Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
It does not have the aproval of the other person on the photo Arne Jose Muller (talk) 09:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 09:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
???????? Alibigrap (talk) 11:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC) Sorry for problem, i was trying to learn about templates. You can delete this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaJaRok95 (talk • contribs) 11:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Test upload. --Achim (talk) 13:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gruene-bt-fraktion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission needed from STEFAN_KAMINSKI
- File:Gerhard Zickenheiner MdB.jpg
- File:Daniela Wagner MdB.jpg
- File:Beate Walter-Rosenheimer MdB.jpg
- File:Julia Verlinden MdB.jpg
- File:Jürgen Trittin MdB.jpg
- File:Markus Tressel MdB.jpg
- File:Margit Stumpp MdB.jpg
- File:Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn-MdB.jpg
- File:Kordula Schulz-Asche MdB.jpg
- File:Stefan Schmidt MdB.jpg
- File:Frithjof Schmidt MdB.jpg
- File:Ulle Schauws MdB.jpg
- File:Manuel Sarrazin MdB.jpg
- File:Corinna Rüffer MdB.jpg
- File:Manuela Rottmann MdB.jpg
- File:Claudia Roth MdB.jpg
- File:Tabea Rößner MdB.jpg
- File:Filiz Polat MdB.jpg
- File:Lisa Paus MdB.jpg
- File:Friedrich Ostendorff MdB.jpg
- File:Cem Özdemir MdB.jpg
- File:Omid Nouripour MdB.jpg
- File:Konstantin von Notz MdB.jpg
- File:Ingrid Nestle MdB.jpg
- File:Beate Müller-Gemmeke MdB.jpg
- File:Claudia Müller MdB.jpg
- File:Irene Mihalic MdB.jpg
- File:Tobias Lindner MdB.jpg
- File:Steffi Lemke MdB.jpg
- File:Sven Lehmann MdB.jpg
- File:Monika Lazar MdB.jpg
- File:Markus Kurth MdB.jpg
- File:Christian Kühn MdB.jpg
- File:Oliver Krischer MdB.jpg
- File:Sylvia Kotting-Uhl MdB.jpg
- File:Maria Klein-Schmeink MdB.jpg
- File:Sven-Christian Kindler MdB.jpg
- File:Katja Keul MdB.jpg
- File:Uwe Kekeritz MdB.jpg
- File:Kirsten Kappert-Gonther MdB.jpg
- File:Dieter Janecek MdB.jpg
- File:Ottmar von Holtz MdB.jpg
- File:Dr. Anton Hofreiter MdB.jpg
- File:Bettina Hoffmann MdB.jpg
- File:Britta Haßelmann MdB.jpg
- File:Anja Hajduk MdB.jpg
- File:Erhard Grundl MdB.jpg
- File:Stefan Gelbhaar MdB.jpg
- File:Kai Gehring MdB.jpg
- File:Matthias Gastel MdB.jpg
- File:Harald Ebner MdB.jpg
- File:Katharina Dröge MdB.jpg
- File:Katja Dörner MdB.jpg
- File:Ekin Deligoez MdB.jpg
- File:Anna Christmann MdB.jpg
- File:Franziska Brantner MdB.jpg
- File:Danyal Bayaz MdB.jpg
- File:Canan Bayram MdB.jpg
- File:Margarete Bause MdB.jpg
- File:Lisa Badum MdB.jpg
- File:Luise Amtsberg MdB.jpg
- File:Annalena Baerbock MdB.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 13:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
hi @ all, The user is already authorized by the OTRS team --> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Gruene-bt-fraktion. The account is an official account of the GRUENE faction in the german Bundestag, the author of the pictures has authorized the publication by the faction _and_ is working for the faction himself. There is no need to delete these pictures. Bernd Fiedler (WMDE) (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the situation here is very clear. OTRS is set. Stefan Kaminski is part of "Gruene-bt-fraktion". --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not "own work" by any stretch of imagination. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:31, 22 Januar 2020 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (COM:CSD#F2) https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQSsAIJnIxrsbbomBMapAILELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKIkRihGiHJQRlRH6FqEcixH8FvsW7CPGLO0jtCzELJQsoCn6I_1EjsiMaMBJohPwLYFTlBoNFOkDEV_1-DdlM-0BgOoLGD4dqZXgeeXXdYF2eH6j9dBRxnPT52wiAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEjCA4KQwLEJ3twQkanAEKGQoGcG9zdGVy2qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wMW41anEKGwoIcmVpbmRlZXLapYj2AwsKCS9tLzAxMjZnYwoeCgtwZXJmb3JtYW5jZdqliPYDCwoJL20vMDFncTUzCiEKDXBob3RvIGNhcHRpb27apYj2AwwKCi9tLzBiNzV3ZzQKHw --Krdbot 20:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate. Msangjunboon2018 (talk) 13:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:05, 22 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: taken from Dotkiwi also printset https://www.google.de/imgres?imgurl=https://i.pinimg.com/236x/8f/fc/d9/8ffcd9bb8c9666dabe86d8309c66fbc2.jpg&imgrefurl=https://www.pinterest.de/koreanspoolstar/wallpapers/&h=498&w=236&tbnid=1kpVfo0KYghtNM&tbnh=326&tbnw=154&usg=AI4_-kRpydpLWL2Ecr5G5UJKSdnHLtbXZg&vet=1&docid=4lVs8-avpE_NRM&hl=de --Krdbot 20:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T00:57:00.000Z-File:Motor_1C_50cc_turbina.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:11, 22 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion): sent to DR by uploader --Krdbot 02:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T00:58:00.000Z-File:Motor_4C_863cc_963cc_turbina.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:11, 22 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion): sent to DR by uploader --Krdbot 02:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 00:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T00:59:00.000Z-File:Motor_4C_663cc_863cc_963cc_1163cc_disposto_à_frente.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:11, 22 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion): sent to DR by uploader --Krdbot 02:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
il comprte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T01:06:00.000Z-File:Ponto_de_marcha.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:11, 22 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion): sent to DR by uploader --Krdbot 02:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T01:07:00.000Z-File:Oleo_20W-50_para_motor_disposto_em_traseira.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:11, 22 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion): sent to DR by uploader --Krdbot 02:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
"Own work" claimed; needs OTRS permission. Not necessarily below the threshold of originality. Ahmadtalk 19:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
This is the original TOWNEW logo. We have permission to use this logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knectek (talk • contribs)
- @Knectek: In this case, please ask the creator/copyright holder to send an email to OTRS team so we can confirm that the permission is valid. You can see COM:CONSENT for more info, or use COM:relgen to generate the permission. Thank you. Ahmadtalk 08:39, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- OTRS Ticket:2020012310006376 received. - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:TOWNEW_LOGO.png” under ticket:2020012310006376. - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:53, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission accepted. - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
property of https://www.thetoc.gr/politiki/article/aikaterini-sakellaropoulou-i-omilia-tis-gia-ti-dikaiosuni Alibigrap (talk) 10:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 10:35, 23 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1): Copyright violation: Not own work, taken from Internet --Krdbot 02:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:58, 23 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: image taken form facebook --Krdbot 02:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of this. Delete and redirect to that. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 18:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
copyvio AT (talk) 13:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:06, 25 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://twitter.com/zz99911/status/1145318179817660416 --Krdbot 02:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photographs, uploader made no other edits across our projects; out of scope.
