Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 8th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Explicit with reason "personal photos by non-contributors". Taivo (talk) 07:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake JamesGangel (talk) 23:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom by uploader and COM:CSD#G7.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English: para la cooperativa de ruido 191.126.3.47 00:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 04:17, 8 June 2022 UTC: Nonsense (G1) --Krdbot 07:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dldlsileleuejid 84.241.178.99 08:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense by an illiterate. --Achim55 (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

do not want to publish this Ieidh583 (talk) 13:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by spam page deleted off wikidata DS (talk) 13:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio, FB MD in exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable SEO person trying to spam himself onto Commons in an attempt at SEO. Honestly, Category:Internet marketing people is a honeypot. DS (talk) 14:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to this and this and this and this and everything here and here and here and here. DS (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; F10. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter. 191.126.3.47 00:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Twitter. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work; screenshot of film Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:03. Retazenie.png and file:Fontaána pre Zuzana (S. Turbová a E. Vejmělková).png due to same reason: screenshots from films. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sustituido por: Escudo del Municipio Francisco de Miranda.png Daniqui04 (talk) 01:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, better version exists. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Omer2020 (talk) 01:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is this, Mr Brown? 191.126.3.47 01:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, man in black clothing with foxtail and foxhead, wearing a baseball bat. This is the uploader's only contribution. No acceptable description, no categories. I'll delete it due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La fuente de Instagram no especifica ninguna licencia. Sebaspikyaq (talk) 01:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Instagram. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

使用予定がないから 中島ゆたか (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promo/press photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

使用予定がないから 中島ゆたか (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promo/press photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really CC0 1.0? Please confirm. MoJieCPD (talk) 02:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Copyright 조선일보 All rights reserved" below the web page. MoJieCPD (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, license review failed. The user uploaded 2 files and I deleted the other also due to failed license review (although the photo depicted another celebrity from another Korean site). Taivo (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded to wrong site, meant to be used with wikipedia entry. This just ends up as a duplicate. Mattamatical (talk) 02:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not clear that this is licensed under a free license. Every page at https://socialist-alliance.org/ (where it is listed as being downloaded from) has the wording "© 2023, Socialist Alliance. All rights reserved." at the bottom of each page. That does not suggest to me that any of their copyrightable works have been released under any free license. TarnishedPathtalk 12:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete In most other countries this would be PD-textlogo but Australia has an extremely low threshold so this is probably over it. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk)

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without camera data, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader request TentingZones1 (talk) 05:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier défectueux ː pages mélangées Cunegonde1 (talk) 07:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of file:Image Suggestions Architecture.jpg, should be versioned there instead MFossati (WMF) (talk) 09:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, better version exists. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work but no exif and you can see how this has been cropped. PCP Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, tiny photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS GARBAGE 🗑 Dronebogus (talk) 11:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down file:Laith MuallemS.jpg. I'll delete file:Laith Muallem.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful that this is the uploader's work given other uploads from the user. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC) Editing to add that the image is likely an "all rights reserved" image on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/crackers250/51828637445/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Wdwd yesterday due to unfree Flickr License. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by spam page deleted off wikidata DS (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mike Peel at 23:09, 10 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by SEO entry deleted off wikidata DS (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mike Peel at 22:55, 10 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by SEO page deleted off Wikidata DS (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mike Peel at 22:52, 10 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by SEO entry deleted off Wikidata DS (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mike Peel at 22:51, 10 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by SEO entry deleted off wikidata DS (talk) 14:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mike Peel at 22:49, 10 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by SEO entry deleted off Wikidata DS (talk) 14:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mike Peel at 22:48, 10 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only in SEO entries deleted off Wikidata DS (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mike Peel at 22:47, 10 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by SEO entry deleted off Wikidata DS (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mike Peel at 22:59, 10 June 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Denisé Cassel want to use another image of her. A different cropping av the photo. SweText (talk) 12:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed atear (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo for non-wikipedian: Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 13:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yeni yapcağım Mertyamanlar1994 (talk) 13:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yeni oluşurulacak Mertyamanlar1994 (talk) 13:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yeni sayfa Mertyamanlar1994 (talk) 13:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and Unreliable . WP:SYNTHESIS. Self-Upload Northeast heritage (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says "This is Random Logo I made", out of scope Nutshinou Talk! 14:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double of File:AEG Olympia Olyport 45 (6981097672).jpg ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ALBUM cover? Eitherway not own work Nutshinou Talk! 14:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope, probably a copyvio too (taken from a Filthy Frank video) Nutshinou Talk! 14:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Maybe even in scope, but deleted as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, non-contributing user to the project Nutshinou Talk! 14:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, non-contributing user to the project -- Nutshinou Talk! 14:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only on SEO entry deleted off wikidata DS (talk) 16:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing has been deleted from Wikidata and the legitimacy of the entry and its adherence to the Wikidata notability policy has been discussed and approved by admins multiple times in the past. The entry being about me and my line of work being SEO doesn't mean everything i put into the database is automatically spam, in fact there is no SEO related gain from "spamming" wikidata whatsoever. I've got an italian olympic athlete that goes by the same name as me and being me and him both notable disambiguation by entry of data on the database serves for the database quality.
That said this is a picture of my face that was uploaded by me personally, Google has treated me like a popular entity way before my entry in wikidata and the picture serves to clarify what my image is between me and the olympic sailor that Google often mistake. I don't see why this should be removed at all. Evaccari (talk) 12:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, yesterday by Mike Peel as copyvio. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a 2005 photo posted to a single-photo Flickr account created in 2017. There's a good chance it's not the work of the Flickr user and it's license-laundered, and we should proceed carefully since it captures a non-famous person caught in a compromising position. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yusuf Sadiq Shehu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yusuf Sadiq Shehu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

complete vanity spam, low quality selfies, some of which are unlikely to be own work

Praxidicae (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md Israfil Hossen1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 02:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lorena2030 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - appears to be documents for a student assignment

