Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 25th, 2019


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate

No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.

russavia (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. -> Commons:FOP#United_States--Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, especially Cloud Sphere1.jpg was deleted before (see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Cloud Sphere.jpg), transferred to de.wikipedia (with a note "deleted on commons") but nevertheless transferred back to here... --Isderion (talk) 11:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. I can't find his email or other way to contact the sculptor or we could ask him if he wants to join my fledgling project.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I found an email for one of his galleries and asked if they would contact him to release images of some or all of his works.--Canoe1967 (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I received a quick reply that my email will be forwarded to the sculptor. Hopefully he will provide OTRS. --Canoe1967 (talk) 18:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
that would be really cool --Isderion (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Without OTRS permission after 9 days Alan (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 3

As per this decision.

-- Tuválkin 09:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--TonyTheTiger (talk) 05:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
TonyTheTiger, copyright law is aggressive, and shark lawyers of famous architects and powerful city halls are aggressive even more. These deletion requests are defensive. Since some images are used in some articles of English Wikipedia, a good case could be made for their retention as fair use, according to the rules of the English Wikipedia; ditto, m.m., for any other Wikipedia or Wikimedia projected that is contaminated with a fair use clause. (But these images would still have to be deleted in Commons.) -- Tuválkin 11:09, 16 August 2014 (UTC) (revised: -- Tuválkin 01:35, 18 August 2014 (UTC))[reply]
I think the principle of Commons:De Minimis applies to File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg and File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg. I think the FAC for CLoud Gate on en addressed the reflection picture. Ruhrfisch (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I  agree with Elcobbola above and therefore  withdraw the nomination for those images. -- Tuválkin 01:35, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted some, kept some. For File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, since it's being used to illustrate the plaza, it would be a better to crop out The Bean rather than deleting the whole thing. King of 07:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 4

Obviously, it's time for another Cloud Gate DR. I've tried to be as generous as I felt was reasonable about only including the images that violate the copyright in this sculpture.

For context, en:Cloud Gate is a public sculpture erected in 2006 in McCormick Park in Chicago. It is not only copyrighted (with no FOP for sculpture in the US), but the City of Chicago has licensed it from the artist, and requires permission for any commercial use of photographs (which is incompatible with Commons).

I've tried to weed out the ones where either the Bean is a de minimis aspect of an image of the park itself, or where it's shape is not visible and it's only 'a mirrored object'. Most of these are simply not okay.

Reventtalk 12:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have sought permission via email from the author (Anish Kapoor) to retain my photo, as there is no FoP for sculpture in the US. The attempt to remove nearly all remaining depictions of Cloud Gate is sudden and troubling. -- adsitm 16:48, 15 Dec 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry that you find this 'sudden and troubling', but I suggest looking at the history of this DR page. As you will see, nearly all images of this work have been deleted on a periodic basis for half a decade now (previously, 'all' images were deleted, but those DRs were filed for the 'category' instead of just files in it, and are thus not here). That copyvio images are sent to DR is nothing novel, this is just something that most people don't realize is copyrighted and like to photograph, to the extent that photography of it is discussed in it's article. Reventtalk 03:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 5

Regular cleaning of this category of new uploads of images that depict too much of this copyrighted work of art.

- Reventtalk 22:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 6

No COM:FOP for sculpture in the US, as per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.

  — Jeff G. ツ 04:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, the bean is de minimis, image hardly even has the bean in the photo. The sculpture is not even visible in File:Tented cloud gate.jpg. File:Cloud gate construction.jpg is simply a photo of a construction site, the sculpture had yet to be erected. It is inarguably de minimis in File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg. It is also minimus in File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG. It is hardly even visible in File:Millenium Park (7391867314).jpg. Seems to be de minimus in File:Bean from Kemper Tower (14958184744).jpg. Also, hardly the primary focal point of the image File:Chicago Bean.jpg. Not at all included in the image File:Cloud gate, Chicago skyline.jpg, as far as I can tell (not sure why it is in this category). Certainly not included in the image File:2008TIBE Day5 Hall1 ThemeSquare On the Road with Cloud Gate.jpg (should not be in this category at all). Not the primary focal point of the image File:The Bean - Millennium Park - panoramio.jpg.

Some of these certainly should be spared, and the category itself should not be deleted. SecretName101 (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SecretName101: Considering File:Cloud gate construction.jpg, in this photo, I see a cross section of what looks like one of the sculptor's ribs, with cross-supports. This looks to me like derivative work of the sculptor's copyrighted mechanical drawings.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
However, this segment essentially (from what is visible in this image) takes a spoke-and-wheel shape, a physical form that has existed since early human history. It would be hard to argue that a photograph of this structural element violates his unique intellectual property. SecretName101 (talk) 01:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion of File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg would be particularly catastrophic, and utterly unnecessary. This is a valuable (and widely-used) image, in which the sculpture inarguably is de minimus. SecretName101 (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've got to disagree with this. If the image were just a distorted picture of the public space, it should be deleted as out of scope. The value of the image is that it's not just the space but a reflection in the sculpture. — Rhododendrites talk22:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Rhododendrites on this one. That one is indefensible, as its sole focus is the reflection on the sculpture. SecretName101 (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to add another image to this discussion. It was not in the category at the time of the nomination (I have since added it), but it does feature the sculpture. File:ParkGrill.jpg. Should this be deleted or re-cropped (with the original version deleted) to remove the Bean, or is the image fine as is. Thoughts??? SecretName101 (talk) 19:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nom. 'kept some due to de minimis or similar. --JuTa 09:47, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 7

still copyrighted, noting here so that it may be undeleted someday

Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted as copyvios. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 8

Copyrighted work, no freedom of panorama for public art in the US.

