Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2009

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


This is an archive for Commons:Featured picture candidates page debates and voting.
The debates are closed and should not be edited.


[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 May 2009 at 17:28:52
Stained glass window at Notre-Dame, Geneva, Switzerland. 

result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 07:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 May 2009 at 19:38:13
Morgan 3 wheeler

  •  Info A Morgan 3 wheeler with a JAP motor during GLP at "Gaisbergrennen" 2009. Sharp, you can see the motion of the wheels but also see the surroundings mirroring in the car. Nice depth of field, the car is complete sharp, the background blurred, but you can see the action. Created, uploaded and nominated by MatthiasKabel(talk) 19:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Background is blurred, centering can be boring, and the shadows ar on the right side of the picture. (5 oppose from me because of resolution didn't influence your decision?) MatthiasKabel (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've sent my lambs out to slaughter, no hard feelings.Mtaylor848 (talk) 21:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Not quite FP for me, due to the distracting background (despite the fact that its blurred) sorry --Tom dl (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I like it. Also the background is just blurred enough to give you the feeling of the oldtimer race. Crop on the left is a little bit tight though. --Chmehl (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support The background needs to be blurry to keep the eye's focus on the car. An in-focus background would be distracting. I wouldn't crop it because the road stripes add to the effect - maybe just a little cropped off the right if any. The engine detail is extremely interesting. Royalbroil 13:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought about cropping on right side also, but I wanted the traffic sign and the shadows and moisture on the right side shouldn't be cutted. MatthiasKabel (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2009 at 03:16:36
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 07:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2009 at 09:22:25
Latin letters 

result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2009 at 13:20:39
A Boat in the Nile river, Cairo, Egypt. 

result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2009 at 17:44:26
The boat shed at the Claremont Museum 

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2009 at 23:20:46
Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos)

Sorry, forgot to log in.  Oppose Compared to for instance File:Anas platyrhynchos 02.jpg this photo dosn't seem to bring out the coloration at its best. In general, I would have preferred a full-body shot as part of an interesting scene, for such a common animal. Bevegelsesmengde (talk) 09:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2009 at 23:40:43
Tree Swallow, Tachycineta bicolor 

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2009 at 23:47:13
Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe) 

result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 07:54, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2009 at 06:18:45
A 'Krishna Lila' float, showing Radha, Krishna and gopis.

Sorry, forgot to log in.  Oppose disorderly in its composition and the main subject isn't in sharp focus. Bevegelsesmengde (talk) 09:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zamek w Mirowie 12.08.08 p4.jpg, withdrawn

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2009 at 13:07:05
SHORT DESCRIPTION

 Albertus teolog (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 08:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2009 at 16:10:58
Dye-powders in Goan market

* Oppose I really want to support, but the crop detracts to a large enough degree that I am forced to oppose. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC) - Voting is over. Sorry. Rastaman3000 (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --kaʁstn 14:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2009 at 09:43:06
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2009 at 05:32:06
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 15:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2009 at 11:11:22
Severijn organ in Cuijk 

result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2009 at 21:53:47
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2009 at 08:04:07
SHORT DESCRIPTION

3,5x & 32 12   • Richard • [®] • 10:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Good! Better mention in one the description page so all can appreciate the difficulty of the shot. --Muhammad (talk) 10:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that would be nice. /Daniel78 (talk) 22:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 15:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2009 at 15:10:03
SORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 15:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2009 at 12:22:54
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • 1.2° seems so minor that I don't see that as a reason to oppose but then again, I'm not a professional photographer so I can't speak to it. I think the contents of the image itself outweighs such a small, miniscule degree of camera tilt. — ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 14:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2009 at 15:46:57
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is not stunning, questionable composition, has glare, has lighting problems, and doesn't befit the FPC criteria in general. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

—Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I am commenting on your proposal to FPX the image because of the reasons that you state are completely subjective and lack substance at that, except at your personal level, which cannot be relied on as evaluation criteria. Not stunning is subjective and subject to personal preference. Not an objective point. Questionable composition is also subjective and again, subject to personal preference. Not an objective point. Glare, where? the sun is behind, so there is no glare. Not a valid technical point. Lighting problems? Which? dynamic range is there, if you knew zone system photography this would be evident. In fact, given the dynamic range, exposure is pretty good. Again, not a valid technical point. So I nonymously (sic?) dissent in your personal opinion and I definitely dissent on your technical observations. Self portraits are a tradition in painters, photographers, etc., and are self interpretations of the creators. Whether they work or not for the observer is a different story, subjected to the cultural capital of the observer and his knowledge of the medium, but they are definitely a common practice. A simple oppose would have been enough. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose -- Really can't see any use or worth in this picture. It's just a picture of a dog shaded by the photographer, in no special way. Definitely not FP-quality. -- Peipei (talk) 11:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thulium crystal 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2009 at 16:18:24
jazz fusion musician 

result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2009 at 16:49:02
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 16:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2009 at 19:50:14
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 16:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2009 at 00:16:53
White-crowned Sparrow 

result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2009 at 01:59:28
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 8 support, 11 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2009 at 11:32:18
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2009 at 16:02:54
Very Expressive photo, Which also has an historical importance 

result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2009 at 14:39

Spark plugs 

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mayhem - Jalometalli 2008 - 21.JPG, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2009 at 20:31:51
Attila Csihar, the current singer of the Norwegian black metal band Mayhem, live at Jalometalli 2008 in Oulu, Finland 

result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:01, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wrist and hand deeper palmar dissection-numbers.svg, not delisted

