Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/02/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 24th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prpbably taken from: https://xn----7sbf0akqag0a2e.xn--p1ai/sonnik-koty-lezut-okno/ E4024 (talk) 03:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 07:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in EXIF means this was previously published on Facebook, requires an OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 08:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previously published https://telegrafi.com/rahoveci-mban-stervitjen-e-pare-ne-palestren-e-re/ Ytoyoda (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 08:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Says here the image is from 2016: https://50skyshades.com/news/airports-routes/kosovo-airport-shuts-after-flight-reportedly-leaves-runway Ytoyoda (talk) 03:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 08:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an architect's rendering, not an original photo Ytoyoda (talk) 03:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 08:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

raw text, unused, out of COM:SCOPE BevinKacon (talk) 10:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 10:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per uploader request --Alaa :)..! 18:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: already in use elsewhere so probably no 'own work'. Encycloon (talk) 14:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 19:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AymanShayto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated. Have File:Anisyl acetate3D.png as higher quality alt DMacks (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. These are actually different chemicals (mistitled image). --DMacks (talk) 19:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader Conservatrix (talk) 06:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:50, 24 Februar 2019 UTC: Original uploader --Krdbot 19:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The current image in the infobox is suspicious as a possible copyfraud. It is the only upload by that user, who has only made a couple other edits on Wikimedia sites ([1]). A reverse image search shows it used a couple of places elsewhere on the internet, which could just be other sites using the wikimedia commons image. However, it may have been copied from Planefinder.net (crediting a Jacob Waldroop for the image), especially because the Commons file name (File:5983902 Photo 1513461.jpg) essentially matches the file URL on Planefinder.net: https://planefinder.net/images/5983902:Photo:1513461.jpg and exactly matches the file name when I try to download that image (via right click, save as) and the other image on the site has a similar file name (which would be unlikely if they had copied from the Commons image). There is no Internet Archive image of that page, so I can't prove it was copied from there. Additionally, the Commons page for the image simply says "The aircraft before it crashed." without any information about where it was taken. AHeneen (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant copyvio, converted to speedy and gone. --Sealle (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Datsofelija (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no licence rights Datsofelija (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)datsofelija[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 18:22, 24 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logically inconsistent (only 20 boxes). Linked URL has no free license.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 19:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 23:42, 24 Februar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Doomdorm64 --Krdbot 13:57, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Las 46 Especialidades Médicas.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Uncle Fred 20:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please use the speedy deletion process for copyright violations. --Green Giant (talk) 20:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've created this page by mistake; tests should go to Module:Complex date/testcases DmitTrix (talk) 21:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 22:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller, pixelated, and with in-image caption, compared to File:C20 Fullerene.png DMacks (talk) 00:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 20:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Debe ser borrado 181.176.106.202 06:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Este es un archivo de musica y este archivo fue publicado sin permiso del autor por eso debe ser eliminado. DANIEL GONZALES RUIS (talk) 17:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Esta inagen debe ser borrada porque esta publicado sin permiso de autor. 181.67.21.40 16:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possibly copyright violation, and likely out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error, uploaded in the wrong category Anthony Libabu (talk) 21:47, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, this page was recently deleted (within the last 24 hours). The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 2604:6000:100E:85D0:BCC1:2821:544C:ECAE 00:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, this page was recently deleted (within the last 24 hours). The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 2604:6000:100E:85D0:BCC1:2821:544C:ECAE 00:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, this page was recently deleted (within the last 24 hours). The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 2604:6000:100E:85D0:BCC1:2821:544C:ECAE 00:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Herr Ju, is this not a screenshot? E4024 (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cited ref does not assert open-license DMacks (talk) 01:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality, amateur drawing with no educational value. AshFriday (talk) 01:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused amateur drawing with no educational value. AshFriday (talk) 01:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality, amateur drawing with no educational value. AshFriday (talk) 01:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. // Liftarn (talk) 07:58, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality, amateur drawing with no educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Shocker" is a copyrighted character, making this image out of scope. To quote the instructions given in the Upload Wizard,

"We can't accept work created or inspired by others. By default, you can't upload someone else's work. This includes...drawings of characters from comics, TV or movies, even if you drew them yourself." 
AshFriday (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:14, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures of SCP-173

[edit]

