User talk:Barcex

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hola, borraste mi imagen por no poseer licencia adecuada pero yo envié un mail con esta al mail que indicaba cuando abrías la foto. No obstante si esta no sirve, sería tan amable de explicarme como puedo aplicarle una licencia correcta??. La imagen es de creación propia y tengo el permiso de el fotografíado para su difusión. Un saludo, feliz año y gracias de antemano!!!

Hello, I want to know why my own picture of South Carolina stathouse has been remove from wikimedia commons ? I could'nt find any explanations about that ... i'm sad.

Please be careful with logos. They could be trademarks => their usage restricted what is against Commons policies. See Commons:Licensing for details. --EugeneZelenko 14:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina Flag

[edit]

I would like to know why are you changing the colors of Image:Flag of Argentina.svg to the non-official colors? BarceX 20:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should provide summaries, otherwise people have to guess the motivation for your actions. My guess was that you changed little for no reason. ¦ Reisio 21:08, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

[edit]

Your account has been renamed. I suggest you register User:BarceX immediately, as a doppelganger account, to prevent anyone else from taking the name and impersonating you. User:dbenbenn 05:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen de Great / Gran Buenos Aires

[edit]

Disculpame, no me he fiajdo bien. --ALE! 21:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barcex!

I notice that you use Template:spanish, but as you can see, you should not use this template any more. You should do it like I have done it in this diff.

btw, I hope you will be admin soon :-)

Kjetil_r 21:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I saw that you have tagged several images of User:Federal Corps with the nsd-tag. I also saw that he has added the source of the images but I reckon that the licenses are not correct or in other words that the copyright holders did not release the images under a GNU FDL license. I have a similar problem with this user concerning an image of an old palace in Buenos Aires. The user claims that the image is PD-old. For me the image is fairly new. Maybe we should put a deletion request on all these images and maybe we should also think about having this user blocked. Regards. --ALE! 21:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hola!
Se trata del imagen Image:Buenos Aires Palacio Antiguo.jpg para cual yo he puesto ahora un "deletion request tag". No se si lo hace de mala o de buena fe, pero realmente not piensa en lo que hace. --ALE! 21:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hola! Las fotos que son aparentemente violaciones de copyright, he puesto en el proceso de "deletion request". Capaz podrias decir algo al respecto alli. Saludos! --ALE! 07:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tus fotos

[edit]

Mirá flaco, todas las images las saqué de http://www.mindef.gov.ar/ o http://www.ejercito.mil.ar/, si te interesa el copyright date una vuelta por ahí que de seguro vas a encontrarlas. Por lo demás te agredecería que tuvieras un poco más de respeto y dejaras de acusarme de violaciones, parece que el que tiene que informarse acerca de licencia sos vos. Actitudes como el de ALE! son sinceramente patéticas, quién se va a pensar que "lo hago de mala fe"??? Por mí borrá las imágenes, de última el que pierde sos vos. Federal Corps 23:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


About Fifa Images

[edit]

I've just source of those soccer related files.--Masoud 16:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

[edit]

Hello. Congratulations. You are now a Wikimedia Commons administrator and you now can place {{user admin}} on your user page. Don't loose the fun with these admin rights. ;-) If you have any questions for example on deletion guidelines just ask me (I am as well on IRC in #wikipedia-de oder #wikimedia-commons channel most of the time). By the way Category:Against policy needs urgently some help on reducing the number of copyvios awaiting their deletion. ;-) Have fun, Arnomane 00:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eso eso, a usar la escoba ;-) Sanbec 09:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulaciones! Si me hubiera enterado antes te votaba: Pero bueno, cualquier cosa, despues voy a poder decir "yo no lo voté!". Che, ponete algun cartelido de administrador en la pagina de usuario, no? Saludos, Mariano 11:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kawanishi H6K Type 97

[edit]

I didn't recall that I actually used the same image I requested for deletion in my own template Template:Info-Kawanishi H6K. Sorry for the mix up. You are correct the name of the file indicated two different planes. Guess I better get some sleep.... It's all straight now and put a correct image back in my template. Thanks. -Mak 09:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

obviously not from 802?

[edit]

you left a comment on the picture i uploaded: No source is given, the picture is obviously not from 802 AD

ok i forgot to put the source, but "obviously not from 802 AD"?? it says right there THE BRITISH ISLES ABOUT 802

Mijotoba 22:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frondizi

[edit]

Gracias por lo de la foto de Frondizi. La verdad, al minuto de subirla me pareció que no era correcto poner la fecha (cosa que hice de costumbre), pero no tuve tiempo de corregirla. —Pablo-flores 18:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A new tool to help with deletions: FYI

[edit]

it's called "Bad Old Ones". See e.g. [1]. I created a template, {{Delete assist}} which should be put on subcats of 'Unknown'. I just put it on the month-level ones, if you want to put it on day-level ones you're welcome to. It will just automatically create the link to Bad Old Ones for that category.

It's good if you want to delete "easy" cases that aren't being used anywhere. :) There's also a 'safe delete' option which creates a backup copy on the toolserver. However Brion is working on undeletion of images at the moment and it might be fixed permanently very soon!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion log summary

[edit]

Hello, and thanks for deleting “Herr_Th.png”. I do, however, attach importance to the fact that I am not a “her”. Never mind and keep yourself busy. — Holger Thölking 18:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Re:Firma

[edit]

He cambiado el código, mi amigo. Es algo que ya me habían dicho pero que creo que nunca hice (o nunca hice bien). Muchas gracias por consultar.--Orgullomoore 05:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Olympiastadion_Brasilien-Kroatien_01.jpg

[edit]
Before knowing about this: [2], I wanted anybody to be able to view/use/change/etc. this image. But I don't want to be sued by FIFA, so I had to restrict usage to noncommercial only. If that's not possible, then please go ahead and delete the files [3], and [4] ;-) Axt 07:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Equipo 1908 1.JPG

[edit]

Che, podes fijarte quien y porque borro File:Equipo 1908 1.JPG (foto de river del 1908), que de cajon tiene el copirait vencido? Se que existia porque la agregue yo a una pagina, pero no encuentro el registro do borrado en nungun lado. Gracias, Mariano 08:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie! No se porque la busqueda en el Log no me tiraba nada. Le deje un messagio a User:Thuresson al respecto, y me tome el atrevimiento de decirle que antes de borrar imagenes con {{PD-AR-Photo}} nos avise a mi a vos. Como es el asunto, ahora se pueden desborrar imagenes?? No sabia. En Commons solamente o en las otras WP tambien? Un abrazo, Mariano 11:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you delete this wonderful picture? As far as I remember they say, that they have the personal permission to use it. Maybe you give this photo another try. As I use it in the article Vladimir Luxuria I would try to help to confirm the licence. Ciao, -- AM 22:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@ÇÇÇÇÇ···――‽‽‽‽Tiefstellen 137.207.232.228 15:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons-l subscription

[edit]

Hello Barcex,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 22:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barcex. I saw your note on this image. Since the status seems to be uncertain, it is not a speedy case (unless you are certain, in which case I invite you to delete it directly). Feel free to raise the issue on COM:DEL. thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dudas sobre la licencia PD-AR-Photo

[edit]

Hola, me parece que la plantilla {PD-AR-Photo} tiene que decir claramente que se debe especificar la fuente donde la foto fue publicada por primera vez. Muchos están robando fotos de internet y como la ven antigua le aplican la licencia pero eso no asegura para nada que la foto tenga mas de 25 años de publicada. Me interesaría conocer tu opinión o saber a quién mas podemos consultar, gracias. --Martin Rizzo 13:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foto petinato

[edit]

El autor de una obra artística tiene derecho inmediato sobre el copyright, no tienen que aclararlo, el derecho le pertenece por la mera publicación o difusión de la obra; por lo tanto cualquier usuario de commons que suba fotos o archivos audiovisuales de un espectáculo artístico debe aclarar específicamente que los dueños del copyright han liberado sus derechos para que sea de dominio público en caso contrario es copyvio. Gracias y saludos --Martin Rizzo 23:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please reconsider your vote at Template:Deletion_requests#Image:Schematic_diagram_of_the_human_eye.png. Thanks! — Erin (talk) 04:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dvorak keyboard2.png listed for deletion

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Dvorak keyboard2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Erin (talk) 03:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news

[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news

[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)[reply]

Islandic road signs by User:Max Mikael Sonnelid

[edit]

Hi, I saw that you were the one who deleted the images of icelandic raoad signs described in User talk:Max Mikael Sonnelid#Please tag images. Although you were right in doing so (no license for 7 days) these images are actually free under the {{PD-Vegagerdin}} tag. Cheers /Lokal_Profil 22:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Didn't mean to critisise the deletion, was just wondering if it's the deleting admin or any admin who can restore the deleted images. /Lokal_Profil 12:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok the list is as follows
All of these images should depict Icelandic road signs and be tagged by {{PD-Vegagerdin}}. I don't know whether the image pages previously specified source but even if they don't I wouldn't think it's to important in this case since all of the images are clearly derivateve works of the original signs for which PD applies. The file names are themselves descriptive names (in Swedish) so once the files are up I can add on a description in english. /Lokal_Profil 13:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All tagged. I also found these two which I missed last time.
/Lokal_Profil 17:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Last two tagged, Many thanks /Lokal_Profil 17:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imagenes

[edit]

Hola, te pido ayuda en este tema ya que sos de habla castellana: en estos dias se borraron varias imagenes por Nilfanion porque no me habia llegado la licensia para usarlas. Hoy me llego y la mande por mail a permissions@wikimedia.org segun me solicito Alhen. Me comunique con Alhen pero ahora me habla en ingles en lugar de español, no se por que, pero bueno, la cuestion es que quisiera que se restituyan esas imagenes ya que no estoy seguro de tenerlas a todos para volver a subirlas. El mail con la autorizacion ya esa alla. Me podrias ayudar con esto? El que las saco de circulacion es Nilfanion, pero como el mail con el OK ya esta alla (contiene la licencia y autorizacion) yase podria retaurarlas. Muchas gracias. Saludos. --Fede5 04:11, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ekwu03

[edit]

My dear the references are under summary. Please reade better. I will therefore delete your tag, unless you have objections.

