Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Instagram - [1] 5th image Ravensfire (talk) 01:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination copyvio. --DMacks (talk) 03:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Misleading redirect made by me because I renamed the file. Please note File talk:Galenus (cropped).jpg Ellywa (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
The source is not available. Yuckyintio (talk) 10:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. 15th century painting. I fixed the source link. --Achim55 (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
I miscaculated the amount of time since this image came into the public domain. It's been 62 years not 72. It won't be eligible for another 8 years. CeltBrowne (talk) 11:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:46, 29 January 2022 UTC: I miscalculated the amount of time since this image came into the public domain. It's been 62 years, not 72. It won't be eligible for another 8 years. --Krdbot 20:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Original version of this image got deleted due to copyright violation Princepratap1234 (talk) 14:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
This was accidentally published, the user did not take the photo. User was trying to link to the source of the image and accidentally published. Cpetrov (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
file was uploaded to this site by mistake Spotlightonthepast (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Flag_of_the_Pacific_Ocean.svg John emil hernandez (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & fictional. --Achim55 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Este archivo fue borrado. 191.126.6.132 02:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. Uploader's request and fictional. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manos rojo (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:R160 V train @ 2 Avenue.jpg
- File:R160 V train @ West 4 street.jpg
- File:R160 A train @ 59 street Columbus circle.jpg
- File:R32 W train @ 39 Avenue.jpg
- File:R32 W train @ Broadway station.jpg
- File:R32 W train Rollsign.jpg
- File:R40 B train interior.jpg
Long-term abuse. User has been globally blocked. --Kinu (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, small photos, only one has metadata. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
same rationale as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rishabh Pant at Adidas Event.jpg Lugnuts (talk) 13:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
non-free image, taken from another website which the uploader has kindly stated Lugnuts (talk) 18:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no indication of a CC license at the stated Youtube source. --Rosenzweig τ 13:50, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyviol (youtube screenshot without license) 109.112.102.36 22:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Fresh da sloggato, sorry Fresh Blood (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fresh Blood: Did you do your due diligence and check the YouTube license before accusing me of a copyright violation? The video's description clearly indicates it is licensed with a Creative Commons CC BY license. Οἶδα (talk) 22:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- What CC BY? where? Fresh Blood (talk) 23:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Οἶδα Vous avez indiqué le lien à creative commons, mais je ne vois pas le lien à la license de l'école Holden, nì a le type de license. Voyons si un admin sest d'acord avec vous! Bonsoir Fresh Blood (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fresh Blood: voir pour les références dans la description sous la vidéo sur YouTube. Οἶδα (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Je ne vois pas qu'il soit écrit CC BY 3.0 o 4.0, les licenses nécessaires pour les imagés. Fresh Blood (talk) 17:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fresh Blood: Il est écrit « Licence : License de paternité Creative Commons (réutilisation autorisée) ». Toutes les vidéos "YouTube CC-BY" sont Attribution 3.0 (lisez COM:YT) Οἶδα (talk) 20:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Οἶδα Merci, vous etes trés gentil mais je ne suis pas convaincu du tout. Voyons ce qui dira un admin. Fresh Blood (talk) 22:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fresh Blood: Il est écrit « Licence : License de paternité Creative Commons (réutilisation autorisée) ». Toutes les vidéos "YouTube CC-BY" sont Attribution 3.0 (lisez COM:YT) Οἶδα (talk) 20:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Je ne vois pas qu'il soit écrit CC BY 3.0 o 4.0, les licenses nécessaires pour les imagés. Fresh Blood (talk) 17:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fresh Blood: voir pour les références dans la description sous la vidéo sur YouTube. Οἶδα (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Οἶδα Vous avez indiqué le lien à creative commons, mais je ne vois pas le lien à la license de l'école Holden, nì a le type de license. Voyons si un admin sest d'acord avec vous! Bonsoir Fresh Blood (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- What CC BY? where? Fresh Blood (talk) 23:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fresh Blood: Did you do your due diligence and check the YouTube license before accusing me of a copyright violation? The video's description clearly indicates it is licensed with a Creative Commons CC BY license. Οἶδα (talk) 22:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: video published with CC-BY license. Ruthven (msg) 12:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Probably stolen from [2], where the photo has been published since 2018. A.Savin 04:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader's comment, see [3]. --A.Savin 20:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Picture stolen from internet, at least on [4] it has been published much earlier than on Commons. A.Savin 04:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader's comment, see [5]. --A.Savin 20:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio from http://www.bilkentneuro.com/ A.Savin 04:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader's comment, see [6]. --A.Savin 20:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Cited source shows a different picture and is not CC licenced. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily deleted as a copyright violation per Commons:Licensing (F1). This is iStock/Getty Images rights-controlled image ID #1176919002 by Ekaterina Zirina. —RP88 (talk) 02:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
нарушение авторского права 95.31.191.213 17:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Polarlys at 23:07, 31 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:20, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal and promotional photos
- File:"One day you miss me Ibne Sadik.JPG".jpg
- File:Ramp Walk Ibne Sadik.jpg
- File:Desire Ibne Sadik.jpg
- File:Ibne Sadik Music Noob Slow base.jpg
- File:Ibne Sadik.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photos
Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Taskin Ahmed Kayum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo
Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, personal image, experiments Gampe (talk) 10:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope * Pppery * it has begun... 00:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope * Pppery * it has begun... 00:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:NOTSOCIAL as well. Учхљёная (talk) 03:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
unused, useless, no cat, no encyclopedic value, just a test, etc F (talk) 08:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
The image is not the user's own work. Jakob990 (talk) 02:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Hosting ; out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 13:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by AntiCompositeNumber at 23:44, 6 February 2022 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 02:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Soy Michael Stiven Ospina y quiero que sea eliminado ya que no tiene que ver con mi religión 2A0C:5A82:1101:CD00:55C4:B0A8:7829:47E0 01:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please log in and confirm this request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
No lo quiero Bildonismo (talk) 19:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by courtesy, uploader's request, unused, dispensable. --Achim55 (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
The better version: File:信義區夜景 - panoramio (6).jpg Solomon203 (talk) 03:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Seems like the alternative may also be a violation of COM:FOP Taiwan since the inside is visible, but I could be mistaken Учхљёная (talk) 04:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
the better version: File:HK WCD WC 灣仔 Wan Chai 軒尼詩道 Hennessy Road Tienren Teashop August 2021 SS2 02.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 07:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Having a better version is not a valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France. Copyright of this building will be expired in 2078. Ox1997cow (talk) 08:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Telegram 2019 Logo.svg, not in use, no benefit to keeping this PNG version. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
COPYVIO. Dronebogus (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
No sister circle and it’s a still image. Likely made by Harvey Weinstein 2607:FB91:1589:8277:8055:5EEB:9B7D:3DAA 21:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Incomprehensible reason, image is clearly a screngrab from a video on a verified Youtube channel with a CC licence. FDW777 (talk) 08:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep I think this is a joke nomination. So the only response is ... Harvey Weinstein?!? This image was clearly made by Jeffrey Epstein and Elvis Presley! --GRuban (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
I am seeking to have this file deleted as a courtesy deletion or speedy deletion. The file is of low quality and falls outside of the Wikimedia Commons scope since it does not have a realistic educational purpose or use. There are plenty of higher quality files on the same subject that Wikimedia Commons holds that can be used instead of this file and there would be very minimal loss of information if this file were to be removed as a courtesy deletion. In order to avoid any confusion, I am the nominator and the uploader of the file. I do believe I have a well-reasoned request for a courtesy and/or speedy deletion and am hoping an administrator will grant this request. Thank you for any help. WikiFan (talk) 23:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ich schlage vor, beide Einzelfotos zu behalten und die Kombination zu löschen, denn sie hat etwas rassistisch sexistisches, weil die Frau dunklere Haut hat und die Vulva in der Rolle eines Objekts für den Penis dargestellt wird. Das wirkt etwas wie Werbung für Sextourismus. Ich habe beim Penisfoto die Farbe korrigiert, jetzt sieht das nicht mehr so schockierend blutrot aus, sondern wie ein normaler Penis mit einem (gefährlichen) Metallring, den man nicht öffnen kann. Das Vulvafoto habe ich schon separat neu hochgeladen. Anstatt zu löschen, könnten wir beim Doppelbild einen Neuupload nur mit dem Penis machen, dann bleibt die Quellenangabe erhalten. Dazu müsste man das Bild dann umbenennen bzw. den Bildnamen kürzen.
- I suggest to keep both single photos and delete the combination, because it has something racist sexist, because the woman has darker skin and the vulva is shown in the role of an object for the penis. It seems a bit like advertising for sex tourism. I corrected the color in the penis photo, now it doesn't look so shockingly blood-red any more, but like a normal penis with a (dangerous) metal ring, that cannot be opened. I have already re-uploaded the vulva photo separately. Instead of deleting, we could reupload the double image with the penis only, then the source information is preserved. To do this, you would have to rename the image or shorten the image name. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete Thank you for your comments. However, I am still seeking, per personal request and nomination, that this file be deleted as a courtesy deletion for the reasons listed above in the original nomination. In addition, aside from having really no realistic educational value or purpose, you are right, the ring can be dangerous if not used properly as an aid or device. Thus, I believe the reasons for a courtesy deletion are valid and legitimate, and continue to kindly request to have this file removed as a courtesy by an administrator. There are many other similar files on Wikimedia Commons that can be used in lieu of this file and no significant loss of information will be experienced through this file’s removal. WikiFan (talk) 20:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ja ich stimme Dir voll zu. Schnelle Löschung ist das richtige. Andernfalls könnten Betrachter des Fotos das noch als Aufforderung missverstehen, so einen gefährlichen Metallring selbst zu verwenden.
- Yes, I agree with you completely. Quick deletion is the right thing to do. Otherwise, viewers of the photo could misinterpret it as an invitation to use such a dangerous metal ring themselves. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Das Foto der Vulva ist allerdings für die Sexualmedizin wertvoll, da man die Schwellung der unter der Haut neben dem Introitus vaginae liegenden Schwellkörper der Klitoris (bulbi vestibuli) gut erkennen kann. Das Vulva-Foto wäre von der Löschung des Doppelbildes nicht betroffen, weil ich es schon separat hochgeladen habe.
- The photo of the vulva is, however, valuable for sexual medicine, as one can clearly see the swelling of the erectile tissue of the clitoris (bulbi vestibuli) lying under the skin next to the introitus vaginae. The vulva photo would not be affected by the deletion of the double image because I have already uploaded it separately. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wenn Du das Vulva-Foto trotzdem gelöscht haben möchtest, bin ich aber auch damit einverstanden.
- If you still want the vulva photo deleted, however, I agree with that too. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much again for your input. I would still like the photo of the vulva deleted as well. Since the photo has already been separated, how can it be removed or deleted? Can it simply be removed or would it need to be nominated as a courtesy deletion? In any event, if both photos can be deleted it would be very much appreciated. Again, thank you. WikiFan (talk) 13:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Einverstanden. Du kannst hier einen Löschantrag stellen. Ich habe gerade ein besseres Foto gefunden, auf dem man die Schwellung der Bulbi vestibuli viel besser sehen kann.
- That's fine with me. You can make a deletion request here: File:A Sexually Aroused Female Vagina.jpg
- I just found a better photo where you can see the swelling of the vestibule bulbs a lot better. Sciencia58 (talk) 13:35, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Das sollte man auch gleich löschen. Das scheint derselbe Penis zu sein. Da wollte anscheinend jemand seinen Exhibitionismus in wikimedia commons ausleben.
- That should also be deleted right away. This appears to be the same penis. File:Penis Cock Ring Erection.JPG. Apparently someone wanted to live out his exhibitionism in wikimedia commons. Sciencia58 (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, self-requested. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Mala Edicion Heikesilas (talk) 01:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: seems to be out of scope. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, user request within own userspace, COM:CSD#U1 applies. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Seems not own work and seems no OTRS pending due to permission from Times of Assam claiim Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unless permission is provided. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Hola Soy MICHAEL STIVEN OSPINA BETANCURT Y ME EQUIVOQUE AL CARGAR ESTE ARCHIVO NO PERTENCE A MI PROPIEDAD Y TAMPOCO TIENE QJE VER CON M RELIGION 2A0C:5A82:1101:CD00:55C4:B0A8:7829:47E0 01:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please log in and confirm this request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright holder © Vichcic - http://www.redbubble.com/people/vichci
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
It's not a PD according to {{PD-Turkey}}. Nanahuatl (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Flyingshots.de (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos with unknown usecase. Out of COM:SCOPE. Might also be copyrighted as above the TOO.
Jonteemil (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Borderline threshold of originality case; see COM:TOO US Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- It wasn't me who have uploaded it here to Wikimedia Commons; I've put it directly intro the en wikipedia with the fair use license and 256x256 resolution. So please revert to it! All questions to this mister User:Steven (Editor) --Orange-kun (talk) 02:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. Unfortunately you get automatically pinged. I'll take it up with the deletion script authors, since this is happening frequently. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- The enwiki discussion is closed as "revert to non-free", so the Commons copy should be deleted then. George Ho (talk) 23:26, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Restored, but the 128x128 version only as it is under the MIT license. Ankry (talk) 09:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Has MIT license without explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Edge describes it as " Proprietary software, based on open source components" and does not mention MIT license. Maybe it is PD-shape and SVG code is MIT licensed? As mentioned in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Microsoft_Edge_logos MIT license in principle can be used but I see no evidence that copyright holder licensed it in this way Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per Ankry, only the 128x128 version is under the MIT license, not this SVG. Wcam (talk) 18:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 09:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
I think I was wrong to tag this as OK for Commons. A full version can be seen here, with credit ©️2004 University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee Libraries." Although it may not be the work of the university, the claimed authorship by English Wikipedia uploader (w:en:User:Aldrinv) is doubtful nonetheless. This image looks edited too to be sharpened, and cropped the lower part that contains the copyright info/claim. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope. Questionable notability. Also no permission. SCP-2000 07:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation. The author is Haigwood Studios per EXIF data and the image is low resolution. Seem the original image is [8]. SCP-2000 07:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
According to the image quality, this is a screenshot. "Own work" in the true sense does not apply here. Mosbatho (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: COM:DW with no evidence of permission. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
unused, useless, just a test, no cat, no encyclopedic value. F (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: No educational value (note that it does not have to be encyclopaedic per COM:SCOPE);
this is not Malevich. I wonder whether it is supposed to display in black in preview and colourful when opened, though. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Own work claim seems dubious due to uploader history. However likely qualify under fair use on English Wikipedia albeit possible lower resolution. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
no permission given from author that is named in description Hoyanova (talk) 09:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tvsimlinhares (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The JSMS Team (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic and screenshot. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 10:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yugandhargangu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic and screenshot claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 10:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 10:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Full size version: File:民進黨立委 陳亭妃.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Reprinted from https://www.asahi.com/and/article/20200225/9004745/. 勝錦 (talk) 14:41, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Günter Grote
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1985; no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Lieber Martin SG, deinen Löschantrag verstehe ich nicht: ich hatte die Dateien mit gleichzeitiger Weiterleitung des Einverständnisses der Erben zur Veröffentlichung an WP:Permissions hochgeladen
- Bitte um Klärung und Vorschläge für ein mögliches Vorgehen.