- File:Klasická póza - "Jsem mooc".jpg
- File:Převlek - Mendělejev.jpg
- File:Mistr sám na čtvrthodince.jpg
- File:Nákup.jpg
- File:Po dlouhém tréningu chvilka odpočinku.jpg
- File:Russkij standart.jpg
- File:Jablíčka, to je moje.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 11:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sarah Algar
[edit]4 portraits of 4 non-notable women. Each has a category, but none of them have any indication of their profession or importance. I think they were just attendees at a charity ball. Out of scope.
- File:Sarah Algar, Kate Bradley, Nadia Davis, Menreet Kaur (6885613856).jpg
- File:Sarah Algar, Kate Bradley, Nadia Davis, Menreet Kaur (6885614168).jpg
- File:Sarah Algar, Kate Bradley, Nadia Davis, Menreet Kaur (6885614454).jpg
- File:Sarah Algar, Kate Bradley, Nadia Davis, Menreet Kaur (6885614806).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Norman dembe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kroomleorg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional logos, out of scope.
- File:The Kroomle initiative 1 Billion Happy Moments.jpg
- File:Kroomle initiative Lets give eatch other hope.jpg
- File:Kroomle initiative 1 Billion Happy Moments.png
- File:Give-hope.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality photos without meaningful descriptions, no context, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Student shauld stay away from drugs.jpg
- File:To stay away from drugs.jpg
- File:Giving teachings.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no description, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GaryKrantz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional logos and photo, out of scope.
- File:KMG Music Logo.JPG
- File:KmgmainPDF.pdf
- File:KMG-NETWORKS-OUT.gif
- File:GK Headshot Red Backround.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mapala Silvagama (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Gladian XXIX Kasuari.JPG
- File:Lambang mapala silvagama.png
- File:Msg 216.JPG
- File:Pekalen mapala silvagama.JPG
- File:Penyerahan baju lapangan.JPG
- File:Jokowi mapala silvagama.JPG
- File:Ekspedisi merapi.jpg
- File:Yang tua bergaya.jpg
- File:Explorasi flora lereng merapi.jpg
- File:Narsis.jpg
- File:Wangama rally XI.jpg
- File:Sumbing.jpg
- File:Semeru 1984.jpg
- File:Ekspedisi 50 Taman Nasional Mapala Silvagama.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Advertising and unusable montages, out of scope.
- File:Farbglaswelten - ein aussergewöhnliches Kunsthandwerk.jpg
- File:Glasmaler Martin Halter Schweiz.jpeg
- File:Glasmaler Martin Halter's Farbglaswelt.jpeg
- File:Glaskunst Architektur MH Inszenierung.jpeg
- File:Glaskunst-Ätzung Glart Bern Schweiz.jpeg
- File:Glasbilderkunst Glasmaler Martin Halter.jpeg
- File:Martin Halter Glasmaler-Restaurator Bern.jpg
- File:Jugendstil-Farbfenster Rekonstruktion.jpeg
- File:Glasmalerei "...wegweisend" Martin Halter Bern Schweiz.jpeg
- File:Glasmaler-Restaurator Martin Halter Bern.jpeg
- File:Glasmalerei "Pfau" von Martin Halter Bern Schweiz.jpeg
- File:Glasmaler-Restauratoren-Atelier Martin Halter Bern Schweiz.jpeg
- File:Glasbruch-Instandsetzung mit Glart.jpeg
- File:Glasmalerei Nachlass Atelier Halter Bern Schweiz.jpeg
- File:Glasmalerei-Bilder Martin Halter Bern Schweiz.jpeg
- File:Glaskünstler Martin Halter Bern Schweiz Glasbilder.jpeg
- File:Bleiverglasung -Kunst-Decorverglasung ©martin halter bern.jpeg
- File:Glaskunst Martin Halter.jpeg
- File:OtfCxZ.jpeg
- File:W8QJK6.jpeg
- File:Glaskunst jeltTB.jpg
- File:Glaskunst -Schriftbild MH -JH Bern.jpeg
- File:Moderne zeitgenössische Glaskunst-Gestaltung M.H. Bern Schweiz.jpg
- File:Glaskunst "Entfaltung" Martin Halter Bern.jpg
- File:ART IN MARTIN Auftragsarbeiten.jpg
- File:Grisailles-glasmalkunst ©martin halter bern.jpg
- File:Farbverglasungen Glaskunst für Türen und Fenster.jpg
- File:Kunstglas im Interieur.jpg
- File:Glaskunst Glasmalerei Architektur.jpg
- File:ART IN MARTIN1 1.jpg
- File:CIlS3u.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Rhyma - Why you do me so Ft. K-D Beats (Official Music Video).webm
- File:Rhymaimage1004.jpg
- File:Rhyma Image222.png
- File:Fly with Thumbnail.jpg
- File:Rhymangn@12345001.jpg
- File:Nicetimeimage.jpg
- File:RHYMA.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurrs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 00:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T00:54:00.000Z-File:Bateria,alternador,motor_de_arranque.png){kind=link}
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 00:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T00:55:00.000Z-File:Carburador_duplo_base_fcc.png){kind=link}
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 00:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T00:55:00.000Z-File:Carburador_simplex_base_fcc_mota_50cc.png){kind=link}
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 00:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T00:56:00.000Z-File:Carburador_simplex_base_fcc.png){kind=link}
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T00:57:00.000Z-File:Compressor_simples_com_correia.png){kind=link}
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-22T01:07:00.000Z-File:Confirmado.png){kind=link}
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
il comporte des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 01:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 14:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Іванна Денькович (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 14:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 14:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Terms of Use in EUMETSAT only allows non-commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 01:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete this photo of myself for privacy reasons. RSchoenbaechler (WMF) (talk) 10:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-10T10:39:00.000Z-File:Robin_Schoenbaechler.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, there is another photo of him. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused file. Small photo possibly of plants on table in art gallery. No educational use. Malcolma (talk) 10:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
This photo was stolen. It was made by Mohi Syed: https://www.pexels.com/photo/mobile-phone-samsung-edge-samsung-galaxy-s6-edge-plus-50614/ Alibigrap (talk) 10:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
copyright holder Rohan Pieter Nel, Hemmersbach Cryovault Alibigrap (talk) 10:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Movie poster with unknown people? Alibigrap (talk) 10:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Please go ahead and delete the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishnik1114 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
no take a photo Gunofficial1998 (talk) 10:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no indication of a free license. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
A very suspicious upload. Claimed to have been made today, in a very small size with no exif data. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Is this a personal photo of the user? If not who is it? What country is it in? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality personal image, that is not even used on user's page. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The unused and randomly categorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Is vervangen voor nieuwere versie Wouter Sere [1] 14:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouter Sere (talk • contribs) 14:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 14:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 14:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Dubbele upload Wouter Sere [2] 14:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouter Sere (talk • contribs) 14:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
dubbele upload Wouter Sere [3] 15:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouter Sere (talk • contribs) 15:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The photo is blurry, out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Named author is "Edna Michell", which is not the uploader (per today's UDR). Since Edna Michell appears in them, it is unlikely that she is the photographer. These cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS.