--Gruk 21:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


It seems we do not speak the same language. The author/owner of the pictures wrote in her mail: "i authorize any use of my > photos ...including uploading the photos to illustrate any wikipedia entry... " .

Please re state your objections in casec you still have one. Otherwise, your apologies are accepted.--Gruk 21:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are interested, the complete correspondence was as follows.

hello dear g. ruk... i authorize any use of my photos currently located at www.photosight.ru/ownpage.php?authorid=108571 (including uploading the photos to illustrate any wikipedia entry... you should use the caption "photo courtesy of www.ekwuinox.com" with every photo of mine picked by you... please provide me with the links on wikipedia articles with my photos used later... best regards, iris



> --- g.ruk1967@sapo.pt wrote: > > > Hi Iris, > > > > Many thanks for your mail. I have already uploaded a > > series of you wonderful > > pictures in wilipedia... and they were immediatley > > deleted. Thus was because in > > your mail (that I copied into wikipedia) you say you > > authorise the us of your > > pictures in the wikipedia. However, they are telling > > me (I should know) that > > you should specify that you authorise your picture > > for any use. > > > > I am looking forward for your reply. > > > > G Ruk > > > > Citando Iryna Nepomenko <ekwuinox@yahoo.co.uk>: > > > > > hello g. ruk... aha, i'm perfectly aware that > > > wikipedia is the open source with free editing... > > i > > > really doubt whether my photos could be a match to > > > brazilian waxing or any similar topic because > > thanks > > > the lord i have very few pubic hair and use just > > > regular razor shaving... anyway, you may use my > > photos > > > to illustrate a wikipedia entry... you should use > > the > > > caption "photo courtesy of www.ekwuinox.com" with > > > every photo of mine picked by you... i'd also like > > if > > > you provide me with the links on wikipedia > > articles > > > with my photos used later... best regards, iris > > > > > > > > > --- g.ruk1967@sapo.pt wrote: > > > > > > > Ms Iris Ekwuinox > > > > > > > > Sorry, apparently I missed your previous mail. > > Any > > > > picture uplodaded in > > > > Wikipedia can be used to illustrate any article. > > So > > > > even if I intend to use a > > > > picture of yours to illustrate article A, they > > can > > > > then be used by another > > > > Wikipedia editor to illustrate article B . > > > > > > > > You ask why I have chosen you. I do not know > > whether > > > > "to have chosen you " is > > > > the appropriate term. I was browsing looking for > > a > > > > nice picture to illustrate > > > > the article "Brazilian waxing", and I found your > > > > pictures in Photosight.ru. I > > > > found them very professional , much better than > > most > > > > nudes in other picture > > > > sites. There are several other articles that > > could > > > > gain in being illustrated > > > > with your pictures, such bikini, beauty, face, > > > > naturism, etc. > > > > > > > > I am looking forward for your mail confirming I > > can > > > > use your pictures in > > > > Wikipedia. Please tell whether you wish your > > name > > > > and the photographer to be > > > > mentioned. > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > GR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Citando <ekwuinox@yahoo.co.uk>: > > > > > > > > > hello g. ruk... i've already replied your > > mail > > > > on > > > > > october 13... it said > > > > > > > > > > "hello g ruk... this is probably a great > > > > idea... > > > > > but could you please answer these simple > > questions > > > > > first... why you've chosen me, what the > > article > > > > > (entry) will be about, what photos you'd like > > to > > > > pick > > > > > and upload to wikipedia... best, iris " > > > > > > > > > > strange, you haven't got it... this is the > > second > > > > > try... talk to you, iris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- g.ruk1967@sapo.pt wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms Ekwuinox > > > > > > > > > > > > I have not yet got a reply from you. I would > > > > > > certainly appreciate you could give > > > > > > me the authorisation to upload your pictures > > in > > > > > > Wikipedia. > > > > > > As I told you, if you wish, I can either > > give > > > > you > > > > > > credits and refer your name > > > > > > (or of your photographer or both), or omit > > > > names. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance and I am looking forward > > for > > > > your > > > > > > answer, > > > > > > > > > > > > G Ruk > >

Hope this is useful. Please confirm.--Gruk 21:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Ok. Thanks for your attention. Viva es:Francisco Franco caudillo de Espana por la gracia de Dios.--Gruk 21:59, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consulta

[edit]

Hola Barcex, soy nuevo en commons (hace un tiempo estoy en la wiki en español), y tengo algunas dudas.

No estoy seguro a quien recurrir, asi que navegando llegue a [[5]] y alli encontre dos nombres con el es delante, el tuyo y el de Dodo, asi que les deje el mismo mensaje a los dos (si se conocen tal vez puedan arreglar si alguno me contesta porque conoce mas del tema).

Estoy interesado en conocer un poco el tema de subir imagenes, es decir, se como subirlas, pero no estoy muy al tanto del tema de las licencias. Lei todo lo que encontre pero me maree un poco.

En mi caso tengo fotos para subir relacionadas a un club, que las saque de un fansite del club (el webmaster del fansite es el dueño de la autoria), y no tendria problemas en conseguir su autorizacion para usarlas.

¿Luego que debo hacer? Se que tengo que subirlas y poner algunas cosas en la pagina de la imagen pero no estoy seguro que. ¿Que info debo agregar? Y mas que nada, ¿cual es la licencia que debe figurar?

La imagenes las armo el webmaster de este sitio, le escribi para preguntarle si puedo usarlas y me dio su ok.

Aguardo respuesta cuando puedas, sino tal vez me puedas orientar a quien consultar.

Saludos y muchas gracias. --The Edge 19:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hola, muchas gracias por la info que me pasaste, la voy a tener en cuenta para subir las fotos. Te agradezco la ayuda, cualquier otra duda te consulto.
Saludos y gracias nuevamente.
--The Edge 17:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hola Barcex, estoy de regreso.
Me demore un largo tiempo, porque fue lo que me tomo escribirme con los dueños de las imagenes que tengo en mente subir + conseguir su autorizacion e investigar con detalle.
Ya estoy en condiciones de subir las imagenes (mi idea es bajo licencia GDFL.
Si ese es el proximo paso (ademas de incluir por supuesto en la pagina de las imagenes el link y el mail donde verificar con el dueño), te solicito me des el OK.
Saludos y muchas gracias.
The Edge 02:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leyendo de Commons y es:, también la embarré

[edit]

Hola Barcex. Justo estaba leyendo la lista de correo y viendo los problemas de Commons con es: y todo lo demás, mientras agregaba problemas. Existen Image:IglesiaDalcahue.jpg e Image:IglesiaAchao.jpg, que en realidad son Image:Iglesia de Achao.jpg e Image:Iglesia de Chonchi.jpg, pero Pedrebol tuvo un lapsus al subirlas, ya se lo señalé en wikipedia y me respondió positivamente. Para solucionar el problema, propuse para borrado ambas imágenes con {{delete}} y luego me enteré en la lista de correo que corresponde un borrado rápido, en este caso con {{badname}}. Cambié el aviso en las fotos, pero las peticiones de borrado regular permanecen aquí y aquí. ¿Puedes ayudarme? Saludos y gracias. --Lin linao ¿dime? 19:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC) w:es:Usuario:Lin linao PS: Por cierto, ¿dónde está la discusión en Commons acerca de todo el problema con la basura de es:wp?. No la he podido encontrar, para ver de primera mano qué es lo que se dice y ver si uno de estos días lanzo mi candidatura :).[reply]

Admins

[edit]

Hi. I think it would be helpful if you, as an experienced Spanish admin, would help acquaint Loco085 and maybe 555 with different aspects of Commons. For example with different templates, messages, the deletion request, categories, etc. If you have the time? Perhaps I should also ask Platonides? / Fred Chess 21:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


So you are from Argentina? Ok, I'll be more careful and not write "Spanish users"... :-)

Here is some places that Spanish speaking admins might want to watch

Another pages that might be interesting is Commons:Help page maintenance

If I can think of more pages, I'll inform you....

Thanks for the assistance Fred Chess 11:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comentario

[edit]

Hola Barcex, te he dejado un mensaje arriba en la seccion "Consulta". Saludos. [[User:The Edge|The Edge [[Image:Flag of Argentina.svg|15px]]]] 18:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hola nuevamente, muchas gracias por la info! Me pondré en campaña para subrilas con la info solicitada. Saludos y gracias. The Edge 19:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jelp

[edit]

Che, no me conecte por un tiempo a commons, y me borraron un par de fotos mias, de las primeras que subi, a las que no les habia puesto el tag apropiado de licencia. Me las podras desborrar? son Image:Chubut-PeninsulaValdes-SeaElephants-P2230757b-closeup.jpg y Image:Chubut-PuntaTombo-P2220157b-small.jpg (si lo copie mal, fijate en mi talk page). Te ruego ademas que me peques un chiflido en en:User talk:Marianocecowski. Muchas gracias, y disculpame el inconveniente. Un abrazo, Mariano 12:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias, troesma! Mariano 12:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:C M4a1.jpg

[edit]

Regarding

File:C M4a1.jpg

. Because there is no popup choice to say it is not mine but release under PD. I cannot say it is mine because I do not create it. It was created by ms:Pengguna:Rizuan. Yosri 00:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images not created by me. It is dumb to expect me to declare I create it just because it say so in popup choice, since I just copy over PD images from other Wiki. Next time I just copy over to Wikipedia Melayu. Yosri 10:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just realize also, it is not wise using Common media if the images are going too disappeared. Better to copy. Yosri 10:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Necesito ayuda

[edit]

Hola, Barcex. Me explico. Marcaste un par de fotos que subí para ser borradas. Me gustaría encontrar la forma de que no se eliminaran arreglando el tema de las licencias. Pero el problema es que no sé qué tipo de licencia se les puede colocar.

