Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/07/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
I cropped it from another photo i was not aware of the copyright violation so just delete it i dont want no trouble 2.47.211.244 12:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 13:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Бессмыслица Zhereserberg (talk) 12:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Spam & copyvio. --Achim (talk) 14:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 13:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Credits of this picture: https://it.sputniknews.com/20210712/la-coppa-torna-a-casa-dopo-mezzo-secolo-gamba-la-repubblica-mancini-ha-fatto-un-miracolo-12118664.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frah il Potterhead (talk • contribs) 13:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Blackcat 
17:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 11:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 13:21, 14 July 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 20:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Source website has "All rights reserved." disclaimer, no indication of free license. MKFI (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Source website has "All rights reserved." disclaimer, no indication of free license. SORAtrans (talk) 23:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader agrees with deletion. --Achim (talk) 06:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
User page created without intentional Ryse93 (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: own user space. --Achim (talk) 14:55, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Low-res photo from a user who's uploaded copyrighted images as their own. Seems unlikely that this is an original work. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 07:36, 15 July 2021 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Periklis1999 --Krdbot 20:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Professional quality and no metadata - own work unlikely. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:24, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadata - probable copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: G4. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
I gave a wrong number for my file-name DiAuras (talk) 21:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:07, 15 July 2021 UTC: I gave wrong number for my file --Krdbot 20:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Univision would never license its logos for "free" use ItsJustdancefan (talk) 20:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 11:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:02, 17 July 2021 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 20:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Badly blurred - no concievable use MPF (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 11:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tapon kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]self promo on enwp & bnwp
Minoraxtalk 11:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 11:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- It'd be appropriate to add File:Md Ismail .jpg to that. Athaenara (talk) 11:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 11:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 11:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adnaan sheikh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nishant jadhwani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hacı Ali Türkmen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal unusable image - not being used anywhere. –Davey2010Talk 19:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal unusable image - not being used anywhere. –Davey2010Talk 19:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal unusable image - not being used anywhere. –Davey2010Talk 19:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
some unused autopromo logo(?), sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 19:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope and copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused uncat fictional flags.
Pibwl (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
unused personal(?) photo, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 19:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deep-Passion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very poor quality self-portrayal.
- File:Geil wichsen und abspritzen.ogg
- File:Hard cock with wet glans.png
- File:Young naked and horny man showing his hard penis.jpg
Achim (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
unused commercial, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 21:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
An image published in 1978 is not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 02:32, 20 July 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minus1st sm.jpg: An image published in 1978 is not old enough to be in PD --Krdbot 14:29, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Non-selfie and uploader (Pouria nikseresht) purports to be subject (Pouria nikseresht). Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject, and does not transfer but through writing. COM:EVID of permission from the actual author needed. Эlcobbola talk 15:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Jan Myšák (talk) 09:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Montenegro (1905–1918).svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Business12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in promotional sandbox.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Romania (1965–1989).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
image used only by page deleted off de.wiki and thus not within project scope. DS (talk) 16:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a vidcap to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
low quality, doubtful source - no educational value Albinfo (talk) 20:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
low quality, doubtful source, no educational value Albinfo (talk) 20:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
another low quality image from this user - bad quality, doubtful source, no educational value like this Albinfo (talk) 20:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
another low quality image from this user - bad quality, doubtful source, no educational value like this Albinfo (talk) 20:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
another low quality image from this user - bad quality, doubtful source, no educational value like this Albinfo (talk) 21:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
These files don't have the right essential information. Some files might be public domain. However, if the correct information about these is not provided, Wikimedia Commons will not be able to keep them.
- File:Yamato-e.jpg
- File:Doc2fb image 03000005 copy.jpg
- File:Пример Суйбокуга.jpg
- File:Памятник Юкимуры.JPG
- File:Портрет Юкимуры.jpg
- File:Эмблема клана Санада.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bozsonyiviktoria1969 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:A faluház Homlokzatán a címer és a név.jpg
- File:Velebit teli-768x576.jpg
- File:Baráthok Kútja.png
- File:A kutak története.png
- File:Fürdőhely használata.png
- File:Zimonjic.png
- File:Zimonjic Pravoszláv templom.png
- File:Martonosi Templom.jpg
- File:Kispiaci Péter Pál templom.jpg
- File:Kishomok Iskola.jpg
- File:Völgyes vasúti megálló.png
- File:Aratóünnep.png
- File:Szent József a Munkás Templom.jpg
- File:Oromhegyes Temploma.jpg
- File:Újfalu.jpg
- File:1553506874BKBnO.jpg
- File:Cnesaa.jpg
- File:Ifikaa.jpg
- File:Városházaa.jpg
- File:Könyvtárésotthon.jpg
- File:Iskolánk.jpg
- File:Nagytemplomkanizsa.jpg
- File:Tóth József valamikori kúriája.jpg
- File:Kuriakep.jpg
- File:Naselje 12.jpg
- File:Kep17.jpg
- File:Kep15.jpg
- File:Magyarkanizsa19.jpg
- File:Kanizsa madártávlatból.jpg
- File:Fürdő (2).jpg
- File:ADORÁN.jpg
- File:Szent szobor.jpg
- File:Szegenyvigado.jpg
- File:2 vilaghaborus emlékmű.jpg
- File:A költő és a festő.jpg
- File:Beszedes.jpg
- File:Cigánylány.jpg
- File:Csodakut.jpg
- File:Fikázós jancsika.jpg
- File:Irotabor.jpg
- File:Janosszobor.jpg
- File:Szappanos ház.jpg
- File:Szunyogfalu.jpg
- File:KISTEMPLOM.jpg
- File:Oromhegyes.jpg
- File:KISPIAC.jpg
- File:Oromhegyesi.png
- File:Tiszavirágszobor.png
- File:Tresnjevac01.jpg
- File:Naselje 22 jpeg.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pouria nikseresht (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, social media UI in bottom left corner of File:Behzad 85 images.jpg, icons and clipped watermark in lower left corner of File:2021-07-14 at 6.57.54 PM.jpg, uploaded with blatant copyvios of this subject (see File:01576765 b images.jpg and File:Behzad with rasoul images.jpg, etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue.
- File:Behzad 85 images.jpg
- File:Behzad funs images.jpg
- File:W Image 2021-07-14 at 6.58.24 PM.jpg
- File:B behzad image 2021-07-14 at 6.58.25 PM.jpg
- File:Beshtayem Image 2021-07-14 at 6.58.26 PM.jpg
- File:2021-07-14 at 6.57.54 PM.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 15:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pouria nikseresht (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, appeared elsewhere (e.g., File:Yaser shahi 85.jpg is here; File:Yaser shahi 45.jpg is here; File:Yaser shahi 23.jpg is here, etc.), uploader history of copyvios, etc. Duck/PRP.
