Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 27th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Raimond Spekking (raimond.spekking@gmail.com) Copyright holder The copyright is hold by the artist. 191.125.142.66 00:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Author Raimond Spekking (raimond.spekking@gmail.com) Copyright holder is the uploader Raymond.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as author, photographer and copyright owner. Raymond 06:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Also used. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, clear outcome of the discussion. --Leyo 07:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer needed on website Doggydog2233 (talk) 03:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and not "own work". See https://www.discogs.com/release/1410127-Girls-Aloud-Something-Kinda-Ooooh and https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=something+kinda+ooooh+video Jonesey95 (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --plicit 13:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; CV in pdf-format. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sirs and Madams,
I created the file and thus there are no copy rights violations.
Kindly please publish the page as intended, note please that the search engines are not picking up the page.
I would appreciate your input referencing the same.
Regards,
Saf Fahim SafFahim (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody mentioned copyright (CV means curriculum vitae). This is simply out of scope of Commons. Commons is not Facebook or alike. --Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted and I indefinitely blocked the uploader. Taivo (talk) 06:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Site does not says that this file is in public domain Kazman322 (talk) 11:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English: Jane before after the buildin fell down 191.125.142.66 00:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SD:copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears in several places without a free license. No description or categories -- who is he? Out of scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Closed in favor of mass deletion of five identicla images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Bastianseho (talk) 17:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial use is prohibited on the publisher site, and the license does not match CC-BY-SA. エノール (talk) 08:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:44, 27 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Anime/manga/comics --Krdbot 19:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. Dwinug (talk) 11:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. Dwinug (talk) 11:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. Dwinug (talk) 11:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 20:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double Kinacki (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark says "©Eric Raptosh", is not the work of the Flickr user Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Somebody needs? 5R-MFT (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Only pornographic. The uploader is a new user since 24 June 2022 and using Commons for self-promotion of his body parts. Buceta is a vulgar expression in brazilian-portuguese for the vagina → Category:Buceta (surname) chosen by the uploader.Nemracc (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Content intended as vandalism (G3). --Эlcobbola talk 19:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a press picture, not own work Elisfkc (talk) 19:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Bastianseho (talk) 22:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. This is the 3rd one. --Achim55 (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlbertoUrbinaCR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probable copy-vios. A series of professional looking portraits, of low resolution and no exif data.

Voice of Clam 06:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No discernible encyclopedic purpose, bizarre and possibly insulting.

Dronebogus (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Achim55 (talk) 20:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oribay Group Automotive (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. Also no evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook, studio, scope, etc. 191.125.142.66 00:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is scope? Entonces OTRS 191.125.142.66 00:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope is? 191.125.142.66 00:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Faheem Khan Rana? 191.125.142.66 00:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chander_Mohan_Parasher 191.126.141.6 02:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Used on a draft page on en:WP is not a reason to delete the photo. --Ellywa (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file? 191.125.142.66 00:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

amateur drawing, no es usado 191.125.142.66 00:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable individual Oaktree b (talk) 01:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential out of scope. The use of this file is unknown. Uploader was locked because of spam. SCP-2000 05:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio/out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 07:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damienllq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fantasy diagrams, out of project scope

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damienllq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fantasy diagrams, the French Assembly has more than 500 seats, does not match with the actual results (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Seatings_of_the_National_Assembly_of_the_French_Fifth_Republic,_2022-2027)

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not realistically useful for an educational purpose: blurred personal holiday picture with no recognizable element Phso2 (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:Scope. Jonteemil (talk) 11:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Busoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PENIS and possibly COM:OOS. Commons already have a wide coverage of the topic.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Busoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PORN, images have no educational value

Yeeno (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Busoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PORN

//LevandeMänniska (talk), 00:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Commons isn't a porn host and these clearly don't serve any education purpose. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Busoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Immature exhibitionistic nonsense

Dronebogus (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per the nominator. Commons isn't a porn host. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Busoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NUDE and no educational value

LevandeMänniska (talk), 06:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete; one is COM:INUSE but doesn’t need to be because I don’t know how a naked man in a telephone booth taken by an exhibitionistic man child tells anyone anything about Cap d'Agde Dronebogus (talk) 11:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete exactly i was going to talk about it it's weird i just waited to translate it to make sure i hope someone know this language would be able to make a case and put it on administrators notice board i think this user act on bad faith 197.54.17.205 12:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subrata1w (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 15:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo by non-contributor. Yahya (talk) 11:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:52, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful, seems to be a random sketch and random words note. ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 21:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified, unlikely to be identified, blurry, not useful for educational or other purposes ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 22:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no apparent educational use ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 22:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is hard to imagine that this photo should be the "own work" of the uploader. As such the CC license is quite doubtful. After all, it is a vehicle from the 1920/1930s. Is there a usable public domain license that can possibly be used for this? Mosbatho (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, CC license very unlikely, no proper source etc. to determine copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 09:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. As depicted fr:Guilly d'Herbemont died in 1980, probably the sculpture is still protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 18:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio (lower left corner, the other parts are okay) Enyavar (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be press photo, not own work (image is seen on https://www.uscellular.com/accessories/apple-watch-series-6-cellular-blue-aluminum-blue-sport-band-44mm) Elisfkc (talk) 19:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

