Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 10th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is 88.23.172.172 22:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 23:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of non contributing humans Eatcha (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:CSD#F10. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Capone1990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS

Эlcobbola talk 15:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laplumetech (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rodolfodelgadot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Max.antoine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:36, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RODROX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saxknowledge (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 15:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:40, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clamelie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:40, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Achim Raschka (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio, 1955+50=2005, which is later than their URAA date of 1996. Unless there's something I'm missing, this should be deleted. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Recherche Monaco CSM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pauline.geCCE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:45, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Litererian1912 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO upload taken from antique/auction sites. Lower res, no camera EXIF, and appeared elsewhere before upload to Commons (e.g., File:English Baron’s Coronet for the 1911 Coronation of King George V.png is here; File:Paul Revere Silver Coffee Pot.jpg is here; File:Francis I Coffee and Tea Set by Reed & Barton.jpg is [1]; etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 16:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 09:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 09:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sock of en:w:User:Mokshanine. See en:w:User talk:Amanbir II Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley at 19:56, 11 Januar 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Amanbir IV --Krdbot 01:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sock of en:w:User:Mokshanine. See en:w:User talk:Amanbir II. Possible copyright violation. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley at 19:56, 11 Januar 2020 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Amanbir IV --Krdbot 01:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exif show this photo was uploaded in facebook. So the uploader may not origin photographer. Need OTRS confirm. 轻语者 (talk) 12:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie still: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lu tawa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of private images, out of project scope. Commons is not your personal free web host.

Achim (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 01:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DrJSE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE images or screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 01:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DrJSE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable license and/or outside project scope

Ytoyoda (talk) 02:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from https://www.instagram.com/p/BgoxRzGnDUp/?igshid=o7gcqrgovydv Ytoyoda (talk) 02:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published on various websites, see TinEye. Permission needed. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 05:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 07:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie : unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Missing permission. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:02, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khaykm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source/permission

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Permission required. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PENIS Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low Quality Image U+1F360 (talk) 20:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes very low quality - deleted - Rudolphous (talk) 20:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination by Rudolphous. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:19, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidihlm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PENIS

Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Definitely copyvios + blatantly promotional in nature Gnangarra 09:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

note a tiny eye check doesnt confirm the rationale for speedy deletion, no information was provided for claim of CV Gnangarra 10:12, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Ellin Beltz. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2011-2016 Kancelaria Sejmu Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THIS PHOTO IS ILLEGAL! Bartiniier (talk) 12:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Author's request (G1 speedy delete). This page must be delete by my decision.(I am the author and this is my decision.) Bartiniier (talk) 14:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sppicard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rmartinmolina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 15:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 15:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruby131 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17
54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded wrong images Najimimtiaz (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i'm uploaded wrong logo please deleete it... Najimimtiaz (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justin holarrhena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nithindharan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hugo Luis Alvarado (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, not own work (uploader is pictured in).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from www.flightradar24.com — Redboston 19:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer's watermark. , false date : https://www.24hod.sk/fotograficka-sutaz-horna-nitra-mojimi-ocami-pozna-svojich-vitazov-cl574477.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moulay Aamar Hilali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills from an unfree video.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moulay Aamar Hilali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Image extraite de cette vidéo You-tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKTPu9U8E1Y

Habertix (talk) 19:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+ likely out of scope too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moulay Aamar Hilali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, wrongly categorized and wrongly described. No indication of educational value. Out of scope. Sije (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 06:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sock of en:w:User:Mokshanine. See en:w:User talk:Amanbir II Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:21, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sock of en:w:User:Mokshanine. See en:w:User talk:Amanbir II Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sock of en:w:User:Mokshanine. See en:w:User talk:Amanbir II Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-resolution bitmap reupload of File:Under construction icon-orange.svg TFerenczy (talk) 11:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

créer lors d'une formation Wiki Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with no meaningful description. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 20:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with no meaningful description. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photograph U+1F360 (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photograph U+1F360 (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photograph U+1F360 (talk) 20:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photograph U+1F360 (talk) 20:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality image of (apparently) non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 20:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality heavily compressed image unused on any wiki CourtlyHades296 (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used; low quality. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of own uploader because exist a better version of the same photo. Ecummenic (talk) 02:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW showing a copyrighted banner. Permission is needed 219.78.190.68 02:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC-SA license on Flickr, not compatible on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not free license on Flickr. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not represent the subject well. Ponderosapine210 (talk) 03:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; poor quality; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hazy, pixilated, does not represent the subject well. Ponderosapine210 (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; poor quality; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. I don't think the uploader is any member of LSD (group). --Animalparty (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio; no permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same photo with better resolution (and correct title) exists: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ingela_Lundb%C3%A4ck_WPTTC2006_2.jpeg I'm the uploader Sinobball (talk) 04:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; duplicate file; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bessho_Kimie_WPTTC2006_2.jpeg Sinobball (talk) 04:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; duplicate; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vince.palmer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

2D representations of copyrighted 3D art.

