Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
실수로 업로드했습니다 Travis3846 (talk) 01:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gleb Leo as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is a reprint of the 1985 with a small article (page 2), which was written for this edition, so there is copyright in it. Also there is a copyright symbol on the page 6
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. If the main work is in the PD, wouldn't it be possible to remove the infringing mentioned article from the pdf-file in order to maintain the original work? Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have already loaded original edition of the 1913. Also I have copied all progress of the reprint on Wikisource to the index of this original and proofed these pages. So there is no damage and we can delete it without editing file. Gleb Leo (talk) 11:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I no longer want this nude photo of me posted for privacy reasons. Nudemodel90 (talk) 11:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I no longer want this nude photo of me posted for privacy reasons. Nudemodel90 (talk) 11:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I am deleting all of my nude pics for personal reasons. Nudemodel90 (talk) 12:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 14:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
I no longer want this nude photo of me posted for privacy reasons. Nudemodel90 (talk) 11:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I no longer want this nude photo of me posted for privacy reasons. Nudemodel90 (talk) 11:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I no longer want this nude photo of me posted for privacy reasons. Nudemodel90 (talk) 11:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I no longer want this nude photo of me posted for privacy reasons. Nudemodel90 (talk) 11:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Por error de una primera publicación que era una prueba ROSY SUÑÉ (talk) 13:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Por error de una primera publicación que era una prueba ROSY SUÑÉ (talk) 13:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
duplicate and wrong date Steffen E. Kramer (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Flag_of_Pacific_Ocean.svg John emil hernandez (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:Flag_of_Pacific_Ocean.svg John emil hernandez (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & fictional. --Achim55 (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Flag_of_the_Pacific_Ocean.svg John emil hernandez (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & fictional. --Achim55 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Este archivo fue borrado. 191.126.6.132 02:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted. Uploader's request and fictional. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
File:U.S._states_flag_map.png John emil hernandez (talk) 17:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
File:U.S. states flag map.png John emil hernandez (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
John emil hernandez John emil hernandez (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
File:U.S._states_flag_map.png John emil hernandez (talk) 17:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
U.S states flag map John emil hernandez (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
U.S. states flag map.png John emil hernandez (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Unless uploader was present when the photo was taken (which is under current covid-19 rules very unlikely) the provided information is incorrect and there is doubt if the photo is available under an acceptable license Mbch331 (talk) 19:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted, SNOWBALL. --Ciell (talk) 21:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://elpais.com/internacional/2021-11-30/xiomara-castro-encabezara-el-giro-a-la-izquierda-de-honduras.html Jakob990 (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted Platonides (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnnyknox13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-resolution images, look more like those that can be found on the Internet rather than so-called "own work". Also notice that most of the images have "cami de la cruz" description, and Google Translate tells me it means "shirt of the cross". As a part of their uploads look like a brochure, It is reasonable to assume that this user is using commons for promotional purposes, which is clearly out of scope.
- File:Cami de la cruz fashion newyork.jpg
- File:Cami de la cruz fashion.jpg
- File:Cami de la cruz fashion designer newyork.jpg
- File:Cami de la cruz designer partykingwear.jpg
- File:Cami de la cruz fashion designer partykingwear.png
- File:Cami de la cruz fashion newyork.png
- File:Cami de la cruz fashion rock n roll.png
- File:Cami de la cruz fashon designer new york.png
- File:Partykingwear designs mens apperal.jpg
- File:Partyking designs.jpg
- File:Partykng mens apperal and ladies.jpg
- File:Partykingwear mens tshirts.jpg
- File:Cami de la cruz rock n roll designer.jpg
- File:Cami de la cruz.png
- File:Cami de la cruz Fashion designer.jpg
- File:Partykng macys.jpg
Stang★ 21:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, cf. Google. --Wutsje 21:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
this was a accidental upload (and copyvio) DanielleJWiki (talk) 15:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:30, 14 January 2022 UTC: this was a accidental upload (and copyvio) --Krdbot 02:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
{{copyvio|https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10111007623865331}} Jakob990 (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Platonides at 20:46, 14 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: no es trabajo propio --Krdbot 02:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot taken from a site with rights reserved Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted, copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Obsolete Rkt2312 (talk) 01:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No need to delete this 4 years old redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo is likely to be under copyright protection. Not uploaded with explicit consent of the company. Take Mirrenberg (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: As Stanno is a company founded in Italy we can assume the logo was created in Italy which makes COM:TOO Italy, which is quite high, the relevant page to look at, and as we can see this logo is clearly below it. Relicense to {{PD-textlogo}} . (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 19:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of w:File:Rubin1.jpg, which was deleted on en wiki for not having a fair use rationale. Yeeno (talk) 22:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The author seems to be artist Michael Haussmann. At first sight no evidence the work is free. I have sent an email. Hopefully we will get an answer. Otherwise delete. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete The author wrote: "Lieber Basile Morin, danke für die Anfrage. Mein Gemälde "Portrait Edgar Rubin" wurde von meiner Webseite ohne meine Erlaubnis kopiert / verwendet. Es ist nicht frei lizenziert, es ist durch Copyright geschützt. Bitte File aus Wikipedia löschen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Michael Haussmann"
Translated in English: "Dear Basile Morin, thanks for the request. My painting "Portrait Edgar Rubin" was copied/used from my website without my permission. It is not freely licensed, it is protected by copyright. Please delete file from Wikipedia. Kind regards, Michael Haussman".
Thus, immediate deletion seems justified. Best regards, Basile Morin (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Copy violation, obviously copyrighted material NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 05:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as clear copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 14:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Obsolete redirect Rkt2312 (talk) 01:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The file is in use more than 50 times [1] 2003:DE:70D:51FD:B544:301:F379:16B8 20:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality {{BadJPG}}), orphaned, i.e. probably replaced by a better version. Leyo 13:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The in-image caption text prohibits reuse on other wiki projects as well. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valiullah syed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused; out of project scope.
- File:Maulana syed Muhammad shah akber .Hyderabadi.png
- File:Maulana syed Muhammad shah akber.png
- File:Maulana syed Muhammad shah akbar Hyderabadi DB.jpg
- File:Maulana syed Muhammad shah akber miftahi.png
- File:Maulana syed Muhammad shah akbar.png
pandakekok9 11:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:08, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, orphaned/replaced by File:Arm first.png. Leyo 13:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Since we have a better PNG version, there is no need to keep this low-quality file. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality {{BadJPG}}), orphaned, i.e. replaced by a better version. Leyo 13:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Opaque (white) background & pixelated at full size. Replaced by File:Baeyer's Probe Alkenes V.2.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality {{BadJPG}}), orphaned, i.e. probably replaced by a better version. Leyo 13:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. File:Erythro threo.png isn't great, but it's at least better. DMacks (talk) 17:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality {{BadJPG}}), orphaned, i.e. probably replaced by a better version. Leyo 13:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep- But Delete this image because it is chemically incorrect. doi:10.1021/jo101558s talks about making esters not ethers, so there is a missing oxygen between carbonyl and the "Ar". DMacks (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- But
- Delete I have uploaded File:General reaction equation of chan-lam reaction of carboxylic acids.svg as corrected replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect OH label, poor quality {{BadJPG}}), orphaned. Leyo 14:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. It has a chemistry error and it is unused. Marbletan (talk) 18:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Missing stereochemistry & not drawn according to MOS. We have File:Estradiol.svg as high-quality alternative. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 14:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Extremely low-quality chemical structure with opaque background. I have uploaded File:Indazole-3-carboxamide-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
The image is not the user's own work. Jakob990 (talk) 02:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deleted by Túrelio. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Collection of photos from various authors. No permission. Also not in use.
- File:Jean-luc dawans finnmark.png
- File:Jean-luc dawans.png
- File:Jean-luc dawans lekkarod.jpg
- File:Jean-luc dawans.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Kingdom of eland
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags etc.; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
GPinkerton (talk) 06:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags etc; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:KINGDOM OF ENAROVA.png
- File:Coat of arms kingdom of eland.png
- File:Passport kingdom of eland.jpg
GPinkerton (talk) 06:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution unused images, probable copy-vios. In any case these are unlikely to be educational, and are therefore outside COM:SCOPE.
O Still Small Voice of Clam 12:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Photographer published the files under a cc-by-sa-4.0 license as can be seen from the EXIF information of the photos. Uploader changed that to cc-by-sa-2.0-generic. COPYVIO
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51511233682).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51511238532).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51511273812).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51511278632).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512037226).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512070416).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512256968).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512266778).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512296738).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512744064).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512791119).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512796264).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51512798644).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag (51513946473).jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag - 51511278632.jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag - 51512796264.jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag - 51512798644.jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag - 51513946473.jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg spricht beim Klimastreik vor dem Reichstag.jpg
- File:Greta Thunberg und Luisa Neubauer demonstrieren mit Fridays For Future (51512252348).jpg
- File:Klimastreik von Fridays For Future, Berlin, 24.09.2021 (51528336991).jpg
C.Suthorn (talk) 14:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep all. Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses listed that CC-BY is an acceptable license, regardless of version 2.0 or 4.0. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Yes. But the licence should be the correct one. How did you A1Cafel arrive at posting the wrong version? Please correct that on all files you uploaded, and please be careful in the future. Or is it the Exif that is wrong? –LPfi (talk) 15:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @LPfi: It is uploaded via Flickr, which is licensed under version 2.0. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: OK. Perhaps both versions should be mentioned? –LPfi (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @LPfi: It is uploaded via Flickr, which is licensed under version 2.0. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and a large trout to the nominator.
