Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/03/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 4th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta imagen fue subida sin consentimiento, por lo tanto pedimos su eliminación lo más pronto posible. HeyCiryX (talk) 03:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta/s imagen/imágenes fue/fueron subida/s sin consentimiento, por lo tanto pedimos su eliminación lo más pronto posible. HeyCiryX (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text-only pdf file, out of scope as excluded educational content. 2001:14BB:65D:E06C:8CCD:A6D5:ECA:A4D6 05:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 10:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kits editing wrong color Satya090 (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image owned by an HBO employee [1] Pbritti (talk) 16:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 19:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violate Copyright Tomm1g4m3 (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request & screenshot. --Achim55 (talk) 19:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stating the sheep is a Romanian military sheep (in Hungarian) as own work , can be a joke but can be offensive aginst a nation JSoos (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 21:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark contradicts claimed authorship Cabayi (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also found at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=512169343608290&set=pb.100044456856985.-2207520000..&type=3 . --Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Promo photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oceanian Union does not exist. fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy diagram. Oceanian Union does not exist in real life. ISRO4883 (talk) 06:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free image. Need a confirm that it is your own foto and you agree to free use of it. It was previosly published on web: https://sud.ua/ru/news/ukraine/231096-v-khozyaystve-sgoditsya-pod-nikolaevom-mestnye-ukatili-vrazheskiy-btr-na-traktore-foto https://charter97.org/ru/news/2022/3/2/457198/comments/ Kursant504 (talk) 06:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regreatably, the uploader's other contributions also seem to suffer from the same issue. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete as a clear copyright violation. A crop of a picture published online, with a lower resolution.[2] No camera metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 10:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Much earlier higher res publication on 2 March: credited Фото: "Суспільне. Миколаїв" Davidships (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pyb (talk) 20:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused as to why you decided to leave his four others photos out of this request @LevandeMänniska: --Trade (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not that used to VisualFileChange and I have some problems with my eye sight. So maybe I just missed them. My bad. Sorry. //LevandeMänniska (talk), 07:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope collection of personal images, several photos have derivative works issues

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all of them. Out of project scope. Kadı (talk) 21:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 01:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The phenylacetyl group should be an ester. See Figure 1 in doi:10.3892/ol.2014.1958. I have created File:Phenylacetylrinvanil.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 00:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 17:18, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NationStates map Enyavar (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy flag for a fictional rebel province in Belgium Enyavar (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy CoA for a fictional rebel province in Belgium Enyavar (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy CoA for a fictional rebel province in Belgium Enyavar (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy map for a fictional rebel province in Belgium that conquered Luxemburg Enyavar (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, see https://www.williamghelfi.com/blog/2016-05-15-heresy-right-hamburger-sidebar/, Photo by Mark Smith. Published with CC BY-ND 2.0, not compatible with Commons. JopkeB (talk) 04:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajesh.chopade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 06:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eon10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 06:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:KumhoPetrochemical.logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 07:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:KUMHO TIRE logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 07:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo Lymantria (talk) 07:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is taken from the magazine "1st Look" Vol. 210 (December 2020 issue). Refer to the news website, it can be presumed that it is not the uploader's own work. Tychou12 (talk) 09:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

news website:https://www.allkpop.com/article/2020/12/1st-look-magazine-teams-up-with-2020-mama-for-special-edition-covers-feat-boa-bts-izone Tychou12 (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless this issue is resolved, the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added and the uploader was notified on 8 February 2022. 181.203.4.97 23:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Regasterios at 13:27, 13 March 2022 UTC: No permission since 8 February 2022 --Krdbot 20:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Krayon95 (talk) 21:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 15:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake photo used for a hoax article on English Wikipedia about a boy who can breathe underwater. I see no future use for this doctored photo. It's not clear what it even depicts. Liz (talk) 01:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 15:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Copyvio + is that literally a photo of a screen?

Dronebogus (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 15:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Out of scope garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Out of scope junk

Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Out of scope

Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS junk files

Dronebogus (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

More OOS junk

Dronebogus (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope junk

Dronebogus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS crap junk

Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:1

No copyright info + OOS

Dronebogus (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:1

Load of OOS crap

Dronebogus (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

More OOS crap

Dronebogus (talk) 05:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert me if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Oos garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted I'm closing this since the files were already deleted. Feel free to revert if there's a reason the discussion should still be open. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per the nominator. BTW, I'm interested to know what the plan is for the category once it's empty. One could argue it should be deleted, but empty or not it seems like an important category...Although realistically there probably aren't going to be many (if any) files about the year 1. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted --Adamant1 (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

That was fast. More junk as usual

Dronebogus (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted The images were deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, some apparent copyviols from social media. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Out of scope crap

Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

Garbagé de OOS

Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:1

OOS garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Personal photos of non-contributors. Kadı Message 19:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Considering that the photos starting with Kareem were uploaded today, isn't it premature to make the conclusion that that used is a non-contributor? So far, they are, but surely, we have to give them more than one day to show whether they will contribute. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    There’s a long-standing pattern that people who upload random selfies in nonsense categories are not productive contributors. Most productive editors edit, THEN add purely decorative material like this. Dronebogus (talk) 00:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm aware of that policy. My point, since I guess it's not obvious, is that one day (or, for example, one week) is not long enough to know whether a user will be productive or not. If we want to prohibit users from uploading photos of themselves before uploading any other photo or making any other edits to articles that are not about them, a policy stating that needs to be made explicit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek, These images which are linked above do not contain encyclopedic value, that's why they are being deleted. This policy is about that. If we accept these kind of photos, Commons would turn into Instagram. Your arguments are about assuming good faith and being tolerable which are valuable, but we need to look at this point of view also. Regards, Kadı Message 14:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No we wouldn't. Users are allowed to upload a photo of themselves. We have to decide whether if a user uploads a photo of themselves, it should be the subject of a deletion request on the same day it is uploaded, which seems very rude to me, or whether we will be polite and give them a grace period. If not, we need to establish a new rule explicitly prohibiting such uploads with much more stringent specified exceptions than I believe are spelled out now, as I stated above. I suppose we need to have a discussion about this on Commons talk:Deletion requests. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure it's a formal policy that users are allowed to upload a photo of themselves. That may just be an informal courtesy. Do you know whether such an exception is clarified anywhere? I know that such photos are supposed to have a template on them, stating that they are not educationally useful and are subject to deletion when no longer in use on a user page, but that's a different though related matter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek, please open a discussion, so everyone can have a chance to see it and then make comments. Kadı Message 14:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Instagram crap

Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Usual collection of Instagram crap

Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Oos garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Usual oos crap

Dronebogus (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Derivative work of logo. Source country is unknown, so we cannot be sure in freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1

[edit]

Personal spam and potential copyright violations

Dronebogus (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.97.164 13:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.97.164 13:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.97.164 13:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 20:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: COM:NOTHOST & COM:CSD#F10. --Achim55 (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP issues. Still in copyright as it was only installed 2005 (see [3]). Premeditated Chaos (talk) 01:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LeonAspurs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW - scans of newspapers/photo - Facebook uploader is not author, and no free license there anyway.

Эlcobbola talk 22:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unremarkable dick selfie per COM:PENIS, unlikely to be useful Dronebogus (talk) 09:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 13:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS, inferior quality and not educationally useful Dronebogus (talk) 09:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 13:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absurdly bad COM:PENIS dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 13:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 13:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Iftekhar Mahmud (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's not real Iftekhar Mahmud (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --plicit 13:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Seems like other users think this could be educationally useful. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In den Metadaten dieser Datei wird "Copyright Historisches Museum Frankfurt am Main" angegeben, das Museum hat mir aber schriftlich die Erlaubnis erteilt, es unter CC BY-SA in der Wikipedia einzufügen. CPallaske (talk) 19:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Diese Lizenz ist in mehrfacher Hinsicht Blödsinn. Öffentliche Verlautbarungen sind nicht urheberrechtlich geschützt, weiterhin ist die Quelle mehr als 200 Jahre alt, somit sind alle denkbaren Urheberrechte in allen Ländern abgelaufen. Fotografische Reproduktion von gemeinfreien Texten begründen kein neues Urheberrecht. der Text ist komplett gemeinfrei. Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Dennoch wäre es besser, die Datei nochmals, aber ohne die Metadaten hochzuladen. Das werde ich tun, wenn die jetzige Fassung gelöscht ist, weil sich das "Copyright" aus den Metadaten nicht entfernen lässt, dann auch unter CC0. CPallaske (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Einfach eine neue Version ohne Metadaten, aber mit demselben Dateinamen "drüberladen" (das geht) und dann die erste Version löschen lassen. --Rosenzweig τ 22:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alles klar, ist erledigt. Dann kann der Löschantrag beseitigt werden. CPallaske (talk) 07:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the file, deleted only the first version as described. --Rosenzweig τ 00:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

投稿者として削除依頼します。タイトルに問題があるため。 Rebirth10 (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ファイル名を改めたいだけであれば {{Rename}} を使用して改名を依頼してください。. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

タイトルに問題があるため削除依頼します Rebirth10 (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ファイル名を改めたいだけであれば {{Rename}} を使用して改名を依頼してください。. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

タイトルに問題があるため削除依頼します Rebirth10 (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ファイル名を改めたいだけであれば {{Rename}} を使用して改名を依頼してください。. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

タイトルに問題があるため削除依頼します Rebirth10 (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ファイル名を改めたいだけであれば {{Rename}} を使用して改名を依頼してください。. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

品質に問題があるため削除依頼します Rebirth10 (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. 他ウィキで使用されています. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wow, no shit. Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, I see here educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dispute the administrator’s close for this. There is no educational value in this, it is just a vandalistic COM:PENIS image Dronebogus (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wow, no shit. Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, we have better file:Nude penis pic.png about the same. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, not so bad. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random low quality penis photo, I don't think this is good quality or has anything special, it is slightly blurred A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete the author even admits it’s boring. I don’t know why Taivo was insistent on keeping some of these things. Dronebogus (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Humoyun Umaraliyev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

PDFs of scientific papers from https://involta.uz/index.php/iv/index, a site which I cannot see is published under a free licence, either on its web page or in the PDFs. All uploads are CC-Attributed to the uploader as "own work", but the uploader is not named as the author of any of them.

