Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/06/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 16th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from here. Howicus (Fish and ships!) (talk) 01:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Mass deletion of multiple copyvios uploaded as 'own work' Revent (talk) 03:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KMRscreamer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The first ten uploads by this user were all copyright violations, as were several others I looked at. This user is blocked on English Wikipedia as a sockpuppet of a user with a history of making hoax articles about bridges.

Howicus (Fish and ships!) (talk) 02:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Verified a number of blatant copyvios, went ahead and nuked the rest based on COM:PRP, as claims of 'own work' are obviously not trustworthy. Revent (talk) 03:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated Dxerd (talk) 03:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. Revent (talk) 06:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated Dxerd (talk) 04:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. Revent (talk) 06:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do not believe this is an autistic individual, more likely a prank. Moreover, no proof that the individual photographed agreed to this was provided Cannolis (talk) 05:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Both an obvious copyright violation (per the watermark) and a personal attack on the depicted individual. Twofer. Revent (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG not working, have re-uploaded in PNG. Bitjungle (talk) 06:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded (and broken) unused file. Revent (talk) 08:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG not working, have re-uploaded in PNG. Bitjungle (talk) 06:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded (and broken) unused file. Revent (talk) 08:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG not working, have re-uploaded in PNG. Bitjungle (talk) 06:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded (and broken) unused file. Revent (talk) 08:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is an earlier version of the correct file. It contains unfortunatelly a mistake. I wouldn't be glad, if someone uses the false scheme, which is about first aid. I hope you understand the importance of the issue. CaptZod (talk) 21:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I consider only the two older files to be deleted. The newest file should stay uploaded. CaptZod (talk) 21:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Older revisions deleted per request. Revent (talk) 12:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want everyone to see that this page has been nominated for deletion, so I updated and uploaded the file again as a new file. This file can be deleted now. Thank you very much in advance. 89.67.242.36 21:08, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is an update of this file at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pierwsza_pomoc.pdf, so please delete this file. CaptZod (talk) 07:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request, redirected to newer version. Revent (talk) 08:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupt file 37.5.3.45 10:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Blank image. Revent (talk) 11:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 46.218.9.198 09:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation per nom. Also no FOP for artistic works in Taiwan. Revent (talk) 11:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious source (facebook) 37.5.3.45 11:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. Uploader claimed image was released into the PD by the author, but the Facebook post linked for permission specifically stated otherwise. Revent (talk) 11:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can't believe that this gallery is the author of this file 37.5.3.45 11:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already done. Image is from Discovery Channel website. Revent (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

................. 93.7.9.31 13:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedy close. No valid reason for deletion given. Revent (talk) 14:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (55 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.3.45 14:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, 2010 image at higher resolution. http://vk.com/id113268664?z=photo113268664_196725109%2Fphotos113268664 Revent (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (58 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.3.45 14:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. Image available from Columbian newspaper websites at much higher resolution, with attribution. Revent (talk) 15:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hannah haper 138.210.197.242 04:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason given. Hannah Harper, that's right. Description states this too: "Cropped from Image:Hannah Harper 2.jpg; original image e-mailed to uploader Videmus Omnia in response to request. Date 3 April 2008; original photograph obtained on 22 September 2007. Author Jacklee; original photograph courtesy of Hannah Harper." -- Deadstar (msg) 11:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. No reason for deletion given. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic photo, spam, only really used for comedic purposes, and is only used on a list of bra designs. Photo's source is a pornographic website (Not Safe For Work:http://www.hannahmodel.com), which hosts numerous computer viruses, also used to host so called "escort services" (e.g. prostitution). Citadel48 (talk) 03:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Are you saying the original photograph was not properly licensed? The previously closed discussion suggests otherwise. It is in use in the articles "w:Undergarment" and "w:Underwire bra". — Cheers, JackLee talk 08:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about copyright. And trust me, this discussion is not over.

The source hosts viruses & prostitution, something you must understand is illegal in the United States, the country wikimedia is based in. The photo has no encyclopedic value, and the pages it's used may have it replaced by almost 10 similar files (plus, the specific file here is only used in one wikipedia page).

This file may also be classified as spam as it only advertises the subjects personal website, which as stated before, carries numerous computer viruses.

Cheers, Citadel48 (talk)

 Keep Original photo seems well-licensed according to the Riana (talk · contribs) on the OTRS team (see here), so the license isn't the issue. This crop is also widely used for encyclopedic purposes, e.g. on simple:Underwear and de:Unterwäsche, and is therefore obviously in scope. If the source's website is now distributing malware, perhaps the description page's link should be removed (i.e. remove the "[ ]" from the link) or some other warning put in place on the image page, but obviously keep the image. Storkk (talk) 16:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image is used very little, and may be replaced. This specific one is only ever used for sexual jokes, and is a blatant promotion of the subject's website.