- Why have you nominated these for deletion?
- Why have you given a nomination based on nit-picking questions of the CC version, and yet managed to misrepresent the licence altogether? (It's a CC-by, not a CC-by-sa).
- These were published to Flickr with inconsistent metadata (it happens). Fortunately trivially so. The photographer's Flickr pages list both CC-by 2.0 (Flickr's page) as well as CC-by 4.0 (embedded in the image EXIF). A1Cafel has uploaded them correctly, according to Flickr's description. FlickrReview then checked and passed them on that basis. If the photographer (or Flickr automation) has mapped the embedded 4.0 onto a 2.0 for their web page, then that's unfortunate, but it's neither the uploader's fault, nor is it anything like a reason for deletion.
- If anyone thinks that exbedded EXIF should override Flickr's web page (i.e. use CC-by 4.0 rather than CC-by 2.0), then I'm fine with that. Just change it. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wow. This is so shoddy.
- So the nominator here has uploaded hundreds of near-identical Thunbergs into Category:Greta Thunberg in Berlin, September 2021, mostly taken from the back or sides with a railing in the way, and there's a real COM:SCOPE question over why would need all those. Now they're scratching around trying to find reasons to delete someone else's better photos of the same event (they are at least from the front). Wow. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- have been seeing a few users just mass uploading from flickr old images which are not just irrelevant but also out of scope, we really need to update our policy on this and enforce it. Stemoc 16:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As uploader of File:Klimastreik von Fridays For Future, Berlin, 24.09.2021 (51528336991).jpg also nominated to deletion. First Flickr site interface only has Creative Commons licenses CC-BY and CC-BY-SA up to Version 2.0. And nominate this files to deletion just because of a problem of what version of license is valid? If, hypothetically deleted, what would happen to possible future uploads of the same file, even if mentioning the CC-BY 4.0? An exercise in pure futility, redundancy and duplication.
- But also files like File:24. September 2021- UprootTheSystem Demo in Berlin 171.png are clearly in scope and, to me, this nomination is simply a misguided but honest action by C.Suthorn and not some machiavellian plan. Tm (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:24. September 2021- UprootTheSystem Demo in Berlin 171.png would obviously pass COM:SCOPE if it were the only image in this category's scope. But it isn't, it's one of two hundred, all near-identical but of poor quality compared to the better dozen or two here. We don't need anything like all of them. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- They are not poor quality and not nearly identical and COM:SCOPE makes no mention on any upper limit on the number of the same event and\or person of an image or images to be in or out of scope. Tm (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Some are nearly identical, so one could find those near duplicates and nominate them, but that would mean people having to check whether they really are close enough etc. Much work. Better instead create a gallery with a few of the best ones, and people who think some more would be valuable can add those. That's how I usually handle my own photographs: deleting is just to laborious and there might still be some detail that is missing from the chosen images. Deleting doesn't save space on Commons, as the images are just hidden. –LPfi (talk) 14:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- They are not poor quality and not nearly identical and COM:SCOPE makes no mention on any upper limit on the number of the same event and\or person of an image or images to be in or out of scope. Tm (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:24. September 2021- UprootTheSystem Demo in Berlin 171.png would obviously pass COM:SCOPE if it were the only image in this category's scope. But it isn't, it's one of two hundred, all near-identical but of poor quality compared to the better dozen or two here. We don't need anything like all of them. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. See Commons:Multi-licensing; files can be licensed under two licenses at the same time (as long as applied by the copyright owner) and let the re-user decide which of the licenses they wish to follow. If you wish to discuss scope or quality, then renominate individual images or with better rationale. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Whatyouknowaboutrollingdowninthedeep (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, these appear to be fictional historic election maps created for Reddit (for example: https://www.reddit.com/r/imaginaryelections/comments/rw148x/the_1879_east_rumelian_election/) rather than seeing any use on Commons or Wikipedia. Perhaps the uploader is using them to make preview edits to Wikipedia and save the screenshots.
File:Bulgara.jpg exists elsewhere on the web and is unlikely to be the uploader's own photograph of the Bulgarian army. Files all have descriptions like "hello" and "aaaaa".
- File:Sanstefanomap1.png
- File:Eastrumeliamap(2).png
- File:Provincialcounsel.svg
- File:Eastrumeliamap (1).png
- File:Eastrumeliamap.png
- File:Parlameng.svg
- File:Altassemblybg1990.svg
- File:BG1990constituent assembly election(imaginary).svg
- File:Anothaimaginaryparliament.svg
- File:Senateofbioko(imaginary).svg
- File:Bgsusthing.svg
- File:Parliamentchartalternate.svg
- File:Parlamentb.svg
- File:Bulgara.jpg
- File:Kingdom of Bulgaria (1914)6.png
- File:Svgfiles.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2021-11-10-08-10-02-396852-15000600769055582191.svg
- File:Ligma.jpg
- File:2020electionfirstround.png
- File:Svgfiles 2021-11-02-09-43-59-797838-2524698143813490433.svg
- File:Partydiagram.svg
- File:Bulgariaaa.png
- File:Bplaflag.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 14:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Colour version appears in a few places online (https://www.facebook.com/IshaNirmitBajaj/photos/a.370202747026580/373253643388157/, https://www.facebook.com/PheonixGamingBD/photos/106702787955463). May be clipart, may be copyrighted. Probably not the uploader's own work as is claimed. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Higher quality colour versions exist online (eg. https://www.cleanpng.com/png-copyright-symbol-clip-art-adidas-design-5701559/), cannot trace the original source. Not the own work of the uploader. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 12:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Not in use, and no educational use comes to mind Tabercil (talk) 01:24, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Is this person notable? --Leoboudv (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. Pruneautalk 11:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
although found some hundred times in the net, I found no evidence this is free material. At least not own work. See http://tineye.com/search?url=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2F3%2F39%2FAndrea.jpg%2F300px-Andrea.jpg&sort=size&order=desc Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, thats just an (try google search) 'wale wallpaper' image grabbed from the internet. The same applies to the users other upload File:--arbolitoito.jpg wich is a 'tree wallpaper'. False authorship claim, blatant copyvios.
The uploader included no metadata other than that this photo is of someone named "Andrea" who is an Italian writer. The uploader has no undeleted edits to any other WMF projects; as such, it is impossible to even begin to infer who this person is, and therefore the image can have no educational use and it is not within project scope. DS (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- also, the filename "Andrea" should probably be salted. DS (talk) 23:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yudha dwiyoko putra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional photos of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:YDXJ1593.jpg
- File:DRANKEN MONSTER 2016.jpg
- File:DRANKEN MONSTER profil 2016.jpg
- File:DRANKEN MONSTER LOGO.jpg
- File:DRANKEN MONSTER.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional screenshots and logo, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thesouveran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ella.vornices (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 12:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Darrenhilton220 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Generic headshots not used on Wikipedia. Also, images previously published at https://hiltonbusinessventures.com/#executive-team and requires COM:VRT verification.
