Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/08/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 21st, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Adam Maher Ramzy (talk) 06:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Łamanie praw autorskich (copyright violation) 188.146.103.183 14:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 00:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has no use, educational value. Uploaded by LTA, see also en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub/Archive আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy per useless LTA content. --DMacks (talk) 22:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Female genitalia 216.134.252.176 19:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedily: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of 6 images, one of which was deleted per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vulva_5b.png. Free licensend image must be substituted or collage is not free. Image in fairly wide use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've come from a notice at en-wiki and know little about how Commons works. However, I'd hate to have to debate over a new image at en-wiki. It's a bit odd to delete a whole image file because one of the components has to be removed, isn't it? Isn't there a way to find someone here who can remove or replace that part? -Crossroads- (talk) 04:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Commons! Commons is for free licensed media only. A collage that contains a copyright violation cannot be free licensed. As to replacing the copyright problem portion, that was what I suggested, and Matinee71 seems to have already taken care of it. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I changed that part. Matinee71 (talk) 12:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New version edited by Manitee71 Kept, previous versions derivative of deleted image deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was previously uploaded and deleted per COM:TOYS. Oh and it is an exact mirror of an Instagram post by journeygirlkelsey, whom I doubt that they released their photos under a free licence. Blakegripling ph (talk) 01:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 02:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 14:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lomeno 24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos of a non active contributor - OoS

Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lomeno 24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion of another famous youtuber, out of project scope.

Achim (talk) 15:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55, I would like to keep my images, I am not self-promoting the images, I want to use them for an image gallery, we can come to an agreement. User:Lomeno 24 Lomeno 24 User talk:Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 23:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Basophilia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS: Unremarkable.

Mys_721tx (talk) 23:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:17, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User is not creator of work 24.147.21.249 02:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the particular scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. The user seems political party promoter since he upload particular political personal's image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the particular scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. The user seems political party promoter since he upload particular political personal's image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the particular scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. The user seems political party promoter since he upload particular political personal's image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the particular scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. The user seems political party promoter since he upload particular political personal's image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the particular scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. The user seems political party promoter since he upload particular political personal's image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the particular scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. The user seems political party promoter since he upload particular political personal's image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:08, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the particular scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. The user seems political party promoter since he upload particular political personal's image. ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:08, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete +1 Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused penis picture, also the description said the boy is only 15 years old, which indicates child pornography 137.189.220.15 08:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Very poor quality. --Achim (talk) 08:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope file —MdsShakil (talk) 08:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 08:19, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 08:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 08:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Xavier Zevaco died in 2006, so his work is definitely not in the public domain. No indication why this image can be uploaded here. Husky (talk to me) 09:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT needed from current copyright owner. --Strakhov (talk) 15:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 10:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely own work & low quality picture. --Strakhov (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyviol (photo by © Francois Roelants / Canal+ , cf. metadata) — danyele 15:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio -- Nutshinou Talk! 16:23, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, probably self advertisment aswell Nutshinou Talk! 16:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE and self advertisment Nutshinou Talk! 16:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Nutshinou Talk! 16:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is propably copied from here and it is unlikely own work. Puppe100 (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 15:59, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exif: fotografer „GASSAMA“ Polarlys (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

certainly not own work Polarlys (talk) 18:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 16:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 19:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope personal art. --Strakhov (talk) 16:05, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a copyright mark, copyvio, possible Flickr laundring. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. A copyright mark on a cc-by licensed photo is entirely correct: a cc-by licensed photo is copyrighted. This is a reason to tag with {{Watermark}}, but if there are no other indications that there is something wrong with this file's license than that its author on an external website added a copyright notice to it, there is no reason to delete. Tokfo (talk) 07:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tokfo. --Strakhov (talk) 16:08, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope (COM:SELFIE) —MdsShakil (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have tons of images for the Bosphorus. It has pretty low resolution and can't be used at all. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by America4094 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploads are all claimed to be own work, but that claim looks to be dubious. Many of the uploads have been deleted as copyright violations. I am not the only editor thinking the claim of being the copyright holder is suspicious. User:PjotrMahh1 asked about the origins of some photos. User:Habitator terrae also asked about the provenance of the photos. No reply was ever made by the uploader. A misplaced message on the upoloader's user page accuses the uploader of claimming art work by Scott McBee as their own.