[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 May 2009 at 07:20:40
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Support Labeling is not that important in my opinion to delist an otherwise impressive and very useful illustration. --norro 15:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep It probably took hours and hours of hard work to make this highly detailed illustration. Since you cannot substitute it with a real-life photograph of a dissected hand, the FP status of this image should stay. (P.S. I have such a feeling that I was not the only one to use wrong template in order to vote. Whoever is going to count votes, read the comments first, they might contradict the vote template.)--Ahnode (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't useless because you want it to be useless. See above. --Ahnode (talk) 14:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I said partially (please read my comments properly) as it is salvageable should the original author (or someone else for that matter) want to do the effort. I'd rather have it as a correct image than not used! Lycaon (talk) 15:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think it will be a good idea for you to notify The Photographer about this nomination to delist his illustration. At the same time, I would suggest you, as a scientist, to help us improve the illustration and explain precisely on the talk page (image's or user's... wherever) why do you think it is inaccurate. This is going to be the best 'favour' you can do so far (removing it from articles doesn't count, as you haven't discussed it first at the article's talk page). As for your claim regarding absence of references, Wilfredo specifically addressed this issue when replied to your comment. Probably you couldn't have asked Wilfredo to enter this information into illustration's description template. But again you haven't contacted him yet. --Ahnode (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This was obviously not a reference. I can't understand why you are so adamant in wanting to keep this picture as FP when it clearly needs work done to it. It doesn't even specify whether it is a left or a right hand so that a laymen (99.99% of users here myself included concerning human anatomy) can't properly judge whether it is a top or a bottom view... Lycaon (talk) 20:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 1 (2?) delist, 2 (3?) keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. Maedin\talk 17:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cyclone Catarina from the ISS on March 26 2004.JPG, delisted

[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2009 at 13:49:04
Cyclone Catarina

I think that a replacement would need to be nominated on its own. It would be dramatically different from this version since the colors are not at all similar to the original photograph. 16:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Cyclone Catarina 

result: 5 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. Maedin\talk 17:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2009 at 20:53:25
American Goldfinch 

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 17:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2009 at 22:09:21
The wooden church in Vărai, Maramureş County, Romania 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 17:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2009 at 20:43:49
Northern Flicker 

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 14:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2009 at 19:42:00
Northern Flicker 

result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 14:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2009 at 05:59:32
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 14:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2009 at 09:42:33
MacBeth

The FP criteria are somewhat photograph-biased, but it's usually accepted that informative illustrations are fine =) Adam Cuerden
Obviously the photographic quality of the file is fine. The underlying graphic design of the illustration is not FP quality. Downtowngal (talk) 16:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 14:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Sympetrum fonscolombii (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Sympetrum fonscolombii 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Calopteryx virgo (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Calopteryx virgo

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: nothing is in focus. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Lycaon (talk) 18:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2009 at 18:21:38
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info created by Thomas Gainsborough - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Dcoetzee
  •  Support -- A 7.0 MP photo of a 1770 portrait of David Garrick by Thomas Gainsborough. Garrick was "an English actor, playwright, theatre manager and producer who influenced nearly all aspects of theatrical practice throughout the 18th century," (source) and Gainsborough "was one of the most famous portrait and landscape painters of 18th century Britain." (source) Remarkable for its quality and significance. Photo by National Portrait Gallery staff. Dcoetzee (talk) 18:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Very good. Not as arresting as the Darwin pic below, though. Maedin\talk 20:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2009 at 18:12:43
Charles Robert Darwin, by John Collier, 1883 (1881) 

result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wind Turbines and Power Lines, East Sussex, England - April 2009.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2009 at 12:35:05
Energy in East Sussex 

result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2009 at 05:29:01
Skyline Arch 

result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2009 at 12:27:57
Gulmohar tree leaves 

result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 10:22:10
Sculpture in village Jesiona 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 17:21:02
Spiral staircase at Hartenfels Castle, Torgau (Germany) 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 19:10:00
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 21:48:09
Scouts warm their hands around a lantern at camp. 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2009 at 03:10:32
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 19:13:28
A visualization of the internet

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is below size requirements. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

→Diti the penguin — 19:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2009 at 18:09:47
Skyline Arch 

result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edward Walsh - Queenstown, Upper Canada on the Niagara (a.k.a. Queenston, Ontario).jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2009 at 17:13:01
Queenston, Ontario 

result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2009 at 22:44:12
Saalhof in Frankfurt am Main

This will take years, as will the renovation of the Saalhof itself which is now hidden in a scaffolding for at least five years. You won't be able to see both buildings without a jacket before about 2015. --Mylius (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2009 at 14:19:20
Carrots of many colors. 

result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2009 at 08:21:57
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2009 at 09:02:23
Skellig Islands 

result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2009 at 21:29:56
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spheniscus demersus at National Aviary 2.jpg, withdrawn

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2009 at 23:40:25
Penguin? But its head isn't white!

  •  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Notyourbroom (talk · contribs)
  •  Support As nominator. —Notyourbroom (talk) 23:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Zoo environment spoils the picture for FP. Lycaon (talk) 10:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sadly… →Diti the penguin — 12:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Lycaon. —kallerna™ 15:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment You know I'm a stickler for geotagging, having made, e.g., the {{Geo}} template. On a number of occasions, I've been told that the geotagging would be useless for photographs of a given creature because the subject was photographed in captivity. I never recall that fact being considered a dealbreaker for an image's FPC eligibility in the past. Even if the image were said to lack the ecological validity provided by an in-habitat shoot, I believe the image illustrates the species quite well, and with high image quality; and I feel that any "damage" to the image's suitability is mitigated by the fact that it also illustrates the state-of-the-art in enclosure design, as this exhibit opened just a couple of weeks ago at the National Aviary. —Notyourbroom (talk) 19:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment Zoo environments certainly don't prevent a picture getting FP, however they usually fall into two categories : 1) even though the animal is captive you don't get that impression by only looking at the picture, 2) inspires emotions of anger or pity (i.e. a gorilla or chimp looking sad clutching the bars of its cage). In this particular case I think the opposes are because it doesn't fall in either category, IOW the background is distracting without offering much value (I understand this is a new enclosure, but it's hard to tell by simply looking at the picture). --ianaré (talk) 20:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose No wow in this image. --Afrank99 (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 12:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate, withdrawn

[edit]

Clever alt-text here

 I withdraw my nomination 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 12:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Sympetrum fonscolombii-1 (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 08:07:12
Sympetrum fonscolombii 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Sympetrum fonscolombii-3 (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 08:09:06
Composed eyes of Sympetrum fonscolombii 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 10:57:55
Command and Projection ship Mistral in Toulon harbour 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 10:59:44
Toulon harbour 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 14:09:19
Nesselwängle in a cold morning 

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2009 at 13:34:26
Man sleeping siesta under mango trees in Ouagadougou. His wife is working in the background fields. 

