User talk:Remux

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Remux!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Remux!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revista Deportivo Cali Marzo 2012.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 20:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revista Deportivo Cali Contenido.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 20:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Voĉdonu

[edit]

Ĉu vi volas voĉdoni favore al zorgi la arkivon? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deportivo Cali Blazono.svg --Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 04:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:McArthur River Borraloola.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:McArthur River Borraloola.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SEL-Insigno.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:56, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sesio ne estas seanco

[edit]

Saluton Remux! Mi vidis ke vi skribis en la priskribo de ĉi tiu bildo http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KER-Ekzameno_Kalio_2013_04.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D la vorton "sesio" por diri "sesión", tamben la ĝusta vorto estas seanco. Sesio ja ekzistas, sed ĝi celas alia aĵo.

Ĉe ReVo: sesio vidu tie la rimarkon pri seanco.

Dankon pro via atento. Ĝis! --Wikiseldon (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tamen, ankaŭ taŭgas «sesio». Laŭ PIV « Difinita serio de kunsidoj, universitataj prelegoj ks.», kaj ankaŭ ĉe edukado.net aperas tiele Hodiaŭ per skajpaj sesioj komenciĝos la Dua Tutmonda Ekzamensesio --Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 04:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mi scias ke en edukado.net ankaŭ uzas ĝin. Tamen, tio ne signifas ke tio estu ĝusta (ĉiu povas erari kaj fakte mi mem ofte eraras). Laŭ la difinoj de ReVo kaj PIV sesio ne ĝustas ĉi-kaze. Atentu ke PIV parolas pri "serio de...", alidirite "serio de seancoj". Mi opinias ke en edukado oni misuzas intence ĉar ili preferas uzi "sesio" por esti pli simila al la pli internacia (tio estas, pli internacie konata pro la angla kaj eble la franca) radiko por la afero. Eble de ia vidpunkto seanco ankaŭ povas esti sesio, se oni komprenas tion, kiel serion de nur unu seanco. Mi ne intencas ĉi-kaze altrudi mian vidpunkton, sed nur atentigi pri la nune akceptita difino en la vortaroj, kiuj devus taŭge helpi al ĉiu kaj en similaj kazoj, speciale al neokcidentanoj. Se mi miskomprenis la aferon, kaj fakte la ekzamenoj okazis en serio de seancoj, simple malfaru mian ŝanĝon. --Wikiseldon (talk) 17:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nu, mi vidas ke vi komprenas la hispanan, do bve rigardu la vortaron de Fernando de Diego, laŭ tiu vortaro, seanco estas ia kunveno kiu devas okazi plurfoje por ĝin plenumi, rigardu la erojn #4 kaj #5. Sesio estas unu-foja kunveno, rigardu la eron #2. Laŭ tiu ideo, la pli taŭga estas senso anstataŭ seanco. Ankaŭ mi pensas ke Edukado.net estas kiu organizas la eventon kaj ili estas fakte lingvaj fakuloj! Pro tio eble ili ne eraris, kaj se ili eraras tre eble ili korektas siajn erarojn tujtuje -- Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 18:40, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ĉi-kaze mi pli fidas PIV (kiu ankaŭ estas redaktita de fakuloj) kaj ReVo, krom diri ke mi opinias ke vi miskomprenas la ekzemplojn montritajn en la FDD-a vortaro, fakte la 11-a ero diras "sesión de espiritismo, seanco" kaj tia afero ne bezonas pli ol unu seanco. Mi nun ne scias kiel ĝuste kompreni la unuan difinon de PIV (periodo) kvankam la ReVo-a diras "kalendara periodo" kaj poste diras "kunsidoJ" kun fina Jo. La dua difino en PIV diras klare "serio de". Laŭ mia kompreno de tiuj difinoj, sesio en la hispana estas pli simila al "temporada de, época de, período de" ol al la hispana "sesión" (ekzemple en Hispanio, oni diras "época de exámenes" al tiuj sinsekvaj tagoj aŭ semajnoj, en kiuj okazas ekzamenoj). Mi ne certas ĉu la hispana havas pli konkretan vorton por sesio. Mi ankoraŭ pensas ke pli ĝustas seanco kaj ke en edukado konscie eraras laŭ propaj ŝatoj aŭ opinioj. Aŭ eble ili tute ne eraras ĉar kutime ili aranĝas sesiojn (plurajn seancojn, eĉ se ĉi tiuj okazas samtempe) kaj simple uzas sesio ĝenerale eĉ se la sesio, nur temas pri simpla seanco. Tio rajtigus vin uzi sesion. --Wikiseldon (talk) 10:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eble Edukado okazigas sesiojn, sed tio kio okazis en Kalio, estis ero de tiuj sesioj, do seanco. Ambaŭ pravas! --Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 17:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete

[edit]

Para la próxima, ante evidentes casos de infracción de los derechos de autor, usá {{speedydelete|razón}} en vez de abrir una discusión para borrado. --Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 19:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Remux,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Remux,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
[edit]

Sal Remŭ! Via foto File:IJK 2014.jpg asertas, ke vi estas ĝia kreinto. Tamen, ĉu tio pravas ankaŭ por la logo? Ĉar por foto entenanta kopirajtitan logon validas aliaj juraj reguloj ol por nura foto de ekz. naturaĵo. Tiaokaze pro kopirajtaj problemoj ĝi ne povos resti en Komunejo. Se vi ne aŭtoras la logon aŭ ne povas ricevi konfirmon pri libera permesilo de la krinto, bonvolu realŝuti la bildon al la Vikipedio kaj petu forigon tie en Komunejo. Male, kutimaj fotoj de IJK (kiel komuna foto, fotoj de koncertoj aŭ aliaj progameroj) estas tre bonvenaj ĝuste en Komunejo. Amike. --KuboF (talk) 00:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kara Kubo, bedaŭrinde mi ne estas la kreinto de la logoo, nur de la foto. Do mi pensas ke la plej taŭga afero estus forigi la bildon, se vi pensas ke ĝi estos utila por la esperanta vikipedio, do bve alŝutu ĝin al vikipedio. -- Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 05:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mi ĵus alŝutis la bildon al la Vikipedio kaj nun mi petas forigon. Amike. --KuboF (talk) 15:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Remux,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Unua Kolombia Kongreso de Esperanto.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:La visión del Descubrimiento.jpg

[edit]

No es cierto. La imagen fue tomada de un sitio de Internet donde indicaba explícitamente licencia Creative Commons. Por que esa imagen fue fotografiada y limpiada digitalmente de una pintada callejera en Bolívia. Yo la vi. --Zósimo (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help decide the future of Wikimania

[edit]

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 23:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola, Remux! Te invito al Wikiproyecto Deportes de Wikimedia Commons. ¡Buena suerte! --NaBUru38 (talk) 00:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Billete de 100 mil pesos colombianos

[edit]

Hola. Cuales son tus motivos para solicitar borrado de la imagen? Que deberia tener la misma para permanecer y no ser borrada. Gracias --Dannybalanta (talk) 05:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dannybalanta: Hola Danny, lo que pasa es que la imagen que subiste tiene derechos de autor ("Todos los derechos reservados"), por lo que no se puede subir a Wikimedia Commons. Recuerda que en este lugar solo pueden ser subidas imágenes con licencias libres. Ya que alguien retiró la plantilla, la he vuelto a colocar. -- Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 19:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola de nuevo :@Remux: ¿Entonces que debe hacerse para que si haya una permanencia? Recuerda que es con fines ilustrativos y de aprendizaje. Si yo tomo una foto en alta calidad, o lo escaneo si es de mi propiedad, ¿seria lo mismo? Actualmente tengo un ejemplar del nuevo billete. Gracias --Dannybalanta (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dannybalanta: Sí, es mejor que tu mismo lo escanees y subas la foto, no ha habido problema con los billetes escaneados subidos en Commons. Recuerda que no importa si es con fines educativos, solo las imágenes libre pueden ser subidas a Wikimedia Commons. Es algo tedioso de comprender al principio, pero tiene su razón de ser. -- Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 21:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Remux,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Upload Wizard

[edit]

Hola, desde luego que te ayudo. Aquí está el código de la campaña del año pasado. Necesitaría lo siguiente:

Si se mantienen las licencias admitidas (era una CC-BY-SA 4.0), no hay que hacer mayores cambios.