SCP-173, its likeness, and the photograph have NOT been released under any Creative Commons license. This sculpture and its likeness may not be used for commercial purposes under any circumstances. Trade (talk) 01:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality, amateur drawing with no educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 01:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:16, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality, amateur drawing with no educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality, amateur drawing with no educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur drawing with no educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 01:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused amateur drawing with no educational value. AshFriday (talk) 01:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality, amateur drawing with no educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality, amateur drawing with no educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 01:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused picture of questionable educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable artists. AshFriday (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, amateur drawing of questionable educational value. Commons is not a hosting service for non-notable cartoonists. AshFriday (talk) 02:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lovely! But regrettably we avoid keeping amateur art in Commons. E4024 (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position - especially the stars - of the flag is here: Flag of the United States, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 03:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not a reason to delete. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 03:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The file is in use on en:Flag of the United States and fi:Pystyliputus, so by COM:INUSE it should be kept even if it's inaccurate. Once the DR is over, it might be renamed. --bjh21 (talk) 13:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Icon flag is trying to replace this perfectly good file (File:Vertical United States Flag.svg) with a file named File:Flag of the United States, vertical.svg. The stars in Icon flag's new file are rotated by 90° which is a defacement of the US Flag. So no, do not delete File:Vertical United States Flag.svg. If you want to delete something, please delete File:Flag of the United States, vertical.svg instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MapGrid (talk • contribs) 14:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: this is the standard vertical display of the U.S. flag – it's definitely not standard to rotate the stars as in File:Flag of the United States, vertical.svg. Alkari (?), 25 February 2019, 00:43 UTC
 Keep Fry1989 eh? 02:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position - especially the stars - of the flag is here: Flag of the United States, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 03:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete SVG exists. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 06:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Only because there is a superior SVG of this image. Fry1989 eh? 02:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of Australia, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 04:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Icon flag is trying to replace File:Vertical Flag of Australia.svg with a new file named File:Flag of Australia, vertical.svg. The Southern Cross constellation on Icon flag's new file is rotated by 90°; this is a defacement of the Australian Flag. Please do not delete the original file (File:Vertical Flag of Australia.svg). You may consider deleting the new file (File:Flag of Australia, vertical.svg) as some may find it disrespectful or offensive. And FYI if you look at the description of File:Flag of Australia, vertical.svg it says "Flag of Serbia, vertical".MapGrid (talk) 22:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may have noticed that the Union Jack is not symmetrical, so please, look at the file Vertical Flag of the United Kingdom.svg. --Icon flag (talk) 01:06, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah U:Icon flag; I did not initially notice that you also fiddled with the Union Jack in the canton of File:Flag of Australia, vertical.svg. You messed that up too. A vertical flag really just means the vertical display of a standard non-vertical flag. This means a simple 90° rotation of the entire flag followed by a possible flip along the y-axis. These transformation can be done with a physical flag just the same as they can be done with a picture of the flag. You should not be doing any transformation that would require scissors and thread! Specifically you should not rotate or flip individual parts of the flag. For the Union Jack, the correct vertical display requires a rotation only [2]. The Austrailian flag requires a rotation of the entire flag followed by a flip of the entire flag. The flip is required to keep the canton in the upper left corner. It is shown and explained in this government documentation: [3]. Thus the old file (File:Vertical Flag of Australia.svg) is correct. Your new file is wrong. There are many people in this world that take pride in the flags of their countries. It is offensive to butcher the flags without bothering to do any research. MapGrid (talk) 02:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Icon flag, presumably everybody reading this is aware that the Union Jack is not symmetrical. I have looked at File:Vertical Flag of the United Kingdom.svg; file size is bigger than it needs to be, but other than that it looks fine; the two wider white lines on the left side of the flag are above the diagonals as they should be. Now as I said above, the Flag of Australia needs to be rotated and then flipped to be shown correctly in a vertical orientation; the result is that the two wider white lines on the left side of the canton end up below the diagonals. Seriously, I suggest you buy yourself a flag of Australia, hang it vertically with the canton in the upper left corner and then stand back and take a look! MapGrid (talk) 06:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree with you, MG. RainbowSilver2ndBackup (talk) 17:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of Canada, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 04:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please rename if you deem necessary, but there is no reason for deletion. MapGrid (talk) 04:45, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks to me like Icon flag is trying to replace a perfectly good vertical image of the flag with a new file named File:Flag of Canada, vertical.svg. This new file shows the maple leaf rotated by 90°; it is an improper defacement which I find offensive. Government images of what the flag should look like when hung vertically can be found here: [4]. So again, I reiterate, please do not delete File:Vertical Flag of Canada.svg.MapGrid (talk) 14:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
MapGrid, thanks for pointing this out. Icon Flag nominated quite a number of vertical flags for speedy deletion, which I sent all to DR at the same time. You seem to know about flag issues, so I would appreciate you taking a look at the other ones to see what you think. Huntster (t @ c) 21:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Correct alignment for the Canadian flag when hung vertically. Fry1989 eh? 01:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of New Zealand, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 04:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Icon flag is trying to replace File:Vertical Flag of New Zealand.svg with a new file named File:Flag of New Zealand, vertical.svg. The Southern Cross constellation on Icon flag's new file is rotated by 90°; this is a defacement of the New Zealand Flag. Please do not delete the original file (File:Vertical Flag of New Zealand.svg). You may consider deleting the new file (File:Flag of New Zealand, vertical.svg) as some may find it disrespectful or offensive. MapGrid (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may have noticed that the Union Jack is not symmetrical, so please, look at the file Vertical Flag of the United Kingdom.svg. --Icon flag (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of Turkey, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 04:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

>>>>>> File:Vertical Flag of Turkey.svg is BASED ON THIS PHOTOS:


SEE ALSO: Flags of the World, Turkey: Vertical hoisting of the Turkish flag. and
 See also category: Buildings with flags of Turkey.
>>>>> NO VALID REASONS FOR DELETION!

SOURCES FOR File:Flag of Turkey, vertical.svg????

Ping @RainbowSilver2ndBackup as involved party. User talk:FDRMRZUSA (26 February 2019; 16,12 UTC+1).

It appears both orientations of the crescent and star are correct. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:21, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of Serbia, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 04:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Icon flag is trying to replace File:Flag of Serbia (vertical).svg with a new file named File:Flag of Serbia, vertical.svg. The new file has a rotated crest which may be considered disrespectful. Please don't delete the original (File:Flag of Serbia (vertical).svg).MapGrid (talk) 23:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may have noticed the vertical flags of Serbia: Flags of the World, VectorStock and eBay. --Icon flag (talk) 01:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Fry1989 eh? 01:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:21, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of Malaysia, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 04:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This could easily be interpreted as a vertical banner with elements of the flag, rather than being truly representative of the national flag. The two are quite different. Huntster (t @ c) 04:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. This type of banner was used here and here and here. The content of this file is therefore not arbitrary or deceptive and shouldn't be deleted. Its name and categorization might need to be changed in order to distinguish it from what Icon flag claims (unfortunately without naming a source) to be the official vertical flag. TilmannR (talk) 10:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of Malaysia, vertical.svg

 Keep This is actually rather common in Malaysia. Here's one on the Petronas Towers. Fry1989 eh? 01:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of Serbia, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 04:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fry1989 eh? 01:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is already the file: file: Flag of Serbia (vertical).svg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:999:481:41fc:51b4:f3e:e8a4:3b17 (talk) 22:21, 10 November 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, no valid reason for deletion, the vertical flag is just vertical, this is both.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep This file shows the flag horizontally and vertically, and is used for a long time on en:Flag of Serbia, meaning that it is useful. Note that multiple flag files are victims to vandalism, showing rotated coat of arms that is not how the vertical flag is displayed in practice. Nikola (talk) 11:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aulendil17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 08:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lihi g (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host

Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Lihi g (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host

Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FreddyCat2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Meta data and water marks (when present) read "Stella Photography", needs COM:OTRS from Stella to retain.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC license could not be confirmed at source. This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. MB-one (talk) 11:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyrighted content.--Up and Go (talk) 22:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 00:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from Facebook according to meta data NinjaStrikers «» 07:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from this website. Fran1001hk (talk) 07:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rosegichukij (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo s

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 09:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samuel Gariy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope.