36.80.67.195 20:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a previously published image at https://www.barbanews.com/peoples/neymar-joue-du-piano-dans-sa-villa-au-bresil-pour-passer-le-temps/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Válter Guerreiro Martins

[edit]

Unused personal photos; out of the project scope. Francisco (talk) 21:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination except last one (file is in use). --Wdwd (talk) 12:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't appear to have any educational value. Uploader gave no description. Content of image is simply a bunch of post-it notes with Arabic (I think) writing. ···日本穣 Talk to Nihonjoe 21:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination;unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio (just the low center piece of the poster, but still) Enyavar (talk) 21:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Directorkkbinojee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-official logo, looks close to this fan art here: https://www.behance.net/gallery/109166669/FIFA-WORLD-CUP-2026-LOGO-DESIGN?tracking_source=search_projects%7Cmorocco%202026 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 22:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:World_flag_map.svg John emil hernandez (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 20:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP France for election posters.

King of ♥ 17:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pyb (talk) 07:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work very doubtful : no meta information, in https://www.wvnstv.com/news/economist-who-pulled-albania-out-of-1997-anarchy-dead-at-58/ cited as work of AP / Hektor Pustina – there also available in higher resolution. most probably grabbed from the web (same file name as image in https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/economist-pulled-albania-1997-anarchy-dead-58-76750891 ) Albinfo (talk) 12:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted all contributions of the user. --rubin16 (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be grabbed from the web as all the other contributions of this user https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TurtleBlossomOwnsTheNight Albinfo (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted all contributions of the user. --rubin16 (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be grabbed from the web as all the other contributions of this user https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TurtleBlossomOwnsTheNight Albinfo (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted all contributions of the user. --rubin16 (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be grabbed from the web as all the other contributions of this user (images of politicians all around the world at various times, all own work) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TurtleBlossomOwnsTheNight Albinfo (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted all contributions of the user. --rubin16 (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be grabbed from the web as all the other contributions of this user (images of politicians all around the world at various times, all own work) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TurtleBlossomOwnsTheNight Albinfo (talk) 12:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted all contributions of the user. --rubin16 (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2022 IMMOFINANZ AG. All Rights Reserved Andrei (talk) 08:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All rights reserved by cocnircle. Andrei (talk) 08:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Netora as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|2=http://www.city.mimasaka.lg.jp/kanko/info/1647473731606.html See also File:マンホール(湯郷温泉).png. Not eligible for COM:CSD#F3 as it is taken in a public place. King of ♥ 16:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. WikiGi (talk) 18:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlicensed image Dexxtrall (talk) 12:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:TikTok Logo.svg. Jonteemil (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 00:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong Picture and Bad quality delete please. Thanks Secondacc123 (talk) 03:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, quality is acceptable, educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright misuse Thatguy4312 (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 15:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:penis spam 192.145.119.12 20:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 15:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je doute fortement que ConradVdE soit le détenteur des droits de cet affiche. Sété40 (talk) 17:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:59, 23 August 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: poster --Krdbot 18:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description বাংলা: mother toung 191.125.142.66 00:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 11:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:செவ்வாழை முதலிய 4 சிறுகதைகள்.pdf right file name available Info-farmer (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 11:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'ho caricata per errore Al*from*Lig (talk) 22:24, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted and redirected by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 20:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'ho caricata per errore Al*from*Lig (talk) 23:09, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted and redirected by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 20:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'ho caricata per errore Al*from*Lig (talk) 23:10, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted and redirected by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 20:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

illustration already uploaded as File:The Time Machine by Virgil Finlay 2.png Loominade (talk) 08:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name Photoshoper97 (talk) 20:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wrong name Photoshoper97 (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we usually keep redirects. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file format, right file was upload as .svg ReyHahn (talk) 14:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Devo caricarlo su Wiki Loves Italia Scattare61 (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is very much a margin case, but Commons:Threshold_of_originality#United_Kingdom does imply that UK has a low threshold of originality and the tiny modifications of the letters here were also cited by the judge of the EDGE case as creating originality. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 12:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Midnight68

[edit]

Out-of-scope images uploaded by a socks of user:Midnight68 / Blackshade9 / Simon Kirby.

Should be deleted all as fakes. These are not screenshots, but combinations of multiple images. Filenames are untruthful as they don't represent the apps and in some cases, there is a large gap between the image and the app in the filename (FKiss for the clearest example. Also RenPy images also don't look like RenPy UI). Some of the images are created for showing panties in unrelated articles and/or vandalism.

