Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![33 File:Album "Sehnsucht".jpg](#File:Album_"Sehnsucht".jpg){kind=link}
![34 File:Album "Liebe und mehr...".jpg](#File:Album_"Liebe_und_mehr...".jpg){kind=link}
![39 File:"Rybka" .png](#File:"Rybka"_.png){kind=link}
Mina_Luna_Vincent_(Q106666859)hands.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Parce qu’elle est Non-sens Lmane8939 (talk) 00:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Non sense est seulement ton remarque. C’est lhistoire de l’eglise, qui on peut voir en toutes les eglises ortodoxes.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 01:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 02:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Johnjoshua1 and sockpuppets
[edit]- File:Disenchanted logo.jpg
- File:Doug Peterson (Nebraska politician).jpg
- File:Al Gross.jpg
- File:Gomez-Heritage Elementary School.jpg
- File:Chris Janicek.jpg
- File:Kate Bolz.jpg
- File:Vinny Palermo.jpg
- File:Daniel Eugene Sheehan.jpg
- File:James Hugh Ryan.png
- File:Jeffrey J. Funke.jpg
- File:Justice Michael Heavican.jpg
- File:Joseph Rummel.jpg
- File:Heath Mello.jpg
- File:Chairwoman Jane Kleeb.jpg
- File:Lindsey Miller-Lerman.jpg
- File:Stephanie Stacy.jpg
- File:Michael Heavican Chief Justice.jpg
- File:James Myles O.Gorman.jpg
- File:Omaha City Council. svg.png
- File:Pete Fetersen.jpg
- File:R. M. Marrs Magnet Middle School.jpg
- File:Mike Boyle .jgp.jpg
- File:Vinny Palermo.jgp.jpg
- File:Raymond Joseph Neary.jpg
- File:Fdfdgc.png
- File:Archbishop George Joseph Lucas.jpg
- File:George Joseph Lucas in 2018.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These are all lifted from the very URL specified in the file, and are all (c) all rights reserved by the copyright holders, with no evidence of reassignment or licensure to this individual. --Elizium23 (talk) 02:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (except 2 ineligible): per nomination. — Racconish 💬 07:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
mirrored version of File:Engraving Fonvizin.jpg. don't mirror historical images! it's misleading Алексей Скрипник (talk) 10:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be withdrawn. --JuTa 12:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Above the originality threshold in the People's Republic of China RyanCray (talk) 05:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio https://www.anel.qc.ca/formateur/bertrand-laverdure/ Supertoff (talk) 05:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:25, 13 June 2021 UTC: Copyvio https://www.anel.qc.ca/formateur/bertrand-laverdure/ © Association nationale des éditeurs de livres 2021. Tous droits réservés. / --Krdbot 14:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
L'ho caricata per errore Alexdechi (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out os scope. — Racconish 💬 16:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. — Racconish 💬 16:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md atif zafar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:IMG-20210119-WA0011.jpg
- File:IMG-20210113-WA0020.jpg
- File:IMG-20210125-WA0009.jpg
- File:IMG-20210119-WA0012.jpg
- File:Md atif zafar.jpg
- File:Md atif.jpg
- File:Dhanbad boy.jpg
- File:Md atif zafar dhanbad.jpg
Minoraxtalk 03:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manoj tyagi1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Keshav Mehta ,Sandeep Mishra Sudhir Dahiya, Kapil Vyas Kumbh 2019 Prayagraj.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Keshav Mehta & Sudhir Dahiya Kumbh 2019 Prayagraj.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Keshav Mehta & Sandeep Mishra & Suresh Kumbh 2019 Prayagraj.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Chinmayanand Bapu Ji Kumbh 2019 Prayagraj.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Chinmayanand Bapu Ji & Sudhir Dahiya Kumbh 2019 Prayagraj.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Chinmayanand Bapu Ji & Keshav Mehta Kumbh 2019 Prayagraj.jpg
- File:Manoj.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Virender Sehwag(Indian cricketer).jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Swami Ramdev Ji & Swami Avdheshanand Giri Ji-Sudhir Dahiya.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Sushil Kumar(Indian wrestler).jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Rajat Sharma(Indian TV Host).jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Jaya Kishori Ji.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Swami Ramdev Ji, Laxmi Narain Goel Ji & Jawahar Goel Ji.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Laxmi Narain Goel Ji & Jawahar Goel Ji.jpg
- File:Swami Ramdev Ji With Acharya Balkrishna Ji & Pramod Joshi.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi1.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Vijender Singh(professional boxer).jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi2.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Swami Ramdev Ji & Shankar Mahadevan.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Swami Ramdev & Shekhar Ravjiani,Sonakshi Sinha,Kanika Kapoor.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Sushil Kumar & Sudhir Dahiya.jpg
- File:Manoj tyagi With Suresh Goel.jpg
- File:Manoj. Tyagi.jpg
- File:Manoj.Tyagi.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tygai.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi-With Didi Maa Sadhvi Ritambara ji.jpg
- File:ManojTyagi With Didi Maa Sadhvi Ritambara ji.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Manoj Tiwari.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Baba Satyanarayan Mourya ji.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Aastha Team.jpg
- File:ManojTyagi.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi With Didi Maa Sadhvi Ritambara ji.jpg
- File:Manoj Tyagi Maha Kumbh.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-With-Swami-Ramdev-ji-AasthaChannel.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-With-Swami-Ramdevji.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-With-Anna-Hazare-&-Swami-Ramdev-Ji.jpg
- File:ManojTyagiWithPervinderChudharyKeshavMehta.jpg
- File:Manojtyagiwithkeshavmehta.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (23).jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (22).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (21).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (20).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (19).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (3).jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (2).jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (1).jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-With-Totalbhakti-Team.JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-With-SwamiRamdevJi&Pramod-Joshi.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-With-SwamiRamdevJi&PramodJoshi.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-With-Keshav-Mehta.JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-With-KeshavMehta.JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-in-Shoot.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi-in-Happy-Mood.jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (18).jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (17).jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (16).jpg
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (15).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (14).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (13).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (12).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (11).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (10).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (9).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (8).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (7).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (6).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (5).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (4).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (3).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (2).JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi.JPG
- File:Manoj-Tyagi (1).JPG
- File:Manoj tyagi.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Minoraxtalk 03:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:DERIV. Beer label with detailed artwork, being used to illustrate the brewery article on Wikipedia. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Useless capture of a list items Pierre cb (talk) 11:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted quickly. --rubin16 (talk) 17:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Screen capture of document from unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 12:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: contributions of a spammer abusing multiple accounts, speedily. --rubin16 (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Screen capture of document from unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 12:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: contributions of a spammer abusing multiple accounts, speedily. --rubin16 (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Screen capture of document from unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: contributions of a spammer abusing multiple accounts, speedily. --rubin16 (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Screen capture of document from unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: contributions of a spammer abusing multiple accounts, speedily. --rubin16 (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploads by sockpuppet of Morris Kiyosaki 1 of banknotes photos. Copyright status unknown. Pierre cb (talk) 12:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily deleted. --rubin16 (talk) 17:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Unfree Flickr file (Unfree Flickr file) and the most recent rationale was: Unfree AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This was uploaded by a bot in 2007 but was recently found to be non-commercial at Flickr. It looks like the original licence has been changed at Flickr since I don't think that one of our bots would have uploaded non-free images. So instead pf speedily deleting the file, we should rather discuss what to do with it. De728631 (talk) 17:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. See above. --De728631 (talk) 17:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Even though the photo is CC BY-SA on Flickr, the Totoro character is still copyrighted and there’s no FOP for 2D artworks in Japan. Thibaut (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 18:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Book cover. Photograph copyright status unknown. MKFI (talk) 18:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Press photo, photographer unknown, suspected copyright violation. MKFI (talk) 18:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Press photo, actual photographer unknown, suspected copyright violation. MKFI (talk) 18:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