- File:Yaser and hasan 1.jpg
- File:Yaser shahi 87.jpg
- File:Yaser shahi 98.jpg
- File:Yaser shahi 85.jpg
- File:Yaser shahi 45.jpg
- File:Yaser shahi 23.jpg
- File:Yaser shahi 4.jpg
- File:Behzad beshtayem.jpg
- File:Behzad beshtayem stadium.jpg
- File:Behzad beshtayem and rasoul khatibi.jpg
- File:Behzad beshtayem baku.jpg
- File:Image 2021-07-14 at 6.58.28 PM (1).jpg
Эlcobbola talk 21:13, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal image - not used in any articles although it is used on their userpage however the uploader is spamming it everywhere. –Davey2010Talk 19:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Taivo. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal images - not used in any articles. –Davey2010Talk 19:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Taivo. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Personal unusable image - not being used anywhere. –Davey2010Talk 19:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Taivo. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Also nominating two derivative works from this image:
No indication of the original source for this work. Description notes that the image was taken in 1987, which would normally indicate that the underlying image is not old enough to be PD. Seraphimblade (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep – The image was uploaded as own work by the user and released as CC-BY-SA-4.0 so can't see any reason this would qualify for deletion. Kiwichris (talk) 05:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Keep What has PD to do with this? This was a publicity shot (one of many) taken at the request of both of us, and to be able to use it in election literature the photographer (name unknown now) assigned the copyrights to us. It must have worked becasue I won my election with 64% of the vote. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Did the photographer assign the copyright to you wholesale, or just give you the rights to use the image for publicity? Those would be two very different things, and only the first would allow you to CC license the image. Regardless, it wouldn't be an "own work"; the photographer is still the author even if they assigned copyright, so that's inaccurate regardless. Seraphimblade (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- It was a party junket, quite informal and we all had these done on the understanding that we could use freely them on any election material without any restrictions. There's no way of tracing the photographer and all my contemporaries from those days are probably dead, or in the House of Lords (if there's a difference). Have updated author field accordingly. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. In that case, I would stand by my recommendation to delete. An "understanding that (you) could freely use them on any election material" is not at all the same as a CC license release to the general public or a wholesale transfer of the copyright, so I do not believe that it would constitute a free license even if that could be verified. Seraphimblade (talk) 00:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- It was a party junket, quite informal and we all had these done on the understanding that we could use freely them on any election material without any restrictions. There's no way of tracing the photographer and all my contemporaries from those days are probably dead, or in the House of Lords (if there's a difference). Have updated author field accordingly. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry but we need formal confirmation of that release via OTRS to keep. --Gbawden (talk) 14:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Izumo no Okuni
[edit]No FOP in Japan. It was erected in 1994. [1]
- File:Izumo no Okuni statue.jpg
- File:Okuni1603.jpg
- File:Okuni1603a.jpg
- File:StatueOfOkuni b.jpg
- File:StatueOfOkuni.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 06:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Izumo no Okuni
[edit]The statue of en:Izumo no Okuni (ja:出雲阿国) in Kyoto was erected in 1994. [2] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Source says © Copyright Ahads2005, All rights reserved Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
The authorship of the photo that the user attributes to herself is very dubious. --Alzinous (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; clearly a photo of a photo. --Gbawden (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arthistorygirl202 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A number of photos claimed as own work but with mostly no exif. And the artworks would need OTRS anyway to keep them
- File:Beautiful Torso Sculpture.png
- File:Labors of Hercules Drawing 9.jpg
- File:BEAUTIFUL TORSO .jpg
- File:Grand battles 2.png
- File:Grand battles 1.png
- File:Young Ed Smith.png
- File:Golden amazon.png
- File:Smith studio view.png
- File:Torso by Ed Smith .png
- File:Ed smith in studio.png
- File:Late photo of ed smith.png
- File:Early Photo of Ed Smith .png
- File:Ed smith working .jpg
- File:Ed Smith Studio Views 001 copy.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
As per the source: © Grosby Group. The uploader name is different; so does the uploader have the necessary rights to upload this photo under a free CC license? Is there an OTRS-permission? Mosbatho (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete - source page says "© ¡HOLA! Prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de este reportaje y sus fotografías, aun citando su procedencia.", which even to my limited Spanish says reproduction prohibited. --GRuban (talk) 20:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Scanned images, no checkable license and source information.
GeorgHH • talk 18:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tavannes Watch Co
[edit]Copyright violation? Most of these images can also be found on https://tavannes-watch.swiss/about-us/, so not "own work" by the uploader; I left out the images of newspaper advertising and other images of which I think they are over 70 years old
- File:Tavannes Watch 12.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 18.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 20.png
- File:Tavannes Watch 23.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 24.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 27.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 28.png
- File:Tavannes Watch 29.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 33.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 34.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 35.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 36.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 38.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 40.png
- File:Tavannes Watch 41.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 42.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 43.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 44.png
- File:Tavannes Watch 45.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 46.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 5.jpg
- File:Tavannes Watch 8.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 05:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OTRS permission is required. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
out of scope; uploader did this to disparage instead of to contribute Born2bgratis (talk) 06:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I should have nominated this rather than requesting a rename, I agree that it is out of scope. A S U K I T E 23:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, all need permission
Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Metal casted part with help of 3D printed ceramic shell.jpg
- File:Ceramic shell for investment casting printed with Admaflex DLP.jpg
- File:Admaflex300 Industrial 3Dprinter ceramic metal.png
- File:Admatec 3D printed copper green sintered.jpg
- File:3D printed parts in ceramic by Admatec Admaflex 3D printer.jpg
- File:3D printed ceramic parts.jpg
- File:3D printed metal parts.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
cus it has amogus referece ok Amorgosfan (talk) 21:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep bogus deletion request for featured picture, picture of the day, and nominee for picture of the year, used on so many other wiki pages that the listing only goes up to az. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Pas de raison valable pour une suppression. Amorgosfan est déjà bloqué sur WP:en pour en:WP:NOTHERE. (No valid reason for deletion. Amorgosfan is already blocked on WP:en[3]). HB (talk) 05:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Sorry, but what should “cus it has amogus referece ok” mean, and why is this a reason to request the deletion of a file? --Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Vabariik (talk) 12:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjqDnifXZzs. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Missing nitrogen atom in the pyrrolizidine ring system, hence the file is incorrect. I have replaced it with File:(+)-1,7a-Diepialexine-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality MoS version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The chemical structure is indeed incorrect and there is a high quality replacement. Marbletan (talk) 12:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
This is a bit complicated, so apologies in advance if anything is unclear. File:Germacrone.png does not accurately represent the chemical structure of germancrone. Germacrone is the trans,trans (or E,E) isomer but this image shows the cis,cis (or Z,Z) isomer. File:Germacrone structure.svg shows the correct structure. There is also another file, File:(3E,7E)-3,7-Dimethyl-10-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclodeca-3,7-dienone.svg which is an svg version of germacrone.png. It was renamed from "germacrone.svg", because it is not, in fact, germacrone. However, it was renamed incorrectly. It should be titled "(3Z,7Z)-3,7-Dimethyl-10-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclodeca-3,7-dienone.svg". I propose that:
- File:Germacrone.png be deleted because it is unused, inaccurate, and essentially identical to File:(3E,7E)-3,7-Dimethyl-10-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclodeca-3,7-dienone.svg
- File:(3E,7E)-3,7-Dimethyl-10-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclodeca-3,7-dienone.svg be renamed to "(3Z,7Z)-3,7-Dimethyl-10-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclodeca-3,7-dienone.svg".