Lord Belbury (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; I didn't see a free license either. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Humoyun Umaraliyev (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Same as previous DR. No free license at pdf or at involta.uz.

P 1 9 9   18:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dyolf77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Low resolition. Not own work and no permission.. Just text and simple shapes, bellow the COM:TOO and in use. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Yes, but not own work! --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 01:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Claiming own work is not assuming bad faith, it is just the default licensing in the Upload Wizard. Modifing the description and license with the right ones is better. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:10, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:34, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Afifa Afrin as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 02:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no threshold of originality guidance for Bangladesh to determine if the work is below the threshold in the country of origin. For public domain / copyright ineligible works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. The work would be subject to copyright in some jurisdictions due to the graphic element. Unless further guidance becomes available, Commons:Precautionary principle applies. mattbr 08:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 10:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image comes from Getty Images (link), an artist's illustration of how the Fisht Olympic Stadium would look like once completed for the 2014 Winter Olympics, and it's not available under any CC or GNU license, having it's commercial use forbidden without prior permission, meaning it's not from the 2018 Summer Youth Olympics opening (held at the Obelisco de Buenos Aires), and it's a copyright violation. Solon 26.125 07:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evident encyclopedic purpose. Furthermore, the photo shows a private e-mail address. 79.34.195.137 16:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, photo of a significant pornographic actor. The watermark is undesirable, but is not a valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

single upload, standard social media size without EXIFs, very unlikely to be own work but grabbed from a social media Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Obriski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Takesnags (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MySisters200 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images seem to have been made with the https://tocaboca.com/app/world/ app. I can't see that they freely licence the output.

Lord Belbury (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fictional map about a simulation about "controlling" countries Enyavar (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Enyavar and Gbawden: What do you mean by "fictional" and "simulation"? Do you know about Latin America politics? Bageense (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I vaguely remember the file, it was about an online forum with red-vs-blue countries, reflecting SA rivalries? Anyway, if there was a deeper meaning to it (politics??), there was no clear description, and it was unused. --Enyavar (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fictional map about a simulation about "controlling" countries Enyavar (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fictional map about a simulation about "controlling" countries Enyavar (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fictional map about a simulation about "controlling" countries Enyavar (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fictional map about a simulation about "controlling" countries Enyavar (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without publication data, this image's copyright status cannot be determined Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope:Fictional map of a country within Spain Enyavar (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope:Fictional map of a country within Spain Enyavar (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol from https://fr-fr.facebook.com/estateragazzi2012/posts/2390228964346692/ . Antonio1952 (talk) 20:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Map of the fictional Chanista Empire Enyavar (talk) 21:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Flag of the fictional Chanista Empire that rules over Latin America Enyavar (talk) 21:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even without knowing what the map key says, I don't think this map is within an educational scope Enyavar (talk) 21:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio (also overloaded screenshot) Enyavar (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Yachay as depicted appears to be a fictional place? Enyavar (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Yachay as depicted appears to be a fictional place? Enyavar (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Yachay as depicted appears to be a fictional place? Enyavar (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of educational scope, I believe Enyavar (talk) 22:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait  Keep, it actually makes sense in the context of the spanish Wikipedia for children. Sorry! --Enyavar (talk)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of eductional scope, I believe - insect with a fake laughing mouth Enyavar (talk) 22:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

improper file type. Montanahunts (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Non-notable person. -- Pofka (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No creative commons license on link Suhaengpyeongga (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random personal party of non-notable people. -- Pofka (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Non-notable child. -- Pofka (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Non-notable person. -- Pofka (talk) 15:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Non-notable people. -- Pofka (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Weak keep. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation / no use for the project (see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/14._Februar_2022#Jo_Nin_(gelöscht)) Martin Sg. (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Currently in use and appears to be own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

single upload, small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Divelandy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo of questionable notability: out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evident encyclopedic purpose. 79.34.195.137 16:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, photo of a significant pornographic actor. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evident encyclopedic purpose. Furthermore, the photo shows a private e-mail address. 79.34.195.137 16:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, photo of a significant pornographic actor. The watermark is undesirable, but is not a valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1981: https://rkd.nl/nl/explore/artists/69511 Tekstman (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2022 Yahoo.All rights reserved.Powered by WordPress VIP(opens in a new window). 181.203.4.97 23:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped derivative work of deleted image — Dudek1337 (talk) 23:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr photo may not qualify as speedy delete candidate per COM:CSD#F3. However, it is a derivative of non-free elements seen in a conference. Also, one of non-free slides is the photo's focal point. George Ho (talk) 23:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, only text Ezarateesteban 23:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemp. artwork, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemp. artwork, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Xgeorg (talk) 10:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pure black - upload fault? Xgeorg (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ottobw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation. These paintings have been made by painters who are not yet dead or died very recently, so no PD. And I do not see VRT tickets (there is only one VRT ticket for File:Zelfportret in beslagen badkamerspiegel, Rein Pol 1976, Olieverf op paneel 44 x 50 cm.jpg, which is not in this list, with nr ticket #2022022310010632, but not for the rest). .

