Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/04/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 7th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo was not captured by NahidSultan himself, it was captured by someone else, this photo must be deleted (one proof is Nahid is beside the fat faggot man). কুমকুম ভাগ্য (talk) 08:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo is not NahidSultan's own work, there is no strong proof that it is his own work, it can't be captured by him, it was captured by someone else, Nahid is in this phoot (beside the fat man). কুমকুম ভাগ্য (talk) 08:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page must be deleted as this was not captured by NahidSultan himself, it was captured by some other person(s), the person beside the faggot is Nahid 87.239.255.101 07:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: LTA User:জঙ্গলবাসী. ~ Nahid Talk 08:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

실수로 업로드했습니다 Pokemon W (talk) 01:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F7. --Minoraxtalk 08:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs replacement of deleted File:Marilyn Monroe - publicity.JPG or is to be deleted itself, no uploader's reaction at their talk page. Sealle (talk) 07:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ✓ Done It is not very nice to rummaging through another project contribution after the conflict with user. I noticed your post on my talk page yesterday, you could give me more time to fix it. However, the new photo is better than the old one, everything that is done is all for the better. ·Carn 08:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: done, no more reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 09:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nome file errato Artemio982 (talk) 10:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request, replaced by File:Claas 405.jpg. --Achim (talk) 12:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nome file errato Artemio982 (talk) 10:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jo%C3%A3o_dos_Santos_(Pai)_mais_novo.jpg) should not be deleted as it is a family photo identifying my father, taken by our family and we want it to be used freely by anyone wishing to publish his biography and work. We would be grateful if you could please withdraw your deletion request. Luís Grijó dos Santos Luís Grijó dos Santos (talk) 12:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Requested erroneously, go to Commons:Deletion requests/File:João dos Santos (Pai) mais novo.jpg. --Achim (talk) 12:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete the whole thing 71.73.12.94 17:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:RENAN GARCIA EN LA METROPOLI Y SOCIEDAD MOZAMBICANA 11.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miros Dursselev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three different cameras in 8 months: unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the first has no other versions on the web than ours. The second was published elsewhere. Ruthven (msg) 19:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miros Dursselev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploads from same bad Flickr account Https://www.flickr.com/photos/77160433@N04/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy delete per CSD as flickr washing. ~riley (talk) 21:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arikumajans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope SEO spam

Ubcule (talk) 23:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Advertising - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 07:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TROPHY should be blurred or cropped out. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: blurred. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TROPHY should be blurred or cropped out. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: blurred. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France and maybe the photo violates architect's copyright. Who is the architect and when (s)he died? When the house was erected? Taivo (talk) 11:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This house was built in C19th: www.mi-aime-a-ou.com/cilaos_maison_soledad.php. Mirgolth (talk) 02:38, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the house is old. Taivo (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D9%BE%D9%84_%D8%AE%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%88_%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%86_soheilchehri%D8%A8.jpg Soheilchehri (talk) 21:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 12:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Penis Mjrmtg (talk) 00:31, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnnythe01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal photos, out of scope

Pippobuono (talk) 09:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Renan Garcia Tamayo-1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Selfies and pictures taken clearly out of a car with parts of the car still visible.

Jonteemil (talk) 13:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Renan Garcia Tamayo-1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal documents and certificates of unclear significance.

Omphalographer (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment While personal and lowish quality, the documents appear to be doctor's certificates and similar stuff from Cuba, and as far as I can see in the Category:Documents of Cuba there are no other files that depict Cuban doctor's certificates. Those files might be in scope for articles about doctor's certificates or titles and/or about tertiary (medical) education in Cuba. One also appears to be a pdf/book about medical staff training. Nakonana (talk) 08:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, or perhaps to Category:Diplomas of Cuba (which doesn't exist yet, but could)? Part of what I'm trying to do here is to diffuse files out of catch-all categories like "documents". Omphalographer (talk) 08:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Furqaanis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Furqaanis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fair-use (movie poster)