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; FOP in the US is only for buildings. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside project scope, unused on Wikipedia Ytoyoda (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW, photographs of trophies that are under copyright are considered derivative works.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:DW, photographs of trophies that are under copyright are considered derivative works.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Right, for the files that you mentioned, I thought the trophy was prominent enough but I realize mileage may vary. As for the copyright status, any version of the trophy from 2000 should be under copyright since it was designed in 1999. The older one was a 1967 design, and I’m assuming it’s been less than 40 years since the designer’s death. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; kept a couple which are arguably de minimis. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most recent version of the trophy is copyrighted, photographs are considered derivative work.

The following are used on en-wiki to illustrate the trophy.

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. This trophy is under copyright. COM:De minimis doesn't apply here as the trophy is the main subject of these pictures. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martin_Zvolanek.jpg Sinobball (talk) 05:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; duplicate file. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no reason Dispolt (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:Porn. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old Logo without claim, new logo to be found: https://www.renolit.com/typo3conf/ext/renolit/Resources/Public/Images/logo/RENOLIT_Logo_cp_21_rgb.png RENOLITGroup (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please upload the new logo as a replacement. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no reason Dispolt (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:Porn. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not a building so FOP-US doesn't apply here. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no reason Dispolt (talk) 07:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:Porn. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:De minimis. Small banners. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:19, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LiisRaadla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Georges Braque (d. 1963), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Copyrighted work by Georges Braque, No permission. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LiisRaadla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Georges Braque (d. 1963), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Copyrighted work by Georges Braque, No permission. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:20, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image of an unidentified goat, basically a cropped and worse duplicate of File:Capra di montagna.JPG Syrio posso aiutare? 12:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie. Photographer's permission required via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 21:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this photo of myself for privacy reasons. RSchoenbaechler (WMF) (talk) 10:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion, there is another photo of him. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Юрій Сидоряк (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it to show someone how to upload photos. It doesn't belong on Wikimedia. WebMaven2000 (talk) 22:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 12:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Аналогичная фотография размещена также на личном сайте персоны (прямая ссылка) в более высоком разрешении — 578х866 против 533х800 на Викискладе. Следовательно, файл на сайте не является производным от этого файла. На сайте не указана дата создания и загрузки фотографии, в подвале сайта после знака копирайта указаны годы: 2001- 2017. На Викисклад фотографи загружена в 2014 году. Таким образом, существует вероятность того, что фотография на склад была залита с сайта. Доказательств обратного, увы, не представлено. Для загрузившего этот файл был единственной активностью в проекте. Сомнения же в лицензионном статусе фотографии должны трактоваться в пользу его удаления. Лицо, изображённое на фотографии через своего адвоката угрожает судом участнику русской Википедии. Претензии могут распространиться и на авторское права. — Redboston 02:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Person on photo died in 2018. Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He died in 2018. But it's my file. User:Mmgl 22:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leave it on Wikimedia Commons. I do not know the reasons that prevent the use of this file. On the page photo of "leaving" Mikhail Mikhailovich. It is also a good, symbolic photo. Alpha-Gamma (talk) 05:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://cuauhtemoc-col.gob.mx/administracion2012-2015/dependencias/dependencias.html + photographer's signature. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DVGUPS1407 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of photos, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The note suggests that this is not the uploader's work or held under a compatible copyright. ReaderofthePack (talk) 21:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Дублирование Alterbulat (talk) 23:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanslambrechts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No metadata, all same subject - not selfies. Looks like professional shots or rephotographs of something. Unlikely own work, more likely fan gallery or promotionalism.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dudhatjanak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work due to lack of meta data and apparently one picture was published with a caption. Seems to be promotionalism, other uploads (now gone) were similar.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helmondsport (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source/permission.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 12:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krajnyak.zoltan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical coats of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krajnyak.zoltan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Schreckgespenst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© 2020 Die Allianz für Österreich

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures of those politicians are published with the note "lizenzfrei" (royalty-free) by their party (see here). I apologize for my sparse knowledge of the procedure here on Commons, should I have uploaded them with a wrong licence please feel free to change it in whatever way required.--Schreckgespenst (talk) 09:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Schreckgespenst: Umm, it's said "license free" which is not the same as "published under a free license" including commercial use so I'm afraid it's not sufficient for Commons. Let's wait for an Administrator decision, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I understand... the problem seems to be that they are very unspecific about what exactly they mean. According to my research "lizenzfrei" could be translated to "licence-free" as well as "public domain", but as you say, let's wait.––Schreckgespenst (talk) 10:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unfortunately, the copyright status unclear, and OTRS-verification is needed. --Storkk (talk) 10:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elana Barker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: One deleted, other processed as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elana Barker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pixabay images. Images uploaded from Pixabay dated before 2019 (files uploaded since the site's recent license change in early January 2019 are no longer under CC0). Please add the date of creation and the {{Pixabay}} tag.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Over a month and no progress. Individual files can be undeleted if evidence of proper source and date is provided to COM:REFUND. --Storkk (talk) 10:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elana Barker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.undergroundpress.co.za/news/fokofpolisiekar-new-music-new-fokof-lager-box-new-exhibition

