Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 4th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uncategorized BrideofScience (talk) 01:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a reason to delete anything, but ... uploader's request on uploading day, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

declared as own work but occurs on http://www.zeleb.mx/n/claudia-alvarez-afirma-que-dejar-tv-azteca-fue-una-gran-decision-013284 Jkbw (talk) 02:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by user:Ellin Beltz as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am not the owner of the content and was experimenting WolfOfSEO (talk) 18:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused redirect to deleted image KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 23:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jannycampos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

too bad quality - out of scope

/St1995 22:29, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jannycampos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

too bad quality - out of scope, susp. copyvios

/St1995 19:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Janny stated in his/her userpage, that (s)he wants to delete his/her account. Probably this means, that (s)he agrees to delete all the photos. Small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Title too long 67.244.58.187 01:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete Kulturwandler (talk) 16:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 22:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:The PDF files in Tamil without OCR conversion available Info-farmer (talk) 03:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty category. --JuTa 23:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OTRS from "Richard Glanton" would be required to retain this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sent OTRS with license document BtaylorPA (talk) 20:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS ticket received. -- Darwin Ahoy! 09:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by Marta Diez

[edit]

Artwork by Argentine artist Marta Diez (b. 1956). As still copyrighted works, they need an OTRS ticket. - Fma12 (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olsoncon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 00:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DeviantArt does have a CC BY SA 3.0 license, but this photo is specifically copyrighted by its creator. "©2015-2016 TheAmazingMedics" and does not make reference to any creative commons license, nor is it specified as CC. Tutelary (talk) 00:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious licence for a company; not in use; English Wikipedia article where the logo was deleted in 2014 +mt 01:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused logo of questionable notability (article deleted), also maybe above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Each image needs to be attributed to the relevant authors, otherwise it's a copyright violation ThumpyMcStumpy (talk) 02:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, lacks of sources. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status, per COM:CUR#Peru, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banknotes of Peru: @Jameslwoodward: (...) and "for informational purposes" is the only quasi-license I see, which is nowhere near enough for Commons.(...) Supposed "own works" derived from modern coins of Peru, copyrighted by the issuer en:Central Reserve Bank of Peru.

+/- 80 % of the files below were uploaded since 2015 by user Marcomogollon (talk · contributions · Statistics) (like File:1 Nuevo Sol ROP chullpas.png [no source] or File:1 Nuevo Sol reverso 2015.png [with source]) who claims that "Este trabajo no es objeto de copyright de acuerdo con el Decreto Legislativo 822, artículo 9, inciso b (Ley sobre el derecho de autor)." [is not object of copyright because...]. Art 9 is part of the preliminary title and is completely unrelated and there is no "inciso b" (sub-section/item) for this artcile, full text law via en:Copyright law of Peru. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Peru = "Government works: no" = +70 pma / +70 years publication.

Some of the files may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 14:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. There is no reason to believe that Peruvian coins are not copyrighted for 70 years pma. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think there is not copyright law for Peruvian coins, those are public. John PC (talk) 00:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Currency#Peru. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S5011481 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader claims to be the copyright holder, but lists websites as sources for most of them. One is clearly a screenshot of Google Earth, and many look like scans from various printed publications.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Doubtful own work. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of probably copyrighted content, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linhkhanhcam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Linhkhanhcam: Hi, since i'm the archive manager of Nha San Collective artists photos, and the artists have agreed to give the copyright to creative common, what else can I do to keep these from being deleted?

Contemporary artworks by living artist, no COM:OTRS permission from either the artist or the photographers.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Linhkhanhcam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs of art works by contemporary artists (at least five), all claimed as "own work". It's simply not possible to be five different living artists, hence these images are COM:COPYVIOs because there is no permission from artist *and* photographer. No indication of user's own photography either, only a few have metadata, but they are variable and not from the same camera/s.

Linhkhanhcam: Hi, since i'm the archive manager of Nha San Collective artists photos, and the artists have agreed to give the copyright to creative common, what else can I do to keep these from being deleted?

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that there is was a unsigned comment in the section above. @Linhkhanhcam: Please send COM:CONSENT to COM:OTRS. Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of commons scope; effect work (watermark) Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen capture of a Youtube video. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pedro.Santos.Pereira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Magazine/newspaper. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HansDesmet1970 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - commons isn't a family fotoalbum. Personal photographs of non notable minors.

Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/669223010444922880/9UTHvkyX.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.aeita.com.br/wiki/images/thumb/0/02/JoseDion2.jpg/300px-JoseDion2.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.supersporting.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/alvalade-estadio-sporting.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.nigerianbestforum.com/generaltopics/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/pix2009070717538811.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Debora3321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Umin18 (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC) Private information.. uploaded mistakenly. Please take down immediately. thank you.[reply]


Deleted: . --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph is not own work of uploader if it's also the uploader being depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nandini nandu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be unused userphotos and are out of scope for Commons.

Stefan2 (talk) 17:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Slogan8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The watermark suggests that this is a copyvio from somewhere.