Kept - The image is not "used very little", it's used on 18 Wikimedia projects! That the nominator finds the source morally objectionable is irrelevant, and that the source website may contain content which is illegal is also irrelevant, as we are not responsible for the content of offwiki links. The photo is freely licensed, so there are no copyright issues. The photo is in use, so there are no scope issues. The subject matter is entirely legal, so there are no issues there either. In short, no reason for deletion. Commons is not censored. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is doubtful given the username and the author on the file. Not to mention they could upload with full res image without the watermark CC-Canuck (talk) 17:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran-Air/Boeing-747-286BM/2507611/ Uploaded images with multiple differing watermarked copyrights as 'own work' Revent (talk) 22:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name on the watermark doesn't match the uploader. Other uploads are copyvios. CC-Canuck (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. http://www.airliners.net/photo/Mahan-Air/Airbus-A340-642/2647899/M/ Uploaded images with multiple differing watermarked copyrights as 'own work' Revent (talk) 22:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ошибочно загрузил фотографию Volkovr13 (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio, uploader request, recent unused file Revent (talk) 22:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image shows Primula elatior and is mislabeled, P.pulverulenta is deep pink flower with dark eye and mealy stem 95.148.117.0 19:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion stated. Sort out possible factual issues on the talk page. Revent (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=grande+collecte&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjAEaiQELEKjU2AQaBAgKCEMMĈCwjKcIGmAKXggDEij6A7gUiAr8CacUpwqmCvUDnhSmFNY9pDq-Pao91D3GJLc9_1yizPZwpGjAaPNj6ztLgG1aIv4vKVEyl-m1DbbCHIEySk6pnMZbYAsZAZ8OIUSQIOllR3IhtNJsMĈCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgRt1FKsDA&sa=X&ved=0CBsQ2A4oAWoVChMI7P_f56-ŬgIVxCGsCh1rJABK&biw=1366&bih=682#imgrc=Ziiq_KkOBHpgoM%253A%3BsP3QX7t1QR6byM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.actionprgroup.com%252Fuploads%252Fimages%252FClient%252520Logos%252Flogo.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.actionprgroup.com%252F960.html%3B1638%3B2346 Multichill (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Come on user:1989 and user:P199. This file was uploaded by Europeana themselves. How is this a copyright violation? If you don't believe that I'm sure they're more than willing to send a release to OTRS. Multichill (talk) 15:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A release via OTRS is needed. Currently this file fails com:EVIDENCE. Natuur12 (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Multichill: I may still be learning the ropes as an admin, but this much is obvious to me: the uploader (User:Wdejager) is not the credited author (Europeana). So there is certainly a problem here. --P 1 9 9   15:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This file was incorrectly licensed as CCO own-work when first uploaded. Instead, it should be tagged as CC-By-SA 4.0 attributed to institution:Europeana 1914-1918 - as per the Europeana terms which state that "Unless stated otherwise, all Europeana publications and texts, including blog posts, are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 4.0 International License.". By the way, given this was not a new upload, and is used in hundreds of places, a speedy-delete was never an appropriate action here. P.S. user:Wdejager is the head of Marketing at Europeana (and new to Commons) and I am the Wikimedia liaison for the organisation itself, so we can send an OTRS ticket if that's needed, but the organisational policy page should be sufficient. I can change it now, or someone else can do it if that's the preferred process. Wittylama (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is exactly why evidence should be properly presented. Imho it is nor clear if the statement at their website covers the logo. Please make him send an email to OTRS so we can confirm his account. This can prevent a lot of trouble now and in the future. People can't just smell that he is the head of Marketing at Europeana. Natuur12 (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A permission email has now been sent to OTRS at #2015061710009742 to confirm that the Europeana publication policy does apply to the logo. For good measure this email also covers everything in Category:Europeana logos.
P199/Natuur12, yes people can't 'smell' the professional affiliation of a user, but don't you think that for a file that's been up for over a year and is used in many hundreds of pages via a partnership template, that speedy deletion is an unnecessarily abrupt act... Sure, critique the license and ask for more details, fair enough, but don't just summarily zap longstanding files that have lots of inbound links. Furthermore, you say "it is nor clear if the statement at their website covers the logo" - since when do we not accept the official policy page of an organisation which says "Unless otherwise stated, all Europeana publications and texts...are licensed under CC-By-SA" as not sufficiently clear?! You can't BE more overt than that in declaring that the default position is a free-license. Wittylama (talk) 09:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission received. PierreSelim (talk) 10:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 04:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 04:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 04:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Motopark (talk) 12:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please remove at least my E-Mail and Name for data security reasons . I took the picture. It can be deleted Tho~enwiki (talk) 11:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please login to the account that originally uploaded these images (it was renamed to Tho~dewiki as part of SUL finalization) and make an edit confirming this request, so it can be verified that you are actually the original uploader? Revent (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, it's not that simple. The original uploader was de:User:Tho at dewiki, which no longer exists, because sv:User:Tho had more edits. The renamed de:User:Tho~dewiki (Contribs) was'nt merged with User:Tho~enwiki (Contribs). --Emha (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, understood, he needs to logout of Tho~enwiki, and then login as Tho~dewiki and confirm the request so we know it's him. Otherwise, I guess an email to an administrator (or maybe OTRS) from the address given in the attribution would also verify that the request is legit. I just don't think we can remove the attribution information without actually verifying that it's the creator who is asking. Revent (talk) 16:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I realy don't know how to login as Tho~dewiki because it's not my user name. My username was renamed from Tho to Tho~enwiki . Someone of course can send me an E-Mail or ask me to send a mail to verify. Thanks. Tho~enwiki (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I sent you an email, requesting a response. Please reply from the email address given in the attribution of these images, to verify that you are the creator. Thanks. Revent (talk) 08:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
After verifying the identify of this person by email contact, removed real name and email address from public history and log entries. Revent (talk) 03:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Attribution deleted and image kept. Nothing more to be done here. Ankry (talk) 04:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis titulaire de l'image et l'ai uploadé pour faire un test sans connaître le fonctionnement du moteur Wikipédia. Merci de supprimer cette image et toutes ses versions de vos serveurs. Nekkso (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upload par erreur, merci de supprimer cette image et toutes ses versions de vos serveurs Nekkso (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Currently in use on jvwiki. Revent (talk) 22:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, or at least only by mistake. A File:CTV.jpg was used in an infobox since the page's creation in 2014, but has apparently always been a redlink. Storkk (talk)
 Delete, uploader requested and not in scope. Single apparent use is a name collision. Storkk (talk) 10:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. Revent (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private memories, no educational value for others 37.5.3.45 10:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Divya694 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked with a blog url. Uploaded in a row on 12.06.2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food. File:Parwal ki Mithai.jpg previously published in 2013 via worldofgoodfood.com (today 404)

