User talk:The Squirrel Conspiracy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Sven Manguard)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en
This user is a native English speaker.
This user is an administrator on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)
This user is an administrator on Wikidata. (verify)
This user is a member of the Volunteer Response Team. (verify)


Archives —
SM: 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015-19
SQ: 2020-23 • 2024

Note to self

[edit]

Your speedy deletion of File:Ann-Helén Laestadius - Hei fávru - Inari Saami.jpg as advertising spam

[edit]

Hi. You deleted File:Ann-Helén Laestadius - Hei fávru - Inari Saami.jpg, which was uploaded by Muotâ as advertising spam inspite of COM:INUSE. That file is within the scope of the Inari Saami Wikipedia and was being used to illustrate the article of the very book the book cover is from, which goes against COM:INUSE:

A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose

and

It should be stressed that Commons does not overrule other projects about what is in scope. If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope.

Furthermore, you have not left any sort of message on Muotâ's talk page to say it was being deleted or why. I would appreciate it if you would undelete it and also restore it in the article on smnwiki it was used in, which you incorrectly tagged as advertising spam. I have declined your spurious request for the article to be speedy deleted as spam there. - Yupik (talk) 02:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've undeleted it. I'm not convinced that it isn't spam, but I'm using Google Translate and you're a local admin and presumably speak the language. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. There is no Google Translate for Inari Saami, so not sure what it's telling you. I think it's important that Inari Saami speakers can see their own literature reflected in Wikipedia and this was the first time we could upload the cover of a book to illustrate one of the articles. The article is also connected to other important pages on the Inari Saami Wikipedia such as the author's page and "Books in Saami languages published in 2024", so it feels off that both the image and the article were marked as advertising spam. - Yupik (talk) 09:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm not sure what you mean."

[edit]

I meant if you could just undelete the photo with the problematic part cropped off Trade (talk) 07:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users sign.jpeg

[edit]
File:Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users sign.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANU report about Dronebogus

[edit]

I don't want to beat a dead horse. But the ANU report about Dronebogus seems like a pretty cut and dry instance of harassment to me. I asked him not to contact me on my talk page, he did, and the guideline is pretty clear that unwanted attention or contact constitutes harassment. So can you tell me what exactly I was wrong about there? At least IMO it's totally within my right to tell people not to leave me messages on my talk page if I want to and then report them if they aren't willing to respect the request. Or should I just be forced to have people who are causing me stress and anxiety repeatedly contact me against my wishes? Adamant1 (talk) 10:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block on FreierAlvin

[edit]

You blocked User:FreierAlvin as sock, but it was only lasted for 3 years, not indefinite. Would you mind to adjust the expiration of block on this user? A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Done. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete closure on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AvelTop1

[edit]

A couple of the files on this deletion nomination (mostly stock charts like File:WEGE3.jpg) weren't deleted when you closed the nomination. Omphalographer (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sometimes the bulk resolution tool does that. Fixed! The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

[edit]

I'm working my way through the adminship applications on the English WP, which is quite a time-consuming task given the size of the pool. I've just reviewed your application and get the sense from the comments that whilst it's an unusual case, there seems to be consensus that it makes sense to have cross-Wiki admins.

I certainly agree with that thinking and as a en.WP admin who is quite active on Commons, and looking after Wikipedia's mainpage (which involves media files, of course), I've often had similar thoughts. Wouldn't it be good to get adminship on Commons, too, so that I can deal with admin issues myself rather than having to wait for somebody else to find time? I don't hang out in the administrative area of Commons, hence cannot judge whether the sentiments that you expressed in your application would be seen like that on Commons as well. I'd like to hear your thoughts on that. In terms of my admin-adjacent activity on Commons, I regularly nominate files for deletion. On Wikipedia, I frequently use Commons media protection to protect media files as the page history will show you. IRL, I'm friends with Commons admin Podzemnik if you'd like to have a check in with a fellow admin. Please ping me when you reply as my Commons watchlist is so large that it's become near-useless, and talk page replies can easily be overlooked. Schwede66 22:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I shall note that most of my deletion requests are much less controversial than the last one I posted. Schwede66 23:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: My perception of Commons RfAs is that there are three criteria that are important:
  1. You have a strong knowledge of copyright - enough that you can be trusted to close things at COM:DR and to handle things like COM:CSD#F1.
  2. You consistently communicate clearly and professionally
  3. You've been active on Commons for at least a year
The Commons RFA process is nowhere near as... erm... involved as the en.Wikipedia one. Skimming your talk page archives, you might get some questions trying to make sure your understanding of COM:DW is up to snuff (based on some deleted uploads from a while back), but I suspect your RfA would be successful on your merits as a Commons user, let alone as a cross-wiki admin. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. What's the story with nominators? Is that common, or even preferred, or are self-noms the done thing? Schwede66 01:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Schwede66: IIRC, every successful RfA on Commons in the last three years has been a self-nom. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. Good to know. Schwede66 01:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My own has been a self-nom. @Schwede66, I'm certain you will make it. All the best. We definitely could use more Commoners who are also admins on en-wiki. Regards, Aafi (talk) 04:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bother. I've just seen the admin election results, and you came close, but didn't quite make it. I'm sorry to see that. I have yet to read the election debrief in full but note that the lowest number of oppose votes was 74, and some candidates were strong enough that in a "normal RfA", they would have got close to zero opposes. Hence, there's something weird going on; it seems that some voters opposed across the board. If it hadn't been for this odd behaviour, you'd now been an admin on the English Wikipedia. Either way, I'm sorry that it didn't work out this time and if you'd like to run again at some point, feel free to get in touch beforehand to talk about whether I can be your nominator. Schwede66 20:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy, I join the words of @Schwede66. I really felt sorry that you couldn't make it. Next time, for sure. Regards, Aafi (talk) 04:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Discord screenshots