That accusation would appear to apply to File:S.S. America.jpg. Scott McBee's web iste has that same image as a sample of his work in the scroll of ocean liner images. Scott even confronted America4094 here [1]

File:Alferdoss Large.jpg uploaded in 2017 is a photo-edited version of an image posted on a web forum in 2012.

File:American Star 3.jpg uploaded in 2017 is cropped version of this image from 2011.

File:S.S. America in 1978.jpg has obviously been scanned from a magazine.

Whpq (talk) 12:57, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion Divided I propose keeping only

Those images seem like the best to use in the article and there isn't a lot of free images of her here. The rest of the images can be deleted. As for America4094, he hasn't been active here since 2017 based on his contributions, so I suggest blocking him in case he tries to retaliate or something like that. Angelgreat (talk) 22:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Angelgreat: What makes you think any of those images are actually the author's own work? -- Whpq (talk) 12:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Whpq: I'm not, I'm just saying keep some of then as they're being used in the Wikipedia article. You already deleted the Olympic and Aquitania scrapping images on Wikipedia, but this is way more big. Unless there's more public domain equivalent images of the America here, some of the images needs to be kept for now. Angelgreat (talk) 13:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of Commons. See you talk page. -- Whpq (talk) 18:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This has been a stalemate for a while. Just delete them.Angelgreat (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Although my intention is not to get into the discussion, it's true that it seems good to me that the images are deleted, since it is clear that they do not seem to be own works of the original uploader.

However, as for this image's case, I've added web links where the photograph also appears, to replace the "own work" template. Also, since the photograph was taken in Italy, I've replaced the uploader's license (which attributed him/her the authorship of the image) with the license-templates "PD-Italy" and "Not-PD-US-URAA" (the latter due to the fact that, in 1996 -the date of the restoration of copyright in the United States by the URAA- the image wasn't in the public domain in Italy yet because, in that moment, there hadn't passed 20 years from it's creation yet).

Obviously, I'm of the opinion to keep this image for erasure as well until otherwise determined. I hope to be of help and regards. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.151.31.9 (talk) 15:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually in favor of keeping some of the images if we keep trying to find the true sources. And id the licenses are ok, they'll stay. Otherwise, they can go. Angelgreat (talk) 16:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so I dug a bit more and I was able to find some of the original sources and some info.

It's quite clear that America4094 had edited the photos in a attempt to hid their origins. At this point, some of his edits were not enough to be reverse-search, but others like the ones he took with a camere in front of a crt are too poor quality. I think File:America-29.jpg, File:America-27.jpg and File:Italis-2.jpg should be deleted. Angelgreat (talk) 16:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out File:SS-America-0-Large.jpg and File:SS America.jpg are edited versions of [5] and File:America-53.jpg is a colorized version of [6]]

Angelgreat (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 10:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de nom (catégorie) Romainbehar (talk) 06:55, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M. Moaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope file

MdsShakil (talk) 08:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 12:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who's not a Wikipedian, just trying to promote himself. Osama Eid (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Black and white Shepherd Neame pub signs

[edit]

These are derivative works of non-free pub signs. Freedom of panorama in the UK doesn't apply to graphic works like engravings. Since each sign is the main subject of its photograph, de minimis doesn't apply. They're all in the same style and look quite new, so I doubt any of them is old enough to be out of copyright. Given the hatching, I think even those that are derived from existing pictures will surpass the threshold of originality in their own right. --bjh21 (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. The signs all seem to be inspired by much older images but are all quite recent. Multichill (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nitsego (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyright status.

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nitsego (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyright status.