- File:15 Fs.jpg
- File:Cantilena tree.jpg
- File:17FXx F2s.jpg
- File:Edna Michell002 Fs.jpg
- File:Edna Michell009 Fs.jpg
- File:Michell orson welles.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Cổng trường Nam Lý.png
- File:Santruongnamly.jpg
- File:Vatkiniemnh.jpg
- File:Khuonvienmhnh.jpg
- File:Khuonviennh.jpg
- File:Santruongnh.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Verum36alpha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ռոմեո Մելիքյան (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Միջադեպ քաղաքում-7.jpg
- File:«Ամբոխը շարքից 2».jpg
- File:Պայքար շարքից 1.jpg
- File:Պայքար շարքից փ.jpg
- File:Հորինվածք.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Newtonizaaq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Hamis Kiggundu on a casual visit to the president of Uganda.jpg
- File:Hamis Kiggundu presenting the Nakivubo Stadium plan to the President of Uganda.jpg
- File:Hamis Kiggundu and His Manager with the president of Uganda in 2017.jpg
- File:Ham Purchasing Machinery for his Agro Processing Industries.jpg
- File:Hamis Kiggundu with a Friend at His newly started project Ham Palm Villas.jpg
- File:Hamis Kiggundu with the Kabaka of Uganda.jpg
- File:Launching his book (Success and Failure Based on Reason and Reality) at His office.jpg
- File:Hamis Kiggundu.jpg
_at_His_office.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
obvious copyright violation PeeJay2K3 (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alex.333.Z (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of domestic plant. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kudrat Hossain Babu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:My Friend In Panama.jpg
- File:My Best Friend Abroad 01.jpg
- File:Emilio Sempris(Panama, Minister, Environmentalist) With POP In Europe.jpg
- File:Foto Emilio Sempris Resolucion Conflicto Indigena.jpg
- File:Emilio Sempris(Panama, Minister, Environmentalist) Awarded By COP 25 Startup In Europe.jpg
_With_POP_In_Europe.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Awarded_By_COP_25_Startup_In_Europe.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.32.25 16:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately
Delete. The sculpture appears to be made in 1960, if we apply 120 year rule then we can undelete in 2081, otherwise we should try to find out whether sculptors are still alive to see when the countdown has began. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:PORN, COM:PENIS Wutsje 18:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, puerile, non-educational, redundant and subsequently out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 10:53, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
COM:PORN, COM:PENIS Wutsje 18:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, puerile, non-educational, redundant and subsequently out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 10:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
COM:PORN, COM:PENIS Wutsje 18:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, puerile, non-educational, redundant and subsequently out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 10:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Needs OTRS, just like File:Letter K as King.JPG. E4024 (talk) 14:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have sent the corresponding email for both files. Please let me know if there are any questions. Clean Copy (talk) 16:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission. --Guanaco (talk) 23:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
COM:CSD: F10. Personal photos by non-contributors. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 18:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Author request: Out of COM:SCOPE, not in use anywhere. Ahmadtalk 18:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Author request: Out of COM:SCOPE, not in use anywhere. Ahmadtalk 18:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Buddy Magazine (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD F10. Personal photos by non-contributors
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 18:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal collage, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality logo, out of scope. Possibly screengrab too. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shihabskytar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of another famous entrepreneur who did contribute nothing to our projects, out of COM:PS. bn:আলাপ:Omar Faruk Shihab is already deleted, vanity page d:Q66132418 (135 edits) will be next.
Achim (talk) 19:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Meaningless Low Quality Image Jjw (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal diagram, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
not own work: see metadata Bradipo Lento (talk) 21:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright credit in description implicates possible license-washing. ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Per File:Софья Капкова.jpg, photo: UGOLPHOTO Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio too. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Probably not a selfie, photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Probably not a selfie, photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of an insignificant person, used in articles for self-promotion GAndy (talk) 23:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:13, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The unused and randomly uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? Advertisement? Watermarks. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Can be used in user page if uploader wants it Estopedist1 (talk) 09:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
unused self-promotional image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a commercial organization Papuass (talk) 12:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
unused duplicate of File:Cаттаров.png Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to bad quality. Multiple alternatives in category:Sunsets of Falcón. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yococaricuao (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope. Likely DW copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
advertising and promotional, as written in the description, no educational purpose Pippobuono (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no description, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, blurred image. Ahmadtalk 18:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal diagram, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- It was a study to show, how an urban tram network can be presented in a way, that with high resolutions each detali is visible, but with low resolutions the graphic lines are not too feeble.
- See User talk:Stef.muc#StraßenbahnGleisplanBremen2013.png.--Ulamm (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- So, it is no longer needed then... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xtreme Dummy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Random color patterns of no use, all unused, only uploads by this account.
- File:Hot Pink.png
- File:Orchid Purple.png
- File:Slate Blue.png
- File:Deep Blue.png
- File:Aqua Cyan.png
- File:Lime Green.png
- File:Grass Green.png
- File:Dew Yellow.png
- File:Blazing Orange.png
- File:Tomato Red.png
BevinKacon (talk) 19:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
used for Spaming باسم (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of focus, exact in-focus replacement on hand (File:Museo de la Ciudad, Defensa 230 - Muestra sobre radiodifusión.jpg). Retired electrician (talk) 23:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor near duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyvios: author credit doesn't match uploader. And unused logo, out of scope.
