Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/07/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 11th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete as original image includes sensitive metadata Bowtakwah (talk) 01:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and revision deletion of 1st version. --Achim (talk) 07:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would like my image removed as I was not aware that it would be under a creative commons license. I am aware that I cannot revoke the license but would like to stop my distribution here. Sydney Metro Vlogs (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this photo for permanently. Huzaifa Mumit (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this photo and page. Huzaifa Mumit (talk) 14:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A.Tuna35 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. Random internet images and copyrighted logos without sources and permission.

Smooth O (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted as obvious copyvio. --rubin16 (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file/mis-uploaded. I might upload a better shot of this later. Blakegripling ph (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:15, 11 July 2021 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 20:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It contains a logo from a Business Butterflystring (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in my opinion this is not a problem, because the logo is simple. However, I delete the file due to missing educational value. Depicted person is unidentified, maybe non-notable. Uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 06:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT All associated wikipedia pages (EN and PL) have been deleted, due to self-promotion and non-notability. See consensus here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Polish_Ambassador Goffman82 (talk) 05:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 01:34, 12 July 2021 UTC: No permission since 30 June 2021 --Krdbot 14:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly not own work, but by Pranesh Pravin Walawalkar Vexations (talk) 22:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 11:33, 12 July 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 20:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 오대경 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Raw text without educational use.

SCP-2000 06:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The uploader has been locked because of spam-only account. SCP-2000 11:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 오대경 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

SCP-2000 03:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 오대경 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

SCP-2000 11:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate, sorry Judithcomm (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 10:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellywa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader cannot arrange permission, photo can be speedy deleted, see ticket as shown on image
I oppose to this speedy deletion: the upload was made after a thorough explanation with the depicted person and she claims to have the rights. I at least want the time to address the photographer and ask them to consider supporting the release under the CC-license. I have to say that asking a person for the contract or a proof of purchase of these rights I do find very, very doubtful in an OTRS-review process. I'd really like to here how other queues and languages handle this. Ciell (talk) 19:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Ciell (talk) 19:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, go ahead. Please note ticket:2021062710002254. Elly (talk) 20:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, thanks to the efforts of @Ciell: permission of the photographer is received. Elly (talk) 13:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Artwork without educational use. SCP-2000 03:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused PNG version replaced by SVG version A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE, out of scope - Nutshinou Talk! 09:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible self-promotion, no educational use CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image without educaional use Drakosh (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chongkwunying250 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image collection, all unused, out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   22:16, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Judithcomm (talk) 15:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 21:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dont need it up here anymore Slinkyw (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2021 Instagram do Facebook https://www.instagram.com/p/CMiePRTJ614/?utm_medium=copy_link Lentoster (talk) 22:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Minoraxtalk 06:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The one who upload the photo is apparently not the author. Koala0090 (talk) 00:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by Fitindia. --Jianhui67 TC 10:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The one who upload the photo is apparently not the author. Koala0090 (talk) 00:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by Fitindia. --Jianhui67 TC 10:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong photo uploaded please delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subodhkumarbthbthbth (talk • contribs) 2021-07-06T14:57:04‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shivvbhardwajj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promo on enwp

Minoraxtalk 02:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If we do not know even country, then the file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 06:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo on wikidata & no permission Minoraxtalk 09:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is own work. Higher resolution can be found here. No meta data. Wouter (talk) 09:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rodolfo Gonzales Cruz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appear to be TV screenshots

Ytoyoda (talk) 10:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: screenshot of a Mac OS and a website CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: the name on the photographs indicates it is not a personnal work from Simon Fletcher CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: screenshot of a webpage CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: screenshot of a webpage CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by H.dogan555 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giuseppe Audino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giuseppe Audino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inocnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain text, out of project scope. Achim (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1ntercalare1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Burmese Editor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation.

