Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/15
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
© Gretel Herrera. Con la tecnología de Blogger. Jos1950 (talk) 00:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Old photo. Copyright for photographs in the Dominican Republic expires 50 years after the first publication; proof of first publication is still needed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- And this © Gretel Herrera. I have seen the picture somewhere else and with better quality, but also ©. --Jos1950 (talk) 17:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- I don't thing that a Blog owner can take the copyright for a work already in the PD. This picture has been created more than 100 years ago. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I can use that the next opportunity. --Jos1950 (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- And this © Gretel Herrera. I have seen the picture somewhere else and with better quality, but also ©. --Jos1950 (talk) 17:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Amitie 10g: PD image (BTW, I uploaded a better resolution version). Ruthven (msg) 09:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logotipo del Ministerio de las Patatas Fritas con Kétchup.png
This file was initially tagged by Gage as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: A larger version of this same photo has been deleted from Commons three times already, as it is work of the Alabama government and not public domain. I did not find the larger, deleted resolution. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Taivo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Luther_Strange.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 Correction, twice. Gage (talk) 09:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, now I agree to delete the file speedily. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pleclown as no permission (No permission since) Autorisation en cours. Yann (talk) 12:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- I am currently explaining to the author the OTRS procedure. The author is not connected this week end, but I should get an answer within a week. --Nattes à chat (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
no authorization received speedy deletion please (artist does not agree with terms of CCBYSA) Nattes à chat (talk) 02:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pleclown as no permission (No permission since) Autorisation en cours. Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
speedy deletion please artist did not agree with terms of CCBYSA Nattes à chat (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pleclown as no permission (No permission since) Autorisation en cours. Yann (talk) 12:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
speedy deletion please artist did not agree with terms of CCBYSA Nattes à chat (talk) 02:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pleclown as no permission (No permission since) Autorisation en cours. Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
speedy deletion please artist did not agree with terms of CCBYSA Nattes à chat (talk) 02:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SouthamptonFan123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be a screenshot from TV, see COM:DW.
- File:F.Forster 2016.jpg
- File:Fraser Forster vs West Ham Unted.jpg
- File:Fraser Forster vs Arsenal 2016.jpg
★ Poké95 03:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SouthamptonFan123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No credible claim of ownership. Multiple images are crops of Getty or Flickr photos. Many appear to be screenshots based on blurring.
- File:Nathan Redmond.jpg
- File:Maya Yoshida.png
- File:Cuco Martina.png
- File:Cedric Soares.jpg
- File:Shane Long playing Southampton.jpg
- File:Virgil van Dijk 2016.jpg
- File:Pierre Emile Hojbjerg 2016.jpg
- File:Jay Rodriguez 2016.jpg
- File:Cedric Soares - Southampton.jpg
- File:Cedric Soares 2016.jpg
- File:Charlie Austin 2016.png
- File:Sofiane Boufal.jpg
- File:Nathan Redmond.png
- File:Shane Long.jpg
- File:Oriol Romeu.png
- File:Jay Rodriguez.png
- File:Jake Stephens.jpg
- File:Sims.JPG
- File:Southampton vs Liverpool 1-0.png
- File:Bournemouth 1-3 Southampton.jpg
- File:Forster against Bournemouth.jpg
- File:Forster vs Bournemouth - December 2016.jpg
- File:Jordy Clasie playing for Southampton.jpg
- File:Virgil van Dijk.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 16:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Image taken from Flickr, uploaded by blocked user Ytoyoda (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope ~ Nahid Talk 12:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Wikitanvir: Out of project scope
I created this by mistake, instead of creating a category. Pititnatole (talk) 16:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: housekeeping. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Matanya: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Julia and Dairn, 7 Oct. 2010 - Flickr - PhillipC.jpg: Private photo, not used.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
holiday snap of non-notable individual; out of scope DCB (talk) 17:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 20:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Oversaturated and blurry. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Not free Logo / Logo non libre Supertoff (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons: surpasses threshold of originality
This image contains a derivative image which is clearly labeled "H/HISTORY" like the History Channel from Television. I suggest that the US worker was using the other Image from History Channel as an example and despite it being in a NARA photo, that the contained image is not able to be freely licensed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jasonanaggie - Using VisualFileChange.
Copyright violation (see http://www.hln.be/hln/nl/2734/Sporting-Lokeren/article/detail/2837197/2016/08/23/De-Ridder-na-20-jaar-weer-bij-Lokeren-Dit-voelt-als-thuiskomen.dhtml) Sussexpeople (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
EXIF states: Australian Defence Force photo by ADF Cpl. Janine Fabre. The US govt can't make this available under any licence, or even into public domain, without approval from the ADF. Something they refuse to do Mungoola (talk) 04:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd: Broken redirect
This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 16:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Images taken from https://www.championat.com/hockey/news-2231797-vratar-salavata-niklas-svedberg-predstavil-novyj-shlem.html Ytoyoda (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.pressworks.com.br/upload/clientes/resultados/gde/296-MAC_0758%20RGB.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 20:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Closed DRs for other images
|
---|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)[edit]COM:DW of artwork.
LGA talkedits 23:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:03, 23 May 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)[edit]A Public Domain Mark (PDM) here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With the PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image.
Leoboudv (talk) 03:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete, unless the Flickr account owner licenses the images. The public domain mark, and it's use on Flickr, has been discussed repeatedly, multiple places. There is a clear community consensus that we cannot accept it, because it is not a license, and we cannot 'pretend' that people who apply it to their own works are granting a license. - Reventtalk 20:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
If you wish to change Common's policies on a completely different issue like Public Domain Mark, this is not the right forum. PDM just Cannot be accepted from a private person's flickr account because the copyright owner, Linda Rae Duchaine here who states a claim of copyright over her images in the camera metadata, can Revoke permission at any time. How can Commons use these images? --Leoboudv (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC) (t) Josve05a (c) 22:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Deleted: per nomination - obvious case. --Jcb (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)[edit]These files are on Flickr with the 'Public Domain Mark', which is not a valid license for Commons, see Template:Flickr-public domain mark since they can be revoked by the copyright owner at any time. As long as the license is not changed at source, we cannot keep these images.
Leoboudv (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)[edit]per COM:BLP
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
|
Files uploaded by Victorgrigas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE unused AI images.
