Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/04/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 27th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate|File:Cholesterinisch.png}} Nightingale (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC) TEMPLATE ERROR: correct file name: File:Cholesterinisch.png--Nightingale (talk) 11:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file speedied as a duplicate  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.oda.te.gov.ua/main/ua/news/detail/31706.htm (taken in August 2012). WikiMapia user is unlikely to be the author, as the photo was uploaded to WikiMapia in September NickK (talk) 12:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Anatoliy (talk) 12:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from local government website via WikiMania - the resolution on the local website is twice higher than here NickK (talk) 12:15, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Anatoliy (talk) 12:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho copyright protected logo, Roland 01:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)


Deleted. Whatever the status of the original logo, it clearly is not created owned and licensed by the uploader as claimed. False info. No use in article space. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Nikbot as no license (no license). The record at LOC is here. I don't think this is PD but I'm not 100% on it. –⁠moogsi (blah) 07:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, "HABS" image = Historic American Building Survey, public domain US Government collection. Thanks for identifying the source. The uploader did a poor job of giving proper source and info on this photo, which has now been improved. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad image should not be here mistakenly put up DigDug66 (talk) 11:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, orphan file, uploader request. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 17:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I withdraw this nomination - the image is used on wiki page High Contrast (talk) 17:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and request by the uploder Jarekt (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: requested by the uploder Jarekt (talk) 20:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name and duplicate of Category:Members of the National Assembly of Mauritius Kingroyos (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author request. →Nagy 20:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Julo (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful, see Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 09:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Julo (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The poster is copyrighted because the author died in 1946. Clarissy. 13:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nominator rubin16 (talk) 16:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

content is inaproprate 86.3.5.85 19:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedy keep, nominator provided no reason based in policy, no obvious issue with this file. Dcoetzee (talk) 23:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

don't like it 67.213.111.176 22:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedy keep, nominator provided no reason, etc. Trycatch (talk) 23:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fisting close-up.JPG

[edit]

This picture looks suspicious. The girl in the picture looks underage. The age of the female participant should be verified and if it not possible, the picture should be deleted. The female looks very young (under 18) which can be clearly deduced from the vaginal area. The girl in the picture looks underage and is suspicous. --93.115.84.198 20:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept - bogus nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alberto ECJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No own work. All images uploaded by this user are copyvio. 1 example: File:M46&M47.png -> url - image. I think it's viable a nuke.

Alan Lorenzo (talk) 23:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Yeah, look like copyvios. Some may be PD from NASA or such, but would take too long to pin down. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hemmeband17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:LL – all of these are the same Flickr stream and were uploaded both here and at Flickr between 7-8 April 2013; File:Layla autograph2012.jpg was previously published at [1]. File:KaitlynFCW2012.jpg at [2], File: ExtremeExposeMiz2007.jpg at [3].

January (talk) 15:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VitorBinelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted comic characters. User has used {{PermissionOTRS}} without any ticket ID.

—Bill william comptonTalk 12:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by VitorBinelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Simply impossible.—Bill william comptonTalk 14:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: user has been blocked –⁠moogsi (blah) 00:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviocopyvio copyvio? Svajcr (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 01:08, 28 April 2013 by Denniss, closed by .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This video game character from Assassin's Creed is copyrighted. Leoboudv (talk) 19:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cosplay, it isn't copyrighted. I found the photo on Flickr with a correct licence.--Nicryc (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn, no other strong arguments for deletion –⁠moogsi (blah) 09:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Uploader claims to be the author of the image, but the image appears to be a commercial album cover and no evidence of authorship has been provided. Nick (talk) 07:38, 25 April 2013

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 15:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Taivo (talk) 10:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, uploaded by bot Taivo (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, the uploader's only contribution Taivo (talk) 11:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, uploaded by bot Taivo (talk) 11:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with OP --Sphilbrick (talk) 13:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:07, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope High Contrast (talk) 16:36, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 17:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 10:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image (he is not a notable person), out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 20:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted: Image says R.K.Arun in tamil Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 22:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This person is en:Ben Cooper (musician). Although, it is unknown yet, is he notable enough for his own article (at moment in 2 languages). But there is an article about his band en:Radical Face in 7 languages. This picture can be used in these articles. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The poster is copyrighted because the author died in 1946. Clarissy. 14:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyvio Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Found here in Flickr with all rights reserved. Not sure if that is original, but that image was added Dec 2012.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I've nominated a few other uploads of the same user as copyright violations. Mostly images found on a forum called Skyscrapercity.com . --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:15, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment  Delete Hello Wikipedia team,

This is Sriram Hariharan. I take full ownership and credit for the above image that has been posted by Faheem9333. I have clicked this picture myself at Coimbatore International Airport on June 24, 2012 after arriving from Mumbai on Jetlite S2 4645, and this image can be found at the following places online:

Jetphotos.net: http://jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7509014
Skyscrapercity Forum: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=97935530&postcount=842
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/41731083@N08/8242016280/

I request Wikipedia team to remove this image as it contains my watermark. Should you need the image, I can provide an unwatermarked one. I really thank Rsrikanth05 and Sphilbrick for reporting this image as a copyright violation.


