Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 26th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am not use Mr Rahul124 (talk) 09:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion, incomprehensible nomination. --Wutsje 10:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source page doesn't have claimed license. 191.116.5.106 23:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the (Swedish) painter died in 1941, painting is in the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 21:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cause it is my own file Minurdha Senarath (talk) 05:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author requests deletion of own file. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no meaninful content Masti (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: vandalism. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no meaninful content Masti (talk) 22:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by AntiCompositeNumber at 23:16, 26 December 2021 UTC: Content intended as vandalism (G3) --Krdbot 02:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no meaninful content Masti (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by AntiCompositeNumber at 23:16, 26 December 2021 UTC: Content intended as vandalism (G3) --Krdbot 02:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no meaninful content Masti (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by AntiCompositeNumber at 23:16, 26 December 2021 UTC: Content intended as vandalism (G3) --Krdbot 02:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no meaninful content Masti (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by AntiCompositeNumber at 23:16, 26 December 2021 UTC: Content intended as vandalism (G3) --Krdbot 02:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-Wikipedian person, just trying to promote themselves Osama Eid (talk) 23:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. [24Cr][talk] 22:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio copyrighted works of Category:Andy Warhol. The work must be released by the author or their heirs via E-mail confirmed authorization to be allowed on the Commons. Krok6kola (talk) 03:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC) copyvio|1=Works of Andy Warhol published after 1928 are under copyright. .[reply]


Deleted: by Infrogmation. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. It is not free image Reiro (talk) 03:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Screenshot. A09090091 (talk) 18:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name file is untrue. The man is André Dupin and not Jean-Henri Dupin. It's a mistake of the Getty Museum Bruno Belhoste (talk) 11:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Can be moved via {{Move}}. A09090091 (talk) 18:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong File Alireazamagh (talk) 12:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep until valid reason is given. A09090091 (talk) 18:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete until valid reason is given.


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de publication ABID SONNY (talk) 15:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no scientific significance 95.31.191.213 18:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Fake, DW of this one. --Achim55 (talk) 09:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Assuming intended insult, DW copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 09:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused duplicate of File:Jack Kevorkian National Press Club.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lavado de Flickr. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.116.5.106 (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as dupe. --Achim55 (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING Larryasou (talk) 06:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and poor quality graphic stated as 'own work'. Re-creatable in better quality if required. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 07:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 08:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:US-DeptOfHUD-Seal.png and File:Seal of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.svg (uploaded before this file). No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 08:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. Potentially made up by the uploader. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huluaventura (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and image stated as 'own work' promoting a company. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 11:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jalaj kumar anupam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 11:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused poor-resolution selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete taken from https://www.healthfitnessrevolution.com/fittest-daytime-talk-show-hosts/ A09090091 (talk) 18:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of a company logo which is redundant to File:Humanix Books logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 12:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Alex ahmos (talk) 12:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HunceGrunheim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 12:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly distorted logo. Low resolution. Redundant to the better quality File:HCE-logo.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 13:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to the higher resolution File:HUNTER-LOGO.jpg. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 13:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, not useful Gintek (talk) 14:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete A09090091 (talk) 18:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred unuseful Gintek (talk) 15:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete A09090091 (talk) 18:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : https://www.musicme.com/Abou-Tall/ Lagribouille (talk) 15:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom.  Comment You can use {{Copyright}} as a form of speedy deletion. A09090091 (talk) 19:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Young Luiz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Extremely small person images. Commons is not a web hosting service

Herby talk thyme 15:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon de File:TF1.svg JessydeVilly (talk) 12:32, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nomination for deletion 86 Juegos (talk) 16:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for DR, doesn't exceed COM:TOO A09090091 (talk) 18:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Luchoxtrab as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G2 - Unused and implausible, or broken redirect. Thank you - Luchoxtrab (talk) 08:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC). Not a broken redirect. I allow a regular request. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 14:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Huron Consulting Group logo.svg which was sourced from the company website. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 16:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VarunN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Hustle Productions logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 16:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samarth05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (both files already deleted by EugeneZelenko). --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samarth05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Energy Petrol logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That is not a real computer virus; out of scope Nutshinou Talk! 17:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete, forgot this was even uploaded. HVS B61 (talk) 03:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Banti mathur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 17:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zvifty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

game screenshoots or something else out of scope.

Pibwl (talk) 18:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, no description, unknown subject, doesn't seem to be in a scope. Pibwl (talk) 18:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Street market in Uganda, of obvious educational value. Darwin Ahoy! 14:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Darwin. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

špatně nahráno Lusylka83 (talk) 18:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie, Blurry Lukemelon (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arw916 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 18:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not with scope and it seems like social media collection ~AntanO4task (talk) 18:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not with scope and it seems like social media collection ~AntanO4task (talk) 18:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adamas77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 19:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

claimed to be 'own work': but it is listed as being from the singer's webiste. Smerus (talk) 19:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RandomID (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 19:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HyperBrewLLC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 19:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhieavancena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and promotional shop signage stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 19:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, see indicated source ("google"), indicated author ("idk") and Google Images result. Nutshinou Talk! 20:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, see indicated source ("google"), indicated author ("idk") Nutshinou Talk! 20:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be fit the project scope (128x128 image of text that says "IM ON EXILE AND I LOVE IT") Nutshinou Talk! 20:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be fit the project scope (64x64 image of text that says "IM ON EXILE AND I LOVE IT") Nutshinou Talk! 20:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tirupati Rathod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal file collection, all unused, out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   20:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magdaraginia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alonsobp1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jet Multimedia España (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 22:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/Coopera

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 22:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helena Simon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 22:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 22:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user selfie Nutshinou Talk! 22:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user selfie Nutshinou Talk! 22:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user selfie, possible copyvio (modern art in the background) Nutshinou Talk! 22:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sr Kúent Afallza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

logos, aerial photos, professional sport photos, less professional sport photos, newspaper titles, autograph cards: certainly not "own work"