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 09:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fanrong23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OnaiOrdna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI the uploader is a sockpuppet of GrazyPolis' --Vituzzu (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Klemens Karkow, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:48, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, reloaded again. User warned. Again

Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and blocked. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal, unused. Out of COM:SCOPE. Steinsplitter (talk) 12:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per nom. Possibly eligible for speedy deletion as there is no evidence that the depicted person agreed. —Nagy 18:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of non-contributor, promotional QueerEcofeminist (talk) 13:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional use, non-encylopedic value QueerEcofeminist (talk) 13:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nill Margarido (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably not own work Per FBMD exif

Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful - we already have the background image on commons and the text is mainly a repetition of specifications Kges1901 (talk) 16:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. matanya talk 16:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Matanya. --Jianhui67 TC 05:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map. Superseded by File:Lage von Peckeloh in Versmold 2.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant and misleading. Possible vandalism. Broichmore (talk) 18:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: seems like a test upload. --Jianhui67 TC 05:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это не оригинальный фильм 1939, а более поздняя обработанная копия. Непонятно зачем к оригинальному фильму в 68 минут приклеен он же без звука. Качество низкое. К сожалению не заметил эту копию до загрузки нормальной. Так бы загрузил поверх. -- НоуФрост (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 02:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam-type image. Only use prior to this was on a simplewiki article which has since been deleted. There is no potential educational use for this image IMO. Hiàn (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adhm el3ao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GCasiachange (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely Flickr washing. Both Flickr accounts contain almost no uploads other than these. Files were uploaded to Commons almost immediately after being posted to Flickr.

Paul_012 (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS Note to closing admin: If closed as delete, please also add the accounts to the blacklist, thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is Facebook (FBM). Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 20:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://faceafrique.com/news/togo-le-pasa-compte-venir-a-bout-de-la-malnutrition-dans-les-couches-les-plus-defavorisees/ GuillaumeG (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination although mentioned source is currently unavailable. --Ellywa (talk) 03:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by France la france 1959 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 21:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works. Evidence of permission is needed. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 21:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC) هذه شهاده تقدير خاصه بي من قبل مؤسسه ومبادرات الملكه رانيا في التعليم عن بعد اخدتها وحصلت ع الشهاده بعد الكورسات لماذا تحذفون👿[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted banners and food packing

Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HachemBrown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 22:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BOMAME (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope.

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 22:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal photo. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 22:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Donia Said Kamel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 22:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused personal photo of rather small dimensions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Alaa :)..! 16:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image. E4024 (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS pics of a youngster who could well use a short term Commons vacation. E4024 (talk) 15:08, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repetition of deleted OoS files. E4024 (talk) 18:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: was already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been uploaded and deleted several previous times. Unused image of non-contributer to Commons. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment simply adding File:Farhan Rana Rajpoot Signature.jpg to the deletion request, it is the uploader's signature -Nutshinou Talk! 19:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted both. Uploader is globally locked. I tagged 4 sockpuppets. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been uploaded and deleted several previous times. Here only to self-promote. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted by Fitindia. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 09:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal photo. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 09:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal photo T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 09:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal photo T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 09:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

speedydelete:non-existent source.-- 93.190.143.86 13:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. IP vandalism has been reverted. Artix Kreiger (talk) 15:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Mickey Mouse & Star Wars trooper, which are still in copyright, unlikely source has permission from Disney or Lucas BevinKacon (talk) 10:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stéphane Bily (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Oeuvres d'un artiste toujours vivant, autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:30, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not useful Aloneinthewild (talk) 14:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:34, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No cats. Is she someone in scope? E4024 (talk) 14:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope. --1989 (talk) 08:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Genius Omuzira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:39, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:39, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, small photo with no Exif Metadata T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Grabbed from Facebook according to metadata. Phyo WP (message) 15:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayoub SANHAJI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mouha.ibs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios. I do not trust this user as many of their images appears to be blatant copyvios from other website. I have nominated some for speedy deletion but decided to DRs these ones as they do not have Exif metadata. Considering that this user uploads images protected from other website here. I think we should delete all these images per COM:PRP. For example File:Bois sacré 01.jpg was copied from this website and File:Lutte traditionnelle sans frappe 01.jpg from this website and several others listed here on the same website.

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mouha.ibs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of other copyrighted images (DW). Delete per COM:PRP

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From an American publication that has a copyright notice. Undelete in 2030 Abzeronow (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abzeronow, i did not find the place where you have found the copyright concerning this newspaper. I already saw several granted pictures as the file File:Betty Bryson in Screenland.png for example. But if you think we have not the well right to conserve the file, we must delete it. It is just a break heart, is she not pretty !

Have a nice evening.--Gismoz (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Check https://archive.org/details/hollywood23holl/page/n465 Copyright symbol on top of the page and text at the bottom that says "Copyright 1934." Also you can see the copyright holder named as Hollywood Magazine Inc. and the issue being August 1934. Now it may be possible the copyright on this was not renewed but that requires research. @Clindberg: Per COM:PCP this should be deleted unless proof is shown the copyright was not renewed around 1962 Abzeronow (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, it's got a copyright page there. However, per this page, Hollywood Magazine never renewed their issues. Some individual contributions were renewed occasionally, but not whole issues. So this should be {{PD-US-not renewed}}. The other file you mention has the correct license.  Keep Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, added license and removed the "no license" tag. Per Carl, this should be closed as Kept. Abzeronow (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --1989 (talk) 08:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamlilriot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion of non-notable artist.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yuniang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios. I don't trust this user as they appear to be uploading copyvios from another Website. These has no Exif metadata and I think we could comfortably delete these images per COM:PRP. See File:Extrait du vin 06.jpg for example

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:45, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yuniang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios. I don't trust this user as they appear to be uploading copyvios from another Website. These has no Exif metadata and I think we could comfortably delete these images per COM:PRP.File:Extrait du vin 06.jpg for example