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:15, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Bezerkoner

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Bezerkoner (talk · contribs):

Small photos, mostly without camera data. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Luiz André Alves de Miranda

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Luiz André Alves de Miranda (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of David Font Mampel

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of David Font Mampel (talk · contribs):

VRT-permission from authors is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Beyond102

[edit]

Beyond102 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Tellatabi

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Tellatabi (talk · contribs):

One photo is credited to another person, the rest are small photos without metadata. Probably all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of InstitutodederechopenalUCLM

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of InstitutodederechopenalUCLM (talk · contribs):

No camera data, mostly small size, different resolution, different authors. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Dabbelju2

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Dabbelju2 (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos, metadata is always missing. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Rkgovindarajan

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Rkgovindarajan (talk · contribs):

Unused photos of non-notable person, out of project scope. In addition, small photos without metadata, probably not own work, but real photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Rafiki Eoax

[edit]

Rafiki Eoax (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without camera data. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations and non-free images: these are all simple pictures of Bank of England notes of designs first issued in 1971 or later (see https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/withdrawn-banknotes for dates of introduction), meaning that they're unambiguously still in copyright. Some of them may be being used within the Bank's conditions, but those conditions are not generous enough to constitute a free licence.

bjh21 (talk) 14:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations. All of these are straightforward pictures of Northern Ireland or Scottish banknotes issued since 1950. These are issued by commercial banks and as far as I can see none of those banks has licensed them under a free licence.

bjh21 (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR UK

Ox1997cow (talk) 09:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: These are all current banknotes of the Bank of England, which doesn't permit their use under a free licence. --bjh21 (talk) 10:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are Bank of England Emergency Wartime Issue notes as shown on https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/withdrawn-banknotes. According to that page, they were designed by "W M Keesey and others". Walter Monckton Keesey died in 1970, so these notes won't enter the public domain until 2041 at the earliest. The Wikipedia article on him mentions only that he designed the reverse of these notes, but its source for that is the Bank of England page linked above, and that page doesn't have any such restriction, so I think under COM:PRP we should assume that both sides of the notes are in copyright.

bjh21 (talk) 11:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • As I understand copyright to the images of banknotes belongs to bank, not to creator. And bank made it free/public domain. Even if I`m wrong File:10 Sh 1940 E.jpg and File:Ł1 1940 E.jpg are obverse, not reverse of banknote, to whom Walter Monckton Keesey had no relation at all. --Ibidem (talk) 12:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      I agree that the copyright belongs to the bank. The date of death of the author is only relevant for working out the length of copyright. The problem is that the bank hasn't, as far as I know, granted a free licence for the use of these notes. The bank does grant a licence on https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/using-images-of-banknotes, but it's not a free licence by Commons' standards because it requires marking with "SPECIMEN", and requires that reproductions not appear in an "inappropriate context". On the authorship point, what evidence do we have that Keesey only designed the backs of the notes? The Wikipedia article on him claims this, but it cites a Bank of England Web page that says "Design: W M Keesey and others", making no distinction between the sides. --bjh21 (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diana Winterbotom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artwork by Mit Borras, needs OTRS, others credited to Rachel Lamot, etc. None of these are own work either

Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Goten1980

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Goten1980 (talk · contribs):

The photos have no description, claimed NASA photos have no source. The science photos have no explanation, what happens. The waterfall photo has the waterfall (even country) unidentified. That way the photos are out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:57, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jmrubiano

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Jmrubiano (talk · contribs):

No metadata, mostly small size. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Octavius 909

[edit]

Octavius 909 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Onlyblacksheep

[edit]

Onlyblacksheep (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

The files are not called own work, that means: evidence of free license, for example VRT-permission from photographer is needed. Small size, no camera data. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gpccurro

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Gpccurro (talk · contribs):

Different sizes, cameras, authors and copyright holders, made in different ends of world. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/popup.png

[edit]

Useless material uploaded by vandalism-only accounts. See m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2022-06#Mihai4801@ro.wikipedia

Gikü (talk) 10:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains lots of copyrighted images Thyj (talk) 10:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jmgalher

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Jmgalher (talk · contribs):

If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lurdeswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and poster. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KrystofKanyzak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fahadharbi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-WAGov. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 23:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As lovely as this medal is, the design on it is copyrighted to the IOC. See COM:CB#Art (copies of) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 23:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As lovely as this medal is, the design on it is copyrighted to the IOC. See COM:CB#Art (copies of) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 23:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fatty acid chains should have all cis double bonds. See doi:10.1351/PAC-CON-08-08-28. I have created File:Dinogunellins v3.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a distorted version of File:1,1-diiodoethane (bond and stick model).png. Spheres are no longer spherical. Marbletan (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not a 19th century painting but a 20th century painting by Tak Heesung(1915-1992). 평화신문(literally "Peace Newspapaer"), published by en:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Seoul, says "2월 27일 베르뇌 주교가 관청에서 문초를 받고 있다. 그림=탁희성." (Febrary 27th, 1866, Simeon Berneux was questioned at the office. Painted by Tak Heesung) Also there is an autograph from Tak Heesung in Chinese characters, "竹亭 卓熙盛", on the left-lower of the drawing. So the image's status can't be CC BY-SA 3.0. 211.36.150.117 04:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apenas esta asomando cabeza en el mundo del hip hop, con sus casi 10 años en la cultura. 191.126.3.47 00:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of scope, non-notable person. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is KHOO YEONG SOON, not uploader. See EXIF shizhao (talk) 01:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.126.3.47 01:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not own work, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.126.3.47 01:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not own work, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? Post mortem 191.126.3.47 01:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not own work, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User generated Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 02:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. This is the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 08:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Praxidicae as no permission (No permission since) JopkeB (talk) 03:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae, How do you know that uploader Anu Chauhan000006 is not the maker of this photo (and the other ones he/she uploaded), as he/she stated in the files, what causes your doubts? --JopkeB (talk) 03:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. If all the other uploads were deleted due to missing permission, I'll delete this one as well. Educational value is not so big. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the photographer? maybe non-free file. Saayeeh (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirect page