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS Mys_721tx (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 01:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate; better version exists: File:House on Haunted Hill.jpg 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • KEEP. This file has more vivid colors and in not cropped and appears to be a photograph of an original artwork. The other supposedly "better" version has the bottom text cropped out and is therefore not a complete copy of the original artwork. The difference in colors indicate that the this "better" version may have been previously edited for color, tint or other attributes. This other version is not a duplicate, so it should be kept. --Ooligan (talk) 21:37, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edited to remove blatant false claims of authorship, false license, false date, etc; fixed to factual information. Kept, nothing wrong with having similar but different versions of in-scope PD works. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:08, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This logo may also fall above COM:TOO. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 11:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Sultan Zain (talk) 14:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Sultan Zain (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably taken from web. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asicevnejc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files have been uploaded as Aida's Photogaphy work without any evidence for free license. Also these are personal pictures outside the scope of the project

MdsShakil (talk) 08:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, was just useful for some experiments. See also User_talk:Ssire F (talk) 09:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake অদৃশ্য মানব (talk) 10:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by a living artist, OTRS prmission needed. MKFI (talk) 12:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: watermarked image, uploader is apparently the subject, photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 12:19, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I revoke the current license on Wikimedia Commons and I no longer allow for the use of the image on any Wikimedia website or project. Asher Heimermann (talk) 18:43, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I revoke the current license on Wikimedia Commons and I no longer allow for the use of the image on any Wikimedia website or project. Asher Heimermann (talk) 18:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I revoke the current license on Wikimedia Commons and I no longer allow for the use of the image on any Wikimedia website or project. Asher Heimermann (talk) 18:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test media, unused, no context given. Fl.schmitt (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, fair image ~AntanO4task (talk) 19:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; advertising and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error GNKdiego13 (talk) 20:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Own Work. Taken from internet. Check the metadata Librero2109 (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web, such as this and this one. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS Mys_721tx (talk) 23:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Mys_721tx (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work of US Gov. 1992 publication by Californian academic organization or entity.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1997 publication of South African origin. I fail to see how this is free from copyright restrictions

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the file descriptions are confusing, but I can confirm the files are indeed 1997, but given that they are erroneously labelled as 19th century I can see somebody would think they're out of copyright. The Internet Archive license for these files is actually CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0, which means that they cannot be uploaded to commons anyway. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC license of YouTube video does not apply to self recording by Steven Donziger that was included in KolectiVOZ Digital broadcast. William Graham (talk) 21:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question Could you point me to guidelines or information that show this excludes the images from the CC licence? Not disputing this is true just new to this and would like to understand. The video is made up of two self recordings meaning that only the banners in the video would be covered by CC license if true. Vladimir.copic (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unless someone can provide some evidence as to how this screenshot is not covered by the CC license. The content of the video is an interview conducted via videocall. This is no more a "self-recording" than an audio interview conducted over the phone is a self-recording. Happy to take advice on this. Vladimir.copic (talk) 23:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per meta:Wikilegal/Copyright in Zoom Images. In the case of a live video feed, copyright belongs solely to the party who fixes the content in tangible form. -- King of ♥ 06:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I missed the Creative Commons tag in the description the first time I saw this video but it's definitely there. The most reasonable interpretation of this is that all parties who contributed to making the video, including Donziger, had no objections. Connor Behan (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused image of non notable person Headlock0225 (talk) 22:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{vk} I withdraw my nomination as the file is now in use --Headlock0225 (talk) 09:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 13:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. ~AntanO4task (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. ~AntanO4task (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. ~AntanO4task (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo,fair image ~AntanO4task (talk) 19:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personality rights XenonX3 (talk) 19:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Senegal: non-free (2010) monument.