- File:King Trump 6.png
- File:King Trump 3.png
- File:King Trump 4.png
- File:King Trump 5.png
- File:King Trump 2.png
- File:King Trump.png
- File:Ugly Trump —-.png
- File:Ugly Trump —.png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The King Trump ones are high-quality caricatures with quite some meaning. This is in contrast to this "caricature of Donald Trump" that people here are seemingly desperate to keep and which is entirely inappropriate, not a caricature, and not useful or educational but out of scope. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Personal art and AI art is deemed out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time. Leoboudv (talk) 02:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Beautiful picture, but sadly yeah it should be deleted. Too bad. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to McLaren. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yep, DELETE, as it is ambiguous and looks rendered and not photographed; something only the manufacturer could produce with Maya. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Mercedes. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I can't tell if this is a photo or a rendering, but either way it wasn't made by the energy department, good catch. DELETE Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Honda. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yep, DELETE this one, no doubt about this with the fake skyline in the background. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Audi. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 07:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 08:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yep, no doubt that this one was a screw up by the energy department. That is not the work of an energy department staffer, not to denigrate those working in the energy department. DELETE Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Nissan. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah I would have to agree when comparing this one to the others that this photo is likely provided by Ford; as judged from the highly retouched city scene around the car vs. the car show style photos that seem questionable. I agree that this one should be deleted as a safe precaution. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Ford. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I wish it had some exif data, as it does not look like the quality that a car manufacturer would produce, but more along the lines of what an energy department intern might produce at a car show, taking a rapid approach to get all the cars at an event, but I won't protest it if you want to err on the side of caution. I honestly did not see that little part of the descriptions when I initiated the uploads. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- It's worth noting that some images in this set are indeed produced by the Dept of Energy, File:Toyota Mirai (29414863042).jpg for example. In these cases, the author is "Simon Edelman, Energy Department". Badzil (talk) 07:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I wish it had some exif data, as it does not look like the quality that a car manufacturer would produce, but more along the lines of what an energy department intern might produce at a car show, taking a rapid approach to get all the cars at an event, but I won't protest it if you want to err on the side of caution. I honestly did not see that little part of the descriptions when I initiated the uploads. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Not actually the work of a DOE employee, the photo is even credited to Hyundai. This photo has already been deleted once. 70.67.179.167 08:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- copyrighted: 千葉県(Chiba Prefectural Government)総合企画部報道広報課千葉の魅力発信戦略室
Not free enough to share on commons for:
- official prohibitions on color/shape modifications : [3](pdf ja)
- need of permission : [4](ja)
- this photo is hardly judged as "De minimis".
(see also similar cases : Commons:Deletion requests/Files under Category:Guribū) --Tokorokoko (talk) 03:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chi-ba-kun
[edit]Copyrighted character. Not free. [5]
- File:チーバくん (11029520866).jpg
- File:チーバくん歌舞伎バージョン (13264455555).jpg
- File:チーバくん歌舞伎バージョン (13264609563).jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2015. [6] G I Chandor (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The monument was erected in 2012. [7] G I Chandor (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2001. [8] G I Chandor (talk) 00:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Yumura Onsen, Hyogo
[edit]No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1985. [9]
G I Chandor (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2013. [10] G I Chandor (talk) 00:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1993. [11] G I Chandor (talk) 00:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
copy rights Aoisora be (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Clearly out of scope. Supernino (talk) 09:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a document only for User:Gazouya. Out of scope. G I Chandor (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal item Pippobuono (talk) 10:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MaxiCarruega (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos and logo. Out of scope. User did nothing for Wikipedia apart from creating a user page in 2014.
Castillo blanco (talk) 10:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep She is a notable people. I've msg'ed Chris to ask who they are and will update the image when I hear back. BTW, he's a notable photographer. Mungoola (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It is Ruzwana Bashir. Peek is the name of her company. Mungoola (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Ruzwana Bashir is a notable person. --Érico (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
out of scope (COM:PENIS) Sascha GPD (talk) 10:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
out of scope (COM:PENIS) Sascha GPD (talk) 10:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Maybe a Facebook screenshot of a private person. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 05:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 00:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nakanotake-jinja
[edit]No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2005. [12] [13]
G I Chandor (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Qurren (talk) 10:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tarō Okamoto
[edit]As per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Japan, photos of art works situated in public locations in Japan cannot be uploaded to Commons. (Tarō Okamoto died in 1996.)
- File:Taro Okamoto1.jpg
- File:Taro Okamoto2.jpg
- File:有樂町 2014 (16262109752).jpg
- File:若い時計台 (321319845).jpg
- File:若い時計台 20-55 (1028982482).jpg
DAJF (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tarō Okamoto
[edit]No FOP in Japan. It was created by Tarō Okamoto (1911-1996).
- File:Taro Okamoto^^39,s ^quot,Young clock tower^quot - panoramio.jpg
- File:Taro Okamoto^^39,s ^quot,Young clock tower^quot, again - panoramio.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 03:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tarō Okamoto
[edit]Copyright violation. These are art works by Tarō Okamoto (1911-1996).
- File:岡本太郎-Painting by okamoto tarou - panoramio.jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (12).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (14).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (15).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (16).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (18).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (19).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (20).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (21).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (22).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (23).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (24).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:若い時計台 - panoramio (7).jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 01:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tarō Okamoto
[edit]Copyright violation. It was created by Tarō Okamoto (1911-1996).
G I Chandor (talk) 00:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tarō Okamoto
[edit]NoFoP-Japan. This work was created in 1969 and is therefore under copyright protection.
- File:Tower of young sun in Japan Monkey Park 2.jpg
- File:Tower of young sun in Japan Monkey Park 3.jpg
- File:Tower of young sun in Japan Monkey Park.jpg
Syunsyunminmin (talk) 08:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: work by Taro Okamoto († 1996). --Yasu (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Painted by Josef Frühmesser, not "own work". See W:Josef Frühmesser. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- "Own work" was referring to the photography of the painting of course, I will correct it. Ritter von Schönherring (talk)
- Do you have permission from the copyright holder? Vanjagenije (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the painter must also send a permission to OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
clearly it's copyrighted as there's a copyright watermark in it, plus the source is a mainstream news outlet, so the likelihood this is CC released is slim to none Joeyconnick (talk) 00:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 01:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This is personal artwork by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Artwork by non-notable artist, more suitable for website "deviant art" or similar.