  • Una es un escudo municipal, eso no es propiedad de nadie. Por eso no entiendo por qué no se puede poner como libre.
  • Por otro lado subí una foto de Arno Breker. La foto es de 1976 pero dice que es de una cámara digital porque era la única forma que tenía de digitalizarla. La foto es efectivamente de esa época, y aparecía en la portada de un libro algo posterior. Consideré que el copyright quizá hubiera expirado, y si te digo la verdad, el libro en sí hoy ya no se publica por hablar bien de este personaje, ya se sabe... El libro no es español, creo recordar que era americano, en breve lo podré mirar, ahora no dispongo de él. ¿Hay algún tipo de licencia para estas cosas?

El principal problema de este sitio es que se ve atado por las leyes en muchos casos absurdas. Gente que con buena voluntad mete fotos se desespera al ver que son borradas una y otra vez. Yo no me enfado con nadie por que me hagan eso (estoy muy acostumbrado a borrar páginas en la wiki que escriben novatos sobre cosas sin relevancia), pero me gustaría encontrar la forma de que esto no ocurriera más. ¿Si hago una foto yo mismo a un lugar público como una iglesia, qué licencia le debo endosar?

Saludos, Ilfirin 19:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por tu tiempo. Al de la foto de Breker es imposible contactarle, aunque sé el nombre, ni idea de su localización, y es francés, seguramente anciano ya. Lo del escudo, sé quién hizo esa versión (es un señor del pueblo en cuestión, le conocía, vivo allí), pero el problema es que ya no está con nosotros. Así que nada. Muchas gracias por el consejo para las fotos propias. Por supuesto, sé que no tiene nada que ver con novatos, sólo ponía el símil. A ver si puedo colgar fotos propias. Pero hay que reconocer que a veces este tema de no poder hacer fair use nos jode un poco en la wiki española, respecto a la inglesa. Pero bueno, c'est la vie. Saludos, Ilfirin 00:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pero algo así implicaría a en:wiki a borrar cientos de sus imágenes de fair use, ¿no?. Intentaré ver qué puedo hacer, me informaré y compararé. Gracias por todo. Intentaré seguir las normas de libertad de contenido aquí. Saludos, Ilfirin 08:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MAP0001

[edit]

Please undo deletion of this photo of Harriet Quimby who died 1912 . It is kept from www.fabrics.net/ colpics/gia/MAP0001.jpg. Drabel 11:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, soy ary29 de la Wikipedia en italiano. He descubierto che esa imagen fue elaborada por Hill, un usuario de it.wiki, desde al archivo original Image:Mexico.Chis.EZLN.01.jpg. Ahora que hemos comprobabado el origen de la imagen y quienes son los autores (el usuario que tomó la foto, y luego Hill que la elaboró), ¿puedes recuperarla? Muchas gracias de antemano, Ary29 13:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He añadido el Template:Information. ¡Muchísimas gracias por tu rapidez desde it.wiki! Ary29 14:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


bandera uruguaya

[edit]

hola, tengo un problema de derechos con el sol de la bandera argentina que use para una bandera uruguaya historica. Como es una imagen de wiki, no entendi como confirmar los derechos del autor. Que tengo que poner al subirlo a commons para respetar los derechos del creador? si me lo explicas, lo usare en las proximas contribuciones. Hay un escudo historico de paraguay que lo hice sobre la base del actual, modificandolo para restablecerlo a su diseño antiguo. tambien podria usar la misma aclaracion que el de sol de mayo. Desde ya, gracias, y disculpa las molestias. --Pruxo 07:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)pruxo[reply]

Kamui99

[edit]

Respecto al comentario que has dejado en el archivo del noticeboard, ¿es correcto? ¿No debe "resucitarse" la conversación?

Por otra parte, te dejaste la evidencia más clara: en las dos últimas imágenes que subió a Flickr, se hizo el loco y dijo que le dio vergüenza preguntar sus nombres a las chicas (de suerte que algún despistado incluso le aclaró el nombre de una), pero las imágenes originales, sin recortar ni rotar ni escalar, están aquí. Juju. --Dodo 19:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eoin Colfer

[edit]

Hola, Barcex. Tengo un problemita con una imagen, y me dijeron que hablara contigo.

Se trata de que subí una imagen de Eoin Colfer que se encontraba almacenada en Wikipedia Inglés, pero al momento de indicar la licencia, no supe cual era la indicada.

Tampoco sé muy bien cual es el código que hay que agregar para indicar la licencia una vez que ya subí la imagen.

Espero puedas ayudarme. Muchas gracias, --Maxisi 20:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consulta

[edit]

Hola Barcex! Tengo una consulta. Generalmente traduzco al español las leyendas que llevan las fotos del día, pero ahora me encuentro que algo cambió y no se cómo hacerlo. Por ejemplo, en la página Template:Potd/2007-06, antes presionaba la pestaña "editar" y aparecían como enlaces en rojo las plantillas que estaban sin traducción, pero ahora veo que sólo aparecen las que están en azul, ¿cómo hago para ver las que corresponden al español, que para el mes de junio en su mayoría deberían estar en rojo? ¿o dónde las puedo encontrar para poder editarlas? Espero haber sido clara. Saludos, --Dianai 13:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por tu respuesta. Saludos, --Dianai 12:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USB to PS2 mouse adapter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boeing 737-522 - Smart Wings - OK-SWU - LEMD -20050410140058b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Descripción

[edit]

Hola Barcex! ¿Es correcta la descripción en inglés que tiene la siguienhte imagen? (Template talk:Potd/Month/full#19 Me parece que no debería ir el autor de la foto, no he visto nunca otra descripción hecha de esa forma. Saludos, --Dianai 12:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Buenos_Aires-Plaza_Congreso-Pensador_de_Rodin.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 12:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Usser blocked

[edit]

Hola amigo nesesito discutir mi bloqueo Mi cuenta ruben_bardales85 esta bloqueada con el identificador de bloqueo #6813 y IP 190.6.194.161 Sin embargo no hay una razon espesificada, solo dice de motivo "bye bye", lo que parece realmente ofensivo y contraproducente a las normas de etiqueda que deberian guardarse en wikimedia.

Posiblemente si haya comentido alguna falta a las politicas de wikimedia commmons, y me disculpo por ello. Por la misma razon quiero discutir las razones de mi bloqueo.

Contacte al administrador Siebrand y le pregunte cual era la razon de mi bloqueo a lo cual me contesto

Your upload of Esvastica y lineas azules.png was the reason for the ban. Siebrand 05:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lo cual no es una razon valida o aceptable.

Esperaba alguna respuesta como;

El archivo Esvastica y lineas azules.png viola las politicas de wikimedia commnos, por las siguientes razones
*
*
* ...???

Creo sin pasar a megalomania que el bloqueo de mi cuenta es injustificado.

Duda sobre imagen de Flickr

[edit]

Hola Barcex, resulta que en Flickr me he encontrado esta imagen de Wanda Nara y quería saber si se la puede subir a Commons para ilustrar el articulo que hay sobre ella en Wikipedia en español. Es que no se que hacer con este tipo de imágenes ya que, al parecer, las imágenes de Flickr se pueden subir a Commons, pero, necesitan ser verificadas por un administrador. Si me podes decir como subir esta imagen (si es posible) o si podes hacerle las verificaciones correspondientes, me ayudarías mucho. Gracias de antemano. --Swicher 08:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, resulta que quería ver si se podía subir esa imagen para reemplazar la imagen Image:Wandanara.jpg que tenia copyright y que la había subido el usuario Guillexxxramos, pero, que fue borrada por Drini. Otra cosa, ¿no podrías explicarme cual es el procedimiento para subir imágenes de Flickr o decirme en donde dice como hacerlo (por si algún día me llego a encontrar alguna imagen con licencia libre que quiera subir a Commons)?. Por cierto, he visto que Guillexxxramos ha subido imágenes sin especificar el origen ni la licencia que tiene. Una de sus imágenes es esta, que he encontrado de donde proviene y he dejado un mensaje en la pagina de discusión de la imagen avisando al respecto, me gustaría que revises eso. Gracias. --Swicher 21:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos de las vacaciones

[edit]

Hola Barcex, qué tal va todo... Espero que bien, acabo de regresar de vacaciones con mi familia y me he encontrado el ambiente de la wiki algo crispado... Enfín, que me ha parecido un buen momento para subir a Commons algunas fotos que he hecho en Italia y de las que he visto carece. He empezado con una del Palacio Ducal de Lucca (Lucca_PalazzoDucale.jpg), pero al utilizar el nuevo interfaz de subida veo que para que se considere propio tienen que ser fotos de paisajes o gente en actos públicos, y que se excluyen claramente obras de arte. Bueno, ¿eso incluye edificios? Pone que estatuas, pero no sé si también las que están en la calle, tipo "Garibaldi" o "Puccini". ¿Y las obras antiguas de algún museo en el que está autorizado fotografiar? Bueno, todo por no darme la paliza en balde, y subir sólo aquello que sea legal... Bueno, saludos.Robespierre 14:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AverMedia RM-RH Remote control (white background) edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LAPA_3142_Approximate_flight_path.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 06:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

imagenes de la página web del Presidente de la Argentina

[edit]

Hola Barcex, me gustaría subir una imagen de la página web del Presidente de la Argentina, pero no entiendo la situación legal. Como he visto que has subido el Image:Néstor Kirchner-Retiro Retrato Bignone-Buenos Aires-Marzo 2004.jpg, ¿probablemente sabés más? Podrías explicarmelo... ¿están todas las imagenes de la página licenciadas "Creative Commons Attribution 2.0"? Si lo están, ¿hay una página que so puede citar por eso? O ¿es necesario obtener la permisión para cada imagen? Gracias, Ibn Battuta 06:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mis mocos

[edit]

Tenés razón con respecto a los mocos que me mandé. Muchas gracias. (Ayer a la noche reemplacé el de la SIGEN pues la anterior foto no mostraba el reloj, que lo habían desmontado para hacerlo andar, después de ...¡22 años!