- Gruß Filiusque (talk) 15:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Makrokosmos-neu.JPG” under ticket:2014111910020075. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, VRTS permission received. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Humboldt-Gymnasium Düsseldorf
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks (busts by Becker who died in 1965; relief by Kindermann who died in 1997); no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- I got written permissions of all artists (resp. of their children as the holder of rights) to publish these photos on Commons. I send them to WP-Permissions, as regulated. Are the papers deleted there? If necessary: I could search these papers on my PC, to whom should I send them again, if requested? Filiusque (talk) 16:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Beucker-A-Humboldt-neu.JPG” under ticket:2014111910020075. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Beucker-W-Humboldt-neu.JPG” under ticket:2014111910020075. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, VRTS permission received. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Recently, Faith Factor Media has uploaded a new logo. BibleVerses.in (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused out of scope logo AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
US copyright of the piece "Dream" by the late John Cage was registered in 1960 (EP0000210207) and then renewed in 1988 (RE0000392223). Should not host this sound recording. George Ho (talk) 09:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. When I created and uploaded this file I wasn't aware of this issue. --Luisalvaz (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
unused, useless, no cat, no encyclopedic value, just a test, etc F (talk) 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
unused, useless, no cat, no encyclopedic value, just a test, etc F (talk) 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 09:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
experiments, out of scope, no usage Gampe (talk) 10:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bikrookanpurgangster (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete OOS. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 15:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
source doesn't have a creative commons license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bacromisee (talk • contribs) 19:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: (non-admin closure) 10:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC) by Achim due to "Content intended as vandalism (G3)". — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo and poor quality image of a band claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 12:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 12:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Mala edicion Heikesilas (talk) 01:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Où est le problème ?
- Il me semble que le cliché respecte toutes les règles de Commons, sauf erreur de ma part.
- Le demandeur (User:Heikesilas) a lui même une demande de suppression de page ? est-ce du vandalisme ?
- donc CONSERVER le fichier File:Rue des Tirecelins vue sur le n° 5.jpg
- Merci Doique (talk) 09:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Je viens de la placer dans le domaine public CC0 au cas où ce serait le problème. --Doique (talk) 11:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Mala Edicion Heikesilas (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Mala Edicion Heikesilas (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Mala Edicion Heikesilas (talk) 01:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: FOP-related requests have been split to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (FOP-related). However, to preserve existing references to these requests, all numeric disambiguations have been preserved. _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]seem not to be own work (upload pattern mismatch, exif, ...)
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf 01.jpg
- File:NationalShrineofOurMotherofPerpetualHelpjf 02.jpg
- File:OurLadyofLightParishjf 04.jpg
- File:OurLadyofLightParishjf 03.jpg
- File:OurLadyofLightParishjf 02.jpg
- File:OurLadyofLightParishjf 01.jpg
McZusatz (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice. I went and called 2 offices on the matter. I consider that the USA laws and Commons are the same, and Philippine copyright laws were borrowed from USA. Hence, I needed some enlightenment on the legal ramifications on copyright law. Specifically, the issue here is whether or not these uploaded images violated copyright or any other laws? Let me share my legal opinion and thoughts on the matter. First, the CBCP allows reproduction of any and all religious images. Second, for me, original images are those like mine which are from my cameras SONY 2008 and NIKON AW100 inter alia, where the size is very big that is 4,600 x 3,400 or 6 Mb+. A photographer would not in his right sense give to the internet for public use or consumption, like Facebook, etc. big or his or her original images. I conclude therefore that the religious images I got from the internet are even copied from derivative works of originals, since they are so small. In fact, the reasons I uploaded them here in Commons are: a) I love the sun images, and I desire to share beautiful pics in Commons when the sun fails me in my photography, b) I test the speed of the falling internet here, and c) most of the times, I fail to meet on time the parish priest of the Church, so I get permission from the office or the parishioners to get their pics of the this church or the priest. However, they would not allow their names to be revealed for privacy. Second, I asked about 3 lawyers of a legal department of the Copyright law office, and they opined that images, like books must comply with copyright deposit rules and regulations issued due to the Law requirement. More importantly, photographs of churches of priests and parishioners in churches when uploaded or copied for religious and moral reasons, etc. are not violative of the law, especially when the size is so small. Why should I get from the internet small images when I personally spend huge sums to go to the church and landmark sites, and spent more money in uploading these images from 11 pm to 4am daily more or less? In good faith, I love them and I ponder legally, that there is no obstacle in law, when I share them in Commons, Fair use so to speak. I do have the express but verbal permission of the CBCP and the churches to use their pictures especially as I said, I failed to capture a sunny facade of the church and the parish priest was away when I shot. Let me put here some parts of the law as basis of my above submissions: [Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines[9] and [10] - Republic Act No. 8293. K: Photographs and cinematographic works made in a process similar to photography - Section 185 of the Intellectual Property Code provides for fair use of copyrighted material. The criteria for fair use is almost identical to the fair use doctrine in United States copyright law, with the exception that even unpublished works qualify as fair use under Philippine copyright law.[11]SEC. 185. Fair Use of a Copyrighted Work. – 185.1. The fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, research, and similar purposes is not an infringement of copyright. Decompilation, which is understood here to be the reproduction of the code and translation of the forms of the computer program to achieve the inter-operability of an independently created computer program with other programs may also constitute fair use. CHAPTER IX DEPOSIT AND NOTICE SEC. 191. Registration and Deposit with National Library and the Supreme Court Library. –SEC. 192. Notice of Copyright. –xxx.)]
- IN FINE, I respectfully submit the above legal argument. And I stress that I failed to get a written legal opinion from the CBCP and our Copyright law office. I think this mater had already been exhaustively talked about or discussed by the editors in [12] Tambayan. I have no objection to the fair discretion of older editors to delete my above images, for the good of Commons. Best regards.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 14:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
- com:fair use is not allowed on commons therefore they need to be Delete. (Fair use is allowed on en.wiki, though) --McZusatz (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrightviolations (com:fair use) McZusatz (talk) 10:14, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 8
[edit]Suspicious early uploads of Ramon FVelasquez. While his recognized tool is Nikon COOLPIX AW100 (or Sony DSC-T200 for his 2012-era uploads like File:Churchpuljf.JPG), the following nominated images have either different camera models or are missing exif metadata (and some very small resolutions). These may have come from his apprentices or other people then passed on to him. No indication of proper copyright transfer via COM:VRTS correspondence if this is true. Likely similar case to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez#Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 2. See the nomination proper for added details.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
It can be noted that Ramon FVelasquez's reply to the second thread above seems self-contradictory: "Second, for me, original images are those like mine which are from my cameras SONY 2008 and NIKON AW100 inter alia, where the size is very big that is 4,600 x 3,400 or 6 Mb+." and afterwards then "I conclude therefore that the religious images I got from the internet are even copied from derivative works of originals, since they are so small." Plus he introduced the concept of fair use, even if fair use is eternally not allowed here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs) 9
[edit]Photos of non-descript darkness and objects/person by a former sock of Judgefloro (talk · contribs). Out of COM:SCOPE and unused. More usable photos are found at Category:Casa Hacienda de Tejeros.
- File:TejerosConventionjf3547 03.JPG
- File:TejerosConventionjf3530 02.JPG
- File:TejerosConventionjf3530 01.JPG
- File:TejerosConventionjf3512 13.JPG
- File:TejerosConventionjf3512 07.JPG
- File:TejerosConventionjf3512 06.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Poor quality, objects obscured by dark side of the objects not facing the sunlight, and the sunlight caused glare in the image. COM:NOTUSED and out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Zambalesajf0146 20.JPG
- File:Zambalesajf0146 21.JPG
- File:SantaCruz,ZambalesChurchjf9958 08.JPG
- File:SantaCruz,ZambalesChurchjf9958 07.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez (talk · contribs), group 1
[edit]Uploads by another sock of en:Florentino Floro, using Commons as cloud storage. Handling with a DR per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 93#JFVelasquez Floro.
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Strongest possible
Keep High resolution photos of cityscapes, in scope. Somewhat properly categorized, at least one image I checked is in use of two wikipedias. Almost everything I checked are strongly differing views (not 500 photos of the same thing from the same persepective or so) - No clue whats up with this AN report which alleges "severe mental illness", "ridicoulus categories", "terrible images" without any evidence whatsoever. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong keep. The images are immensely valuable, especially in the absence of representative photos for Wikipedia articles that use them. I go further to say that Judgefloro has contributed much valuable photos that are in current use in several Wikipedia articles. If categorization of photos is a problem, I would assist further as I am currently doing with several of his previous photos. Sanglahi86 (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86@TheImaCow I would rather be selective in which of the files of Judge Florentino Floro can be retained and which ones must go. The INUSE files in Wikimedia sites should be retained. Others must go, like File:Baliuagjf9406 30.JPG, which is just a random image of unidentifiable birds because those are too distant. I do not see any utility to this particular image, with obscured view of birds (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines). Though I agree that this DR in particular is too broad that reviewers may struggle which files are to be kept and which should go. By the way, thanks for categorization efforts Sanglahi86. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm all in on deleting low quality images, but nominating hundreds of images by a user because there might be some one or two low quality/oos images is absurd (I checked plenty more, and still haven't found a single one, other than the birds), and appears to be based on some personal grudge instead of actual larger-scale problems with the images. ~TheImaCow (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86@TheImaCow I would rather be selective in which of the files of Judge Florentino Floro can be retained and which ones must go. The INUSE files in Wikimedia sites should be retained. Others must go, like File:Baliuagjf9406 30.JPG, which is just a random image of unidentifiable birds because those are too distant. I do not see any utility to this particular image, with obscured view of birds (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pigeons of the Philippines resting on overhead power lines). Though I agree that this DR in particular is too broad that reviewers may struggle which files are to be kept and which should go. By the way, thanks for categorization efforts Sanglahi86. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Even though this is an organizational nightmare. The useless images need to be nominated separately, but deleting the whole lot of them is not going to be a net benefit to the project. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural Kept per discussion. Please narrow down significantly to the useless files, and not the in use ones or the useful ones. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Violation of Copyright Erik Pirntke (talk) 02:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Original file has been proposed for deletion. Deletion mistakes (talk) 03:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per A09090091 at Commons:Deletion requests/File:On. Roberto Rossini.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:On. Roberto Rossini.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Wrong license. If depicted person was born in 1911, then the photographer cannot be 100 years dead. Real creation year, first publication data and real license are needed to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe das Bild ausversehen hochgeladen. Bitte löschen Andi3366 (talk) 08:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright seems not given by source as claimed. Image - or lowwer res. derivitive - could be used under Non-free fair-use on Englsih WikiPedia Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Own work is under doubt. VRT-permission from photographer (if dead, then from heir) is needed. This is the uploader's last remaining upload, not yet nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photo of photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FMSky as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Jimmy Carter and Giscard d'Estaing, 01-05-1978 restored.jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (TIFF -> JPEG), though JPEG file looks better. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: since TIFF is lossless, they are generally kept, and it is the source file for the JPG version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FMSky as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Jimmy Carter participates in the Bonn Economic Summit - NARA - 180423.tif
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (PNG -> TIFF) and as the PNG looks sharper than TIFF. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needless small/low-res version. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
A forrásban nincs alátámasztva, hogy 1940-ben hozták nyilvánosságra a képet. Az egészen biztos, hogy nem 1940-es a kép, mert ezen a képen nem egy 43 éves ember van. Mi és hol bizonyítja, hogy ez a kép 1940-ben megjelent nyilvánosan? Az is erősen kétségbevonható, hogy 1940-ben készült. Elnézve a körülményeket, még az sem kizárt, hogy 1999-ben lett nyilvánosságra hozva, hiszen egy olyan mű a forrása, amely 1999-ig tartalmaz adatokat. Jelenleg ez a kép nem tiszta jogilag, így Delete. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 10:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Goof detective work, the image looks like that of a 60 year old man, so not PD-Hungary (pre 1942). --RAN (talk) 21:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
used for promotion at wikidata, has a watermark, questionable copyright status (cf. https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/34133277/photos/1009613736 and others) Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Justus Karamura (talk · contribs)
[edit]Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this screenshot and thought all video's of the Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal channel on YouTube were CC-BY. After uploading I noticed this screenshot is from a video that was not released by them as CC-BY. Robotje (talk) 11:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
User logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
extremst unscharf, somit eigentlich völlig unbrauchbar. Ist das Kunst oder kann das weg? Mateus2019 (talk) 12:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Unknown author of this image, no indication shows this is taken by US Marine employee. Stang★ 12:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Absent conflicting information, an aerial image of a U.S. Marine Corps base taken from a low-flying plane and posted on that same base's website is prima face evidence that it is the work of a military employee. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's only upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I think we should assume good faith on this one. If there was something else suspicious about the user's uploads, I would say to delete, but I'm not seeing anything else. I did reverse image searches on both Google Images and Tin Eye and nothing showed up but Wikipedia mirrors. There is a clear date that the image was taken, and low resolution/no EXIF data might be more expected in a digital image from 2005. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work in a museum, no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright protected work, not outside the museum, and not visible with closed museum doors, so not covered by German Panoramafreiheit; no evidence that uploader is allowed to put it under a CC license --> therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Not verifiable as the site has disappeared, Also no cear mention of who the author is. Someone Not Awful (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hausairsky (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 13:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No meaningful usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Could be found on other websites ([13], [14], [15], [16], [17]). 北巷猫眠 (talk) 13:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Copyvio: [18] --北巷猫眠 (talk) 14:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philippfromanywhere (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 13:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture was taken inside a building, so no freedom of panorama. Artists died in 2007 and 2015. Till (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
This rationale really isn't correct. Something doesn't fall out of copyright just because different versions of the government have used it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:41, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Similar image as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Willy_Schneider_im_Keller.jpg , by another user, as it seems CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Possible advertising: Quotation with a url CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Can't be a personal work : http://www.regards.fr/actu/idees-culture/article/a-propos-du-livre-de-philippe-corcuff-et-de-la-grande-confusion Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 14:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uncropped versions found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Geekkailash (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo and graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 14:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ToyitomaOda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from posters. Should be blanked/cropped to keep.