Stefan2 (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion and rather poor quality: out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Logo of a highly unnotable band. Natuur12 (talk) 21:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isn't Big Canon (Bowman) Dam, but the backside of the photo. What's the sense? ProfessorX (talk) 22:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When you click on the search link in the UUID on any of these, you see the front and back listed. Often the back has other details, such as a description of the photograph or listings of others in the series. In this case even the stamp and hand written note may be useful for verification, in fact the possible accession or catalogue date of 1982 is not in the online metadata. -- (talk) 23:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Fae. Natuur12 (talk) 23:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete the UUID search link isn't valid (or I can't find it), and the catalogue date of 1982 or other details can be written in the description. We don't need 15 MB extra disk space for this information. It's useless.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ProfessorX, a simple file deletion does not save the 15MB, it merely renders the image inaccessible to non-admins. Furthermore, the back is worth having, though I'd personally have uploaded it first then uploaded over it with the front. But still, no point changing it now.  Keep -mattbuck (Talk) 20:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would appreciate if you use jpg format instead, and connect them properly with the front side file. Seems all of your “backsides” are not connected to the front side files, for example:

  • File:Looking down upon Ayer's Peak, a mountain 600 feet high (NYPL b11707184-G88F105 001B).tiff
  • File:A mightly red rift in the earth - Bright Angel Canon from O'Neil's Point (NYPL b11707184-G88F105 002B).tiff
    and many more.--ProfessorX (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, see the NYPL project page. I may add cross links as a later automated housekeeping exercise. Click on the link next to UUID on any image and all scans of the same object are listed. -- (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Logo of a speedy deleted business. (I'm not sure if this is a copyvio or not) Guerillero 04:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: out of scope, and likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The maps etc is copyrighted, so this unfortunately needs to be deleted as a non-free derivative PlumpyMcFrumpy (talk) 04:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Per EXIF: "Copyright holder Copyright: Kaitlyn A Johnston - Kaitlyn Johnston Photography". Nick (talk) 05:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Document needs proper source & license, if it's really 1863, it cannot possibly be own work.' Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment Uploader replied on talk page, moving here:
    the file is based on an old picture titled "Verlauf der Zweigbahn nach der Eröffnung" (Stadtarchiv (town archiv Bremerhaven). The author is not known (anonymous) and because it is over 150 years old, and stored in the public city archiv of Bremerhaven, free to be used and distributed. --Dirk-Franz (talk) 08:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Added Stadtarchiv Bremerhaven as Source. @Dirk-Franz: Ideal wäre noch ein genauerer Hinweis (ArchivNr, Teil von Sammlung o.ä.). -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 18:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Source and license are fixed, so I think the Deletion request can be closed. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: ok now. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No confidence that this image is the own work of the uploader whose other uploads were speedied. This one is most likely a COM:COPYVIO as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No indication of user's own work, other uploads were copyvios. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete Likely copyvio. Érico (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: likely copyright violations. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The sculptor Eugene Daub is still alive and the description indicates that the sculpture was installed in 2008. (Harvey Milk died in 1978, so it seems unlikely that a Harvey Milk memorial would have been created before that year.) Also, the sculpture is located in the US, which does not have freedom of panorama for artwork. Gazebo (talk) 06:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



    Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    While the photograph may be own work of uploader, it's a derivative work of a copyrighted Disney character, Mickey Mouse. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The sculptor Eugene Daub is still alive and the description indicates that the sculpture was unveiled in 2013. Also, the sculpture is located in the US, which does not have freedom of panorama for artwork. Gazebo (talk) 06:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



    Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I as the author uploaded a corrected File (better raw conversion) as File:Donau City Vienna from Donaupark on 2014-08-08.png before knowing about the correct update procedure. Rftblr (talk) 23:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: uploader's request, unused file. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of scope (Commons don't host private pictures). Sismarinho (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of scope (Commons isn't Flickr). Sismarinho (talk) 10:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I uploaded this image by mistake, didn't know about the correct way of doing double thumbnails. - [Tycho] talk 22:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Bonjour, je suis membre de l'association Musimot en train de créer une page Wikipédia. Je ne voulais pas télécharger l'image, ceci est une erreur de la ma part. Merci de la supprimer. Bien cordialement. Isidore Beautrelet (talk) 23:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Unused image, uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Going to rehost it on another media-network. HeraldicUnion (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: CC license can't be revoked Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I would like my own image removed from this site as I will rehost it on another media. HeraldicUnion (talk) 16:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: The license you used can't be revoked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I would like to have my photo removed to upload a better version, thank you. HeraldicUnion (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Going to upload a better version. HeraldicUnion (talk) 08:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Personal unused image of non-notable person. Richard Avery (talk) 11:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal image of a non-notable person Richard Avery (talk) 11:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted by Herbythyme: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Not a notable person. Commons isn't Flickr. Sismarinho (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete The file is used in pt.wiki and so in scope. But the photo is small and has no metadata, uploader has problems with copyright. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     Delete = grabbed from Internet = tagged with copyvio via http://revistaquem.globo.com/QUEM-News/noticia/2013/08/guilherme-boury-faz-primeira-aparicao-publica-com-nova-namorada.html (2013, credit: "Foto: Thiago Duran/AgNews", Copyright © - Editora Globo S/A) = http://s2.glbimg.com/z9QyI2Mauh8pkqJSfPVDTaBcK1PFsfMidG1bPHiWsWJIoz-HdGixxa_8qOZvMp3w/e.glbimg.com/og/ed/f/original/2013/08/24/2_3.jpg. --> +/- 85 % of "Cross-wiki upload from pt.wikipedia.org" are bad... Gunnex (talk) 22:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per above. Érico (talk) 22:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This logo is is categorized in "Coats of arms of Turkey" and has been uploaded by an user, who upload random files from Internet. I open a DR to get input about originality / coat of arms status / works of government copyright status / date and author of this logo Dereckson (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Keep Repeated geometry. Fry1989 eh? 23:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    COM:FOP#United Kingdom lets me guess, that although the thing is permanently situated in public place, such kind of 2-dimensional art needs OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The sculpture is not permanently installed here, so Portuguese freedom of panorama does not apply. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Seems like derivative work of copyrighted poster. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Not own work, just derivative of [1] - colorized copy. Dubious licensing, no evidence that original is PD. Sealle (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused private image. Looks to me like out of COM:SCOPE. JuTa 17:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    See COM:DW. Stefan2 (talk) 17:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 04:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Thats a scan/photo of a photo and likely not nown work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 17:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 04:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    identical to File:F.J.C. Cambournac. Photograph. Wellcome L0011622.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Keep The 'L' and 'V' series are different scans which used different methods. There are a lot of these and rather than duplicates, these scans of the archive material could be used to digitally enhance and make a more accurate overall result in the future, even when one is significantly inferior in quality to the other. -- (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: Per Fæ. Green Giant (talk) 04:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