- File:CC Protesta LXII Leg.jpg
- File:GladysMartinenvivopleno.jpg
- File:Noticias del Congreso - Laksman y Melisa.JPG
- File:Canal del Congreso.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:24, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep, there is a page about her in uk.wikipedia : uk:Гісь Ольга Михайлівна. Pippobuono (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Too low quality. Google translates the description as "a head turtle in a Dubrovnik aquarium", but you have to stare at this image for a long time until you're able to see the dark shape of a turtle in a lot of darkness. Not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:41, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required, also found similar image on amprensa A1Cafel (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi A1Cafel. I worked on the communication team of Carlos Alvarado during his presidential campaign, so it is not surprising that the image has been published in other media. I do not know why you say that the metadata of the photograph indicates that it was downloaded from Facebook, but I can assure you that it was not so. --MadriCR (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- As additional proof, you can see the rest of the photographic archive in these links. 1 2 --MadriCR (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Taken in 2017 per https://flickr.com/photos/142254651@N06/42920416792/in/album-72157668391369217/ and this image is (C) - if this is free we will need OTRS permission Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Let's see. It is obvious that they are different photographs. The one uploaded here in Commons I uploaded it under a CC license. The rest of my photo file on flickr is under copyright. Do you need me to do something on the album to verify that it is my account? You cannot force me to release the entire file under a CC license because for that I selected the photos that I would donate to Commons. --MadriCR (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; For images published prior in other media we need permission via COM:OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
_05.JPG){kind=link}
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
_05.JPG){kind=link}
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use, deletion reasion probably made up, user has done earlier attempts to revoke their contributions. --Jcb (talk) 20:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. Tm (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
The person in the picture, I was notified. Please delete it, I didn't have permission. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not this again. After other attempts with false allegations, like your not being the author, that you had withdraw the license, now you allege that you dont have permissions you were "notified" by the person in the picture. Non identifiable, so any "arguments" in that regard are irrelevant and in this case, just another attempt to have this image deleted by any means necessary. Also file in use in sk.wikipedia.org Čergovský Minčol. Tm (talk) 10:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not this again. After other attempts with false allegations, like your not being the author, that you had withdraw the license, now you allege that you dont have permissions you were "notified" by the person in the picture. Non identifiable, so any "arguments" in that regard are irrelevant and in this case, just another attempt to have this image deleted by any means necessary. Also file in use in sk.wikipedia.org Čergovský Minčol. Tm (talk) 10:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see history and former DRs. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
_05.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-5){kind=link}
The person in the picture, I was notified. Please delete it, I didn't have permission. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see history and former DRs. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. I'm not the author of the photo. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please go through OTRS to clarify this mass deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
The person in the picture, I was notified. Please delete it, I didn't have permission. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not this again. After other attempts with false allegations, like your not being the author, that you had withdraw the license, now you allege that you dont have permissions you were "notified" by the person in the picture. Non identifiable, so any "arguments" in that regard are irrelevant and in this case, just another attempt to have this image deleted by any means necessary. Tm (talk) 10:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see history and former DRs. --Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
The person in the picture, I was notified. Please delete it, I didn't have permission. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not this again. After other attempts with false allegations, like your not being the author, that you had withdraw the license, now you allege that you dont have permissions you were "notified" by the person in the picture. Non identifiable, so any "arguments" in that regard are irrelevant and in this case, just another attempt to have this image deleted by any means necessary. Tm (talk) 10:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see history and former DRs. --Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
The photo is apparently taken by Mehr News. It needs a license and source correction, but I couldn't find the photo's link on Mehr. Ahmadtalk 20:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. I'm not the author of the photo. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please go through OTRS to clarify this mass deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:55, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. Tm (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
The person in the picture, I was notified. Please delete it, I didn't have permission. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not this again. After other attempts with false allegations, like your not being the author, that you had withdraw the license, now you allege that you dont have permissions you were "notified" by the person in the picture. Non identifiable, so any "arguments" in that regard are irrelevant and in this case, just another attempt to have this image deleted by any means necessary. Also file in use in sk.wikipedia.org Černiny (vrch v Bukovských vrchoch). Tm (talk) 10:19, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see history and former DRs. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
The person in the picture, I was notified. Please delete it, I didn't have permission. Milan Bališin (talk) 20:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not this again. After other attempts with false allegations, like your not being the author, that you had withdraw the license, now you allege that you dont have permissions you were "notified" by the person in the picture. Non identifiable, so any "arguments" in that regard are irrelevant and in this case, just another attempt to have this image deleted by any means necessary. Also file in use in sk.wikipedia.org Černiny (vrch v Bukovských vrchoch). Tm (talk) 10:19, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see history and former DRs. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F010140-0001, Salzgitter AG.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 11:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
While this was broadcast on NASA TV, it was a direct re-broadcast of the SpaceX web stream, available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhrkdHshb3E. There is no evidence that this broadcast is available under a free license, nor that SpaceX released all rights as the license on this description page suggests. Additionally, the {{Cc-zero-SpaceX}} template on Commons applies only to photo galleries on the SpaceX website and (formerly) to media on SpaceX's Flickr page posted as cc-zero; it does not apply to broadcast video. Precautionary principle applies unless SpaceX specifically releases this media under a free license. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:32, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- What a pity, i thought it was more from NASA than SpaceX. Can somebody ask SpaceX due to the copyright status of their videos? --Ras67 (talk) 17:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
low res, compressed file and uploaded by a user with history of copyvio. Need more detailed source info to verify license. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:45, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. shield of an extinct Brazilian football club, with which the uploader has not proved connection. Leon saudanha (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo without persmission, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded by an undisclosed paid editor without OTRS permission by the original copyright holder. The original version of this image was published by Yahoo News in September 2015. GSS (talk) 06:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- There are two issues with the permission email that was sent to OTRS, a) it wasn't sent by the original copyright holder, and b), it contains a permission letter in PNG form which anyone can create using the paintbrush. By the way, why would the original photographer provide a photoshopped version of his/her work with no metadata? GSS (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the claim of ownership is dubious as best. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyright violation, No permission. - FitIndia Talk Mail 12:32, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of artist (out of scope) and copyvio of artist's work.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for temporary art installations in Germany. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious to be own work. COM:OTRS may be needed.