result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Yann (talk) 08:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2009 at 17:28:54
SHORT DESCRIPTION

 Support boo the lot of you. Lot of talk about how the child isnt done justice and the square parts arent squared up to the frame. Captures something perfectly. Should need no more than that. ~ R.T.G 21:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Vote added after end of voting period. Maedin\talk 07:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]
result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 23:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2009 at 20:22:49
Uca pugilator and hole

  • Thanks for the questions. If you look at the alt view the entire burrow is showing, but I think a tighter framing looks better. These guys never go too far from their burrows. I would rather wait for other opinions before removing the seaweed. --ianaré (talk)
  •  Neutral Lovely pic of the crab but again the environs look artifical and obscure (probably te best pic possible of those environs who knows) ~ R.T.G 21:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Vote added after end of voting period. Maedin\talk 08:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]
result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 23:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2009 at 20:52:53
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 23:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustave Doré - Miguel de Cervantes - Don Quixote - Part 1 - Chapter 1 - Plate 1 "A world of disorderly notions, picked out of his books, crowded into his imagination".jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2009 at 22:52:19
Don Quixote 

result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Yann (talk) 09:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 10:23:46
Sculpture in Góra Świętej Anny 

result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 09:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Libellula depressa-5 (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 14:09:13
Head of Libellula depressa 

result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 09:33, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Libellula depressa-6 (by).jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 14:10:36
Libellula depressa 

result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 15:39:40
Avenue des Champs-Elysées 

result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tigre.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2009 at 23:45:44
Herring gull, photo taken in South Stack RSPB Reserve in Wales 

result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2009 at 11:43:44
Romanesque rotunda in Predni Kopanina 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2009 at 17:18:52
Cetonia aurata take off. 

result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2009 at 21:41:59
Polemonium reptans flowers 

result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2009 at 21:45:21
Thiodina puerpera female 

result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:33, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour Eiffel Wikimedia Commons.jpg - featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2009 at 22:52:06
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

18 support, 1 oppose --> Featured --Paris 16 (talk) 04:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 01:15:55
Charlie Daniels 

result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Calopteryx virgo-1 (by).jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 08:05:21
Calopteryx virgo 

result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Brenthis ino (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 08:10:14
Brenthis ino 

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2009 at 18:45:27
Ears of barley in summer, ready to harvest them. 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2009 at 18:54:09
General view of Dehesa de Cuéllar, a little village placed in a valley in the province of Segovia, Spain 

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 16:48:52
Panoramic view of Lisbon 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 20:24:23
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2009 at 22:42:57
Spider web 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 01:10:03
Amish raking hay

You surely mean "personality rights". --Túrelio (talk) 05:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes   • Richard • [®] • 10:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Added personality rights warning--JMSchneid (talk) 12:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelicans in fllight in mazatlan.jpg, withdrawn

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 02:39:47
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support If you think it is important to id the pelicans, do so! Me take the picture, you name the subject. -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info looks like Pelecanus occidentalis --ianaré (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Please obtain id's before you nominate. Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 11:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Well Lycaon, a few things... Ianare generously contributed with the id... (thanks Ianare) before you opposed. And while I see the value of identifying subjects, it is not part of the guidelines, and I don´t think it should be a requirement. So I see no basis for your oppose, unless you find other faults... (and please don´t just add the requirement by yourself). Some people are good at photography, others at identifying or classifying images... Others at both... If you have the knowledge, share it. I have photographs, I share them... That way everyone wins! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's not very fair, isn't it? Imagine if I would nominate a name of an insect (well defined) and trhen say: ""I name the subject, you take the picture". A bit ridiculous too, wouldn't it be? Lycaon (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • LOL! Wrong premise Lycaon, starting point is the image, all else follows. Besides, this particular image is centered on flight of pelicans, where the particular identification of the subjects is not the main objective. Remember the Tao, "The tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be named is not the eternal Name. Translation, the words are not the thing named, the words are not the image. The image is the image. The words about the image is not what is judged here. The image is. Granted, Identification is extremely desirable, but to what depth? And since this is a collaborative effort, I think it is reasonable for people to help the project along, not to shoot it down in technicalities. Add them and further the effort. I prefer depth over form. --200.56.93.82 18:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Opps... that was me... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • You are missing the (my) point. I have nothing against uploading unidentified pictures (though I'd never do it myself) but there are lots of options to find out an id before you nominate. FP is not an identification forum (nor a forum to post several alternative versions of the same thing for that matter, but that is another story). We have Commons:Photography critiques for that. Other users can do it (e;g. Alvesgaspar, Yann, Richard Bartz, ...) so why couldn't you? I help where I can and when I can and so do other people. Lycaon (talk) 22:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          •  Comment Please judge on FP criteria, this is still not QI. I agree that identification makes an image much more useful, but images are not just used for Wikipedia articles about a species. --Tony Wills (talk) 23:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Bad quality + id's missing. —kallerna™ 12:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • ... and continuing with the next... What does bad quality mean? There are generally agreed criteria in the photographic world that can, somewhat objectively, define quality in specific terms. Please define your idea of bad quality in adequate language, at least as a courtesy considering your ever present opposes. I think the authors deserve to know the substance, if there is any, of the critiques. That way others and I may learn something from your wisdom. As for the ID, if you had taken the time to read the description, you would have seen the ID. --200.56.93.82 18:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC) That was me... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Weak quality, image v. soft at full size and some CA evident. - Flying Freddy (talk) 08:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 12:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 18:02:37
Northern Mockingbird 

result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2009 at 22:28:51
A goose (Branta canadensis) and offspring. 