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:45, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vdacunha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright holder is "Hartac". There is no evidence that uploaded is the same persona as hartac. Delete per COM: PRP

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant. Irrelevant. Possible vandalism or more likely sandbox material uploaded in error. Prank Broichmore (talk) 18:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant. Possible vandalism or more likely sandbox material uploaded in error. Broichmore (talk) 18:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant. Possible vandalism or more likely sandbox material uploaded in error. Broichmore (talk) 18:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant. Possible vandalism or more likely sandbox material uploaded in error. Broichmore (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant. Possible vandalism or more likely sandbox material uploaded in error. Broichmore (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant. Possible vandalism or more likely sandbox material uploaded in error. Personal detail of the uploader Broichmore (talk) 18:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible vandalism or more likely sandbox material uploaded in error. Everything this Uploader has done is prank stuff. Broichmore (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It’s presumably copyrighted; no indication of CC license Umimmak (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 19:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused family private photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 19:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Towobola Iyanou Samuel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 19:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 20:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All uploads by Istkart

[edit]

I want to nominate all 7000+ images by User:Istkart for deletion. I haven't scrutinised every each of them, but I scrolled through the upload list and I think it's safe to assume that they only consist of poorly made (technically and artistically), unusable and inaccurate maps which are screencaps of flash files located at user's personal website. There are two types of images:

I don't see any utility for these, but one think they certainly do: render whole categories unusable for navigation (see Category:Maps of the Byzantine Empire for example).

Some of user's uploads were deleted earlier for the reasons above (being inaccurate and OOS).

I'm not tagging 7000+ files for obvious reasons. --Qbli2mHd (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

List of 7k files

Discussion

[edit]
  • Having sampled a few of these: mass deletion may well be in order, or (possibly) section these off into some subcategories where they will not render major categories useless. I'd be glad to see someone show why a few of these might be useful & should be kept on a case-by-case basis. Still, at the very least, User:Istkart should (1) explain what he/she is trying to do here and (2) refrain from further similar uploads until we have a consensus that we want what the user is uploading. - Jmabel ! talk 22:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom. @Jmabel: would it make sense to tag the files and list them here?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Jeff G.: It's an awful lot of files for an explicit list here, but tagging seems worth doing, so that someone has a chance to speak up about anything they think is worth saving. I really wish User:Istkart would weigh in to explain his/her intent and promise to refrain from further similar uploads until we have a consensus. Without that, I get a lot less interested in working out whether any of his/her work should be kept. - Jmabel ! talk 01:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom. They clutter categories and are really useless, not to mention usually riddled with errors and inaccuracies. Constantine 10:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nearly the same as File:Molécule de morphine.jpg, except slightly different angle (no better/worse) and this one has lots of jpg artifacts (worse) DMacks (talk) 12:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 20:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equivalent to File:Synthesis of morphine.png by same uploader except several "Ph" (phenyl group) symbols were written "PH" or "PH2" (and subsequent mis-ordering thereof) DMacks (talk) 13:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there are other chemical mistakes equivalent in both files, but may as well get down to one file and then fix it only once. DMacks (talk) 13:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 20:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong reaction - hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid will give chloro-4-butanol see here Codc (talk) 20:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it, please. The file presents water hydration and does not explicit (acid) hydrochloric acid. The equation for hydrolysis is: C4H8O + H2O = C4H10O2, so the file mathematically is correct. Regarding the poor quality, I can improve it. I apologize that many persons only think about file deletion and not file improvement. Deletion is right when the file is totally incorrect, and regarding the poor quality, it should be remade and not deleted. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 21:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Claudio Pistilli: Yes, in my explanation for deletion I mentioned that the normal hydrolysis of tetrahydrofuran leads to 1,4-butanediol. As DMacks also mentioned below, the reaction equation is mathematically correct, but completely chemical nonsense. Reversed, the acid-catalyzed dehydration of 1,4-butanediol leads to THF, so your equation is basically proven wrong. Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Hydrolysis of the ether to the diol is a reasonable reaction (agree with Chem Sim 2001, disagree with the original nomination), but it seems likely that the product would be (as Chem Sim 2001 notes) the 1,4-diol not 1,2-diol. The file thus does seem "totally incorrect" as well as being really poor quality. DMacks (talk) 03:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I just searched SciFinder, and there are zero hits for THF→butane-1,2-diol. A reaction can be blindly mathematically balanced and yet still be total nonsense. DMacks (talk) 03:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Claudio Pistilli, "Regarding the poor quality, I can improve it." You have yet to demonstrate this claimed ability. It's time to start. DMacks (talk) 03:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Unfortunately you act as inquisitors, not collaborators. We are here to offer knowledge, don't make war, myfriends. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 10:28, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Claudio Pistilli: Your updated reaction equation now looks right, however you still need an acid (proton) to start the hydrolysis. I would prefer to redraw the reaction equation conform to MOS standards (e.g. with ChemDraw). It's still from low quality, sorry! Maybe we should also hear DMacks opinion. Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:54, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can't you see that your behaviour is seen by the whole world? What do you mean by MOS standards? Claudio Pistilli (talk) 12:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please look here Manuel of Style/Chemistry. I don't want to offend your work, but many users also think that some of your former or present structural formulas or reaction equations are qualitative cheaply. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: Here is a better link which explain the MoS-standards:Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No objection to keeping (now that the product structure is correct) if someone has a use-case and doesn't mind it missing the catalyst. DMacks (talk) 03:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File has been updated/corrected and it is currently in use. Ed (Edgar181) 21:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