     Delete the source webpage has a clear copyright notice at the bottom and there is no evidence this image is in the public domain as claimed. Ww2censor (talk) 18:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 04:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No FoP in South Korea Wdwd (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Applies also:

    --Wdwd (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Agreed, how do you move them to the English Wikipedia like this one? Massyparcer (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I tried doing that but it won't let me because the image is already on commons. Massyparcer (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. To upload to a Wikipedia, you'll need to find an article to use the image, and make sure it meets all ten criteria at en:WP:NFCC, using a rationale template from en:Category:Non-free use rationale. Green Giant (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Request by :EN: arbiter here Martinvl (talk).

    Drmies is of the view that the image is potentially libellous. I concur with her. See "contributions by "User:Dj paulo12345" in the in English Wikipedia in this history 21:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC).


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 03:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope. Selfie used in deleted autobio en:Jackellcob. JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 03:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Plutonide54321 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded on 04.01.2016. Considering also File:Cajuigalpa.jpg, grabbed from http://www.laprensa.com.ni/2013/12/03/departamentales/172768-remozan-catedral (2013, © 2016 Editorial La Prensa, S.A. Todos los derechos reservados.) = http://cdn.laprensa.com.ni/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/1386042079_031213Dep-Brevephoto01.jpg (exif available = copyrighted work by "TATIANA ROTHSCHUH")

    Gunnex (talk) 21:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 01:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree map in the lower right corner. Eleassar (t/p) 21:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    I have cropped the map out. --Sporti (talk) 06:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Great, it's a very fine photo now. The unfree version still needs to be deleted though. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



    Kept: Unfree revision has been deleted. Green Giant (talk) 01:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by MichielDMN as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: official logo https://www.base.be/nl.html; certainly not the license as given by the uploader

    I've converted to PD-textlogo.  Keep 86.84.247.233 15:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: Does not appear to cross the threshold of originality. {{PD-textlogo}} seems to fit. --Storkk (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyrighted statue from 1989, artist Taru Mäntynen is still living. FOP#Finland is for buildings only. MKFI (talk) 13:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, Freedom of Panorama in Finland does not apply to sculptures. --Storkk (talk) 15:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    outside of the scope of commons Guerillero 04:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 00:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    URV? von http://www.redblocsystems.com/uploads/pics/kommerzialrat_05.jpg Jbergner (talk) 05:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:55, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Mohamed Yass (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    No confidence that any of these images was created by uploader, they're all professional food shots. Variable sizes, no metadata, etc.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 00:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Mohamed Yass (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages versus User talk:Mohamed Yass and the (impressive) logs by uploader. Obs.: File:Killerwhales jumping.jpg + File:River in the Amazon rainforest.jpg were used, missing the rest. Last remaining files by this user so far as all recent uploads from 02.+03.2016 (just uploaded after his 3rd block) were copyvios.

    Gunnex (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 00:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    identical to: Moscow Victory Day Parade 2012-05-09 (41d3ea8745adb8200c98).jpg

    but other file is of better quality. Anidaat (talk) 06:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Omuraiisu (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    No confidence that any of these images of a musician are the own work of the uploader, small and variable sizes, no metadata and so on. Most likely COM:COPYVIOs.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Hi Ellin Beltz, thank you for reviewing the files and ask my opinion first before deleting these files. I'm new in uploading picture to wikipedia, so sorry if I make a lot of mistakes. I want to upload recent picture for this singer-actor profile page, but it's hard to find free content image in CC lisence for this singer-actor. All these images are not mine, it's from the source I give in each files. I'm not sure if File:Lee Seung Gi LF promo02.jpg andFile:Lee Seung Gi LF promo01.jpg are the own work of the uploader in that link or not(bridgenews.tistory.com/1125). I uploaded it to Wikipedia because on that link, the uploader give free content CC lisence. You can delete it if you think it not assuring enough. But I hope you will not delete files File:Lee SeungGi HillofFreedom VIP03.jpg, File:Lee SeungGi HillofFreedom VIP02.jpg, File:Lee SeungGi HillofFreedom VIP01.jpg. Because besides the sourse for these images (http://lungsdebut.tistory.com/338), I think those images are the own work of the uploader/author because it has the author logo (lungs debut) in the images.

    Regards Omuraiisu (talk) 00:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment According to COM:L, in order for Commons to free-host photographs, they have to be either the own work of the uploader (which these are not), or you need permission from the actual photographers to be sent to COM:OTRS. The website you linked gives photo credits: I only rechecked one, it read "Photo: yunyeohong reporter". That's not own work of the blogger either. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Definately not COM:TOO, this complex logo doesn't appear to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I Want To Delete It Personaly Syed4695 (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, unused, unlikly to be usefulfl. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Uploads by WhiteColor PH

    [edit]

    I have reason to believe that WhiteColor PH (talk · contribs) has been Flickrwashing the images that they have uploaded.