Rhododendrites talk16:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 9

No FOP for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:The Bean Chicago United States Travel Photography (112096191).jpeg is just a reflection on a surface, I don't see anything copyrightable there. This photograph also shows such a simple and usual object: File:The Bean (30263803).jpeg that I have difficulty understanding why it would be above the threshold of originality. Was there some case on court about it, or something similar?-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DarwIn: Please see COM:FOP US and Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I know, but there is also TOO. You can't simply declare something is art and expect protection. Something that looks like a mere ellipse in a reflective material look way below the TOO for the US. But for File:The Bean Chicago United States Travel Photography (112096191).jpeg it's obviously  Keep, there's nothing copyrightable there, at least that I can see.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all as blatant derivative work copyvios. DarwIn TOO is no longer relevant if this sculpture by its copyright-conscious artist w:Anish Kapoor has caused hot water to several users in the past, most notably NRA (National Rifle Association) when they included an image of this artwork in their video. See [1], [2], and [3], which I used as sources for another entry under "United States" in w:Freedom of panorama enwiki article and its Tagalog Wikipedia translation. All non-trivial images of this sculpture must be removed (US de minimis is much sharper, see COM:DM United States, it uses "triviality" concept than "incidental"). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: TOO does matter here; I could for example extract one of the squiggly lines from Donald Duck's head and it would suddenly fall below TOO. So just because the work as a whole is above TOO, doesn't mean that a small portion of the work is necessarily also above TOO. For images like File:The Bean Chicago United States Travel Photography (112096191).jpeg, the shape of the outline is almost certainly below TOO. So the artist here has essentially created an algorithm to transform the surrounding Chicago skyline, in the form of a mirror reflection. The question becomes: Does the creator of this algorithm have enough creative input to have a copyright stake on its output, which was chosen by the photographer? -- King of ♥ 04:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: it seems we are entering another part of the gray area of the no U.S. freedom of panorama for any protected public artworks concept. The sculpture may be a simple kidney-shaped bean that is "ordinary" in the eyes of most people, though it has created headaches for one end-user (National Rifle Association). Kapoor himself is a noted litigous artist, and one attorney asserts that only the City of Chicago has the right to commercially use images of this copyrighted work. Perhaps COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle may roll in? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Part of PCP is that the likelihood of the creator suing should not be taken into account in these decisions. That's why we kept the monkey selfie. In some of these closeups, I just don't see anything copyrightable. -- King of ♥ 06:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the U.S. Copyright Office considers it creative enough to be copyrighted. [4] Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them can be cropped or have the work of art blurred out of them, and still be useful. I deleted the obvious cases, though.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 10

Another set of derivative work copyvios: of a sculpture protected by copyright by its living artist w:Anish Kapoor. Previously these were categorized under Category:Millennium Park so they got undetected. See [5] and [6] for the basis of nomination for these perhaps last non-trivial images of the copyrighted sculpture. There is no freedom of panorama for all copyrighted artworks in the United States, see COM:FOP US. US de minimis is sharper (COM:DM United States), as it uses "triviality" concept instead of "incidental".

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per COM:FOP US, Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate, and the above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 11

Still another set of derivative work copyright violations. No FOP of any sort for copyrighted public works in the U.S. except architecture, and sculptor Anish Kapoor does not allow free culture (commercial) reuses of visual appearances of "his" artwork! See also above nominations. American de minimis uses triviality concept instead of incidental/accessory concept like those in Europe or much of Asia.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Has the sculpture actually been determined to meet the threshold of originality? I know Kapoor filed for copyright registration, but it's not clear if the registration was granted. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it is copyrighted. [7] Ixfd64 (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all per COM:FOP US, Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate, and the above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Cleaned up the nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 12

There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States, and none of the nominated images show the sculpture in a trivial manner (U.S. de minimis is too narrower than European ones). This sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per COM:FOP US, Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate, and the above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all per Jeff G. File:The Bean Reflecting (pingnews) (222198126).jpg may be considered de minimis as it only shows a reflective surface, but the quality of the image is so poor that it is not worth keeping IMO. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted all but one per DM. — Racconish💬 15:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 13

Several new files have been added that populate this category. I'm also tagging several older files that haven't been discussed before to gather consensus on whether they should be kept on de minimis grounds.

At issue is that these files depict Cloud Gate, a copyrighted sculpture permanently installed in the US where there is no freedom of panorama for public art. Quoting an earlier successful deletion request, "this sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC." IMO the litigousness of the copyright holder should not affect our consistent application of standards around copyright law but it's been brought up before so I suppose it's worth bringing up again.