Cited at [4] as The Washington Post/Getty Images
for copyright. Found many similar images with a reverse image search, so this (and the resolution) may be a giveaway to be a screenshot (a frame of a video). 84.250.17.211 11:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eric Villa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I had tagged this file for speedy deletion but the request was declined by user:Wdwd because it was used on an autobiography on azwiki of the uploader. The article has been nominated for deletion (Yaşar permalink) there, and all of the participants there so far voted for deletion of the autobiography. The article on azwiki will likely get deleted sooner and after that this image will explicitly be outside of Commons' project scope and making it eligible for speedy deletion per F10. It is worth mentioning that the creator of the article has clear intention of promoting himself, and if he continues here a block should be in order. Masum Reza📞 19:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This request applies for first and second version, not for whole file. This was derivative work of screenshot with unknown copyright status, so I cropped the screenshot out. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. Both photo and presentation that can be seen on the picture are on Commons (File:12th Birthday of Wikimedia Serbia 17.jpg and File:CEE Meeting 2018, Wiki ambassadors.pdf). So, every single part is under CC BY-SA 4.0. --Miljan Simonović (talk) 10:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept, I will revert my upload, but if you want it as separate file, just ask. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
This appears to be some sort of a poster. COM:OTRS is needed. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 17:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
These are all images uploaded by socks of User:Phnom Penh Skyline (see history at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phnom Penh Skyline). The original account never edited here, but there's 30 or 40 known socks, about half of which have contributed to Commons. Most of them have already been blocked and nuked for uploading copyright violations, and it looks like these are the remainder. It's possible that these are somehow legitimate I suppose, but they're pretty old, and so it's hard to tell for sure, but there's just no reason to really believe that any information provided by these socks is reliable. GMGtalk 16:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Also included:
- File:Mondia Tevi.jpg
- File:Sangkrant angel Cambodia.jpg
- File:Cambodia Illumination Royal Boat 2018.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 17:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
property of https://www.facebook.com/koreanpopsorchestra/photos/a.427665079726/10157749038014727/?type=3&theater Alibigrap (talk) 11:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
a 1963 file, shooted in UK. In fact, it's uploaded in copyviol — isn't an "own" work, a Creative Commons / free release, or a PD-UK licenced. — danyele 15:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
The person claimed to be the author was born 3 years after the photo was made, so he cannot be the photographer. The photo originates from a 2014 book, so {{PD-Poland}} does not apply. An evidence that the photographer died before 1946 is or an evidence or pre 1989 publication is needed. Otherwise, we need free license permission via OTRS from the photographer or their heirs. If the photographer is unknown, the photo will be suitable for Commons in 2048 (per {{PD-old-assumed}}). I see no justification for the declared license. Ankry (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
property of https://www.instagram.com/fariba.glam/ Alibigrap (talk) 11:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Facebook's file ( see exif ) , possible not own work, need OTRS confirmed. 轻语者 (talk) 11:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
low-resolution version of File:Slesarenko9.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
No educational value, out of context and not in use. 193.171.188.3 14:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: lots of context in description, lots of educational value. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
other image with better resolution already available 2001:B07:6442:8903:490A:89B3:EE0A:EBFF 15:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Unless this is an exact, scaled-down duplicate, that is not a reason to delete. We don't keep only the best images, we keep all we can get. - Jmabel ! talk 00:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Jmabel, no close duplicate available. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emanuele Mazzei (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photo and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Foglio Matricolare di Pietro Mazzei.pdf
- File:Diario di Bordo di Pietro Mazzei.pdf
- File:Relazione incidente aereo 1.2.38.pdf
- File:Pietro Mazzei.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Chiedo cortesemente di non procedere alla cancellazione dei file sopra detti fa me caricati alcuni giorni fa per i motivi che qui sotto espongo per ciascuno di essi:
1 -File:Foglio Matricolare.
Questo file proviene dal Distretto Militare Regionale di Firenze, Firenze. Un Ufficio dello Stato Italiano. Mi è stato inviato in data 12 febbraio 1999. Per ottenerlo ho fatto specifica richiesta.
Sono uno strettissimo congiunto di Pietro Mazzei morto il 12 aprile 1941 a causa di ferite di guerra
Questo documento contiene la annotazioni dell'intera vita militare di Pietro Mazzei dal 20 luglio 1935
al 12 aprile 1941 (data di morte del titolare di questo documento). Per sua natura questo documento non è soggetto a copyright; non è mai stato pubblicato.
2 - File:Diario di Bordo di Pietro Mazzei.pdf
Questo file proviene dallo Stato Maggiore dell’Aeronautica Italiana, Reparto Affari Generali, Ufficio Storico, Roma. Un Ufficio dello Stato Italiano.
Mi è stato inviato con lettera in data 22 Marzo 1999. Per ottenere questo documento ho fatto specifica richiesta. E’ stato compilato giorno per giorno dal Maresciallo Pilota Pietro Mazzei nel periodo dal 20 giugno 1940 al 10 gennaio 1941, contiene la descrizione dei suoi voli aerei e delle sue missioni di guerra. Per sua natura questo documento non è soggetto a copyright. Non è mai stato pubblicato.
3 - Relazione incidente aereo 1.2.38.pdf
Questo file proviene dallo Stato Maggiore dell’Aeronautica Italiana, Reparto Affari Generali, Ufficio Storico, Roma. Un Ufficio dello Stato Italiano. Mi è stato inviato con lettera in data 22 Marzo 1999.
Per ottenere questo documento ho fatto specifica richiesta. Io sono uno strettissimo congiunto di Pietro Mazzei, morto il 12 aprile 1941
In base a questo documento a Pietro Mazzei fu concessa una Medaglia di Bronzo al Valore Aeronautico.
Per sua natura non è soggetto a copyright. Non è mai stato pubblicato.
4. File:Pietro Mazzei.jpg E’ una foto di Pietro Mazzei, Pilota della Regia Aeronautica, durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale, davanti ad un trimotore SM.81 fatta nel 1941 prima della sua morte. E’ una foto di mia proprietà da sempre in quanto io sono erede dei beni di Pietro Mazzei, mio strettissimo congiunto, e sono quindi anche proprietario delle sue cose. Egli è stato un pilota pluridecorata ed io pensato di onorare la sua memoria pubblicando questa foto su Wikipedia. Ho concettualmente sbagliato dichiarando in lingua inglese che questa foto è opera mia quando volevo intendere che essa era una cosa (foto) di MIA PROPRIETA’. Quanto alla data di creazione che appare essa indica solo la data in cui ho fatto la scansione dell’originale della foto per ottenere il file digitale .jpg.