NinjaStrikers «» 16:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work. Google Images Search returns with same images NinjaStrikers «» 16:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, no cat, just a test, etc F (talk) 17:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jeg innså at det er dårlig for mitt personvern JOestby (talk) 19:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kamel MEZITI Kamel Meziti (talk) 16:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request. It is also likely to be a copyright violation. --Ahmadtalk 23:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer needed Colin.champion (talk) 08:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the uploader did not provided sufficient information about on this media's copyright status. Philcom700 (talk) 18:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader did not provide sufficient information on this media's copyright status 95.237.48.112 02:12, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the uploader did not provided sufficient information about on this media's copyright status. 87.18.203.210 19:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at alll. --JuTa 05:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a COM:DW A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; photo of a photo - needs permission from original photographer. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kawakamiyoshihiro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work

A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is no longer needed. Cayman42 (talk) 18:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing from the uploader to say they own this image Lugnuts (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe meine Meinung geändert. Ich möchte nicht mehr, dass es öffentlich sichtbar ist. 15000 Röntgen (talk) 20:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own-work claim: watermark, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader and subject have the smae name and it is not a selfie, so there may be another person who was the photographer and owns the copyright. Also, we are told that this is a Pressfoto, which suggests a different possibility, also with the uploader not the owner of the copyright.

It's a small image with no EXIF. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And the flickr account mentioned is flickrwashing, 2 photos, no followers, created in 2021 Gbawden (talk) 14:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 3D works in USA Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 3D works in USA Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 3D works in USA Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 3D works in USA Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 3D works in USA Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 2D & 3D works in USA Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 2D & 3D works in USA Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 3D works in USA Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete this please Slinkyw (talk) 02:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused and hardly usable. Courtesy. --Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Binksternet (talk) 02:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Binksternet (talk) 02:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Binksternet (talk) 02:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Binksternet (talk) 02:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was hastily restored and without a consensus on the premise that The Dark Side Of The Moon album is a Unites States work that failed to comply with Unites States copyright formalities. This is nonsense and appropriate basis has not been offered.