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 10:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elana Barker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A collection of small images - uncategorized - which do not appear to be fully own work of uploader. Drawings, painting, illustrations, photographs of other photos and so on. No useful metadata indicating creation.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep File:Frans Hals 008.jpg. I examined this one because it was so obviously PD and I wondered what could have gone sour. I think the nominator misunderstood the history. There was a file called File:Skildery.png which apparently had the same image and may indeed have been missing the metadata. But it has been redirected to File:Frans Hals 008.jpg, which in the summary does explain that it was painted in the seventeenth century, so it's definitely PD, and also has the license tags claiming that it's PD. --Trovatore (talk) 01:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep File:Frans Hals 008.jpg. per above, plus it is sourced to the PD collection the Yorck Project, like tens of thousands of other Commons pics. It has been around since 2005, is fully categorized, and has tons of metadata. It is used in many articles on many wikis. Johnbod (talk) 03:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. Copyright holders should confirm the licenses via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The result of the discussion is keep. --Soumyabrata (talksubpages) 14:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is outdated. We want to change it to other one. 92.119.221.137 09:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This logo doesn't correspond to real one. I would ask to substitute it with the relevant one. 2A0B:A080:1:131:D994:F232:1081:EF93 10:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason for deletion just upload the new one as separate file and write this information in the description. --GPSLeo (talk) 10:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old logo — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 45.89.88.219 (talk) 06:25, 2 October 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per previous result above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is an image of an article published in 1984-10-01 of a magazine, in which per Template:PD-Taiwan, the article itself is far from local public domain. As a result, the file is an unfree derivative work, and is likely to be copyrighted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fma12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.stade.fr/ Not obvious whether the logo is under or above COM:TOO. Additional opinions required. Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In my opinion, the logo has some elements (shades, gradients, its shape itself) that place it above the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xema34 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos appear to be above COM:TOO

Эlcobbola talk 20:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works (COM:DW) Batholith (talk) 18:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works (COM:DW) Batholith (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works (COM:DW) Batholith (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works (COM:DW) Batholith (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works (COM:DW) Batholith (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works (COM:DW) Batholith (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request, become useless being replaced by a GeoJSON map Ldgdps (talk) 06:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Author request, replaced with GEOJSON file Ldgdps (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hsiao_Shu-chin_WPTTC2006_1.jpeg I am the uploader for both images Sinobball (talk) 07:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: please use duplicate template next time. --Indeedous (talk) 21:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PMPProd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 21:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.copyright.gov/about/legal.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 21:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

French government works are non-free, so unless there's something I'm missing, the user cannot license the certificate. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 21:46, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request, become useless being replaced by a GeoJSON map Ldgdps (talk) 06:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helvio ricina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken with at least 8 different cameras, so unlikely to be own work. Some files might be PD, but are missing information on author and date.

Didym (talk) 14:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It looks to me like a mix of photos that are plausibly their own work and others that are not. It's not that uncommon that people own various different cameras and/or smartphones and take pictures with them over time, I have done so myself - but some of the images here seem clearly taken from somewhere else, for example File:Capture d’écran 2019-06-27 à 12.00.29.png where the French word for "screenshot" is even in the file name. On the other hand, for example, several of these images seem to be taken with the same iPhone 6 and uploaded in large size with Exif data; in these cases I would assume own work. I think that the files need individual review. There are very different cases in this list - for example, File:Marinodimarcocedrino.jpg could be deleted because it is per description an "imaginary" portrait of the person depicted, drawn in 2019 by a non-notable artist (the uploader?), so I would say that it is out of scope as not educational - as an exception to COM:INUSE; it's in use in French Wikipedia, but I do not think that according to any Wikipedia's rules you can use your own completely fictitious portrait for a person where no portrait is known... So I'm going to add some keep/delete votes to individual files in the list. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:54, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Additional comment: I notice now that several of the images in the list have already a "maintain" note added by Adri08 which is to be interpreted as a "keep" vote (see discussion in the section below). Gestumblindi (talk) 18:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photos with Apple Iphone6 and others cameras

[edit]

Not convinced by the motive for Images taken with de cameras Apple Iphone6 (2019) Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL (2012) etc... (see Metadata photos) . The photos are taken at different dates allany from 2006 to 2019, the user may have changed his equipment or have different ones. Adri08 (talk) 19:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adri08: Didn't see your comment when posting my comment above when looking at this individual deletion request, as it didn't have a proper sub-heading (was on the same depth as the deletion request). I think I agree with you, but will add my own votes, too. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Additional comment: Some of the iPhone photos are clearly taken from existing photos/publications, sometimes the raster is visible. These should be deleted, see my votes. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. --Regards--Adri08 (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, deleted the rest. Ruthven (msg) 23:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from https://naturkozmetikum.com/szappan Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yaroslav Rogalskyi in photo, dancing on stage - could not take a picture of himself. Uploader is not the author. No Permission. Bogus license, false own work claim.