- File:Launch of Denise Charles for the June 7 by-election (26948612061).jpg
- File:Follow-up Workshop on Climate Change Issues (26411400072).jpg
- File:Follow-up Workshop on Climate Change Issues (26437615041).jpg
- File:Follow-up Workshop on Climate Change Issues (25900879963).jpg
- File:Follow-up Workshop on Climate Change Issues (25898826234).jpg
- File:Follow-up Workshop on Climate Change Issues (26503717535).jpg
- File:Follow-up Workshop on Climate Change Issues (26230871090).jpg
- File:Follow-up Workshop on Climate Change Issues (26437613641).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nomination, kept some as DM (either too small, indiscernable, or blurry). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ToyitomaOda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality OOS selfies and other personal travel photos that were important from Flickr. Commons isn't a personal file host.
- File:DIM03958, 06-39-24 (46777936855).jpg
- File:DIM03970, 07-30-59 (33816520208).jpg
- File:DIM03973, 07-34-10 (33816523228).jpg
- File:DIM04018, 09-54-38 (46777951435).jpg
- File:DIM04051, 10-27-07 (33816545788).jpg
- File:DIM04056, 10-27-49 (33816549888).jpg
- File:DIM04065, 10-30-25 (33816552868).jpg
- File:DIM04076, 10-32-40 (40727603683).jpg
- File:DIM04077, 10-32-43 (47694267701).jpg
- File:DIM04082, 10-36-41 (32750825997).jpg
- File:DIM04091, 10-40-30 (32750829887).jpg
- File:DIM04125, 10-47-46 (33816593578).jpg
- File:DIM04186, 11-02-52 (32750859267).jpg
- File:DIM04188, 11-03-06 (47640984242).jpg
- File:DIM04196, 11-08-45 (32750870687).jpg
- File:DIM04218, 11-12-57 (47694115241).jpg
- File:DIM04204, 11-10-19 (32750873087).jpg
- File:DIM04223, 11-13-54 (47694122821).jpg
- File:DIM04239, 11-16-20 (32750891007).jpg
- File:DIM04244, 11-19-31 (47694133051).jpg
- File:DIM04248, 11-20-40 (47694140641).jpg
- File:DIM04251, 11-21-18 (46778056875).jpg
- File:DIM04268, 11-25-21 (33816647038).jpg
- File:DIM04296, 11-29-59 (32750915297).jpg
- File:DIM04305, 11-31-15 (32750919997).jpg
- File:DIM04310, 11-32-30 (47641046532).jpg
- File:DIM04322, 11-33-44 (47641048062).jpg
- File:DIM04324, 11-33-54 (33816664598).jpg
- File:DIM04330, 11-35-59 (47641059392).jpg
- File:DIM04345, 11-37-26 (40727727803).jpg
- File:DIM04371, 11-40-55 (47641073112).jpg
- File:DIM04397, 11-48-15 (47641075872).jpg
- File:DIM04420, 11-53-22 (40727748053).jpg
- File:DIM04422, 11-53-54 (32750976407).jpg
- File:DIM04434, 11-55-13 (32750980827).jpg
- File:DIM04437, 11-55-31 (40727762373).jpg
- File:DIM04442, 11-56-14 (40727766063).jpg
- File:DIM04443, 11-56-18 (33816725858).jpg
- File:DIM04468, 11-59-50 (33816727258).jpg
- File:DIM04470, 12-00-06 (47694209381).jpg
- File:DIM04490, 12-04-04 (47694212721).jpg
- File:DIM04523, 12-10-45 (47694213701).jpg
- File:DIM04532, 12-13-19 (40727784183).jpg
- File:DIM04541, 12-19-29 (40727846943).jpg
- File:DIM04565, 12-24-57 (47641136362).jpg
- File:DIM04581, 12-41-49 (47641139352).jpg
- File:DIM04606, 12-44-50 (33816755208).jpg
- File:DIM04617, 12-46-14 (32751034057).jpg
- File:DIM04626, 12-46-46 (47641154302).jpg
- File:DIM04650, 12-51-55 (46778182365).jpg
- File:DIM04657, 12-52-48 (46778184585).jpg
- File:DIM04660, 12-53-14 (32751067897).jpg
- File:DIM04732, 13-09-20 (46778222915).jpg
- File:DIM04765, 13-16-18 (33816828378).jpg
- File:DIM04770, 13-31-15 (47641223502).jpg
- File:DIM04773, 13-32-20 (47694322821).jpg
- File:DIM04797, 13-44-04 (47694327931).jpg
- File:DIM04806, 13-46-37 (47641238522).jpg
- File:DIM04865, 14-33-15 (32751138177).jpg
- File:DIM04873, 14-43-05 (32751154877).jpg
- File:DIM04932, 15-14-34 (33816912268).jpg
- File:DIM04935, 15-15-36 (46778313295).jpg
- File:DIM04936, 15-15-46 (40727978573).jpg
- File:DIM04955, 15-18-38 (40727988143).jpg
- File:DIM04974, 15-32-26 (40727995903).jpg
- File:DIM04975, 15-33-54 (33816952698).jpg
- File:DIM04983, 15-38-37 (40728010863).jpg
- File:DIM04980, 15-37-56 (47694417981).jpg
- File:DIM04982, 15-38-28 (46778357355).jpg
- File:DIM04984, 15-38-48 (32751244667).jpg
- File:DIM05103, 07-28-14 (47641380712).jpg
- File:DIM05113, 07-31-06 (46777539485).jpg
- File:DIM05159, 09-53-09 (40720016773).jpg
- File:DIM05218, 15-48-37 4 (47686287981).jpg
- File:DIM05230, 17-46-45 (47686294391).jpg
- File:DIM05240, 18-32-32 (47633369202).jpg
- File:DIM05279, 07-24-22 (40720097683).jpg
- File:DIM05284, 07-25-03 (47686371321).jpg
- File:DIM05286, 07-25-13 (47686374881).jpg
- File:DIM05288, 07-25-22 (47633440282).jpgBot
- File:DIM05306, 07-30-15 (32743254617).jpg
- File:DIM05347, 08-29-07 (32743273517).jpg
- File:DIM05449, 15-38-42 (33808942748).jpg
- File:DIM05450, 15-38-50 (47633510052).jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 00:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- I looked at a few. Some are posed pictures, not selfies. Those can be deleted. The photos of the plants in the greenhouse are useful if the name and location of the botanic garden can be identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I'm not up on the area, but some of the photographs in the same series are probably of South Korea. So it's possible the photos of the plants in the greenhouse were taken either at Universal Studios Korea or the Korean Botanical Gardens. If not some other botanical garden/theme park in South Korea. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept those scenery stuff. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ToyitomaOda (talk · contribs)
[edit]OOS selfies and images of a trip. Commons isn't a personal file host.
- File:DIM05738, 12-35-39 (40720338083).jpg
- File:DIM05743, 12-36-13 (40720341053).jpg
- File:DIM05763, 12-44-50 1 (46770612655).jpg
- File:DIM05780, 12-47-45 (47686644801).jpg
- File:DIM05875, 13-40-08 (46770677665).jpg
- File:DIM05931, 14-20-44 (33809225728).jpg
- File:DIM05957, 14-38-32 (32743612127).jpg
- File:DIM05970, 14-39-36 (32743632067).jpg
- File:DIM05984, 14-47-46 (47633849832).jpg
- File:DIM05985, 14-47-48 (40720519583).jpg
- File:DIM05987, 14-47-51 (33809276928).jpg
- File:DIM06005, 14-55-23 (32743661087).jpg
- File:DIM06007, 14-55-31 (47686806141).jpg
- File:DIM06010, 14-56-29 (40720549073).jpg
- File:DIM06035, 15-04-28 (40720560323).jpg
- File:DIM06038, 15-05-32 (32743700457).jpg
- File:DIM06040, 15-05-53 (40720571403).jpg
- File:DIM06043, 15-07-12 (40720576793).jpg
- File:DIM06048, 15-09-24 (47633939352).jpg
- File:DIM06057, 15-14-02 (40720586343).jpg
- File:DIM06106, 15-38-42 (47633973822).jpg
- File:DIM06076, 15-31-17 (40720592723).jpg
- File:DIM06094, 15-36-03 (46770855005).jpg
- File:DIM06144, 16-17-57 (47633993042).jpg
- File:DIM06463, 11-21-14 (33809719218).jpg
- File:DIM06551, 15-15-30 (46771336825).jpg
- File:DIM06573, 15-59-49 (46771360985).jpg
- File:DIM06570, 15-59-13 (46771349435).jpg
- File:DIM06579, 16-00-38 (32744189227).jpg
- File:DIM06584, 16-01-09 (46771375875).jpg
- File:DIM06585, 16-01-14 (47634440562).jpg
- File:DIM06589, 16-01-43 (47687339211).jpg
- File:DIM06632, 16-30-03 (40721164533).jpg
- File:DIM06650, 16-37-58 (47634525212).jpg
- File:DIM06683, 16-54-05 (47687442811).jpg
- File:DIM06687, 16-54-18 (46771503485).jpg
- File:DIM06715, 17-02-05 (46771542095).jpg
- File:DIM06716, 17-02-14 (47634604152).jpg
- File:DIM06730, 04-57-43 (33810029358).jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Same comments as for the other group of deletion requests: Posed pictures can be deleted; many of the location shots can be kept if the location can be identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept those scenery stuff. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Personal photos and media files of a non-notable person/non-contributor, not used anywhere, out of scope.
- File:Zsw ps e.ogg
- File:Zsw score.jpg
- File:Zsw nyc.jpg
- File:Nannan zsw.ogg
- File:Zsw.ogg
- File:Izsw.png
Wcam (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
not free, scrreshot Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 15:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
no one wants it CalebSC55 (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#U1. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 18:31, 29 January 2022, by Billinghurst (CSD U1). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
El archivo no es realmente útil para un propósito educativo. Oescalona (talk) 15:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Jean Cocteau died in 1963. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:350B:FABC:E0A1:3BB5 15:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Jean Cocteau died in 1963. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:350B:FABC:E0A1:3BB5 15:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Jean Cocteau died in 1963. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:350B:FABC:E0A1:3BB5 15:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Jean Cocteau died in 1963. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:350B:FABC:E0A1:3BB5 15:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Jean Cocteau died in 1963. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:350B:FABC:E0A1:3BB5 15:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Jean Cocteau died in 1963. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:350B:FABC:E0A1:3BB5 15:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Flag Mechanic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps and diagrams. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Dedicated Route Map.png
- File:Day Map.png
- File:High Speed UK Map.png
- File:Carbon tax world map.png
- File:High Speed Rail Map.png
- File:HSR Map.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Don't understand the requestor rationale, more in favor for Keep... unless there are better maps of course. These maps mostly seem to provide quality data (like yes/no/nodata) and are a much better visual+accessible aid than a raw tabular form. The HSR maps of UK seem redundant to each other though. --Enyavar (talk) 15:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: maps as in scope, deleted the text diagrams that can be in wiki-markup if needed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Laurahndez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Azul Marino Ciudad Foto Motivación Frase Inspiración Fondo de Pantalla (3).png
- File:Centralpark.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Laurahndez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ericamoscatello (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Robótica.jpg
- File:Centro Educativo Eureka 2.jpg
- File:Educativo Eureka.jpg
- File:Centro Educativo Eureka.jpg
- File:Lorena y Liliana de la Calle.jpg
- File:Matemática.jpg
- File:De la Calle.jpg
- File:Escuela Eureka.jpg
- File:Logo Eureka.jpg
- File:Logoeureka.png
- File:Mundos Eureka.jpg
- File:Cortical izquierdo (ci) límbico izquierdo (li) límbico derecho (ld) cortical derecho (cd).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Nuestras Artesanias.jpg
- File:GASTRONOMIA.jpg
- File:Centro de la comunidad.jpg
- File:Santa Maria La Alta.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, too small to be useful. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikiviciao (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
The logo of the sports organization. protected by copyright GAndy (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sam. Pacheco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrabs. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GimenezSafi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Duplicates. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
inferior version (larger white border) to File:Circumferencia polars10.svg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
I accidentally uploading a photo that I did not want to be there Jdlugos (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
image appears empty ( or white fg on white bg?) Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
No sources for this picture. The name "landroofslak" doesn't even excist in Dutch language DirkVE (talk) 16:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Fictional user-invented flags for small islands which don't have flags. Out of COM:SCOPE.
Lord Belbury (talk) 16:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jumilian Kidz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos, graphics and images claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Jumilian Kiidz Branding Pack.jpg
- File:Jumilian Kidz Logo.png
- File:Jumilian Kidz Official Photo.png
- File:Jumilian Kidz Presents AMSTERGROUND Podcast 304 Cover.jpg
- File:Jumilian Kidz Presents AMSTERGROUND Podcast 302 Cover.jpg
- File:Jumilian Kidz Presents AMSTERGROUND Podcast 303 Cover.jpg
- File:Jumilian Kidz Presents AMSTERGROUND Podcast 301 Cover.jpg
mattbr 17:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
this is a minor posting selfies in an attempt to 'up his station' in life. he doesn't fully understand the ramifications of posting online (so, let's save his 37 year old future self from his 17 year old current self). the associated wikipedia article has been deleted, and the user blocked (on enwp) for sockpuppetry. 2601:983:8280:4F70:EC27:A5E6:C794:8F44 17:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo and graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 17:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Dora Kallmus (Madam d'Ora) died in 1963, undelete in 2034. 1932 photograph was probably published for the first time when this was uploaded. Abzeronow (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
no proof of actual ownership, source nor license exist Vacant0 (talk) 18:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no proof that it is NOT own work either, not found elsewhere online using TinEye and Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
promotional Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subhrasingh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same problems as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sarah Joy Jones a few years ago: uploads of Tapan Kumar Pradhan and other poets, but taken on different cameras in different styles, with some of them looking like photos of computer screens. I've already flagged some obvious copyvios by this user but will put the full set up for review. TinEye suggests that File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan (1995).jpg is a close reupload of Sarah Joy Jones's File:Dr Tapan Pradhan as a University Student.jpg.
- File:Poet Vihang Naik at British Council.jpg
- File:Vihang Naik, Poet & Writer.jpg
- File:Bibhu Padhi Indian Poet.jpg
- File:Nandini Sahu Odia Poet.jpg
- File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan (2009) at Pune.jpg
- File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan (1999) Volleyball Coach.jpg
- File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan (1978) Child.jpg
- File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan (1999).jpg
- File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan (2021).jpg
- File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan (1995).jpg
- File:Abdul Rasheed - Kannada Writer.jpg
- File:Paromita Das - Indian Historian and Writer.jpg
- File:Dr Tapan Kumar Pradhan at Indian Express Awards.jpg
- File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan and Shyam Benegal.jpg
- File:Professor Paromita Das - Historian & Writer.jpg
- File:Shampa Sinha - Australian Poet of Indian Origin.jpg
- File:Shampa Sinha - Indian Origin Poet.jpg
- File:Poet Haldhar Nag Kavyanjali Book Release.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Do not delete the file Tapan Kumar Pradhan (2021). I have taken this picture myself with my own smartphone. Since I am the creator of the picture, there is no copyright violation at all. Subhrasingh (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Do not delete the file Tapan Kumar Pradhan (1999). The image has taken restored by me from the original damaged photograph. There is no other copy of the original print now. The author has no objection to its upload on public domain. Subhrasingh (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
This file may be deleted. This was the wrong file uploaded by mistake. I shall be uploading the correct file. Subhrasingh (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Which file is "this file"? --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept one file that is claimed as own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subhrasingh (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FOP for 2D artworks in India.