Per COM:L, works must be free in both the United States and country of origin, if different.
This is not a United States work:
  1. The Dark Side Of The Moon cover was designed by Hipgnosis (an English graphic design firm) and George Hardie (an English graphic designer). The cover was purchased by Pink Floyd (an English band). To the extent a band is not a legal entity, the purchasing entity would be understood to be the individual band members (all English) or EMI Recording Studios (an English music recording studio). Accordingly, this work was created by an English entity, sold to an English entity, and necessarily distributed though multiple entities such as printers, advertisers, etc. before any album on which it appeared was offered to consumers (verily, one must print an album before it can exist to be sold).
  2. UK Copyright Law, like US copyright law, holds that copyright subsists upon creation. If the argument that this is a United States work because it was first published on album covers in the United States is to be accepted, the aforementioned transactions, sales, and distributions would necessarily have been of an unpublished work. UK Copyright Law sets forth the "If the work is unpublished [...] the country of origin is [...] the country of which the author of the work is a national". (15A(5)) Accordingly, even hypothetical acceptance of first publication on a United States album cover would not render this a United States work under UK law.
  3. Further, even if we ignore the work's existence and UK origin as an unpublished work, publication in the United Kingdom was within 30 days of the earlier publication in the United States (the basis for restoration was 24 February 1973 Billboard appearance, and there was a London premier 27 February 1973). Again, per UK Copyright Law, "If the work is first published simultaneously in two or more countries of which two or more are Berne Convention countries, then (a) if the United Kingdom is one of those countries, the country of origin is the United Kingdom" (15A(4)), where "references to simultaneous publication are to publication within 30 days of first publication" (15A(6)(b)) Эlcobbola talk 16:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep I agree with elcobbola's analysis of the facts under U.K. law above, and I agree that this artwork is copyrighted in the United Kingdom. However, I don't think that U.K. law is the right lens under which to examine the copyright status—COM:L states that In cases where a work is simultaneously published in multiple countries, the "country of origin" is the country which grants the shortest term of copyright protection, we appear to have simultaneous publication in the United States and the United Kingdom, and the U.R.A.A. analysis given in the undeletion discussion indicates that the work is presently in the public domain in the United States due to simultaneous publication in the U.S.A. and abroad while failing to adhere to U.S.A. copyright formalities for copies distributed in America (a number of dates regarding how the artwork was first used in several contexts are available in several documents available at TSDR, none of which appear pre-date to the advertisement in Billboard that was brought up in that discussion). In other words, my reading of that policy is that in this case of simultaneous publication in the United Kingdom and the United States, what Commons deems the "country of origin" would appear to be the United States when the United States grants less copyright protection—regardless of the nationality of the creator. (Similarly, the country of origin would be the United Kingdom when the U.K. grants less copyright protection, though this is moot because the file has to be PD in the U.S.A. even if the U.S.A. is not the country of origin.)
My reason for describing this as "weak keep" is that, in hindsight after starting all of this, this seems to be relying on an edge case that may not have been the subject of adequate public discussion when the policy was written. What I initially filed as an undeletion request probably should have been preceded by a discussion on COM:VPC as to how this sort of edge case should be handled, and it might be wise to have that general discussion so that we can definitely resolve this going forward. For the time being, however, the text of the policy is real, and we probably shouldn't be deleting files that comply with our licensing policy merely because this is an edge case that the text of the policy presently allows.
(For what it's worth regarding the band as a legal entity and its previous action related to this mark, the band's IP appears to be presently registered to Pink Floyd 1987, Ltd., a company based in the United Kingdom. There are some past companies, such as Pink Floyd Music, Ltd., that may have held rights to other IP that the band collectively created. When Pink Floyd 1987, Ltd. has filed lawsuits in the United States that use the cover art without their authorization, they have done so under trademark law without stating claims related to copyright. The registered trademark, of course, is a non-copyright restriction, so it doesn't affect the ability to host the file on Commons.) — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Shouldn't have been undeleted in the first place. Now it has, but then it should be re-deleted. Treating the album cover as one of US works is a lot to ask for, especially in this international project and when the cover was created and designed by British artist under a British company. We can't assume that it's a US work just because a few of US magazines like Billboard used the cover as part of pre-release advertising. Other UK publications must have most likely used the album cover as well before the album's initial UK release. We can't assume the album cover was wasn't used in British pre-release advertisements just because they haven't yet been found. Furthermore, this project shouldn't be above (what) the Berne Convention (applies) or any other applicable US–UK treaty or international treaty. Speaking of Berne, when the album was first released, the UK was a Berne member, but the US wasn't until 1989 or 1990. Berne Convention would've protected the album cover by then as Berne didn't count the US as one of its members. George Ho (talk) 03:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC); corrected, 15:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Further note: Nothing against Yann personally, but suggesting others to find a British pre-release advertisement before re-nominating this image for deletion would be asking or begging for a lot, wouldn't it? Also, what about COM:PCP under assumption that such pre-release ad can be found? --George Ho (talk) 15:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This is definitely an edge case as we do have evidence of US publication. But I basically also agree with Elcobbola that this is ultimately a UK artwork, and therefore cannot be hosted on Commons yet. Abzeronow (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The keep argument is interesting, but it is involved rather than simple. Several conditions must align. It wants to use US law on a UK creation for a publication failure, but it does not want to use the US sense of publication, so there is an argument that the UK sale was not publication but rather licensing. Why can't it be both? Failing that, there's an argument that the UK art was merely derived from the UK art. It is too tenuous for me. Glrx (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no permission (No permission since) Bogdanov-62 (talk) 04:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Racconish. --Minoraxtalk 11:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Khmergfn15 (talk) 10:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Khmergfn15 (talk) 10:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nachweise fehlen Wname1 (talk) 12:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Racconish. --Minoraxtalk 11:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a publication, which is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 13:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused personal photo of non-contributor and non-notable person George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 06:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo per COM:TOO China

Minoraxtalk 12:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of television channels and networks of China. --Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo per Commons:TOO China.

Minoraxtalk 12:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G4 by Túrelio . - FitIndia Talk 06:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo per COM:TOO China.