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 15:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imran baloch ox (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JWTWorldwide (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John West (X) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Osmilgarcia

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:Osmilgarcia. All the files are selfies useless for educational purposes. Felviper (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of project scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yazdanpanahaskari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For you, everything is good for deleting beautiful photos. But it's a wide-angle photo. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@ComputerHotline: Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in France so we cannot legally host these - see COM:FOP Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; unfortunately. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrongly uploaded Aletastravels (talk) 10:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake.. Aletastravels (talk) 10:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo through window glass. Every part of the photo is blurry. Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qp37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of COM:SCOPE. Anyway permission of painter needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qp37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of COM:SCOPE. Anyway permission of artist needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qp37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of COM:SCOPE. Anyway permission of painter needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof author (Tuduce Alex Photography / Alexandru Tuduce) agrees to the license. Gikü (talk) 13:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in Latvia Krd 14:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in the US Krd 14:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bollywoodbell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per COM:NOPENIS Alex Cohn (talk) 18:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chicheka lullaby (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Raha Faridi, photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone's first selfie isn't exactly something that belongs on the wiki Sadads (talk) 21:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator's website says that "all rights reserved" for their content. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SEO spam, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 23:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SEO spam, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 23:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work; small, no EXIF data, uploader has a history of uploading copyright violations. Ahmadtalk 00:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that account belongs to photo's owner. Jeff Parrot, cited as creatoe of image, actually only wrote the article it is featured in, is never credited as the photo's creator in the link provided SecretName101 (talk) 02:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The photos provider was not in there. And it cannot be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grand Moff Farmer (talk • contribs) 03:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. PCP. Not at source and source is (C) anyway. --Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cartoon screenshot. ~Cybularny Speak? 09:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. These explanation boards are copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:31, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Per COM:EDUSE and COM:NOTUSED. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 18:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:YoutuberDanielSantos.jpg

[edit]

Copy of Instagram Edu! (talk) 18:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Ahmadtalk 18:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was previously published here and here. An OTRS ticket is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a private photo - i wish to have it deleted. i also reached out to the person that took it, requesting to be deleted. NVolk97 (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. I would favour this deletion request if it had been worded as an appeal (e.g. «I don’t think this is a flattering photo, please delete it as there are better alternatives»). Worded as it is, as a legal threat (however mild) based on a patent falsehood (this is very obviously not a private photo), I cannot support it. -- Tuválkin 05:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The link was sabotaged by NVolk97. Tm (talk) 11:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I dont known if this is a sock or not, but this is irrelevant. If this is a sock, is a pretty low and weak act, unworthy of anyones times.
If this indeed the person depicted, i have to say that this is not a private photo. First you cant say that you did not know that this particular photographer was photographing you, as you were clearly possing for this photographer, the same minute this photo was taken, have an derivative photo on your DE Wikipedia page.
Also your claim that this photo is private is patiently false as there was a wide photographic coverage of this event, an public event called "Circus Roncalli Gala Premiere In Hamburg", as can be seen by the extensive photographic coverage made by Getty Images, in Gallery One, where you appear not once, but twice. or on Gallery Two, where you appear one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen times. And in several of this images you are clearly posing and surrounded by several persons, on a public event, so the reasoning of this being a "private photo" is either a genuine but mislead assumption or a patient falsehood with unknown intents. Tm (talk) 11:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hanooz 05:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by J.Gordijn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. This one File:Nikita Gokhale Art Nude in Jewellery 01.jpg shows the URL it was taken from and this one File:Nikita Gokhale Sensual 01.jpg has a watermark of JG photography.

Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not enough information on this micronation, removed from Commons gallery "Flags of Micronations" Centralismo (talk) 15:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is used in nine Wikipedias, from fi:Valtio (mikrovaltio) to zh:反义词. There's an entire article about the place at fi:Valtio (mikrovaltio). Therefore, under COM:INUSE, it's significant enough to be kept on Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 10:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:INUSE (deletion template was already removed from the description page by an IP user). --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Article on Wikipedia was deleted. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of actual use by Bir Tawil claimants, only plausible place of origin is micronation wiki, Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:37, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of use, moderators please don't keep. Removed from Commons gallery on Micronations. Centralismo (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: The file is still in use on ar:أعلام الدول المجهرية, ko:아프리카의 기 목록, ko:마이크로네이션 목록, ko:마이크로네이션의 국기 목록, and vi:Cờ Thánh giá Bắc Âu. Those uses would need to be removed before COM:NPOV would permit deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 10:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV, in use in three language versions of Wikipedia (deletion template was already removed from the description page by an IP user). --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per EXIF, this image was copied from Facebook. No proof of permission. Gikü (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Regasterios at 16:19, 15 April 2020 UTC: No permission since 7 April 2020 --Krdbot 01:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author = editor - false information or flag is not official O revolucionário aliado (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license. --ƏXPLICIT 07:44, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent building; no FOP in Romania. Gikü (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 11:07, 26 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 14:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded from various sources without valid license

Off-shell (talk) 09:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for artistic works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 22:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV Channel logo. Fair use Khinkali (talk) 18:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Логотип телеканала. Добросовестное использование Alfa-ol (talk) 09:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:31, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Please see Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Universal Studios Japan globe. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guilhermesantiagos

[edit]

Low-re .png images, probably out of COM:SCOPE. Ericom Sandra de bot (talk) 13:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Closed bad DR. --P 1 9 9   16:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guilhermesantiagos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re .png images, probably out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copyrighted. The uploader has not provided enough information to prove it otherwise. Keivan.fTalk 02:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This might somehow be salvageable, but it is clearly not "own work". The uploader acknowledges photographing it from a wall in a restaurant. How would the bottom photo possibly not have a copyright of its own? And even the other two seem likely to be copyrighted. Jmabel ! talk 03:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2007. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 04:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep:this is a work of architecture being a building. According to Copyright Ordinance (Chapter 528) (consolidated version of May 27, 2016), it is not a copyright infringement to take photographs the images of buildings and artwork.--Wpcpey (talk) 05:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - the subject is a painting which does not have FoP. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: It is on a fixed structure. See Cap. 528 Article 5, 71(1)(a) and 71(2)(b) for further details. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 05:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that A1Cafel you still refuse to correct yourself and keeps garbling Cap. 528 Article 71(1)(b). ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 05:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - no FoP for 2D works in HK. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Oman A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For you, everything is good for deleting beautiful photos. But it's a wide-angle photo. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Architecture is architecture -- residential, commercial, industrial. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 05:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You say an false information. It's a Spoilt vote. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 05:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For you, everything is good for deleting beautiful photos. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

drawing by a non-notable artist: out of COM:SCOPE Ankry (talk) 06:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Argentina for architecture, but not for sculptures. Maybe the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Who is the sculptor and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, requires permission from the mural artist. No freedom of panorama for murals in the UK. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ultimograph5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are from Andrey Shelepin/Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center and not from a NASA photographer! Roscosmos' media materials usage guidelines are not compatible with Commons' licensing rules.

