2600:100C:A203:16B3:7818:2A0B:C470:4E6E 04:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I made it 11 years ago so it's bound to be out of date. Cains (talk) 10:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map needs to be updated greatly. Several states not marked have H&M stores including but not limited to, Texas. 2600:100C:A212:26E1:95C4:A640:3681:AC30 05:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Shows situation as of 2011. Creating a new map showing the situation in 2023 is welcome. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:1a2b3c 123

[edit]

I believe they should be deleted because the artist Ottar Espeland (Norway) died in 1996 and has not been dead for at least 70 years. Files showing his work cannot be uploaded until 2067, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Public_domain#Copyright_terms_by_country Norway life + 70 and Category:Ottar Espeland. --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon. Le Leprechaun (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept File:Place-nalinnes-centre.png, deleted and redirected File:1904 - Place du centre à Nalinnes-Centre.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mortada4x (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be edited renders of the building. As per w:en:Central Bank of Iraq Tower, the estimated year of completion is 2022. But these images date to 2014, at that time the building was virtually non-existent. Therefore, I suspect copyright violation.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced and potentially problematic especially in a geopolitical sense of a so called irredentist "Undivided India" map. Anyone could create a map of their own country and annex its neighbours and claim that it's "undivided". In this particular case, the inclusion of Tibet and Afghanistan is really stretching it. The only time "India" was larger than it is today was during British colonial rule, when it had also included Bangladesh, Pakistan and Myanmar (detached in 1937 to become its own colony). 175.197.219.194 19:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, the image is extremely misleading and should be deleted. Blatantly putting Tibet as part of India without any proper reasoning or reference. Tanvir Ahmed Zubair (talk) 10:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I agree with all the criticisms of the map, but it's in use to illustrate Hindu nationalism and cannot be deleted per policy. Please understand that tendentious content can and even must be covered in order to show what extremists are saying and doing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination not in use now. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Barring a notice elsewhere by the "Freedom to Breathe Agency", the prose contained herein is automatically under copyright regardless of the photograph's licensing. Fourthords | =Λ= | 13:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudolaw isn't the law. The prose was obviously not created by the government and is not in the public domain. Chess (User talk:Chess) Please ping when replying. 02:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio of text, no government public domain status. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo uploaded under improper licensing. Adog (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing source for the Lil Baby pic Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Kadı Message 06:05, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING.

Wcam (talk) 12:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The YT video lacks a CC-BY license even if the channel frequently uploads other videos with that license. Seloloving (talk) 05:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problem solved, the original source and picture were replaced with the authorized ones uploaded by the same author. Hank2530 (talk) 13:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I substituted the image with a composite from the video. This deletion request may be closed but the first version of the file still needs to be revdel'd. Seloloving (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Seloloving: Pay attention to this: This photo (which updated in 14:42, 22 August 2022 by User:Seloloving) is too similar with this photo ([4]) of CCTV in this article ([5]). The last identical file was flagged for copyright infringement and removed.--TakeuchiYui.AutoConfirmed (talk) 03:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 18:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploaders "own work". Mako001 (talk) 02:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mark Miller as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: not realistically useful for an educational purpose.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. (does not qualify for G7-speedy). -- Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator and author/artist. While I have many works with true encyclopedic value that I have contributed based on public domain images, this subject has many images that could be released to a creative commons license, including the original photo the painting is based on. Also, no OTRS is forthcoming for permissions from the original photographer from me for the image. The photographer had given verbal/private permissions, but I am not willing to ask for OTRS.--Mark Miller (talk) 05:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded after June 2017: https://unsplash.com/photos/SGlxo6rSYcw Abu-Dun (talk) 07:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:55, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted. Checkat the bottom of the webpage at https://thenextera2022.com/ Tomchiukc (talk) 08:08, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is a trademark, mate. Check the regulations please. -Jaden Lai