Kept: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AThe_Iranian_Air_Force_units_started_the_second_day_of_their_large-scale_military_exercise%2C_codenamed_%E2%80%98Guardians_of_Velayat_Sky-98%E2%80%99%2C_in_the_central_province_of_Semnan_on_Friday_morning2019.jpg&type=revision&diff=418619130&oldid=415516490. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher-res version credited to Islamic Republic of Iran Army here, not Mehr. https://www.newsweek.com/iran-large-air-defense-drills-1473362. Genuine Mehr photos at this date should have a watermark and photographer credit. This photo has neither. The license reviewer should not have confirmed it. Streamline8988 (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Please also delete File:Mersad-16 SAM system.jpg. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion photo of the uploader: Commons is not a publicity site. Pierre cb (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a TV program can't be personal work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyrighted screenshot seems plausible. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspecious to copyright violation. Photo or scan of a picture can't be personal work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Professor6000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, to small resolution, should be SVG, not used, will be used in a draft at en.wp that is out of scope/original research, if notable at en.wp should be a wikitable, not an image

C.Suthorn (talk) 04:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments One file was a duplicate and needed removal My images can be enlarged for better resolution, I will try that The tables are images also, I have several tables..Can I insert a PDF instead of creating a new table ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Professor6000 (talk • contribs) 12:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Professor6000 No. Whether it's PNG or PDF or something else, we don't accept tables here at Commons. If you want to use a table over at en:Draft:Conductivity of a Partial Vacuum, you have to re-create it there in Wikitext syntax. There's no way around that. See en:Help:Table for instructions, but be aware that they will not accept your work at Wikipedia anyway. See en:Wikipedia:No original research for that. El Grafo (talk) 10:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. Unsourced, originally 92.9% unusable whitespace, fuzzy when scaled down, and OOS. C.Suthorn: I removed File:Vacuum Vs. Flash Voltage.png because it was since deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vacuum Vs. Flash Voltage.png.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Building too recent-looking to be eligible for {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}}, not to mention the lack of freedom of panorama for commercial exploitations of public works and art here without the need of licenses from architects or sculptors. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, seems photographer's copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran Rohalamin (talk) 05:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I could not google, how old the building is. Maybe it is free from copyright due to age. If you know, when the house was built and who is the architect, you can create an undeletion request. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violation. Since there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, this image under a commercial license (Creative Commons) needs additional permission from the author of the copyrighted architectural work shown, Sindiong-Ocampo architectural firm who is the designer of the w:en:Ali Mall. Non-commercial licensing is not allowed as per COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Отсутствует источник фотографии, несмотря на то, что с 2018 года сайт Госдумы переведён на Creative Commons Attrubition 4.0 International. Фото изначально было опубликовано с нарушением авторского права. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not a useful photo and not related with Khalistan Movement. Tzar96 (talk) 08:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Own work is unlikely, copyright problems. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mas1367 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The first and third image are Potential copyright violation, which are low image resolution and missing EXIF data. The second image is Out of scope that is personal image. The uploader seem cross-wiki spammer.

SCP-2000 08:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative work: photograph of a computer monitor image. MKFI (talk) 08:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vijasama (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted film posters.

MKFI (talk) 08:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition, the film itself is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Literally a photograph of a photograph (i.e. [1]). presumably found via a web search. Given this, it is likely not "own work" as asserted and that the uploader does not have authority to release this under a Commons-compatible license. Kinu (talk) 08:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, not taken in 2022. Subject died in 1999 so the original is likely still copyrighted. MKFI (talk) 08:55, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: curriculum vitae text of (apparently) this user in PDF form. Rosenzweig τ 09:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: versions with different backgrounds have been published in multiple sites, eg: https://twitter.com/BarchokHillary/status/1514151808876388353/photo/1 MKFI (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Draft about the depicted person is declined. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

segnata come opera propria ma essendo lui il soggetto della foto è evidente che è stata scattata da qualcunaltro Threecharlie (talk) 09:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a bad jpeg conversion of File:OR-5 AZE ARMY.svg Nutshinou Talk! 10:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as the file is unused, I agree to delete. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation. Walter Monckton Keesey died in 1970, so his works are still in copyright. Monty2ra claims to be the author, but gave the file a name that suggests it's by Keesey and added it to the Wikipedia article on Keesey. If Keesey's heirs have licensed this sketch under a free licence then I think we need evidence of that sent to the Commons:Volunteer Response Team. bjh21 (talk) 10:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A very similar rationale applies to this file uploaded by the same user:

It's claimed to be the uploader's own work, but also to be by Keesey. --bjh21 (talk) 11:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under copyright, see fr:Fichier:AC Bellinzone.svg Nutshinou Talk! 11:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is trademarked, not copyrighted! --RAN (talk) 12:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The same logo can be seen at acbellinzona.ch and the content on that website is being claimed as "All rights reserved", which means copyrighted. Unless it's within the public domain for some reason per COM:SWITZERLAND, it looks like this might not be able to be kept by Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The website is copyrighted, every time I create a new webpage using SquareSpace, or similar, software, it stamps the new page with a boilerplate copyright notice containing the year and the copyright symbol. They are using Responsiva software. The logo, even if copyrighted, has been their logo since 1904, and Swiss copyrights run for 70 years. Being trademarked, means we cannot misrepresent their logo. --RAN (talk) 01:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • If it can be demonstrated that the logo has been used since 1904, then I agree that it would clearly be within public domain. Logos of sports teams, however, do sometimes make reference to the founding of the team (often by adding a year or something else), but that doesn't mean the logo has been in use since that time. As for the copyright notice, it may indeed be a boilerplate notice, but it also applies to the content of that webpage. If the logo is so old that it's now PD, then that wouldn't apply to the logo per se; it still, once again, would need to be shown that the logo was first "published" more than 70 years ago. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • It only applies to material newly created at that website. My blog is copyrighted, but if I post an image that is owned by Getty Images, I don't now own the copyright to that image, and you know that. --RAN (talk) 03:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • As I tried to state above (perhaps not too clearly), the copyright notice on the website wouldn't apply to the logo if it was previously published somewhere else (which is most likely the case), or otherwise not eligible for copyright protection; however, being previously published somewhere else doesn't necessarily mean the logo is now within the public domain. Obviously, if the copyright is held by someone else, then you can't wash that copyright away with a new license; such a thing, however, seems irrelvant to this situation so not sure what Getty has to do with things. (FWIW, though, Getty has had its own issues when it comes to claiming copyright.) Anyway, if it can be clearly shown that the logo is PD per Swiss copyright law, then it should be converted to PD. Sports teams have, however, been know to change their branding over time; so, I don't think it can automatically be assumed that this logo is the same one the team has been using since it was founded or at least has been using since 1951. If you have some reason to believe that to be the case, then perhaps you can add that information to the file's description. This is an archived version of the team's website from October 2000; so, it can be seen that the logo was at least used since then. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    This is supposed to be the team's logo from the 1980s. Even though it looks the same, the snake imagery is a little different. This is a player's trading card from 1982-83 and once again the logo looks similar but also a bit different. This is a 1943 dated photo but I can't see the logo. If there are any old photos, game programs or other official team materials published prior to 1952 in which the logo can be seen, then I think that could help establish that this is now within the public domain. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Is there any article on the history of the logo? I'm a little wary when you have the 1904 organization declare bankruptcy and reviewing a translation of the German page, it looks like the club didn't even have this name formally under 1926 so why would the 1904 "Football Club Bellinzona" use ACB in its logo? I note that the German page doesn't use this logo and it says not to upload this to Commons. See de:Datei:Bellinzona.svg. Is there a reason for the discrepancy between the German wiki and having a version on Commons? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under copyright, see fr:Fichier:Logo FC Villefranche Beaujolais 2011.svg Nutshinou Talk! 11:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under copyright, see fr:Fichier:Logo FC Gueugnon 1995.svg Nutshinou Talk! 11:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under copyright, see fr:Fichier:Logo Olympique Saumur.svg Nutshinou Talk! 11:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality and redundant to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ich_4.jpg Dronebogus (talk) 11:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam 2003:DA:170A:9F37:ADCB:A86C:C7B7:B0BE 12:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused so-called selfie, the uploader's only contribution. No description, no categories. Very beautiful woman. After thinking whole day about the woman :-) I decided to delete her due to missing educational value. Commons has a lot of beautiful women anyway. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

luck of permission The Wolak (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So what exactly is this about? I am a family member, who owns the entire copyright to the entire series of his portrait photos. What evidence should be presented and - where? Melhior12 (talk) 11:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Melhior12: Please open COM:VRT page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent to our permissions department at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Permission must come from photographer's heir, not from depicted person's heir. But if the photo is published before 1995 in Poland, then the photo is not copyrighted – but this needs evidence: when and where the photo is published? Taivo (talk) 12:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the file will be restored, after the permission will arrive. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I received the authorization via VRT on ticket:2022060710010405, however the permission was sent by the Brazilian branch that only has the concession to use the brand (see link) and my understanding is that only the American parent company has the authority to provide such permission (see link). ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 13:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope (screenshot of a selfie from Facebook) Nutshinou Talk! 13:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope (screenshot of a selfie from Instagram) Nutshinou Talk! 13:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no hentai here. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Akatalexe as Noncommercial (cc-by-nc-nd)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. User:Akatalexe, who is not the uploader, has changed the license template to an incompatible NC/ND license and has added several comments which seem to render this reproduction unusable for Commons, despite being from year 1838. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a 2017 shot by a professional photographer. It was probably illegally uploaded by a user of the recording. In any case it is not in the public domain and should be deleted.--B.T. Jonas (talk) 20:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Despite of that, it is debatable whether the reproduction of the original painting, which is clearly in the public domain, is copyrightable at all (provided the frame is removed). --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not the image, but the photograph is protected by copyright. Using them violates the rights of the photographer and the owners of the user rights. This is not about a mobile phone photo, but about a professional photograph, which is subject to copyright, at least in the country where it was taken (in Switzerland). After all, it is not just any photograph, but a clearly identifiable one. If someone uses or disseminates such a photograph, which was only given to him for precisely determined use and with certain further conditions, is liable to prosecution. Of course, if he had made the recording himself, it would have looked different.--B.T. Jonas (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag, such photo of 2D art is not copyrightable. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given Hoyanova (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Not because there is no source, but because we already have a better version of the image, which is sourced. The nominator could have easily found that one, if I did. --RAN (talk) 02:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, we have file:Menelik II - 4.jpg. @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): in the future please show filename of better file, saves time for others. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is available on fr.wiki under fair use: fr:Fichier:Logo AJ Auxerre.svg, Commons does not allow fair use. Nutshinou Talk! 14:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality duplicate of File:Flag of Starosakhchinskoe rural settlement.png Nutshinou Talk! 14:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by spam page deleted off wikidata DS (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and not clear what election this is a map of (and no data source given). Elli (talk) 14:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality image that can already be replaced with File:DVD logo.svg Nutshinou Talk! 14:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably COM:ADVERTISEMENT? The uploader's username is Anyal heavy Nutshinou Talk! 15:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A simple search shows this is a CopyVio Culex (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only in SEO entry deleted off Wikidata DS (talk) 16:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Still used in pt.wiki and Wikidata. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, still used in these two projects. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The used image of Castro isn't uploaders work. See TinEye GeorgHHtalk   16:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unterstand am 8.6.2022 nicht mehr angetroffen Pathumthani (talk) 16:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Herbert. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realized it is bad for my privacy GonzalezMan4011 (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I don't think so. No address, no personal names, no even car number. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realized it is bad for my privacy GonzalezMan4011 (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I don't think so. No address, no personal names, no even car number. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this image back when I first created my Wikipedia account, essentially as a test to fill out the Jean Lussier article. It is a picture of a picture at the Niagara Falls museum. Clearly, I did not know what I was doing at the time, so I request that this file be permanently deleted. It is not being used on any page at the moment. TNstingray (talk) 17:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, depicted photo was created in 1928 and definitely was published on the same year for promotion. Likely it was published with copyright notice. Without knowing copyright status of the photo, I'll delete it, but as we do not have any photo about Lussier at moment, it will be undeleted after copyright expiration in 2024 (95+1 years from publication). Taivo (talk) 09:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Naioli as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Blurry and better version of the image is available at File:GF 024.jpg Naioli (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F10 Also violates https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G3 according to talk on delete request Jphwra (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Wdwd on the same day with reason "personal photos by non-contributors". This is the uploader's only contribution, (s)he is globally locked due to vandalism. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sustituida por: File:Bandera del Municipio Simón Rodríguez.svg Daniqui04 (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sustituida por: File:Bandera del Municipio Simón Rodríguez.svg Daniqui04 (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sustituida por: File:Escudo municipio Simón Bolívar estado Anzoátegui.JPG Daniqui04 (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sustituido por nueva version: File:Escudo del Municipio Diego Bautista Urbaneja.svg Daniqui04 (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused media file; possibly out of scope HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of Policefilestonite19 (talk · contribs) due to same reason: no educational value. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reemplazada por nueva versión: File:BANDERA MUNICIPAL.JPG Daniqui04 (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen sin uso. Daniqui04 (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, seems like the file is incorrect, at least we have file:Escudo del Municipio Diego Bautista Urbaneja.svg. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:EDUSE due to extremely poor quality. Achim55 (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that KimHolgerKelting (talk) 20:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, very blurry. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file, out of scope HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 19:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has copyright watermark, not own work MB (talk) 19:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of Otol Emmy Andrew (talk · contribs) due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this is not out of scope this photo was uploaded for home and habitat theme so it is relevant to the topic as it is showing part of home Lorato Othusitse (talk) 08:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:19, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ditu Mario (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-notable person, self-promo attempt at ro:Ditu Mario. Maybe can be used in Category:Taekwondo, but the quality is too modest.