Sí, tengo el google Earth, pero no lo uso mucho. ¿Mis fotos están apareciendo ahí? Después miro, me tengo que ir a votar por un Pino que está solo. ; )

¿Cómo es lo de las coordenadas? es decir: ¿hay un método rápido para buscarla y pegarla?

Me voy, che, que el clima desmejora, climática y políticamente. ; (.

--Roberto Fiadone 14:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Gracias mil por ahorrarme el trabajo de poner la referencia geográfica y por categorizar mejor las fotos que bajo (tengo unas muy buenas del Palacio de la legislatura de la Ciudad de Bs. As. ¡pero no tengo tiempo de bajarlas! Idem para la Manzana de las Luces. Es que desde el 9º piso del INDEC se obtienen fotos interesantes de la zona...
--Roberto Fiadone 00:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Foto de un cartel publicitario

[edit]

Hola Barcex

Tengo una foto sacada muuuuy de cerca de un cartel publicitario que dice pizzería Las Cuartetas. El cartel está en la vía pública (av. Corrientes), pero al estar tomado de cerca y al recortarla, no se nota que sea así.

¿Hay algún problema? ¿El que sea propaganda y no quede claro en la foto en sí, que el cartel está en la calle, importa?

Tengo una linda ideíta con respecto a como usar ese cartel, por eso sería bueno bajarla : ) .

Gracias una vez más ( y van....)

--Roberto Fiadone 23:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Era como me imaginaba. Que pena. No va entonces. :( --Roberto Fiadone 15:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong country

[edit]

Regarding this edit Buenos Aires is the capital of Argentina :) Barcex 21:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh! I must have been really absentminded! Not only I know that but I mustn't do that kind of mistakes after my geography studies! I can't help but being ashamed even if it was some thoughtlessness (errare human est!)... Sorry for that! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
Esta imagen puede ser borrada.

Gracias por subir Image:Buenos Aires - Avenida de Mayo - Palacio Barolo - Interior (b).jpg. Me he dado cuenta de que la página de la imagen actualmente no especifica quién creó el contenido, así que el estatus del derecho de autor no está claro. Si no has creado tú mismo esta imagen, entonces es necesario que argumentes por qué la imagen se puede usar en Wikimedia Commons (ver el enlace de etiquetas de derecho de autor abajo); también debes especificar dónde la encontraste; por ejemplo, en la mayoría de los casos, un enlace a la web de donde la tomaste y los términos de uso del contenido de esa web.

Si la imagen no tiene una etiqueta de derecho de autor también debes añadírsela. Si tú creaste la imagen, entonces te recomendamos usar {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} para licenciarla con la GFDL y todas las versiones de la Creative Commons CC-BY-SA. Puedes mirar Marcas de derechos de autor para la lista completa de etiquetas que se pueden usar.

Ten en cuenta que cualquier imagen sin fuente o sin etiqueta será borrada una semana después de que haya sido subida, como se describe en criterios para borrado rápido. Si has subido otras imágenes, por favor, comprueba que has especificado también sus orígenes y sus etiquetas de derecho de autor. Puedes encontrar todas los archivos que has subido usando la herramienta Gallery. Gracias. Patstuart (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

¡Oia!

[edit]

Barcex...¿¿¿qué es esto???

--Roberto Fiadone 14:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Change

[edit]

Hi. Please change my nickname from Tramman to Prasuk historyk, because I want one nick in all wikia. Pawel Tramman 16:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Subterráneos de Buenos Aires - Antiguo logo.svg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Dodo 11:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misterio en las sierras de Famatina

[edit]

Che Barcex, cuando bajé esta foto:

resulta que al editar copié y pegué; y le coloqué erroneamente la geocodificación de esta foto:

Al minuto de darme cuenta entré al editor y borré esa geocodificación, de manera que teóricamente ya no está, no hay ninguna. Pero si entrás al google earth aparecen las dos en el mismo punto, como si el borrado de la geocodificación de la primera no hubiese surtido efecto. : P

No sé porqué ocurre, pero se me ocurre que tal vez se subsanaría si vos lo geocodificaras correctamente.

--Roberto Fiadone 22:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Fallas

[edit]

son todas del año 2006. si necesitas algun dato más no dudes en preguntarmelo.. gracias por tu interés --Silvestre 12:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fiebre Amarilla

[edit]

¿Está bien lo que puse?

--Roberto Fiadone 22:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC) (el molesto de siempre) : P[reply]

muchas gracias

[edit]

Muchas gracias por los consejos, respecto de la foto del cartel considero que no es ni una publicidad ni tampoco algo que tenga Copyright, tan sólo un cartel indicativo en un lugar de acceso público.--Gabrielsus 16:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Detalle

[edit]

También se puede observar en el cartel en el ángulo inferior derecho la leyenda "A+BA", la misma de alguna manera era durante la gestión de Telerman una identificación del G.C.B.A., no cabe duda que ese cartel indicativo fue creado por el Gobierno, si bien la AAT es una organización privada sin fines de lucro; al recorrer un espacio público tiene regulaciones del Gobierno, por otra parte los tranvías hace rato que son de interés turístico para la ciudad; en pocas palabras no es más que un cartel indicativo colocado por el gobierno local y no una obra de arte. Considero que mi reacción fue equivocada, lo admito, entendí mal algunas cosas; pero de ninguna manera puedo aprobar que de entrada se quiera eliminar un archivo sin antes utilizar otras instancias como la discución.--Gabrielsus 13:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FOTOS AAT

[edit]

Te reenví este mail de la AAT, con esto el tema debería quedar cerrado

From: Asociación Amigos del Tranvía To: Gabriel Sus Cc: aquitram@fibertel.com.ar ; gafamata@yahoo.com.ar Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 9:51 PM Subject: RE: consulta


Estimado Gabriel, Ante todo, muchas gracias por contactarte con nosotros! Y desde ya te aclaramos que no hay absolutamente ningún problema legal, desde el momento en que usaste tus fotografías de nuestro Tramway Histórico para colaborar con nosotros, merced a la gran mano que nos diste al subir en Wikipedia y complementar nuestro artículo. Quienes estamos agradecidos somos nosotros. Y sabé que nos tomamos una licencia, porque copiamos una de tus fotos y la pegamos en la definición de "tranvía" de Wikipedia. Por supuesto que nuestros abogados se ponen en guardia cuando la imagen de nuestro Tranvía es usada en beneficio de alguien sin nuestra autorización, pero en este caso, está más que disculpado, como dijimos recién... Agradecidos! Justamente hace tiempo que queremos subir a la Página de Wikipedia dedicada a la Asociación nuestro EMBLEMA, pero quien te escribe es medio torpe para esas cosas, y quizá nos podrías dar una ayuda en subirla tu. Si es así, te mandaremos el archivo del monograma y desde ya agradecidos por tu colaboración. Te esperamos entonces cuando gustes por nuestro "Tramway", o nuestra Sede Social y Biblioteca Popular Recibi de nuestra parte el más cálido abrazo. Atentamente, Ernesto Falzone Secretario Asociación Amigos del Tranvía y Biblioteca Popular Federico Lacroze




From: gabrielsus@datafull.com To: info@tranvia.org.ar; aatranvia@hotmail.com Subject: consulta Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 16:08:07 -0300


El motivo de mi consulta es el siguiente: durante el año pasado asistí a un evento de vuestra organización en el cual tomé algunas fotos, parte de ellas las coloqué en Wikipedia en el artículo que hace una descripción de la Asociación de Amigos del Tranvía y otras también aparecieron en uno de los boletines electrónicos más importantes de Argentina en materia ferroviaria: Crónica Ferroviaria; lamentablemente antes de hacerlo omití preguntar a ustedes si podía haber algún inconveniente legal en tomar fotografías de vuestras unidades y publicarlas; si es así les pido disculpas por no haber consultado el tema con la debida antelación. Acá les envío los vínculos de donde observar las fotos. Ante cualquier inconveniente estoy vuestra entera disposición.

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asociaci%C3%B3n_Amigos_del_Tranv%C3%ADa http://www.cronicaferroviaria.com/boletines/boletin10032008/boletin.html


Saludos cordiales Gabriel Julián Sus



Sospechosa foto de Palermo

[edit]

Hola Barcex: recurro a vos porque me parece sospechosa una foto de Palermo (esta), que Leoncio dice haberla sacado personalmente, pero sin datos sobre fecha, lugar, ni circunstancia. Habría que pedirle que ratifique que la haya sacado él y que dé esos detalles faltantes para corroborar. Te lo pido a vos porque no se bien que plantilla y procedimiento se utiliza. Te mando un gran abrazo,--Roblespepe 05:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barcex, me parece que esta foto File:Salta - Viaducto La Polvorilla.jpg que quitaron por tener mal la licencia era mía. ¿Se puede saber cual era el problema y reponerla?

Viaducto la Polvorilla

[edit]

Barcex, me parece que esta foto File:Salta - Viaducto La Polvorilla.jpg que quitaron por tener mal la licencia era mía. ¿Se puede saber cual era el problema y reponerla?