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The collage includes non-free images. Clarissy. 20:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Author died in 1946. COM:DM not applicable. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding was these were pre 1917 and therefore out of copyright. If this is incorrect then delete away Victuallers (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, «Азбука красноармейца» is a soviet work. :-) Clarissy. 14:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

badly composed picture, blurred a×pdeHello! 16:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyvio: Says Slakhs Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully in scope. –⁠moogsi (blah) 06:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyvio Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, likely film snapshot. No metadata. Savhñ 09:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a mistake with the file name and title it should be frederick olalekan jacobs and may d Frederick olalekan jacobs (talk) 22:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Category:People with headphones has 211 images, but none of these shows so well, that unused headphones can be weared that way also. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It might be in scope but it is a copyright violation. The image comes from here: http://dj.beatport.com/djfenixoficial?utm_campaign=bp_share&utm_source=bp_share_facebook&utm_content=bp_share_DJ+Profile&utm_medium=bp_share_DJ+Profile_2964852 --High Contrast (talk) 17:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I see it on the site listed above, but that site seems to source it to Facebook. Given that Facebook often picks up images from Wikipedia, I wondered if that could be the case, but I assume that Facebook doesn't search Commons, it only search Wikipedia, so the fact that this image isn't linked to an article, suggests it is not the case that Facebook got it from Commons. (Are my assumptions valid?)--Sphilbrick (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 00:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Unlike most other images by this uploader, this might be in scope if some actual info were given - eg, where and under what circumstances was this band performing, and what type of music? However it is unfortunately blurry and of poor quality, and no indication of compensating importance. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. FunkMonk (talk) 13:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely bad quality, Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 10:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be free licensed (direct link missing). Even in the archives = http://web.archive.org/web/20060101000000*/http://www.camara.goioere.com.br (range: 2005-2008) http://www.camara.goioere.com.br main site is configured with "Copyright 200X@ Câmara Municipal de Goioerê - Todos os Direitos Reservados" (All Rights Reserved). Unknown author (private or governmental work?), failing also {{PD-BrazilGov}}. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 21:30, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The named author, Hirofumi Yoshida, is also the subject. It is unlikely that he actually took this photograph. The uploader is a third party and there is no evidence of permission. www.HirofumiYoshida.com has an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtfully own work Polarlys (talk) 10:07, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is an excellent image about black man smiling. We have 1203 images in category Category:Smiling men plus 178 in Category:Males smiling and 465 in Category:Smiling but so good images about smiling black men are quite rare. There are some in Category:People with black skin and Category:Men with black skin. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 02:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, from band's official site The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, unused Polarlys (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 00:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer is not uploader and photo seems to be taken from the internet (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=sbi:AMhZZiu-xW34SY2tn2Mj2AL1ttj85CLHfCIH-THORv6SmqeLWk7RT9lVwRI1UB-0wBe1-JpoEJJvILGCkyZsyJNLTr5lOuV6lxl4Bv6bdGfcDHDSF1DFE8Wyg7MESHOVsToJbOWf8Pz0UYpzRhxEW6T0_1Xdwi4EWhObd1U1hfKaQZGL9CuRGD8Dj8G4vf1n8JwRcxA2_1mQZrLWaXylOpS_19wT7yYsYIMSMOhFIUO_1AQHgJeJFDs1N0leXvdGcLMgjticlGAcLCuxT2DtzaUYZqgL0VIwtyUByatHhCG6DDDS737Asfrdi4tgDOgauA5FVk03fJ4Sro1JxUEbjMfqp7Dq4_1gTUcefZl4kXQ0aTjAp2wmNYEzUswNZAkyCpGsZoGEGN1XiFwk6JpVQFlV5JOCccjuGvILZJ0LnRPwOKwphiW1pXrKJn8vowKEwlaeOzTwU2fGF_1S-OoM0D_12LV3d8wN3m06ZT6lhrsWv3LA3MXi-heq-xNmMSPYzFNa2nxa5Peosz5xULNdgXN9WogEASIuGIHRMUSudvN1K09rdq_1lOsF_1pySvUUcPTww5-XGQrZ661HfioCu8fiQh5xsPiBlnHp_1KQMF8_191JbTP34Y5O_1013VghB95e7OTpcRd6_1xKXTmv1RcUnnlFAjUgFPtA4ycKF1t_1gMTFyWqHvNRFdQzIP_1TTqL9BvvFf8QZDHWnFS0HGK2A3uwIWej9Sw0p1KRYEyNtaqGAmi6TRx0vK1leGXx4CC-TRjYw1SFFImRsE3lZsCDZKxAxD7faoxMIyFpJHYfO7CNlEArpRwZIB1f953wyr3lj2taSluU6b1fXeOMIM1Jo4LyEpi0GyETYfmE4jOE4Z_1UGPPjGQVbApTcioNOfKI0MIU_1p_1AKkQbtxdn2NsWC1MUBNc5ZjEDjhU37VU-3756oqysTLHRfNoFz_103xEKxm-WCNbYiijfQcwr5X9glMygbKRu3cScyECX-3NOr9vbppnk8pXWcQ5cPWX_19VLVYFId6GaosvgFSTT5c0v8Y717udWrkVATAL6OJ8trpVzoKwm0ttufseG68e-mk58PiDdWzkbvoMrL4ehfrvNp3MKx1ykpRBLPuJVTnHlzINGCgf-ihko4SyzXeOYJ0JP2npeDCDVYlofaPZ2ucoJBgs7eJLeeBnFqEK1lsopNyLs2VsxfEsVCkMtKELk6OxJIbaKVtCiU0tL_1K1Eqn4bGBvgSxH1NiFNpMrZE9uAOwgR6PTuL8v0IqbGo0IiBJNqIlDj5lFi_18cv-x7D9XJdPHTGHolNpR03WdyPMLHZ_1RjdTKegn5c9T8wfApiN3JJ0Sz_1Ec&ei=uKN7UbiyEcTFObDmgQg&start=0&sa=N&biw=1276&bih=999) — Racconish Tk 10:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Uploader wrote under permission "no", so probably there is no permission for the use of this file. CennoxX (talk) 18:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: INeverCry 00:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 22:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the source country. art work by ja:小森邦夫 in 1993-02 Nightingale (talk) 00:07, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trade mark InstantNull (talk) 23:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 02:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 17:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a big (c)ajithv on the image. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, originally posted by ME on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151130732842449&set=a.10150609988622449.381172.703817448&type=1&theater Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Says Copyright ajithv, and User Faheem claims it's his. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone elses image, flicked. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:07, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:07, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