Minoraxtalk 10:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission to be own work. Nghiemtrongdai VN (talk) 08:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by King of Hearts at 04:31, 23 July 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Not own work, taken from Internet (source date 2020) http://daidoanket.vn/nha-van-quan-doi-phung-van-khai-toi-viet-tren-tinh-than-vun-ven-lich-su-dan-toc-547109.html --Krdbot 08:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist w:Dyre Vaa died in 1980, which means this public art is still unfree. There is no commercial FOP for non-architecture in Norway. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Derivative of artistic work the rights to which are still retained by heirs of the artist. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this photo. I uploaded it, but now I can't find my account details of Wikipedia account. So, I want to delete this photo and then create a new account and start again with a new account. Supunhab (talk) 06:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept. Whether or not you are the photographer starting a new account, that is not a reason to delete. Uploaded more than a year ago. No evident problem with image, which is in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this photo. I uploaded it, but now I can't find my account details of Wikipedia account. So, I want to delete this photo and then create a new account and start again with a new account. Supunhab (talk) 06:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept. Whether or not you are the photographer starting a new account, that is not a reason to delete. Uploaded more than a year ago. No evident problem with image; good quality and in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is from his Instagram, so is not a free use image SSSB (talk) 18:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is from his twitter and therefore not a free use image SSSB (talk) 06:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned Image. Rkalanidhi (talk) 17:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion. In use on 6 wikis. --Achim (talk) 19:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Invalid deletion reason claim. Image is properly categorized and in use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque carreguei a imagem errada. Entretanto já carreguei a correta. sanjorgepinho (talk) 18:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to copyrighted (see the watermark in image), but im not sure as the source isn't written in a language I can read. Zppix (talk) 18:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, CV, false license claim. "Droits de reproduction et de diffusion réservés © 2004-2020" = not free. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's obviously by Marcus Adams [2]. Adams died in 1959. His works are copyrighted in the UK until 2030. DrKay (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's obviously by Marcus Adams. This is a famous photo he took, see e,g, [3]. Adams died in 1959. His works are copyrighted in the UK until 2030. DrKay (talk) 18:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque sí Sinsentido Bea.miau (talk) 21:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I don't understand what is the problem with this pic... ? Sebleouf (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Mundane detail perhaps, but well observed and photographed. Not nonsense; no problem. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in source country

Nightingale (talk) 12:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Katō Kiyomasa (ja:加藤清正) at the en:Nagoya Noh Theater (ja:名古屋能楽堂) was created by Shizuo Takato (ja:高藤鎮夫). [4] The year of his death is 1988. [5] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:24, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? this is monument. not Art! KKPCW (talk) 06:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 14:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Katō Kiyomasa (ja:加藤清正) at the en:Nagoya Castle (ja:名古屋城), named "清正公石曳きの像" (Statue of Kiyomasa's Stone Pulling), was created by Shoji Ishiguro (ja:石黒鏘二). [6] The year of his death is 2013. [7] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC) This is not art! Monument. Why???????????? KKPCW (talk) 13:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 16:42, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence image released under creative commons license SecretName101 (talk) 01:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakenly created while cropping. Requested by original uploader. -钉钉 (talk) 05:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept. Image uploaded in 2017, too long for courtesy deletion; @Jeff G.: removed deletion request tag same day as nomination. User:Billinghurt states not a dupe. (No opinion on whether should be relisted for more specific reason; noting that already closed on the image page.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by the musician pictured in the photo, for use in Wikipedia article written about himself, violating self-promotion rules. COM:ADVERT The wikipedia pages (EN and PL) have been deleted, due to self-promotion and non-notability. See consensus here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Polish_Ambassador Goffman82 (talk) 05:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom and no evident in scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:08, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist w:Dyre Vaa died in 1980, which means all of these public artworks are still unfree for 70+1 years after his death. There is no commercial FOP for non-architecture in Norway. The images depict his protected 3D artworks in more than incidental or "not the main subject" / COM:DM way.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files show works by Norwegian sculptor and painter en:Dyre Vaa, who died in 1980. So they are still protected by copyright in Norway, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2051.

