User talk:Tobi 87

English: Welcome to the Commons, Tobi 87!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Filnik 16:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muscheln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipe Creek Vista-Grand Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superb sharpness and nice composition. Thegreenj 22:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Canyon NP-Arizona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good (almost too much) sharpness and lighting. Chmehl 18:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley West Mitten Butte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High Q. Barabas 00:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praslin vom Nid d'Aigle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A great panoramic view. Good details. --B.navez 09:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff Palace-Colorado-Mesa Verde NP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 15:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenuntergang am Moosfluh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice postcard --Mbdortmund 15:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiescheralp-Wallis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 19:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Innerlifeofbottle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice work. _Fukutaro 14:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Bryce Canyon-Utah-USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Béar-Pyrénées Orientales-Frankreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anse Sévère-La Digue-Seychelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice one --Mbdortmund 13:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anse Takamaka-Mahé-Seychelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice-Pudelek 20:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moraine Lake-Banff NP.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Colours, detail and noisefree: QI. Lycaon 21:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allianz-Arena-München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I rotated the image 0.2 degrees clockwise. - Tobi 87 12:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC A bit bright but just meets QI requirements for me. Lycaon 14:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anse Source d'Argent 3-La Digue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Carefully exposed, good compostition, good lens. --Ikiwaner 21:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anse Source d'Argent 2-La Digue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The couple under the palm tree is distracting, but otherwise it's a lovely shot. Arria Belli 16:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anse Source d'Argent-La Digue-Seychellen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A classical, both superb and realistic --B.navez 18:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Anse-La Digue-Seychellen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the frame created by the rocks and the curve of the bay. Arria Belli 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artist Point-Monument Valley-USA-retouched.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Double O Arch-Arches NP-Utah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aletschgletscher-Eggishorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peyto Lake-Banff NP-Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Anse Takamaka-Mahé-Seychelles.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Anse Takamaka-Mahé-Seychelles.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Grand Anse-La Digue-Seychellen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Grand Anse-La Digue-Seychellen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Anse Source d'Argent 2-La Digue.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Anse Source d'Argent 2-La Digue.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Aletschgletscher-Eggishorn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Aletschgletscher-Eggishorn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Peyto Lake-Banff NP-Canada.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Peyto Lake-Banff NP-Canada.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Praslin, Seychelles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks ok to me. --Eusebius (talk) 08:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 04:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 06:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bryce Canyon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment this one (FP) and this one are also very good, and they may have better colours. --Eusebius (talk) 08:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

  Because... ? --Eusebius (talk) 06:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 06:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olympic Park Munich, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportGood overview of the Olympiapark and high Quality. --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 17:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Manneporte in Étretat, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Neutral criteria met, but colours look unnatural. Scope is very close to Aiguille rock and Porte d'Aval in Étretat, France (actually elements of the other scope can be seen through the arch). Actually, I think I would be happier with a single scope "Étretat cliffs". --Eusebius (talk) 10:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
•  InfoI took this photograph at sunset. That's why the colours are in this case so bright. -- Tobi 87 (talk) 10:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Foroa (talk) 05:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 09:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Organ of St. Stephen's Cathedral, Passau, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question I am not really sure about the scope. Is this long version ok? -- Tobi 87 (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure, since it comprises both the subject and additional information about the subject. I would suggest "Organ of St Stephan's cathedral, Passau, Germany" (still quite long). I support as soon as we agree on a scope. --Eusebius (talk) 09:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

 Comment I agree with you. -- Tobi 87 (talk) 10:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

•  Support meets criteria, beautiful pic. --Eusebius (talk) 10:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cliff Palace in Mesa Verde National Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Best candidate to me, needs geocoding. --Eusebius (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  •  Info I geocoded my photo;) -- Tobi 87 (talk) 12:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me then. --Eusebius (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Robson Provincial Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Neutral Having the park sign, the forest and Mount Robson in the same frame is quite nice, I like the composition, especially for a valued image of the park. However, I think the background exposure (and maybe the clouds) ruins it: Mount Robson can barely be recognized. --Eusebius (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support The image page was over-categorized. I have cleaned them a little. I agree the lightning could have been better but I still think it clearly illustrates the subject, and I am sure it is challenging to get simultaneous good lightning on all the elements in the image, especially the sign and the mountain. Other criteria met. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 1 neutral

