User talk:Bacon Noodles

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bacon Noodles!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Add some infos

[edit]

At fr:Village de Séraphin, we need to add an external link just bottom of "Liens externes" section like that (see text source to copy it):

The same link is currently added at en:Village de Séraphin.

Thank you.--2A0D:5600:43:4000:0:0:0:A541 16:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've cropped the image to remove blank space. However, for the edits on the Village de Séraphin pages, since you're specifically requesting new external links, I would recommend creating an account and editing those pages, yourself. — Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 16:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine animated.gif

[edit]

I wanted to point out that a part of the changes seen in the gif from 18th to 26th March showing Russian occupied territory in the north expand before shrinking (specifically around Shotska) is inaccurate. There was some Russian bot accounts who kept edit warring for those changes in that time before being blocked en masse, it would be best to skip the versions showing the extended Russian control of the north in that period in the next update. Thanks. Viewsridge (talk) 10:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Viewsridge: Regarding the choice of positions/frames, I selected ones which were not reverted (in the source map) and were in place, at the end of the day. For the most part, although your concerns are well within reason, the animation is mostly a general illustration with days shown for less than a second each, as opposed to the detailed standings of the main SVG map, and the limited resolution would be unlikely to overly emphasise minor movements around the line of control. If you'd like to specifically let me know which individual days need changing and which file version(s) you think should be used instead, I'd be more than happy to replace them and upload a new version, it would not be a hassle. — Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 18:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the changes from 18th to 26th of March should be removed. Instead being replaced with a still image for each passing day of the 18th March revision. There was a confusion around the town of Shotska at the time, but as it turned out, it was never captured. Viewsridge (talk) 10:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Viewsridge: What I've done in the latest revision is, instead of a single still image that would exclude changes in the Donbas, I've modified the specific days to exclude major changes in the north east - which may not be an exact match to what the situation was because I used maps from 17 March and 27 March (a 10-day gap). Also, as I'm not sure which date Chernihiv was completely encircled, the updated animation shows it from 25 March); if it was earlier/later, it's an easy fix, but just needs confirmation. Again, since it's just a general illustration, so it's not urgent urgent, but anything particularly substantial can be still updated. — Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 18:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That looks good, thanks. Viewsridge (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine animated.gif, Again

[edit]

Hello! I am updating the colors of this animation to make them match the current color scheme of the regular map. You created modified frames from March 18th to March 26th, which I don't have access to. I need them so I can update their colors. Could you please upload the .svg files for those frames so I can update them? Please upload them in this name format, "2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine animation F(number).svg". The frames in question are 23 to 31, so the files in order should be F23, F24, etc. to F31. I have already updated the colors for the rest of the animations frames. Many thanks!--Physeters 10:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and why is your entire talk page an archive? Is that a mistake? Physeters 11:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I moved over the automated things, like deletion requests, but there was also some random guy who kept changing IP (even though the trackers show it as being in a similar place; check page history, it'll be clear which it is) then removing the message he/she/it posted. It wasn't a rude message, it was just a request to crop an image and add an image to another page, which was just slightly random. — Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 17:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Physeters: Hello, I only have the modified frames in bitmap format because the animation didn't require an SVG version. Essentially, for the most part, to recreate it, the boundaries for the north-west were kept from March 17th until March 24, then included changed slightly to show Chernihiv encircled from the map on that day - until 27 March, when it resumed being the same as the source file. (Also, see the previous section above because it's when the deviations were added.) If it'd help, I can tell you which specific revisions were used; the website I used to compile the gif can also separate frames, if that would help at all because I'd prefer not to upload them as separate files. Depending on your software, if you're going to make another .gif, it may just be a matter of selecting the areas and changing the hue slightly, which is what I was going to do for those days. If you've got Inkscape or something similar, I think it'd only need some slight manual tweaks to match it, it's only 10 frames. — Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 17:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I'll just recreate them in Inkscape, and convert them back to .pngs when I compile the .gif. Physeters 18:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:A private audience with Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.176 03:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trent1 600dpi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yilku1 (talk) 02:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:1990s decade montage.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

– Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 17:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:AliDieng4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: YT license review failed: "This video belongs to http://www.cctv.org and published with permission under Creative Commons License CCTV Center for Media & Democracy Programming is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License."
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ciell (talk) 19:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Ulaanbaatar International Airport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 13:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southampton UK city council composition.svg

[edit]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Smiler jerg (talk • contribs) 20:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated [1] this diagram using the Parliament tool - can you update it, please?

(Note: I've moved the Green party to be next to the Liberal Democrats, as I think this more accurately reflects the arrangement for Southampton City Council) smiler (talk) 20:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded it as a new file because of current file overwrite policy and also replaced it on the main page on Wikipedia. -- Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 21:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thank you! smiler (talk) 19:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]