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Boeing_737-204C_-_TAT_-_F-GGPB_(1990).jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aeroparque_Jorge_Newberry-Overview_(by_Darío_Crusafón).jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Boeing_737-204C_-_LAPA_-_LV-WRZ_(1998).jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category Buenos Aires

[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:AutomovilClubArgentino.JPG&direction=next&oldid=9978988 isnt Palermo, its Recoleta.

Fuente Monumental Las Nereidas

[edit]

Hola Barcex, estoy terminando un artículo sobre la fuente "de Lola Mora". Aproveché para ello una foto que vos bajaste de flickr, muy buena. Pero quería bajar alguna otra, sobretodo alguna que mostrara la fuente completa, y resulta que no encuentro nada sin derechos, que sea bajable. Lo más cercano es esta que entiendo que tampoco se puede bajar. ¿alguna idea de donde puedo obtener alguna? ¿O tengo que ir a sacarla? : (

Gracias. --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 00:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duda sobre licencia de imágenes de "cuadros PD-old"

[edit]

Hola Barcex, si me haces el favor te agradecería que me aclarases una duda sobre licencias, ya que tenemos discrepancia de opinión al respecto dos usuarios y me gustaría que nos sacarás del error a quien pudiera no estar acertado en su interpretación. Me dirijo a ti simplemente por ser un administrador en Commons de los de lengua española, por lo que como administrador estarás familiarizado con estas cuestiones, y porque he visto que todavía no andas de vacaciones. La duda es relativa a la licencia de "dominio público" de las "imágenes sobre obras", en concreto cuadros, que ya están a su vez en dominio público. Las dos opiniones son las siguientes:

  • el archivo que has subido…, me guio por el sumario, es de un cuadro… de 1909, así pues está en dominio público, ya que el autor falleció en 1930. No obstante, la imagen es una foto del cuadro, luego la licencia se ha de aplicar también a la foto. En general cuando veo que el usuario que sube la imagen indica la licencia {{PD}} doy por sentado que la foto es suya; pero en tu caso indicas que la foto es del propio "autor" de 1909, ya que en aquella época la fotografía no era en color, como ahora, pienso que quizá los datos de fecha y autor del sumario se refieran al cuadro, no a la foto. Por ello entré en la fuente, ya que pudiera ser que la foto subida esté en su origen con licencia compatible y, lamentablemente, está allí bajo copyright de…, quien se reserva todos los derechos de propiedad intelectual. Puede ser que la foto haya sido hecha por ti, en ese caso es el sumario lo que habría que corregir. Acláramelo, por favor, pues me temo que habría que borrarla.
  • Este tipo de fotos, las fotos de cuadros me refiero, no están sujetas a esta legislación, ya que ellas mismas son reproducciones de la obra original, es decir, el cuadro, el cual se halla en dominio público. Que la foto de una reproducción sin copyright pudiera tenerlo, supondría que fuera considerada como una obra original y eso sería plagio, lo cual va en contra de la propia legislación. Para que pudiera aplicarle el copyright, debería haber algún tipo de modificación notable (como, por ejemplo, el cuadro de la monalisa de Leonardo y el de la monalisa de Duchamp o Warhol; siendo variaciones, son en sí mismas obras originales), con lo cual se podría considerar como una obra distinta a la que reproduce. En Wikipedia y Wikimedia.commons tienes muchos ejemplos de ello. Esto, incluso, se podría hacer extensivo a la escultura e incluso arquitectura, ya que igualmente son reproducciones de obras en dominio público, si bien el componente más subjetivo de estos artes -encuadres, luces, etc...- hace que sea más complicado y por ello, no se suelen usar. Siguiendo esta lógica, los datos de la imagen corresponden al cuadro, no a la fotografía, y así queda reflejado al poner la fuente.

Si no te importa contéstame en tu propia página para que le pueda indicar el enlace al otro colega y podamos leer ambos tu respuesta a esta duda. Disculpa las molestias y gracias por anticipado. Recibe un cordial saludo.--Jatrobat (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Facades in Buenos Aires

[edit]

¿Cuál es la idea de crear Category:Facades in Buenos Aires? O_O --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah! No me des pelota. Ya entiendo. --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Esta imagen es {{Pd-ineligible}} porque solo tiene letras en una fuente sencilla. Por favor reemplazala o voy a pedir en COM:UDEL. -Nard the Bard 15:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SOS UN ZARPADO

[edit]

chabon , me borraste TODAS las fotos que subi , algunas por copyvio y otras sin razon aparente cuando estaban perfectamente taggeadas?

parece que la unica diversion que tienen en esta comunidad es deletear imagenes que sube gente que REALMENTE quiere aportar a la wikipedia haciendo MEJORAR los articulos y lo unico que logran en una actitud totalmente FUNDAMENTALISTA es desanimar a escribir y colaborar , igualmente vos no tenes la culpa sino la politica extremista de wikimedia que me hace acordar mucho a un presidente del norte de cierto continente americano. PORTAZO. soy user:militancia deslogueado , aunque no se si tengo ganas ahora de seguir siendo parte de esta comunidad.--201.255.109.128 23:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:JR_Riquelme.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

abf /talk to me/ 19:03, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! Una pregunta, ¿sabés en qué quedó esto? no me respondieron más y la plantilla de borrado sigue ahí. Saludos. Sking (talk) 11:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Estampillas-Argentina-Encotel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 02:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Operadoras-Museo-Telecomunicaciones-Madrid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

wL <speak·creatively> 14:05, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto de Buenos Aires

[edit]

Increible: no encuentro una foto digna del Puerto de Buenos Aires. Hasta en Commons le damos la espalda. Todas se remiten a Puerto Madero o La Boca, y en la de la usina se lo ve muy de lejos.

Fijate si tenés más suerte o si podés obtener alguna.

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 21:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PD: Che, como se te enojó el anónimo de más arriba.  : P

Foto de menor de edad y esfera de piedra

[edit]

Ya le hice estos pedidos a Loco085, pero no está activo ultimamente:

1) Entiendo que esta imagen debe ser borrada:File:Federico Quiroga.jpg

2)¿Esto vale File:Esfera piedra.jpg  ?


Saludos.

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Arg-airforce-OFD.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arg-airforce-OFD.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arg-airforce-OFD.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ChristianBier (talk) 22:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Arg-airforce-OF9.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arg-airforce-OF9.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arg-airforce-OF9.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ChristianBier (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Arg-airforce-OF8.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arg-airforce-OF8.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arg-airforce-OF8.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ChristianBier (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Arg-airforce-OF7.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arg-airforce-OF7.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arg-airforce-OF7.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ChristianBier (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Arg-airforce-OF3.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arg-airforce-OF3.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arg-airforce-OF3.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ChristianBier (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Arg-airforce-OF1a.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arg-airforce-OF1a.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arg-airforce-OF1a.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ChristianBier (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Arg-airforce-OF4.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arg-airforce-OF4.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arg-airforce-OF4.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

ChristianBier (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

San Marcos Sierras

[edit]

Porfa, borra la categoría: Category:San Marcos Sierra (Argentina)

Gracias.

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 15:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sealand_fortress.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ALE! ¿…? 07:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeje

[edit]

Y Rubocrosita.jpg es en realidad una rodocrosita, ahi veo como arreglo, saludos!!! Ezarate (talk) 22:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC) listo, podes borrar las incorrectas, otro día con ganas sigo subiendo, saludos!!!Ezarate (talk) 23:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tren del Este

[edit]

Hey Barcex, como estas, mira, agregastes una categoria: «Category:Tren del Este, Buenos Aires», pero esto no es un tren sino un tranvia, y ya que es conocido como Tranvía del Este, y a nivel de publicaciones urbanísticas a nivel internacional como el Puerto Madero Tramway, porque agregarle un tercer nombre, no seria mas apropiado Tranvía del Este. saludos —Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 02:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

test

[edit]

TUSC token 13e9d059c9ef2e1327053c80adba997a

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Imagen de Caras y Caretas

[edit]

Hola Barcex, acudo a ti por recomendación de la administradora Cookie, ya que ella no sabe mucho de leyes argentinas. Te transcribo mi duda, la cual plasmé en su discusión:

Hola Anna, espero que estés bien. Mi nueva duda surge por una imagen de la tapa de la revista Caras y Caretas, que requeriría para el artículo de Domingo Cabred. La imagen en cuestión está aquí y fue realizada por José María Cao Luaces en 1902. Cao falleció en 1918. Y la pregunta del millón es... (suenan los tambores =D) ¿está libre? Saludines desde Buenos Aires, Agustín Any question? es-wiki 22:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Espero que puedas ayudarme en este asunto. Si quieres ver la respuesta de Cookie puedes ir aquí. Te dejo un cordial saludo, Agustín Any question? es-wiki 01:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


categorizing Wikimania 2009 photos

[edit]

Hi Barcex, when uploading Wikimania 2009 photos, please do no put them in a Wikimania 2009-subcategory and in the main cat Wikimania 2009. This is considered overcategorization as of our policy and actually makes the main cat Wikimania 2009 very hard to handle. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aeroparque_Jorge_Newberry-Overview_(by_Darío_Crusafón).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Regarding this picture, you should know that in early 2006 we had very different standards for Commons permissions. All the OTRS permission checking was de facto implemented later. If we have to delete in 7 days all pictures of that dates that do not have a permission in OTRS a significant amount of Commons pictures have to be deleted. I think that it should be enough to trust the uploader if he deserves to be trusted for pictures uploaded those days. I will look if I can recover the permission e-mail from Dario, otherwise I will contact him again. In the meantime I will remove the no permission tag for the image because it is a legitimate image and is used in many articles, if it is deleted soon it will be retired from the articles and it will be hard to restore all those articles once the picture is undeleted.
Best regards. --Barcex (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.
I know the OTRS system was set up later that year; I didn't notice the file was that old. I disagree, though, with the notion that we should apply different standards to files simply based on when they were uploaded.
In any case, I see that this is not the first time the image has been tagged as missing permission, so as I see it, there's already been plenty of time to address the issue. Please don't just remove problem tags without adding the missing information. If you think the necessary information is provided, you may convert the request to a regular deletion discussion instead.
Finally, if the file is deleted, it can still be undeleted, and CommonsDelinker keeps a log of all its actions, and with only 20 instances of use, it should be quite manageable to undo the delinking. LX (talk, contribs) 18:25, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why interference Category:Gastronomy?