Fiducioso di un favorevole accoglimento ringrazio e saluto. Emanuele Mazzei. 27 gennaio 2020--Emanuele Mazzei (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I added the correct licenses (works from Italian's military, which fall under {{PD-ItalyGov}}).
@Emanuele Mazzei: L'unico dubbio è sulla foto, perché sarebbe di proprietà del fotografo, quindi dubito fortemente che sia tua. Di contro, l'assenza di contenuto creativo la rende nel pubblico dominio oramai. Ruthven (msg) 21:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
No indication or source given to indicate that this is own work. The same file can be found uploaded as non-free content to English Wikipedia as en:File:Beatrice Hicks.jpg and sourced to this website. Furthermore, a Google image search shows the same image being used on multiple websites which even further weakens the claim of own work. Most likely case scenario is that the file's uploader isn't really familiar with c:COM:L and just mistakenly assumed that being able to download an image free of cost from some website means that the image is not protected by copyright. So, don't think this can be kept per COM:PCP unless the original source can be found and the file can be verified to be not eligible or no longer eligible for copyright protection, or previously released under a free license by its copyright holder. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Terms of Use in EUMETSAT only allows non-commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 01:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Source is claimed to be "Municipality of Nová Role" but no OTRS ticket or evidence that it's been released CC0 as claimed. Uploader has a history of copyright violations. Buidhe (talk) 02:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right, it has no permission. Author of this picture is probably dead very long time and I don´t know him at all. And I am not going to solve it with our town officials. Do what you have to. --Whitesachem (talk) 06:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The burden of proof lies with users wanting a file to be kept. --Green Giant (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Here's the talk page of the uploader on Commons and at fr.Wikipedia. S/he seems to make edits every few weeks or months or so. Boud (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Remarque : Le mieux serait si Sandervalya pouvait expliquer un peu plus ici (en français ou en anglais). Boud (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Given the background images of people in t-shirts standing higher than Tebboune, the claim of this being a photo at a football match is credible. What is more likely? (1) that a Wikipedian who appears to live in Algeria attends a football match, takes a photo at high resolution of the crowd, knowing that Tebboune could be cropped from the full photo later on, and later on does the cropping? or (2) that online media published a photo including Tebboune in the crowd knowing that Tebboune himself would appear at the very low resolution (by 2017 standards) of 230x290 pixels, instead of using a high-quality telescopic lens or equivalent to get a high-resolution photo? I would tend to suspect that (1) is more likely. I don't think that the circumstantial evidence for a copyright violation (2) is strong enough to delete the photo. It would be best if the uploader could speak up... Boud (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The burden of proof lies with users wanting to keep a file. The hypothetical situation may be correct but we need firm evidence. --Green Giant (talk) 23:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment Prelude. --Regasterios (talk) 09:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep I categorized the file. I think is very nice artwork. It can be used, for example, to illustrate what artistic images can be made with Inkscape. --Regasterios (talk) 09:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per User:Regasterios. --Green Giant (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded by His Majesty King Sean, clear lack of notability. Copied from micronations wiki where it should have stayed. IMO we shouldn't support trolls who are dissatisfied or don't like their government and therefore call themselves King of a micronation. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cordoba33. Worst case were if the micronations wiki had to shut down and we'll get all the crap. Achim (talk) 12:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictional flag with no claimed significance. (Previous file is unrelated; this is a default filename used by a flag design web site.) Omphalographer (talk) 21:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted the PNG version File:Crontinallia Colonies Flag.png. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
The video in the source does not appear to be distributed under a free licence. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
I think that this is a derivative work of the posters and books depicted in the photo. They are not De Minimis here. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi! This photos are from a Free Culture Festival made in Buenos Aires in 2008. This pictures shows a stand where you could take movies and books for free, it was part of the festival. No intention to make derivative work, only show the way this event was. Niamfrifruli (talk) 13:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Niamfrifruli: Hello, I appreciate you uploading files from that event. I think other ones are quite good, but this particular one cannot be hosted on Commons due it it being a COM:DW. 13:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
File:01970 Kutno-lens, three districts groups of the nordic-littoral composition, the Kutno, Płock and the Warmia.jpg
[edit]
License {{PD-Polish}} aplies only to photographs. Jarekt (talk) 13:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
File:01973 Siedlungfunde aus dem 5.-6. Jahrhundert n.Chr. in Radziejów, Kujawien; Fibel der Typengruppe West Heslerton, Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia-r1973-t-n22.png
[edit]
License {{PD-Polish}} aplies only to photographs not drawings. Jarekt (talk) 13:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC) ps: Image is a photograph = {{PD-Polish}}
Files uploaded by Ingvarslerkis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, available here (page 3&4) with a link to the original source (archived) that doesn't include a mention of a free license.
- File:Gaismas bēgšana.jpg
- File:Pārāk spilgts gaismas apgaismojums pilsētā, kas rada „gaismas kupolu‟.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 15:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Invalid license. Uploaders purported link to permission does not work. Per [9], there is no clear indication that North Carolina state government works are public domain or copyrighted. This should be deleted per COM:PCP. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 16:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Link was to old disclaimer page. Has been updated. "Photos of House and Senate Members on the individual NCGA Website member webpages are not published on the NCGA Website until we receive copyright release from the photographer so these specific photos are considered in the public domain once they are published on the NCGA Website." Rockhead126 (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Rockhead126: How does a modern permission on the current website apply to photograph from 1999 taken from archive from 2000 and that does not appear on the current website? --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 01:06, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SAgarSHarma24x7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]From the copyright point of view, File:1. sAgar SHarma.jpg needs OTRS permission because it can be found on the web using Google search by image/TinEye, and File:MY GranD mOm !.jpg is a derivative work because of it's background, which can be found on several websites on the web using Google search by image and TinEye. However, I think we also have a scope problem; these pictures are out of COM:SCOPE.