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2009 at 15:26:12
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Yann (talk) 21:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2009 at 21:51:25
Inner old town of Dresden as seen from the Mary's bridge at early dusk

  •  Comment I just wonder how you can talk of poor quality as there are even aliasing artifacts in the full RAW because lens resolution outperforms the sensor. A 1Ds Mark II doesn't get any better than this with any lens on the planet. --Mylius (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 09:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Alternate (Blue color cast removed, sharpness adjusted)

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2009 at 19:09:57
Inner old town of Dresden as seen from the Mary's bridge at early dusk 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 21:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2009 at 19:09
Short description 

result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Yann (talk) 21:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2009 at 23:37:06
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Yann (talk) 17:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 04:42:12
International Space Station, March 2009 

result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Yann (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twin FA-18E launch - 081122-N-9900B-005.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 06:30:58
Twin F/A-18E launch 

result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => /not/ featured. Yann (talk) 17:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 08:32:14
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 06:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 10:23:37
A/CA/4/09 swine flu virus 

result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 14:45:52
SHORT DESCRIPTION

* Support Lovely. 19:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 

result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 06:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2009 at 05:48:12
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Good. I like the animals --kaʁstn 15:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Poor quality, what is the purpose of this image? - Flying Freddy (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment What do you mean by bad quality? I keep reading that short sentence in this forum yet the quality gurus never seem to put forth valid arguments that result in such judgement and do not contribute to the authors or other observers. If it is an opinion, say so, if it is the result of an evaluation process, bad quality can be expressed in photographic terms. As it stands, it is just an opinion. Purpose of the image? Well, if you read a little about geography, rivers and ecosystems, this picture illustrates on those areas, encyclopedic in nature. Pretty or eye-catching photography? Definitely no. Illustrative of a geographical space, yes. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment In this instance I was referring to the softness of the image esp. away from the cows, nearly all the image is soft (maybe motion blurred?) especially at the edges when compared to work such as diliff's, obviously this isn't a downsampled pano, but this is really unlike a 50d with good glass in front of it. I'm sure you know far more about it than me, and there's probably a reason why you didn't, but in this instance I would consider a polarizer, shooting at ~90mm on a crop body you're not going to get a huge amount of difference in polarization across the sky and you'd definitely knock out some of the haze and increase the contrast. Hope this clears up my views - 58.169.106.1 22:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment Fair enough... I accept that critique as responsible and agree with the points you make. And for your information, lens was a 28-135 IS with polarizer. Probably motion blurr despite IS. Photo take from a bridge with lots of vibration and wind. Could be better, yes. Will reshoot when possible. Regards. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Please do try to take it again, Tomas, it's a good scene. (P.S. I hope the cows are there next time!) Maedin\talk 16:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I'd like the scene to have a little more colors. A deeper blue for the sky would make it more appealing. --S23678 (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 15:21:20
A bicycle with the Dutch flag parked on a bridge across one of Amsterdam's many canals. 

result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 22:25:33
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2009 at 13:25:44
Bodie Island Lighthouse, Outer Banks, North Carolina (United States).

  • I assume you are referring to sidewalk not being straight. If so, I did worked on it for a while with Hugin but never succeed. I guess I am not very skilled with that software. --Jarekt (talk) 03:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 14:22:13
Cat 

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 16:54:23
Irisbus Citelis 18M bus in Brno-Husovice trolleybus depot, part of the exhibition for 140 years of public transport in Brno, Czech Republic 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 18:26:09
Caltha palustris 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 19:45:37
SHORT DESCRIPTION

It looks so. For this reason I don't support, just  Neutral. --kaʁstn 14:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the images shows reflections from a window of bus. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Lycaon (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

* Request  Support I agree can someone fix the windows, the image is amazing and definetely a top notch photo. Whens the last time you have seen a aircraft with that REAL background! Amazing view!> IP vote and too late anyway.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 00:44:31
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the images is too small. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

--Mbz1 (talk) 01:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 00:50:33
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the images is too small. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

--Mbz1 (talk) 01:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 00:58:00
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is below size requirements Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Lycaon (talk) 06:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:52, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silk Route - Pakistan.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 01:00:50
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the images is too small. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

--Mbz1 (talk) 01:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 11:20:20
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is below size requirements Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Lycaon (talk) 11:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 10:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2009 at 09:53:54
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 19:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2009 at 11:58:09
Panorama of Liptov in winter, Slovakia 

result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2009 at 12:30:03
A bald eagle. 

result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 19:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2009 at 20:11:31
Speedway racer 

result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 19:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 00:02:00
SHORT DESCRIPTION

It is etched to see better the cristalic structure of the metal. (metallurgy) HBR (talk) 00:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 19:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 10:38:43
A composite image of Olympus Mons on Mars, the tallest known volcano and mountain in the Solar System. 

result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 19:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chicken February 2009-1.jpg, not delisted

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 13:07:48
SHORT DESCRIPTION

The reason the chicken was running
  •  Keep First I don't believe that a recently promoted image should be immediately nominated for delisting, any more than a recently declined image should be immediately re-nominated - both are inappropriate. Secondly, I didn't vote on this original nomination but watched its progress with interest. Yes in terms of narrow quality criteria it is mostly blurred and even the parts in focus are not particularly sharp. But this is FP, not QI, and a lot of people don't seemed to know the difference. The 'quality' guidelines of FP were strengthened in line with the QI guidelines, mainly I think because of the large number of nominations - to help weed out unworthy images. But FP has always been about the most striking images on Commons, not just the 'best' in terms of technical quality, but the best in terms of eye popping, and interest grabbing - suitable for a front window display for Commons. --Tony Wills (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment I agree with your first sentence, but make an exception as this image was proposed humorously. Also, thinking long-term - it's 50 years from now and there's some major disaster - which electronic archives will be chosen to be saved? I would bet that the FPs would be high on the list. So I would add 'enduring' to 'striking' and 'eye-popping'. My sense is this image is a transient joke that served its purpose. Downtowngal (talk) 23:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An argument about archives for posterity is somewhat irrelevant, FP are simply the 'best' pictures on commons right now, I don't expect current FPs to survive 5 years, let alone 50 years :-). I don't see why you see it as a 'joke' image, whatever the reasons for nomination, it is an excellent example of a panning shot of a moving animal (a lot more difficult than something moving smoothly like a vehicle). The 'ordinary' subject has a humour element and is greatly enhanced by the photography technique. I hope we can get back to promoting the best of Commons, rather than just the best of QI :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 00:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if there were any better panning photographs of animals, I thought I had seen one or two here, but all I can find is this one ;-) --Tony Wills (talk) 02:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 4 delist, 10 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. Maedin\talk 19:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 11:46:17
Orthodox Cathedral of Timişoara