    • File:Red Velvet Joy in 2015.png - Uploaded on Flickr and Commons on January 8, 2016. Attributed to Christian J, and appears to be a single-purpose account. However, uncropped versions exist on elsewhere prior to both upload dates, like on this Tumblr post dated September 21, 2015.
    • File:Kim Chiu in 2015.jpg - Uploaded on Flickr and Commons on June 14, 2015. Attributed to Dixie Sandoval, and appears to be a single-purpose account. However, uncropped versions exist on elsewhere prior to both upload dates, like on this forum post dated April 18, 2015.
    • File:Kim Chiu in Baguio.jpg - Uploaded on Flickr and Commons on May 22, 2015. Also attributed to Dixie Sandoval. However, uncropped versions exist on elsewhere prior to both upload dates, like on this blog dated January 7, 2012.

    Despite there being two Flickr accounts, they both contain the exact same text in their descriptions:

    The text may be freely redistributed and used.
    It may be freely modified, and modified versions may also be freely redistributed and used.
    In all cases, CC-BY-SA requires proper attribution of the author(s).
    CC-BY-SA allows commercial re-uses provided such re-use is also under CC-BY-SA.
    Labeled for reuse.

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The dragon model is prominently shown and is likely copyrighted. (If there are photos were the dragon model is de minimis, then those photos can be kept but they should be accordingly tagged with {{De minimis}}.)

    It seems doubtful that freedom of panorama would apply to works temporarily displayed as part of a parade (even if the same works are repeatedly displayed again in future parades) and if the photos were taken at the Walt Disney World Resort near Orlando, Florida, then FOP is irrelevant because the US does not have FOP for artistic works.

    Gazebo (talk) 07:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    I don't think that the Maleficent Dragon float is copyrighted, or any parade floats for that matter. Asking on Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Parade Floats Copyrighted?. Elisfkc (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Delete Based on sampling 5 of the photographs, there is likely to be copyright for the dragon model and potentially for the "performance" which can be presumed to have been on private land. Unfortunately without any freedom of panorama provisions, even the wider shots with views of the buildings are problematic, as Disney may claim copyright for the highly recognizable architecture. There is a different point of view we can take for parades and floats which are on public land as part of marches and demonstrations, but even then we have to be cautious when artworks are the focus of a photograph as opposed to general crowd and parade shots, or photographs of what might be claimed as objects of artisanship rather than artworks. For this case COM:PRP applies, unless the resort has a standard release for tourist photographs (which might be on the ticket terms). -- (talk) 16:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @: I don't believe that they have a standard release. That wasn't the answer I was hoping for, but thanks anyways. I'll upload File:Festival of Fantasy Parade Sleeping Beauty Unit1.jpg to Wikipedia directly, since that's where it is currently being used. Elisfkc (talk) 18:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    There is no FOP in Argentina for sculptures. en:Eduardo Catalano died in 2010, so undelete in 2081.

    russavia (talk) 16:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No FOP in Argentina for sculptures.

    russavia (talk) 06:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


     Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 22:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    For the reasons given above.

    Jespinos (talk) 17:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: INeverCry 18:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unclear copyright status + per above rationale: "there is no FOP in Argentina for sculptures. en:Eduardo Catalano died in 2010, so undelete in 2081". In en:Floralis Genérica states (unsourced) that the sculpture was "a gift to the city by the Argentine architect Eduardo Catalano." Despite of needing a source for this, can't say if this "give away" involved also all pending imaginable [copy]rights, enabling the "Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires" ({{CC-AR-GCBA}}) as the possible donee to relicense the work...

    Gunnex (talk) 08:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: most likely derived (especially the cartoon inside the logo) from copyrighted content. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 10:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Looks like personal art-work of a non-notable person. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 11:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, copyvio http://cardoso126.rssing.com/chan-33855970/all_p10.html. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused, personal vanity photo of non-notable person. Richard Avery (talk) 11:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:49, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyright suspicion 138.231.139.234 11:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This looks like a Google Earth screenshot Richard Avery (talk) 11:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: https://dn-coding-net-production-static.qbox.me/e42d465b-2625-4bb0-9761-7aba28a85ab8.jpg. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Looks like a Google Earth Screenshot Richard Avery (talk) 11:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: http://www.wallpapers13.com/niagra-waterfall-wiev-from-above-0908/. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

     Delete: the YouTube video has the standard YouTube licence which does not allow commercial or derivative reuse. Ww2censor (talk) 11:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Lack of metadata, uploader.s history. doubtful he/she is the author Richard Avery (talk) 11:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination - http://magidos.blogspot.com/2015/04/niagara-selaleleri.html. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    company logo Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: textlogo. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Lintsai (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

    EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by LIU Music Club (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

    EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 00:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Shahbazhussain31 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of company of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

    EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 00:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Dijonstaps (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

    EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 00:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Building was completed in 2011, and there's no Freedom of Panorama in Albania, so copyright still applies. Themightyquill (talk) 12:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This photo is over at http://www.boeingimages.com/Package/2JRSXLJX1ID9 where it states it is a Boeing (C) ARR photo 106.68.206.147 12:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No evidence of release as claimed at source MilborneOne (talk) 13:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No evidence of claimed release by an uploader with little knowledge of copyright going by deleted uploads MilborneOne (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The image is a copyright infringement, as can be seen at http://www.alamy.com/image-details-popup.asp?imageid={3A9E924F-1E78-4B37-8454-829D39A96792} where a version of the picture is available for payment. Also, the image has been used, so far as I can see, only in a vandalism page (now deleted) on English Wikipedia, the file information gives confused information as to whether the name of the person depicted is named "Benigno" or "Joe Graham", while the uploader claimed in the page on English Wikipedia that it was someone called "Carlos M. Fernandez", and yet the web site I have linked to above appears to indicate that it is in fact Eric Trump, suggesting that the whole thing is vandalism. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Themightyquill as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. This buildings was built in 1981 and there is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Unfortunately, that means images of this building and its artwork are subject to copyright, and can't stay at wikimedia commons. JuTa 20:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: DM Natuur12 (talk) 07:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyrighted building (built in 1981) in a country without Freedom of Panorama. In a previous deletion request, the image was kept as de minimis by Natuur12 but I think that must have been a simple error. The building is clearly the focus of the image, and is in fact the very name of the file. Themightyquill (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Link from article should be enough. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    out of scope, spam, del on de Nolispanmo 16:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Photo of a not notable person. Commons isn't Flickr and copyvio (http://1000kitap.com/kitap/kanatlarim-asktandi). Sismarinho (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I realize this is a photo of the square, but I think the building likely makes up too much of the focus to be considered de minimis. It was built in 1981 and Albania has no Freedom of Panorama. Themightyquill (talk) 14:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, building encompases 20% of the photo's area. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Building was built in 1981 and Albania has no Freedom of Panorama, so it's still subject to copyright. Themightyquill (talk) 14:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Building was built in 1981 and Albania has no Freedom of Panorama, so it's still subject to copyright. Themightyquill (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Much poorer quality than File:Mudhouse Mansion.JPG: this image is blurry, tilted, and of far lower resolution. If it were sharply resolved, I can imagine someone using this in place of the other, because it depicts the house in summer rather than in winter, but this image is so blurry that it wouldn't really be better than the other one in any situation. Nyttend (talk) 14:18, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: http://www.tesslockhart.com/ghost-whisperer-grief-obsession.html. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The building was completed in 1963 so it's surely still subject to copyright, and Albania has no Freedom of Panorama.

    Themightyquill (talk) 14:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    My files were uploaded with WikiLovesMonuments temporary autorization, so must keep. --Sailko (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, Sailko, I had no idea such a thing existed. Can you indicate what that means more specifically, so that I avoid doing this again? Thanks. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: no evidence of permisson. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Screen capture of a Youtube video. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The Archaeological Museum was built in 1948 so it's still subject to copyright, and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Albania.

    Themightyquill (talk) 14:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    My files were uploaded with WikiLovesMonuments temporary autorization, so must keep. --Sailko (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    What is this. The file University of Tirana is taken by me, and I had a deletion request on it. --TorbjørnS (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @TorbjørnS: File:University of Tirana02.JPG depicts a work of architecture that is subject to copyright, and since wikimedia commons doesn't accept images subject to copyright, it probably can't stay here. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok. Thanks for explaining. I never knew a whole building could be copyrighted, but OK. --TorbjørnS (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep it. Museum was opened in 1948, but the building is older – built for other used. Architect is it:Gherardo Bosio, who died in 1941. So, this is PD. See also de:Mutter-Teresa-Platz. --Albinfo (talk) 17:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    That's great news, Albinfo! Any chance this also applies to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Presidency, Tirana (or even Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Palace of Culture (Opera), Tirana) ? It would be great if we could save those images too. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    No, unfortunately not. --Albinfo (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: PD as discussion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This logo is above the threshold of originality. Josve05a (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    copyrighted logo SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Keep This is clearly {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 16:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: no valid reason for deletion - textlogo. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No evidence of release or source as it is clearly taken from a book or journal and not the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 15:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Probably Crown Copyright but certainly not the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 15:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Probably Crown Copyright but certainly not the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    If this really is from 1930 (as the uploader states), then I suspect that the uploader's claim that the uploader is the photographer isn't correct. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused low picture Pippobuono (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Commons isn't Flickr. Sismarinho (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    See COM:DW. Stefan2 (talk) 16:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:MOH William G. Harrell.JPG. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 14:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    See COM:DW.

    Stefan2 (talk) 17:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:MOH William G. Harrell.JPG. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 14:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


    Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:MOH William G. Harrell.JPG. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 14:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused photo, with copyright in the description, with no information Pippobuono (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted by AzaToth: Copyright violation: Taken from http://www.michaelbuie.net/html_info.cfm?menu_itemID=1049820&load=html&parentID=1049819