- File:Germacrone.svg, currently a redirect to File:(3E,7E)-3,7-Dimethyl-10-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclodeca-3,7-dienone.svg), be changed to redirect instead to File:Germacrone structure.svg --Innerstream (talk) 23:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Can't {{PD-chem}} apply? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- PD-chem is an acceptable license for these files, but I don't see how that is relevant to the accuracy of the depicted chemical structures, which is what is being discussed here. Innerstream (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & explanation. I agree to this proposed approach. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support the nom's proposal. Renaming files to fix simple factual mistakes is a no-brainer (it's speedy-rename criterion #3). Deleting poorer images when we have better ones is generally good. And fixing redirects to point to what their name is again is rather than what it isn't sure reduces chances for confusion or mis-information. The other isomer is a real chemical (doi:10.1177/1934578X0800300418), so this isn't a case where we should just delete the other isomer as "obvious mistake, no COM:EDUSE). DMacks (talk) 03:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete Copyrighted album cover. Taken from any of take your pick. No reason to believe the work is that of the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 02:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete Copyrighted album cover. Taken from any of take your pick. No reason to believe the work is that of the uploader. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? The title mentions © Jan-Philipp Behr but he is not the uploader and there is no OTRS-permission JopkeB (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of some sort Lymantria (talk) 05:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Above COM:TOO Andy Dingley (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
no evidence that the video is cc by 3.0 웃OO 06:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment- How there's no evidence? This is a screenshot from Youtube. --Williamsburger26 (talk) 12:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Just saying that the video was a screenshot from YouTube doesn't qualify as evidence. Sometimes, creators will mark their videos in the description with "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", therefore allowing screenshots to be uploaded. In this video however, it does not. It's also good to make sure that videos marked as Creative Commons were created/filmed by the creator and not just a reupload. 웃OO 08:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 13:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted webtoon image. MKFI (talk) 07:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted magazine cover. MKFI (talk) 07:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Klankbeeld (talk) 07:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
I made a mistake uploading the file and there is a label on the image Aay1373 (talk) 11:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete Not in use; uploader request within 7 days of upload. Brianjd (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
© Каталог белорусского дизайна 2014 - 2021 Drakosh (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
© Каталог белорусского дизайна 2014 - 2021 Drakosh (talk) 11:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
© Каталог белорусского дизайна 2014 - 2021 Drakosh (talk) 11:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not own work, was uploaded to Last.fm last year here: https://www.last.fm/music/Marwa+Loud/+images/769cd84327158bf7ea5f2d2b8343b4be. Original source is unclear, but is likely a publicity photo. Fences and windows (talk) 11:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:14, 29 July 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 02:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Not own work owned by Univision. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 00:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Rationale does not address the reason why the image is claimed to be free. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
The license claims that this logo "does not meet the threshold of originality" and that it is just a basic text using default font. I believe that the logo designers made a lot of artistic choices picking the shapes of each letter to create this unique and recognizable logo. I would love to find a way to keep the logo, Maybe if we could identify the copyright owners I would be happy to contact them and ask if they would release the image. However the current license is not adequate. Jarekt (talk) 01:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:TOO UK. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Original (linked in source) was taken from the internet without permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm the person who uploaded this file on Commons. It has been deleted on the local version en.wiki (see here). I have nothing to say against deletion. — VTH94 (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I've checked the enwiki file history and confirmed. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
blurry, many better files see Pietà in Saint Peter's Basilica Oursana (talk) 02:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Not quite of the quality that we would typically consider deletable. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Can't {{FoP-Pakistan}} apply for your cases? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- In what way does this violate copyright?
- This was your own work
- You uploaded it here in 2017
- You licensed it then, under a CC-by-sa licence
- At the time you licensed it, you were the rights holder of these images, and in a position to license them correctly.
- That CC licence is irrevocable.
- I'm sorry if you've changed your mind. I'm sorry if you didn't realise that such licences were irrevocable. But that's how it is, and we can't change it now. So Keep. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- There are a number of these. I'll bundle them here, as it's the same issue for each:
- File:Kiris Village, Ganche District, Baltistan.jpg
- File:Lady Finger and Ultar Sar.jpg
- File:The mighty Nanga Parbat.jpg
- File:Lower Kachura (Shangrila Lake), Skardu, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg
- File:Lower Kachura Lake (Shangrila Lake), Skardu.jpg
- File:Fairy Meadows, the land of Fairies.jpg
- File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg
- File:Into the Nature of Kachura Forest.jpg
- File:Upper Kachura Lake, Skardu, Baltistan.jpg
- File:Sheosar Lake, Deosai, Baltistan.jpg
- File:Into the nature.jpg
- File:Rakaposhi, the mother of mist.jpg
- File:Morning View of Skardu from Kharpocho Fort.jpg
- File:Baltit Fort, Hunza Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg
- File:Gul-e-Gilmit, Upper Hunza.jpg
- File:Nestled in Clouds.jpg
- File:Rakapohsi Peak.jpg
- File:Badshahi Mosque, 7 Lahore.jpg
- File:Badshahi Mosque, Lahore III.jpg
- File:Badshahi Mosque, Lahore IV.jpg
- File:Badshahi Mosque, Lahore VII.jpg
- File:Derawar Fort, Bahawalpur IIi.jpg
- File:Faisal Mosque, Islamabad III.jpg
- File:Landsdown Bridge, Sukkur.jpg
- File:Masjid Wazeer Khan.jpg
- File:Baltit Fort, Hunza, GB Pakistan.jpg
- File:Jehngir Tomb, Lahoree.jpg
- File:Aerial View of Altit Fort, Hunza.jpg
- File:Waterfall at River Sindh.jpg
- File:Ramkot Fort, Dadyal, Azad Kashmir.jpg
- File:Pass Cones, Gojal, Upper Hunza,.jpg
- Andy Dingley (talk) 13:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyright infringement of https://stock.adobe.com/100753312 Twotwofourtysix (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't want it to be here free for public to use in their marketing projects. Fassifarooq (talk) 19:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- The file in question is being used on 18 pages across the Wikis. It’s removal would cause a lot of disruption. Idell (talk) 05:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: CC licenses are irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 14:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
For violation of copyrights Fassifarooq (talk) 02:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hunza, Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheBishop 999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:ShunsukeMaedaTottori.png
- File:Yasushi Kita.png
- File:Ryuji Hirota.png
- File:Kiyomitsu Kobari .png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheBishop 999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Why 214? https://entranceindia.com/election-and-politics/shri-santokh-singh-chaudhary-member-of-parliament-mp-from-jalandhar-scpunjab-biodata/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, only 216×215 pixels. I blocked the uploader for a year due to uploading copyvios after warnings and previous blocks. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Violation VNC200 (talk) 03:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: License Review failed. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Horio Yoshiharu
[edit]The statue of en:Horio Yoshiharu (ja:堀尾吉晴) at en:Matsue Castle (ja:松江城) was created by Fumio Nishimura (ja:西村文男). [4] He is alive. No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
- File:Matsue Castle MG 20161021 104716.jpg
- File:Tonomachi, Matsue, Shimane Prefecture 690-0887, Japan - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Tonomachi, Matsue, Shimane Prefecture 690-0887, Japan - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Tonomachi, Matsue, Shimane Prefecture 690-0887, Japan - panoramio (7).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Obviously a recent statue. No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright 2021 © Bbpilipinas.com . All Rights Reserved 50.46.116.219 04:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete image directly sourced from the subject's profile on the Bininbining Pilipinas 2021 pageant website www.bbpilipinas.comHariboneagle927 (talk) 03:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 04:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely above COM:TOO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
The statue of en:Kyusaku Ogino (ja:荻野久作) in Niigata City was created by Yo Takahashi (ja:高橋洋). [5] He is alive. No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Honda Tadakatsu
[edit]The statue is an artwork made by Masatomo Nakagawa in 1990. see ja::Honda-Tadakatsu statue Kuwana.jpg [6] No FOP in source country.