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
2022 Crown Copyright clearly visible. It is also not licensed by the MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ILLUSTRATION LICENCE as it was not sourced from the Defence Brand Portal website https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk see Guidance Ministry of Defence copyright licensing information (Updated 1 December 2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-copyright-licensing-information/ministry-of-defence-copyright-licensing-information Melbguy05 (talk) 07:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
sourced to a Devianart user but does not seem to be his own work. Just a bad copy of the image posted here via there. Had just filed another DR for derivative/stolen image by this Devianart user, maybe all images sourced to him should be questioned Denniss (talk) 00:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Non-free image, per here. BrazilianDude70 (talk) 00:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
File is missing pages 1 & 2 (I'll be uploading the complete file shortly) Oryang7 (talk) 01:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Esta imagen fue tomada por mi mismo
The image is not the user's own work. https://www.facebook.com/102621275551866/videos/434953878017613 Jakob990 (talk) 14:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
The image is not the user's own work. Jakob990 (talk) 02:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: cropped from unknown source, missing essential info and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
It is very unlikely that this photo was taken by the uploader, as the uploader claims. This is Getty Images rights-controlled photo ID #861943874 by French photographer Jacques Marie. —RP88 (talk) 03:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Egoriy the Great (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Иван Евгенов.jpg
- File:Tatyana Mayboroda.jpg
- File:Sidorov Jacob.jpg
- File:GetImage2020.webp
- File:HqoHzDZWSig.jpg
- File:1 заседание Детского Парламента l созыва..jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 06:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Алексей Бирюков (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 06:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; works by living artist-
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ups, Myrtha Steiner hat mir ausdrücklich ihre Einwilligung für das Urheberrecht gegeben. Dann reicht das so nicht. Werden die Bilder wieder eingestellt, wenn sie mit dem Release Generator eine Erlaubniserklärung an Wikimedia sendet? DreiNüsse (talk) 13:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Jetzt habe ich deine zweite Nachricht mit den Tipps gesehen, herzlichen Dank. Schwitze schon ein bisschen ... DreiNüsse (talk) 13:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: permission received. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio 191.126.61.186 01:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope and not own work (tranmission code in EXIF data). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Roberto De Salvatore 191.126.6.193 01:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. A09090091 (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Source Roberto De salvatore Author Roberto De Salvatore 191.126.61.186 01:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete likely out of COM:SCOPE; only contribution by Wendysan90 (talk · contribs) and unused in articles. Photo of a probable non-notable individual. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:JWilz12345. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Author karoline glasow Copyright holder www.foto-glasow.de 191.126.61.186 01:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Obsolete redirect Rkt2312 (talk) 01:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no, not obsolete, in use. And even if no longer used, this is a valid and likely search name for this file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
The image is not the user's own work. Jakob990 (talk) 02:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- You guess?, or have an actual proof? -Kes47 [REPORT AN ERROR] 04:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)¨
- Delete No metadata or EXIF. Taichi (talk) 08:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficeint reason for deletion. Not found using TinEye and Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elpichoninjr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:Regionite Roundel.png
- File:Mutualism Orange Symbol.png
- File:Flag of the Sudame-Kiwi Plan.png
- File:Flag of the United Regions of America.jpg
- File:Privadoygenteist Big Black flag.jpg
GPinkerton (talk) 06:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Midhatsalah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 06:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CircassianJew (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:Alaska flag.jpg
- File:Hwan Banner.jpg
- File:Gogruyeo Alternate.png
- File:Korean holdings in italy lol.png
GPinkerton (talk) 06:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danielmm88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:Bandera de Durango.svg
- File:Bandera de Campeche2.png
- File:Bandera para el Distrito Federal (Mexico).png
GPinkerton (talk) 06:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Uploader globally banned. GPinkerton (talk) 06:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DarkoRatic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags etc; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:State Emblem of Socialist Republic of Serbia and Republic of Serbia(1992-2004) Alternate Colors.png
- File:Coat of arms of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and State Union of Serbia and Montenegro.png
- File:Coat of Arms of the Republic of Montenegro 1993-2004.png
- File:Flag of the Bosniaks of Bosnia and Herzegovina(Variation).png
- File:Flag of the Bosniak-Croat Federation.png
- File:Flag of Kosovo and Metohija (Fictional).png
- File:Coat of arms of Kosovo and Metohija (Fictional).png
- File:Flag of the of the Serbian Krajina(Fictional).png
- File:Flag of Montenegro (1994-1998).png
- File:Flag of the Republic of Serbia (Fictional) 2.png
- File:Flag of the Republic of Serbia(Fictional).png
- File:Coat of arms of Republic of Serbia(Fictional).png
- File:Coat of Arms of Serbia(Fictional) 2.png
- File:Coat of arms of Kraijna (fictional variation).png
GPinkerton (talk) 06:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
86a Strafgesetzbuch. 84.61.188.59 19:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Um...speedy keep? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 00:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- What's wrong with it? --NuclearVacuum (talk) 01:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- The sourcing is likely dodgy, the flag may be wholly fictional, unless someone somehow found in a dusty German archive somewhere a proposed flag design for a territory on which a claim was never made. Could have happened, but I don't think so. That said, my only worry would be how it's used in articles. I see no need to delete it altogether from commons, given the only woe I see here is that it's most likely a fictional graphic. Someone might find it someday and find it helpful for harmless fiction. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- 1 Gwen Gale, please do not discredit pages by inserting claims of what Germany did or did not do. This isn't the place for it. Night w (talk) 04:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. He's citing Strafgesetzbuch section 86a, which unfortunately doesn't affect Wikimedia. Night w (talk) 04:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. The original version (GIF) of this image was created and used for the article on New Swabia in the Russian WP in July 2006 (here's the diff),where it has been part of the article since that time. It was created by User:Maxim Razin who was an active contributor from December 2004, especially to the Russian Wikipedia (here's his edit count), but he has been inactive since December 2007.
- Another version (SVG) was then created and uploaded here by NuclearVacuum in July 2010, based on Maxim Razin's earlier GIF version.
- Over the past couple of weeks Bluesclues100 has created a number of flag images for regions of Antarctica and surrounding islands, which appear to be mostly fictional - but including this New Swabia flag image.
- User 84.61.188.59 has rightly called for these spurious flag images to be deleted. In the case of the New Swabia flag image however, he has nominated it for deletion not on grounds of dubious authenticity, but under 86a Strafgesetzbuch.
- From the English WP article: The German Strafgesetzbuch (Criminal Code) in § 86a outlaws "use of symbols of unconstitutional organisations". This concerns Nazi symbolism in particular and is part of the denazification efforts following the fall of the Third Reich.
- The law prohibits the distribution or public use of symbols of unconstitutional groups, in particular, flags, insignia, uniforms, slogans and forms of greeting.
- Gwen Gale has now questioned the authenticity of this flag image, which is an entirely different matter. As this image has been in the Russian WP New Swabia article since 2006, this does suggest that that it may be authentic - and given the Nazi penchant for symbols, it does seem possible. As NuclearVacuum has some Russian language skills (mine are practically non-existant), I suggest that he check the references (and their reliability) there. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 06:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep No proof the flag doesn't exist, and national bans on former NAZI symbols do not effect Wikipedia. Fry1989 eh? 21:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 21:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
This is an altered version of the flag of the Reichskolonialbund, as described here. I dont know if it needs to be deleted, but i really dont think we should be perpetuating misinformation. this flag is used on multple pages on 2 WP's, inaccurately. I now note the previous deletion discussion. The argument that its being used on a WP article is patently false circular reasoning. can we at least remove incorrect information on this, with some consensus so im not seen as disruptive for doing so myself?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: The file already states it's fictitious and we can't completely control what is put on Wikipedia. From what I'm getting from this is that your issues are towards non-English sites. You should bring up discussions on those particular talk pages to get any real info change. I'm all for updating the file description or changing the file name to reflect it non-authenticity, but I don't necessarily support removing it based on what other users do with it. I agree on allowing a consensus on this issue. --NuclearVacuum (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Commment the file doesn't state its fictional. it states it is the flag of a disputed territory. Its categorized as fictitious or special, so a cursory reading of the entire file page could easily lead one to believe its not fictitious, but "special", whatever that means. Yes, all i really want is for it to be properly described and categorized so that wikipedias dont use it incorrectly. We cant control what people place in articles, but we can make sure they arent mislead. I dont need it removed.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- The template and category is what I meant by it being marked as fictitious. You are more than welcome to rewrite the description if you want, I would've had nothing against it. --NuclearVacuum (talk) 17:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Fry1989 eh? 18:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
No consensus to delete -FASTILY 23:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 06:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo fo some sort Lymantria (talk) 07:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IsmaailGhafar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader is apparently the subject. Photographers unknown.