Polarlys (talk) 22:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jack Soley (talk) 02:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept this, dupe redirected here. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just troll. Uproader is blocked unlimitedly. Reiro (talk) 03:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 18:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. It is not free image. Reiro (talk) 03:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom. Multiple instances found on web. A09090091 (talk) 18:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. It is not free image Reiro (talk) 03:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per COM:PRP. A09090091 (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. It's not free image Reiro (talk) 03:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Screenshot. A09090091 (talk) 18:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. It is not free image Reiro (talk) 03:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per COM:PRP. A09090091 (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poem of the uploader, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poem of the uploader, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own artwork of the uploader, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poem of the uploader, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poem of the uploader, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poem of the uploader, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poem of the uploader, out of the scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poem of the uploader, out of the scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poetry of the uploader, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poetry of the uploader, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-quotation of the uploader, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poetry of the uploader, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of artwork, reverse image search suggests copyright violation, no indication that uploader is the artist nor has authority to grant license. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esquire Korea, the author of this image, did not explicitly say that they released this image under the Creative Commons license Suhaengpyeongga (talk) 11:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete No CC license on link. A09090091 (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Auhg8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Auhg8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image of unamed flower. Not educational Krok6kola (talk) 20:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Bodiadub sockpuppets 4

[edit]

per userchecking result

--Anntinomy (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Bodiadub sockpuppets 3

[edit]

per request result here

Deleted with NPD

--Anntinomy (talk) 20:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (reason below). --Wdwd (talk) 08:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the file seems to be broken Welkend (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I managed to fix the file.Jonteemil (talk) 12:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, photo are from press release of Hawley & Hazel John123521 (talk) 00:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 19:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still from a video, probably copyright protected | Imagen fija de un vídeo, probablemente protegida por derechos de autor Mussklprozz (talk) 08:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 19:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Higher resolution image here: https://sntedz.com/archives/1112. --Amada44  talk to me 19:20, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The better version is File:紫藤廬9078.jpg. Solomon203 (talk) 10:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 19:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unidentified sporting event with no indication of importance. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No es trabajo propio. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.116.5.106 (talk) 23:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 19:23, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Pazhani Manivannan (talk) 10:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The space around the butterfly does not add any value to the image. I move a cropped higher res version to the other image. --Amada44  talk to me 19:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private snapshot; completely out of project scope. LexICon (talk) 12:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 19:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is meaningless to preserve. It is a PD file and must be tailored to the official logo. The description of this file is unknown. This file is confirmed to be copyrighted. Simsunman (talk) 13:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is taken from the official site, but the logo falls below the threshold of originality for the US, so is properly tagged PD-textlogo. --Masem (talk) 14:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 19:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chanty Hallet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The painter of these paintings needs to be identified. @Chanty Hallet: Please explain why you are authorized to release these images under a free license.

King of ♥ 03:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 20:20, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EternalSunshineBrand

[edit]

I am unable to find any proofs of notability of this musician. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 20:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

title is contentious .. there is no proof that Aryans entered India or were not the original inhabitants of the subcontinent.... this pictured needs to be urged asap 2003:F2:670A:8800:A489:38DE:7FC0:5FD0 04:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Not a valid reason for deletion, in use. --Achim55 (talk) 08:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 20:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence image created by uploader, can be found throughout Facebook/Pintrest. See Google image search results. ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 22:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article to which this image was used has been deleted on en.wiki as a hoax article.--☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 23:16, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 19:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohaenma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO - low res, all but one without camera EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Arastoo Khoshrazm. jpg.jpg is here; File:Maral Torkaman. Jpg.jpg is here; File:Amin Hassani. Jpg.jpg is here, etc.) - Quack.

Эlcobbola talk 15:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: LTA, known coyright troll, not humoring this. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohaenma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

Timtrent (talk) 12:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohaenma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

Timtrent (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subido dos veces de la misma fuente, está repetido. Zumalabe (talk) 01:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate of File:La prisión del príncipe de Viana (Museo del Prado).jpg. --P 1 9 9   20:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by M.Bitton as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 1) The image is copyrighted Medi1TV. 2) Since it was first published in Morocco in 2020, it won't be in the public domain until 2090. 3) There is nothing to suggest that it's "Egyptian work" (as claimed by the uploader) or that is has anything to do with Egypt for that matter. M.Bitton (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC) King of ♥ 01:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per prp. We have no evidence the photo was or wasn't taken in Egypt in 1965 by an anonymous photographer, or given a free license. We do have evidence the YouTube source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlTDKU-EhqI is unfree.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, thanks for the help :-) MakhzenHuman (talk) 09:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: par above. --P 1 9 9   21:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrigthed by France Télévisions. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 01:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   21:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC Source: Flicker (2gVbMPv) Py4nf (talk) 02:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   21:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Salavat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted non-trivial logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 02:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I figured there was to much going on for it to be under the TOO. If it is decided to be under the TOO then it might need to be removed from Commons anyway as Spacetoon is based in the United Arab Emirates which Commons doesn't cover for TOO purposes. Salavat (talk) 03:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own poem of the uploader. Out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Regular contributors are allowed a few personal images. --Yann (talk) 08:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support This was done during a wikimedia event, which is why I shared it here. Nattes à chat (talk) 16:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would not mind anything located in Category:User page images or Category:Wikimedia events‎. But in Category:Poems in French I expect for the poems written by poets rather than by wikimedians. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use on userpage of active user. --P 1 9 9   21:11, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

historical images, unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:11, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After discussion is was a agreed that there is an error in the table. Since the file is not in use it's better to delete it La Nave Partirà (talk) 09:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And text tables should be in wiki-table format if needed anyway. --P 1 9 9   21:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing on the source page indicates this file is under a compatible licence of any kind. Mbrickn (talk) 10:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description, poor resolution; hardly of any educational use Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubt that it is personal work because of the legend bottom right: "Automatish schaltender …" Msbbb (talk) 16:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, clearly cropped from somewhere else. --P 1 9 9   21:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taitamtinh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of logos and official photos, definitely not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yêu cầu xóa

[edit]

Đề nghị Bot xem xét và xóa các hình ảnh như trên giúp tôi. Để tôi tải lại và dẫn nguồn lại. Thank!