notnice Nehagd (talk) 09:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior version of File:USS Yorktown (PG-1), side view 2.jpg with less restoration Kges1901 (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of non-contributors, promotional QueerEcofeminist (talk) 12:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of non-contributors, promotional QueerEcofeminist (talk) 12:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a replica of an image with the same file name. The other one is the one that has been kept updated and is linked to pages on Wikipedia --99.226.115.81 16:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Confusing request - what file would this be a duplicate of? Anyway, this is in use on 57 pages in 15 projects. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There is no reason to delete this file. And as already said it is used in 57 pages. --217.84.177.133 16:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. If this is an exact duplicate, then it can be deleted if the other file is identified.Nilfanion (talk) 12:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jean-Miii as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: There are many falses thinks in this document (for example, Belarus is a communist state).
Converted by me to DR, as the nominators rationale is not valid for speedy-deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a single reason to delete. A republic, like Belarus, can be communist (which is not) and still be a presidential republic. Tm (talk) 17:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 KeepНикола Стоіаноски 15:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per dicussion and 2009 discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality; Commons isn't a personal photo album. Madness Darkness 17:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, старое фото, фотограф, скорее всего не известен, дата обнародования неизвестно, оцифровано в наше время Dogad75 (talk) 19:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Я поставил новое описание к фотографии. Проверьте, пожалуйста. И у меня вопрос в связи с прочитанным на странице. Можно сделать так, как здесь написано? "Материалы могут быть помещены в Википедию, если их авторы согласятся на то, что ссылка на сайт будет проставлена в истории правок в качестве комментария к соответствующей правке".--А.В.Осмоловский (talk) 20:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  I withdraw my nomination Лицензионный статус фото уточнён, сделано в фотоателье в Сант-Петербурге до 1900 года, что попадает по {{PD-RusEmpire}}. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for spam/advertising. Out of scope. Dmitry89 (talk) 04:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is Facebook (FBM). Evidence of permission should be sent to COM:OTRS T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 08:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly uploaded this image, I need to do some editing on this image than I will upload this same image in future - IndrajitDas 08:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious PD rationale. This is a pretty complex 3D rendering with shadows and highlights, not "simple geometric shapes". LX (talk, contribs) 10:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that instead of commenting here, the uploader chose to blank out the notice of the ongoing discussion in spite of clear instructions not to do so. LX (talk, contribs) 01:09, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low res, unused crop without reason, redundant. BevinKacon (talk) 10:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Louvre Pyramid is sadly under copyright as France has no Freedom of Panorama Basvb (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

raw text, unused, out of COM:SCOPE BevinKacon (talk) 11:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Batman & Cat woman, which are still in copyright, unlikely source has permission from DC Comics BevinKacon (talk) 11:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt they can be used for educational purpose, also given that we have similar (and slightly better) files like File:Arena riga - panoramio (4).jpg in the category.

Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kerllenandressa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted images

Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Отсутствие прав на использование Lenya2666 (talk) 13:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused fantasy election results & insignia - https://www.nationstates.net/nation=shavo Cabayi (talk) 13:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TopHatPanda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused fantasy election results & insignia - https://www.nationstates.net/nation=soleanna

Cabayi (talk) 13:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TopHatPanda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused fantasy election results & insignia

Cabayi (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TopHatPanda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused fantasy insignia - https://www.nationstates.net/nation=rhosenburg

Cabayi (talk) 14:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TopHatPanda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused flags and emblems of fictitious nations, and an unidentified photo probably related to this or other fictional topics.

Omphalographer (talk) 21:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused bot upload. Left and right parts of painting is missing without reason, better versions available at Category:The Birth of Venus (Botticelli). Redundant. BevinKacon (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused fantasy election results Cabayi (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused election diagram with no means of finding which election it may relate to - no date, no results Cabayi (talk) 14:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused fantasy election results Cabayi (talk) 14:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused fantasy election results Cabayi (talk) 14:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:49, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jean-Miii as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: There are many falses thinks in this document (for example, Cameroon is a dictatorship).
Converted by me to DR, as the nominators rationale is not valid fo a speedy-deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all bad, started all over again with the image Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 16:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request for deletion. Reasons:

--Kuebi (talk) 16:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia and the photo violates sculptor's (et:Mati Karmin, still living) copyright. Taivo (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've created this page by mistake; tests should go to Module:Complex date/testcases DmitTrix (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of image at source which appears to have watermark showing actual creator. I was unable to verify this license at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unable to verify license at source, notice watermark upper left corner. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unable to verify license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook sized here at at source, but unfortunately unable to verify license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This one was CC-NC. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Now fixed. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 15:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Лицензию исправили на {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Снимаю с удаления --Butko (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File has been kept as {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --Butko (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License tag was fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per File:Karl Armin Troeger.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would be easyer, if there would be a reason explained for deleting. I don't see any, so I am against this request! --Cigarman (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no OTRS permission for 30 days. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See here T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, presented as a logo of an Israeli political party, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2). -- Geagea (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, presented as a logo of an Israeli political party, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 17:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2). -- Geagea (talk) 23:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

原作者(我)請求刪除這張相片。The original author (me) requested to delete this photo. TimChen Talk 03:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: derivative work issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

原作者(我)請求刪除這張相片。The original author (me) requested to delete this photo. TimChen Talk 03:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: derivative work issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thank you for the will to contribute, this is a nice photo. However there is a lake of evidence that the painted sculpture represented on the photo is itself covered by a compatible free license. If you have proof that this is legal to upload a representation of this artwork under the selected free license, please proceed. --Psychoslave (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thank you for the will to contribute, this is a nice photo. However there is a lake of evidence that the artworks represented on the photo are covered by a compatible free license. If you have proof that this is legal to upload a representation of these artworks under the selected free license, please proceed. --Psychoslave (talk) 06:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems that this is coming from an existing image of ignition church, see LOVE WEEK 2016 for example. At minimum an OTRS permission process should be open, I think. --Psychoslave (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Complex logo that need a permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thank you for the will to contribute, this is a nice photo. However there is a lake of evidence that the artworks represented on the photo are covered by a compatible free license. If you have proof that this is legal to upload a representation of these artworks under the selected free license, please proceed. --Psychoslave (talk) 15:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sthay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images under copyrigt, autorizations needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 08:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - different authors are clearly quoted in the EXIFs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Schipitun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of the non-free w:Harvest Records logo. Must be blurred or cropped to keep.

