User talk:Sanjorgepinho

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sanjorgepinho!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thank you. sanjorgepinho (talk) 01:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:EPP Congress Zagreb 2019 09.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:EPP Congress Zagreb 2019 09.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably right. I did not know that I could not photograph election campaigns without identifying the perpetrators. You can remove the photo because I don't know who created it.sanjorgepinho (talk) 23:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikivoyage

[edit]

Não tenho telegram, más pode ser via e-mail ou na página da Wikivoyage, ou enfim na minha página pessoal. Já agora aproveito para dar-te os parabéns para a tua página, devias fazer a mesma em português. Subscrevo-me com os melhores cumprimentos Xicodaponte (talk) 10:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

O Wiki Loves Earth 2020 em Portugal começou!

[edit]

Category:Praia de Galapinhos

[edit]

Não foi a minha edição que "deslocou as coordenadas da praia de Galapinhos para 38° 30′ 00″ N, 9° 00′ 00″ O e que estão erradas". Acrescentar ou apagar uma categoria não interfere com as coordenadas. O que se passou foi com a Wikidata, com duas coordenadas diferentes, situação que você já resolveu. Tm (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Já verifiquei que não foi você, desculpe-me. Quem fez a fusão no Wikidata, a partir do Q62125906 para o Q49324260, esqueceu-se de atualizar o Wikidata ID no OpenStreetMap, mantendo-se lá o Q62125906, originando este erro. Assim, depois de atualizar o Wikidata no OpenstreetMap, as coordenadas voltaram a estar corretas.sanjorgepinho (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Não há problema algum. Todos nós cometemos enganos e, para esclarecer, não tinha reparado que alguém tinha feito a fusão de dois items na Wikidata. Com os melhores cumprimentos. Tm (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Concelho de Sabrosa 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

sanjorgepinho (talk) 23:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:


Palosirkka (talk) 21:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already put a picture there. I will post the others later.sanjorgepinho (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Terrorist organization has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 08:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 16:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 16:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 16:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 16:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]