Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/05/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_2010.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_1935.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Because it is Nonsense Wh Hc7 (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
temporaire Ad9434 (talk) 03:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 07:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, image is widely available on wallpaper websites. Chenzw Talk 13:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvio. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
copyvio : http://l-unite.fr/index.php/le-mag/ Supertoff (talk) 06:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:26, 31 Mai 2020 UTC: copyvio : http://l-unite.fr/index.php/le-mag/ --Krdbot 13:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) MoSchle (talk) 07:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ich habe versucht, die Lizenz nachzutragen. MoSchle (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: look OK now. --JuTa 18:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
License review failed, not freely licensed. Eatcha (talk) 12:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Mistake on my side. sorry. //Eatcha (talk) 12:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn: Brianjd (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Borrar de mi historia Arte fusion medios.slp (talk) 13:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 14:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Renamed. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
uploaded wrong picture Zeeshan khan 101 (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
NOT MY PROPERTY Zeeshan khan 101 (talk) 20:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Διότι δεν απεικονίζει το είδος Aricia agestis, αλλά το είδος Polyommatus icarus. Celaricia (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Διότι δεν απεικονίζει το είδος Aricia agestis, αλλά το είδος Polyommatus icarus. Celaricia (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing to do, file has been renamed. --Achim (talk) 21:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
We need permission from the artist Ebru Yıldız (not "Yildiz). E4024 (talk) 15:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- [Edit:
Keep to be explicit 20:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)] The photographer is Ebru Yildiz, she uploaded the image herself under the username Ebruyildiz. Ebru Yıldız and Ebru Yildiz are the same person; you can see she spells her name with an "i" on her website. Umimmak (talk) 17:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC) 
Delete - Please also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:01 Leiomy Mizrahi by Ebru Yildiz.jpg. --E4024 (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Procedural close: Merged into Commons:Deletion requests/File:01 Leiomy Mizrahi by Ebru Yildiz.jpg Brianjd (talk) 03:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin close)
cross wiki spam - repeat offender Quakewoody (talk) 21:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam - repeat offender Quakewoody (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Arte fusion medios.slp (talk) 16:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: File page with no file. --Achim (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Spam by a newly founded company, en:Draft:Baseimmune declined. Achim (talk) 14:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: empty gallery -- this is a speedy delete. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Arte fusion medios.slp (talk) 16:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: File page with no file. --Achim (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as no permission (No permission since) OTRS permission is unvalid? Regasterios (talk) 18:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Withrdrawn sorry I didn't see the OTRS so far down Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --clpo13(talk) 16:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Zeppelin LZ 38 near its hanger.jpg Thats Just Great (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 01:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 18:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:24, 2 Juni 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: book cover --Krdbot 20:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:24, 2 Juni 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: book cover --Krdbot 20:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 18:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:24, 2 Juni 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: book cover --Krdbot 20:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 18:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:24, 2 Juni 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: book cover --Krdbot 20:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
License review failed, video not found Eatcha (talk) 12:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and uploader request at [1]. --clpo13(talk) 18:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The file is intended for fair use and I would like to upload this locally. Alberth95 (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 21:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Image's license is not allowed on Commons. My silly mistake. Lefcentreright (talk) 00:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete
I beg to differ: the release under CC0 by the likely employer of the photographer seems sufficient to me.On further examination, I agree with the nominator, it should have been CCO, but it is not, with no explanation of the PD statement — Racconish 💬 07:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC) amended 16:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete ?????? Failed licence review: Public Domain Mark. Nominated by uploader. Brianjd (talk) 10:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Image's license is not allowed on Commons. My silly mistake. Lefcentreright (talk) 00:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete
I beg to differ, the release under CC0 by the likely employer of the photographer seems sufficient to me.On further examination I agree with the nominator, it should have been CC0 but it is not with no valid explanation of the PD mark — Racconish 💬 07:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC) amended on 16:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)- Speedy delete No licence review, but seems to follow same pattern as Commons:Deletion requests/File:UNDP Ambassador meets with President Emmerson Mnangagwa of Zimbabwe.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 10:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama licenses some of the images appearing on its site under the terms listed at {{BollywoodHungama}}. This image does not meet the requirement for that template. The source page has only "Copyright © 2019 Hungama Digital Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: see below. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
files copied from elsewhere; not a bollywoodhungama website image Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Questionable licensing.
Princepratap1234 (talk) 11:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Surely a copyvio. Not even worth trying to fix the file description, unless the uploader can provide more information. Brianjd (talk) 11:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 00:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saridewiugm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:KARTINIGRADUATION.jpg
- File:FrogsPrincess.jpg
- File:SisterBloodGraduation.jpg
- File:ZerotoOne.jpg
- File:Kopiraz.jpg
- File:RendangBuya.jpg
- File:PhypitosFans.jpg
- File:UGMLOGO.jpg
- File:KARTINI Indonesia.jpg
- File:KARTNIUNIVERSITASGADJAHMADA.jpg
- File:KARTINIGENERATION.jpg
- File:KARTINI and Friends.jpg
- File:KARTINI.jpg
- File:Sister in blood.jpg
- File:Phypitos.jpg
- File:Startup College UGM.jpg
- File:FROGSID.jpg
- File:Frogs indonesia.jpg
- File:WisdomParkUniversitasGadjahMada.jpg
- File:FullHouse.jpg
- File:Sari dewi ugm.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saridewiugm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 05:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of focus photo Mindmatrix 00:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete COM:SCOPE—no conceivable encyclopedic purpose. Buidhe (talk) 04:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:07, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Harassment and stalking against de:User:Schmitty by globally banned User Styron111. --Schniggendiller (talk) 19:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Working capital determinents1-LIC -INDU BALA.pdf
- File:Cash flow concept & format.pdf
- File:Rating Given by different agencies.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:43, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sayeed Ebrahim Dariwshean (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Special Training for Directors of Bamyan Local Government, Bamyan, Afghanistan.jpg
- File:After Signing Ceremony in GMIC, Kabul, Afghanistan.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:43, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Екатерина Палинчук (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:43, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Екатерина Палинчук (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GerardoS93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be Google Map/Earth screenshots.
- File:Località Salto in Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Santa Lucia in Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Frazione Pozzi di Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Chiesa dei Santi Nazario e Celso in Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Spineto di Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Frazione Torre di Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Frazione Pero di Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Epitaffio di Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Caprare di Bracigliano.jpg
- File:Chianche di Bracigliano.png
- File:Piazza Tuoro.jpg
- File:Casa dello zoppo.png
- File:Cappella di San Felice.png
- File:Ortara.png
- File:Cappella dei SS. Apostoli Pietro e Paolo.png
- File:Piazza 5 Maggio .png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all as screenshots from one of the street view providers, looks like Google Street View. Not all have obvious overlays from the street view, but being uploaded from the same user doesn't suggest that any are different. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK ▎enWiki 19:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Куліковська (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:16. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:17. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:15. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:13. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:14. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:12. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:11. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:10. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:9. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:8. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:7. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:6. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:5. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:4. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:2. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:3. Villa π. Boutique Hotel, Food&Wine Club.jpg
- File:Манзюк Марія Василівна.jpg
- File:Кафедра міжнародної політики.jpg
- File:Яцина Павло Ернестович.jpg
- File:Панов Ален ВОлодимирович.jpg
- File:Палінчак Микола Михайлович.jpg
- File:Слободянюк Альона Олегівна.jpg
- File:Минайло–Приходько Рената Юріївна.jpg
- File:Лешанич Мирослав Михайлович.jpg
- File:Стеблак Діана Михайлівна.jpg
- File:Нікогосяк Татевік Андраніківна.jpg
- File:Савка Віталій Янович.jpg
- File:Нечипорук Кирило Олександрович.jpg
- File:Павлишин Світлана Ярославівна.jpg
- File:Бочок Вікторія Михайлівна.jpg
- File:Кальницька Марина Анатолівна.jpg
- File:Казакова Людмила Олександрівна.jpg
- File:Дір Ігор Юрійович.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Various artworks, stated as own work, without name of authors, source and permission.