And also

Professional, studio shooting. Photographers' permissions missing.

Микола Василечко (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True. Yaroslav is on the stage. Author Lexrogalsky is viewer. Not Yaroslav but Lexrogalsky uploaded this file. What the problem?
And Also,
I rented studio and light, I hired makeup and photographer. Yes, it’s professional shoots and I’m an owner of files.
Lexrogalsky (talk) 11:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is obvious to me that your login is similar. You write I’m an owner of files, so you are not the author. Give permission. --Микола Василечко (talk) 14:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The owner means copyright holder. Anyway, thanks, I've sent files to OTRS.--Lexrogalsky (talk) 15:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: One kept, rest deleted for no OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 18:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per File:ElanaqshabandiandNada.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Jameslwoodward. --Gbawden (talk) 18:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 03:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maria-Strong-official-USCO-photo.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not if it's a work of the US government, which are public domain. TJRC (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @TJRC: U.S. Copyright Office is a part of the Library of Congress which is the legislative branch, not the executive one. Besides not every agency work is ineligible for copyright.--Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're seriously confused about the scope of section 105 of the copyright act. It covers all works of the federal government, not only works of the executive branch.
On what basis do you believe that the United States Copyright Office is not part of the United States Government?
Your statement that "not every agency work" is technically true, because there is one single exception to the rule, but the works here do not fall under that exception. That sole exception is for works of standard reference data produced by the Department of Commerce, and has nothing to do with the U.S. Copyright Office. TJRC (talk) 18:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. LoC works are PD. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TJRC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not sure images are public domain (https://www.copyright.gov/about/legal.html).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Nothing on the cited page suggests otherwise; and the cited page has nothing whatsoever to do with NASA, so I have no clue what the purported connection to the two NASA photos is supposed to be. TJRC (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. LoC works are PD. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signed. Please explain why public domain in Russia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not signed. That's the attribution of the quote. Possibly {{PD-RU-exempt}} if official propaganda meets the first criterion, but I'm not sure. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no information about the original work. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher resolution image of the same drawing already existe and this file has an illegal copyright watermark William Ellison (talk) 09:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Philipp Kester (1873-1958), German photographer. Not allowed on commons

Mutter Erde (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maranchak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magometh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajaram Jain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same tiger can be seen here – a clipart of unclear origin, unlikely own work. TFerenczy (talk) 19:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this logo meets the threshold of originality in China, it shouldn't be PD-textlogo. See COM:TOO China Larryasou (talk) 10:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it isd above ToO, and that we need a permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been uploading (or replacing) SVG files of the logos of companies that are/were part of South Korean conglomerate Kumho Asiana Group, taken from official sources. And the recent replacement of the Air Busan logo SVG file was a part of this operation.
By the way, I don't actively contribute here in the Commons (except for the recent Kumho logo jobs, of course). So could you explain what do you mean by "it isd above ToO"? JSH-alive (talk) 13:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, above COM:TOO. ƏXPLICIT 01:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Bibitte52 (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: plain text, not copyrightable. --ƏXPLICIT 01:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guillaumeburger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rosiebroken (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright on image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Willem Borgh (1925-2003) died in 2003, so this photo could not have been taken in 2014 or in 2012 (in accordance with metadata). Does the uploader have the copyrights of Cor Jong and was he (Jong) the creator of the original photo? Gouwenaar (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DejiJJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely derivative work

1989 (talk) 08:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DejiJJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re vintage images or screenshots, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 13:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 Keep: This file is in use on en:Road signs in Vietnam. As explained in COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete files that are in use just because they are "wrong". If the file is incorrectly used on English Wikipedia, that use should be permanently corrected first. --bjh21 (talk) 14:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 16:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


Kept: same as before. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:KOSOVO, not own work Чорний Кіт (talk) 13:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:1972 DeTomaso Pantera and Liv Lindeland.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sock of en:w:User:Mokshanine. See en:w:User talk:Amanbir II Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is not a selfie as claimed. OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not available to access the original link at Youtube right now. AT (talk) 10:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was license reviewed at time of upload. The entire purpose of license review is to prevent us needing to delete the file if the original source goes stale. As long as there's no compelling reason to believe that the Youtube video was license laundered,  Keep. Storkk (talk) 10:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 11:43, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Indira Vizcaíno Silva.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:12, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and out of focus Schwede66 11:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saatyaki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per File:Seshendra Families1.jpg

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saatyaki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark show origin photographer no origin uploader. Need OTRS confirm. 轻语者 (talk) 12:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:51, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. An advertisement? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam – uploaded for now deleted self-promotional article on slovak wiki TFerenczy (talk) 14:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deaproz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 14:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the illustrator? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality Estopedist1 (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploading a duplicate Hecke1971 (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope (no motorcycles on this image). Cjp24 (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license. The uploader claims "own work" from 2016; however, it is obvious that the aerial photo of the farm houses are much older than that, problably from mid 20th century Pugilist (talk) 13:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Assanges as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. Unsppported licensing materials, see 'Important Notice' of the Hong Kong District Councils. (區議會網站刊登的區議員官方肖像為合理使用影像,無法上傳至維基共享計劃) //