another source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/14108884@N07/1436602245/ AlleinStein (talk) 08:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The named author, Hirofumi Yoshida, is also the subject. It is unlikely that he actually took this photograph. The uploader is a third party and there is no evidence of permission. www.HirofumiYoshida.com has an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete What is it? File name says "object" and file description says "File 2". Taivo (talk) 10:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear who the photographer was, or how this could be claimed to be on a free licence. The claim of own work would need careful verification. Versions of this promotional portrait can be found elsewhere on the internet, invariably in online catalogues of movie memorabilia. (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The signature makes me suspect a copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:P 2.jpg

unused personal picture Wer?Du?! (talk) 09:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The poster is a russian work and the author died in 1946. Clarissy. 13:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 20:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 20:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 20:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 02:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral There is an article about the band en:Radical Face in 7 languages, so subject seems notable, but the quality is IMHO really bad. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The named author, Hirofumi Yoshida, is also the subject. It is unlikely that he actually took this photograph. The uploader is a third party and there is no evidence of permission. www.HirofumiYoshida.com has an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 20:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is copyrighted in Russia according to paragraph 1 of article 1256 of Russian Civil Code ("Исключительное право на произведения науки, литературы и искусства распространяется ... на произведения, обнародованные за пределами территории Российской Федерации или необнародованные, но находящиеся в какой-либо объективной форме за пределами территории Российской Федерации, и признается за авторами, являющимися гражданами Российской Федерации (их правопреемниками)"). {{FoP-Germany}}, but {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 20:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 20:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, utterly useless for educational purposes. LX (talk, contribs) 13:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. 1954 work. The sculptor, Raymond MARTIN, died in 1992. Jebulon (talk) 17:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only contributions of the it.wikipedia uploader are copyright violations, see it:Discussioni utente:Aerosmith. So I doubt that this file is own work. The photo is taken on February 14 2005 at MGM's premiere of 'Be Cool' at Grauman's Chinese Theatre in Los Angeles, California. Martin H. (talk) 21:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 02:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

though I am the rights holder, didn't mean to actually upload it, so I'd prefer a user-request deletion. Was just trying to get rights templates set for another image. Kevin Gorman (talk) 18:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus PD rationale. –⁠moogsi (blah) 07:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The named author, Hirofumi Yoshida, is also the subject. It is unlikely that he actually took this photograph. The uploader is a third party and there is no evidence of permission. www.HirofumiYoshida.com has an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Nothing to do with that. Taivo (talk) 13:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader at first claimed this image was published in 2011, then changed it to 1976 and had now changed it to 1951, a date that conveniently falls within the public domain period for the copyright tag {{PD-Australia}} that has now been added. However, the source link given, which has never been available to check the copyright status of the image, states 1976, if this was the publication date then the image is not in the public domain in Australia and certainly not in the US. Other changes to help the image fall within the new template include changing the author from "The Campus News Publishing Team" to anon are all suspicious actions. Without confirmation of the publication date this should be deleted. - Ww2censor (talk) 22:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cannot see any. probably broken file . the uploader uploaded File:Versdiplom2009.png instead Nightingale (talk) 01:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: http://thuvien.yeunhiepanh.net/Uploads/Picture/20115154235-IMG_3588.JPG AlleinStein (talk) 09:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The relief is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 22:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 22:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 20:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Cannot be useful without place description. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, possible copyvio. Savhñ 09:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I do not believe "I am copyright holder". Taivo (talk) 13:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Sorry about the girl, but she seems to be non-notable. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Jespinos (talk) 00:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Willamina

[edit]

Here are all files uploaded by user Willamina (her other contributions are deleted):

All these photos depict a non-notable DJ Shanu. No mention in English wikipedia. None of these files are used. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DeMeerpaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user's username is the same as the name of the building he/she uploaded pictures of. The black and white pictures look like they are scanned from a book. Being affiliated with the current owner, however, does not give you the copyright to pictures of the building. I've asked for OTRS verification before on another picture that stated the building's website as its source with no result.