Ras67 (talk) 13:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --Platonides (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Xinhua News Agency are copyrighted. Not sure the image fit the criteria (2) news on current affairs of Template:PD-PRC-exempt. A1Cafel (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17jiangz1: Ok, thank you! I guess it makes sense. For the last part, I thought that government works that are not eligible for copyright protection in their own country are accepted in Commons, and that an explicit free license is not needed in that case. --MarioGom (talk) 00:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MarioGom: I think that's only the case if it is released into public domain explicitly, or implicitly through legislation, but nonetheless, this is not considered a government work. --17jiangz1 (talk) 06:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --Platonides (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Xinhua News Agency are copyrighted. Not sure the image fit the criteria (2) news on current affairs of Template:PD-PRC-exempt. A1Cafel (talk) 14:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Digital billboard in Shibuya expressing support against coronavirus.jpg. --Platonides (talk) 22:18, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says screenshot, source info not given Ytoyoda (talk) 19:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 22:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Producer.jpg I didn't upload this file to Wikimedia. MrTaghizade (talk) 19:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Unclear what MrTaghizade pretends. MrTaghizade uploaded File:Producer.jpg on 21 Sep 2016, deleted on 6 February 2019. A different file was uploaded by MichaèledTs on 6 Aug 2019. Now deleted 9 May 2020 per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Producer.jpg. Platonides (talk) 22:32, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il s'agit de mon image, je veux supprimer cette photo de moi. Je subis des préjudices et cela doit cesser. Cedricflorian (talk) 20:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused file. Author (and subject) requested deletion. Potential controversial wrt personality rights. --Platonides (talk) 22:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL, no permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We would need a release from the photographer -- Jorge Eduardo Olmos (hijo). --Platonides (talk) 22:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality crop of File:Nice Musée Masséna 01.jpg, I suggest uploading a new version as a JPEG instead of PNG Ytoyoda (talk) 20:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Plus, doubtful own work. Claims to have been uploaded from www.nice.fr --Platonides (talk) 22:40, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamel.elmahrouk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images. Besides uploader seems to be pictured in so not own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EditQwerty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the two images of Carrie Symonds are very different. The one on the website has a lot of camera light, and mine has none: The two images are very different and do not have any copyright violations. This was taken by a company called Bitfork Media: which went bust in January, they provided free images wich are non-copyright. My logos are made completely by me- and it says "Own Work" The Joe Wicks one is non copyright: free to use because its for editorial use only. https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/joe-wicks-aka-the-body-coach-teaches-the-uks-school-news-photo/1208029121?adppopup=true EditQwerty (talk) 08:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)EditQwerty[reply]

@EditQwerty: Your logos are out of COM:SCOPE since there's no entry about you in one of our sister projects. "Editorial use" doesn't mean you are authorized to re-license the file, on the contrary. Besides Getty images are not free: they are on sale. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:46, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: What about the Carrie Symonds one? Thanks, EditQwerty (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2020 (UTC)EditQwerty[reply]
@EditQwerty: Please sign your postings. The Symonds upload is a copyright violation and it will be deleted soon. Please note that on Commons we don't give personal answers about the deletion process and uploaders have to wait until an Administrator (who I am not) decides to close the deletion request. In the meantime you should read the "First steps tutorial" section on the top of your Talk page since it seems you haven't understood yet how copyright works. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:06, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: I have been signing. The Carrie Symonds one, is not a copyright violation. Thanks, EditQwerty (talk) 10:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)EditQwerty[reply]

File:Carrie Symonds.png was not even mentioned here. The image appeared on https://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/boris-johnson-et-sa-compagne-attendent-leur-premier-enfant-20200229 and was deleted as a likely copyright violation. Platonides (talk) 22:46, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted File:EditQwerty Logo new in 2020.png and File:My world of editing.png. Both were unused at deletion time. Platonides (talk) 22:46, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope self-promotional image by user who had been misusing en.wikipedia as a web host Ubcule (talk) 23:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 22:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 04:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 08:47, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Myroundcube

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:Myroundcube. I believe they should be deleted because they are suspected copyright violations. --Pafsanias (talk) 12:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 08:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 08:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted poster. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 08:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion requests filed by 2602:306:CD29:AC00:1133:4ED4:B728:26B4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These should all have been speedily deleted under CSD COM1/CSD G1 back in 2014 but for some reason that didn't happen. {{Kept}} leading to these gibberish requests has been placed on the file talk pages which lead me to believe that there had been an actual deletion request, which wasn't true. Delete so to not confuse and lead other into misbelieving please.