affiche d'un film de 2012 toutjours protégé par le droit d'auteur. Rien n'indique que la personne ayant téléchargé le fichier soit l'auteur des photos et du photomontage. Olivier Tanguy (talk) 20:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 20:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Plattencover sicher nicht eigenes Werk Bahnmoeller (talk) 20:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
![20:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/13#c-Bahnmoeller-2021-06-13T20:34:00.000Z-File:Album_"Sehnsucht".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 21:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
![21:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/13#c-Racconish-2021-06-13T21:02:00.000Z-File:Album_"Sehnsucht".jpg){kind=link}
Plattencover sicher nicht eigenes Werk Bahnmoeller (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
![20:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/13#c-Bahnmoeller-2021-06-13T20:35:00.000Z-File:Album_"Liebe_und_mehr...".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 21:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
![21:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/13#c-Racconish-2021-06-13T21:03:00.000Z-File:Album_"Liebe_und_mehr...".jpg){kind=link}
copyrighted logo (en:File:Among_Us_cover_art.jpg#Summary) - Nutshinou Talk! 20:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 21:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
affiche d'un film sorti en 2019. Rien n'indique que l'auteur de la photographie et celui de l'affiche aient mis leur travail en Creative Commons Olivier Tanguy (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 21:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Film de 2017. Rien n'indique que l'auteur des photos et celui de l'affiche aient laissé leur travail en Creative Commons Olivier Tanguy (talk) 21:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 21:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I did not see this license at source given. The copyright statement at bottom of page is quite different. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 21:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I did not find this license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
![21:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/13#c-Ellin_Beltz-2021-06-13T21:09:00.000Z-File:"Rybka"_.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 21:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
![21:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/06/13#c-Racconish-2021-06-13T21:20:00.000Z-File:"Rybka"_.png){kind=link}
This file is out of project scope. Commons:Project scope Also this photoshop work created with a copyrighted photo. [1]. This file will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 14:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete - DW. --E4024 (talk) 20:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
sevmedim Yeissensura (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. Unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
per previous deletions - nothing has changed. Snackmurat (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Not clear where this photo is located on the source website, but the source website has copyright information, as well as complicated instructions about how to get permission to use her stuff, doubtful any Creative Commons licenses would be used. The author of the pic is probably not the subject, either. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination - the uploader has clarified it is their photo in the discussion page here, will have it clarified on the file, thanks Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 18:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
i made a mistaken upload E.stepanova (talk) 10:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Shittoshi
[edit]self-advertisement for non-notable cryptocurrency
- File:Shitoshi TOSHI Token Icon.jpg
- File:Stoshiupdate.png
- File:Coingecko ShiToshi.png
- File:Shitoshi Token Logo.png
- Nutshinou Talk! 13:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Coinhousebrasil
[edit]self-advertisement for non-notable cryptocurrency
- Nutshinou Talk! 14:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 2012.
- File:Walter Zimbrich - Hungener Schlossfest-Schlips 1979.jpg
- File:Walter Zimbrich - Küsten XXXV.jpg
- File:Walter Zimbrich - Binder, upside down.jpg
- File:Walter Zimbrich - Hangman's Tie 1982.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 14:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Images about artist Hurshch: magazine covers, watermarked images. Suspect all are copyvios.
- File:Hursh Ch Choreographer.jpg
- File:Hurshch In a shoot.png
- File:Abdullah Choreographer pics.jpg
- File:Hursh ch New Pics.jpg
- File:Abdullah Hursh.jpg
- File:Hursh ch Look 2019.jpg
- File:Hursh ch Model.jpg
- File:Hurshch magzine cover.jpg
- File:Hursh Ch modeling.jpg
- File:Hursh Ch.jpg
- File:Hursh ch.jpg
- File:Hursh Ch fitlook magzine cover.jpg
- File:Hursh ch Magzine Cover.jpg
MKFI (talk) 18:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Duplicita - omyl při nahrání Anatol Svahilec (talk) 16:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 14:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, crop e.g. from [2] Kacir (talk) 08:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied: copyvio. --Ankry (talk) 13:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
License review not possible: source link is dead, could not find a contributor with that username on iNaturalist or a matching upload. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep in use — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn: User:C1K98V has found the originals, and license review has passed. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Incorrectly drawn methyl groups; SVG replacement available in Category:Eupatolitin. Wostr (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree the chemical compound is depicted incorrectly and there is a high quality replacement. Marbletan (talk) 17:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Replaceable by File:Eupatolitin.svg as correct version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 19:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Incorrectly drawn methyl groups; SVG replacement available in Category:Eupatolitin. Wostr (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree the chemical compound is depicted incorrectly and there is a high quality replacement. Marbletan (talk) 17:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 19:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope.
- File:Deeq 20210420-161101.png
- File:Deeq Aw.jpg
- File:Deeq iyo Ciro.jpg
- File:Deeq Aw XIRSI.jpg
- File:Received Deeq Aw XIRSI.jpg
- File:IMG-20210514-WA0010.jpg
Minoraxtalk 03:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by วิศรุต อินทรสุริยะ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
- File:วิศรุต อินทรสุริยะ (ท็อป).jpg
- File:ท็อป Chocobear.jpg
- File:ท็อป วิศรุต อินทรสุริยะ.jpg
- File:Chocobear 1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Minoraxtalk 03:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- motion seconded Delete lousy images — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- motion seconded
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Graziaiantoschi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of authorship
- File:Pasquale Iantoschi Comizio.jpeg
- File:Pasquale Iantoschi Sindaco.jpeg
- File:Pasquale Iantoschi-Alcide De Gasperi.jpeg
- File:Pasquale Iantoschi-Aldo Moro.jpeg
- File:Pasquale Iantoschi Insegnante 2.jpeg
- File:Pasquale Iantoschi Insegnante 1.jpeg
- File:Paquale Iantoschi Salesiani.jpeg
- File:Pasquale Iantoschi Militare.jpeg
- File:Pasquale Iantoschi Presentazione.jpeg
— Racconish 💬 07:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aûgust' Augustin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams/logo. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexedonny (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Microarray data C2orf74 colon adenomas .png
- File:C2orf7r colorectal cancer.png
- File:3'UTR structure .png
- File:Ali2d secondary structure.png
- File:C2orf74.MSA.png
- File:Annotated.MSA.png
- File:C2orf74 unrooted phylogenetic tree.png
- File:C2orf74 conceptual translation .png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:3-ketosphinganine reductase reaction.png
- File:3-ketosphinganine reductase.png
- File:3-ketosphinganine.pdf
- File:3KS Image1.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:3-ketosphinganine reductase pathway.png
- File:3-ketosphinganine reaction.png
- File:3-ketosphinganine.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MichaelMajid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Plotting Considerations.jpg
- File:Stairs Detailing Sample.jpg
- File:Lift Well Detailing.jpg
- File:One Way and Punching Shear Reinforcement.jpg
- File:Foundation Layouts for Main and Added Rebars.jpg
- File:Spandrel Beams.jpg
- File:Shear Wall Cross Section with Openings.jpg
- File:3-Leg Shear Wall Cross Sections.jpg
- File:Shear Walls with Openings in Elevation.jpg
- File:Shear Wall Legs in Elevation.jpg
- File:Shear Wall Layouts .jpg
- File:Sections in Tables & Texts in Tables.jpg
- File:Columns elevation.jpg
- File:Columns layout .jpg
- File:Cross Section of Beams.jpg
- File:Beams Longitudinal Report.jpg
- File:CSI and SPIDTECH Relationship .png
- File:SPIDetail at a Glance-page-041.jpg