The facade is oriented north-northeast, and almost all time is in the shade. In the morning, a building on the left make shade for the flowers. Almost all time the sky (south) is white. Well, is not a good subject for a FP, see others pictures in the category. Thank you. --Turbojet (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Per other opposers --S23678 (talk) 02:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 17:02:03
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 17:40:17
the little village of Sainte-Enimie in Languedoc-Roussilllon 

result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 19:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2009 at 16:56:14
Canadair Aircraft 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:27, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2009 at 18:02:46
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Symp-nerv (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Sympetrum fonscolombii 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Libellula quadrimaculata-1 (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 15:33:21
Libellula quadrimaculata 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Libellula quadrimaculata-3 (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 15:34:48
Libellula quadrimaculata 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Libellula quadrimaculata (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 15:36:05
Libellula quadrimaculata 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2009 at 05:23:31
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of JPEG artifacting, ghosts, noise, pincushion distortion and other things. MER-C 10:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. 
result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:79 - Québec - Juin 2009.jpg, withdrawn

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 00:20:04
Ville de Québec

 Oppose The composition from the two pictures is not very good --kaʁstn 13:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  in order to do some more editing of the water stitches. I'll re-nominate when corrected. Thanks for your comments. --S23678 (talk) 16:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 19:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:XH558 Flypast.JPG, withdrawn

[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 21:54:05
Avro Vulcan XH558 

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 19:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jasná Ski Resort - skilift on Chopok.JPG, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 07:44:05
Frozen ski lift 

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured --D-Kuru (talk) 12:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]

Edit 1, missing result

[edit]

Less blue 

result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured --D-Kuru (talk) 12:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 19:04:30
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is too small. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Lycaon (talk) 05:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, x neutral => not featured. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 17:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boelge stor.jpg, delisted

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 20:38:10
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 5 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. Maedin\talk 11:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 19:56:29
bismuth crystal, a chemical element

The crystal ?   • Richard • [®] • 21:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
the image: please look at the en:Focus stacking process. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know about focus stacking. I was wondering how two creators created the image. --Muhammad (talk) 04:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. I read about this from de-wiki and Richard taught how to stack focus? But what about downsampling ([2])? —kallerna™ 14:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
this was simply a first test without focus stacking. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 20:57:54
Lockstitch Sewing Machine Mechanics 

result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2009 at 05:17:52
Alex Swings Oscar Sings 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2009 at 17:15:51
Mount Fitz Roy seen from the road to El Chaltén

Ok. Thanks. I uploaded a new version (of a almost identical photo taken a few minutes later), normaly i do not processe my picture on the computer (im not good, and i dont have any professional program) but I did it here.--Ankara (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

After some work on the computer 

result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2009 at 18:58:05
Le Grand Escalier de l'Opéra Garnier, à Paris

  •  Info I may downsample images, but not by so much scale... without reason : if I remember (I lost the RAWs) the source pictures were taken at ISO 1600 and f/2.8. Hence a very bad quality when viewed at 100% (soft and very noisy). Leaving the picture unscaled down would certainly have not been seen well. For another reason, my picture of Eiffel Tower below is downsampled : I have a front focus problem on my lens... sadly... because the picture could have been twice as large. -- Benh (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I sympathise with Benh as I too am accused of downsampling excessively with some of my images, and what many people don't realise is the difficulty in actually getting the image at all. It shouldn't matter what the theoretical resolution might be. If you're going to complain about downsampled panoramas, you might as well complain that Benh take a 100 segment mosaic instead of just 15. :-) Diliff (talk) 16:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2009 at 21:18:54
Obélisque of Place de la Concorde, in Paris

A ridiculous FPX. We have FPs that are more noisy than this; it is not in any way at all an obvious dequalifier. --Aqwis (talk) 08:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think a perspective correction is needed : the obelisk is really thinner at the top than at the bottom. But don't hesitate to create another version if you wish. Peter17 (talk) 21:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course it's tappered, that's not the point. If you draw a vertical line (with respect to the frame of the picture) passing the pointy end of the obelisk, it falls quite off to the left of the base, instead of almost perfectly in the middle. Which means it's definitely tilted to the left. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 04:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I mean it's not eye catching enough. Maybe the obelisk has an interesting history, but you can't see that in the picture. It's like making a photo of a radio, that is playing a very good song. --Tired time (talk) 12:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose La photo illustre bien le sujet, mais la composition est plutôt ordinaire pour une FP. --S23678 (talk) 02:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Seconded. This is a rather standard photograph, a more artistic shot could have given better results. →Diti the penguin — 20:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Maybe it is not artistic, but you cannot obtain those resolution and details with a standard photograph. You need to take several pictures and assemble them, what I did. Peter17 (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        •  Comment Yes it is quite good quality over all. But if you use techniques like stiching multiple images you need to remove artifacts of the process (ie one shouldn't be able to tell it was done this way), so first either fix the aerial on the roof behind, or if that is too difficult, then perhaps just clone out the aerial. People also expect something special, beyond quality, about FP images. Perhaps historical significance isn't enough :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 22:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Brenthis ino (by)-cropped.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 13:20:42
cropped and centered version of File:Thomas Bresson - Brenthis ino (by).jpg 

result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 14:02:48
Male Zabulon Skipper