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aiguille rock and Porte d'Aval in Étretat, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Neutral Properly illustrates the subject (this is probably the most famous sight of Étretat cliffs), better quality than the other images that can be found in the cat on Commons. I will change my neutral to a support if the scope is changed to "the Aiguille rock and Porte d'Aval in Étretat, France" (or something similar) because this is not the only natural arch of the site. I think it is not necessary to add the touristic name of the region (Pays des Hautes Falaises), scopes should be kept precise but simple. --Eusebius (talk) 08:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Info Thanks for your advice;) I changed the scope like you proposed it. -- Tobi 87 (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 15:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 13:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
glaciers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
glacial lakes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Multilicense?

Would you consider multi-licensing your images so that they can also be used under the Creative Commons license? Then they will also be available for use on sites like Wikitravel, etc. If so, please change the license on each of your images to: {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} Thanks! Cacahuate 23:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey great, thanks so much! Cacahuate (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Great, thanks again! I haven't copied many over yet, I started with one today, you should be able to find your images by searching Wikitravel Shared (our equivalent to Commons) with your username: [1]. At the moment we don't have any sort of tool like commons has to check usage across different language versions on WT, but you'll certainly find them on the English version. Thanks! Cacahuate (talk) 19:45, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Sainte-Enimie

Bonjour,

Je crois qu'il y a un problème avec la nomination de ton image : elle est nominée dans un set, mais elle est seule. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viaduc de Millau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 10:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Enimie-Gorges du Tarn-Frankreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good view --George Chernilevsky 10:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sainte-Enimie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Difficult decision, but better quality than other images for this scope. Yann (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 18:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sainte-Enimie-Gorges du Tarn-Frankreich.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sainte-Enimie-Gorges du Tarn-Frankreich.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

File:Reichstagskuppel 1-Berlin.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstagskuppel 1-Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments noise imo acceptable --Mbdortmund 22:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Olympiastadion day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great! -- H005 14:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Olympiastadion night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fantastic, although the sky could need some denoising. -- H005 14:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Reichstagskuppel 2.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstagskuppel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Cayambe 19:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Reichstagskuppel 3.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstagskuppel 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this one --Berthold Werner 18:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Farbprofil

Hallo Tobi, gratulation zu deinen gelungenen Bildern! Etwas ist mir gerade bei deinem Olympiastadion aufgefallen: Du verwendest ein Nikon sRGB Profil. Das macht mich neugierig, weshalb verwendest du nicht ein standardisiertes Profil wie IEC-sRGB oder Adobe RGB oder ProPhoto RGB? --Ikiwaner (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Pyramide_des_Louvre-Paris.jpg

Bonjour ! Cette belle photo ne peut malheureusement pas rester sur Commons : la pyramide est l'œuvre de I.M. Pei, qui est encore en vie. Elle est donc encore protégée par le droit d'auteur. Contrairement à l'Allemagne, la France ne reconnaît pas la liberté de panorama : qu'une œuvre soit sur la voie publique ou non ne change rien.

En revanche, les Wikipédias anglophone et francophone (avec l'avertissement fr:Modèle:Fair use bâtiment récent) acceptent localement des images de bâtiments récents. Tu peux donc ta photo importer là-bas, où elle pourra être utilisée. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 21:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Berliner Olympiastadion night.jpg

An image created by you has been promoted to English Wikipedia featured picture status Your image, File:Berliner Olympiastadion night.jpg, was nominated on en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! jjron (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I assume you don't have an account at en:wiki? These cross project promotions are kind of tricky. --jjron (talk) 12:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Tobi. Thanks for the note. :-) Keep up the great work! --jjron (talk) 13:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thor's Hammer-Bryce Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Côte de granite rose-Ploumanach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Lmbuga 17:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Panorama Berliner Olympiastadion-Glockenturm.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Berliner Olympiastadion-Glockenturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very informative and useful photo with good technical quality.--MrPanyGoff 17:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenuntergang am Kölner Dom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very, very good composition (sun between the towers, the cathedral, the TV tower, the bird in the sky), nice play with lights, good quality (some artifacts, but overall above-average). IMHO it could be featured... --Carschten 15:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Marksburg-Braubach