- File:Рафрафгт.jpg
- File:Ројте.jpg
- File:Ragero рафгре.jpg
- File:UWIqg1jBs2z18O92Sklr8zlB8Y3LqVfmD1ln7UQAsSUcV6B6dMkxPIZ4osjVX-16AjzvUaWK2jJhed3w9gCoCUMoR2ENgUhLeUY4Q6DqhjpDFA-Fx3EvwLTTbio4sUq5.jpg
- File:Крстот на Хаџи-Рувим Ненадовиќ.jpg
- File:2 бт.jpg
- File:Битолски крст од XIX век.jpg
- File:Крстот на Саватија Савинц.jpg
- File:Крст - изработен во резба.jpg
- File:Крст, дрво, XVII век.jpg
- File:Дрвен крст.jpg
- File:Крест-енколпион Богородица Купјатицкаја.jpg
- File:Крест-енколпион Распeтие Христово.jpg
- File:Чен Ксухаи, Кина.jpg
- File:Rfeeert.jpg
- File:Хаануман Кабли, Индија а.jpg
- File:Тошио Јошизуми, Јапонија.jpg
- File:Сузана Фаантанариу, Романија.jpg
- File:Сеунг Јеон Ким, Кореа.jpg
- File:Петер Алик, Германија.jpg
- File:Николас Поигнон, Франција, а.jpg
- File:Нгуен Трунг, Виетнам, а.jpg
- File:Михаел Горо, САД.jpg
- File:Микаел Кихлман, Шведска.jpg
- File:Мехрадат Катеи, Иран.jpg
- File:Мартин Гарсиа Ривера, Порто Рико.jpg
- File:Марк Фрисинг, Луксембург, а.jpg
- File:Лилјана Стојановиќ,Србија.jpg
- File:Куројанаги Масатака,Јапонија,.jpg
- File:Краисак Кирачакул, Тајланд.jpg
- File:Јука Вантинен, Шведска.jpg
- File:Јири Андерле, Чешка.jpg
- File:Едо Муртиќ, Хрватска.jpg
- File:Душан Калај, Словачка.jpg
- File:Диана Виктор, Јужна Африка.jpg
- File:Дадо Џуриќ. Франција, Црна гора.jpg
- File:Владимир Зуев, Русија.jpg
- File:Виктор Mануел Кастило Хернардес, Мексико.jpg
- File:Аника Ромејн, Австралија.jpg
- File:Eрнст Фуч, Австрија.jpg
- File:Петер Милтон, САД.jpg
- File:Rtaft.jpg
- File:8aрту.jpg
- File:Ратрењгг.jpg
- File:Бослијраф.jpg
- File:Rafikotr.jpg
- File:Venceslav Antonov Astralni portreti 86x61 2017 lito w.jpg
- File:Tamiyukiраф.jpg
- File:Ravlad.jpg
- File:Bongt.jpg
- File:Drew.gif
- File:Toranju.jpg
- File:Imra.jpg
- File:Rafelantr.jpg
- File:Gotleybra.jpg
- File:Roftr.jpg
- File:Rafen.gif
- File:Masahiro-Fu.jpg
- File:Ciampini My Great Mum 1st master.jpg
- File:Drefon.jpg
- File:Bbor.jpg
- File:Wladrin.jpg
- File:Buff р.jpg
- File:Марка р.jpg
- File:Rofen 9а.jpg
- File:1vffr 8.jpg
- File:7th-international-triennial-of-graphic-art2012bitolamacedonia њ.jpg
- File:Владраф 6.jpg
- File:2006 10 20 Megunarodno graficko trienale 5р.jpg
- File:2003 09 30 Megunarodno graficko trienale 4 а.jpg
- File:Raf 77.jpg
- File:2000 09 30 3 Megunarodno graficko trienale Bitola-cropб.jpg
- File:2 Меѓународно графичко триенале Битола - МГТ Битола.jpg
- File:1 Меѓународно графичко триенале Битола - МГТ Битола.jpg
- File:6 Меѓународно графичко триенале.jpg
- File:International Triennial of garphic art Bitola 2.jpg
- File:IGT - Bitola Triennial.jpg
- File:IGT Bitola.png
- File:Триенале.png
- File:2vlado.jpg
- File:S200 vlado.goreski.jpg
- File:Vlado Goreski -Nocturne VII - 3.jpg
- File:Ѓорески.jpg
- File:Цртеж 7.jpg
- File:Zdcsdcdc.jpg
- File:Lhbkjhbkhb.jpg
- File:DRjmID1W0AAo4MO.jpg
- File:Левиатан.jpg
- File:Bcnvn.jpg
- File:17aa.jpg
- File:Сценографија, Браќата карамазови, Театар „Марин Држиќ“, Дубровник.jpg
- File:Hystory of death a.jpg
- File:Hystory of death......jpg
- File:Владо Ѓорески, 2000.jpg
- File:Петар Хаџи Бошков „Ненасловено“.jpg
- File:Пецо Видимче „Портрет“.jpg
- File:Борислав Траиковски „Спирали“.jpg
- File:Перо Спироски „Пејзаж“.jpg
- File:Никола Мартиноски „Портрет на девојче“.jpg
- File:Никола Мартиноски „Три деца“.jpg
- File:Лазар Личеноски „Поле со афиони“.jpg
- File:12 pole so afioni.jpg
- File:06 esen.jpg
- File:05 portret na gospodin.jpg
- File:04 portret na devojka (1).jpg
- File:03 pejsaz.jpg
- File:02 ptici.jpg
- File:01 lokvanji.jpg
- File:09 zima.jpg
- File:Dim;e Nikolov, grafika.jpg
- File:Димче Николов.jpg
- File:Dimce-nikolov-cifte-3.jpg
- File:2.Тоде Ѓорески.jpg
- File:Тоде Ѓорески.jpg
- File:„Шаман“, акватинта, 2020.jpg
- File:Полиптих, литографија, 2020.jpg
- File:Од циклусот „Улис“, бакропис, 2019.jpg
- File:Од циклусот „Катедрала“, комбинирана техника, 2019 година.jpg
- File:„Распетие“, сува игла, 2018.jpg
- File:„Левијатан“, литографија, 2017.jpg
- File:„Ангелско попладне“, сува игла, 2018.jpg
- File:Сценографија од претставата „Животот е сон“ - Македонски Народен театар, Скопје, режија - Владо Цветановски, 2014 година.jpg
- File:Сценографија од претставата „Безбог“ во изведба на Народниот театар од Битола, 1991 година.jpg
- File:„Архелаос“ - Македонски народен театар Скопје.jpg
- File:Сцена од претставата „Браќата Карамазови“, театар „Марин Држиќ“, Дубровник, Хрватска.jpg
- File:Плакат од претставата „Браќата Карамазови“, театар „Марин Држиќ“, Дубровник, Хрватска.jpg
- File:Сценографски скици за претставата „Евангелие по сенките“ од Владо Цветановски и Владо Ѓорески, Народен театар Битола, 1997 годин.jpg
- File:Плакат од претставата „Безбог“ во режија на Владо Цветановски - Народен театар Битола, 1991 година.jpg
- File:Сценографија од претставата „Безбог“, Народен театар Битола.jpg
- File:Кире Ѓоревски.jpg
- File:Циклус „Симфонии“, 27, 2020, 100 Х 70, литографија.jpg
- File:Одисеј.jpg
- File:;iuhcbbnfg.jpg
- File:„Afternoon of a Angelus“drypoint, 2018.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Smooth O (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:05, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
User with bad history, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Planets X.jpg
- File:Vlado Goreski, 2001.jpg
- File:Shamans,VIII.jpg
- File:Nocturne VIII.jpg
- File:Nocturne VII.jpg
- File:Planets,IX.jpg
- File:Planets, V.jpg
- File:Shamans, IV.jpg
- File:Nocturne, III.jpg
- File:Nocturne II.jpg
- File:Nocturne XXVII.jpg
- File:Nocturne I.jpg
- File:Photo collage - Brothers Karamazov.jpg
- File:Without God.jpg
- File:Vlado Goreski, 2007.jpg
- File:Drawing for a theatrical performance Gospel in the Shadows.jpg
- File:Photo collage - Life is a dream.jpg
- File:Drawing for a theatrical performance- Without God.jpg
- File:Archelaus.jpg
- File:IGT 2018.jpg
Yann (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IsidoraColic (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://www.icdo.at/about-icdo/
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IsidoraColic (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images are from copyrighted website https://www.icdo.at. No proof of permission.
- File:Palais Wertheim Closing Ceremony photo by Danijela Bogdanovic (185).jpg
- File:Communities interview Sacalaca.jpg
- File:Mayavoice artexh.jpg
- File:Solidaridad ICDO.jpg
- File:Memorandum signing ICDO UIMQRoo.jpg
- File:The Black Line in Weltmuseum Wien.png
- File:Bridging Diversity- Grude.jpg
- File:Bridging Diversity- Art and Expression.jpg
- File:BridgingDiversity-BiH.jpg
- File:3rd Bridge for Cities ICDO.jpg
- File:Art Exhibition ICDO.jpg
- File:Gala Dinner ICDO.jpg
- File:Rathaus Opening Ceremony photo by Danijela Bogdanovic (37).jpg
- File:Rathaus Opening Ceremony photo by Carmen Ciobanu (59).jpg
- File:SKINCLUSION.jpg
- File:Panel Discussion Music and Beyond.jpg
- File:ICDO Italy.jpg
- File:Palac and Dieck.jpg
- File:Albertonodale.jpg
- File:Mueckler ICDO.jpg
- File:Toni slika.jpg
- File:Josipa Palac.jpg
- File:YY 6310 copy.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Smooth O (talk) 19:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
It has multiple meanings. --Orijentolog (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
This image file, originating from the Mackinac State Historic Parks website https://www.mackinacparks.com/canadian-costume-reflected-lifestyle/, has been used for ongoing inappropriate edits to the English Wikipedia article Loincloth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loincloth and its non-English counterpart articles. Rather than adding text to the article to explain a costumed French-Canadian within the article, the image has instead been used to overwrite existing images without any justification nor an accompanying Edit Summary.
In short, rather than a Good Faith edit, the image has been used for disruptive edits to said articles. With no other use for this image, I thus nominate this image for deletion. DeNoel (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: The file French Canadian Costume.jpg has not been used in a meaningful manner, neither preceding nor during this deletion request. It has been over one month since being nominated for deletion, and nobody has offered any sort of opinion about the file. I thus suggest it's abandoned, and hereby request an admin to have a look over this request. DeNoel (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: wrong/inappropriate use is a problem for WP, not Commons. It doesn't need to be used in a meaningful way in order to be considered in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence at the source website that this is a free image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Strakhov (talk) 10:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neigle Santos (talk · contribs)
[edit]One of the files states source as "weltfussball.de databank": no metadata, so probably copyvios. Most probably out of scope too.
Kissa21782 (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 18:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
not own work. Vareloco (talk) 02:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yep. FBMD at MD. --E4024 (talk) 04:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + a Google search by image. --Ahmadtalk 23:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Her FB image. E4024 (talk) 21:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, and same user. Repetitive behavior.--Vareloco (talk) 01:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Own work? E4024 (talk) 04:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: perhaps not. Small, no EXIF, available elsewhere by using Google search by image/TinEye. --Ahmadtalk 00:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Own work? E4024 (talk) 04:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: perhaps not. Small, no EXIF, available elsewhere by using Google search by image/TinEye. --Ahmadtalk 00:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Promotion of software products as a advertisement. Articseahorse (talk) 23:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:23, 8 Juni 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lifan24 --Krdbot 14:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
It is a promotion for a get rich quick scan. Articseahorse (talk) 23:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:23, 8 Juni 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lifan24 --Krdbot 14:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
It contains derivate work which I was not aware of would not be allowed. I have made a replacement file at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ac_src_meters_with_meter-shunts_speaker_with_load-shunt_rev2.jpg Aclassifier (talk) 13:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
It contains derivate work which I was not aware of would not be allowed. I have made a replacement file at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ac_src_meters_with_meter-shunts_speaker_with_load-shunt_rev2.jpg Aclassifier (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 08:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
flurry flurry flurry Xocolatl (talk) 23:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yeungchunming1992 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files were previously deleted as copyvios. See deletion log and uploader's talk page User_talk:Yeungchunming1992.
- File:Chai Wan Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School 1997.jpg
- File:Chai Wan Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School 2001.jpg
- File:Chai Wan Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School 1995.jpg
- File:Chai Wan Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School 1994.jpg
- File:Chai Wan Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School 1993.jpg
- File:Chai Wan Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School 1970s.jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學307號課室.jpg
- File:翻新後的6樓禮堂.jpg
- File:昔日學校大門.jpg
- File:Father Stephen B. Edmonds.jpg
- File:地下大堂現貌.jpg
- File:Chai Wan Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School.jpg
Wcam (talk) 13:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yeungchunming1992 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same as the reason of previous deletion request. Copyvio.
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學翻新後的6樓禮堂.jpg
- File:正在擴建校舍新翼中的柴灣天主教海星小學興華（二）邨校舍 (1997年).jpg
- File:翻新後的柴灣天主教海星小學興華（二）邨校舍 (2001年).jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學興華（二）邨校舍 (1999年).jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學興華（二）邨校舍 (1994年).jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學興華（二）邨校舍 (1995年).jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學興華（二）邨校舍 (1970年代).jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學興華（二）邨校舍 (1993年).jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學307號課室.jpg
- File:文顯榮神父.jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學昔日學校大門.jpg
- File:柴灣天主教海星小學昔日地下大堂.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
SCP-2000 04:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- These pictures some of my own work, some of the school work, and I got their permission. Yeungchunming1992 (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Yeungchunming1992: Please see COM:OTRS on how to send us that permission Gbawden (talk) 13:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- FYI: Commons:Deletion_requests/files_of_Yeungchunming1992. Yes, we do received a ticket: #2022020710010154, but it is hard to process it...