- File:BardScion 06.png
- File:BardScion 05.png
- File:BardScion 04.png
- File:BardScion 02.png
- File:BardScion 03.png
- File:BardScion 01.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal photo. Érico (talk) 19:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal photo. Érico (talk) 19:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal photo. Érico (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal photo. Érico (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No encyclopedic value TJH2018talk 19:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabbir Rahman Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 22:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uncategorized, and not used. DavidIvar (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
False caption, image uploaded purely to support Wiki vandalism General Ization (talk) 23:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:State of Washington v. Trump
[edit]Files are not from the Federal Government. According to {{PD-USGov-Judiciary}} "Filings by parties are copyrighted (except for filings by the United States government, which should be tagged with {{PD-USgov}}"
- File:Declaration of Solicitor General Noah Purcell.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Declaration of Asif Chaudhry.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Declaration of Ayesha Blackwell-Hawkins, Esq.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Declaration of Robert Dzielak.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Declaration of Emily Chiang.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Declaration of Jeffrey Riedinger.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Plaintiff State of Washington's Supplemental Brief Regarding Standing.pdf
- File:First Amended Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Notice of Amended Citations.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Brief of Amicus Curiae the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Brief of the Service Employees International Union as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiff State of Washington.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Proposed Brief of Amicus Curiae Law Professors on the Subject of State Standing.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Brief of Amicus Curiae Washington State Labor Council.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Brief of Amicus Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State in Support of State of Washington's Amended Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Akamai Technologies Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Anti-Defamation League Amicus Brief Updated.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Appellees Notice of filing additional evidence in district court.pdf
- File:17-35105 - CREDO Mobile Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Daniel Escamilla Amicus Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Daniel Escamilla Amicus Motion.pdf
- File:17-35105 - David Golden Motion to Intervene.pdf
- File:17-35105 - DiCentral Corporation Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Fitbit Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - GoDaddy Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Medidata Solutions Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Molecule Software Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - MongoDB Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - OneLogin Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - PA-MA-NY-CA-CT-DE-IL-IA-ME-MD-NH-NM-NC-OR-RI-VT-VA-DC Amended Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Participating Law Firms of the Employment Law Alliance Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Postmates Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Quantcast Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Redfin Corporation Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - SoundCloud Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - SpotHero Inc Letter Joining Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 - Technology Start-Ups Joinder to Technology Companies amicus motion and brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 Additional Law Professors Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 American Center for Law and Justice Amicus Motion and Brief Updated.pdf
- File:17-35105 American Immigration Council Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 American Immigration Council Exhibits.pdf
- File:17-35105 Anti-Defamation League Amicus Motion.pdf
- File:17-35105 Anti-Defamation League Motion for Extension of Time.pdf
- File:17-35105 Constitutional Scholars Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 Freedom Watch Motion.pdf
- File:17-35105 Groupon Letter Joining Technology Companies Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 Hawaii motion to intervene.pdf
- File:17-35105 HIAS Amicus Motion.pdf
- File:17-35105 Jewish Federation Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 Letter by Additional Technology Companies Joining Technology Companies Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, et al, Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 Muslim Advocates Amicus.pdf
- File:17-35105 Natl Immigrant Justice Ctr ASISTA Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 Pivotal Software Letter Joining Technology Companies Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 SEIU Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 U.S. Justice Foundation Citizens United et al Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:17-35105 Washington State Labor Council Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:Amicus-Brief-by-Tech-Companies.pdf
- File:Law Professors Motion to Substitute Corrected Amicus Motion and Brief.pdf
- File:LETTER from Plaintiffs re Briefing (Purcell, Noah).pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - Exhibit A to response.pdf
- File:Washington v. Trump - STATES’ RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY MOTION UNDER CIRCUIT RULE 27-3.pdf
Elisfkc (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Here is the pertinent discussion on this issue:
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:DARWEESH_V._TRUMP_1-_complaint.pdf -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 00:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- But to sum up the crux of the issue is that the courts have not found that Court filings once in the publicly available system, are still under copyright. There is not a single case on this issue in any United States courts. The only case that comes close is regarding publicly available filings on EDGAR with the SEC: https://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/litigationnews/top_stories/072010-EDGAR-copyright-infringement.html
- Here I would make the corollary that if you want to maintain confidentiality and copyright protection of public domain legal filings, it must be agreed to by the judge and be filed under seal. This is just the fundamental nature of our legal system; it is open for anyone to see, we don't have secret trials, or secret filings unless one can prove the need for confidentiality and probable damage caused by making court filings open to the public to read, sell or do whatever with. It is one of the very cornerstones of the American Judicial System. You cannot copyright something that will be filed with the court because in the very act of having a court clerk; it moves into the Public domain. This is why you can get copies of any court filing for free and can reproduce these and sell them as many websites do. Jasonanaggie (talk) 01:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I am just going with what seems to be the rule according to the template I mentioned. It also brings up the issue then of copyrighted images and logos filled inside of amicus curiae briefs. Are they then in the public domain, or will they still be copyrighted? Elisfkc (talk) 02:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Filings such as this are most definitely public records, and copyright fair use would cover most reasonable cases of copying. Certainly, any copying in relation to discussing the court case would be fine. But, that doesn't necessarily mean that the entire scope of possible uses protected by copyright is OK -- the case you link is someone directly using the content in a filing to aid a competing service (the use having nothing to do with the reasons they were filed). Or, things like derivative works may not be covered by fair use. I'm pretty sure that in cases like this, it's just that the fair use grounds are greatly expanded as compared to normal works, not that copyright is completely extinguished. And while most real-life uses and copying in relation to the court case would therefore be OK, it's still not really the same thing as "public domain" (i.e. complete lack of copyright), and therefore not the same thing as "free". It's frustrating, no doubt, as they are very pertinent for educating about the case, but... it may still be at odds with our charter. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete all. The fact that there may be a solid fair use case for the verbatim reproduction of court filings (or an implied license for verbatim reproduction) is no answer to the fact that the court filings are presumptively copyrightable and non-free, and is inconsistent with our license allowing for free usage of files on Commons, including for derivative works and commercial purposes, and our policy on the unacceptability of "fair use" files. (Full disclosure: I was responsible for the change to the language in {{PD-USGov-Judiciary}}.) RJaguar3 (talk) 05:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Just curious; can you cite even a single case brought in court in which someone claimed a copyright violation by people who sell court filings or give away court filings. I have done quite a bit of WestLaw searching and I could not find a single case. This is very odd if your contention that there is a copyrightable claim to a court filing after it is filed with a clerk of the court. Let me give you an example, let's say that a certain attorney contends that their particular wording of a prenuptial agreement is so special that nobody should be able to reproduce it without license given to the original attorney. I would expect to find a case citing this, however, when you think about the very nature of how case law is used and how precedents are set, someone would be commended for finding the wording that stands up best in all courts of law and reproducing it word for word without citation as it is unnecessary in a court of law, unless you also want to cite the case to cite it for precedent before the court you are filing with. If something is copyrighted and could not be reproduced even being done so in a for-profit venture, there should be at least one case you can point to showing this. But as I see it that would undermine the independence of the judiciary from the legislature; because if copyright laws which are made by the legislature could limit the judiciary, the legislature would be overstepping their Article I powers of the constitution in their forcing the judiciary (which only is governed by Article III of constitution) to abide by any regulation that the legislature would want to place to limit the judiciary. Any such statute applying to the judiciary would be unconstitutional on its face because the judiciary is a coequal branch of government with the legislature and the executive. None of the three can encroach on any of the other's duties. Jasonanaggie (talk) 05:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- White v. West Publishing Corp. and Reed Elsevier Inc. (S.D.N.Y. July 3, 2014) (finding legal database republication of court filing to be fair use, noting that plaintiff registered copyrights in briefs). RJaguar3 (talk) 05:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- ADDENDUM The complaint in the case states that the two briefs had copyright registration numbers TX0007259439 and TX0007417300, which I verified using the Copyright Office catalog. RJaguar3 (talk) 06:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, thank you; this is a truly awesome find! Here is a good summary of the case for anyone not interested in reading a court order: http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/07/republishing-litigation-brief-is-fair-use-white-v-westlaw.htm
- I searched the case to see if it had been appealed any higher, as a circuit court decision would be more definitive, but yes, this seems to be one of those few cases that died at the district court level, and I haven't even seen something that went this far. Nevertheless it confirms what I thought about how the court felt about the issue, but they squarely used the Fair Use factors to decide the case. I wonder if the district court used the fair use test because of the novelty of the case that was before it, as the court seems to dislike the idea of copyrighting something that you intend to file in court too. I did like how much latitude the court gave WestLaw and LexusNexus. The difference I see between this case and the filings that are being discussed above is that there was a copyright registered relating to the documents being contested. There is no copyright registration in place for any of the documents being discussed for deletion, which then would be using them as Fair Use, but without the copyright registration, I think it's closer to Public Domain. Anyone else think the same way? Jasonanaggie (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The docket does add some basis on my thinking above (https://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-york/nysdce/1:2012cv01340/392336) Docket at 32. The court dismissed the case before the plaintiffs actually filed for registration of their copyrights. They then moved for leave to refile after gaining the copyrights registered. Then the ruling that User:RJaguar3 was ultimately found in favor of the defendants. This is the only case of its kind filed in any court across the country. Which makes it a great find! Jasonanaggie (talk) 20:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Just curious; can you cite even a single case brought in court in which someone claimed a copyright violation by people who sell court filings or give away court filings. I have done quite a bit of WestLaw searching and I could not find a single case. This is very odd if your contention that there is a copyrightable claim to a court filing after it is filed with a clerk of the court. Let me give you an example, let's say that a certain attorney contends that their particular wording of a prenuptial agreement is so special that nobody should be able to reproduce it without license given to the original attorney. I would expect to find a case citing this, however, when you think about the very nature of how case law is used and how precedents are set, someone would be commended for finding the wording that stands up best in all courts of law and reproducing it word for word without citation as it is unnecessary in a court of law, unless you also want to cite the case to cite it for precedent before the court you are filing with. If something is copyrighted and could not be reproduced even being done so in a for-profit venture, there should be at least one case you can point to showing this. But as I see it that would undermine the independence of the judiciary from the legislature; because if copyright laws which are made by the legislature could limit the judiciary, the legislature would be overstepping their Article I powers of the constitution in their forcing the judiciary (which only is governed by Article III of constitution) to abide by any regulation that the legislature would want to place to limit the judiciary. Any such statute applying to the judiciary would be unconstitutional on its face because the judiciary is a coequal branch of government with the legislature and the executive. None of the three can encroach on any of the other's duties. Jasonanaggie (talk) 05:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:State of Washington v. Trump
[edit]Same as above, since they are from the State of Washington.