Files uploaded by Taitamtinh

[edit]

Collection of logos and official photos, definitely not own work. Taitamtinh (talk) 04:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Taitamtinh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of official photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 07:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taitamtinh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the uploader of this file/image, and I would like to be deleted, thanks. Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 16:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   21:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hector Maldonado García (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Hutchison Ports 2016 logo.svg which was sourced from the company. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 17:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

špatně nahráno Lusylka83 (talk) 18:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   21:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image of an unnamed flower. Not educational Krok6kola (talk) 20:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected logo; cannot be on Commons Huji (talk) 03:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader work as no META. Pierre cb (talk) 05:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   02:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader work as no META. Pierre cb (talk) 05:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   02:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader work as no META. Pierre cb (talk) 05:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   02:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader work as no META. Pierre cb (talk) 05:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   02:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of copyright ownership / potential copyright violation: no exif data and looks like a downscaled derivative; uploader DaanWillem seems different from the subject Andrew Mathers (or Andre van Meurs); used as profile picture on the subject's various social media, e.g. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=484599796368385. HyperGaruda (talk) 07:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. DW judging by the border at the bottom. --P 1 9 9   02:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Produced in 1940s or 1950s probably, but since we don't know the creator, the location and the publication information, we can't comment if it's a PD or not. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   02:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We don't know the creation date, the creator ot the location. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical image, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   02:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grenn1000 as Copyvio (db-copyvio); nominator wrote in edit-summary: "My name is Sharam Kohan. This is a picture of me and published without my permission. I want this picture to be delete"
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no external hits found. However, courtesy-deletion possible. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   02:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://directory.education.tamu.edu/view/mpkj.engelen. An OTRS ticket is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certificate produced by the UK-based Soil Association. Copyright will rest with them and it will be above COM: TOO UK due to the background graphics. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use or need for such a certificate to be hosted here therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement https://firstpsy.com/1788/contacts/ 95.31.191.213 18:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Author nadia_buzhan per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   02:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a portrait of another general. This file has already been uploaded under the name File:Jacques Pierre Louis Marie Joseph Puthod.jpg. The portrait of the general Rottembourg can be seen here File:Henri Rottembourg.png

Это портрет другого генерала, который загружен на викисклад под названием File:Jacques Pierre Louis Marie Joseph Puthod.jpg. Портрет генерала Роттамбура можно увидеть тут: File:Henri Rottembourg.png Apr1 (talk) 18:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Created new redirect for incoming links. --P 1 9 9   02:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without proper description, this Excel table image is hardly useful Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing here suggests that the image is copyright free. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason for suggesting this image to deletion? This is portrait of Muhammed Jahan Pahlavan by painter Natig Jamal Afshar. This portrait made in 2006-2007 years. What is wrong? This file introduced by author of portrait. How we can solve this problem and delete your deletion request? Elnur Neciyev (talk) 15:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Permission needed from original artist, see COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   02:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, wrong categories, probably copyright violation. 87.154.170.101 22:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

هذه الصورة أنا من التقطها وأمتلك كامل حقوق النشر والتأليف
وبإمكانكم التحقق من ذلك حيث أنني أؤكد لكم بأنه من المستحيل أن تجدو لها نظيرا على الانترنت Doua.bouguerra (talk) 09:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Superseded by numerous better fire images already on Commons. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cited source appears to be incorrect. And if it's correct, how does Ahspooner have permission to upload it? Kenneth C. Zirkel (talk) 22:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cited source appears to be incorrect. And if it's correct, how does Ahspooner have permission to upload it? Kenneth C. Zirkel (talk) 22:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation? Who is the author?? 87.154.170.101 22:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected author

[edit]

Mieczysław Peterek is author of the photo, I took it from brochure of Zbigniew Bielewicz's old exhibition thanks to the painter's family. Also, I will credit him in the article, since there's polish article about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tabrus (talk • contribs) 04:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Permission needed from original artist, see COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   02:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation. 87.154.170.101 23:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, watermarked, picture previously used in multiple news articles: Google Images result Nutshinou Talk! 23:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: stated source and watermark is Fars News, {{Fars}} applies. --P 1 9 9   03:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, cropped to remove watermark, picture previously used in multiple news articles: Google Images result Nutshinou Talk! 23:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:3748384920201932u432.jpg. --P 1 9 9   03:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A substantial portion of this image of an impromptu gravesite shrine in Germany is the photo of the deceased and a loved one. I findit unlikely that the uploader was also the original photographer of the deceased, because they included no details in their upload about who the deceased was. The photo is not on permanent display, and it's debatable whether the graveyard counts as a 'public place',so COM:FOP Germany doesn't apply. DS (talk) 23:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am wondering if this file is an inappropriate depiction in Australian First Nation Women. All are presented bare breasted with no cultural context, no names and no appropriate referencing of source for the image? Eothan (talk) 23:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and in use. --P 1 9 9   03:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional photo, upload by someone who notoriously uploads unfree BWM press photos Polarlys (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unrelieable uploader. --P 1 9 9   03:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing evidence of permission for CC-BY-SA 4.0. Does this fall under the threshold of originality for the Netherlands (COM:TOO Netherlands)? mattbr 09:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Unsupported license claim; no alternative license offered -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