Confirmes-tu qu'il est aussi mal fichu que sur la photo ou y a-t-il une erreur de perspective? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monte Rosa und Liskamm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. Informative image description. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marksburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Request Could you change the scope from 'Marksburg' to '[[:Category:Marksburg|Marksburg]]'? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Info Of course:) --Tobi 87 (talk) 19:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  CommentI think you need to restrict the scope of "outside" Albertus teolog (talk) 09:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 21:04, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Gornergrat-Zermatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect! Try nominate it as FP candidate --George Chernilevsky 11:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weitsee-Reit im Winkl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --kallerna 10:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Panorama Berliner Olympiastadion-Glockenturm.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama Berliner Olympiastadion-Glockenturm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama Berliner Olympiastadion-Glockenturm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Gornergrat-Zermatt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Gornergrat-Zermatt.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 04:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esel-Pilatus Kulm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. Mattbuck 17:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Esel-Pilatus Kulm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Esel-Pilatus Kulm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Panorama_Berliner_Olympiastadion-Glockenturm.jpg

File:Panorama_Berliner_Olympiastadion-Glockenturm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 15:49, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Er läuft noch... Nichts gegen dein Foto natürlich - ist eine grundsätzliche Sache. Sorry für die Störungen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:04, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburger Hafen-St. Michaelis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 16:11, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Sanary in VI

Merci de revenir en VI. Je te suggère deux modifications qui peuvent s’appliquer aux deux autres photos que tu as versées. Elles sont très bonnes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menton-Côte d'Azur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments excellent composition -- Felix Koenig 13:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calanque des Pierres-Tombées-Cassis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good -- Felix Koenig 13:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hafen und Felsen von Monaco-La Turbie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belvédère du Tilleul-Route des Crêtes-Gorges du Verdon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sanary-sur-Mer, harbour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I suggest a slight modification of the scope, it is important to attach the image to a category.

It lacks geocoding.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Menton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Figuerolles, La Ciotat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:11, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Calanque du Petit Canereit-Massif de l'Esterel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Calanque du Petit Canereit-Massif de l'Esterel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monaco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Very good view. But "breathtaking" isn't encyclopedic. And I believe the location is wrong. It's north of the observatory. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:41, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
• Yes and easy to fix --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
• The location (geocoding) is right. I corrected the image description for better understanding. Please explain me what "encyclopedic" means in your opinion. The photo shows almost the whole territory of Monaco and thus gives a great overview. What is missing to become a VI? --Tobi 87 (talk) 08:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, location is right, sorry. I'll fix the style.  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 10:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Massif de l'Esterel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best overview. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:28, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vieux-Port (Marseille).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

• Should be added to Category:Vieux-Port (Marseille) and the scope linked to this category. Yann (talk) 08:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Info Done! -Tobi 87 (talk) 19:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I added the category which you didn't do. I removed my opposition. Yann (talk) 23:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:35, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harbour of Nice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Request The scope should be linked to Category:Harbour of Nice and the image categorized in that category, by the way (<= criterion 6). --Myrabella (talk) 15:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Èze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Reichstagskuppel 1-Berlin.jpg

And also:

• File:Reichstagskuppel 2.jpg
• File:Reichstagskuppel 3.jpg

Yours sincerely Lophotrochozoa (talk) 13:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Meet our photographers

Hello,

You have 10 featured pictures, meaning you qualify for Commons:Meet our photographers! Maybe you want to add yourself?

You have some amazing pictures! InverseHypercube 22:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breite-Kluft-Aussicht-Sächsische Schweiz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 05:31, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Völkerschlachtdenkmal Tag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Vassil 22:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama-Calanque de Sugiton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Côte d'Azur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. Mattbuck 10:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Congratulations Tobi 87, your image Image:Grand Canyon NP-Arizona-USA.jpg was the Wikipedia Random Picture of the Day! Go to this page to see what it looked like.