- For File:文顯榮神父.jpg, it is pretty clear we could delete it as {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} should not be applied to newly uploaded file.
- Per EXIF data, two files are created by "Canon DIGITAL IXUS 120 IS":
- One file is created by "Nikon Coolpix 990":
- Two are created by phone "MOTO RAZR V9":
- The rest of them are created by "HP Scanjet djf300", likely scanned version of some old photo.
- I just replied with some boilerplate, hope uploader could provide more information. Stang★ 10:47, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP. If something still comes out of that ticket please consult COM:UNDEL. --Rosenzweig τ 19:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Dubious "own work". See File:Jyotirmoy Singh Mahato BJP.jpg for the uploader's own EXIF data. E4024 (talk) 18:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jagannath Sarkar MP. @Fitindia: . -mattbuck (Talk) 18:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This looks like a copyvio of this.- FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright violation and missing permission with Low resolution photo of dubious quality. 𝕃𝕚𝕗𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕞𝕖𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢 05:56, 4 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LifetimeWiki (talk • contribs) 05:56, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
_2010.jpg){kind=link}
_2010.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is A selfie Mzmmafaz (talk) 03:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
_2010.jpg){kind=link}
- Not a selfie and it is in use. Why are you doing this? --E4024 (talk) 04:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep notable person, reasonable quality, used. Buidhe (talk) 04:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
_2010.jpg){kind=link}
unused, uncategorised, a test file Estopedist1 (talk) 07:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
File:The Ancient Agora and the Acropolis from Apostolou Pavlou Pedestrian Street on May 29, 2020.jpg
[edit]
I overprocessed this picture. Please delete it. George E. Koronaios (talk) 11:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Uploader request within 2 days of upload. Not in use. Brianjd (talk) 11:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Double posted. It is also accidentally posted by my newer account (Long lasting memories). After delete this file, this account is going to be deleted also and keep active only new account. When in G (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Question: What is the other file name of this image? --Achim (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @When in G: If this file is an exact duplicate of the other post, please tag it with {{Duplicate}}. Brianjd (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
@Achim55: The other filename is File:Γαλαξείδι 01.jpg. I want to keep Γαλαξείδι 01.jpg and delete Γαλαξείδι. Σεπτέμβριος 2019.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by When in G (talk • contribs) 09:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. Is User:Long lasting memories another account of yours? --Achim (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
@Achim55: Long lasting memories is my new account. I forgot that i had When in G account also. When in G account created only for upload this file in wikimedia, but now, i plan to delete When in G account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by When in G (talk • contribs) 09:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, File:Γαλαξείδι. Σεπτέμβριος 2019.jpg is a slightly different crop from the original (same for File:Γαλαξείδι 01.jpg) but in this case I think we can Delete leaving a redirect because the former was uploaded 8 months ago. --Achim (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
@Achim55: Thank you very much! The difference between these two files is in RAW editing software used for. In the case of Γαλαξείδι 01.jpg the RAW editor was RawTherapee software instead of Silkypix used for Γαλαξείδι. Σεπτέμβριος 2019.jpg file. This software can read more pixels from the outer area of the camera sensor than used by the build-in JPEG engine of the camera. This is why this file has more than 6000 horizontal pixels (which is Nikon's D3300 horizontal JPEG pixels) — Preceding unsigned comment added by When in G (talk • contribs) 14:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvio Flix11 (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
not free — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yamaha5 (talk • contribs) 2020-05-29T14:30:08 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work per watermark. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Seem to be taken from WP-subject twitter https://twitter.com/kanzajaved and so unlikely to be correctly submitted. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
It is a promotion for a get rich quick scan. Articseahorse (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. --Herby talk thyme 12:07, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of the text depicted. There is no permission from the authors of the text as far as I can see. whym (talk) 00:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- 日本語で失礼します。この写真は、京都アニメーション放火殺人事件において、慰問する人や報道陣が殺到したことから地元町内会が解体工事中の京都アニメーション第1スタジオに掲示したものであり、事件の説明のために必要なものです。この文書は公共空間に掲示されたものであるため、削除対応は不適切と考えます。--しんぎんぐきゃっと (talk) 00:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- しんぎんぐきゃっとさんが町内会を代表して書いた文章であれば問題ないのですが、そうでなければ著者の許諾が必要です。また、「このことが広く知られてほしいから掲載に異存はない」といった意味での許諾ではなく、 「著者は私であり、私はCreative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International のライセンスで以後誰でも自由に転載・改変することを許す」という種類の許諾が必要です。Commons:OTRS/jaもご覧ください。 --whym (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 18:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Cross-wiki spam. Esteban16 (talk) 23:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 22:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Cross-wiki spam. Esteban16 (talk) 23:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2010, no fop
- File:Bleiglasfenster in der nordwestlichen Seitenkapelle in St Johannes in Neumarkt 01.JPG
- File:Bleiglasfenster in der nordwestlichen Seitenkapelle in St Johannes in Neumarkt 02.JPG
- File:Bleiglasfenster in der nordwestlichen Seitenkapelle in St Johannes in Neumarkt 1.jpg
- File:Bleiglasfenster in der nordwestlichen Seitenkapelle in St Johannes in Neumarkt 2.jpg
- File:Glasfenster Johanneskirche Neumarkt Hl Geist.jpg
- File:Kunstglasfenster St Johannes Neumarkt Opf 000.JPG
- File:Kunstglasfenster St Johannes Neumarkt Opf 001.JPG
- File:Kunstglasfenster St Johannes Neumarkt Opf 002.JPG
- File:Kunstglasfenster St Johannes Neumarkt Opf 003.JPG
- File:Kunstglasfenster St Johannes Neumarkt Opf 004.JPG
- File:Kunstglasfenster St Johannes Neumarkt Opf 005.JPG
- File:Kunstglasfenster St Johannes Neumarkt Opf 006.JPG
- File:Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz St. Johannes 358.jpg
- File:Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz St. Johannes 359.jpg
- File:Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz St. Johannes 360.jpg
- File:Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz St. Johannes 361.jpg
- File:Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz St. Johannes 364.jpg
- File:Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz St. Johannes 365.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 044.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, stained glass windows by Hans Gottfried von Stockhausen who died in 2010, no fop
- File:Altarraum St Johannes Neumarkt.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 0011.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 0015.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 0017.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 0036.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 0037.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 045.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 090.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 091.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 092.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 099.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 100.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 115.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 116.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 117.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 120.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 121.JPG
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 129.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 130.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 139.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 156.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 157.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 161.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 167.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 171.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 180.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 181.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 184.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 185.jpg
- File:St Johannes Neumarkt NM 186.jpg
- File:St. Johannes Neumarkt Oberpfalz Blick durchs Mittelschiff auf den Altar.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sridharbsbu (talk · contribs)
[edit]an blocked user. Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
Estopedist1 (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
not free — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yamaha5 (talk • contribs) 2020-05-29T14:29:46 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: not own work per watermark. --Emha (talk) 15:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
contains copyrighted photos such as trump profile photo and also a large amount of potentially copyrighted text Thespoondragon (talk) 04:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: contains copyrighted photos. --Emha (talk) 15:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Protests Spread Across US After Death of Black Man in Police Custody (Source).webmhd.webm
[edit]This has an in-video label stating "AP", and it's unlikely VOA staff would have been on-scene Bri (talk) 04:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Agree, should be deleted then. I hadn't noticed this on the initial upload Oaktree b (talk) 15:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Protests Spread Across US After Death of Black Man in Police Custody (Source).webmhd.webm: contains copyrighted material by AP. --Emha (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Uploader's reqeust within 24 hours. Lesser quality version of File:Olaus Magnus - On Ice Equipment.jpg Thuresson (talk) 07:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- (For those who don’t know, @Thuresson is an admin.) @Thuresson: Why don’t you just delete it yourself? Is that against admin policies? Brianjd (talk) 10:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure since non-administrators can not delete their own files. According to Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion under G7 files can be speedy deleted upon request by uploader within 7 days. Thuresson (talk) 11:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am well aware of G7, which is why I asked. Brianjd (talk) 11:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure since non-administrators can not delete their own files. According to Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion under G7 files can be speedy deleted upon request by uploader within 7 days. Thuresson (talk) 11:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request within 24 hours. Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion G7. --Emha (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
y Arsenrex (talk) 07:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of Google Earth Sattelite: Copyrighted = Copyright Violation. --Emha (talk) 15:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artworks (church built in 1968), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 09:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: artwork inside - needs permisson of the artist. --Emha (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artwork (church built in 1968), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 09:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: artwork inside - needs permisson of the artist. --Emha (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: artwork inside - needs permisson of the artist. --Emha (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artworks (church built in 1968), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: artwork inside - needs permisson of the artist. --Emha (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artwork (church built in 1968), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 09:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: artwork inside - needs permisson of the artist. --Emha (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artwork (church built in 1968), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 09:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mariä Himmelfahrt - Hohenkemnath-015.JPG: the STONE is artwork inside - needs permisson of the artist. (the cross could be old enough). --Emha (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artworks (church built in 1968), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: artwork inside - needs permisson of the artist. --Emha (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Previously deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tolkien signature.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/PD ineligible signatures. DrKay (talk) 12:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COM:SIG#UK. --Emha (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I created this file and its not in use Bar (talk to me) 14:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion. Obvious educational use. Brianjd (talk) 01:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Emha (talk) 16:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
copyright Bar (talk to me) 02:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The image is not in the indicated source. --E4024 (talk) 14:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: seems like work of US government, but – I did not find the photo at source site. License was never reviewed and that way I cannot confirm, that the photo is work of US government. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
It is a Wikimedia screenshot but there is a deleted image in the infobox: File:Hungaria Esperanto-Asocio.jpg Regasterios (talk) 14:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: contains previously deleted file without a valid licence. --Emha (talk) 16:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 16:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Milwaukee Public Museum
[edit]Photos taken in Milwaukee, US. No FoP in US for artworks.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Yuraily Lic, I see your reasoning and agree with it, sad though I am to see my dino photos go. Howicus (Look at what I found!) (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your understanding, Howicus. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ThatMontrealIP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Work by en:Maurizio Cattelan and photo taken in Paris, but there is no freedom of panorama in France.