Gikü (talk) 19:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, quality was not the best. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, tilted, no educational value. In addition the uploader stated: "My best friend took a photo about me ...", so that's technically copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, Out of Scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, but I see here educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete The uploader has just added This was a picture posted on @ezraforsc's Instagram 24-hour story on Election Day. I screenshotted it. to the file. It is unlikely to be other than copyvio 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the instagram page is no more, so licence verification is impossible 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Описание попадает под ВП:УКР. В добавок нет независимого авторитетного мнения к тому, что мы на изображении наблюдаем Mandorakatiki (talk) 21:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English: 'Destruction of a battery of American-made M777 howitzers'
The description falls under en:WP:UKR. In addition, there is no independent authoritative opinion to what we observe in the image.
 Keep No valid reason given relating to deletion Andy Dingley (talk) 22:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Для вас напишу по-русски (на викискладе язык общения - английский): вы не на рувики. На викискладе не действуют "местные" правила языковых разделов. Фото может быть удалено только если нарушает правила Commons'а, чего тут, конечно же, нет. Kursant504 (talk) 01:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No reason for deletion. Just a user's protest against what he doesn't like Kursant504 (talk) 01:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
И кстати если вы перейдёте в статьи на рувики, где данные изображения используются, то увидите, что данное видео и происходящее на нём было описано сразу в нескольких независимых экспертных западных АИ, иначе их бы просто не было в статьях. Что ещё раз означает, что это просто ваш протест. Kursant504 (talk) 01:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Naming is indeed confusing: per sources it was an unsuccessful assault (see, this source, for example). So I suggest to rename rather than delete. Amishaa (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep; and rename.--Nicoljaus (talk) 11:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No destruction there => random explosition => useless file Юрий Д.К. (talk) 05:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, you can rename the file, if you want. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of this photograph. Simply redrawing an existing work does not magically remove the original copyright. Permission from the original photographer is needed. Эlcobbola talk 21:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:58, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hogyncymru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are the work of Rhŷn Williams, a living artist. There is no evidence of permission from Williams.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence of permission from Williams." Yet, here's an image with evidence showing that wikipedia verified that I'm the creator of my art, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mari_Lwyd.jpg Hogyncymru (talk) 18:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I have asked OTRS to confirm if these are covered by #2016081010015528 Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hogyncymru: The previous permission that you granted us with ticket #2016081010015528 doesn't cover the files mentioned here. Would you mind sending us an updated permission via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: I can, however, the 'Y draig aur' & 'Y Ddraig aur' were created specifically for wikimedia, so when I uplaoded them onto here, they had not been published elsewhere. Hogyncymru (talk) 22:52, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: I have sent wikimedia an email to confirm and release the rights. Hogyncymru (talk) 23:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS Ticket:2021072810013453 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 16:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hogyncymru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW - drawings/paintings based on existing photographs (e.g., File:Contemporary drawing of Rhys Ifans (2015).jpg is from this; File:Contemporary oil painting of Debbie Harry (Blondie).jpg is from this, etc.)--see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Contemporary drawing of Gruff Rhys (2015).jpg. Simply redrawing an existing work does not magically remove the original copyright. Permission from the original photographers is needed.

Эlcobbola talk 21:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Those indeed would be Commons:Derivative works of the underlying photos. One example was the Obama "Hope" poster; that was ruled by the judge to not be fair use of the underlying AP photo, and the parties then settled before the judge made an explicit infringement ruling (though that was almost certainly coming if the settlement had not happened). So  Delete if COM:VRT permission from the photographers (or whoever owns the photo copyright) is not received. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence to suggest that the uploder is the representative of Anambra state government. Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team . T CellsTalk 21:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary PNG version of File:2022 Idaho gubernatorial Republican primary election results map by county.svg. Elli (talk) 21:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I know that a lot of these space photographs are public domain images from NASA, but I'm not sure if this is one. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I add another version from the cover due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Not23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence to suggest that the uploder is the representative of either the state government or federal government. In addition, there is a significant doubt about the copyright of the other photos. Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team.