Gunnex (talk) 14:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Divya694 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermark on the files

Divya694 (talk) 03:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Will this be encyclopdic ? I doubt it Pippobuono (talk) 19:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be copyright material with no permission. Mark Marathon (talk) 06:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyvio. INeverCry 01:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already exists as Botanical garden, Balchik Vodnokon4e (talk) 22:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat. JuTa 20:08, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 10:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Attack image per description: "Persona fea" = ugly person. Savhñ 09:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --JuTa 22:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr images from Bennington College seem to be 'All Rights Reserved' which means no one can use any of their images. No online source is given for this image. Leoboudv (talk) 09:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Found the source quite easily here and it is ARR, so I have tagged it as speedy. Ww2censor (talk) 09:32, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by User:Taivo JuTa 22:27, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a work created by HM Aviation Pvt. Ltd. and there is no evidence of permission. Additionally, the file seems to be out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 11:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Hedwig in Washington. JuTa 22:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aquawalk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios of disk covers

— Racconish 📥 16:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Yann. JuTa 22:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope 4ing (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 22:16, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image Lazlo 01:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per description on Flickr this is a derivative work of another image, with no indication that the original is compatibly licensed. Revent (talk) 01:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor-quality vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small picture without metadata and bad quality Motopark (talk) 05:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Revent (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:37, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Seems to be "useful" for advertising the card designer only. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PessoaFeliz123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    02:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:51, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable, no articles, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified, unused (not even on a profile). Is this useful ? It looks like an uploading test by a child/teenager user. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused personal image. Revent (talk) 06:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no existing categories, no articles, no used and maybe no quite notable, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 05:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 12:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.3.45 06:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.3.45 10:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

totalement flou KAPour les intimes 10:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: out of project scope, unusable poor George Chernilevsky talk 13:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: scan of a printout of a Wikipedia article. Access the page normally through Wikipedia by going to nl:Radiologie instead. Stefan4 (talk) 11:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: text document of unclear notability. Stefan4 (talk) 11:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dani fran123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: text documents of unclear notability.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: text document of unclear notability. Stefan4 (talk) 11:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image Lazlo 12:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; not in COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; not in COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image Lazlo 14:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:28, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful of educational purposes. Lazlo 14:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful of educational purposes. Lazlo 14:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ulises Vergara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.3.45 14:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorized personal photo Jarekt (talk) 15:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image Lazlo 15:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. Fma12 (talk) 14:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 16:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 16:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 16:09, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 16:15, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 16:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajandimriofficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files; Not educationally useful.

Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 16:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 17:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 17:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 20:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 20:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 20:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 20:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 20:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 20:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 20:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 20:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Habertix (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Николай205 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Applies to all of these: They seem to be uploaded for advertisement only. No Permission and it is questionable whether the content is within scope, too. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:30, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/plt.htm Revent (talk) 22:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. I think that website uses a lot of fair use images and this is most likely to be one. Green Giant (talk) 19:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/626.htm Revent (talk) 22:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. I think that website uses a lot of fair use images and this is most likely to be one. Green Giant (talk) 19:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, most likely spontaneously uploaded in a row on 10.06.2006 shortly after death of en:Pattabhirama Reddy Tikkavarapu (Indian film screenwriter etc.) on 06.05.2006, considering also:

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:PattabhisRelatives.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 23:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 19:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charles Borguestein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these images are photos of pages of a book, but there is no mention of what the book is, or why it is freely licenced. Unless proof that they are freely licenced can be provided, they should all be deleted per COM:PRP.

ColonialGrid (talk) 21:15, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. These files can easily be restored if the requested information is provided. Green Giant (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence presented that the file has in fact been released under the claimed license - image from deviantart [1] by someone with a different username and marked as copyrighted on a page stated to be all rights reserved. Nigel Ish (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Likely a COM:NETCOPYRIGHT copyvio, also uploaded images from globalsecurity.org. As an image previously published with a copyright notice, declaration of consent per COM:OTRS is required. Revent (talk)

Deleted: Per nom and Revent. Green Giant (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Viktor Mukhin (1977), Vasily Fedchenko (1979), Vasily Agibalov (2002). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 2004, by Akhnaf Ziyanaev. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 19:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern sculptures, plaques, monuments and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Mostly per nom, except the museum image which has been cropped and older version deleted. Green Giant (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data says the copyright belongs to Juan Antonio Tejedor. No evidence of permission for reuse. DAJF (talk) 03:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [2], [3]); no evidence for permission HaeB (talk) 04:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faratrinec (talk · contribs)

[edit]

7 photos made with 5 different cameras. I strongly doubt own work.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright movie scene Mark Marathon (talk) 06:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright movie scene Mark Marathon (talk) 06:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently copyright scrren capture. Mark Marathon (talk) 06:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehler beim Hochladen Wegavision (talk) 06:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isscyhenoista (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appear to be images taken from the subject's social media, with a false claim of 'own work'. Low resolution, with no metadata, and contributor has a history of copyright violations, including images of this same person. Images were uploaded immediately after a final warning to stop uploading copyright violations (in January), though the account has been inactive since.