Habertix (talk) 15:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, my mistake. This should be deleted then.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 16:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Encyclopedic value missing Hans Haase (talk) 00:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep In scope. Nicoli Maege (talk) 18:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Images in Wikimedia Commons dont need an "encyclopedic value", but this image has, but even if it didnt had this image is in scope. Tm (talk) 01:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: See COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
This photo violates my rights!!! 181.124.176.74 22:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Surely if the nominator was the subject, they would also have nominated all the other photos of Category:Sandra Reehs. Brianjd (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Brianjd. FredWalsh (talk) 09:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Emha (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
It has multiple meanings. --Orijentolog (talk) 23:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: as disambig. --Achim (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Mistake. --Orijentolog (talk) 00:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, empty. --Achim (talk) 18:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Mistake. --Orijentolog (talk) 00:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, author's request. --Achim (talk) 19:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
The person in the picture asked me to submit a request to delete this image. Link to her Facebook profile 2A00:1028:8380:B672:C574:2EA2:8642:F14B 06:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Provided that the request was based on personal reasons of the person displayed, I (as uploader) agree.--David Sedlecký (talk) 07:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
The person in the picture asked me to submit a request to delete this image. Link to her Facebook profile 2A00:1028:8380:B672:FC32:CB10:9A0F:9FDC 17:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I'm the uploader of this file and request you to delete it based on repeated personal request of the person displayed. Moreover it has no use on any project. Thanks. --David Sedlecký (talk) 07:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: personal rights / unused file. --Emha (talk) 16:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Picture of a newspaper: both text and images under copyright. Kissa21782 (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artworks (church built in 1968), no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 09:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: artwork inside - needs permisson of the artist. --Emha (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, map, book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags
- File:Місцева бригада прокладає колії. Велике Колодно..jpg
- File:Місцева бригада будує колії. Велике Колодно..jpg
- File:Залізнична станція с. Велике Колодно.jpg
- File:Меморіал пам'яті полеглих односельчан в Другій світовій війні с.Велике Колодно.jpg
- File:Церква Воздвиження Чесного Хреста ПЦУ (1902р.) с.Велике Колодно.jpg
- File:Костел Воздвиження Чесного Хреста с.Велике Колодно.jpg
- File:Gorpin-Ikona-Kostel.jpg
- File:Перв'ятичі на карті.png
- File:Батькова рука.jpg
- File:Church Vyrov 2.tif
- File:Church Vyrov 1.tif
- File:Olexander Sodomora 1.tif
- File:Olexander Sodomora.tif
- File:Tserkva Pervyatuchi.jpg
_%D1%81.%D0%92%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B5_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Лесь Бабський-“Сергій” – поручник СБ ОУН.jpg
- File:Лукань Калина Дмитрівна 2.jpg
- File:Лукань Калина Дмитрівна.jpg
- File:Драмгурток села Кобаки. Зима, 1942 .jpg
- File:Калина Лукань "Галина".jpg
- File:Миклашів 2.jpg
- File:Миклашів.jpg
- File:Село Миклаші́в, 1906 р. Фото- Фріц Вільгельм фон Ессен.jpg
- File:Село Миклаші́в Пустомитівському районі Львівської області. 1906 р. Фото- Фріц Вільгельм фон Ессен.jpg
- File:Українські святкові вбрання в Калуші, початок ХХ ст..png
- File:Гуцул грає на дуді.png
- File:1937р., Вирів. "Союз Українок" (в центрі - Софія Содомора).tif
- File:1937р., Вирів. Отець Олександр Содомора з прихожанами під час будівництва нової церкви.tif
- File:Церква Преображення Господнього (1765) та дзвіниця в с.Вирів.jpg
_%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B7%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8F_%D0%B2_%D1%81.%D0%92%D0%B8%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Лукань Калина Дмитрівна - "Галина".jpg
- File:Лукань Калина - "Галина".jpg
- File:Калина Лукань — "Галина".jpg
- File:Лесь Бабський - "Сергій" - поручник Служби Безпеки ОУН(р).jpg
- File:Андрейчук Іван Федорович.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RomanVR
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. RomanVR (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube. Note that images originally released on GreatAgain's YouTube channel but not repost to GreatAgain's website are not freely licensed A1Cafel (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CrazyWhiteHorse (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violation. Person on photo died in 1991.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CrazyWhiteHorse (talk · contribs)
[edit]Documents and a photo of unclear copyright status, definitely not own works as stated.
- File:Архивная справка МХТ Павел Иванов 1.jpg
- File:Архивная справка МХТ Павел Иванов 2.jpg
- File:Свидетельство Петрова Юрия Владимировича.jpg
- File:Петров Ю.В. Дирижёр.jpg
- File:Архивная справка Петров Ю.В.jpg
- File:Списки учащихся детской хоровой школы при Ленинградской Академической капелле(1942 г.)-2.jpg
- File:Списки учащихся детской хоровой школы при Ленинградской Академической капелле(1942 г.)-3.jpg
-2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Xunks (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atibrarian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atibrarian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Extremely unlikely that we'd be seeing black and white photos from 2021; unlikely to be Atibrarian's "own work".
- File:Chief Shaibu Abu 08.jpg
- File:Chief Shaibu Abu 07.jpg
- File:Chief Shaibu Abu 04.jpg
- File:Chief Shaibu Abu 06.jpg
- File:Chief Shaibu Abu 05.jpg
- File:Chief Shaibu Abu 02.jpg
- File:Chief Shaibu Abu 03.jpg
- File:Chief Shaibu Abu 01.jpg
SHB2000 (talk) 07:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Comment Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Nigeria, if these photos are at least 50 years old, they would be PD. I would not be surprised at all if they were, but we need to know whether they are or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek, thanks for your kind observation. These images are over 50 years old and are now PD according to Copyright - "Cinematograph films and photographs. 50 years after the end of the year in which the work was first published.[C.28/2004 1st Sched]" law in Nigeria.
- The images are rare family photos of my great-grandfather. Regards. Atibrarian (talk) 23:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, Atibrarian. In that case, we should keep them, but please go through COM:VRT and change the author description on the file page in order to satisfy everyone. Otherwise, they could be deleted per the precautionary principle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Atibrarian: please state the correct date and author on the file descriptions. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 23:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Atibrarian: We are still waiting for you to update the correct date and author. Please do so ASAP so that I can close this deletion request. Thank you. —holly {chat} 23:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Ikan Kekek, GrandEscogriffe!
- I trust you all are doing well. I am sorry for the delay in changing the authorship and date of the photos. I have attempted to make some changes to the details of the photos but was a bit difficult. Furthermore, ascertaining the date and author of the photos has been a bit difficult due to the fact I currently don't have access to physical photos/out of reach at the moment to enable me to scan for more details about the author and date of publications.
- In the coming weeks, I should be able to make the necessary changes as I intend to visit my county home. Atibrarian (talk) 05:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, enough time has passed since january. Per nomination. @Atibrarian: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holders (all heirs of your grandfather) to publish these files on Commons with a free license. If successful, the files can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Historical maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: NOT per nomination, but bevcause the first is a duplicate of File:Insola-de-Porta-Comasina.jpg, while the second is a PDF file while it should be an image format. Ruthven (msg) 16:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Missing permission and personal image.; probably should be handled as normal DR — billinghurst sDrewth 14:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Support deletion. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 09:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
This is NOT a picture of Satriano di Lucania 79.43.153.190 20:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please change the name or/and the category. Ruthven (msg) 07:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rodelar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation:http://driza.blogspot.com/2010/02/el-ayuntamiento-de-peque-da-luz-verde.html
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as this image is not totally identical to the external hit[2]. It might be a redrawing. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
![[2]](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/_JxWp1kRhKWM/S2gnWAFNx9I/AAAAAAAAAbs/Khn5wz_DBHc/s1600/peque_escudo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Too close to source, derivative work. --Ezarateesteban 15:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
not free — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yamaha5 (talk • contribs) 2020-05-29T14:29:58 (UTC)
- Delete via watermark it's apparently from instagram.com/abihaye_paitakht/ --Emha (talk) 15:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 16:36, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 16:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Elisabeth (Sengenthal)
[edit]copyvio, contemp. artworks, no fop
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 008.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 009.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 012.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 016.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 018.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 024.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 026.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 027.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 028.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 029.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 030.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 031.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 032.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 033.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 034.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 035.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 036.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 037.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 038.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 039.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 040.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 041.jpg
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 051.JPG
- File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 055.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 14:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Some of these (e.g. File:St Elisabeth Sengenthal NM 008.jpg) are COM:DM. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Peter und Paul (Berngau)
[edit]copyvio, contemp. artworks, no fop
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 1 00.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 1 01.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 18.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 29.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 34.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 35.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 36.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 37.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 38.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 44.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 46.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 50.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 51.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 52.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 53.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 54.jpg
- File:St Peter und Paul Berngau 70.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 14:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Walburga (Neumarkt-Stauf)
[edit]copyvio, contemp. artworks, no fop
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 007.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 011.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 012.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 014.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 015.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 016.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 029.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 032.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 033.jpg
- File:St Walburga Stauf NM 036.jpg
- File:Wallfahrtskirche Mariahilf Neumarkt Oberpfalz 027.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 14:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Marathitil Aadivasi Kavitetun Chitrit Jhalelya Strichya vividh rupancha chikitsak abhyas.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:OTRS must be used instead. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Also Commons:Derivative works from photos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paweeraphat Thasee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:เปิดการเดินรถต่อจากสถานีนาทาถึงสถานีหนองคาย.jpg
- File:การเปลี่ยนชื่อสถานีรถไฟหนองคายเดมเป็นสถานีรถไฟนาทา.jpg
- File:บป4.jpg
- File:บป1.jpg
- File:สถานีรถไฟบ้านปินอดีต1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paweeraphat Thasee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:จิ๋ว พิจิตร.png
- File:Mp104.jpg
- File:38dbb8c52fc078008342db3cbe2e64e7 .jpg
- File:Image1456.ท.jpg
- File:14415468311441546853m.jpg
- File:Sonti sommart 01.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Misia22442 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Romeo e Giulietta - Carla e Marisa Fracci.jpg
- File:Carla e Marisa Fracci.jpg
- File:Marisa Fracci.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Screencap taken from https://www.thestate.com/news/local/article243123801.html. Not likely uploader's photo. Vauxford (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Screencap from video, not likely uploader's photo. Vauxford (talk) 16:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; low quality and lack of metadata suggest screenshot, presumed copyrighted per COM:NETCOPYRIGHT ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 17:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose/comment - not sure why this couldn't be a screencap from the uploaders own video? (or does the metadata show it wasn't from a phone?) I don't think quality should enter into it though - documentation of these events is important, so even low quality photos of the events are useful for historical documentation purposes. If there's a good reason to think this was taken from an online video I support, otherwise oppose. -- Phoebe (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Phoebe The other image the user uploaded was proven to be a screencap from a video posted on some American news website, The State. Plus, cameras of all type don't really save photos in .png formats. A image saved as a .png is usually a result of screencapping using a software like Lightshot. --Vauxford (talk) 22:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- fair enough! thanks. -- Phoebe (talk) 13:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Not the photograph was taken in 1895, but the machine shown in the picture. As you can read in the summary, the photo is from the Historical Museum of Dombóvár, Hungary. Unlikely to be own work, unknown copyright situation. Regasterios (talk) 17:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Maddriver371 (talk) 17:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I made a screenshot of my one OSX, the same as on the English Wiki-page.--Maddriver371 (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete The screenshot is yours, but macOS is not. Brianjd (talk) 04:42, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Strange on English Wikipedia its oke?--Maddriver371 (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- English Wikipedia has different rules. Over there, it might be OK. Over here, it is definitely not OK. Brianjd (talk) 07:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
This painting have the mention «unknown author» in the description. Fralambert (talk) 18:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable, out of scope. — Yerpo Eh? 18:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Single upload, no EXIF data, looks like promotional photo. Smooth O (talk) 19:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
This file shows personal advertisement. Shahriar Kabir Pavel (talk) 20:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Personal Photo. Shahriar Kabir Pavel (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 2004, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Dubious own work. See other upload by the same user. E4024 (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation 30ChuaPhaiLaTet (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Authorship of this is questionable, found all over the web since 2013. Initially uploaded in low resolution/quality by one user, recently uploaded in high resolution/quality by a different user, all claimed as "own work". -- Túrelio (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm the photographer of this photo and I want to delete this photo. 2A04:4540:B02:9E00:8532:FE5A:9FEA:27DF 21:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion. Nominator is unidentified. Photo is of reasonable quality and the subject is identified. Uploaded in 2012. Brianjd (talk) 04:42, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Wrong use of copyright information, no Creative Commons (source: https://www.flickr.com/people/florianruecklies/) Florian.ruecklies (talk) 22:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Given CC licenses cannot be revoked and replaced by ARR. --Achim (talk) 22:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Not done License has been verified by FlickreviewR. Thuresson (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/2007050110009977
[edit]References OTRS ticket 2007050110009977, which Josve05a checked and found that it does not confirm permission.