- File:List of Materials.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Berman.yaniv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Found here in 2017 - https://indiecanent.com/actor/amit-hechter/ - needs OTRS. Also, no meaningful exif unlike other uploads and some have Copyright holder RAMI KATZAV
- File:יום 1 בשדות.jpg
- File:יום 20 חוף.jpg
- File:יום 19 חמי.jpg
- File:יום 18 מיטל.jpg
- File:יום 16 תותח.jpg
- File:יום 16 נמרוד.jpg
- File:יום 14 מאיים.jpg
- File:יום 14 מאור.jpg
- File:יום 12 קשירה.jpg
- File:יום 11 מישל.jpg
- File:יום 8 הבאר.jpg
- File:יום 7 עמית.jpg
- File:יום 6 חץ בעין.jpg
- File:יום 5 עופר.jpg
- File:יום 4 מלכודת.jpg
- File:יום 3 סליפי שחקנים.jpg
- File:יום 2 בשדה.jpg
- File:יום 1 צילום.jpg
- File:חוצים את הגדר.jpg
- File:Yaniv Innoweek.jpg
- File:Director-Yaniv-Berman-2-by-Shimrit-Nomdar.jpg
- File:Alpha Diaries Soldier.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 18:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. Sandra Becker 01 (talk) 20:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Blatantly used this image on top of the following article's infobox and it's considered vandalism. DesktopTech2020 (talk) 21:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope; random picture of uploader with text "MEGA MAN 2" written over it - Nutshinou Talk! 21:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
G1: No valid content; also appears to be non-free January2020 (talk) 21:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Have no use. Commons isn't web host. Out of project scope. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted newspaper Johnj1995 (talk) 23:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 09:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Missing exif data, likely copyvio. NoonIcarus (talk) 16:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Felipe Loaiza's permission needed. — Racconish 💬 17:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Sitter, not photographer. Felipe Loaiza's permission needed. — Racconish 💬 17:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Sitter, not photographer. Felipe Loaiza's permission needed. — Racconish 💬 17:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpectraKo as Noncommercial (cc-by-nc-nd-2.0)
License on Flickr conflicts with PD-US-Gov license. Credited photographer states on Facebook that she is NASA photographer. Copyright-status needs to be discussed. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Despite that the picture is uploaded under CC-BY-NC-ND it's on the public domain due to being a work of NASA personnel, see Template:PD-USGov-NASA.--BugWarp (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- BugWarp that is not necessarily the case. As the template says, NASA copyright policy states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted". The Flickr page clearly notes that it is copyrighted. - ZLEA T\C 16:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- And the template itself will tell you what those exceptions are. These images from the Flickr feed are also published on NASA Image and Video Library where there is no signal whatsoever about the Creative Commons licenses, and if you check the copyright status on the EXIF data of the image you can see that once again there is no reference to CC. US law is above whatever license the NASA community manager at Flickr decided to pick.--BugWarp (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- That's a good point. I was not aware of it being published on the NASA website, so I will say Keep. - ZLEA T\C 19:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- And the template itself will tell you what those exceptions are. These images from the Flickr feed are also published on NASA Image and Video Library where there is no signal whatsoever about the Creative Commons licenses, and if you check the copyright status on the EXIF data of the image you can see that once again there is no reference to CC. US law is above whatever license the NASA community manager at Flickr decided to pick.--BugWarp (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- BugWarp that is not necessarily the case. As the template says, NASA copyright policy states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted". The Flickr page clearly notes that it is copyrighted. - ZLEA T\C 16:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- This file is licensed as non-commercial and non-derivative at Flickr. The same picture can be found at the NASA website though without those restrictions. So I think it is in fact {{PD-USGov-NASA}}. De728631 (talk) 18:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Racconish. --Minoraxtalk 10:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
้ีาน่้ ธัญญาลักษณ์ ศอกกำปัง (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete OOS — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
poor or mediocre quality with identifiable people. Balaji (talk) 02:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hoax; used only in English Wikipedia hoax article w:en:Draft:The 1st Gamer Furry War. Tol | talk | contribs 05:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
The metadata contains the name of the author and copyright holder, it does not appear to be the uploader, need the author's permission to license their photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Mina_Luna_Vincent_(Q106666859)hands.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mina_Luna_Vincent_(Q106666859)hands.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope, unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Mina_Luna_Vincent_(Q106666859)hands.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Mina_Luna_Vincent_(Q106666859)hands.jpg){kind=link}
self-advertisement - Nutshinou Talk! 12:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Painting of Antoni Tàpies; doesn't seem to be own work of uploader. Encycloon (talk) 12:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Raising this as a test deletion discussion. Though the source website has a copyright release, the original EXIF includes:
Deliberately offensive text 'hidden' in metadata
|
|---|
|
FilmiTadka, the Big Daddy to tame all the bitches and pompous assess has arrived. We are about the bluntest journalism Indian Film Industry has ever seen. We will reveal every secret of Indian stars, their scandals, all the goods and bads of the world of cinema. We are not about dumbass journalism, where Kal se lekar Aaj Tak all have shown how Aishwarya is pregnant at least 100 times every day as‘breaking news’, NO, Never. But yes, we will be asking questions like why it happens that scandals never leave our stars why it happens that they all condemn it still become a part of it every time? After all it is showbiz, they like it, they won’t be paid if their faces are not out here in the media. Well they want it, right? We will give them what they want, but the rules are not set out by them this time it is the other way around. From their waste sizes to their sexual fantasies and career fears, from Rakhi Sawant to Aishwarya Rai, from Emraan to Amir, no one’s safe now, watch outkids run to mommies, FilmiTadka is here. |
The EXIF reads as childish trolling, with spelling mistakes. The credibility of the website release, or the correct preservation of the rights of photographers must be in doubt, making it a failure under Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. This doubt applies even if the EXIF is later removed or suppressed.
Raising for deletion, and I suggest everything else uploaded from this garbage website is considered suspect, unless someone can provide better verification, such as a much higher quality publisher, than what appears to be a trolling website. Note the rationale here is based firmly on copyright there is no need to have a debate about censorship as that is not the core issue. Fæ (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete AGF is no longer practised on Commons and is certainly not extended to image sources. This source seems to be going out of its way to making itself untrustworthy for any claims, including sourcing and licensing. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Help desk#Sexist, Vulgar, Misogynistic content in Image MetaData., where this was first raised. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep +1 to Bjh21. They look legit, even if the opposite of scholarly. - Jmabel ! talk 15:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per User:Mysterymanblue below. - Jmabel ! talk 22:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment: I've struck the last bit of my comment because it seems that the manifesto was meant to be widely published: it appeared on the site's "About" page: https://web.archive.org/web/20120103133040/http://www.filmitadka.in/static/about-filmitadka.html. --bjh21 (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- With regard to these keep rationales, as you believe the copyright is verifiable, could you confirm the name of the photographer that has released their rights, or whether the photographer was exclusively employed at the time they took the photograph, by the same person who owns the quoted source website that we now know for their "filth/nonsense"? --Fæ (talk) 19:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment While I agree that such filth/nonsense calls the reliability of sources into question, I would hope that it would be used as one of several criteria in determining if files should be deleted. That is, the presence of highly offensive sentiments that are not an integral part of a work should not be an overriding factor in a deletion request. Mysterymanblue 19:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I arbitrarily chose a FilmiTadka file and decided to look into it. I chose File:Avinash Sachdev FilmiTadka.jpg and ran it through TinEye. That led me to this file from this page at nowrunning.com, dated to Dec 5, 2010, around the same time as File:Avinash Sachdev FilmiTadka.jpg. They appear to be the same photograph and they have essentially the same metadata (you need to look at the original version uploaded to Commons to see the full crop). Since they both applied watermarks to their images, I believe that they probably got their image from the same (unwatermarked) source as nowrunning.com. This source is likely Viral Bhayani, who you can read about here, and whose name appears in the "comment" field of both photographs' metadata ("VIRALBHAYANI9821123099").