[edit]

See also Why interference Category:Gastronomy? (Category:Gastronomy --> Category talk:Gastronomy)--Tom778 (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

¡Reprimen una manifestación! :(

[edit]

Hola Barcex,

Se buenito: me dicen que el enlace donde figura la "source" de esta foto [6] es incorrecto, y que le da error cuando intenta abrirlo. No lo entiendo, yo lo puedo abrir sin problemas y el enlace dice de donde y que atribuciones tiene la foto. ¿Cuál es el problema?

Un abrazo, gracias.

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, claro, ya me doy cuenta, yo tengo acceso porque estoy registrado pero el no. ¿Habrá manera de solucionar eso? ¿o será mejor que baje la foto y la suba como mía? A mi amigo no le va a importar. --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 02:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images of the Burj Al Arab

[edit]
Your uploaded images of the Burj Al Arab have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--by Màñü飆¹5 talk 03:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for assistance with photos from BUE

[edit]

Hi, I am an editor on English WP, and I am currently working on many various articles for which I require photos from around the world. I am currently requiring photos from Argentina for these articles, and I was hoping that you may be able to assist with these photos? The photos I currently require are listed at en:User:Russavia/Required_photos#.C2.A0Argentina. If you are able to assist with any of the photos from Buenos Aires, and perhaps put me in touch with photographers from the other regions, it would be greatly appreciative.. Please leave any comments or questions for me on my English WP talk page at en:User_talk:Russavia or on Commons at User_talk:Russavia, as I am unlikely to read replies on other language projects. Thanks in advance for any assistance which can be provided. Cheers, --russavia (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Calfulcurá ==> Namuncurá

[edit]

Hola Barcex,

Hay una foto que estuvo mal puesta en el artículo de Calfulcurá, en Wikipedia.es. Va a haber que cambiarle el nombre pues no es Calfulcurá, en realidad es Namuncurá. No hay fotos de Calfulcurá, y nunca usó uniforme argentino, como dejé escrito acá.

¿Podrás cambiarle el nombre? Yo olvidé cual es la plantilla para pedirlo.

Saluti,

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 19:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Museums in Cura Brochero

[edit]

¿Podrías borrar esta categoría que cree por error (en realidad debió decir Category:Museums in Villa Cura Brochero)?

Gracias

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 18:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Barcex

[edit]

Mi nombre de usuario es pedrodecuba , escribi y publique aqui en wikipedia un articulo llamado Analisis de la Iglesia Catolica Cubana los Ultimos 15 anos.Pagina 1 a la 15, publique las paginas por separado pues no supe publicar todo el articulo junto ,necesito por favor me ayude a poner u organizar todas las 15 paginas en un solo articulo; categoria: trabajo propio; expandir del espanol, topico religion;fecha 06/28/2010. Le agradeceria su ayuda para publicar este articulo y hacerlo accesible a todos.Muchas Gracias.

Mapas cordobeses

[edit]

Hola,

Los mapas que están en este artículo ¿Están permitidos? Yo supongo que no ¿Verdad?

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Buenos_Aires_-_Floralis_generica_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

[edit]

Hi, I'm writing you regarding the following matter: As you probably know, the OTRS team handles emails, in which user confirm the copyright for files they uploaded. We have different queues for different languages and volunteers who reply to them. Unfortunatly our spanish speaking volunteers became inactive a while ago. Now the queue for spanish e-mails is growing and noone is able to handle them in a timely fashion.

Thus: Are you, as a native Spanish speaker, interested in becoming an OTRS member? If yes, you can formaly apply here --DieBuche (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biblioteca de programacion

[edit]

Saludos, mi nombre es Carlos tengo 20 años y estudio ing. en sistemas y queria ver si me podria ayudar en algo como dice el tema que es crear una biblioteca de programas en diferentes lenguajes de programacion para dar una guia base de como resolver las tareas de estudiantes con dificultad en esa area como yo la tuve al comienzo de mi carrera. Espero tenga una buena acogida mi peticion gracias y buen dia.

Operativo retorno

[edit]

Hola, ya que se supone estás retornando y no despareciste (yo tampoco) ¿Podrías, como para ir activándote, borrar esta categoría que cree ayer y ahora me di cuenta que es demasiado general?

Gracias. :)

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion notification Category:Stéphane_Poulhies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

Vlaam (talk) 18:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Moneda 2 pesos-Argentina-Borges-1999.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--ARTEST4ECHO talk 15:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¿Acampada Sol?

[edit]

Veo que has removido la categoría "Movimiento por la democracia 2011". Desconozco cuales habrán sido tus motivos y el por qué ves más adecuado el de "Acampada Sol", ya que lo mantienes. Entenderás que deberemos llegar a un acuerdo para que las fotos de este movimiento, que está solicitand una democracia real o profunda, estén contenidas en una categoría adecuada. Espero tu respuesta ya que voy a seguir colgando fotos y la actual categoría me parece inadecuada. Saludos --Nemo (talk) 14:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vale Barcex, de acuerdo contigo. Y disculpa el tono del anterior post, aunque los demás no tienen por qué pagarlo, me pillo en un mal momento. Saludos, --Nemo (talk) 22:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Ahora recurro a ti en petición de ayuda. He cometido errores al subir las fotos 018, 019, 029 y 40. en algún caso no coincide la previsualización con el tañano natural o pone como versión útima una y luego aparece otra. Esto se ha debido a que advirtiendo que me equivocaba al subirlas o en el número del nombre o en la imágen o en los datos, cancelé la subida antes de que terminara (lo digo por si se considera un bug, dar pistas). El caso es que he intentado solucionarlo en la 040 y parece que lo estoy liando más. Què hago, las marco para borrar y las subo de nuevo o cómo lo soluciono. saludos y gracias anticipadas, --Nemo (talk) 14:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sabiendo eso, lo que pienso que puedo hacer es editar las actuales, las que sea necesario, con la imagen que deba de ir en cada una de ellas (Upload a new version of this file). Cuando se renueve la cache, me imagino, que quedará todo correcto las correctas. Saludos, --Nemo (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He dado por hecho que las que permanecerán son las que aparecen en la vista a su tamaño natural, por lo que he subido las que quedaban pisadas (y alguna más), con esto creo que queda arreglado, y cualquer nueva equivocación la solucionaría una vez se renueven las cachés. Gracias, --Nemo (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:20110524 0034b.jpg

[edit]

Socorro: necesito cambiar el nombre del fichero que indico. Se trata de la Iglesia de Campanar (valdría ese nombre, o Mare de Deu de Campanar o algo por el estilo). Lo subí mientras hacía otras cosas y -si bebes, no conduzcas- me lie y no le puse nombre. ¡¡Gracias Mil!! B25es (talk) 08:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perfecto. Gracias.81.202.237.93 16:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Por si es posible

[edit]

Hola, nuevamente aquí. Quisiera borrar File:Comercio y Acampada 018.JPG, si fuera posible. La subí apresuradamente y no estoy satisfecho con ella. Por otro lado la 019 es la misma y pienso que es la que vale. Gracias anticipadas, Nemo (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias. He estado viendo tus fotos, enhorabuena, me gustan mucho. Lo mismo nos hemos cruzado por la plaza o lo mismo nos cruzamos. A mí te será fácil reconocerme. Saludos, Nemo (talk) 21:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Protests May 2011

[edit]

Thx for your photos -> used in pl Wikinews. Best regards. Przykuta[edit] 13:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Otra vez por aquí

[edit]

Molestando de nuevo. He subido una fotografía del directorio donde no estaba pixelada File:Cangreso - tarde de junio 01.JPG. Si pudieras borrarla que ya estoy subiendo la pixelada, gracias, --Nemo (talk) 20:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tampoco sé si estarán bien la categoría.--Nemo (talk) 20:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No me preguntes por qué, pero si me pudieses borrar File:14-06-2011 Comisiones de trabajo 02.JPG te lo agradecería. Saludos, Nemo (talk) 10:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC) Gracias[reply]

Hola de nuevo. Estoy subiendo unas fotos que son del movimiento que reivindica la música en la calle y tomadas en la Puerta del Sol. No sé si las estaré categorizando bien, lo dejo a tu criterio. Saludos cordiales,Nemo (talk) 22:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lo que hagas está bien. Te he avisado por eso, porque yo no sabía donde colocarlas. Saludos, Nemo (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC)PD: Sí, las fotos están hechas en la Puerta del Sol[reply]

Foto spam adolescente

[edit]

Hola :)

Creo que esto hay que borrarlo ya: [7]

Saluti.

Rúper --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 20:57, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Otro pedido...

[edit]

Hola,

Esta categoría tiebne mal puesto el nombre (le falta la "s" a "Justicialista")

[8]

Por otra parte me parece más apropiado ponerle: Category:Justicialista (automobile)

En fin, si se pudiese arreglar al menos lo primero...

Gracias.

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 23:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Madrid - Manifestación laica - 110817 202020.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Madrid - Manifestación laica - 110817 202020.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The poster contains many copyrighted components, which hardly belong to the protestor, and surely isn't covered by COM:FOP of Spain. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The clause "but only to the extent justified by the informatory purpose" is not equivalent to a free license. But, if you prefer, I can open a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Y otro pedido mas...