Presidentman (talk · contribs) Wikipedia Random Picture of the Day 13:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Reichstagskuppel 1-Berlin.jpg

And also:

• File:Reichstagskuppel 2.jpg
• File:Reichstagskuppel 3.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 15:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Berliner Olympiastadion day.jpg

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 22:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Please...

...COM:OVERCAT. Cologne Cathedral at Night = contains Cologne+Cathedral+Night [2]. Commons categories ≠ Flickr tags. Thanks. --A.Savin 21:45, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Kurze Klarlegung

Prager Marktplatz

lb Tobi87, ich habe das Bild deswegen abgelehnt, weil es zwar - soweit ich es gesehen habe - ein wirklich (fast) fehlerfreies Stitching hatte, aber in der Nachbearbeitung habe ich schlichtweg ein zu intensives Überbearbeiten erkannt. Die Tiefen hätten reduziert werden müssen, dann ist der Dynamikumfang einfach zu hoch, es wirkt - wie leider viele Panoramas von Dir - einfach unnatürlich bunt. Du hast auch aus meiner Sicht gnadenlos nachgeschärft, was somit die Kontraste extrem erhöht hat.

Angesichts deiner Ausrüstung und der so hervorragenden Objektive wundert mich das etwas, ich habe versucht den Grund zu finden. Es kann durchaus sein, dass es an der Postprocessing-Software liegt. Und auch an einem vielleicht nicht optimalen Bildschirm, der dir ein anderes Ergebnis vorgaukelt (ich habe hier einen kalibrierten IIyama mit Full HD). Auf einem zweiten Monitor, einem billigen Samsung, dem ich trotz Kalibrierung eine übermässige Wärme nicht rauszunehmen imstande bin, schaut das Bild dann noch extremer aus. Ich habe den Eindruck, dass du meine Kritik als sehr harsch empfunden hast, denn sonst hättest du die Nominierung nicht gleich per Löschung eliminiert. Ich möchte keineswegs die Qualität deiner Bilder angreifen, schon gar nicht das gute Händchen für die aus meiner Sicht ganz hervorragende Motivwahl deiner Bilder (meine persönliche Schwäche).

Was würde ich dir bei diesem Bild raten? (ich hoffe sehr, du arbeitest mit RAW-Bildern)

• Die Tiefen selektiv etwas zurücknehmen, ebenso das Schwarz (siehe den rechten unteren Teil des Platzes und der Gasse, sowie die Teile des Platzes, welche im Schatten liegen. Das führt wahrscheinlich dazu, dass der Dunst im Hintergrund etwas stärker wird, aber damit könntest du das Westportal der Kirche herausheben (und den schwarzen Turmes rechts im Hintergrund), was automatisch den Blick des Betrachters auf eben den mittleren, wichtigen Teil fokussiert. Ein ähnliches Problem habe ich auch bei den Bilder mit den schwarzen Steinen auf den Seychellen gesehen. Da wäre wirklich noch ganz viel herauszuholen.
• Den Farbraum-Dynamikregler weniger stark nach rechts ziehen. Die roten Dächer sind wirklich - auch auf meinem kalibrierten Monitor - zu rot. Um die Fassadenfarben der Häuser zu erhalten, könntest du eine selektive Luminanzreduktion im Rot-Bereich machen.
• Den Schärferegler etwas vorsichtiger verwenden (kommt jetzt aufs Programm an, welches du verwendest). Es gibt unterschiedliche Möglichkeiten, die Schärfe mit Vorsicht zu erhöhen, aus meiner Erfahrung ist der Schärferegler die schlechteste aller möglichen Varianten.
• Ich habe noch einen Überlagerungsbereich gefunden, der nicht ganz sauber ist. Siehe Notiz direkt im Bild.

Ansonsten finde ich - wie schon gesagt - deine Bilder wunderbar, nur beim Post-Processing ist noch etwas Erweiterungsbedarf. Ich bin immer der Meinung, dass man nichts davon machen sollte, was dann der Betrachter als solches auch zu erkennen imstande ist.

Es würde mich interessieren, ob aus der Kamera heraus direkt mit JPG arbeitest, ob du die Bilder am Notebook weiterverarbeitest und welches Programm/ welche Programme du verwendest (gerade auch fürs Stitching). Leider kann man das über die Exifdaten von dir nicht auslesen.