There is no evidence to suggest that the uploder is the copyright holder. Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team.

T CellsTalk 21:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CApolitics223 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source has a clear cc-by-nc license. Evidence of purported cc-zero needed.

Эlcobbola talk 21:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence to suggest that the uploder is the copyright holder. Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team. T CellsTalk 21:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Okechukwu Obuo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence to suggest that the uploder is the copyright holder. Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team.

T CellsTalk 21:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F1: Copyright notice for the NYTimes may be viewed at https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014792127-Copyright-Notice "All materials contained on this site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of The New York Times Company" DanielPenfield (talk) 22:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader is indefinitely blocked as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F1: Copyright notice for the NYTimes may be viewed at https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014792127-Copyright-Notice "All materials contained on this site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of The New York Times Company" DanielPenfield (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader is indefinitely blocked as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely copyright violation. Original is uploaded by a user called NathanMcCree who takes no other action, ever. The file exif data has been wiped and the files saved on a local device onbly minutes before it is uploaded. Similar or identical images are found on the internet clearly professionally produced and used for promotional purposes. . It is extradordinarily unlikely that a well-know composer would upload his own image and even if he did, he is unlikely to be the copyright holder. That would appear to be with a marketing agency providing images to suitable publications. There is no likley reason to believe that this image is genuinely licensed for use on Wikipedia, no OTRS ticket, just a facsimile user name. Velella (talk) 22:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader stated on his talkpage, that the photo is taken "by a good friend of mine". The good friend must send VRT-permission and the photo will be restored. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F4: COM:TOYS DanielPenfield (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 13:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused maps, potentially inaccurate and made with a very wild guess, as these were removed from their intended article way back in 2020. The sister files of these two were long deleted in enwiki via proposed deletions as unused and low resolution files: w:en:File:Ph density bulacan.PNG, w:en:File:Ph density cavite.PNG, w:en:File:Ph density pampanga.PNG, and w:en:File:Ph density rizal.PNG.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Chriasratom

[edit]

Chriasratom (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission.

Second group. Small photos without metadata. Probably not own work, but real photographers' copyright violation. Uploader is globally locked sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 07:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not seem to be own work as the image contains explicit “© Sodomka - Ženíšek, 2013” (= two Czech surnames, so it is not a work of an individual). Maybe could be discussed whether the layout or idea is copyrighted. Could the content fall under PD-text? Or could be published a re-drawn image based on this knowledge? Gumruch (talk) 11:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. In my opinion the file is copyrightable, but can be redrawn based on this knowledge. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright - promotional image Evaders99 (talk) 23:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own file, unused V8powerage (talk) 02:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. User can request deletion of own uploads during first week after upload. Here almost 3 years have passed. Educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep As above. No reason for deletion. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Adamant1 (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette image doit être supprimée car gnawa est un art strictement et purement Marocain inscrit au patrimoine immatériel de l'unesco et ne doit pas être représenté par une image algérienne car cela donne l'occasion aux algériens de s'attribuer injustement cet art exclusivement Marocain . Merci 2A01:CB06:802A:5B82:D79:D990:175D:4920 22:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Monsieur Patillo (talk) 08:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason given for deletion. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my own file V8powerage (talk) 02:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Uploader can request deletion of own uploads during first week after upload. Here almost 3 years have passed. Educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Adamant1 (talk) 06:08, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own file unused V8powerage (talk) 02:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. User can request deletion of own uploads during first week after upload. Here almost 3 years have passed. Educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Image is in scope and after the first week (in which COM:CSD#G7 applies), you can still nominate your own photos for deletion, but then you have to give some tangible, convincing reason other than that you don't want it here anymore. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own file V8powerage (talk) 23:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want the files deleted more then two years after the upload? --GPSLeo (talk) 13:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image is in scope and after the first week (in which COM:CSD#G7 applies), you can still nominate your own photos for deletion, but then you have to give some tangible, convincing reason other than that you don't want it here anymore. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this picture and want to delete it from wikipedia V8powerage (talk) 23:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want the picture deleted i change mind about publishing it V8powerage (talk) 14:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are two images here! I like both. Split and keep. 186.175.55.88 15:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No valid reason for deletion. CC-BY-SA licenses are perpetual. Günther Frager (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own file V8powerage (talk) 23:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image is in scope and after the first week (in which COM:CSD#G7 applies), you can still nominate your own photos for deletion, but then you have to give some tangible, convincing reason other than that you don't want it here anymore. Also, this photo is in use in Polish Wikipedia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own file V8powerage (talk) 23:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image is in scope and after the first week (in which COM:CSD#G7 applies), you can still nominate your own photos for deletion, but then you have to give some tangible, convincing reason other than that you don't want it here anymore. Also, this photo is in use in English and Polish Wikipedia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont want this picture to be on wikipedia anymore I revoke the copyright please delete it. V8powerage (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want the picture deleted i change mind about publishing it V8powerage (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue with vandalistic acts like blanking the file page you will face problems in Commons. Keep. 186.175.55.88 15:21, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No valid reason for deletion. Günther Frager (talk) 19:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own file V8powerage (talk) 23:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason for deletion. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image is in scope and after the first week (in which COM:CSD#G7 applies), you can still nominate your own photos for deletion, but then you have to give some tangible, convincing reason other than that you don't want it here anymore. Also, this photo is in use in English Wikipedia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own file V8powerage (talk) 23:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason for deletion. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image is in scope and after the first week (in which COM:CSD#G7 applies), you can still nominate your own photos for deletion, but then you have to give some tangible, convincing reason other than that you don't want it here anymore. Also, this photo is in use in Polish Wikipedia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want the picture deleted i change mind about publishing it V8powerage (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice picture, congratulations! Keep. 186.175.55.88 15:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And be careful. Upgrading with unrelated images can be taken as vandalism. Keep away from acting like a vandal please. 186.175.55.88 15:17, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No valid reason for deletion. CC-BY licenses are perpetual. Günther Frager (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior crop of File:Shakespeare.jpg without proper attribution.  Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F5. The uploader has a very loose grasp on COM:EVID.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: The file is possibly taken from a frame and not from another file but in question other files are freely licensed in the Public Domain (DP) and can be used and modified. -LeonaardoG (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot that contains personal information. Should be deleted for privacy reasons. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I do not see any private information. But the file is unused and educational value seems rather weak. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Walter Camacho Marin