do not folowing the image 86 Juegos (talk) 16:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es este archivo un trabajo propio? No lo creo. 191.116.29.106 17:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not enough info, copyvio will be hard to prove as the image was uploaded in 2010. A09090091 (talk) 18:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Uploader says he took it in 1984 when Nancy Allen was walking in to a promotional appearance for the release of "Strange Invaders". Looks like it was taken about then and that she is walking into somewhere. I see no reason to be suspicious and say assume good faith. Lots of amateur photographers take pictures of celebrities walking into appearances. -- WikiPedant (talk) 04:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, no indication that this is not work by uploader found. Reverse image searches only find a couple of results clearly derivative of this upload (including attributing it to the Wikimedia uploader), none attributing to any other source, author, nor license, and none predating this Wikimedia upload. Commons has a fair number of contributors who have uploaded some of their own photos 25 years or more after they were taken; we might wish that this user was more active and on Commons now when someone questions their image 12 years after it was uploaded, but is not the case. Quoting WikiPedant, "I see no reason to be suspicious and say assume good faith." (This closure is of course not to prejudge any future renomination if any evidence whatsoever is found to question the copyright status/source of this image.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the user's own work. No metadata. Seems like a screenshot. Kadıköylü (talk) 17:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Belge doğru ve gerçeği yansıtmaktadır. Vesikalok fotoğraf. 91.93.102.146 15:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Out of scope. Kadı (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Re)Deleted Unused, uncat, no evidence of in-scope relevance seen -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Hazhk removed the license with the comment: The image is no longer present on the source website, but there's no proof that it was freely licensed. The copyright belongs to either the National Party or the NZ Government JuTa 02:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Hmm. There was no license review here, so we cannot prove that this image was actually taken from the web site, which is, indeed, licensed CC-BY. Under a strict reading of our rules, that calls for deletion of the image, but I an inclined to keep it and add a note to the file description explaining the reasoning. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the National Party does not publish content under a free license Schwede66 18:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per previous -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just came across this old, poorly taken dick pic I uploaded as a joke years ago, on an account created with an e-mail I don't even use anymore. I had completely forgotten about it, but it's low res, unprofesional, and not very useful. Any chance we take it down? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mengano21 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Image is in use in 2 projects, thus in scope; request from user who is not uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be copyrighted and is suitable for PD-trivial, but it is definitely not its own work. AleUst (talk) 19:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom, false license claim; TOO:Russia status for PD unclear to doubtful. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be copyrighted and is suitable for PD-trivial, but it is definitely not its own work. AleUst (talk) 19:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be copyrighted and is suitable for PD-trivial, but it is definitely not its own work. AleUst (talk) 19:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license claim, looks to be over strict TOO:Russia -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Melmann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NASA's photos are public domain unless noted otherwise. The source page for this photo, on Flickr, notes that the license is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0. Per Commons:Licensing NC and ND media is not allowed. BugWarp (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While the link states CC BY-NC-ND the file is in public domain per US law. All NASA images are upload to NASA Image and Video Library and there is no statement about NC-ND there.--BugWarp (talk) 21:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NASA pictures are fine, even when NASA employees chose a wrong licence on Flickr. Please don't delete any file of VA256 launch taken by Bill Ingalls or Chris Gunn on behalf of NASA (the two NASA photographs that were present). Most of these pictures (but not all of them) are also shared on NASA website or NASA Webb Flickr account where there is no restriction. It's clearly an error from people managing NASAHQ Flickr account. vip (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above comments -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Melmann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NASA's photos are public domain unless noted otherwise. The source page for this photo, on Flickr, notes that the license is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0. Per Commons:Licensing NC and ND media is not allowed. While the link states CC BY-NC-ND the file is in public domain per US law. All NASA images are upload to NASA Image and Video Library and there is no statement about NC-ND there BugWarp (talk) 21:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NASA pictures are fine, even when NASA employees chose a wrong licence on Flickr. Please don't delete any file of VA256 launch taken by Bill Ingalls or Chris Gunn on behalf of NASA (the two NASA photographs that were present). Most of these pictures (but not all of them) are also shared on NASA website or NASA Webb Flickr account where there is no restriction. It's clearly an error from people managing NASAHQ Flickr account. vip (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Melmann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NASA's photos are public domain unless noted otherwise. The source page for this photo, on Flickr, notes that the license is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0. Per Commons:Licensing NC and ND media is not allowed. While the link states CC BY-NC-ND the file is in public domain per US law. All NASA images are upload to NASA Image and Video Library and there is no statement about NC-ND there BugWarp (talk) 21:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NASA pictures are fine, even when NASA employees chose a wrong licence on Flickr. Please don't delete any file of VA256 launch taken by Bill Ingalls or Chris Gunn on behalf of NASA (the two NASA photographs that were present). Most of these pictures (but not all of them) are also shared on NASA website or NASA Webb Flickr account where there is no restriction. It's clearly an error from people managing NASAHQ Flickr account. vip (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above comments -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Melmann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NASA's photos are public domain unless noted otherwise. The source page for this photo, on Flickr, notes that the license is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0. Per Commons:Licensing NC and ND media is not allowed. While the link states CC BY-NC-ND the file is in public domain per US law. All NASA images are upload to NASA Image and Video Library and there is no statement about NC-ND there BugWarp (talk) 21:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NASA pictures are fine, even when NASA employees chose a wrong licence on Flickr. Please don't delete any file of VA256 launch taken by Bill Ingalls or Chris Gunn on behalf of NASA (the two NASA photographs that were present). Most of these pictures (but not all of them) are also shared on NASA website or NASA Webb Flickr account where there is no restriction. It's clearly an error from people managing NASAHQ Flickr account. vip (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Don-vip and Hunster -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Melmann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NASA's photos are public domain unless noted otherwise. The source page for this photo, on Flickr, notes that the license is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0. Per Commons:Licensing NC and ND media is not allowed. While the link states CC BY-NC-ND the file is in public domain per US law. All NASA images are upload to NASA Image and Video Library and there is no statement about NC-ND there BugWarp (talk) 21:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NASA pictures are fine, even when NASA employees chose a wrong licence on Flickr. Please don't delete any file of VA256 launch taken by Bill Ingalls or Chris Gunn on behalf of NASA (the two NASA photographs that were present). Most of these pictures (but not all of them) are also shared on NASA wensite or NASA Webb Flickr account where there is no restriction. It's clearly an error from people managing NASAHQ Flickr account. vip (talk) 23:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per comments & similar cases-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Melmann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NASA's photos are public domain unless noted otherwise. The source page for this photo, on Flickr, notes that the license is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0. Per Commons:Licensing NC and ND media is not allowed. While the link states CC BY-NC-ND the file is in public domain per US law. All NASA images are upload to NASA Image and Video Library and there is no statement about NC-ND there BugWarp (talk) 21:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NASA pictures are fine, even when NASA employees chose a wrong licence on Flickr. Please don't delete any file of VA256 launch taken by Bill Ingalls or Chris Gunn on behalf of NASA (the two NASA photographs that were present). Most of these pictures (but not all of them) are also shared on NASA website or NASA Webb Flickr account where there is no restriction. It's clearly an error from people managing NASAHQ Flickr account. vip (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above comments and similar cases -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos made not by uploader. Some derrivative works (artworks, posters, cards, Flickr screenshots).