Ahmadtalk 19:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo of a wall of artworks in a gallery, by university students who were alive in 2014, so the works are all still under copyright
I understand however about cases like this need discussion. Regasterios (talk) 21:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No FOP in US for artwork (this is an enhibit in New York). DMacks (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
File:ASC Leiden - van de Bruinhorst Collection - Somaliland 2019 - 4484 - A painting depicting an animal story with a lion, a bleeding dromedary and other animals. A mathematical geometric series of 0.5 - Xarunta Dhaqanka ee Hargeysa.jpg
[edit]
The author of the painting is not mentioned and the OTRS permission mentions the photo, not the painting. See the earlier discussion on the OTRS Noticeboard. Eissink (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Assuming good faith, I guess it's much more effective and less time-consuming to ask User:Jmgurey (who identified himself as being Jama Musse Jama and who said he is happy having this image of his painting on Wikimedia/Wikipedia) if he can go through the OTRS process and indicate what kind of license he thinks most suitable. I will ask him. Vysotsky 22 jan 2020 19:27
- The picture legally is {{PD-Somalia}}, but of course it is better now that the author is known that he decides. For acknowledgement etc. {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}} would be great, Hansmuller (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- See the comments of the self-declared author (Thank you!!) here. Long live ethnomathematics! Hansmuller (talk) 20:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- The picture legally is {{PD-Somalia}}, but of course it is better now that the author is known that he decides. For acknowledgement etc. {{CC-BY-SA-4.0}} would be great, Hansmuller (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Please provide context, links and proof to your proposition that the picture is PD-Somalia, because the license does not say so, Hansmuller. You cannot just assume or simply state that some work meets certain standards if you don't even know who made the work or when it was made (although I think I can say that the painting was not made in such a distant past that PD-old would apply). Eissink (talk) 13:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC).
- Comment The painter was very positive about giving the painting an open license, see this discussion. I have asked him to confirm this by sending an email to OTRS. I hope some time is allowed to make this happen. Vysotsky (talk) 00:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Renewed request today. Vysotsky (talk) 16:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:ASC_Leiden_-_van_de_Bruinhorst_Collection_-_Somaliland_2019_-_4484_-_A_painting_depicting_an_animal_story_with_a_lion,_a_bleeding_dromedary_and_other_animals._A_mathematical_geometric_series_of_0.5_-_Xarunta_Dhaqanka_ee_Hargeysa.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020041910008715. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 04:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:ASC_Leiden_-_van_de_Bruinhorst_Collection_-_Somaliland_2019_-_4484_-_A_painting_depicting_an_animal_story_with_a_lion,_a_bleeding_dromedary_and_other_animals._A_mathematical_geometric_series_of_0.5_-_Xarunta_Dhaqanka_ee_Hargeysa.jpg” under ticket:2020041910008715. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 04:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS verified. --Storkk (talk) 17:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Source/Permission needed. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- The person who created that portrait is unknown, his/her name is not revealed by the DPRK government. I created that file, not anyone else. My file is the same as "File : Portrait of Kim Il Sung-3 (Author : Unknown)"--The Travel Guy (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- @The Travel Guy: Kindly add the source of where you got/derived the file from. As you said, the creator is unknown so you can't seemingly create the file out of no where. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kim Il Song Portrait-2.jpg but re-license to {{FoP-North Korea}}. Finnusertop (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Added {{FoP-North Korea}}The Travel Guy (talk) 02:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Finnusertop. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
the file may be the uploader's own work, but the design of the seal is certainly not. 92.193.134.239 22:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative of a copyrighted work. --ƏXPLICIT 10:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.32.25 16:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
It is obviously not own work, however maybe PD-old. Need clarifying. Regasterios (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
неправильное название файла при загрузке Aizhan Seit (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
ライセンス変更したい 活かに (talk) 00:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Although "I want to change the license" (Google's translation) wouldn't be a valid reason for deletion (CC-BY-SA is irrevocable, additional licenses can be added without deletion), COM:CSD#G7 ("Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content") would have been applicable at the time of nomination for an unused file. However, by now this image is in use in some wikiprojects in German and Italian Wikipedia - not in actual articles, but in lists of missing articles for singers. That's probably not "unused content"? So I'm not sure how to handle this case. Gestumblindi (talk) 01:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete csdg7. uploader uploaded a bigger one File:出口 陽(aki).jpg.--Roy17 (talk) 11:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Wiki rules require when removing the Speedy Template to change to the Regular Delete template. I do not wish this file to be deleted since it is not a violation. There is a dispute with another author. Author claims since it was originally written by President Trump's personal attorney that it is a violation. I claim that since the document was released by the US House of Representatives that this made it freely available and issued by the US Government. Pbmaise (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giuliani letter to Ukraine President.jpg. Jay Sekulow like Rudy Giuliani is not a U.S. government employee. This is a copyright violation. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 00:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Both "the House and Senate Reports on the Copyright Act of 1976 include the "reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports" among examples of fair use"File:https://fas.org/sgp/crs/policy.html. The document in question was requested by the US House of Representatives according to a subpoena issued to Lev Parnas on October 10th, 2019Media: Breuninger, Kevin (October 10, 2019). "Giuliani associates tied to Ukraine efforts are subpoenaed in House impeachment inquiry". CNBC. Retrieved January 20, 2020. and hence was part of a judicial proceeding. More specifically both the subpoena and document originated from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Hence the document in question was legally obtained by Congress as part of Judicial proceeding.
There is no question that the document was released by the US Government. The question is whether fair use of the document can be made once the document has been released. There is no question in the media. They have indeed used the document in their news articles and this document has been distributed worldwide.
Example of use of the document can be seen at Media:https://www.npr.org/2020/01/15/796593183/new-lev-parnas-documents-suggest-u-s-ambassador-was-under-surveillance-in-ukrain
Let's turn to a discussion on fair use of potentially copyrighted documents that have been released under the Freedom of Information Act. See: This document by the US Department of Justice File:https://www.justice.gov/oip/blog/foia-update-oip-guidance-copyrighted-materials-and-foia
"the revised Copyright Act specifically codifies the common law doctrine of "fair use," which permits the reproduction of copyrighted materials "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . . scholarship, or research" without liability for infringement. 17 U.S.C. § 107."
The use within Wiki Commons of this document falls directly under that criteria.
The document in question is freely available to the public as a matter of agency record. Indeed the documents were published by the US Government.
So the question may turn did the US Government legally release the document? Again we can turn to the US Department of Justice analysis for answers.
They outline two important reasons why a document may not be released:
Records "specifically exempted from disclosure by statute . . . provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld." 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3), and, Protection of "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential." 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)
The letter by Giuliani was written to a Ukrainian and copied to another Ukrainian. It cannot be argued that this was an internal letter between the President and his personal attorney.
