Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/02/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 8th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Agrotis vancouverensis 04.jpg

[edit]

Because it is A selfie Hikrash (talk) 21:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request by another Android user. --Achim (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Соревнования по мотокроссу. 1.jpg

[edit]

Я так хочу.Это мое фото Андрей Малков (talk) 12:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7, uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarah von Neuburg and Lars Christian Karde ‚Weihnachten bei uns‘.jpg

[edit]


File:Sarah von Neuburg and Lars Christian Karde ‚Weihnachten bei uns‘.jpg copyviol from Sarah von Neuberg's facebook page at [1] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And the other also found on her facebook page, at [2] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Both stolen from celeb's facebook page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WBAF Magazine.jpg

[edit]

Time of the copyright on this magazine cover is not expired. So it needs to be deleted. Uğurkent (talk) 11:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: no license, user upload history, no indication of publication under a free license on the given source, magazine cover. --Ahmadtalk 17:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:北信濃ふるさとの森文化公園（2017-5-4）.jpg

[edit]

間違って投稿しました。削除をお願い致します。--黒崎一男 (talk) 09:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by User:Túrelio. GFJ (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mercedes-Benz Museum 201312 08 blue hour.jpg

[edit]

Mercedes- Benz everything rest 68.208.127.67 18:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matjaž Hribljan.jpg

[edit]

Matjazh1 (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Delete}} Matjazh1 (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gr Nordende Dorfstraße 19 1988.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) Barghaan (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to insert the license . I added it now --Barghaan (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gr Nordende Dorfstraße 19 a 1996.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) Barghaan (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indinavir Structural Formula V.1.svg

[edit]

Unused chemical structural formula with opaque (white) background. Replaced by File:Indinavir Structural Formula V.2.svg by the same uploader (same orientation, transparent background). Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 16:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MetroLisboa-linha-verde.svg

[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:MetroLisboa-linha-verde.png for reference. If this is a derivative version and the source has been deleted, then it can’t really be kept per COM:PCP. — Marchjuly (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Marchjuly: Interesting that you can write so much and read so little. Let me put here what’s on the modified filepage: The current version is a DW of File:Chatte bernerienne.svg, which is PD-author. Also interesting how you think that the current image «seems the same if not really close to one nominated for deletion» — I suspect you might need to refresh the page (too busy dishing out unneeded lessons in copyright to think about it?), unless you cannot really tell apart twose two very different images of stylized sail ships, in which case I have nothing more to say. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The original image is a copyright violation per the nomination, so the old revisions are deleted. The replacement may be free, but it is an incorrect logo. We don't delete images for editorial reasons, but no wiki has made the choice to use the updated image or anything other than the official logo. For this reason and in the spirit of COM:OVERWRITE, I am delinking this file via CommonsDelinker. Feel free to revert this delinking on your local wiki if it's supported by consensus. --Guanaco (talk) 21:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Drunk Texan guy.jpg

[edit]

The picture was uploaded without my consent . It is defamatory and embarrassing [shows me drinking alcohol and the title describes me as drunk]. It was taken in a private space. Please delete as soon as possible. 64.18.151.247 21:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Low quality, not particularly useful (although it is in use on one page). The source also indicates someone other than the uploader, making it problematic for copyright reasons as well. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy per source =/= author. ~riley (talk) 02:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jitendra Digital Entertainment (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on hi.wiki

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 11:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zozimbini.jpg

[edit]

This is from an online source and obviously not copyright-free or license-free. For deletion. Migsmigss (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mosa altamri.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation: https://www.thenational.ae/sport/football/dusan-tadic-warns-ajax-need-to-play-much-better-in-apoel-return-leg-if-they-are-to-reach-champions-league-group-stages-1.900753#14 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 08:45, 11 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.thenational.ae/sport/football/dusan-tadic-warns-ajax-need-to-play-much-better-in-apoel-return-leg-if-they-are-to-reach-champions-league-group-stages-1.900753#9 --Krdbot 14:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prime Suspects- The Anatomy Of Integers And Permutations.jpg

[edit]

This image is listed as Own Work by the author, but is almost certainly publisher's cover art. It either is not the author's own work, or the author is an employee of the publisher, which is a conflict of interest. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 07:51, 11 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: book-cover: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZit6QEGRGVFa8xeZvo0qlUSblOf9iyzfGmiZ7oozP_1mOvlZD8FyrBJncAeAVy4xyK309K6ElQW1Yrys2E8PD0OPZXNBoEF7GRmbcU4cGRGfGjNTPNvRbmIDspuBXE3v84E8eAstY9AXO1dwnvgMuMljV2Fd6ANOq1F_1PQAC8iGAj5d2xeL13TRr6WnfAYoHYAtgrXnvlUFQSKhcPtAgeRqY2XiRoloGa7TTnZ47mCpvVjRwbAJgagVq8o9z5QhfMS0FXqIb_1dlEKNe-11QlA2ItWC8cOO46hZmIvO4wMqV6Es5QSdYxJCTaSNnHzBbdYAC96RsqnsN4RHYDCPqaf0VgumE3a9g --Krdbot 14:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexander D. Henderson, Sr.jpg

[edit]

This 1892 image is obviously not {{Own}} work of the uploader as he claims. It may or may not be in copyright depending on its publication history, if any. We cannot keep it without knowing its publication history, if any. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The image is from Alexander D. Henderson's weeding day in 17 February 1892. The license has changed from PD-self to PD-1923. --Greg Henderson 16:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Perhaps it would be better to use license: PD-US-unpublished. What do you think? --Greg Henderson 20:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Kept: PD-US-unpublished is good. Withdrawn by nom. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid

[edit]

These show a building by w:Bèi Yùmíng.

On two of the images, the building is de minimis. Those two should be deleted because of artworks by w:Tony Cragg (File:La pyramide du musée du Louvre (6269037550).jpg) and w:Wim Delvoye (File:Un "suppo" sous la pyramide du Louvre (7166203965).jpg).

Stefan4 (talk) 22:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 2

[edit]

I hate to do this, but see Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures of the Louvre Pyramid and Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests: The Louvre pyramid is a copyrighted artwork by I.M. Pei (still alive). France has no freedom of panorama. In these pictures, the pyramid is the main subject of the image, so unfortunately there's no exception like De minimis. There may be more problematic images in this category, I just picked the ones that seemed to be more or less clear cases for now.

El Grafo (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion of File:P1030568 (5015328803).jpg. The main object is the old Louvre, seen through some glas. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 3

[edit]

No Fop in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, except those where the pyramid is not the main object. Materialscientist (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 4

[edit]

{{NoFoP-France}}.

* File:Louvre at dusk.JPG * File:Louvre at dusk2.JPG already kept in previous DR --Denniss (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg per comment below --Denniss (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons 2.jpg not main object --Denniss (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josve05a (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most are not DM. The pyramid is to prominent, captured intentionally or the images was even used to illustrate the pyramid. Doesn't fit DM. According to the Frech FOP-template "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 5

[edit]

The pyramid is still covered by copyright (the architect, Ieoh Ming Pei, is alive), there is no FOP in France and COM:De minimis is not applicable for these files. Per archives, see Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests.

VIGNERON (talk) 14:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 6

[edit]

{{NoFoP-France}} Some of these (~3-5) may have already been kept in an earlier DR, but under a false premise, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louvre at dusk.JPG. I feellike it would be benificial to have a new and 'clean' disussion about these files.

Josve05a (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As two pictures of mine are affected - with one even serving as the prime example for alleged false premises - I'd like to maintain that the principle of de minimis should be applied at least to File:Louvre at dusk.JPG and File:Louvre at dusk2.JPG. They are in fact very similar to the images used to illustrate De Minimis in France --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore  Keep, also per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Same for my picture which was not even nominated for deletion in the last round where 5 others were removed. I find this repeated request is itself under false premises and object strongly. Dfg13 (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg, as I already wrote in March: the pyramid is an "accessory to the main handled subject" - the entrance. It also has been discussed and excepted here and obove. --Euku:⇄ 07:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, after consulting Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests/kept I decided to delete all the photos. Object under construction can also be protected with copyright, if enough copyrightable details are seen. General views about museum can also be protected with copyright, if the museum is protected with copyright, that means, if enough copyrightable details are seen. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 7

[edit]

{{NoFoP-France}} As earlier DRs (above).

Josve05a (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: but kept one. From the perspeĉtive it becomes quite clear that the pyramid is there intentional and is indeed one of the main subjects. Natuur12 (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 8

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --The Photographer (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blacked-out version kept, others deleted: none of these images complies with de minimis. For re-upload, please black out or crop. --Pitke (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pitke (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 9

[edit]

This building has been designed by Ieoh Ming Pei (b. 1917), an architect who is still alive. As there is no freedom of panorama in France, this picture should be removed from Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 10

[edit]

No FOP in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 09:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thesupermat (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I deleted all files where the pyramid is the central element. For the rest, it could be argued that the pyramid is unavoidable (cf. the Terreaux case), or a secondary element. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, but some are  kept, because not enough copyrightable details can be seen. Taivo (talk) 19:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 11

[edit]

The Louvre pyramid is a copyrighted artwork by I. M. Pei. France has no freedom of panorama. In these pictures, the pyramid is one of the main subjects of the images, so there is no exception like De minimis.