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Walter Camacho Marin (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Veihelmann

[edit]

Veihelmann (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

VRT-permission from author Ulf Dahl is needed. No evidence, that uploader is the same person. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Emrad284

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Emrad284 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without camera data. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hochlader offensichtlich nicht identisch mit Urheber bzw. Rechteinhaber - kein Hinweis, dass Hochlader berechtigt ist, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 11:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto kommt von Flickr. Der Account dort sieht auf den ersten Blick in Ordnung aus. --GPSLeo (talk) 13:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, from Flickr with CC license. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was cropped from the original file by this user to add it to this article on es.wikipedia Anexo:Beatificados por Francisco. The image was later changed with File:Pope Paul VI (Correio da Manhã - AN 413) (cropped).jpg for reasons of better view of the face. This cropped image does not add much relevance considering that we currently have better quality photographic portraits of Paul VI in Category:Portrait photographs of Paulus VI. 83.61.237.190 20:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason to delete. Also, possibly block evasion of Marium Alberto. Bedivere (talk) 02:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment, @Bedivere I understand that you may think I'm Marium Alberto trying to evade his block, but I assure you that this is not the case. In fact, I work to review images and verify that their licenses are ok. Also, this photograph is too dark that the Pope's face is barely visible. For that we have the full photograph here. 83.61.237.190 07:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. Marion Alberto is Ecuadorian, whereas your IP is Spanish. Anyway, not liking the cropping is not a valid reason to delete. It might still find some use. Bedivere (talk) 13:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, it's understandable you thought that at the beginning. Also, I agree with you, it's possible it could be used in any project, but I considered that, as the face of Paul VI is barely visible and we have more photographs of him in which his face's visibility is better, this cropped version may be deleted. In fact if we can give some use it'll be ok. 83.61.237.190 13:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it's not necessary to delete this, and apparently there is no consensus for it. --Rosenzweig τ 10:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of FullAfraZ

[edit]

FullAfraZ (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Photos of presidents are not own work. Real author, creation year and real source are needed for determining copyright status. Taivo (talk) 08:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep those that were created 50 years ago or more as PD-Liberia. --RAN (talk) 12:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sources are still needed – for example for verifying, that depicted people are who they are claimed to be. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: These are apparently not very reliable, tiny and useless without proper sources to verify if they actually are what they are claimed to be. I was looking for some if I could find sources with reverse image search tools, but either found nothing or, like in the case of File:Charles H. Harmon, vice president of Liberia.png, found that the attribution was wrong; we already have that one as File:J. J. Roberts - Leslie.png, showing another person. So I've decided to delete the lot per the precautionary principle (except two which are crops of other files we already had); if the uploader cannot be bothered to provide proper source for verifiability, we cannot be bothered to check them all and keep them. --Rosenzweig τ 19:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dendermonde vroeger & nu (talk · contribs)

[edit]
   Wat hier wordt gepost heeft 7 jaar werk gekost .
   Indien je in de site kijkt staat er reeds : personen die toelating gaven hun foto te gebruiken .
   Dit zal ingevuld worden wanneer mijn kleindochter tijd vind , ik kan niet vlug genoeg typen om dit epistel neer te pennen .
   Dat dit succes heeft bij de plaatselijke bevolking kan je zien op mijn Facebook site met dezelfde naam .
   De namen zijn gelijkend , maar ze geven steeds een ander zicht .
   Vele steden zouden ook beter iets dergelijks doen , anders verdwijnt de geschiedenis .
   MVG
   Rudy Dendermonde vroeger & nu (Overleg) 07:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

This is the first fifty of 1,000 images, many of which have the same problems. First, I don't think it is appropriate to upload historical images in pairs or triplets as was done here. That make it harder for our users to reuse them. Second, and more important, while some of these may be PD because of age, that must be proven, and I doubt that any of them are actually "own work" as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Copyright law actually has it so that when you scan or even crop an existing public domain/creative-commons image, that derivative copy is your own work, even though it doesn't transfer the original copyright to you. That is why we don't allow people to upload under a "no derivative license". The problem is that our form only allows you to add in one name, the original author or the derivative copy maker. All these images are properly dated and are public domain in the EU except File:Kerkstraat H. Maagdcollege 1958.png which can be deleted, the cutoff date is 1951. --RAN (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my bad English .
You asked for the permissions to use the foto .
I already ment dat they were comming in Dutch
I ditn't start de list because I'm not verry quicly in that thing en my dauchter dus .
I will start to give the list of permissions , even in Facebook You need to have de autorisations .
If there are more problems , please tell me
Dendermonde vroeger & nu
Rudy Dendermonde vroeger & nu (talk) 07:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward By now there are 4500 uploads, it seems all of them are tagged "own work", "cc-by-sa-4.0", and none of them is "own work" or "cc-by-sa-4.0". The actual authors are mentioned on the user page. C.Suthorn (talk) 07:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward By now there are 5169 uploads. C.Suthorn (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It is sad to delete all these images. I considered many of them, they are all combinations of unsourced photos or drawings. As an arbitrary example, the schoolclass photo (File:Kerkstraat H Maagd-College 1914 Klasfoto uit WO I. & 1965 3° Wet B.png), a combination of a photo from 1914 and 1965. Both are still copyrighted and we would need permissions of the photographers (not of the owner of the prints). These items cannot be maintained on Commons, because the copyright status is unclear, and the large majority is still copyrighted. My advise would be to store this work on a dedicated website, where you can include a disclaimer about the copyright. Perhaps with involvement of a lawyer to avoid problems. Several are old postcards, there have been severe problems with these in my home country, the Netherlands. For instance read https://www.prentbriefkaarten.info/blog/richtlijnen-auteurswet. --Ellywa (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dendermonde vroeger & nu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

same rationale as first DR. 7195 files. some uploaded before first DR, others while the first DR was runnning. It would be good to keep all this files, but it does need VRT permission.

