User talk:Dmottl

Welcome to the Commons, Dmottl!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 20:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Limmatquai at nighttime.jpg

Hello Dmottl,

I don't fully understand why I should have removed the edited version instead of the original version? Could you please clarify what you mean?

Regards,

Tiago Fioreze

Image:Dassault Rafale B.jpg

Hello,

would you happen to have an uncropped version of this file somwhere ? I am trying to take my change at post-processing it a little bit, and a little more room on the front could be nice.

Thanks in advance ! Rama 16:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kuznetsk Alatau 1.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Tajikistan T154 EY-85717 MUC edit1.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tajikistan T154 EY-85717 MUC edit1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 06:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tajikistan T154 EY-85717 MUC edit1.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 07:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map_zuby.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Map_zuby.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

sk (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airolo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks very good to me. --Eusebius 15:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dniepr river in Kyiv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent resolution, good composition although it would be better without the tree in the bottom right. TimVickers 18:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beskid Śląsko-Morawski - panorama 2.jpg

Thank you for the photo collection :) --Pudelek (talk) 16:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reflections of Earth fireworks

Hi Dmottl,

I've uploaded a new version of File:Reflections of Earth 11.jpg, which you opposed for Quality Image status. Could you please look at the image again, and possibly comment on its review? Thanks! --bdesham ★ 03:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've sharpened the bottom area of the photo, so I'd appreciate your looking again… thanks! --bdesham ★ 19:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazakhstan Altay 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks fine to me. --Jonny-mt 16:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazakhstan Altay 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks ok to me. I like the composition. --JuliusR 20:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please geocode. --Siipikarja 14:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Perhaps too tightly cropped from the top. --Siipikarja 14:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuznetsk Alatau 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good composition, nice image overall. --Siipikarja 16:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S7 Il-86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments meets QI-requirements --Mbdortmund 11:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chufut Kale3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Geocode would be nice. --Richard Bartz 23:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nice.--Mbz1 16:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow International Business Centre, Marc 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good exposure and sharp picture, QI.--PieCam 02:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you very much :-)). Lycaon (talk) 01:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Moscow International Business Centre, Marc 2008.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow International Business Centre, Marc 2008.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Best regards.--Mywood (talk) 12:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kazakhstan Altay 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazakhstan Altay 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kuznetsk Alatau 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kuznetsk Alatau 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Gaspra-AiPetri.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gaspra-AiPetri.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Best regards.--Mywood (talk) 07:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

File:La Defense - Stairway to Heaven.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:La Defense - Stairway to Heaven.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Defense - Stairway to Heaven.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Thanks

I wanted to thank you for nom'ing the image Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazakhs.jpg! I would likely have not come across this image as I'm currently working on customs services pages on Simple English Wikipedia (where I'm an admin). I think that the image is really excellent! I've left a Support !vote on the page. Well done!! :) fr33kman -s- 22:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

While browsing through your gallery, I discovered this image, and was quite taken with it. I've finally gotten around to nominating it for FP status, so best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 04:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kazakhs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazakhs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

A request

I saw the great job you removing vignetting on this image, when it was nominated for FP status, and I was wondering, would you be able to apply your skill to this file? I'm planning on nominating it, but the vignetting is likely to be a sticking point, and my own graphics talents aren't amazing (yet). I think the lighting is just right, but any improvements you could make would be appreciated. 08:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Very poor quality image (JPEG artifacts), I'm not sure my edition is much better than original. See here --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 10:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it completely slipped my mind. That's what weird work shifts will do to you, I guess. I do prefer your version, but I see your point about the quality. Not really FP worthy, but still a cool scene. Thanks for your efforts in any case. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 04:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kazakhstan Altay 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazakhstan Altay 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Markakol map-ru.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Markakol map-ru.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Chersonesos Bell.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chersonesos Bell.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Malfunctioned chute.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Malfunctioned chute.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Agreed --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 06:04, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Dmottl!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Park-Belukha.jpg is uncategorized since 21 May 2009.
Image:Усть-Кан.jpg is uncategorized since 24 May 2009.
Image:Поселок Кучерла.jpg is uncategorized since 24 May 2009.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kuznetsk Alatau 3.jpg, which was nominated by Tom dl at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kuznetsk Alatau 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Would you permit use of the Stairway to Heaven photo in a work that is not a Share-Alike? I'd like to use it in a self-published book with a comment about isolation that goes with success in the modern world.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lake Vuoksa 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Vuoksa 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Park-Belukha.jpg

File:Park-Belukha.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Insider (talk) 00:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altay-Sayan map ru.png, File:Altay-Sayan map en.png