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    {{PD-MD-exempt}} tag seems invalid, as the image doesn't fall into any of the given PD criteria. Also, no explanation as to why/how this is PD in the US. Nick (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 21:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    copyright violation (source gives no information about a free license) Hyperdieter (talk) 17:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: There is a link to license information, but unfortunately it's dead... Deleting until copyright holder confirms license to COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 00:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Doubtful "own work"; small size, no EXIF data. - Fma12 (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete Appeared on Twitter the day before the upload here. https://mobile.twitter.com/locuracuervaa/status/684212851825864704 Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination; If uploader is the photographer, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Small size, no EXIF, likely professional portrait. If uploader is the photographer, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    There is no evidence of Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Sqncjs (talk) 17:49, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i2.media.daumcdn.net/svc/image/U03/news/201503/08/maniareport/20150308162605708.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 08:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Likely derivative of photograph of unknown authorship. --Storkk (talk) 08:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Derivative of photograph of unknown authorship. Original photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Derivative of photograph of unknown authorship. If uploader is the original photographer, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Small size, EXIF credits NGC4226@NAVER.COM, who should confirm license via COM:OTRS to have this undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 08:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Small size, likely professional portrait. If uploader is the photographer, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Small size, no EXIF, likely professional portrait. If uploader is the photographer, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Small size, no EXIF, likely professional portrait. If uploader is the photographer, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Likely derivative of photograph of unknown authorship. --Storkk (talk) 08:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Likely derivative of photograph of unknown authorship. --Storkk (talk) 08:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Likely derivative of photograph of unknown authorship. --Storkk (talk) 08:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Small size, no metadata, likely professional portrait. If uploader is the photographer, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Small size, no metadata, likely professional portrait. If uploader is the photographer, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No encyclopedic use. Had been used in the speedy deleted Article de:Project Worm Hyperdieter (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:RegiowikiAT --K@rl (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Wenn alle Fotos gelöscht werden, die nirgends verwendet werden, sind wir ziemlich leer und die de-WP ist sowieso nicht das Maß aller Dinge hier. --K@rl (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: High quality technical drawing that is currently not in use, but could easily be. The benchmark is "realistically useful", which this appears to be. --Storkk (talk) 08:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry @Storkk: : It is in use see in RegiowikiAT --K@rl (talk) 10:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    But thanks for not deletion :-) --K@rl (talk) 10:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This is a painting by w:Richard Diebenkorn. The uploader's claim that he made the painting isn't credible: the painter died in 1995, but the upload to Commons was after 1995. Stefan2 (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]

    Of corse this is NOT my painting , but this is the photo of the POSTER of Ruchard Diebenkorn painting. You can delete if wou want. I have nothing against. I want only to state that this is the photo of the corresponding poster which is my own property, and I think that the photo of this poster will inprove the article about Richard Diebenkorn in wikipedia. Very best regards, Leon Petrosyan


    Deleted: per nomination, owning a copy of something doesn't give you the copyright. If the heirs of Richard Diebenkorn wish to license his work, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No FOP in Belgium, author died in 1947 Sonty (talk) 17:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, there is no Freedom of Panorama exemption for buildings in Belgium. Copyright held by Victor Horta, who died less than 70 years ago. --Storkk (talk) 08:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo Pibwl (talk) 17:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 09:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    dubious licence for a company; not in use; English Wikipedia article where the logo was deleted in 2014. +mt 05:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    A Google search does not reveal any other copies of this image on the net, but the fact that it was uploaded by a user with a record of uploading blatant copyright violations (official promotional images) together with the odd aspect ratio (square) and fact that it has no EXIF data all make this image unlikely to be the uploader's own work as claimed. DAJF (talk) 05:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    logo under free license, PR activity Bilderling (talk) 09:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Looks like copyvios as it has low resolution and no vaild EXIF, and it copy from online source like this AntanO 10:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Your assessment ii a mistake. This is a furniture item in my home in Bangalore. I cropped the picture and hence the poor resolution.--Nvvchar (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of scope (Commons isn't Flickr). Sismarinho (talk) 10:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by R. Alexandra I. (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    I checked two of these images, and they are definitely not own work, both being taken from random Internet sites. I'm guessing all of them are the same. Only some of the music sheets might be free, but certainly not because they are own work by the uploader; maybe someone knows music sheets copyright better. Still, we need to know their actual source.

    Andrei S. Talk 11:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the relief is joint work by A. Gangl (d. 1935), V. Šubic (d. 1946), and M. Sternen (d. 1949); it will enter the public domain in 2020. Eleassar (t/p) 12:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Can you prove a source for that, National Gallery doesn't mention Šubic or Sternen[4]?--Sporti (talk) 21:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Written here. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Likely professional shot, EXIF credits a MahbabWorks, who should follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm license. Storkk (talk) 15:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    bad quality, other versions available — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rettinghaus (talk • contribs) 2016-02-04T11:25:09‎ (UTC)


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Atullapat (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Logos and images of web resolution without EXIF. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:GenPrecha.jpg.

    Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This is not the image shown at the source, the colors are all wrong and the size is different. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused logo of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Seems to be a promotional picture from an unknown source. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 17:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Non-free logo. The composition contains several triangles disposed a certain and non trivial way, with color changes when they are layered to suggest transparency effect. Such composition seems to be above the threshold of originality. Dereckson (talk) 18:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    identical to File:Luís da Silva Mouzinho de Albuquerque.jpg, except for watermark; worse resolution Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Advertisement, out of scope. Achim (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Not the uploader's own work. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Bellow the COM:TOO in the UK? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: Likely not. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    too bad quality, out of scope /St1995 19:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Looks like low-res copy of File:Yerevan State Medical University.JPG Kareyac (talk) 20:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Cobija (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Photos from archives funds, generally with unknown author and date. We need to review public domain rules applicable to each file, correctly tag the one in PD and delete the remaining.

    Dereckson (talk) 20:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    All these medias are offered by SALT, and seems to be regulated by this policy when the mention "open access" is offered as metadata: "The material is being provided solely for the purpose of individual research and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows to download the works and share them with others as long as you credit the creator or the licensor, but you can't change them in any way or use them commercially.".

    The copyright holder is identified as Ülgen family. According Kumkum, Ülgen is involved in GLAM, as a heritage curator.

    Also according Kumkum, a part of these photos are from ottoman period. That means we have candidates for PD-1923 (by the way, in Turkey, media published before 1923-10-29 are according Kumkum public domain too).