I'm a little confused. I believe the information is already there. Can you help me understand what else it is that I need to do? -- Meganmccarty (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
When you saved it, did you use save for web? If yes, the EXIF is lost and you need to use the original to replace the EXIF --Muhammad (talk) 04:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand "save for web;" Is the EXIF data you are referring to under the Metadata section on the description page? If so, I have no control over that. In the past, I used Microsoft Photo Editor to crop my photos, which provided much Metatdata info automatically; however, that MS product has been discontinued. Now I use Picasa 3.0, which only provides basic Metadata info - I cannot add anything additional. -- Meganmccarty (talk) 15:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I assumed you were using Photoshop. I haven't used Picasa so sorry I can't add anything else. --Muhammad (talk) 18:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I already uploaded the original version as File:Male Zabulon Skipper, Megan McCarty.jpg. Thank you so much for your help. -- Meganmccarty (talk) 00:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 19:28:06
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 22:57:07
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Comment Too dark? Well, if the rocks are dark, how else would they show if not in their darkness? If a person´s skin is dark, must it be lightened up? What is too dark? Please explain in photographic terms. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Just not enought wow IMO. Sorry. —kallerna™ 13:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose As Kellerna. I mean, anyone could have shown up at the right time of day and taken this photo. It's pretty and interesting but that's not enough. Downtowngal (talk) 18:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment LOL!!!! Yes, anyone could have... but nobody did!!! This is not really supposed to be a pretty picture, but a picture of petroglyphs, on the beach, a very specific place on earth, made interesting by the fact that despite the hundreds of years, erosion, the glyphs survive, and they themselves represent interesting graphics and patterns. The intention is to show the glyphs, in and in relation to their environment. If on top of that you want to discuss photographic technique... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Tomas, I like your work, I like your artistic sensibility, but I am not judging by my taste, I'm judging by the FP criteria, like a juror on a jury who has to abide by the law, and one of the requirements is to explain opposition. I can just oppose without explanation too. Downtowngal (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment LOL!!! Downtowngirl, don´t take it personal... I just like to argue a bit... It´s a long story here... ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 23:18:35
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Overexposed. Maybe you could do some edits to RAW-file? —kallerna™ 15:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Overexposed where? The cloth is white and under sunlight, yet the important parts are within the tonal range, with perhaps very small sections blocked, which is acceptable, considering their placement in zones XIII to X on a gray scale. The shadow areas and dark subjects have acceptable detail (zone II and III), so considering the short dynamic range of digital photography, and the tonal range represented, as well as the texture range, including highlights and shadows, exposure is pretty good. You may want to check the histogram, adjust your monitor and a read a little bit of information on zone system photography. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose slightly overexposed (edges of cloth), not a big fan of the motion blur, and composition is a bit lacking. Each of these separately would not make me oppose, but taken as a whole they do. --ianaré (talk) 13:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment This picture illustrates a process of recreating petroglyphs. How many times have you seen that? It is an illustrative image first of all. Now, technically, as I said above, knowledge of zone system gives access to evaluation parameters in terms of the capacity of the medium (digital photography) to represent in its corresponding zone of the gray scale the different luminosities of the subjects of the image. With this in mind, skin tones are correctly represented in zone VI, where it belongs in a normal scale. That means that exposure is correct in terms of original luminosity values with a normal gray scale; the white cloth is correctly represented in zones VIII to X, zone X being the base of the medium, with no texture, but well represented within the dynamic range where you can perceive changes in tonality. The gray scale is slightly modified with photoshop, a normal procedure based on traditional dark room practices. When I analize an image for exposure, I identify a subject with a known corresponding value in the gray scale, and considering the light source and where the other elements fall within the gray scale, I then determine if the scale is normal, expanded or contracted in order to accomodate a visually appealing gray scale, and at the same time, I can determine if the gray scale can be expanded, contracted or moved up or down. Only then can exposure can be judged somewhat objectively. To say that the edges of the white cloth is over-exposed means nothing, for those parts are represented in its corresponding zone. If exposure is manipulated so that those edges fall below zone IX, which is where the tonal range starts, then everything else would be bumped to lower light values, and then we would have true exposure errors, or at least, a modified gray scale with objects outside their natural, corresponding equivalent in gray. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Believe it or not I have seen that method for transcribing petroglyphs, except done in black. I am certainly not opposing on 'no interest'. I'll admit I've never used the exposure zones method. I'm not claiming to be a master, but I usually just try to make sure the histogram looks OK on the camera. If as whole the image is too dark or light, then I adjust using photoshop. To me those edges are definitely overexposed, in the sense that no adjustment will bring out any detail in them. I also feel that if the shutter speed had been higher, there would be less motion blur and overexposure. --ianaré (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment... And that would have created a wrong exposure, by lowering the value of the highlights, the rest of the tonal values would have been pushed into darker zones, losing the real gray scale value of the image. You would sacrifice 99.9% of true exposure for nothing. Nowhere in the history of photography says that everything must be within the tonal or texture range. The histogram is a great tool, specially for zone system visualization, but to know where to place the curve is the real challenge. Anyway, I disagree with your opinion about the significance of a very, very minor area, of white subject in direct sunlight. Of course a few pixels will be completely white, almost as specular reflexions. And as I said, given the luminosity range and the lighting conditions, exposure is pretty, pretty good. Any Zonie will telll you that. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergen - Torget panorama.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2009 at 09:53:31
Torget and marina in Bergen, Norway 

result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2009 at 23:05:29
Scorpion Fish 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 12:26:01
American Elms 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 21:37:56
Wedding party: child marriage in India in the beginning of the 20th century. 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Court of Gayumars Persian miniature.jpg, withdrawn

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 01:54:00
Court of Gayumars

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is dithered Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Lycaon (talk) 05:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the info! I have uploaded a different version which I hope is non-dithered:

. Should I re-submit this as a Featured Picture? --Drscience (talk) 14:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)  Drscience (talk) 00:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 11:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Father son.JPG, withdrawn

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 06:02:32
Father and Son

 Koustav2007 (talk) 10:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 11:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knee deep.JPG, withdrawn

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 06:09:53
pouring rain

 Koustav2007 (talk) 10:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 11:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2009 at 08:02:22
Colosseum by Night

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image quality is very poor Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2009 at 21:25:28
Sabre of the militia of Lausanne

Yes, maybe I should try and post a digitally alter version with the stand erased. Rama (talk) 21:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 08:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Edit 1, not featured

Retouched version 

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 08:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2009 at 19:35:20
A convoy demonstrated by the Dutch army, this type convoys are currently active in Iraq

 Info There is no "tilt". The camera was horizontal, the ground is just like this. See the barrer on the right of the image, that will give you a reference for the true vertical. Rama (talk) 13:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Info See above. I have a problem with the colour of the vehicles and the carrying of loaded weapons, but these are facts of life, and the "tilt" is too. Rama (talk) 13:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 11 support, 11 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 08:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2009 at 22:55:15
Common Yellowthroat 

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 08:57, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 05:20:33
The Organ at Arches National Park 

result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 08:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 11:06:22
The Cività of the Viterbo city of Bagnoregio, Italy

  • It's hard to describe properly, but it's like there's a slight blending of lines together. The antennas and tress blending in the sky for example. I've noticed this occurs sometimes when the F-Stop is greater than 12-13. --ianaré (talk) 21:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, there might be some diffraction present in the photo as it is taken with f/16 aperture. Too bad, because I hoped to have a large enough DOF to keep the whole Cività in focus. Etnoy (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 11:58:46
Cetonia aurata taken near Malé Kyšice in Central Bohemian Region, Czech Republic 

result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 12:45:12
Arte plumária de índios do nordeste do Brasil (Olinda). 

result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 14:02:59
Manual film projector 

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 17:58:34
U.S. Air Force airmen jump above Choctawhatchee Bay, Florida.