MKFI (talk) 07:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
We have tons of images from Cappadocia already and we can't see anything in this one. I don't thing it has educational value. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Plain text bio, out of project scope. Achim55 (talk) 08:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nestor Volya as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: changing the terms of copyright
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. As recorded by FlickrReview-Bot this image was offered under the described free license at time of upload. So, later changes to more restrictive license are not relevant to the previously offered license. However, it might be discussed whether this image is in scope. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Google Translation this is a "Copy of the copyright certificate of the fonts..." So looks like COM:LL to me. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
File:FlySkyHy is an app ($40 ish if I recall correctly) used by Paragliders. It also works in “airplane mode.” (49971583058).png
[edit]COM:Flickr washing: screenshot of an app, and the map used is a Google map which makes this also a COM:Derivative work. Uploader has been blocked. MKFI (talk) 09:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
This image appears to be a screenshot of a game or 3D model. Copyright status uncertain. MKFI (talk) 09:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- So, you must prove that is a copyvio. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 01:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No need anyway for this when we already have numerous good photos on Commons. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Permission is missing Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Permission is missing Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
No permission Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
No permission Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
No permission Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
No permission Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
No permission Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
No permission Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing permission for shown artwork. No FoP. Artist Michael Josef Dieck died 9.1.1987 in Mayen/germany. Wdwd (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing permission for shown artwork. No FoP. Artist Michael Josef Dieck died 9.1.1987 in Mayen/germany. Wdwd (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope (low-res "screenshot" of an amateur video) Rojelio (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing persmission, Photo taken by photographer Astrid Waller, according to File:Sigmund Aas.jpg 4ing (talk) 13:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing persmission, photo taken by photographer Astrid Waller, according to File:Sigmund Aas.jpg 4ing (talk) 13:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Previously published on Pixabay under a license that's incompatible with Commons: https://pixabay.com/photos/marbella-spain-andalusia-street-4060680/ Ytoyoda (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 13:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Объективно не нужен Oleg Shiryaev (talk) 14:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Файл не нужен Oleg Shiryaev (talk) 14:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Бесполезный файл Oleg Shiryaev (talk) 14:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Больше не требуется Oleg Shiryaev (talk) 14:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Не требуется Oleg Shiryaev (talk) 14:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio since no Meta in the photo. Pierre cb (talk) 14:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Likely a copyvio since it is a photo of a musical album. Pierre cb (talk) 14:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
erreur de droit d'auteur Tyo310 (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Wrong license. The logo obviously reaches the Threshold of originality under Austrian law. sугсго 15:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Wrong license. The logo obviously reaches the Threshold of originality under Austrian law. sугсго 15:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
derivative work of old photo, no information on creator Polarlys (talk) 15:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works Polarlys (talk) 15:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria Sanz Ferrero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope (article en:Adam_Musto was deleted.) No source, inappropriate license. -Nard the Bard 15:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted speedy in accordeance to our deletion-policies. The image is definetely out of scope and also wrongly licensed. abf «Cabale!» 15:16, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
EXIF data says this image is copyright of Julia Wesely. Uploader claimed to be Nathan Rubinstein, and did not express any connection to Julia Wesely. DS (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Blurry low quality personal photo without compensating imporatnce Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Probably worth making "Adam" into a redirect to file:Name.jpg. DS (talk) 03:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
because its a duplicate of a photo One.atif (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DONGATO937 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshots.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M2dsa Nantes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CONSULTING AP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Capture d’écran 2020-05-25 à 19.25.13.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2020-05-25 à 19.25.01.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2020-05-25 à 17.58.54.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2020-05-25 à 17.59.20.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2020-05-25 à 17.59.05.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
low quality 2806:2F0:4040:7034:119E:2CA2:A313:E6B9 17:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep at 1.25 MB it is the highest quality image in the category of only 5 images. --RAN (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per User:RAN. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yarrowworks (talk · contribs)
[edit]As stated below the information template, photo are not own works but by Bennett Morgan. Bennett Morgan should send permissions to com:VRT
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- fr:InterSyndicale Nationale des Internes existed a while, but now deleted. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Etienne isnih (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo, map graphic and image of a group of people claimed as 'own work' related to an organisation without a project entry. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 19:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 19:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joseph Mary House of David Jesus David Christ Bethlehem Judea (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host. No contribs to wm projects.
- File:Joseph Mary House of David Jesus David Christ Bethlehem Judea.jpg
- File:Joseph Mary House of David Jesus David Christ Bethlehem Judea 3750 Country Club Drive Long Beach California 90807.jpg
- File:Joseph Mary House of David Jesus.jpg
- File:Joseph Mary House of David Jesus David Christ.jpg
- File:Joseph Mary House of David Jesus David Christ Bethlehem.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
photo session that looks identical to File:Matteo-marani.jpg; the latter credited however to Remo di Gennaro (OTRS check in progress) and not, like this, under a Creative Commons licence... a probably copyviol? — danyele 20:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abmpublicidad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 20:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gcoronel.djuv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 20:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дмитрий Головаш (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope - unused house plan design figure.
Stang★ 20:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
The picture is unlikely to have been taken in 2022. Copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 20:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate. The picture is unlikely to have been taken in 2022. Xocolatl (talk) 20:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
No source, possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, used for cswiki vandalism Jan Myšák (talk) 21:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
File is not actually a photo of the ship, but a photoshopped image of a model. It's been previously uploaded and deleted. See here Cléééston (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with the deletion since it is apparently a photo of a ship model. -Artanisen (talk) 22:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 03:03, 18 January 2022, by Túrelio (CSD G7). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
unused image of formula that can better be typeset with TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot from a TV channel Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 22:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Por que ya tengo uno Alex969 (talk) 22:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Barney Josephson is dead in 1988, and I do not find any clue that this picture was published without a copyright. Also, the source is a search engine. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Redundant duplicate image. Updated image has been uploaded so file is no longer needed. Pages have been updated so file is no longer in use Imcdc (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:China Investment Corporation Logo.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Better version already on File:Coat_of_arms_of_Kenya_(Official).svg Lyndonbaines (talk) 06:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (the file was used and I created a redirect). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Obsolete redirect Rkt2312 (talk) 01:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
This logo is no longer current for the company Zip Co and has been replaced with this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zip_Logo.png Please check site www.zip.co to confirm. 122.199.38.252 02:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Old logo of Zip that is outdated. 2001:8003:C0FA:8400:EC69:19D6:3708:E8D2 02:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOO Australia. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
ince the National Security Law imposed in June 2020 in Hong Kong, such articles can damage my reputation and impact my employment opportunities. 143.89.116.119 04:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
It is an old logo which is not being used anymore by this company. Visit uta.com for the current version of their logo. UTAMarketing (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
{{Vk}},insufficient rationale. We like to keep old logos for history sections of Wikipedia articles, etc. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)- Delete. But in my opinion the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete, changed per Taivo. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: We keep old logos, and it is still in use. As for TOO, it is far too simple, it doesn't even come close to the complexity shown in the examples of "Protection accorded" in COM:TOO Germany. Instead, it is much more similar to the example of the 3rd bullet in section "Protection denied" IMO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maestraeducacióninfantil (talk · contribs)
[edit]PowerPoint screenshot. Should be remade with LibreOffice or uploaded as presentation.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. Kept one in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Alaskazoogravestone.JPG Threecharlie (talk) 16:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate, per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
This is not Samanta Ponder. The person is undentified in the Flickr source and Ms Ponder states that it isn't her in her Twitter feed [2] Nthep (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
I feel that, although the individual graphic elements of this cover art may not pass the threshold of originality, as a whole they do, and therefore it is not subject to PD-Simple. DS (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
This is not Samanta Ponder. The person is undentified in the Flickr source and Ms Ponder states that it isn't her in her Twitter feed [3] Nthep (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
It is unused but exist a vector alternative DustDFG (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
This is very obviously taken from some publication. No provenance is given, no way to ascertain proper licensing. DS (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. And this name should be SALTed too. It is too generic of a filename and if someone wants to upload a photo of Fred, we need to know his last name. --B (talk) 12:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and protected as per User:B. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Antonio Antolini
[edit]The uploader seems to be using Commons to promote his own book and using file spaces as galleries.
- File:-Monja Zen Budista recebendo um exemplar de "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo" do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo, do escritor Antonio Antolini no clube Sírio Libanês, em São Paulo.webm
- File:A jornalista Marília Gabriela com um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo”.jpg
- File:Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Antonio De Orleans Bragança recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Apresentadora Faa Morena recebendo um um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do escritor Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Ator Caco Ciocler recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do escritor Antonio Antolini, o mesmo autor da obra consagrada "Buscai, e Vos Será Dado! O Evangelho Nada Secreto de Antonio".jpg
- File:Buscai, e Vos Será Dado! O Evangelho Nada Secreto de Antonio.pdf
- File:Cláudio Antonio Jucá Santos, recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Cássia Kiss Magro feliz con o livro "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo" do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Daniela Albuquerque recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Dudu Camargo recebendo de presente um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Eliana Toscano, recebendo do escritor Antonio Antolini um exemplar de "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo".jpg
- File:Eriberto Leão com o livro A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo do Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Escritor Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Escritora Fátima Pimentel recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do escritor Antonio Antolini, o mesmo autor da obra consagrada "Buscai, e Vos Será Dado! O Evangelho Nada Secreto de Antonio".jpg
- File:Jornalista Cid Moreira fala sobre o livro "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo" do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:José Laurentino Gomes com um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Luislinda Dias de Valois Santos recebendo um exemplar de "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo.jpg
- File:Lúcia-Maria-Werner-Viana-Lins.webm
- File:Maju Coutinho recebendo um exemplar de "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo" do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Marco Lucchesi recebendo um exemplar de "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito" do Antonio Antolini".jpg
- File:Maria Da Conceição Evaristo De Brito recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Maurício De Souza recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Mário Sergio Cortella recebendo um exemplar de "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo" do escritor Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:O ator e cineasta Luís Lázaro Ribeiro Ramos recebeu um exemplar de A Carta da Vitória do Espírito do escritor Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Padre Antônio Maria emocionado ao falar sobre o livro A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Padre Carlos Alves Ribeiro lendo um trecho de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do escritor Antonio Antolini, o mesmo autor da obra consagrada "Buscai, e Vos Será Dado! O Evangelho Nada Secreto de Antonio".webm
- File:Padre Juarez emocionado com o exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Padre Marcos Roberto Pires, recebendo do escritor Antonio Antolini, um exemplar do livro A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo.jpg
- File:Pastor Silas Malafaia.jpg
- File:Rafael Cortez esteve no estande de "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo" do Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Rafael De Faria Cortez Bragança recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.jpg
- File:Rubens Barrichello saudando o escritor Antonio Antolini.ogg
- File:Thalita Rebouças recebendo um exemplar de “A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo” do Antonio Antolini.webm
- File:Ziraldo Alves Pinto recebendo um exemplar de "A Carta da Vitória do Espírito Santo" do Antonio Antolini.webm
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escritor Antonio Antolini.jpg — billinghurst sDrewth 22:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable webshop Lymantria (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
double emploi - format pdf à supprimer ; format jpg à maintenir Rogerbasset (talk) 18:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Fotografia należy do zespołu Aston Martin. Nie znalazłem oryginalnego źródła, zdjęcie z tej samej sesji zostało wykorzystane w tym materiale 89.76.137.164 18:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
VRT-permission from photographer Gary Edwards is needed. Taivo (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Small image size, probably stolen porn Dronebogus (talk) 21:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. In addition, I see in description non-commercial license, but NC-licenses are prohibited in Commons. Taivo (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not delete my content. I am the owner of this artwork, logo, organization and its likeness, and I approve its use in the public domain and creative commons of wikipedia. Please contact me if you have futher questions regarding my art work, logo, etc. toddacanterbury@gmail.com 2601:647:8104:3310:406A:6143:A006:B689 22:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- We do not know, who is writing behind the IP. VRT-permission from company representative is still needed. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope (no such article on any WP). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bignight13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images uploaded are unlikely the work of the uploader as claimed. No EXIF data, all low resolution. Some have been published before: [4], [5], [6]. The only exception with EXIF and full resolution is File:พระฤทธิฤาชัย.jpg which has likewise been published before: [7].