- File:Washington v. Trump - Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.pdf
- File:Purcell Declaration (Exhibit A).pdf
- File:Purcell Declaration (Exhibit B).pdf
- File:Purcell Declaration (Exhibit C).pdf
Elisfkc (talk) 05:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb, As closer, I also not that I don;t think Commons scope covers keeping publicly available court documents. closed by. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Flag files uploaded by User:Radiodjerikstonehvny
[edit]- File:Flag of Bergen County, New Jersey.jpg
- File:Flag of Warren County, New Jersey.jpg
- File:Flag of Essex County, NJ.jpg
- File:Flag of Burlington County, New Jersey.jpg
- File:Flag of Danbury, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of Norwalk, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of Stamford, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of the City of Waterbury, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of New Milford, Conn.jpg
- File:Flag of Greenwich, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of Bethel, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of Bristol, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of the City of Hartford, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of Groton, Connecticut.jpg
- File:Flag of Bergen County, New Jersey - 2.jpg
User:Radiodjerikstonehvny has uploaded a quite a number of files of flags of US cities as "own work" or PD when it is not clear that either is really the case. It's highly unlikely that files such as File:Flag of Greenwich, Connecticut.jpg and File:Flag of Stamford, Connecticut.jpg were created by the uploader, and unlike the States of California and Florida, I don't believe en:Connecticut, en:New Jersey have similar copyright rules when it comes to governmental works. In addition to licensing things as "own work", there is also PD claims for File:Flag of Bergen County, New Jersey.jpg, File:Flag of Essex County, NJ.jpg and File:Flag of Warren County, New Jersey.jpg which seem to indicate that this particular user is not familiar at all with COM:PD. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also small, poor quality. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Cropped from this image, no evidence that the uploader is the original author of the image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- File:Screenshot 126.png
- File:Screenshot-12.png
- File:Screenshot-1.png
- File:Screenshot 1.jpg
- File:ScreenShot-1389839413-0.png
- File:Screenshot 1.png (in description [translated from russian]: "Please say me, what image or symbol on T-shirt is it?")
- File:Screenshot 13.png
- File:Screenshot-12 Wiki rendering showing content .png
- File:Screenshot 1 neues BS-Portal.jpg
- This list can be very big. Just put any number after "File:Screenshot" in search box in right upper corner.
Hosting file. Commons is not a share resource for images. ← Alex Great talkrus? 02:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of licence, needs OTRS permission Mungoola (talk) 03:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: very poor quality -- unusable. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Info says: "Australian Defence Force photo by Cpl Matthew Bickerton". US govt contractors can't do anything with licencing. ADF refuses to CC licence other than CC-BY-NC-ND. Mungoola (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Images released to the U.S. Department of Defense as a courtesy by contractors, allies and coalition partners are public domain within the United States per Ticket#2016052110008897. This grant of license may not apply outside the United States as noted by {{PD-US}}. – Maliepa (talk) 03:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The OTRS ticket is a special case and has no general applicability. The copyright to contractor courtesy images remains with the contractor unless there are special circumstances. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Info states: "Australian Defence Force photo by Cpl. Matthew Bickerton". US govt contractors can't place this into PD. ADF refuses to CC licence properly. Mungoola (talk) 04:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Images released to the U.S. Department of Defense as a courtesy by contractors, allies and coalition partners are public domain within the United States per Ticket#2016052110008897. This grant of license may not apply outside the United States as noted by {{PD-US}}. – Maliepa (talk) 03:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The OTRS ticket is a special case and has no general applicability. The copyright to contractor courtesy images remains with the contractor unless there are special circumstances. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Info states: "Australian Defence Force photo by Cpl. David Said". US govt contractors can't place this into PD. ADF refuses to CC licence properly. Mungoola (talk) 04:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Images released to the U.S. Department of Defense as a courtesy by contractors, allies and coalition partners are public domain within the United States per Ticket#2016052110008897. This grant of license may not apply outside the United States as noted by {{PD-US}}. – Maliepa (talk) 03:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The OTRS ticket is a special case and has no general applicability. The copyright to contractor courtesy images remains with the contractor unless there are special circumstances. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peterandfrankie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Missing or questionable authorship and source information. The uploader claims that photos taken in 1910 (File:SPC AT 1910.jpg, File:OPENING OF WU TING FANG.jpg) are his/her own work, which seems unlikely. The uploader also claims to personally be the copyright holder of photos from vaguely identified sources ("St Paul's College," "Wayfarer," "Wayfarer Bk", "St Paul's College Wayfarer" or some variation thereof), but there is no explanation as to why this would be the case. Apparently, Wayfarer is a school magazine of St. Paul's College in Hong Kong, established in 1958. Some of these photos may be in the public domain due to age, but a proper rationale, correct publication date and verifiable source information is needed for each.