Revent (talk) 07:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question the "own work". See this where the photographer is Janobb, the photo added in November 2013. The Commons user has only this contribution and there are no metadata Wouter (talk) 07:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo propriete de yann arthus bertrand issue du livre algerie vue du ciel http://www.yannarthusbertrand2.org/index.php?option=com_datsogallery&Itemid=27&func=detail&catid=15&id=435&p=9&l=1600 Bachounda (talk) 08:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the photograph meets the copyright tag criterion: originally published in Slovenia before 1970. Eleassar (t/p) 08:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abivargheseak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 12.2014 these two files appears to be video screenshots from the Indian short film "The Return Address", produced by "Infamous Coconuts Productions" and directed by "Abi Varghese". Example: File:Return Address2.jpg --> https://vimeo.com/24370272 (2011, © by "Infamous Coconuts", 09:23 min.). Despite of having a similar username, the director is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. Additional it is unclear if he holds the copyrights of the film. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established. The related enwiki-entry about the director was deleted in 12.2014.

Gunnex (talk) 09:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vidal-Naquet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:30, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded in 12.2014 by 1-upload user Fenderbass (talk · contributions · Statistics). Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 09:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of an artist which is still alive, so ORTS needed 46.218.9.198 09:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern sculptures, plaques or monuments. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 10:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 37.5.3.45 10:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The source page has apparently been deleted from Facebook, which makes it hard to give an opinion about that, but highly unlikely to be in the project scope anyhow. Revent (talk) 11:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Stefan4 (talk) 11:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 11:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wording 'Música del game play' suggests that this is unfree. Stefan4 (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-trivial logo 37.5.3.45 11:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javier Mansilla Montero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These do not seem to be own work. See COM:L.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:EDUSE. Stefan4 (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deconoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:EDUSE.

An unused low-quality picture of too low quality to be useful. See COM:EDUSE. Also contains a website URL as a watermark, which could mean that the file is a copyright violation from there.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The first page contains lots of text written by Google and is unfree. With the exception of the first page, the rest of the pages appear to be free. Stefan4 (talk) 11:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that first pages are automatically generated by Google, but it was downloaded exactly that way through Internet archive. There won't be a problem deleting this file, since I can will generate a new file without the Google Disclaimer.--Gynfa (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IIM17FC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope text documents missing evidence of permission.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source page does not list any copyright tag or proper source, so we don't know whether the age requirements in the template are satisfied or not. Stefan4 (talk) 12:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 12:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 12:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fair-use picture, includes text inside picture and logos Motopark (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 12:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image from basketzg.pl website 99kerob (talk) 12:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image from basketzg.pl website 99kerob (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the lamp is work by Danilo Fürst (d. 2005). Eleassar (t/p) 13:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted model of the town. Eleassar (t/p) 13:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is derivative of a variety of copyrighted images, including the Disney birds and the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nenabor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work 37.5.3.45 14:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by King Boy Achraf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Books. No evidence of permissions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by King Boy Achraf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Proper translator and illustrator should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by King Boy Achraf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:50, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work without EXIF 37.5.3.45 14:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LL41000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for 2D works.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msimca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 37.5.3.45 14:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PaulaSe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

as mentioned in other positions I do not agree with this. According to Commons:Project scope this file should stay since it is being used on wikiversity in an educational context. This is a ongoing class and our students might extend the files they are currently uploading in a manner that is not feasable as wikitext so we have COM:INUSE COM:EDUSE. Our students have the job to create text and share it with other students and give feedback. Attempting to deleting the work of our students in an educational setting - which is the designated scope of wikimedia projects - makes me really sad. Also it is frustrating for our students who might turn into wikipedians to have this constant feedback of questionable quality and scope. So please - as you did in other cases - do not delete the files of our course --Renepick (talk) 16:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but what is preventing your students to use wiki-format for such texts? It'll be much more easier to fix errors or add content. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? (Are you the photographer?) 37.5.3.45 14:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}} (size) and mixture of fonts. Unused, replaceable by File:Baeyer-Emmerling-indoolsynthese.png DMacks (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://www.hairrestorationhouston.com/ Yunshui (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? (Are you the artist?) 37.5.3.45 14:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}} (small, artifacts), mixture of fonts and other style details. Unused, have File:Baeyer-Emmerling-indoolsynthese mechanisme.png DMacks (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hm.management777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems equivalent to File:Dess-Martin-Oxidation 2.svg except some less even bondlengths DMacks (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Migangel9390 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ditao93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious "own" work (363 Results at TinEye) 37.5.3.45 14:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete http://best-troll.deviantart.com/art/Troll-N-deg-114-380088406 Revent (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arthur Campello (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused icon with unclear use (for google) Kopiersperre (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A PDF file (only one slide) with a possible copyrighted logo. Lazlo 15:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juan Morales (Poeta) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indianactors (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, promotional and not useful for education

George Chernilevsky talk 17:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indianactors (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duck copyvios - generally professionally staged images of purportedly notable persons with differing technical characteristics and multiple camera models (e.g., Canon EOS 450D. SAMSUNG WB5500, Canon EOS 60D, GT-S5830i, NIKON D7000, Canon EOS 550D, etc.) Some likely COM:DW's of backgrounds (e.g., File:Chani dance choreographer 02.jpg), some explicitly not uploader's work despite self license (e.g., File:Performers dholkichya talavar 02.JPG source is "dholkichya talavar tv show"), others COM:NETCOPYVIO (e.g., File:Chani Kaur 02.JPG is here, etc. Quack.

Эlcobbola talk 21:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, near-certainly the work of multiple copyright holders, thus making them copyright violations here. Photographers should confirm the licenses by following the instructions at OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 16:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disinformative, used nowhere. SMAUG (TalkContributions) 17:15, 16 June 2015 (UTC) EDIT: + Own request. --SMAUG (TalkContributions) 17:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manut Chicharito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some of these files have watermarks, so all files are doubtful own work.