Betrachte diese Kritik als eine auf hohem Niveau, die ausschließlich der Optimierung von bestehendem, hervorragenden Material dient!

Gruß aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 16:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Auch gut, wenn du nicht darauf antwortest.--Hubertl (talk) 15:19, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kölner Dom bei blauer Stunde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice! -- Felix König 21:41, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gepard-Serengeti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augurbussard-Serengeti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality, could be FP candidate --Uoaei1 06:41, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia da Marinha-Algarve-Portugal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia de Carvoreiro Algarve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helix-Liseberg Göteborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting. And the challenge of a bulb shot well resolved. --Cccefalon 18:55, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buteo augur (Augur buzzard).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus

(talk) 05:39, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Info Done! Thanks for the advice;) -- Tobi 87 (talk) 07:31, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Point to a Gallery is a good idea. But you have to put the picture.:) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Info I thought I did it. Now, the image is part of the gallery. -- Tobi 87 (talk) 08:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Augurbussard-Serengeti.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Augurbussard-Serengeti.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenstein-Sächsische Schweiz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Foggy air and not the best light but imho nonetheless QI. Nice framing. --Tuxyso 08:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morgiou, looking westwards.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info The category:Morgiou exists, but why is it marked in red? Thanks in advance for an explanation! ;) -- Tobi 87 (talk) 22:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Look at the change in the syntax of scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
• It would be perfect if you add, in scope, the sense of exposure --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
• Done -- Tobi 87 (talk) 07:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leichtathletik WM 2013 Moskau 100 m Vorlauf.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leichtathletik WM 2013 Moskau 100 m Vorlauf.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helix by night-Liseberg-Göteborg.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A thoroughly enjoyable and interesting photo.. I do not see any posterized areas. The above radiations are due to the long exposure. --Steindy 10:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leopard-Serengeti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 16:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
En-Vau, facing south-east, Calanques of Marseilles, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good but it would be interesting to have exposure --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Info Done -- Tobi 87 (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coumasse, facing westwards, Pyrénées-Orientales, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good but it would be interesting to have exposure --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Info Done -- Tobi 87 (talk) 11:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Wehlsteinaussicht-Elbsandsteingebirge-Sächsische Schweiz.jpg

Hallo Tobi! Ich hatte übersehen, dass du eine neue Version des obigen Bildes hochgeladen hast. Inzwischen wurde es ja schon promotet. Ich finde allerdings, dass deine neue Version nicht in allen Belangen eine Verbesserung ist. Im Hintergrund konntest du einige Details wiederherstellen wenngleich der Hintergrund jetzt recht gräulich aussieht - ob diese Anmutung eher der Stimmung vor Ort entsprach kannst du besser beurteilen - die zusätzlichen Details sind aber ein Zugewinn. Nicht gelungen finde ich allerdings deiner selektive Bearbeitung des Felsens rechts vorne. Gerade diesen fand ich in der ersten Version ausgesprochen gelungen, weil er so gerade von dem warmen Morgendlich angestrahlt wurde. Dieser wirkt nach deine Bearbeitung nun fad-gräulich. Alles Kritik auf sehr hohem Niveau wobei du ja auch auf hohem Niveau fotografierst und nicht "knipst" :) --Tuxyso (talk) 18:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehlsteinaussicht-Elbsandsteingebirge-Sächsische Schweiz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's a very nice photo, but remarkable parts of the sky (top right) are burnt. Could you reconver something from RAW? --Tuxyso 08:25, 9 October 2014 (UTC)  Done I tried my best ... now it is up to you to decide;) -- Tobi 87 23:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 17:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malachit-Eisvogel-Serengeti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Thank You

Thank you very much for sharing your great work. Some of your images are shown on kreuzwortraetsel.net, crosswords.net on some themed crosswords.

Steffen 02-jul-2015

File:Viaduc de Millau-Cap Coste-Brunas.jpg

File:Viaduc de Millau-Cap Coste-Brunas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 21:06, 28 August 2017 (UTC)