- This is not a one-off occurrence. You can see another file with a Viral Bhayani comment in metadata at File:Yukta Mookhey at Lavasa Women's Drive anthem and tshirt launch (10).jpg. Viral Bhayani probably would not license their photos under CC-BY-SA because they make money by selling the photos. This leads me to believe that these two files, at least, are copyright violations. Given the repeated nature of FilmiTadka's manipulation of metadata (adding its own authorship information), these apparent copyright violations, and the questionable nature of the website raised by its offensive metadata, I support deletion on all FilmiTadka files. Mysterymanblue 20:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Delete: Thank you Mysterymanblue! You've convinced me that, at best, many of the photos in Category:Images from FilmiTadka are copyright violations, and we can't reliably tell which ones aren't. I've looked through the metadata in a couple of hundred photos and the name of FilmiTadka's own photographer, Sumit Bajpai[3] doesn't appear anywhere. --bjh21 (talk) 21:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Mysterymanblue. @Jmabel: Kindly note that new information from Mysterymanblue. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. — Racconish 💬 14:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
unuseful personal photo 維基小霸王 (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 14:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maurice Crijns (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 15:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 15:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
unused; hardly useful due to poor resolution; can better be typeset in TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
unused; hardly useful due to poor resolution and missing explanation Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
unused; hardly useful due to poor resolution and missing explanation Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
unused; hardly useful due to blurryness and poor resolution Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover. MKFI (talk) 18:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, description says "My photo", probably a selfie - Nutshinou Talk! 19:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, description says "My photo", probably a selfie - Nutshinou Talk! 19:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Contains no valuable information Astrocat9 (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; logo of unknown purpose, no definition, out of scope. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}}, replaced by File:Febantel structure.svg and File:Febantel.svg. Leyo 22:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree the depiction is poor quality and there are suitable high quality replacements. Marbletan (talk) 17:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 16:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work — Racconish 💬 09:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a photo of a public sculpture in the steeet. Emeraude (talk) 15:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- No FOP in France. The sculptor,, Pierre Maguelon, died in 2010. — Racconish 💬 16:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FoP in France. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work — Racconish 💬 09:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a photo of a public sculpture in the steeet. Emeraude (talk) 15:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- No FOP in France. The sculptor, Pierre Maguelon, died in 2010. — Racconish 💬 16:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FoP in France. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work — Racconish 💬 10:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a photo of a public sculpture in the steeet. Emeraude (talk) 15:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- No FOP in France. The sculptor,, Pierre Maguelon, died in 2010. — Racconish 💬 16:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FoP in France. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Coypright violation? These are recent (±2013) artworks of former queen Beatrix. The artist cannot be dead for over 70 years, FOP is not applicable and I do not see OTRS permissions by the artists. JopkeB (talk) 11:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип Pulsar 66fd (talk) 08:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Self promo and copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of Pikachu. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 11:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not a free file; FCSB website mentions "all rights reserved" 8Dodo8 (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. His twitter is under copyright. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Logo with no apparent own work by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Seems unlikely own work, no metadata, small and low quality. Other hits of it were found on the web, but inconclusive to publication date. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 07:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
According to the metadata at Flickr this photo was taken in South Korea where there is no freedom of panorama. So while the Flickr licence for the photo itself may be correct, we cannot keep this derivative work of the advertisement. De728631 (talk) 21:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The statue and the monument was unveiled in 2013 (source). There is no freedom of panorama in Cambodia, and COM:OTRS correspondence from the author/s (the sculptor and the designer of the shrine) is required.
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik z posągiem Króla Ojca Norodoma Sihanouka (03).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik z posągiem Króla Ojca Norodoma Sihanouka (04).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik z posągiem Króla Ojca Norodoma Sihanouka (05).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik z posągiem Króla Ojca Norodoma Sihanouka (06).jpg
- File:Medvedev in Cambodia 01.png
- File:Sihanouk statue at night.jpg
- File:Sihanouk Statue at night.jpg
- File:Statue of King Father Norodom Sihanouk 2.jpg
- File:Statue of King Father Norodom Sihanouk 3.jpg
- File:Statue of King Father Norodom Sihanouk.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Cambodia for commercial uses of images of protected artworks if those works are th intended subjects of such images. This 3D artwork was unveiled in the late 1970s per w:Cambodia–Vietnam Friendship Monument (Waymarking.com alleges this year as 1979). Hence permission from the artist who created this work or his heirs is required.
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (03).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (04).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (05).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (06).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (07).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (08).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (09).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (10).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (11).jpg
- File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik Przyjaźni Kambodży i Wietnamu (12).jpg
- File:Cambodia–Vietnam Friendship Monument in Phnom Penh.jpg
- File:Cambodia–Vietnam Friendship Monument Phnom Penh 2.jpg
- File:Cambodia–Vietnam Friendship Monument Phnom Penh.jpg
- File:Cambodia–Vietnam Friendship Monument.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TumiMajess as no source (No source since). However source provided along with OTRS permission. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep User is editing tests and inserting gibberish cross-wiki. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 14:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Because the image is inaccurate and not clear to the viewer, and because the background lighting and the image are not clear Redfox6600 (talk) 18:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 14:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
This picture should be deleted because it is not clear the photography and the background lighting of the picture is not good and because this picture is not educational 2001:1670:8:ED5A:D4E3:6ED9:FFBA:BCA8 06:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The image is not clear due to the reflection of the shooting light on the camera 2001:1670:C:FEBD:A9BD:25F9:A601:C75 16:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per previous keep. Better quality than most "penis selfies". -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I request to delete this image because it is not clear and it is in my previous account, which I do not use and I have new images on my new account, which is Redfox2003 Redfox2003 (talk) 09:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Quality issues were addressed in the previous requests; the fact that it was uploaded by an old account is not a valid reason. Brianjd (talk) 09:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, even the uploader admitted that the image is useful and of good quality. Brianjd (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This image was previously kept twice and has good quality. Tm (talk) 12:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The picture is not appropriate because it belongs to the penis of a teenager who has not reached the legal age 2001:1670:8:67FA:14EC:8A8A:4924:AD32 19:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- A startling claim suggesting anon either is the subject of the photo or has intimate knowledge about them. I suggest you present your specific evidence proving this allegation privately, email as detailed at COM:VRT. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN at any rate Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by جوادگودرزی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history
- File:آبشار تاف.jpg
- File:نمای شهر بروجرد از بالای بام بروجرد (تپه چغا).jpg
- File:قله ی شیر برفی.jpg
- File:قله ی میش پرور.jpg
- File:سماور بزرگی در پارک یادبود بروجرد.به طور کلی بروجرد مهد سماورسازی ایران است،همچنین بزرگ ترین سماور دنیا در بروجرد است.jpg
- File:بزرگترین سماور جهان در بروجرد.jpg
- File:قله ی سه کوزان نمایی از شهر.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4nn1l2 (talk) 18:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Test upload? Spamming web design courses? Not part of COM:SCOPE anyway Andy Dingley (talk) 19:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juniordealer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Press photographs of Sherri Littlefield, most likely not own work. Dates do not match even though these are different versions of the same image (2020 and 2019 claimed); file EXIF in File:Sherri Nienass Littlefield, Press Photo.jpg shows 4 May 2016.