Ras67 (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominator Ras67, the rationale for deletion you placed on ALL these images was "the pyramid is one of the main subjects of the images, so there is no exception like De minimis."
Frankly, I have found the closures of discussions that revolve around FOP and de minimis, in France, to be pretty inconsistent, and unpredictable. Some discussions where I thought the images were sure to be deleted ended up being kept because the closing administrator concluded the questionable element was merely "one of" the elements of those images.
I uploaded one of these images, one that shows the square in front of the Louvre, including the pyramid. The Pyramid takes up less than ten percent of that image's real estate, less than one third of the horizontal span of the image.
Did you intend everyone weighing in here to take a meaningful look at all two dozen images? Do you think it might have made sense for you to have further broken them down, separating the few where most of the image was of the pyramid, from those where the image was really of the square in front of the Louvre?
How about going back and adding your estimate of how much of each images' real estate is taken up the pyramid?
In my opinion, these two dozen images should not have been the subject of a single nomination, because they are not sufficiently alike. Geo Swan (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You want a nomination for each picture alone? IMHO all pictures have the same problem. The question is, where is de minimis exceeded and where not. May the closing admin decide, therefor is this discusion. But you have right, this procedure is inconsistent and unpredictable like the whole subject. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 22:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One has to understand the decision of the Cour de cassation in the Terreaux case to decide what is OK and what is not, which is a bit complex. In short, it says that if a copyrighted work appears unavoidable in a general picture, then it is acceptable.
I am surprised we don't have an article about this. In 2005, the Cour de cassation said that general pictures of the Terreaux square in Lyon, including the work of art by Daniel Buren are not violation of the author's copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We have a guideline, but how tight is the commentary. The pyramid as central element of the place is in almost every image unavoidable. To "freeing" a picture you have to photograph the whole place? Where is the threshold? To my nomination i've included the pyramid's space and in relation the space of all other (non copyrighted) elements. I don't know if this proceeding is correct.--Ras67 (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IANA, but I think our interpretation of French is too strict. As it is said on the FOP page, a picture is not a derivative work if the work of art is a mere element blended into an architectural ensemble. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, apparently nobody wants to close the request and I must close it again. I keep all the photos previously kept or undeleted. File:January Mon Dieu Palais Louvre Paris - Master Earth Photography 2014 - series France saphir pictures - panoramio.jpg is de minimis.

I explain keeping file:Parisienne2002-1.jpg. Pyramid is simple geometrical figure and not copyrightable. Louvre Pyramid is not a simple geometrical figure and it is copyrightable. It's not allowed to use non-trivial details of copyrighted objects. But under some circumstances the photo has no copyrightable details, only simple geometrical figure, which isn't copyrightable. These photos can be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 12

[edit]

No FOP in France

Thesupermat (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thesupermat: Half of these are already nominated. There is no need to do it again. Then images are acceptable if the pyramid is an unavoidable element in the whole composition (decision of the Cour de Cassation regarding the Terreaux case). Regards, Yann (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: are you sure? "Paris Musée du Louvre - panoramio - Nikolai Karaneschev.jpg" is the only file I see already nominated (nothing on this page and nothing on the talk page of these file). I've put a gallery to show that in most of these photos the Pyramid is the main subject and not really an unavoidable element.
At least for the Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 09 to 16 and for Paris, France (Unsplash QrpX-2tPmNY), I would say  Delete.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am sure. I nominated them myself. I think File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 03.jpg, File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 04.jpg, File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 05.jpg and File:Louvre Palace (5986775507).jpg could be kept. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most of them. Kept the four mentioned by Yann and one additional that has already been deemed fine in two previous DRs on this page. --Majora (talk) 00:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 13

[edit]

COM:FOP France

Roy17 (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. Even the last one has the pyramid as a very prominent feature. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 14

[edit]

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright.

大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru: pd ineligible is possible, but only if the object is really simple, like a flagpole or an obelisk.--Roy17 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: And what is so special about a simple tetrahedron / pyramid? The general shape is ineligible for copyriht in my opinion. Close up images of the roof construction may be not. --D-Kuru (talk) 21:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Automatic window cleaner, Louvre 11 December 2007.jpg.  Delete everything else since the pyramid is the primary subject.--Roy17 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, except those Darwin pointed out. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 15

[edit]

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear cases. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ahmadtalk 18:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 16

[edit]

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 17

[edit]

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

 Keep --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader. OK for suppression of File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg. But for File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg, the main subjects of the photo are the strike and the Louvre. Not the pyramid. This is a case of COM:DM. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I cropped the file above to remove most of the pyramid. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? On File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg, the pyramid is not totally visible. The bottom of the pyramid is hidden by people. It shows that the pyramid is not the main subject. This is a case of COM:DM. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangopaso: Are you willing to crop out the top of each photo, down to the top of the head of the tallest depicted person? I would accept that.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I uploaded a new version. I hope it will please you. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: I think you did not crop enough from 1, and you didn't crop 2 at all. Pinging @Minorax as nom.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I said OK to delete the #1 picture. I cropped again File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg to preserve and save my photo. But I disagree, the precedent cropping was enough. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: Did you mean  Keep #1 and  Delete #2? I share your view. IMO image #1 is cropped enough to make the Louvre Pyramid in de minimis. Admins should delete the first two verson of File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg if you keep it. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: Oops... I meant  Keep #1 (cropped with the pyramid in de minimis) and  Delete #2 (with the whole pyramid). --Tangopaso (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep First and  Delete second per above, the copyrighted parts should be cropped as like the first one to avoid FOP problems. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Yann (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 18

[edit]

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

Minoraxtalk 11:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Yann (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 19

[edit]

The building was completed by architect I. M. Pei (1917–2019) in 1989. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2090.

A1Cafel (talk) 14:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for File:Palais du Louvre 003.jpg due to de minimis.
 Delete for all other --Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, above sections.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 20

[edit]

pyramid too big (main subject of the photo) to be a FoP exception

— Draceane talkcontrib. 08:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)--[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid 21

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in France. COM:FOP France. Creator was Ieoh Ming Pei. He died 2019. The files can be restored in 2090.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas Beck, I think that before you propose this massive request, you should at least check if it was kept as File talk:South facade of the Richelieu Wing (162242079).jpg or if broke any rule...
All that I opened should be kept as the protected monument is not the main object or occupy a significant area of the photo.
Read the previous discussion before this propostions. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 23:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for all, see quotation below. --Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
“One has to understand the decision of the Cour de cassation in the Terreaux case to decide what is OK and what is not, which is a bit complex. In short, it says that if a copyrighted work appears unavoidable in a general picture, then it is acceptable.
I am surprised we don't have an article about this. In 2005, the Cour de cassation said that general pictures of the Terreaux square in Lyon, including the work of art by Daniel Buren are not violation of the author's copyright. Regards, Yann”

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ototo76 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's sandbox was speedily deleted in September 2019 as spam. The user was subsequently blocked for advertising. Out of project scope.

ƏXPLICIT 00:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 02:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Niraj30 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on hi.wiki

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 03:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: done by Gbawden. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1023 Bkumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promo on en.wiki

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 03:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 02:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Na paye timilai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 03:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 02:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joe Delamielleure.jpg

[edit]

See this essay on derivative works. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:강의.jpg

[edit]

non notable personal image Jjw (talk) 05:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:이 건홍 ( lee kyunhong ).jpeg

[edit]

non notable personal image Jjw (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:이 건홍 ( 李 健弘 ) lee kyunhong.jpg

[edit]

non notable personal image Jjw (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:화요일.jpg

[edit]

non notable personal image Jjw (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Софрон Дмитерко ЧСВВ.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2017. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник О. Довбушу.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2014. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Moran.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation http://brancoweiss.org.il/about-us/%D7%94%D7%90%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%A0%D7%95/ Golan's mom (talk) 11:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rangergoldandoodle1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I suggest these are Out of scope

Herby talk thyme 11:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 02:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr.Nitin's file.pdf 1234 (1)(1) (1).pdf

[edit]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lesly Manigat bio.pdf

[edit]

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Čechy - znak.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused coat of arms. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jiwaqar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 02:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OM Shanti paid.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Introduction to hand sewing.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are tutorial documents not allowed?