- File:JOHNRKENNARD.jpg
- File:Vincent Stanton.jpg
- File:EGSTEWARD.jpg
- File:HAWINGHO.jpg
- File:Speak.jpg
- File:Gerald Heath Lander.jpg
- File:Joseph Charles Hoare.jpg
- File:History 1873.jpg
- File:History 1851.jpg
- File:Charles Richard Alford.jpg
- File:Vincent John Stanton.jpg
- File:SPC COL EVAN STEWARD.jpg
- File:Colonel Evan Steward.jpg
- File:Spcstaff1957.jpg
- File:Spcreport1931.jpg
- File:SWPSPC.jpg
- File:Howe.jpg
- File:Revd A D STEARD.jpg
- File:OPENING OF WU TING FANG.jpg
- File:COLLEGE 1960.jpg
- File:SPC AT 1910.jpg
- File:SPC AT 1850.jpg
- File:SPC 1950S.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- The photos with the exception of Principals' Photos are taken through the College magazine, Wayfarer, which has entitled for free use. {{Copyrighted free use}}
- Whilst the photos of the principal is taken from the website of St. Paul's College. - http://spc.edu.hk/content.php?id=58&mid=1-15
- These photos are used in
- |lang1=en|wiki1=wikipedia|article1=St._Paul's_College,_Hong_Kong
- |lang2=zh|wiki2=wikipedia|article2=聖保羅書院
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterandfrankie (talk • contribs)
- I'm afraid that doesn't really help much. I see that you've changed the source and licensing information for File:Joseph Charles Hoare.jpg, File:Gerald Heath Lander.jpg, File:Speak.jpg, File:Howe.jpg, File:HAWINGHO.jpg and File:Vincent Stanton.jpg, pointing to http://spc.edu.hk/content.php?id=58&mid=1-15 and claiming that the content is covered by {{Copyrighted free use}}. However, the source site contains a copyright notice and an "All rights reserved" statement. That means that they reserve the right to control how their work is used and by whom – the exact opposite of {{Copyrighted free use}}. And you're still claiming that you are the photographer of File:SPC AT 1910.jpg and File:OPENING OF WU TING FANG.jpg and that you're the copyright holder of the rest of the photos... —LX (talk, contribs) 17:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 07:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peterandfrankie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very unlikely to be own work, especially given the user's upload history.
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
no permission for background painting Krd 06:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also poor quality. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Web-sized painting uploaded by mobile device, unlikely to be uploader's "own work" as stated czar 07:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
дубль https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coke_Sign_-_panoramio.jpg Alexandronikos (talk) 07:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
дубль https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cojoba_rufescens_(10150212353).jpg Alexandronikos (talk) 07:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of focus. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Obvious scanned image, no source LMLM (talk) 07:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Suica
[edit]Suica's Penguin is a copyrighted character. [14]
- File:Suica Train Card.JPG
- File:Suica wiki.jpg
- File:Suicaキャラクター.PNG
- File:Suicaペンギン.png
- File:雨漏り 注意してください (2243457285).jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 08:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File:雨漏り 注意してください (2243457285).jpg It's not face.
- Keep File:Suica Train Card.JPG and File:Suica wiki.jpg
- There is the penguin-character at edge. Not Main Subject, Not Big. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Katori-jingu
[edit]Copyright violation. The text on the description plates are copyrighted works.
G I Chandor (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The photo and map on the description plate are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --★ Poké95 10:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide boards are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
out of scope (copied table) Eternal optimist (talk) 08:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oui, à supprimer (ok). MerveillePédia (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. This monument was erected in 2004. G I Chandor (talk) 08:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2000. [15]
- File:Kanazawa-C-2839.jpg
- File:Kanazawa-C-2856.jpg
- File:Maeda Toshiie 前田利家 尾山神社090965.JPG
- File:Statue of Maeda Toshiie in Oyama Shrine.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 08:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 08:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 08:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 08:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tomakomai, Hokkaido
[edit]It is a copyrighted character of Tomakomai City. [16]
G I Chandor (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a copyrighted character of Otaki Town. [17] G I Chandor (talk) 08:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The advertisement is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 09:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
screenshot of Twitter, free license? Furthermore, educational purpose of the screenshot? Ezarateesteban 22:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable youtube, Out of Scope. Kkairri (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- This file is used his user page on English Wikipedia, but he hasn't edit yet. In addition, it can be considered as advertisement.--Kkairri (talk) 23:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Tawfik Bennani.jpg
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Denis Hedone is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Takamatsu Five Arrows
[edit]Paintings are copyrighted works.
G I Chandor (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- This looks like a scanned personal photo. There is metadata which is when the scan happened. I'm in favor of keeping this photograph. Badzil (talk) 09:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also unidentified person -- out of scope personal image. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
wrong licence Pippobuono (talk) 10:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private dark photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France. Who is architect of depicted building and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Complex logo. Not a public domain. Texniths (talk) 10:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
no proper licence Eingangskontrolle (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Complex logo. It doesn't seem as a public domain Texniths (talk) 11:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Exif data : Auteur : Bernard Thibodeau Détenteur du droit d'auteur : CdC-HoC, le détenteur des droits doit donner son accord voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 11:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious copyvio. Fausse affirmation sur la paternité de l'oeuvre et contravention aux droits d'auteur. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia. Sculptor's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope ~ Nahid Talk 12:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scop Mjrmtg (talk) 12:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Very small picture. Likely copyvio. Badzil (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Same applies to the other files from this contributor. Badzil (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused photo, no educational. Out of scope. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 12:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mountainside Medical Equipment (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
Castillo blanco (talk) 12:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work. No proof of free license nor permission. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work. No proof of free license nor permission. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Ozkr cross fr.jpg
- File:Ozkr cross moto.jpg
- File:Ozkr cross fj.jpg
- File:Ozkr cross.jpg
- File:Ozkr Cross 22.JPG
- File:Ozkr Cross Ilusionista.jpg
Castillo blanco (talk) 13:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Image clearly states non-commercial use only. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Please, remove copyrighted artwork. Otherwise, remove the whole picture Discasto talk 14:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: cropped to eliminate problem. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The same image is already available elsewhere online such as on campaign posters and at her Twitter account. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 14:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julesvandam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own works, small sizes, no exif
/St1995 14:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Camilapobletem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own works, small sizes, no exif
/St1995 14:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal photos. Out of scope.