Eleassar (t/p) 09:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all de minimis, considering that the title of the image is "monument from afar" and that the caption says "A view of the African Renaissance Monument from Ouakam. Wish the shot came out clearer. Next time." --Eleassar (t/p) 11:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I find FOP highly counter-intuitive. Some countries, like France, have troubling, idiosyncratic FOP rules. I am cutting and pasting the short Senegal section:
There is no freedom of panorama in Senegal. In fact the Senegal's law is very similar to the french law. The Loi 2008-09 du 25 janvier 2008 sur le droit d’auteur et les droits voisins au Senegal, (article 46) (Archive) says that it not possible to reproduce an artwork if it's the main subject of the photo or it is for commercial purpose (source: Bureau Sénégalais du Droit d'Auteur).
« L’auteur ne peut interdire la reproduction ou la communication d'une oeuvre graphique ou plastique située en permanence dans un endroit ouvert au public, sauf si l'image de l’oeuvre est le sujet principal d'une telle reproduction, radiodiffusion ou communication et si elle est utilisée à des fins commerciales. » (Official link) (Archive)
The question still on: does it apply to things before 2008?
Heck! COM:FOP#Senegal says "Senegal's law is very similar to the french law."
File:African Renaissance Monument (5538226284).jpg only shows the monument, but File:A Maersk truck driving in front of the African Renaissance Monument in Dakar, Senegal.jpg showed a truck in front of the monument -- the truck is larger than the monument. What if File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg had been named File:New construction in Senegal, with the African Renaissance Monument in the background -a.jpg? I suggest that when we know there are images that comply with COM:FOP#Senegal, because the monument is just one element in a wider picture we should not be considering removing this category, because those compliant images belong in it. Further, I suggest our nominator could have saved the rest of us a lot of time. I suggest our nominator shouldn't have nominated the category, and everything in it -- since they recognized some of the images were FOP compliant. Rather I think they should have made a mass nomination of images that did not include those images they were sure were FOP compliant. Geo Swan (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Eleassar,

I regret to state that I understand too well what the fuss is about!

So the French law, or the Senegalese law, or the Yankee laws say that... but please realize that in the whole world laws are so numerous and so complex that, at any time, anyone can be reproached something!! I believe you may be staying in Slovenia. Did you country and society did not suffer enough of censorship during the communist rule? Would you really prefer to see it now replaced by United States dictatorship and thought control??

Judging at the continuous vanishing of images, the trend appears to move towards a Wikipedia with no picture at all! But make no mistake, when the images and pictures will be all gone, then the attack will be against the text, any form of free thinking text...

Now, to answer your remarks squarely: the "Projet de monument Renaissance" is mostly a photograph of a public poster describing the project while the monument itself is only shown by its basement and occupies only the top of the picture.

The "Renaissance africaine" is not really a picture of a work of art, but of workings, as a North-Korean company was then building this stalinian style and controversial monument. I also believe the picture marvelously describes the political situation then prevalent in Senegal: the family chief has no head while his partner and their child have theirs in full...

Finally I add what cannot be shown by the picture: that the whole group is not looking towards the North (former colonial powers) nor to the East (holy cities) but to the North-West: the all invading, overbearing and bankrupt United States...