- File:พระฤทธิฤาชัย.jpg
- File:นายก.png
- File:วัดบูรณ์.jpg
- File:สำนักงานเทศบาล.jpg
- File:สัญลักษณ์.png
- File:นายก.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 07:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bignight13 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Based on the previous DR, there is no reason to believe that these remaining low-res uploads are own works. Unreliable uploader.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
re-nominating per Commons:Deletion requests/File:2-Eurocent-Münze Andorra 2017.jpg --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Courtesy pings to Ellywa, Geoprofi Lars, M.nelson. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Jonatan Svensson Glad; Delete per COM:Currency#Map: No information, assume "Not OK". -M.nelson (talk) 10:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- There’s an en-wiki page (that I wrote) where I would be glad to use it if permissible, but took it off per precautionary principle when a declared COI editor added it along with a whole bunch of other obviously problematic files. I haven’t converted to SVG before tho I imagine I could figure it out. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per above. (TOO is high in UK; if useful on a page on en:w might qualify for non-free fair use there. ) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
a handwritten happy new year msg with drawings should be copyrightable?
RZuo (talk) 16:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, also image was taken from 3rd party website, no indication that the uploader has authority to license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Criticaltime (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-res diagrams without context, little educational value, unusable, out of scope.
- File:Study 2 hosp.png
- File:Study 2 homeless.png
- File:Study 1 aver - homeless nts.png
- File:Phases of CTI.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, date, and permission. And not found at stated source, fails COM:LR. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And not own work, missing permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own works: historical images, scans of existing photos, and screen captures, missing or inconsistent EXIF data. All missing essential info and permission.
- File:Stich alter Safes.jpg
- File:Stacke-Tresor antik.jpg
- File:Cash-Drop.jpg
- File:Cash-Drop Stacke GmbH.jpg
- File:Wertschutzschrank-Euroline Stacke GmbH.jpg
- File:Tressortüre ELT-500 Stacke GmbH.jpg
- File:Luftaufnahme Stacke GmbH.jpg
- File:Stack GmbH Fassade.png
- File:01Hardwig Rodde.png
- File:Windpark Rodde.jpg
- File:Familie Rodde auf Traktor.jpg
- File:Landmaschine.jpg
- File:Rodde mit Orakel.jpg
- File:Adeliges Gut.jpg
- File:Bernd Tüxen.jpg
- File:Pfahlscheune.jpg
- File:Eigentümer und Chef- Hartwig Rodde.jpg
- File:Carl-Albrecht Rodde und Ehefrau Erna Rodde.jpg
- File:Ille und Erhard Rodde.jpg
- File:Neu-Bülker Stein vor der Gutszufahrt.jpg
- File:Luftaufnahme 2005.jpg
- File:Gut Neu-Bülk – Herrenhaus.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of nondescript sign, no context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Low-res image of nondescript room, no context, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused graphic/logo, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexsilaen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res clip art, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. Only used on sandbox page of user without any meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused random photos of nondescript objects, no context, little educational use, unusable and out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aanchalsaroha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused screenshot and logo, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. Article delete at de.wp. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused text diagram without clear purpose, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Logo/image, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, banner, and text image - no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal vacation photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yodas henchman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images/logos, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation - looks not like a selfie. Xocolatl (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Biolabgroup5 (talk · contribs)
[edit]4 Unused text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. And 3 scanned graphs, not own work.
- File:Thomas likes bio lab.png
- File:Table 1- Comet Assay Analysis of Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii DNA.png
- File:Table 1- Comet Assay Analysis of Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii DNA exposed to Trifluralin in comparison to a control of Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii DNA not exposed to Trifluralin(N=169).png
- File:TP test.png
- File:PP test .png
- File:C. Reinhardtii.png
- File:Table 1-Xenopus laevis (Froglet) Survival Rates at different dilutions of stock Trifluralin (2.139%), N=1.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Onorevole Roberto Rossini no own work 191.126.6.193 01:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason. No such image found on given website. A09090091 (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per A09090091. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:On. Roberto Rossini (cropped).jpg re the extracted file. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Nominate again if more info on copyright status is found. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded and deleted in 2015 as a copyvio: Special:Undelete/File:Kento Masuda with Monsignor Luigi Casolini.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Kento Masuda with Monsignor Luigi Francesco Can. Carolina di Sersale.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2022011810006757. --Mussklprozz (talk) 22:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have updated the license. Thus, we can Keep per COM:FLICKR. Sincerely, Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
It's the same request as Duckstation. Redream is similar evidence to Teknoparrot, and despite the upload image he uploaded, it has been confirmed that it is copyrighted, and it has been agreed to delete six files and categories here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Takuyakoz (talk • contribs) 20:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Category deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:2007 Indianapolis Colts season
[edit]The source shows a CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license, which does not jive with Commons. Unless someone can get COM:VRTS from the photographer, we cannot host this image on Commons. And yes, it's in use, but, copyright is copyright and we can't host this image on Commons at this time.
Missvain (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The files were uploaded using the old Flickr upload bot, which wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) have worked unless the image had a free, Commons-compatible license, and Creative Commons license are irrevocable. I'm adding {{Flickr-change-of-license}} for the time being. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Just checked and there's a ton of images from this Flickr user on Commons, and they're all reviewed by Flickrreviewr or the Flickr Upload bots, and now licensed CC BY-NC-ND: [%22\%2236703550@N00\%22%22,%22craigoneal%22}}] It looks like the user changed their mind on licensing sometime between the early 2010s and now. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Ytoyoda. --Rosenzweig τ 17:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
There is no way that someone making their own maps of the same part of the world would make them all in completely different styles. Clearly not own work.
- File:Regency of Algiers in 1771.png
File:Almoravid Empire-en.jpg- File:Greater Morocco Ar.jpg
- File:Muscat and Oman (AR).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @P199: Not sure if it matters, but it's worth noting that the uploader is a confirmed sock of a highly disruptive editor whose latest confirmed sock is still active on Commons. Please see the SPI on en.wp for more info. Best, M.Bitton (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose deleting File:Almoravid Empire-en.jpg, support deleting the rest: The description of File:Almoravid Empire-en.jpg indicates that it is a modification of File:Empire almoravide.PNG, which makes the source clear in any practical sense. The actual author parameter can easily be fixed to reflect that if needed. The file is a straightforward English translation and is currently used on Wikipedia ([8]), so it's useful in its own right. As for the other three files: delete, unless Mhd240 can clarify the sources right now. Based on what M.Bitton has just pointed out, I'm guessing they've moved on... R Prazeres (talk) 21:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Struck one per User:R Prazeres. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Eminem in 2011
[edit]This may be Flickr photographer's self-photographed photo, but the subject shown here is a screen showing the performer. In effect similar to a COM:SCREENSHOT. COM:Derivative work. No proof that the projection is freely-licensed. Similar case: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rihanna and Chris Brown (3037559357).jpg.