- File:Atal Bihari Vajpayee (mural).jpg
- File:Maharaja Krushna Chandra Gajapati (mural).jpg
- File:Madhusudan Das (mural).jpg
- File:Fakir Mohan Senapati (mural).jpg
- File:Jayee Rajguru (mural).jpg
- File:Gangadhar Meher (mural).jpg
- File:B R Ambedkar (mural).jpg
- File:Tulasi Munda (mural).jpg
- File:Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (mural).jpg
- File:Govind Ballabh Pant (mural).jpg
- File:Sarojini Naidu (mural).jpg
- File:Shahid Bhagat Singh (mural).jpg
- File:Bal Gangadhar Tilak (mural).jpg
- File:Utkal Mani Gopabandhu Das.jpg
- File:Mahatma Gandhi (mural).jpg
- File:Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose (mural).jpg
- File:Veer Surendra Sai (mural).jpg
- File:Satya Narayan Bohidar (mural).jpg
- File:Nityananda Mahapatra (mural).jpg
- File:Godavarish Mohapatra (mural).jpg
- File:Baishnaba Pani (mural).jpg
- File:Satyajit Ray (mural).jpg
- File:Karunakar Singh (mural).jpg
- File:Mahadevi Varma (mural).jpg
- File:Suryakant Tripathi (Mural).jpg
- File:Swami Vivekananda and Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (Mural).jpg
- File:Sarojini Naidu and Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan.jpg
- File:Chanakya and Haldhar Nag.jpg
- File:CV Raman and Srinivas Ramanujam (Mural).jpg
- File:Mayadhar Mansingh with Manoj Das (Mural).jpg
- File:Manoj Das with Ramakanth Rath.jpg
- File:Madhusudan Rao with Godabarish Mishra.jpg
- File:Dalai Lama and Subramaniam Chandrasekhar.jpg
- File:Shyama Prasad Mukherjee with Sukhdev Thapar (Mural).jpg
- File:Vikram Sarabhai (Mural).jpg
- File:VP Singh and VV Giri (Mural).jpg
- File:Sarala Das and Sarat Chandra Bose (Mural).jpg
- File:Birsa Munda with Bal Gangadhar Tilak (Mural).jpg
- File:Birsa Munda with Laxman Nayak (Mural).jpg
- File:Shahid Laxman Nayak and Bipin Chandra Pak.jpg
- File:Dadabhai Naoroji with Bipin Chandra Pal (Mural).jpg
- File:Pathani Samanta with Odia poetess Kuntala Kumari Sabat.jpg
- File:Pathani Samanta and Rabi Singh (Mural).jpg
- File:Baidyanath Mishra (Mural).jpg
- File:Sister Nivedita with Dayananda Saraswati.jpg
- File:Pandita Ramabai with Keshab Chandra Sen.jpg
- File:Keshab Chandra Sen with Bankim Chandra Chatterjee.jpg
- File:Trilochan Pradhan with Dayananda Satapathy.jpg
- File:Padmashri Krutartha Acharya with Rajat Kumar Kar.jpg
- File:Muralidhar Tali with Parshuram Mishra.jpg
- File:Braja Mohan Panda with Ghanashyam Panigrahi.jpg
- File:Laxmi Narayan Mishra with Shankar Prasad Padhi.jpg
- File:Prahlad Ray Lath with Mahanta Bihari Das.jpg
- File:Nrusingha Guru with Braja Mohan Patnaik (Mural).jpg
- File:Revolutionary Khudiram Bose with Tapan Kumar Pradhan (Mural).jpg
- File:Pathani Samanta with Kuntala Kumari & Rabi Singh.jpg
- File:Poet Rabi Singh with Tapan Kumar Pradhan.jpg
- File:Khudiram Bose (Mural).jpg
- File:Tapan Kumar Pradhan (Mural).jpg
- File:Mahanta Bihari Das (Street Mural).jpg
Yann (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. Thyj (talk) 03:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Orphan image that appears to have never been used since its upload date in 2015. Also out of scope. Neko-chan (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Neko-chan (talk) 20:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 12:27, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Screen grab from Google Maps Kenneth C. Zirkel (talk) 18:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
not needed and not used in any articles, and we already have
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
-5.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Metuboy&oldid=625701044#File:Presidential_Complex_(Turkey).png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=650649595#File:Microsoft_Edge_logo_(2019).svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
-5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-5.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-5.jpg){kind=link}
-5.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[17]](https://youimg1.c-ctrip.com/target/100u12000000t8xyw5449_D_750_420.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_l%C3%ADmbico_izquierdo_(li)_l%C3%ADmbico_derecho_(ld)_cortical_derecho_(cd).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_Pune.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Volleyball_Coach.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Child.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
FMSky (talk) 18:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not needed and not used in any articles, and we already have
.jpg){kind=link}
FMSky (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I'm not sure either of those statements are a valid reason to delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Mateus lima lima (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, "flag" with no usage on other projects.
Stang★ 19:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 23:41, 29 January 2022, by Fitindia. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
I just uploaded a better version of this image from the same source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Palais_Jonas_von_K%C3%B6nigswarter,_Vienna,_1860s.jpg Papergirl (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
foto antigua — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzaloluciani (talk • contribs) 12:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: promotional, no educational value. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
foto antigua — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzaloluciani (talk • contribs) 13:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photoshoped photo of bird. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 20:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not any valid reason to delete as this image is not photoshoped, i.e. not a fake, as anyone that would seen the image for more than mere milisecond. This image shows a living pigeon in a real fountain in the city of Braga, Portugal. Also not in use is not a reason to delete. Tm (talk) 20:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Keep no reason to delete Dronebogus (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Not fake but certainly heavily edited, unuable low res. Numerous alternatives available in its categories. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Mangalankit7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Just Click Image Making Comapny Logo2.png
- File:Just Click Image Making Comapny Logo1.png
- File:Just Click Image Making Comapny Logo.png
mattbr 20:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
plain text, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 21:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: excluded material per COM:OOS. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused, no cat, no real educational value Pibwl (talk) 21:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused logo, out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphics. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"hypothetical History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
hypothetical map *for my Sandbox*; but it is unused. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
No licensing info Non-compliant ver., unnecessary duplicate Dronebogus (talk) 21:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
The file is just a crop of the 4th revision of File:SCP-087.PNG, and is of a non-compliant version of that image. (See its file history). aismallard (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Still an unnecessary duplicate Dronebogus (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr-spam by Matlin. No description, no category, bad name... Xocolatl (talk) 21:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No vaild reason of delete. Personal attacks. Matlin (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Identified and in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No category, no description, low quality, Flickr-spam. Xocolatl (talk) 22:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No vaild reason of delete. Matlin (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality image of nondescript bird, no description, ununable, out of scope. Innumerable better bird pics already on Commons. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
An SVG of this file has been made and is available at National Intelligence And Security Service Seal.svg DownTownRich (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr-spam. Low quality, no category, no description. Xocolatl (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No vaild reason of delete. Good quality. Matlin (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Coords identified and in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:JustEntertainment New Logo2 (2016).png
- File:JustEntertainment New Logo (2016).png
- File:JustEntertainmnt logo (2015).png
- File:Fluky 2016 logo.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
mattbr 22:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Atatürk TBMM'de Nutuk'u Okuyor.jpg 𐰇𐱅𐰚𐰤 (talk) 22:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: needless crop. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Urbandownmix (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 22:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juubeo.ltd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo and graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 22:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is not the original creator of the file. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photo of photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to the almost identical and higher resolution File:Juwai logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 22:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JVINTERIÉR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic and images of flags containing a portion of the logo claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 22:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Older revision (21:47, 29 January 2022) contains personal information Majvdl (talk) 22:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
D'après la traduction de Google Traduction, il s'agit d'une très douteuse plaisanterie. Finoskov (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Promotional logo of a non-notable company. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
DW, copyright status of depicted photo on the item is unknown. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- User responded on talk page of his own, please review my corrections and remove my request. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn (DW of PD work). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:Germany, this image is not in PD as author Walter Niemann died in 1953 and this image will be in PD status after 70 years. Could be undelete in 2023. Stang★ 19:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Stang! This image has nothing to do with the composer Walter Niemann. The image was drawn by our (grand)father Walter Niemann (painter) - we inherited and hold the rights. White.lost (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @White.lost: sorry about my false judgement about the author of this image. Could you please send an authorization letter to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org in order to clarify this case? You can find more information on page COM:VRT. Thanks! Stang★ 01:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @White.lost: Please do this for the other uploaded pictures as well. / Bitte auch für die anderen hochgeladenen Bilder. Nicht, das die als nächstes einen Löschantrag bekommen. Vielen Dank! (Schöne Bilder(spende) !)--Fano (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Kam darum nicht umhin. --Martin Sg. (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @White.lost: Please do this for the other uploaded pictures as well. / Bitte auch für die anderen hochgeladenen Bilder. Nicht, das die als nächstes einen Löschantrag bekommen. Vielen Dank! (Schöne Bilder(spende) !)--Fano (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @White.lost: sorry about my false judgement about the author of this image. Could you please send an authorization letter to permissions-commons
- Ja, da wäre Deine Verifizierung als Erbe des Urheberrechts wohl unbedingt erforderlich. Denn - Verwechslung hin oder her - auch dieser Künstler ist definitiv noch keine 70 Jahre tot. Und bei einem 1986 Verstorbenen müssten wir noch viel länger auf die Freigabe warten als nur bis 2023.
- Du sprichst von "we", d.h. seid Ihr eine Erbengemeinschaft? Ich hoffe, Ihr seid Euch über die Veröffentlichung unter Creative-Commons-Lizenz einig! --217.239.4.223 10:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022013010002406 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 00:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Hamburger Hinterhöfe.tif” under ticket:2022013010002406. --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Could this also be applied to this? White.lost (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 12:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Originally uploaded by Ldopa (talk · contribs) to File:1ukdiv.gif as own work/PD-self. EnigmaMcmxc (talk · contribs) now claims it's a derivative of a 1982 work, which would still be protected by copyright. The source link they provided doesn't show anything helpful. And for the record, a png is not a vector image. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have not been able to get the direct link to work, https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/3007655, or via the web archive
- The Imperial War Musuem website stated that the current insignia was designed in 1983 by Major-General Brian Kenny. The article explained that the new design was created by using the division's existing insignia (a white triangle, PD since original design / non copyright due to simple geometry) and the black rhino that was used by another formation in the 1940s (UK gov / public domain).
- It is my understanding that the 1983 creation date makes this ineligible for the PD Crown CopyrightEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 13:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
The permission cited for these files excludes commercial use and is not acceptable for Commons or Wikipedia.
- File:240407 F.Loechner 5009.jpg
- File:240407 F.Loechner 5056.jpg
- File:240407 F.Loechner 5040.jpg
- File:240407 F.Loechner 5016.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 04:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Transferred from talk page
Martin Storz gab Dr. Ullrich Löchner die Erlaubnis, Bilder seines Vaters Friedrich Löchner nach Wikipedia zu bringen. Entsprechende Telefonate und E-Mails wurden geführt bzw. geschrieben. Ullrich Löchner bat mich, einige dieser Bilder nach Commons hochzuladen. Heute früh schrieb ich beide wegen des aufgetretenen Problems an. Sohn Ullrich kehrt jedoch erst in etwa 10 Tagen von einer Reise aus den USA zurück. Reicht die Zeit aus, um eine allseits befriedigende Lösung zu finden? --GFHund (talk) 05:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
End of transfer
- Ich denke schon. Der Löschantrag kann nach 7 Tagen entschieden werden, man kann aber auch länger warten. Und auch wenn die Bilder gelöscht werden sollten, sind sie nicht wirklich weg, sondern können von jedem Admin wiederhergestellt werden, wenn eine ausreichende Genehmigung vorliegt. Ich bitte den entscheidenden Admin (wer auch immer das sein wird) im Anschluss auf Englisch, etwas mit der Entscheidung zu warten. --Rosenzweig τ 15:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- @deciding admin: The uploader has asked for some time, two weeks or so, to get a sufficient permission that includes commercial use from the author. Please wait before deciding this DR, if possible. Thank you. --Rosenzweig τ 15:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
As far as I can see is this simply wrong. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
{{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}
--Jörgens.Mi Talk 12:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Per the file descriptions, the uploader is not the author of these images. The author gave the uploader permission to upload them, but excluded commercial use, as cited in the decriptions: Am 07. März 2013 sandte Martin Storz an Dr. Ulrich Löchner, der sie an mich weiterleitete, folgende Erlaubnis: "ich erteile Ihnen die Erlaubnis, alle Fotos, die ich von ihrem Vater am 24.04.2007 in Heilbronn gemacht habe, zeitlich und räumlich unbegrenzt zu nutzen. Davon ausschließen möchte ich eine kommerzielle bzw. werbliche Nutzung. Urheberangabe: Martin Storz". Martin Storz/Graffiti, Senefelderstr. 19 A, D-70178 Stuttgart So any cc-by-sa license bestowed upon the images (by the uploader?) is not ok with the author, it seems. --Rosenzweig τ 14:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Please email COM:OTRS with the permissions email attached to get these restored FASTILY 23:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I had initially tagged these files as derivative works with no source inidicated. Starting a regular DR as a courtesy to the uploader to allow all the time needed for review.