Sealle (talk) 10:50, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Right and top part of painting is missing without reason, better versions available at Category:The Birth of Venus (Botticelli). It is used on what looks like a dead spam page at Wikipedia from 2011, but there's nothing but the painting in the picture. Redundant BevinKacon (talk) 10:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - I created a redirect for the second image as it was used in several places. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution compared to images at Category:Tondo Doni, unused. Redundant. BevinKacon (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This head is copyrighted as a sculpture. Although it is possible that its copyright has expired, that seems unlikely and, in any event, must be proven. This image is a derivative work and infringes on the copyright. Therefore, either it must be proven that the copyright has expired or the creator of the head must provide a free license using OTRS.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is too recent to assume that its creator has been dead for 70 years, In order to keep it one Commons, it must be proven that it is no longer under copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) John D Clare, 1995, as the image itself points out - beyond that it's small, wonky, meaningless without the key, only appears on one page, etc Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It has key
Yellow: Triple Alliance
Beige: To be annexed
Orange: Vassal states or to be annexed
Pink: "closer relationships"
size is perfectly normal, etc...
what's the problem? --Čeha (talk) 00:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: "(c) John D Clare, 1995" as watermark is the problem. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlike other Cineplex photos, there is no artistic value in photographing with Cineplex Cinemas logo alone, with no clear view of the full building. As an example, my file File:Cineplex Cinemas Lansdowne & VIP.JPG shows the full building, adjacent buildings, the road, etc. and is a very useful file. LABcrabs (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First, artistic value or not is not for you to decide. Second, even without artistic value is not a reason for deletion. And finally, in Canada we have Freedom of panorama which means store front can be photoed. Raysonho @ Open Grid Scheduler / Grid Engine (talk) 22:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the IMAX logo with an unclear view of Cineplex Cinemas Downtown Markham. Nothing in this photo can be deemed to be unique to Markham. LABcrabs (talk) 21:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First, artistic value or not is not for you to decide. Second, even without artistic value is not a reason for deletion. And finally, in Canada we have Freedom of panorama which means store front can be photoed. Raysonho @ Open Grid Scheduler / Grid Engine (talk) 22:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thehomard08 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Jean-Michel Coulon, (d. 2014), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thehomard08 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Invalid date or permission or not public domain yet.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jest żle nazwany Elżbieta Kossecka (talk) 22:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File has been renamed so there is no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 20:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GilPe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand why these files should be deleted? --GilPe (talk) 15:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Most of these are redirects, which I have deleted. Their targets, and the rest of these, are in use,. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GilPe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Luxembourg. In order to keep these, we will need a license from the architect.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GilPe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Luxembourg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:57, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused election diagram with no means of finding which election it may relate to Cabayi (talk) 14:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 21:29, 15 April 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 00:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad composition. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license, false own work claim. Микола Василечко (talk) 14:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You left a message about deleting the file. I have oral permission from the copyright holder. How does it formalize? Thanks. --Ольга Кряжич (talk) 14:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:OTRS. --Микола Василечко (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pa2chant. as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: copyright infringement of a motto registered as a trademark ([5])
Converted by me to DR, as trademark-protection has nothing to do with copyright and I doubt that the depicted sign contains anything copyrightable. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the design is not copyrigtable, I thought original motto were protected by copyright ; you says that's not the case, so the request can be closed. --Pa2chant. (talk) 17:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Je crois que je vais désormais facturer les pertes de temps, avec ça pas de doute ça va être rentable. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 17:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I own the copyright to this picture but someone claims I don't. To remove the copyright warning template, i must nominate this for deletion. Fistiq (talk) 12:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fistiq: Please send a permission via COM:OTRS if you are the copyright holder. FitIndia 17:14, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description; no license; obviously a copyright violation Malyacko (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:06, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

made a new, better version, uploaded elsewhere Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --xplicit 07:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some kind of striping from nik. make a new version. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --xplicit 07:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published here by a user named " otaats" more than 2 years before updated to Commons. Obviously not "own work". Vanjagenije (talk) 23:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --xplicit 07:29, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was based on the other SVG file – which since has been updated to include this language (it uses the SVG "switch" element). So there is no longer a need for this "localized" file. Cherkash (talk) 23:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Perhelion: could you please close this request? It's been open and unopposed for a few months now. I'm asking you since you've acted on similar requests in the past: e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg. Thanks. Cherkash (talk) 16:18, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was based on the other SVG file – which has since been updated to include this language (it uses the SVG "switch" element). So there is no longer a need for this "localized" file. Cherkash (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Perhelion: could you please close this request? It's been open and unopposed for a few months now. I'm asking you since you've acted on similar requests in the past: e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg. Thanks. Cherkash (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was based on the other SVG file – which has since been updated to include this language (it uses the SVG "switch" element). So there is no longer a need for this "localized" file. Cherkash (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Perhelion: could you please close this request? It's been open and unopposed for a few months now. I'm asking you since you've acted on similar requests in the past: e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg. Thanks. Cherkash (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was based on the other SVG file – which has since been updated to include this language (it uses the SVG "switch" element). So there is no longer a need for this "localized" file. Cherkash (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Perhelion: could you please close this request? It's been open and unopposed for a few months now. I'm asking you since you've acted on similar requests in the past: e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg. Thanks. Cherkash (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was based on the other SVG file – which has since been updated to include this language (it uses the SVG "switch" element). So there is no longer a need for this "localized" file. Cherkash (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Perhelion: could you please close this request? It's been open and unopposed for a few months now. I'm asking you since you've acted on similar requests in the past: e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg. Thanks. Cherkash (talk) 16:14, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 18:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a defaced image of the Canadian flag. MapGrid (talk) 14:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There file shows the maple leaf rotated by 90°. It is a clear defacement of the Canadian flag. For a official government information on vertically hanging the Canadian flag see here: [6]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MapGrid (talk • contribs) 14:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: no opinion on whether to delete or keep, but if kept this version should definitely be marked as "unofficial" per Canadian flag guidelines. Huntster (t @ c) 23:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is the correct alignment for the Canadian flag when hung vertically, and the source provided in the first response confirms that. Fry1989 eh? 01:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note that RainbowSilver2ndBackup modified the file *after* it was sent to DR, hence the confusing replies here. Huntster (t @ c) 03:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Just another variation on flag of Canada. P 1 9 9   02:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2003:DD:83D8:DC00:5143:506:24EE:A67D as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Foto wurde veröffentlicht ohne Einwilligung des Grundstückbesitzers. Verletzung Persönlichkeitsrecht. --2003:DD:83D8:DC00:5143:506:24EE:A67D 21:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Converted by me to DR, as it seems unclear who is actually claiming the deletion and whether there is anything private shown in it. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2019