Vera (talk) 14:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giggette (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be illustrations from a book published in 1992. Not {{PD-Art}}.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 08:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GoioWiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status: Mostly unknown date, author = "José Mousinho" (= uploader GoioWiki (talk · contributions · Statistics)?) and source = "prefeitura" = Prefecture of related Brazilian municipality. All this vague information declared by uploader as free licensed = unlikely. Per COM:PRP, permission needed. Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goioere 1966.jpg and User talk:GoioWiki.

Gunnex (talk) 22:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HeinzMosquera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Personal photos and snapshots that aren't educationally useful may be deleted. See COM:SCOPE.

Senator2029 21:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Personal photos. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julie89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permissions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mario Alberto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private pictures of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 02:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pame JazZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 00:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syed asad mahmood kazmi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private pictures of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 23:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, there is for example an image from 2006, 4 years before the image was uploaded to Commons, and there are a lot if you search for it with reversal google search, I think the author must prove he is the original creator, there are some other very similar images like this and this. I don't believe Lotus666 is the original author. UAwiki (talk) 23:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In regard to quality, resolution and appearance, this image is surely a professional promo shot. It is very similar to this one on the group's MySpace page, which is labeled "from Photoshooting". As the uploader is gone since 2010 (last edit on :pt was in 2011), we are unlikely to hear from him. We might consider contacting the group directly (possibly via [4]) and asking them for a statement or a direct permission. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's a copyvio, if someone wants to get an OTRS we will restore it when we recieved the permission PierreSelim (talk) 11:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho out of scope, Roland 01:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

 Keep It is used in user page in nl.wiki. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 10:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho out of scope, Roland 01:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

 Keep It is used in user page in nl.wiki. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 10:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho out of scope, Roland 01:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

 Keep It is used in user page in nl.wiki. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 10:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho out of scope, Roland 01:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

 Keep It is used in user page in nl.wiki. Licence should be pd-ineligible. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 10:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image attributed to DigitalGlobe, not US State Department, thus not public domain Samuell (talk) 03:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reuploaded without explation several months after deletion. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fire in the Vicinity of an Oil Pipeline in Homs, Syria.jpg Samuell (talk) 02:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As above. BrightRaven (talk) 14:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect with no significant page history that is blocking a move of the map back to this name. The dab is no longer needed; that duplicate file was created several years ago because the file that used to be here was protected and admin requests to update were not being answered. Kwamikagami (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Moot; there is currently no redirect at this title. --King of ♥ 10:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted @King of Hearts and Kwamikagami: I did find a not used redirect File:World marriage-equality laws (redirect).svg, which I deleted per nomination. Ellywa (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



2013 failed deletion request for the current map that should be returned here
=== File:World marriage-equality laws.svg ===

Not used anywhere other than talk pages, CSS is screwed up with the stylesheet specifying country info being overriden by inline styles, filled with Inkscape garbage, fully adequate alternative (File:World homosexuality laws.svg) exists. Ajfweb (talk) 03:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the page please. I find it very useful.


Kept: FASTILY 10:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is used without the permission of Crystal Lowe. She wishes to have the photo removed. TijanaPopovic (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No permission of en:Crystal Lowe is needed. We do not have a better photo about her. Taivo (talk) 13:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is a photo of a very public person, that has 10 articles on different languages on Wikipedia. Also this image (and crop) is in use in said ten articles, and also in user in the article Driven To Perform, where it was taken, and so this image depicts Crysral Lowe (a public figure) in a very public place and event, modeling in said event (as one of her jobs) and is clearly and knowingly posing to the camera and looking directly to the camera when this image was taken. Also checking the history of Crystal Lowe article on English Wikipedia i have to ask as to how do we know, that the w:user:Buckworth, the user (with only two edits) that tried to take of this images from the article in the English Wikipedia are in any way connected with Crystal Lowe, as we claims to ("I removed the photo at the request of the subject of the page. No permission was given to use this photo. I am awaiting permission from a photographer. A new photo is forthcoming"). In resume no personality rights violation and, secondly, no proof that indeed the user in Emglish Wikiedia is in anyway connected with the person depicted n this image. Tm (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY 10:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is used without the permission of Crystal Lowe, the subject. She wishes to have the photo removed. TijanaPopovic (talk) 05:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No permission of en:Crystal Lowe is needed. We do not have a better photo about her. Taivo (talk) 13:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep per Taivo. Crystal Lowe was evidently posing for the photographer at this event. This photo (and a derivative crop) is the only free licensed photo Commons has of this person who has articles about them in Wikipedias in 10 different languages, and image is in wide use in Wikimedia. (That said, if the subject of the photo wishes to submit a photo or photos of themselves which they think are better and which are authorized for reuse under a free license, that would be very welcome. See Commons:OTRS.) -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Aside from the above, image is used at en-wiki to illustrate the event at which it was taken, where the subject was employed as a model. Generally, I see no policy-based reason to allow the subject of an article to use publicity photos to displace third-party-created images. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is a photo of a very public person, that has 10 articles on different languages on Wikipedia. Also this image (and crop) is in use in said ten articles, and also in user in the article Driven To Perform, where it was taken, and so this image depicts Crysral Lowe (a public figure) in a very public place and event, modeling in said event (as one of her jobs) and is clearly and knowingly posing to the camera and looking directly to the camera when this image was taken. Also checking the history of Crystal Lowe article on English Wikipedia i have to ask as to how do we know, that the w:user:Buckworth, the user (with only two edits) that tried to take of this images from the article in the English Wikipedia are in any way connected with Crystal Lowe, as we claims to ("I removed the photo at the request of the subject of the page. No permission was given to use this photo. I am awaiting permission from a photographer. A new photo is forthcoming"). In resume no personality rights violation and, secondly, no proof that indeed the user in Emglish Wikiedia is in anyway connected with the person depicted n this image. Tm (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY 10:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a map that is highlighted for a region whose definition has been changed by the U.S. Census. Marketdiamond (talk) 07:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In that case, this is historical map. Historical maps are also needed, for example in article about Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 10:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also affected:

Reason: {{Dupe}} of File:Dyosfaires video.ogg. Bad file name, too. McZusatz (talk) 09:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Eisenerz 5562.JPG the file was transferred from lb:User:Cornischong from commons to lb-wikipedia before it was retransferrred to Commons The size of this picture is exactly the same as the one from the orignal picture. Robby (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Robby. --Cayambe (talk) 17:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not exact duplicate PierreSelim (talk) 11:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately UK signatures such as this are copyright protected. Boult only died in 2003 MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found higher resolution version of this image posted earlier than sep 28, 2012: https://www.google.com/search?sa=N&q=m+countdown+smile+thailand&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSYRpfCxCo1NgEGgIIBwwLELCMpwgaOAo2CAESEPICggK7AasBFHwStwEvsAEaIMi5bPUFU3pE1MuUyIJNY8-RnL21U6L8B9PGgGiUeZkpDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEY1bw8Qw&ei=Ww98UYTuA8uqlAWytoHYDA&ved=0CCsQ2A4oAA&biw=1280&bih=866#imgrc=lOu27b0zPMai8M%3A%3BEU3K76XSxfe6hM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.talkertain.com%252Fwp-content%252Fuploads%252F2012%252F09%252Fapink-2.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.talkertain.com%252F2012%252F09%252F24%252Fmnet-12%252F%3B900%3B600 Puramyun31 (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Permission has been lodged with OTRS MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apink at Mnet 'M Countdown'.jpg

I found a same image on internet:http://mwave.interest.me/enewsworld/en/article/16327/a-pink-added-to-m-countdown-smile-thailand-concert-lineup (2012.09.28 15:46, earlier than commons version) Puramyun31 (talk) 23:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS ticket. Yann (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is an inferior PNG version of something that I plan to redraw in SVG using better elements. I am the original uploader. — AJDS talk 17:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, and replaced by svg MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:08, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Poor quality photo, no indication of any compensating importance. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:24, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. The quality is not a valid reason per-se to delete the picture. The image is unused (as there are millions in Wikimedia Commons) and it is not personal. It belongs to one of the notable Cafés in Buenos Aires: Esquina Homero Manzi that means that it is not out of scope. So there is no reason to delete it. Barcex (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The quality is enough for thumbnails, and thus for Wikipedia use. Are there similar images from cafés in Buenos Aires? --LPfi (talk) 09:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not great quality, but certainly in scope MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho is prolematic, so it's imho not respecting the girl's personality rights respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, as well imho no 'educational use', i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 17:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC), Roland 17:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

 Keep Big educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Appears to have been taken in a public place MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:07, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechtes Längen-Breiten Verhältnis JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 22:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not so bad at all! Taivo (talk) 10:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Bad length to width ratio" is not a valid reason to delete MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:DX 6.10.jpg

keine Informationen bezüglich der Uhrheberrechte JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 18:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No license since January. --JuTa 21:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Following the recent upload of the duplicate File:Microsoft Alemania.jpg I have serious doubt that 1) this is in Mexico 2) this is the uploaders work. Publications of this file before June 2011 (this upload) exist, e.g. http://www.t-online.de/computer/id_15425006/microsoft-muss-500-millionen-dollar-zahlen.html of 2008 or http://www.tz-online.de/aktuelles/welt/tz-microsoft-deutschland-muss-millionen-euro-strafe-zahlen-159393.html of 2009. In fact I trust the EXIF of File:Microsoft Alemania.jpg which says it is in Germany and which gives a photographers name, both files are copyvios. Martin H. (talk) 02:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded the SVG format. Mazta2012 (talk) 07:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Replaced with svg MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately UK signatures such as this are copyright protected. Pinter only died in 2008 MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:55, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 09:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we don't delete image redirects (unless for very recent uploads) Denniss (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we don't delete image redirects (unless for very recent uploads) Denniss (talk) 19:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film posters are usually presumed non-free. I don't understand how User:Fookdat is the "author", if the "film [is] by Vinod Bharathan". —Bill william comptonTalk 12:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment (A) Who the film is by has little to do with who did the poster. (B) The image EXIF lists the copyright holder as www.fookdat.org and the author as "Vinod Bharathan, www.fookdat.org", so it's possible it was uploaded by Bharathan.--Prosfilaes (talk) 09:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, it needs OTRS permission.—Bill william comptonTalk 11:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not own work as claimed. We need permission from the copyright owner MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete Taivo (talk) 11:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Sinnamon MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete What do we do with that? Taivo (talk) 13:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per Sinnamon MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately UK signatures such as this are copyright protected. This becomes PD in 2021 as Orwell died in 1950. MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:00, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted in 2021: and restored now Platonides (talk) 14:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately UK signatures such as this are copyright protected. This becomes PD in 2021 as Orwell died in 1950. MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:00, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted in 2021: and restored now Platonides (talk) 14:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 10:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Taken in a private place with no subject consent MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