File:Luise Oberländer 1805-1873.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}}. Person in the photograph died in 1873, so it must be considerably older than 120 years. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Taufe Erika Aken.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}}. Per Category:Erika Marie Ottilie Meyer (née Heußinger), the baby in this picture was born in January 1899, and this photo from the christening must have been taken shortly afterwards, so it's older than 120 years. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Maria Weiß Frankfurt.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Weak keep This most definitely looks like an image from far back in the 19th century, judging by the style of the clothing and the photograph, so it is most likely quite a lot older than 120 years and would be eligible for {{PD-old-assumed}}; but as there is not even an approximate date given (only the upload date), it's a bit harder to confidently vote for keeping it. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Marie Schneidewind verh. Schlotheim.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}}. Per life dates in the image, Marie Schneidewind was born in 1851 and she looks young in this photograph (maybe taken for her wedding in 1872?), so it must be older than 120 years. The added hand-written text with life dates is below the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1958d.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Keep This is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, so the uploader most likely either has the rights to release it under a free license, or it could be seen as not copyrightable to begin with. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: what license then ? — Racconish 💬 19:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Racconish: It depends. If we want to play it safe and assume that the particular form of presentation might have created copyright protection, GFHund owns it, and thus is able to release it under the free license chosen here, that is, the existing CC-BY-SA 4.0. That would be my approach for these cases, I think. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: what exactly would be copyrightable here ? Why not {{PD-ineligible}}? — Racconish 💬 20:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Racconish: Well, maybe assuming a possible copyright might be a bit far-fetched, granted. In a country with a particularly low threshold of originality, maybe the whole presentation including the combination of colors etc. could be seen as original enough. There is also the special protection of databases to consider. But if you prefer to change the licensing to {{PD-ineligible}}, I'm fine with that. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:09, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: what exactly would be copyrightable here ? Why not {{PD-ineligible}}? — Racconish 💬 20:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Racconish: It depends. If we want to play it safe and assume that the particular form of presentation might have created copyright protection, GFHund owns it, and thus is able to release it under the free license chosen here, that is, the existing CC-BY-SA 4.0. That would be my approach for these cases, I think. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: what license then ? — Racconish 💬 19:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1958.pdfnomination withdrawn
Unsure Although this is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, it contains also a photograph with unclear provenance / licensing status. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1957d.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Keep This is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, so the uploader most likely either has the rights to release it under a free license, or it could be seen as not copyrightable to begin with. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1957.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Keep This is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, so the uploader most likely either has the rights to release it under a free license, or it could be seen as not copyrightable to begin with. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1956d.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Keep This is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, so the uploader most likely either has the rights to release it under a free license, or it could be seen as not copyrightable to begin with. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1956.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Keep This is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, so the uploader most likely either has the rights to release it under a free license, or it could be seen as not copyrightable to begin with. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1955d.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Keep This is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, so the uploader most likely either has the rights to release it under a free license, or it could be seen as not copyrightable to begin with. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1955.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Unsure Although this is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, the copyright status of one of the photographs on that page is unclear. As photographer of Maria Inkamp's photo, Gerhard Hund is mentioned, so this seems to be fine, but the photo of Friedl Rinder is by Gerd Rinder, and who has the rights to that? Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: how about cropping out the photo and keeping the text only as {{PD-ineligible}}? — Racconish 💬 21:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Racconish: In this particular case, there are two photos in the file, and the one of Maria Inkamp (to the right) is apparently the uploader's own work, so I agree with you, but only the photo to the left (Friedl Rinder) would need cropping out. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: how about cropping out the photo and keeping the text only as {{PD-ineligible}}? — Racconish 💬 21:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1954d.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1953d.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1953.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1952d.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1952.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Unsure Although this is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, it contains also a photograph with unclear provenance / licensing status. Photograph could be cropped out, I suppose. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1951d.pdfnomination withdrawn
- Unsure Although this is from the uploader's own website teleschach.de (has a copyright notice by himself), and it's mostly a simple table of data, it contains also a photograph with unclear provenance / licensing status (it's stated that the photo is "im Besitz", that is owned, by Gerhard Hund, but not who took it). Photograph could be cropped out, I suppose. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1951.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1950d.pdfnomination withdrawn- File:Turnier DDEM-1949o.pdf
File:Turnier DDEM-1949.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Brief 19.10.1860 Wilhelm an Bertha und Gustav.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to PD-old-auto with parameter deathyear=1902. I suppose that this "Wilhelm Zangemeister" is the same Karl Friedrich Wilhelm Zangemeister who wrote File:Brief Wilhelm an Gustav 1861.jpg, it has the same signature, so the same as in my comment to that applies: Author died in 1902; as this seems to come from the uploader's own family archive and is published here first by the uploader, it is also in the public domain in the US per the Hirtle chart (unpublished work by a known author with a known date of death: 70 years after the death of the author). Gestumblindi (talk) 19:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Turnier DDEM-1948o.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1947.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1943.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1942.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Turnier DDEM-1939.pdfnomination withdrawnFile:Hugo Schneidewind Sangerhausen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep The author has been dead for more than 70 years. See description. --GFHund (talk) 07:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The description still doesn't actually mention who the original author of the photograph is. But as you told me on my German Wikipedia talk page that Hugo Schneidewind (not the author, but the depicted person) died in 1900, the photo must be older than 120 years. Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}} Gestumblindi (talk) 10:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Hugo Schneidewind Nordhausen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep The author has been dead for more than 70 years. See description. --GFHund (talk) 07:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The description still doesn't actually mention who the original author of the photograph is. But as you told me on my German Wikipedia talk page that Hugo Schneidewind (not the author, but the depicted person) died in 1900, the photo must be older than 120 years. Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}} Gestumblindi (talk) 10:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Hugo Schneidewind Göttingen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep The author has been dead for more than 70 years. See description. --GFHund (talk) 07:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The description still doesn't actually mention who the original author of the photograph is. But as you told me on my German Wikipedia talk page that Hugo Schneidewind (not the author, but the depicted person) died in 1900, the photo must be older than 120 years. Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}} Gestumblindi (talk) 10:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Thilo von Schlotheim.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}}. Person in the photograph died in 1897, so it must be older than 120 years. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Alexandra Schneidewind mit Sohn Boris 1883 Moskau.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}} as this is an 1883 photo. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Else Treusch von Buttlar 1928.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- [
File:Todesanzeige Horst Treusch von Buttlar 1914.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Meyer-Robert 1938.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Axel von Bonin 1912.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Horst von Buttlar 1962.jpgnomination wiothdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Max 1968 Heiningen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Else 1962 Heiningen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Charlotte 1962 Heiningen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Otto 1902 Moskau.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Hugo 1900 Nordhausen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Erich 1903 Jena.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Emil 1899 Nordhausen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Alfred 1904 Sangerhausen.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Ottilie.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Bertha.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Brief Wilhelm an Gustav 1861.jpgNomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to PD-old-auto with parameter deathyear=1902. A letter written by Karl Zangemeister who died in 1902. As this seems to come from the uploader's own family archive and is published here first by the uploader, it is also in the public domain in the US per the Hirtle chart (unpublished work by a known author with a known date of death: 70 years after the death of the author). Gestumblindi (talk) 22:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Boris Schneidewind Moskau.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}}. 1885 photo. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Familie Schneidewind 1843.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}}. 1843 daguerreotype. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Vater von Martin Luther.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Weak keep and change licensing to
{{PD-old-auto-expired |deathyear=1553}}This is a reproduction of a 19th century photograph of a 16th century (1527) painting of Hans Luther. It's by Lucas Cranach the Elder who died in 1553, so it couldn't be more clearly in the public domain. Although there are other versions in Category:Hans Luther (father of Martin Luther), I think it may be worth keeping that one, too, as none of the other files has a really good resolution, e.g. File:Hans-Luther.jpg, although in color and better looking, is only 600 x 800. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Christian Friedrich August Reinhardt.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to
{{Licensed-PD |1=PD-old |2=CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. Per description, this was painted around 1801. As it is apparently the uploader's own photograph taken (with an iPhone 7, as others of his photographs) of the framed image owned by himself, CC-BY-SA-4.0 still applies for the photograph of the three-dimensional object. (In this case, I suggest "PD-old" and not "PD-old-assumed", as per the documentation on {{PD-old-assumed}}: "Please use {{PD-old}} or {{PD-old-auto}} (...) if the work was created more than 190 years ago by an unknown author (...)" Gestumblindi (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Wilhelm August SCHNEIDEWIND.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to
{{Licensed-PD |1=PD-old-assumed |2=CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. For the original picture, I assume PD-old, as the person depicted died in 1850, and it seems to be a Silhouette portrait made during his lifetime, as it was popular in the 18th and 19th century. So it must be older than 120 years. As it is apparently the uploader's own photograph taken (with an iPhone 7, as others of his photographs) of the framed image owned by himself, CC-BY-SA-4.0 still applies for the photograph of the three-dimensional object. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Johanna Henriette Sophie JENISCH.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to
{{Licensed-PD |1=PD-old-assumed |2=CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. For the original picture, I assume PD-old, as the person depicted died in 1849, and it seems to be a Silhouette portrait made during her lifetime, as it was popular in the 18th and 19th century. So it must be older than 120 years. As it is apparently the uploader's own photograph taken (with an iPhone 7, as others of his photographs) of the framed image owned by himself, CC-BY-SA-4.0 still applies for the photograph of the three-dimensional object. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Friederike Luise Auguste Günther.jpegnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to
{{Licensed-PD |1=PD-old-assumed |2=CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. For the original picture, I assume PD-old, as the person depicted died in 1831, and it seems to be a Silhouette portrait made during her lifetime, as it was popular in the 18th and 19th century. So it must be older than 120 years. As it is apparently the uploader's own photograph taken (with an iPhone 7, as others of his photographs) of the framed image owned by himself, CC-BY-SA-4.0 still applies for the photograph of the three-dimensional object. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Wilhelm Ludwig Oberländer.jpegnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to
{{Licensed-PD |1=PD-old-assumed |2=CC-BY-SA-4.0}}. For the original picture, I assume PD-old, as the person depicted died in 1823, and it seems to be a Silhouette portrait made during his lifetime, as it was popular in the 18th and 19th century. So it must be older than 120 years. As it is apparently the uploader's own photograph taken (with an iPhone 7, as others of his photographs) of the framed image owned by himself, CC-BY-SA-4.0 still applies for the photograph of the three-dimensional object. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige August Heussinger 1903 Potsdam.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Ottilie Schneidewind 1905.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Franz Schneidewind 1898.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Melanie Heußinger 1944.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Todesanzeige Otto Zangemeister 1902.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Conventional, "boilerplate" death notice without original authorship, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Confirmanden 1879 Schlosskirche Hannover.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. Merely a list of candidates for confirmation without original authorship (see also my general comment at the end of the list). Gestumblindi (talk) 22:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Urkunde Cothenius-Medaille 1971 Friedrich Hund.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep and change licensing to {{PD-text}}. A simple document for an award, doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Hugo Schneidewind Naumburg.jpgnomination withdrawn