[edit]

Antes de que se agrande ¿Podrías cambiar Category:Plaza República de Chile a Category:Plaza República de Chile (Buenos Aires) ?

Gracias...

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Error de nombre

[edit]

Subí una foto File:Esquina de Agustina de Aragón y Almàssera VLC.jpg y en realidad es la esquina de María de Molina y Almàssera. ¿Me la puedes modificar, porfa? Mi nivel de perfección deja mucho que desear. ¡Gracias! B25es (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aurogyro-ELA-07-Casarrubios-Spain.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Aurogyro-ELA-07-Casarrubios-Spain.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

russavia (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boeing 737-204C - Britannia Airways - G-AXNB (1985).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Boeing 737-204C - Britannia Airways - G-AXNB (1985).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

russavia (talk) 13:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

[edit]

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Barcex. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnstel (talk) 21:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Autogyro-Avro-620.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Autogyro-Avro-620.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

russavia (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motorbike toy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Acather96 (talk) 20:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This brand/company is "Bimet Corwin" or "Bi-Met Corwin"? See company website and name on bus - left side, top. What you thinking? Marek Banach (talk) 00:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you can contact with Centro Carrocero Corwin s.a. and ask it in Spanish language about oficial brand name!? Second question: category like Ugarte buses is for fotos buses sorted by brand and model or waiting for sort by model (like Ugarte Europeo). Category like Ugarte buses in Argentina is for fotos sorted by brand (Ugarte) and country (Argentina). Is not the same!!! Sometimes exist categories like Ikarus 280 in Hungary with brand name (Ikarus), model name (280) and country (Hungary) in one. Marek Banach (talk) 18:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buenos Aires?

[edit]

¿Por qué [esta edición tuya eliminando la categoría de Buenos Aires? Lobo (howl?) 10:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Te envié un mail.

[edit]

¿Leíste mi mail de ayer?

0_0

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden categories

[edit]

Hi, can you explain why did you removed file from hidden categories? Kobac (talk) 10:42, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

consulta

[edit]

Saludos Barcex, como eres administrador y hablas español quise consultar contigo una duda sobre el borrado de dos imágenes, ocurre que subí el archivo el año pasado, las imagenes de un concierto tomadas por un compañero parte del staff de una productora, con su consentimiento entonces, las modifiqué y recorté para subirlas y darles uso en la enciclopedia, pero hace unos días tuve noticias sobre que la totalidad de esas fotos habían sido vendidas a una revista, el tema aquí es que yo no tengo mas que su palabra atribuyéndome los derechos de la imagen y para evitar algún conflicto he optado por pedir su eliminación, no se trata de recursos muy utilizado, de hecho me estoy preparando para darles reemplazo a todos sus usos, lo que quiero saber es si existe algún problema con su eliminación, y que es lo que tengo que hacer ya que la explicación que te doy, no entra dentro de ninguna de las opciones de borrado mas usadas. Se trata de este y este otro archivo. Espero tu respuesta, saludos. Pierrot de Lioncourt カバー!!!カバー!!! 12:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¿Bórrese?

[edit]

Menor de edad autopromosionándose. --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Claro que si no te pongo el enlace nunca lo vas a encontrar...[9] --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Línea 8/41/60/68 (Buenos Aires), entre otras

[edit]

Hola, te debo felicitar por las fotos, que quedaron muy buenos, y la verdad, sería bueno que subas otras más.

Garacias

Mega-buses (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Así sera amigo, abrazo.

Mega-buses (talk) 17:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help!

[edit]

Hola Barcex. No sé a quién pedir ayuda, pues no hablo mucho inglés. He recibido una serie de cambios de licencias a mis archivos, las subí bajo CC-BY 3.0, pero el usuario Jbarta la ha cambiado por dominio público por geometría simple. ¿El puede hacerle eso a mis archivos?

Si encuentras algo de tiempo te agradecería me ayudaras. La discusión actual se está llevando a cabo en la página File talk:Gota01.svg.

Gracias de antemano. — Zóram Hákān Talk 23:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

20minutos.es

[edit]

Good afternoon,

In 2007, you added 20minutos.es in bad sources.

In 2009, people transfered from Wikipedia Spanish to Wikimedia Commons some 20 Minutos pictures.

In 2012, someone nominated for deletion one of those pictures. We then prepared a licensing template explaining the permission.

Today, I moved your entry from bad sources to problematic sources. If you don't agree with the fact their licensing policy is clear or if you don't agree with the rationale if we can't handle public domain dates calculation, FoP and Flickr, we can handle 20 minutos.es, you will be interested to participate to the discussion in Bad sources talk page.

Best Regards, --Dereckson (talk) 13:10, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Importar un gadget de la Wikipedia español

[edit]

Hola, Barcex. ¿Sabes crear gadgets, copiándolos y pegándolos? Es para que crees este gadget que tenemos en la Wikipedia en español.--Vivaelcelta {discussion  · contributions} 20:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Barcex,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Buenos Aires - Obelisco (fachada sur, poema) - 20061212a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 20:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ARA Libertad - IMO inválido

[edit]

Hola Barcex, la Category:IMO 6125398 contenía a ARA Libertad, pero:

  • Libertad es un buque de guerra y no tiene numero IMO
  • 6125398 es un número IMO inválido (no está asignado por IHS Fairplay, los dígitos no verifican el checksum, es un error de un shipspotter), lo que quiere decir que no hubo ni habrá ningún barco con este número, por eso la categoría va a estar siempre vacía y entonces puede ser borrada. Hay una discusión de borrado acá. Dos usuarios quieren mantener la categoría y volver a asignarla a ARA Libertad.

Pero además la categoría está vacía desde hace más de 4 días y según esto debe ser speedy-borrada en forma directa. Le solicito su intervención como administrador. Atentos saludos. Windroff (talk) 19:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hola,

¿esto hay que borrarlo, no? [10]

Abrazo.

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 23:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...¿no hay que borrarlo...?
0_0
--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

un favor

[edit]

He subido una nueva version de una imagen pero no se actualize, aunque aparece en el historial. Cuando lo arregle tenga cuidado, por favor, de no borrar la nueva descripción y la nueva licencia. Le dejo el enlace:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gran_Capit%C3%A1n_Duque_Nemours.JPG

Gracias.--Lancastermerrin88 (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

La version es 22:02 15 jun 2013, pero conservando lo que le he dicho. Gracias.--Lancastermerrin88 (talk) 21:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FoP Argentina

[edit]

Estimado, le hice la pregunta que viene a continuación a Roberto Fiadrone, quien me sugirió que te pregunte a tí: Revisando las imagenes para tagear como FoP-Uruguay, me encontré con algunas obras del escultor José Luis Zorrilla de San Martín en exposición permanente en Argentina subidas a commons con el tag {{FoP-Argentina}}:

La duda que me surge, es que según esa plantilla, el FoP-Argentina se aplica 'de facto' para edificios y construcciones, pero no para otras obras (como esculturas). Por lo tanto quería preguntarte tu opinión respecto al 'status legal' de esas imágenes. Saludos,--Zeroth (talk) 20:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metedura de pata

[edit]

He subido una imagen sin darme cuenta de que ya había otra muy parecida. Teniendo en cuenta que la mía es mejor, ¿se podría borrar la otra?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alfonso_XII_of_Spain.png Ésta es la mala.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alfonso_XII._Pintado_por_Casado_del_Alisal_en_1884.jpg Ésta es la buena. gracias. --Lancastermerrin88 (talk) 21:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

¡Gracias!

--Jalu (talk) 21:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you make those corrections, suggested there? JKadavoor Jee 15:47, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Catedral de la Almudena

[edit]

Hola Barcex

Me gustó mucho la foto desde el principio. Esperemos que ahora tenga votos y sea imagen destacada. En cuanto la tengas modificada me avisas y la nomino otra vez.

Saludos!

Enhorabuena! Lo lograste!

Hola Barcex! Como diría aquella, la hemos liado parda en el concurso WLM! Tu y yo finalistas y con dos fotos. Enhorabuena!!

--Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 09:39, 08 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: El truco del parque

[edit]

Jaja, me refiero a que desde ese césped las vistas son muy buenas, pero no parece haber mucha gente que lo sepa y suba, ¡todos se quedan en la calle! --Kadellar (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Catedral de la Almudena - 130826 211731.jpg, which was nominated by Pedro J Pacheco at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Catedral de la Almudena - 130826 211731.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 17:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de Toledo - 130903 211409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Diana Ringo 16:46, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your feedback on this discussion

[edit]

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Variation among admins in application of duplicate policy with relation to different file types  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph Attribution Letter, Old Warsaw, 3.2-S3

[edit]

Dear Mr. 'Barcex', I am writing to thank you for making your photograph available for publication through Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. We plan to use the following photograph for inclusion in Harold Kalman, Heritage Planning, to be published in 2014 by Routledge. The image that we plan to use is:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Warsaw_-_Old_Town_Market_Square_-_Zakrzewski%27s_side_.jpg

Could you please tell me who should be credited in the caption.]

If you have any questions please contact me by email at skicbbc@gmail.com.

Thank you, Susan

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Real de Aranjuez - 130921 115527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Barcex,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Editor @ ar.wiki

[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Final Wiki Loves Monuments

[edit]

Felicidades por el puesto 40 en la final mundial de WLM con la foto del Palacio de Aranjuez.