Rosenzweig τ 17:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files show sculptures by Norwegian sculptor en:Dyre Vaa, who died in 1980. So they are still protected by copyright in Norway. There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for sculptures etc., only for buildings. So the files are not ok for Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. They can be restored in 2051, except for the photo of the 1972 "piperen" sculpture, which can be restored in 2068 (URAA).

Rosenzweig τ 17:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo seems to be similar to phto on her homepage (https://sites.google.com/site/sallalintonen/photos , upper photo under "2019", marked "Photos ©Yannick Rosset". Source and author is given but there is no proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license. Evidence of permission should be provided. Htm (talk) 07:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, pcp, and COM:EVID.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:13, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was used on an article that has since been deleted due to failed GNG. Won't find usage in the future. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom, uncat since March, no evident in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 02:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 雷電1990 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Out of scope maps relating to coverage of TV/radio stations with no guarantee of accuracy. One of the maps even states it is for 2023, which is too advanced and leaning towards w:WP:CRYSTAL (advanced mag-isip or advanced thinking, even if there is no assurance that the station coverage will be really like the ones indicated on the map by 2023).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 雷電1990 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

These are essentially unused files redundant to File:Labelled map of the Philippines - Provinces and Regions.png, File:Ph regions and provinces.svg, and File:Ph regions and provinces.png. Additionally, there is no indicated source on where the base map was obtained: is the base map uploader's own work, came from an another map here on Commons, or came from an external source?

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 雷電1990 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Out of scope logos (unused), and a file of a flag with unknown attribution plus horrible title. All made by a now-blocked sockpuppet.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free content, no prove that the author is the creator of this post A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"No prove". If you can't read or write Englsh, or autotranslated templates, please don't mess around with deletion. I am the author of this post, as the template clearly states. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misuse of {{FoP-Norway}} template. Norwegian freedom of panorama is noncommercial for depictions of public art like sculptures, but noncommercial is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Only buildings can be freely depicted. So unless the depicted works (e.g. sculptures or literary texts) are works of sculptors or authors who have been dead for more than 70 years ({{PD-Norway}}), these images intentionally showing the sculptures or literary texts (like informational signs) with wrong use of FoP-Norway tag may need to be deleted.

Note that the posthumous copyright term in Norway is 70+1 years after the artists' deaths.

Works by w:Carl E. Paulsen (died 1973, undelete in 2044)
Works by w:Dyre Vaa (died 1980, undelete in 2051)
Works by no:Gunnar Janson (d. 1983, restore in 2054)
Works by no:Brit Sørensen (died 2008, restore in 2079)
Other nominated images

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copivio (photo of a book page) Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 04:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakenly created while cropping. Requested by original uploader. -钉钉 (talk) 05:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot or screen grab. Sreejith K (talk) 05:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:24, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1950 monument in Bergen, Norway is the work of sculptor en:Dyre Vaa, who died in 1980. So it is still protected by copyright in Norway. There is no freedom of panorama in Norway for sculptures etc., only for buildings. So the files are not ok for Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. They can be restored in 2051.