- Keep The author has been dead for more than 70 years. See description. --GFHund (talk) 07:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The description still doesn't actually mention who the original author of the photograph is. But as you told me on my German Wikipedia talk page that Hugo Schneidewind (not the author, but the depicted person) died in 1900, the photo must be older than 120 years. Keep and change licensing to {{PD-old-assumed}} Gestumblindi (talk) 10:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Hochzeit Juliane Meyer mit Gerhard Hund.jpg
- File:Tochter Juliane Meyer.jpg
- File:Mutter Erika Meyer.jpg
- File:Erika Meyer an Onkel.jpg
- File:Wendula und Juliane Meyer.jpg
- File:Juliane Meyer mit Puppenwagen.jpg
- File:Erika Meyer mit Kinderwagen.jpg
- File:Juliane und Wendula mit Hunden.jpg
- File:Lorenzkirche Nürnberg innen.jpg
- File:Binnenalster Hamburg alte Ansicht.jpg
- Delete In this case, it looks like an old postcard with insufficient information on author/date of publication. This also applies to the next 15 files in the list up to and including File:Alte Klosterkirche Volkenroda.jpg, as these all look like postcards. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Etliche sind Fotos. Sind jedoch schwer von Postkarten zu unterscheiden. Ich bewahre diese noch etwas auf, aber spätestens bei meinem Tod landen sie im Müll. Weiteres siehe bei meiner Bemerkung zum Foto des Sohnes von Erika Meyer. Erst verlor sie ihren Sohn, später ihre Tochter Wendula, die sich das Leben nahm, kurz nach Geburt ihres Sohnes Allart. Meine Frau Juliane war das einzige Kind, was ihr blieb. --GFHund (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Auch besitze ich die original Photo-Negative meiner Schwiegermutter zu verschiedenen Städten wie, Posterstein, Schleusingen, Bettmar, Aken, Stolberg, Stadtilm, Heringen.--GFHund (talk) 08:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ebenfalls die Originale antiker Ölgemälde fand ich in den vielen Kisten des Nachlasse meiner Schwiegermutter. Jedoch habe ich noch nicht alle Kisten durchsucht. Es gibt da Ordner mit original Abschriften der Pastoren aus Kirchenbüchern. Da über mehrere Generationen nur ein Mädchen Nachkommen hatte, landeten sämtliche Dokumente in Volkenroda, auch eine originale Kopie von Luthers Testament. Der Nachlass reicht bis zu den Eltern von Martin Luther, in dessen Familie einer ihrer Vorfahren aufwuchs.--GFHund (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Auch besitze ich die original Photo-Negative meiner Schwiegermutter zu verschiedenen Städten wie, Posterstein, Schleusingen, Bettmar, Aken, Stolberg, Stadtilm, Heringen.--GFHund (talk) 08:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Blick von Museumsbrücke Nürnberg.jpg
- File:Sebalduskirche Nürnberg.jpg
- File:Rothenburg mit Markusturm.jpg
- File:Braunschweig Altstadtmarkt antik.jpg
- File:Würzburg Residenz Ansicht a.jpg
- File:Würzburg Residenz Ansicht.jpg
- File:Braunschweig Dom Rückseite.jpg
- File:Rothenburg Tauber Rathaus.jpg
- File:Basilika Vierzehnheiligen von Süden.jpg
- File:Burg Greifenstein im Westerwald.jpg
- File:Altengottern Schloss antik.jpg
- File:Schloß Hardenberg Neviges.jpg
- File:Freiburg i. Br. Westansicht Münster.jpg
- File:Domäne Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Alte Klosterkirche Volkenroda.jpg
- Delete See my first comment for this sub-group of 16 files (I inserted separating lines to make it clearer). Gestumblindi (talk) 19:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Ottokar Meyer Soldat.jpg
- Weak delete Looks like a portrait by a professional photographer (there's something embossed to the lower right, can't read it, might be their signature?), so GFHund's mother-in-law (the mentioned source) probably didn't own the copyright. Only "weak delete" because the person in the picture died at the end of World War II ("starb Ende des 2. Weltkrieges"), so if the photographer were anonymous (it's a possibility, though the embossing suggests otherwise), it could be {{PD-anon-70-EU}} Gestumblindi (talk) 19:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
-
- zeigt meinen Arbeitsplatz. Ich besitze jede Menge Fotoalben und Schachteln, die mir meine Schwiegermutter hinterließ. Sie ist eine Nachfahrin von Lucas Cranach der Ältere und hat viele Bilder selber gezeichnet. Außerdem wird etliches für vorhandene Artikel verwendet.--GFHund (talk) 02:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe das Foto Ottokar von meiner Schwiegermutter geerbt, die erst mehr als 20 Jahre nach Ende des 2. Weltkrieges starb. Das Foto ist heute immer noch in meinem Besitz. Ich besitze sehr viele Kisten mit ihrem Nachlass, die ich nicht einfach in den Müll schmeißen will. Ob ich vor meinem Tod (zur Zeit bin ich 89 Jahre alt) es schaffe, alles abzuarbeiten, weiß ich nicht. --GFHund (talk) 20:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- @GFHund: Ich habe grösstes Verständnis für den Wunsch nach Bewahrung. Mein im letzten Jahr verstorbener Vater war zwei Jahre jünger als Du und ich bin auch jemand, der versucht, Orte zu finden, an denen man Dokumente aus der Familie sinnvoll unterbringen kann, eben nicht "auf den Müll schmeissen". Aber Wikimedia Commons eignet sich in solchen Fällen höchstens für eine limitierte Auswahl des Materials: Nämlich Bilder, die einerseits zumindest einen potentiellen edukativen Zweck haben, andererseits aber auch urheberrechtlich den hiesigen Richtlinien entsprechen. Und das ist bei Fotos aus Familienalben etc. leider oft nicht der Fall, weil sich dadurch, dass man ein Foto physisch im Besitz hat, nicht ergibt, dass man die Urheberrechte daran hat und es freigeben kann. Wenn wir dieses Beispiel nehmen: Ich habe oben angesprochen, dass es so aussieht, als habe das Foto ein Profi-Fotograf gemacht. Die Rechte an solchen Fotografien sind normalerweise nicht an den Auftraggeber gegangen, sondern lagen weiterhin beim Fotografen, und dann für 70 Jahre nach dessen Tod bei seinen Erben. Wir müssten hier also wissen, wer der Fotograf war, und ob er vor mehr als 70 Jahren gestorben ist... - Ich habe selber durchaus interessante Fotos aus Familienbesitz, die z.B. die Stadt Basel in den 1930er Jahren zeigen, aber ich weiss, dass ich die Rechte daran nicht habe, also lade ich sie nicht hoch. Das ist zu bedenken. Vielleicht gibt es ja irgendeine Institution, die an diesem Familienarchiv interessiert wäre? Gestumblindi (talk) 23:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ich gab früher bereits viele Dinge an das Museum im Schloss Heringen. Dort wohnten Vorfahren meiner Töchter. Wegen Corona konnte ich nicht nach Heringen fahren, vielleicht später einmal. Im Artikel zum Schloss zu sehende Bilder stammen von mir.--GFHund (talk) 03:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- @GFHund: Ich habe grösstes Verständnis für den Wunsch nach Bewahrung. Mein im letzten Jahr verstorbener Vater war zwei Jahre jünger als Du und ich bin auch jemand, der versucht, Orte zu finden, an denen man Dokumente aus der Familie sinnvoll unterbringen kann, eben nicht "auf den Müll schmeissen". Aber Wikimedia Commons eignet sich in solchen Fällen höchstens für eine limitierte Auswahl des Materials: Nämlich Bilder, die einerseits zumindest einen potentiellen edukativen Zweck haben, andererseits aber auch urheberrechtlich den hiesigen Richtlinien entsprechen. Und das ist bei Fotos aus Familienalben etc. leider oft nicht der Fall, weil sich dadurch, dass man ein Foto physisch im Besitz hat, nicht ergibt, dass man die Urheberrechte daran hat und es freigeben kann. Wenn wir dieses Beispiel nehmen: Ich habe oben angesprochen, dass es so aussieht, als habe das Foto ein Profi-Fotograf gemacht. Die Rechte an solchen Fotografien sind normalerweise nicht an den Auftraggeber gegangen, sondern lagen weiterhin beim Fotografen, und dann für 70 Jahre nach dessen Tod bei seinen Erben. Wir müssten hier also wissen, wer der Fotograf war, und ob er vor mehr als 70 Jahren gestorben ist... - Ich habe selber durchaus interessante Fotos aus Familienbesitz, die z.B. die Stadt Basel in den 1930er Jahren zeigen, aber ich weiss, dass ich die Rechte daran nicht habe, also lade ich sie nicht hoch. Das ist zu bedenken. Vielleicht gibt es ja irgendeine Institution, die an diesem Familienarchiv interessiert wäre? Gestumblindi (talk) 23:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete Professional photograph from 1908, not quite old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Could be {{PD-anon-70-EU}}, but probably not. Undelete in 2029. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Juliane Meyer in weiß..jpg
- File:Erika Meyer mit Kindern.jpg
- File:Ottokar Meyer.jpg
- File:Wendula Meyer.jpg
- File:Erika Heußinger Aken.jpg
- File:Kinder Erika Meyer.jpg
- File:Kinder Erika Bad Salzhausen.jpg
- File:Hochzeitsbild Erika und Otto Meyer 9.6.1922.jpg
- File:Bild Sophie Günther.jpg
- @GFHund: Das Medaillon sieht ziemlich alt aus. Weisst Du, wann es ungefähr gemalt wurde? Ist es wohl älter als 120 Jahre? Dann könnten wir es behalten (gerne das ungefähre Jahr in der Beschreibung ergänzen). Gestumblindi (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ich besitze etliche dieser Art. Sie liegen zeitlich etwa um 1800. Siehe Etwas genauer kann ich es aufgrund der Ahnentafeln ermitteln.--GFHund (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Vieles kann man meiner Ahnenforschung zu den Familien Meyer und Hund entnehmen, wie den nachfolgenden Kindern von Carl Friedrich Schneidewind (1802/1889): Anna, Friedrich, Emil, Alfred, Max, Edmund, Otto und Hugo. Auf dieser meiner Webseite gibt es viele Links zu Einzelheiten. wie den Nachkommen von Ludwig Bernhard Schneidewind (1735/1790).
- Sowie den Vorfahren von Sarah HUND, meiner Enkelin (zurück bis ins elfte Jahrhundert).
- File:Dr. E. Schneidewind Lutherhaus in Eisenach 1880.jpg
- File:Otto Schneidewind Baden.jpg
- File:Otto Schneidewind b.jpg
- File:Otto Schneidewind a.jpg
- File:Otto-Frau-Sohn Schneidewind.jpg
- File:Alfred Schneidewind Sangerhausen.jpg
- File:Hans von Arnim Weimar.jpg
- File:Detlev von Arnim Berlin.jpg
- File:Marie von Arnim Berlin.jpg
- File:Frau von Arnim Berlin.jpg
- File:Familie Schneidewind 1846.jpg
- File:Olli von Schlotheim Sondershausen.jpg
- File:Hugo von Schlotheim Sondershausen.jpg
- File:Caroline Roskowski,geb. Schneidewind.jpg
- Keep Caroline Roskowski, geb. Schneidewind (not the author, but the depicted person) died in 1883, the photo must be older than 120 years.--GFHund (talk) 21:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Edmund Schneidewind (not the author, but the depicted person) died in 1897, the photo must be older than 120 years.--GFHund (talk) 21:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Emil Schneidewind Hildesheim.jpg
- File:Oskar Schneidewind Braunschweig.jpg
- File:Oskar Schneidewind Berlin.jpg
- File:Marie und Alfred Schneidewind.jpg
- File:Oskar Schneidewind Posen.jpg
- File:Fritz und Ottilie Schneidewind.jpg
- File:Edmund Schneidewind.jpg
- Keep Edmund Schneidewind (not the author, but the depicted person) died in 1897, the photo must be older than 120 years.--GFHund (talk) 21:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Alexandra Muromzeff Moskau.jpg
- File:Otto und Alexandra Schneidewind Moskau.jpg
- File:Otto Schneidewind Göttingen.jpg
- File:Otto Schneidewind Berlin.jpg
- File:Anna Schneidewind.jpg
- File:Eva und Olga von der Osten Berlin.jpg
- File:Olga von der Osten Berlin.jpg
- File:Eva von der Osten Berlin.jpg
- File:Emma von der Osten Berlin.jpg
- File:Herr von der Osten Berlin.jpg
- File:Frau von der Osten Berlin.jpg
- File:Gedenken von Cleve 1914,1918.jpg
- File:Gedenken von Buttlar 2016,2019.jpg
- File:Gedenken von Buttlar 1914,1915.jpg
- File:Logo SK Freiburg-Zähringen 1887.jpg
- File:Trauung Margarete Häßler und Carl Schneidewind 1911.jpg
- File:Kriegstrauung Hans von Buttlar 1915.jpg
- File:Emma Zangemeister mit Hans von Buttlar.jpg
- File:Ottilie Schneidewind Braunschweig a.jpg
- File:Ottilie Schneidewind Hannover.jpg
- File:Fridr. Heussinger.jpg
- File:Motiv 7-08-11-b.jpg
- File:Motiv 7-08-11-a.jpg
- File:Motiv 6-11-28-c.jpg
- Delete Copyright protected book cover. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Fritz Baumbach schenkte mir das Buch.--GFHund (talk) 06:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- @GFHund: Es geht hier um die Gestaltung des Buchumschlags. Diese ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Der Verfasser eines Buchs hat die Rechte an Umschlag-Abbildungen normalerweise nicht (sondern der Verlag), und selbst wenn Fritz Baumbach diese Rechte hätte, hat er sie Dir nicht übertragen, indem er Dir das Buch als physisches Exemplar geschenkt hat. Du kannst also dieses Bild nicht unter einer freien Lizenz hier hochladen. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Fritz Baumbach schenkte mir das Buch.--GFHund (talk) 06:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a copyrighted protected book cover. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep
- Bertha Christiane Auguste Zangemeister (* 2. Mai 1812 in Volkenroda ; † 8. Juni 1902 in Sangerhausen) ist verwandt mit den Brüdern Karl und Otto Zangemeister.--GFHund (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Emil Schneidewind Nordhausen.jpg
- File:Fritz Schneidewind Sangerhausen.jpg
- File:Fritz Schneidewind Nordhausen.jpg
- File:Bad Wörishofen um 1900.jpg
- File:Bad Doberan 1800.jpg
- File:Ottilie Schneidewind Braunschweig.jpg
- File:Otto Schneidewind Moskau.jpg
- File:Friederike Heußinger.jpg
- File:Otto Meyer Bild.jpg
- File:Familiengeschichte Erika Meyer.pdf
- File:Krögelstein.jpg
- File:Graf Arnim Schlagenthin Gräfin Arnim, geborene Gräfin zu Toerring-Jettenbach.jpg
- File:Herr von Arnim Kröchlendorf b.jpg
- File:Ffrau von Arnim Kröchlendorf.jpg
- File:Fr. v. Arnim Kröchlendorf mit Sybille v.A..jpg
- File:Gräfin Elinor Arnim Boitzenburg.jpg
- File:Graf Arnim Boitzenburg.jpg
- File:Hans von Arnim.jpg
- File:Sybille von Arnim.jpg
- File:Gräfin Arnim Boitzenburg.jpg
- File:Herr von Arnim Kröchlendorf.jpg
- File:Volkenroder Wald d.jpg
- File:Volkenroder Wald c.jpg
- File:Volkenroder Wald b.jpg
- File:Volkenroder Wald a.jpg
- File:Klosterkirche Volkenroda b.jpg
- File:Klosterkirche Volkenroda a.jpg
- File:Amt Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Unterricht Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Gut (Schloss) Volkenroda d.jpg
- File:Gut (Schloss) Volkenroda c.jpg
- File:Gut (Schloss) Volkenroda b.jpg
- File:Gut (Schloss) Volkenroda a.jpg
- File:Tante Emminchen Zangemeister.jpg
- File:Horst Mergter Hildesheim.jpg
- File:Alma Zangemeister Nordhausen.jpg
- File:Malvine Zangemeister Nordhausen.jpg
- File:Malernin Zangemeister Nordhausen.jpg
- File:Wappen Stühler.jpg
- File:Sohn von Bertha Stühler b.jpg
- File:Sohn von Bertha Stühler a.jpg
- File:Tochter von Bertha Stühler.jpg
- File:Berta Stühler geb. Zangemeister.jpg
- File:Satzung Familienverband Zangemeister Gotha 1907.pdf
- File:Berthold Zangemeister Nordhausen.jpg
- File:Theodor Zangemeister Nordhausen.jpg
- File:Dorothea Friederike Luise Henriette Weyland.jpg
- File:Johann Theodor Liebegott Günther.jpg
- File:Erika Meyer Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Familie Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Singstunde Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Alter Pferdeschlitten Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Alter Kinderwagen.jpg
- File:Alte Kinderkutsche.jpg
- File:Kapitänleutnant Otto Weddingen.jpg
- File:Fregattenkapitän Karl von Müller.jpg
- File:Idyll am Wolgastsee.jpg
- File:Kapitänleutnant Hellmuth von Mücke.jpg
- File:Hans von Buttlar.jpg
- File:Gebäude Gladenbach 1950er.jpg
- File:Gebäude Ziegenhain, 1950er-b.jpg
- File:Gebäude Ziegenhain, 1950er-a.jpg
- File:Ansicht Fritzlar 1950er.jpg
- File:Vom Fels zum Meer.jpg
- File:Brief Wendula 1956.pdf
- File:Arbeitsbuch Erika Meyer 3.Reich.jpg
- File:Clärchen Zangemeister Gotha.jpg
- File:Luise Zangemeister Gotha.jpg
- File:Vorfahren Juliane Meyer.jpg
- File:Skizze Grabstein Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Skizze Kamin Volkenroda.jpg
- File:Urkunde Zangemeister 1902.jpg
- File:Motiv Teeglas Figur.jpg
- File:Motiv Ordix Open Frankfurt-98.jpg
- File:Motiv Tasse-d.jpg
- File:Motiv Wandteppich 1988.jpg
- File:Dimmling Hund MK-69(1974).pdf
- File:Genealogie Burggraf Friedrich (1192-1871).jpg
- File:Schneider Hund 1988 Bayer.jpg
- File:Urkunde Bayer 1986 GH.jpg
- File:IHK Köln Urkunde 1986 GH.jpg
- File:F.Hund mit Schwestern 2015 Naumburg.jpg
_Volkenroda_d.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Volkenroda_c.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Volkenroda_b.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Volkenroda_a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Weak delete There is an error in the file name and description. This photo was not taken "2015 in Naumburg", but in 1915, also per de:Friedrich Hund, where this image is in use. Sadly, 1915 is 15 years too "new" for {{PD-old-assumed}}. We could possibly assume {{PD-anon-70-EU}} but this would be on shaky grounds. If deleted, undelete in 2036 with PD-old-assumed. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This honorific speech was held by Ernst Schmutzer who is alive and presumably holds the copyright for the text. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete this and the following 10 files starting with "Plakat ..." except one (will vote separately there), as these are all posters for chess events designed by various artists with photos, graphics etc. of unclear copyright status. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Plakat 3279.jpg
- File:Plakat 3278.jpg
- File:Plakat 3276.JPG
- File:Plakat 3275.jpg
- File:Plakat 3274.jpg
- Weak keep This poster might be simple enough to lack copyright protection. Short, simple text advertising a chess event with location, date and terms of participation, no particular graphic design. Might be a borderline case. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:Plakat 3273.jpg
- File:Plakat 3272.jpg
- File:Plakat 3271.jpg
- File:Plakat 3270.jpg
- File:Plakat 3268.jpg