- File:Eminem-Lollapalooza2011 (cropped).jpg - much worse. Straight COM:SCREENSHOT by cropping
- File:Eminem-Lollapalooza2011.jpg - original, but the screen is only object of interest that would fulfill COM:SCOPE (in scope but derivative work violation)
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
It is unused but exist a vector alternative DustDFG (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We don't delete bitmaps just because there's a vector version. Especially not when this is a 48px bitmap, useful for icons but not easily auto-created from an SVG. INUSE is irrelevant as that's not a reason for deletion either. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: there is also Tux paint logo.png which can be resized to the same size as this version:
. Do we need both PNG versions?Jonteemil (talk) 22:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- As a general rule, I would say yes. 48px is tiny. Designing bitmap icons at that size is not a simple matter of hitting resize, a good one is carefully tweaked by eye. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: there is also Tux paint logo.png which can be resized to the same size as this version:
- Delete Looking at both examples here, there is no discernable difference, hence no benefit to keeping the nominated file. Redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_used_by_Paragliders._It_also_works_in_“airplane_mode.”_(49971583058).png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Badge.jpg){kind=link}
_Insignia.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:GlobalUsage&offset=&limit=500&target=Kenya+Coat+of+Arms-detail.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
6.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Alternate_Colors.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_used_by_Paragliders._It_also_works_in_%E2%80%9Cairplane_mode.%E2%80%9D_(49971583058).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_used_by_Paragliders._It_also_works_in_%E2%80%9Cairplane_mode.%E2%80%9D_(49971583058).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Copy.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Survival_Rates_at_different_dilutions_of_stock_Trifluralin_(2.139%25),_N%3D1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per P199. --Rosenzweig τ 21:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
File:A great blue heron shows off its fish-catching skills on the banks of the Mississippi River (41077c6c-4921-4138-8443-7cf97d9c15bb).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BMacZero as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence of free license
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. The source-page states under "Constraints": Public domain:Full Granting Rights, suggesting it is indeed in the PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bright colors remind us of a sunset as a big boat approaches the stone arch bridge in Minneapolis and the waterfall near (4103a19f-7db7-4842-87e4-0e6239bf1c1d).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Painted trillium, by Addison Salvatore; 7th grade; Oak Hill Middle (0538103c-690b-4297-bb3e-b1f7b359351b).jpg.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- It's a good point that the permission is explicitly listed as public domain. The only argument I have for deletion is that I was told by a support person when I started this upload that the license information on this database could be unreliable, and for that reason I've tried to only upload files that I can verify as PD without taking NPGallery's word for it. I don't know how plausible it is that the NPS intentionally acquired the copyrights for a bunch of children's drawings, but perhaps they did. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Related files:
- File:"Don't Pollute" demands this eagle after finding all this garbage in the river. (0975dde8-42f4-470a-8ceb-bd265ececaeb).jpg
- File:A bald eagle arrives at its nest to feed its young. (365c97df-c154-418f-88bf-085d37ce783c).jpg
- File:A beautiful view of St. Anthony Falls in Minneapolis with the stone arch bridge in the foreground. (2f4e2ee8-ba96-4b67-9472-b04a83a58477).jpg
- File:A beautiful watercolor image of the Mississippi River in downtown St. Paul including Harriet Island Regional Park. The artist (7145b3b9-c62c-421e-81e3-513bef658c03).jpg
- File:A bird dives for its lunch as a group of students look on from a nearby boat. (30a49076-52ec-4fd4-9064-6a4fbbd81eca).jpg
- File:A bird flies over an upsetting river scene and near a billboard encouraging people to take better care, "Let's Not Litter (134e62b5-da6f-4bb3-a63b-b78f7582e0eb).jpg
- File:A boat floats toward the stone are bridge in Minneapolis (18ac4b4a-f50f-4861-912a-7dcd7192d05d).jpg
- File:A dual image of the waterfall of St. Anthony as it is now and the waterfall of the past, in its more natural form. (be265e44-2ca9-4667-abd0-630ef41a0351).jpg
- File:A peaceful scene with a deer next to the Mississippi. (f0a194d7-e676-46cd-a4c7-b93d6c1abf67).jpg
- File:A peaceful underwater scene with fish, frogs, and turtles, but wait... who's that ready to make a meal out of any one of them?! (ed78d399-b8b5-418b-ba88-0c96b7be5fac).jpg
- File:A thoughtful frog sits on a lily pad. (6a2d28f7-5954-4d37-b7c7-735f83389ffd).jpg
- File:An artist puts the finishing touches on their perfect cityriverpark view just for you. (6993253e-764b-485f-8c6f-441eb2c5ca46).jpg
- File:An eagle soars over the river with lunch in its talons. (d002870c-dade-4074-b320-aa646a4fea0d).jpg
- File:An otter feeds their young on a log near the river bank. (d0dbd0ef-9a0d-486e-bb28-a24e3687795c).jpg
- File:Birds are often active at sunup and sundown and this artist captured that wonderfully, along with the beauty of the city skyline (5e9c1c49-3bb0-40b2-9831-48c33aa6ba23).jpg
- File:If looks could kill! This bird has had a rough go of it from all the pollution in the river. And talk about cliffhangers! (4cb8dc62-f368-494b-991b-e3992ccaebd7).jpg
- File:If you've ever wondered what a Big River Journey field trip looks like, wonder no more! (ddbe9d21-19d2-4df9-bf55-0e678279ba77).jpg
- File:Minneapolis was built right on the banks of the Mississippi and you can find natural and human-made spaces all around the city. (0685422b-45c3-46c0-96a5-d7b569977ad1).jpg
- File:On the Big River Journey Field Trip, students have the opportunity to learn about aquatic macroinvertebrates using microscopes (5a4c8113-6241-4b9d-8584-fd2583bed4ef).jpg
- File:Otters live in the Mississippi River and their message to us is simple, "Please Don't Litter In Our Home!" (6a2f0658-a49a-4c74-b631-a23ec46575b5).jpg
- File:Sometimes simple is best. This sketch of the falls and lock at St. Anthony in Minneapolis doesn't need any embellishment. (2051e9fd-c681-4069-824d-0f304495f6bf).jpg
- File:The Big River Journey field trip is one that students remember for a long time, this student visited three learning stations (470c3b78-1c55-43d2-88d0-65c04e875b26).jpg
- File:The gates of a lock at sunset with a great blue heron standing in relief. (ae3835fa-fb54-4539-81e1-b9439f661e88).jpg
- File:The judges hope you are as taken with this bird as they were... and of course the message, "Do Not Pollute Water." (97e20050-f676-4535-887d-4d4fef003730).jpg
- File:The lock at St. Anthony Falls is an impressive sight. Invoking many to say, open the gate "Let the Water Go Through!" (e7d7b266-5559-4ded-bba2-221dbd6f7be1).jpg
- File:The view from inside the pilot house as a boat captain navigates the Mississippi River. (161bc932-0475-49b2-8db7-df6ab81c9824).jpg
- File:This artist reminds us that "The surface doesn't count. Our eyes only see so far" while depicting a clean, blue river near a (4749ec3d-874e-4461-b0a3-e3536c043562).jpg
- File:This artist shares their knowledge of the river in hopes of inspiring action. "Save the Mississippi" (45600832-64f1-47e2-b758-4a415b983bd8).jpg
- File:Vibrant colors along with the imagery of river animals connecting to humans through the river snagged this artist the grand (7a08de58-6b48-4e63-98d9-90f3002dc0d7).jpg
- File:Vibrant colors surround a vaguely human form that is filled with images of the many animals that rely on the Mississippi for (f0169f06-ec64-401f-8067-a3ce60e3cc2f).jpg
- File:Why not "Keep the Mississippi clean so the animals can drink clean water" including this family of deer or the fish of the river. (8e9cae77-a8db-42ed-8aee-3b09661d7a0c).jpg
- File:Wildlife on the river shares an important message. "Stop pollution, it's the best solution!" (94bcf093-605a-4a64-b2b6-76009bb068af).jpg