Rosenzweig τ 16:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While a copy of this image was once posted on a U.S. government website (a press release at NIH.gov), the photograph is most likely not the official work of a Federal employee: EXIF metadata states author is Chris Goodfellow, who is a photographer for the Gladstone Institutes, with which Dr. Ott is affiliated. Unless there is additional compelling evidence to the contrary, or formal permission from the photographer/copyright holder, this photograph is not free. --Animalparty (talk) 06:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source and EXIF metadata indicate copyright is held by Colorado State University. Merely being hosted on a U.S. Government website does not magically turn images public domain. --Animalparty (talk) 07:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspect that file is unlikely to be "own work". Low res suggests grabbed from web. Three hits in TinEye from 2008, 2010, 2014. User pahadi boy has similar editing pattern to User:Himanshu baghel (baghel boy), whose uploads I nominated for two speedies. If the original painting is PD or freely licensed, then that needs to be demonstrated. Pelagic (talk) 07:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure what this picture is. It is unused, has no camera details. Th uploader has a track record of uploading unpermissioned pictures stated to have been given to them by the artist. This may be part of that series, in which case COM:OTRS should be used to grant permission and prevent this discussion from moving to deletion. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Likely out of scope for Commons, educational value not established Timtrent (talk) 08:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, possible copyvio. 176.59.52.36 08:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake licence, there is no mention on that youtube video or channel that re-use is allowed Snowflake91 (talk) 09:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The first version of the file has a signature of the creator (Ercüment Tutar) and there is no proof that the uploader is that person. High possibility of copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from here, as it's mentioned on the file description. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a very low quality image and there is a better version: File:Sophie Caroline Marie von Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel Matthias Heinrich Schnürer 001.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 09:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously modern statues. No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is from a printed material, probably. We can see dots. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sophisticated logo uploaded over a validly licensed text logo. Please delete only the latest version. Ytoyoda (talk) 10:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite dubious if really own work. Looks more like a photo from a magazine (or newspaper) page. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite dubious if really own work. Looks more like a photo from a magazine (or newspaper) page. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite dubious if really own work. Looks more like a photo from a magazine (or newspaper) page. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite dubious if really own work. Looks more like a photo from a magazine (or newspaper) page. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite dubious if really own work. Looks more like a photo from a magazine (or newspaper) page. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

e Khmergfn15 (talk) 11:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Pleaes provide a policy-based reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Takeda Katsuyori (ja:武田勝頼) at the en:Kai-Yamato Station (ja:甲斐大和駅) was erected in 2002. [8] No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Honda mon.svg file is identified as a fake image created by PD-Art, but it is found that the file contains copyright separately, so it needs to be deleted. Gameposo (talk) 12:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Knestis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works (copies/scans) of existing photos, not the uploader's own work. Some may be eligible for PD-old depending on the original author and publication history.