[edit]

Hello, I created this as a tool to help others learn how to hand sew, are tutorials or self-written documents not allowed on Wikimedia Commons? This is meant to be an educational tool and includes illustrations along with text. I created this file because I could not find a similar tool on Commons and wanted to create something that was freely shareable. --Bagelpigeon (talk) 06:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikibooks is best place for tutorials. Images (preferably in SVG format) should be uploaded separately on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MoAC Phryg Cybele.jpg

[edit]

Deleted on Turkish Wikipedia as unsourced. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:MoAC Jewelry 2.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Divyansh971 20200206 235224 0.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019-07-04 08-54-26 ILCE-6500 DSC01532 DxO (48337115637).jpg

[edit]

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019-07-04 09-20-44 ILCE-6500 DSC01604 DxO (48337902877).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019-07-04 09-35-49 ILCE-6500 DSC01640 DxO (48339592906).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Japan Expo 2018

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works. COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Japan Expo 2018

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Japan Expo 2018

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Japan Expo 2018

[edit]

COM:TOYS. COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Seibuen Amusement Park

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete – as with the prior deletion request, the primary purpose of uploading these photographs was to get images of Seibu-en into Commons from flickr; in performing the uploads, I must have selected these images that show copyrighted Sanrio characters. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Seibuen Amusement Park

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete — Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 05:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/"Madame Tussauds San Francisco"

[edit]

No COM:FOP US in USA for such sculptures.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/"at Madame Tussauds Hollywood"

[edit]

No COM:FOP US in USA for such sculptures.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Wax figures in the Madame Tussauds New York

[edit]

No COM:FOP US in USA for such sculptures, category should also be deleted as not useful.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:William and Kate at Madame Tussaud's New York.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP US in USA for such sculptures. BevinKacon (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/"Madame Tussauds Hollywood" -insource:delete

[edit]

No COM:FOP US in USA for such sculptures.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/"Madame Tussauds San Francisco" -insource:delete

[edit]

No COM:FOP US in USA for such sculptures.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Musée Miniature et Cinéma - Star Wars.jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I agree. It's sometimes hard to know what we can or can't do with film props and costumes, but it seems obvious to me now that this is an example of unauthorized publication. I should check all my other uploads from the same museum. I suppose most of them should be deleted (but not all). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Star Wars – The Exhibition, Centro de arte canal

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Star Wars – The Exhibition, Centro de arte canal

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Star Wars – The Exhibition, Centro de arte canal

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hassan essam seo.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo for non-wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 01:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jonas Lohrmann beim 57. Jugend musiziert Regionalwettbewerb in Köthen.png

[edit]

From here Brotfried (talk) 01:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Btw: The uploader is blocked in :de. --Autumn Windfalls (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:至誠の像.jpg

[edit]

Work by living sculptor Yoshio Usui (臼井佳夫). Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such statues. Yasu (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patafisik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Touristic panels, with copyrighted text and images. There is no FoP in France.

Ruthven (msg) 15:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patafisik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Touristic panels in Italy, where there is no FoP for such works.

Ruthven (msg) 19:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipediya M (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blasewitz, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (1567).jpg

[edit]

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blasewitz, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (1569).jpg

[edit]

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cara Bermain Baccarat Online.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Veeranam.jpg

[edit]

Low Res Unlikey to be ownwork Perumalism (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Acta Constitutiva.pdf

[edit]

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Madeena Palli.jpg

[edit]

Low Res Unlikey to be ownwork Perumalism (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thoppu.jpg

[edit]

Low Res Unlikey to be ownwork Perumalism (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Keni.jpg

[edit]

Low Res Unlikey to be ownwork Perumalism (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eid ka.jpg

[edit]

Low Res Unlikey to be ownwork Perumalism (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Allah Akbar Masjid.jpg

[edit]

Low Res Unlikey to be ownwork Perumalism (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doug Jones with Jeff Daniels 2019.jpg

[edit]

Very unlikely that photographer was "on duty" on Broadway... Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy keep - As I've stated previously, this image is under the public domain as it is published by a member of the United States Congress on an official duty social media account and during their official duty as a Congressperson. I am copying and pasting the following from a mass deletion by the nominator which remains open (see here). It will most likely be kept if the reviewers are aware of American public domain federal law and so far the !votes are in favor of keep.
  • "Government content on any [social media] site is generally public domain and therefore can not become the intellectual property of an individual or be protected by a site provider." p 12 "Corporation for National and Community Service", link. Please note, "generally" refers to common sense: If the government employee posts the official Michael Jackson video for "Thriller" on social media, it falls under "not generally" - it's copyrighted. However, a crappy phone picture that a passerby probably took using a sitting member of the US Congress' cell phone and handed back to said Congressman, or that an aide took, and that Congressman posts on his official Twitter, it is public domain.
  • "Some Representatives or Senators might choose not to formally archive their social media posts, since they are already in the public domain." and "Since Member tweets, Facebook posts, and other social media items are in the public domain on the social media services’ platforms, interested parties might be able to use those to help understand public policy development." Source: "Social Media Adoption by Members of Congress: Trends and Congressional Considerations" by Jacob R. Straus, Specialist on the Congress, 2018, p 13. – published by the Congress, link.
  • Keeping in the spirit of how public domain and the US Federal Government works, the Official Guide to Government Information and Services states: "U.S. government creative works are usually produced by government employees as part of their official duties. These works include writings, images, videos, and computer code. A government work is generally not subject to copyright in the U.S. Unless the work falls under an exception, anyone may, without restriction under U.S. copyright laws: 1)Reproduce the work in print or digital form; 2)Create derivative works; 3)Perform the work publicly; 4)Display the work and 5) Distribute copies or digitally transfer the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending." Source
  • Regarding Congresspeople running for office, if they are an incumbent, their work is in the public domain: "...works created by incumbent presidents or U.S. Senators or Representatives, if made within the scope of their employment, lack copyright protection and are free to use."' Source
  • Please note, that many of the official social media accounts for federal employees are used exclusively during their tenure as federal employees and then they are abandoned and archived. Example: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a personal instgram which is 100% copyrighted. She also had a Congressional Instagram, which is public domain unless it's a previously copyrighted photograph. Here's another example - Ivanka Trump has a personal Instgram, but no official government account, therefore all of the photographs – unless stated otherwise by Trump - are copyrighted. Here's another example: Eric Swalwell has a personal Twitter account which is copyrighted (unless stated otherwise) and he has an official Congress Twitter account that is public domain and selected Tweets will be archived by the Library of Congress upon retirement from the federal government. It's pretty obvious that the recent photos of MLK are copyrighted, when the photograph that his staffer took of Swalwell talking at a town hall is public domain. You can read examples of the policies set forth for officials - such as the one's for the Senate, here.
  • The General Services Administration oversees developing policies and relationships with social media companies to ensure that the TOS of companies align with federal policies. For example, these are the guidelines for federal employees from Instagram. You can find the entire list of modified social media TOS to accompany federal work here. These guidelines are in place for all federal employees. Note, you won't see "public domain" used in any of these - that's not how it works. However, you'll notice that federal guidelines supersede social media TOS. Example from Facebook: "If You are the federal government or a federal government agency in the United States: "Terms relating to indemnification do not apply to your Official Use except to the extent expressly authorized by federal law." Indemnification includes copyright in social media TOS. Therefore, federal agencies are exempt. You'll notice, it states that if you are a state or local official, your state or local policies supersede Facebook - therefore if you're the Governor of California, your posts are public domain because of state law, but if you're the Governor of Indiana (my home state!) it's copyrighted. The same goes for every social media outlet.
  • Also, please denote the public domain license - created by Commonists - for Congress: "This United States Congress image is in the public domain. This may be because it was taken by an employee of the Congress as part of that person’s official duties, or because it has been released into the public domain and posted on the official websites of a member of Congress."
Thanks again for your consideration and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Missvain: A few very simple questions since you seems to be a specialist of how the Congress works:
  • is a Gongressman "on their official duty as a Congressperson" when he goes to Broadway on is it on their leisure time?
  • what's the photographer's name and what make you think he/she is an official Congress photographer?
  • is an official photographer on their official duty when he goes to Broadway?
Thanks, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We need to know if the photographer was a govt employee. This could have been taken by anyone and shared on Insta. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ANNAL AARU (2)ss.jpg

[edit]

low res bad quality Perumalism (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019-nCoV cases in Greater China.svg

[edit]

The Image File:2019-nCoV cases in Greater China.svg is marking Taiwan as part of China. Also, Arunachal Pradesh administered by India is given in yellow colour along with China. No Corona Virus victims are reported in Arunachal Pradesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antojpr (talk • contribs) 10:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. Arunachal Pradesh is colored not because of the coronavirus but because it is claimed by China, which is a fact. As a disputed territory, the color is apparently different from that of Tibet, where there is actually a coronavirus case. Greater China, the Chinese equivalent of which is actually a term in Chinese speaking areas to avoid controversy, means mainland China + Hong Kong + Macao + Taiwan, not just China, so Taiwan is colored. --34Unionist (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monyment of memory.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since) Regasterios (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be an own photo, however no FoP in Ukraine. --Regasterios (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:Pamyatnik. Fragment monyment of memory.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 17:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. No Permission from the sculptor. Created probably after 1960. Still no indication that author would have died 70 or more years ago. Random licensing, unclear copyright status. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:G2 Esports.png