In the case of the email written by the President's current attorney Sekulow to a former attorney Dowd, the email was obviously given to Lev Parnas. That is why he had it in his possession. Lev Parnas is a private citizen and hence any possible theory of priviledged communication between the two attorneys was lost. Pbmaise (talk) 02:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The document was made public and part of a larger document titled HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD9011 this designation is a document number for docs.house.gov. The document is also incorporated into a second larger document that can be found at: https://judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/document_production_lev_parnas_january_14_2020_parnas_additional.pdf
Pbmaise (talk) 04:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Thank you for directing me to the page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Fair_use I now see that while the document is fair use, fair use is not acceptable. I therefore change my position to deletePbmaise (talk) 07:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep On the other hand I just finished reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content these items constitute non-free content and this type of content is specifically permitted under certain circumstances. Underneath these wikipedia guidelines,
"There use should be minimal and confined (with limited exceptions) to illustrating historically significant events"
The impeachment of the United States President and evidence that his personal attorney acting with Lev Parnas were trying to shake down the Ukrainian government certainly constitutes material illustrating a historically significant event. Therefore, the material can be used.
I need to follow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Implementation Pbmaise (talk) 09:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep crop the Outlook icons (copyrighted and unnecessary). Everything else is {{PD-text}}. The headers are not copyrightable. The body is short to the point of not copyrightable. The footer is a simple boilerplate message widely used in industry and not copyrightable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-text}}. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
I don't think this qualifies as public domain. It was produced by PBS which is a nonprofit organization, not a government agency. Just because it was given to the House and the House released it doesn't mean the House (which is NOT a government agency) can withdraw the original copyright and make it public domain. It's perfectly fine if English or some other place wants it used under fair use but I don't see it being in the public domain. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Parnas is not/was not a Federal employee, and PBS is not a federal agency. --Animalparty (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep "A government agency, sometimes an appointed commission, is a permanent or semi-permanent organization in the machinery of government that is responsible for the oversight and administration of specific functions, such as an intelligence agency". The government agency that released the document falls under this definition. The members of this organization are all paid employees of the US Government and conducting their work on the behalf of the government.
The document wasn't merely "given" to the House. It was under subpoena. Both "the House and Senate Reports on the Copyright Act of 1976 include the "reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports" among examples of fair use"File:https://fas.org/sgp/crs/policy.html. The document in question was requested by the US House of Representatives according to a subpoena issued to Lev Parnas on October 10th, 2019Media: Breuninger, Kevin (October 10, 2019). "Giuliani associates tied to Ukraine efforts are subpoenaed in House impeachment inquiry". CNBC. Retrieved January 20, 2020. and hence was part of a judicial proceeding. More specifically both the subpoena and document originated from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Hence the document in question was legally obtained by Congress as part of Judicial proceeding.
There is no question that the document was released by the US Government. The question is whether fair use of the document can be made once the document has been released. There is no question in the media. They have indeed used the document in their news articles and this document has been distributed worldwide. Let's turn to a discussion on fair use of potentially copyrighted documents that have been released under the Freedom of Information Act. See: This document by the US Department of Justice File:https://www.justice.gov/oip/blog/foia-update-oip-guidance-copyrighted-materials-and-foia
"the revised Copyright Act specifically codifies the common law doctrine of "fair use," which permits the reproduction of copyrighted materials "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . . scholarship, or research" without liability for infringement. 17 U.S.C. § 107."
The use within Wiki Commons of this document falls directly under that criteria.
The document in question is freely available to the public as a matter of agency record. Indeed the documents were published by the US Government. So the question may turn did the US Government legally release the document? Again we can turn to the US Department of Justice analysis for answers. They outline two important reasons why a document may not be released disclosure prevented by statute 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3) and Protection of "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential." 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)
Neither protection applies. Lev Parnas is a private individual and not employed by the President as his attorney. Pbmaise (talk) 02:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The document in question is identical to a second document released by the US House Judiciary Committee that can be found at https://judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/document_production_lev_parnas_january_14_2020_parnas_additional.pdf
It is apparent that the House Intelligence Committee passed the document to the Judiciary committee and there is a letter of transmittal on their website that states they sent two flash drives. Pbmaise (talk) 05:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- The US Government did not CREATE the photographs, they just released them. Any compilation or additions by federal employees would be a Derivative Work. Lev Parnas is not and has never been a Federal government employee. If a Senator releases a video tape of Star Wars with a new ending, it doesn't change the underlying copyright of the work. And non-free media under fair use cannot be hosted on Commons. --Animalparty (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- It's even worse when it came because of a subpoena. That means the House members didn't even create it but made Parnas produce it and then turned around and publish it. Taking Animal Party's analogy further, it would be that if the House subpoenaed George Lucas to testify, everything he's ever made suddenly became public domain even though he'd go to jail if he didn't follow the subpoena. This is a waste of time for something that can just published at English under fair use. Why is there a clamor to have it here? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – No permission. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Lev Parnas is not and has never been an employee of the Federal Government. --Animalparty (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The document in question did not come from Lev Parnas. It came from the US Government based upon a judicial proceeding and a subpoena issued to Parnas. It was released by the US Government and the question turns to whether release by the Government was illegal. For reasons already stated on other delete requests made today, the standard to prevent the public from viewing the document does not apply. Hence document is fair use according to US Department of Justice guidelines. Pbmaise (talk) 03:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete After reviewing the page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Fair_use I now see that while the document is fair use, fair use is not acceptable. Pbmaise (talk) 06:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep On the other hand I just finished reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content these items constitute non-free content and this type of content is specifically permitted under certain circumstances. Underneath these wikipedia guidelines,
"Their use should be minimal and confined (with limited exceptions) to illustrating historically significant events"
The impeachment of the United States President and evidence that his personal attorney acting with Lev Parnas were trying to shake down the Ukrainian government certainly constitutes material illustrating a historically significant event. Therefore, the material can be used.
I need to follow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Implementation Pbmaise (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW of many non-free components. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Claims to be an edited version of File:San Francisco International Airport at night.jpg, but this looks like a brand new work, only using the photo as a reference for the general structure. BevinKacon (talk) 19:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Viral licenses are not automatic. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Fake date/authorship/license information: no evidence for the declared license and no evidence for copyright expiration as it originates from a 2014 book. Ankry (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gikü as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted logo. The logo is very simple and ineligible for copyright. But it is used only in declined draft. Maybe the logo is out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 15:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 00:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use). The cover is under COM:TOO without the image. The image may have entered the public domain. Engraver's name not readable. "F. Koevein"? Strakhov (talk) 18:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly it's not {{Own}} so deleting then as lacking a proper source. —howcheng {chat} 00:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also nominated for identical reasons: File:Velvaleedickinsonmay201942letter.jpg
Despite being criminal evidence, wouldn't the copyright of this typewritten correspondence still be that of Lee or Velvalee Dickinson? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 18:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