JopkeB (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note 1: Permission has been received for the Sjouke Heins images per ticket:2022080410006181, so I undeleted these 5 files. Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note2: The work of Rein Pol has been released with ticket:2022022310010632, Ellywa (talk) 15:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement, low-res, no Exif metadata (png file), unused file. Cjp24 (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright violation. Low image resolution and missing EXIF data. Seem the screenshot of her Instagram live [4]. COM:VRT permission is necessary. SCP-2000 14:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted from a Speedy Deletion request {{Copyvio}} by User:Pigsonthewing to regular Deletion request, for the following reason:
Potential copyright violation, incorrect license/very high likelihood of not being "own work". — Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 14:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Apparently from https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch/status/1499640226481901570/photo/1 - unlikely to be own work" Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment While the licensing information is almost certainly incorrect, the source cited in the speedy deletion was also unlikely to be the original. From the images I've seen, this is a cropped version from a TV broadcast; here's an example, which shows more of the frame (top and bottom of the image) posted by @AeronewsGlobal at 7:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC). Depending on who took the image, as it is a developing situation at Antonov Airport, it's difficult to assess, the license may be classed as a work of government, such as {{PD-UA}} (public domain by virtue of a news report), {{Kyivcity.gov.ua}} (CC-BY work of Kyiv city government) or copyrighted by a presently-unknown photographer. However, it is practically a given that it is not "own work" of User:Bmurphy380 (the original uploader). — Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 14:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete apparent copyvio. However, the image is so informative that it should be uploaded to Wikipedia under Fair Use. Akira CA (talk) 20:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I agree. The video that the image is from is the first clear image showing the AN-225 destroyed so it is of historical significance. It should be moved to Wikipedia under Fair Use at least until we know what the licensing of the source video is. - Omega13a (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
source Channel One Russia. News release at 2:24 https://www.1tv.ru/news/issue/2022-03-04/09:00#1 "The use of the materials of the Site is possible only for personal use." --Rumlin (talk) 08:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete TV screen capture, hence clearly a copyvio. Akela NDE (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
COM:UKRAINE states that

any work originating in Ukraine must be in the public domain, or available under a free license, in both Ukraine and the United States

This is not the case for press information that does not originate from an Ukrainian source (Otherwise any copyrighted work broadcast in Ukrainian news would become free for all! I don’t think their copyright holders would like that). Here, said press information appears to originate from a Russian source, so NOP Ukraine does not apply. There is also the fact that, for stuff originating from occupied Ukrainian territory, the applicability of Ukrainian law may be subject to discussion. Akela NDE (talk) 10:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:An-225 Destroyed.jpg -- 65.92.246.142 21:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete This is not own work. This is a frame from a TV report. See at 1:40: https://www.1tv.ru/news/2022-03-04/422647-eksklyuzivnyy_reportazh_pervogo_kanala_iz_gostomelya_kotoryy_kontroliruyut_rossiyskie_desantniki --Kursant504 (talk) 22:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Copyvio, no evidence of permission. --benlisquareTalkContribs 00:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag)

The Licence is included though in the template {{BAS data}} Hogweard (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License has been fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Hogweard (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

However the Licence is included in the template {{BAS data}} Hogweard (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License has been fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourceː twitter Satirdan kahraman (talk) 14:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourceː twitter Satirdan kahraman (talk) 14:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This book was issued in 1959, so the artist who designed this bookcover cannot be dead for at least 70 years. JopkeB (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - I agree, this is just a book cover, and it's not free to use. Poor quality and typo in file also, but that's not the issue. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion and INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. File is an illustration of the traditional Christmas event w:en:Koledari.. Other related files nominated at the same time have a potential educational value. When nominating multiple related files for deletion please use the method described in Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Nice portrait of the lady, but the car in the background ruins the entire photo. There are better similar photos in the same category.--Æo (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)  Keep. Nice photo of a lady participating to a folk religious ceremony, holding a broom and with swastikas drawn on her cheeks. I have cropped the photo so that the car is less visible and the lady is central. The image has educational value and should be kept.--Æo (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I sent the wrong image. CesarCoelho667 (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, potentially useful as an illustration of a traditional Christmas activity, see Category:Koleduvane and w:en:Koledari. This also applies to other files nominated for deletion at the same time, including File:Kalyada KR 2012 425.JPG, which is in use. When nominating multiple related files for deletion please use the method described in Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamesrobert123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User's other uploads were credited to Mordor Intelligence without permission. These early three are the same kind of thing, but were uploaded as "own work". They're all vague and unsourced business statements next to what may be an unlicenced stock photo.