[edit]

Copyright is held by G2 Esports and is unavailable under the stated license. CentreLeftRight ✉ 18:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. It's over the threshold of originality, doesn't fall into {{PD-textlogo}} category. Sir Lothar (talk) 09:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Astralis.png

[edit]

Copyright is held and enforced by Astralis and is unavailable under the stated license as its design is not simplistic enough and consists of more than just SIMPLE geometric shapes and text. CentreLeftRight ✉ 18:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. It's over the threshold of originality - COM:TO. Sir Lothar (talk) 09:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SK Gaming.png

[edit]

Copyright is held and enforced by SK Gaming and is unavailable under the stated license as its design is not simplistic enough and consists of more than just SIMPLE geometric shapes and text. CentreLeftRight ✉ 18:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ABC4434.jpg

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 — Ирука13 18:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Otakar Kubín - Bouquet (late 1920).jpg

[edit]

The painting is not yet in public domain: the author, Otakar Kubín died in 1969 GiantBroccoli (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Closeup non errected.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Close up view of male genitalia.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Closeup picture of a micropenis.JPG

[edit]

Non-useful image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Speeding like NAV banner.jpg

[edit]

COM:OTRS is required. I believe that even if the person is not notable, the photo is useful enough. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikipicjyw.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Lord Bolingbroke as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.donga.com/en/article/all/20200203/1968657/1/Pianist-Won-Jae-yeon-to-have-a-recital-in-Seoul
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as external hit is a massive crop[3] compared to our image. So, it can't be the source. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP. I found a version here - https://www.sac.or.kr/SacHome/perform/detail?searchSeq=41521 - Unlikely to be own work. Can undelete with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ferrol, Canido 02-43b.jpg

[edit]

Own photo is not the same as {{own}}. COM:DW ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gone_Postal, this photo is an image of a graffi at Ferrol, Spain, and in Spain there is Commons:Freedom of panorama. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abdulkadirbingol.jpg

[edit]

https://www.facebook.com/Dilkul.Ciziri/photos/a.218140861589270/229110490492307/?type=1&theater ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kingroland.jpg

[edit]

This has practically no educational use ~~ Alex Noble - talk 20:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think a bigger concern is Commons:COPYVIO. I have strong doubts this is completely the OPs own work. For example [4] seems to be the exact same frame although in a different colour. (And it sort of sounds like that is a real life frame with the other stuff remove which begs the question of who may own the copyright to the original frame.) I have strong suspicion the other elements are likewise from elsewhere. Without the OP having identified where each element came from, it's impossible for us to know if they are available under suitable licences. There's a good chance they are not. AFAIK, many clipart libraries and similar are royalty free but still have significant licence limitations generally only allowing you use them in your own work but not to sell the raw clipart. And since the OP misleading claimed this was entirely their own work we cannot trust them without them letting us verify the licence status. Nil Einne (talk) 10:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Nil Einne. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zarah Sultana MP.jpg

[edit]

This is the subject's Twitter profile picture; there is no copyright release so we cannot host it on Commons Andrew Gray (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imran Hussain MP.jpg

[edit]

This is taken from the subject's Twitter profile; there there is no copyright release so we cannot host it on Commons Andrew Gray (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imran Hussain MP.jpg

[edit]

Source is a minor Indian YouTube channel hosting five full minutes of Parliamentary Recording Unit footage from the UK House of Commons, under a CC-Attribution licence. OPL doesn't extend to such video footage (https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/), and the channel seems to be a collection of TV clips from different stations around the world, all CC-licenced. Unlikely to be with permission. Belbury (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gagan Mohindra MP.jpg

[edit]

This picture seems to be taken from a council website; there is no copyright release so we cannot host it on Commons Andrew Gray (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Foto PT zw.jpg

[edit]

missing permission - the photo's subject can't be the photographer 84.25.35.181 21:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mianserin synthesen 2.svg

[edit]

{{BadSVG}}, replaced by File:Synthesis Mianserin 1.svg and File:Synthesis Mianserin 2.svg. Leyo 22:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Captura190916.png

[edit]

test image Aitorembe (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:SS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graz4501 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The photographs may or may not be the work of the uploader, but the coin was designed by Giannino Castiglioni who died in 1971. They will be under copyright until January 1, 2042 and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from his heir.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nat Gold 1.jpg

[edit]

The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Only uploadings (the other is File:Nat Gold.jpg]]) by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader tries to cheat by additional uploading a mirrored version
--Achim (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and from fb per md. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nat Gold.jpg

[edit]

The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Only uploadings (the other is File:Nat Gold 1.jpg) by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader tries to cheat by additional uploading a mirrored version
--Achim (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Justago Logo.jpeg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 17:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Holy Family high school.jpg

[edit]

Unused file. So dark its of no use. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 04:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AmarJyoti AkkaMahadevi Poster.jpg

[edit]

Film poster. Unlikely {{own}}. At the very least we need COM:OTRS. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 10:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luis *.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation, small resolution and missing EXIF Jianhui67 T★C 06:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miladaku (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work: "FBMD" in exif data indicates that these images were copied from Facebook.

HyperGaruda (talk) 08:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Т. Г. Шевченка в с. Радча.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1990. No Permission from the sculptor Василь Гурмак. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Т. Г. Шевченку в Тисмениці.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1992. No Permission from the sculptor Любомир Яремчук та Микола Посікіра. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Артуру Бернсу.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2019. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Р. Шухевичу в Івано-Франківську.jpg

[edit]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2019, May 23. No Permission from the sculptors Ігор Семак та Євген Шатирко. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Пресвятій Родині.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2019, September. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Митрополиту Андрію Шептицькому. м. Івано-Франківськ.JPG

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2015. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник "Дерево щастя".jpg

[edit]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2009. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник шкільництву.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2005. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник шкільництву.jpg

[edit]

Re-uploaded Commons:Deletion requests/File:Пам'ятник шкільництву.jpg Микола Василечко (talk) 09:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник діячам "Руської трійці".jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2013. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Опанасу Заливасі.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2017. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник А. Мельнику.jpg

[edit]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2017. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Шандору Петефі.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2017. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пaм'ятник Івану Пулюю.jpg

[edit]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2015. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Погруддя Дмитру Гаху.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник Народному вчителю.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2018. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам’ятник «Пасхальне сонце».jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2008. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник мотоциклу.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2018. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник капітану "Титаніка" в Івано-Франківську.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2018. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник роботу-козаку.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2019. No Permission from the sculptor from ВПУ №21. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник С. Пушику.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2019. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Барельєф сотнику ОУН-УПА Шраму (Степан Бурдин).jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пам'ятник в с. Крушельниця.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1900. No Permission from the sculptor . Микола Василечко (talk) 10:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2016-07-08 09-24-25 ILCE-6300 DSC03561 (27674818693).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pominik-Nikifora-we-Lwowie.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2000. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2016-07-08 09-17-39 ILCE-6300 DSC03530 (27674197434).jpg

[edit]

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2016-07-08 09-53-29 ILCE-6300 DSC03630 (28009407570).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chondrima ei Raate.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work or just a blatant copyvio. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Gile Bre

[edit]

Files uploaded by User:Gile Bre. Unused fictional flags out of COM:SCOPE. Finnusertop (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loksabha Secretary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://loksabhaph.nic.in/Copyright.aspx?linkid=1

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT).→ VRT

Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR since source does not specify a free license. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jonas Lohrmann hält seine Jugend musiziert Urkunde neben einer Bach Statue.png

[edit]

From here Brotfried (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Btw: The uploader is blocked in :de. --Autumn Windfalls (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amadou Haya Sanogo.PNG

[edit]

Link is dead and not archived, no such video was found at the source. Image has both w:ORTM (presumably non-free) and VOA (pd-usgov) watermarks, making provenance unclear. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - the video from it comes from is still available in several place (e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4r-HUHtXtE ) and is not a VoA video. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Recm-06.02.20.jpg

[edit]

Ya no lo utilizare en este medio Recm sten (talk) 04:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Azad-university-logo.svg

[edit]

Bogus own work claim. However, the logo may be {{PD-Iran}}. Please determine the year the logo was first introduced. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danialbehzadi (talk) 09:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Molina Mehdy.jpg

[edit]

Previously published at https://www.facebook.com/thegentlemenmovers/photos/a.430396700630270/963348444001757/?type=3&theater Ytoyoda (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly published on the club website of the player https://carabins.umontreal.ca/... without free-licence granted : « © 2020 Carabins de l'Université de Montréal. Tous droits réservés. ». - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 18:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ضريح الامام علي بنجف.jpg

[edit]