Matlin (talk) 11:43, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry personal photographs with no apparent educational value. Out of COM:SCOPE.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comic apparently featuring DC Universe characters, as evidenced by file description; see w:Fawcett City for context. COM:DW at best.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works or out of scope (personal photos or spy-like photos).

Matlin (talk) 08:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forced to stay at school. (38451174161).jpg even appears to fall under COM:DW. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS, derrivate works, previously deleted etc.

Matlin (talk) 09:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, private photos uploaded by non-author, derrivative works, random pedestrians etc.

Matlin (talk) 11:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Drinking from the Flickr firehose gives us a lot of COM:FREE content, but I'm not seeing COM:SCOPE in these. If anyone wants to keep particular ones as having some value, I'd be fine what that. But I can't see anything here worth keeping. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I agree. Most are indeed out of scope and/or copyright violation (like File:Avatar (718206733).jpg and others on the last page). I would like to keep though:
--JopkeB (talk) 16:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all and shutdown this kind of lazy DRs in the future. Deletionists (as above) will say that if inclusionists want to keep any of these 1703 files (let me say this again: seventeen undred and three files!!) we should simply indicate which ones and why. That’s completely backwards. -- Tuválkin 15:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've always been against long bulk nominations for just that reason, and I'm about as inclusionist as it gets. But I eyeballed all of this batch and couldn't see anything here, just lots of holiday snaps (in just that pejorative sense). Plenty are notable tourist destinations where we do need content of them; but at the same time, that notability means that we already have that content, and we have a better version of it without the eponymous tourist standing in front.
So unusually for me, delete the lot. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Further deletion requests/2021/12/23

[edit]

Moved to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp/2021/12/23, following up on Krok6kola's Help Desk request. - Jmabel ! talk 18:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors), derrivative works, one sculpture from France (no fop), etc.

Matlin (talk) 22:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--JopkeB (talk) 03:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:2020 08 27 Wien 154236 397 (50376007971).jpg as text-only COM:OOS image. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 03:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Why is this photo out of scope? I cannot find a reason. --JopkeB (talk) 04:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JopkeB, Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰, This is a quotation. Are all quotations not educational? Why do we have such an elaborate category structure (see Category:Quotations) for them? I think they are educational, this one also. Even raw text can be educational; we also have books in Commons. So I disagree. --JopkeB (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I never said it wasn't educational, but this kind of educational material is specifically exempt from Commons' scope (per the policy cited above), since it is better stored on Wikiquote. The category seems to a large extent to consist of quotes with additional media rather than just raw text, and others can be deleted on a similar basis (OTHERSTUFF is an argument to avoid). Full books are generally considered to be of additional value, as they can be used to illustrate the original source (such as done on Wikisource, even though the raw text is hosted there in parallel), but this is already explained in the policy I linked. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But in Wikiquote you cannot store photos like this one, only add plain text. This is not plain text, this is a photo of a text, probably of a plaque somewhere in Vienna. I hope that this is an exception to the rule you are referring to. Otherwise you might as well delete all the files in Category:Quotations and then you could never add a photo of a plaque with a quotation in Wikipedia, Wikiquote or elsewhere, as an illustration. For this photo: There might in the future be a quote in Wikiquote with this text, then this photo might be an illustration. So I still want to keep this photo. --JopkeB (talk) 05:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me that this deletion request has not been well thought out:

  1. By no means all files are in Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp (for instance: File:"Yellow Snow Guy" (316953708).jpg, File:"Quien no cae, no se levanta." (10881132673).jpg and File:"Entrepreneur is just French for has ideas, does them." -- @alexisohanian (10726431215).jpg). This makes it very hard for others/us to judge those which are not there. It is not doable to check them one by one.
  2. There are too many files which may not be deleted already, only by a quick look by Infrogmation of New Orleans and me.

My request and proposal is: this deletion request will be withdrawn and Matlin makes a new one, now more carefully, with only files that indeed are out of scope or have a copyright issue AND are all in one category, gallery page or other overview. And please, make seperate deletion requests for copyright violation and out of scope. --JopkeB (talk) 04:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment This person (Matlin) has uploaded thousands of files. See Category:Uploads by Matlin. For a long time I categorized what I could. But there were so many near duplicates and junk files, I stopped. A good result of this "incident" is that Matlin has begun to categorize some of his own files. The category Category:Uploads by Matlin/temp was not created by Matlin, but by an editor seeking a way to deal with suggesting deletion of some file. I don't think there is another way to do a batch task. Krok6kola (talk) 17:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, please be more selective in future. --Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos uploaded non by author.

Matlin (talk) 20:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 01:55, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors), derrivative works, out of scope etc.

Matlin (talk) 16:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private photos, anonymous models, dogs etc.

Matlin (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. JopkeB (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly agree (though File:Windsor 035DSC 0299 (48975090193).jpg and File:Sassari 213DSC 0239 (49378461422).jpg should be deleted per COM:DR/COM:FOP Italy and COM:FOP UK).  Keep File:Tonight is totally a colacao night. (5270206848).jpg since the only other image of this beverage appears to be File:Colacao.jpg. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fitindia Did you intend to close these? Also, what is the reason you deleted the File:Tonight is totally a colacao night. (5270206848).jpg contrary to my reasoning above? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4 ✓ Done - FitIndia Talk 02:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --- FitIndia Talk 02:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derrivative works, interior of museums etc.

Matlin (talk) 15:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --- --- FitIndia Talk 06:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2.2 Out of scope

   2.2.1 Not educationally useful

Matlin (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fitindia More nominations you probably wanted to close. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 06:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --- --- FitIndia Talk 06:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derrivate work

Matlin (talk) 11:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --- --- FitIndia Talk 06:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derrivate works - one blurred photo.