CC-Canuck (talk) 17:15, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Manut Chicharito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 22:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M3stylediva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 17:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The painting is a central part of this image and has unknown licencing information. CC-Canuck (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, promotional George Chernilevsky talk 17:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 17:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vector version available, used nowhere. SMAUG (TalkContributions) 17:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. Not useful for education George Chernilevsky talk 17:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty 6AND5 (talk) 17:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copright-violation: see [4] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Austriantraveler (talk • contribs)


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posible imagen escaneada de un medio impreso sin la debida licencia. MarcoMogollon (talk) 21:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed appears to be a scan of an image printed by color halftoning, and thus a quite probably copyvio. Also of extremely low resolution. Revent (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The design on the t-shirt is a central part of this photo and isn't under a free licence (or there is no evidence of such) CC-Canuck (talk) 17:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from www.mesballades.com, only contribution from uploader, probably not copyrightfree. Small file. There are many better alternative pictures already. Havang(nl) (talk) 17:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Vera Isayeva (✝1960) and Robert Taurit (✝1969). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Leonid Mogilevsky (still alive). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. The obelisk established in 1985. High reliefs and sculptural decoration by A. Charkin, V. Sveshnikov, B. Petrov, A. Vinogradov. Authors are still alive. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since uploader is not the same as the author, OTRS should be followed Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Konstantin Simun (still alive). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Ivan Korneev (still alive). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - this image is derivative work, see COM:DW. Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong upload Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 19:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 2003, sculptural decoration by Anatoly Dyoma (still alive). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 2002. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is derivative work, photo of photo. Who is the photographer of underlying photo and does (s)he allow to publish his/her work under free license? Taivo (talk) 19:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 1997, by Albert Charkin (still alive). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 19:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Not useful for educational purposes. Lazlo 19:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Bust established in 2002. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark shows that the Philippine Air Force is not the copyright holder, hence this needs a proper release from the photographer VN-A861 (talk) 20:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete good catch. Probably copyright violation, originally from Rogier Westerhuis. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cleiberlopez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Converting speedy deletions to DR, rationale was "Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivate work" by The Photographer.

Revent (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images of modern Venezuelan banknotes. COM:Currency does not discuss Venezuela, and I can't find any other references to establish their copyright status. Not IMO valid speedies, but not willing to dismiss entirely. Revent (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 01:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a movie poster of Aadu (film) because of the watermark text, but not sure. Sreejith K (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadra Mosalla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations. Two of four uploaded images (so far) uploaded as 'own work' were obvious copyvios, watermarked with varying names. These do not pop up obvious matches, but need checking.

Revent (talk) 22:30, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could be old enough or pd-heirs. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 10:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been globally replaced by better quality File:Flag of the Basque Country by Sabino Arana.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 00:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bitmap images that have been superseded by SVGs are rarely deleted. Doing so in the past has created massive cross-wiki drama. The original version can be marked with {{Vector version available}}. Revent (talk) 01:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Per Commons talk:Superseded images policy.--Wdwd (talk) 19:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work, it's a derived image from a UK TSGRD design.

The correct license would be OGL3, but in addition an outright OTS confrimation that

  1. The sign design
  2. The camera pictogram
  3. The "Transport" typeface

are all within the scope of the OGl3 license (given the exceptions noted) is needed.

Anyone want to get OTRS on these three points?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So instead of nominating it for deletion, why didn't you just change the license???? What a waste of time. Fry1989 eh? 00:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(@Fry1989) Because to do that needs the additional confirmation about scope inclusion. If you can get the DfT to confirm the scope, then I am more than happy to change it over to OGL3 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn per comments above... An OTRS Confirmation would however be cake icing :) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion / withdrawn. icing is always optional! :-) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information: no consent nor permission given by the subject, who is a person identifiable as a well known French physician, guest of a popular talk show on the French television channel France 5. 82.244.37.163 00:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep If the person is well known, permission is not necessary. No personal rights infringed here. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete You could easily check on [this page] that need for permission is the general case. Moreover, in France the subject's consent is needed to just take a picture, to publish it or to use it commercially, since "Everyone is legally protected from unauthorised distribution, publication or commercialisation of a picture of himself. The permission has to be interpreted in a strict way (only to the extent expressly consented to by the subject." The few mentioned exemptions (public events, right to inform) don't apply to the present picture. 82.244.37.163 09:32, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#France Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jc809 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk upload of movie logos, most obviously well above the threshold of originality.

Revent (talk) 00:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would question this. Images such as File:Taken-2-510976bf05803.png are below threshold for originality, I think. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly: Some here are probably fine, some are quite likely well over the line, and some are marginal. The intent here is to get a consensus about which are which. In the case of that particular image, the pattern of white specks across the lettering is 'somewhat' creative (it's not a simple font) and make it questionable. Revent (talk) 11:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(further comment) It's also worth pointing out that these were all uploaded with obviously incorrect claims of 'own work', and gibberish in the file descriptions. Revent (talk) 11:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, agree. You should maybe have this pointed out in your DR. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lazlo 12:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Any artistic work = (c). Simple logos kept. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File does not match the license. Music is not in the public domain. See en:Mohammed Abdel Wahab. kahusi (會話) 10:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-Libya}} states that the copyright term for Libya is 50 years pma, and Mohammed Abdel Wahab died in 1991. Underlying lk (talk) 00:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Mohammed Abdel Wahab? --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The composer of the anthem, see en:Mohammed Abdel Wahab (also linked above).--Underlying lk (talk) 13:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PD in 2041. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:54, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted multiple times as a copyvio, no evidence that {{PD-US-not renewed}} applies to this file. Underlying lk (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

navyband.navy.mil/disclaimer.html

Information presented on this service not identified as protected by copyright is considered public information and may be distributed or copied.