- – BMacZero (🗩) 16:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- "the license information on this database could be unreliable," - hell, if the agency gives such a statement, we are doomed. (What kind of ethics do they follow in their work?) I think, then per COM:PCP we need to delete these images, as we might knowingly expose re-users to litigation. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- In case it's important, the exact wording I received was "there is not a good way to assure an asset id is truly in the public domain, or not" (as I recorded at Commons:Batch uploading/NPGallery). Animalparty also observes many inconsistencies there. – BMacZero (🗩) 17:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- "the license information on this database could be unreliable," - hell, if the agency gives such a statement, we are doomed. (What kind of ethics do they follow in their work?) I think, then per COM:PCP we need to delete these images, as we might knowingly expose re-users to litigation. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. Apparently these children's drawings were submitted to various drawing contests of the NPS, so they were not done by NPS employees. Given their ambiguous answer about the PD status of their files, it is not clear if the NPS actually somehow acquired copyrights to these drawings, which would be necessary for them to put them in the PD, or if even every single author/artist represented here released their work into the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 14:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Bright colors remind us of a sunset as a big boat approaches the stone arch bridge in Minneapolis and the waterfall near (4103a19f-7db7-4842-87e4-0e6239bf1c1d).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BMacZero as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence of free license
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. The source-page states under "Constraints": Public domain:Full Granting Rights, suggesting it is indeed in the PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:A great blue heron shows off its fish-catching skills on the banks of the Mississippi River (41077c6c-4921-4138-8443-7cf97d9c15bb).jpg. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- This should also apply to these images from the same park/event:
- File:A bird's eye view of the working river in Minneapolis. (5b99d846-7ae6-4553-9b1d-519fbcc3ac57).jpg
- File:A depiction of how one person can "Help save the river! Clean Up!" Just think of what a group could accomplish, or all of us! (0f328f27-9a7f-4dd1-93f9-c9d5acdd8af2).jpg
- File:A mixed media piece with reminders of you everyone can take care of the river. (13db8839-0143-4647-9acd-dcb9e1225740).jpg
- File:A patchwork of paper comes together to bald eagle, wings spread out, landing on a nest high up in a tree. (00401fd1-04bf-4f1e-b9f1-ec3acc82bd67).jpg
- File:An original piece of art with native fish and wildlife of the river calls for an original poem about fishing! (41418c45-b23e-48b4-a257-7eb2c88d18d5).jpg
- File:Bird, turtle, and otter watching are all easier from a boat on the river. Good thing these students have binoculars to help! (26dc7a65-6a22-4bef-bf4b-23829acdde2b).jpg
- – BMacZero (🗩) 23:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. Apparently these children's drawings were submitted to various drawing contests of the NPS, so they were not done by NPS employees. Given their ambiguous answer about the PD status of their files, it is not clear if the NPS actually somehow acquired copyrights to these drawings, which would be necessary for them to put them in the PD, or if even every single author/artist represented here released their work into the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 14:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Painted trillium, by Addison Salvatore; 7th grade; Oak Hill Middle (0538103c-690b-4297-bb3e-b1f7b359351b).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BMacZero as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence of free license
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. The source-page states under "Constraints": Public domain:Full Granting Rights, suggesting it is indeed in the PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:A great blue heron shows off its fish-catching skills on the banks of the Mississippi River (41077c6c-4921-4138-8443-7cf97d9c15bb).jpg. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- These other images from the same park and event should also be considered in this request:
- File:A Day in the Park (1a4c3313-f77b-455d-be5d-f6cbbd192566).jpg
- File:Bloodroot, by Emily Justice; 10th grade; Summers County High (44bd9397-aa9d-4502-9294-f27eea866182).jpg
- File:Butterflyweek, by Sariah Nutter; 1st grade; Glade Creek Elementary (575299c5-7256-4d33-bef5-333dbe933e54).jpg
- File:Canada violet, by Avery Walton; 2nd grade; Summersville Elementary (53fb4006-60f4-45b9-823c-675e1b25a377).jpg
- File:Canada Violet, by Elizabeth Williams; 8th grade; Independence Middle (522ff4e0-c706-4ff2-95a0-6af830694e83).jpg
- File:Carolina silverbells, by Sophie Raines; 9th grade; Independence High (3bd02de8-1cfd-4617-8f0a-724cc9781475).jpg
- File:Catawba rhododendron, by Cameron Shea; 3rd grade; Marsh Fork Elementary (493bfa6a-c9d2-4dbb-85ae-a43e7cd412b3).jpg
- File:Crested iris, by Ashley Lilly; 12th grade; Summers County High (39e504bf-9fff-46ba-a70c-d77160388200).jpg
- File:Daisy fleabane, by Caige Ratcliff; 1st grade; Fayetteville Pre K-8 (26c552f4-028b-4912-b9d3-ecbb06df11e3).jpg
- File:Dancing in the Forest (526768d2-ffd1-4243-b4cd-f68bd89fa824).jpg
- File:Dwarf larkspur, by Leavie Lilly; 1st grade; homeschool (0e7dfe73-08d4-48a0-ab8b-72efcda59871).jpg
- File:Fire pink, by Wesley Jones; 2nd grade; Divide Elementary (267c8e63-ab38-41af-9ee4-21d02a8d0026).jpg
- File:Flowering dogwood; by Zasha Woodson; 6th grade; Oak Hill Middle (17fdcbda-2a08-4a9a-8e8f-37c70c10c25f).jpg
- File:Hepatica, by Katelynn Talbert; 11th grade; Nicholas County High (141838e0-dde6-4252-afa7-d1cf20c892d3).jpg
- File:I Hike to Meet Pink Lady (029e3f2f-f333-4e60-88e1-a45b633f9af1).jpg
- File:Jack-in-the-pulpit, by Madison Buckland; 6th grade; Summersville Middle (25408832-ce43-4029-bda8-d72f799fe803).jpg
- File:Lady Slipper With Lady Bug (4f5c8305-915a-4bd8-854e-5c3d354a42d0).JPG
- File:Milkweed, by Ella McClure; 2nd grade; Divide Elementary (1c26b5a0-b28d-4221-9c9d-9df8a0f2a554).jpg
- File:Mountain laurel, by Cole Bailes; 4th grade; Mt. Nebo Elementary (46a66007-0de9-4636-b184-5329bd63d05b).jpg
- File:Pink lady slipper, by Knowledge Farley; 1st grade; Glade Creek Elementary (2c67946a-0b2d-4313-bb9d-ff820b3e2516).jpg
- File:Red trillium, by Lacie Jones; 10th grade; Nicholas County High (1cea68ac-b0e3-4a6d-afc3-c2e460828d65).jpg
- File:Red trillium, by Laynie Kincaid; 4th grade; Glade Creek Elementary (2c2d3476-7b29-45a6-ae9f-50b141ea177c).jpg
- File:Rhododendron, by Lakyn Misch; 7th grade; Park Middle (1945bc2a-ef22-4e5f-afc5-906d707bfd9d).jpg
- File:Spiderwort, by Haley Kuhn; 4th grade; Glade Creek Elementary (3c84b2f4-697e-4792-ac95-97121dcf1d98).jpg
- File:Spring beauty, by Dai'Mya Harris; 1st grade; Beckley Elementary (480385d0-2b5a-406e-978a-2f533101c785).jpg
- File:Spring beauty, by Hailey Rose; 8th grade; Independence Middle (59c148ed-4f2e-47ac-add7-75722a437e7c).jpg
- File:Squirrel Corn of Spring (02986e61-e066-4c0a-978e-b4e984d533c1).jpg
- File:The Beautiful Blue Violets (14222b15-374d-410a-b23e-c4bfee421aed).jpg
- File:Yellow ladies slipper, by Lilianna Sowder; 12th grade; Oak Hill High (5df5d30c-b3c6-47e9-b18e-630dd110791e).jpg
- File:Yellow lady's slipper, by Siera Underwood; 12th grade; Oak Hill High; BEST IN SHOW OVERALL (2d8a1d9d-3dfe-4290-9cfe-fd25ffb520cf).jpg
- File:Yellow wood sorrel, by Zachary Hall; 4th grade; Glade Creek Elementary (1794e8d3-1041-4b1d-9e67-21461cf45c23).jpg
- – BMacZero (🗩) 02:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. Apparently these children's drawings were submitted to various drawing contests of the NPS, so they were not done by NPS employees. Given their ambiguous answer about the PD status of their files, it is not clear if the NPS actually somehow acquired copyrights to these drawings, which would be necessary for them to put them in the PD, or if even every single author/artist represented here released their work into the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 14:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Per this the mural was painted in 1998 and the designer is still alive, thus copyrighted. No FOP in the United States. Sennecaster (talk) 04:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:Revised Slaton, TX, mural IMG 4664.JPG is the exact same deal, uploaded by the same person (Billy Hathorn) and should also be deleted. Sennecaster (talk) 04:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Note: I would have closed and deleted the images, but no notice of deletion discussion was placed on File:Revised Slaton, TX, mural IMG 4664.JPG when it was added to this request. I have done so and placed notice on the Uploader's page. Image currently in use in more than 20 projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Huhhh, must have forgotten to spread the notice love. ar, azb, ca, ce (admin/uploaders), en, fa, fr, it, pt, sr, tr, tt, uk, uz, and vi all have EDPs that this could be evaluated against, but I would say that the english wikipedia's application of its EDP would not allow this on its current article. Projects that have based their EDP off of the enwiki may also apply that interpretation. Sennecaster (talk) 05:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 02:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
This logo looks quite complex and might above the TOO threshold in Bangladesh. Stang★ 21:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Stang★, the following logo main portion is written in Bangla (রকমারি) & second is in english (.com). This is the reason why I added the PD-Textlogo license for the logo. If that's the reason for deletion I will add the license that was in the first place (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International).
- Kindly do Let me know.