- File:Sherri Littlefield .png
- File:Littlefield Press Kit.png
- File:Sherri Nienass Littlefield, Press Photo.jpg
MKFI (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:58, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Size & quality suggest not own work, likely screenshot/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:54, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Size and lack of quality suggest not own work perhaps a screenshot/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Who is Hisham? 191.126.163.60 22:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 14:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Yahoo Logo with Non-Covid-19 2601:644:4401:4DE0:7911:608A:5445:D30C 21:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep That does not specify a grounds for deletion. It's public-domain (PD-shape} SecretName101 (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It will be Deleted Forever. KamranBhatti4013 (talk) 03:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --✗plicit 12:04, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work of McDonald's billboard ads. Violation of graphic artist's copyright. No applicable FOP or any exception too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 04:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work. — Racconish 💬 09:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in France, unfortunately. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
It's a photo of a public sculpture in the steeet. Emeraude (talk) 15:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- No FOP in France. The sculptor, Pierre Maguelon, died in 2010. — Racconish 💬 16:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
License not free, uploaded by mistake :( DrHolsow (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
в источнике нет указания на свободную лицензию, наоборот. -- Tomasina (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at alll. --JuTa 05:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Calligraphy work is copyrightable (COM:TOO China). The following work was based on Mao Zedong's calligraphy which won't be PD until 2026:
- File:Guangxi University Name.svg
- File:The Central Academy Of Drama.svg
- File:Chongqing University Name.svg
- File:Guizhou University Name.svg
- File:Nankai University Name.svg
- File:Tsinghua University Name.svg
- File:Peking University Name.svg
The following work was based on Guo Moruo's calligraphy which won't be PD until 2029:
See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mao Zedong's calligraphy, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of universities and colleges in China Wcam (talk) 10:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
poor quality copy of same edition, duplicates file:The Dialogues of Plato v. 2.djvu, unneeded at enWS — billinghurst sDrewth 01:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
I agree. The djvu file is sufficient. --Rodney 22:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seandecorabersoch (talk · contribs)
[edit]No exif info, seems not uploader's own work.
(｀・ω・´) (talk) 02:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Agree, not because of the nonexisting exif, but because it seems to be marketing. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 02:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I think this has not passed the copyright threshold. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 02:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, self-advertisement uploaded by "Bicon Token". - Nutshinou Talk! 12:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Image below TOO, but out of scope: COM:ADVERT; Google search did not turn up Bicon cryptocurrency. Name is too close to Bitcoin. Glrx (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 02:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I think this has not passed the copyright threshold. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 02:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, self-advertisement uploaded by "Bicon Token". - Nutshinou Talk! 12:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Image below TOO, but out of scope: COM:ADVERT; Google search did not turn up Bicon cryptocurrency. Name is too close to Bitcoin. Glrx (talk) 01:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter Camila Maciel Estefani (talk) 02:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I think this has not passed the copyright threshold. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 02:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, self-advertisement uploaded by "Bicon Token". - Nutshinou Talk! 12:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Image below TOO, but out of scope: COM:ADVERT; Google search did not turn up Bicon cryptocurrency. Name is too close to Bitcoin. Glrx (talk) 01:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
requested by uploader Troutfarm27 (talk) 03:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
wrong photo, this is not Kangal Kangalshepherddog (talk) 04:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- !vote struck, I have not noticed the watermark before Gestumblindi’s !vote below. Cavalryman (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC).
- Delete lousy image — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- By this do you mean low quality or poorly framed/unrepresentative? I would disagree with both. Cavalryman (talk) 00:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC).
- Weak delete Normally, I would say "If this is not a Kangal dog and you know which kind of dog this is, just rename the photo accordingly, no reason for deletion". The quality is not great, but good enough. But there is also a watermark in the lower right corner which is barely readable ("petlubi"? "petlobi"?) but doesn't seem to correspond to the uploader's name, so a copyright violation seems possible. Could be a screenshot, there's also somethin in the upper right which looks like part of an overlapping window. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP for artworks in USA, neither 3D nor 2D Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible Com:Derivative work: DW of a screen JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Derivative. Glrx (talk) 01:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
i transferred it via flickr-to-commons but im not sure if its not a copyright violation FMSky (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Shopping malls in Manila
[edit]Mall bldgs. Exterior and interior designs from mall architects. No freedom of panorama in the phils.
- File:168 Shopping Mall, Binondo, Manila.jpg
- File:Robinson333jf.JPG
- File:Robinson33jf.JPG
- File:Robinsons Place Manila.jpg
- File:Robinsons2jf.JPG
- File:Robinsonsjf.JPG
- File:Robinsonsplace2jf.JPG
- File:Robinsonsplacejf.JPG
- File:SM Aura in Fort Bonifacio Global City, Metro Manila II.JPG
- File:SM Aura in Fort Bonifacio Global City, Metro Manila III.jpg
- File:SM Mall Of Asia interior.jpeg
- File:WTMP A-trio a5 1.JPG
- File:WTMP A-trio c9 1.JPG
- File:WTMP caladcarens A-5.JPG
- File:WTMP caladcarens B-2.JPG
- File:WTMP celine marie castañeda DSC02249.JPG
- File:WTMP celine marie castañeda DSC02276.JPG
- File:WTMP DinoBrinas DSC 0119.jpeg
- File:WTMP Flashbang A5-SMCityManila.JPG
- File:WTMP Flashbang A5-smcitymla.JPG
- File:WTMP Flashbang A5.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Sculpture isnt incidental as claimed by the notice posted on the description. It is substanial. No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Artwork / sculpture by EDUARDO CASTRILLO. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment does de minimis ({{NoFoP-Philippines}}) applies? Ping two of the users whom I asked about DM - FOP matter before: @A1Cafel and Finnusertop: (as this seems "borderline"). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep IMO de minimis can be applied here. The sculpture is incidental. This image can still be useful without the sculpture. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
low quality surveillance cam shot with no info Kotivalo (talk) 06:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
the image already exists: Biserica Sf. Ioan Nepomuk din Suceava43.jpg Cezarika1 (talk) 06:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
the image already exists: Biserica Sf. Ioan Nepomuk din Suceava44.jpg Cezarika1 (talk) 06:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Am not seeing where the photo is located on the website, but the website has copyright information and there aren't any Creative Commons licensed images there. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
The metadata indicates this came from a newspaper or other publication, maybe this one? It is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise, or there is permission from the copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
COM:SCREENSHOT violation: derivative work of an audiovisual work (Holy Mass feed published by the cathedral administration). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work: small size 5.213.228.195 07:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Small size and Another version of this image is uploaded in 1397 SH: https://www.kut.ac.ir/page/13/%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B4%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87 Rohalamin (talk) 05:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; apparently published on that web site on 2018-08-02, 19 months before it was uploaded here. --Rosenzweig τ 13:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
File was removed from Vimeo, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Meghan Markle in 2016
[edit]File was removed from Vimeo, unknown copyright status
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (01).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (02).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (03).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (04).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (05).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (06).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (07).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (08).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (09).jpg
- File:Meghan Markle drilling a borehole in Rwanda (10).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep The video is still there, apparently the URL has changed (I don't know how). But the video is there on the "wholives" profile. Just change the URL. Minerva97 (talk) 21:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? The painter still is alive (born in 1942), so this artwork cannot be in the public domain, and I do not see an OTRS permission JopkeB (talk) 09:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as duplicate. SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Complex logo c.f. the "LY" company logo examples on the page COM:TOO China. Wcam (talk) 10:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? It looks like this is a work of art by Tim van Cromvoirt (born 1988), not by the uploader, no FOP in the Netherlands for art inside a building (unless this is a public space), and I do not see an OTRS permission from the artist. JopkeB (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Cambodia. This artwork was created in 2012 by an "unknown" sculptor. Even if unknown, this work is still protected by copyright for a certain period of years from its "publication" (the unveiling in 2012). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Still copyrighted in the Philippines until 2053 (2002+51+1) and in the US until 2073 (2002+70+1). CC-license needs OTRS permission from heirs. Howhontanozaz (talk) 13:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
title P.Jothi Lakshmi0496 (talk) 13:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, I renamed it to File:ஜெனகை மாரியம்மன் கோவில்.jpg instead. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
The kurdish officials are the people of any country, but they are not kurds, and those who were playing for you are not happy with who I say. 191.116.230.241 13:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
unused screenshot of purposefully offensive vandalism (severed head) on the spanish avengers endgame article, unsure if that's an actual deletion reason but even then I fail to see encyclopedic value - Nutshinou Talk! 14:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Violation of rule COM:FOP Belarus. Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Violation of rule COM:FOP Belarus. Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Claimed to be own work owned by Televisa. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep and just change the ownership information. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep The alleged copyright infringement and the deletion request is complete nonsense
- First of all, this simple logo is not a copyrightable work anyway, because it does not have the required threshold of originality. There are tens of thousands of them at Commons (e.g. over 77,000 here or over 45,000 here) that only require the license building block [[Template:PD-logo|{{PD-logo}}].