Copyvio. Tineye finds many other sites where it was published in 2017, so {{own}} and today's date is a lie. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SF trolejbus.JPG

[edit]

Low-resolution, blurry photo, no longer in use. Plenty of better photos of this trolleybus model on Commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Derenovka.JPG

[edit]

And also

Small size, some do not metadata, others have different cameras. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shiroiwa Ruki produce101jp.jpg

[edit]

Official profile photo that most likely doesn't belonging to the uploader. See higher resolutions. Chiyako92 (talk) 09:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FRMHB.jpg

[edit]

Non free logo LeFnake (talk) 12:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Madurocarabobo11372107284111.jpg

[edit]

Author is Marcelo Garcia per Metadata, not own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hidroven fachada.jpg

[edit]

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hidrolara fachada.jpg

[edit]

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sistema hidraulico trujillano fachada.jpg

[edit]

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ali Banya.jpg

[edit]

Version of this photo previously published at http://sportlife.az/futbol/-, requires OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 05:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ймовірно, будинок біля синагоги, Бучач.jpg

[edit]

And also

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 08:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anna Dolata,2017.jpg

[edit]

Tiny picture taken from the web. Probably not taken by uploader: https://www.pinterest.com.au/annadolata/ grillo (talk) 12:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure, should I write the answer here? It is me who has talen this photo of Anna Dolata. If this is to small maybe there is others to "borrow" on the webb? Or how does that go about. I know that at Medeapriset.se there is images of her in a purple skirt.Leogirl1234 (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Picture 2s.jpg

[edit]

The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Noé à la soiré de Fafa loca l' été 2019 quand il à décidé d' exposer son style en buvant un max.jpg

[edit]

Photo d'une personne en train de boire, rien d'encyclopédique FHd (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طالقاني .jpg

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mahmoud Taleghani (2).JPG Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Christian Ferrer. --Didym (talk) 14:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trebron94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sv rapport1.pdf

[edit]

and File:Sv rapport2(1).pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tim Worley, NFL Player.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal file, out of Commons scope. Please note that file description ("Tim Worley, Former Player for the Chiacago Bears") is clearly wrong since the photo (dated 2016) depict a teenager while the football player Tim Worley was born in 1966 (and, by the way, has black skin as is possible to see with a search on the web). Civitas13 (talk) 17:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:86. Oviraptor.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted text and images. FunkMonk (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Close-up photographs of human penis.jpg

[edit]

Poor quality image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Il Commendatore Aldo Natoli Sindaco di Lierna, tiene un discorso in Piazza IV Novembre, 15 dicembre 1956.jpg

[edit]

While it is possible that this 1950s image is actuall the work of the uploader, as claimed, it is very unlikely. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wampa.jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. It's a costume made by a fan. --Clodion (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Clodion is totally right Jmex (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
All creative works are copyrighted. There is no evidence that the copyright holder of this work allows free use. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep COM:Costumes. It's a costume by a fan.--Huguespotter (talk) 08:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No evidence of copyright violation. --Cody escouade delta (d) 13:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The same. It's a costume made by a fan. --Éric Messel-2 (talk) 19:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wampa.jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to the description of this file, this photo was taken at "Star Wars The Exhibition". Please see this photo [5]. The object in this photo and the object in this file is the same. Is this made by a fan? Is this a costume? No. This is not a costume made by a fan. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Visitor's photo from an exhibition? Even the uploader's description states it is from an exhibition - how could it be fan made and free from copyright? /Sofie Sigrinn (talk) 13:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blas Ricardo Sanz.jpg

[edit]

File:Blas_Ricardo_Sanz.jpg JoseLu987 (talk) 10:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per metadata, grabbed from facebook; no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blas Ricardo Sanz.jpg

[edit]

I don't like this photo Vegetal123 (talk) 10:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Markus Portrait.jpg

[edit]

Its a professional Photo an so permisson needed. Brotfried (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got the permission by Markus schroeppel to publish this picture under creative commons license on wikipedia. ExtraOrdinaryCrafts (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; can be undeleted when we get permission. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarah von Neuburg und Schwester Noelle bei einer Oktoberfestveranstaltung.jpg

[edit]

All of the user's uploads are photos of this media personality. The other 5 have all been deleted as copyright violations, stolen from the subjects social media pages. I think the uploader has forfeited assumption of good will for the one remaining image the true source not yet identified. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thumb indicating scale of a glans penis.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A close up of human foreskin.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful photo of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 02:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep DR created by blatant sockpuppet. Good resolution photo, illustrative close-up. --Fæ (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Firstly the file has been on this site for 3 years, in that time some other projects not based on Wikimedia may have started using it and rely on it for their licene continuity. This project is here to provide educationally useful media not a small amount of educationally useful media. Secondly this is a high quality image in the category, that has only 87 images. Are you honestly suggesting that this is enough? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Semen ejaculated from my penis.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful photo of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep raised by a 1 day sockpuppet account and supported by an self declared anti-pron warrior. This is obviously in scope and has been hosted on this project for 11 years. --Fæ (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erected length increase (1).jpg

[edit]

Non-useful image of two dildos Glandular (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ALDO NATOLI.jpg

[edit]

{{delete|reason=While it is possible that this 1950s image is actuall the work of the uploader, as claimed, it is very unlikely. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per voce and jim. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tigutorn

[edit]

According to en:List of tallest buildings in Estonia, the building is from 2008, so the architect has presumably not yet been dead for at least 70 years. I skipped a few files in the category where the tower arguably is de minimis.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:45, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tigutorn

[edit]

Modern building so copyright still valid, and there is no FOP in Estonia. I'm not sure if some images could be ok per de minimis.

kyykaarme (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mahmoud Taleghani (2).JPG

[edit]

Copyright at source. Besides it's unlikely that image has been first published in Iran at the claimed date (that's it: under the Shah Regime). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: com:PCP No evidence of publication or public presentation in Iran. --Hanooz 18:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taro Hayami.jpg

[edit]

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musicfancy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Anguillara Sabazia

[edit]

Touristic panels, copyrighted by the Town council. They are PD in Italy 20 years after publication under {{PD-ItalyGov}}. These ones look pretty recent.

Ruthven (msg) 15:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo PET EMB.svg

[edit]

It was uploaded as mine by a mistake Luiz F.L. Franco (talk) 13:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Catalogue of the Trustees, Faculty and Students, of the University of North Carolina (1860-1861) - DPLA - 501a9e1e015c9b03158b4f9eaf5b8e05 (page 44).jpg

[edit]

Azért, mert Nonszensz Macskelek (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Center for Immigration Studies Certified Copy of Original Articles of Incorporation (01.09.86).pdf

[edit]

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Glauco area.png

[edit]

Rhythmical13 (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Close-up photographs of human penis 2.jpg

[edit]

Poor quality image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Close-up photographs of human penis 2.jpg

[edit]

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 14:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per previous DR and Ikan Kekek. Also, the juxtaposition of long, curly hairs on the legs and short, straight hairs on and around the penis is interesting. Brianjd (talk) 13:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it’s fine Dronebogus (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. ✗plicit 01:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:00 Penis.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:00 Penis.jpg

[edit]

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:00. Erect Penis Circumference.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A partially engorged penis.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Unshaved korean penis.jpg

[edit]

Non-useful image of uploader's genitals Glandular (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hassan-Baha-Eddine-Diab.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Panam2014 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://libnanews.com/qui-est-hassan-diab/
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as external image is a massive crop[6] compared to our image. So, it can't be the source. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: 3 February 2020 - 26 January : it is clearly a copyvio. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Found on https://www.gettyimages.fi/photos/hassan-diab?family=editorial&phrase=hassan%20diab&sort=mostpopular - likely to be a copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PM Albin Kurti attending Ceremonial Guard during handover of government.jpg

[edit]

Not found at URL. Anyway The Prime Minister Office - All rights reserved 2018 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The original picture can be found at this URL 46.99.16.246 19:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still copyrighted: Zyra e Kryeministrit të Kosovës - Të gjitha të drejtat e rezervuara 2018 --Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abdullah Naveed.jpg

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request -Abdullah Naveed (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC) File:Abdullah Naveed.jpg[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mmmm Tasty Sheep.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a coprighted logo Ytoyoda (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lacava y Nicolás Maduro.png

[edit]

Video was unavailable on YouTube, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep CC-BY licensed video, (archive). --Jamez42 (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lacava 2017.png

[edit]

Video was unavailable on YouTube, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep CC-BY licensed video (archive) --Jamez42 (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rodolfo Marco Torres.png

[edit]

Video was unavailable on YouTube, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep CC-BY licensed video (archive) --Jamez42 (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marco Torres y Nicolás Maduro.png

[edit]

Video was unavailable on YouTube, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep CC-BY licensed video (archive) --Jamez42 (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luisa Ortega Díaz and Nicolás Maduro.png

[edit]

Video was unavailable on YouTube, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep CC-BY licensed video. See here.--ZiaLater (talk) 05:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, video with Creative Commons license. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nicolas Maduro February 2017.png

[edit]

Video was unavailable on YouTube, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep CC-BY licensed video. See here.--ZiaLater (talk) 05:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, video with Creative Commons license. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I put an archived version in the source, there you can see that it did have a license that allows reuse. --Gindomarlo (talk) 02:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nicolas Maduro military.jpg

[edit]

Video was unavailable on YouTube, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep CC-BY licensed video. See here.--ZiaLater (talk) 05:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, video with Creative Commons license. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eva Golinger and Nicolas Maduro.jpg

[edit]

Video was unavailable on YouTube, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cosplay of Darth Vader

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. It's fan cosplay. --Clodion (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per COM:COSTUME - AdamBMorgan (talk) 19:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per COM:COSTUME, it's cosplay. --Archimëa (talk) 12:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It's fan cosplay Jmex (talk) 09:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per COM:COSTUME --Cody escouade delta (d) 13:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It's fan cosplay. --Éric Messel-2 (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cosplay of Darth Vader

[edit]

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. And, COM:COSTUME says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted". These are based on a existing character design. So, these photo are not permitted.