Deleted: per nomination, likely above COM:TOO Hong Kong. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, EXIF data indicate it is from facebook, possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 08:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Material from goverment website is not in PD. Larryasou (talk) 10:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. See also uploader's talk page. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:47, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright https://www.ouest-france.fr/pays-de-la-loire/nantes-44000/c-est-simple-quand-une-femme-dit-non-5401214 Remy34 (talk) 15:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After discussion with the author of this visual, the photographs of the tiger, the fish and the platypus were bought on Stockphotos and are not free of rights. The hammerhead shark image is free. --Abalg (talk) 11:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same issue with File:Poster Podcast Nomen.png, File:Poster Podcast Combats.png and File:Poster Podcast Petit Poisson Deviendra Podcast.png.
The image of File:Poster Podcast Baleine Sous Gravillon.png (hammerhead shark) is from Marc Mortelmans and is free of rights. ----Abalg (talk) 12:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Les différents podcasts de l'association Baleine Sous Gravillon.jpg --Abalg (talk) 12:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Les différents podcasts de l'association Baleine Sous Gravillon.jpg --Abalg (talk) 12:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Les différents podcasts de l'association Baleine Sous Gravillon.jpg --Abalg (talk) 12:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad PNG; superseded by File:Esfand 2022.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wheelix-de as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: superseded by 1912-Hg.png In use. Yann (talk) 18:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pro: Es ist die pixelbasierte Version einer halbherzig ausgeführten Vektorisierung auf Grundlage der benannten 1912-Hg.png es gibt keine Verwendung für diese Version. Wenn du Commons mit sowas „Vollstopfen“ willst, ist das kein Problem für mich, ich wollte einfach aufräumen mit solchen Grafiken von minderer Qualität.

Deleted: not an exact copy, but at least partially a derivative work of the image we have scanned as File:1912-Hg.png. That one is a work of Hermann Knodt (1880–1969), so it is not in the PD in its source country Germany yet. The file can be restored in 2040. --Rosenzweig τ 15:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wheelix-de as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: superseded by 1912-H.png In use. Yann (talk) 18:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pro: Es ist eine Version, die ein Scan eines Drucks ist, bei dem die Ausgangsgrafik bereits eine ungünstige Kopie der schwarz-weiß Variante (1914) des bunten Originals (1912) namens 1912-H.png ist. Man sieht die Halbtondruck Punkte noch. Des Weiteren hat der kusiv geschriebene Wahlspruch nichts in der Wappengrafik verloren.

Deleted: not an exact copy, but a derivative work of the image we have scanned as File:1912-H.png. That one is a work of Hermann Knodt (1880–1969), so it is not in the PD in its source country Germany yet. The file can be restored in 2040. --Rosenzweig τ 15:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wheelix-de as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: superseded by 1912-K.png GerritR (talk) 20:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Einspruch, Löschantragsgrund "superseded" nicht statthaft, auch nicht im regulären Verfahren.--GerritR (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist die pixelbasierte Version einer halbherzig ausgeführten Vektorisierung auf Grundlage der benannten 1912-K.png es gibt keine Verwendung für diese Version. Wenn du Commons mit sowas „Vollstopfen“ willst, ist das kein Problem für mich, ich wollte einfach aufräumen mit solchen Grafiken von minderer Qualität.Wheelix-de (talk) 22:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
erstens ist es auf jeden Fall keine Sache für einen Schnelllöschantrag, siehe COM:dupe und COM:redundant. Zweitens halte ich es für fragwürdig, die Datei zu dekategorisieren.--GerritR (talk) 08:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not an exact copy, but a derivative work of the image we have scanned as File:1912-K.png. That one is a work of Hermann Knodt (1880–1969), so it is not in the PD in its source country Germany yet. The file can be restored in 2040. --Rosenzweig τ 15:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wheelix-de as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Superseded by 1912-L.png GerritR (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Einspruch, superseded ist kein gültiger Löschgrund, auch nicht im regulären Verfahren.--GerritR (talk) 20:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
pro:Es ist die pixelbasierte Version einer halbherzig ausgeführten Vektorisierung auf Grundlage der benannten 1912-L.png es gibt keine Verwendung für diese Version. Wenn du Commons mit sowas „Vollstopfen“ willst, ist das kein Problem für mich, ich wollte einfach aufräumen mit solchen Grafiken von minderer Qualität.Wheelix-de (talk) 22:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Erstens ist es auf jeden Fall keine Sache für einen Schnelllöschantrag, siehe COM:dupe und COM:redundant. Zweitens halte ich es für fragwürdig, die Datei zu dekategorisieren.--GerritR (talk) 09:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: work of Hermann Knodt (1880–1969), so this is not in the PD in its source country Germany yet. The file can be restored in 2040. --Rosenzweig τ 14:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as Logo. Converting to DR per uploader's comments at COM:UNDEL:

According to Japanese Copyright law,a work made by organizations are copyrighted for 50years. The logo of Kyoto university officially adopted in 1990. However, the original logo was designed in 1951. Therefore,I guess this logo must be public domain. Thank you. Ramsal18 (talk) 00:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

@Ramsal18: Is this current logo exactly the same as the 1951 version? If not, can you please link to a copy of the original version so we can discuss whether the modifications are above COM:TOO Japan? King of ♥ 04:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is just a little distinction between the original version and current one which I think is entitled to no new copyright. Please see logo history.--Larryasou (talk) 05:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Per COM:JAPAN the copyright of a work in the name of an organization expires 70 years after publication, or 70 years after the creation if the work is not published within 70 years after creation. So the original logo with the tree is now in PD. Imho the current logo differs only on minor points from the original logo of 1950 als shown by Larryasou, so it is in PD as well and can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 23:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lallint as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Website says "All rights reserved", and the song played in the video is licensed to music companies, too. I doubt that all of these multiple cameramen, filming at multiple different angles very professionally, would all go on to release the video under the license, as well. The source video is deleted, too. Not a valid reason for speedy. The Vimeo video seems to have been an official release, based on the description of the source. Pinging 1989 who LicenseReviewed the file in 2015 to see if he remembers any details. King of ♥ 04:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wayback Machine archived this link: [6] and indeed it is licensed under CC-BY license. It was uploaded by this channel, which claims to "This is the official site for all RockBitch videos.". Indeed, the captured website links to this Vimeo channel. The website does indeed say "All rights reserved", but that only applies to website probably. Borysk5 (talk) 12:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 23:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is CommsPE, but file name is:File:Daisy Edgar-Jones Headshot 2 Jason Hetherington.tif -- implies that the uploader is not the photographer and does not have permission to use this file Sardaka (talk) 10:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 23:53, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of file:Woman Montage (1), without acknowledging the author of the original Matinee71 (talk) 10:51, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The image, consisting of many individual photographs is not licensed correctly, as it does not list all authors. The image is not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 23:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AtenorWiki

[edit]

Files with missing EXIF data, unlikely own work. File:Isadora Zubillaga.jpg is a copyvio from El Nuevo País y Zeta newspaper ([7]). --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:51, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 23:57, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grupodeboston

[edit]