- So it doesn't really matter who created this work, because there is no copyright infringement here and so there is no reason to delete the file.
- There were only errors in the description, but even these are no reason to delete the file.
- Second, it was not the user @Ariela2020: , but the bot @BotMultichillT: that entered the wrong claims in the description. This bot error can also not be a reason for deleting the file.
- The false claims in the description and about the license have already been corrected in the meantime. Thus, the alleged copyright infringement or the deletion request is just warm air and nonsensical.--Bestoernesto (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
uploaded under incorrect name and accidentally left redirect when moving Nick Number (talk) 16:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING, beer label artwork is the focus of the image. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The fact that the mountains on the label are the Piton Mountains, as shown below, is the focus of the image. Is it really impossible to host such an image? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that may actually be the main problem. There's no way an argument like "It's a shot of the whole bottle, the label is just de minimis" would convince here. --El Grafo (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's certainly not my argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Not own work of the uploader. According to Ticket:2021052010007157, the copyright transfer remains unclear. Mussklprozz (talk) 16:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Author requests deletion (>7 days from upload). Image unused and not associated with a page. Jordan first (talk) 16:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be trivial at all. Facenapalm (talk) 18:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- This logo should be deleted on Commons and re-uploaded on local Wikipedias under fair use license.--Orange-kun (talk) 19:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of license at source POLITANVM talk 19:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio: Appears to be scanned from a book or other publication Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Offensichtlich an tausenden von Websites vorhanden https://pixy.org/4800373/ Bahnmoeller (talk) 20:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep CC0 at source. — Racconish 💬 21:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
"Software google" in meta data suggests this is not own work, also size and quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of an Israeli high-ranked executive; the only contribution of this uploader. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyvio of the original image. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW with unidentified source. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm upload, I would to delete file. Pitpisit (talk) 02:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
a copy of this is named William Ethan Kotivalo (talk) 06:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal image of non-notable individual. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
a copy of this is named William Ian Gates ?? Kotivalo (talk) 06:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal image of non-notable individual. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
The website from which the picture is taken does not offer free/reusable images 8Dodo8 (talk) 13:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? The artist is still alive (born in 1959) and I see no OTRS permission. JopkeB (talk) 10:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Why a deletion request when the maker of this work placed it here? Yes, I am alive and am alowed to share my work. There is no copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruud iuoma (talk • contribs) 12:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- I/others can not see that your username belongs to Ruud Janssen (now anyone can claim that he is Ruud Janssen; Commons is very keen on copyrights, so administrators won't just believe it). To avoid misunderstanding, please send an e-mail to OTRS with this information. See :Commons:OTRS for the details. You may send it in Dutch instead, if you prefer that, see OTRS-NL. Mention in the email the link of this photo and any others of your artwork you have already uploaded. Perhaps you may also mention this information on your user page. JopkeB (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by JuTa. --Minoraxtalk 07:12, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Uploader and subject have the same name. Unlikely to be "own work" since the photo is not a selfie as you can actually see both hands of Mr. Prateek in the image. Needs permission from the copyright-holder (most likely the photographer) via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Notice about service shrinking and ventilation for Tohoku Shinkansen during the COVID pandemic.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 14:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Might be utilitarian information? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 05:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
a copy of this is named William Ethan ?? Kotivalo (talk) 06:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no eduse. Ruthven (msg) 11:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
a copy of this is named Gemologist.jpg Kotivalo (talk) 06:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 11:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader and subject have the same name. Unlikely to be "own work" since the photo is not a selfie as you can actually see both hands of Mr. Prateek in the image. Needs permission from the copyright-holder (most likely the photographer) via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Yann. Ruthven (msg) 11:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Yanlışlıkla yükledim Zhryldiz (talk) 12:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom ("accidentally uploaded").--Nanahuatl (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
الخارطة غير صحيحة، وتم تنبيه مالك الملف لكن لا يوجد تجاوب!. Wil13 (talk) 09:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, unlikely to be own work. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
This was asked about at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/06#File: Milwaukee Brewers cap logo on navy.png, but there was only one response and that response seemed to indicate that this wasn't PD-logo. The logo consists of the letters "M" and a "b" as well as a "baseball" combined together to give the appearance of a baseball glove and ball, but that combination seems to have quite a creative aspect to it that goes a bit beyond a simple text logo or font. The same logo is uploaded locally to English Wikipedia as en:File:Milwaukee Brewers logo.svg licensed as non-free content, and that can't be the case if this file is OK as currently licensed. According to the article en:Milwaukee Brewers#1978–1993 , the logo was actually designed by a college student sometimes around 1978; so, perhaps it was a en:work for hire and the copyright was transferred to the team per this. However, the team might still hold the copyright on it if they they registered it as such. Of course, it's possible that this could be {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but it would seem to be a bit careless for a major professional sports team and a major professional sports league to not register the team's branding. So, I'm not sure this can be kept per COM:PCP unless the consensus is that it meets "PD-US-no notice". Just for reference, I Googled "Copyright status of Milwaukee Brewers Logo" and the first hit I got was a link to this page. Now for sure, there's a difference between trademark and copyright and Commons host lots of trademarked logos. However, it seems that the someone associated with the team or Major League Baseball. I get that trademarks need to be actively enforced, but again this a major league baseball team and the logo isn't logo enough to be PD simply due to it's age unless it didn't not have a notice. Moreover, the logo is still used as part of the team's primary branding these days which means it might not meet the "inclusive" for the PD-US-no notice license even if it wasn't originally provided with one, and a copyright notice isn't required for US works after March 1, 1989. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Adding the following variations of the same logo:
- File:Milwaukee Brewers Logo.svg
- File:Milwaukee Brewers cap logo.png Ytoyoda (talk) 14:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate photo which was uploaded from a website which is no longer in use. The other, later version, is higher resolution and is from Flickr, not Picasaweb which I no longer use. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faysal gade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files, unlikely to be own work, single uploads, not in use.
Smooth O (talk) 09:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a poor quality duplicate of another photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello
I don't find the other photo in higher resolution. what's the name of that file?
Squallgofsc (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello
I don't find the other photo in higher resolution. what's the name of that file?