-M.nelson (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All of the above-referenced digital images are scans or photos of prints from Kirk family photo albums, which I have in my possession. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knestis (talk • contribs) 16:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)--Knestis (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks Knestis. Could you update Source, Author (photographer), and Date (original photo date) on the images to make it clear when they were originally taken and by whom?
    The copyright status of the images still needs to be determined. If you inherited the photos from the photographer/copyright owner, you might be presumed to have inherited the copyright, and the license {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}} might be appropriate. Otherwise, the copyright status will depend on if/when the photo was published, or (if/)when the photographer died, per the table at Copyright rules by territory/United States. -M.nelson (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, needs proper license and permission A1Cafel (talk) 13:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly needs clarification; contradictory statements - is it from 1995 or 2021? Is the uploader the photographer? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value 96.245.88.219 13:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Sugiyama Waichi (ja:杉山和一) in en:Enoshima (ja:江の島) was erected in 2020. [9] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Conbabs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a picture of me that I don't want to have published Finnpei (talk) 14:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Satisfies COM:VAND. Uploader intention is only to spread hatred towards a particular group using Wikipedia. There is no mention of licencing here and it can be seen at http://chithrakaran.blogspot.com/ 157.44.179.79 14:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mainspace it was used on was deleted due to failed GNG. This image won't find any use in the future. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mainspace it was used on was deleted due to failed GNG. This image won't find any use in the future. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Jagan Nath University Bahadurgarh 2.jpg. It won't find any use in the future as the mainspace article on Wikipedia was deleted over failed GNG. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In this image, main objects are fireworks. Photos of fireworks are allowed. (See also: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Fireworks displays) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Fireworks are the focus. --Missvain (talk) 02:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In this image, main object is Seokchon Lake. To make the main object a little clearer, I cropped the upper part of the image. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I am not convinced the lake is the focus of this photo. you can still see the buildings pretty clearly. Feel free to take this to undeletion request if you disagree or feel strongly about my decision. --Missvain (talk) 02:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In this image, main object is clean sky. This photo was uploaded for the purpose of illustrating air pollution in South Korea. (Comparison of days with a lot of fine dust and days with little fine dust) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Pretty clear that the skyscraper is the focus. Feel free to take this to undeletion request if you disagree or feel strongly about my decision. --Missvain (talk) 02:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [10], and tower masked. Yann (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was used on an article that has since been deleted due to failed GNG. Won't find usage in the future. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why unlikely? It seems to me there's a high likelihood of the owner being the uploader, who is a French speaker with parkour in their account name and who edited the Parkour article a few months later. Unless you're accusing the account of being a sockpuppet because it has only a few edits. ··gracefool | 00:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Takeda Shingen (ja:武田信玄) at the en:Kōfu Station (ja:甲府駅) was created by Torahiko Miyachi (ja:宮地寅彦). [11] The year of his death is 1995. [12] No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. There is an older version and any future corrections can be uploaded over that file. Fry1989 eh? 16:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:42, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be an own-work, since the image has no Metadata or categories, and was uploaded from a new user with a questionable upload history. Also shares similarities towards a YouTube video from 2015. Link20XX (talk) 17:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:42, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Maeda Toshiie (ja:前田利家) at the Komaruyama Park (ja:小丸山公園) in Nanao City, named "前田利家松子之像" (en:Statue of Maeda Toshiie and Matsuko), was erected in 2001. [13] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings - yes, I agree. As uploader I did not know the age of this statue; and of course the law must be followed. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 21:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Daderot: Thank you for understanding. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:44, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue on the mailbox is obviously a recent artwork. No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request : metadata encoding error - needs re-upload (1st upload… 1 of 3 files) Smooth Guy (talk) 18:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request : metadata encoding error - needs re-upload (1st upload… 1 of 3 files) Smooth Guy (talk) 18:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata encoding error - needs re-upload Smooth Guy (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Cyberman: https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/doctor-who-ranking-the-cybermen-stories-which-is-the-best/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request : metadata encoding error - needs re-upload (1st upload… 1 of 3 files) Smooth Guy (talk) 18:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File no longer used after the mainspace was deleted over failed GNG and copyright violation. The uploader of this file is an account from the school itself which is a conflict of interest. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File can't be used after the mainspace was deleted over failed GNG and copyright violation. The uploader of this file is an account from the school itself which is a conflict of interest. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is no longer needed. Cayman42 (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the video is marked CC, this image is a still image that's not original to the video and is likely owned by a photo agency or ESPN. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Hasegawa Tōhaku (ja:長谷川等伯) at the Nanao Marine Park (ja:七尾マリンパーク) was created by Taro Tanaka (ja:田中太郎). (This statue is the same design as the statue erected at the Nanao Station in 1990.) [14] The year of his death is 1992. [15] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! As uploader, I have absolutely no objection. I did not know the sculptor, or when he died - of course the law must be followed. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Daderot: Thank you for understanding. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nomination and discussion. It is regrettable that Japanese FOP is for noncommercial only for artistic works, though noncommercial does not fit with COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