Nightingale (talk) 02:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Honda Tadakatsu
[edit]The statue of en:Honda Tadakatsu (ja:本多忠勝) at Kyuka Park (ja:九華公園) in Kuwana City was created by Masatomo Nakagawa (ja:中川正知) in 1990. [7] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
- File:Honda-Tadakatsu statue Kuwana.jpg
- File:本多忠勝と蜻蛉切.jpg
- File:本多忠勝像 ／ 九華公園（桑名城址） - panoramio.jpg
- File:本多忠勝像／桑名城 - panoramio.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Honda Tadakatsu
[edit]The statue of en:Honda Tadakatsu (ja:本多忠勝) at Okazaki park (ja:岡崎公園 (岡崎市)) was created by Motohiro Suzuki (ja:鈴木基弘) in 1982. [8] The year of his death is 2007. [9] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
- File:Okazaki Park Honda Tadakatsu monument ac.jpg
- File:Okazaki Park 岡崎公園 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Okazaki Park 岡崎公園 - panoramio (2).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kikuchi Takemitsu
[edit]The statue of en:Kikuchi Takemitsu (ja:菊池武光) in en:Kikuchi, Kumamoto (ja:菊池市) was created by Shinya Nakamura (ja:中村晋也) in 1989. [10] He is alive. No FoP in Japan for 3D works.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
The statue of en:Momofuku Ando (ja:安藤百福) at the en:CupNoodles Museum Yokohama (ja:カップヌードルミュージアム 横浜) was erected in 2011. [11] No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Violation COM:FOP Russia. Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Company given as author, photographer unknown. No free license on source website. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 06:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Suspicious own work claim, image has been published before: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ast-ceo-avellan-wants-where-133119144.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAA0xT32Xwntj3N3fwVYSLlXYh46oSpOv9whUMoAngLRL4c5323zMUDJCFFb1INquBHtl_O9RLUi2uolXzrAkVCMtCZZrX7CIZJ1AfKwDw8j72QehmPf0EIgh2ny5OOjYRqnZ8tJOP5brP9QwhZCxwv6t38SXpqRI-t-keDPCuj2X MKFI (talk) 06:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=280527935743445&__tn__=C-R MKFI (talk) 07:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, not own work. MKFI (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Bilorv (talk) 14:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
low-res excerpt, dubious own-work claim Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted according to EXIF. Not own work, Confirmed by uploader in https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndardiskussion:SvArkitekter Kitayama (talk) 07:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. QubeCube (talk) 13:28, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 09:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Asartea as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See image; there is a copyright tag in the bottom left rubin16 (talk) 10:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as the work is watermarked as copyrighted, and the archive on the website shows no indication it is under a free license rather than ARR. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 11:48, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Covers of Hungary, AZE-13.jpg rubin16 (talk) 10:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Covers of Hungary, AZE-13.jpg rubin16 (talk) 10:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChillyInPhilly (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old photos, we need permission from the original photographer
Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
The image is copyrighted to McDowell's No1. And incorrectly uploaded Rustyattic (talk) 11:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 18:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted website ViperSnake151 (talk) 20:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Crop to just the table. The table cannot be copyrighted. 36.85.216.243 13:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 21:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Albert De Villeroux died in 2011, copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:5CC:348C:7CA4:CDDC 13:33, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 12:13, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 11:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Fake ownership (photo taken from http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/08/t-17-possible-czechoslovak-tier-6-light-tank/) DerpGunKV2 (talk) 12:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Fake ownership (photo taken from https://wot.cz/article/trocha-historie-s-wot-tank-t-50-t-51) DerpGunKV2 (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Fake ownership (photo taken from https://warspot.ru/4909-chehoslovatskaya-alternativa-dlya-tridtsatchetvyorki) DerpGunKV2 (talk) 12:34, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Here is the latest version on Flickr by the original author: File:Cosplayer of Serah Farron at FF24 20140727a.jpg. Solomon203 (talk) 12:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Delete File:Cosplayer of Serah Farron at FF24 20140727a.jpg (the new one, not the notification) as duplicate of existing image. It doesn't "improve" or "supersede" the original - in fact it's a better crop. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Deleted the Flickr import. Anyone who wants the uncropped version may find it in the original file's history. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation - published on the performer's Facebook profile where it says the author is Maša Gojić. No evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 13:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Direct copyvio taken from this copyright museum image - https://collection.australiansportsmuseum.org.au/objects/39707/photograph-from-frank-lavers-photograph-album-image-of-alick-mackenzie AAhelifan (talk) 13:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: That link establishes that the image is PD due to age. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Screen capture of unknown origin despite the claim of the uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 13:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Screen capture of unknown origin despite the claim of the uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 13:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
File:سپند امیرسلیمانی بازیگر نقش تابنده ( کرم خاکی - شب تاب ) در مجموعه تلویزیونی کلبه عمو پورنگ.jpg
[edit]تصویر بسیار کوچک است و برای همین کاربرد خاصی ندارد. SsMmNn (talk) 08:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unnecessary crop. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
The image is screen-grabbed from quora.com. Non adhering the copyright policy. 137.97.100.65 09:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright violation.--2409:4073:2E8C:DB27:C462:3D77:7C24:1973 08:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Infringement of [12]. Not an "own work".--2409:4073:2007:F3A:E442:C2E3:7C01:E699 06:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
File is not used anymore. A higher version file, containing correction in respect to district Rai Manuk in regency Belu, replaces the older one. Tajala (talk) 09:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:West Timor and its regencies and districts v2.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Victuallers (talk) 09:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
File is not used anymore. The higher version file, containing the corrected position of district Rai Manuk in regency Belu, replaces the older file Tajala (talk) 09:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Regency Malaka and its districts (West Timor) v3.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
File is not used anymore. The higher version file, indicating the proper location of district Rai Manuk in regency Belu, replaces the older one. Tajala (talk) 09:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Regency Timor Tengah Utara and its districts (West Timor) v2.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and highly unlikely to be own work (see metadata infobox). rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, no reason not to assume own work (metadata merely indicates that Google software was used to edit the file - not necessarily taken from Google). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
File is not used anymore Tajala (talk) 14:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Roads on West Timor v2.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
File is not used anymore. Instead of this, the higher version file is used, which describes the correct position of district Rai Manuk Tajala (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Regency Belu and its districts (West Timor) v3.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate, wrong file name F. Riedelio • Diskussion • ✉ 14:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: original but deleted 2nd version per COM:OVERWRITE and duplicate of File:Klingenmünster Burgruine Landeck (Denkmalzone) 020 2017 07 14.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
File is not used anymore Tajala (talk) 14:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:West Timor and its regencies and districts v2.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
