User talk:Wegavision

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wegavision!
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boizenburg Kino 2011.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Boizenburg Kino 2011.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Niteshift (talk) 07:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Wegavision, könntest du hier möglichst noch den Bildhauer (des Skulptur) und das Jahr der Aufstellung ergänzen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Wegavision, hier warst Du beim Knipsen SEHR fleißig, nur die Kategorisierung ist etwas unglücklich. Besser, weil dem allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch folgend, wäre Category:Shops in Mannheim-Innenstadt mit den Elternkategorien Category:Mannheim-Innenstadt und Category:Shops in Mannheim. Schaue auch mal in letztere Kategorie, darin sind noch weitere Geschäfte aus der Mannheimer Innenstadt, die noch umkategorisiert werden sollten. Wenn Du einverstanden bist, schiebe ich alles von Category:Mannheim-Innenstadt shops nach Category:Shops in Mannheim-Innenstadt. Ich bitte dann um eine kurze Info. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 09:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blumenhaus am Theater Mannheim S6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

217.91.186.203 08:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CLS Computer Mannheim-Käfertal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nolispanmo 09:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Autohaus Sinemus Mannheim-Wallau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rsinemus (talk) 07:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OSM-Bilder

[edit]

Hallo Wegavision,

toll, zu sehen, dass es noch mehr Leute gibt, die Bilder in OSM Pflegen. Wir in Tübingen machen das auch, allerdings in vielen Fällen unter dem wikimedia_commons-Tag. So weit wie in Mannheim sind wir allerdings noch nicht. :-)

Viele Grüße Dktue (talk) 17:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jasmin Thai-Massage Mannheim Augusta Anlage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

46.5.148.46 10:26, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]