The number before is how many articles the image is currently in use and in parenthesis, there is a comment on how the image could be replaced. In most cases, images are redundant and originally added by socks to the articles.

Artificial images of software
Artificial videoplayer screenshots
Artificial visual novel screenshots

--Zache (talk) 07:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per nom. Let's stop the game. Yann (talk) 08:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Strong oppose I'm talking about File:VisualNovelGame-censored.png.
This version is used on Wikipedia in French on the fr:Visual novel article, so it is not "out of scope". I uploaded it because another user replaced the original version by the censored one, so I created a new file.
The arguments "Should be deleted all as fakes. These are not screenshots, but combinations of multiple images." are absurd and not valid reasons for deletion. This particular file has never been meant to represent an existing game.
Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 09:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
This particular case was added to fr.wikipedia.org at january 2019 (diff) and image was reuploaded November 2019 with young girl in shower (see file history File:VisualNovelGame.png). It is pretty much same pattern of vandalism like in other cases such as in File:WikiReader018.png or File:RenPy001.png or File:Planet boy.jpg or File:WikiDesktop007.png. First non-suspicious file was added to article and then the content was changed to include panty pictures or half-nude minors. --Zache (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also just to be clear and so it will be said aloud. I didn't mean that Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ was one of the sockpuppets or related to Midnight68. I updated the wording in the list to make it more clear. --Zache (talk) 12:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the article on visual novels not better served by any one of the other images of visual novels in Category:Visual novels? — Rhododendrites talk21:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Part of a sustained effort to flood Wikimedia sites with personally created fetish content with little-to-no educational value. From Commons:Deletion policy: (a) Self-created artwork without obvious educational use, (b) Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, (c) Was uploaded with the intent to be used solely for purposes of ... spamming. A few are COM:INUSE, but in every instance I've checked, they're used in articles because one or more of the sock puppets went around to several language Wikipedias and added it themselves. As an aside (and let's not get distracted too much by this), what's the point of prohibiting sockpuppetry if we're just going to say "thanks for the self-promotion; a few people think it's in-scope, so see you next on your next sock"? — Rhododendrites talk21:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Zache: Minor point, but File:VisualNovelGame.png is a Midnight68 creation, too. The part of it created by someone else is File:Anime Girl.png. — Rhododendrites talk21:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, I noticed that. Also File:Datesim001.png was partly created by that another user. I nominated this now too for the deletion as I missed it first. Basically i feel that image was created and used to agitate Niabot (who was the original user who asked to delete Midnight68 images) in the first place. --Zache (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep solely for file:WikiDesktop007.png for a minor personal use, though I’m not demanding anything of course. Also delete anything with lolicon snuck into it for obvious reasons. The others are generally innocent enough but fairly useless so I’m neutral/weak delete. Dronebogus (talk) 14:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as per nom.--Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 17:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Book cover, Duplicate: Reproduction of this portrait https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_Charles_of_France4.jpg CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from an unknown source, the white lines suggested that this was cropped from a larger image. The file description is unsourced too, there is no indication that the invaders were Cholas and the weapon was a flamethrower (it looks like normal fire). From the style of painting, it is similar to post-19th century Siamese traditional art, not from the Chola invasion era. 3D view (Axonometry and Isometry) of traditional Siamese art is very rare, probably this image was made after World War 2 when knowledge of modern 3D view is more understood. Surijeal (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Since the file is in use on many wikis I think the solution is not to delete but to investigate. Perhaps add {{Fact disputed}} to show users that concerns have been raised. Due to copyright rules of India old works are most likely PD so I do not think there is a copyright issue even if this work was made in the 1940s or 1950s. --MGA73 (talk) 06:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question What is the copyright situation in Thailand, if this is indeed a Thai painting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The claim that 3D view is rare in traditional Thai art appears to be false, given that such drawings are seen in the murals at Wat Phraw Kaew, e.g. File:112 Ramakien Murals (9150379096).jpg, File:041 Ramakien Murals (9151217906).jpg, File:Thai palaces murals.jpg first drawn in the 18th century. Stylistically they are not that different, and such 3-D drawing styles are common in many pre-20th century Asian art forms. They are entirely different from modern images (e.g. no or poorly-executed perspective). I would say that stylistically such drawing are typically pre-20th century (and no one has said that it is from the Chola invasion era), and the nomination is not based on firm ground. Hzh (talk) 08:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I advise not to jump to a quick conclusion by assigning delete or keep, especially if there are still problems that have not been discussed in one's reply. This applies to other people too. Now for your argument, 1. Can you give proof that those images you pointed out were from the 18th century? <like, real credible sources such as journals, books, dissertations, thesis, monographs, etc that mentioned that those images were from that era> 2. Have you considered the possibility of a new/modern image painted in those places? It was "first drawn in the 18th century", meaning that there is a possibility of them being from the later eras 3. Can you prove that the File:Battle of kedah.jpg is indeed from that era? 4. What is your stance about the poster (user:Everdawn), did they really make that file themselves or take it from other sources without mentioning it? 5. Can you prove that the license given is valid? 6. Can you prove that the file indeed depicted the battle of Kedah of the 11th century? <even if assuming the mural comes from later era, this is important because the file is named so and the captions used in the Wikipedia pages followed the file name and description in Commons> Surijeal (talk) 13:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are just talking random things that make no sense. The Ramakien murals were commissioned by King Rama I to decorate the walls of Wat Phra Kaew, the most important temple in the Thai royal palace ground, you think they would just paint some random modern pictures over it? It is more for you to prove the illogical things you said about 3D view being post-WW2, no one who knows anything about art would say such things. Hzh (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
None of you has given definite proof that the disputed mural depicted in the file was made in the 18th century or in modern times. Verosaurus (talk) 10:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say it's from the 18th century - the 18th century refers to the Ramakien murals. The suggestion that such paintings may be traditional is the absence of proper perspective drawing, since perspective drawing originated in the West. Early Eastern artworks that attempted to draw perspective are always imperfect, for example this Chinese Tang dynasty work - File:T'ang Architecture in the Mo-kao Fresco 0.jpg and the Thai Ramakien murals File:041 Ramakien Murals (9151217906).jpg (you can see that the roofs are not angled correctly by modern eyes), or simply not attempted e.g. this Mughal painting File:1561-The Submission of the rebel brothers Ali Quli and Bahadur Khan-Akbarnama (cropped).jpg or the "Kedah" painting. Bad or absence of perspective drawing does not necessarily mean that the supposed Kedah painting is pre-20th century, but it would suggest it is traditionally Eastern, and that the idea that it is post-WW2 particularly ill-informed. Hzh (talk) 11:53, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question 1) The description in the Commons page is likely a fraudulent claim. It has no reference and may have been added for supporting certain claim/article. 2) As for the image itself, if this was taken as a photo, it needs to be questioned because of the small size, unclear resolution, and the white edges may indicated a screenshot from a file or website. 3) The intent of the original uploader should be taken into consideration, the uploader has been proven to upload problematic files in the past (about 7 images has been deleted). A page made by the user:Everdawn is full of fraudulent claims, fake references, and misattributed references [1]. 4) Does the user themselves set the file license as written, or was it the transferer? Proof is needed for claiming it was licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license 5) I have no capability to answer Siam art-related dispute, so no comment in this issue. Verosaurus (talk) 11:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry if my replies raised more question than answer. From the discussion above, I think that this file has double licensing problems, the first is about the mural depicted in the file, the second is about the license of the file itself, so even if the mural can be positively declared (using proof) that it was PD, the next problem lies on the credibility of the claim made by the uploader that they're indeed own/created that file themselves and grant the license attached to the Commons page. My stance about this is {Delete} if the uploader cannot prove that they own the file and the license given in the file isn't verified by WP:VRT; and {Delete} since the file appears to be a part of a hoax with misleading description and unproven copyright status. If the file is assumed to be a photograph taken by user:Everdawn, no corresponding metadata can be found in the file to support the assumption. If the file is assumed to be a scan from another source, an attribution is needed for the original author (the user did not or has not give the attribution). Verosaurus (talk) 21:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I've long tried to track down the source for this image but been unable to. It's likely a violation of copyright, is a poor quality picture, and doesn't depict what it's claiming to depict. Ummonk (talk) 19:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, every file in Commons must have source. This file has still no other source than English Wikipedia, which is not acceptable. Also the file has no proper license, because such an old work cannot have CC-license. Also we have neither creator nor creation time. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