- File:Francois Steyn 2007.jpg
- File:Butch James 2007.jpg
- File:Bobby Skinstad 2007 med.jpg
- File:John Smit 2007 med.jpg
- File:Brad Barritt 2007.jpg
- File:JP Pietersen 2007 med.jpg
Logan Talk Contributions 22:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I trusted on OTRS. If they must be deleted, then it's ok to me. We don't want infringe anyone's copyright. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 23:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: ticket does not contain any license information. --Didym (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Articseahorse (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Adolf Hitler Ich bin Sozialist Monument for the German Labour Front, Deutsche Arbeitsfront (DAF), 1935.jpg
[edit],_1935.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1935.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not own work—reproduction of previously printed photograph. 1935 date makes own work unlikely. Under german copyright rules (70 year rule) it is virtually guaranteed to be copyrighted under URAA. Buidhe (talk) 00:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Fue una imagen de mi propiedad que subi hace muchos años sobre un borrador de mi logo actual AJ Zombietve (talk) 01:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - OoS. --E4024 (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Per EXIF, this image is taken from Facebook. Proof of permission is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gikü (talk • contribs) 2020-05-28T22:57:55 (UTC)
- The same applies to:
- --JuTa 02:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
infringement of COM:ADVERT — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommanderWaterford (talk • contribs) 2020-05-26T19:54:15 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Image without metadata, in low resolution. Not enough evidence of own work; user with history of copyvio Frodar (talk) 04:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 16:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
No info. OoS. E4024 (talk) 04:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
this seems to be a derived work where the original image is from an unknown source that is quite likely to have copyright attached — billinghurst sDrewth 04:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Not an "own work", like other uploads by this user. E4024 (talk) 04:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Own work? E4024 (talk) 04:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Another "not an own work" by the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 04:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/ESC-Уэльс
[edit]Unused files with rotated text for a table, replaced by a template. Replacement example.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1986, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1987, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, artwork from 1987, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) Maddriver371 (talk) 10:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Likely copyvio: movie set photo with only Facebook metadata. Kissa21782 (talk) 10:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemp. artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, mural is contemp. artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, mural is contemp. artwork, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Pius (Neumarkt-Hasenheide)
[edit]copyvio concerning artworks, church built in the 1960s (see [3]), no fop.
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 010.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 011.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 015.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 016.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 017.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 018.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 023.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 025.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 026.jpg
- File:St Pius - Neumarkt Hasenheide 027.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
unused formula that could better be typeset in TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
unused formula that could better be typeset in TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Fails COM:EDUSE as not realistically useful for any informational or educational purpose. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK ▎enWiki 12:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This photo was taken in Montana, US. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
DW. No original author, source, date, or permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright reasons FUCKWICK2006 (talk) 15:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- This picture was made during days of BritI also ish Somaliland. Who took the picture is unknown. It was taken around 1940's.
- Also Somalia has no copyright law and it's been 80 years since the picture was taken.
- I believe it should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlaskaLava (talk • contribs) 15:35, 31. May 2020 (UTC)
- Me too. I also believe this file should "stay" and the nominator with their strange username should "go". Admins? --E4024 (talk) 19:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- When I said "nominator" I was referring to this user. :) Sorry. E4024 (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I also blocked the user with the inappropriate username for violating our username policy. They can create a new account with an appropriate username if they wish. --Missvain (talk) 19:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:National Health Service logos
[edit]- File:Aneurin Bevan University Health Board logo.svg
- File:Barts Health NHS Trust logo.svg
- File:Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board logo.svg
- File:Call 111 Logo.svg
- File:Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust logo.svg
- File:Confed logo.png
- File:Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust logo.png
- File:East London NHS Foundation Trust logo.svg
- File:East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust logo.svg
- File:EvelinaLogo.png
- File:Health and Social Care in Northern Ireland logo.svg
- File:Health Education England logo.svg
- File:Health Research Authority logo.svg
- File:Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust logo.svg
- File:HSJ Logo.png.jpg
- File:Logo of SYAS.jpg
- File:National Health Service (England) logo.svg
- File:NHS 111 logo.svg
- File:NHS Ayrshire and Arran logo.svg
- File:NHS Blood and Transplant logo.svg
- File:NHS Borders logo.svg
- File:NHS Counter Fraud Authority Official Logo.jpg
- File:NHS Dumfries and Galloway logo.svg
- File:NHS England logo.png
- File:NHS Fife logo.svg
- File:NHS Forth Valley logo.svg
- File:NHS Grampian logo.svg
- File:NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde logo.svg
- File:NHS Highland logo.svg
- File:NHS Improvement logo.svg
- File:NHS Lanarkshire logo.svg
- File:Nhs logo.png
- File:NHS Lothian logo.svg
- File:NHS Orkney logo.svg
- File:NHS Resolution logo.svg
- File:NHS Scotland logo.svg
- File:NHS Scotland.svg
- File:NHS Shetland logo.svg
- File:NHS Tayside logo.svg
- File:NHS Wales logo.svg
- File:NHS Western Isles logo.svg
- File:NHS-Digital-logo WEB LEFT-100x855.png
- File:NHS-Logo.svg
- File:NHSBT Logo.gif
- File:Nhsconfed logo.gif
- File:Norfolk LINk.jpg
- File:North East Ambulance Service Logo.png
- File:North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust logo.svg
- File:Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust logo.svg
- File:South West Yorkshire Mental Health Trust.jpg
- File:St georges logo.png
- File:TENYAS Logo.png
- File:The Dudley Group logo.jpg
- File:Wakefield and Pontefract Community Health NHS Trust.png
- File:WYMAS Logo.png
_logo.svg){kind=link}
All NHS logos are protected by Crown copyright in the UK. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 07:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - The NHS ones don't meet the threshold of originality to be copyrighted so therefore are fine however there are a few in this selection that IMHO dont meet TOO (mostly the symbols) but it'd take forever to list the problematic ones. Keep all per TOO. –Davey2010Talk 11:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Some NHS Wales logos are still protected by Crown copyright, even also met as "sweat of the brow" doctorine. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 03:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- You can't "!vote" twice: you need to make clear that you are the same editor called TheMuscovian above. DrKay (talk) 10:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- I've updated their name to their new one but agreed they cannot !vote twice so have struck this, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 10:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Davey2010 - they don't meet the threshold for copyright. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep A few of these might meet threshold of originality and need checking, but the majority of these are simply text. There was a previous discussion about the main NHS logo which resulted in keep: Commons:Deletion requests/File:NHS-Logo.svg. the wub "?!" 13:30, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Most of these are below the threshold of originality so should be kept. Elshad (talk) 11:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Question What about NHS logos in Wales and Northern Ireland, which is eligible for threshold of originality? See: COM:TOO United Kingdom. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 21:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- These NHS logos are ineligible for copyright protection. Otherwise, it would subject to be so-called, "sweat of the brow" threshold in the UK. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 03:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - As per COM:TOO United Kingdom, almost all logos are copyright protected. Even then, UK government logos are not subject to the standard provisions for copyright eligibility - this is not a matter of the threshold of originality. Crown copyright and the Open Government Licence in the UK protects government and department logos outside of normal copyrighting requirements. Section 163 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 explicitly states that work created by government ("an officer of the Crown"; such as the NHS logo) qualifies for copyright protection notwithstanding ordinary requirements. ItsPugle (talk) 04:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Right, if these logos that are eligible for graphics were used from Wales, and Northern Ireland, except the NHS logo in England and Scotland (which is public domain in the US). --The Houndsworth (talk) 07:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- The Houndsworth: As per COM:L, only content that is permissible in both the US and the country of origin can be kept. All four governments (England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland) websites use the Open Government License, which explicitly protects "departmental or public sector organisation logos". On top of that, Section 163 extends throughout the entirety of the UK, protecting all government logos (including all the ones linked above). By all regards, this material is protected in the country of origin, and therefore not eligible for uploading on Wikimedia Commons. ItsPugle (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, I would keep these NHS logos, but also tagging with an OGL license tag. --The Houndsworth (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- As I've now explained twice, the OGL is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons for government logos. These logos cannot be on Wikimedia Commons as they are not subject to standard copyright provisions under the the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. They have to be deleted. ItsPugle (talk) 03:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, I would keep these NHS logos, but also tagging with an OGL license tag. --The Houndsworth (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- The Houndsworth: As per COM:L, only content that is permissible in both the US and the country of origin can be kept. All four governments (England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland) websites use the Open Government License, which explicitly protects "departmental or public sector organisation logos". On top of that, Section 163 extends throughout the entirety of the UK, protecting all government logos (including all the ones linked above). By all regards, this material is protected in the country of origin, and therefore not eligible for uploading on Wikimedia Commons. ItsPugle (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Right, if these logos that are eligible for graphics were used from Wales, and Northern Ireland, except the NHS logo in England and Scotland (which is public domain in the US). --The Houndsworth (talk) 07:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep except
File:Norfolk LINk.jpg,File:NHS Wales logo.svg, File:Aneurin Bevan University Health Board logo.svg, File:Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board logo.svg, File:EvelinaLogo.png & possibly File:Health and Social Care in Northern Ireland logo.svg. --Minoraxtalk 09:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)- @Minorax: Just wanted to make sure that you've seen my above comment. Special copyright provisions apply to UK government/public service logos - they're eligible for copyright protection regardless of TOO etc, and I don't believe belong on Commons. ItsPugle (talk) 09:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- But this file File:Norfolk LINk.jpg was created by own work within the uploader and it is on Creative Commons license, but keep it. --122.2.101.68 23:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- That file has not been verified through COM:OTRS, so it needs to be deleted until permission can be expliclty obtained from the NHS. ItsPugle (talk) 04:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- But this file File:Norfolk LINk.jpg was created by own work within the uploader and it is on Creative Commons license, but keep it. --122.2.101.68 23:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Minorax: Just wanted to make sure that you've seen my above comment. Special copyright provisions apply to UK government/public service logos - they're eligible for copyright protection regardless of TOO etc, and I don't believe belong on Commons. ItsPugle (talk) 09:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, except those pointed out by Minorax. --ƏXPLICIT 02:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Explicit: Hey! Sorry to be a pain, but would you be able to just explain why the issues I pointed out didn't seem to be considered? UK law is quite clear cut on the fact that government media is not covered by the threshold of originality. Especially how COM:TOO UK says "The level of originality required for copyright protection in the United Kingdom is very low" and points out that even icons like this cannot be hosted on Commons. ItsPugle (talk) 07:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by AnshumanSV05 (talk · contribs)
[edit]In both cases there is a (c) in the lower right. I doubt very much that the uploader actually drew the base map from scratch. It may be PD, it may be a licensed work (which may require attribution), or it may be a copyright violation. In order to keep the maps, we must know the source of the base map.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peremohy Avenue, Kiev
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine, no permission.