The privacy & security notice indicates that these files are not protected by copyright.SpanishSnake (talk) 23:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That disclaimer applies to the performance, not the composition.--Underlying lk (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - not sure why one would think that the anthem of Libya is created by the US military. --Jcb (talk) 10:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misjudgment about copyright 최광모 (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c)vio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also:

Derivative work of copyrighted content (packaging). Deletion requested and replacement (File:Stella Artois chalice filled.jpg) provided in ticket:2015061510013615 (only 1st nominated file).    FDMS  4    01:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Artistic photos of beverage bottles are not derivative works

[edit]

See Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits.

Furthermore, quoting from the page Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter:

"primarily in light of Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, in which a photograph of a bottle was held not to be derivative of the label on the bottle"

Therefore the images File:Stella Artois 330ml bottle.JPG, File:Stella Artois en Brasil.jpg, File:Stella Artois Pro.jpg, and File:Ahh beer.jpg can be contributed as they are original artistic images. - User:GR8DAN

Please note that this was a US case and as such has little relevance to the situation in other countries.    FDMS  4    16:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per FDMS and Com:Packing. Replacement done. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2002 statue INeverCry 01:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1996 bust/monument

INeverCry 01:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2005 monument INeverCry 02:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:28, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1959 statue INeverCry 02:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:28, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument INeverCry 02:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:28, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1995 statue

INeverCry 02:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:28, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1959 statue INeverCry 02:09, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1996 monument INeverCry 02:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern bust and monument in Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine - the author ru:Василевич, Григорий Михайлович died in 1976

INeverCry 02:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unclear copyright status (low resolution; apparently taken from here (not the other way round as the external website contains related similar images the Commons user didn't upload)).    FDMS  4    02:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument to Vasily Margelov who died in 1990

INeverCry 02:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1995 statue INeverCry 02:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:31, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1959 statue INeverCry 02:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:42, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1959 statue INeverCry 02:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1959 statue INeverCry 02:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1959 statue INeverCry 03:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The monument was installed in 1959, its author died in 1990.


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern building INeverCry 03:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument INeverCry 03:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - plaque with 3d sculpture element - date of 1997 is engraved on plaque INeverCry 03:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP in the Ukraine. :-( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - plaque with 3d sculpture element - date of 1984 is engraved on plaque INeverCry 03:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine :-(( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - plaque with 3d sculpture element - date of 1984 is engraved on plaque INeverCry 03:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine :-(( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument in Lviv INeverCry 03:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine :-(( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1996 statue in Lviv by Sergey Oleshko and architect Michael Yaholnyk

INeverCry 03:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine :-(( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2005 statue

INeverCry 04:10, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP in Ukraine - 2008 monument

INeverCry 04:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Indeed, COM:SELFIE. Revent (talk)
I would check if we have equivalent images of young males with suits, but categories about suits are absolutely messed. Atm, I can't find any equivalent image in Commons, and therefore  Keep unless we had enough better quality equivalent images to fit any potential educative use of such images.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think we do, but don't have time to search right now. Revent (talk) 18:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear (c) status. Source = Facebook. Own work claim therefore dubios IMHO. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:03, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Italy: non-free information board. Eleassar (t/p) 06:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a "art work, or building", so I think that COM:FOP#Italy is not applicable. In addition there are no copyright information into the panel. --Luigi.tuby (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Object still under (c) -> no FOP in Italy Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:08, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copy of an original. Guru2989 (talk) 10:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Vinit Chamling.jpg]]


Deleted: If I understood the uploader correctly, copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used only for self promotion on english wikipedia, out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 10:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's in use in enwiki. If such use is not legitimate in English Wikipedia, the page should be deleted or edited there according to local policies and community. When done there, we can discuss here whether the image is scope.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: scope, misuse of commons and wikipedia for self promo. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:23, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is this pd-old? CC- unlikely. Steinsplitter (talk) 10:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: © Monique Rasson Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

モザイクが薄いため削除を依頼 Hot cake syrup (talk) 12:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

モザイクが薄いため削除を依頼 Hot cake syrup (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per request Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:28, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; not in COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Actually, hybrid flags (half of one country on one side and half of the other country on the other side) are generally considered within scope, since they have a number of legitimate uses, such as UK-Norway relations, Norwegians with UK connections, Britons with Norway connections, etc. This goes a little beyond the most basic (heraldically "dimidiated") hybrid format, but it's not really any stranger than File:English language - United States, Canada and the United Kingdom.svg etc... AnonMoos (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Way in scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:35, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How so? Keφr (keep talk here) 12:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". As a hybrid flag image representing Britain and Norway it is useless; reversing the colours on one half of a Union Jack does not mean "Norway" to anyone. GPinkerton (talk) 18:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Repeat what I said above: "hybrid flags (half of one country on one side and half of the other country on the other side) are generally considered within scope, since they have a number of legitimate uses, such as UK-Norway relations, Norwegians with UK connections, Britons with Norway connections, etc...." AnonMoos (talk) 18:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. Messing about with the colours of one flag does not a hybrid flag make. It could easily be replaced with a suitable hybrid image if required, but this file is unused so such a need is at present hypothetical. GPinkerton (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not too sure why your particular personal opinions as to what is and what is not a valid hybrid flag should carry any great weight. AnonMoos (talk) 03:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neither I yours. Of course, it's more than obvious that no-one agrees with you about its usefulness, or else the file would be in use. GPinkerton (talk) 12:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; not in COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not especially attached to this one particular image, but there are many hundreds of "Special and fictional" flags on Commons, and there's been a de facto policy for many years that such flags are not usually deleted just for being special or fictional, but rather only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering)... AnonMoos (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:36, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Irrelevant post-closure remarks

[edit]