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As an addendum to this, Alokahkumar (talk · contribs) and Sophia Reddy (talk · contribs) have been uploading a lot of the same kinds of images from Mordor Intelligence. Those have all now been deleted as G10 advertising. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Irrelevant person. -- Pofka (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There are better ones incl File:Kalyada KR 2012 365.JPG. --Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. These are random spoons. -- Pofka (talk) 14:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Non-notable building, structures. I can't see any value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, non descript house. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, in use in multiple Wikipedia articles to illustrate a traditional Christmas activity, including in w:en:Koledari. Other related files nominated at the same time have a potential educational value. When nominating multiple related files for deletion please use the method described in Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. COM:INUSE explicitly says, "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose". MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random, non-notable people. -- Pofka (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Moreover, it is a likely violation of COM:ADVERT rule due to the advertisement of a private company Pioneer. -- Pofka (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules. Moreover, the girl is likely too young to be photographed and uploaded to Commons without her parents permission. -- Pofka (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person. -- Pofka (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a party of random people with random costumes. Random person. -- Pofka (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TRUM10710 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics and promotional images claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 07:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting. Separar un bibliotecario con estomago para borrar todas estas imagenes innecesarias de penes feos. Basta con los que se usan. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.203.96.86 (talk) 00:10, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pure male feet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OOS, personal files with no educational use, commons is not an amateur fetish site.

Dronebogus (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 10:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pure male feet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Many redundant or duplicate files + COM:OOS

Dronebogus (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лобачев Владимир's photos without educational value

[edit]

These files clearly violates COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as they have absolutely no educational value. These photos seem like taken straight out of the social networks. Moreover, seeing random companies flags and texts on clothes, it may also be violation of COM:ADVERT rule. ---- Pofka (talk) 14:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Most kept, one or two low quality ones deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I sent the wrong image. CesarCoelho667 (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7 and needs more info to keep. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random object. -- Pofka (talk) 15:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; just a random sack. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random, non-notable people. -- Pofka (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random person with random costume. -- Pofka (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:44, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:44, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: procedural close: already kept by Gbawden. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: procedural close: already kept by Gbawden. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alokahkumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Deletion request created in error, had the wrong dropdown setting on VFC. Meant to speedy-delete as G10, which I've now done. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: see comment by Lord Belbury, nothing left to do here. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random object. -- Pofka (talk) 15:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random object. -- Pofka (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: procedural close: already kept by Gbawden. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. -- Pofka (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 09:01, 16 April 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Semi erect circumcised penis.jpg --Krdbot 12:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Borderline case - it is in use as a user profile image in ru:Участник:TwixVIXX, which is however only "allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project" per project scope. TwixVIXX isn't really an active participant, however, and has only edited their own user profile page since 2020. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. Random, non-notable people and objects. -- Pofka (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per the statements of User:Лобачев Владимир in other deletion requests for files of the same group, this is "an illustration of the traditional Christmas event w:en:Koledari" and has potential educational value. They are all of fair enough quality, including this one, and I don't see a reason to delete any of them. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per the statements of User:Лобачев Владимир in other deletion requests for files of the same group, this is "an illustration of the traditional Christmas event w:en:Koledari" and has potential educational value. They are all of fair enough quality, including this one, and I don't see a reason to delete any of them. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per the statements of User:Лобачев Владимир in other deletion requests for files of the same group, this is "an illustration of the traditional Christmas event w:en:Koledari" and has potential educational value. They are all of fair enough quality, including this one, and I don't see a reason to delete any of them. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per the statements of User:Лобачев Владимир in other deletion requests for files of the same group, this is "an illustration of the traditional Christmas event w:en:Koledari" and has potential educational value. They are all of fair enough quality, including this one, and I don't see a reason to delete any of them. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per the statements of User:Лобачев Владимир in other deletion requests for files of the same group, this is "an illustration of the traditional Christmas event w:en:Koledari" and has potential educational value. They are all of fair enough quality, including this one, and I don't see a reason to delete any of them. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Лобачев Владимир. Quality is good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as this file have absolutely no educational value. This is a random party of random people with random costumes. -- Pofka (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not trustworthy organism distribution map. The insect in question occurs all over Europe, including north of the polar circle, but not in Iceland, Turkey and Morocco? Enyavar (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused map with unclear data source. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not trustworthy organism distribution map. The organism in question neatly follows state borders, was eradicated in Russia and Belarus, but spreads all over Scandinavia? Enyavar (talk) 22:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:INUSE. Map may be questionable, but is still in use in Basque Wikipedia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). What is the age of this image? King of ♥ 02:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; none of the essential info has been provided. --P 1 9 9   01:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has several major errors with the track configuration. I have created a corrected version, File:Lechmere 1936 track layout.svg. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; superseded as stated. --P 1 9 9   01:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   01:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, the black border tells me this was copied from somewhere Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tineye finds this in 2020 - https://www.nj.com/opinion/2020/11/the-truth-about-trump-and-voter-fraud-its-hiding-in-plain-sight-opinion.html - before upload. Needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anonymous91997 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

avy.eu clearly says (C) ARR. No indication of a free license

Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. Kept logo that is use, might be below TOO. --P 1 9 9   01:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, clearly photoshopped from something else. Not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official photo, taken from FB per MD. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Renvoy as no permission (No permission since)