Regards,

B.J. Noël

Ad Geo Swan: thanks for having provided the excerpt of the relevant article from the copyright act.
Ad B.J. Noël: Thanks for your opinion, but the purpose of this page is not a political discussion about the scope of Commons and Wikipedia (you can try opening it elsewhere), but whether the nominated images are free or not.
In File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg the intention might have been to take a photo of the monument, but the result is a photo of the city with the monument - probably a camera in a kite is difficult to point accurately. I don't see this image different from photos of the Louvre with its de minimis copyrighted pyramid.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:DM, the intent is of the key importance in deciding whether a work is de minimis or not: "If the poster forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the poster was 'just in the background'. If the existence of the poster was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area." The prime difference between this image and the Louvre image is that whereas the Louvre image was taken primarily to depict the square and not the pyramid, this one has been taken to depict the monument. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean that if file name and description were "Buildings in Dakar" it would be OK to keep under de minimis? We can reupload it.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've been discussing the image as it stands at Flickr, where it originates from. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If you cropped out the truck in the first image, you would have a better photograph. If you cropped out the monument, you would have a picutre of a Maersk container at an angle -- not very useful. THe same argument can applied to the two or three images that include significant parts of the city -- the monument is still the center of interest. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This statue was designed by architect Pierre Goudiaby and completed in 2010. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Senegal has no Commons-acceptable FoP. Accordingly, reproductions of Senegalese architecture and sculptures by means of images are only permitted on noncommercial basis, conflicting with Commons:Licensing which states that all files must be freely usable by anyone in the world.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This monument has been designed by the Senegalese Pierre Goudiaby Atepa (b. 1947) who is still alive. As there is no Freedom of Panorama in Senegal, the pictures depicting this building have to be removed from Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Senegal, and these commercially-licensed images that show the 3D artwork as main subject violate the copyright of the artwork's living artist, sculptor w:fr:Pierre Goudiaby Atepa (1947–). Needs COM:VRTS permission for commercial Creative Commons license from the sculptor himself.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The part of the French/Senegalese law says "It is prohibited EXCEPT when the image is the center of the subject". Which it is. Key word: 'sauf". You folks are 180, i.e. not 100. Get a French speaker when in doubt. But doubt is the last thing I notice on this platform monitored and administrated by a very special type of people. Put that image back on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:983:3772:1:ed2c:160d:a6ad:d136 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 15 January 2022‎  (UTC+8)


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, redundant to File:Flag of Rwanda.svg. Jonteemil (talk) 23:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused File Douuwwurunwuuzhe 00:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   02:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused File Douuwwurunwuuzhe 00:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   02:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete, unused CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from Fallujah channel which is copyrighted Abu aamir (talk) 02:19, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not original work, a non-cropped version can be found at https://www.skrivunder.com/203 Autom (talk) 03:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

aesthetically awful, sloppy, unkempt uniform Peace is contagious (talk) 04:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inaccurate gooofy, dumpy uniform Peace is contagious (talk) 04:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   02:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there's already another category of the same name with the wikidata infobox Sophia91 (talk) 05:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"ineligible for copyright" seriously? This IS a copyrighted label and not a "simple logo" DerpGunKV2 (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but no. All of the material contains factual information about the recording itself, i.e. who sang the song and who produced and performed the music. It doesn't contain lyrics of the song or anything like that. Furthermore, the logos of Atlantic Records are not creative or original enough for US copyright; see COM:TOO US. Moreover, the red and black colors used are too plain.  Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Ho (talk • contribs) 02:29, 21 August 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:George Ho. --P 1 9 9   02:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Permission needed from Dirty Heads --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zevaco's work is not in the PD yet, and i doubt this will fall under freedom of panorama because the works are not there permanently. Also, they are the main subject of the photograph. Husky (talk to me) 09:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Just granpa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents which could be replaced with wiki-tables.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Just granpa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All those cosmologies are shown as a circle - why? -, are unsourced, and most have some syncretic elements inserted by the user. Therefore, they are not educational + COM:NOTHOST. See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Norse cosmology.svg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Image of Revelation.svg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mythological landscape.svg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Death in the desert.svg, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Table of Nations.png whose images had the same problems.
As for File:Allotment of land to the 12 Tribes of Israel.svg, it has too many information for it to be readproperly, has the Roman god Janus in the Sea of Galilee, and is unsourced.

Veverve (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal images, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. HansAchterbahn (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   02:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant list with potentially sensitive personal data Fl.schmitt (talk) 12:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of copyrighted stock photos, eg https://stock.adobe.com/10158953, https://stock.adobe.com/1201492. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". See: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 幻光尘 GPinkerton (talk) 12:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with the request tbh. I just vectorised a file that I'm well aware it's not actually in use, but only created by some random user. There are hundreds if not thousands of such files in wikimedia and if the above user wants to identify them all they're more than welcome to do so (it's a hard task, trust me ;)). --Argean (talk) 12:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Correspondence uploaded by User:MaddyJ Scott

[edit]