abdul haseeb 117.206.78.162 16:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid deletion rationale. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 10:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. (Can't tell if it is a re-upload of previous deleted image). P 1 9 9   15:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fastily: It appears you restored the image shortly after deleting it per a previous DR. What is the reason for keeping this file? WJBscribe (talk) 16:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom. --JuTa 19:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment If she is really dying of emphysema and we have her permission to publish it should be kept (but renamed, since at least for heard diseases it was shown that praying for people actually increased their mortality rate). The uploader needs to at least make a statement that one's mother is OK to publish this photo under a free licence (please explain to her that free licence means no restriction on use, somebody can make a porn video with donkeys and your mother, and if there are no other laws in the country where such a creation will be made that forbid it, neither you, nor your mother will be able to stop distribution). Sinnamon Girl (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I do not believe the file name. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken in a private place with no subject consent MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately UK signatures such as this are copyright protected. Golding only died in 1993. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep Do you look at images before nominating? It was in use on arabic wikipedia on April 25th, you nominate in on 27th saying "unused". Thank you for having so little respect for everybody else's time. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 04:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: File is in use MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:49, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE, the article on ar.wikipedia.org was deleted Polarlys (talk) 20:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete now it is not in use. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

deleted Out of project scope. Jean-Fred (talk) 18:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its from here the third file - mouseover the arrow 217.246.215.54 09:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete (support request), Roland 15:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Deleted: FASTILY 11:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: FASTILY 11:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of "File:Oonari-teppaku.jpg". 콩가루 (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not simple geometry and there's not a source where you can check the permission. 80.30.83.71 13:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source page, "This music was performed by its copyright holders, the National Symphony Orchestra of Taiwan and the National Taiwan Choir, who have granted permission for it to be downloaded and used for non-profit purposes only." It is a violence of copyright rule in Wikimedia Commons. As a consequence, it has to be deleted. Billytanghh (talk) 04:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Although the words and music are for all intents PD, this file is not. It is distributed with the restrictions that it cannot be used for commercial purposes, and therefore not free enough for Commons.--KTo288 (talk) 19:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright tag {{PD-ROC-official}} only seems to cover text, but this is a performance and a sound recording. The copyright tag {{PD-Taiwan}} only seems to cover the text and musical composition but not the performance or sound recording of the song. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This can be addressed by reverting the file to the version I had originally uploaded (which is a recording of a MIDI file I had made myself from the score), and possibly preventing people from uploading completely different versions in violation of COM:OVERWRITE. wctaiwan (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I didn't notice that the history contained different recordings of the song. The version from 2013 seems to be the one you created, so revert to that revision. All non-free versions in the history should be deleted.
A MIDI file is not a sound recording in my opinion. It may or may not count as a performance, so I suggest that you add a copyright tag (for example {{Cc-zero}}) in case something which you have made is subject to copyright. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did leave a note to that effect on the talk page when I first made the upload. I'd rather not add a template lest people think there is copyright involved in what I did. I've reverted the file to my version, but we still need an admin to perform revdel (and maybe add protection? If you look at the file history this isn't the first time this has happened...). wctaiwan (talk) 19:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • The note on the talk page should be enough. What should be done is that we should keep the file revisions which are 506 kilobytes but delete the ones which have different file sizes as the ones with different file sizes have unknown copyright status.
Copyright law contains several different rights: the author's right and several related rights. The author's right protects works, i.e. things which meet certain quality criteria, see COM:TOO. Apart from works, there are a few things which politicians felt needed protection, but which by definition are non-original, and those are protected by related rights, which are based on other criteria than originality, and are normally protected under different international copyright treaties than the author's right. A sound file would typically be subject to two related rights:
  1. The right to sound recordings: If you use a sound recording device to record sound, then you become the copyright holder to the sound recording. There is always only one way to record sound, so there is no way to do this in an 'original' way. If a computer program generates a sound file out of music scores, then I would argue that no one is recording any sounds but that the sound file is generated using other methods which are not subject to copyright protection. Therefore, I would say that this right isn't applicable to the file you created.
  2. The right to performances: If you perform a work, then you become the copyright holder to the performance right, and other people are not permitted to make or distribute sound or video recordings of your performance without your permission. This right only applies to performances of works (i.e. the thing which you perform must meet the originality criterion), but the performance itself doesn't need to be original in any way. I'm not sure why the politicians decided to make the performance right a related right since a performance could be 'original' or 'non-original', but that's the way they chose to do, so we will just have to accept that. I don't know whether your instructions to the computer to create this sound file constitute a 'performance' or not, but for the avoidance of doubt, it's good that you put the statement on the talk page.
Also note that the sound recordings and the performances typically have different copyright holders, and in the European Union and possibly elsewhere also different copyright terms. A few countries only seem to recognise one of the rights. For example, USA only seems to protect sound recordings but not performances. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept and deleted. I revision deleted the older versions that were non-free performance/sound recordings, but kept the public domain MIDI version created by wctaiwan. —RP88 (talk)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work of art is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}.