File was uploaded in 2009 to ru.wiki. Deserves to be discussed in a DR rather than in a slow speedy. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No permission. The original source seem [5] which was uploaded on or before Apr 24, 2008. SCP-2000 07:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
support deletion, am going to delete in ru.wiki too, but keeping for now so that others could see the original description rubin16 (talk) 09:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lob Toloka

[edit]

These files clearly violates COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:NOTHOST rules as they have absolutely no educational value. This is a construction of a random buildings and file "Lob Toloka-3.jpg" is just a photo of irrelevant person. ---- Pofka (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lob Лебедка.jpg , Lob Korenskie-rodniki-17.jpg , Lob Toloka-4.jpg и Lob Toloka-1.jpg shows specity of technology of log canin building. Lob Toloka-1.jpg is using in the featured article. --Мечников (talk) 19:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most images are log cabin construction, which is in scope. Deleted the unrelated personal photos, as per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unuseful, easily replaced with text Ezarateesteban 23:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mewa767 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: bad name NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could one of the administrators please educate the generally co-operative user User:Mewa767 that bad file names should not be deleted, but kept, because they are likely to be used by external Wikis. I tried it several times on his user page, but he is of the opinion, to know it better. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, redirect from the original name of a renamed file. --Rosenzweig τ 20:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject of this photo has little notability. I cannot find any reference which verify that he was a politican. In addition, this was used in a hoax article about him. Fehufanga (talk) 08:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep "Little notability" is subjective and not correct. He has valid external identifiers at Wikidata and we have his obituary. --RAN (talk) 13:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) The Wikidata entry is dubious at best. He does have an obituary, but that is so far, the only source I can find about him. The Wikidata entry mentions that he was a politician from Illinois, however I cannot find any source which verifies that he was ever a politician (there are also dubious claims that he ran for vice-presidency of the United States in his EverybodyWiki page), he is mentioned to be a prominent farmer in Illinois in the obituary. The other photo of him is claimed to have been sourced from www.wolffamilymuseum.org, which doesn't even exist (not in the wayback machine either). Fehufanga (talk) 07:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Fehufanga: Since dubious biographical information is circulating, we need to make sure that we have correct information available. If we delete the image here only the misidentified version will be available, if we keep it here we can let people know there is a problem with it and that the identification is disputed. I see that the references in the original article are nonsense, we can strip the Wikidata profile down to what we can confirm, but we need an entry to show people what can be confirmed. I added a note to each image that the identification of the person has not been confirmed by comparison with the original source. We already know that "After a long illness, Wolf died in Altamont, Illinois on May 10th, 1929" is incorrect, he died very quickly from blunt force trauma. At least Geni and Familysearch and Findagrave have not been contaminated. How did you discover that his political career was fake? Good detective work. RAN (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) I'm going to start with another claim, that Augustus was a lawyer. Looking through at his census records from 1900 (sign-up required to access, which I reluctantly had to do) reveals that he worked as a "farmer". I'm not an expert in old US census data, but I don't see why he would be listed as a "farmer", if he was working as an attorney. It is not out of the possibility that he retired from his legal profession at the time, but previous census records show that he was working as a farmer as well. As for being a politician (specifically, a member of the Illinois House of Representatives), it's a lot more difficult for me to find any information about the members of the Illinois House of Representatives from that time. I'm relying on the census records which mention that he was only a farmer, and that no external source mention him as a politician, not in genealogy websites either. Besides that, most of Augustus' details in Wikidata match with the records I found in FamilySearch's census archive.
    I must also mention some other members of the Wolf family.
I had already loaded the 1900 census to the category. All of the references used in the biographies are fictitious. I am still looking for obituaries in Illinois newspapers. I have deprecated any fact I cannot verify at Wikidata. --RAN (talk) 18:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Augustus' son, Theodore Herman Wolf was supposedly a politician. Theodore has a bit more information in FamilySearch but his description makes zero mention of him being a politician. His census records also show that he was working as a farmer. The source cited for Theodore's article in EverybodyWiki is falsified (they really have a weak policy and enforcement regarding verifiability over at EverybodyWiki).
    • Augustus' father, Augustus Wolf was also a politician. There are several conflicting accounts. If my memory serves me right, his (now deleted) article in Simple English Wikipedia, he was a member of the United States House of Representative from New York. My search in Political Graveyard finds no mention of an Augustus Wolf. Augustus Wolf's EverybodyWiki article makes no mention which state he represents, but assuming Illinois, since that appears to be where most of the Wolf family resides, nothing can be found from the duration of his term either.
    • Alex T. Wolf is Augustus (Bernard)'s great-great grandson (verified from an obituary of Alex's grandmother, and tracing back the generations from FamilySearch). Over several years, he, or somebody affiliated with him has tried to promote Alex by creating Wikipedia articles of him. His article was deleted from the Simple English Wikipedia, and numerous attempts at recreating it has appeared over the last few months.
    The reason I'm requesting deletion in the first place is to stop these hoax articles from being created again, they were used as a part of an elaborate scheme to leverage Alex's notability.
    My thanks to User:Tymewalk for assisting me with significant parts of this investigation. Fehufanga (talk) 14:29, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • We should probably change the names of the files to "unidentified man #1" and "unidentified man #2". As I previously stated, now that the image is in circulation on the Internet, if we delete our copy with all the warnings I added, the only one left will be the one appearing with the false information at Google Ballotpedia and other Wikipedia clones. Deleting the picture has nothing to do with recreating a deleted article. If we delete the image and it gets uploaded again, it will no longer have the warnings associated with it. --RAN (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is very interesting dicsussion. However, as a result we have here a photograph of an unknown person with fake source and fake authorship. If this picture was not in fact published in some newspaper in 1901 (and this claim looks as false as all other information provided by the uploader), how can we believe that it is in PD?. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mewa767 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: bad name NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect should be kept as a matter of principle, please. The file might already be used in a local wiki, as discussed on several occasions on User talk:Mewa767, e.g. Bitte_lege_beim_Umbenennen_IMMMMMER_eine_Weiterleitung_an. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As shown in the red box, the tag {{rename|korrekter Name}} should be used, please, if a file name is wrong. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear User talk:Mewa767: Please act very carefully. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ganz nebenbei: Die Schreibweise Groeneveld ist in Tübingen durchaus üblich. (By the way: The spelling Groeneveld is still common in Tübingen). --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: we usually keep redirects. --Rosenzweig τ 09:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical bad COM:PENIS pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flags created and uploaded by Red Star Baltic