She is one of the greatest doctors in Europe, she was born in 1990, Dr. Rana Turkman was born in Iraq, she studied at the University of USA and then took Italian citizenship in 2009. She also won the Nobel Prize in 2020. Dr. Rana Turkman is a specialist in musculoskeletal and neurological diseases She is considered one of the most famous doctors in the world 191.125.142.66 00:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio crop of image found at [2]. --Rosenzweig τ 18:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description العربية: Engineer Rana Turkman, born in 1990, is still alive. She is the largest CNC engineer in Europe, she has made very great achievements in technical arts. She also won the Nobel Prize in 2020. 191.125.142.66 00:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment We don't need two identical pictures of her, but if the description is accurate, she is noteworthy. However, the claim that she won a Nobel prize appears to be false, as I don't see evidence of this claim in a web search. Also, I would hope someone born in 1990 would still be alive! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio crop of image found at [3]. --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English: Engineer Rana Turkman, born in 1990, is still alive. She is the largest CNC engineer in Europe, she has made very great achievements in technical arts. She also won the Nobel Prize in 2020. 191.125.142.66 00:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio crop of image found at [4]. --Rosenzweig τ 18:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NO FOP in Italy 220.246.247.97 07:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of the Porsche logo, can not be considered COM:de minimis. Jonteemil (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: although the Porsche logo is certainly trademarked, it is in fact a mixture of elements which are either very simple (PD-ineligible) or from old coats of arms (those of Württemberg and Stuttgart), so PD-old. --Rosenzweig τ 18:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PROPER SNN.IR PHOTOS SHOULD HAVE WATERMARK. NO WATERMARK = NON-FREE FILE PHOTO Streamline8988 (talk) 21:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who said it should have watermark? I'm not read it in SNN (خبرگزاری دانشجو). [5] some of their photos haven't watermark. M.Nadian (talk) 08:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The footnotes of the website clearly say "All Content by Student News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.". No mention to watermarks. The image is available in the mentioned link under that terms. https://snn.ir/fa/news/996225/%D8%AE%DB%8C%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%B4%DA%A9%D9%86-%D8%AC%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%AA%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B4%DA%A9-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%DA%86%D9%87-%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%98%DA%AF%DB%8C%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B4%DA%A9%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%AE%D8%AA-%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%AF-%D8%AA%D8%A7%DA%A9%D8%AA%DB%8C%DA%A9%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%DB%8C%D9%84-%D8%B1%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%AF Hosortyr (talk) 12:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 18:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not realistically useful for educational purposes Fernrohr (talk) 22:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Educational and useful image. Why delete it?. Luispihormiguero (talk) 14:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Per above --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 18:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es aceptable esta actitud de fotografiar las partes intimas de la gente en una piscina? 191.125.142.66 00:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per the discussion in the previous deletion nomination. It's best not to be overzealous in nominating plausibly educational photos, and whose "acceptability" are you trying to enforce? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion and discussion in previous DR. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Odantapuribs (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: too late for a courtesy deletion, and I think the image is in project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 13:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Odantapuribs (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: too late for a courtesy deletion, and I think the image is in project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 13:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING Wdwd (talk) 14:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KLKPASA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of the IMF is likely above the threshold of originality, and the organization's copyright notice prohibits the use of the logo without prior permission.