Un saludo

Pedro J Pacheco (talk)



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Barcex,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Foto Puente De Toledo

[edit]

Buenas tardes, pertenezco a una empresa que se llama GTLED, hemos visto la foto que le has sacado al puente de Toledo de madrid, concretamente:

21:23, 25 September 2013 Puente de Toledo - 130903 211409.jpg (file)

Nos gustaría saber si podemos utilizar su fotografía para incluir en nuestra Web o algún catálogo ya que el producto que lleva el puente es nuestro, los proyectores lineales blancos y amarillos, nos gustaría que nos dieras tu consentimiento para poder usarla o nos expliques que pasos tenemos que seguir para poder usarla, muchas gracias por tu tiempo, quedamos a la espera de su respuesta, un saludo.

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Shadowxfox (talk) 04:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Barcex,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oporto - Jardim Do Morro - 20110425 133656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Last month you created this category to classify one image, and that’s very good, but in its parent category (which you linked to, which is also very good) there were already a few files and subcategories that belonged in the new category you created. I moved those down, now. -- Tuválkin 15:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

19:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Ayúdame ocupo un administrador que hable en español

[edit]

User:Barcex (talk Ayúdame por favor a solucionar este problema es que no sé inglés, muchas gracias aquí esta el vídeo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marinamzt.webm


Celtis Tala

[edit]

Buenas noches Barcex. Un usuario me sugirió hacerle la consulta en su página de usuario. El tema es así: hace un tiempo atrás, he subido a commons, unas imágenes de un árbol: Tala (Celtis tala). El problema surgió un día que misteriosamente apareció en el artículo sobre ese árbol, una imagen de un pequeño poblado llamado TALA en Chipre. Con este usuario, quisimos tratar de solucionar el problema, y aparentemente lo solucionamos, pero ahora vuelve a aparecer un problema similar con otra imagen, que según se informa posee el mismo nombre ... Aquí está la foto: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porte.JPG Quise subir la imagen con otro nombre, pero me parece que commons reconoce que es la misma que ya está subida y me dá error. y aquí el artículo ... https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celtis_tala

Desde ya, muchas gracias Arianza1 (talk) 04:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barcex. You closed the above as deleted, but it seems you forgot to delete. Cheers! Storkk (talk) 11:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buenos Aires-2687f-Monumento a Roca.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zellfaze (talk) 17:02, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barcex,

Please change the image of the subject image name The Ashram in Fort Cochin, India.This image is in India (2005) Gallery as India - Varanasi pharmacy - 0822

India - Varanasi pharmacy - 0822

. Also, tho image India - Women playing a banjo - 7211

India - Women playing a banjo - 7211

can be removed from India (2005) gallery.

Thanks in advance,-Schwiki (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate

[edit]

Hi Barcex, I disagree with this edition. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's the same image. I'm the author. Could you help to fix (erease) it? Thanks, --Pedro Felipe (talk) 06:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monumento a Julio Argentino Roca

[edit]

¡Hola Barcex!

Tanto tiempo. :)

Che, ¿borraste la foto tuya del Monumento a Julio A Roca? No la veo por ningún lado...Estoy creando un artículo para Wikipedia sobre el onumento.

Saluti. --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 00:08, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conocidos personales

[edit]

Hola Carlos. No sé si recuerdas, pero nos conocimos en Madrid en una quedada de WM-ES. Me ha sugerido Laura Fiorucci que me registre en es:Wikipedia:Conocidos personales. No sé si te importaría indicar que me conoces personalmente. No conozco en persona a tanta gente y, sobre todo, la mayor parte no está en Conocidos personales. Gracias --Discasto talk 18:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid - Basílica Pontificia de San Miguel - 130202 113324.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Strakhov (talk) 17:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: All media...

[edit]

Hola Barcex, gracias, tienes toda la razón. No había reparado en lo me comentas. Si necesitas ayuda para hacer la transición, no tienes más que decirme cómo y me pongo a ello. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 10:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

過去ログを使ってみてはいかがでしょうか?少し重くなっています。--活性化中 (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@活性化中: Unfortunately I do not speak Japanese. Please write me in English or Spanish and I will be glad to answer. Barcex (talk) 13:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok.I'm sorry. How about using the past log? It becomes slightly heavy.--活性化中 (talk) 13:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@活性化中: Could you elaborate about what is the "past log"? I do not know what it is and I find no reference to such concept on Commons. Thanks Barcex (talk) 13:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cambio de categoría

[edit]

Hola Barcex, la próxima vez que tengáis que hacer algo así, decídmelo y programo un bot para hacerlo. No es muy rápido (no le dejan hacer muchos cambios al mismo tiempo), pero evita perder el tiempo con asuntos mecánicos. Un saludo --Discasto talk 16:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: Hola. No sabía que tenías un bot. Si es así bienvenido sea, estoy cambiando las fotos de "All medias.." a "All media" de cada año. Y como mis herramientas son rudimentarias sólo tengo el cat-a-lot, pero son miles. Así que si quieres hacerlo con tu bot, perfecto. Barcex (talk) 09:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tengo, y no (me) cuesta nada. Eso sí, dime qué años hay que cambiar. Veo que también hay alguien más haciendo cambios. Avísale, por favor. Esta noche me pongo. Son unas pocas líneas de código pero ahora no tengo acceso. Un abrazo --Discasto talk 09:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hola @Discasto: . Los años que hay que cambiar son de 2011 a 2017. Yo hasta hace 24 horas estuve haciendo algunos con cat-a-lot, pero ya no he hecho más. No sé quién estará cambiando, si me dices le aviso, porque no he coordinado con nadie tareas. Hay muchas imágenes que debieran haberse movido ya solas porque están con la plantilla "Supported by Wikimedia España" y yo la cambié, pero tarda unos días en reflejarse el cambio. Pero la mayoría son ficheros que tienen la categoría y no la plantilla, esto no lo sabía antes de meterme en el lio :) 10:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Discasto: Veo que la categoría de 2017 ha sido borrada a pedido de @Rodelar: así que está terminada. No sé quién la hizo, pero está. El resto de categorías está pendiente. Barcex (talk) 10:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, yo ayer vi que se estaban moviendo de All medias...in 2017 a All media (siguiendo el ejemplo de años anteriores), por lo que moví las que quedaban con Cat-a-lot y luego solicité el borrado de All medias. Saludos. --Rodelar (talk) 12:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No he hecho nada al final porque he visto que seguían moviendo ficheros. De todas formas, para cosas como estas (un traslado simple), mi recomendación es que uséis otro gadget, VisualFileChange (en Preferencias, os aparecerá algo llamado 'Perform batch task' en la barra de herramientas de la izquierda). Sirve para muchas cosas y no específicamente para mover ficheros entre categorías. Sin embargo, os permite hacer cambios masivos de textos en los ficheros de, por ejemplo, una categoría. Yo he llegado a seleccionar mil ficheros de una tacada y a hacer una sustitución de texto (que es de lo que se trata en este caso). Un abrazo (y a vuestra disposición, como siempre) --Discasto talk 18:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: @Rodelar: Ya está hecho. Mi experiencia con el VisualFileChange no fue muy buena, parece una herramienta muy en desarrollo todavía pero es prometedora y muy potente. No fue cómodo usarla y el cat-a-lot al final era más rápido y simple. Pero descubrí que en COM:CDC puedo solicitar una petición y pasa un bot y en unas horas hace el trabajo. Barcex (talk) 17:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Touzrimounir: Hi. Thanks for the invitation. I was one of the lead organizers of Wikimania 2009 and I had enough with it :) I spent all my organization energy there and do not want to do something similar anymore. Barcex (talk) 20:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Department of Drawings and Prints, Metropolitan Museum of Art

[edit]

Hola Barcex. He realizado la fusión de Category:Drawings and prints in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, con Category:Department of Drawings and Prints, Metropolitan Museum of Art. Había unas discusiones antiguas:

  • Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/07/Category:Drawings and prints in the Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/07/Category:Department of Drawings and Prints, Metropolitan Museum of Art

¿Puedes comprobar que está todo correcto? Gracias. Un cordial saludo, --JMCC1 (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JMCC1: Hola. Yo no me dedico a temas de categorías con lo que no soy alguien con experiencia suficiente para dar una respuesta definitiva. El movimiento me parece que está bien hecho. Lo único que veo es que no me queda claro que la conclusión del debate sobre la fusión haya sido fusionar, sino lo contrario si leo bien. Barcex (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias Barcex. Si lo solicita alguien, siempre se pude reponer la Category:Drawings and prints in the Metropolitan Museum of Art (como subcategoría de Category:Department of Drawings and Prints, Metropolitan Museum of Art) aunque es una duplicación innecesaria, pues tenrdían ambas los mismos archivos. Un cordial saludo, --JMCC1 (talk) 17:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

use of image for academic publication

[edit]

Hello, I'd like to use your image of the Mariblanca for an academic publication, Artistic Circulation between Early Modern Spain and Italy. The image would appear in the inside of the book, in black and white. Is this okay with you? (Please write me in Spanish if it is easier for you!) thanks, Kelley Khdidio (talk) 16:38, 25 November 2018 (UTC)khdidio[reply]

Your photo on MSN

[edit]

Your photo File:Buenos Aires - Cementerio de la Recoleta - 20090104-17.jpg was used on https://www.msn.com/es-ar/noticias/argentina/la-muerte-%E2%80%9Cfotografiada%E2%80%9D-por-la-que-hoy-conmemoramos-el-d%C3%ADa-del-maestro/ar-BBNae4X without attribution. Nemo 18:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning (Aug 2019)

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Barcex. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2019 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Madrid - Acampada Sol - 110520 190640.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted poster
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Madrid - Acampada Sol - 110520 194144.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted poster
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid - Acampada Sol - 110520 224158.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid - Acampada Sol - 110520 224632.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid - Acampada Sol - 110521 214304.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:09, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Argentina.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

149.74.60.204 11:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ganímedes (talk) 19:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buenos Aires-Combinación Subte Lima y Avenida de Mayo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Athens - Klafthmonos square - 20060508.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]