First, there is one photo that is entirely of Cloud Gate for which a de minimis rationale would not apply:

Second, there are several photos in which Cloud Gate appears at a distince within the larger context of the setting. A de minimis arguement could be made for these, and we have kept two files in the past (File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg and File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG) on these grounds. However, in both of those cases Cloud Gate is a significantly smaller and less focal portion of the image.

Third, several photos depict a portion of Cloud Gate up close, often with the inclusion of other elements in the foreground or background. Do these files qualify as de minimis inclusion of the copyrighted work? Consider this file which had most of Cloud Gate coropped out to focus on the background elements instead.

Finally, one photo is simply a selfie taken by way of the mirrored surface of Cloud Gate. This might be argued to be entirely a photo of the sculpture, or to be a completely de minimis usage. In either case, I'm nominating it here for consensus:

Any of these files that aren't deleted (or that are partially cropped and saved) can be added to Category:Incidental views of the Cloud Gate. Thanks! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I disagree that the statue is a "clear focal point" of either File:Chicago skyscrapers on a rainy night (52036718532).jpg or File:Bilde(62) (801715).jpg. I would keep both of those. SecretName101 (talk) 19:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep File:Bean Selfie.jpg - here is a reflective surface. Reflections are not subject to copyright. The artist did not invent a mirrored surface. The copyright object cannot be distinguished as different from a mirror by this close up image. -- Ooligan (talk) 13:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - kept one. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 03:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, many similar earlier listings. COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 05:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't forget to login.  Keep Subject is notable. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used. 213.158.197.100 06:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: hounding, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty category of unknown person Bramfab (talk) 09:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Empty. --Achim (talk) 21:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gallery page with no image. Correct category for subject is c:category:Jana Thompson Grazer Archie02 (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Empty. --Achim (talk) 21:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; unused vanity image of non-notable person; only upload of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clear copyvio, baidu watermark is there too Cohaf (talk) 05:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Zhuyifei1999 at 22:41, 25 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 02:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement baidu watermark is there too Cohaf (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Zhuyifei1999 at 22:41, 25 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 02:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement national geographic watermark is there too Cohaf (talk) 06:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Zhuyifei1999 at 22:41, 25 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 02:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from [8] Liuxingy (talk) 14:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Zhuyifei1999 at 22:41, 25 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 02:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from [9] Liuxingy (talk) 14:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Zhuyifei1999 at 22:41, 25 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 02:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from source indicated but no license present that is compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 00:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 12:56, 26 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - --Krdbot 20:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1953.[10] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Magog the Ogre:
Seems like there is confusion regarding which Henry Ballantyne this refers to. This file pertains to Sir Henry Ballantyne, born 8th March, 1955 in Melrose, died 15th July, 1941 in Haddington (buried in St Andrews Cemetery, Peebles). This was reported in the Aberdeen Press and Journal on 16th July, 1941: "Sir Henry Ballantyne. who has died at Haddington at the age of eighty-six, was a well-known Border Liberal, educationist, and manufacturer. He was chairman of the Royal Commission on Scottish Housing and for eight years president". [11] [12] Canaryman123$ (talk)

Kept: apparently a case of mistaken identity. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claiming fair-use is disallowed by COM:FAIRUSE Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - E-Pana is legitimately under free-use for the exact same reason that this image is allowed under free-use: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Natalee_Holloway_yearbook_photo.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

Though this image is subject to copyright it is believed to be covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

  1. the image was released to the media by the family to publicize the search;
  2. the image is low resolution;
  3. it does not limit the copyright owner's rights to the image;
  4. the image subject is missing/presumed dead and a free use version is unlikely to become available;
  5. no free use photograph of the person is available

Nfox24 (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nfox24:
en:WP:FAIRUSE is for English Wikipedia only and can't be applied on Wikimedia Commons.
--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work as the images are all smaller than Facebook and apparently promotional in nature.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Загружаем новую версию N.Ahadova (talk) 10:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I claimed as my own but it isn't. It's a free-to-use picture. I want to change it Michron777 (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Random International

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:Random_International. I believe they should be deleted because the types of creative commons licence offered by wikipedia don't offer enough protection to our works. Random International (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request at upload day. --JuTa 13:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete it because I no longer want to use it, I have a much better version that I will upload for next works. Kopjevići Živinice Gornje (talk) 18:40, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:48, 27 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 20:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milyan212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This series of images include some logo/packaging or powerpoint images as well as screenshots, and images captured from web of buildings and towns, indicated by small file size, low quality, letterboxing, and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:47, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C'était un test. Cette carte n'a pas l'autorisation pour être diffusé. Je souhaite le retrait de celle-ci. SUV56 (talk) 16:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rephotograhed image, is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If own work, its an unused personal image. If not own work, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) productoradeimagenes.com Todos los derechos reservados Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2018 Michael Becker Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sharp, not a useful picture. Tukka (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bad quality, no purpose Tukka (talk) 16:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazador furtivo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Due to the nature, size and quality of these images, it's unlikely that any are own work of uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joblazarusokellosr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DjEdgardsanchez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable person (for example, uploaded for use on vanity es.wiki user page that has now been deleted 4 times (!!!).)

Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is offensive towards territorial integrity of 4 bordering countreis. It spreds chauvinistic ideas and hatred. This map is offensive to Macedonians, Montenegrins, Greeks, Serbs and other nations. The name is in Albanian... Mm.srb (talk) 02:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on sq:Dibra, sq:Shqipëria natyrale, and sq:Shqiperia etnike. Under COM:INUSE, that's enough that it shouldn't be deleted on grounds of inaccuracy or offensiveness. See COM:NPOV for more details of Commons' handling of territorial disputes, and COM:CENSOR for its approach to offensive material. --bjh21 (talk) 13:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement , baidu watermark is there Cohaf (talk) 06:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by another admin. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chosenjabes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is more about the people than about Glen Doll; not for education purposes JopkeB (talk) 10:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image, out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is more about the people than about Glen Clova; not for educational purposes JopkeB (talk) 10:18, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image, out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Appears to have been deleted already. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://twitter.com/DefiPour/status/1050340116802211841 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE 2001:A61:356C:4901:332E:5E32:57C2:9A8F 14:29, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by J0145 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: what is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jetaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two unused images of color. Uncategorized.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandeep saan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachin9975 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis0040 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 13:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative works.

~Cybularny Speak? 18:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ara Souvalian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Self promotion.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Alaa :)..! 14:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Gbawden (talk · contributions · Statistics). --Érico (talk) 11:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Source: https://www.facebook.com/tveducativapg João Justiceiro (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam- this picture widespread on social media --Alaa :)..! 08:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Promotion- no useful content --Alaa :)..! 08:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in MD. Is it PD? E4024 (talk) 19:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in MD. Is it a free file? E4024 (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in MD. Is it a free file? E4024 (talk) 19:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete it because I no longer want to use it, I have a much better version that I will upload for next works. Kopjevići Živinice Gornje (talk) 18:40, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete it because I no longer want to use it, I have a much better version that I will upload for next works. Kopjevići Živinice Gornje (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Never ever "own work". Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This recent image cannot be {{PD-Iran}}. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "Use TeX" image. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "Use TeX" image. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "Use TeX" image. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "Use TeX" image. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "Use TeX" image. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "Use TeX" image. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "Use TeX" image. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:44, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "Use TeX" image. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 22:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another Eurovision copyright violation from the user. Wumbolo (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like a brochure, own work is improbable, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no project use, out of scope unlikely to be own work Praxidicae (talk) 17:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requires OTRS, just like all the other uploads of the same user. E4024 (talk) 18:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nijntje is een auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk van Dick Bruna (1927 - 2017). トトト (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
本作品は釜石駅前、国道283号歩道内にある公共サイン。設置時には新聞にも掲載された。ナインチェ・プラウスが描かれ、販売されている本を配置・撮影したものではない。Ty19080914



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE, no person of enyclopaedic relevance 2001:A61:356C:4901:332E:5E32:57C2:9A8F 14:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE 2001:A61:356C:4901:332E:5E32:57C2:9A8F 14:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a screen; derivative work GRuban (talk) 14:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contain copyrighted cover art Darklanlan (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ant wiki images are not CC released, but retain the copyrights of the original publication. Kevmin § 15:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution photo with no Exif data, likely copyvio. May be the same as the deleted File:Anastasiya Orlova (2017-03-24).jpg (I'm unable to check). Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Это мое фото, все права на него у меня. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Immortal55555 (talk • contribs) 12:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: taken from Facebook, no permission. --Sealle (talk) 13:27, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:29, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:29, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 11:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:29, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 05:29, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 05:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:40, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bless them Mama Africa (3).jpg

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 13:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MD has another author name, Orhan. E4024 (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this image. It was taken without Becca Conviser's permission and posted without her permission. In accordance with Wikimedia Commons policy, images like this should be removed. E2J32nd (talk) 21:26, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not per nomination, which seems spurious, but for likely being a copyright violation: small size, no exif, likely professional photo shoot. If photographer confirms authorship and license via OTRS, this should be restored. --Storkk (talk) 11:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that any of the three images in this collage/sign were created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

неверное перенаправление 87.226.217.178 05:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de Copyright Clodion (talk) 07:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would assume the M shape in the middle would be copyrighted?, Not sure if this fails TOO or not, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 17:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Mazacoin is an American company. Fonts are not copyrightable in USA and the rest is too simple to be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is not in the claimed source. While it is probably public domain we cannot be certain Mztourist (talk) 06:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly a derivative work, IMHO. E4024 (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photomontage withput source. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