Hello Lycaon, how do you know D2X? I don't like pictures without EXIF, too. HBR (talk) 07:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The nominated picture is a derivative of a derivative of this. Lycaon (talk) 11:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not exactly. The nominated picture is a derivative work of a simple copy of this. Sémhur (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
EXIF data added. Sémhur (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure? Am I missing something? Lycaon (talk) 18:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
May be, may be not. They are not at the usual place; look under the licence. I have found them in the picture, but I don't know how to put them at the normal place. So I wrote them here. Sémhur (talk) 19:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK, I did it myself. Lycaon (talk) 22:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Sémhur (talk) 17:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 12 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 09:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 18:31:15
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 09:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 21:19:01
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 09:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 22:52:12
Paul di Resta on the Hockenheimring

Thanks for your comment. I wouldnt like to crop it as it adds to the panning effect. Is it really that bad? :) --AngMoKio (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Someone have to pay the bill for such an expensive sport :-)   • Richard • [®] • 14:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Too much advertisement? Should the photographer go and remove the advertisment or what?! -- Pro2 (talk) 19:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The photographer should not bring an image with advertisment into the Wikimedia commons. We need to avoid making plugs in the Wikimedia commons. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that there mustn't be any advertisment visable in images. Haven't heard of such policy. I was talking more about aesthetics. Here advertisment is too distracting for me. For example here there are some ads, but when you look at the picture, you see a car. When I look at this picture, I find myself staring at letters "AMG". They are too big and right in the middle. No, I don't think advertisment should be removed, I just think that this image should not be featured and that nothing can be done about it.
It's a picture of a race car. Race cars have advertisements on them. So pictures of race cars should be ineligible for FP? How about a photo of a pro footballer. They have ads on their jerseys; should they be ineligible for FP also? Street photography often contains unavoidable billboards. Where do you draw the line? Cacophony (talk) 06:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The blurry background is the thing about a panning shot. If you want the car and the background sharp you need a very short exposure. To make such a pic is no problem at all, much easier than this one, but the problem is that on such a pic it would look like as if the car would just park on the road. About the ads I can only say: Racing cars have ads, also the one you mentioned above. Furthermore this car is an AMG-car so in the end it is the brand of the car. --AngMoKio (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 09:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2009 at 04:28:38
Landscape Arch in Arches National Park, USA.

I added more info on the image description page. Because it was a stitch of 5 photographs I'm not sure EXIF is the best place to put source info. Cacophony (talk) 00:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Lycaon (talk) 06:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 09:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metro Paris - Ligne 8 - Porte de Charenton w.b.c.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2009 at 10:07:30
Paris underground metro, Porte de Charenton station, ligne 8. 

result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:12, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2009 at 10:07:30
Paris underground metro, Porte de Charenton station, ligne 8. 

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:12, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse - Pont Saint-Pierre et Hôpital de La Grave.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 00:38:07
Garonne in Toulouse by night 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 02:10:24
Gateway Arch at the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 07:59:19
General view of Antalya, a city in southern Turkey 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 17:57:23
The Communal Palace in Buzău, Romania. 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 19:59:09
Budapest Night Parlament 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 21:22:10
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2009 at 08:23:39
Panoramic photo of the Seven Rila Lakes 

result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2009 at 00:13:11
Court of Gayumars

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is too small. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

—kallerna™ 13:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 15:26:24
removed reflections and 2 persons

* Support Amazing picture, the small edit has really beautified this image. A well worth aircraft capture. --80.194.30.187 00:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Please login to vote. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is the one below. I improved the removal a bit there. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good, the one below is significantly better.--Kjetil_r 09:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 06:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

cropped and adjusted levels 

result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 06:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2009 at 14:37:49
The Organ, an impressive sandstone fin at Arches 

result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 06:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2009 at 18:34:33
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • You mean the scale? Apply just at the end, when you don't have to sharpen or resample any more. It is a very sharp line which does not react well to bitmap operations (which often use averaging algorithms). Lycaon (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Scalebar removed 

result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2009 at 23:17:02
Australian blenny 

result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 07:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 00:53:58
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 00:55:39
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 11:09:32
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image needs tilt/perspective correction. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Lycaon (talk) 11:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

corrected perspective

This one isn't unusual at all. A user has nominated the original version, which I altered and uploaded again than nominated it. The shadows and lighting ruin the image plus there are many tiles that are dirty. The art isn't that historic (probably late 20th century) and represents probably modern Islamic art. It isn't a moving object, which makes it very easy to take a picture of (avoid direct lighting). I find it very "weird" that no opposition has come up till now.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 20:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Some people oppose by ignoring a nomination. Downtowngal (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The image was thrown out of nomination because it needed tilting and some fixing. I fixed that to the wishes of FastTrack.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 11:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree with you. If we had an image of Genesis in the bible which is well decorated and nicely scanned it could become Featured. The same with the Qur'an or any other religious book. We shouldn't care about the message as long as it's a well done picture.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 11:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
@Alvesgaspar - Featuring of Sybols I think is no problem. I think a much bigger problem is the featuring of photos of the american war maschine every day by commons. HBR (talk) 20:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Whats the problem? I like it because of it's colours, textures and feature. It does not support any bias? I think its nothing to do with religion. Its arabic scripture made into art. Dont need to through religion into question when you see an islamic artifact.. --Fast track (talk) 22:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 11:12:37
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 07:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 16:14:39
Tenerife Lizard 

result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2009 at 17:26:16
Red Mount Teide bugloss 

result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2009 at 11:06:08
King John