Ytoyoda (talk) 21:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IMF logo.png is a derivative works of File:IMFMaailmanpankkiSuomalaisessaPostimerkissä.JPG, which is in Commons under license CC BY-SA 4.0. In addition, the autorship and the license is duly acknowledged. So, I'm against this deletion request for this reason.--Babelia (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I understand the reasoning here. If I take a photograph of that happens to show a copyrighted work in the corner of the image, I could argue that the copyrighted element is de minimis so I own the rights. But if I crop it to show only that copyrighted element, then it's no longer de minimis and I can't claim to own the rights. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As before: The logo of the IMF is likely above the threshold of originality, and the organization's copyright notice prohibits the use of the logo without prior permission.

Jonteemil (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio. https://www.peoples.ru/art/cinema/director/anton_chizhikov/index.html https://vk.com/spinus?z=photo18451142_457239417%2Fphotos18451142 Drakosh (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 07:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Iraq. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader User:Afoui is American Friends of The Open University Of Israel -- this needs a free license from an authorized official of the organization. The related article has been deleted at WP:EN. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't look like a selfie, so it needs a free license from the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject is probably uploader, does not appear to be a selfie, so needs a free license from the actual photograher. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication of why this is in scope. The author, Giannis Andreou, is not the uploader, so the copyright is in doubt. The stated source site has an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thomaskeelathu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ensygloge is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (link). Too restrictive for Commons.

Jonteemil (talk) 11:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS; copyrighted Pokémon characters. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:38, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English: event manager 191.125.142.66 00:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Promotional. --Kadı Message 18:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed with 'Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License' at source; NC is not compatible with Commons Gikü (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is hard to imagine that this photo should be the "own work" of the uploader. As such the CC license is quite doubtful. After all, it is a vehicle from the 1920/1930s. Is there a usable public domain license that can possibly be used for this? Mosbatho (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright AP Librero2109 (talk) 18:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Iran. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't look like a selfie, so the Own Work claim by the subject is unlikely correct. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be above COM:TOO China. I'd say this logo is more complex than this one which was deemed above the TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 11:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete complex logo.--RZuo (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong language code OtuNwachinemere (talk) 17:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a reason to move a file, not to delete it. - Jmabel ! talk 14:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS 220.246.247.97 07:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is Hummel figurine 184 "Das Allerneueste", created in 1946 by de:Arthur Möller (Bildhauer), who died in 1972. The file can be restored in 2043. --Rosenzweig τ 11:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuente con copyright 191.125.142.66 00:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuente con copyright 191.125.142.66 00:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On peut difficillement qualifier le scan d'une brochure commerciale de "travail personnel" Bertrand Labévue (talk) 14:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is a copyrighted image from the About Us page from a company (see the wikiapage it's linked to) ♦♦♦thibaultmol♦♦♦ (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jammalibrahim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader is the subject depicted in these portraits. Requires COM:VRT permission from the original photographer(s).

plicit 07:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LeviTune (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flickrwashed promotional images. Flickr account contains only these two images, uploaded a few days ago.