entirely unused, was created (by myself) due to a disagreement on the shades of the historical mauritanian flag, the current file now uses the darker shades used in this file, making this entirely unneccesary Thespoondragon (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a derivative work of https://twitter.com/forcemotorsfml/status/1012277647185928195, with the background removed. However, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While I did not find an exact match of this image, the size, the white background, the professional quality of image but low file size and so on all suggest that this - like the other images uploaded by this user - was unfortunately not own work at upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this described squadron emblem. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a different head on different body edit from a photo similar to any of these:> https://www.google.com/search?q=bobby+roode+nxt+champion&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSmQEJb35cRkf938EajQELEKjU2AQaBgg9CEIIFQwLELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKLQaiRDdG9QRhBCFEJEHiB3gEuof4zr4OqY_1gyXYJJAtpT-nOvk6jy0aMJqb6EYqGQjsIV80Nt0JSx02FBNoZ1ReyjQAHyJJLnEwv2NXJY-Aq4_1mtT0AZyWQbyAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIE9xR4ZAw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJgpfK54fgAhVN-6wKHbtDD_0Q2A4IKigB&biw=1029&bih=949 ... Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep

Es una edición que hize en Picsart Sunset Shimmer Pony 507 (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the United States. Park was dedicated in 2016. Sculpture by Huo Bhao Zhu Abzeronow (talk) 03:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of Twitch video: https://clips.twitch.tv/UninterestedPlayfulSpindleDxCat Ytoyoda (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No specimen Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete, this type of image is valuable for taxonomists. Experts at Naturalis (Leiden, the Netherlands) have told me this when i uploaded seemingly "empty" images of plants and here molluscs because a change in the species name is shown. (The companion image File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - RMNH.MOL.120792 - Incisura lyttletonensis (Smith, 1894) - Scissurellidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg shows the 7 minuscule specimens.) Thanks for keeping this image Hansmuller (talk) 21:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Agreed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image ailleurs sur Internet, pas convaincu qu'elle soit libre Shev123 (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file CCATNQ (talk) 21:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is not an open source image. The copyright of this image belongs to Trustees, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Vastu Sangrahalaya (website -csmvs.in) 182.56.193.233 07:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The painting is PD and the image falls under Bridgeman. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader does not appear to have the copyright. Metadata indicates this as the work of professional photographer Gerrit Fokkema, and it is used on a number of websites such as http://www.nickgreiner.com.au/ and https://www.celebrityspeakers.com.au/nick-greiner/ 82.39.49.182 08:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not concord with the reality from 1914 or 1919 ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Miller%27s_history_of_the_world_war_for_human_right;_being_an_intensely_human_and_brilliant_account_of_the_world_war_and_why_and_for_what_purpose_America_and_the_allies_are_fighting_and_the_(14595424610).jpg ) Rgvis (talk) 10:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what does not match, exactly ? We are talking about 1919-1920, not about 1914-1918.Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 14:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC) We need only one discussion for the English and German (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hungarian-Romanian War.de.png) versions. Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 14:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This map is not a copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Miller%27s_history_of_the_world_war_for_human_right;_being_an_intensely_human_and_brilliant_account_of_the_world_war_and_why_and_for_what_purpose_America_and_the_allies_are_fighting_and_the_(14595424610).jpg showing exclusively the 1914 lands of Austro-Hungary, but a derivative work, showing more other details according with several historic maps from Hans-Erich Stier's (dir.) Grosser Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1985, (ISBN 3-14-100919-8), Putzger's Historischer Weltatlas, Cornelsen 1990, (ISBN 3-464-00176-8), Georges Duby's Atlas historique Larousse 1987, (ISBN 2-03-503009-9), the « Atlas des Peuples » of André & Jean Sellier, La Découverte publ., : Europe centrale, 1992, (ISBN 2-7071-2032-4) the Történelmi atlasz, Hungarian academy publ. 1991, (ISBN 963-351-422-3) CM and the Atlas istorico-geografic, Romanian academy publ. 1995, (ISBN 973-27-0500-0).--Julieta39 (talk) 17:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, the territorial status in 1914, as is presented in this map, does not reflect the reality of the time, Hungary not being an independent state, but a constituent of the Austro-Hungarian Empire; where are the borders of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, to which Hungary belonged? Also, in 1914, we cannot talk about the RSFSR! Secondly, in November 1918, the Austro-Hungarian Empire disintegrated, and immediately, all territories with ethnicities other than Austrians and Hungarians separated from the former Empire, and folowed a different historical course. What are Bukovina, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Austria, Bosnia in this context? Independent countries, provincies, or what? In 1919, territorial demarcations were quite different. (Rgvis (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]
It seems that you disagree this map because, as created by Kryston, it is a comparative one, what showing in colors (yellow, blue, red, green) the austrian-hungarian Hungary, the Romanian, Serbian and Russian territories in 1914, and also in pink stripes the Soviet Hungary in 1919 and in white lines, the 1920 borders? --Julieta39 (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thirdly, the statement that "between December 1918 and June 1920 Transylvania was administrated (misspelled as "administratered") by Oskar Jaszi - Alexandru Averescu and the Hungarian-Romanian Commission is pure OR. Shortly after the dissolution of the empire, the Transylvanian Romanians did not accept any proposal from the newly created Hungarian government, and Transylvania came under Romanians control, through the Directing Council of Transylvania, Banat and all Romanian lands in Hungary, which, starting November 1918, assumed administrative and executive power in all these territories. (Rgvis (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]
If the Jaszi-Averescu Hungarian-Romanian Commission is pure OR, so Michel Sturdza (The Suicide of Europe, Western Islands Publishers 1968, p. 22, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 68-58284) and some others romanian historians are only liars. In fact Oskar Jàszi ruled the Hungarians of Transylvania (especially in the towns) and the romanian Council of Transylvania, Banat and all Romanian lands in Hungary have not an official de jure control, but the romanian troops ensured its de facto authority --Julieta39 (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Finally, the map shows absolutely nothing about of the Hungarian-Romanian War. Everything on this map is inaccurate and confusing! (Rgvis (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]
If you want, please, improve this map. Today, I improve just some details. --Julieta39 (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some examples of accurate maps:

before WWI: [14], [15], [16], [17]
after WWI: [18], [19], [20], [21].
(Rgvis (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The map is in use, so it cannot be deleted for this reason. You may want to add {{Inaccurate-map-disputed}}. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not concord with the reality from 1914 ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Miller%27s_history_of_the_world_war_for_human_right;_being_an_intensely_human_and_brilliant_account_of_the_world_war_and_why_and_for_what_purpose_America_and_the_allies_are_fighting_and_the_(14595424610).jpg ) Rgvis (talk) 10:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We need only one discussion for the English and German versions (the discussion is at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hungarian-Romanian War.en.png).Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 14:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This map is not a copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Miller%27s_history_of_the_world_war_for_human_right;_being_an_intensely_human_and_brilliant_account_of_the_world_war_and_why_and_for_what_purpose_America_and_the_allies_are_fighting_and_the_(14595424610).jpg showing exclusively the 1914 lands of Austro-Hungary, but a derivative work, showing more other details according with several historic maps from Hans-Erich Stier's (dir.) Grosser Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1985, (ISBN 3-14-100919-8), Putzger's Historischer Weltatlas, Cornelsen 1990, (ISBN 3-464-00176-8), Georges Duby's Atlas historique Larousse 1987, (ISBN 2-03-503009-9), the « Atlas des Peuples » of André & Jean Sellier, La Découverte publ., : Europe centrale, 1992, (ISBN 2-7071-2032-4) the Történelmi atlasz, Hungarian academy publ. 1991, (ISBN 963-351-422-3) CM and the Atlas istorico-geografic, Romanian academy publ. 1995, (ISBN 973-27-0500-0).--Julieta39 (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you explain what does not match, exactly ? We are talking about 1919-1920, not about 1914-1918.Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 14:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC) We need only one discussion for the English and German here (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hungarian-Romanian War.de.png) versions. Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 14:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This map is not a copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Miller%27s_history_of_the_world_war_for_human_right;_being_an_intensely_human_and_brilliant_account_of_the_world_war_and_why_and_for_what_purpose_America_and_the_allies_are_fighting_and_the_(14595424610).jpg showing exclusively the 1914 lands of Austro-Hungary, but a derivative work, showing more other details according with several historic maps from Hans-Erich Stier's (dir.) Grosser Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1985, (ISBN 3-14-100919-8), Putzger's Historischer Weltatlas, Cornelsen 1990, (ISBN 3-464-00176-8), Georges Duby's Atlas historique Larousse 1987, (ISBN 2-03-503009-9), the « Atlas des Peuples » of André & Jean Sellier, La Découverte publ., : Europe centrale, 1992, (ISBN 2-7071-2032-4) the Történelmi atlasz, Hungarian academy publ. 1991, (ISBN 963-351-422-3) CM and the Atlas istorico-geografic, Romanian academy publ. 1995, (ISBN 973-27-0500-0).--Julieta39 (talk) 17:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, the territorial status in 1914, as is presented in this map, does not reflect the reality of the time, Hungary not being an independent state, but a constituent of the Austro-Hungarian Empire; where are the borders of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, to which Hungary belonged? Also, in 1914, we cannot talk about the RSFSR! Secondly, in November 1918, the Austro-Hungarian Empire disintegrated, and immediately, all territories with ethnicities other than Austrians and Hungarians separated from the former Empire, and folowed a different historical course. What are Bukovina, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Austria, Bosnia in this context? Independent countries, provincies, or what? In 1919, territorial demarcations were quite different. (Rgvis (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]
It seems that you disagree this map because, as created by Kryston, it is a comparative one, what showing in colors (yellow, blue, red, green) the austrian-hungarian Hungary, the Romanian, Serbian and Russian territories in 1914, and also in pink stripes the Soviet Hungary in 1919 and in white lines, the 1920 borders? --Julieta39 (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thirdly, the statement that "between December 1918 and June 1920 Transylvania was administrated (misspelled as "administratered") by Oskar Jaszi - Alexandru Averescu and the Hungarian-Romanian Commission is pure OR. Shortly after the dissolution of the empire, the Transylvanian Romanians did not accept any proposal from the newly created Hungarian government, and Transylvania came under Romanians control, through the Directing Council of Transylvania, Banat and all Romanian lands in Hungary, which, starting November 1918, assumed administrative and executive power in all these territories. (Rgvis (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]
If the Jaszi-Averescu Hungarian-Romanian Commission is pure OR, so Michel Sturdza (The Suicide of Europe, Western Islands Publishers 1968, p. 22, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 68-58284) and some others romanian historians are only liars. In fact Oskar Jàszi ruled the Hungarians of Transylvania (especially in the towns) and the romanian Council of Transylvania, Banat and all Romanian lands in Hungary have not an official de jure control, but the romanian troops ensured its de facto authority --Julieta39 (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Finally, the map shows absolutely nothing about of the Hungarian-Romanian War. Everything on this map is inaccurate and confusing! (Rgvis (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]
If you want, please, improve this map. Today, I improve just some details on the english map. --Julieta39 (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some examples of accurate maps: before WWI [22], [23], [24], [25]; after WWI [26], [27], [28], [29]. (Rgvis (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The map is in use, so it cannot be deleted for this reason. You may want to add {{Inaccurate-map-disputed}}. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of File:Paulo Leão filme policarpo quaresma.jpg + doubts about copyright (of both files); the picture could be taken from a film with copyrights JopkeB (talk) 11:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of File:Imagem 007 edit.jpg + doubts about copyrights (both files)ː could be a still from a movie JopkeB (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion. Not educationally useful. What are images like these doing in Commons? Also the guy has a whole category of similar images from various places where he's posing as a tourist.. Hjart (talk) 11:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Romania and the photo violates map creator's copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YouTube uploaded not creator of video SecretName101 (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer: Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