Notice: In fact there is a program of the Hong Kong community user group to upload their portraits on Wikipedia with their knowledge, cooperation, and approval. Please note that a request about this image **has been received by OTRS**. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 23:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per File:IMG 2525-01 crop.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PCP; exif shows this is a scan, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Expletives in the description and category and probably not own work anyway TFerenczy (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from trophies, posters, historical photos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


No valid reason for deletion request. Covered by Brazilian Freedom of Panorama. The situation would be different if there were a sign "taking of photographs prohibited" at the entrance of the Fluminense trophy hall in Laranjeiras, but there is not. Apart from this, lots of 3D-objects om display are older than 70 years, which makes them per se copyright free in Brazil, not p.m.a. Oalexander (talk) 07:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Вы не перепутали Бразилию с Россией?  OpposeSoul Train (talk) 19:13, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Museums covered by FOP Brazil. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mission Mangal (transl. Mission Mars) is a 2019 Indian Hindi-language drama film which is not freely licensed. The poster should be deleted. Thanks for understanding. Eatcha (talk) 19:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW, 2D recreation of a copyrighted 3D work Ytoyoda (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:DW, 2D presentation of a 3D work Ytoyoda (talk) 16:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality Estopedist1 (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Distorted sound, unusable. --King of ♥ 05:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barbette47 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Why PD-old-70-1923 for european images with unknown author?

Didym (talk) 15:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dleal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://www.programaibermedia.com/pt/nuestras-cronicas/un-editor-de-cine-basicamente-intuitivo-una-conversacion-con-nelson-rodriguez-zurbaran-maestro-fundamental-del-cine-cubano-y-latinoamericano-del-siglo-xx/ Besides Nelson Rodriguez is probably not the copyright holder since he is pictured in.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel The picture was obtained from him directly. He authorized me to use it. Please advise. I don't know if this is the write place to respond you. Thanks. --Dleal (talk) 02:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dleal: Please have him sending a permission via COM:OTRS explaining who are the photographers of the two pictures. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:OTRS permission from the original photographer(s) required. --ƏXPLICIT 12:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without an author or date, there is no evidence this photo is subject to Japanese copyright, which is the basis of its public-domain claim. According to enwp, the subject was born and died in the US, so this photo could fall under those separate copyright laws, which often require knowing a publishing date. — fourthords | =Λ= | 18:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1233 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Background: Hong Kong community user group uploaded the above portraits on Wikipedia under the consent, cooperation, and approval of the District Councilors. OTRS tickets have been submitted and pending for verification.

Files were initially tagged by Assanges as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. Unsupported licensing materials, see 'Important Notice' of the Hong Kong District Councils. (區議會網站刊登的區議員官方肖像為合理使用影像,無法上傳至維基共享計劃) / Notice: In fact there is a program of the Hong Kong community user group to upload their portraits on Wikipedia with their knowledge, cooperation, and approval. Please note that a request about this image **has been received by OTRS**. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Combined as a single request. -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 09:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I voted for delete was simply the source 1233 given is unfree materials, whether they have councilors' consent or not. As long as the new free source provided, I'm OK with it. Will contact OTRS volunteers shortly for discussions, thanks. --@assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 09:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, as 1233 contacted to the district councils, they have stated that the photos' copyrights belong to the councilors, making councilors' approvals are valid. --Billytanghh (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All low resolution photos; direct permission from an official email address is required. The OTRS permission received come from another source, so it's not valid. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by JuTa, except for File:Fung Ka-lung portrait.jpg as OTRS permission was confirmed. --ƏXPLICIT 12:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is unfortunately not PD-old-70-expired as claimed. The author may have died more than 70 years ago, the book may have been published in 1924, but this photograph of the cover is almost certainly copyright-protected. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photograph of a 3D object (the book as a whole, not just the cover) which creates protection for the photograph as such. Also, for the cover, we would need to know the life dates of the cover artist, not of the book's author (as it was published in London, UK copyright of 70 years p.m.a. applies). --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by 1976 county image, which had the same county map CourtlyHades296 (talk) 02:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 14:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:Henri Lebasque died 1937, thus expected to be PD in France 01.01.2008 (1937 + 70 + 1), which is after 1996 and thus not yet PD in US without evidence of US publication/non-compliance with formalities (See COM:HIRTLE). Images must be free in country of origin and US. (Current self claim and CC-by-SA are bogus in all cases.) Эlcobbola talk 15:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Multiple sites including https://www.rauantiques.com/sainte-maxime-le-gouter-des-enfants-by-henri-lebasque say it's a circa 1917-1918 painting. It was probably either published around then or not published before 2003, which would make it public domain in the US. I also agree that CC license and self claims are bogus. Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:EVID: "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined: the file is in the public domain." Creation is not publication, and "probably" is not good enough. Where is actual evidence, not idle speculation? Эlcobbola talk 16:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is there reasonable doubt that would point to the painting was somehow published between 1925 and 2002? This seems like a COM:POINT nomination. Abzeronow (talk) 16:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
After you've read COM:EVID, please read COM:AGF. Again: where is your evidence? Эlcobbola talk 16:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sonja Meijer (1929-1994) died in 1994, so this photo could not have been taken in 2014. Does the uploader have the copyrights of Cor Jong? Gouwenaar (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 00:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