Jonteemil (talk) 18:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wiktionary-logo-en.png can be added here, albeit from a different user.Jonteemil (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as non sensical and confusing. — Racconish💬 08:52, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: the image is not in the pubblic domain in source contry (Italy). As witten in the description this is image is an illustration by Italian illustrator Amerigo Ferrari (1889-1970) so the image will be copyrighted for some years (for additional external source of the author see here, for source of the date of death of illustrator see here ). Please note that the template PD-Italy is wrong since it applies only to simple photo and this is not a photo. Civitas13 (talk) 20:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Undelete in 2041 Platonides (talk) 22:52, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO Sweden which is quite low. en:File:Norrby IF logo.svg was also deleted for being above the TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo; very likely promotion material. Gikü (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character / works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: one per nomination; kept one as DM, low-res image, no copyrightable elements. --P 1 9 9   18:54, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Dennisnash (talk) 11:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by vector image: File:West Florida Flag.svg Centralismo (talk) 11:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; user's profile picture, but no Wikipedia activity and no image usage. Gikü (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is used by https://www.facebook.com/SurorileOsoianu/ as their FB page pic and also in various promo materials (such as CDs); needs proof of permission Gikü (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:56, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent building; no FOP in Romania. Gikü (talk) 13:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think this would be eligible for copyright. Platonides (talk) 22:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: simple construction, no copyrightable elements. --P 1 9 9   18:57, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasveer10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasveer10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of own uploader because exist a better version of the same photo. Ecummenic (talk) 16:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred image, probably not Mantodea Brunei (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9   19:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RosascoAndrea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of photos, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:08, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a video screenshot, no useful source info given Ytoyoda (talk) 19:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How do you make this picture? Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --P 1 9 9   19:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SirEdimon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It doesn't seem that this image is free. It's everywhere on internet: [1].
Discussion requested by uploader Achim (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