- File:Gauß-weber-medaille 1976 friedrich hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Berlin+Brandenburg Academia 1994 Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Akademie der Naturforscher 1945 Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Uni-Frankfurt 1956 Ehrendoktor Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Promotion 1929 Ingeborg Seynsche.jpg
- File:Urkunde Sächsische Akademie 1933 Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Otto-Hahn-Preis 1974 Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Uni-Köln 1983 Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Promotion 1922 Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Grosses Verdienstkreuz 1965 Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Urkunde Ehrenbürger Jena 1996 Friedrich Hund.jpg
- File:Vernetzung Willibrord Haas 1985.pdf
- File:Urkunde SRW JBMM 1977.jpg
- File:Urkunde SRW JMM 1977.jpg
- File:Urkunde NRW MMM 1979.jpg
- File:Urkunde NRW MMT 1977.jpg
- File:Urkunde BSMM-2018.jpg
- File:Urkunde BSMM-2014.jpg
- File:Urkunde Rhein-Wupper 2002.JPG
- File:Urkunde Königsspringer Frankfurt 1958.jpg
- File:Urkunde Hessen 1956.jpg
- File:Urkunde Königsspringer Frankfurt 1956.jpg
- File:Urkunde Königsspringer Frankfurt 1955.jpg
- File:Urkunde Mittelrhein 2003.jpg
- File:Urkunde BdF 2003.jpg
- File:Urkunde Familienturnier Thüringen 1997.jpg
- File:Internationales Mädchenturnier 1985 Dorothee Hund.jpg
- File:Mittelrheinmeisterin 1982 Dorothee Hund.jpg
- File:Mittelrhein Jugendmeisterin 1986 Dorothee Hund.jpg
- File:Mittelrhein Jugendmeisterin 1984 Dorothee Hund.jpg
- File:Mittelrhein Jugendmeisterin 1982 Dorothee Hund.jpg
- File:NRW Ehrung 1993 Juliane Hund.jpg
- File:Mittelrheinmeisterin 1981 Juliane Hund.jpg
- File:Mittelrhein Ehrung 1976 Julinae Hund.jpg
- File:Mittelrheinmeisterin 1972 Juliane Hund.jpg
- File:Hessenmeisterin 1959 Juliane Hund.jpg
- File:Bezirksmeisterin 1955 Juliane Meyer.jpg
- File:Walter Grotian 1920 (cropped).jpg
- File:Schachtage Dortmund-2018.jpg
- File:Schachtage Dortmund-2016.jpg
- File:Schachtage Dortmund-2010.jpg
- File:Bundesliga Berlin-2017.jpg
- File:FIDE Marienbad-2016.JPG
- File:EBAY Köln-2005.jpg
- File:Ehrung DDEM-1964- Bremen.jpg
- File:Presse Schachbundesliga-2014-Eppingen.jpg
- File:Artikel Dame-unter-Königen-2018.jpg
- File:Urkunde BSMM-2019.jpg
- File:Tisch 7-05-19.jpg
- File:Motiv 6-10-12.jpg
- File:Motiv Familienturnier-Erfurt-1996.jpg
- File:Motiv 7-06-21.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1962.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1959.jpg
- File:Motiv 6-07-15.jpg
- File:Spiel 7-05-06-c.jpg
- File:SPIEL 6-11-27-a.jpg
- File:Motiv Tasse-b.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1980.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1978.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1976.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1974.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1964.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1972.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1997.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1982.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1968.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1970.jpg
- File:Turnier DDEM-1960.jpg
- File:TeleSchach Aktuelles Deutsche Schach Damenmeisterschaft 1970 in Lauterbach Hessen.pdf
- File:TeleSchach Aktuelles Deutsche Schach Damenmeisterschaft 1968 in Fürstenfeldbruck.pdf
- File:TeleSchach Aktuelles Deutsche Schach Damenmeisterschaft 1959 in Dahn.pdf
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 21:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment Copying from my comment on User talk:GFHund (in response to the original tagging):
- The individual cases seem to be quite different and merit individual discussions. For example, the file you listed first, File:Todesanzeige Anna 1903 Sangerhausen.jpg, is a very conventional death notice for which it can be argued that it it is {{PD-text}}, as the short text announcing the death of Anna Schneidewind in 1903 contains no original content, it's following the "boilerplate" for such a notice, thus doesn't meet the threshold of originality. File:Confirmanden 1879 Schlosskirche Hannover.jpg is a similar case, merely a list of candidates for confirmation without original authorship (if one were to argue that the decorative border could be copyrighted, I would say that, as it's from 1879, we could use {{PD-old-assumed}} for that part, but that's taking it a bit far IMHO). File:Brief Wilhelm an Gustav 1861.jpg, a letter from 1861, is most certainly in the public domain. Some photographs might be works by GFHund or his late wife (you have seen his user page and the link to the Wikipedia article about him there?).
- Meanwhile, Ralf Roletschek has already removed the tag from File:Todesanzeige Anna 1903 Sangerhausen.jpg and I changed the license there to {{PD-text}}, so I think the case of this particular file is closed. Given GFHund's age (see his userpage!), it's plausible that photos e.g. from the 1950s from the estate of his late wife which were uploaded as "own work" might have been taken indeed by himself, or his wife (and inherited with the rights by him), but some confirming statement might be needed. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Info to the admin who will close this some day: Please note also the now collapsed list "Withdrawn nominations" at the top (mostly my arguments for keeping, then withdrawn by the nominator Racconish), as similar reasons might apply for part of the still open deletion requests. Given the sheer amount of uploads, however, I feel that I have done enough here and will refrain from checking more of these files individually. It's a difficult case. There are files that seem quite clear cases for deletion, others that seem quite clearly to be PD, and borderline cases... Gestumblindi (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and research deleted most of them. Those indicated to be kept were kept, in addition I could keep some which are imho in PD. Some are listed in undelete categories. I hope this beautiful digital archive can be stored in another safe place. --Ellywa (talk) 12:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Previously nominated but not included in the lists above, revised the date for later review:
- File:Turnier DDEM-1949o.pdf - Gerard Hund is shown on the photo from 1949. It is not clear who made this photo or whether the photo has been published before, anonymously or with a name. So this is copyrighted and the image should be deleted. Can safely be undeleted 120 years after 1949 = 2070.
Ellywa (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC) Ellywa (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Meine Antwort hierzu: ==> Das File:Turnier DDEM-1949o.pdf erstellte ich aufgrund meiner eigenen Webseiten Teleschach. Siehe hierzu zum Beispiel Deutsche Meisterschaften der Frauen: [[19]]. Das abgebildete Foto machte ein Beauftragter des Deutschen Schachbundes. --GFHund (talk) 05:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unless the photographer died within two years after the photo was made, the photo is still copyrighted. --Rosenzweig τ 09:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work without permission for original work
- File:Grafik 3xKluge.jpeg
- File:Elternführerschein plakat.jpg
- File:Elternführerschein erziehung.jpg
- File:Elternführerschein s+s.jpg
- File:Elternführerschein 1976.jpeg
- File:Schach Magazin 1992-1.JPG
- File:Edelmann,Heinz 1982 WDR.jpeg
Wdwd (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If there is some kind of permission as alluded to in some file descriptions, it's not properly documented. The Edelmann image can be restored 70 years pma in 2080. --Rosenzweig τ 16:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Reformierte Kirche Sent
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 2018 (public domain in 2088); no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, windows are by Hanns Studer (1920–2018). The files can be restored in 2089. --Rosenzweig τ 21:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation as this is reproduced from Lebensbilder des sächsischen Adels II (2016) page 103 92.11.171.93 17:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Lithograph after w:de:Moritz Krantz (+ 1869), author died more than 70 years ago. PD-Art --Concord (talk) 20:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Concord. --Rosenzweig τ 21:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 11:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Per [20], artwork is from 1965 by artist Helmut Gottfried. I could not find out if he's still alive or else when he died. --Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation as this is reproduced from Lebensbilder des sächsischen Adels II (2016) front cover. 92.11.171.93 17:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The correct license would be PD-anon-70-EU for an image taken circa 1900 and made available to the public. The photographer has the original copyright for the negative, but when they make a print it starts the copyright clock, which runs for 70 years, when the name of the photographer is not known. Reusing the image in 2016 does not restart the copyright clock or transfer the copyright, any more than Commons hosting the image in 2022 restarts the copyright clock or transfers the copyright. I have added your information to the image page. --RAN (talk) 20:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: If I were reasonably sure that this photo actually IS from 1900, I'd keep the file with {{PD-old-assumed}}. But that year is just a speculation, added by another user after upload, as is the speculation that this is "anonymous". So all I have is that one of the persons shown died in 1913, so the photo cannot have been taken later. Therefore the file can be restored in 2034 with PD-old-assumed. --Rosenzweig τ 15:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Unknown author, unknown publication country and data (only knows it must be later than 1904, and the uploader specific the publication data is "approximately 1910"), no enough evidence to show if it is a PD file. Maybe suitable for {{PD-Japan}} but I am not pretty sure. Stang★ 12:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Found image at http://pinyin.info/news/2006/make-romanizations-not-war/ which was posted in 2006 and could be the source image. Another version without that text can be found in British Museum https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_2012-3053-1 donated 2012 by Israel Goldman, also from an unknown author. They all write the image is created between 1904-1905 during Russo-Japanese war. Migebert (talk) 12:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Very unlikely to be still copyrighted. --Jarekt (talk) 18:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sara.rodrigues.pizza as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Logo old and shows up wrong on Google in connection with Domino's Jobs. The rights for this logo are now owned by Domino's — billinghurst sDrewth 09:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 21:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Exists for the purpose of a sandbox page. Hope you understand why it's there Toffeenix (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- This seems to be a map related to Eurovision, not alternate history. I recommend the nominator to check the context of files where they are used. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Seems to be a map of real Eurovision results. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; Günter Grote, artist of stained glass windows, died in 1985; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Grabkapelle Firminus Wickenhäuser Düsseldorf.jpg
- File:Klais Orgel in der Kirche St. Mariä Empfängnis in Düsseldorf.jpg
- File:St. Maria Empfaengniskirche in Düsseldorf. The Geographer-11.jpg
- File:St. Maria Empfaengniskirche in Düsseldorf. The Geographer-3.jpg
- File:St. Maria Empfaengniskirche in Düsseldorf. The Geographer-5.jpg
- File:St. Maria Empfaengniskirche in Düsseldorf. The Geographer-9.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, die Bilder zeigen nicht vordergründig das geschützte Werk. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- So sehe ich das auch. Es geht bei den Fotos darum, einen Eindruck vom Kirchenraum zu vermitteln Philipp Jakob
- Ich kann mich nur anschließen, auf jeden Fall behalten! Nichts für ungut, aber ich wäre bei einer Mehrheit der obigen Fotos nicht im Traum darauf gekommen, dass die paar blauen und weißen Fensterscheibchen, die da einen kleinen Teil des Hintergrunds bilden, überhaupt Teil eines Kunstwerks sein könnten. Also wenn die nicht unter de minimis fallen, was dann? Es wäre ganz allgemein schlicht absurd, wenn aufgrund einer exzessiven Auslegung des Bildrechteschutzes Innenaufnahmen bedeutender historischer, denkmalgeschützter Kirchenbauten nicht mehr veröffentlicht werden könnten, nur weil einige im letzten Krieg zerstörte Fenster in der Nachkriegszeit durch moderne Exemplare ersetzt wurden, die zwar selten das künstlerische Niveau der originalen Ausstattung erreichen, dummerweise aber in jedem Foto des Chorraums quasi zwangsläufig als Staffage auftauchen. Deshalb: bitte etwas mehr Augenmaß bei den Löschvorschlägen!
- Gruß --Im Fokus (talk) 13:28, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Den Ausweg "Beiwerk" hat uns leider 2014 der Bundesgerichtshof verbaut, siehe COM:DM Germany. Nach diesen äußerst restriktiven Kriterien kann ich die meisten Bilder daher nur löschen, zwei kann ich durch Zuschneiden retten. Die Dateien können 2056 wiederhergestellt werden. --Rosenzweig τ 19:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
If this is User:Érico, how can it be an own work? He is seen from behind, no metadata etc. Frog informs (talk) 01:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, he can upload his picture. No valid reason for deletion. Kadı (talk) 17:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Let's assume in good faith that some kind of self-timer was used. --Rosenzweig τ 23:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Currency#New Zealand. DrKay (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. GreenPollock (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Instantbird
[edit]These logo came from [21], but the release license is for screenshots and there is no mention about the logo of software Instantbird. Alos it is inappropriate to tag them as MPL version2, because this license is for source code only ("How is Instantbird licensed?" section).
Stang★ 12:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per [22], "Instantbird is licensed to you under the terms of the GNU GPL license version 2.0 or later", therefore I kept the files with {{GPLv2+}}. --Rosenzweig τ 22:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Complex logo above TOO threshold in China: for the design of "m" letter. Stang★ 11:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Additional notice for the copyright notice on its official website: “Bangumi 番组计划、天窗联盟以及相关站点的 logo、网页样式、图形均受商业外观、版权、道德规范、商标及其它所有相关知识产权的法律保护。用户可用于非商业目的使用、传播以及再创作。未经许可，不得用于商业目的。” Bold word states "commercial reuse of its logo is not allowed", which conflict with CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. Stang★ 19:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. SCP-2000 07:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 23:59, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:COVID-19 denialism
[edit]Clipart covid denialism stickers using 1950s style line art which exists widely online. File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (11).jpg is a printout of a comic strip with the credit stripped out (https://www.facebook.com/madebyjimbob/photos/1944334935747338), File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (07).jpg is a picture of Bill Gates of unclear provenance (https://www.ambiance-sticker.com/en/wall-decal-portrait-bill-gates-xml-420_3391_3551-11105.html).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (02).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (04).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (06).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (07).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (11).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (13).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (14).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (22).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (23).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (25).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (26).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (32).jpg
- File:Penzance - COVID-19 stickers (33).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 22:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. They are not a printout from the above link, they are photographs from around Penzance and are a record of the anti Covid-19 stickers that have been posted around the town. I think they are a legitimate record of the pandemic and should be recorded. It was the name “white rose“” that first attracted my interest, as their is a Cornish song called the White Rose. I since found out that the white rose was originally an anti nazi organisation in 1930s Germany. I find it fasinating that someone is posting these around Penzance – they are soon disfigured, but I think they are relevant part of the history of this pandemic. Jowaninpensans (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- They're a valuable record, and thanks for capturing them. While all the text-only stickers you've captured are fine, it could be a problem that the ones listed here are using what may well be other people's copyrighted imagery, in a way that's the main focus of the image. Freedom of panorama in the UK only extends to "permanent" artworks, which these temporary stickers aren't, and COM:GRAFFITI assumes that the artwork is original, which isn't the case here.