Copyright violations: the copyright of a letter normally belongs to the person who wrote the letter. Three of these files are from letters that were signed by people whose name does not match the uploader, the fourth is an unsigned letter. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be of any use: thus outside of Commons scope MPF (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Afeef as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: does not appear to be a personal photo. --P 1 9 9   02:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader replaced the first version of the file with a blank image. Claimed as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 16:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader replaced the first version of the file with a generic search symbol. Claimed as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 16:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

couldnt find claimed license on source page Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9   02:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is this? Looks like vandalism. Uploader has only 2 edits, both related with this image. MBH 16:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:CSD#G3. --P 1 9 9   02:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has no use, no educational value. Uploaded by LTA, see also en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub/Archive আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Victuallers (talk) 17:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, above COM:TOO. --P 1 9 9   02:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone who's not a Wikipedian, just trying to promote himself. Osama Eid (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry photo, unused, uncategorized since February. Described only as "history". No evident in scope usefulness. The majority of the user's uploads have been deleted for false license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement for NY-based SEO company, advertising embedded in JFIF DanielPenfield (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is against the scope such as COM:NOTSOCIAL and COM:HOST. ~AntanO4task (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Strakhov. --P 1 9 9   03:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominar para borrado GNKdiego13 (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

مكرر مرتين د.خالد محمد الهاشمي (talk) 20:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. --P 1 9 9   03:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

مكررة مرتين د.خالد محمد الهاشمي (talk) 20:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio: screenshot. --P 1 9 9   03:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image Douuwwurunwuuzhe 00:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - In use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The template says that this logo image consists of simple geometric shapes or text, but I doubt it is correct. Is the dome of the Capitol and the font used in the logo so simple? I think that needs to be discussed. Ldorfman (talk) 01:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the composition is ostensibly in the public domain, the performance/recording is likely not in the public domain. The archive of the source website at the time does not indicate that the marching band of the University of California, Berkeley released their recording into the public domain, so the file should be deleted.  Mysterymanblue  01:23, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A suitable replacement file exists at File:Hail to California (choral).opus.  Mysterymanblue  03:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to its FAQ, IVAA (Indonesian Visual Art Archive) collections are licensed in CC BY-NC 2.0 (section "Sejauh apa arsip dari @rsipIVAA bisa saya gunakan?"), which violates COM:LICENSE. AnsyahF (talk) 02:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Update: The author changed its license to {{PD-Art-100}} in Special:Diff/584742298. Still a copyright violation because in fact the painting was made in 1973 and didn't entered public domain yet as of 2021. AnsyahF (talk) 07:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution photo of a printout of a seemingly copyrighted map (looking at the link in the description) Mosbo6 (talk) 01:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chema Fernández Escuer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I have just deleted two of this user's uploads as proven copyvios, so it may be time to reexamine all of their uploads. Most of them have no EXIF metadata.

King of ♥ 04:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and User:Whpq. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chema Fernández Escuer (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Likely not own works: several images taken from FB as per EXIF data, File:Jorge Azcón y Sara Fernández.jpg found here, File:Pregón de las Fiestas del Pilar 2019.jpg found here. Unreliable uploader.

P 1 9 9   02:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images are from a 1990 Italian publication? Italy is pma 70 and I fail to see how these could be PD as claimed.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:37, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 11:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep – (Google Translate from Persian gives the nomination as 'Inadequacy and the existence of alternatives'.) The category indicates that these are are pictures of a cemetery in Nameq, Iran, and that this is a Iranian national heritage site. File:Nameq Cemetery2021 9 (2).jpg is in use in w:fa:نامق. The technical quality of some of the images is poor, but they have a clear educational use. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@4nn1l2: Can you solve the problem? (Nameq) POS78 (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi- This is a photo of me and is an invasion of my privacy. It is being used on many other websites to link my private information (address, birthday, phone number0 with my photo. please remove the photo. 2603:7000:8C40:3AC6:6D36:486F:6E31:85B3 14:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete images of people by the request of an anonymous IP User, who could be the subject or an enemy or a vandal. The subject is a notable person. She may use VRT to properly identify herself and request deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1986 publication of South African origin. I fail to see how these could be free from copyright restrictions as the current license indicates.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1980 publication of Italian origin. Italy is pma 70. So I fail to see how these could be free from copyright restrictions