- Kind Regards
- - Dr. Editorial (talk) 21:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Description page indicated this file is "reconstructed from source of rokomari.com Logo", it means this is a derivative work, and should not be tagged as cc license? imo the color selection, font might above TOO, but I am not pretty sure at present. Just wait for someone else to re-check. Stang★ 14:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- User:Dr. Editorial, It's clear that it is derived work and please donot remove the deletion tag yourself. Wait as long as any admin reviews this. ~ A. Shohag (pingme or Talk) 18:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bangladesh has nothing about TOO there, but says Bangladeshi law is modelled on UK law, so presumably the TOO is low. The Bangla lettering is not just some font, but rather artistic, that's why I agree that it is probably above the TOO. --Rosenzweig τ 02:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. It is not Open Government Licence v3.0. Crown Copyright still applies to Ministry of Defence images on the The National Archives UK Government Web Archive see https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webarchive/information/ see Guidance Ministry of Defence copyright licensing information (Updated 1 December 2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mod-copyright-licensing-information/ministry-of-defence-copyright-licensing-information.Melbguy05 (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nominator: has re-read section "Legal Information" of the "How to use the web archive" by the National Archives and the Ministry of Defence copyright licensing information and is now of the view that there was not a copyright violation. Also, that the Open Government Licence v3.0. applies. Notwithstanding, that it "..does not allow the re-use of imagery containing personal data". However, in this instance whilst the photo depicts individuals it is of such a low quality that the individuals are not identifiable.--Melbguy05 (talk) 11:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept - Open Government Licence v3.0. applies (withdrawn by Nominator)--Melbguy05 (talk) 12:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: according to the source, this file is licenced with Crown Copyright. According to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Crown_copyright it cannot be maintained on Commons and is not compitable with the licencing on the file, OGL. --Ellywa (talk) 08:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the source, this file is licenced with Crown Copyright. From Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Crown_copyright it appears that files with this licence are copyrighted and cannot be maintained on Commons. The crown copyright is not compatible with the licencing included on the file, the OGL. Therefore this file must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 08:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, seems own image of uploader. Is in use on the projects. The nomination is too late for a COM:COURTESY deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Crown Copyright, incorrect copyright information, needs to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, does not seem to be own work. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
_Badge.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Badge.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
_Badge.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: According to the source, this file is licenced with Crown Copyright. From Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Crown_copyright it appears that files with this licence are copyrighted and cannot be maintained on Commons. The crown copyright is not compatible with the licencing included on the file, the OGL. Therefore this file must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 08:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
_Badge.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No source found for the OGL, deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Devence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licenced with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Devence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licenced with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Devence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licenced with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Devence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licenced with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Coldstreamer has uploaded a new version over a 2014 version. I reversed the upload to the original version. --Ellywa (talk) 09:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Would prefer to have a replacement to hand for immediate replacement, before removal. Kiltpin (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. Yes I would also like to see a replacement, but nobody took action since January 2022. --Ellywa (talk) 09:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- OGL v1.0 licence do not apply. State exemption: military insignia. Should be removed asap. Creuzbourg (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 09:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 10:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Se requiere permiso de OTRS. 191.126.61.186 01:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably not made by the uploader, so deleted per nomination. @Jdroberto: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Text is above the threshold of originality and is thus copyrighted. These signs are usually new, and while it may be {{PD-US-no-notice}} it is dubious at best. Sennecaster (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I think the letters/text are {{PD-text}}. I doubt there is any creative authorship in this short text. It think it is fcts, data, and unoriginal information. --MGA73 (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This site: [9] gives the rules under which New Mexico State Scenic Historical Markers are created. It states explicitly:
- "M. The text for markers, having been written by public officials, shall remain in the public domain and is not subject to copyright by any party other than the state."
- I admit the wording is contradictory, but any lawyer worth his salt would seize on the "in the public domain" as the relevant part of the text. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 16:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- And if there is consensus that this document establishes that the texts of all New Mexico Scenic Historical Markers are in the public domain, we may want a new PD template for this case. But I lack the knowledge or administrative chops to create such a template.--Kent G. Budge (talk) 17:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- That's really unusual; almost every state gov has a death grip on every bit of copyright it can get. I'm not sure I can trust it completely I/R/T to how Commons interprets what public domain means, but the fact that it says "in the public domain" tips it towards more towards PD than copyrighted. Thanks, NM, for more edgecases in US copyright! /s Sennecaster (talk) 00:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 13:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, according to description made by another person, J-Man11, whos permission is lacking. --Ellywa (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Use {{Fair use delete}} template to move it to English Wikipedia. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Sreejithk2000: I don't think that process is actually working. The files in Category:Pending fair use deletes were added to that category months ago, and User:Commons fair use upload bot has only two edits, from December 2014, and no deleted edits at all, suggesting it never ran. Its predecessor, User:Commons fair use upload bot (usurped), last ran in June 2014. --Rosenzweig τ 18:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The source website, https://royalsignals.org/royal-signals/upload-your-story, does not show the persons uploading stories or images are releasing the files with a free licence. --Ellywa (talk) 13:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 13:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the source, this file is licensed with Crown Copyright. From Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Crown_copyright it appears that files with this licence are copyrighted and cannot be maintained on Commons. The crown copyright is not compatible with the licensing included on the file, the OGL. Therefore this file must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the source, this file is licensed with Crown Copyright. From Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Crown_copyright it appears that files with this licence are copyrighted and cannot be maintained on Commons. The crown copyright is not compatible with the licensing included on the file, the OGL. Therefore this file must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the source, this file is licensed with Crown Copyright. From Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_Kingdom#Crown_copyright it appears that files with this licence are copyrighted and cannot be maintained on Commons. The crown copyright is not compatible with the licensing included on the file, the OGL. Therefore this file must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- If the version you have uploaded is copyrighted, why not simply revert the file to its earlier configuration. Who says this sort of thing is copyrighted anyway? Representations of heraldry of this sort are usually fine. GPinkerton (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per GPinkerton, reverted to earlier version and deleted the version of Coldstreamer20. --Ellywa (talk) 13:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: reverted to earlier version and deleted the version of Coldstreamer20. --Ellywa (talk) 13:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
_Insignia.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Insignia.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
_Insignia.png){kind=link}
Deleted: taken from a copyrighted magazine without permission. --Ellywa (talk) 13:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
_Insignia.png){kind=link}
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Coldstreamer20: You can just upload the free file to the same filepage and then tag the file with {{Overwritten revdel}}.Jonteemil (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Well I miss-used the word of "free", I meant that in the sense of it being tagged correctly. They will be uploaded to Wikipedia using the free-use license instead of the current wrong OGL license. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 02:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The images of regimental insignia of the British Army are not copyrightable. There is nothing unique about this photograph and fails to secure copyright on that ground alone. 2601:283:C202:5890:0:0:0:4DA6 02:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The design of this striped rectangle is beloo TOO imho. --Ellywa (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Has former copyrighted-images. The badges are background image are from Defense Images, which should have been removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Not sure I follow the logic here. There is no evidence presented that this is copyrighted (and the nomination itself says former copyrighted?). It's an incredibly simple pattern and its ties with the very old agency means that it is also either expired heraldry or released by OGL (as tagged) being from the MoD. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 09:34, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source given, Defence Brand Portal, https://www.defencebrandportal.mod.uk/, can only be entered with a login. It is not shown the files on that website are licensed with the OGL as is listed on the file page. Therefore the image must be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: kept the original upload, deleted the version of Coldstreamer20. --Ellywa (talk) 13:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: kept the original upload, deleted the version of Coldstreamer20. --Ellywa (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted, per discretion would like to remove and replace eventually with free version. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: kept the original upload, deleted the version of Coldstreamer20. --Ellywa (talk) 13:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jelican9 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Although there is no official coat of arms of Istanbul, the logo in the image belongs to the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality. Doc Taxon (talk) 10:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The symbol is used by Istanbul municipal government in the public and therefore public domain according to Turkish laws. Doc Taxon (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Doc, Not all items belonging to the public are considered as public property in Turkish law. Apart from that, the image you added is the logo of the municipality (which is not the correct form). Jelican9 (talk) 14:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't talk about all items. Doc Taxon (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The logo of Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality does not meet the PD-75 criteria. For this reason Speedy delete Jelican9 (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The logo of Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality does not meet the PD-75 criteria. For this reason
- I didn't talk about all items. Doc Taxon (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Doc, Not all items belonging to the public are considered as public property in Turkish law. Apart from that, the image you added is the logo of the municipality (which is not the correct form). Jelican9 (talk) 14:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, Doc Taxon, your argument is invalid. There is no such clause in Turkish law.--Kadıköylü (talk) 19:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Túrelio: , could you evaluate? --Jelican9 (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Túrelio: , could you evaluate? Kurmanbek (talk) 20:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. No reason is named anywhere why any of the bullet points of {{PD-Turkey}} would apply. --Rosenzweig τ 22:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
A screenshot from a TV or computer screen can in no way be considered an independent work of the author of Anzhi86--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 20:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, apparently taken from the 1970 film "The Boys in the Band". --Rosenzweig τ 22:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