Saludos Superzerocool (talk) 11:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ya he habilitado la campaña en Campaign:wikivacaciones2016. La URL del Upload Wizard sería https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UploadWizard&campaign=wikivacaciones2016. Haz algunas subidas de pruebas y me comentas. Saludos! Superzerocool (talk) 12:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Acción Deportivo Cali.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Acción Deportivo Cali.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acción Deportivo Cali.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escena de Efraín ante la tumba de María.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escena de la película " MARÍA", EN DONDE SE OBSERVA A EFRAÍN Y SU HERMANA EMMA, llevando flores a la tumba de María.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fotografía de una de las escenas, de la primera película que se hizo sobre María.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Remux,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaime Garzón Univalle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Librada College 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:15, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural Jaime Garzón Univalle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:15, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KER-Atestilo

[edit]

Saluton! Via aŭtorecatribuo tie ĉi estas tre dubinda. -- Tuválkin 07:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dankon pro partopreni en Vikio Amas ZEOjn 2018!

[edit]
Certificate of participation in
Wiki Loves ZEOs
2018
Remux, dankon pro partopreni en Wiki Loves ZEOs 2018 kaj helpi videbligi la Esperantan heredaĵon tra la mondo!
Ni nun invitas vin plulabori por atingi nian celon: (1) Rakontu al ni kiel vi eksciis pri la konkurso; (2) Alŝutu pliajn fotojn; (3) Verku artikolojn pri ZEOj kaj uzu la fotojn de la konkurso.
Amike, la organiza teamo. Sahaquiel9102 (Diskutpaĝo)

--Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 03:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

¡Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Colombia ha comenzado!

[edit]

¡Hola! Gracias por tu participación anterior en Wiki Loves Monuments o en Wikivacaciones. Nos alegra anunciar que otro concurso fotográfico internacional está ocurriendo en este momento: Wiki Loves Earth 2019. La idea del concurso es tomar imágenes de nuestro patrimonio natural – nuestras áreas protegidas. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar la naturaleza de Colombia y mostrarla al mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos. Esta es la primera vez que Colombia participa en el concurso, ¡así que necesitamos imágenes hermosas!

Por favor ve a la página del concurso y lee las reglas: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Colombia. Ahí encontrarás también cómo participar en el concurso. Si tienes alguna duda, por favor no dudes en preguntarnos escribiéndonos a contacto@wikimediacolombia.org.

Gracias,
Comité organizador de Wiki Loves Earth en Colombia
--19:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¡Mayor número de fotos! [Wikivacaciones 2021]

[edit]

Hola Remux Muchas gracias por participar en nuestro Wikiconcurso Wikivacaciones 2021. Eres el usuario con mayor número de constribuciones al concurso fotográfico. Para entregar el premio necesitamos algunos datos personales tuyos, podrías por favor enviarnos un correo a: contacto@wikimediacolombia.org con tu nombre, dirección de correo electrónico y número de celular. ¡Muchas gracias por participar! Cordialmente,


Wikimedia Colombia

Wikimedia Colombia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monica Bonilla (WMCO) (talk • contribs) 19:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Campaña Wikivacaciones

[edit]

Hola Remux

Soy Sara, oficial de Comunidad para el Capítulo Wikimedia Colombia. Quisiera recordarte que aún puedes participar en el concurso Wikivacaciones 2023 (termina el 31 de enero, 2024). Con este concurso, buscamos enriquecer el registro de las regiones y la cultura de nuestro país. Puedes encontrar toda la información sobre el concurso aquí.

¡Anímate a subir tus fotos!

Cordialmente, Sara Idarraga (WMCO) (talk) 23:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Felicitaciones, eres una de las personas ganadoras de Wikivacaciones 2023

[edit]
Muchos saludos, Remux:

Queremos agradecerte por participar del Concurso fotográfico Wikicavaciones 2023, sumando imágenes de tus vacaciones por Colombia en Wikimedia Commons del 1 de diciembre de 2023 al 31 de enero de 2024.

En esta versión del concurso sumamos más de 2000 imágenes de la cultura, la gastronomía, la biodiversidad y las fiestas y festivales de Colombia. Y tú fuiste ganador en la categoría Biodiversidad. Te invitamos a escribir un correo a comunidad@wikimediacolombia.org para coordinar la entrega de tu premio.

¡Gracias por contribuir al conocimiento libre desde Colombia!

Trophy_Flat_Icon_GIF_Animation

Cordialmente, Equipo Wikimedia Colombia.


. Sara Idarraga (WMCO) (talk) 22:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]