Castillo blanco (talk) 14:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tobías Rubilar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own works, small sizes, no exif
- File:Infancia de Ediberto Langer.jpg
- File:En las cercanías de la estación.jpg
- File:Encuentro Cultural.jpg
/St1995 14:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYzcyNGVjNDItNDI3OC00OTM5LWJmNWQtYWJmYzM1NGRjNDAwL2ltYWdlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDcxODM3OTI@._V1_UY1200_CR206,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: What is still missing in existing collection of explicit images? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
From http://www.hakagroup.co/TheTeam.aspx?cms=iQRpheuphYtJ6pyXUGiNqro6mMRwUUrE
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gibsoncenia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Family Picture 2016.jpg
- File:Gibson Torreon's Birthday in Gigaworkz Technonologies Inc.jpg
- File:Santo Niño Mass during Christmas Celebration 2016.jpg
- File:First Date in Robinson's Galleria.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, no educational purpose apparent Joschi71 (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%97%D7%94:%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%9F_%D7%93%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9F_(%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A9_%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A8) Tomtom (talk) 23:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Info. The photo does not photographed by the uploader. OTRS permission needed.-- Geagea (talk) 00:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 11:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danielhbordeleau (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, drawings and newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Bélanger - exposition de 1969.jpg
- File:Time-Balbo.jpg
- File:Balbo-arrivée.jpg
- File:Balbo-préparatifs.jpg
- File:Balbo-Shetiac.jpg
- File:Balbo-Longueuil-depart.jpg
- File:Balbo-promotion.jpg
- File:Balbo-Retour-Rome.jpg
- File:Balbo-radio.jpg
- File:Balbo-president.jpg
- File:Balbo-preparation.jpg
- File:Balbo-Chicago.jpg
- File:Lemay-oct37.tif
- File:Lemay-sept39.jpg
- File:Lemay-jan39.jpg
- File:Lemay-juin39B.jpg
- File:Lemay-juin39.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep "File:Time-Balbo.jpg" as public domain per PD-US-not renewed-TIME, if the uploader withdraws his claim of being the author and copyright owner of this image. Delete "File:Balbo-arrivée.jpg" for insufficient evidence that the uploader owns the copyright to these articles of the New York Times. Delete "File:Balbo-préparatifs.jpg" for insufficient evidence that the uploader owns the copyright to this text by Arnaldo Cortesi. Delete "File:Balbo-Shetiac.jpg" for suspect statement of own work as the source. Keep "File:Balbo-Longueuil-depart.jpg" as public domain per PD-1996, PD-Canada (photographs created before 1949) and PD-Canada-anon (texts published anonymously more than 50 years ago), if the uploader withdraws his claim of being the author and copyright owner of this image. Both the texts and the photographs are attributed specifically to this newspaper, without individual names. Delete "File:Balbo-promotion.jpg" for insufficient evidence that the uploader owns the copyright to this text by Arnaldo Cortesi. Delete "File:Balbo-radio.jpg" for insufficient evidence that the uploader owns the copyright to this article published in the New York Times. Delete "File:Balbo-preparation.jpg" for insufficient evidence that the uploader owns the copyright to this text by Arnaldo Cortesi. Keep "File:Lemay-oct37.tif" as public domain per PD-1996 and PD-Canada (the artist died in 1944), if the uploader withdraws his claim of being the author and copyright owner of this image. Keep "File:Lemay-sept39.jpg" idem. Keep "File:Lemay-jan39.jpg" idem. Keep "File:Lemay-juin39B.jpg" idem. Keep "File:Lemay-juin39.jpg" idem. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: and Kept"" per nomination and Asclepias. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://g3.delphi.lv/images/pix/995x521/-IvK2NWrxfc/gobzins-roberts-47690491.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The data use policy of the source website states that […] materials are protected by United States copyright law or in some cases under a Creative Commons 3.0 license. […]. The sub page presenting this image does not seem to include any indication that this file is available under a CC license, however. Unless I've missed something, this should probably be moved to en.wp – shouldn't be too difficult to come up with a fair use rationale for it. El Grafo (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The source page is clearly marked ARR. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Soupert & Notting 1889 avec la rose Souvenir de Victor Gautreau.pdf
- File:Henri Gautreau 1937 à Montgeron (91).jpg
- File:Henri Gautreau 1902 portrait retouché.jpg File:HG 1902 portrait retouché.jpg
- File:1897 - Henri Gautreau au 30 rue des Amandiers.jpg File:1897 - HG Gautreau au 30 rue des Amandiers.jpg
- File:1877 Henri Gautreau 18 ans.jpg File:1877 HG Gautreau 18 ans.jpg
- File:1902 - Henri Gautreau - Paris -.jpg
- File:1898 carte de visite H. Gautreau.jpg File:1898 carte de visite HG 2Mo.jpg
- File:Facture H. Gautreau 1932.jpg File:Facture HG 1932.jpg
- File:Henri Gautreau, 1907, Bagnolet.jpg
- File:Camille Bernardin (1831-1894).png
- File:La Casserole-jardinière sur la revue OMNIA en 1911 H.Gautreau.jpg
- File:Les deux paniers a salade catalogue H. Gautreau 1948.jpg File:Les deux paniers catalogue HG 1948.jpg
- File:Le Volcan, extrait du catalogue Henri Gautreau 1903.jpg File:Le Volcan, extrait du catalogue HG 1903.jpg
- File:Carton publicitaire 1899 Henri Gautreau rechaud.jpg File:Carton publicitaire 1899 HG.jpg
- File:Planche du brevet Henri Gautreau 1893 modèle Le Démontable.jpg
- File:1901 Henri Gautreau lors de la mise au point d'un nouveau modèle.jpg File:1901 Henri Gautreau en Mise point d'un nouveau modèle.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Some files restored. License, date, source, and author fixed. Yann (talk) 06:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali Akbar Saiidikia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in France. Thesupermat (talk) 15:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Noideawhatiamdoing (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photo and book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep File:The Tarankaki question.pdf. The author Jamie Busby died before 1947 and the work was published before 1923 as per PD-old-1923 and the work is also public domain in New Zealand! --47.150.92.85 20:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep File:Buddle holding shark.jpg. On http://www.aucklandmuseum.com/collections-research/collections/record/am_library-photography-67226 under Availability it says "No known copyright restrictions (Copyright)" --47.150.92.85 20:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep keep both no copyright restrictions exist on both images! --47.150.92.85 20:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Clearly PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The advertisement is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 09:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Advertisements are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 09:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-thumb-6374128-200-cPROjmO5FOONlRQ2RSzJXpZH2DfVUOjc.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Image is "all rights reserved" on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/144700784@N07/32161754201/ Ytoyoda (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Taken from Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/tahsan_sj?lang=en Ytoyoda (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
not CC-BY : Owner of the camera but not author of the picture Irønie (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gdoneil
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Could you please elaborate on what you mean by "out of Common:Project scope". I created the media myself using information from a source that I cited. I believe this would allow me to contribute the media to the page.gdoneil(talk) 22:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- It's much better to use w:en:Help:Table for such purposes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- I believe that the person before me used a table to present the information, and that table was large and uninviting to read. By using a photo, I think it creates an inviting form of media that attracts readers primarily through the presentation of the chart.gdoneil(talk) 13:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- It's much better to use w:en:Help:Table for such purposes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: the second, kept the first for being in use. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gdoneil
[edit]Submitter claims this as their own work, but it's a close copyedit of the table on page 2 of this document published by Montgomery County Public Schoolsː http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/techlit/docs/Levels%20of%20Use.pdf
Is there a fair use rationale in this case? Ringbang (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted No, fair use is not allowed on Commons. Clear copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation unless Valentin712 is Christian Schenkel, the author: http://www.dtoday.de/regionen/lokal-panorama_artikel,-Schweden-fordert-Deutschland-heraus-_arid,151433.html. jdx Re: 16:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- i asked him now there if he is the same person: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Valentin712 --2003:6A:6B05:AD00:9CA6:4DD7:F898:AF84 17:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
permisiom? BDaniel (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
permision? BDaniel (talk) 17:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. Not found elsewhere on the internet but credit in EXIF data doesn't match uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately this file is copyrighted and only hosted by ESO. Szczureq (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately this file is copyrighted and only hosted by ESO. Szczureq (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately this file is copyrighted and only hosted by ESO. Szczureq (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Maybe not educationally useful. Low resolution and a bit unclear. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Apparently cropped from the photo in this person's Linked In profile. No evidence that the uploader created the original image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