[edit]

Hey, any chance you had time to close this one? Trade (talk) 01:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Done. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaland and Puzzle piece on a blue background.gif

[edit]

Hello! I recently uploaded "File:Chaland and Puzzle piece on a blue background.gif", and I’m sure it’s under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. However, I noticed it’s been categorized under "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike missing SDC copyright status" and "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 missing SDC copyright license". Could you help me take a look at this? Thanks so much, and have a wonderful day. P. ĐĂNG (talk) 09:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P. ĐĂNG: SDC is Commons:Structured data. Bots should add the structured data automatically and remove those categories sometime in the next few days. You can ignore those categories; they're just there to tell the bots that there's a new file they need to work on. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen that the file has been adjusted. Thank you! P. ĐĂNG (talk) 03:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ft lauderdale strikers logo.png

[edit]
File:Ft lauderdale strikers logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to restore deleted images

[edit]

Good morning @The Squirrel Conspiracy,

I would like to kindly request the restoration of some images that I uploaded to Commons from my main account, Macrobreed. I am no longer active on that account and now use this alternative account. The images are as follows:

These images were deleted for being out of scope. Please refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Macrobreed for more details. I understand that some of the other images I uploaded may not meet Commons' scope. However, I added all images in good faith, either sourced from Flickr or created by myself, such as the image taken on World Stroke Day.

Thank you for your consideration. Macrobreed2 (talk) 10:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please put this request on COM:UNDEL. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy, Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate your help and guidance. Macrobreed2 (talk) 13:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

[edit]

Hey, I think you have mistakenly closed 40+ deletion requests, e.g. 1, 2, 3 related to the maps uploaded by the user User:Saad_Ali_Khan_Pakistan as deleted even though they were kept. However, I've fixed all of them. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Looks like there's something broken with the close tool. I know I clicked Keep because it created the keep page (File talk:NA-104 map.png, etc.), but somehow the wrong text appeared. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries! Seems like there was a glitch with the tool, but it's all good now. Have a good one! Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD closure

[edit]
The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I have opened an AN/UP thread related to this matter here. As such, I am closing the discussion here. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2024/09/Category:Lamborghini Invencible seems there was no consensus for this.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 09:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The category can always be recreated if images are found, but we don't keep empty categories on the hope that images might appear, Wikidata item or not. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any policy to support your point of view? I think yours is a mistaken assumption.
If you wish to express a point of view in the discussion, please do so instead of supervoting by closing it.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 08:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Empty and has no significant history" in COM:D. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a category, not a general page. As mentioned in the discussion, it was correctly defined and had an infobox. We don't delete categories merely because they currently have no files and the discussion didn't conclude with a consensus to delete. Please correct your admin actions.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 09:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can take this to COM:UND if you wish but I don't intend to reverse the deletion myself. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:39, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can I count on you that you will apply COM:D correctly going forward? That is only delete empty categories if they are "obviously unusable for the future"?
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 08:31, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


Camilo Minero AI Images.

[edit]

This is an AI generated image based on a real person, but the final image isn't real.