+File:Table of Nations2.png
+File:Table of Nations3.png
Not educational, and they are unsourced. Those are supposed to be about the world as seen in the book of Genesis (Bible), yet it has Cro-Magnon, Scandinavia, Caledonia, Japanese, Berbers, Minoeans, Austroasiatic languages, Tibeno-Burman languages, Sinitic languages, (second image) the Afar triple junction, the Ethiopian Mount Olympus, the Mongols and other things. The creator has refused to indicate his/her source(s) for those images. Veverve (talk) 22:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Maeda Toshiie (ja:前田利家) at the Arako Station (ja:荒子駅) in Nagoya City was erected in 平成19年 (=2007). [16] No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Why?? This is not art! mounment. KKPCW (talk) 07:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue of en:Minamoto no Yoritomo (ja:源頼朝) at the Genjiyama Park (ja:源氏山公園 (鎌倉市)) in Kamakura City was erected in 1980. [17] No FoP in Japan for 3D works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No commercial Freedom of Panorama for copyrighted non-architecture in Japan.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an original work by {{Mehr}} 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 139.59.242.243 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <用戶盜取的個人旅行照片可以在這裡找到。從我的社交資料中竊取的照片。必須一勞永逸地阻止此用戶>
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as nominator, who claims copyvio (translat. from Chinese: Personal travel photos stolen by users can be found here. Photos stolen from my social profile. This user must be blocked once and for all), did not provide any evidence. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Kept: No evidence provided by the nominator, nor am I getting any reverse image search results. --King of ♥ 03:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeated Yuanga (talk) 18:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear what nominator means but COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ 03:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il s'agit probablement d'un vandalisme au vu du nom et de la description de la photo Eru (talk) 07:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 16:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is contemporary art in Costa Rica; the artist is https://es-la.facebook.com/pg/PinturasyArtesaniasBonilla, so still living; no FOP in Costa Rica JopkeB (talk) 12:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


MY ANSWER Costa Rican carts are painted with the same patterns by many artisans, and this is just a photo of a painted cart in a public place, so there is no copyright infringement at all. If it makes you happy to delete it, go ahead, I guess you mean well, but now you know there is no valid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MongeNajera (talk • contribs)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is contemporary art in Costa Rica; the artist is https://es-la.facebook.com/pg/PinturasyArtesaniasBonilla, so still living; no FOP in Costa Rica JopkeB (talk) 12:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
REBUTTAL Costa Rican carts are painted with the same patterns by many artisans, and this is just a photo of a painted cart in a public place, so there is no copyright infringement at all. If it makes you happy to delete it, go ahead, but now you know there is no valid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MongeNajera (talk • contribs) 11 jul 2021 16:43‎ (UTC)

No, it makes me not happy that these two photos might be deleted, I like the photos. But there are laws to be respected, and that is more important than keeping photos on Commons. "FOP" means Freedom of Panorama. For Costa Rica it is not allowed to commercially use photos of art of which the maker is not dead for 70 years or longer, see Freedom of Panorama in Costa Rica. It should be possible that all photos on Commons may be used commercially, so photos of art of Costa Rica, even when they are taken outside, are not allowed. The moderator who will decide about this deletion, will judge whether the painting on this cart required enough creativity to exclude this photo from Commons. (And please sign your contributions to discussions, use ~~~~ to do so.) JopkeB (talk) 04:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not an official crest of RKS Raków Częstochowa. It contains bad fonts and colours. Present logo is available to download on official site - Rakow.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majkel93 (talk • contribs) 2021-07-09T19:50:29‎ (UTC) Hi, please replace the old logo with the current one, I also attach it here. Thank you. You have the current logo here: https://rakow.com/assets/images/soccer/RKS_herb.png- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olaf.lubinski (talk • contribs) 12:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: An SVG can be trivially edited to provide the right colors; it is easier to do so starting with an existing file than having to create it from scratch or asking an admin to restore. --King of ♥ 23:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 188.127.20.223 as Logo Yann (talk) 16:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published https://www.facebook.com/cfc.aero/photos/a.541170052617570.1073741825.124172404317339/766522883415618, though likely taken from somewhere on http://cfc.aero/ or http://annaserbinenko.com. Either way, unlikely to be own work, especially considering the author listed in the metadata doesn't appear to match the original uploader. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with this picture or its copyright. It adds informative illustration to the wiki entry. Therefore it should not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.103.235.244 (talk) 03:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questo file va cancellato poiché ho immesso dati errati sulla fonte originale Claudio Doliana (talk) 05:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   18:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

मैंने इसे गलती से अपलोड कर दिया है Rupchandrakushwaha (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Uploader's request but in use on hi:कुशवंश. --Achim (talk) 08:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   18:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's by Cecil Beaton. Beaton died in 1980. His works are copyrighted in the UK until 2051. DrKay (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, I also nominated this file for deletion because it' a derivative work of this other.

Cordial greetings.

79.145.175.244 18:54, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]