User almost definitely lied about copyright. Logo is from http://www.cardozohigh.com/. Mets501 (talk) 18:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
User almost definitely lied about copyright. Logo is from http://www.cardozohigh.com/. Mets501 (talk) 18:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
User almost definitely lied about copyright. Logo is from http://www.cardozohigh.com/. Mets501 (talk) 18:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
It is not from the US Government as tagged, but from the Connecticut State Senate; there is copyright information on the website. Also the image has in the metadata: Author and copyright holder Derek Dudek "All rights reserved." Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Better evidence is needed for the claim that the uploader is the author and copyright owner of this logo, especially given that it was used by the municipality before 2015 [18]. Asclepias (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Better evidence is needed that the uploader is the author and copyright owner of this artwork, given that it is said to be from another source. Asclepias (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Sloan Digital Sky Survey images are non-commercial use only Lithopsian (talk) 19:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
not own work Triplecaña (talk) 20:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This image is blurry and of little interest or use. I propose deleting it. SecretName101 (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This image is dark, blurry, and of little interest. It has relatively no potential uses. SecretName101 (talk) 20:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This image is dark blurry, and has no apparent uses. SecretName101 (talk) 20:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with no apparent use. TimothyJosephWood 13:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copivio of logo Stolbovsky (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
This contributor has several deletion requests. Exif data of File:Anastasia Mcqueen junto con Lindsay Mcqueen.jpg say that the author and copyright owner is Tobias Oelgart. Exif data of this image say that author and copyright owner is Mohamed Chendri. Both images are uploaded as own work. Thuresson (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Sealle, closed by. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
not own work: painting from sq:Fatmir Haxhiu (year 2000), see https://www.facebook.com/GegTosk/photos/a.439306782794541.99594.439285259463360/975746885817192/?type=3 Albinfo (talk) 21:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
another image that was grabbed from the web by this user – popular on the web (e.g. http://www.tourplanning.eu/it/traditional-costumes/ ), probably from Pinterest Albinfo (talk) 21:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Buste d'Abraham Duquesne, réalisé en 1949 par Marius Petit, né en 1913 décédé en 2009 ( https://e-monumen.net/patrimoine-monumental/petit-marius/ ) 82.121.151.41 22:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
> Compris. Il me semble difficile de joindre les héritiers de l'auteur pour solliciter leur autorisation. Je vais donc attendre 2159. --Blanchoyeur 09:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
German stamps are no longer PD, due to a court decision. The author of the original (this version is a DW) stamp, Leo Haas, died in 1983. This will not be PD before 2054. Jcb (talk) 22:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
German stamps are no longer PD, due to a court decision. The author of the original (this version is a DW) stamp, Leo Haas, died in 1983. This will not be PD before 2054. Jcb (talk) 22:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The Little Mermaid is still copyrighted Pugilist (talk) 22:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The Little Mermaid is still copyrighted Pugilist (talk) 22:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The Little Mermaid is still copyrighted Pugilist (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The Little Mermaid is still copyrighted Pugilist (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The Little Mermaid is still copyrighted Pugilist (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The Little Mermaid is still copyrighted Pugilist (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright infringement (see this page) Andycyca (talk) 06:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
looks like a website screenshot, dubious self-work claim FastilyClone (talk) 06:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 17:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused and unusable blurry photo with little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 17:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The Licensing is invalid/无效的授权协议 Shwangtianyuan (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Jcb as Copyvio. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porsche 918 Spyder (28898945984).jpg. Badzil (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- This one is arguably deletable on lack of quality arguments, it looks horrible when I blow it up. I wish the energy department would get their act together and only post their photos. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Maybe not educationally useful due to the low quality. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Maybe private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Both these people are notable people. I've msg'ed Chris to ask who they are and will update the image when I hear back. BTW, he's a notable photographer. Mungoola (talk) 18:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The female is Ruzwana Bashir and Peek is her company. It could easily be used in her wp article Mungoola (talk) 18:23, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, person now idenified and notable per COM:SCOPE. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 17:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation claimed by Herzogin Amalie Bibliothek Weimar. Es liegt eine schriftlliche Auskunft der Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek in Weimar vom 13.2. vor, dass Digitalisate aus deren Bestand und damit auch das Journal des Luxus und der Moden nicht außerhalb des Bibliotheksservers genutzt werden dürfen. Das Digitalisat wurde von Studierenden im Rahmen einer Seminararbeit eingestellt. Zum Schutz der Studierenden bitte ich als deren Lehrender um Entfernung des Digitalisats Jürgen Nemitz (HSP) (talk) 11:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Herzogin Amalia Library in Weimar claims, that the digitized text must not be used outside the library's servers.--137.248.1.31 15:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- This appears to be a scan of a text published in 1790. Is there any doubt in that and its copyright status? Please note that usage restrictions like those enumerated on the title page are not of concern for Wikimedia Commons as they are non-copyright restrictions. In principle we can consider deletions out of courtesy on request by the uploader, Ziemer&Perl, in case of accidental uploads. But this does not appear to be accidental as it has been transcribed at Wikisource, hence COM:INUSE applies. (But it appears pretty strange that the usage restrictions have been transcribed as well.) --AFBorchert (talk) 08:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- In regard to the issues with the text "Ah, ca ira!" we prefer the deletion of that document because we do not want to get any legal problems with the Herzogin Amalie Bibliothek Weimar. We both would be delighted if there would be an agreement about the deletion by an admin or whoever is able to delete it.--Ziemer&Perl (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- A deletion out of courtesy has to be postponed until at least the corresponding pages at Wikisource are deleted, i.e. s:de:Ah, ca ira!, s:de:Index:Ah, ca ira!.pdf, and the page-wise transcriptions. A deletion request has been filed and I think that we should wait for its closure. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: The title page has been removed, the rest of the file is in the public domain. The other concerns have been resolved. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Uploads of User:Talleres Adultos Mayores
[edit]Involved all the uploads of Talleres Adultos Mayores
Several problems as photos without metadata and taked in several places and cities (a lot of kilometers of distance between places), a collague without sources provided (File:Teatro Argentino de La Plata (Argentina).jpg) and a copyvio deleted. Or we applied COM:PRP or we apply an analysys to all the pictures uploaded by the user Ezarateesteban 23:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- File:Teatro Argentino de La Plata (Argentina).jpg
- File:La Plata race course (Argentina).jpg
- File:Museum of Musical Instruments (La Plata).jpg
- File:La Plata race course (6).jpg
- File:Bon Odori La Plata.jpg
- File:La Plata race course (5).jpg
- File:La Plata race course (3).jpg
- File:La Plata race course (4).jpg
- File:La Plata race course (2).jpg
- File:La Plata race course.jpg
- File:Argentinian Theatre (4).jpg
- File:Argentinian Theatre (3).jpg
- File:Argentinian Theatre (1).jpg
- File:Argentinian Theatre.jpg
- File:Museum of Musical Instruments (3).jpg
- File:Museum of Musical Instruments (2).jpg
- File:Museum of Musical Instruments (1).jpg
- File:Museum of Musical Instruments.jpg
- File:Escuela Graduada "Joaquín V. González".png
- File:House (Joaquín V. González).jpg
- File:Joaquín V. González.png
- File:Casa del Puente (Argentina).jpg
- File:Casa Curuchet in La Plata, Argentina.jpg
- File:Curutchet House in La Plata.jpg
- File:Curutchet House.jpg
- File:Curutchet House (sketch).jpg
- File:Córdoba (province).jpg
- File:Villa General Belgrano (3).jpg
- File:Villa General Belgrano (2).jpg
- File:Villa General Belgrano (Argentina).jpg
- File:Oktoberfest in Córdoba.jpg
- File:Mocona Falls.jpg
- File:Mocona Falls (animals).jpg
- File:El peñon (Argentina).jpg
- File:Eiffel Mill.jpg
- File:Campo de piedra pomez (2).jpg
- File:Meridiano V (La Plata).jpg
- File:The Automobile Museum (La Plata) (2).jpg