Matlin (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marc Robert died in 1962. No freedom of panorama in France. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:7827:55A6:2786:B96A 20:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cette statue concerne Eugène VIALA et non Marc ROBERT. 176.142.154.4 20:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2033. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; contemporary artworks (p. 1973); no freedom of panorama (see https://katharinen-kirche.ekhn.de/fileadmin/content/gemeinden/oppenheim/Kirchenfuehrungen/diekatharinenkircheinoppenheimmitbildern.pdf)

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Formalrechtlich ist der Löschantrag sauber begründet. Es ist nun mal so, dass man als User nicht so einfach herausfindet, wann die Glasfenster entstanden sind. Durch Zufall stieß ich auf die Seite der Forschungsstelle Glasmalerei des 20.Jahrhunderts. Denen ist es wohl erlaubt, Fotos von urheberrechtlich geschützten Werken zu veröffentlichen. Ich habe diese Seite getestet. Dabei ist herausgekommen, dass sie reichlich Gelegenheit bietet, Größenordnungen von Fotos aus der Wikipedia auf Niewiedersehen verschwinden zu lassen. --Dguendel 12:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Apparently the windows are by de:Heinz Hindorf (died 1990), de:Gustel Stein (died 2010) and Hermann Geyer (died 2016). Since I don't know who did which window, I'll put the files up for restoration in 2087. --Rosenzweig τ 21:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist of stained glass windows died in 1990; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think that in 2 & 8 the windows are covered by de minimis? 17:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
No, the interpretation of DM ist quite strict, in Germany indeed. --Martin Sg. (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Looking at the criteria at COM:DM Germany (postulated by the Federal Court of Justice in a 2014 decision), I can't assume de minimis for the two files mentioned either. Very unfortunate, that court is very restrictive in copyright matters. The windows are by Heinz Hindorf (died 1990); the files can be restored in 2061. --Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't identify the background map provider, but I doubt the uploader actually created the satellite image and the streets/cities/labels themselves (as implied with "own work"). Thus, there is no license provided for the background map, although the displayed data from the heat map may be free.

The data source "https://www.vesselfinder.com/" uses GoogleMaps as their standard background, which might be the case here, but again I'm not sure. Enyavar (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: doi:10.1002/0470862106.ia023. Is this arrangement of the table creative enough to meet COM:TOO? King of ♥ 01:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak keep The list's order doesn't have any creative input as it is ordered lexicographically, and no additional information, other than the note at the bottom, has been provided that is creative. Even then, the key is just… a key, and likely isn't creative enough for copyright. However, maybe the grouping is copyrightable — Berrely • TC 11:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Table is not copyrightable, however the left column was probably cut off. A09090091 (talk) 18:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader asserted {{Own work}}, which it's clearly not originally so. If this it worth keeping, it's worth being more honest about its source. DMacks (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry it has been a few mounts. How do I add the source and change it from own work Thepuglover (talk) 07:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per user:Leyo and User:Wostr. --P 1 9 9   02:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toverslak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images attributed to Beurtvaartadres but missing permission. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 09:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept 2 as per above. --P 1 9 9   02:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Kept those with OTRS, deleted the balance. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a restored version and this one is not in use. Nanahuatl (talk) 03:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep By definition the "restored" version is different from the earlier version. There is no reason to delete two different versions of the same image and retention here actually has the benefit of illustrating the extent of the restoration. If the original is deleted, viewers will have to guess at what changes were made to the original. From Hill To Shore (talk) 13:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per From Hill To Shore. --Rosenzweig τ 20:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo likely above COM:TOO. I cannot confirm the logo is released under CC-BY-SA 4.0 licence. It's unlikely Nintendo would license under CC licences. Stylez995 (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 10:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not pd-textlogo, permission required Krd 09:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same case as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carsae FC.png: "Timor Leste does not recognise the Berne convention and therefore images can be freely used outside the country." --JPF (talk) 09:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
…which doesn't make the image pd-textlogo. Krd 10:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. This is not a PD image in Timor Leste, and cannot be maintained on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 10:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the entire template is confusing - if something is above TOO then it should be nominated for deletion. Maybe this template should be rephrased to make clear that work in on edge of TOO and it is likely that while it was kept on Commons the court decision may be different? Or change "The depicted work is believed to be protected by copyright." to "The depicted work is may or may not be protected by copyright." or something? See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:TOO Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Removed the template from some 40 files. --Ellywa (talk) 10:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The threshold of originality is very low for UK works, see COM:TOO UK. The logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK) due to the multiple lines used to create the 'H' shaped logo. For public domain works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. I consider Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle applies here. No usage on Wikimedia projects, see w:en:File:Hull CoC black and white.jpeg under 'fair use'. mattbr 11:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for the illuminated Eiffel Tower in France (a discussion in a similar case see here) Llez (talk) 11:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 10:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader’s own work, see https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1399/10/14/2425267/%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85-%D9%84%D8%A7%DA%A9-%D9%BE%D8%B4%D8%AA-%D9%88-%D8%AD%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%A2%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%B4%D8%AF Ytoyoda (talk) 14:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Iranian news agencies: {{Fars}}, {{Tasnim}}, {{Mehr}}, and other Iranian news agency photos are only reliable <with free licences> when they have the watermark of the agency and the name of the photographer on the photo itself. --Ellywa (talk) 21:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Church of the Transfiguration of Christ at Slătioara Old Calendarist monastery do not comply to WCommons's guidelines as there is no FOP in Romania

[edit]

There is no FOP in Romania, and w:ro:Mănăstirea Slătioara states this monastery was re-build in 1978 after being razed. See also the discussion here concerning the paintings of Glicherie Tănase as a saint.

Veverve (talk) 16:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:12, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file, a German aerial photograph said to be from before 1939, was uploaded using the {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} license tag, a rather special license tag that does NOT apply to the image, because it was NOT "published by a legal entity under public law". Accd. to German law, "Legal entities under public law" , emphasis on under public law (de:Juristische Person des öffentlichen Rechts), are basically cities, counties/districts, the German states, the German nation state itself, some churches and some other public bodies. Also, to use this tag, the legal entity under public law in question must be named as a "Herausgeber" in/on the work, and at the same time no personal author must be named. There is an entity named ("Junkers Luftbild"), but that is a commercial company and not one of the legal entities under public law. So it is clear the tag cannot apply.

{{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} (and similar tags), often used by uploaders as a sort of catch-all for older works, definitely do not apply because an author is named. But even if no author were named, these tags are not applicable to German works before 1995, since German law says that pre-1995 anonymous works are only really anonymous if the author was never publicly disclosed anywhere, not even in a lecture or similar. One cannot prove that, so pre-1995 "anonymous" works from Germany are not suitable for Commons (or de.wp).