- I can't outwit Disney's lawyers by printing out a picture of Mickey Mouse, sticking it to a wall and taking a photo of that as my own work. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- I want to make it clear that I do not put up the stickers. I just record them when I find them. Jowaninpensans (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sincere apologies, I didn't mean to suggest anything like that! I mean to say that if the original picture of a 1950s clipart man or Mickey Mouse would be deleted from Commons for copyright reasons, a photo of a close-up sticker of that self-same illustration would (some obscure regional panorama laws aside) also be deleted, irrespective of who made the sticker and who took the photo of it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- I want to make it clear that I do not put up the stickers. I just record them when I find them. Jowaninpensans (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:04, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FMSky as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Jimmy Carter and other G7 economic summit leader gather for a photo op in Bonn, Germany. - NARA - 180457.tif
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (GIF -> TIFF) and as GIF file is annotated, whereas TIFF file is not. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and redirected to File:Jimmy Carter and other G7 economic summit leader gather for a photo op in Bonn, Germany. - NARA - 180457.tif, which I have annotated in the same way as this GIF image (though the annotations didn't show up for whatever reason). --Rosenzweig τ 14:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FMSky as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Jimmy Carter and leaders of Western Europe, Helmut Schmidt, Giscard d'Estaing and James Callaghan pose while meeting... - NARA - 182944.tif
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (GIF -> TIFF) and as GIF tiff is annotated, whereas TIFF file is not. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and redirected to File:Jimmy Carter and leaders of Western Europe, Helmut Schmidt, Giscard d'Estaing and James Callaghan pose while meeting... - NARA - 182944.tif, which I have annotated in the same way as this GIF image (though the annotations didn't show up for whatever reason). --Rosenzweig τ 14:34, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Logo claimed as CC missing VRT permission. The country of origin is likely to be the UK and the threshold of originality is very low for UK works, see COM:TOO UK. The letter 'A' has been modified to include a mouse pointer (for this online service). Sufficient effort (from a UK perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK). For public domain works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. mattbr 22:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, since this was a UK company from 2006 to 2020 and so UK law with its really very low TOO likely applies. --Rosenzweig τ 14:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION for claimed PD status PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also image of obviously Russian origin uploaded with Anonymous-EU tag, so clearly someone who does not know what he is doing. --Rosenzweig τ 19:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION for claimed PD status PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also image of obviously Russian origin uploaded with Anonymous-EU tag, so clearly someone who does not know what he is doing. --Rosenzweig τ 19:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Image was removed from Bloom's Wikipedia article citing privacy concerns. Unusual for having been uploaded by a user who wrote the "is a convicted American fraudster" Wikipedia article that it was used to illustrate, while claiming that this was a photo they themselves took of Bloom, in what looks like a friendly domestic setting. Also unconfirmable whether this even is Bloom, when the only photos I can see online are low-res newsprint from the 1980s (which are similar, but not conclusive). Lord Belbury (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. We have no way of ascertaining whether this individual is the convicted fraudster, and the circumstances by which the photo was obtained were never satisfactorily explained during discussions on en.Wikipedia. I'd have to suggest that Commons:Photographs of identifiable people guidelines give no real choice but to remove the photo. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for now, and add the disputed fact tag if you still think the uploader is being deceptive. To me the faces match all the known images of Bloom. None of the claims above dispute the license which has nothing to do with a "friendly domestic setting" or "privacy concerns". The man is clearly aware that his photograph is being taken. --RAN (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- My questioning of the origin is also a licensing concern, if the uploader is not the photographer. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. Too many legal concerns with this one. --Rosenzweig τ 19:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Not an official state banknote ({{PD-RU-exempt}}). A share of the soviet joint-stock company. — Redboston 02:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep since you've already replaced the PD-RU-exempt on the page with a more appropriate license. The copyright has long since expired if it ever had any, and I'm assuming there are no other issues with it. Учхљёная (talk) 03:41, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- PD-RU-exempt is clearly not suitable. So I replaced it with PD-ineligible, which might fit the situation. We have no proof that the copyright has expired. The author of the painting is unknown. There are works created much earlier, for which copyright is still valid.— Redboston 05:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not sure that the underlying image is simple enough to be ineligible for copyright protection. And yes, not a state banknote rubin16 (talk) 09:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- PD-RU-exempt is clearly not suitable. So I replaced it with PD-ineligible, which might fit the situation. We have no proof that the copyright has expired. The author of the painting is unknown. There are works created much earlier, for which copyright is still valid.— Redboston 05:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not PD-RU-exempt, not PD-ineligible. The author can be potentially found out (it is not simple, but it is possible). Alex Spade (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PD-RU-exempt does not apply, and a drawing like this clearly is not PD-ineligible. Without further information, the only way I see is to delete the file and restore it in 2052 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Keine freie Lizenz, keine Freigabe, geklaut von https://bergson-muenchen.de/presse/#press-1 © BERGSON 2021 Mateus2019 (talk) 11:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: uploader and website appear to be the same and uploaded version is much higher resolution than on website, so likely own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per P199. --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Keine freie Lizenz, keine Freigabe, geklaut von https://bergson-muenchen.de/presse/#press-1 © BERGSON 2021 Das Gebäude links im Bild befindet sich noch im Bau, hier ist es fertig, demnach wurde das "Foto" mittels Computerdesign erstellt und kann kein Lichtbildwerk sein Mateus2019 (talk) 11:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: uploader and website appear to be the same and uploaded version is much higher resolution than on website, so likely own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per P199. --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Calligraphic logo. Calligraphy works are protected in China, per COM:TOO China. Wcam (talk) 14:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Just so you know, I had a discussion at the village pump where I admitted that I possibly made a mistake when judging the logo's originality. Essentially, I thought that the logo consisted of the name of the company written in a familiar (rather than unique) semi-cursive script and a generic shape with two W's, but it has been pointed out that I was probably fundamentally incorrect on both of these claims. There is not much else to say, other than that I will likely reupload the file on the English Wikipedia with the PD-ineligible-USonly tag. FreeMediaKid$ 01:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. SCP-2000 07:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Signature is copyright protected in China per COM:TOO China and COM:SIG China. Wcam (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. SCP-2000 05:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Signature is copyright protected in China per COM:TOO China and COM:SIG China. Wcam (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. SCP-2000 05:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Files by User:Bogunilia
[edit]- banknotes
- File:Banknote Uralskiy frank 10 (1991).jpg
- File:Banknote Uralskiy frank. 5. 1991.jpg
- File:Banknote Uralskiy frank. 100. 1991.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These are not official government banknotes. Not a {{PD-RU-exempt}}. For example see w:ru:Файл:1000 Ural Franc A.jpg as fair-use. — Redboston 03:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Would you be so kind to tell me, should I delete this upload by myself, or I should just leave it and it would be deleted soon? What is prefered? Bogunilia (talk) 20:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Для удаления файлов нужны специальные права. Как правило, это делают администраторы. Да и нельзя просто удалить файл без решения, если было начато обсуждение. Поэтому стоит дождаться решения.— Redboston 21:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- other
Author is Дмитрий Павлович Бухарцев (at the end of the post). Shot in 1937. Rehabilitated in 1960 [23], [24], [25]. According to the Russian law (p. 4), the period is calculated after the rehabilitated. 70 years have not yet passed.— Redboston 05:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- I would like to mention, that it is (according to Russian law) - legally published service work ("легально обнародованное служебное произведение") p. 4 st. 1295 - free using of this kind of works (including citation from newspaper and journal) is legal according to pp.1 p.1 st. 1274. Bogunilia (talk) 08:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Article 1274 of the Civil Code of the RF is analog of en:fair-use in the US law. Fair-use is deprecated on Commons. Alex Spade (talk) 14:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- According to st. 6 of law 231-fz (implementation of part 4 of Civil Codex), period of 70 years applies to the object, created before 01.01.2006 only in cases if 50 years from the moment of death have not passed (have not passed to the moment: 01.01.1993 - please see text on the link above). If author was shot in 1937, 50 years have ended in 1987. As I can see, law 231-fz has no special options for prolonging in cases of rehabelitation (law nowadays does, but it applies only to object created only after embedding - st.5 of 231-fz). Bogunilia (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Specific text of law has not such plolonging in letter indeed, but court practice (including Supreme Court) has it. Alex Spade (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Would you be so kind to tell me, should I delete this upload by myself, or I should just leave it and it would be deleted soon? What is prefered? Bogunilia (talk) 18:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Since the file was nominated for deletion on the basis of court decisions (and not on the text of the law itself), would you be so kind to provide specific details (examples) of such court decisions (court desicions, that has extended the period especially for persons, that had been repressed, and where period was calculated since the rehabilitation date, and non since the death date)? Bogunilia (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Let's go another way. Do you have source(s), which is/are dividing repressed-rehabilitated author by "repressed before/after X" or "rehabilitated before/after Y"? Alex Spade (talk) 22:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Specific text of law has not such plolonging in letter indeed, but court practice (including Supreme Court) has it. Alex Spade (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- According to st. 6 of law 231-fz (implementation of part 4 of Civil Codex), period of 70 years applies to the object, created before 01.01.2006 only in cases if 50 years from the moment of death have not passed (have not passed to the moment: 01.01.1993 - please see text on the link above). If author was shot in 1937, 50 years have ended in 1987. As I can see, law 231-fz has no special options for prolonging in cases of rehabelitation (law nowadays does, but it applies only to object created only after embedding - st.5 of 231-fz). Bogunilia (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Article 1274 of the Civil Code of the RF is analog of en:fair-use in the US law. Fair-use is deprecated on Commons. Alex Spade (talk) 14:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022012910003024 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If something comes out of the VRT ticket, please go to COM:UNDEL if necessary. --Rosenzweig τ 11:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Above threshold of originality in Finland. The threshold is high enough only if there is basic colors and shapes, and those geometric object in these images are not that simple.
- File:Keski-Suomen piraatit logo.svg
- File:Keskusta.svg
- File:KTP logo.svg
- File:Logo of Left Alliance, Finland.svg
- File:Ruotsalainen kansanpuolue Teillogo.svg
Stang★ 00:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- On mobile and wiki syntax is rusty so sorry for the formatting... File:Keski-Suomen piraatit logo.svg is my own work and based on the public domain Pirate Party logo and the public domain coat of arms of Central Finland. File:Keski-Suomi Coat of Arms.svg Do I need to prove ownership in some way? - User_talk:Yaamboo 2022-01-29 06.02 UTC (how do I make this automatically, I have no idea :D )
- @Yaamboo: You need to state these sources in the "Source" section of your files, and include proof that the source is in PD or released under another free license. These files are considered derivative works and require permission for the source image (in addition to the permission you've provided for your own work in recreating the images). -M.nelson (talk) 00:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: File:Keski-Suomen piraatit logo.svg per Yaamboo and two others because they appear to be below COM:TOO Finland, deleted two because they appear to be above COM:TOO Finland. --Rosenzweig τ 15:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
нарушение авторских прав 95.31.191.213 17:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Я конечно только начинающий участник,но тут я не пойму... Все фотографии из семейного альбома,сделаны во время экспедиции САЭ-12 СССР.
- Если что то не так извините. И хотел бы узнать какие мои дальнейшие действия по этим фото и многим другим,их около 1000 шт. Выходит Я их не могу выставлять и о них никто не узнает. Очень жалко. <shaman144:А.В.Леденёв> (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @А.В. Леденёв: We need permission from the photographer of the photos in the image (or the photographer's heirs). If you have this permission, please provide it to COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 00:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Photos seem to be from SAE-12 (1966–68) therefore not in PD per COM:RUSSIA. Need permission from the photographer (or heirs). -M.nelson (talk) 00:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Footage from a film should respect {{PD-Japan-film}}. After 1953, cinematographic works are protected 70 years after their publication and 38 years after the death of the director. Ishiro Honda died in 1993 Malvoört (talk) 00:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Malvoört: This is a production still not footage from the film therefore, that copyright law does not apply to this photograph. - Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 6:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Eiga-Kevin2. --Rosenzweig τ 19:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation as this is reproduced from Lebensbilder des sächsischen Adels II (2016) page 83. 92.11.171.93 17:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The copyright belongs to the 1700s artist, not the publisher of the book that included a copy of the painting from the 1700s, who did the book attribute it to so we can add in creator= and add in birth and death dates. --RAN (talk) 19:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the painting is certainly PD. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Question It looks old, but from what year is this? Who was the artist? --Rosenzweig τ 18:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The file cannot be a copyright violation from "Lebensbilder des sächsischen Adels II (2016) page 83" due to these points:
- There is no colored illustration in the book but a gray illustration of the painting with a slightly smaller image detail. So the picture can't be from "Lebensbilder".
- The painting is lost or of unknown whereabouts at the time of book publication.
- The photographer's name is not mentioned in the book.
- The photograph of the painting is from before 1945.
- The photograph made for the book was provided by the main state archive (Hauptstaatsarchiv) in Dresden.
– Doc Taxon 
Disk. • 10:40, 30. Jun 2022 (UTC)
- If still necessary I can send you the relevant pages from this book. – Doc Taxon
Disk. • 10:59, 30. Jun 2022 (UTC)
- Yes please. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Template:Sent – Doc Taxon Disk. • 12:15, 30. Jun 2022 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: Template:Sent – Doc Taxon
- Yes please. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete It is possible that this is indeed a photo of an 18th century painting, but I've tried for a while now and did not get a meaningful date for the creation of the image that would allow me to keep the file. The uploader only gave the 2021 upload date (obviously useless), and the publication where a B/W version (also partially seen in this poster via [26]) appeared says that it is a lost/missing painting and that the photograph they are reproducing is from "before 1945". I'd need either a creator that died over 70 years ago or creation before 1902 for {{PD-old-assumed}}, but I don't get either. Also, this is obviously a file in color, while the only other versions found are both in black and white, so what is the source of the color? It was possibly added by the uploader, User:Guccee (pl:Wikipedysta:Guccee). So I say too much is unclear, and the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless Guccee (whom I have notified) or someone else comes up with a sourced pre-1902 date for the painting and preferrably also an explanation for the coloring. --Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- PS: The original claim that this is a "Copyright violation as this is reproduced from Lebensbilder des sächsischen Adels II (2016) page 83" is nonsense of course as that volume does not claim to have created that painting, they reproduced a photograph from an archive. --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. In addition, per COM:EVID the uploader should provide evidence the image is in public domain with a source showing the age of the (black/white or colored) image. --Ellywa (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