[edit]

I believe that these flags violates COM:NOTHOST rule because they were created and uploaded by user Red Star Baltic and were never used officially by Lithuania, thus they have no educational value. If they were used officially, then please provide reliable sources supporting your claims. ---- Pofka (talk) 13:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old and historically incorrect version of file, new file is uploaded here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Cesar_Maria_Guerrero.svg GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 01:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (both files uploaded by nominator). --Rosenzweig τ 10:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Record sleeves in Category:Sound recording in Auckland Museum

[edit]

Copyright violations of the depicted record sleeves. These are sleeves of gramophone records released in New Zealand in or after 1956. They are too complex to be allowed under the threshold of originality. It is unlikely that the Auckland Museum owns the copyright of the record sleeves. See Commons:Batch uploading/AucklandMuseumCCBY which acknowledges that some files from this museum may have copyright issues. -- Verbcatcher (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check this next week, but honestly it seems unlikely HMV would release copyright of a record. These are listed as CC-BY on the museum's website, so there's a chance that he held the copyright to the artwork and donated it. --Prosperosity (talk) 03:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see the CC release, I looked, but did not see. If it is there, I am ok with keeping assuming a government has the right to release from copyright, we should add "Creator=Nevile Lodge". --RAN (talk) 07:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The New Zealand government may have the power to release things from copyright, effectively confiscating property, but this would probably require an act of parliament. Even if government ministers had the authority to issue directives of this sort, they would be very unlikely to delegate this authority to museum employees. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, per nomination, kept the first two as the drawings appear to be anonymous and covered by {{PD-New Zealand}}. The others can be restored in 2040. --Rosenzweig τ 10:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MER-C as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 02:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The threshold of originality is very low for Russian works, see COM:TOO Russia. Sufficient effort (from a Russian perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin. For public domain / copyright ineligible works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. mattbr 11:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Doubtful authorship and license. Udokan copper permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is the old logo of Biletinial. 176.236.73.238 09:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Doubtful authorship and license. Biletinial permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.97.164 14:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this is in the public domain for various reasons. One being the stamp isn't. I don't think the image by ArtCraft is either. Adamant1 (talk) 23:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this is in the public domain for various reasons. One being the stamp isn't. I don't think the image on the side is either. Adamant1 (talk) 23:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by P199 as no permission (No permission since). Does PD-PhilippinesGov apply? King of ♥ 02:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The YT source video is not free. And like modern musical versions of old works, this performance is likely a proprietary non-free rendition, irrespective of the licensing status of the anthem itself. --P 1 9 9   18:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It is a national anthem, for crying out loud. The performance is a mere cover and is not even a "modern" musical version. No permission is needed. 124.107.145.177 05:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 18:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) King of ♥ 02:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to think uploader did not make this photo. They uploaded a lot of similar images with the same quality. Therefore decided to keep. --Ellywa (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) King of ♥ 02:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to think uploader did not make this photo. They uploaded several similar images with the same quality. Therefore decided to keep. --Ellywa (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since). 1929 work, should be checked for PD. King of ♥ 02:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cinearte v.10, n.412, 1935 - Brigitte Helm.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cinearte (Brazil Magazine) for more covers from this series of uploads. --Rosenzweig τ 21:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. This drawing could be in PD per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Brazil (Anonymous Publish + 70 years). However, the name of the illustrator on the front page of a magazine is usually included in the colofon or on one of the first pages. As this has not been checked by the uploader or anyone else (in a library) this image might NOT be anonymous and therefore it might still be copyrighted and must be deleted per COM:PRP. Per community decision of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template a work which is older than 120 years can be maintained, because it is assumed the photographer died more than 70 years ago. As this magazine is from 1929, the image can be undeleted in 121+1929=2050. --Ellywa (talk) 19:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Diannaa as no permission (No permission since). Needs verification of PD status. King of ♥ 04:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep According to the version of the image at Ancestry it is his 1923 high school yearbook image. If I have time I will load the full page of images with the text. --RAN (talk) 06:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just found the image on google images, I do not know anything about the copyright information. Brigantics (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: correctly licenced Template:PD-US-expired as it is published 1923 per RAN. --Ellywa (talk) 19:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since)