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF, non-standart ratio of length and height. Brateevsky {talk} 18:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a reason for suspicions. Any serious photographer often crops his photos, and EXIF is easily lost during re-savings in the process of editing.  Keep. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 23:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I often crop my photo, but my EXIF is saved. The other file of the user — File:UKRSPECSYSTEMS PD-2 photo 1.jpg — contain EXIF and metadata. --Brateevsky {talk} 08:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If absence of metadata were a valid reason for deletion, such files would be nominated by bots. There is plenty of graphics editors and file formats, and they are not obliged to support EXIF. Save any file in png or bmp, and EXIF will be lost. Natural format for master copies made from raw files is by no means jpg. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 20:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Looking at all their uploads, this image (and File:Skyline SL-231 FLYGHT.jpg) are clear outliers that don't match the pattern of their other works. COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9   02:58, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The image appears in many places on the Web, but all of them are much smaller than this. This is large enough to be very unlikely to have been taken from the Web. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1970 publication of italian origins. Italy is pma 70. I fail to see how these could be free from copyright restrictions. Please can someone start a process to mass review the BHL image mass uploads please?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a presumably copyrighted design Colin M (talk) 23:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See this page. Ox1997cow (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: What do you think about this? Ox1997cow (talk) 15:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No comment, sorry. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Kept, no consensus to delete. (Note: This is not a judgement on whether the current version of the template is accurate.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This VP discussion reaffirmed that there is actually no Commons-acceptable FoP for Italy. The template is misleading. For those building who falls below COM:TOO, {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}} is already functioning A1Cafel (talk) 17:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help agreeing with you.--3knolls (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't mean to put CC 1.0 but, usually there would be a watermark on an image but this one did not have a watermark. It is not copyright but probably incorrect license Username006 (talk) 05:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this discussion at my talk page here [7] in which it is postulated that "it is not copyrighted because there is no watermark". Andrewgprout (talk) 07:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the copyright of the image from [8] is covered at [9]. The photo has no copyright attribution, under the copyright information of the site it belongs to some one else and permission needs to be sought, regardless that the owner is unknown. Sciencefish (talk) 08:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sciencefish: I tried contacting them but their contact form just sends the query to my own e-mail. Also, the image just before the one I had uploaded has also been uploaded by another person. Username006 (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It seems unlikely that this is not either a press photo or an accident investigation photo. If the latter, it will be Crown Copyright that will now have expired, however as it does not appear in the final report it seems this is the less likely option. As far as I can tell from reading the advice page about UK copyright, a non-crown copyright image would be copyrighted until at least 70 years after creation, which would be 2038 in this instance. Thryduulf (talk) 19:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unlikely this has anything to do with the BAAA-ACRO website, it was the image published on the front page of the London Times on 4 July 1968 and looking at the image quality it would appear to be a scan or screen grab of the image available in the Times archive . It is copyright of Times Newspapers Limited. MilborneOne (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted unsupported license claim; no indication that it is PD or free licensed-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most of the vinyl label may not be original enough for copyright, but it contains Mercury Records logo, which is kinda complex enough for copyright especially in the US. George Ho (talk) 06:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC); edited, 06:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept There is already a {{Trademark}} notice, which covers the Mercury Records logo. Label is US printing from 1970 without copyright notice; {{PD-US no notice}} -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not a gamon from Nagai Kujira. The Maury family and Mr. Maury's gamons and archetypes aren't that big. The size is not that wide. It's a violation of copyright. Gameposo (talk) 17:04, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I don't see any copyright (whose copyright?) violated here. If you have any problems with the content of the file, maybe modify it? It's an SVG file after all. --Rosenzweig τ 08:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]