How so? Keφr (keep talk here) 12:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC) [reply]
 Delete For me, a file being fictionnal but not from a howsoever popular/widely known fiction and not used on any project is out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No official relevence, completely fictuous. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a political satire image. If you didn't have anything significant to add with respect to the previous rejected deletion nomination above, then you really should not have made a new deletion nomination. By the way, if you nominate the similar "Flag of Soviet Canuckistan" for deletion, I imagine there would be significant resistance... AnonMoos (talk) 03:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Has no place being on the commons, useless image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cristiano Tomás (talk • contribs) 12:41, 20 August 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing consent from Hartmut S. Bühler Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:36, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

建物の形状が変わったため YO-5351 (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The fact that the building has changed or no longer looks the same is not a valid reason for deletion. If the building no longer stands, then that is all the more reason for keeping this image. --DAJF (talk) 00:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per DAJF. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload new file and change it YO-5351 (talk) 11:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (see DAJF), no alternate file specified; File in use and no recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 05:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image can be found in a search engine only because Google links to Wikipedia, where the image is taken. This image is not true, and the truncated because originally it was the photo on the cover of the CD, the authors could not cause this part of the cover as an infringement of copyright. The same goes for the image associated with the group "Tsyganyata i Ya s Ilyicha"

Deleted: Com:DW of cd-cover Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no sources 37.5.3.45 14:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Test upload Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already exists as Category:Aldomirovtsi marsh Vodnokon4e (talk) 22:55, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:48, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://static1.squarespace.com/static/5228872ce4b02515a5bc0e58/t/52322695e4b0c34b2a13f044/1379019228481/2012victor.png&imgrefurl=http://imgkid.com/victor-logo.shtml&h=932&w=872&tbnid=LX_xXAegIbX7NM&zoom=1&tbnh=232&tbnw=217&usg=__h66zaqij25GRF0isoPDolu-vWmc=&docid=O3vVtf1ImSmLrM. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I don't see it so simple to be above the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 21:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused selfie logo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=kodak+logo&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSigEahwELEKjU2AQaAggKDAsQsIynCBpgCl4IAxIomxKeBp0GmwPvAbII6RO3B6QG-gnfPKw9sD2tPbE6qz2dNOA8vDPMLRowYjezzJ2Djt98pX11SBBhNsTy4NIFoxpkgIbdYLW7qy6iyMazM0gfDMybXsuRoi-HDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIE83RHsww&sa=X&ved=0CBsQ2A4oAWoVChMI77Xd7_qUxgIVxjOsCh3rGwGj&biw=1366&bih=682 Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 20:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie 10g, simple shapes and text only. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:50, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see source. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 20:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Small company logo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=youtube+logo+png&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSjAEaiQELEKjU2AQaBAgACAoMCxCwjKcIGmAKXggDEij6ErcHmwb7EpwGoAbwAfkSowbNAq4isjfzKfQprSLRKPUpiiqJJMk3GjCMod-DVpCVllTuUfBf8mgxHbqOzG9pfBCb87hstWXgLyc3MKIa-UWIbKJbJTa31IcMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgRlrt9iDA&sa=X&ved=0CBsQ2A4oAWoVChMIiInd8f6UxgIVSSKsCh3coQCq&biw=1366&bih=682#imgrc=KMj2pUNUtzorAM%253A%3B5fPO1UtPvFPdOM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fupload.wikimedia.org%252Fwikipedia%252Fcommons%252F4%252F4d%252FKukuzoo_logo.png%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fgalleryhip.com%252Fyoutube-logo-history.html%3B1004%3B960. Uploader seems to belongs to the company that own the logo, but may be outside the Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Far above the TOO. If the uploader is the owner/author of the logo, an OTRS ticket is needed. Otherwise, it should be removed. Fma12 (talk) 21:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:07, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic, uncyclopedic pornagraphic video, not used on any wikipedia pages. Citadel48 (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic, uncyclopedic pornagraphic video, not used on any wikipedia pages. Citadel48 (talk) 22:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How? Is it used in any pages?


Kept: IMHO in scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is porn 194.233.96.65 05:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This file should be kept, along with all this user's files, as important cultural documentation of a specific and fairly unique form of human sexuality. Here we have a long-term couple who has been producing media for the public domain for 15 years. This sort of material will be invaluable to future historians' efforts to understand the evolution of human sexuality, especially as it relates to the internet. They are named appropriately so that if anyone wishes to view them, they know precisely what they are going to be viewing. Furthermore, none of this content is shot pornographically. The intention is clearly not to arouse, but instead to demonstrate. Such resources are useful for learning about sexual matters without being exposed to actual porn. There is a distinct cultural interest in retaining them.--Hawkblade96 (talk) 08:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic, uncyclopedic pornagraphic video, not used on any wikipedia pages. Citadel48 (talk) 22:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How? Is it used in any pages?


Kept: In scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic, uncyclopedic pornagraphic video, not used on any wikipedia pages. Citadel48 (talk) 22:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic, uncyclopedic pornagraphic video, not used on any wikipedia pages. Citadel48 (talk) 22:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic, uncyclopedic pornagraphic video, not used on any wikipedia pages. Citadel48 (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 71 year old male claim sounds strange. Com:PCP for now. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity image. Hand-held video footage of user masturbating his penis. Checked usage (none). User has uploaded multiple images of his penis during his time at Commons. Do we need this penis? --Outsider80 (talk) 00:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepThe Commons is not censored. If we do end up with a surfeit of this sort of file, we should keep the best (and those in use). I do not think the issues that we have with simple penis pictures (a huge glut of them) yet apply to this type of file. --Simonxag (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Patrícia msg 17:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

explicit pornographic material. There are enough educational videos Frank wia (talk) 23:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: strong keep; 1. commons is not censored, 2. actually there is very little comparable material as per: educational videos, & 3. we had this debate already, about this file; the decision was keep, overwhelmingly; the nominator even changed their vote.