The deletion rationale remains unclear. Do you have a SVG file that supersedes this one? Please provide links to it if this is the case. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


SVG links https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thai_Rural_Road-%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%822031_%E0%B8%991-1.svg Thank you!


มองโกเลีย​๔๔ (talk) 23:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 16:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photograph U+1F360 (talk) 20:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regular DR instead. COM:SCOPE? Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file is sourced to Flickr (see here), but even it seems really unlikely that this would be the original work of the Flickr account holder. Even if it's unintentional, this seem like a case of COM:LL. The question then is whether bank note itself is copyrighted. According to COM:MONEY and COM:CUR Sierra Leone, government works such as currency are copyrighted. I guess this could be so old so as to be in the public domain, but en:Siaka Stevens, the individual depicted on the note, died in 1988; so, this seems really unlikely.
There is also a crop of this file which has been uploaded as File:Siaka Stevens (from Bank note).jpg. If the original Flickr file cannot be kept for some reason, then this crop would also probably need to be deleted as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability. Is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sock of en:w:User:Mokshanine. See en:w:User talk:Amanbir II Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NBK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour EugeneZelenko, c'est moi NBK qui ai photographié ces différents documents originaux. Voici les informations complémentaires demandées. je reste à votre disposition pour de plus amples informations.

author : Céline Laguarde (1873-1961), sans descendance. date : 1913 country of creation : France


author : Céline Laguarde (1873-1961), sans descendance. date : 1904 country of creation : France

author : Maurice de Lambert (1873-1942) date : 1908 country of creation : France


author : Nicolas Botta (Composition numérique à partir d'une illustration du livre de SCHULZE (H.) (lieutenant royal prussien en retraite), Chronique de tous les ordres et marques d'honneur de chevalerie accordés par des souverains et des régences avec les dessins des décorations. Puisée dans des sources authentiques, Supplément n°1, Berlin, 1870, Charles Lindow imprimeur et libraire-éditeur, index pp. I-XIX, pl X-LXVII, 522 p. Planche 65 pp512-513.) date : 2011 country of creation : France

author : inconnu date : après 1894 country of creation : France ou Turquie

Merci de m'aider à mieux présenter ces illustrations pour la communauté. --nbk (talk) 16:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)NBK[reply]