Not own work files: the first and second files' author is Pedro Díaz Blum, and the third and fourth's is Donald Trump. I would assume that the last file's author is Pedro Díaz Blum too, who is one of the signers of the document. --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except the tweet of Donald Trump. --Ellywa (talk) 23:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I know USPTO has a pretty high bar for threshold of originality, but it seems like the bull graphic is complex enough that it no longer qualifies as a text logo? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: watermarked with 中国新聞 Fish bowl (talk) 23:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is from Google Street View. Copyvio. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 12:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has uploaded several copyright violations. Judging by the resolution of the image, it appears to be a screenshot of a video. No exif data; likely not uploader's own work. – Pbrks (t • c) 14:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; image dimensions of 1920 × 1080 pixels do suggest a video screenshot. --Rosenzweig τ 14:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect information in need of update, I will upload a new version after deletion. Ornithoptera (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lallint as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clear copyvio King of ♥ 04:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment This was rejected for speedy deletion by one admin, retagged by the same user, and then subsequently deleted by another admin. Thus this is prima facie a controversial case and should be brought before DR. -- King of ♥ 05:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thanks for converting this to a regular DR. This was originally tagged as copyvio using the rationale “Clear copyvio” without any further elaboration. I declined this as this does not appear to be a clear-cut copyvio to me as this video has been published under a CC-BY license at Youtube. This was confirmed by YouTubeReviewBot and can also be verified through archive.org. This license was later retracted. My decline was later undone by Lallint now using the rationale “The Discord ping sounds used in the remix are copyrighted so this video is a derivative”. This may very well be the case but such cases should be discussed in a regular deletion request as this is no longer a clear-cut case as required for a speedy deletion. I haven't researched whether this video is indeed a derivative. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: On this archive, from april 2020, 10 months after the first upload on Youtube, the license is still CCBYSA. If it was a mistake, it took long to get corrected. The music appears free as well, so no reason to think it is copyrighted by somebody. However, small sounds perhaps are copyrighted, but can be considered de minimis. Impossible to check... so decided to keep. --Ellywa (talk) 19:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad png; superseded by File:Céré de la tamkharit avec sauce.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. made a redirect to the jpg version. --Ellywa (talk) 19:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFop for modern (2021) monuments in Russia. 176.59.52.31 12:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Этот памятник героям Великой Отечественной войны. Охраняется государством. Удаление этого файла - основательная причина для обращения в Роскомнадзор и в суд. Surge-63 (talk) 09:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 14:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to think this is not an own photo. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ambigous. Not sure if the "Office of Senator Robin Padilla" would count as a work of the Philippine government which would make this file in the public domain. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 19:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Cloudbound: Unused crop of headshot of former Wikipedia Mascot [sic, contest was inconclusive] Arlo James Barnes 15:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use at ja:Template:Character-stub, used on many articles on Ja.Wp. --Ellywa (talk) 19:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

much better versions available

-- FMSky (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:REDUNDANT. This version is not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 19:22, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad PNG; superseded by File:Louis Richmond Cheney.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's bad about it? Nick Number (talk) 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no requirement to delete, no consensus to delete. --Ellywa (talk) 19:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 21:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:TOO Italy “the threshold for an industrial design product to enjoy copyright protection is still quite high and even famous industrial design products have been denied such protection by Italian Courts”. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. I consider this logo below the high TOO of Italy and decided it can be kept on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 19:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be taken from https://thegeorgiareview.com/authors/jackson-virginia/, authorship is unclear. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point--it also appears on her university web page: https://www.faculty.uci.edu/profile.cfm?faculty_id=5852 Marfanow (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, the YouTube source appears to be a clip from a TV show. The YouTube uploader does not appear to be an official account of a TV company, so it is unlikely that they own the copyright. Ravensfire (talk) 22:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I agree with Rejoy2003 the Youtube film used as a source is licensed CCBYSA. It is a (rather amateurish) film for an election campaign. No reason to think it is not uploaded by the person himself with a free license. therefore decide to keep the image. --Ellywa (talk) 19:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See bottom of the page: there seems to be a watermark indicating an agency or photographer to whom the picture belongs (I cannot really read it clearly, it is too bad quality). Real photographer's name is needed, as well as an authorization. Titlutin (talk) 23:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flags of w:The Other Russia of E. V. Limonov (founded in 2010); clearly over COM:TOO Russia and most likely COM:TOO US as well.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and discussion. We would need permission of the owners of the copyright per VRT. If succesful, the images can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]