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vader at Dragoncon 2010.jpg, Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of First Order Stormtroopers and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Darth Vader.

And, File:Darth vader cosplay (14049852150) (cropped).jpg has been deleted as copyvio.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't think that line from COM:COSTUME was meant to be taken as "if A, then B; therefore, if not A, then not B", but rather that photographs of potentially or otherwise non-free costumes have unclear status on Commons. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cosplay at NYCC (60421).jpg, Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/01#Sesame Street, and the last sentence of COM:COSTUME (Present consensus has adopted the view that in order to be a copyright violation, "[t]he photo would have to be primarily of the mask or other separable element of the costume, e.g. focusing on the expression inherent in the mask distinct from that of the general character."). -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 02:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Needless to say, the mask is point. As you can see, these are photos wearing the mask. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per @MGA73: above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please see File:Darth vader cosplay (14049852150) (cropped).jpg. Photo of Darth Vader cosplay has been deleted as copyvio. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Please see these DRs. All nominated files have been deleted.

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cosplay of Darth Vader

[edit]

The source file, File:Darth Vader cosplayer (13962210033) (cropped).jpg, has been deleted. Wikimedia Commons is not able to keep these files.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cosplay of Darth Vader

[edit]

per the recently closed DR.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Most of the pictures were kept above last year. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's a judgement made by a non-admin. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete in general. The design of Darth Vader most certainly is under copyright, and these are photographs of duplications/derivative works of that design.  Mysterymanblue  08:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Star Wars is certainly under copyright, but costumes, in general, are “useful articles” categorically ineligible for copyright protection. (Many of these images also contain depictions of other characters, so separate inquiries would be required to determine the copyright status of those images.) The Copyright Office stated, in “Registrability of Costume Designs,” that costumes are useful articles, and thus could only be registered (for copyright protection) if they met the standards for separability. There are two methods by which a copyrightable work may be separated from a useful article: physically and conceptually. To be physically separable, the work and the article must be able to be separated physically. An example is a sculptured base to a lamp: the lamp is a useful article, while the sculptured base is a creative work. To be conceptually separable, while not being physically separable, it must be possible to imagine the work separate from the article. An example is a design printed on a shirt, or etched on the back of a chair: the design itself is physically connected to the work, but can be imagined as a separate work. A rather preliminary overview of the costumes here nominated does not indicate to me that there is a creative work which can be either physically or conceptually separated from the “useful article” costume. Therefore, I would keep these works as to the current deletion reason. A search through Copyright Office records buttresses my conclusion: while there is a registration for a Darth Vader sculpture, there is no registration for the costume itself, as would be expected if the costume was eligible for copyright. The closure of the earlier discussion was made by a user who is currently an administrator, and could close this discussion as an administrator on the same grounds. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. In an answer to the remark of TE(æ)A,ea, I do not think these costumes are useful articles. Some other costumes perhaps are useful. These are for playing and showing only. --Ellywa (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo-sd-large.jpg

[edit]

This is a logotype for a political party. It is not owned by the uploader so the uploader can't give it a free licence. grillo (talk) 12:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copyvio. /Julle (talk) 14:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AlternativforSverige.jpg

[edit]

This is a logotype for a political party. It is not owned by the uploader so the uploader can't give it a free licence. grillo (talk) 12:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copyvio. /Julle (talk) 14:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Riot Games (2019).svg and File:RIOT Games.png

[edit]

Not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The white lines in the fist portion of the logo are below TOO. 49.146.8.70 03:21, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Source makes no mention that image is freely licensed and has notice "© 2017 Riot Games. All Rights Reserved". Skazi (talk) 19:36, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Take a look at File:Blizzard Entertainment Logo.svg. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 49.146.8.2 (talk) 03:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a vote! Can you stop changing IP addresses?! Your opinion is already clear. Skazi (talk) 10:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: The fist logo may be in between TOO. en:File:Riot Games wordmark.svg is ineligible for copyright. I consider  Delete and replace with wordmark. Arianator with love (talk) 07:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:19180814-komuch troops marching through kazan.jpg

[edit]

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gunshiro Motizuki's Statues.jpg

[edit]

Work of living sculptor Masakuni Tomita (富田眞州). Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such statues. Yasu (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PA-Rotmistrov-01.jpg

[edit]

no proof of PD status: No proof that author dead for more than 70 years. Wikipeder (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Jcb (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PA-Rotmistrov-01.jpg

[edit]

no indication of early enough publication to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Novomyrhorod prapor.jpg

[edit]

File is out of use and superceded by SVG and PNG versions. VileGecko (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Chaoyangmen Station (Line 6)

[edit]

{{FoP-China}} only applies to outdoor public places. These photos are apparently taken at indoor places.

Wcam (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zagroda Felicji Curyłowej w Zalipiu.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no permission (No permission since) Regasterios (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be own photo, and Muzeum Okręgowe w Tarnowie is identical to Dudek 1947. --Regasterios (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Previously published at https://muzeum.tarnow.pl/zwiedzanie/oddzialy/zagroda-curylowej-w-zalipiu/informacje/ without any evidence of a free license. To restore this file, please have the copyright holder send permission to COM:OTRS. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PAX East 2016 Star Fox Zero Arwing Cinemagraph.webm

[edit]

Its a COM:DW but it is a short ciip. MGA73 (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP. "it is a short clip" is a fair use argument. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:People's March For Europe London Saturday September 9 2017.webm

[edit]

The video is no longer at Flickr so we cant verify the license. MGA73 (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Musee des beaux-arts besançon.jpg

[edit]

Ce fichier a été pris par mes soins et comporte des informations personelles Creepeurman (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A.D. Henderson, Jr.tif

[edit]

Unless our uploader is over 100 years old, this is not {{Own}} work as he claims. We cannot keep it without knowing its actual photographer and its publication history if any.

Also, please note that, with limited exceptions which do not apply here, the tif format is not permitted on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jameslwoodward I have updated the A.D. Henderson, Jr.tif with a new license as PD-because as Hagley Museum and Library has granted permission to use this image. It was published 1926.--Greghenderson2006 (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The permission from Hagley is irrelevant because the image is PD from being published in the US between 1926 and 1979 without a copyright notice. However, that does not change the fact that, as noted above, Commons does not keep tif images. Please upload this again as a jpg with the same licensing that I have put on this version. This version will be deleted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, no problem. File has now been replaced with: Alex D. Henderson Jr.jpg with the licensing PD-US no notice. Thanks for your help.--Greg Henderson 19:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Angelina Weaver Henderson.jpg

[edit]

This image is clearly not {{Own}} work of the uploader as claimed. While it is probably PD, we need to know its history in order to keep it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jameslwoodward I have updated the Angelina Weaver Henderson.jpg with a new license as PD-US-expired as it was published before January 1, 1925.--Greghenderson2006 (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In order to keep it on that basis, you must prove its publication before 1925 or without notice, as you did with at least one other image. The file description says that it has been in a family album. That does not constitute publication as required by copyright law. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Changed PD-US-expired to PD-US-unpublished as the work was never published and has no copyright. The author of the work is unknonw and is long dead as the photo was taken around 1900 (she died in 1909). --Greg Henderson 17:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greghenderson2006 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion remains. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 32

Nominating all files where the mosque's architecture is the main subject. Per previous deletion requests: no COM:FOP Morocco, so copyrighted until 2070 (architect Michel Pinseau died in 1999).

HyperGaruda (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:23, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 33

[edit]

Recent work of architecture by Michel Pinseau, not allowed in Commons because no FOP in Morocco.