A pre-1939 photograph is also not old enough to assume that the photo must be in the PD anyway, since the author easily could have lived beyond 1950. There is {{PD-old-assumed}}, but the photo would have to be at least 120 years old for that.

tl;dr: There is not enough information for us to be able to keep this file. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless conclusively shown to actually be in the public domain or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 17:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. As the photographer is unknown it is not clear if the image is in public domain. It is also not known if and when the image was first published. Therefore the photo must be deleted. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template the photo can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was made, which will be not later than 1939+121=2060.. --Ellywa (talk) 22:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dispe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These two files, showing a German wrestler from ca. the 1930s, were uploaded using two license tags. One, {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}, is a rather special license tag for works "published by a legal entity under public law". Accd. to German law, "legal entities under public law" , emphasis on under public law (de:Juristische Person des öffentlichen Rechts), are basically cities, counties/districts, the German states, the German nation state itself, some churches and some other public bodies. Also, to use this tag, the legal entity under public law in question must be named as a "Herausgeber" in/on the work, and at the same time no personal author must be named. None of this is shown to apply here, so we have to assume that it does not apply and the tag is not applicable for these files.

The second license tag, {{PD-anon-70-EU}}, is a tag that is (like similar tags such as {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}) often used by uploaders as a sort of catch-all for older works. But these tags aren't applicable to German works before 1995, since German law says that pre-1995 anonymous works are only really anonymous if the author was never publicly disclosed anywhere, not even in a lecture or similar. One cannot prove that, so pre-1995 "anonymous" works from Germany are not suitable for Commons (or de.wp).

The photographs are also not old enough to assume that the photos must be in the PD anyway, since the author could have lived beyond 1950. There is {{PD-old-assumed}}, but the photos would have to be at least 120 years old for that.

tl;dr: There is not enough information for us to be able to keep these files. They should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless conclusively shown to actually be in the public domain or under a free license.

Rosenzweig τ 17:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment PRP's ratio is to ensure that someone clearly identifiable and reasonably alive (or dead less than 70 years ago) has not their rights infringed. We may assume in good faith that this photograph is PD. If it were one decade older I might have doubts but is next to zero the possibility that someone can claim rights over this photograph. -- Blackcat 22:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Per the precautionary principle, arguments that amount to "we can get away with it", such as "next to zero the possibility that someone can claim rights over this photograph", are against Commons' aims. --Rosenzweig τ 23:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: , Commons' aim is to recognize the authors their right where unquestionably identifiable. The photograph said clearly "Unknown author" and also the archive where it comes from (Reinhardt Wolf). So unless you know more about the paternity of that photo, that photo is anonymous. -- Blackcat 18:41, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I explained in detail above why that is not applicable to German works before mid-1995. And no, "to recognize the authors their right where unquestionably identifiable" is not the aim of Commons. That is "to provide a media file repository: * that makes available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content to all, and * that acts as a common repository for the various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation. (Commons:Project scope) Which is further explained in Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle: "Commons' users aim to build and maintain in good faith a repository of media files which to the best of our knowledge are free or freely-licensed. The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." --Rosenzweig τ 19:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And I do not see that significant doubt, both for the age of the photo and for the fact that a famous photographer claims it "unknown" in his own archive. -- Blackcat 00:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Who? Which archive? Where does who claim it to be unknown? And why should it have any importance? --Rosenzweig τ 00:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On the olympedia.it website it is written that the author of the photograph is unknown. The photo is taken from the Wolf Reinhardt archive. More than 70 years have passed: therefore the PD-anon-70-EU rules apply.--Avversario (talk) 01:50, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again: PD-anon-70-EU and similar tags do not apply to German works created before mid-1995. The link you gave is to some "d2a3o6pzho379u.cloudfront.net" site, not to olympedia.it. But even if it were: Why would it be legally relevant if these people (whoever they are) do not know the author? That does not make him anonymous in a legal sense. Where does the photo (both of them actually) originate from? When and where was the first publication, was it published elsewhere later? Was any author credited then? These are the questions you need to satisfactorily answer to determine if any work is actually anonymous (and even then, it wouldn't apply to German works before mid-1995, as explained mutiple times). And what is the "Wolf Reinhardt Archive", who is Wolf Reinhardt? Why would it be of any importance what this guy or what this archive says? There are so many unanswered questions here, we have barely any information about these two photos. Definitely not enough to determine their copyright status, which means deletion per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 13:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The link ( http://d2a3o6pzho379u.cloudfront.net/58344.jpg ) comes from the Olympedia web site. From the page Wolfgang Ehrl (clik photo). Wolf Reinhardt is a German photographer/journalist, author of this books.--Avversario (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Aha. So apparently it is this guy, born in 1959, described by the German Integrated Authority File as an information scientist and economist who is also interested in the history of the Olympic Games, and he wrote several books about the Olympic Games in the 1920s and 1930s, making him a writer as well. I don't see anything there about him being a journalist or photographer.
So I guess he's been gathering photographs of the athletes competing in the games he's writing about, and apparently enough photos to call them an "archive", this "Wolf Reinhardt Archive". But again, I don't see why the fact that he or the Olympedia people do not know the author of a photograph would be of any relevance. That does not make that photograph anonymous in a legal sense, as explained in more detail above. --Rosenzweig τ 15:57, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. As the photographer is unknown it is not clear if the image is in public domain. It is also not known if and when the image was first published. Therefore the photo must be deleted. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template the photo can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was made, which will be not later than 1930+121=2051.. --Ellywa (talk) 22:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot of computer software, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aids_computer_virus.png#Licensing Nutshinou Talk! 18:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Available on en:WP as fair use (which is not allowed on Commons). --Ellywa (talk) 22:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это карта не верно составлено. Никогда самурские общества не входили ни в какие ханство, а тут самурские общества тоже включили в состав Кюринского ханство. Добавьте точную карту Кюринского ханство. 2A00:1370:811D:32FE:1482:3AF4:8C43:8AC4 19:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Если вы считаете, что карта неточна с исторической точки зрения, то это не повод удалять изображение, находящееся в общественном достоянии. Да и основанием для включения в Википедию информации является не её «истинность», а проверяемость[1]. См. также: [2] --Interfase (talk) 20:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 22:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be copyrighted and is suitable for PD-trivial, but it is definitely not its own work. AleUst (talk) 19:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please change the licencing as you suggest. --Ellywa (talk) 22:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be above COM:TOO Japan, the sun with a smiley inside isn't really text. Jonteemil (talk) 20:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This TimedText file should be in Latin as its title says, but it's still in English since three month from its creation. Pacha Tchernof (talk) 22:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. I will make sure this is done i9n the next weeks.Please don't delete until I have had chance to hurry this on. --JimKillock (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JimKillock, you're welcome! I've found five more similar "Latin" TimedText pages with English subtitles in them that could be nominated to deletion. It won't be done because of your willing to tackle the translations. Please choose the deadline date for these translations yourself — when they will be nominated for deletion if they won't be translated — and let us know.
2) TimedText:Taj_Mahal_-_Mausoleum_der_Liebe_(CC_BY-SA_4.0).webm.la.srt
3) TimedText:Petra,_Hauptstadt_der_Nabatäer_(CC_BY-SA_4.0).webm.la.srt
4) TimedText:Newtons_Idee_der_Schwerkraft.webm.la.srt
5) TimedText:Mekka,_Geburtsort_des_Islam_(CC_BY-SA_4.0).webm.la.srt
6) TimedText:Die_Aachener_Kaiserpfalz_(CC_BY-SA_4.0).webm.la.srt
Please have a wonderful holydays! All the best, Pacha Tchernof (talk) 19:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there @Pacha Tchernof: my colleague is starting work on these hopefully this week. I imagine these will be done at the rate of 1-2 a month, so will take approx three to six months to clear, a bit faster if I find other volunteers. --JimKillock (talk) 08:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JimKillock, thans for the update. It's good to know that you continue managing these subs. When I nominated this one for deletion I didn't know about amount of the work you've done and you do. So I wish to find more volunteers to your Latin project(s)! — Pacha Tchernof (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Slow work I'm afraid, slower than I expected, but the first of these is being check and will shortly be added (Petra) --JimKillock (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, let us be patient. --Ellywa (talk) 22:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also affected: File:Brigitte Helm Binder.jpg --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This file, a portrait photograph of German actress Brigitte Helm, was uploaded (transferred from de.wp) as a work of the photographer Alexander Binder (who died in 1929). But it's most likely not. Yes, his signature is in the image, but the people continuing his photo studio also continued to use that signature as a kind of trademark. So it's not a guarantee that Binder is actually the photographer.