C.Suthorn (talk) 10:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - more of the same -- speedy delete. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name pronunciation is not Igbo language (ig) OtuNwachinemere (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. The indication of Ig could be understood in relation to the igbo language, but it has other meanings as well. Please ask the uploader for clarification. --Ellywa (talk) 09:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate recording OtuNwachinemere (talk) 07:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The recording is not exactly the same as File:Ig-Angela Okorie.ogg, so both can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 09:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not "overtly too simple to attract any copyright issues." The drawing of the tree would be copyrightable in most countries. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre Definitely agree. Nothing "simple" about the Cedar tree and text. A free use version is here. Prodrummer619 (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Magog the Ogre This is a public domain picture of the logo of the Lebanese Government (Council of Ministers) made by the government of Lebanon, it is completely free domain. There is absolutely nothing in it which could be considered copyrighted. Taken straight out of http://www.pcm.gov.lb/arabic/index.aspx?pageid=5 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.56.106.191 (talk) 22:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The one thing copyrightable here is the drawing of the Cedar tree. I've compared it with the one from the country's flag, and it is apparently the same. The flag has been around for over 50 years, so {{PD-Lebanon}} for an anonymous or collective work over 50 years old should apply. If there is a specific known author of the drawing who died less than 50 years ago, please re-nominate this file for deletion (along with various Lebanese flag images I suppose). --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Accd. to en:Flag of Lebanon, the current flag was adopted in 1943 and designed by en:Henri Philippe Pharaoun, who died in 1993. The tree however goes back to the older flag of the French Mandate of Lebanon designed by en:Naoum Mokarzel, who died in 1932. So PD-Lebanon for the work of an author who died over 50 years ago. --Rosenzweig τ 10:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name pronunciation is not Igbo language (ig) OtuNwachinemere (talk) 07:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 09:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. The indication of Ig could be understood in relation to the igbo language, but it has other meanings as well. Please ask the uploader for clarification. --Ellywa (talk) 09:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free (https://www.lylo.fr/artiste/sabine-aubert) Hyméros --}-≽ Yes ? 22:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures of this websites were added on this website AFTER they were added on Wikipedia. So, the correct thing to do if you have time to waste is to call the website and tell them to mention in the image description that's it's under Creative Commons licence.
The deletion request is not valuable because it's definitely not in the hands of Wikimedia/Wikipedia Abuse of deletion request is explicitly forbidden on Wikimedia Commons as mentioned on the code of conduct that MUST be followed.
Best regards. 2A01:CB04:4FE:1000:FCC1:5F47:785B:F0B4 23:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 08:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-WAGov. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep There doesn't appear to have been a debate on the template here at Commons and I can't read what info was in the license. There seems to be confusion between "public records" released by the government and photographs released by the state archive as "copyright-free". Perhaps we need the equivalent of "Flickr-no known copyright restrictions", we can create: "Washington State Digital Archives-no known copyright restrictions". Their copyright info reads: "Unless specifically stated, images from our photo collections are copyright-free". I see no difference between our accepted "Flickr-no known copyright restrictions" and the wording at the Washington State Digital Archives website. --RAN (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've gotten in a few debates myself about whether or not photographs or stamps are government documents and/or public records. So I feel like this is something that really needs to be clarified. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As I see it, this has nothing to do with the formerly existent PD-WAGov template, and neither the uploader nor anyone else has claimed that this photo is the work of a Washington State employee and in the public domain for that reason. Per the source link, this photo is part of the Susan Parish Photograph Collection, 1889-1990, so named after a woman who acquired the archives of three Washington State based photographers and sold them to the Washington State Archives in 2001. These photographers were not state employees, but private enterprises which “contracted with the State of Washington to take government related photographs which include state government officials, legislators, construction of state government buildings in Olympia, and other significant events”. This photo is therefore the work of one those photographers, but the archive does not say (or know) which one.
The real question is if this photograph was published around the time it was made in 1961 or not. If it was just a negative on a roll of film and was not published before 2003, {{PD-US-unpublished}} would apply. One might speculate that the archive did acquire all copyrights regarding the photos in said collection and released them in the public domain; their answer here (“Unless specifically stated, images from our photo collections are copyright-free, as are the rest of our images and audio. We only ask that the Washington State Archives, Digital Archives be included in the citation as the source for these images.”) might be a hint of that, and it is apparently what the license tag for this upload is built upon. But we don't really know if that is the case, I couldn't find it explicitly mentioned anywhere.
The other possibility is that the photograph was published in 1961 or soon after. Publication in the US before 1978, according to court cases, could be the photographer selling a print of a photograph to a customer. If that print had no copyright notice (which seems likely), the photo would be in the public domain. Even if there was a notice, a 1961 copyright would have needed a proper renewal after 28 years (which seems even less likely than a notice), else the copyright would have expired. So if the photograph was published in 1961, it's likely in the public domain in the US. But we don't know if it was published, and it's not like this is the official portrait of the governor destined to be displayed on office walls, in which case publication would be very likely. --Rosenzweig τ 20:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and per comments of Rosenzweig. There is no evidence per COM:EVID that this image is in PD. So therefore it has to be removed. --Ellywa (talk) 08:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]