- File:La Plata city map.jpg
- File:The Automobile Museum (La Plata) (3).jpg
- File:The Automobile Museum (La Plata).jpg
- File:Bon Odori in La Plata (4).jpg
- File:Bon Odori in La Plata (5).jpg
- File:Bon Odori in La Plata.jpg
- File:Bon Odori in La Plata (3).jpg
- File:Bon Odori in La Plata (2).jpg
- File:Iguazu Falls (Argentina).jpg
- File:Irrigation Ditch and Canals.jpg
- File:Irrigation Ditch in Mendoza.jpg
- File:Irrigation Ditch and Canals (2).jpg
- @Ezarate: Its usually customary to list down all the files under discussion. I have done that for you now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination -- small size, poor quality in some cases, no EXIF, no useful categories. Kept several large images with Samsung EXIF. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 16:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:07, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
There is no such thing as a 'piecewise function' in mathematics. The definition of a function may use a case distinction (this is the meaning employed at en:piecewise), but every function can be written in that form. Whether a function can be defined without case distinction depends on the available set of basic operations; mathematics doesn't fix this set to be the "usual" operations +, -, *, /, sin, cos, log, ... from physics and engineering. Therefore, this category should be deleted in order not to convey wrong mathematical concepts. — A function may be such that pieces of it have particular properties, e.g. Category:piecewise linear functions does make sense. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete --Achim (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: empty & per nomination. --Achim (talk) 17:42, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of File:Blokkerlogo.png. JurgenNL (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Merged duplicates per {{Dupe}}. (t) Josve05a (c) 06:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Bild ist mit falschem Text unterlegt und nicht signifikant, da nur ein anderer Maßstab verwendet wurde Werkstoffler1234 (talk) 10:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, request by uploader due to incorrect scale being used. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Bild ist mit falschem Text unterlegt und nicht signifikant, da nur ein anderer Maßstab verwendet wurde Werkstoffler1234 (talk) 10:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, request by uploader due to incorrect scale being used. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Bild ist mit falschem Text unterlegt und nicht signifikant, da nur ein anderer Maßstab verwendet wurde Werkstoffler1234 (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, request by uploader due to incorrect scale being used. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Bild ist mit falschem Text unterlegt und nicht signifikant, da nur ein anderer Maßstab verwendet wurde Werkstoffler1234 (talk) 10:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, request by uploader due to incorrect scale being used. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Bild ist mit falschem Text unterlegt und nicht signifikant, da nur ein anderer Maßstab verwendet wurde Werkstoffler1234 (talk) 10:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, request by uploader due to incorrect scale being used. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Bild ist mit falschem Text unterlegt und nicht signifikant, da nur ein anderer Maßstab verwendet wurde Werkstoffler1234 (talk) 10:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, request by uploader due to incorrect scale being used. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Bild ist mit falschem Text unterlegt und nicht signifikant, da nur ein anderer Maßstab verwendet wurde Werkstoffler1234 (talk) 10:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, request by uploader due to incorrect scale being used. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
(shifted) duplicate of File:Surface plot on matlab.svg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
How to remove my duplicate? --Opisthofulax (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- As far as I know, ordinary editors like you and me don't have access rights to do that. If you agree, some privileged administrator will perform the deletion. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes, it's a duplicate, it should be removed. --Opisthofulax (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 13:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
not own work, taken without OTRS from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=134917289#post134917289 Triplecaña (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
evdo kartal hakında bilgileri Evdocan (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Uploader requesting deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. It would also be subject to deletion for being an unused low-quality personal photo of a subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
non-free, www.fotograftina.se is hte photographer not the person on the picture Yger (talk) 15:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be from https://twitter.com/rafiath_rashid/status/759461506983440384 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Socata TBM-700, Private JP6351502.jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Fake name and description. Actual output see here. Nut1917 (talk) 15:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
кривое название, смысла не несёт Barbariandeagle (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Spain Discasto talk 16:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Zustimmung der Urhebers (Fotograf Wolfgang Günzel) fehlt. „Quelle:Eigenes Werk“ ist fehlerhaft. OTRS-Ticket ist notwendig. Artmax (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Zustimmung der Urhebers (Fotograf Wolfgang Günzel) fehlt. „Quelle:Eigenes Werk“ ist fehlerhaft. OTRS-Ticket ist notwendig. Artmax (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
This flag did not exist and is out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
http://colombia.jairobernal.com does not clarify if it uses free licenses. Hence. it is assumed copyright Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 17:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
This flag did not exist and is out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Pakistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Taken from https://twitter.com/Martinez_Maxi10/status/707404816193077249 Ytoyoda (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution. Maybe private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
not own work, see File:Dupre-Salona-1821.jpg Albinfo (talk) 21:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've tagged this as an inferior duplicate. lNeverCry 00:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- It is not a duplicate; the flag has been changed, and I’ve removed the tag. The “own work” claim might apply to the alteration of the painting, but it could have come from anywhere. The intent is unclear, but could be seen as excessively nationalistic, and it‘s not good that there‘s nothing to say it’s a DW or identify the source. I‘m not sure these defects in themselves are criteria for deletion, but I‘m inclined to say Delete.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 06:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
chybně nahraná verze souboru Harmcz (talk) 22:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- This one and File:Seznam stanic letecké záchranné služby v ČR.png seem to be mistaken versions replaced by the newest version File:SEZNAM STANIC LZS ČR HEMS.png. --ŠJů (talk) 00:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
chybně nahraná verze souboru Harmcz (talk) 22:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & note that it had pile of logos across the bottom. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
chybně nahraná verze souboru Harmcz (talk) 22:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
chybně nahraná verze souboru Harmcz (talk) 22:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- This one and File:Seznam stanic letecké záchranné 2017.png seem to be mistaken versions replaced by the newest version File:SEZNAM STANIC LZS ČR HEMS.png. --ŠJů (talk) 00:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
probably not own work Tomas62 (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
It's just a logo how else can I get on the page. Thanks Harmz (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
There is no evidence of any permission for the use of the painting. The FOP tag is not applicable to this work -- it is neither outdoors nor permanently on dsiplay to the public. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Making a cropped version should solve the issue. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 11:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- That's quite true, but "somebody" must do the crop now. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I cloned out the painting and I deleted the former version. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I downloaded a better version of this document HotaniKG (talk) 03:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I disagree this version is better contrasted with good details. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, looks previously published. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Persönlichkeitsrechte sind nicht gewahrt 9EkieraM1 (talk) 13:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- @9EkieraM1: The description say is is taken at a premiere, therefore this is a public presentation by definition, I don't think there an issue with the personnality rights. Is it the depicted person who asked for the deletion of this image? Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: Yes, it was the depicted peron, who asked me in a mail for the deletion of this image. 9EkieraM1 (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
This looks to be a DVD cover and not an original film poster. We hope (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- File:Lure of the Circus poster.jpg This is an original poster for the seventh installment of the serial and this is one for the 14th installment in poor condition. We hope (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: pre 1923. Ruthven (msg) 10:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)