It's a book cover, violates author copyrights Liridon (talk) 15:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
studio photo, low resolution, EXIF missing, uploaded by an SPA. permission should be verified via COM:OTRS Vera (talk) 15:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
I feel that the focus of this image is not the two artists and the curator holding the artwork, but rather the artwork itself; as such, I feel that this is not covered by FoP DS (talk) 17:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Same issue for File:Aranda Art High Street Armadale with Willie Tjungurrayi and George Ward Tjungurrayi artworks.jpg (same uploader, same curator). DS (talk) 19:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Very low resolution, own work unlikely at best. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
The uploader gives as copyright notice "This is copyrighted LOGO of THE EXTRACTION ESPORTS. Reuse of this logo without legal permission is prohibited". A reuse of file on Commons only being possible if the uploader/Copyright holder gives the "green light" is not suitable. Mosbatho (talk) 18:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly out of scope. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Please upload higher resolution, otherwise too small to be useful Isderion (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and upload the source files. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Univision would never license its logos for "free" use ItsJustdancefan (talk) 20:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, logo above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ItsJustdancefan as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Univision TDN logo 2019.png
COnverted to regular DR to allow for discussion per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (SVG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
aerial image taken in 1986 in Albania? definitely not own work. Low quality, doubtful source. Albinfo (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
unused, unknown notability of some criminal, surely not an own work Pibwl (talk) 21:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
sole upload, unknown notability, unclear copyright Pibwl (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
the image is used on various social media sites. No proof of authorship by uploader. GeorgHH • talk 21:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
No exif info, According to the description, it doesn't look like the uploader's own work. (^･ｪ･^) (talk) 00:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
grabbed from the web: available in higher resolution at https://allthecities.com/city/get-full-image?id=2033 > https://allthecities.com/puke-vs-gracias#true-6 and labeld "by kostvil" at https://triphappy.com/places/koman-shkoder-county-albania-travel-guide/7219 Albinfo (talk) 20:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Closing this request and promoting it to Speedy Deletion. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 08:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We are not given a location, but the description is in Persian, so presumbably it is Iran or Iraq, neither of which have FoP. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Hungarian ''Pachycrocuta''
[edit]FOP Hungary does not include building interiors Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 15:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Argentina for sculptures. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates and the photo violates architects' copyright. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Non-selfie and uploader (JohnnyNostra) purports to be subject (Johnny Nostra). Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject, and does not transfer but through writing. EXIF, for example, credits "Author HUSTLE HARDER PRODUCTIONS." COM:EVID of permission from the actual author needed. Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, This is Johnny Nostra. After fully reading and Comprehending the issue you raise with this file, the author of this file is indeed labeled by a friend and Colleague of mine, Danny G, who is the Owner of Hustle Harder Productions. We both worked on this photo in the studio together. I have been granted the full license by Danny G and Hustle Harder Productions. They equally have just specified to me via phone call on this date July, 14 at 4:40 PM EST. that they are willing to provide you with this explanation that I Johnny Nostra have full permission to upload and license out this photo as I please. I am now and have always been the Legal copyright owner of this file. To further explain, due to mine and hustle harder's valid offer acceptance and consideration, we agreed that I would be able to upload the works. All the elements of a valid contractual agreement. we are both willing to provide you more information as to the permissions.
- This is all very interesting, because several minutes ago you claimed "I am the photographer," which you then decided to blank." This is not a comment that could be made in error, so one must conclude you struggle with the truth. You also said "I am a law school graduate," which, if not also an untruth, would mean you would be expected to be aware of 17 U.S.C. § 204, which provides, "A transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of law, is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer, is in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed or such owner’s duly authorized agent." (underline added) Indeed, this notion was referenced in the request rationale. Accordingly, if you are "now and have always been the Legal copyright owner of this file," you would both 1) have the document to provide us and 2) know that "that they are willing to provide you with this explanation" is utterly meaningless. Эlcobbola talk 21:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Works by Jacob Wexler (1912–1995)
[edit]The uploader, Iawexler, claims that these (i) are by Jacob Wexler (1912–1995), yet (ii) are his/her [Iawexler's] "own work". Something is wrong here.
- File:1935 Barbara Song.jpg
- File:1935 Clown (Pierrot).jpg
- File:1935 Clown with Violin.jpg
- File:1935 Pimp's Ballad.jpg
- File:1942 The Red House.jpg
- File:1943 Figures In The Street.jpg
- File:1947 Sitting Woman.jpg
- File:1950 Conversation.jpg
- File:1953 Sitting Woman.jpg
- File:1953 The Exodus.jpg
- File:1954 Two Women.jpg
- File:1954 Woman in Yellow.jpg
- File:1955 At the Studio.jpg
- File:1956 Horizontal Movement.jpg
- File:1959 Light and Shadow.jpg
- File:1959 White-Gray-Black.jpg
- File:1961 Painting.jpg
- File:1961 Space.jpg
- File:1962 Movement.jpg
- File:1964 Forms in Space.jpg
- File:1965 Green Stains.jpg
- File:1965 Movement in Space.jpg
- File:1967 Light and Shadow.jpg
- File:1968 Construction on Red Background.jpg
- File:1968 Torso.jpg
- File:1968 Wheels.jpg
- File:1969 Rocking Chair.jpg
- File:1974 The Second Day.jpg
- File:1977 Fata Morgana.jpg
- File:1979 Genesis.jpg
- File:1980 Street View.jpg
- File:1982 Forms in Space.jpg
- File:1982 Musicians.jpg
- File:1985 Clown.jpg
- File:1986 A street in Haifa.jpg
- File:1986 The Studio.jpg
- File:1987 The Studio.jpg
- File:1987 Welcome (No. ll).jpg
- File:1988 Nude.jpg
- File:1990 Clown with Flower (Pierrot and Columbine).jpg
- File:1993 Royal Couple.jpg
- File:1994 Naked Trees.jpg
- File:In the Evening 1948 62x50.jpg
- File:Jacob Wexler 1948 50x61.jpg
- File:Jacob Wexler 1984 27x27.jpg
- File:Jacob Wexler Still Life, 1945.jpg
- File:Mekorot 1960s.jpg
- File:הגדה של פסח, 1953.jpg
Hoary (talk) 22:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: This would have been better titled "Commons:Deletion requests/The majority of the files in Category:Jacob Wexler", or similar. For now, I'm not touching a sizable minority, most of which are photographs portraying Wexler. Some of these photographs may for all I know indeed be by the uploader; a number of the others may be in the public domain. What's pretty clear is that the copyright status of many is (however well-intentionedly) misrepresented. -- Hoary (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Retraction: I've just now checked half a dozen among those files listed above. For each, I read: "The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page." (This template was added after the deletion request template was added.) I'm surprised that Iawexler hasn't mentioned this here; but anyway the presence in Commons of these files now seems unproblematic. -- Hoary (talk) 22:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Not own work owned by CNN. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 22:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There's no claim here of "own work". Andy Dingley (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
This is a Fair Use image on Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CNN_International.png#mw-jump-to-license ItsJustdancefan (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Then go to Wikipedia and talk to them about it. That's a different image, it's not on Commons, it's on Wikipedia. Nothing to do with Commons.