I used pics as an inspiration for the AI, but I'm not using those images in the final product. Milton Alex Martínez (talk) 20:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your description says that you fed a photo into the AI. That makes the output a derivative work of that photo. We need the copyright status of the source photo. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea. At least I would need a week to see who took the photo and check with the museum. Please, do not delete it, I need it for a test. Milton Alex Martínez (talk) 20:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea. At least I would need a week to see who took the photo and check with the museum. Sorry, but that makes it pretty obvious that you don't have the rights to the underlying work. As for not wanting it deleted because you need it for a test, Commons is not your personal webhost. You can use Flickr for that, or something. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No I don't have it, I really thought I didn't need it since I'm not using those images, I'm not getting anything from this and I'm not trying to hide it either. As for the test, I was asking for a favor, but do what you need to do. Milton Alex Martínez (talk) 01:59, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rathaus Spandau Deletion Request

[edit]

Hello. I have a question about a deletion you carried out in 2023 of images of the “Rathaus Spandau” subway station in Berlin, Germany. Two pictures remained there. Could you please explain to me why these two images were not deleted? Thanks Lukas Beck (talk) 08:36, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas Beck Please link me to the DR so I can take a look. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 12:00, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:U-Bahnhof_Rathaus_Spandau Lukas Beck (talk) 13:27, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lukas Beck Thanks. I deleted those images in June 2023 and they were reuploaded a month later by User:Любитель свежего воздуха. Always a risk when the origin is Flickr unless the entire Flickr account gets blacklisted. I deleted them again just now. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'll keep an eye on it in the future Lukas Beck (talk) 13:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

[edit]
Thank you for looking after the orthographic projection maps, not just protecting them against vandalism but cleaning up the (lengthy) edit histories they've accrued due to vandalism as well. ReneeWrites (talk) 09:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:CVSH8978.jpg

[edit]

Hello The Squirrel Conspiracy,

you closed the DR as deleted, but apparently you did not actually delete the file. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 21:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Fixed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F10 AI DR closures

[edit]

Thanks for resolving these. Should I just be flagging AI-generated content from users with no other contributions as F10, in future, or are other admins likely to disagree with that?

Would it be worth formally updating the definition at COM:CSD? Belbury (talk) 19:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what other admins will think, but in my opinion, it's from a user with few/no other contributions, and it doesn't appear to be intended for an article, I think F10 is valid. It's not the "AI-generated" part that's important; I also do this for stuff like personal flags, selfies, etcetera. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll flag some of the more obviously useless ones as I see them, and see how that goes. Belbury (talk) 19:40, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question re: File:Syrian Civil War map.svg

[edit]

What are your thoughts on a histsplit, where the versions that are all green are split off into their own file? I feel like we're getting a lot of sisterwiki users here who don't understand COM:OVERWRITE, and forking the file and then presenting it to them on local wikis as two options might reduce disruption going forward. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk: Perfectly fine with that, but it's not something I know how to do myself. I collapsed down the revert war to put out the fire, but there's no reason those files can't be unhidden and moved elsewhere. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:53, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry...

[edit]

im sorry for my behaviour in com-an-b topic. i dont wanna seen as troll here and i did that mistake because i wanted to make it delete ASAP. i didnt think very good, i just acted. sorry... modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:57, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu homes.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu homes 02.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu forest.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kesagake oak.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.180.139.144 (talk) 10:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlocking File:Syrian Civil War map (ISW-CTP).svg

[edit]

Hello @The Squirrel Conspiracy, I am the current owner of the Syrian Civil War map (ISW-CTP).svg on Commons. Since the transition, I have been solely responsible for regularly updating the map. However, I have some concerns about the ability of other editors to contribute to this map.

The original map from the transition, Syrian Civil War map.svg, has remained stagnant following the resolution of the edit war and has not been updated since. Consequently, the responsibility for maintaining the map for the civil war has fallen entirely to me. While I have been committed to this task, I recognize that I cannot sustain this effort indefinitely. The map was initially created as a proposed scenario, exploring the use of sourcing similar to the Russo-Ukrainian war map team, with which I was formerly involved, as a potential solution to the stalemate. I did not anticipate that this map would become the primary one, nor did I foresee that I would assume the sole responsibility for updating it.

Given that my interest and capacity to update this map may wane in the future, I kindly request an exemption for this file, allowing other editors to override and update it. This would enable collaborative editing in the same manner as the Russo-Ukrainian war map team and ensure the map remains updated even when I am no longer able to contribute. Indeed this wouldn't ensure more editwars, but there are some users that are also concerned with how the map should be laid out and, I would think, should have the opportunity to have it updated. [Eg. Concerning colors, Concerning SVG. Symbols.]

So i'd have to ask an admin first to get an opinion before any permissions and request for override. Thank you for considering this request. Kaliper1 (talk) 22:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Squirrel_Conspiracy&oldid=973238067"