copied from Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:Luís Grijó dos Santos
This file should not be deleted as it is a family photo identifying my father, taken by our family and we want it to be used freely by anyone wishing to publish his biography and work. We would be grateful if you could please withdraw your deletion request. Luís Grijó dos Santos Luís Grijó dos Santos (talk) 12:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As I indicated this image have been used in books and every where in internet. If you, Luís Grijó dos Santos, holds the image's copyright, you should send a e-mail to Commons:OTRS authorizing its use on Wikipedia.--SirEdimon (talk) 20:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. The email has been sent. Luís Grijó dos Santos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luís Grijó dos Santos (talk • contribs) 10:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 23:43, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Frau Freudenthaler ist an mich herangetreten und wünscht, dass dieses Foto gelöscht wird. Bwag (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Freudenthaler has approached me and wishes that this photo will be deleted. - Bwag (talk) 18:06, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The picture has been taken and uploaded without the consent of Laura Freudenthaler. She requests for the picture to be deleted. MoeSzyslak1977 (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tightly cropped low res photo from a user with a history of copyvio, missing essential source info Ytoyoda (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superceded by File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Indonesia.svg and no longer used or updated. Redundant file. A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Usually we do not delete per Commons:Deletion_policy#Redundant.2Fbad_quality but I think in this case it is okay because there were better alternatives all the time. --MGA73 (talk) 14:25, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a gut feeling that the combination of elements here is above the TOO. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Flickr account: missing data on EXIF, low-re. Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Miros Dursselev Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be able to be licensed like this, as its from a 2015 publication. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason to believe that the Flickr uploader would be an imposter of a non-notable student. --King of ♥ 07:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment You should probably ask User:Rodhullandemu, because he decided these photos were OK on Commons under British common law. Your subject is similar both in style (relief) and in material (ceramics).--Roy17 (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I take it as read that this work is in a public place rather than just being visible from one. It looks to me like a relief, which means it has depth and is therefore a 3D work. The depth is part of the creative process and IMO is intended to give a more realistic impression. Hong Kong law is based on English law which allows FOP for both 3D works and 2D works of artistic craftsmanship. There is very little guidance from UK the courts as to what constitutes a "work of artistic craftsmanship". From COM:FOP UK, "In Hensher -v- Restawile, some examples were given of typical articles that might be considered works of artistic craftsmanship, including hand-painted tiles...". This image looks like a hand-painted tile, albeit on a large scale, so IMO qualifies for FOP as both a 3D work AND as a work of artistic craftsmanship. The Hong Kong courts may diverge from UK law at some point, but until they do, I imagine they'd be guided by UK precedents. Hope that helps. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AndyHung1979 and Wpcpey: --Roy17 (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Clindberg for opinion. --Wcam (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Works of artistic craftsmanship do seem to need at least some sort of utilitarian aspect to them, i.e. there was at least some restriction imposed on the artist in service to the utilitarian needs. The hand painted tiles have been mentioned as qualifying, and are probably at the edge -- but those are at least sold as a product, and the painted tiles do need to work together when installed as a wall alongside other tiles. Stained glass windows are another one mentioned -- those do still need to function to let light through, and stand up to weather. I don't really see how this work qualifies in that respect -- seems completely artistic. However, if there is a 3-D aspect, which at first glance there seems to be... could argue that it qualifies as sculpture. Probably lean keep on that aspect. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per general consensus above. --King of ♥ 07:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is uploaded by me and i want to delete this file because i already uploaded this file on other websites Abhishek009kk (talk) 10:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: You cannot revoke a license you have granted. --King of ♥ 07:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. It's a costume made by a fan. --Clodion (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Clodion is totally right Jmex (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
All creative works are copyrighted. There is no evidence that the copyright holder of this work allows free use. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep COM:Costumes. It's a costume by a fan.--Huguespotter (talk) 08:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No evidence of copyright violation. --Cody escouade delta (d) 13:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The same. It's a costume made by a fan. --Éric Messel-2 (talk) 19:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to the description of this file, this photo was taken at "Star Wars The Exhibition". Please see this photo [2]. The object in this photo and the object in this file is the same. Is this made by a fan? Is this a costume? No. This is not a costume made by a fan. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Visitor's photo from an exhibition? Even the uploader's description states it is from an exhibition - how could it be fan made and free from copyright? /Sofie Sigrinn (talk) 13:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is obvious that the photo was previously published on the website. In other uploads of the user who uploaded this photo were wrongs with the source, license or date. The photo must be deleted due to incorrect information for licensing or possible copyright infringement. Uğurkent (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to the given license of PD-NASA being highly questionable since the Event Horizon Telescope project is the primary credit, I reached out to them to clarify what license this image might have. Per their response at https://twitter.com/ehtelescope/status/1247538956004024321, it appears they want CC-by-ND-4.0, which unfortunately is not compatible with Commons. PD-NASA is not acceptable here. Huntster (t @ c) 16:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Huntster: Thank you for the note re this image file - *entirely* ok with me to do whatever is finally decided with the file - no problem whatsoever - Thanks again - and - Stay Safe and Healthy !! Drbogdan (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 07:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is no more in use. MostarReds (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo of questionable scope. --King of ♥ 07:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flyer depicted is the work of the interview subject, Mary Abukutsa-Onyango, and not the work of the publisher of this video. It is therefore not theirs to license. Vera (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its says "In an interview conducted by Leslie Chan of Bioline International, Prof. Mary Abukutsa-Onyango ...." Lets assume that they were all grown-ups and they knew what they were doing? Victuallers (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Publishers of books rarely write the books. Directors of film rarely do all the acting. Victuallers (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
this is a work that existed before the film was made. The maker of the film isn't the one who can take the credit so crediting him as the author is absurd. There is no proof Abulutsa-Onyango gave a free license to it and the maker of the video likely included it under fair use, which isn't allowed on Commons. Vera (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: In most countries the Director is also the copyright holder. We still need permission for this file. Ruthven (msg) 17:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All other uploads by this users were copyvios. This has a very small resolution and no EXIF data. The uploader's claim that this is their own work isn't trustworthy. AFBorchert (talk) 10:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at source; regardless of whether the license is valid there is no FoP in Romania. Gikü (talk) 13:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It's not a FoP matter (the building is way below the threshold of originality), but the source site displays "Copyright © - Spitalul de Psihiatrie Nucet" and no free license. Ruthven (msg) 17:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover. Gikü (talk) 13:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the logo is copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 17:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small resolution without EXIF data. Probably not own work. Regasterios (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios! A képet először tévesen sajátnak tüntettük fel, mivel a tulajdonostól kaptunk engedélyt teljeskörű felhasználásra. Leitner Csaba, a kép tulajdonosa pár hete elküldte Önöknek a megadott email címre az engedélyt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aszegedi22 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion (we cannot redirect files with different extensions). Ruthven (msg) 17:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cancellare versione precedente con targhe e volti visibili Walter Giannetti (talk) 15:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion (deleted older version). Ruthven (msg) 18:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cancellare versione precedente con targhe auto visibili Walter Giannetti (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion (deleted the version with personal information). Ruthven (msg) 18:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