- Have you decided what the deletion rationale is here yet, or are you just going to keep trying new ones with every comment until you can get one to stick? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per Andy Dingley. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete File history says "Uploaded own work with UploadWizard". It's clearly not the user's own work. Source is listed as CNN, author as WarnerMedia. No evidence that the uploader has the right to represent either of those entities. A keep could be justified on a "threshold of originality" rationale. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 19:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - njo evidence of CC license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Taiyo Park
[edit]No FoP in Japan for artworks.
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 14.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 16.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 17.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 18.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 19.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 20.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 21.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 22.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 23.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 24.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 25.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 26.jpg
- File:Taiyo Park 0001 27.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Contested speedy deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
See also File:Elwin Huaman (profile).jpg
The speedy deletion rationale for both of these was the same: "Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search."
That is lazy and slipshod as a nomination rationale for a DR, and for a speedy it's inexcusable. There was no claim "This image is a copyvio, here is the source image. That source image is likely the source and has an incompatible licence <thus>." Instead it was merely a link to a potential Google image search.
Google image search doesn't turn up many matches, but adding the subject's name does (that in itself was a failure by the nominator to not do this). Some examples: https://www.uibk.ac.at/alpinerraum/dps/dp-mountaintourism/flash.html.en https://onlim.com/en/company/ https://uibk.academia.edu/ElwinHuaman
Now there is a problem. These are "source images" of which the Commons image was such an unarguable derivative that not only did it need to be deleted, but it could be deleted without further discussion, and with a threat of blocking the uploader. However they're only an eighth of the size of the image on Commons. Some are also in black & white. These were not the source for the Commons image.
This is yet another abuse of deletion processes, harassment of GF editors here and in particular an abuse of the speedy deletion process. This needs to stop. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Andy Dingley, thanks for bringing my case up, I hope it can be solved in a good way. Elwinlhq (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#A1Cafel and yet more abusive deletions Andy Dingley (talk) 11:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This image has no EDIT meaningful EDIT exif, which is suspicious when we have an own work claim. I would delete under PCP as it stands. A google image search finds it here - https://www.uibk.ac.at/alpinerraum/dps/dp-mountaintourism/flash.html.en - in July 2020, before the upload date. Although smaller that is another reason to view it as suspect. Sorry but in this case A1Cafel is 100% correct to nominate it Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- So https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f4/Elias_K%C3%A4rle_%28profile_picture%29.jpg is a copyvio of https://www2.uibk.ac.at/images/130x-auto/alpinerraum/dps/dp-mountaintourism/images/elias-new.webp
- Thus the "infringing copy" is eight times bigger than the original.
- These are uploads by Elwinlhq (talk · contribs), the subject of File:Elwin Huaman (profile).jpg. He's the subject of File:Bachata huk yachana.png / qu:Bachata as well, so I think we have a pretty good basis for believing his identity to be as claimed (and just what the hell has happened to AGF?). Which shows both of our subjects here to be Sem Web researchers at the University of Innsbruck, and appear on that university's relevant pages – exactly as we would expect for two people in this field, with (so far, but we're working on that!) an interest in collaborative contributions to Wikimedia projects. There is absolutely zero that is suspicious here.
- "This image has no exif" is simply untrue, and nor is that (still!) any reason to delete anything. We need to keep DRs based on fact and policy, not opinions and handwaves. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi A1Cafel, you are saying that if I upload my own photo and it has not enough "EDIT", it cannot be uploaded/loaded on Wikidata? You sent me a DR/speed deletion, and a link to Google images portal claiming that it is has copyright somewhere. I think this is just a misunderstanding, I uploaded my photo and the rights related to Elias Kärle picture were given to me to upload it on Wikidata.
- Delete At User talk:Elwinlhq#Hi A1Cafel,, the uploader admitted that he is not the author of these two files, but they received the permission from the copyrighted holder. Elwinlhq just need to submit the permission to OTRS in order to keep these files. BTW, Low resolution image with no (EXIF) metadata (Nomination made by admin) is a common reasons to be at DR. I don't know why you are nitpicking on me. If you want me to link a policy to support the DR, I would say it had COM:PCP concern. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- You can't use a discussion in response to a DR as justfication for having listed that DR as a trawling exercise beforehand!
- Nor is "low resolution with no EXIF" any relevance here because >1000px is not low resolution.
- If you'd had an honest reason to doubt these images (and you've given none so far) then you could (of course) have listed them as a DR. But you didn't, did you? You went for an undiscussed speedy instead, with your regular threat of blocking on top. You do this over and over and you seem more interested in getting rid of editors than in maintaining content. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- A1Cafel One is a photo of myself (Elwin Huaman) taken by me, so what is the issue there?, the second one about Elias Kärle, I got the rights for publishing it on Wikidata. If I understood well, your intention was to "intimidate" me for not filling out all EDIT attributes of the pictures and you want to block me for have been uploaded my own pictures? Or are you just sending an automatic message to all new editors? Elwinlhq (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- If your (A1Cafel) intention was to send me the message: "Elwinlhq just need to submit the permission to OTRS in order to keep these files." I would have appreciated more than trying to block me. Elwinlhq (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not seeing a strong case of deleting per COM:PCP, there are no other places where the same or higher resolution is being used elsewhere, only links to low resolution. Lack of a detailed EXIF, is more of a concern with photographs that are found online in a large quantity and I'm not seeing that with this image. A1Cafel's claim that the uploader is not the author is unfounded per [13] "thanks for your comments on the photo, however this is a mistake I got the rights for the photo and that is why I can upload it. Please, remove the copyright violation request. If you have any question or further comments, I will be glad to answer and hear it.", no where did they state that they are not the author. I'm AGF with the uploader of the photograph. Bidgee (talk) 02:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Elwinlhq: If you own this photo (which typically means you took it yourself), or if someone else has agreed to release it with a free license, that's great! But if it's in use on the internet before being uploaded here, we need you (or the person who owns it) to send a formal email. Just follow the instructions here: Commons:Wikimedia OTRS release generator, which will produce email text that you can easily copy/paste into an email. Once you send the email, edit the file page (the image page) and add this: {{Otrs-pending}} (with the curly brackets). That tells other people that you're working on it, so don't delete! :) — Rhododendrites talk | 13:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think you are taking AGF far too far in this case. The uploader has another warning for a file on his TP where they admit they didn't take it (despite claiming own work) but have the rights to it. Behaviour like this throws AGF out the window Gbawden (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Assuming good faith when someone selects the default upload option and hasn't actually received instructions about how to fix it beyond linking to some acronyms seems like a very small amount of AGF to me. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi User_talk:Rhododendrites, thank you for your answer, I can do this in order to clarify this misunderstanding, if there is something else that I can do, please just let me know. Elwinlhq (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- From the uploaders talk page "I got the rights for the photo and that is why I can upload it." Goes contrary to the claim of own work- thus deletion remains the best option unless we get OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021071610005574 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 05:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. The person in the photo died in 1927. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
какие еще авторские права !? а предыдущее фото было нормальным !? это мой пра-дед и фотография лежит у меня дома ! срочно удалите ваше вмешательство ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Вознесенский Д.С. (talk • contribs) 06:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
я не понимаю какие коды лицензии надо использовать для фото из личного архива, вставьте правильный, плиз — Preceding unsigned comment added by Вознесенский Д.С. (talk • contribs) 08:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Уважаемый Maxinvestigator ! вы отменили новую лицензию ! что вы предлагаете ? я поставил не свободную лицензию по образцам многих вики-страниц с персонами недавно умершими. Что вы хотите от этого файла ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Вознесенский Д.С. (talk • contribs) 06:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Если вы не обратили внимание после того, как оформили файл несвободным, он автоматически был вынесен к быстрому удалению. Тот факт, что на фотографии изображен ваш родственник, не делает вас правообладателем этой самой фотографии. Здесь указано, что данное изображение является репродукцией, если это была репродукция с опубликованного материала, то изображение будет свободным. Maxinvestigator (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Source that proves the status of the file added, PD now. --rubin16 (talk) 07:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of FIle:Flag of Montenegro (1905–1918).svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.