Ich wünsche die Löschung des Bildes da, ich der Besitzer dieses Grundstückes bin und Sie ohne meine Einwilligung einfach das Bild veröffentlicht haben. Bitte löschen sie dieses Bild umgehend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DD:83D8:DC00:C4BB:27E5:8A6A:C5F3 (talk • contribs)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 16:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture from a political campaign with the party's logo. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 17:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:36, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Icon flag as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The correct vertical position of the flag is here: Flag of Canada, vertical.svg Huntster (t @ c) 04:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any image that depicts the maple leaf rotated by 90° w.r.t. the flag is a defacement of the Canadian flag. Both File:Flag of Canada (pantone, vertical, leaf normal).png and Flag of Canada, vertical.svg should be deleted.MapGrid (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, see https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/flag-canada-etiquette/flying-rules.html#a21 for what MapGrid is referring to. I have no preference for delete or keep, but the "wrong" version should definitely be marked as "unofficial" per Canadian flag guidelines. Huntster (t @ c) 23:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There are many examples of the Canadian flag hung in this manner with the maple leaf rotated. It's not the official way it is supposed to be done, but I've seen it in my town, in Toronto, all over the place. Fry1989 eh? 01:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Fry1989, and "inaccuracies" are not a delete reason for Commons. P 1 9 9   17:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello,

Unfortunately, no evidence was provided that the light spectacle represented is covered by a free license compatible with the one selected for the uploaded file. German freedom of panorama doesn't cover original art works that are not permanent. Thus this deletion request, which let the opportunity to bring additional legal information that would actually this upload legal. For example if the author of the light spectacle released it in public domain. Not that this also apply to the 85 additional files named with incremented suffix.

Cheers, Psychoslave (talk) 14:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The artist of the work has agreed to have the photos stay up on Wikimedia commons and will write an e-mail to the OTRS team to further clarify the misunderstandings. --Sparrow (麻雀) (talk) 11:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever OTRS ticket is received. P 1 9 9   17:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower part of painting is missing without reason, better versions available at Category:Mona Lisa. Redundant. BevinKacon (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and redirected. P 1 9 9   17:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a corrupted automated upload from the MET, filedesc and image don't match. The image (according to file desc and EXIF) has been replaced by File:Marcantonio Pasqualini (1614–1691) Crowned by Apollo MET DT1450.jpg, the image itself has been replaced by File:Libro De Catafalchi, Tabernacoli, con varij designi di Porte fenestre et altri ornamenti di Architettura MET MM79974.jpg, which has a correct filedesc and a better resolution/quality. IMO disc page should be moved there. Achim (talk) 12:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Filo gèn' as Speedy (Speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: Bad file
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for SD. Also, I don't understand why this should be a "bad file". -- Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly labelled as uploader's "own work". It's safe to assume that it isn't. Can anyone give any legitimate reason why this might be public domain in France? ("PD-old-70-expired" requires us to know that author died over 70 years ago). If not, this must be deleted.

(Auto-translation: "A tort étiqueté comme "son propre travail". Il est prudent de supposer que ce n'est pas. Quelqu'un peut-il donner une raison légitime pour expliquer qu'il s'agisse d'un domaine public en France? ("PD-old-70-expired" exige que nous sachions que l'auteur est décédé il y a plus de 70 ans). Sinon, cela doit être supprimé.")

Ubcule (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cette photo anonyme vieille de plus de 70 ans est dans le domaine public en France. L'indication "travail personnel" est une erreur. --Basilou (talk) 12:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Translation of Basilou's comment: "This anonymous photo, more than 70 years old, is in the public domain in France. The indication "personal work" is an error." Ubcule (talk) 21:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pierre Raymond Esteve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents, charts and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The uploader is new on WPfr (and Commons) and seems in good faith. We need to give him time to adapt to the common rules and solve the date issues on his files. À l'attention de Pierre Raymond Esteve : faites une description en anglais en plus du français si vous le pouvez et mettez les bonnes date de création du média, c'est important., Mise à part ça, je ne vois pas ce qui pourrait être problématique. bonne continuation ----Abalg (talk) 02:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Raymond Esteve, EugeneZelenko and Abalg : I corrected and updated the information of File:Pr Léonide Goldstein.jpg according to the information that Pierre communicated to me by mail.--Braaark (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was asked by the photographer who uploaded this photograph, Pierre Etevenon, to provide this information:

Photographer : Dr. Pierre Etevenon WP alias: User:Pierre Raymond Esteve Post-doctoral student of Professor Goldstein

photograph of Professor Leonide Goldstein taken in front of his polygraph in the Neuropharmacology Department of the New Jersey Neuropsychiatric Institute (NJNPI) in Princeton NJ. january 1965/

Personal photograph, part of Dr Etevenon’s own historical scientific archives. For confirmation: Dr Pierre Etevenon, Directeur de Recherche honoraire INSERM (French NIH) has a personal internet site with URL http://www.sgdl-auteurs.org/pierre-etevenon/index.php/pages/Biographie, and also a scientific site with ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pierre_Etevenon.

(I am also a former student of Professor Goldstein, 1971-1978. We co-edited a book together in 1977, and I know the polygraph in the photo, and have met the photographer, Dr. Etevenon. I can vouch for the identity of Dr. Goldtein and the polygraph. If there is anything he needs to provide to vouch for the fact that he is the photographer, I can communicate it to him. He is not sure how to proceed to make sure his photo is not deleted. He is the one who posted it, and he gives permission for it to appear with whatever license WP requires.)