    This archive fund is interesting, we could contact Wikimedia User Group Turkey, so they could approach the fund and discuss a more liberal policy than NC ND. --Dereckson (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: The license mentioned at the website fails com:L. While some may be PD in Turkey we will never be able to determine the US copyright status of those files because critical information like date of creation, date of publication etc are missing. Therefor this files have to be deleted per com:PCP. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyrighted COM:PACKAGING? Taivo (talk) 09:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyrighted COM:PACKAGING? Taivo (talk) 09:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyrighted COM:PACKAGING? Taivo (talk) 10:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Incomplete source, so inpossible to verify the public domain claim. The uploader claims that the picture was taken in the 1930s, which is incompatible with the uploader's claim that the picture was published before 1923. Also, since this was a British ship, it is very likely that the source country is not the United States, so a source country copyright tag is also needed. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    not more useful Dianakc (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, the image was some form of personal art. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate, the 4th edition was a reprint copy of 3th edition File:Толковый словарь. Том 4 (Даль 1909).djvu. Bad quality of scan, no some pages. See talk in archive s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД/Архив/3#К удалению: устарелые сканы. Vladis13 (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page #1315. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page from File:Толковый словарь Даля (1-е издание). Часть 1 (1863).pdf. Vladis13 (talk) 17:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page from File:Толковый словарь Даля (1-е издание). Часть 1 (1863).pdf. Vladis13 (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate page. Don't using after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. Vladis13 (talk) 16:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    bad quality, similar and better: File:Alessandro Poglietti after Jan Erasmus Quellinus.jpg Rettinghaus (talk) 16:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination - after replacement. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicates File:Diagram showing where the adrenal glands are in the body CRUK 4152.svg Johnbod (talk) 21:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Duplicates File:Diagram showing where the adrenal glands are in the body CRUK 412.svg. Originally loaded with wong image - see the history. CRUK request deletion Johnbod (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: Redirected to duplicate. Green Giant (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The given source is highly questionable. Deletion would be by the way not a big loss, because there are three other versions of this image. Speravir (Talk) 21:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    And obviously the uploader has no intention to take part in any conversation about this: Special:Diff/186570253/186571443 (see deleted section on bottom).

    No reaction here until now …
    There’s actually no doubt, that the painting is in public domain, so I could live with keeping the file despite the unlikely source. It would be much more honest to say the source would be unknown. --Speravir (Talk) 17:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Since there has been no reaction at all for over a month: I changed the source indication to “unknown”, now.
    Hence the reason for my deletion request is not valid anymore and I removed it from the file. --Speravir (Talk) 19:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. Green Giant (talk) 10:47, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Missing United States copyright tag. Per COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law, the uploader has to prove that this is in the public domain in both the United States and the source country, but this hasn't been done because no United States copyright tag has been provided. As a Chinese photograph from 1949, the copyright usually runs for 95 years from publication in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 11.2015 by Marcomogollon (talk · contributions · Statistics) but derived from previous published, copyrighted content, like http://kinsatravelcollection.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/se%C3%B1or-de-sipan-01.jpg (or Google).

    Similar case by this user was File:Llama_P_icon.png ("own work"), corrected by me via this edit (corr false claim of authorship/license/etc.), but this time I could not find a related Commons-file. Gunnex (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Nominanting also:

    as indicated "Basado (no copiado) en la portada del libro "La camiseta de Lolo"" = based (not copied) from a copyrighted book cover (released 2014, book about en:Teodoro Fernández, "Lolo", 1913—1996) which is this one here: http://www.upc.edu.pe/sites/default/files/news/file/524760_10202902357147709_2105318926_n.jpg. IMHO, for a to some degree talented photoshopper a work within 5 minutes (minor variation) = copyrighted (derivative work). Gunnex (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    ¡Caramba! los diseños son basados, NO COPIADOS de otros. Si yo tomo una imagen y le hago modificaciones sustanciales ¿acaso no es mi obra? como L.H.O.O.Q. de Marcel Duchamp o las Latas de sopa Campbell de Andy Warhol. Solo un retrógrado y falto de sentido común diría que porque una obra se basa en otra, aunque no sea idéntica, ya es una copia. Marco M. (talk) 14:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    a non-free logo image and is was uploaded with wrong license tntchn Comment · Contribs 13:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete The file information is incorrect either way, as it is missing the source and probably lists the wrong author.–Totie (talk) 14:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Deleted, I don't think this passes the Commons:Threshold of originality for PD-textlogo. I've replaced usage with the (newer) File:LastPass logo 2016.svg prior to deletion. –Krinkle 02:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Dirk-Franz (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Two identical images, one given an author's name the other claimed as own work... one or the other of those two statements is correct, both of them cannot be.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    thanks for the hint, Ellin, you are correct. Because I am still a learner, I labled the second file incorrectly. The foto is - like most of the pictures uploaded in this category - inherited from my father who died in 1973 and who took the foto himself around 1930. --Dirk-Franz (talk) 08:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you the only legal heir ? Unfitlouie (talk) 16:50, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Files uploaded by Dirk-Franz (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Two identical images, except one has been stained green, both claimed as own work and dated 1936. A real source/author is needed.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    thanks, Ellin, for the hint; the images are based on a foto token by my father and inherited by me. I scanned the negativ myself which resulted in the greenish stain; the latter was removed by me on request of an editor of my article on wikipedia. I just corrected the file concerned --Dirk-Franz (talk) 09:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Files uploaded by Dirk-Franz (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Two identical images of a building, except that one copy has been died a bright green. Both are claimed to be "own work" but they're both quite old and I think more information is needed.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    thank, Ellin, for the hint; the image with the green stain can be eliminated, I did not know, how to do that by myself. I removed the stain on request of a moderator of my wikipedia-article; the white&black image however should remain.--Dirk-Franz (talk) 09:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Files uploaded by Dirk-Franz (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Two identical images uploaded of the same building, both as own work but too old (destroyed in WWII). A proper source is needed for these images.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    thanks, Ellin, for the hint. As far as I can see, I labeled the source as 'Papierbild' and the author as 'Franz Kohnert', the latter was my father who died in 1973, he made the foto himself in 1936 and inherited the foto to me; I scanned the foto myself. Because I am still new on wikimedia, I should greatly appreciate your assistance in labeling the images according to wikimedia rules. Kind regards, --Dirk-Franz (talk) 09:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: Because these (and others by this uploader) are not own work, in order to keep them here we will need a license via OTRS setting forth the author's name and that the uploader is an heir or otherwise entitled to freely license them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Dirk-Franz (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Historical photos, paintings, maps, drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

    EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Because it is not a subtitle to the video. Almondega (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the Dragon Bridge remains unfree until 2016; whereas the death year of the building in the background (1908, A. Cantonini) is unknown to me. Eleassar (t/p) 15:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    I assumed as bridge is almost completly in the dark, you can't actually make out its shapes. --Sporti (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



    Kept: We can keep this, both per Sporti and because it is not clear that bridge design has a copyright -- it does not in most countries. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Photograph is not own work of uploader if it's also the uploader depicted in the photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Also we need a license for the artwork. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No proof that the author of this photo really is unknown, so no proof of PD in the UK. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    So, who is the author? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    For PD, unknown means unknowable after a reasonable search. I don't see why it would be unknowable. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Pour des photos sur des bâtiments sans importance de ce type ce n'est pas surprenant que l'auteur soit inconnu, j'ai cherché mais je n'ai rien trouvé et si j'avais trouvé son nom ce n'est pas sur du tout que l'on trouve ses dates de naissance ou de mort. C'est une photo "banal" avec un sujet "banal" à l'époque de la prise de vue 1905. Cordialement --Quoique (talk) 08:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: It's a UK image, so to keep it, you must show that it was published before 1968 and that the author is unknown after a reasonable effort has been made to identify him. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Photograph is not own work of uploader, if it's the uploader being depicted in the photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No encyclopedic use. Had been used in the speedy deleted Article de:Project Worm Hyperdieter (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC) Template:RegiowikiAT[reply]

    Es gibt noch was anderes als die de-WP ;-) --K@rl (talk) 09:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused logo of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 17:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The three images nominated are representatives of the problem with the entire category Category:2015 aerial photographs of Bangalore. There are a *lot* of images of landscape shot from a plane window, but it's not clear where they were taken, which nullifies most- if not all- of their usefulness to Commons. Most obviously *aren't* of the city Bangalore itself, and it's not clear how many are of rural Bangalore district, or whether they're just part of some guy's trip to Bangalore.

    Some of these are quite nice pictures, and I'm sure that if there was some accurate background they'd be a lot more useful and in-scope, but there isn't, and until then, they're probably not.

    Any thoughts on how many- if any- of these are worth keeping for Commons' use?

    (This follows Commons:Categories for discussion/2016/02/Category:2015 aerial photographs of Bangalore).

    Ubcule (talk) 19:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment I suppose we could move them up to Category:2015 aerial photographs of India, copy them to Category:Unidentified locations in India and hope that someone can figure out the locations. For some of the ones further down on the category page, that might actually work. --El Grafo (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    You're right that the later ones are more likely to be identified than others, but there are a *lot* of these images.
    The ones of unidentified mountainous landscape are unlikely to be identified; they look okay at a large scale, but when the contrast is adjusted and they're viewed more closely they exhibit the usual smartphone camera softness and lack of detail (caused by noise reduction). They're likely not worth that much guesswork!
    I have to admit that I still kind of like a lot of them as photos, but the wing in every photo is ultimately a hindrance and the amount of (arguable) overlap in content is also an issue. They *would* almost all be worth keeping if they were better-identified, but I strongly suspect even the original photographer couldn't place some of the more generic ones!
    The essential question is, if they hadn't already been uploaded, would we consider uploading them all? Ubcule (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    As per Commons talk:Deletion requests/Files in Category:2015 aerial photographs of Bangalore these images are of all very similar, of doubtful utility and without any clear description, are likely totally useless. I've nominated all but a few images in the category for deletion. If there are others specific images that people can justify saving, that's fine with me.

    Themightyquill (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    As per Commons talk:Deletion requests/Files in Category:2015 aerial photographs of Bangalore these images are of all very similar, of doubtful utility and without any clear description, are likely totally useless. I've nominated all but a few images in the category for deletion. If there are others specific images that people can justify saving, that's fine with me.

    Themightyquill (talk) 13:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyvio https://www.footy-boots.com/puma-evospeed-1-blue-green-30828/ Sismarinho (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Keep It's listed as Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) at http://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/puma-nordic/images/falcao-puma-evospeed-184367 Kaiketsu (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Keep Photographs from Puma press releases appear to be {{Cc-by-3.0}} as mentioned above. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment footy-boots.com appears to be a review site, and looks to be using 'stock' images from Puma. They are unlikely to own the image itself. The only real question is if the mynewsdesk licensing is 'reliable' (a issue that is under discussion elsewhere. Specifically, some 'licensed' images on mynewsdesk appear to have not been deliberately release under the stated license. That's tangential to the claim made here, though. Revent (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: Conflicting licenses requires us to delete -- see COM:PRP. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]