russavia (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Without OTRS permission after 9 days Alan (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.
russavia (talk) 16:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Deleted -FASTILY 07:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
As per this decision.
-- Tuválkin ✉ 09:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted some, kept some. For File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, since it's being used to illustrate the plaza, it would be a better to crop out The Bean rather than deleting the whole thing. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Obviously, it's time for another Cloud Gate DR. I've tried to be as generous as I felt was reasonable about only including the images that violate the copyright in this sculpture. For context, en:Cloud Gate is a public sculpture erected in 2006 in McCormick Park in Chicago. It is not only copyrighted (with no FOP for sculpture in the US), but the City of Chicago has licensed it from the artist, and requires permission for any commercial use of photographs (which is incompatible with Commons). I've tried to weed out the ones where either the Bean is a de minimis aspect of an image of the park itself, or where it's shape is not visible and it's only 'a mirrored object'. Most of these are simply not okay.
Reventtalk 12:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Regular cleaning of this category of new uploads of images that depict too much of this copyrighted work of art. - Reventtalk 22:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP for sculpture in the US, as per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.
— Jeff G. ツ 04:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC) In File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, the bean is de minimis, image hardly even has the bean in the photo. The sculpture is not even visible in File:Tented cloud gate.jpg. File:Cloud gate construction.jpg is simply a photo of a construction site, the sculpture had yet to be erected. It is inarguably de minimis in File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg. It is also minimus in File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG. It is hardly even visible in File:Millenium Park (7391867314).jpg. Seems to be de minimus in File:Bean from Kemper Tower (14958184744).jpg. Also, hardly the primary focal point of the image File:Chicago Bean.jpg. Not at all included in the image File:Cloud gate, Chicago skyline.jpg, as far as I can tell (not sure why it is in this category). Certainly not included in the image File:2008TIBE Day5 Hall1 ThemeSquare On the Road with Cloud Gate.jpg (should not be in this category at all). Not the primary focal point of the image File:The Bean - Millennium Park - panoramio.jpg. Some of these certainly should be spared, and the category itself should not be deleted. SecretName101 (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
The deletion of File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg would be particularly catastrophic, and utterly unnecessary. This is a valuable (and widely-used) image, in which the sculpture inarguably is de minimus. SecretName101 (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nom. 'kept some due to de minimis or similar. --JuTa 09:47, 13 December 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
still copyrighted, noting here so that it may be undeleted someday Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Deleted: speedily deleted as copyvios. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyrighted work, no freedom of panorama for public art in the US.
— Rhododendrites talk | 16:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Some of them can be cropped or have the work of art blurred out of them, and still be useful. I deleted the obvious cases, though.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Another set of derivative work copyvios: of a sculpture protected by copyright by its living artist w:Anish Kapoor. Previously these were categorized under Category:Millennium Park so they got undetected. See [18] and [19] for the basis of nomination for these perhaps last non-trivial images of the copyrighted sculpture. There is no freedom of panorama for all copyrighted artworks in the United States, see COM:FOP US. US de minimis is sharper (COM:DM United States), as it uses "triviality" concept instead of "incidental".
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Still another set of derivative work copyright violations. No FOP of any sort for copyrighted public works in the U.S. except architecture, and sculptor Anish Kapoor does not allow free culture (commercial) reuses of visual appearances of "his" artwork! See also above nominations. American de minimis uses triviality concept instead of incidental/accessory concept like those in Europe or much of Asia.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Cleaned up the nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States, and none of the nominated images show the sculpture in a trivial manner (U.S. de minimis is too narrower than European ones). This sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted all but one per DM. — Racconish 💬 15:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Several new files have been added that populate this category. I'm also tagging several older files that haven't been discussed before to gather consensus on whether they should be kept on de minimis grounds. At issue is that these files depict Cloud Gate, a copyrighted sculpture permanently installed in the US where there is no freedom of panorama for public art. Quoting an earlier successful deletion request, "this sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC." IMO the litigousness of the copyright holder should not affect our consistent application of standards around copyright law but it's been brought up before so I suppose it's worth bringing up again. First, there is one photo that is entirely of Cloud Gate for which a de minimis rationale would not apply: Second, there are several photos in which Cloud Gate appears at a distince within the larger context of the setting. A de minimis arguement could be made for these, and we have kept two files in the past (File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg and File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG) on these grounds. However, in both of those cases Cloud Gate is a significantly smaller and less focal portion of the image.
Third, several photos depict a portion of Cloud Gate up close, often with the inclusion of other elements in the foreground or background. Do these files qualify as de minimis inclusion of the copyrighted work? Consider this file which had most of Cloud Gate coropped out to focus on the background elements instead.