--Harnad (talk) 20:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, all the problems reported by EugeneZelenko are solved (proper author/date/country of creation information supplied, copyrights status and license tags corrected).--Braaark (talk) 20:11, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was excluded from any usage in wikimedia and wikipedia. The subject in this picture did not give it's consent for a public use. 90.22.231.232 16:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. And more proof needed that there is no consent. P 1 9 9   17:16, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not-in-use formal PR picture of an Israeli communication director. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 19:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure permission ("rechtenvrij") is sufficient for Commons. See also File:Jesse Klaver 2017.jpg Encycloon (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The license has changed, it's now CC-BY 2.0. Current version of the website mentioned as source is archived as https://archive.is/iwwdz. Mbch331 (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the license on the image page. Koeckenpan (talk) 15:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: suitably licensed at source website. P 1 9 9   17:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was based on the other SVG file – which has since been updated to include this language (it uses the SVG "switch" element). So there is no longer a need for this "localized" file. Cherkash (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Perhelion: could you please close this request? It's been open and unopposed for a few months now. I'm asking you since you've acted on similar requests in the past: e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg. Thanks. Cherkash (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused election diagram with no means of finding which election it may relate to - no date Cabayi (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by George Chernilevsky at 11:37, 16 Juli 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election apportionment diagrams --Krdbot 00:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused election diagram with no means of finding which election it may relate to - no date Cabayi (talk) 13:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've tried checking zh:Category:中華民國立法委員模板. No match found.--Roy17 (talk) 02:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by another. --Majora (talk) 20:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. There is a {{PD-URAA}} tag but a license for its home country is missing. JuTa 10:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: home country license still missing. --JuTa 18:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a photograph by Gabriel Machado. Other images from the same photoshoot can be found on his website: http://mcmstudio.net/profile-gabriel-machado/celebrities/ Nothing seems to indicate that the uploader, Lexycool, is Gabriel Machado, which would make this file being here copyright infringement. Bizarre BizarreTalk modern to me 16:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The GOPE officer is gorgeous, but User:Carliitaeliza has turned this image into a personal file. She is a good Commoner. Has uploaded good pics. Among them I found this one of another Carabinero: File:Chilean Policeman.jpg. I hope she can take another pic of the SWAT guy, alone. Carliita, amorosa, por favor no exponer demasiadas imagenes personales en Commons. We don't like "self promotion" here. E4024 (talk) 22:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keepIf the user in the image is a trouble, perhaps it is better to crop out her, as it seems that the remaining part of the image can be useful and is not irreplaceable currently.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks OK tzo me. --JuTa 18:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was taken from Google Earth and the uploader cropped the watermark out. If this image is from the USGS, an appropropriate link must be found to prove it. Veggies (talk) 02:50, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See the "original revision" in the info box, it shows the USGS info. And see the image page history, you nominated the same file in 2014 and it was deemed not to be a violation. Oaktree b (talk) 03:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks OK to me. --JuTa 18:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File originally from the bot uploaded version (File:Michelangelo Buonarroti 046.jpg). The left part of the painting is missing without reason, and is lower quality than other uploads of same image. So should be deleted as duplicate of File:Tondo Doni, por Miguel Ángel.jpg BevinKacon (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 18:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded jpg version of emblem, with jpg of the same resolution available. Kges1901 (talk) 11:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 18:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably no 'own work', so licension should be changed. Encycloon (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per request ticket:2018100910002867, there is a new version of the logo File:Logo Poma.png. Bastenbas (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The old logo should be kept, even if the company has a new one. Fry1989 eh? 02:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree beause it appears as first result on google and people keep on using it when they talk about POMA, which damages the POMA Brand — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.218.99.107 (talk) 10:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 18:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ddjahh as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Personal photos by non-contributors - I really like the picture but I don't think this lady would be happy to know she has been taken in photo and furthermore that the photo is actually visible by everyone on internet...
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support - Author This is an excellent street scene from Prague. The person is shown as she is in public and is not shown distorted or alienated. The picture is funny without ridiculing the person. --Ermell (talk) 08:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I'm not sure the lady would be glad to hear she appears in a "funny" picture of... herself. Even if, as you said, she's not ridiculised, the limit seems very thin to me. But indeed I agree, your picture is excellent but maybe not enough to be uploaded and seen by everyone... I probably exagerate but I can't imagine a picture featuring myself like this one on Commons, Wikipedia and, maybe, somewhere else later. --Ddjahh (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --JuTa 18:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it not dangerous to have these "recent personal documents" here? What if someone misuses them? E4024 (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file uploaded here is a specimen found in an official guide released by National Immigration Agency of Republic of China. The link is in the source. Thank you for addressing your concern but this specimen is not an actual travel document belonging to any individual, and the ID photo is computer-generated. You could find more similar specimens bearing the same photo and "personal information for illustrative purposes" if you follow the source link. -- Chopro (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the "specimen" version. --JuTa 18:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apart from the airport interior, the photograph includes several advertismenet billboards, clearly visible and most likely copyrighted. Note that the copyright exception under Bangladeshi law applies to works of architecture and pieces of sculpture but not to images. — kashmīrī 16:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is too recent to assume that its creator has been dead for 70 years, In order to keep it one Commons, it must be proven that it is no longer under copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a sculpture, but it is just a lamp, industrially produced, it falls under Commons:UA --Sailko (talk) 18:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2010-03 about the File:Ettore sottsass, libreria casablanca, 1981.JPG --Sailko (talk) 18:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it is not "just a lamp" -- it is a lamp with considerable extra features that are unnecessary to its use as a lamp. It would have a copyright as sculpture in the USA and, as a general rule, the European countries draw the line farther on the side of sculpture than we do in the USA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. It is a beautiful lamp, yes, but it is just a combination of lamp+clothes hanger, it does not have any "sculpted" part. Please also see the previous case I linked. --Sailko (talk) 12:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ruthven, you just closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alessandro mendini per alchimia, la poltrona di proust, 1978 (riedizione 2003).JPG, this would be a similar case for another utilitarian object. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 05:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Published here a year before uploaded to Wikipedia. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlike other Cineplex photos, there is no artistic value in photographing with Cineplex Cinemas logo alone, with no clear view of the full building. As an example, my file File:Cineplex Cinemas Lansdowne & VIP.JPG shows the full building, adjacent buildings, the road, etc. and is a very useful file. --LABcrabs (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]