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Please put this information into file description and fix license tags. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Casper Kull (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, painting, document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Obligatory notice of being asked by another user to comment on this DR.
 Keep File:Broschyr om Spanska sjukan från Medicinalstyreslen 1918.pdf due to either {{PD-Sweden-URL9}} (it is a brouchure and not a report, so unsure), or due to point one of {{PD-Sweden-photo}} (non-artistic work before 1970).
 Comment The person in File:Porträtt Oscar Medin.jpg died in 1927, so it highly possible this is PD in at least the US due to age. Not sure about Sweden due to unkown authorship. Possible  Keep due to {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}.
 Delete File:Porträtt Arnold Josefson.jpg due to author Helmer MasOlle (Q6152608) died in 1969. Undelete in 2040.
 Comment Regarding File:Kerstin Nordendahl Bild.jpg see comment above regarding File:Porträtt Oscar Medin.jpg, however subject died 1958. Category on file pages says it is from the 1920s.
 Keep The source of File:På apoteket på Rosenborgsgatan i Huskvarna, JM 2014-1-96.jpg (a county museum) attribues the photography company, and claims the file is licensed as CC-BY 4.0.
Pinging copyright expert Clindberg for a second opinion.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:På apoteket på Rosenborgsgatan i Huskvarna, JM 2014-1-96.jpg links to a source[2] which lists this image (possibly with adjusted brightness) as CC-BY-4.0. I fail to understand why this image was nominated for deletion. --Bensin (talk) 17:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: execpt for File:Porträtt Arnold Josefson.jpg per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{FoP-Macao}}, freedom of panorama in Macao applies only for permanently installed objects. In my opinion the goat sculptures are not permanently installed, so permission from sculptor is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. --JuTa 10:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltqphg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Merci de corriger les dates de prises de vue, de mentionner le(s) nom(s) du(des) photographe(s) et d'expliquer pourquoi ces images sont hors droits d'auteurs en France.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltqphg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Photo prise il y a 110 ans, entreprise aujourd'hui disparue, merci  Keep.
publicité datant de 84 ans, entreprise de transport aujourd'hui disparue, merci  Keep.
Photo prise il y a 107 ans, merci  Keep.
Photo prise il y a 108 ans, casino disparu, merci  Keep.
Publicité parue il y a 111 ans, merci  Keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltqphg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, postcards, drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Publicité datant de 111 ans, cette société n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Publicité datant de 111 ans, cette société n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Publicité datant de 111 ans, cette société n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
annuaire datant de 111 ans, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de plus de 200 ans, cette banque n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
publicité datant de 100 ans, cette banque n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
publicité datant de 100 ans, cette banque et cette succursale n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
publicité datant de 98 ans, cette banque n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
publicité datant de 90 ans, cette banque et cette succursale n'existe plus, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de  Keep cette image, le peintre Eugène Chigot est mort en 1923. --Ltqphg (talk) 09:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 119 ans, prêtée par un descendant, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 125 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 119 ans, prêtée par un descendant, merci  Keep.--Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Document datant de 143 ans, prêtée par un descendant de la famille, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo prise par mes soins, entreprise disparue, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 130 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 130 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 125 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 110 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)* File:Publicité, de l'architecte Joseph Magnin, parue en 1909 dans l'annuaire général de Paris-Plage Le Touquet-Paris-Plage.png[reply]
photo datant de 1OO ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 112 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 110 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 120 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 120 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 89 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 91 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 93 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 100 ans minimum, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 122 ans, hôtel détruit en 1902, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 122 ans, hôtel détruit en 1902, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans, années 1900, Paul Ridoux est mort en 1920, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo cant de 100 ans environ, premier quart du siècle précédent, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 116 ans, casino fermé et démonté peu de temps après, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 93 ans, détruit lors de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Plan établi il y a 127 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans minimum, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 90 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 120 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 120 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 126 ans, Ernest Legendre est mort en 1914, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo prise il y a 100 ans environ et donner par un cousin de la famille Grujon, merci  Keep.
Please keep, as it has been post stamped on 22 July 1912. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep, because it has been published on 27 April 1908, as shown in the third line of hte document. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 120 ans, Charles Delambre est mort en 1906, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 111 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo d'une publicité datant de 111 ans, hôtel détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo d'une publicité datant de 111 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 100 ans, Allen Stoneham est mort depuis 93 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 160 ans environ, ce pont a été détruit avant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 95 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 96 ans, merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 95 ans, il est mort en 1933. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 80 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 91 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement en 1929. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 120 ans, le tramway a disparu définitivement pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 126 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 126 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 126 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 98 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo remise par le secrétaire perpétuel de la Société académique du Touquet-Paris-Plage pour insertion dans Wikipédia. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo en double à supprimer. merci  Delete. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 134 ans, couverture d'un livre en ma possession. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 126 ans. le bâtiment n'existe plus depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 100 ans, Joseph Louis Sanguet est mort depuis 99 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 120 ans. le bâtiment a été détruit depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 100 ans, Édouard Lévêque est mort depuis 86 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 93 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 95 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 94 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'au moins 80 ans. Albert Pouthier est mort depuis 72 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus 110 ans, Léon Garet est mort il y a 108 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 134 ans d'un journal disparu depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 134 ans d'un journal disparu depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 134 ans d'un journal disparu depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 134 ans d'un journal disparu depuis plus de 100 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo d'environ 100 ans, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo d'environ 112 ans, Joseph Louis Sanguet est mort depuis 99 ans. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant d'environ 100 ans, hôtel et entreprise disparus aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1960, piscine disparue aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1960. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1950, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1930, hôtel très endommagé pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale et qui est détruit définitivement dans les années 1960. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant des années 1900, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans minimum, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo à  Delete, merci.
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo prise pendant la Première Guerre mondiale, datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, hôtel construit en 1904 et détruit en 1909. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel construit en 1909, voir cachet de la poste. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, période de construction de l'hôtel. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1910, voir date manuscrite figurant sur la carte, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1890, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, hôtel construit en 1904, disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, voir cachet de la poste sur la photo, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, villa qui devient l'hôtel Bristol en 1927. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1890, hôtel construit en 1892, disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1900, hôtel détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, hôtel construit en 1904, voir commentaire manuscrit, sur la carte, datant de la Première Guerre mondiale, hôtel détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale et disparu aujourd'hui. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1910, voir commentaire manuscrit, sur la carte, datant de la Première Guerre mondiale. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1900. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 70 ans environ, des années 1950, hôtel disparu. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1890, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 94 ans, des années 1920, paru dans le journal "Échos mondains" de juin 1926. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 94 ans, des années 1920, paru dans le journal "Échos mondains" de juin 1926. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 150 ans, des années 1860, réalisée par Gustave Souquet. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans, des années 1920, pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926, voir la date figurant sur la photo. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1900, pont détruit en 1926 pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926, voir cachet de la poste sur la photo. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
à  Delete, merci. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 70 ans environ, des années 1950.
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1900, pont détruit en 1926 pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926, voir cachet de la poste sur la photo. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo, de 71 ans, datant de août 1949, année d'ouverture du pont routier d'Étaples.
à  Delete, merci. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
à  Delete, merci. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans, de 1926, pour la construction du pont routier d'Étaples de 1926, pont détruit pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
photo datant de 70 ans environ du pont provisoire construit après la Seconde Guerre mondiale et remplacé par le pont routier d'Étaples inauguré en 1949. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930. piscine disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 80 ans environ, des années 1930. piscine disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 60 ans environ, des années 1960. piscine disparue. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920. hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1930, entreprise disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1930, entreprise disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1930, entreprise disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 100 ans environ, des années 1920, chapelle disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1910, chapelle disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1900, voir cachet de la poste de 1907 sur la photo, chapelle disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 90 ans environ, des années 1920, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 120 ans environ, des années 1890, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, entreprise disparue. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910, voir inscription manuscrite "1912" sur la photo, hôtel disparu. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo difficile à dater, datant de 110 ans environ, des années 1910. Merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Photo datant de plus de 100 ans, Joseph Louis Sanguet est mort depuis 99 ans. merci  Keep. --Ltqphg (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
License tags must be fixed. Sorry, but 1960 photos are not in public domain in France. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ltqphg: De toutes manières, que les bâtiments aient disparus ne fait pas disparaître le copyright. Certaines des photos ne sont d'ailleurs pas assez anciennes pour être sûr que 70 ans se soient écoulés depuis la mort du photographe. Aussi, pour chacune des photos où les noms d'un photographe et/ou d'une maison d'édition sont présents (donc, ce ne sont pas des photos anonymes), vous devez rechercher les noms des héritiers des photographes et obtenir leur autorisation pour publication. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, mon intention, en apportant ces précisions, n'est absolument pas de "forcer" une décision mais juste de donner les informations qui puissent permettre de prendre la décision la plus adaptée, eu égard au temps de travail considérable que j'ai consacré pour la recherche et l'importation des ces images ainsi que leur insertion dans Wikipédia. Vous remerciant pour votre compréhension dans le respect des règles Wikimédia. Bien cordialement. --Ltqphg (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ltqphg: Peut-être mais vous n'avez pas répondu aux objections soulevées par le nominateur: "Photos historiques et publicité. Des informations appropriées sur l'auteur / la date / le pays de création doivent être fournies pour déterminer le statut des droits d'auteur et les étiquettes de licence corrigées." En matière de photographies non anonymes, le nom et date de décès du photographe sont essentielles parce que c'est à partir de là que le décompte du copyright commence; la date de création étant purement accessoire et, dans le cas qui nous intéresse, inutile. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltqphg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These plaques were created by Alain Gonon, born in 1964. No freedom of panorama in France.