同じ写真【京都市電チラシ】を投稿してしまいました。 Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 13:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination this is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pictPicture shows a smeared banner with an old logo that doesn't exist anymore and has been replaced; I would like to put a new picture here Nancy1911 (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a reason to replace the current use of this image at de:Europäisches Zentrum der Künste Hellerau by a better one, but no reason to delete it from Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The reasoning is utterly illogical for a place like wikimedia commons. --Goldchinese (talk) 18:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We generally keep old images for historical reasons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work from a driving license. Hanooz 14:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Sodankylä Tourist Information

[edit]

The following photographs were uploaded under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license with "Sodankylän matkailuneuvonta" (Sodankylä Tourist Information) as the author and with source information "From the organisation which have rights to this photo, with the permit to publish this in Wikimedia Commons.":

There are two (possible) problems with these photographs:

  • The permission from Sodankylä Tourist Information does not explicitly permit licensing under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 or any other free license.
  • Such permissions should be verified via COM:OTRS.

––Apalsola tc 14:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For clarification: I think these photographs are OK provided that Sodankylä Tourist Information sends the permission via COM:OTRS. ––Apalsola tc 15:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission(s). Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- Appears at https://www.spd-voerstetten.de/meldungen/spd-kreisparteitag-mit-katja-mast-mdb/ with "© 2017 - 2019 Version: 3.8 ". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What are commentators/translator dates of life? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What are author dates of life? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What are authors dates of life? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It is a diagram of a artificial canal in Persian. It has an obvious educational use. Exactly how many diagrams of artificial canals in Persian do we have? Notability has nothing to do with Commons deletion criteria, and neither does whether a file is an SVG. GMGtalk 15:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Given the small file size, I doubt that it is the uploaders own work as claimed. Since it has no categories, it is lost among our 50 million images and is therefore useless. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zearchitect01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings, photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image due to the association logo clearly seen on the apron. The author of the picture is probably trying to sponsor his association. Mlvtrglvn (talk) 15:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nothing "clearly seen" here, but it failed Flickrreview. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Japan for architecture, but not for other kind of art. The photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sdunham6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The license presented does not match the license present in the footer of site of origin, which is clear in saying "all rights reserved". Leon saudanha (talk) 16:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo quite identical to File:Musée du Louvre Darafsh (627).jpg. There is no encyclopedic value to have 2 so closed photos. Tangopaso (talk) 16:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: almost duplicate of File:Musée du Louvre Darafsh (627).jpg Miniwark (talk) 20:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason that you seek to delete this file rather than the other one? I'm not sure which one is objectively better w.r.t. educational value. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
̺ Delete I agree. Photo quite identical to File:Musée du Louvre Darafsh (627).jpg. There is no encyclopedic value to have 2 so closed photos.--Tangopaso (talk) 20:16, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - Photographers often make more pictures of one item (they do not always upload them all), building or whatever. Only because there is one photo that only is a bit different, is not a reason for deletion. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is no reason why we can't have both. holly {chat} 19:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the people in the photo would like it to be removed Avedianmp (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete it because I no longer want to use it, I have a much better version that I will upload for next works. Kopjevići Živinice Gornje (talk) 18:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete it because I no longer want to use it, I have a much better version that I will upload for next works. Kopjevići Živinice Gornje (talk) 18:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete it because I no longer want to use it, I have a much better version that I will upload for next works. Kopjevići Živinice Gornje (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete it because I no longer want to use it, I have a much better version that I will upload for next works. Kopjevići Živinice Gornje (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete it because I no longer want to use it, I have a much better version that I will upload for next works. Kopjevići Živinice Gornje (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture quality not good Tinukjoy (talk) 20:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Facebook Image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not found at web link Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:47, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - stated source is "Copyright © 2018 Informa UK Limited ". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by more quality vector version. - 91.193.178.20 21:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer want the file avaliable. Christopher-Photo (talk) 21:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request. Christopher-Photo (talk) 21:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I no longer want the image available. It lacks quality too. Christopher-Photo (talk) 21:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request. Christopher-Photo (talk) 21:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violoationː The painter was born in 1943, so he cannot have been a painter AND been dead for at least 75 years. AND I do not see permission of the painter or his heirs. JopkeB (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rejected fast delete by @Sanandros: . I think there is enough high quality versions of this emblem in Category:Emblems of the Federal Protective Service (Russia) . -91.193.178.20 21:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC) 91.193.178.20 21:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but they all differ in colors.--Sanandros (talk) 23:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded a new PNG version of this image. Cyberdoomslayer (talk) 22:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A foto se encontra nesse site aqui, https://www.lance.com.br/corinthians/prestes-estrear-pelo-roger-diz-pressionado-mas-pronto.html, e está substituindo uma foto do Flickr hospedada legitimamente. WikiGusta (talk) 01:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: latest version per COM:LL and reverted to previous version per COM:OVERWRITE. P 1 9 9   14:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete the latest version and restore the previous version that is verified to be freely licensed. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Done as requested. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader's request as newer version File:Machang Bubuk state constituency.svg available. *angys* (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: , this is my previous work and I would like to delete it from Commons.*angys* (talk) 11:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, that is not a valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