Looking further, I found out that the image uploaded here is actually cropped. You can see the full image at [3]. It's one of the postcards published by the German company Ross-Verlag in the 1920s to 1940s. The number 564 gives you a clue, after a search you will find that it is one of the "Luxus" series cards, and that it was published in the summer of 1931. A similar image (same hairstyle and accessories, also with the "Binder" signature, likely from the same photo session, uploaded here as File:Brigitte Helm Binder.jpg) was published by Ross-Verlag as number 5871/2 of their regular postcard series. Accd. to [4], that one was published at some point in 1930 or 1931. I think 1931 is more likely because the number is close to 6000, and the numbers from 5000 to 6000 are said to be from 1930/1931, while 6000 to 7000 are from 1931/1932.

If you look in the lower right corner of the uncut postcard, you'll see that it is marked with "Atelier Binder, Berlin". Accd. to de.wp, "Atelier Binder GmbH" is the name Binder's successors gave to the studio after Binder's death, while Binder himself is said to have used the designations "Alex Binder Photogr. Atelier" or "Alex Binder, Berlin" or "Phot. A. Binder, Berlin".

So we have an image that was published in 1931, two years after Binder's death, along with a similar one probably from the same photo session published about the same time. I guess that there is the possibility that those were older photographs and it was still Binder himself who shot them before he died in February 1929. But I don't think that is very likely. Brigitte Helm was one of the bigger stars back then, and [5] shows that Ross-Verlag published 168 postcards featuring her. So my interpretation is that they constantly needed new, fresh images showing her and would rather not publish older images of her.

The conclusion is that the photo in question was most likely not taken by Binder himself before he died in February 1929, but rather by one of the photographers working in his studio after his death. Who that might be is unclear. de.wp speculates it could have been Hubs Flöter (who died in 1976). But whoever it was, I do have significant doubts that it was actually Binder, and therefore the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

tl;dr: There is significant doubt that Alexander Binder is actually the photographer of this image. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless conclusively shown to be actually by Binder or otherwise in the public domain or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 23:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anny Ondra Binder.jpg for a very similar case. --Rosenzweig τ 13:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good research, I suppose. Being the uploader in good faith, I am afraid Delete. BasileusAutokratorPL (talk) 10:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a copyright violation: author unknown. (See also other images uploaded by the same person.) Erik Wannee (talk) 13:51, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This photo is cropped from File:DeEersteVijf.jpg, so to be considered as well in this DR. Ellywa (talk) 21:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The question is/was more how sure we are wether the author is unknown. I think it would be good if the uploader contacts VRTS to verify certain things and if successfull, to restore the deleted file (link). Encycloon (talk) 13:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader responded here. --Encycloon (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The image is licensed as cc-zero, but there is no evidence that the unknown author made such release. The image perhaps could be pd-something if a validf explanation is found (which I don't see so far), but in no case cc-zero and unknown author. --Krd 09:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from talk page of uploader:

I have explained this a thousand times and I am getting fed up. So one last time, Verzetsmuseum Leeuwarden has a collection of pictures which was taken in 1945 for a specific book and of which the photographer is unknown. I used them in my book in 2019 and these pictures have been used a thousand times. We are free to use them, but people here don't seem to understand. If this picture is taken away again, I will stop my work on Wikipedia. Hurkonides (talk) 14:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hurkonides, sorry to disturb again about the photo. You wrote this picture was made in 1945 for a specific book. Can you show in which book this photo was published shortly after WWII? Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 21:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no response from uploader regrettably. --Ellywa (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]