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I photoshop and edit the images, not sure why needs to be deleted. LeviTune (talk) 14:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You mean you work for the "Sparkling Ice" company and made these images for them? --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, I mean I downloaded the images and then edited them. I don't work for the company. Thanks LeviTune (talk) 07:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seraphimsflame (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no indication that this person is notable, therefore it appears to be out of scope.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubiously licensed files uploaded by Jrosales080878 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these images are claimed to be own work, but that claim is dubious. the images have different EXIF info with one image stating the author as "Gonzalo E. Pozo" . See Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Jrosales080878 where other of this edtior's uploads have been nominated. One of those images has an author of "Johnny Stevens". See also File:Cybersecurity Operations at Port San Antonio.jpg where the initial upload was claimed to be own work but is in fact a United States DoD photo ("U.S. Air Force Photo by Maj. Christopher Vasquez").

Whpq (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 18:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JasonGlennHuntly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS panchira images uploaded by a sock of Midnight68.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all - I'd also add [almost all] of the ones that are in-use, too. They're only in-use because the uploader went around to multiple Wikimedia projects to add them. In some cases, they appear relevant, but looking closer you see that e.g. this is being used to illustrate a character in a comic, but literally any other picture of this character from the same public domain comic would be a better illustration. In this one, the child's face is obscured because it's a panel carefully selected by the uploader to get a glimpse of her underwear. It just happens that these comics aren't well-known enough for Wikipedians to have gone in and cut out better illustrations. Same with File:Wilbur12pp30.jpg, File:Pep61pp14.png, and File:AliceUpsideDown.jpg. There is only one file the sockpuppet uploaded which I can see a case for retaining: File:KatyKeene4page10.png, because it seems fairly standard based on a very cursory look at the comic. — Rhododendrites talk04:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I am confused, you want to delete public domain images, because they show fictional characters in underwear? We have over 5,000 penis pictures. If the entire work can be hosted at Commons, why delete individual frames over underwear showing? Are we bringing back the 1954 comic book code? They are perfect examples of why the code was instituted in 1954, and to understand why the code was instituted, you need to see examples. --RAN (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. I agree with Richard above and don't understand the deletion rationale. Whether these should be used in a Wikipedia article or which Wikipedia articles they should be used in is not a deletion rationale. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ikan Kekek and Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The issue isn't censorship. If that were the case, these are all quite tame compared to a lot of what we host. The issue is that these are part of a sustained campaign by a banned user/sock puppeteer to flood Wikimedia projects with as much "girls in their underwear" content as possible, adding both their original Deviant Art-style content and this sort of obscure comics. The uploader has selected roughly the least educational frames from the comics in question, prioritizing illustrations of girls in their underwear to identify a particular character even at the expense of showing their face. What is the value in that, except in the sense of "absolutely everything in the public domain has educational value"? If I went through old movies and instead of just uploading the movie, I extracted close-ups of some body part, and then spammed those in character/actor articles on Wikipedias in a dozen different languages, and used sock puppets to do it, would we still have "let's not censor public domain movie stills" arguments? — Rhododendrites talk12:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, we would. Remember the scene near the end of Cinema Paradiso with all the clips of the censored movie scenes? Did that have value? These images are of use, and the only question is whether or how they are used. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • It appears that you want to punish the images because you can't punish the uploader, that doesn't serve the purpose of Commons. The argument is also that the images are the "least educational", but that is still educational, so within scope. If someone were to extract all the underwear/nudity in public domain films, it would be used to illustrate an article on the Hays Code and show all the stages of filmdom, pre Hays Code; the Hays Code period, and the post Hays Code period where nudity was back in films starting in 1970 (if the public domain ever reaches 1970). See: File:Dorothy Mackaill Safe in Hell 1931.jpg from the book Forbidden Hollywood on this very subject. --RAN (talk) 13:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • The argument is also that the images are the "least educational", but that is still educational - Yes, like how planets are among the "least small" objects in our solar system, thus they are small. You're coming up with specific examples of nudity to illustrate a subject, not random stills which nobody has ever talked about, which were not specifically the subject of censorship, but which just happen to satisfy a particular user's fetish when extracted from their context. If the comics are valuable, anyone can just upload the whole comic. The question is why are these valuable apart from the comics as a whole? — Rhododendrites talk19:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Least File:Dreadful2.jpg could be deleted as it is Midnight68:s redrawn version of the original. I think that the biggest reason for deleting these would be that if we keep them then we need to check the categories for category spamming and what is written to descriptions (... Shows how a badly damaged picture can be restored with a graphics editor... without mentioning that the clothes were removed, ... While the comic was aimed at a predominately female audience, stories contained a generous amount of fan service, usually in the form of Katy and/or Sis getting changed. ... etc) and these problems will eventually leak to articles via sock editors. -- Zache (talk) 04:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete that one. Dronebogus (talk) 16:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep not because I support the sockmaster’s disgusting obsession with underage girls’ underwear (I don’t) but because nobody is going to understand the connection between these unless they connect the dots. A lot of them barely feature the stupid panty shots or if they do feature them as inoffensively as possible. Some of them are also little more than harmless cheesecake without even a pedophilic undertone. A few could be specifically deleted as useless illustrations of nothing in particular (besides panties) but this isn’t the way to do it. Dronebogus (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: without prejudice to renomination of some, basically per Dronebogus. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher resolution can be found here. No metadata and it is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 07:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. If you are the copyright holder, see COM:VRT. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a school logo is very unlikely 'own work' of one of its attendants Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused images which is a near duplicate of another image on the commons.