Darwin Ahoy! 19:56, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Three photos showing mosaics and two showing interior architecture. Commercial freedom of panorama is not allowed in Morocco. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg Per COM:FOP Morocco:"It shall be permitted, without the author’s authorization or payment of a fee, to republish, broadcast or communicate to the public by cable an image of a work of architecture, a work of fine art, a photographic work, or a work of applied art which is permanently located in a place open to the public, unless the image of the work is the main subject of such a reproduction, broadcast or communication and if it is used for commercial purposes." The main subject of File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg is the person. Also, Michel Pinseau is not the author of the mosaics. إيان (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@إيان: Commons does not host files that are not resuable for commercial end-users. Per COM:Licensing#Forbidden licenses, non-commercial licenses are not allowed. Moroccan FOP is simply unacceptable. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What about File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg? If its main subject is the person, then the image can be used also for commercial purposes, if I understand the quote correctly (I cannot see the image as the file was deleted a few days ago). –LPfi (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 34

[edit]

No FOP in Morocco

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg is previously published and would need a separate VRT permission from the photographer even if we obtained a general permission for the mosque. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 35

[edit]

No FOP in Morocco

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

as these have been blurred out,
Delete the other 2 as non-savable. –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
People browsing through these may want to know what the building sort of looked like..... The blurred images still have some scope and value to them, You nominated these due to characters being present however I have obviously resolved that so at this point there's currently no valid reason to delete them. –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've struck 2 images since both of those sort of have the same view in other images, The 2 remaining images don't have that area in it and so for that reason imho those 2 should be kept,
These images IMHO still have some value to them and regardless of usage readers will want to know what the building inside looks like and the area in both images hasn't been taken in any other images in the main category. –Davey2010Talk 15:02, 13 February 2020
One image is currently not blurred due to WMF constantly bringing up server errors, Until the WMF get that fixed unfortunately for the time being the image will have to remain unblurred as there's no possible way new versions can be uploaded, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016

[edit]

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Fails DW and Out of scope anyway. (Not that it needs reiterating but these were all uploaded as part of an album and limitations at Flickr2Commons meant they all had to be uploaded IE couldn't pick and choose). –Davey2010Talk 00:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arianit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of scale models. See User:Elcobbola/Models, particularly this section for full explanation. Brief examples: The official U.S. Copyright Office visual arts registration form (Form VA) includes "scale model" as a category. Gay Toys, Inc. v. Buddy L Corp., 703 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1983) found "Other than the portrayal of a real airplane, a toy airplane, like a painting, has no intrinsic utilitarian function" (i.e. these are not useful articles).

Эlcobbola talk 20:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea about copyright law affecting photos of model airplanes. I would invite others who can prove otherwise to argue here. I took a photo of a physical object. Arguying the contrary will lead to ridiculous ends. --Arianit (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:01, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arianit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The Prime Minister Office - All rights reserved 2018

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All public websites in Kosovo do this unknowingly, that notice has not been updated since 2018 by the way. Please refer to Article 12 of the copyright law. This is a public website reporting on the public functions of the head of office, see here Template:PD-KosovoGov/en. The law overrides any notice placed there. --Arianit (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Arianit: I'm not sure "official material" is about photos but let's an Administrator decide. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translation of the law referenced by the template (not much more specific):
Copyright does not include:
1.1. ideas, principles, guidelines, procedures, discoveries or mathematical concepts as such.
1.2. laws, bylaws and other regulations.
1.3. official materials and publications of parliamentary, governmental and organizational bodies
others performing public functions.
1.4. official translations of regulations and other official materials, as well as agreements
international and other instruments.
1.5. submissions and other acts in administrative or judicial proceedings.
1.6. official materials published for public information.
1.7. folk expressions.
1.8. daily news and various information that has the character of ordinary reporting
of the media.
– BMacZero (🗩) 22:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-KosovoGov}} applies. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leyda valley Pinot.jpg

[edit]

The packaging maybe copyrighted. Although the text is simple, and the little figurines are in public domain most likely, but somebody had to take photograph of them and that has its copyright. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete/Redact As User:Gone Postal noted, the figurines on the label are protected by copyright even though the rest of the label probably isn't. There's no real agreement among the courts on how much blurring you have to do before something isn't a derivative work anymore as far as I know, so I'd recommend a solid redaction bar. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ski-BASE Jumping.webm

[edit]

Most likely copyvio by the Youtube Uploader, no evidence the original sources were released under CC-BY-SA 4.0 Gyrostat (talk) 13:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the original YouTube link it explicitly states that it is available for public usage under the Creative Commons licensing agreement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snakey123 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Snakey123: Absolutely, that's why I assume that this is a copyvio by the YT user. I don't see how a channel with less than 200 subscribers and less than 50 views on a video can produce such low res videos with helicopters shots. I might add that the topic of this video is inconsistent with the rest of the channel. Now it's not our business to deal with copyvios on YT, but files have to be released under CC by the original creator, which is most unlikely here. Gyrostat (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially, however the only way that that would be confirmed would be by contacting the youtube user directly. Do you suggest that I do that? I feel it is just as likely that this video is correctly licensed under creative commons as the uploader is the one solely responsible for the creation of the video. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snakey123 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the video sources have to be released under CC for this video to be licensed under CC, that's the all point of Creative Commons licences. If you could have answers from the youtube user, I guess we would have facts to rely on. Gyrostat (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for engaging this. What do you recommend I do moving forward? And what can I do in the future to make sure this doesn't happen again? I thought that this video was under the correct licensing, how do I find out these answers? I am new and would like to learn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snakey123 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The best way to avoid this is to be sure that the person uploading the CC video is indeed the person that created the original files. If he is obvisouly not, you must check that the original files are also available under the same CC licence, otherwise it's a copyvio. Sadly, it's a little detective game most of the time if the video/photographer does not usually publish under CC. Gyrostat (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adyaniz y maduro.jpg

[edit]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f8/Adyaniz_y_maduro.jpg/600px-Adyaniz_y_maduro.jpgTransmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: EXIF indicates external source. --JuTa 04:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peteris slavens.jpg

[edit]

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks OK to me. --JuTa 04:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:19180910-wreck of voisin plane kasan.jpg

[edit]

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks OK to me. --JuTa 04:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:19180910-wreck of voisin plane kasan.jpg

[edit]

STILL NO INDICATION of early enough publication to be public domain (regardless of when it was created)! It CAN'T be PD in Russia at all unless it was published before 1950, but we have no indication of publication date early enough - just a URL and an unsubstantiated claim that is was PD in 1996 from a previous deletion request that did not provide any required information. Vauge statement of "looks OK to me" by ruling admin (with history of Russian copyright misunderstandings) goes against all existing copyright law and doesn't provide any basis for support of PD claim. "Looking OK" (whatever that means) to someone with little knowledge of copyright law isn't sufficient grounds for keep. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:19180910-trotzy 1st moscovian regiment after the sucessful capture of kazan.jpg

[edit]

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks OK to me. --JuTa 04:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:19180910-trotzy 1st moscovian regiment after the sucessful capture of kazan.jpg

[edit]

STILL NO INDICATION of early enough publication to be public domain (regardless of when it was created)! Sourcing is VERY poor, only info is jpg link, not sufficient by Wikimedia standards. It CAN'T be PD in Russia at all UNLESS it was published before 1950, but we have NO indication of publication date early enough - just a URL and an unsubstantiated claim that is was PD in 1996 from a previous deletion request that did not provide any required information. Vauge statement of "looks OK to me" by ruling admin (with history of Russian copyright misunderstandings) in previous deletion request goes against all existing copyright law and doesn't provide any basis for support of PD claim. "Looking OK" (whatever that means) to someone with little knowledge of copyright law isn't sufficient grounds for keep. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:19180910-mounted soldiers of 5th red army maching into kazan.jpg

[edit]

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks OK to me. --JuTa 04:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:19180910-mounted soldiers of 5th red army maching into kazan.jpg

[edit]

STILL no indication of early enough PUBLICATION (by 1950) required for item to be PD, sourcing incredibly insufficient, regardless of what vague and confused statements the admin in the previous deletion nomination made in contradiction to all facts. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1921-artillery south of kronstadt.jpg

[edit]

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD. Where and when was it first published? PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks OK to me. --JuTa 04:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1921-artillery south of kronstadt.jpg

[edit]

STILL NO INDICATION of early enough publication to be public domain (regardless of when it was created)! Sourcing is VERY poor, only info is jpg link, not sufficient by Wikimedia standards. It CAN'T be PD in Russia at all UNLESS it was published before 1950, but we have NO indication of publication date early enough - just a URL and an unsubstantiated claim that is was PD in 1996 from a previous deletion request that did not provide any required information. Vauge statement of "looks OK to me" by ruling admin (with history of Russian copyright misunderstandings) in previous deletion request goes against all existing copyright law and doesn't provide any basis for support of PD claim. "Looking OK" (whatever that means) to someone with little knowledge of copyright law isn't sufficient grounds for keep. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've traced it back to Kronstadt insurgency 1921 of the year: myths and ordinariness, which rather cryptically indicates its sources as: (1) Kronstadt 1921. Documents. / Russia XX century. M., 1997, and (2) Semanov, S. N., Kronstadt Rebellion. M., 2003. I don't know where I'd find the former but I think the latter is OCLC 52448901. czar 09:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Are you able to translate this caption? It appears to have been previously published. I don't see it live on boat.ucoz.ru so might need some help searching in Cyrillic. czar 09:51, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also Avrich (1970) doesn't use this photo but credits his similar photographic illustrations to w:Helsinki University Library, so that's a good place to ask about this. czar 23:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
1997 publication IS NOT EARLY ENOUGH.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's definitely from 1921 but I'm still tracking down first publication. The Helsinki library was helpful and had some new images but not this one. See the article's talk page for additional research. I'm emailing a Russian archive. czar 02:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TASS 216646 lists its provenance as unknown. czar 00:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Lazar Kaganovich

[edit]

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD (mostly 2000's books or modern websites, no way early enough). Or, published early enough, but with an attribution that renders the item still copyrighted.