- File:Мозаика Проспект Победы 21 Киев 2012 01.jpg
- File:Мозаика Проспект Победы 23 Киев 2012 01.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник робітникам заводу верстатів-автоматів 02.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник робітникам заводу верстатів-автоматів IMG 6198.jpg
VLu (talk) 13:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Uploader has requested deletion of File:NRB Commercial Bank Limited-Logo.png. Brianjd (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yurena Carrero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
- File:Zigarreten prezioa herrialde bakoitzeko.pdf
- File:2006ko legez kanpoko 24 zigarreta-merkatu handiena.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Works by Lucien Langlet (1927-1985). Not own work, not in the public domain. COM:OTRS needed from inheritors.
- File:Dessin Masques et Visages (Lucien Langlet).jpg
- File:La transfiguration by Lucien Langlet.jpg
- File:Dolce Vita (Lucien Langlet).jpg
- File:Lucien Langlet "Dolce Vita".jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Strakhov (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
This is Old files Murugu19 (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
This image is marked as copyrighted in Russian Wikipedia where it was taken from (apparently, it's used under some kind of fair use there) Gestumblindi (talk) 15:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, lack of evidence that this image represents the subject, it looks lika a stolen picture from a journalistic source and should not remain on Commons, best regards, --Pierrette13 (talk) 04:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lutheraner as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Hochlader offensichtlich nicht identisch mit Urheber / Rechteinhaber, FAQ section indeed mentions that "All images are free to use there is no restriction as long as you would link back to www.sergiokato.com". It doesn't explicitly allow modifications and so, and the file states author is the person depicted. A deletion request is needed. Strakhov (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- also copy file:Logo Grupo Monarca .jpg
Out of project scope. The logo was used in deleted es:Usuario:Grupo Monarca. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Picture really dark and the subject has his eyes closed. WOn't be used on FRWiki Myloufa (talk) 13:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason to take down the photo like crazy and should be kept on the Commons but not be used on Wikipedia. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope and very bad quality image. Also this image seem potential copyio since low image resolution and missing exifdata. SCP-2000 12:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Picture of really bad quality. The face of the person is all blurry. Won't be used on FrWiki Myloufa (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason to take down the photo like crazy and should be kept on the Commons but not be used on Wikipedia. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope and very bad quality image. Also this image seem potential copyio since low image resolution and missing exifdata. SCP-2000 12:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Picture of really bad quality, dark and blurry, Will not be used on FrWiki Myloufa (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason to take down the photo like crazy and should be kept on the Commons but not be used on Wikipedia. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Better no picture as one in such very bad quality. This is not a photo, this is an impertinence. Adelfrank (talk) 13:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
:
Keep In the midst of CAro Caron's photo since taken down like crazy as of today, I would hope to continue retaining this one like most other photos which would not be taken down like crazy as Myloufa puts tags like crazy to take the low-quality photo down. --- Bull-Doser (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope and very bad quality image. Also this image seem potential copyio since low image resolution and missing exifdata. SCP-2000 12:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I agree to yesterday's comment by SCP-2000. There's already another photo of him taken three years prior at 3900 St. Denis St. with other people instead of by himself on this one. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 04:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality image 2605:6000:1526:450B:51EA:9EFC:4D37:1207 23:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:INUSE. SCP-2000 04:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per SCP-2000. --Minoraxtalk 11:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Do not want this file anymore! 174.237.6.28 14:34, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Invalid reason from an unidentified IP address. Already kept in previous DR with stronger reason. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason per COM:D. If you don't want it, don't look at it. Green Giant (talk) 00:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
This photo violates my rights 181.124.176.74 22:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Surely if the nominator was the subject, they would also have nominated all the other photos of Category:Sandra Reehs. Brianjd (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 13:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
The one whose photo l took and uploaded in the Commons now asks to delete this file. --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 14:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not used and probably OoS also. E4024 (talk) 04:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024: The subject has a name. Please spend 5 seconds to search for more information. The subject has a well-described category and an azwiki article. There is only one other image in that category. The other image is not a replacement for this one. It’s hardly out of scope. Brianjd (talk) 11:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Do I understand right, Araz Yaquboglu: your are the uploader, not the author? And the author asks to delete this file why? --Emha (talk) 15:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- No, he is talking about the person in the image. (After I was warned above, I spent 5 hours to understand the case better. :) --E4024 (talk) 16:03, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- delete --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- No, he is talking about the person in the image. (After I was warned above, I spent 5 hours to understand the case better. :) --E4024 (talk) 16:03, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; CC licenses are irrevocable, the subject is notable: az:Eldar Həsənli. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
It has an error in second row. It was replaced by File:La vida cuadrado latino ortogonal.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farisori (talk • contribs) 2020-05-25T03:33:59 (UTC)
Kept: SVG is superior. I fixed the SVG file based on your PNG. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-transparent background Ahladita (talk) 00:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not a reason to delete . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused JPG file superseded by PNG file A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Watermarked Tekstman (talk) 06:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Request by the own uploader because exist a better version of the same photo. Ecummenic (talk) 07:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Uploader request within 2 days of upload. Not in use. Brianjd (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Here is the color fixed version on Flickr by the original author: File:Cosplayer of Hatsune Miku with bikini at CWT39 20150228a.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 07:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused JPG file superseded by SVG file A1Cafel (talk) 10:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 10:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Maddriver371 (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I made the photo myself, so there is no problem with the source. --Maddriver371 (talk) 10:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Maddriver371: “Dw” means “derivative work”. The problem is not your photo. The problem is the art that appears in the photo. You have to explain what is it and why you have permission to copy it. Brianjd (talk) 10:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's Commemorative window (stained glass) in the Cardinal de Jongschool. It hangs in a public school.--Maddriver371 (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @JuTa: Pinging original nominator. Brianjd (talk) 14:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's Commemorative window (stained glass) in the Cardinal de Jongschool. It hangs in a public school.--Maddriver371 (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Maddriver371: “Dw” means “derivative work”. The problem is not your photo. The problem is the art that appears in the photo. You have to explain what is it and why you have permission to copy it. Brianjd (talk) 10:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader is en-1 and has many warnings on talkpage. Brianjd (talk) 10:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW of the copyrighted work. According to this article, the author is Herman_van_Wissen who died in 2000. Also public school is not the public space per Commons:FOP Netherlands. Thus it is not meet {{FoP-Nederland}} and {{PD-old-auto}}. SCP-2000 19:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
License review failed, not freely licensed. Eatcha (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I've fixed the license on YouTube, we accidentally marked it wrong there initially.--Pharos (talk) 15:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: problem got fixed. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
logo of The Universités Populaires du Théâtre, no OTRS Ticket for a valid licence. M0tty (talk) 13:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; too simple to be copyrighted. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Picture of really bad quality. Won't be used on FRWiki. Myloufa (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason to take down the photo like crazy and should be kept on the Commons but not be used on Wikipedia. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In the midst of CAro Caron's photo since taken down like crazy as of today, I would hope to continue retaining this one like most other photos which would not be taken down like crazy as Myloufa puts tags like crazy to take the low-quality photo down. --- Bull-Doser (talk) 02:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Picture that is so dark that there is no use for it. Won't be used on FRWiki Myloufa (talk) 13:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason to take down the photo like crazy and should be kept on the Commons but not be used on Wikipedia. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
{{Vk}}: Myloufa is a crazy guy to take down photos that are low quality. To respond this, I have re-uploaded Caroline Caron (taken down today) & Mark Parisi (taken down in August) but they're cropped. Although they've got Wikis, this photo should not be taken down like crazy. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 02:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Bull-Doser: Guy, you need to stop using words like "crazy". Mind also that you cannot vote more than once in each discussion. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope and very bad quality. --SCP-2000 12:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000: Explain how exactly this photo goes against Commons:Scope. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
{{Vk}}: Despite taking a picture of her over a year ago, it's the only said photo of her. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 04:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: There’s no better photo in Category:Samia Orosemane. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
The subject isn't recognizable on that picture, hence it has no use. Also, the other person might not want to be on that picture. Myloufa (talk) 13:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Only file in Category:Guillaume Martineau. Subject has an article on frwiki. Clear educational use. Brianjd (talk) 14:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Normally, we don’t delete pictures because there are other people in the background. We don’t even blur their faces. Brianjd (talk) 04:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason to take down the photo like crazy and should be kept on the Commons but not be used on Wikipedia. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Bull-Doser: Huh? Why shouldn’t it be used on Wikipedia? Anyway, it’s not up to us; it’s up to each Wikipedia which files they use. Brianjd (talk) 01:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
The picture was taken from a weird angle. The subject is barely recognizable. Won't be used on FrWiki. Myloufa (talk) 14:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason to take down the photo like crazy and should be kept on the Commons but not be used on Wikipedia. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In the midst of CAro Caron's photo since taken down like crazy as of today, I would hope to continue retaining this one like most other photos which would not be taken down like crazy as Myloufa puts tags like crazy to take the low-quality photo down. Besides this, it is the only photo of him as he's got a page on the French Wikipedia. --- Bull-Doser (talk) 02:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PNG is supripr to JPEG, File:UNITEC logo.jpg. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate file. I uploaded this in error. Kebintotgallimore (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep, File:Roman Catholic Diocese of Boac Seal.png and File:Coat of arms of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Boac.svg aren't identical renditions, and raster and vector graphics also aren't considered duplicates for the case of deletion. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 17:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: SVG is suprior. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted photo. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ebruyildiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]
(originally separate DRs, now merged – see below)
These comments apply to both files (they were duplicated in the original DRs)