Chassipress (talk) 15:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not PD-PRC-exempt shizhao (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 19:40, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Logo Ras67 (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COM:TOO#China. - Marking as possible copyright violation because this logo exceeds the threshold of originality and therefore is subject to copyright. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67: You provided 6 years ago www.spacefacts.de/mission/english/shenzhou_9.htm as the website of the China National Space Administration (which it is not). Second, site of the China National Space Administration (http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/) is copyrighted and I haven't found this logo there. Third you say image is "a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia" (which it is not, saying yourself it has been "redrawn by Jorge Cartes (JCR) from Spacepatches.nl"). Then I consider this logo is not covered by Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China: Article 5. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files are under claims that they were published before 1924, or before 1963 without copyright renewal, and are thus PD. However, I'm not convinced that is the case - it's not clear which images were actually published at that time (as Jones was a newspaper photographer) and which were not published until recent digitization. The Boston Public Library, which holds the collection, says the family holds the copyright - and the BPL tends not to be overly conservative with copyright. While I would very much like for these images to be PD, any that haven't provably been published when taken should be considered copyrighted until 2037.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them have specific date pre-1924 dates others are vague -- Thats Just Great (talk) 06:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC):[reply]
@Thats Just Great: The date that the photos were taken is not the issue here - the issue is when the photos were published. That is not always the same. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Others can help search in Genealogy Bank and Newspapers.com, if you have an account there. Restrict the search to Massachusetts or keep all of USA if you think the image might have been distributed by one of the photographic services or the Associated Press. The ones I loaded I had found in newspapers, but I should have loaded the published version when I uploaded the library prints. I am glad that his photos were preserved, photographers and writers were rarely credited for their work. Even when his photos were distributed by the Associated Press or another distributor, he was never credited. It would be sad if all we had were the fuzzy newspaper versions, that only gave us a glimpse of what the subject looked like. Please note that I have ONLY looked for the ones that I uploaded, it is a time consuming process since there may be 50 to 100 articles in local papers for the event that the photo was taken at, and each one has to be looked at to see what photo they used. Remember Leslie Jones was rarely credited for his photos, he was just a staff photographer who kept his negatives, and then donated them to a museum. RAN (talk)

Deleted: per nomination except for those with evidence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]