Finally, one photo is simply a selfie taken by way of the mirrored surface of Cloud Gate. This might be argued to be entirely a photo of the sculpture, or to be a completely de minimis usage. In either case, I'm nominating it here for consensus: Any of these files that aren't deleted (or that are partially cropped and saved) can be added to Category:Incidental views of the Cloud Gate. Thanks! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - kept one. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_Skardu,_Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg){kind=link}
,_Skardu.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_در_مجموعه_تلویزیونی_کلبه_عمو_پورنگ.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_v2.png){kind=link}
_001_2017_07_14.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-1,7a-Diepialexine-2D-skeletal.svg){kind=link}
-3,7-Dimethyl-10-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclodeca-3,7-dienone.svg){kind=link}
,_Skardu,_Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg){kind=link}
,_Skardu,_Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_Skardu,_Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg){kind=link}
,_Skardu,_Gilgit-Baltistan.jpg){kind=link}
,_Skardu.jpg){kind=link}
,_Skardu.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_Skardu.jpg){kind=link}
,_Skardu.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_%D8%AF%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B9%D9%87_%D8%AA%D9%84%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B2%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%86%DB%8C_%DA%A9%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%87_%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%88_%D9%BE%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%86%DA%AF.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D8%AF%D8%B1_%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B9%D9%87_%D8%AA%D9%84%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B2%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%86%DB%8C_%DA%A9%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%87_%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%88_%D9%BE%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%86%DA%AF.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_v3.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_v2.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_v2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_v2.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_v2.png){kind=link}
_v3.png){kind=link}
_v2.png){kind=link}
_001_2017_07_14.jpg){kind=link}
_001_2017_07_14.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_001_2017_07_14.jpg){kind=link}
_020_2017_07_14.jpg){kind=link}
_001_2017_07_14.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4131954934).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4865734246).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_at_night_2.jpg){kind=link}
_at_night.jpg){kind=link}
,_downtown_Chicago.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(302020237).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_night_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_night.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_downtown_Chicago.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(302020237).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179489717).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179490139).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179492567).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179493853).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179495047).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179495495).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9181703314).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9181706070).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004162135).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004164355).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004257826).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004321464).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004322814).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004323314).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004382903).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago_1_26_18_(26388865178).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago_1_26_18_(39343630775).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago,_IL.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_jmcmichael.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198161).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198196).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198236).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549620631).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549628831).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549635591).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35640530046).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35679751185).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198259).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198289).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(34839034874).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(34839040474).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549651301).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_vanz.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198126).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198144).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(801715).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 14
[edit]- File:Miniature Bean (28865844563)~3.jpg
- File:The Bean, Millennium Park, Chicago, Illinois (28865844563)~4.jpg
~3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 03:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, many similar earlier listings. COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Suspected Copyright violation, Owner in Description is not the same as in metadata. Luke081515 19:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
ویکیپدیا جای تبلیغ نیست! SmartWTF (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. Mozamaniac (talk) 09:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: DR is by uploader, but 3 months after upload. And [21] does not suggest an accidental upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence of licence in source. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 17:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, this is likely a copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 22:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:LL MiguelAlanCS (talk) 07:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I found no proof for the suspicion that this is LL. GeorgHH • talk 15:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence of LL, unlike other flickrwashers I have seen. --Gbawden (talk) 14:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
G2. Unnnecessary redirection Macucal (talk) 09:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the redirect is in use, the File is more than 5 Years old. --2003:DE:71E:AD71:91DF:6355:3C16:311F 18:52, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:File renaming#Leaving redirects moving a file without leaving a redirect is only allowed in three instances. This fits none of the three. Also per the IP. (non-admin closure) Jonteemil (talk) 01:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. Uploader claims it as "own work" but also attributes the photo to Walter Bird, who died in 1969, so... WikiDan61 (talk) 19:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
copy https://www.google.com/search?q=cimento+zebu&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2rr7drePxAhWKrZUCHd6gC1YQ_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1360&bih=625 Mário Bubniak (talk) 20:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
copy https://www.google.com/search?q=cimento+cau%C3%AA&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjay_3erePxAhWwu5UCHWjmADEQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=cimento+cau%C3%AA&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgQIABAYMgQIABAYMgQIABAYMgQIABAYMgQIABAYUKSGA1itlQNglZgDaABwAHgAgAGHAYgB6wOSAQMwLjSYAQCgAQGqAQtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ8ABAQ&sclient=img&ei=P0PvYJqwHbD31sQP6MyDiAM&bih=625&biw=1360&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853 Mário Bubniak (talk) 20:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
copy https://www.google.com/search?q=cimento+goias&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwiVpcT4rePxAhWrvZUCHZ7XDz8Q2-cCegQIABAA&oq=cimento+goias&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgYIABAIEB4yBAgAEBgyBAgAEBgyBAgAEBgyBAgAEBg6BQgAELEDUNDjAlj08wJg6_YCaABwAHgAgAGLAYgByAaSAQMwLjeYAQCgAQGqAQtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ8ABAQ&sclient=img&ei=dUPvYNWWBKv71sQPnq-_-AM&bih=625&biw=1360&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853 Mário Bubniak (talk) 20:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
copy https://www.google.com/search?q=cimento+cau%C3%AA&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjay_3erePxAhWwu5UCHWjmADEQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=cimento+cau%C3%AA&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgQIABAYMgQIABAYMgQIABAYMgQIABAYMgQIABAYUKSGA1itlQNglZgDaABwAHgAgAGHAYgB6wOSAQMwLjSYAQCgAQGqAQtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ8ABAQ&sclient=img&ei=P0PvYJqwHbD31sQP6MyDiAM&bih=625&biw=1360&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853 Mário Bubniak (talk) 20:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
copy https://www.google.com/search?q=cimento+goias&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwiVpcT4rePxAhWrvZUCHZ7XDz8Q2-cCegQIABAA&oq=cimento+goias&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgYIABAIEB4yBAgAEBgyBAgAEBgyBAgAEBgyBAgAEBg6BQgAELEDUNDjAlj08wJg6_YCaABwAHgAgAGLAYgByAaSAQMwLjeYAQCgAQGqAQtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ8ABAQ&sclient=img&ei=dUPvYNWWBKv71sQPnq-_-AM&bih=625&biw=1360&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853 Mário Bubniak (talk) 20:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
copy https://www.google.com/search?q=cimento+zebu&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2rr7drePxAhWKrZUCHd6gC1YQ_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1360&bih=625 Mário Bubniak (talk) 20:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vale93b as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: as per Commons:Deletion requests/Italian CoA rubin16 (talk) 10:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Ca%C3%ADda_muro_de_berlin.jpg Finn Yoshi (talk) 12:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Das Bild wird hier mit Copyright „Lionel Cironneau/Keystone“ und hier mit Copyright „AP“ verwendet. Ich denke nicht, dass es frei mit CC-Lizenz verwendet werden kann. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finn Yoshi (talk • contribs) 12:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; copyvio of https://www.luzernerzeitung.ch/international/in-berlin-fallt-die-mauer-so-schaffte-es-aram-radomski-als-erster-uber-die-grenze-ld.1165437 -M.nelson (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark M.nelson. --Ellywa (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Moje zdjęcie, nie zezwalam na publikowanie go AMQLabel (talk) 12:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader courtesy. Seems to be a photo of a non-notable artist so out of COM:SCOPE. -M.nelson (talk) 20:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark, in addition of no educational value and consequently out of scope per COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's own work, as it was earlier uploaded to Last.fm and appears to be a publicity photo https://www.last.fm/music/Alba+Reche/+images/84cc77e57df95c4cde4d20dd791aa383 Fences and windows (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - unlikely to be the uploader's own work, likely COM:NETCOPYVIO of last.fm. -M.nelson (talk) 20:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