We need permission from the artist Ebru Yıldız (not "Yildiz). E4024 (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- [Edit, for clarity Keep 19:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)] The photographer is Ebru Yildiz, she uploaded the image herself under the username Ebruyildiz. Ebru Yıldız and Ebru Yildiz are the same person; you can see she spells her name with an "i" on her website. Umimmak (talk) 17:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - unless we receive permission through OTRS. I had already looked at her internet page, not to learn her name which I already know; if you look at the left upper side the name is written in capital letters to be able to use it as it is (Yıldız/YILDIZ). Of course many people use their names with that kind of small -and almost always inevitable- changes (i for ı in this case) for typing and internet obligations. That does not change her name. Respect her surname which is part of her identity. Full stop. --E4024 (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
These comments only apply to File:01 Leiomy Mizrahi by Ebru Yildiz.jpg
- You're conflating two aspects. Ebru Yildiz uploaded her own photos as "own work" with an appropriate license -- that's all she needs to do. Whether or not you want to use the name she uses professionally (see her books where "Ebru Yildiz" appears in lowercase among many other places on her social media and professional website where she clearly uses Yildiz in lowercase with i where ı could have been used had she wanted to) or not is a separate issue. Umimmak (talk) 19:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Image was properly uploaded as "own work" and is licensed appropriately by the photographer herself. If you look at the copyright info in the metadata on the file page, her name is also spelled "Yildiz" there. Armadillopteryx (talk) 19:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Anybody could use that nick, you know it, right? Using "ı" in software is quite difficult BTW. --E4024 (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I find it a little strange that you acknowledge the reason for the spelling discrepancy and yet still use it as deletion rationale. Armadillopteryx (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- My one and only deletion rationale is that we need an open permission from the artist. --E4024 (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- And the permission was granted when she uploaded the images herself. Umimmak (talk) 19:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- You will see that I am right when the file is deleted. --E4024 (talk) 20:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Unimmak: it's quite common to request that, where an image has been published previously, we get OTRS confirmation that the uploader is the copyright holder. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well if someone does decide it’s necessary to get OTRS confirmation from her, might as well confirm Commons:Deletion requests/File:02 Leiomy Mizrahi by EbruYildiz 02.jpg as well instead of having two requests back to back. Umimmak (talk) 02:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- And the permission was granted when she uploaded the images herself. Umimmak (talk) 19:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- My one and only deletion rationale is that we need an open permission from the artist. --E4024 (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I find it a little strange that you acknowledge the reason for the spelling discrepancy and yet still use it as deletion rationale. Armadillopteryx (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Anybody could use that nick, you know it, right? Using "ı" in software is quite difficult BTW. --E4024 (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
This section applies to both files
- I’m not the one who decided to clutter up the DR with arguments about the name, OK? But now that it’s started, I’m going to join in, with the contact information shown in the metadata:
- ebru@ebruyildiz.net
- www.ebruyiildiz.net
- 146 Franklin Street Apt 3
- Brooklyn, NY, 11222 USA
- 646 338 5365
- Note the misspelled name in the website address. Brianjd (talk) 02:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Back to the topic at hand, do we have evidence that the photos were published elsewhere before being published here? Brianjd (talk) 02:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- The description field for both says "for The Creative Independent in the offices of Kickstarter on August 11 2016", but the published interview in The Creative Independent only features a third image. It would seem that the two images in question were taken during this time, but those images were never actually published. When I did a reverse image search for these two images, nothing earlier than the 11 August 2016 upload date came up. It seems that the photographer retained the rights to these two unpublished images and uploaded them with the appropriate licenses to Wikimedia Commons. Umimmak (talk) 18:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- See also: Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (first paragraph) E4024 (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- The text you reference says, The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted.
- In order for this to apply here, there would need to be significant doubt about the freedom of these files. In contrast to this, I see very little doubt the files are free.
- They appear to be uploaded by the photographer.
- They do not appear to be published previously anywhere on the web (as Umimmak mentioned).
- They appear to be from the same photo shoot as a different image that is on the web, and it would be very reasonable that the photographer is the one who still owns the rights to the unpublished images.
- Both files on the Commons contain a lot of metadata—much more than is common in images ripped from the web—including the software the images were edited on and extensive copyright and contact information linked to the author.
- The date the metadata were generated is consistent with both the uploader's description of when and why the image was taken, and it is consistent with the date that the third image from the same shoot was published (about a month later). The fact that the uploader described very specific details of the photo shoot and that this further checks out with what Umimmak found on the web support the assumption that the uploader is indeed the author.
- Operating on the principle of good faith and looking at the above evidence, I don't think we can claim to have significant doubt that the images are free and properly licensed, and as such the Precautionary principle would not indicate that they should be deleted. Armadillopteryx (talk) 09:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: While it is very common to request a permission statement for "professional" pictures taken by professional photographers via COM:OTRS, I also see nothing suspicious here. File:02 Leiomy Mizrahi by EbruYildiz 02.jpg has been used outside Wikimedia on [4] after being uploaded to Wikimedia (August 09, 2017 > 19:14, 12 March 2017). --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
A photo that entered the public domain in Israel in 2017. I can find no evidence this work is in the public domain in the United States. Wikiacc (talk) 15:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- We had long and tedious discussion about URAA which ended her: URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Other than URAA issue there is no other issues her. The file comes from the The National Photo Collection. An official site of the Israeli government press office. I have added "Not-PD-US-URAA" template. -- Geagea (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Geagea, note from the documentation for that template: "This template should NOT be applied to files uploaded after 1 March 2012. Files uploaded after this date which the template would apply to should be treated as other violations of the Commons:Licensing policy are." Wikiacc (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as per Geagea, and previous discussions. Yann (talk) 21:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted in the US untill 95 years after publication date, that is 2062. The file was uploaded to Commons on 14:34, 1 January 2017, so {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} cannot be used for it, as this tag cannot be used for files uploaded after 1 March 2012. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Coypright violation: Not a government photograph Firebrace (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Firebrace: Yes but the Crown Jewels are part of the governement, even if they didn't take the picture. -- Schweiz41 (talk) 11:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- That isn't how copyright law works in the UK, or anywhere. Firebrace (talk) 17:20, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I have already uploaded the same picture with another title. Please check "File:Inside the underground cistern of Mycenae on December 22, 2019.jpg" George E. Koronaios (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:The lower level of the underground cistern of Mycenae on December 22, 2019.jpg. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This picture is way too bright and has a really low quality. WOn't be used on FrWiki. Myloufa (talk) 22:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason to take down the photo like crazy and should be kept on the Commons but not be used on Wikipedia. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Possibly copyrighted character TheMuscovian (talk) 22:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
La cuenta de la persona tiene la foto y evitar duplicidad. Yoitok (talk) 23:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
La cuenta de la persona tiene la foto y evitar duplicidad. Yoitok (talk) 23:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --4nn1l2 (talk) 08:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Violation of rule COM:FOP Ukraine. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Which/Whose copyright is violated here? Other stations of this Metro also have pictures in Wikimedia Commons. Kvedulv (talk) 14:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Anybody? Kvedulv (talk) 10:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No subject of copyright specified. — Racconish 💬 18:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 18:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, artist of stained glass windows died in 2010, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 20:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: FOP applies, but DM too. — Racconish 💬 18:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This family has enother Coat of Arms. I have uploaded this one, but it's my mystake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yufereff (talk • contribs) 2020-05-30T23:37:02 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
No indication of early enough publication to be PD. Uploader was blocked due to uploading unfree files after warnings. --Interfase (talk) 18:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ewidentne naruszenie praw autorskich wizerunku NBP COM: CUR Poland Numizmatyk123 (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
OK. Zatem do usunięcia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miedzionikiel (talk • contribs) 15:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Aasim 00:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Sources (sorry, don't really use commons too much so am still getting used to this)
File:Redwarn_graphic_issuing_notices.png - integrated image licensed under Pexels License (at https://www.pexels.com/license/) - integrated image: https://www.pexels.com/photo/photo-of-person-holding-alarm-clock-1028741/
File:Redwarn_rollback_graphic.png - integrated image licensed under Pexels License (at https://www.pexels.com/license/) - integrated image: https://www.pexels.com/photo/white-clock-reading-at-2-12-1537268/
Ed6767 (talk) 00:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I changed the tag because one of the sources of the image, Pexels, has a license that seems to allow the image to be allowed for any purpose, but... looking a bit more closely at their license, it seems it may be incompatible with Wikimedia Commons because it does not allow plain redistribution of images closed to the site without modifying it... so a derivative work may be okay, I am not sure anymore. The license seems to be very weird... only allowing derivative works of images posted there to be uploaded here, not allowing the images to be uploaded to other stock image platforms, not allowing endorsement, and not allowing images to be used in a manner that is offensive... I think this may require a judgment call. As for the other image sources, it seems as the images may be too simple to be copyrighted. One is even a Wikipedia diff... Ed6767 I think this can be saved if you maybe replace the clock with one that is freely licensed. You can choose "Free to modify, share, and use commercially" in Bing search or "Labeled for reuse with modification" on Google to have some Commons-compatible images pulled up. You can also use Creative Commons search and choose "Use commercially" and "Modify or adapt" for Creative Commons images you can use. Aasim 01:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Awesome Aasim: There is a more detailed explanation of the license at https://www.pexels.com/terms-of-service/ in section 5.5:
Pexels grants you an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to download, copy, modify, distribute, perform, and otherwise use the Content (this does not include Sponsored Content), including for commercial purposes, without attributing the photographer/ content owner or Pexels ("Pexels License"). The Content made available for download on the Service under the Pexels-License ("Pexels Content") is marked with the reference "Pexels License" next to the respective picture / content. The Pexels License does not include:
- the right to compile any Pexels Content to replicate a similar or competing Service;
- the right to sell copies of the Pexels Content without first updating, modifying, or otherwise incorporating new creative elements into the Content (i.e., selling unaltered copies of photos, videos or other content), including selling the Content as prints or printed on physical goods.
Ed6767 (talk) 01:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification Ed6767. I am still not sure if this is compatible with Commons licensing policy, but I do hope that this file stays. Aasim 01:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ed6767 in response to this I reuploaded the image using an image on Commons that is licensed under the MIT license instead... I think that will probably do better because you cannot upload fair use images into Wikipedia userspace. I think the old image can be revision deleted now. Aasim 16:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Awesome Aasim: Thank you! Ed6767 (talk) 16:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Striking my speedy delete vote. But there are still some problems:
- The file you used (File:OOjs UI icon clock.svg) is not under the MIT licence, at least according to its description here. It’s under the CC BY-SA 3.0 licence, which requires attribution. (I can fix this.)
- The old revision of this file (File:Redwarn rollback graphic.png) needs to be deleted. (I can’t fix this.)