Squallgofsc (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 10:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 10:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio: This photo war not originally taken with a iPhone XS. Mme Mimimi (talk) 11:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio: This photo was not originally taken with an iPhone XS Mme Mimimi (talk) 11:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio: This Scenic design was not originally made by an iPhone XS. Mme Mimimi (talk) 11:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio: This photo was originally not taken with an iPhone XS Mme Mimimi (talk) 11:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Oumaima bouali
[edit]facebook filesnames, very probable copyvio/not own work because content is too varied and there is no OTRS ticket
- :File:391158 542607905790719 1063993927 n(1).jpg
- :File:391158 542607905790719 1063993927 n(2).jpg
- :File:391158 542607905790719 1063993927 n(3).jpg
- :File:391158 542607905790719 1063993927 n(4).jpg
- :File:391158 542607905790719 1063993927 n(5).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Nutshinou Talk! 19:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - agree; additionally, they're rubbish pics, pretty much out of Commons scope - MPF (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of the Manila Metropolitan Cathedral-Minor Basilica of the Immaculate Conception
[edit]A 1958 post War work by Architect Fernando Ocampo plus all post war artworks statuetes etc. No original spanish period work remains because of world war two. No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 35.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 36.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 37.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 38.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 39.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 40.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 41.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 42.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 43.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 44.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 45.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 46.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 47.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 48.jpg
- File:01112jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 49.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 02.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 03.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 04.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 05.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 06.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 07.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 08.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 09.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 10.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 11.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 12.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 13.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 14.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 15.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 16.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 17.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 18.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 19.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 20.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 21.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 22.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 23.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 24.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 31.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 32.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 33.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 34.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 35.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 36.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 37.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 38.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 39.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 40.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 41.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 42.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 43.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 44.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 45.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 46.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 47.jpg
- File:01160jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 48.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 01.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 02.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 03.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 04.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 14.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 15.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 16.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 22.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 23.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 26.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 27.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 28.jpg
- File:01209jfIntramuros Manila Landmarks Buildingsfvf 29.jpg
- File:01762jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Luna Aduana Streets Landmarksfvf 12.jpg
- File:01762jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Luna Aduana Streets Landmarksfvf 16.jpg
- File:01762jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Luna Aduana Streets Landmarksfvf 17.jpg
- File:01762jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Luna Aduana Streets Landmarksfvf 19.jpg
- File:01827jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Landmarksfvf 01.jpg
- File:01871jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Landmarksfvf 14.jpg
- File:01871jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Landmarksfvf 15.jpg
- File:01871jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Landmarksfvf 16.jpg
- File:01871jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Landmarksfvf 19.jpg
- File:01891jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Bells Landmarksfvf 03.jpg
- File:01891jfManila Cathedral Basilica Intramuros Manila Bells Landmarksfvf 04.jpg
- File:02043jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Streets Landmarksfvf 01.jpg
- File:02043jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Streets Landmarksfvf 02.jpg
- File:02043jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Streets Landmarksfvf 03.jpg
- File:02043jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Streets Landmarksfvf 04.jpg
- File:02043jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Streets Landmarksfvf 05.jpg
- File:02043jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Streets Landmarksfvf 08.jpg
- File:02043jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Streets Landmarksfvf 09.jpg
- File:02114jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Casa Rocha Streets Landmarksfvf 11.jpg
- File:02114jfManila Cathedral Intramuros Casa Rocha Streets Landmarksfvf 12.jpg
- File:1033Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 08.jpg
- File:1033Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 09.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 37.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 38.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 39.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 40.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 41.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 42.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 43.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 44.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 45.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 48.jpg
- File:933Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 49.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 01.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 22.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 24.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 25.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 26.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 27.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 28.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 29.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 30.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 31.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 32.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 38.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 39.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 40.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 41.jpg
- File:983Manila Cathedral Intramuros Manila Landmarks 42.jpg
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8371 12.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8371 13.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8371 14.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 01.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 02.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 06.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 11.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 12.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 13.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 16.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 19.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 22.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 27.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 28.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8410 29.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 01.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 02.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 03.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 04.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 05.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 06.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 08.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 09.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 16.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 17.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 18.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 19.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 20.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral8504 21.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9892 10.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 01.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 15.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 16.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 22.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 23.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 24.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 25.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 26.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 27.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 29.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9954 30.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9987 01.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9987 02.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9987 03.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9987 04.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9987 05.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9987 14.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9987 15.JPG
- File:FvfManilaCathedral9987 16.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 05.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 06.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 07.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 08.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 10.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 12.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 13.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 14.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 15.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 20.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila9848 21.JPG
- File:Gerald R Mondala MANILA CATHEDRAL INTERIOR.jpg
- File:Immaculate Conception in the Manila Cathedral.jpg
- File:InmaculadaConcepcionngMaynilaFilipinas2012.jpg
- File:Inside the Manila Cathedral.jpg
- File:Interior de la Catedral de Manila, Filipinas.jpg
- File:La Pieta at Manila Cathedral.jpg
- File:La Pieta In Manila Cathedral.JPG
- File:Laika ac Manila Cathedral (6445260775).jpg
- File:LaPurisimaInmaculadaConcepciondeRibera.jpg
- File:Manila Cathedral altar.jpg
- File:Manila Cathedral Inside.jpg
- File:Manila Cathedral Panorama.jpg
- File:San Cesario esposto nella Cattedrale di Manila.jpg
- File:The Manila Metropolitan Cathedral-Basilica (16672845333).jpg
- File:The Manila Metropolitan Cathedral-Basilica (17085636167).jpg
- File:The Manila Metropolitan Cathedral-Basilica (17292821651).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 05:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Query what is the rationale for the proposed deletions ? Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- I propose this DR regarding a Philippine architecture of 1951-72 period to be put
On hold, pending a renewed discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Philippine buildings from 1951–1972 - anew. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC) - Keep most per newly-accepted consensus on 1951-72 Philippine architectural works, but