are both unused an near duplicates of:

Evrik (talk) 23:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no reason for removal. Lidewij (talk) 06:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suhag Rana a Freelance Web Developer 191.125.142.66 00:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Nominator's rationale is invalid, but this does not change the image's destiny. I am deleting it because "Personal photos of non-contributors.". --Kadı Message 18:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo isn't uploader's own work Kurmanbek (talk) 00:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://mycotek.org/index.php?threads/12/ 184.100.29.153 05:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and also:
 Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 13:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lack of author's permission. Example of utilisation before the upload: [7] [8]. tyseria (d) 16:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamyabaminashayeri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Image appears in several places without a free license. No description or categories -- who is he? Out of scope. Why do we need five crops of the same image?

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo by another author, original file at the Urbanrail website. Santi2222 (talk) 23:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo by another author, original file at the Urbanrail website. Santi2222 (talk) 23:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file name and file description translate as "Photo" and "Image". No categories -- without any information at all, this image is useless. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: now appears to be fixed. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 220.246.247.97 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F6|Bernhard Ludewig is a German based photographer, very unlikely for him to work at the Government of Finland

King of ♥ 18:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It doesn't matter whether the photographer is an employee of the issuer of the license; a contract would suffice. If the licensor were a normal individual, then we would ask them to send proof of the contract to COM:VRT so we can ensure its validity. However, we're talking about a national government here, who presumably is well-versed in copyright law and is not going to make irresponsible claims about the status of images it releases. Given the circumstance, I think we can accept the license at face value without further verification. -- King of ♥ 18:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak keep Nice picture: I used it in the german wikipedia for his article. I think the comment of King of Hearts makes sense! Have a nice day. consider to keep --AltesHasenhaus (talk) 22:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak delete As the uploader, I'm not sure whether the Finnish Government had obtained the permission from Bernhard Ludewig (obviously a normal individual) or not before put them on Flickr. Perhaps the point from KoH make sense, but when others have doubted, it is better to solve it via COM:VRT. Pinging the speedy deleting admin @Túrelio: to see if he had any comment on this. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think the Finnish government uses the correct licenses when it comes to own or external images. For example, the gallery of Marin's visit to the Ukraine appears under a different license. Lord Maximoff (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per Lord Maximoff, usually government uploaded photos are under the correct licenses. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 11:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - the images on Flickr literally say "© Bernhard Ludewig" on them, which means they regard it as copyright to that photographer. Sure, in general we might trust a government, but in this case it's at the behest of whoever happened to upload the image to Flickr, perhaps an unknown official within the government, and they may simply not have understood the different licenses that were available when they uploaded. I think it would be better, per A1afel, to handle this through COM:VRT Amakuru (talk) 22:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Same reasons as the others who voted to keep. Bakir123 (talk) 14:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is scope? 191.125.142.66 00:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder JibanBhaiImages 191.125.142.66 00:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es adecuada para una figura publica Merxe prueba (talk) 15:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:37, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be found here from 2011 and here from February 2016, both before it was uploaded to Commons. COM:VRT permission needed. —Granger (talk  · contribs) 10:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheber wahrscheinlich nicht der Fotograf (Selbstauslöser?) Dirk Lenke (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I think you can even see the actual photographer in a reflection in the left part of the image. --Rosenzweig τ 10:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Indonesia. Jonteemil (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Indonesia, applied art (like this logo I guess) is protected for 25 years from publication, but I don't know if this logo was first published over 25 years ago. --Rosenzweig τ 10:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph was taken in Paris so {{PD-Italy}} criteria cannot be applied in this case. Also, according with {{PD-France}} template, copyright expires after 70 years since the original publication date (or 70 years pma, if the author is known). This photograph of 1964 would be PD after 2035 if the author is unknown. 83.61.237.190 20:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: it's not about where a photograph was taken, but where it was first published. That being said, we're not told and do not know if and when this photo was first published in Italy, so deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 10:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aydin Degeres

[edit]