- Brianjd (talk) 10:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK, maybe I can’t fix it. At least not properly. Why are there so many templates? I can’t find the right one. Brianjd (talk) 10:21, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Ed6767 in response to this I reuploaded the image using an image on Commons that is licensed under the MIT license instead... I think that will probably do better because you cannot upload fair use images into Wikipedia userspace. I think the old image can be revision deleted now. Aasim 16:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: The File was updated and its previous version has already been deleted. --4nn1l2 (talk) 02:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This artist is not dead. However, if is possible to uncertain if this poster is still copyrighted. TheMuscovian (talk) 03:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This poster was published in the US prior to 1978 without a valid copyright notice and so, under applicable US copyright law, it entered the public domain when it was published. Whether the artist has died is irrelevant to its copyright status, at least under US law and Wikimedia Commons' policy for PD-US works.
- As a "full-bleed" poster, the printed design takes up the full space of the paper, and so the poster does not include margins where copyright notices are typically found on movie posters of this era. For reference/verification, the original source is a listing at Heritage Auctions, and here is a direct link to the original jpeg (which I cropped only to remove Heritage's watermark and excess white space, not any part of the poster itself). Compare the standard US one-sheet poster for Zabriskie Point, which remains under copyright as it carries a valid notice ("Copyright 1970 by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc.") in the margins at the bottom-right corner. On the Milton Glaser poster, the phrase "An MGM Presentation" (at bottom right) does include the name of the publisher, but omits the year of publication and the word "copyright" (or an acceptable variation like "©", "Copr.", etc.). I wouldn't even call that a "defective" copyright notice—it's simply not a notice, nor even an attempt at one.
- A final note: there's no reason to believe that there may have been a copyright notice on the backside of the poster. Heritage Auctions didn't provide a scan of the poster's backside; however, they do provide such scans if anything is printed or attached to the backside of a movie memorabilia item up for auction. See, for example, this listing for a movie publicity photo with scans of both sides of the photo sheet. In general, publicity photos (and some other types of movie memorabilia) frequently have material printed on the backside, but posters almost never do for an obvious reason: double-sided printing could cause "bleed through" and mar a poster's appearance when displayed. Heritage Auctions would have included a scan of the backside of the poster if a copyright notice—or anything at all—had been printed there, because anything printed or marked on the backside of a poster up for auction would be highly unusual, unexpected to bidders, and would materially affect the quality and value of the item. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 22:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Brandt Luke Zorn: The artist, Milton Glaser (b. 1929) who is still living but he also owns the copyright of this artwork without getting permission. But also, all works by Milton Glaser (with a signature on it) are still copyrighted. --TheMuscovian (talk) 01:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Brandt Luke Zorn: It's technically not a poster, has not been widely printed like a poster but it's a single painting inspired by the movie. Paintings never bears a copyright notice so it's logical uploader doesn't find one. The painting is still on sale on the artist's website and is probably on the collection of one museum or at leas has been exhibited. Adding that Glaser is still alive it's unlikely that this work is PD. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- @TheMuscovian: The artist being alive or providing a signature are not relevant considerations in this circumstance. In European copyright law, absolutely, but not for American copyright law prior to 1978. "Before 1978, in order to enjoy a copyright, published works had to bear a copyright notice, which would follow a prescribed form. If the notice was not properly affixed upon publication, the work went into the public domain. These rules remain important even after 1978 if a pre-1978 U.S. work is at issue." (International Copyright Law: U.S. and E.U. Perspectives: Text and Cases) If the artist's signature also includes the year and the word "copyright" (or equivalent), then that is a valid copyright notice; a signature alone has no bearing on its copyright status.
- @Patrick Rogel: The issue with paintings and copyright notices is a question of whether publication occurred. Paintings are typically exhibited in private galleries in which copying (photographing) a work is explicitly or tacitly forbidden, so the mere display or exhibition of a painting did not constitute publication and did not require attachment of copyright notice (in the US, prior to 1978). However, it's a different matter if the artist made copies of a painting and distributed them (in the US, prior to 1978); now publication has occurred, and if a notice had not been affixed on the published copies, then copyright of the work was forfeited. Per Wikipedia:Public domain § Publication: "When the work is reproduced in multiple copies, such as reproductions of a painting or castings of a statue, the work is published when the reproductions are publicly distributed or offered to a group for further distribution or public display."
- Just to avoid any confusion, it's worth clarifying that the source, Heritage Auctions, is highly scrupulous and rigorous about publication dates and will note if a poster for sale is a much-later reproduction or reprint of an earlier work. They date the Glaser poster to 1970—not the painting, the actual poster offered for sale—so there is no chance that the copy offered for sale had actually been produced after 1978 or they would have indicated so. Regardless of what Glaser did with the original painting after distributing these copies, or his subjective intent or belief about his copyright ownership, the fact is that the poster was printed in 1970, copies were distributed in some form, and thereby copyright protection on the work was forfeited. Consider:
- "Thus, publication may occur even if the copyright owner does not realize as a matter of law that the acts he is committing or consenting to constitute publication. In sum, as long as the copyright owner voluntarily sells, leases, loans or gives away the original or tangible copies of the work to the general public, publication occurs. ... Questions of publication often occur in the art gallery context. Suppose the artist in our example placed the painting completed in 1970 in a gallery for sale that year. Typically, the artist may not have affixed proper copyright notice to the painting. If the gallery reproduced the work for sale in an advertising brochure, publication would have occurred. Here, because neither the gallery nor the artist affixed proper notice, the work would forever be placed in the public domain. Nothing could revive its status as a copyrighted work." ("Copyright and the Art Museum", p. 269)
- "For works of art, this meant that if the work was sold or offered for sale to the public or was reproduced in a gallery brochure, auction catalog, or other publication distributed to the public without a copyright notice, the artist lost all copyright protection." (A Legal Primer on Managing Museum Collections, Third Edition)
- Even the publication of a much-smaller reproduction of a painting in a booklet without a copyright notice could forfeit the painting's copyright status; printing and distributing the painting as a full-scale poster would do the same. Glaser can sell the poster at his website, and that's fine, it's just not relevant to whether the poster entered the public domain. You can purchase licensed DVD copies of Night of the Living Dead, but that doesn't mean that the film actually retained its copyright status. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 18:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
I could not understand that, i should contacting the admin and close that discussion. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 23:18, 4 June 2020 (UTC)- Actually, every artworks of this poster (including painting) are still copyrighted. But perhaps, I already tagged {{NoUploads}} to this artist category. In order to prevent uploading from Commons that applied to works in the US, usually 1925–64 which had 95 years of creation. Also, it would appled to 1964–78 works, which would lasted 70 years after creation. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 02:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Then also, Milton Glaser currently held the intellectual property rights of this artwork (including his poster). --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 10:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Brandt Luke Zorn: The artist, Milton Glaser (b. 1929) who is still living but he also owns the copyright of this artwork without getting permission. But also, all works by Milton Glaser (with a signature on it) are still copyrighted. --TheMuscovian (talk) 01:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete I claimed this file is a piece of fair use work. The reason why if this artwork might be unvalid license, especially without given permission from the author. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @ZmeytheDragon16: Consult the Hirtle Chart on US copyright law and the public domain, which can also be found on Commons at COM:HIRTLE. For "Works Registered or First Published in the U.S." between "1925 through 1977", if it was "Published without a copyright notice", then it is in the public domain. Under US copyright law of that time period, publishing a work without a notice was deemed a forfeiture of copyright.
- This does not mean that all artworks by Glaser (or by other artists) during that time period are now public domain, because not all of them were actually published. Paintings and fine art are not usually considered "published" if they were merely displayed in a private gallery. However, a piece of advertising art, like Glaser's Zabriskie poster, was certainly "published" because multiple copies were made and it was distributed to theaters for public display. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 20:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- I consulted for the Hirtle chart. Anyway, it is unclear if the artwork for Milton Glaser's licensing rights, but copyright marks were always hidden, within Europe or elsewhere. Then also, the artist is still living. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 02:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- @ZmeytheDragon16: You assert that "copyright marks were always hidden—on what basis, I don't know—but this is simply not true for film posters. Most US film posters of the same era included copyright notices at the bottom margin of the poster; as a random example, zoom into the bottom-left corner of The Ladies Man (1961 film poster).jpg, which carried a valid notice but is public domain for another reason (lack of renewal). A copyright notice on a poster may have been temporarily "hidden" by a frame while it was on display, but it would never be so "hidden" that it would escape the notice of someone handling the actual paper poster—unless the notice was simply not included, as is the case here. I don't think you appreciate the significance of the copyright notice or lack thereof. Publication in the US between 1925–1977 + No copyright notice = Copyright forfeited. Questions of whether the artist is alive or when the artist died become totally irrelevant if both of those conditions apply, and both conditions apply in the case of this poster. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Brandt Luke Zorn: Okay, I already get that point if this poster is out of copyright, but I recently tagged {{NoUploads}} to Milton Glaser's category. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- @ZmeytheDragon16: Right, and you were right to add that template to Glaser's category, because it's true that, in general, copyright protection on Glaser's works will not expire until a very long time from now. But as the {{NoUploads}} template says, we should not upload works by the artist "unless they meet one of the following exceptions", and the first exception on the list is "the work was first published in the United States and one of the United States public domain tags applies". And this poster was first published in the United States and {{PD-US-no notice}} does apply. I would appreciate it if you withdrew your vote to delete this image file. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 00:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Brandt Luke Zorn: Okay, I already get that point if this poster is out of copyright, but I recently tagged {{NoUploads}} to Milton Glaser's category. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- @ZmeytheDragon16: You assert that "copyright marks were always hidden—on what basis, I don't know—but this is simply not true for film posters. Most US film posters of the same era included copyright notices at the bottom margin of the poster; as a random example, zoom into the bottom-left corner of The Ladies Man (1961 film poster).jpg, which carried a valid notice but is public domain for another reason (lack of renewal). A copyright notice on a poster may have been temporarily "hidden" by a frame while it was on display, but it would never be so "hidden" that it would escape the notice of someone handling the actual paper poster—unless the notice was simply not included, as is the case here. I don't think you appreciate the significance of the copyright notice or lack thereof. Publication in the US between 1925–1977 + No copyright notice = Copyright forfeited. Questions of whether the artist is alive or when the artist died become totally irrelevant if both of those conditions apply, and both conditions apply in the case of this poster. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- I consulted for the Hirtle chart. Anyway, it is unclear if the artwork for Milton Glaser's licensing rights, but copyright marks were always hidden, within Europe or elsewhere. Then also, the artist is still living. --ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 02:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per Brandt Luke Zorn. --4nn1l2 (talk) 02:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is the Reading Railroad station in Hummelstown. Brownstone station was at the east end of town and connected the Reading Railroad with the Hummelstown brownstone quarries. Also, the mill in the background is the saw mill and the stone cutters' shed that was relocated to the quarries with the completion of the Brownstone - Middletown Railroad. Moreover, they did not cut bricks out of brownstone. The Hummelstown Brownstone Co. later started the manufacture of sand-lime bricks which were made from the pulverized tailings of brownstone. 24.51.177.28 19:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. File name and desc can be fixed. --Achim (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- I am concerned that the information shown in the lower-right corner of the picture does not correspond with the current license–that is, I doubt this is the uploader's own work. Choess (talk) 20:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: wrong date, source, and creator. --A.Savin 01:44, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