Unsure for artworks inside like statues of saints (but I'm leaning towards weak keep). Regarding buildings, see the updated COM:Philippines#Public domain exceptions for artistic works and the supporting discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/06#Philippine buildings from 1951–1972 - anew. For other artworks I leave the matter on the closing admin or other editors' inputs. @Laurel Lodged: , about the DR that was initiated by the nominator, it relates to freedom of panorama. The Philippines doesn't have FOP in its copyright law as of today, but this church, from 1958, can now be OK for Commons as an architectural work completed during the regime of the old Act No. 3134 of 1924 which didn't provide protection for architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. COM:FOP Philippines is clear, there is FOP for a building completed before december 15, 1972. I could not check all images. @Mrcl lxmna and JWilz12345: please nominate the files which contain images of modern - post 1972 - artworks, because these probably have to be deleted. Thanks,. --Ellywa (talk) 17:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Questionable claim of authorship. Studio photo; uploader has no other contributions. Rameshe999 (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep. The deletion rationale seems to have been copied verbatim from one of the requests I initiated, and usually I'd argue for deletion of such files, but in this case the image is high resolution, has camera EXIF, and doesn't appear elsewhere on the web predating the upload date. It seems plausible that the uploader is the author or has received permission to license the image, and there doesn't appear to be clear reason to doubt its provenance. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly an official photo, only upload of this user. PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Howhontanozaz as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Although the underlying photograph is PD, the image of it is not. There is no free license at the source.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. If the original 2-dimensional work is in the PD, a true reproduction should be o.k. per PD-Art. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploaded a reproduction of the underlying photograph--Mlgc1998 (talk) 16:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- You uploaded a colorized version, that's not the original. Doing this while the DR is ongoing, is the best way to get it deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: We already have the original photograph at File:-Japanese Woman in Carriage- MET DP155596.jpg. Though it is said there to be from Japan in the 1870s, not Manila in 1898. Anyway, best delete this dubious file here per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious claim of own work. No exif and clearly a professional photo. PCP Gbawden (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Zero proofs that this image is a copyright violation. Having no exif is no proof of copyright violation, in fact many times i could point some cases "clearly a professional" images in Commons that were taken by the uploaders but given several facts (not wanting to reveal their real personal name, profession, etc) they were striped of exif before the upload or, in some cases, after the original upload. Given that they are always in high resolution, as this case and given that a Tineye and Google Images search only yield either mirrors of wikipedia or sites that are riff with copyright violations, there is zero proof of this being a copyright violation. In fact File:Honeysuckle Weeks 2018.jpg also upload by the same user has the description "Photoshoot with actress Honeysuckle Weeks. Sussex 2018" and has zero hits in Google Images and Tineye. Tm (talk) 19:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also in talk page of File:Nuevo Editorial Shoot - Honeysuckle Weeks.jpg, an image by the same user you can read that this last image is in a blog (albeit in much lower resolution and uploaded one year and month after the upload to Commons) and that " Maybe the uploader also owns that blog. The same photo appeared on IMDB, likely uploaded around the same time it was uploaded here. Presumably also by the uploader. Didn't find this quality elsewhere, nor anything that clearly predates it". Tm (talk) 19:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- And before someone says that this file could be from IMDB, that site is also riff with stolen photos, some taken from Commons. One eample is File:Erica Ellyson 2010.jpg, an image taken by Glenn Francism professional photographer that had his identity established with OTRS 2008122210029427, that can be seen on as the lead photo of this actress, stolen without any proper atributtion. Tm (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also in talk page of File:Nuevo Editorial Shoot - Honeysuckle Weeks.jpg, an image by the same user you can read that this last image is in a blog (albeit in much lower resolution and uploaded one year and month after the upload to Commons) and that " Maybe the uploader also owns that blog. The same photo appeared on IMDB, likely uploaded around the same time it was uploaded here. Presumably also by the uploader. Didn't find this quality elsewhere, nor anything that clearly predates it". Tm (talk) 19:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The first version of File:Nuevo Editorial Shoot - Honeysuckle Weeks.jpg (corrupted JPEG) looks exactly like a mistake someone would make when editing their own photos, and is highly unlikely to be stolen from the Internet. This photo is just a crop of that. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Doesn't look professional to me. Very casual clothes and setting, absolutely no makeup and obvious acne blemish on cheek. No, not professional at all. Taken spur of the moment possibly by a close friend. 174.64.17.141 12:08, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Uploader and subject have the same name. Unlikely to be "own work" since the photo is not a selfie as you can actually see both hands of Mr. Prateek in the image. Needs permission from the copyright-holder (most likely the photographer) via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Uploader is unlikely the photographer. If they have permission, it should be sent to COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Definitely not own work. Wizardman 16:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Uploader and subject have the same name. Unlikely to be "own work" since the photo is not a selfie as you can actually see both hands of Mr. Prateek in the image. Needs permission from the copyright-holder (most likely the author GLAZE per metadata) via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Uploader is unlikely the photographer. If they have permission, it should be sent to COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Definitely not own work. Wizardman 16:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Завантажено помилково Viktor344432212 (talk) 18:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per {{Db-self}} - uploader requested deletion 2 mins after uploading. File is unused. -M.nelson (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 12:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Reproduction of a probably copyrighted trofee Ruthven (msg) 09:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Or probably not. Edoderoo (talk) 12:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Well, the cup is relatively recent. We're far from the 120 years PD-old-assumed. --Ruthven (msg) 18:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment User has passed away last year. And there seems to be something wrong with the transclusion of {{Autotranslate}} that was pasted to inform the user...? Ciell (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Pictures of trophies are covered by the exception in article 18 of the Dutch Copyright Law (Auteurswet), that has been carefully worded as not to tie the permanent display of a work to a particular place. --MarcoSwart (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I do not see why this falls in the exception of Artikel 18 Auteurswet. That is about the FOP. This trofee is not placed permanently in public space. Perhaps it is a very old design, but in that case evidence should be given that the designer died more then 70 years old. Or the current owner of the copyright should give permission through the procedure of VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Dubious claim to own work. The uploader has claimed own work on a couple of copyrighted movie posters {File:Nepal first Indigenous Santali feature film Bonodal poster.jpg, File:Nepal first historic Indigenous Santali feature film BONODAL poster.jpg) a well as having some other file deleted on copyright grounds. This site has a copy of File:Indigenous Santali women from Nepal making country liquor.jpg.
- File:Indigenous Santali women from Nepal making country liquor.jpg
- File:Poverty can generate idea.jpg
Whpq (talk) 11:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey, Whpq: don't worry be happy now I have deleted remaining photos also from wikimedia commons, I think you are so happy and feel proud when you see that. But you forget I was new on this journey I will be back with full content and knowledge of wikipedia, I would like to suggest you don't think you are god father of wikipedia. You are humans not a God and there is only one God who is watching everything. If you have done in a purpose of demotivating new user then you are totally wrong. You supposed to remind the user by sending notes, if you do in this way than how can you be a good wiki-editor. I know you have more experience on this page means yo have to guide or share the idea with new user. According to your words play with new user like us, you are not a good leader in you personal life, change yourself. Ones again thanks for everything. I will give my best --Zayakg (talk) 12:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader commented, but dit not show or tell that they made these photos themselfves. Therefore they should be deleted, alas. --Ellywa (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jc-amsterdam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable copyright for this set of uploads of photos of a single building, all of which are claimed as the uploader's original work. File:TorenQ zijde Fruinlaan.jpg is watermarked as a Google screenshot, a couple of others appear at https://www.funda.nl/koop/verkocht/amsterdam/appartement-41281705-rietveld-schroderpad-27-pp/, File:TorenQ balkons.png has a border that makes it look like it was taken from another site rather than being an original photo.
- File:TorenQ zijde Fruinlaan.jpg
- File:TorenQ bomen.jpg
- File:TorenQ begane grond.jpg
- File:TorenQ view.jpg
- File:TorenQ balkons.png
- File:TorenQ view further away.jpg
- File:TorenQ zijnaanzicht.jpg
- File:TorenQ plattegrond met raaklijnen.png
- File:TorenQ metrozijde.jpg
- File:TorenQ voorzijde 1.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 14:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. These files are unlikely to be the uploader's own work due to variations in resolution/border/etc and that many photos are on another site (apparently since Feb 2021, before their upload here). Additionally, the floor plan is likely copyrighted by the architect. If the uploader has permission for these photos, it should be sent to COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 17:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. Uploader did not comment to explain authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 18:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Missing EXIF data, likely copyvio. A different version was uploaded by Gerardo Sánchez in his Facebook https://www.facebook.com/GerardoSPSUV/photos/a.945582865526020/1466952080055760/ NoonIcarus (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The Facebook version was uploaded on 2017/11/03, while the Commons version is an earlier version and was uploaded on 2016/09/22. The Facebook version might token from Commons. Missing EXIF data cannot be the sole reason for deletion. SCP-2000 14:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of SCP-2000. --Ellywa (talk) 18:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Missing EXIF data, unlikely original work NoonIcarus (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, like previous DR. Don't nominate again if there are no additional reasons!. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The subject of this image is a quote from The Fountainhead, a copyrighted novel. The quote is on a wall, but the close-up of is so tight that nothing is shown but the text, so it is not a de minimis appearance of the text within the image, and as far as I understand there is no freedom of panorama for text in the US anyway. RL0919 (talk) 18:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I’ve seen this quote on the wall at the American Experience at Epcot. The picture is faithful to the original on the wall. Only the quote is there. I can’t see why it should be deleted. I doubt Disney used it without permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Livfreeordi (talk • contribs) 23:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- No one has suggested that the photo is a fake. But whether Disney had permission to use the text has no bearing on whether Wikimedia Commons has a right to redistribute it. --RL0919 (talk) 19:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, as per Livfreeordi. Zezen (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition a quotation is copyrighted. It may be used, but it depends on circumstances whether it is allowed. It cannot be published with a CC-BY-SA licence imho. --Ellywa (talk) 18:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also deleted redirect, which had no use any more, File:Ayn Rand quote, American Adventure, Epcot Center, Walt Disney World.jpg.jpg. Ellywa (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Shri Anup Chandra Pandey assuming charge as the new Election Commissioner on 9th June, 2021.jpg
[edit]
The license information prevents this image from being hosted at Commons, specifically "The contents, images, text, documents etc. featured on this site may be reproduced free of charge without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the data being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." We have no control over how the image is used, so we cannot host this image. -- DaxServer (talk) 18:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum is not the author and warns that "Archival materials in this collection are subject to copyright or other intellectual property restrictions" [4]. — Racconish 💬 19:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is part of the Ernest Hemingway Photograph Collection. Some are PD others not and usually it's indicated whether they are. Photographs taken by the family were donated to the public by Mary Hemingway - can't remember which date off the top of my head. This particular photo was taken when Hemingway was at a fishing camp with his wife and son in Africa. I can't find the file in question but this similar one is PD. I'm the original uploader, if a I remember correctly and this was meant to have stayed on en.wiki instead of being moved to Commons. Victoriaearle (talk) 01:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. On this page no word about PD of some images. All images are copyrigted, and permission for publication is required from the family and/or the archive. --Ellywa (talk) 18:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