Poor quality screenshots from some video, authorship is unclear, a bit out of scope. --Красный wanna talk? 04:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 15:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Temporary artwork for protest, FOP cannot be used 220.246.247.97 03:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can the license be verified? Jonteemil (talk) 12:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es conocido este cantante? 191.125.142.66 00:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Vk}}, no valid reason for deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Based on a web search, yes, he appears to be well-known as a Punjabi singer/songwriter. That said, if he did upload this photo, who took it? He may own the rights to the photo, but he should go through the standard verification process to make sure no-one's copyright is violated by hosting this image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as per Ikan - Given the uploader and the person in the image is called Vikk Rana obviosly Vikk didn't take the image, So unless they go to OTRS then it should be deleted for being a copyvio. –Davey2010Talk 14:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, need permission from the photographer.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[9], User:Wongan4614 has a history of falsifying authorship. (File:LwoavisProf.jpg, File:LwoavisProfile.jpg) Mys_721tx (talk) 01:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sieht nicht nach Selbstporträt aus, vermutlich URV ohne Freigabe durch Fotografin Jbergner (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Profifoto ohne Freigabe durch den Fotografen Jbergner (talk) 06:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can the license be verified? Jonteemil (talk) 11:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licenses need verification. Without it I'd say that the logo is above COM:TOO US and thus non-free.

Jonteemil (talk) 12:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. I can't see anything on the source page to confirm that the photographer is Istana Johor or that the work is released under a free license. John of Reading (talk) 12:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jane Hart is a curator, gallerist and artist in Miami Beach, Florida and New York. 13 KB own work? 191.125.142.66 00:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to think this is not an own work. Older cropping software removes the EXIF data. Therefore decided to keep the image. --Ellywa (talk) 18:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 186.172.221.246 20:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, found here in 2014 http://www.artnet.com/magazine/features/wood/wood4-25-02.asp. --Gbawden (talk) 14:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is own  ? 191.125.142.66 00:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, cropped version of the photo on many webpages, like this https://almalnews.com/%D9%88%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D9%82%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%B9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84-%D9%83%D9%86%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%B2%D8%B1%D8%B9-%D9%85%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86/, which is copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In scope politicians? 191.125.142.66 00:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The subject on the photo, Hisham Abdul Salam Moussa, is the same as the author. Please follow the procedure of COM:VRT to show you have permission from the photographer. --Ellywa (talk) 18:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution, first upload, hardly any exif data. Looks like a screen grab from a video Vera (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vera! I am the author of that picture. Unfortunately, I lost the high quality original file! It is up to you to decide whether to delete this photo as it is of low quality!
All the best Dalibor1975 (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to think this is not an own work. Older cropping software removes the EXIF data. Therefore decided to keep the image. --Ellywa (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These logos should be deleted for following reasons: a. {{GWOIA}} tag does NOT cover logo of the data provider. b. Logo of public utility should NOT be free of copyright. so it is not in compliance with {{PD-ROC-exempt}} tag. c. Logo style is calligraphy, which is copyrightable in Taiwan.d. logo of government agency is protected by the Copyright Law except the fair use.[10]

Larryasou (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Wcam (talk) 16:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 KeepPart of the Category conforming to the {{PD-textlogo}} specification
Yu tptw (talk) 09:47, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No. These logos exceed Taiwan's TOO which is very low (c.f. the SUNSHOW logo example). The last one's creator, zh:王壯為, died in 1998 so the logo is protected until 2049. Note that the logo is a modern creation in an ancient style, thus not PD due to old age. Wcam (talk) 13:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The last one may be unprotected due to "traditional design elements", per COM:TOO Taiwan. Wcam (talk) 13:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 18:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any evidence of a free licence at the source website (https://keralapolice.gov.in/), and from what I remember India does not put all its government works in the public domain. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Indeed, the source website states "Copyrights @ Department of Kerala Police". --Ellywa (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copyright violation. Copyright belongs to Allstar Picture Library Ltd / Alamy Stock Photo. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 15:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Steve Wood has recently bought the rights to this image and has uploaded this change himself. Does that change anything? Danpottsy (talk) 15:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Steve Wood probably has to show the documentation, but it's unusual for an image library to sell the rights to a particular image to the subject. And unclear why a footballer would buy the distribution rights to a photograph of himself if he's not in the image distribution business. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. @Danpottsy: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 18:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1952 image. Detail are vague -- it may be PD, but that will depend on country of origin and death date of photographer .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The origin is Brazil, anda I don´t know who took the picture, but I´ll try to figure it out. 2804:14D:881:9AD5:485F:C66F:C38A:1F37 17:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:58, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo. Useful chart, logo should be edited out. King of ♥ 17:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then revdel all previous versions once the logo has been removed.Jonteemil (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:58, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It contains information protected by GDPR legislation and should not have been put in the public domain. 2.30.183.46 17:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Krd 19:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 49.184.214.58 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: personinphoto
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion.-- Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with: File:Aimee Larocca (7052963601).jpg and File:Aimee Larocca, Kim Ellery (7052968595).jpg

 Info The photos are still available at their Flickr source. Ankry (talk) 12:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. The wording suggests that the IP-request may come from one of the 3 people visible in the background. If that is true, they could easily be cropped away. --Túrelio (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 19:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]