Здравствуйте! В созданных Вами картах следует уточнить подписи Монгольского и Гобийского Алтая, а также Яблонового хребта. Дело в том, что Монгольский Алтай длиннее, чем сделанная Вами подпись, и практически занимает также и то место, на котором Вами написано слово "Гобийский". Гобийский же Алтай (а он пишется без дефиса, т.к. у Вас он подписан "Гобийский-Алтай") начинается чуть севернее подписи "Алтай" (той, что входит в Ваш "Гобийский-Алтай") и продолжается на юго-восток даже несколько дальше южного обреза карты см. File:Gobian Altai topography.svg. Также, на мой взгляд, неплохо было бы показать озера ru:Хар-Ус-Нуур, ru:Хар-Нуур и ru:Дурген-Нуур, так как это очень большие озера.

Что касается подписи "Яблоновый хребет", то она нанесена на то место, где расположен ru:Хэнтэй. Параллельные Яблоновый хребет и хребет Черского лежат севернее [1].

Надеюсь мои замечания пригодятся при совершенствовании этой нужной карты. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:03, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за Ваши комментарии. Да, уж... А можно Вас вопросить внести изменения? Карту брал эту File:WorldMap-B_non-Frame.png. --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Тут ведь вот какая незадача - указанный Вами источник в Меркаторской проекции, а потому на широтах Монголии имеет сильное искажение (сплющен с севера на юг, либо, если угодно, растянут с запада на восток), а потому уж если и переделывать, то уж и геометрию тоже. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DME.jpg

File:DME.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.61.179.231 15:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Marmolada Sunset.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marmolada Sunset.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Gruppo del Sella.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gruppo del Sella.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Sella group panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sella group panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Annapurna Massif Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Annapurna Massif Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 06:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Moscow City - 2009-08.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo usage

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yak_in_Nepal.jpg

And I attributed the picture like this: Dmitry A. Mottl with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Dmottl and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 09:26, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

Location?

Hi Dmottl - could you add the location for this pic, please? File:Little Egret - Egretta garzetta.jpg - thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:34, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, done --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 08:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow State University.jpg

File:Moscow State University.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow City - 2009-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:14, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Annapurna Massif Panorama

Hello Dmitry A. Mottl,

I wanted to inform you that we were interested in using your picture "Annapurna Massif Panorama" for digital printing samples in our art supplies stores. If selected, attribution would be applied, printed on the back of the sample(s), following the guidelines for Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Thank you for this wonderful image, all the best,

Chris Gillespie Opus Art Supplies Canada BC opusartsupplies.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landeck-Zams Hbf Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice --Moroder 12:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

abdruck

Sehr geehrter Herr Mottl, wir sind ein Verlag in Salzburg und möchten in einem unserer kommenden Bücher "Hutter, Über den Gipfeln" Ihr Bild Ortler_Alps_10000m.jpg verwenden. Können Sie es uns in einer Auflösung von 300 dpi zur Verfügung stellen?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Mag. Dorothea Forster

Ja, schreiben Sie bitte Ihre E-Mail --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boeing-777-300 chassis .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 17:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uspensky Cave Monastery 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Florstein 07:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chufut Kale2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airbus A380.jpg a question

May I ask you a question? On the description is stated that the Airbus A380 is taking off, are you sure? Because you can't see from the picture the long track that the plane should have run to reach take off speed. Thanks for reply. --Demostene119 (talk) 11:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was take off --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Demostene119 (talk) 14:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 14:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:HMS Belfast with rainbow.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HMS Belfast with rainbow.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow State University.jpg

Здравствуйте. В связи с введением свободы панорамы для зданий в России, я заново загрузил этот файл на Викисклад (в той версии, которая является избранной в англовики), откуда он был в свое время удалён. Проверьте, все ли данные верны. В ближайшие дни также планирую номинировать это изображение в избранные на Викискладе. С уважением, --A.Savin 21:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вроде бы всё верно. Если будете номинировать, возьмите панорамную версию --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 21:40, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Moscow State University crop.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow State University.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow State University crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Amazing, per FP --DXR 10:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oriental Pearl Tower in Shanghai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

File:La Defense - Stairway to Heaven.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Defense - Stairway to Heaven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 06:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry of permission of re-using a figure in our book

Dear Dmitry A. Mottl,

This is Dr. Jia He. I'm sending this message to inquire your permission of re-using one of your photos as Figure 1.4(e) in our forthcoming book. The photo is about Oriental Pearl Radio & TV Tower, and the link to that photo is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oriental_Pearl_Tower_in_Shanghai.jpg

If you don't mind, could you please allow me to re-use this photo in our book of "Smart Civil Structures"? The source of this figure will be certainly cited in a proper way. Thanks very much for your kind help and support. Look forward to hearing from you.