"explicit pornographic material" is a personal opinion, to which the nominator is entitled, the nominator is also entitled to be personally offended, morally shocked, & outraged; however that does not constitute legitimate rationale for deletion (see above re: commons is not censored).

i'm always left wondering how come people who are easily offended seem to spend so much time looking for things that offend them?

Lx 121 (talk) 01:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a pornsite or a social networking site. I recommend you read on the policies.

Pornographic, uncyclopedic pornagraphic video, not used on any wikipedia pages. Citadel48 (talk) 22:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grant_1962_3a.png should be moved here which is a color version of the same image CFCF (talk) 06:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this is a move/rename request. Moves done. P 1 9 9   14:28, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the collection and provided sources.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 12:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Seems fixed Natuur12 (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one local source picture missing Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 09:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As per the discussion earlier, I have provided source for all the files similar to File:Collage Rome.jpg. The image which is missing is sourced from wikipedia for which link has been provided.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: issue resolved, all sources provided. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 2 images (File:Sungam-ukkadam bridge.jpg + File:PSG College of Technology Coimbatore.png, both recently tagged as copyvio) used in this collage are missing or are insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From speedy with reason "Datenschutz in google, Foto wird auch nicht mehr im Artikel verwendet --93.195.214.75 13:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)" I don't quite understand this request. Google translates this as "Privacy in google, photo is no longer used in the article". It's a photo of a town, about what kind of privacy the user is talking about? I think it should be kept without additional explanations. Trycatch (talk) 07:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please remove at least my E-Mail and Name for data security reasons . I took the picture. It can be deleted Tho~enwiki (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please login to the account that originally uploaded these images (it was renamed to Tho~dewiki as part of SUL finalization) and make an edit confirming this request, so it can be verified that you are actually the original uploader? Revent (talk) 13:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you are the actual uploader, then just upload a version of this file without the watermark name and web site over this one. One of us will then hide the original. Jameslwoodward (talk) 13:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
After verifying the identify of this person by email contact, removed real name and email address from public history and log entries. The watermark in the files is still there (I couldn't clean it effectively) but points at the usurped dewiki account. Revent (talk) 03:06, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: personal info has been removed, there's no other deletion rationale here. --P 1 9 9   15:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please remove at least my E-Mail and Name for data security reasons . I took the picture. It can be deleted Tho~enwiki (talk) 11:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please login to the account that originally uploaded these images (it was renamed to Tho~dewiki as part of SUL finalization) and make an edit confirming this request, so it can be verified that you are actually the original uploader? Revent (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, it's not that simple. The original uploader was de:User:Tho at dewiki, which no longer exists, because sv:User:Tho had more edits. The renamed de:User:Tho~dewiki (Contribs) was'nt merged with User:Tho~enwiki (Contribs). --Emha (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
After verifying the identify of this person by email contact, removed real name and email address from public history and log entries. The watermark in the files is still there (I couldn't clean it effectively) but points at the usurped dewiki account. Revent (talk) 03:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: personal info has been removed, there's no other deletion rationale here. P 1 9 9   15:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An IP editor on enwp claims this is a photo of himself published without his consent.[5] They removed it from the relevant article.[6] My personal opinion is we should believe him and delete at his request. Thincat (talk) 12:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the original uploader has never made any edits other than to upload this image, I'm inclined to agree. Revent (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The depicted person isn't identifiable, so I don't see a reason for deletion.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Not taken with a cell phone as claimed either. I'd support a courtesy delete, no need to aggravate the IP-User. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:34, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most are in favor of courtesy deletion. Plenty of alternatives at Category:Haematoma. P 1 9 9   15:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file name currently tells that the photographer is Linda Wassberg, but the uploader has requested renaming of the file and requests that it should state that the photographer is Märta Thisner. The uploader can't be both Linda Wassberg and Märta Thisner, so we don't know whether there is any permission in place. Note that the file has been overwritten and that there are two different pictures in the history, see {{Do not overwrite}}. Stefan4 (talk) 11:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We uploaded the original picture and tried to replace it with a newer one. Clearly didn't go about it the right way. Just trying to delete them all now so we can upload the one correct picture and also name it correctly. How do we do this? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garagefilm (talk • contribs) 2015-06-16T11:16:57 (UTC)

As there is no evidence of permission, you will have to provide such evidence. See COM:OTRS. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely own work. Uploaded in 12.2014 by 1-upload user Kurthunter (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photo was previously published via (example, even cropped) via http://www.discoverychannel.com.au/everest/jobys-support-team/ (© 2015 Discovery Networks International All Rights Reserved) = http://www.discoverychannel.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Garrett-Madison.jpg (last modified: 04.2014). The file itself is cropped and was most likely originally grabbed & photoshopped from http://madisonmountaineering.com/staff/garrett-madison/ (© 2015 Madison Mountaineering) = http://madisonmountaineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Garrett-headshot.jpg (per file path: 03.2014). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 09:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[moved from DR talk]:"I represent Madison Mountaineering (owner/operator is Garrett Madison). This image is his headshot and is typically provided to press and media companies (such as Discovery Channel). Please let me/us know how to rectify the issues that is causing the deletion request." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurthunter (talk • contribs) .
If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them, providing evidence that the copyright holder has given permission to publish the file under a free license. If everything checks out, they will restore the file, if deleted in the meantime. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and is understaffed and may take several weeks to process the license. Gunnex (talk) 07:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'll contact Madison. Please leave open for another two weeks. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS Ticket 2015070510000968 --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permission Krd 14:26, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]