 Comment I was not being flippant, and I apologize if you interpreted my question that way. Take it at face value. There is an enormous number of copyright-free 19th century images available, and I assumed you had a rationale for choosing this one to suggest as an FP. Your answer that it's rare to find an encyclopedic image of this play is what I was looking for. Downtowngal (talk) 17:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I read the "Seriously." as half-mocking, when I now see you just meant it as, well, indicating you didnt understnd and seriously wanted an answer. I think it's because I grew up in the nineties =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harbour in Hovedøya.JPG, withdrawn

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 14:29:41
Harbour in Hovedøya island, Oslo

 I withdraw my nomination --Pudelek (talk) 07:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 11:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2009 at 16:42:40
Henry Moore, Reclining Figure

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is below size requirements. Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Maedin\talk 09:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2009 at 16:17:07
German chancellor Willy Brandt joking with actress Romy Schneider (1971)

* Support -- 78.51.0.200 16:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of low resolution /Daniel78 (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. 
result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2009 at 12:30:22
girl was infected with smallpox

 Comment I nominated this image not to be beautiful, but it was a victory of medicine. 

result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 06:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2009 at 18:46:09
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 06:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 08:05:36
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 18:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 14:47:03
Cold winter 

result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 19:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 14:54:51
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 19:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Rotary aircraft engine 

result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2009 at 12:24:12
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: It is a Photoshop Disaster. Windows of the second floor obviously photoshoped in. All the curtains are exactly draped identically; sharpness and grain not consistent w/surroundings, some windows (esp. the 1st one on the left) distinctly crooked w/respect to the building. Magenta bleeading at the bottom of the 4th window from the left. Overall picture is noticeably tilted and has strong distortion. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 12:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. 
result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Surface riddle.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2009 at 17:05:52
SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination   • Richard • [®] • 12:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

correct   • Richard • [®] • 12:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Vittuillakseni sen ekan kommentin heitin (kts. Seppo Räty). —kallerna™ 12:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Was ?   • Richard • [®] • 14:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2009 at 23:14:21
Getty Center Los Angeles 

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church Mylau - side 2009 (aka).jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2009 at 02:25:56
The church in Mylau (Saxony, Germany) 

result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:54, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2009 at 11:54:47
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saleina.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2009 at 11:56:33
Saleina glacier and Aiguille d'Argentière

[edit]

Saleina glacier and Aiguille d'Argentière 

result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. MadGeographer (talk) 12:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2009 at 14:08:31
The apse of St. Lorence Church, Lodi, Italy 

result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:22, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2009 at 14:28:31
Northern wall of Liskamm, from north-west 

result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohyla míru - Austria.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 14:32:52
Peace Memorial in Prace. Sculpture "Austria". 

result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:79 - Québec - Juin 2009.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 14:39:28

Quebec skypline
Quebec skypline
0EV version (non-HDR)
  • But I DID told the water to stay still. Of course, there's always ways to make this panorama look better, but, given the liquid nature of water, I think I cannot blend those seems completely (especially since the fast changing light conditions does not allows for multiple takes). Still, I'm glad that you did not opposed. --S23678 (talk) 03:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 20:44:25
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 22:37:28
Jewish Children with their Teacher in Samarkand, 1905-1915 

result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 23:00:17
Coral around islands 

result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 23:32:23
Dagestani man and woman

* Oppose would support cleaned up version (i.e. blue spots on woman's face) --ianaré (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Ishn-eleg-2 (by).jpg, featured

[edit]

Ischnura elegans 

result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 12:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bresson - Orth-albis-2 (by).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2009 at 06:36:00
Orthetrum albistylum 

result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2009 at 20:16:27
Penitentes formation near to Aconcagua's south wall 

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:44, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2009 at 06:20:10
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse - Daurade at nuit.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2009 at 12:05:29
Along the Garonne in Toulouse

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it's too noisy and overprocessed. --ianaré (talk) 03:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. 
result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 12:46, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

1580, Map of Zeeland

It's dark because the original document is old. Take a look at the 1817 painting declaration of Independance and you'll see dark colors and support too... It has nothing to do with the lighting... and such --132.204.223.92 05:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 16:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2009 at 15:29:43
Grand Prismatic Spring 

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2009 at 20:21:31
Karersee, Dolomites with Latemar in the background. HDR image. 

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Admiralty Extension from Horse Guards Parade - Sept 2006.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2009 at 10:14:57
Admiralty Extension from Horse Guards Parade, London 

result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 16:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2009 at 11:13:25
Concept drawing for the spire of Frankfurt cathedral from around 1415

This is a scan of the original draft for the spire of Saint Bartholomeus's Cathedral in Frankfurt on the Main by work master Madern Gerthener from around 1415. Although there were alternate concepts to finish the spire, Gerthener's sucessor Hans Fluecke von Ingelheim based his final draft from around 1480 on Gertheners concept. Since the spire was completed after it in the 1860s, Gerthener and his draft as depicted here are considered the intellectual fathers of the spire as of today. --Mylius (talk) 12:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 16:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2009 at 16:02:14
Balmoral Castle 

result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kernavė - Hill forts 01.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2009 at 18:49:05
Kernavė Hill forts 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Houses Of Parliament Clock Tower (Big Ben).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2009 at 07:54:08
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2009 at 20:41:43
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little girl - Tajikistan - 25042007.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2009 at 15:38:09
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Below 2 MP /Daniel78 (talk) 20:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. 
result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2009 at 16:28:39
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2009 at 17:09:11
Black Sea Shipwreck

It was cropped   • Richard • [®] • 19:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sry. It looks like downsampled. —kallerna™ 12:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If that is your reason, then good night   • Richard • [®] • 15:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No COI at all in that striking. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2009 at 18:14:01
Argynnis paphia 

result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2009 at 20:43:18
Mural painting 

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2009 at 09:01:44
Finnish lyricist fi:Vexi Salmi 

result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2009 at 10:48:04
Anemone hupehensis var. japonica 

result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 11:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2009 at 17:33:05
SHORT DESCRIPTION 

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2009 at 02:52:19


result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rock Pigeon Columba livia 3264px.jpg, withdrawn

[edit]

Rock Pidgeon 

result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 12:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Log/June_2009&oldid=125576946"