Clarissy. 22:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I hope the copying has been done. 4 weeks seems enough. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does'nt appears to be an original work. Some of the elements are available at this website on an earlier date. Please see the discussion on file's talk page Vssun (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I created the drawing using using this and exported. So many people are using the same software to draw pictures.And images will looks like same. That doesnt mean it was copied from the mentioned website. Bipinkdas (talk) 06:31, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the license of gliffy exports is compatible with commons, the file may be kept. Unfortunately I couldn't find any clear statement on license of such exports. --Vssun (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status FASTILY 23:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is already published at Stage32.com. Most likely to be a false claim of ownership. —Bill william comptonTalk 12:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about his other files File:Vinod Konaril Bharathan.jpg and File:Vinod Bharathan.JPG? Taivo (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 23:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WindowsXP is not free software 콩가루 (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't assure myself the program in that picture is Free software.--콩가루 (talk) 03:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped FASTILY 23:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment It is used on the uploader's user page on ENWP, that is allowed. But is it a copyvio? Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Keep. 16:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment He is running in upcoming elections and using his wikipedia user page for political propaganda. I am not sure if this is allowed. But I am almost sure, that a candidate has rights for his personal propaganda materials. Or if copyright belongs to his party, then his party agrees with that. So I think, that it is not copyvio. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Keep We want to have election posters and similar material, which means the image is very much in scope, even more so if he gets elected. Rights is another matter, but do we have reason to doubt? Using the Wikipedia page for campaigning is hardly allowed, but that does not turn the image less valuable. --LPfi (talk) 11:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY 23:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not simple geometry and there's not a source where you can check the permission. Donperfectodewiki (talk) 13:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is simple.  Keep Fry1989 eh? 19:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I am not able to produce such, so it is not simple. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: pd-simple FASTILY 23:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not simple geometry and there's not a source where you can check the permission. Donperfectodewiki (talk) 13:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is simple.  Keep Fry1989 eh? 19:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I am not able to produce such, so it is not simple. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: pd-simple FASTILY 23:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:07, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barford spent majority of his life in Canada. Connormah (talk | contribs) 17:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 23:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY 23:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unidentified person. Stefan4 (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: –⁠moogsi (blah) 03:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The poster is a russian work and the author died in 1946. Clarissy. 13:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • That was a part of government work: Russian Government official work and part of Soviet Union propaganda.
  • This is a state party propaganda posters of the Soviet Union, made in 1920. The specified worker or "possible author of the work" on a mission to the Communist Party and the Government at their workplace and this work is not covered by the law of copyright.
  • Это плакат государственной партийной пропаганды Советского Союза, изготовленный в 1920 году. Возможный и указанный с недавних пор человек выполнял задание правительства на своём рабочем месте и на данную работу не распространяется закон авторского права.

{{PD-RU-exempt|Russian Government official work - public domain}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherus (talk • contribs) 15:04, 28 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

You mix russian copyright law and U.S. copyright law. This work is not an official document of state government agencies or state symbol/sign. Template PD-RU-exempt is incorrect.
P.S. In 2012 you had used PD-Ukraine. After my nomination you has used PD-RU-exempt. Read WP:Gaming the system. Clarissy. 16:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
P.P.S. The file is marked as fair-use in russian Wikipedia. Clarissy. 16:27, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • На территории Украины этот плакат свободен к использованию, поэтому и стоит шаблон для Украины. Работа выполнялась именно в качестве государственного заказа и за зарплату, а не за гонорар. Автор не указан, но стоит псевдоним. Все работы, опубликованные до ВОВ без указания авторства своодны для использования и не защищены авторским правом. Какое отношение имеет указанная фирма, печатающая плакат сегодня, к автору? Якобы! имя автора появилось недавно и где гарантии, что это был тот человек, который указан под псевдонимом? Работа может быть использована с указанием авторства и без выплаты вознаграждения, что и делается.
  • A pseudonym but not real name of the author published in 1920 and the use of the poster did not violate copyright law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.59.64 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 28 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]
  • we can use the 'attribution' but was not author name for that form of art at that time and no more USSR also — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.59.64 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 28 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]
  • This poster of Soviet Propaganda (or - advertising billboard) was the public domain, also it was freely available and everywhere spread.
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ti_zapisalsya_dobrovolcem_1920_Moor.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.59.64 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 28 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

If the poster or other such work, from the beginning of the last century has been available as public domain, it can not be a particular license now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.59.64 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 28 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-old-auto-1923}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.59.64 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 28 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

This work was copyrighted in the RSFSR and is copyrighted in modern Russia. See Com:L#Interaction of United States copyright law and non-US copyright law and Com:Copyright rules by territory#Russia and former Soviet Union.
P.S. PD-Ukraine, PD-RU-exempt, PD-old-auto-1923, Attribution... Which template will be next? :-) Clarissy. 19:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Каждая страна имеет свои собственные законы, о которых здесь и сообщается шаблонами. Есть страны, где произведение под защитой закона об авторском праве лишь 5 лет: с момента обнародования изображения там, где этот закон распространяется. Выбор верного авторского права, это исключительная особенность авторов статей по различным странам. Однако, в данном случае: дата опубликования именно этого политического плаката - 1920 год. 1920+25=1945 или 1920+50=1970. По любой причине и в любом случае, срок защиты авторского права для данного плаката истёк, и, это произведение является общественным достоянием даже согласно закона Российской Федерации об авторском праве 1993 года.