это не качественная картинка я создал новую Van.Balan (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 09:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is no more in use. MostarReds (talk) 16:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 09:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

that micronation does not exist Antemister (talk) 07:36, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phanlinhhn violated COM:OVERWRITE, the original file has been here for 4 years. Fry1989 eh? 17:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: original restored Denniss (talk) 08:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zero information about this micronation, even online. Removed from Commons "Flags of Micronations". Centralismo (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: en:Forcas and Careiras Ocean Territory was deleted with the comment does not meet even the really low standards of notability for micronations. One remaining use on ko:마이크로네이션 목록 which would need to be removed to satisfy COM:INUSE. That use was added after the enwiki article was deleted. --bjh21 (talk) 10:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This audio is lacking authorship for who created the recording. The words in it might not be copyrighted, but the recording by itself is. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Copyright-Eintrag widerspricht wohl den Angaben zur Lizensierung etc. Xocolatl (talk) 13:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence of permission. The copyright holder should contact COM:OTRS. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Brg-bandeira.PNG. Waldyrious (talk) 15:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: They're not exactly the same. File:Bandeira de Braga - 2.png is a slight crop of File:Brg-bandeira.PNG. Since they're both in use, they should both be kept under COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 10:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: They are exactly the same. One can easily be replaced by the other without any loss.Rpo.castro (talk) 09:49, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: files are both in use, are not exact duplicates, and no reason was provided for why this file is inferior to the alternative per COM:REDUNDANT. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another photo. Israelpr (talk) 18:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find one. --Achim (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. You can renominate the file but please specify where the duplicate is. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Deleted See below. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


the duplicated picture is here https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=88913122

I should have mentioned it in my original request

ShaulaH (talk) 06:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ShaulaH Oh ok, it looks like a processed and unprocessed file to me so I deleted the nominated file. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ShaulaH (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was first published 1985, but {{PD-South Africa}} license tag indicates photographs remain under copyright for 50 years after publication. Source URL is 404, so I'm unable to determine if another license applies. Alex Cohn (talk) 18:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Finnish law pertains to documents published by public officials (and even then independent work such as images within the document might not be PD). This image, however, is from the Flickr account of the Foreign Ministry and not covered by the statute IMO. kyykaarme (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file was previously kept, but it was part of a large batch Commons:Deletion requests/Photos tagged as PD-FinlandGov. -kyykaarme (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credited to Erik van Kordelaar Ytoyoda (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence of permission; copyright holder should contact COM:OTRS. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outdated duplicate of File:COVID-19 cases in Romania by county.png. Alexandru M. (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Logo Museum für Energiegeschichte(n) (talk) 21:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doppelt hochgeladen Museum für Energiegeschichte(n) (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source doesn't claim that their content is under CC public domain license. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: doi:10.1017/S0031182009006313 is non-free. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:32, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of the same person over 30 years: unlikely to be the same person's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not super convinced by this rationale alone. The file is a fairly low resolution scan of a damaged print, not the original negative. I'm not convinced that this isn't own work, but I'm not particularly convinced that it isn't. If we'd heard from the uploader, I'd be much more inclined to keep, but we haven't, so I'm leaning  Weak delete. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per ACN. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]