組織名義で作成された著作物のため Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 16:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

組織名義で作成された著作物のため Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 16:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

組織名義で作成された著作物のため Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

組織名義で作成された著作物のため Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free illustration in Japan. Batholith (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That file is a printing material from brochures.
These are brochures of Japanese railway company made in 1978. --Batholith (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akaotam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete one of the duplicates. Which one doesn't seem to matter that I can see.  Keep the other two. It's a pd-text-logo of a provincial department in France, and it therefore has an obvious educational use. I wonder whether EugeneZelenko even checked what it was for before nominating it. GMGtalk 15:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I checked. There is fourth used variant: File:Cd black 2018fin.png. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then why did you nominate it for deletion as out of scope, when it is clearly in scope? It is not helpful to make deletion requests without including an actual rationale for deletion. GMGtalk 15:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why unused duplicates are in scope? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Their content is in scope; if it wasn't in scope, then we would delete all of them. See COM:SCOPE. You are making an argument about COM:Redundant or COM:Dupe, which has nothing to do with scope. GMGtalk 23:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicates. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

プロジェクト基準/予防原則のため Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UK painting from 1928 by artist who died in 1937 (Frank Brooks (1854–1937) according to BL/ArtUK). The UK copyright term is 70 pma., so copyright expired in the UK in 2007. This means it was still in copyright in the source country on the URAA date in 1996 and had its US copyright set to 95 years from publication (1928), which means it will not enter the public domain in the US before 1928 + 95 = 2023. Thus, while currently public domain in the UK, this work is still in copyright in the US.

PS. The file also has EXIF tags directing to ArtUK's website for copyright info, which in turn claims copyright by ArtUK, all rights reserved, only non-commercial use allowed, and so forth. These should probably be stripped regardless if the file is kept. Xover (talk) 17:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Added PD-Art to it. Keep EXIF data, it can be safely ignored. Abzeronow (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment In the interest of transparency, I should probably note that there is an ongoing discussion at COM:VPC#URAA revisited in 2019 that I was not aware of when nominating this file, and which bears directly on this discussion. As I understand standing Commons policy, the above nom is correct; but if I have misunderstood or if policy changes as a result of that discussion, I would be very happy to withdraw this nom. It's a nice painting and I would love to be able to use it on Wikimedia projects. --Xover (talk) 08:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Our policy remains that images must be free in the USA. This image is not. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Grabbed from the net, perhaps here: https://www.google.com.tr/imgres?imgurl=https://storage.googleapis.com/nrpassets/uploads/articles/1545572115-folk_dance_3.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.nilefm.com/video/51/exclusive-interview-with-amena-el-saie-co-founder-ceo-of-helm-egypt&h=700&w=980&tbnid=QmrrswS1EP28kM&tbnh=190&tbnw=266&usg=K_MNC-uz6goNjz_XF9N9HyvHORQ-I=&docid=sDHAzVqBA5ko5M&itg=1 E4024 (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image at the link you give appears to be derived from the colour adjusted one at commons, so I'd suggest that they got it from here, not the other way around. Hohum (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Are you also inclining to believe that User:Deliawp really took this picture themselves in 1959? --E4024 (talk) 18:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Judging by the TP of the file, User:Nesnad is as skeptical as myself concerning the authenticity of the author of this image. --E4024 (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not own work, but almost certainly PD-Egypt. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" from 950s? All three uploads of this user are fake own work. E4024 (talk) 18:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not own work, but almost certainly PD-Egypt. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]