Best wishes, — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.132.127.192 (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Blanc, 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support First I thought the WB was a little bit too blueish but looking at the building at the right side it seems rather correct. --Code 12:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of an image for an open access (cc4.0) /printed book

Dear Dmitry A. Mottl,

Thank you for uploading the image of Moscow State University.

We would like to use this image in a chapter of an edited book named “Geographies of the University” which will be available through the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License as e-book in open access, and also as a buyable hardcover version. The book is part of the series and project “Knowledge and Space” (http://www.knowledgeandspace.uni-hd.de/) at Heidelberg University.

We would like to ask for your permission to use this image within a chapter of the book that deals with change in the architectural concepts of university buildings. Of course you would be credited as copyright holder and photographer. We would be grateful if you could contact us through knowledgeandspace@uni-heidelberg.de.

Thank you very much, and best regards, Laura Suarsana Department of Economic Geography, Heidelberg University — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.58.181.97 (talk) 13:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vattanac Capital.jpg

File:Vattanac Capital.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annecy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 15:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annecy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 15:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khibiny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 19:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teriberka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwedenbrücke und Taborstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuruosmaniye Camii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:08, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuruosmaniye - von fern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mtskheta and Svetitskhoveli Cathedral 3x2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Wolfgang, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support QI but please, remove the small dust spot (see note) --Poco a poco 17:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Zytglogge clock tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 21:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolvitsa panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --C messier 19:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batumi sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective correction needed. Both sides are leaning in. --Milseburg 09:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not done within a week. --Basotxerri 14:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Korrigiert --Nightflyer 21:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support QI to me. A bit grainy on the bottom but the light conditions were difficult --Podzemnik 09:37, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Blanc from Les Arcs 1950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Nice. --Tournasol7 00:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Teriberka.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teriberka.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kolvitsa panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kolvitsa panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kandalaksha Bay.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kandalaksha Bay.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haridwar Railway Station.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bright and colorful! --PtrQs 01:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Vuoksa 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 20:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Geneva from Chillon Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 9:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Support GGood quality.--Biso 10:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mont Blanc from Les Arcs 1950.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont Blanc from Les Arcs 1950.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter and Paul Fortress.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 11:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow City landscape july 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lake Geneva from Chillon Castle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Geneva from Chillon Castle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bohinjsko jezero panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 15:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vltava river in Prague.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SINP MSU 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Besi Sahar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:51, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamayuru monastery 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Vltava river in Prague.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vltava river in Prague.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Эльбрус с севера.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:34, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawa Yangzum Sherpa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawa Yangzum Sherpa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawa Yangzum Sherpa 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 06:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Dmottl,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Dmottl,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Dmottl,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting permission

Hey Dmottl, Thank you for uploading wonderful pictures. With your permission, I'd like to post picture(s) you've uploaded on Commons from the social media accounts of Wikimedia Commons. Do you consent to the use of the photo(s) on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, Vkontakte etc.? If you agree then how would you like to be attributed (username/real name)? Thank you. ~ Nahid ^Talk, Wednesday 22:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Teriberka.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Les Arcs

Ça va

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ali and Nino, Batumi.jpg

Yours sincerely, 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-18T Engines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antonov An-140 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:54, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antonov An-74 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:La Defense - Stairway to Heaven.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Kolvitsa panorama.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cambodia–Vietnam Friendship Monument in Phnom Penh.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snow Goose - Anser caerulescens.jpg

Здравствуйте! А не сможете вспомнить, где было сделано это фото: File:Snow Goose - Anser caerulescens.jpg? Хотя бы в России или нет? -- 176.59.54.196 19:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Тот же вопрос про File:Черный гриф.jpg и вообще про остальные фотографии животных, загруженные вами ;) 194.186.207.116 12:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have interesting airplane photos / Очень нравятся ваши фотографии самолётов

I live not so far from JFK Airport. I see airplanes at 1 km altitude, I love to spot them right from my apartment window. The most challenging, is to wait for A30 Airbus, and to take a picture of it. Didn't fly for a long time. Живу не рядом но не так уж далеко от аэропорта Кеннеди, и вижу все самолёты туда и оттуда, в зависимости от направления ветра. Когда-то любил исключительно наземный транспорт, а теперь с начала пандемии - за небом соскучился.GK tramrunner RU (talk) 22:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]