И во всех случаях: Закон обратной силы не имеет.


Пост. ЦИКа и СНК СССР 30/I 1925 установило срок авторского права в 25 лет для каждого произведения в отдельности. По истечении 25 лет жизни произведения (а не жизни автора) права автора на это произведение истекали. Для наследников автора было введено еще второе ограничение: их право не могло существовать долее 15 лет после смерти автора, но это не касалось произведений общественного значения.

Если произведение получило общественное значение, благодаря которому оно уже не может рассматриваться как предмет частного права автора, государство может в принудительном порядке закрепить за собой право на воспроизведение и распространение произведения. Автор или его наследники получают от государства денежное вознаграждение. Порядок выкупа авторских прав установлен Основами 30/I 1925. Закон об авторском праве РСФСР от 11 октября 1927 кроме выкупа авторских прав устанавливал еще национализацию («переход в государственное достояние») произведений, имеющих государственное или общественное значение. В этом случае речь идет уже не о передаче (в принудительном порядке) автором государству признаваемых за автором прав, а об установлении монополии государства на издание произведений (или произведения) автора. Такая монополия может быть бессрочна. Она не связана со сроком существования авторского права и прекращается лишь по постановлению того органа, который имеет право ее устанавливать. В Основах 1925 и 1928 о признании произведений государственным достоянием упоминаний не имеется.

Сроки действия издательского договора и ставки авторского гонорара устанавливаются соглашением сторон, но не могут выйти из пределов, определенных законодательством союзных республик (25 лет жизни произведения).

Международная защита авторских прав может производиться лишь на основании особых соглашений Союза ССР с иностранными государствами и лишь в пределах таких соглашений. Условием признания авторского права является выход произведения в свет на территории СССР; поскольку произведение не появилось в свет — нахождение его на территории СССР в виде рукописи, эскиза или в иной объективной форме. Гражданство автора в этом отношении значения не имеет. Но если произведение появилось в свет (или находится) за границей, авторское право на это произведение признается нашим законодательством лишь в случае, когда автор состоит в гражданстве СССР, и лишь в отношении самого автора и его наследников, но не правопреемников.

Закон РФ от 9 июля 1993 г. N 5351-I "Об авторском праве и смежных правах", а на прямое цитирование: Закон Российской Федерации "Об авторском праве и смежных правах" применяется к отношениям по созданию, а также по использованию объектов авторского права и смежных прав, возникающим после введения в действие указанного Закона.

Сроки охраны прав, предусмотренные статьями 27 и 43 указанного Закона применяются во всех случаях, когда 50-летний срок действия авторского права или смежных прав не истек к 1 января 1993 года.

Авторское право юридических лиц, возникшее до введения в действие Закона 1993 г, прекращается по истечении 50 лет с момента правомерного обнародования произведения или создания произведения, если оно не было обнародовано.

Дата опубликования рассматриваемого произведения 1920 год. 1920+25=1945 или 1920+50=1970 В любом случае срок истёк и произдедение является общественным достоянием.


  • Each country has different own laws, which is reported here. Choosing the correct copyright, an exclusive feature of the authors of articles in different countries. However, in this case: the date of publication of this particular political poster - 1920 yr. 1920+25=1945 or 1920+50=1970. In any reason, the term of copyright protection has expired, and it work is the public domain.

I don't follow the above reasoning, which appears wrong to me. See Copyright in Russia and the various articles of that series. The main point is that since 1993, the old Soviet laws are basically moot. I arrive at the following conclusion:

  • In the U.S., this is clearly PD since it has been published before 1923.
  • In Russia, under the 1993 law, this got a copyright term of 50 years p.m.a.. Because Moor was active during the Great Patriotic War, his works got an extra 4 years of copyright protection and thus were copyrighted until the end of 2000 (54 years after the death of the author).
  • The changes in Russian copyright law in 2004 (extension from 50/54 to 70/74 years) had no effect on this work, since they applied only on works still copyrighted in 2004.
  • The new Russian copyright law of 2007 (Part IV of the Civil Code) changed that again: under Part IV of the Civil Code, the term extension from 50 to 70 years applies to all works that were still copyrighted under the 50 year term in 1993 (not 2004). So since 2008, the work is again copyrighted, until the end of 2020.

Therefore:  Delete; undelete in 2021. Lupo 16:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, that was also the outcome in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ti zapisalsya dobrovolcem 1920 Moor.svg. File can transferred as PD-1923-abroad to en-WP, if needed. Lupo 16:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: see my summary above; and previous outcomes. Lupo 16:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have learned today (after nomination of one of my images that there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. I am creating this one nomination to see if such assumption is correct or if there are other considerations. Thank you. Oleg (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are the copyrighted elements you are worried about in this image? I think the obvious work of art is commons:de minimis and the buildings might be old or non-original. But I know nothing about copyright law in Ukraine. --LPfi (talk) 10:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not worried about anything, but trying to clarify the rules. The image has three buildings all of which have authors that have died less than 70 years ago. In fact all of those three buildings are less that 70 years old (1, 2, 3). And a column with a statue was build in 2001. If it's commons:de minimis - great! Let's just clarify such rule in regards to Ukraine and then we can keep it and apply to other similar images as well). Thanks. Oleg (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Seems to meet DM FASTILY 20:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]