COM:TOO? King of ♥ 04:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and COM:TOO Spain; A work which shows uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability is copyrighted. To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho these image shows uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability. Therefore I decided to delete these files. --Ellywa (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 04:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and COM:TOO Spain; A work which shows uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability is copyrighted. To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 04:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and COM:TOO Spain; A work which shows uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability is copyrighted. To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 04:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and COM:TOO Spain; A work which shows uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability is copyrighted. To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

品質が悪いため投稿者として削除を依頼します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: too late to delete per COM:COURTESY. The artwork on the photo is considered De minimis, and there is FoP in Japan. So there seem no copyright issues with this image and it can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

品質不良のため投稿者として削除依頼します Rebirth10 (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:COURTESY, albeit late. Image is not in use on the project and of little or no educational value. --Ellywa (talk) 19:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

品質に問題があるため削除依頼します Rebirth10 (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:COURTESY, albeit late. Image is not in use on the project and of little or no educational value. --Ellywa (talk) 19:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Central photo is a modern monument and there is no FoP in ukraine Andrei (talk) 16:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. In addition, no source is given for the central image (as has been done for the other elements). Hopefully somebody can make a replacement, because this image is used on many articles on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorship declaration is false. How can someone else's signature be his own work? Cabayi (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Licencing is wrong, please use PD-signature per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag. --Ellywa (talk) 19:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation: This image is a 1:1 reproduction of a figure from Rainer F. Foelix': "Biology of Spiders", Oxford University Press 2011, ISBN 9780199734825. Fig. 5.25a, p 161: "tracing of a photograph by Witt" See also the comment by User:Bastian Rast on File talk:Zygiella web.jpg. It has not been shown, wether the person named as content creator (Laura Basset) really holds the right to the image. Burkhard (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that File:Spidey_balloon.png is listed as work derived from this image. --Burkhard (talk) 20:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The permission mail is more than 15 years ago, it's deleted for a long time now. I can't validate the permission today, but this drawing, similar to a technical drawing, is under threshold of originality, isn't it? Kind regards, Doc Taxon (talk) 09:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did find the original photo, on https://www.drpeterwitt.com/spider-web-gallery/ . The website has a copyright sign on the bottom. De Witt died in 1998. Doc Taxon, perhaps you could find out who the heirs are and try to obtain permission for this derivative work. Please follow the procedure of VRT in that case. If succesfull, the image can be undeleted. Ellywa (talk) 07:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and my own conclusion. I will make an alternative for Spidy balloon. This is used on many pages and is made in good faith. --Ellywa (talk) 07:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MBB1969 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents, photos, publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The country of creation of all the images is the Netherlands.
  • I think the two newspaper articles are copyright violation, because they are not yet 70 years old, I gues both are from 1977, but perhaps User:MBB1969 better confirm that.
  • I think the rest of the files should indeed get proper dates. Most of them are in the public domain because they are older than 70 years (except for File:Opa Bel HKB.jpeg, I am not sure about the copyright status of this one) and they are government documents (except for File:Boekelo, Carel Bel 16 48 02 862000.jpeg; the artist, Max Falxsbaum, died in 1945, see https://www.joodsmonument.nl/nl/page/226662/max-flaksbaum/, so more than 70 years ago, this drawing is therefor in the public domain), and have no authors.

These are important documents from World War II. I hope this will help to keep them in Commons. --JopkeB (talk) 16:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note I asked for information and dates on the talkpage of the uploader on NL WP, nl:Overleg gebruiker:MBB1969. I suggest to wait a week for an answer. Ellywa (talk) 06:52, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. Therefore – due to lack of information like source, author, publication status and creation dates – these images must be deleted. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]