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



In regards to File:Joseph Stalin Lazar Kaganovich 1933.jpg, we do not know if the (A Oshurkov) died defore the cut-off date (1 January 1946), and we do not know if the photos by Troshkin and Langman were published early enough - the links are to modern websites, and they can't be used if that website indicated was the earliest publication, regardless of when the author died. They all have to have been published early enough to be PD, and right now there is no reason to think so for those two.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"No reason to think" that the "1938 album" was published in 1938? Do you mean that the provided source is not reliable enough for that claim, or what? --INS Pirat (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@INS Pirat: That one must have slipped my watch, removing it from the list. As for the photos by Troshkin - remember that copyright countdown begins on publication date, not death date of photographer, if a photo is published posthumously. AND Troshkin was a participant in the GPW, so unless we have evidence the Troshkin photos were published early enough sans attribution, they can't be here. The "no reason to think" comment was a reference to the books published after the fall of the USSR cited as sole sources.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In regards to the Troshkin photos - let's remember the annotation from the licence. "If the work was first published posthumously, the copyright term is counted from the date of that first publication, unless the author was later rehabilitated, in which case it runs again from that later rehabilitation date." As far as I know, the photos from RIA novosti by Torshkin were first published in the 2000's as indicated in the url's from the source section, NOT in enough time for their copyright to have expired within a 74 year countdown. Right now, no works by Troshkin published after 1945 can be PD in Russia because of the Great Patriotic War clause and the rules about posthumous publication.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thx, it's discussing in Russian Wikipedia: [9]. See p. 3 in art. 1281 of GK RF. Lesless (talk) 05:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, 2018 is after 2015, so it does not fall under p.3 of article 1281, and it will be free too.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@George Shuklin: No, they are considered to be copyrighted unless early enough publication is found. We cannot assume those photos from the museum had been published by the 1940's, we need to know what publication from early enough (if such publication existed) they were in. Just because the museum did not label the authors of the photos doesn't mean they are public domain - again, this all goes back to when they were first published. Right now, the earliest know publication date for them when they were shown at a museum in the 21st century - NOT long enough for anything to fall into the public domain, author known or not. However - if the museum is the copyright holder of the photos, AND they are willing of officially release them under a license permitted by Wikimedia (such as CC-BY-SA 4.0), then the photos could stay. Consider writing the museum a letter asking for them to send an OTRS permission letter to Wikimedia.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @PlanespotterA320: I think, you should not simply revert sysop actions. Please begin new requests instead of revert actions.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Ahonc: Just bc they's a sysop or whatever doesn't mean they know anything about copyright. Nobody has yet to provide an indication of early enough publication for those photos, and because Russia has the posthumous publication clause, the nomination will stand. Considering the only publication information given is that they were uploaded by RIA Novosti in the 2010's, we have absolutely no reason to think they are PD right now, regardless of when the author died. Being by Troshkin is not an excuse for not being published in time.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Well, it is your opinion. But your opinion is not only right opinion. If you think that photos are not free, it is not mean that they are not free. I am near-native speaker of Russian language, so it is more easy to understand Russian law for me, than for you. And also, I read discussion on WP in ruwiki. If images of Troshkin are first published after 2015-01-01 thay are free. There is no evedence now that images are published earlier, and that's why these images consider as free.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • We can't be certain that the RIAN website was the first publication. (For example, if they were published in the 1960's, we would have to wait many years, and Wikipedia would be in trouble for uploading copyrighted photos from RIAN) We don't know when the first publication was for sure, but we do know that we don't have proof they were published in the 1940's to be PD by virtue of publication time lapsing either. Discussions on ruwiki are merely other people stating what they think, anyone can write anything. Let's stick to pure fact. It is an objective FACT that the Russian Civil code has a posthumous publication clause. The requirements for something to be public domain, clearly outlined in Template:PD-Russia (including in the footnotes), are not met by most of the photos in the Troshkin category. Read the copyright law and the PD-Russia template, or don't participate in these discussions. Being a Russian should not give you more leverage on the topic - considering that a vast majority of Russians are completely naive about their country's copyright law. You don't need to be a Russian to read various unofficial, quality translations of Russian copyright law.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Why did you make such conclusion? Copyright law says: Исключительное право на произведение, обнародованное после смерти автора, действует в течение семидесяти лет после обнародования произведения, считая с 1 января года, следующего за годом его обнародования, при условии, что произведение было обнародовано в течение семидесяти лет после смерти автора. Copyright term is 70 years if work was published during 70 years after author's death. 1944+70+1=2015, so Troshkin's works, first published after 2015-01-01 are certainly free.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • But how do we know that the files from 2018 from RIA Novosti were the FIRST publication? They easily could be re-publications of stuff published in print from the 20th century, albeit after the cutoff date - like hundreds of other photos from RIA Novosti.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
            • Your question "how do we know" that the 2018 publication of a photo was the first publication is the same as asking for proof that the photo was NOT published before 2018. But this is impossible. You cannot prove what is not but only what is. If you want to rule out use of a photo because you think it was published before 2018, then it is your responsibility to prove that is the case. In the absence of such proof, it is reasonable to accept the 2018 publication as earliest. Dayirmiter (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: they looking OK to me. --JuTa 05:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NikolayShvernik.jpg

[edit]

Currently unknown if its in the public domain in the United States Trust Is All You Need (talk) 06:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+ In addition it lacks sources. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 06:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NikolayShvernik.jpg

[edit]

No indication of early enough publication to be public domain anywhere. It can't be PD in Russia at all unless it was published before 1950, but we have no indication of publication date early enough - just a URL and an unsubstantiated claim that is was PD in 1996 from a previous deletion request that did not provide any required information. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: look OK to me. --JuTa 04:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NikolayShvernik.jpg

[edit]

STILL NO indication of early enough publication to be public domain anywhere. It can't be PD in Russia at all unless it was published before 1950, but we have no indication of publication date early enough - just a URL and an unsubstantiated claim that is was PD in 1996 from a previous deletion request that did not provide any required information. Vauge statement of "looks OK to me" by ruling admin (with history of Russian copyright misunderstandings) goes against all existing copyright law and doesn't provide any basis for support of PD claim. "Looking OK" (whatever that means) to someone with little knowledge of copyright law isn't sufficient grounds for keep. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bablu Baghel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random files of people celebrating w:Holi and the others do not seem to have any educational value all seem to be out of COM:SCOPE

- FitIndia Talk Mail 17:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Multiple photos are in use, some other files have in my opinion educational value as well. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: On a side note, the uploader is indef blocked on en-wiki for undisclosed paid editing and socking. GSS (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bhidauni.jpg, Baghel Samaj.jpg and Bhidauni Road.jpg are no longer in use. GSS (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most. Kept some due to usage, motiv or OTRS. --JuTa 05:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Houston Astros World Series Champs logo.svg

[edit]

The MLB logo is too complex. Tbhotch™ 19:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as the MLB logo appears to have lapsed into public domain. The logo was introduced in 1969 and appears to have lacked a copyright notice when it was used. I found these 1969 World Series tickets which use the logo and don't have copyright notices (including on the backs of the tickets). It seems that {{PD-US-no notice}} should apply. –IagoQnsi (talk) 22:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --JuTa 04:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NNVoronov1940.jpg

[edit]

no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • This work was originally published anonymously or under a pseudonym before January 1, 1943 and the name of the author did not become known during 50 years after publication. Это довоенная форма до 1941 года.--KSK (talk) 17:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just because the photo was taken early enough does not mean it was published early enough. WHERE was it published? What newspaper/book/magazine/poster/other publication? I can't just take your word, we need the exact publication or some other proof it was published when you claim it was. Anyway, It's by Aleksandr Ustinov (1909 – 1995).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 04:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/02/08&oldid=479029882"